Anul 1918, ultimul an de război, din Primul Război Mondial (1914-1918), a început cu speranţe şi iluzii pentru Puterile Centrale în ceea ce priveşte obţinerea victoriei militare decisive, iar pentru Antanta, cu şanse şi certitudini, motiv pentru care a fost numit în istoria “Marelui Război” “1918 – Victoria militară a Antantei”. La sfârşitul anului 1917, armele au tăcut pe Frontul austro-ungaro-rus din Bucovina. Siretul, aflat la extremitatea sudică a frontului, a fost devastat de război.

Semnarea Păcii de la Brest-Litowsk, la 3 martie 1918, a însemnat prăbuşirea frontului şi încetarea războiului în Bucovina. Armata rusă, infestată de bolşevism, se retrage din Bucovina la începutul lunii martie. Un martor ocular descrie astfel retragerea militarilor ruşi din oraşul Siret: ,,…Între 4-5 martie 1918, s-au retras ruşii din Siret. În retragere ruşii jefuiau şi luau tot ce le cădea în mâ-nă…”. Pe data de 6 martie 1918, oraşul Siret este reocupat de armata austro-ungară. În oraş şi district este reinstalată adminis-traţia austro-ungară. În fruntea oraşului, în calitate de primar, a revenit pro-fesorul Sylwester Jariczew-ski, iar în fruntea dis-trictului, căpitanul Peter Josiphowicz. Populaţia refugiată în vara anului 1917 începe să se reîn-toarcă acasă. Pe data de 7 martie, autorităţile încep arestările în rândul româ-nilor care nu au plecat în refugiu în anul 1917. Românii erau acuzaţi de trădare şi cola-borare cu inamicul. Au fost arestaţi: judecătorul Apollo Pătraş, Eugen Colomiţchi cu copii săi Arcadie şi Olimpia, Victoria şi Olga Nastasi şi Simion Silion. În ziua următoare sunt arestaţi intelectualii: Liviu Marian, profesor la gimnaziu, avocatul Eusebie Antonovici, preoţii Constantin Gramatovici şi Ioan Vo-robchievici. După o scurtă anchetă, o parte din ei sunt eliberaţi, iar restul sunt condamnaţi şi internaţi în lagărele din Stiria. Cei eliberaţi au fost puşi sub stricta supraveghere a poliţiei. Preotul Constantin Gramatovici, parohul bisericii “Naşterea Sf. Ioan Botezătorul”, fost primar al oraşului în timpul ultimei ocupaţii ruseşti (1917-1918), este condamnat la ani grei de închisoare şi internat în lagăr. La sfârşitul lunii martie, a încetat subit din viaţă primarul oraşului, Sylwester Jariczewski. În locul lui a fost numit bancherul evreu Abraham Pariser. În luna aprilie s-au întors din refugiu germanii, care au fost evacuaţi în toamna anului 1914, în provinciile Stiria şi Carintia. Ei au găsit gospo-dăriile devastate de război, iar ogoarele presărate cu tranşee, mine şi reţele de sârmă ghimpată, lăsate de beligeranţi. Din această cauză, o parte din terenul agricol a rămas neînsămânţat. La începutul lunii septembrie au fost deschise cele două şcoli poporale din oraş, sub conducerea învăţătorilor Dora Kahan şi Alexander Odowiczuk. Deoarece clădirea gimnaziului a fost grav avariată la sfârşitul anului 1917, gimnaziul şi-a reluat activitatea abia la 24 ianuarie 1919, în clădirea Şcolii Poporale de Băieţi, sub conducerea profesorului Michael Babor, întors şi el din refugiu din Boemia natală. Revoluţia de la Viena din 30 octombrie 1918 a însemnat începutul sfârşitului Austro-Ungariei. La 3 noiembrie 1918, Austro-Ungaria a semnat Armistiţiul de la Villa Giusti: pentru supuşii austro-ungari războiul s-a terminat, iar pentru bucovineni începea un nou capitol al istoriei. Fostul profesor al gimnaziului Alecu Proco-povici face necrologul imperiului în articolul “Dumnezeu să o ierte!”, publicat în ziarul ,,Glasul Bucovinei”. În Bucovina, suc-cesiunea imperiului şi competiţia pentru putere între români şi ucraineni s-a transformat în rebeliunea celor din urmă. La chemarea românilor din Bucovina, ameninţaţi de pericolul anexării provinciei la Ucraina de Vest, Divizia VIII Infanterie primeşte din partea regelui ordinul de a intra în Bucovina. Militarii diviziei au fost împărţiţi în trei detaşamente: “Dragoş” comandat de colonelul D. Gheorghiu, “Alexandru cel Bun”, comandat de colonelul V. Tomoroveanu, şi “Suceava”, comandat de colonelul I. Rotaru. În dimineaţa zilei de 6 noiembrie, deta-şamentul “Suceava” trece graniţa şi eliberează oraşul Suceava. După aproape un secol şi jumătate, a doua capitală a Moldovei, oraşul Suceava, se reîntoarce la Patria Mamă. În aceeaşi zi, soseşte de la Cernăuţi vestea că foştii deputaţi în Dieta Bucovinei Aurel Onciul şi Omelian Popowicz au hotărât să împartă Bucovina în două: partea de nord să revină Ucrainei de Vest, iar partea de sud, României. Graniţa între cele două părţi ale provinciei urma să treacă la sud de satul Bălcăuţi, la est de satul Verpolea şi la sud-vest de satul Dorneşti. Datorită intervenţiei energice a siretenilor, oraşul Siret a rămas la sud de „Linia Onciul-Popowicz”, care urma să împartă provincia în două. În dimineaţa zilei de 9 noiembrie, generalul Iacob Zadik, comandantul Diviziei VIII Infanterie, înainte de a da ordinul de intrare în Bucovina, a spus soldaţilor: „…Vouă v-a păstrat soarta norocul de a păşi cei dintâi pe pământul scump al Bucovinei. Fiţi mândri, arătaţi-vă demni de încrederea ce s-a pus în voi… Doresc spornicie pasului ce faceţi voi şi vă zic: Cu Dumnezeu înainte!…”. Apoi în fruntea detaşamentului „Dragoş” trece graniţa austro-ungaro-română, prin punctul Verpolea (Pă-dureni). Detaşamentul „Alexandru cel Bun” a intrat în Bucovina prin punctul Sinăuţii de Jos. Cele două detaşamente au făcut joncţiunea în oraşul Siret. Ultimul primar austriac, Abraham Pariser, a predat conducerea oraşului fostului judecător Apollo Patraş, întors recent din lagărul Thalerhof. În fruntea distric-tului, în locul căpitanului Peter Josiphowicz a fost numit avo-catul Dimitrie Popovici (Truţă). După 144 de ani de stăpânire străină, oraşul şi districtul Siret s-au întors la Patria Mamă. Iacob Zadik a stabilit cartierul general în „Casa Sbierenilor”, fostul sediu al Jandarmeriei austriece. A doua zi, armata a plecat cu trenul spre Hliboka (Adâncata), pentru ca la 11 noiembrie să ajungă la Cernăuţi, capitala provinciei. La Congresul Gene-ral al Bucovinei, din 28 noiembrie 1918, Siretul a trimis trei delegaţi: Ilie Berlinschi, Damian Nimigean şi Apollo Patraş. La congres a participat şi sireteanul Octavian Gheoghian, medic la Cernăuţi. Din partea polonezilor, la congres a participat fostul deputat de Siret Stanislaus Kwiatkowski. Întruniţi la Siret, delegaţii comunelor lipoveneşti din Bucovina, la 25 februarie 1919, au recunoscut Unirea Bucovinei cu România. Peste câteva zile, preşedintele Comunităţii Israielite din Siret şi preşedintele organizaţiei P.S.D. din Districtul Siret, Carl Wittus Wagner, au recunoscut în numele comunităţii actul de la 28 noiembrie 1918. Ulterior şi liderul germanilor, fostul consilier Peter Kopp, a recunoscut Unirea Bucovinei cu România. La nouă decenii de la aceste evenimente, în oraşul Siret, în afară de străzile Unirii, 28 Noiembrie şi Iancu Flondor, nimic nu aminteşte de Unirea Bucovinei cu România. Statuia Unirii din piaţa omonimă, opera regretatului sculptor ieşean Vasile Condurachi, după spusa autorului şi a culturnicilor sireteni, nu este închinată Marii Uniri, ci provinciilor detrunchiate din România Mare, care se află şi astăzi sub stăpânire străină. Pentru a eterniza acest eveniment măreţ din istoria oraşului şi a provinciei, ar fi bine ca nomenclatorul străzilor oraşului să cuprindă şi denumirile: Strada General Iacob Zadic, Strada Cernăuţiului, Strada 9 Noiembrie 1918 etc. Pe clădirea în care a fost cartierul general al Diviziei VIII Infanterie, respectiv Casa Sbierenilor, să fie pusă o placă comemorativă cu următoarea inscripţie: ,,…În această casă a fost sediul comandamentului Diviziei VIII Infanterie, condusă de generalul Iacob Zadik, care pe data de 9 noiembrie 1918 a eliberat oraşul Siret de sub stăpânire străină. Locuitorii oraşului.” Cred că eliberatorul oraşului, generalul Iacob Zadik, merită din partea siretenilor să i se ridice un monument sau măcar un bust.

Prof. FRANZ PIESZCZOCH

Şcoala „Petru Muşat” Siret

sursa:www.crainou.ro

It was a heck of a year, 1918. The War to End All Wars finally ended. The greatest tragedy of the 20th Century was finally over. Communism solidified itself in Russia. The Red Sox won the World Series, something that wouldn’t happen again for over 80 years.

Much of the 1916 team was gone. Ed Barrow, who would later get to the Hall of Fame as architect of the Yankees dynasty, was manager, Former A’s player Stuffy McInnis was at first base, both Larry Gardner and Duffy Lewis were gone. But the big change was that Barrow had figured out what to do with Babe Ruth. Now Ruth split time between the outfield and the mound playing 59 games in the field and 20 on the hill. He went 13-7, getting a decision in every game he pitched, and led the league in home runs and slugging percentage, the first Red Sox to lead the AL in the latter category.

The Sox beat Cleveland and Tris Speaker by 2.5 games and went into the World Series against Chicago as a favorite. They won in 6 games although being outhit by the Cubs .210 to .186. There were no home runs and a Cub win in game 6 by a 3-0 score was the closest there was to a blowout. Ruth in Carl Mays both won 2 games, including a 1-0 game one matchup between Ruth and Hippo Vaughn. The Cubs finally brought Ruth’s consecutive scoreless inning streak to a close in the 8th inning of game 4, but lost 3-2.  In one of those quirks that makes baseball so intereesting, in 6 games no player managed to have more than 2 RBIs, with 5 players doing so).

The Sox fell to 5th the next year and began to dismantle the team. By 1922 almost all the dynasty players were gone to places like New York (Ruth, Mays, Bush, Sam Jones and Scott), Chicago ( Hooper), Cleveland (McInnis). The next time the Red Sox would win a pennant, Ted Williams would be in Left Field.

A mai ramas patriotism ?

Se apropie 1 Decembrie, Ziua Nationala  a Romaniei si noi ne-am gandit sa va remintim un cantec patriotic Hora Unirii de Vasile Alecsandri.

Hora Unirii – VERSURI
1857

Hai să dăm mână cu mână
Cei cu inimă română,
Să-nvârtim hora frăţiei
Pe pământul României!

Iarba rea din holde piară!
Piară duşmănia-n ţară!
Între noi să nu mai fie
Decât flori şi omenie!

Măi muntene, măi vecine,
Vină să te prinzi cu mine
Şi la viaţă cu unire,
Şi la moarte cu-nfrăţire!

Unde-i unul, nu-i putere
La nevoi şi la durere.
Unde-s doi, puterea creşte
Şi duşmanul nu sporeşte!

Amândoi suntem de-o mamă,
De-o făptură şi de-o seamă,
Ca doi brazi într-o tulpină,
Ca doi ochi într-o lumină.

Amândoi avem un nume,
Amândoi o soartă-n lume.
Eu ţi-s frate, tu mi-eşti frate,
În noi doi un suflet bate!

Vin’ la Milcov cu grăbire
Să-1 secăm dintr-o sorbire,
Ca să treacă drumul mare
Peste-a noastre vechi hotare,

Şi să vadă sfântul soare
Într-o zi de sărbătoare
Hora noastră cea frăţească
Pe câmpia românească!

Alte Articole Club13 :

1 Decembrie – Scurt istoric

Imnul Romaniei – Versuri si informatii despre imn

Legenda Lui Mos Nicolae

Urari de La Multi Ani

1750 (en su primera edición) y  1758 (en su segunda  edición  publicada):  Baumgarten  usó  la palabra  ”estética”, se  la designó  como: “ciencia de lo bello, se le agrega  un estudio de la esencia  del arte, de las relaciones  de ésta  con la belleza y los demás valores”. Algunos  autores  han pretendido  sustituirla  por otra  denominación: calología, que atendiendo  a su etimología  significa  ciencia  de  lo  bello (kalos, «bello»).

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Gottlieb_Baumgarten

http://opusprima.wordpress.com/2008/08/23/la-estetica-de-baumgarten/

1900: La moda comienza este año con la llamada silueta S, debido al corsé que empujaba el busto hacia arriba, estrechando la cintura y sus faldas  ajustadas a  la  cadera  ensanchándolas en forma de campana al llegar al suelo. En el mundo  laboral se empieza a  incorporar  los trajes  sastre y el corte  con influencia  masculina  para las  mujeres. Los vestidos eran largos, cubrían los zapatos, las plumas y los encajes  hacían  furor, destacando los grandes  sombreros con infinidad  de adornos y ornamentos. La moda prácticamente solo fue seguida por las clases altas inglesas y francesas.

 1908: La  silueta  era  mucho  mas recta, sin marcar tanto la cintura. Radicalmente  cambió la ropa interior;  se dejó  de  usar  el corsé a  cambio  del  sujetador,  las  faldas  se  estrechaban  tanto  en su  vuelo  que casi  no dejaban andar, los  sombreros  eran  muy  anchos, la  silueta  era  un  triángulo  invertido, haciendo  surgir el escote en V.

http://alaridodelamoda.blogspot.com/2009/09/1908-aparecio-el-corpino.html

1910: Pasan de  moda las mujeres y sus curvas  con el  “talle de avispa”, en esta fecha la mujer convierte el corsé en una faja  que le desdibuja la cintura. Se  instalan  los  PRIMEROS  INSTITUTOS DE  BELLEZA en las principales  capitales  europeas. Estalla  la  guerra  del 14 y la belleza desaparece  como  encanto.  No existe  ese afán  por  conseguir la belleza  artificialmente.

1918: Resurge la femineidad  con un ímpetu insospechado. Surge una mujer  “nueva”, la que tiene que trabajar, la que viste estilo “sport”, la que se corta el cabello “porque el pelo largo es molesto para la mujer que tiene que trabajar”.

1920: La ropa era mucho más práctica. Nuevamente vuelve a cambiar la silueta descendiendo la cintura a su posición anatómica, marcando el talle y ensanchando los hombros. En esta década se destacan las faldas cortas. Desaparecen los sombreros y se vuelven a dejar crecer el pelo.

 1930: El look se militarizo y los tejidos se volvieron pobres debido a la década de guerra, debido a esto las chicas se vestían con uniforme de ciudad, es decir, trajes de chaqueta. La moda se vio totalmente afectada por la guerra.

1940: Volvió el esplendor. Se vuelve a forzar la silueta con una cintura estrecha y se le dio volumen a los hombros y a los pechos. Se aumentó el vuelo de sus faldas, estas con el largo por debajo de las rodillas. Las mujeres estaban cansadas del estilo masculino, asique volvieron las curvas. Los zapatos se estilizaron haciéndolos mas puntiagudos, usaban abrigos de paño, y bolsos al codo. Triunfó el nuevo look de Cristian Dior.

1950: Se utilizaba ropa cómoda surgiendo así la ropa juvenil. Se había puesto de moda la ropa extravagante. Los estampados eran de mariposas y de flores. Las siluetas volvieron hacer más lisas y se comenzaron a imponer rápidamente por todo el mundo las minifaldas.

1960: Surgió el concepto de la ropa diferente, original, divertida y extravagante. El cabello se usaba corto y con cortes geométricos. Tanto los hombres como las mujeres comenzaron a usar pantalones de campana y aparecieron  las blusas de algodón.

1970: Década muy diversa, se produjo un furor hacia lo RETRO. Las flores fueron el principal símbolo en la ropa y en el pelo. Resaltaban los trajes y vestidos, con ajustados pantalones. El algodón fue remplazado por la lycra; usaban botas o zapatones de tacón.

1980: Hubo un nuevo estilo que se caracterizaba por el uso de ropa interior visible, y esto nunca se había visto en el pasado, por lo tanto, esto fue sinónimo de liberación para las mujeres. Gracias a esta tendencia, las mujeres de hoy pueden vestir “sin tener que preocuparse por las transparencias o los tirantes de los sujetadores”.

1990: Había mucha variedad,  no había una tendencia específica y duradera. Trataban de ponerse lo más cómodo, sin darle mucha importancia a la opinión de los demás o a las tendencias, porque la gente había llegado a la conclusión de que no se estaban expresando con libertad. La gran modificación en esta época fue la aparición de los piercings, tatuajes y el pelo teñido.

http://punksunidos.com.ar/artecorporal/2008/08/tatuajes-en-los-ojos-donde-la-tinta.html

Päivän Hyysäri on julkaissut Sunnuntai-sivuillaan reportaasin Hakunilasta. Otsikolla Me olimme Hakunila kirjoitettu kokonaisuus on yllättävänkin asiallinen kyseisen lehden viherhomofeministisen toimittajapiirin kirjoittamaksi.

Penaali Tommi Nieminen kirjoittaa, että kun maahanmuuttajat tulevat lähiöön, kantaväestö alkaa muuttaa pois. Tukholman Tenstassa, Malmön Rosengårdissa ja Kööpenhaminan Nörrebrossa maahanmuuttajat ovat jo suuri enemmistö. Nyt sama tapahtuu myös Suomessa. Jukkis Järäinen ja muut Hakunilassa 1970-luvulta asuneet uudisraivaajat kertovat, miltä tuntuu, kun maahanmuuttajat valtaavat kotikadun.

Pääasiallisesti artikkeli onkin – kuten jo todettiin – yllättävän asiallinen. Mutta kuten aina Hyysärin kyseessä ollessa, tekstin joukkoon on pudoteltu myös aimo annos mitä typerintä mokupropagandaa.

Jokainen voi itse miettiä näiden väitteiden todellisuusarvoa:

Hakunilassa on helppo unohtaa, että ulkomaalaisten maahanmuutto on pääsääntöisesti hyvä asia. Ilman sitä Suomi ummehtuisi. Kansa vanhenisi, ja työikäisten osuus pienenisi. Monet innovaatiot, yritykset ja palvelut eivät koskaan syntyisi.

Se mitä Hyysärin toimittaja pitää ummehtuneisuutena, on perusta yhdenvertaisuuteen perustuvalle hyvinvointiyhteiskunnallemme. Tosin tällä menolla toimittaja saa tahtonsa läpi ja pääsemme moisista risteistä eroon Suomessakin.

Kansan vanheneminen on kupla, joka on puhkaistu jo ajat sitten. Nykyiset suuret ikäluokat ovat sodan aiheuttama tilastollinen harha. Tämä harha katoaa suurten ikäluokkien mukana noin parissakymmenessä vuodessa. On järjen köyhyyttä hankkia kieli- ja ammattitaidottomia siirtolaisia tällaisen kuplan vuoksi Suomeen. Aivan yhtä järjetöntä on myös se, että Suomessa olisi tulevaisuudessa esimerkiksi teollisuustyöpaikkoja, joihin tarvitaan työvoimarmeijaa.

Tällainen ns. humanitaarinen maahanmuutto on muuton kohteena olevalle yhteiskunnalle aina yhteiskunnan huoltosuhdetta rasittava tekijä. Lisäksi tuollainen maahanmuutto massiivisena tapahtumana  on myös De Facto valloitukseen ja sotatoimeen rinnastettava vihamielinen kansainvaellus.

Ja näkisi nyt sitten sen ensimmäisenkin sosiaalisin perustein maahanmuuttaneen tekemän suomalaista yhteiskuntaa hyödyttävän innovaation – kebab ja pizza ovat jo keksittyjä.

Eikä siinä vielä kaikki. Seesteisen ja rauhallisen tilastokerronnan päätteeksi  Nieminen tulee hieman takavasemmalta ja täräyttää näin:

Terveisiä metropolipoliitikoille: Se, että maahanmuuttajat asuisivat tasaisesti ympäri pääkaupunkiseutua – Töölöstä Hakunilaan -, olisi kaikkien etu. Maahanmuuttajalähiössä on vaarana, ettei moni koskaan opi suomen kieltä. Se johtaa työttömyyteen ja köyhyyteen, ja samaa putkea katkeroitumiseen.

Tämä liittyy Hyysärissä viikolla julkistettuun vaatimukseen siitä, että heimoperheille pitäisi muka järjestää luksusasuntoja kaupungin parhailta paikoilta. Lisäksi se, että toimittajan mukaan sosiaaliset maahanmuuttajat päättäisivät asuntopolitiikasta ei ole peräisin tästä maailmasta.

Mielestäni jo pelkkä ajatuskin siitä, että kaikkien agraari- ja paimentolaisyhteisöistä (humanitaarisin syin) Suomeen saapuneiden pitäisi asua Suomeen  päästyään  joko pääkaupungissa tai jossain muussa kasvukeskuksessa, on varsin omituinen.

Jos humanitaarisin syin Suomeen päässyt ihminen tällaista vaatii, niin ainakin minusta tuollaisen maahanmuuttajan motivaatio Suomeen tuloon on ollut nimenomaan länsimaiseen urbaaniin ympäristöön pääseminen – siis elintason nostamiseen tähtäävä sosiaaliturismi.

Maassa maan tavalla tai maasta pois. Ehdottomasti kuitenkin paras metodi estää maahanmuuttajaslummien syntyminen, on estää humanitaarinen maahanmuutto Suomeen kokonaan. Oppia päättäjät voivat ottaa esimerkiksi Ruotsin tekemistä virheistä.

Varsin yksinkertaista ja totta.

Hyvinvointivaltiolla on  omat kulttuurilliset vastaväittäjänsä. Se lepää konsensuksen päällä, joka taas on tapa kertoa toisella tavalla kulttuurillisen variaation puutteesta. Mitä voimakkaampi konsensus on, sitä enemmän hyvinvointivaltiolla on tilaa kasvaa. Mutta kun konsensus vahvistuu, silloin vahvistuu myös yhteiskunnallinen naiiviuskin; uskomus siitä, että omat erikoislaatuiset tavat ovat jotain sellaista joka on myös kaikkia muita vastustamattomasti viettelevää. Pohjoismaiden  suurimmat maahanmuutto-ongelmat eivät välttämättä liity ainoastaan rikollisuuteen, työttömyyteen ja ääri-islamilaisuuteen, vaan johonkin muuhun asiaan erillisenä kokonaisuutena.

Siihen, että Pohjoismaihin tulevat maahanmuuttajat ymmärtävät täydellisesti sen, että pohjoismaalainen hyvinvointivaltiojärjestelmä on pystytetty tasa-arvon perustalle, mutta he ovatkin päättäneet, ettei tämä järjestelmä sovi erityisen hyvin heille.

Lähteet: HS, Christopher Caldwell

Päivitys 22112009 1747: Kyseinen reportaasi on kaikkien luettavissa Hyysärin nettisivuilla. Kirjoitus löytyy täältä.

By no ways a complete list, but here is a timeline of some highlights of world history.

Japan-related dates are written in red.

• 1281: Mongolia was conquering most of Asia. As the Mongolian Navy was heading to Japan to invade, a giant typhoon sunk their entire fleet. Thus saving Japan.
  That typhoon was called 「神風」 (“Kamikaze“), which means “Divine Wind“, in Japan.The World War 2 Kamikaze pilots were named after this typhoon.
• 1346: The Black Plague started and eventually killed nearly half of Europe’s population.
• 1492: Christopher Columbus lands in America. But he believed he was in India and called the inhabitants “Indians“.
• 1603: 「江戸時代」 (The “Edo Period“) begins in Japan.
• 1680: The 将軍 (Shougun), Tsunayoshi, loved dogs and enacted a number of laws protecting dogs and making harming them a criminal offense.He is therefore often called “The Dog Shogun”.
• 1776: America declares it’s independence from England.
• 1789: French Revolution began.
• 1804: Napoleon became the Emperor of France.
• 1854: U.S. Naval Commodore Matthew Perry forced Japan to open to trade with the West.At first Japan resisted and the island of Odaiba was built in Tokyo Bay to defend Japan from the American forces. But Perry’s fleet of black ships were too intimidating and Japan enacted law to allow trade with the West in general and America in particular.The resulting influx of American goods and culture sparked Japan’s “Westernization”.

An Ukiyoe portrait of Cmdr. Perry. His name is written as 「ぺルリ」 ("Peruri") because that's what it sounded like to the Japanese when Perry said his name with his American accent.

1995 January 17: 「阪神淡路大震災」 (Hanshin-awajidai-shinsai), (“The Kobe Earthquake“) destroyed the city of 神戸 (Kobe, Japan).

A collapsed overpass after the Kobe Earthquake; 1995 January.

I know that I left out many important dates. Feel free to write any that you can think of in the comments section of this post.

And did you witness any historic events?

Versurile Imnului Desteapta-te, romane

Versurile imnului naţional aparţin lui Andrei Mureşanu (1816-1863), poet de factură romantică, ziarist, traducător, un adevărat tribun al epocii marcate de Revoluţia de la 1848.  Muzica a fost compusă de Anton Pann (1796-1854), poet şi etnograf, om de mare cultură, cântăreţ şi autor de manuale de muzică.

Poemul “Un răsunet” al lui Andrei Mureşanu, redactat şi publicat în timpul Revoluţiei de la 1848, a fost pus pe note în câteva zile, deoarece îl aflăm cântat pentru prima oară pe data de 29 iunie 1848 la Râmnicu Vâlcea (în Ţara Românească Revoluţia a izbucnit pe 11 iunie). Poemul va deveni imn sub titlul “Deşteaptă-te, române!”, câştigându-şi instantaneu gloria recunoscută datorită mesajului energic şi mobilizator pe care-l conţine. Începând din 1848, “Deşteaptă-te, române!” a fost un cântec foarte drag românilor, insuflându-le curajul în timpul momentelor cruciale, în timpul Războiului de Independenţă (1877-1878), cât şi în cel al primului şi celui de-al doilea Război Mondial. mai multe detalii aici

Plague or Plan? Wayne Madsen On Virus in Ukraine

via Plague or Plan? Wayne Madsen On Virus in Ukraine.

Me voidaan kiukutella, että emme halua maahanmuuttoa, mutta se tulee tapahtumaan.

Julkisrahoitteisen ja kansallisen yleisradioyhtiömme YLEn Aamu-tv:n vieraana 6.11.2009 ollut tutkija Tommi Laitio ajatushautomo Demos Helsingistä pitää faktana, että maahanmuutto lisääntyy ja vuonna 2030 Suomi on nykyistä monimuotoisempi maa.

Tuo lause me voidaan kiukutella, että emme halua maahanmuuttoa, mutta se tulee tapahtumaan, tuo mieleen taistolaisen opettajani 1970-lulta.

Hän sanoi lähes tulkoon samoin äänenkääntein vuonna 1975 meille pikku teineille, että te ja porvarilliset vanhempanne voitte pomppia vaikka tasajalkaa ja kiukutella niin paljon kuin haluatte siitä, että te ette halua sosialismia, mutta se tulee joka tapauksessa tapahtumaan.

Ei sitten kuitenkaan tullut sosialismia – tuli EU ja monikulttuurihulluus…

Lähde: YLE

Fotos del ejercito aleman durante la primera gran guerra, la mayoria de ellas fueron tomadas en el frente oriental combatiendo a los rusos, las tipicas fotos de militares, oficiales posando, compañeros de armas inmortalizando el recuerdo, daños, bajas etc etc etc…

Niin, mihin Suomi todellisuudessa tarvitsee maahanmuuttajia? Varsin tiivistetyn vastauksen tähän kysymykseen antoi vasemmistoliiton kansanedustaja Merja Kyllönen eduskunnassa uuden ulkomaalaislain muutoksesta käydyn keskustelun yhteydessä:

En tiedä, kuinka moni teistä kuuli edustajakollega Yrttiahon kertomuksen, mitä tällä hetkellä kuuluu telakoille. Siellä pyöritetään täyttä höyryä viikoittain koulutuksia, joissa eri päivinä on virolaisia, venäläisiä ja puolalaisia koulutettavia koulutuksessa niihin tehtäviin, joista meidän suomalaiset työmiehemme on lomautettu tai irtisanottu, ja me annamme tämän tapahtua, ja monella keinoin nämä ongelmat kaatuvat koko meidän maahanmuuttopoliittisen keskustelumme päälle.

Eli suomalainen elinkeinoelämä tarvitsee suomalaisia halvempaa työvoimaa tekemään työt Suomessa. Kiitos asian varmistamisesta.

Ei ihme,että tässä nykyisessä menossa pääsee tapahtumaan tällaista.

Lähde: Eduskunta

“It is much easier to make war than peace” — Georges Clemenceau (French ambassador at the Paris Peace Conference) 

When the Great War, WWI, had ended, and the Treaty of Versailles was signed on June 28th, 1919 by the victorious Allied Powers and the defeated Germans, it set in motion a chain of events that ultimately led to the greatest catastrophe in world history, WWII. 

The Kaiser’s army had been quite different from that of the Nazi’s. Yes they had been ruthless, yes they had committed atrocities, but so did many other armies at the time. What made the Kaiser’s forces so much different from Hitler’s was ideology. The Kaiser viewed all Germans, including Jews, as his subjects. In fact, many German-Jews took up arms in the name of the Kaiser and had even served as officers in the war. This is not to say restrictions were not in place; Jews could not join the ranks of the nobility, which in German meant receiving the noble particle “von” before the surname, unless they renounced Judaism and converted to Christianity. This meant they could only rise so high within the ranks of the military, which was not uncommon throughout Europe, as many countries slighted minority groups during the age, be they religious or ethnic, but many Jews served in the Kaiser’s court, and had long established themselves as a well-assimilated, and appreciated community within German society. German-Jews, under the Kaiser, were, for the most part, very proud of their country, culture, and nationality, and thought of themselves as nothing but German. Ashkenazi Jews were actually very closely linked to Germany at the time, and adopted many aspects of German culture into Judaism. Yiddish, for example, was a dialect of German that was widely spoken by many Jews worldwide before the rise of Hitler. 

When Germany surrendered at the end of WWI, one must realize that the Allies didn’t even possess a single square-inch of German soil. For the most part, the British naval blockade, and the protracted nature of trench warfare, was what defeated the German army and the German people’s morale. At the time the armistice was signed, German troops actually occupied French and Belgian territory. Many of the German troops who were told they had to surrender, Pvt. Adolf Hitler included, could not understand why, since it was they, and not the Allies, who occupied their enemy’s countries. They had already technically won the war on the Eastern Front, after signing the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with the Russians in 1918, and had come close to winning the war in the West as well, on a number of occasions, even coming to within 30 miles of Paris at one point in the war. What these soldiers could not see, due to the fact it was intentionally being hidden from them by their government, was the fact that the German empire was running out of food, resources, and money, and morale had dwindled so low at home, and in some divisions, that the Kaiser had been deposed and many of his beloved divisions had begun to surrender their positions to the Allies wholesale. The German war machine had essentially been choked out, rather than smashed altogether, and German defeat was more of a matter of circumstance rather than fact. Most parties, such as the British, were simply happy to end the war, given the fact it had been the most costliest in human history up to that point. The French, however, having suffered German invasions for centuries, advocated a march on Berlin that would disable German war capabilities once and for all. The Allies undoubtedly had the upper hand at the time, but the Germans wouldn’t have stood by quietly had the Allies pursued such a strategy. It would’ve cost far more lives and could’ve extended the war for years on end… and, as is always the case in war, there was no guarantee of success either. 

Without being directly exposed to conditions on the home-front, bitter WWI vets, like Adolf Hitler, could not fathom how they had lost the war. From their bunkers and foxholes, all they could see were German boots on French and Belgian soil, yet they were being told that they had lost the war. Various conspiracy theories quickly started to spread amongst the soldier’s ranks, one of which was the Dolchstoßlegende, which translates in English as the “Stab-in-the-Back Legend”. The Dolchstoßlegende was a belief that gained widespread popularity in post-war Germany that claimed communist Jews, who were not believed to be “true Germans at heart”, had sabotaged the war effort both at home and in the field, causing the German war effort to fail. Only reinforcing the people’s belief in this conspiracy, two prominent German-Jewish bankers, Max Warburg and Carl Melchior, were sent to Paris as part of the delegation to negotiate the Treaty of Versailles and procure the “best possible financial terms” for Germany. When the Versailles Treaty turned out to be as harsh as it was, the two bankers were pointed to as evidence of a Jewish conspiracy that was trying to destroy Germany (Max Warburg’s role in financing the Bolshevik movement in Russia didn’t help things either). Jewish bankers and businessmen were accused of profiteering off of Germany’s defeat and the German-Jews as a people were viewed as an alien-element within Germany by much of the population from that point forward; making the people all the more susceptible to Hitler’s anti-Semitic message. The Weimar Republic was also thought to be responsible for the terms of the treaty, due to their ineptitude and corruption. This created a very hostile climate within the country against the government, which led to various coup attempts throughout the Weimar regime’s short reign. 

An astute statesmen, whose name I cannot recall (thought it was Woodrow Wilson but it doesn’t appear to be) said, “If you treat the Germans like enemies, they will not disappoint”. The exceedingly harsh conditions laid out in the Versailles Treaty, designed to break Germany for several generations, were obviously not very well received in the Fatherland. What really bothered many Germans, more so than the loss of territory/colonies, military reduction, or the reparations, was the forced admission of war guilt on the part of country. In the eyes of many, Germans and neutral parties alike, the Allies were at least partly to blame for backing Serbia after Serbian agents assassinated the crown prince of the Austrian Empire, the archduke Franz Ferdinand. The Allies believed that Kaiser Wilhelm simply used the archduke’s assassination as a pretext for war, and that he had been craving new territory for some time. There was no denying that Kaiser Wilhelm was a militarist-expansionist, and that he had a particular distaste for both France and Russia, but claiming that Germany would’ve declared war on the Allies even if Franz Ferdinand had not been shot is pure speculation. The German people begrudged this condition of the treaty so much because they felt it was the source of all the other terms, such as the territorial loss and reparations. Had Germany’s cause for war been declared legitimate, the Allies would’ve had no justification in sticking it to Germany in the fashion that they did. 

These perceived injustices, combined with the ineffectiveness of the democratically elected Weimar Republic, caused widespread resentment in Germany towards the West (i.e. France, Britain, USA, etc..). Democracy, capitalism, materialism, civil rights, etc… were disdained by many, and a rash of anti-Semitism spread like wildfire. Post-WWI, the German people essentially split into two camps, neither of which were democratic; Marxists and National Socialists. Various communist coup attempts took place throughout the reign of the Weimar Republic, which partly led to a rise in ultra-nationalism. In response to these Marxist agents, many of which were Jewish, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi party began to make headway on the political scene. It wasn’t long after that that Marxists and Nazis were openly killing each other in the streets. Promising to save the wealthy businessmen in Germany from communism, Hitler gained the support of many capitalists, even though he had no more love for capitalism than the communists did. 

The chaotic political conditions mixed with the miserable economic conditions in Germany set the stage for a demagogic, savior-like figure to rise to the forefront of the political scene. The Germans believed they had been unfairly treated by the Allied powers and believed communist Russia was covertly attacking them, in an effort to dismantle their sovereignty and subjugate them to Soviet rule. When Adolf Hitler promised to put the people back to work, rearm the nation, recover lost territory, and rid the country of foreign/communist/Jewish influence, it resonated with many of the people. Although the Nazi Party never gained a majority in the Reichstag by the vote of the people, they did become the most powerful political party in the country by the late ’20s, and their popularity only grew when Hitler started delivering on his promises (i.e. economic revival, rearmament, territorial reclamation, etc..). 

Had the Allied Powers not alienated, punished, and isolated Germany at the end of the war like they did, they would not have fanned the flames of ultra-nationalism within the country and soured the German people’s taste for democracy. On the other hand, had the Allies not totally destroyed the Kaiser’s system and replaced it with a corrupt faux-democracy, there would’ve been no need for a demagogue to create a new system of his own. On the other side of the spectrum, had the Allies, at the very least, driven the Germans out of France and Belgium, there would’ve been no need on the part of the German soldier to reach for conspiracy theories as to why their government had told them to surrender. Of course, hindsight is 20/20, but one can make a pretty good case that the Versailles Treaty was to Hitler as Dr. Frankenstein was to the Frankenstein monster.

In the opinion of most all historians, the first turning point of WWII came decades before Hitler came to power; decades before the second worldwide conflagration was ignited. Had the Allies either dealt with Germany more leniently, or pressed their advantage all the way to Berlin, the course of world history would’ve unquestionably played out much, much differently. 

“I don’t know whether war is an interlude during peace, or peace an interlude during war” — Georges Clemenceau 

The signing of the Treaty of Versailles may have been WWII’s first turning point, but it was by no means its last. I will further elaborate on WWII turning points in upcoming posts.

Vähemmistövaltuutettu Johanna Suurpää oli aktiivisesti auttamassa ensimmäisiä Suomeen rantautuneita diktaattori Siad Barren klaanilaisia  ja läheisiä.

Tuolloinen Pakolaisapu ry:n lakimies osoitti jo silloin suomalaiseen lainsäädäntöön kohdistuvan  kunnioituksensa määrän neuvomalla maahamme kutsumatta tulleita vieraita repimään matkustusasiakirjansa ja hakemaan Suomesta turvapaikkaa.

Näin Suurpää järjesti itselleen sopivasti hyvin palkattuja töitä suomalaisten veronmaksajien kustannuksella. Toinen ilmiselvä seuraus töästä toiminnasta on se, että näin aktiivinen ja lakia täysin omalla tavallaan jo tuolloin tulkinut neito pääsi lopulta lainvalvojaksi eli vähemmistövaltuutetuksi (täysin vastoin virkamieheltä yleensä vaadittavaa puolueettomuuskriteeriä).

Onneksi olkoon.

Eräs Suurpäähän liittyvä asia on kuitenkin kaivanut ja vaivannut  jo vuosia. Se koskee Johannan aikakäsitystä. Minun on vaikea ymmärtää oman aikakäsitykseni kautta sitä, että kun Suurpää sanoi Helsingin Sanomille antamassaan  haastattelussa 21.4.1991 , että “Kestää parikymmentä vuotta ennen kuin suomalainen lapsi alkaa kuluttamisen sijasta tuottaa yhteiskunnalle jotain. Pakolaisen kohdalla kyse on luultavasti parista vuodesta”, mitä hän oikeastaan tarkoitti?

Oman näkemykseni mukaan tuosta lausunnosta on kulunut jo lähes kaksikymmentä vuotta ja tulos on uutisten mukaan tämä.

Lähde: HS

Nu o victorie militară a stat la temelia României Mari, ci actul de voinţă al naţiunii române de a-şi da armătura teritorial-instituţionalã care este statul naţional.[...]

1 Decembrie este Ziua Naţională a României, adoptată prin lege după inlăturarea regimului comunist. Din punct de vedere istoric, la 1 Decembrie 1918, Adunarea Naţională de la Alba Iulia, constituită din 1228 de delegaţi şi sprijinită de peste 100.000 de români veniţi din toate colţurile Ardealului şi Banatului, a adoptat o Rezoluţie prin care s-a consfinţit unirea tuturor românilor din Transilvania, întreg Banatul (cuprins între râurile Mureş, Tisa şi Dunăre) şi Ţara Ungurească (Crişana, Sătmar şi Maramureş) cu România. Citeste mai mult aici ->  Despre 1 Decembrie – Ziua Romaniei

Alte Articole Club13 :

1 Decembrie – Scurt istoric

Imnul Romaniei – Versuri si informatii despre imn

Legenda Lui Mos Nicolae

Urari de La Multi Ani

click to enlarge

scan: RAF_Louvert

Last Wednesday was Armistice Day, when on the “eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month”, in 1918, the armistice was signed for the cessation of hostilities on the Western Front at the end of World War I.

Source:
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/11/armistice_day_remembrances.html

Tu ce stii despre ziua tarii tale ?

1 Decembrie este Ziua Naţională a României, potrivit Constituţiei din 2003, articolul 12, alineatul 2

La 1 decembrie 1918, Adunarea Naţională de la Alba Iulia, constituită din 1228 delegaţi, şi sprijinită de peste 100.000 de persoane adunate la eveniment din toate colţurile Ardealului şi Banatului, a adoptat o Rezoluţiune care consfinţeşte unirea tuturor românilor din Transilvania, întreg Banatul (cuprins între râurile Mureş, Tisa şi Dunăre) şi Ţara Ungurească (Crişana, Sătmar şi Maramureş) cu România.

Rezoluţia votată de Marea Adunare Naţională, proclama:  Vezi aici

Asa cum sublinia si istoricul Florin Constantiniu, “…Marea Unire din 1918 a fost şi rămâne pagina cea mai sublimă a istoriei româneşti. Măreţia ei stă în faptul că desăvârşirea unităţii naţionale nu este opera nici unui om politic, a nici unui guvern, a nici unui partid; este fapta istorică a întregii naţiuni române, realizată într-un elan ţâşnit cu putere din străfundurile conştiinţei unităţii neamului, un elan controlat de fruntaşii politici, pentru a-l călăuzi cu inteligenţă politică remarcabilă spre ţelul dorit. [...]

Marea Unire nu a fost rezultatul participării României la război. Nici partizani Antantei, nici cei ai Puterilor Centrale nu au avut în vedere revoluţia din Rusia şi destrămarea monarhiei austro-ungare. Raţionamentul lor s-a înscris formulei tradiţionale a raportului de putere interstate: victoria Antantei ne va da Bucovina, Transilvania şi Banatul, victoria Puterilor Centrale ne va da Basarabia; o biruinţă o excludea pe cealaltă, astfel că nimeni nu vedea cum ar fi cu putinţă ca toate aceste provincii să intre aproape simultan în frontierele Vechiului Regat. [...]

Alte Articole Club13 :

1 Decembrie – Scurt istoric

Imnul Romaniei – Versuri si informatii despre imn

Legenda Lui Mos Nicolae

Urari de La Multi Ani

UPDATE: Ukrainian Docs liken flu to 1918 version.

Ukraine flu death toll goes up – British labs test to ID flu as H1N1, Spanish flu, or something else.

Here’s the link:

1918 RBD Polymorphsm in Ukraine H1N1?

Joseph Moshe

Today, the MSM are not talking about this case any more. Yesterday, they wanted us to believe that Joseph Moshe was a nutcase and a terrorist, arrested for threatening to bomb the White House. Interesting detail about his arrest (the “Westwood standoff”) was that he seemed to be immune to the 5 cans of tear gas and 5 gallons of law-enforcement grade  pepper spray they pumped into his face. He very calmly remained in his car, as the video footage of his arrest shows.

Professor Moshe  had  called into a live radio show by Dr. A. True Ott, broadcast on Republic Broadcasting claiming to be a microbiologist who wanted to supply evidence to a States Attorney regarding tainted H1N1 Swine flu vaccines being produced by Baxter BioPharma Solutions. He said that Baxter’s Ukrainian lab was in fact producing a bioweapon disguised as a vaccine. He claimed that the vaccine contained an adjuvant (additive) designed to weaken the immune system, and replicated RNA from the virus responsible for the 1918 pandemic Spanish flu, causing global sickness and mass death.

Sources tell us that Bar-Joseph Moshe made no threat against the President or the White House. He did not mention any bomb or attack. He then proceeded to inform the White House he intended to go public with this information. When he noticed men in suits in front of his house and feared that the FBI was about to detain him, he packed some belongings into his car and, him being a dual Israeli citizen, tried to reach the Israeli consulate located in close proximity to the federal building where the standoff took place. The FBI and the bomb squad prevented him from reaching it. Who is this man? His profile on biomedexperts.com says he is a plant disease expert with many publications on his name involving the genetic manipulation of virii. Photographic evidence that Moshe is who he says he is can be found here.

Joseph Moshe was soon after his arrest sent or let go to Israel. Nothing has been heard from him since. The Secret Service was not the agency involved in the surveillance of Moshe at his home in California. This was done by the FBI, who had orders to detain or arrest him. Mounted on top of a large black vehicle used in his arrest was a microwave weapon that possibly damaged the electronics in Moshe’s car as well as any communication devices he had which might have been used to contact the media or others who could help him.

Moshe did not suffer the same effects of the gas and pepper spray that others would have because he had built up an immunity to such weapons as a by-product of his Mossad training. Moshe was not handcuffed because he was not placed under arrest.

Does this sound like an insane conspiracy theory? Sure it does. Due to the scarcity and anonimity of the sources we would dismiss it as exactly that, if it weren’t for some uncomfortable facts: Baxter Pharmaceutical has been caught, red-handed, in spreading a live, genetically engineered H5N1 Bird flu vaccine as a lethal biological weapon all over the world, destined to be used for human vaccinations. This happened just a few months ago. And only luck prevented a global catastrophe of epic proportions.

Baxter International Inc. had mixed live, genetically engineered avian flue viruses in vaccine material shipped to 18 countries. Only by sheer luck, a Czech laboratory decided to test the vaccine on a dozen ferrets, which all died in days. The World Health Organization was notified and catastrophe was averted. This was clearly a deliberate act on Baxter’s part, because they adhere to BS3, bio-safety level three. Baxter admitted a “mistake”. Such monumental screwups are totally impossible at that level. Many safety systems would have needed to be sabotaged, many key personell would have needed to be bribed. It simply can’t be done without direction from the inside. They did not send out the wrong vial – they produced dozens of gallons of biological-weapon agent (genetically engineered live H5N1 / Bird flu virus), then sent it out as a “vaccine”.

Baxter knew full well that their vaccine was lethal, because the year before they had tested it on a few hundred homeless Polish people – dozens died as a result.

Where’s the meat? Well – Baxter is now being sued for the deliberate, repeated contamination of vaccines with biological weapons designed – by them – to mass-murder people. Here is the complaint (PDF). By some kook nutcase? Not likely – Jane Burgermeister is an experienced, respected journalist. She is not the only one suing Baxter for planning and executing a plan for global genocide: Other are filing complaints as well. Read a well-researched complaint here (PDF).

Motive? The latter complaint alludes to it. Have you heard of the Georgia Guidestones? An enormous monument loaded with Masonic symbolism costing millions of dollars, it has been erected by unknown, powerful elites (multimillionaires with the clout to erect monuments wherever they please, obviously) around 30 years ago. It gives an “alternative ten commandments”, of which the first is the extermination of six and a half billion people from the face of the Earth. Half a billion will remain. This is the number of people the planet can sustain indefinitely, so that the descendents of the Rothschilds and Rockefellers can live in peace and affluence indefinitely. Slaves are needed to produce that luxury, but 500 million will do just fine. But how does one go about killing off most of the world?

“Vaccinating” the planet with a bioweapon with near-100% mortality would do the trick. Baxter would provide both the bioweapon as well as the vaccine against it to “civilized” Western peoples. Result: We can plunder Africa, we have no more competition from SE Asia, the oil is for our taking and only Western and perhaps Chinese sheeple remain.

Rockefeller said this in 1994 at a U.N. dinner: “We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis, and the nations will accept the New World Order.” PNAC said something similar right before 9/11.

———-

Most americans would remember the scenes from this event..moshe completely surrounded by cars and being sprayed with tear gas and pepper spray..the story behind the story has come out now..i have wanted to do this story for while but now believe its a relevant time to present it “the vaccine is a bioweapon”..and after seeing what merck did..i dont doubt his claims!

Where is he now?