<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>3dmark &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/3dmark/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "3dmark"</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:31:24 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[SiSoftware Sandra Lite 2010 Final 16.10 Final]]></title>
<link>http://nvidiathepoweroffuture.wordpress.com/2009/11/30/sisoftware-sandra-lite/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ppinheiro</dc:creator>
<guid>http://nvidiathepoweroffuture.wordpress.com/2009/11/30/sisoftware-sandra-lite/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[      SiSoftware Sandra (System Analyser, Diagnostic and Reporting Assistant) é um software de infor]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[      SiSoftware Sandra (System Analyser, Diagnostic and Reporting Assistant) é um software de infor]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Bumper day for Asus with N81Vg]]></title>
<link>http://stuffmiddleeast.com/2009/04/16/bumper-day-for-asus-with-n81vg/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Thomas Shambler</dc:creator>
<guid>http://stuffmiddleeast.com/2009/04/16/bumper-day-for-asus-with-n81vg/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The Asus factory has certainly been busy this morning. After churning out some new motherboards, its]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1746" title="asus_n81vg_lid" src="http://stuffmiddleeast.wordpress.com/files/2009/04/asus_n81vg_lid.jpg" alt="asus_n81vg_lid" width="499" height="375" /></p>
<p>The Asus factory has certainly been busy this morning. After churning out some new motherboards, its moved on to high performance laptops with the N81Vg. The 14in lap-happy PC has standard specs in most areas, however it&#8217;s packing one monster of a graphics card. The Nvidia GeForce GT 120M is DirectX 10 compatible, handles 1080p HD video with ease and uses 110 gigaflops of processing power. To put that in perspective, this laptop received a 3Dmark performance score akin to some hardcore gaming PCs.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Aquamark 3 Benchmark]]></title>
<link>http://nvidiathepoweroffuture.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/aquamark-3-benchmark/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 06:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ppinheiro</dc:creator>
<guid>http://nvidiathepoweroffuture.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/aquamark-3-benchmark/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[     Com este software de benchmark podes testar a tua gráfica e processador&#8230;    O programa co]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[     Com este software de benchmark podes testar a tua gráfica e processador&#8230;    O programa co]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Futuremark Peacekeeper beta]]></title>
<link>http://n0ir.wordpress.com/2009/03/13/futuremark-peacekeeper-beta/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>n0ir</dc:creator>
<guid>http://n0ir.wordpress.com/2009/03/13/futuremark-peacekeeper-beta/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Futuremark très connu pour son logiciel de bench 3DMark sort aujourd’hui une autre façon de tester v]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p style="margin-left:2em;"><img title="titre" style="display:inline;border-width:0;" height="55" alt="titre" src="http://n0ir.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/titre.png?w=240&#038;h=55" width="240" border="0" /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.futuremark.com/" target="_blank">Futuremark</a> très connu pour son logiciel de bench 3DMark sort aujourd’hui une autre façon de tester votre navigateur. Il fallait bien trouver un moyen pour que les geeks puissent montrer qui a la plus grosse avec leur navigateur internet. J’ai découvert cette information grâce au site <a href="http://www.pcinpact.com/actu/news/49699-futuremark-benchmark-navigateur-en-ligne-pea.htm">PC INpact</a>. Étant curieux de nature, je me suis dit qu’au lieu de me fier aux print screen du site, rien de mieux que de faire les tests par sois même étant donné que les machines des utilisateurs sont souvent bien différentes des sites informatiques. </p>
<p>Pour commencer, sachez que je possède un Core 2 Duo E6300 tout ce qui a de plus basique cadencé à la fréquence d’origine 1,86Ghz couplé avec une carte <a href="http://www.sapphiretech.com/uk/products/products_overview.php?gpid=244" target="_blank">AMD/ATI HD4850 512MB</a> de chez <a href="http://www.sapphiretech.com/" target="_blank">Sapphire</a> ainsi que de 4Go de mémoire vive de marque <a href="www.ldlc.com" target="_blank">LDLC</a> sur une carte mère <a href="http://www.msicomputer.com" target="_blank">MSI P965 Neo-F</a>. Vous voilà donc informé sur la configuration de test. Ceci ne comprendra que deux navigateurs, car je ne vois pas l’intérêt d&#8217;en posséder plusieurs (en-dehors d’Internet Explorer 7 qui est inclus dans <strong>Windows Vista Home Premium 32 Bits</strong>). </p>
<p>Les browsers sont donc :</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/france/windows/ie/" target="_blank">Internet Explorer 7</a> </li>
<li><a href="http://www.opera.com/download/" target="_blank">Opera 9.64</a> </li>
</ul>
<p style="margin-left:2em;"><a href="http://n0ir.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/peacekeeper-beta-ie7.png" target="_blank"><img title="peacekeeper_beta_ie7" style="display:inline;border-width:0;" height="141" alt="peacekeeper_beta_ie7" src="http://n0ir.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/peacekeeper-beta-ie7-thumb.png?w=244&#038;h=141" width="244" border="0" /></a> </p>
<p>Internet Explorer 7 s’en sort avec <strong>168</strong> points d’après le bench.</p>
<p style="margin-left:2em;"><a href="http://n0ir.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/peacekeeper-beta-opera.png" target="_blank"><img title="peacekeeper_beta_opera" style="display:inline;border-width:0;" height="143" alt="peacekeeper_beta_opera" src="http://n0ir.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/peacekeeper-beta-opera-thumb.png?w=244&#038;h=143" width="244" border="0" /></a> </p>
<p>Opera quant à lui s’en sort un peu mieux avec <strong>441</strong> points. </p>
<p>Que faut-il retenir de ce genre de benchmark ? Est-il plus intéressant que le célèbre test Acid 2 et 3 ? La réponse est NON. Ce n’est pas parce que vous obtiendrez le maximum de points avec votre navigateur — qui je le rappelle peut varier d’une configuration à une autre – que ceux-ci respecteront les standards W3C du web. Encore une fois, Futuremark nous sort de quoi faire une discussion sur un forum et critiquer ceux qui n’auront pas le meilleur score. </p>
<p>De plus, d’un point de vue sécurité, ce site ne reflètera rien des failles internet de votre browser. Pour terminer, nous noterons que le site est en version « Beta ». Les chiffres sont donc à prendre avec de grosses pincettes.</p>
</p>
<p style="margin-left:2em;"><a href="http://n0ir.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/resultat-global.png" target="_blank"><img title="resultat_global" style="display:inline;border-width:0;" height="118" alt="resultat_global" src="http://n0ir.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/resultat-global-thumb.png?w=244&#038;h=118" width="244" border="0" /></a> </p>
<p>Voici le résultat global des navigateurs testés avec en tête :</p>
<ol>
<li>Safari </li>
<li>Google Chrome </li>
<li>Opera 9.63 </li>
<li>Mozilla Firefox 3.0.6 </li>
<li>Internet Explorer&#160; 8 </li>
<li>Internet Explorer 7 </li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://service.futuremark.com/peacekeeper/index.action" target="_blank">Tester votre navigateur avec Futuremark Peacekeeper beta</a> </li>
<li><a href="http://www.webstandards.org/files/acid2/test.html" target="_blank">Test Acid 2</a> </li>
<li><a href="http://acid3.acidtests.org/" target="_blank">Test Acid 3</a> </li>
</ul>
<p>Petite publication concernant le test Acid 3 sous Opera 9.64 <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p style="margin-left:2em;"><a href="http://n0ir.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/result-test-acid3-opera964.png" target="_blank"><img title="result_test_acid3_opera964" style="display:inline;border-width:0;" height="136" alt="result_test_acid3_opera964" src="http://n0ir.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/result-test-acid3-opera964-thumb.png?w=244&#038;h=136" width="244" border="0" /></a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Konkurs Reactor.pl - Wygraj obudowę lub pamięci GeIL!]]></title>
<link>http://xteam7.wordpress.com/2009/03/07/konkurs-reactorpl-wygraj-obudowe-lub-pamieci-geil/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 13:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>PrX</dc:creator>
<guid>http://xteam7.wordpress.com/2009/03/07/konkurs-reactorpl-wygraj-obudowe-lub-pamieci-geil/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Co można zrobić przy pomocy płyt ze spienionego PCW i aerografu? Okazuje się, że bardzo dużo. Na baz]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Co można zrobić przy pomocy płyt ze spienionego PCW i aerografu? Okazuje się, że bardzo dużo. Na baz]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[NVIDIA przedstawia energooszczędną kartę graficzną GeForce G102M w notebooku ASUS na targach CeBIT]]></title>
<link>http://xteam7.wordpress.com/2009/03/03/nvidia-przedstawia-energooszczedna-karte-graficzna-geforce-g102m-w-notebooku-asus-na-targach-cebit/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>PrX</dc:creator>
<guid>http://xteam7.wordpress.com/2009/03/03/nvidia-przedstawia-energooszczedna-karte-graficzna-geforce-g102m-w-notebooku-asus-na-targach-cebit/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Targi CeBIT 2009 &#8211; 3 marzec 2009 Fakty: Podczas targów CeBIT w Niemczech NVIDIA przedstawiła d]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Targi CeBIT 2009 &#8211; 3 marzec 2009 Fakty: Podczas targów CeBIT w Niemczech NVIDIA przedstawiła d]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Fast and... cold]]></title>
<link>http://clawd.wordpress.com/2009/02/18/fast-and-cold/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>clawd</dc:creator>
<guid>http://clawd.wordpress.com/2009/02/18/fast-and-cold/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Ok, io doar azi am auzit, cu toate că evenimentul s-a petrecut în 10 ianuarie. Dar vă zic şi vouă, p]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><img class="size-full wp-image-1904 alignnone" style="margin:2px 5px;" title="amd_" src="http://clawd.wordpress.com/files/2009/02/amd_.gif" alt="amd_" width="200" height="48" /></p>
<p>Ok, io doar azi am auzit, cu toate că evenimentul s-a petrecut în 10 ianuarie. Dar vă zic şi vouă, pentru că ştiu că vă interesează şi sunteţi pasionaţi de domeniu <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>AMD au reuşit să doboare recordul de pe 3DMark 05 (45474), să doboare recordul de frecvenţă atinsă de un procesor (6.5 GHz), şi să doboare recordul de temperatură la care procesorul să funcţioneze (-270°C).</p>
<p>Deci&#8230; Rezumatul vi l-am zis eu. Restul: [<span style="text-decoration:underline;"><a href="http://game.amd.com/us-en/landings/tomslanding.aspx?CMP=BAC-TWRB&#38;PUB=TomsHardwareCom&#38;L=US&#38;CR=WorldRecord&#38;Region=NorthAmerica" target="_blank">aici</a></span>].</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[45474 3DMarks ]]></title>
<link>http://11k2.wordpress.com/2009/02/18/45474-3dmarks/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Fritz</dc:creator>
<guid>http://11k2.wordpress.com/2009/02/18/45474-3dmarks/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Hier ist das Making Of 45474 3DMarks (Futuremark 3Dmark 06), natürlich mit Flüssigstickstoff. Und in]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><a href="http://11k2.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/090218record.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4191" title="090218record" src="http://11k2.wordpress.com/files/2009/02/090218record.jpg" alt="090218record" width="460" height="174" /></a>Hier ist das Making Of 45474 3DMarks (Futuremark 3Dmark 06), natürlich mit Flüssigstickstoff. Und in Finnland, wo&#8217;s eh schon kälter ist. Speaking of Standortvorteil. Ein Phenom II X4 und zwei 4870 X2 (Doppel-GPU). Und nein, ihr müsst gar nicht fragen: Das Video ist <!--more-->natürlich mit Metal unterlegt.</p>
<p>Trotzdem: Weltrekord. Wieso gibt’s das eigentlich nicht als olympische Disziplin?</p>
<p>Nett vom finnischen Overclockerteam: Sie blenden am Schluss ne &#8220;dont try this at home&#8221; Warnung ein.</p>
<p><span style='text-align:center; display: block;'><object width='425' height='350'><param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/gwkzY8a8aFs&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' /><param name='allowfullscreen' value='true' /><param name='wmode' value='transparent' /><embed src='http://www.youtube.com/v/gwkzY8a8aFs&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' allowfullscreen='true' width='425' height='350' wmode='transparent'></embed></object></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Quem disse que a AMD não faz Marketing]]></title>
<link>http://darciomartins.wordpress.com/2009/01/30/quem-disse-que-a-amd-nao-faz-marketing/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>darciomartins</dc:creator>
<guid>http://darciomartins.wordpress.com/2009/01/30/quem-disse-que-a-amd-nao-faz-marketing/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Durante a CES2009, realizada neste mês, a AMD conseguiu quebrar um grande record mundial de overcloc]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Durante a CES2009, realizada neste mês, a AMD conseguiu quebrar um grande record mundial de overclock. Alcaçou o primeiro lugar em pontuação no programa benchamrk 3dmark 05. Outro record foi batido ao colocar um Phenom 2 rodando a 6.5Ghz, isso mesmo, é o maior core clock obtido por uma processador quad core até hoje. Apesar do record do 3dmark já ter sido batido este mês por processador Ci7 da Intel, o record de maior clock em um processador Quad perdura.</p>
<p>A AMD apresentou para o mundo esta façanha na CES2009 o maior evento do mundo relacionado a eletrônicos. Inclusive colocaram um vídeo no youtube mostrando o feito.</p>
<p><span style='text-align:center; display: block;'><object width='425' height='350'><param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/wB0JodKgZ0A&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' /><param name='allowfullscreen' value='true' /><param name='wmode' value='transparent' /><embed src='http://www.youtube.com/v/wB0JodKgZ0A&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' allowfullscreen='true' width='425' height='350' wmode='transparent'></embed></object></span></p>
<p>Um fato que chamou bastante a atenção foi a temperatura em que o processador estava trabalhando, ele chegou a operar a nada menos do que -245º C e rodando o Windows de forma estável. A AMD mostrou que seu novíssimo processador está livre de um das grandes dificuldades dos overclockers, pois, nos processadore anteriores a este os processadores ao enfrentarem temperaturas muito baixas paravam de funcionar, este efeito é conhecido no meio como <em>coldbug</em>. As baixas temperaturas possibilitam o overclocker atingir velocidade mais alta com seu processador, além da  baixa temperatura favorecer a estabilidade das tensões do processador.</p>
<p>Para quem dizia que a AMD não sabe fazer marketing, está ai um exemplo de que eles estão ao menos aprendendo.</p>
<p>C ya!</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[3DMark06 1.1.0 - Futuremark - 579.99MB (Freeware)]]></title>
<link>http://netvietnam.org/2009/01/10/3dmark06-110-futuremark-57999mb-freeware/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nhân Mã</dc:creator>
<guid>http://netvietnam.org/2009/01/10/3dmark06-110-futuremark-57999mb-freeware/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[3DMark06 is the worldwide standard in advanced 3D game performance benchmarking. A fundamental tool ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[3DMark06 is the worldwide standard in advanced 3D game performance benchmarking. A fundamental tool ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[3DMark05 1.3.0 - Futuremark - 286.83MB (Freeware)]]></title>
<link>http://netvietnam.org/2009/01/10/3dmark05-130-futuremark-28683mb-freeware/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nhân Mã</dc:creator>
<guid>http://netvietnam.org/2009/01/10/3dmark05-130-futuremark-28683mb-freeware/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[3DMark05 is the latest and hottest version of the very popular 3DMark series. By combining full Dire]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[3DMark05 is the latest and hottest version of the very popular 3DMark series. By combining full Dire]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[3DMark03 3.6.0 - Futuremark - 178.04MB (Freeware)]]></title>
<link>http://netvietnam.org/2009/01/10/3dmark03-360-futuremark-17804mb-freeware/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nhân Mã</dc:creator>
<guid>http://netvietnam.org/2009/01/10/3dmark03-360-futuremark-17804mb-freeware/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[3DMark03 is a great benchmarking program for your gaming PC. By combining full DirectX 9.0a support ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[3DMark03 is a great benchmarking program for your gaming PC. By combining full DirectX 9.0a support ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[3DMark Vantage 1.0.1 - Futuremark - 413.80MB (Commercial Trial)]]></title>
<link>http://netvietnam.org/2009/01/10/3dmark-vantage-101-futuremark-41380mb-commercial-trial/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nhân Mã</dc:creator>
<guid>http://netvietnam.org/2009/01/10/3dmark-vantage-101-futuremark-41380mb-commercial-trial/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[3DMark Vantage is the new industry standard PC gaming performance benchmark from Futuremark, newly d]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[3DMark Vantage is the new industry standard PC gaming performance benchmark from Futuremark, newly d]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[PCMark Vantage v1.0.1.0 patch]]></title>
<link>http://nvidiathepoweroffuture.wordpress.com/2009/10/25/pcmark-vantage-v1-0-1-0-patch/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ppinheiro</dc:creator>
<guid>http://nvidiathepoweroffuture.wordpress.com/2009/10/25/pcmark-vantage-v1-0-1-0-patch/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[         A Futuremark, empresa responsável pelo bem sucedido software de Benchmark como o 3DMark ou ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[         A Futuremark, empresa responsável pelo bem sucedido software de Benchmark como o 3DMark ou ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Building a Gaming Computer For $500 Part 2: Performance Analysis]]></title>
<link>http://techonabudget.wordpress.com/2009/10/08/building-a-gaming-computer-for-500-part-2-performance-analysis/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mastamike911</dc:creator>
<guid>http://techonabudget.wordpress.com/2009/10/08/building-a-gaming-computer-for-500-part-2-performance-analysis/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[You probably remember last week we put a Dell Inspiron 546 against a custom-built computer bought fr]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>You probably remember <a title="Last Week's post" href="http://techonabudget.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/building-a-gaming-computer-for-500/">last week</a> we put a <a title="The Pre-built Dell" href="http://configure.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?oc=ddcwta2&#38;c=us&#38;l=en&#38;s=dhs&#38;cs=19&#38;kc=desktop-inspiron-546">Dell Inspiron 546</a> against a custom-built computer bought from <a title="Newegg's home site" href="http://www.newegg.com">Newegg</a>.  This week&#8217;s post will focus on proving the advantage of the (cheaper!) custom-built computer.  Like I said last time, I don&#8217;t actually have the physical computers with me to test, so I&#8217;m going to have to take a different route than I would really like to in order to benchmark these computers.  What I will do in order to most fairly benchmark these computers is break them up by their individual parts (CPU and GPU) and provide information on already performed benchmarks by other sites around the Internet.  From there I&#8217;ll determine which one is better and by how much percentage.</p>
<h2>Part One, CPU Comparison:</h2>
<p>For this test we&#8217;ll pull from <a title="PassMark's home site" href="http://www.passmark.com/index.html">PassMark&#8217;s</a> huge <a title="PassMark's CPU list" href="http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php">list of CPU tests</a>.  Users download PassMark&#8217;s PerformanceTest software and then use it to test their computer hardware.  The results of those tests can then be uploaded to PassMark, where they are then added to the online list.  This is a very nice and simple way for people to test their hardware and have their data available for anyone else to see free of charge.</p>
<p>The two CPUs we will be testing are the Inspiron&#8217;s AMD Athlon™ II X2 215 (2.7GHz, 1MB) and the custom-built&#8217;s <span style="color:#000000;">Intel Pentium E6300 2.8GHz LGA 775 65W Dual-Core Processor.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#000000;">PassMark gives the Athlon 1436 points on their points scale, whereas the Pentium receives 1941 points.  Here is a graph that illustrates this:</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#000000;"> </span></p>
<div id="attachment_22" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 554px"><img class="size-full wp-image-22" title="CPU Analysis" src="http://techonabudget.wordpress.com/files/2009/10/cpu_chart11.png" alt="The custom-built's Pentium clearly wins by PassMark's standards" width="544" height="327" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The custom-built&#39;s Pentium clearly wins by PassMark&#39;s standards</p></div>
<p>This means that the Pentium E6300 performs about 35% better than the Athlon II X2 215 in PassMark&#8217;s synthetic tests.</p>
<h2>Part Two, Graphics Card Comparison:</h2>
<p>For this test we will again use PassMark&#8217;s charts for comparison.  Graphics cards&#8217; performance are uploaded in the same fashion that the CPUs&#8217; performance are.</p>
<p>The two GPUs that are being testing are ATI&#8217;s Radeon HD3200 and ATI&#8217;s Radeon HD4350.  Before I show the chart, I also want to say that the HD3200 is a bit older than the HD4350, and so it only has normal DirectX 10 compatibility, whereas the HD4350 is quite new and supports up to DirectX 10.1, meaning you can take advantage of the upgraded DirectX specifications.</p>
<p>PassMark gives the Radeon HD3200 116 points on their points scale, whereas the Radeon HD4350 receives 234.  I am also going to include the Radeon HD4850 on this chart.  I&#8217;ll explain my reasoning later.</p>
<div id="attachment_24" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 554px"><img class="size-full wp-image-24" title="GPU Analysis" src="http://techonabudget.wordpress.com/files/2009/10/gpu_chart11.png" alt="Simply looking at the model number easily shows which card is better" width="544" height="327" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Simply looking at the model number easily shows which card is better</p></div>
<p>As shown on the graph here, the HD4350 is leaps and bounds better than the HD3200. This means the custom-built computer wins by about 101%, meaning the HD4350 has more than double the performance than the HD3200.</p>
<p>So I included the HD4850 to show you just how much better performance <a title="Newegg Product link HD4850" href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102824">$65 more in investment</a> will get you.  Going from $517 for the custom-built to $582 will get you much improved performance.  How much exactly? 469% better performance over the HD4350.  With the HD4850, you can get some really good gaming performance (Most games will run on Very High Quality on 1680X1050 resolution).</p>
<p>Hopefully this helps to show you just how much better gaming performance you can get out of a comparibly priced custom-built computer when it&#8217;s put up against a pre-built computer.  If you are interested in CPU and GPU comparison&#8217;s, as well as finding out how to get the best bang for your technology buck, website <a title="Tom's Hardware Main Site" href="http://www.tomshardware.com/us/">Tom&#8217;s Hardware</a> is a great resource for information and research.  They constantly keep updated CPU and GPU charts as well as feature articles on which graphics card or CPU is best at certain price points.  Another great way to test the computer you already have is to use <a title="3DMark Vantage" href="http://www.futuremark.com/benchmarks/3dmarkvantage/introduction/">Futuremark&#8217;s 3DMark benchmark software</a>, a widely accepted industry standard in 3D benchmarking.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[3DMark Vantage WR super-smashed by KP and Sham]]></title>
<link>http://quantumeek.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/3dmark-vantage-wr-super-smashed-by-kp-and-sham/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Servando S.</dc:creator>
<guid>http://quantumeek.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/3dmark-vantage-wr-super-smashed-by-kp-and-sham/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Hey Guys. If you do like to Overclock and benchmark this will literally  blow your jaw to the floor.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><iframe src='http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fdigg.com%2Fhardware%2F3DMark_Vantage_WR_super_smashed_by_KP_and_Sham_QEEK' height='82' width='55' frameborder='0' scrolling='no' style='float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 5px; padding: 4px 0 2px 4px; background: #fff;'></iframe></p>
<p>Hey Guys. If you do like to Overclock and benchmark this will literally  blow your jaw to the floor.</p>
<p>Kingpin and Shamino,  some of the best overclockers ever existed just broke the 3DMark Vantage World Record. For recording, the Vantage preset comes @ P (performance)  score. The record was holded by Kingpin  with 42,968 points  using 4 x GTX 285 nvidia GPUs. They had another oportunity since Kingpin went to Taiwan and so they really took the words as a challenge. Please have a look at the <span style="text-decoration:line-through;">frankenstein´s laboratory </span>whole setup and you will see how many GPUs they used:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-426" title="OC" src="http://quantumeek.wordpress.com/files/2009/10/oc.jpg" alt="OC" width="600" height="399" /></p>
<p>Yeeeees. Thats 4x HD5870 new ATI GPUs.  CPU-Z says Core i7  Extreme was used this time but check the manufacturing process is 32nm and the codename Gulftown which is just around the corner. Now look at the results.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-427" title="OC 2" src="http://quantumeek.wordpress.com/files/2009/10/oc-2.jpg" alt="OC 2" width="600" height="619" /></p>
<p>Got the WR  and smashed it by almost 10k points more. Now I can´t find my jaw on the floor&#8230;  Big congrats to Vince Lucido (Kingpin) and Peter Tan (Shamino) on this accomplishment.</p>
<p>For more info you can go @ www.kingpincooling.com which is the new page which hosts &#8220;Team Pure&#8221; with Kingpin as the  captain. <a href="http://kingpincooling.com/forum/showthread.php?t=199">Here the link @ the results.</a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[To Tweakers.net πραγματοποίησε νέο παγκόσμιο ρεκόρ στο 3DMark03 με τρεις 5870]]></title>
<link>http://xollothnews.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/to-tweakers-net-%cf%80%cf%81%ce%b1%ce%b3%ce%bc%ce%b1%cf%84%ce%bf%cf%80%ce%bf%ce%af%ce%b7%cf%83%ce%b5-%ce%bd%ce%ad%ce%bf-%cf%80%ce%b1%ce%b3%ce%ba%cf%8c%cf%83%ce%bc%ce%b9%ce%bf-%cf%81%ce%b5%ce%ba%cf%8c/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>xollothnews</dc:creator>
<guid>http://xollothnews.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/to-tweakers-net-%cf%80%cf%81%ce%b1%ce%b3%ce%bc%ce%b1%cf%84%ce%bf%cf%80%ce%bf%ce%af%ce%b7%cf%83%ce%b5-%ce%bd%ce%ad%ce%bf-%cf%80%ce%b1%ce%b3%ce%ba%cf%8c%cf%83%ce%bc%ce%b9%ce%bf-%cf%81%ce%b5%ce%ba%cf%8c/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[To Tweakers.net πραγματοποίησε νέο παγκόσμιο ρεκόρ στο 3DMark03 με τρεις 5870 ! &#8211; ( HWBOX ) O/]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><a href="http://www.hwbox.gr/news/6201-tweakers-net-pragmatopoiise-neo-pagkosmio-rekor-sto-3dmark03-me-treis-5870-a.html">To Tweakers.net πραγματοποίησε νέο παγκόσμιο ρεκόρ στο 3DMark03 με τρεις 5870 ! &#8211; ( HWBOX ) O/C on first boot</a><br />
<a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.hardware-infos.com/img/startseite/klein/hd5870_5.jpg&#38;imgrefurl=http://www.hardware-infos.com/news.php%3Fnews%3D3190%26sprache%3D1&#38;usg=__uAolTwIEnMrHr_aGe4601Kj6ys0=&#38;h=387&#38;w=450&#38;sz=17&#38;hl=en&#38;start=20&#38;tbnid=QLt1zgVX1ankiM:&#38;tbnh=109&#38;tbnw=127&#38;prev=/images%3Fq%3D5870%26ndsp%3D18%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN%26start%3D1"><img style="border:1px solid;" src="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:QLt1zgVX1ankiM:http://www.hardware-infos.com/img/startseite/klein/hd5870_5.jpg" alt="" width="127" height="109" /></a>Συγκεκριμένα σύμφωνα με τα τελευταία νέα που μας έρχονται από το εξωτερικό τα παιδιά από το Ολλανδικό site Τweakers.net κατάφεραν να σπάσουν το παγκόσμιο ρεκόρ στο μετροπρόγραμμα 3DMark03 πετυχαίνοντας 183959 3D Marks. To νέο παγκόσμιο ρεκόρ επιτεύχθηκε με τρεις κάρτες γραφικών 5870 και έναν <a class="zem_slink" title="Xeon" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xeon">Xeon</a> W3540 ο οποίος ήταν χρονισμένος στα 5231ΜΗz. Να σας θυμίσουμε ότι το προηγούμενο παγκόσμιο ρεκόρ είχε πραγματοποιηθεί με τρείς <a class="zem_slink" title="Radeon" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon">ATI Radeon</a> 4890.[<a href="http://www.hwbox.gr/news/6201-tweakers-net-pragmatopoiise-neo-pagkosmio-rekor-sto-3dmark03-me-treis-5870-a.html">next]</a></p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top:10px;height:15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/4e8f32be-260c-8a6f-af9a-2a07576179d7/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border:medium none;float:right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=4e8f32be-260c-8a6f-af9a-2a07576179d7" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[09/09/09: Benchmarking the GTS250.]]></title>
<link>http://daishirokisame.wordpress.com/2009/09/10/090909-benchmarking-the-gts250/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Honoo</dc:creator>
<guid>http://daishirokisame.wordpress.com/2009/09/10/090909-benchmarking-the-gts250/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ITT: PCs. So yesterday I acquired 3DMark06 for benchmarking purposes. Benchmarking using 3DMark06. I]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div id="attachment_534" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://daishirokisame.wordpress.com/files/2009/09/miku-pc-room.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-534" title="miku-pc-room" src="http://daishirokisame.wordpress.com/files/2009/09/miku-pc-room.jpg?w=300" alt="miku-pc-room" width="300" height="187" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">ITT: PCs.</p></div>
<p>So yesterday I acquired 3DMark06 for benchmarking purposes.</p>
<p><!--more-->Benchmarking using 3DMark06. I have 3DMark Vantage but I don&#8217;t dare to use it, furthermore I&#8217;m running benchmarks on the PC which is running Windows XP.</p>
<p>Right now I have no other benchmarking methods available other than 3DMark06.</p>
<p><strong>Hardware Specifications:</strong></p>
<p>CPU &#8211; Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 2.2GHz<br />
Memory &#8211; 2GB DDR2-667<br />
Graphics &#8211;  ZOTAC NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 1024MB GDDR3<br />
Operating System &#8211; Windows XP SP3<br />
Test Resolution: 1280 x 1024, 32 bits color, 75 Hertz refresh rate</p>
<p><strong>Software used:</strong></p>
<p>Zotac Firestorm (for overclocking)<br />
GPU-Z ver 0.3.4 (for comparison purposes)<br />
3DMark06 (benchmarking purposes)</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 322px"><a href="http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/9753/baseclocksetting.gif"><img title="baseset" src="http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/9753/baseclocksetting.gif" alt="Base clock speeds." width="312" height="371" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Base clock speeds.</p></div>
<p>3DMark Score: 6795 points</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 322px"><a href="http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/7007/oc1r.gif"><img title="oc1" src="http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/7007/oc1r.gif" alt="" width="312" height="371" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Overclocking round 1.</p></div>
<p>3DMark Score: 6851 points</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 322px"><a href="http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/9479/oc2r.gif"><img title="oc2" src="http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/9479/oc2r.gif" alt="" width="312" height="371" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Overclocking round 2.</p></div>
<p>This is the maximum possible I can get, as during the tests my graphic card seems to be hitting its limits, and my monitor began to flicker some anomalies during the test runs.</p>
<p>3DMark Score: 6963 points</p>
<p>I realized that while performance in the HDR/SM3.0 section of the tests continue to improve with the increment of clock speeds, things are not the same in the Shader Model 2.0 aspect in the tests, with the base clock speeds winning out over the overclocked speeds, yet I can&#8217;t tell whether the differences made can be dismissed as small or not.</p>
<p>CPU tests, with my current C2D E4500, are horrible; averaging 0.5 fps for the first CPU test and 0.9 fps for the second test. Enough said.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Δώρο το 3D Mark Vantage με κάθε αγορά Viper II]]></title>
<link>http://xollothnews.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/%ce%b4%cf%8e%cf%81%ce%bf-%cf%84%ce%bf-3d-mark-vantage-%ce%bc%ce%b5-%ce%ba%ce%ac%ce%b8%ce%b5-%ce%b1%ce%b3%ce%bf%cf%81%ce%ac-viper-ii/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>xollothnews</dc:creator>
<guid>http://xollothnews.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/%ce%b4%cf%8e%cf%81%ce%bf-%cf%84%ce%bf-3d-mark-vantage-%ce%bc%ce%b5-%ce%ba%ce%ac%ce%b8%ce%b5-%ce%b1%ce%b3%ce%bf%cf%81%ce%ac-viper-ii/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Enthusiasts Corner (Ειδήσεις) &#8211; Δώρο το 3D Mark Vantage με κάθε αγορά Viper II Η Viper έχει θέ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><a href="http://enthusiastscorner.com/news_full_thread.php?view&#38;post_id=600">Enthusiasts Corner (Ειδήσεις) &#8211; Δώρο το 3D Mark Vantage με κάθε αγορά Viper II</a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://img.neoseeker.com/n/0/ddr3_tri_channel_viper_ii_300px.jpg&#38;imgrefurl=http://www.neoseeker.com/news/categories/23/&#38;usg=__5ZO-O5e6eK0FOPWvy52Mk1F-Bt4=&#38;h=263&#38;w=300&#38;sz=73&#38;hl=en&#38;start=5&#38;tbnid=n-DUQqma1QQ2PM:&#38;tbnh=102&#38;tbnw=116&#38;prev=/images%3Fq%3DViper%2BII%26ndsp%3D18%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN%26start%3D1"><img style="border:1px solid;" src="http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:n-DUQqma1QQ2PM:http://img.neoseeker.com/n/0/ddr3_tri_channel_viper_ii_300px.jpg" alt="" width="116" height="102" /></a>Η Viper έχει θέσει στόχο τις μέγιστες δυνατές επιδόσεις για τον υποψήφιο αγοραστή των προϊόντων της και με κάθε σετ από μνήμες της σειράς Viper II του παραδίδει και το πλήρες μετροπρόγραμμα της <a class="zem_slink" title="Futuremark" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futuremark">FutureMark</a>, το 3D Mark Vantage! Τα set αυτά θα είναι βασισμένα σε μνήμες τεχνολογίας DDR2 και χωρητικότητας 4 GigaBytes έκαστο. Σύμφωνα με την εταιρεία, οι μνήμες αυτές είναι τα απαραίτητα εργαλεία για την “οικοδόμηση” ενός υπολογιστή “απόλυτων” επιδόσεων και θα διατίθενται σε εκδόσεις των 800 και 1066 ΜHz.<a href="http://enthusiastscorner.com/news_full_thread.php?view&#38;post_id=600">[next]</a></p></blockquote>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top:10px;height:15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/53b28078-f317-803f-bdd8-2aedd3d7b641/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border:medium none;float:right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=53b28078-f317-803f-bdd8-2aedd3d7b641" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hidden Windows XP options to boost speed]]></title>
<link>http://mswt.wordpress.com/2009/08/02/hidden-windows-xp-options-to-boost-speed/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Neel Chauhan</dc:creator>
<guid>http://mswt.wordpress.com/2009/08/02/hidden-windows-xp-options-to-boost-speed/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Windows XP is slow and you don&#8217;t know much about hardware, can&#8217;t overclock, or you can]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Windows XP is slow and you don&#8217;t know much about hardware, can&#8217;t overclock, or you can&#8217;t do any memory upgrade, these hidden options will help you boost speed, save power, save money, and increase battery life on a laptop. If you do this on a extreme gaming PC, you will get extreme 3DMarks too.</p>
<ol>
<li>Go to the Start menu in the Accessories \ Systm Tools Section</li>
<li>Click on Disk Cleanup</li>
<li>Click on More Options</li>
<li>Click on Clean Up in the System Restore Section and respond &#8220;Yes&#8221;</li>
<li>Ckick on Disk Cleanup</li>
<li>Select Everything and click on OK and respond &#8220;Yes&#8221;</li>
<li>Rignt Click on My Computer</li>
<li>Go to the Advanced Tab</li>
<li>Click on Settings in the Preformance Section</li>
<li>Deselect options which are useless to you</li>
<li>Click on Apply and OK on both Windows</li>
<li>Go to the control panel and click on &#8220;Add or Remove Programs&#8221;</li>
<li>Uninstall useless applications (Do not uninstall drivers)</li>
<li>Click on &#8220;Add/Remove Windows Components&#8221;</li>
<li>Deselect applications you don&#8217;t need and select applications you want</li>
<li>Click on Next</li>
<li>Restart your system</li>
</ol>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AMD Athlon II x2 250 Review - Part 2]]></title>
<link>http://gamingpcblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/21/amd-athlon-ii-x2-250-review-part-2/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>custompcmax</dc:creator>
<guid>http://gamingpcblog.wordpress.com/2009/07/21/amd-athlon-ii-x2-250-review-part-2/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[If you missed part one &#8211; AMD Athlon II x2 250 Review &#8211; Part 1 Well, here is PART TWO of ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you missed part one &#8211; AMD Athlon II x2 250 Review &#8211; Part 1 Well, here is PART TWO of ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Overclock.pl &amp; SAPPHIRE Technology: Weź udział w 3D Challenge!]]></title>
<link>http://xteam7.wordpress.com/2009/06/24/overclock-pl-sapphire-technology-wez-udzial-w-3d-challenge/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>PrX</dc:creator>
<guid>http://xteam7.wordpress.com/2009/06/24/overclock-pl-sapphire-technology-wez-udzial-w-3d-challenge/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Witamy w trzecim wymiarze! Redakcja Overclock.pl, serwisu technologicznego z ugruntowaną pozycją na ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Witamy w trzecim wymiarze! Redakcja Overclock.pl, serwisu technologicznego z ugruntowaną pozycją na ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Street Fighter IV Benchmark]]></title>
<link>http://nvidiathepoweroffuture.wordpress.com/2009/06/18/street-fighter-iv-benchmark/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ppinheiro</dc:creator>
<guid>http://nvidiathepoweroffuture.wordpress.com/2009/06/18/street-fighter-iv-benchmark/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Este benchmark é uma ferramenta da Capcom para testar as capacidades do teu PC para o lançamento do ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Este benchmark é uma ferramenta da Capcom para testar as capacidades do teu PC para o lançamento do ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[YouGamers: Game-o-meter]]></title>
<link>http://epicfailureblog.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/yougamers-game-o-meter/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>killer182</dc:creator>
<guid>http://epicfailureblog.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/yougamers-game-o-meter/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Hoje gostaria de mostrar a vocês um site muito parecido com o Can You Run It, ele se chama YouGamers]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if gte mso 9]&#62;  Normal 0 21   false false false        MicrosoftInternetExplorer4  &#60;![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]&#62;   &#60;![endif]--> Hoje gostaria de mostrar a vocês um site muito parecido com o Can You Run It, ele se chama YouGamers eu o achei a alguns meses atrás mas só agora que e eu o adicionei na coluna com os sites recomendados e vou explicar o porque que ele esta aqui.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">Primeiramente o Can You Run It não é atualizado a um bom tempo, eu acho que quem o atualizava sumiu, e o Game-o-meter do YouGamers não só esta mais atualizado como é muito mais completo, por exemplo eles não só dão as informações necessárias para um jogo rodar que o Publlisher recomendou, mas também dão as suas próprias recomendações, aqui esta as recomendações de Demigod como exemplo:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.uploadimagens.com/upload/0d7d4bf6ef7c0fd607aba5fe08e844ec.jpg" border="1" alt="upload imagens" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Após rodar o programa ele demonstra através dos números usados acima 1,2,3 e 4 onde o seu computador se localiza:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.uploadimagens.com/upload/2fb7755565490dea289076cfb4520c10.jpg" border="1" alt="upload imagens" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Como ele é bem preciso resolvi coloca-lo aqui para outros se beneficiarem desse ótimo site, ele é totalmente confiável então quando o navegador perguntar se pode rodar o Java clique em Run.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Espero que tenham gostado para entrar na pagina principal onde também tem Reviews e noticias clique <a href="http://www.yougamers.com/">aqui</a> e se quiser entrar no Games-o-meter clique <a href="http://www.yougamers.com/gameometer/10329/">aqui</a> ou na coluna ao lado no YouGamers Game-o-meter.</p>
<p>Fui!!!!!!1!!!!11!!!!one!!!!!™</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
