<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>a-private-view &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/a-private-view/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "a-private-view"</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 04:37:04 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[A private view]]></title>
<link>http://nativeiowan.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/a-private-view/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 05:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>nativeiowan</dc:creator>
<guid>http://nativeiowan.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/a-private-view/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A Private View There has been much said about the need to focus our attention on the “youth” of our ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>A Private View</p>
<p>There has been much said about the need to focus our attention on the “youth” of our Nation. There has been much said about the need to create jobs, the need to extend the commercial base from the Nation&#8217;s urban areas into the rural sector. There has been much said about the need to engage our youthful citizenry before we lose them.</p>
<p>Job creation is a difficult “nut to crack”. Especially in an Island Nation like ours. An Island Nation where the majority of our citizenry are rural based, minimally educated and growing at an aggressive rate.</p>
<p>It may be wise to review our situation before we “jump in the deep end” and start dreaming too much about “job creation”:</p>
<p>�     What kinds of jobs are we talking about, for the Solomons, right now? And into the future?</p>
<p>�     What impediments are we facing that inhibit or prohibit job creation?</p>
<p>�     Where should these jobs be?</p>
<p>�     What skill-sets do we need to a) immediately move to increase the total number of jobs available, and b) create new jobs into the foreseeable future?</p>
<p>From an Employer’s point of view there are a couple very strong positives, as well as a number of strong negatives, herein:</p>
<p>!   The employee-base we currently have is characterized by:</p>
<ul>
<li>A low level of formal education</li>
<li>A high level of basic manual skills</li>
<li>A low level of technical skills</li>
<li>A keen sense of willingness</li>
</ul>
<p>!   The job market we currently live in is characterized by:</p>
<ul>
<li>Most positions offered are of a menial or manual labor nature</li>
<li>Short term or transient employment versus long term or career based employment</li>
<li>Jobs are centralized in a very few number of urban centers</li>
<li>Training being required for most positions above menial levels</li>
</ul>
<p>So, from an employer’s point of view the easiest positions to fill are those that are unskilled. Any job an employer may have that require a skilled employee means that the employer must either import the skill-set required or train employees into the required skill-sets.</p>
<p>Training employees is an important part of business but there are detractors here, namely, the fact that employees do not traditionally stay with a single job for their whole career.  This means that an Employer must be prepared to train again and again to fill even basic jobs.</p>
<p>Additionally the fact that most jobs are concentrated in the urban centers means there are issues with housing, home leave allowances, wontoks, etc, etc.</p>
<p>This takes us back to our questions above:</p>
<p>�     What kinds of jobs are we talking about, for the Solomon’s, right now? And into the future?</p>
<ul>
<li>The question here may be begging a two-fold answer; we need unskilled jobs now and we must raise our skill levels so we can field more skilled employees as we move forward.</li>
</ul>
<p>�     What impediments are we facing that inhibit or prohibit job creation?</p>
<ul>
<li>Again the answer is multifaceted; we need to review those laws that control employment aiming to make them modern and functional for both the Employees and the Employer while, consciously, bringing the mentality of both the Employer and the Employee (and the Government) into the 21<sup>st</sup> century.</li>
</ul>
<p>�     Where should these jobs be?</p>
<ul>
<li>We know that by default most jobs are in urban settings thus, perhaps, a dual approach of small business/ job creation in the rural areas combined with continued industrial and service based commercial developments into the urban areas.</li>
</ul>
<p>�     What skill-sets do we need to a) immediately move to increase the total number of jobs available, and b) create new jobs into the foreseeable future?</p>
<ul>
<li>Skilled employment is what we are in need of. But we are an agrarian society. A combination of career oriented Employees working in the skilled employment market AND unskilled, transient or seasonal Employees for sectors such as agriculture, logging, mining, etc.</li>
</ul>
<p>It has been said in the press many times: The job of Central Government is to develop and maintain basic infrastructure and services. The job of the Private Sector is to create jobs. We need good roads, and more roads. We need wharfs, airstrips, a functioning telecommunication network, water, power, law and order.</p>
<p>The Private Sector of the Solomons has proven itself to be resilient, adaptable and committed. Private Business fuels the Central Government. The tripartite cooperation of the Government, the Employees and the Employers is required in order for consistent forward growth and positive gains to be made.</p>
<p>It is not a difficult formula.</p>
<p>Perhaps the tripartite backbone of the Nation, the Government, the Employees and the Employers should meet and discuss the future? No one of the three can effect change on their own. It requires a combined, premeditated cooperation of all three before we will see honest and sustainable changes, growth and benefits for all.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA["Aanrijding in Moscou" op Semaine de la Critique in Cannes]]></title>
<link>http://aolfilm.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/aanrijding-in-moscou-op-semaine-de-la-critique-in-cannes/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>aolblogt</dc:creator>
<guid>http://aolfilm.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/aanrijding-in-moscou-op-semaine-de-la-critique-in-cannes/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Aanrijding in Moscou&#8221;, het filmdebuut van regisseur Christophe Van Rompaey, is geselect]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>&#8220;Aanrijding in Moscou&#8221;, het filmdebuut van regisseur Christophe Van Rompaey, is geselecteerd voor de 47e editie van de Semaine de la Critique van het Internationaal Filmfestival van Cannes, dat dit jaar van 14 tot 25 mei plaatsvindt. Dat meldt het Vlaams Audiovisueel Fonds (VAF) donderdag. &#8220;Deze selectie is een geweldig kwaliteitslabel voor onze film&#8221;, zegt producent Jean-Claude Van Rijckeghem van het Gentse productiehuis A Private View. &#8220;Het betekent dat de film nu alle kansen heeft om ook in het buitenland een breed publiek te vinden&#8221;. De dramatische komedie speelt zich af in een volkswijk aan de rand van Gent en vertelt het verhaal van Matty (Barbara Sarafian), een door het leven getekende vrouw van 41. Na een banale botsing op een parking van een grootwarenhuis raakt ze verbaal én emotioneel in de clinch met de veel jongere truckchauffeur Johnny (Jurgen Delnaet). In Vlaanderen kwam &#8220;Aanrijding in Moscou&#8221; eind januari 2008 in de zalen en haalde meteen de absolute top qua bioscoopbezoek. In Gent liet de film negen weken lang alle Amerikaanse concurrentie achter zich. Het is sinds 1995, met &#8220;Manneken Pis&#8221; (Frank Van Passel), geleden dat er een Vlaamse speelfilm geselecteerd werd voor deze oudste en belangrijkste nevensectie van het filmfestival.</p>
<div class="logoMarginTop" style="text-align:right;"><em>Copyright(c) Belga 2007 &#8211; 2008</em>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA["Aanrijding in Moscou" trok al meer dan 100.000 bezoekers]]></title>
<link>http://aolfilm.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/aanrijding-in-moscou-trok-al-meer-dan-100000-bezoekers/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>aolblogt</dc:creator>
<guid>http://aolfilm.wordpress.com/2008/03/03/aanrijding-in-moscou-trok-al-meer-dan-100000-bezoekers/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Vijf weken na de bioscooprelease heeft de romantische komedie &#8220;Aanrijding in Moscou&#8221; de]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p> Vijf weken na de bioscooprelease heeft de romantische komedie &#8220;Aanrijding in Moscou&#8221; de gouden kaap bereikt van 100.000 bezoekers. De prent was in zijn vijfde weekend nog steeds nummer drie in Vlaanderen. Al 106.023 mensen gingen intussen naar de film kijken, zo meldt Kinepolis Film Distribution. &#8220;Aanrijding in Moscou&#8221; is het speeldebuut van Christophe van Rompaey met Barbara Sarafian, Jurgen Delnaet en Johan Heldenbergh in de hoofdrollen. Het verhaal gaat over de 41-jarige huismoeder Matty (Barbara Sarafian) en de 29-jarige trucker Johnny (Jurgen Delnaet). Ze rijden elkaar aan op het parkeerterrein van een supermarkt en krijgen ruzie over wie nu eigenlijk in fout was.<br />
De film werd geproduceerd door productiehuis A Private View (van &#8220;Man Zkt Vrouw&#8221; en &#8220;Verlengd Weekend&#8221;) en werd geregisseerd door Christophe van Rompaey naar een scenario van Jean-Claude Van Rijckeghem en Pat van Beirs.</p>
<div class="logoMarginTop" align="right"><i>Copyright(c) Belga 2007 &#8211; 2008</i></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
