Sheikh Abu Hamza(May Allah hasten his release) speaks about the issue of evil scholars and democracy, illustrating how both of them have similarities to the magicians of Farun:

Hate preacher Abu Hamza secretly gives lectures on Islam… through the water pipes of his prison cell

Hate preacher Abu Hamza is delivering extremist sermons to prisoners through the water pipes of his cell, it has been claimed.The Muslim cleric is defying a preaching ban imposed by prison bosses to radicalise inmates.He is able to give his lectures through the plumbing that connects to neighbouring cells in Belmarsh Prison.

The Quilliam Foundation, a counter-extremism think-tank, has called for the 51-year-old to be removed from the mainstream prison population.Its report on growing prison radicalisation says the authorities have tried to stop him giving sermons openly. But a source told the thinktank that Egyptian-born Hamza has found a way to talk to his fellow inmates – through the pipes.

The news comes as it was revealed prison bosses spent £650 on new sink taps in Hamza’s cell. At taxpayers’ expense, plumbers spent two days replacing the standard twist taps that Hamza has used for five years with new chrome lever ones.

They are designed to be easier for the preacher to use than standard taps. He has worn a prosthetic arm since losing both arms and an eye in an explosion in Afghanistan.

Hamza is being held at Belmarsh pending extradition having served his sentence.He was jailed for seven years in February 2006 for preaching hate and inciting murder at Finsbury Park Mosque in North London.But with a reduced sentence and taking time spent on remand into account, Hamza would now normally be eligible for release.

But U.S. prosecutors want him to stand trial on terrorism charges. Hamza is appealing to the Court of Human Rights.

The TaxPayers’ Alliance estimates father-of-eight Hamza has cost Britain £2.75million in welfare payments, council housing, NHS and prison bills, trials and legal appeals.

It is feared his fight against deportation could take five years and cost another £250,000. MAIL

HOOK-handed hate preacher Abu Hamza WILL be sent to the US for his terror trial, a court ruled yesterday.

The bearded extremist is set to be extradited to face justice for supporting al-Qaeda plots and helping set up terror training camps.Hamza, 49, faces nine charges. Home Secretary Jacqui Smith is expected to rubber stamp the extradition within days. But Judge Timothy Workman told City of Westminster JPs he will NOT face the death penalty or be flung in Guantanamo Bay.

Hamza was last night returned to London’s Belmarsh prison – where he is serving a seven-year sentence after being convicted of soliciting murder and inciting racial hatred in February.The Egyptian-born cleric was orginally seized on an extradition warrant issued by the US government in May 2004. The US legal process was frozen until Hamza’s Old Bailey trial and failed appeals.

If he is found guilty Stateside he will be sent back to the UK to finish his term – then shunted to the US. His lawyers said yesterday they will apply for the US trial to take place here.

by paulabowles

For the past few weeks the British media and public have hotly been debating the rights and wrongs of allowing the controversial British National Party [BNP] leader to appear on the BBC’s ‘flagship’ politics programme Question Time. Despite attempts to halt Nick Griffin’s appearance, the programme finally aired on Thursday 22 October 2009, with record viewing figures of 8 million.

Since the broadcast, media analysis has been at fever pitch in an attempt to make sense of the reality. Against the backdrop of debates over freedom of speech and right wing rhetoric, as well as accusations of Holocaust denial and racism, Griffin has announced he will be making a complaint over his treatment by the programme.

In essence, Griffin insists that the format of the programme was changed in order to focus purely on his party’s policies on immigration and race, leaving him facing little more than a ‘lynch mob.’ Although, many commentators have suggested that his appearance has irrevocably tarnished the limited credibility of the BNP, others have argued that he should never have been allowed to appear in the first place. Interestingly, the BNP insist that their membership has increased since Griffin’s appearance. Needless to say the debate will run for some considerable time, dragging the issue of freedom of speech once more into the spotlight.

Read more

Tanya Golash-Boza on A Confluence of Interests in Immigration Enforcement: How Politicians, the Media, and Corporations Profit from Immigration Policies Destined to Fail

Amir Saeed on Media, Racism and Islamophobia: The Representation of Islam and Muslims in the Media

North London Central Mosque, Finsbury Park

A local man has revealed his concerns about the possibility of Islamic extremists living in the London Borough of Islington.

The North London Central (NLC) Mosque on St. Thomas’s Road, Finsbury Park was at the centre of police investigations into alleged links with Al-Qaeda in 2002.

It is best known for its contacts to controversial cleric Abu Hamza Al-Masri, who was jailed for seven years in 2006 after being found guilty of inciting murder and racial hatred during his sermons held at the Mosque.

“The community has been rebuilt”

A representative from the NLC Mosque was not available for comment but Mohamed Abdelhalim, Operations Manager at nearby ‘Muslim Welfare House’ said, “after the damaging links to Al-Qaeda and terrorism, the congregations at both our Mosques became a lot smaller. But it doesn’t affect us anymore, the community has been rebuilt.”

Despite an increase in the numbers of worshippers at both Mosques in the Finsbury Park area and a new management structure at the NLC Mosque, some locals are still worried about the legacy of Islamic extremism in the area.

A member of the congregation at the NLC Mosque who wished to remain anonymous remembers being turned away in 2002 by supporters of the extremist Imam Abu Hamza. Since that time he said

“Things at the Mosque have improved greatly, but I am still worried. You cannot tell what might happen. It’s very likely there are still extremists in the area, which is a problem for everyone”.

By Nick Higgins

A local man has revealed his concerns about the possibility of Islamic extremists living in the London Borough of Islington.

The North London Central (NLC) Mosque on St. Thomas’s Road, Finsbury Park was at the centre of police investigations into alleged links with Al-Qaeda in 2002.

It is best known for its contacts to controversial cleric Abu Hamza Al-Masri, who was jailed for seven years in 2006 after being found guilty of inciting murder and racial hatred during his sermons held at the Mosque.

“The community has been rebuilt”

A representative from the NLC Mosque was not available for comment but Mohamed Abdelhalim, Operations Manager at nearby ‘Muslim Welfare House’ said, “after the damaging links to Al-Qaeda and terrorism, the congregations at both our Mosques became a lot smaller. But it doesn’t affect us anymore, the community has been rebuilt.”

Despite an increase in the numbers of worshippers at both Mosques in the Finsbury Park area and a new management structure at the NLC Mosque, some locals are still worried about the legacy of Islamic extremism in the area.

A member of the congregation at the NLC Mosque who wished to remain anonymous remembers being turned away in 2002 by supporters of the extremist Imam Abu Hamza. Since that time he said,

“Things at the Mosque have improved greatly, but I am still worried. You cannot tell what might happen. It’s very likely there are still extremists in the area, which is a problem for everyone”.

By Nick Higgins

Asking a legitimate question doesn’t guarantee a legitimate answer. Families bereaved due to acts of terrorism are often treated appallingly when they ask for a detailed explanation of how their loved ones died. If the bereaved family is content to accept government assurances that their loved ones were killed by Al Qaida or its affiliates, and that that organisation is led by Osama bn Laden, who is still alive, hiding out somewhere – but still plotting – then the government will be pleased to exploit that family’s tragedy as the incident is woven into the mythological fabric of a particular nation state. There can be televised funerals, lots of flag-waving, tears, grief – but please, no awkward questions. Don’t ask any, you know, security related questions – especially national security related questions. We must protect our sources, and not reveal how we gathered any intelligence, the government will claim. When all else fails and the questions are becoming too pertinent then sensetive intelligence sharing agreements with the U.S. will be given as the reason why a particular piece of information cannot be disclosed to the bereaved family.

Bereaved family members need to be allowed to go through the various stages of grief with as much care and consideration as humanly possible. That is because if they do not get past the initial anger at their loss, they will never progress to the final stage of the grieving process which is closure. If, for example, a bereaved family member’s anger at the murder of their loved one ends up consuming them, then the terrorists will have claimed another victim. One essential way to help bereaved family members deal with their loss is to tell them the truth at all times and if they want detailed answers then give them.
If the bereaved family member is not given the truth then they can be emotionally crippled by their loss – or are forced against their will to campaign for the truth as is the case of Jim Swire in the Lockerbie case.

Of course bereaved family members are not the only people to suffer because of acts of terrorism. Also directly affected are those injured in the attack and their families and friends. It is not necessary to point out to readers of this report that injuries to innocent bystanders are often horrendous. It should be pointed out, however, that many victims of terrorism end up losing their legs. This happened in the blasts of 7/7 and also the Bali attack of 2002. Losing one or even both legs would surely be a devastating loss for anyone, and if they were not given truthful answers to any questions they pose then the psychological trauma they are suffering will get worse. Injured people and their families also need to go through a grieving process of their own and recover as best they can. But the physical recovery process and the emotional recovery process are in fact two separate processes and at the same time a single process. Providing truthful information to all the various victims of terrorism is, therefore, an essential moral duty. There can be no exceptions, whatever belief system you hold.

With the above in mind, it is also necessary to avoid developing senseless conspiracy theories which may anger victims of terrorism and slow down their road to recovery. If the facts are quite clear, that a particular group carried out an attack for a particular reason, then suggesting otherwise only causes further grief. Imagine how bereaved family members would feel when confronted with some of the conspiracy theories prevelant in America. They might hear, for example, that their loved ones didn’t really die aboard Flights 11, 175, 77 or 93 but were all murdered later by government agents. They might hear, as another example, that the Twin Towers were demolished by explosives planted by the U.S. government. If they don’t have a science background and are not able to easily refute any particular conspiracy theory then they become enraged, unable to move forward in the direction that closure will bring.

Australian tourists visiting the resort island of Bali are sometimes accused of not respecting local culture, parading around the beaches semi-naked, getting drunk and riding rented motorcycles in a dangerous manner. To say that Indonesia’s Muslims are the only ones upset at this behaviour is not really accurate as many Balinese don’t like the behaviour either. Balinese people are not predominantly Muslim but practise their own version of Hindhuism which incorporates some indigenous animist traditions. The Balinese economy has nonetheless grown significantly since the advent of commercial passenger flights. An increase in visitors allowed the Balinese hospitality industry to grow significantly and previously unsealed roads were sealed. Not all the effects of tourism were beneficial, however, and it is sometimes suggested that Balinese traditional dancers, for example, have lost their tradional role within Balinese society as they now perform mostly for the tourists. As a way of summing up this perspective, it should be noted that in the second part of the last century, Bali became exposed to the rest of the world in a way that had not occurred previously. A tradional economy became a capitalist economy. The violence that rocked Indonesia in the 1960’s also had a significant impact on the development of Balinese society.

Within the above context it should be agreed that some visitors did behave inappropriately but some behaved very well. The well-behaved tourists were officially welcomed at the airport by Indonesian government employees and the Balinese themselves made a conscious effort to be welcoming, friendly and courteous. Australians who ventured overseas for the first time and found themselves at Denpassar airport also discovered for the first time in their lives that they didn’t belong to the dominant culture anymore; they had to fit in with their European or American counterparts and with the people who owned the island. For a young person who has never left one of the major Australian cities, this can be the first step on the path to a better personal understanding of the world.

Nevertheless, in late 2002, a group of terrorists identified by the Australian government as Islamic fundamentalists, attacked Bali and caused the deaths of nearly 200 mostly young Australians. The Australian government adopted the rather peculiar position of disagreeing with a joint Indonesian/FBI forensic investigation which found traces of C4 plastic explosive residue at the site of the attack. Indonesian police spokesman Brigadier-General Saleh Saaf said: “We have together with experts from the FBI processed the data jointly and we are now really certain that C4 explosive was used”. It is important to note at this point that the data was jointly processed, which could mean that experts from the FBI and Indonesian police both participated in tests – but which could also mean that tests conducted by the FBI were confirmed by Indonesian tests or vica versa Readers are advised to study the BBC report to get a better understanding of the investigation.

One sigificant suggestion in the report is that the discovery of C4 at the site “ prompted speculation that if Islamic militants carried out the bombing, they may have had some help from elements in the Indonesian military which have been involved with resurgent radical Islamic groups since the fall of General Suharto in 1998.” Because C4 is primarily a military grade explosive which is a lot harder to get hold of than agricultural fertiliser or even TNT, the use of C4 would tend to suggest the attackers had access to military resources, which is difficult to reconcile with the attack being carried out solely by homegrown radicals. The Prime Minister of Australia at the time, John Howard, appeared on national television and said that the Australian Federal Government and the Australian Federal police were unable to conclude that C4 explosive residue had been found and disagreed with any suggestion that C4 residue had been found. The trouble for this argument was, however, that the conclusion that C4 been found was confirmed by two of the world’s most experienced police forces as a result of a joint investigation. Was the Australian Prime Minister suggesting that the joint FBI/Indonesian investigation had conducted unscientific tests or that the results were tainted? Was he suggesting that the FBI/Indonesians were for some reason incapable of conducting scientific forensic tests? Was the Australian Prime Minister rejecting the conclusion that C4 explosive residue had been found at the blast site for less than honest reasons; perhaps because even to speculate that the attackers had access to military resources was unacceptable from a political point of view?

An alternative hypothesis emerges at this point. Perhaps the suggestion that C4 explosive residue had been found was a lie in the first place, conconcted by the FBI and elements within the Indonesian police force to exert pressure on elements within the Indonesian armed forces who were openly supporting Islamic radicals, especially in Arce, via an Archinese operative known as Abu Jihad. Indonesian Security Forces, widely criticised in Australia for their role in the Dili graveyard massacre and their alleged participation in communal strife in the Mallaccas on the side of the Muslims, could be seen in this light as being the recipients of a payback. Perhaps the allegation wasn’t meant to stick, with a single unequivical Australian objection to the results of the forensic tests. Perhaps – but I don’t think so for two specific reasons.

In 2003 or 2004 an SBS Dateline programme aired on Australian television with some fanfare prior to the programme’s scheduled airing which hyped the suggestion that the Australian Government were not at all happy with SBS about the programme’s content and had unsuccessfully tried to ban the programme through the courts on the grounds that it disclosed, you know, national security secrets. Now anyone who can remember Abdurrahman ad-Dakhil Wahid, the half-blind Indonesian President, could only describe him as an enigmatic, animated character. But in a quite remarkable segment of the programme, which unfortunately I was unable to record, the President of the Indonesian Republic suggested that perhaps the plans of Amrozi, Iman Samudra and Ali Gufron had been discovered by the Indonesian military who then conspired to make sure the attack caused maximimum carnage, making sure C4 was used to increase the bomb’s damage. In his own words the Indonesian President suggested this possibility and then the next moment said that he, of course, was suggesting no such thing. In Abdurrahman ad-Dakhil Wahid’s unique style he was, in fact, making a suggestion – and then stating that that would be the farthest thing from his mind. It was a clever ploy but it was not one which could be seen as having only one interpretation. He was, in effect, putting elements of the Indonesian Security Forces on notice that they were under scrutiny. At this stage it is only fair to say that the jury was out about whether C4 had been used in the device which caused so much carnage on the island of Bali.

By now the many visitors to this blog will be aware of the story of Omar Hamza Jenvey, the ex Indian intel, FSB stooge who recently reverted to Islam, the true religion of God. Because Islam recognises Christians and Jews as true people of the book we are making this information available to you, in the hope that you will indeed revert to Islam, which is the only way to save yourselves from hell. We hope that you will recognise these words as being a sincere attempt to tell you the truth, and what you make of it is decided by Almighty Allah, The Lord of the Worlds. Omar Hamza Jenvey was in fact still an FSB/Indian intel operative at the time the Bali bombings. He spent his life conspiring against the true believers and attempting to frame them up. Despite his despicable actions, Allah has blessed him with a thousand blessings. Allah has accepted his sins and allowed him to enter into the fold of Islam, which always endeavours to spread the truth, no matter what the consequences are. But as a consequence of accepting Islam, Allah has decreed that formerly dishonest operatives who accept Islam must be truthful in their future encounters. They must obviate their past sins by being truthful in the future, praying five times a day, giving money to charity, going to Mecca and maintaining a fast in Ramaddan. In my opinion and not that of Islamic scholars they should also be prepared to extend the Muslim hand-shake to any other Muslim and be friendly and courteous, not forgetting to extend the mandatory Salaam Aleikum.

It is tempting to ask Mr Omar Hamza Jenvey what really happened in Bali. Because I’ve found information which requires urgent action. The bereaved relatives will not be able to have a hope in hell of getting their lives together with these questions hovering their heads. Please tell them the truth and let their grieving process for the relatives reach its ultimate goal which is closure.

I often get replies to these posts when I get my head together, stay honest and get on with the truth. Sometimes these posts contain, you know, national security information. What is important to realise is that as far as Australians are concerned, we have freedom of speech implied but not written into the Australian constitution. We obviously need help from Omar Hamza Jenvey and others to help bereaved family members overcome their grief. The following two links are of vital interest for anyone attempting to uncover the truth about the Bali bombings and the terrible carnage they caused. Sometimes replying in the normal manner via either operation_breaklock@yahoo.com.au or andreweslazak@yahoo.com.au is not appropriate, either. In that case please encrypt a blank txt message and send it to the aforementioned email addresses at your pleasure. Also the key

http://web.archive.org/web/20030619161847/www.supportersofshariah.co.uk/yemen.html

The above link opens a page of one of Glen Jenvey’s sites. Glen Jenvey was the name Omar Hamza Jenvey went by before he reverted to Islam. It seems that in his work as an agent of the Crusaders Mr Jenvey came across information which suggested that not only had C4 been used in the Bali bombing but the C4 came from the same batch as the C4 used in the USS Cole attack. Whether Mr Jenvey overheard this or was privy to any more detailed information is neither here nor there. What we are appealing for here is information which must be accepted with an open mind. We are confident we will receive information on this issue because giving us information is the right thing to do. Please don’t allow the victims of the Bali bombing to suffer a similar pack of lies as given to grieving families in the Lockerbie case.

Was Glen Jenvey so obsessed with Abu Hamza that he was prepared to blame him for almost anything? Please don’t forget that Mr Jenvey has in the past claimed that Abu Hamza was the architect of 9/11 and not OBL. Let’s not forget Mr John Loftus’ claim that Abu Hamza recruited radicals to fight in Kosovo for MI6. We know about the C4 used in the USS Cole attack but was C4 used in Bali as well and if so was it the same batch. Where does the batch trace back to? Questions, questions. Legitimate questions. Please help provide the answers.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/2329189.stm

Nu tar Sverigedemokraternas partiledare av sig masken och visar vad partiet står för – ren rasism.

Då är det på sin plats att påminna om att partiet så nyligt som i Kyrkovalet 2009 lät sig representeras av kandidater med ett politiskt förflutet i Nordiska Rikspartiet och Nationaldemokraterna. Det är också viktigt att framhålla vad Jimmie Åkesson svarade när han konfronterades med det, eftersom han i en intervju i fjol hade svarat nej på frågorna om någon kan representera partiet med ett förflutet i nazistiska organisationer eller sympatier med sådana. Då sa Åkesson istället plötsligt

“att han har svårt att politiskt definiera Nordiska rikspartiet och Nationaldemokraterna. Vidare sade han att de tre personerna i kyrkovalet, och deras människosyn, har bedömts vara trovärdiga partiföreträdare.”

Jo, vi har fattat det. Att Sverigedemokraterna har samma åsikter som nazister. 

Hur många nazister tänker Sverigedemokraterna låta vara “trovärdiga partiföreträdare” i riksdagsvalet 2010?

Läs: AB – Professor Jan Hjärpe efter Jimmie Åkessons debattartikel: “Det här är ren rasism”, AB2, AB – Statsministerns attack mot SD,   SVD – SD:s påstående saknar grund,  AB – BRÅ: Uppgifterna stämmer inte, Expressen – Från skinnväst till kostym,  AB3,   DN-Reinfeldt: “Kärnan i partiets idé”,   Expo – Bildspel om Sverigedemokraterna,  DN,

Läs bloggarna: Svensson, Knuff

Det har varit svårt att undgå att Sveriges rasistparti haft kongress i helgen. Massmedia har rapporterat flitigt, snart kan väl bara de mest hysteriska SD-bloggarna hävda att partiet skulle vara nedtystat på något vis.

Inte minst avlivas den myten när partiledaren Jimmie Åkesson undertecknar en debattartikel i Aftonbladet i dag. Ärendet är islam, och SD får en helsida att hetsa mot landets muslimer. Ironiskt nog har Aftonbladet tidigare deklarerat att SD inte skulle få köpa samma utrymme för samma budskap. På redaktionell plats går det däremot bra, bara man “väger upp” med kommentarer från islamologer och Jan Helin.

Ökningen av människor med ursprung i muslimska länder är det största hotet mot Sverige sedan andra världskriget, heter det i artikeln. Det är vad man brukar kalla skarpt läge, under andra världskriget riskerade vi att hela eller delar av landet ockuperades av främmande makt. Artikeln jämför alltså Sveriges muslimska befolkning med fientlig trupp, och blandar höga och låga exempel på det växande hotet. Det är allt från att “ett tiotal muslimska terrororganisationer” etablerat sig i Sverige till att det säljs halalkött i matbutikerna. Naturligtvis anges ingen källa på det här om terrororganisationerna, men den som har gott minne kan ju lätt räkna upp, tja, noll exempel på islamistiska terrordåd i landet. Den vanliga SD-retoriken alltså, ljug och hoppas att ingen märker.

Som alltid när man ställs inför den här typen av skitsnack blir man tvungen att ställa sig frågan om motiv, avsikt och medel. Islamistiska rörelser kan vara riktigt hänsynslösa och obehagliga, och oftast har de utvecklats i en hänsynslös miljö. Hamas utvecklades i slummen i Gaza, Hizbollah i inbördeskrigets Libanon och talibanerna i kaoset i Afghanistan. Det finns andra riktningar inom politisk islam som utvecklats under andra förhållanden som är betydligt fredligare. En islamistisk politisk rörelse i Sverige skulle knappast se ut som Hizbollah. Ett svenskt Hizbollah skulle å andra sidan knappast få några större anhängarskaror, eftersom de inte svarar mot människors materiella behov.

Betraktar man den politiska kartan i Sverige är det snarast slående hur lite vi har av politisk islam. Stödorganisationer för grupper utomlands, ja – det är väl det SD syftar på med “ett tiotal muslimska terrororganisationer” – men var finns det islamistiska partiet med hundratusentals anhängare? Vilka val ställer de upp i? Vilka är deras företrädare och hur lyder deras krav? Har man minsta kunskap om politisk islam så är det uppenbart att den tar sig uttryck i massrörelser, demokratiska eller ej, där den tillåts göra det. Så var är det svenska AKP? Var är det svenska FIS?

Sanningen är den att Sverige inte ens kan skryta med någon mediakåt halvdåre som mulla Krekar eller Abu Hamza. Mohamed Omar må vara småskoj som ormen kulturkoftorna närde vid sin barm, men saknar de nödvändiga egenskaperna (typ frontvana från Afghanistan eller krok istället för hand) för att bli vår egen islamistiske boogy man.

I själva verket uppvisar svenska muslimer en häpnadsväckande brist på just politisk enighet och vilja att låta islam genomsyra svensk politik. Lika bra det, vi har nog med den västerländska högerextremism som Åkessons lilla parti är exempel på.

Sverigedemokraterna odlar även i medias strålkastarsken myten om att de inte får den exponering de förtjänar. Inte ens helgens utmärkta täckning av kongressen lär ändra på det, med tanke på att de tror på betydligt knäppare saker mot bättre vetande. Dock är det skillnad på att rapportera om vad ett parti gör och att ge dem en plattform de kan hetsa mot folk från.

Publiceringen av Jimmie Åkessons muslimhets är långt ifrån första gången vare sig han eller hans parti får skriva på redaktionell plats i mainstreampressen, det gjorde redan hans företrädare Leif Zeilon på 80-talet när organisationen kallades BSS. Dock är läget ett litet annat nu. Aftonbladet anser säkert att de gör en god gärning när de låter SD själva visa hur radikalt deras muslimhat är, men med sådana argument kunde man ju ge några helsidor till ND, Folkfronten och SMR också.

De som överväger att rösta på SD gör det för att partiet upplevs som radikalt, inte trots det. Vad som är viktigt för SD är inte att framstå som moderat utan som rumsrent. En debattartikel med oblyg muslimhets i landets största tidning  får dem att framstå som både radikala och rumsrena. Aftonbladet har därmed återigen gjort sig till plattform för fascister – precis som man var på 30- och 40-talen.

En eventuell granskning av JK för hets mot folkgrupp (fällning är det knappast tal om) hjälper bara SD, samtidigt som det är Jan Helin som eventuellt skulle dras inför rätta.

Andra om Sverigedemokraterna, SD, Jimmie Åkesson, BSS, Leif Zeilon, Jan Helin, Aftonbladet, mulla Krekar, Abu Hamza

They say a picture is worth a thousand words…. this one is worth about roughly four hundred and ninety five I would say.

If these are your keys then please contact Islamic Jihad for your free gift, you will need to supply address and next of kin details.

Why should I not be surprised by this, taken from the Sunday Express?

“POLICE will be ordered not to charge Muslim extremists in many hate crime cases – to stop them becoming more militant.

“It could even mean officers tolerating many activities of Muslim preachers of hate like the hook-handed cleric Abu Hamza.”

My feelings are if you have a law, then it’s a law – you enforce it come what may! If the damn law’s wrong, you change it!

You never adopt a policy of one law for one section of society, but not for another. Therein, folks, is the road to hell. You simply undermine the entire structure of law!

“A senior Whitehall official said the guidance was being drawn up as part of a drive to use persuasion rather than the criminal justice system to fight extremism.”

So I guess the same’s going to apply to the BNP, is it? We’re all going to turn a blind eye while they preach hatred, religious and racial, and incite violence (because that’s what always happens when you allow incitement of this nature!)

VIOLENCE!

Another winner from our Gordon!

See HERE.

Source: Daily Star
H/T: Jeffrey Imm

ABOVE: Abu Hamza

The aim is to stop people being dragged into extremism.

Senior Whitehall official

RANTING extremists like hate preacher Abu Hamza could escape criminal charges in the future as new rules advise police to “leave them alone”.

Police chiefs have been told to change the way they deal with extremists. The guidelines are intended to stop them becoming more extreme.

Home Office guidelines, issued to forces around the country, warn that charging people in borderline cases could make them more radical.

But the new approach has outraged campaigners. Tory MP Patrick Mercer, chairman of the parliamentary anti-terror committee, said: “I would question the Home Secretary’s judgment on this issue and ask him to explain the strategy in words of one syllable.”

A senior Whitehall official said: “The aim is to stop people being dragged into extremism.”

He insisted: “We are not talking about letting someone off who has committed a clear offence.”

A 20-year old British Student from Bristol appeared in court charged with making explosives with intent and preparing for terrorist acts.

Andrew Ibrahim converted to Islam and within just five months had been radicalised. The student fell under the spell of the teachings of online radical preachers, becoming fascinated by the 7/7 bombings in London and the teachings of Abu Hamza al-Masri as well as the ideology of al-Qaida. Ibrahim had grown a beard, changed his name to Isa by deed poll and had developed a ‘mindset of martyrdom’.

The court was told that Ibrahim had been heard to refer to Britain as a ‘dirty toilet’ and friends of the man had said how his views on the 9/11 attacks were that they were a ‘justified response’ for Western aggression.

When police raided his flat they found home-made explosives in a biscuit tin in the refrigerator, a detonator under the sink and a ’suicide vest’ with pockets to carry bombs hanging on his bedroom door. He has pleaded guilty to preparing an explosive substance but denies that he planned to kill or injure people or blow up any buildings with it, the case continues…

Three sons of the hate filled Muslim cleric Abu Hamza have been sentenced to between 2 to 4 years for running a £1 million luxury car scam.

The three men were part of a seven- strong gang who targeted luxury cars, BMW’s, Range Rovers and Mercedes. The gang picked cars that had been left in long-stay car parks and once they had found out who the owners were they were able to write to the DVLA posing as the owner of the car.

They would claim to have moved and requested a new log book be sent to a new address. The DVLA would then send a letter to the original address giving them 21 days to write to them if the change was incorrect. As many of the targeted owners were away for longer than 21 days the gang were able to receive many logbooks and obtain replacement keys from the dealers after changing the ownership of the car to a fake identity.

Some of the cars would be sold to unsuspecting buyers and others were shipped abroad or used as collateral against loans that were never repaid.

32 vehicles were stolen, or targeted for theft by the thieves with a new value exceeding £1 million.

Abu Hamza’s sons are Hamza Kamel (22), Mohammed Mostafa (27) and stepson Mohssin Ghailam (28).

Their father Abu Hamza (51) has been arrested in the UK under the Terrorism Act 2000.

Charges he was found guilty of include;

Six charges of soliciting murder under the Offences against the Person Act 1861.
Three charges relating to “using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour with the intention of stirring up racial hatred”.
One charge of owning recordings related to “stirring up racial hatred”.
One charge of possessing “terrorist encyclopedia” under the Terrorism Act.

I’m glad to say that this guy – Abu Hamza, the radical Muslim cleric – is currently doing porridge at Her Majesty’s pleasure and I sincerely hope the one-eyed, hook-handed cunt really will be extradited to the US as soon as he’s finished ‘passing the soap’ with his new best friends…

I read today how his 3 sons will now be joining him in stir for their part in a car stealing racket.

Perhaps a bad move as they’ll very likely be able to secrete a fleet of Mercs up their arses by the time they’ve been made some 6′6″ hairy biker’s bitches.

So, imagine my surprise when I found this pushed through the letterbox not 5 minutes ago:

I don’t think I’ll be trying out their menu, although whipping the chicken out of the tandoor must be a breeze with a metal hook at the end of your arm…

What do:

1) Paedophilia, 2) Alcoholism, 3) Attempted murder on a parent, 4) and most recently, a young muslims foray into a homosexual relationship have in common? (I’m sure Abu Hamza would not approve…)

Why, they’re all headline grabbing attempts by the Beeb scriptwriters to keep the masses watching Easternders of course…

‘Enders is something of an institution, but has lost its way somewhat over the past few years.

I’m still surprised the BBC haven’t adopted more digital marketing techniques to give the show a boost and deepen engagement with its hard-core audience, particularly to help them shape, and input into the show.

But for the meantime, they have another Daily Mail furore ahead… (which will help awareness in the short term at least)

Iain Morrison is a senior marketer in the British Tourism Industry, an Eastenders fan and like all of you, knows nothing beats a good soap death…