<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>al-sen &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/al-sen/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "al-sen"</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:17:28 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[McCain crushes Obama in AZ, leads in FL and gains in MA (Update with new Zogby national)]]></title>
<link>http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/08/04/mccain-crushes-obama-in-az-leads-in-fl-and-gains-in-ma/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Taniel</dc:creator>
<guid>http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/08/04/mccain-crushes-obama-in-az-leads-in-fl-and-gains-in-ma/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Update: The plot thickens and polls continue to show whatever national advantage Obama had to be fad]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><strong>Update</strong>: The plot thickens and polls continue to show whatever national advantage Obama had to be fading. After nearly <em>three months</em> without a single national poll showing him ahead, McCain led in last week&#8217;s USA Today/Gallup poll, Rasmussen&#8217;s tracking this morning and he now gains 11% in <a href="http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1535">Zogby&#8217;s national poll</a>, 42% to Obama&#8217;s 41% with 2% each for Bob Barr and Ralph Nader. (Last month, Obama led by 10%; 5% in June and 10% in May). Zogby finds Obama slipping among all demographic groups, including independents, Democrats (Obama is at a weak 74%) and women.</p>
<p>Zogby&#8217;s previous poll was released at a time many polls showed a mid-to-high single digit lead for Obama  &#8211; leading to talk that Obama could build a solid advantage by the end of the summer. Now, the race looks to be as tight as it&#8217;s been since June 3rd. Is the Obama camp not letting its opponents&#8217; attacks dictate the conversation, and is this not the point at which the Obama camp finally starts using footage like McCain&#8217;s &#8220;bomb Iran?&#8221; Of course, the campaign might be preparing to unveil its vice-presidential pick (perhaps Wednesday morning in Indiana&#8230;) and does not want to muddy its message.</p>
<p><strong>Original post:</strong> After a first <a href="http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/08/04/polling-roundup/">polling delivery</a> this morning &#8211; which included McCain&#8217;s first (albeit statistically insignificant) lead in a tracking poll since Obama clinched his party&#8217;s nomination &#8211; here is a second daily update. It contains strong numbers for John McCain, and it is difficult to not have the impression that polls over the past week or two have found consistently improving state results for the Arizona Senator &#8211; look at the 7 Quinnipiac polls from swing states released in <a href="http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/07/31/q-pac-polls-from-the-big-three-obama-ahead-losing-ground/">two</a> <a href="http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/07/24/mccain-progresses/">different</a> installments, <em>all</em> finding McCain improving from his June results.</p>
<p>None of the results listed here qualifies as bad news for Obama. The two candidates are exchanging leads in Florida, Obama certainly does not need Arizona and the Rasmussen tracking from this morning was just one national poll in dozens that have shown Obama ahead. But to Democrats who have gotten used to good presidential polling over the past few months and certainly over the past few weeks, the psychological pressure can certainly mount. Overall, these polls certainly do not suggest that Obama has lost his edge, but they do point to the fact that the presidential race is a close one and there is enough polling data to back those who say that it is quickly tightening.</p>
<p>August will not be decisive, and any post-Labor Day news and poll is hugely more important than anything that will happen now; but the summer often sets the tone for the fall, and with the Olympic-period lull starting in four days, it does look like we will be going into the conventions without either candidate having opened a significant lead.</p>
<p>On to the afternoon&#8217;s state polls:</p>
<ul>
<li>In <strong>Florida</strong>, McCain leads 50% to 44% in <a href="http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=9946139b-a61a-4f93-bbcc-6ce0fae9014a">SUSA&#8217;s first poll</a> since February.</li>
</ul>
<p>[I am not one to look for sample problems in every poll that is released, but do note that the partisan breakdown is 43% Republican and 38% Democratic. That's an improvement for the GOP over 2004, despite the fact that most polls find a significant swing leftward <em>and</em> the fact that Florida Democrats have made significant <a href="http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/07/14/battleground-watch-dem-growth-in-florida-and-nevada/">registration gains</a>. In the previous SUSA poll from Florida, Democrats had a 9% edge in the sample; the latest PPP poll had as many Democrats and Republicans and the latest ARG poll had a 5% Democratic advantage. This is not to say that SUSA's poll is wrong - I don't like cherry-picking polls, and a lot of problems have problems like this. But I am just pointing out something we should take into account when interpreting the results.]</p>
<ul>
<li>In <strong>Arizona</strong>, the second poll of the day confirms that McCain has less to fear than some Republicans feared. He is leading 52% to 36% (up from 9% last month) in <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/arizona/election_2008_arizona_presidential_election">Rasmussen&#8217;s latest poll</a>, 57% to 38% with leaners. Obama&#8217;s favorability rating is dismal: 43% to 55%.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>In <strong>Massachusetts</strong>, Obama&#8217;s margin of victory plunges from 23% to 9% in the latest <a href="http://www.suffolk.edu/college/1450.html">Suffolk poll</a> as Obama is now ahead 47% to 38%.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>In <strong>Connecticut</strong>, Obama <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/connecticut/election_2008_connecticut_presidential_election">leads</a> 51% to 36%. His favorability rating is 61%, comparing to 41% for McCain.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>In <strong>Alabama</strong>, finally, McCain <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/alabama/election_2008_alabama_presidential_election">crushes</a> Obama 55% to 37%, 58% to 38% with leaners.</li>
</ul>
<p>With two polls in one day finding McCain with very solid leads in his home state, talk of Arizona emerging as a potential battleground state should be tabled. Unless other evidence emerges to challenge these surveys, it is simply too unlikely that any candidate will lose his home state &#8211; particularly a Republican in red-leaning Arizona. Gore lost Tennessee, sure, but he also lost the rest of the South.</p>
<p>As for Massachusetts, longtime readers of this blog know that I have long expressed amazement at how poor Obama&#8217;s numbers have been in the Bay State. Obama struggled to open any lead at all against McCain for a while in the spring, and McCain tied him repeatedly in SUSA polls. Other polling groups found Obama significantly under-performing compared to Clinton. Polls released since Obama clinched the nomination &#8211; including Suffolk&#8217;s previous survey &#8211; found Obama rising in one of the bluest states of the country, and they better hope McCain&#8217;s gains in this poll are only statistical noise. As for Connecticut, this is a Northeastern state McCain was interested in contesting but polls have shown little opening for him, leading me to move the state to the safe Obama column in <a href="http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/07/16/fourth-electoral-ratings/">early July</a>.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, two Senate polls were released from races that are at best third-tier:</p>
<ul>
<li>In <strong>Oklahoma</strong>, GOP Sen. Inhofe <a href="http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?articleID=20080803_16_A5_spancl223249">leads</a> state Senator Andrew Rice 52% to 30% in the latest Sooner poll. In the institute&#8217;s previous poll, Inhofe led 60% to 19%.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>In <strong>Alabama</strong>, Senator Jeff Sessions crushes Vivian Davis Figures 58% to 31%, a 3% improvement since last month.</li>
</ul>
<p>There is nothing to see in the Alabama Senate race, which has always been ranked as safe Republican in my Senate rankings. Some Democrats believe there is some potential for Andrew Rice in Oklahoma, and the DSCC did send a few paid staffers to the state a few years ago, hinting that it took such talk seriously. Yet, and though he is no beloved incumbent, Inhofe presents no obvious vulnerability and Oklahoma looks to be as red a state as any. The latest presidential poll found McCain leading by 32%, and that&#8217;s not the kind of margin a Democratic Senate challenger can easily overcome. The race is ranked 18th in my <a href="http://campaigndiaries.com/senate/">latest ratings</a>, and it is clearly closer to the safe column than to the competitive one.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Monday polls: McCain still ahead in Florida but loses Virginia ]]></title>
<link>http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/monday-polls-mccain-still-ahead-in-florida-but-loses-virginia/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Taniel</dc:creator>
<guid>http://campaigndiaries.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/monday-polls-mccain-still-ahead-in-florida-but-loses-virginia/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The day&#8217;s most significant presidential polls came from two red state targeted by Barack Obama]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>The day&#8217;s most significant presidential polls came from two red state targeted by Barack Obama. And as has been the norm for the past few months, Virginia continues to look like a better pick-up opportunity for the Democratic candidate than the good old swing state of Florida:</p>
<ul>
<li>Rasmussen <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/florida/election_2008_florida_presidential_election">released</a> its second <strong>Florida</strong> poll in 8 days and finds little change, with McCain ahead 48% to 41%. He led by 8% two weeks ago.</li>
<li>The favorabiliry ratings tell a worse story for Obama, as his favorability rating is down at 44% (57% for McCain) &#8212; with 40% viewing him <em>very</em> unfavorably (versus 18% for McCain)!</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>In <strong>Virginia</strong>, however, Obama is ahead 49% to 47% in the <a href="http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=b3aa039f-ad80-42e9-b384-e37f124f51d5">latest SUSA poll</a>. That is actually a 7% drop from the May poll &#8211; but it conforms to the most recent polls from <a href="http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/06/18/wednesday-polls-strong-day-for-obama-who-leads-big-in-pa-oh-wi-and-me-and-within-the-margin-of-error-in-va-and-fl/">PPP</a> and <a href="http://campaigndiaries.com/2008/06/16/monday-polls-virginia-is-indeed-a-toss-up-and-is-it-worth-looking-at-kansas/">Rasmussen</a>.</li>
<li>Obama&#8217;s lead is sustained by the partisan breakdown: 43% to 31% in favor of Democrats, a 17% swing compared to the 2004 exit polls (39% GOP-35% Dem).</li>
</ul>
<p>SUSA&#8217;s swing in partisan breakdown is sometimes bigger than other groups find, though it does conform to the latest Newsweek or LA Times polls and it matches expectations as to the electorate&#8217;s transformations in the past four years, so that it remains a credible finding. However, I am not sure what to think of Rasmussen showing such astronomically high &#8220;very unfavorable&#8221; ratings in so many states. Other polls have not shown such a large discrepancy in the two candidates&#8217; favorability rating.</p>
<p>Besides this methodological note, neither of these polls is surprising. Despite two unexpected surveys two weeks ago showing Obama gaining in Florida, most of the polls taken in the Sunshine state have shown that this is a rare swing state in which McCain seems more secure than Bush was in 2004 and 2000. On the other hand, poll after poll confirms that Virginia is at the top of Obama&#8217;s pick-up list. McCain will need to flex his military muscle with the state&#8217;s veteran population to overcome the rapid Democratic gains in NoVa, and his road would be tougher if Obama selects one of the Virginia boys (Webb, Warner, Kaine) as his running-mate.</p>
<p>Three other polls were released from safer states:</p>
<ul>
<li>In <strong>Alabama</strong>, Rasmussen finds McCain losing ground but still <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/alabama/election_2008_alabama_presidential_election">comfortably ahead</a>, 51% to 36% (he led by 28% last month).</li>
<li>Here again, Obama has a strikingly high &#8220;very unfavorable&#8221; number (37%) &#8212; though this is more expected given the state&#8217;s racial polarization. His favorabily rating is 40%, whereas 67% have a favorable view of McCain.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>In Massachusetts, SUSA released its <a href="http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=730e5d9a-7be3-486e-9594-37b5351ad3d8">first poll</a> finding Obama ahead (finally) by double-digits. He was ahead by 5% in the last poll, but now leads 53% to 40%.</li>
<li>This comes entirely from the partisan breakdown (40% dem, 17% GOP), but Obama remains weak among his party: 76%.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Finally, Obama has not yet put Georgia in play but the state is at the threshold of competitivity: McCain maintains a 10% lead in <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/georgia/election_2008_georgia_presidential_election">Rasmussen&#8217;s latest poll</a> (53% to 43%), just like last month.</li>
<li>McCain maintains an edge in favorability: 60% versus 47% for Obama (and 34% very unfavorable).</li>
</ul>
<p>Longtime readers of this blog know I have long been puzzled by Obama&#8217;s numbers in Massachusetts, where numerous polling instutes showed him struggling and polling significantly weaker numbers than Clinton. But no poll was more severe for Obama than SUSA&#8217;s, as survey after survey showed him in a toss-up with McCain in what is arguably the most Democratic state in the country. A few polls have shown Obama creating some distance here, and while 13% remains strangely small in such a blue state, it is certainly an improvement. It remains difficult to imagine how Massachusetts could be anywhere near the list of competitive states in the fall, but we will keep an eye on poll trendlines.</p>
<p>Finally, two Senate polls were released by Rasmussen confirming what we already know &#8212; Alabma and Georgia are unlikely to join the list of competitive races:</p>
<ul>
<li>In Georgia, Saxby Chambliss leads his 5 opponents by margins ranging from 13% (against Jim Martin) to 27%. He is above 50% in all match-ups.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>In Alabama, Sen. Sessions leads Vivan Figures 58% to 34% &#8212; an improvement of 9% by the Democrat but this remains a third-to-fourth tier race.</li>
</ul>
<p>Note that Democrats were really interested to challenging Chambliss after the nastiness of the 2002 race, but a strong challenger never emerged. </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Latest Senate Polls - AL, AK, CO, GA, ME, MN, NH, NJ, SD, TN, VA]]></title>
<link>http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/2008/04/10/latest-senate-polls-al-ak-co-ga-me-mn-nh-nj-sd-tn-va/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>xstryker</dc:creator>
<guid>http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/2008/04/10/latest-senate-polls-al-ak-co-ga-me-mn-nh-nj-sd-tn-va/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Latest Senate Polls for 2008: State Incumbent Poll Dem Candidate % Rep Candidate % AL Sessions Rasmu]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Latest Senate Polls for 2008:</p>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>State</th>
<th>Incumbent</th>
<th>Poll</th>
<th>Dem Candidate</th>
<th>%</th>
<th>Rep Candidate</th>
<th>%</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/alabama/">AL</a></td>
<td>Sessions</td>
<td><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_senate_elections/alabama/election_2008_alabama_senate">Rasmussen 4/2</a></td>
<td>Figures</td>
<td>36</td>
<td>Sessions</td>
<td>57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/alaska/">AK</a></td>
<td>Stevens</td>
<td><a href="http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_senate_elections/alaska/election_2008_alaska_senate">Rasmussen 4/7</a></td>
<td>Begich</td>
<td>45</td>
<td>Stevens</td>
<td>46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/colorado/">CO</a></td>
<td>Allard</td>
<td><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_senate_elections/election_2008_colorado_senate">Rasmussen 3/17</a></td>
<td>Mark Udall</td>
<td>46</td>
<td>Schaffer</td>
<td>43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/georgia/">GA</a></td>
<td>Chambliss</td>
<td><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_senate_elections/georgia/election_2008_georgia_senate">Rasmussen 3/20</a></td>
<td>Vernon Jones</td>
<td>30</td>
<td>Chambliss</td>
<td>56</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/georgia/">GA</a></td>
<td>Chambliss</td>
<td><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_senate_elections/georgia/election_2008_georgia_senate">Rasmussen 3/20</a></td>
<td>Dale Cardwell</td>
<td>36</td>
<td>Chambliss</td>
<td>52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/georgia/">GA</a></td>
<td>Chambliss</td>
<td><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_senate_elections/georgia/election_2008_georgia_senate">Rasmussen 3/20</a></td>
<td>Jim Martin</td>
<td>33</td>
<td>Chambliss</td>
<td>51</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/maine/">ME</a></td>
<td>Collins</td>
<td><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_senate_elections/maine/election_2008_maine_senate">Rasmussen 4/3</a></td>
<td>Allen</td>
<td>38</td>
<td>Collins</td>
<td>54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/minnesota/">MN</a></td>
<td>Coleman</td>
<td><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_senate_elections/election_2008_minnesota_senate">Rasmussen 3/19</a></td>
<td>Franken</td>
<td>46</td>
<td>Coleman</td>
<td>48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/new-hampshire/">NH</a></td>
<td>Sununu</td>
<td><a href="http://www.americanresearchgroup.com/nhpoll/senate08/">ARG 3/14-3/17</a></td>
<td>Shaheen</td>
<td>47</td>
<td>Sununu</td>
<td>33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/new-jersey/">NJ</a></td>
<td>Lautenberg</td>
<td><a href="http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_senate_elections/new_jersey/election_2008_new_jersey_senate">Rasmussen 3/27</a></td>
<td>Lautenberg</td>
<td>54</td>
<td>Joe Pennacchio</td>
<td>36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/new-jersey/">NJ</a></td>
<td>Lautenberg</td>
<td><a href="http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_senate_elections/new_jersey/election_2008_new_jersey_senate">Rasmussen 3/27</a></td>
<td>Lautenberg</td>
<td>54</td>
<td>Murray Sabrin</td>
<td>35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/south-dakota/">SD</a></td>
<td>Johnson</td>
<td><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_senate_elections/election_2008_south_dakota_senate">Rasmussen 3/4</a></td>
<td>Johnson</td>
<td>63</td>
<td>Joel Dykstra</td>
<td>28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/tennessee/">TN</a></td>
<td>Alexander</td>
<td><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_senate_elections/tennessee/election_2008_tennessee_senate">Rasmussen 4/3</a></td>
<td>Bob Tuke</td>
<td>30</td>
<td>Alexander</td>
<td>59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/tennessee/">TN</a></td>
<td>Alexander</td>
<td><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_senate_elections/tennessee/election_2008_tennessee_senate">Rasmussen 4/3</a></td>
<td>Mike Padgett</td>
<td>31</td>
<td>Alexander</td>
<td>58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/virginia/">VA</a></td>
<td>John Warner</td>
<td><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_senate_elections/election_2008_virginia_senate">Rasmussen 3/26</a></td>
<td>Mark Warner</td>
<td>55</td>
<td>Gilmore</td>
<td>39</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Today&#8217;s new poll is Alaska, where Rasmussen shows a <strong>Tossup</strong>. Since March, 4 races have been polled as <strong>Solid Republican Hold</strong> (AL, GA, ME, TN), 2 races are <strong>Solid Democratic Hold</strong> (NJ, SD), 3 races are <strong>Tossups</strong> (AK, CO, MN), and 2 races are <strong>Solid Democratic Gain</strong>. New Mexico hasn&#8217;t been polled since February, but it too rates <strong>Solid Democratic Gain</strong>, while Oregon&#8217;s February polls shows it to be <strong>Solid Republican Hold</strong> at this time. That is regardless of whether Wilson, Pearce, Merkley, or Novick wins their respective primaries. Louisiana has not been polled since December and rated <strong>Slight Democratic Hold</strong> at that time.</p>
<p>For races where the most recent poll is older than March, check out our <a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/senate-polls-2008/">Senate Polls page</a>.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
