<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>annoying-words-and-phrases &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/annoying-words-and-phrases/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "annoying-words-and-phrases"</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:31:07 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Bugbears #1]]></title>
<link>http://thehaints.wordpress.com/2012/04/06/bugbears-1/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 18:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>haints1932</dc:creator>
<guid>http://thehaints.wordpress.com/2012/04/06/bugbears-1/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Like many of you, there are many things which cause my neck muscles to spasm and my right eye to dev]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thehaints.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/nails-on-chalkboard.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-466" title="Nails on a Chalkboard" src="http://thehaints.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/nails-on-chalkboard.jpg?w=207&#038;h=300" alt="" width="207" height="300" /></a>Like many of you, there are many things which cause my neck muscles to spasm and my right eye to develop a rapid tick (ok, maybe you just get gooseflesh). A good deal of these irksome things are words and phrases which for some known or unknown reason, drive me bananas (and not in a good way). I thought it would be a good idea to share some with you every once in a while. Because, hey, we all need to offload our own irritations onto someone else.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be happy to hear your <a title="bugbear" href="http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/bugbear" target="_blank">bugbears</a> if you&#8217;re so inclined.</p>
<p>In the meantime, here are a few of mine:</p>
<p>1. <em>Teachable moment</em>:  Is Oprah responsible for this overused phrase?</p>
<p>2. <em>Speak to</em>: as in &#8220;that book really spoke to my childhood experiences.&#8221;</p>
<p>3. <em>On trend</em>: What&#8217;s wrong with &#8220;trendy&#8221;?</p>
<p>4.  &#8217;<em>pant&#8217; used in the singular</em>:  mainly by fashion commentators who probably know better than I do, but it still sounds annoying to my ears.</p>
<p>5. <em>Different to, as opposed to different from</em>: I mean, can you <em>really</em> differ <em>to</em> something?</p>
<p>6. <em>The use of &#8220;I&#8221; as a direct object</em>:  e.g. &#8220;If you have any questions, please contact Haints or I.&#8221; Please, people, do not contact <em>I</em>. <em>I</em> cannot help you, but <em>me</em> is always ready to assist.</p>
<p>6. <em>The word</em> bugbear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Annoying Words and Phrases ]]></title>
<link>http://skimhenson.wordpress.com/2012/02/20/annoying-words-and-phrases/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>skimhenson</dc:creator>
<guid>http://skimhenson.wordpress.com/2012/02/20/annoying-words-and-phrases/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[“I’m gonna fix that last joke by taking out all the words and adding new ones.”Mitch Hedberg Readers]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_4071" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://skimhenson.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/annoying.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-4071" alt="“I’m gonna fix that last joke by taking out all the words and adding new ones.”Mitch Hedberg" src="http://skimhenson.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/annoying.png?w=300&#038;h=188" width="300" height="188" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">“I’m gonna fix that last joke by taking out all the words and adding new ones.”<br />Mitch Hedberg</p></div>
<p><strong>Readers shared words and phrases they disliked, were tired of hearing, and downright hated.</strong></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the list.</p>
<p><strong>Words:</strong><br />
awesome, hub, hubby, literally *, moist, pedagogy, plethora, preggers, preggo, random, stuff, uh **, whatever</p>
<p>* when used incorrectly<br />
** the non-word</p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><strong>Phrases:</strong><br />
My bad.<br />
I am like &#8230;<br />
It is what it is.<br />
I’m fine. It’s fine.<br />
To tell you the truth, &#8230;<br />
Can I be honest with you?<br />
I’m a Christian (but actions contradict).<br />
Initials for anything and everything like CEO and EEO and SEO and …</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">The final word on unpopular words for 2012 is use with caution. Grammar Nazis are everywhere.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">Lastly, I&#8217;m like really happy you stopped by. To tell you the truth, there&#8217;s nothing I&#8217;d appreciate more than for you to be honest with me. Leave an awesome comment, maybe about a word you don&#8217;t like and stuff.</p>
<p><strong>WRite wHere I&#8217;m supposed to be</strong> &#8211; I nitpick words. My husband used to say, &#8220;It&#8217;s just semantics.&#8221; He now says it matters. I knew he&#8217;d come around.</p>
<p>Disclaimer: S. Kim Henson and Well-Written Days are not responsible for unfriending that may occur if you keep up this vocabulary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Should Sleeping Dogs Lie or Lay, and Other Grammar Puzzlers]]></title>
<link>http://mikegreenstein.wordpress.com/2011/09/06/should-sleeping-dogs-lie-or-lay-and-other-grammar-puzzlers/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 22:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mike Greenstein</dc:creator>
<guid>http://mikegreenstein.wordpress.com/2011/09/06/should-sleeping-dogs-lie-or-lay-and-other-grammar-puzzlers/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Grammar&#039;s burning questions confronted. In the adage &#8220;let sleeping does lie,&#8221;  is]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_397" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 224px"><a href="http://mikegreenstein.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/question-mark-1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-397" title="Question Mark 1" src="http://mikegreenstein.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/question-mark-1.jpg?w=214&#038;h=300" alt="" width="214" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Grammar&#039;s burning questions confronted.</p></div>
<p>In the adage &#8220;let sleeping does lie,&#8221;  is &#8220;lie&#8221; correct, or should it be &#8220;lay?&#8221; Do members comprise a committee, or do they compose one? Head-scratchers like these come up often, and each time they befuddle me anew. But do they continually befuddle me? Or is &#8220;continuously&#8221; the word I&#8217;m looking for?</p>
<p>Thankfully, the answers to such perplexing questions are now but a few keystrokes away. Any time you’re not sure whether you’re using the correct word or phrase,  just type the words that confuse you into a search engine and you’ll turn up more choices for grammar answers than you’ll ever need&#8211;and almost as many opinions about what&#8217;s right.</p>
<p>Here are a few examples:</p>
<p><strong>Lie or Lay?</strong></p>
<p>You lay or place something, as in: Lay the carpet or lay the book on the table. But you lie on a bed or other flat surface.<br />
Therefore, the following  sentences are incorrect: He is laying on the bed. Why don&#8217;t you lie it on the bed? The correct forms are:  He is lying on the bed; why don&#8217;t you lay the book on the bed?</p>
<p>Here’s where it gets really confusing: The past tense and past participle of  lay is laid (they laid the groundwork; he had laid the plans), while the past tense of lie is lay and its past participle is lain: He lay on the floor face down; she had lain in bed for hours.</p>
<p><strong>Continuing, Continuous or Continual?</strong></p>
<p>Sorry, these words are not interchangeable.</p>
<p>Continual implies recurrence at regular or frequent intervals&#8211;for example, playing baseball requires continual practice. Continual means duration over a long period of time, but with intervals of interruptions.  A corporation evaluates the effectiveness of its products and implements change on a continual basis.</p>
<p>Continuous means extending uninterruptedly in time: For example: a continuous rain fell in Seattle for two days. Continuous is duration that continues over a period of time, but without intervals of interruption. For example:  The plan called for continuous improvement.  The electric fan emitted a continuous whirring sound.</p>
<p>In some cases, however, continuous can be interchangeable with continuing. If we look at them both as adjectives, continuous means unbroken and continuing usually means from a given point onward. Both can describe time or distance.  Some examples:</p>
<p>At one time, Route 66 was a continuous length of highway, stretching from Los Angeles to Chicago.</p>
<p>Ever since I&#8217;ve known you, your complaining has been continuous. </p>
<p>Your continuing tardiness will not be tolerated.  (into the future)</p>
<p>As a present participle, continuing is often used in verb forms and as a gerund:  Continuing with this charade would be a grave mistake! (gerund)</p>
<p>The train passed through St. Louis and was continuing to Chicago. (participial phrase)</p>
<p>She was continuing to annoy me.  (past progressive tense)</p>
<p><strong>Comprise or Compose?</strong></p>
<p>Comprise means “is made up of” or “consists of.”  The whole comprises the parts. Compose means “make up” or “&#8221;make.”  The parts compose the whole.</p>
<p>Incorrect:  The Beatles was comprised of four musicians.</p>
<p>Correct:  The Beatles was composed of four musicians.</p>
<p>Correct:  The Beatles comprised four musicians.</p>
<p>Correct:  Four musicians composed the Beatles.</p>
<div id="attachment_398" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://mikegreenstein.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/question-mark-2.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-398" title="Question Mark 2" src="http://mikegreenstein.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/question-mark-2.jpg?w=300&#038;h=214" alt="" width="300" height="214" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Searching for answers.</p></div>
<p>Once again, in practice it’s not that cut-and-dried. What about the phrases “is comprised of” and “is composed of”? In her excellent essay on this subject, <a title="Grammar Girl" href="http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Grammar Girl</strong> </a>notes, “One of these (phrases) is allowed among grammarians, and one is not. ‘Is composed of’  is OK. You can say, ‘Our nation is composed of many ethnic groups.&#8217; On the other hand, most grammar sources agree that ‘is comprised of” is an incorrect phrase. Just as you can’t say, ‘The house includes of seven rooms,’ you can’t say, ‘The house is comprised of seven rooms.’ You have to say, ‘The house comprises seven rooms.’”</p>
<p>Even this rule may be changing, however. Grammar Girl cites a survey by the  <em><strong>American Heritage Guide to Contemporary Usage and Style</strong>. </em>The survey reports  that in 1965, 54 percent of the usage panel disapproved of the phrase “is comprised of,” whereas in 2005, 65 percent approved of it, and only 35 percent disapproved. This traditional distinction may be destined to fall by the wayside.</p>
<p>Confusing? Of course! So don’t frustrate yourself with such arcane rules. When it comes to getting your words shipshape, just hire an editor and let an expert decide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why Do They Hate Us?]]></title>
<link>http://languageandgrammar.com/2011/07/29/50-most-annoying-americanisms/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>languageandgrammar</dc:creator>
<guid>http://languageandgrammar.com/2011/07/29/50-most-annoying-americanisms/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[By Paul Yeager, author of Literally, the Best Language Book Ever Why do they hate us (U.S. citizens)]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[By Paul Yeager, author of Literally, the Best Language Book Ever Why do they hate us (U.S. citizens)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Proofreading, Anyone?]]></title>
<link>http://mikegreenstein.wordpress.com/2010/04/09/proofreading-anyone/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 06:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mike Greenstein</dc:creator>
<guid>http://mikegreenstein.wordpress.com/2010/04/09/proofreading-anyone/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[In their second game of the new baseball season, San Francisco Giants outfielder Eugenio Velez wore]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="bodytext_bottom">
<div id="fontprefs_bottom">
<p>In their second game of the new baseball season, San Francisco Giants outfielder Eugenio Velez wore a  jersey that read &#8220;San Francicso.&#8221; According to The Associated Press, no one noticed until after the Giants&#8217; 10-4 win over the Astros. Interestingly, the AP story quoted  the Dominican outfielder saying &#8220;Incredible!&#8221; in Spanish. Except the AP version left out the &#8220;i&#8221; in incredible.</p>
<div id="attachment_187" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://mikegreenstein.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/eyeball.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-187" title="A 3 dimensional blue eye texture with reflections." src="http://mikegreenstein.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/eyeball.jpg?w=150&#038;h=150" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Another set</p></div>
<div id="attachment_187" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://mikegreenstein.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/eyeball.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-187" title="A 3 dimensional blue eye texture with reflections." src="http://mikegreenstein.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/eyeball.jpg?w=150&#038;h=150" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">...of eyes can be helpful.</p></div>
<p>I had just finished reading that story in The Seattle Times when I turned my attention to a slick, expensively produced pamphlet published by Animal Health division of Novartis, one of the biggest pharaceutical companies in the world. And yet in its section on training, it refers to &#8220;methods based on punitive <em><strong>principals</strong></em>.&#8221; (Principles would be the correct word here.)</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t anybody bother to proofread anymore? A second pair of educated eyes can spare a lot of embarrassment later. <strong><a href="http://mikegreenstein.com" target="_blank">Better get an editor.</a></strong></p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Cliché or Not Cliché]]></title>
<link>http://mikegreenstein.wordpress.com/2009/10/15/cliche-or-not-cliche/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mike Greenstein</dc:creator>
<guid>http://mikegreenstein.wordpress.com/2009/10/15/cliche-or-not-cliche/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[“Whatever” topped Marist College’s recent list of the most annoying conversational word or phrase, t]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Whatever” topped <strong><a title="Marist Poll" href="http://maristpoll.marist.edu/107-whatever-takes-top-honors-as-most-annoying/" target="_blank">Marist College’s recent list</a></strong> of the most annoying conversational word or phrase, the choice of 47% of the 938 Americans surveyed. “You know” finished second with 25%, followed by “it is what it is” (11%), “anyway” (7%) and “at the end of the day” (2%). Those were, like, uh, the only five choices&#8211;ignoring many other deserving candidates.</p>
<p>As usual, I’m outside the mainstream on this. To me, an awkward “you know” (or two, or 10) is the biggest turnoff in a person’s conversation. “Whatever” can have several connotations, depending how it’s delivered. With the right nuance, it can still be an effective word to express exasperation or dissonance. Regardless of how a speaker says it, the word always conveys some meaning.</p>
<p>“You know,” on the other hand, has no redeeming value. It’s an obstacle, a conversational stalling tactic, a sure sign of indecision and nervousness. Look at <strong>Caroline Kennedy</strong>: One “you know”-laden <a title="Caroline Kennedy" href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article5416006.ece" target="_blank">interview</a> killed her quest to succeed Hilary Clinton as U.S. Senator from New York.</p>
<p>In writing, of course, the list of overused expressions runs much longer than these five conversational annoyances. But when you’re writing a letter to a prospective client, a memo to your team or a report, it’s hard to know when a particular expression crosses over from widely understood figure of speech to sad <a title="Cliche Finder" href="http://www.westegg.com/cliche/" target="_blank">cliché</a>. Nor does it always matter; if the phrase is still connecting with your audience, using a cliché might be entirely appropriate.</p>
<p>Ultimately, it’s purely a matter of taste, of finding a balance and a rhythm in your writing and adopting a tone that feels natural. Finding that happy medium is another reason everyone can use <a title="Mike Greenstein Writing &#38; Editing" href="http://mikegreenstein.com/pages/services.php" target="_blank"><strong>an objective editor</strong></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
