So every most Tuesday evenings at 5:30, I head on over to my gym spot for Jackie’s Guts and Butts class.  Generally speaking, this is not something I would admit to comfortably on the Internet because:

a) it’s embarassing to admit that one needs so desperately to work on these two areas that they need to go to a specially tailored class for professional instruction, and

b) I hate the word “butt”.  I think it’s the stupidest, dumbest sounding word ever and I never ever use it.  I worry about having kids because I know I can’t teach a child to talk about his (or her) ass all the time, but I can’t bring myself to propogat the use of that idiot word to a new generation.  I could tell them to say “booty”, I guess, but I’m a white lady.

Anyway, so fine. On Tuesday’s I go to what will heretofore be referred to as G&B.

So Jackie is really awesome at G&B. She’s this super cute high-energy brunette who wears leotards and a high ponytail when she teaches us, and always has some dancey-style playlist set up to keep us pumped the whole way through.  We use one of those STEP aerobics things from the eighties and when you’re hopping around and looking at the leotard and the aqua blue and neon pink colors of the STEP, you can almost convince yourself that you’re in a fun workout video instead of concentrating on how sweaty and miserable you are.  The next day you feel sore, but in a good way, and can tell that Jackie really knew what she was doing.  Awesome.

So about a week ago, before class began Jackie told us that due to some scheduling conflicts, she would no longer be teaching Tuesday evening G&B! I know! I was like “what the fuck?” in my mind but no one said anything cause what do you say? “Why?” she’s not our foster mother, she’s a gym class teacher.  So we all put on a brave face and nodded when she said that some guy, name of Forreste (!) would be taking over the class. She mentioned that

I showed up on Tuesday with not a little bit of trepidation. What was this Forreste guy going to be like ?  For some reason I pictured this.

In terms of physique, race and sexual orientation I was not disappointed but in every other respect, oh yes I was.

Jackie’s class usually begins with some warm up exercises where we jump around on that STEP thing to some Lady Gaga-type shit to get the blood pumping and “warm up the core”.  Forreste’s class was dead silent. No music.  No STEP.  Just a mat on the floor.  He instructed us to lay on our backs and proceeded to awkwardly lead us through a series of abdominal crunches so poorly described that we had to start over about six times until we got it right.  I could tell that my fellow G&B-mates were as dismayed as I was. As exhausting and high-impact as Jackie’s class was, it made you feel alive and that you were actually working out.  Forreste’s class  was probably a fairly accurate approximation of physical education at a juvenile detention center would be like.

The other thing about Jackie’s class is that we stand up virtually the entire time.  There’s a little bit of mat work but only at the end. This was a part of my decision making when I elected to wear the workout pants with the teensy tiny little hole in the crotch.  Unfortunately for me, Forreste dearly cherishes exercises in which you spread your legs wide open and move your pelvis around.  Did I mention I had also eschewed underwear? I had. Compounding my discomfort with the Draconian, music-less exercise regimen I was engaged in was the palpable terror that at any moment I might inadvertently flash a gay man my goods. To avoid this during Forreste’s many trips around the room, I would convulse my body awkwardly so that my legs were closed whenever he approached my mat.  Unfortunately for me, Forreste was a bit of a taskmaster, and he insisted in correcting my form, coming far closer than he knew to being Newman in Basic Instinct.

Forreste, I presume was unused to teaching men and women who don’t have the core strength of a Green Beret, as he grew exasperated with our feeble attempts to balance on one foot while holding our opposite leg behind us at perfect 90 degree angle.

The class wore grimly on.

“No, like this,” he would  sigh in exasperation, demonstrating uselessly once again.  “If you’re doing it right you should be feeling it all through here” he added, grasping his own ass firmly in both hands to better illustrate his point. The only place I was feeling anything was in my neck which I moved up an down to simulate the movement I would be doing with my torso, were I in anyway capable. Apart from a sub-part instructional technique, Forreste seemed unaware that he was not, in fact,  the MC of a dance competition.  “Are we feeling it our legs, ladies?” he would cry, hand on hip, oblivious to the two men in the room.  We nodded grimly, abs clenched, trying to maintain our position.  “I saaaaaaiid “Are we Feeling it in our legs, ladiieess”  he sang out sassily, doing his best to generate a loud cheer of affirmation. He was rewarded with slightly more audible groans and seven pairs of dagger-eyes.   It was with a collective shifty eyed -half smile that we bid Forreste adieu.

As we filed into the locker room my fellow classmates and I exhcanged wry smiles; the kind of rueful acknowledgement of one another’s suffering that I imagine hostages share.

“So I’m gonna see y’all next week, right?” Forreste called after us down the hall.  We all pretended not to hear.

A friend lent me the memoirs of Basic Instinct writer Joe Estahaus, they are aptly titled “Hollywood Animal.” I found it fascinating and at the same time extremely disturbing to read about the darker side of Hollywood. It’s pretty much all about money, sex and power… those three chestnuts that continue to come back and haunt the human race. If I’m honest the Hollywood he describes is not something I ever care to be apart of…

The Hollywood he describes is a Hollywood that has forgotten that holiness can easily be found in the mundane and ordinary every day life… things like friendship, intimacy and loyalty are not easily found in Joe’s Hollywood. Funnily enough these character traits are often highlighted in truly great human stories… even those that originate in Hollywood.

Everyone is searching for something, if you are hungry you search for food, if you are thirsty you look for a drink, if you are lonely you look for a friend; the stars are brightest when even the moon is hiding from the night.

BRITNEY, JACKO, JESUS AND RON JEREMY

“Dear User, عفواً، الموقع المطلوب غير متاح. Sorry, the requested page is unavailable. إن كنت ترى أن هذه الصفحة ينبغي أن لا تُحجب تفضل بالضغط هنا. If you believe the requested page should not be blocked please click here. لمزيد من المعلومات عن خدمة الإنترنت في المملكة العربية السعودية، يمكنك زيارة الموقع التالي: For more information about internet service in Saudi Arabia, please click here: www.internet.gov.sa”

If the screen 0n your desktop shows this message, you might have typed one or more of these words on your search engine…breast, boobs, tits, ass, butt, sex, Britney Spears, Micheal Jackson, Jesus Christ, Ron Jeremy, jew, Judaism, anal sex, rimming, fellatio, gay, homosexual, Madonna, Pamela Anderson, Tommy Lee, bisexual, erotic, erection, ménage à trois, blow job, Pope John Paul, pig, Piglet, pork, bacon, pork chop, Budha, Budhism, Hinduism, Catholicism, Scientology, glory hole, butt plugs, hymen, penis, vagina, foreskin, clitoris, Playboy, Playguy, Basic Instinct, Babe: Pig in the city movie, honcho, Seancody, slut, hooker, Chichilarue, transsexual, transvestite, lesbians, dikes, semen, sexual intercourse, fuck, uncut, bottom boy, circumcised, cybersex, Paris Hilton, Ana Nicole Smith, dildos, twinks, fags, deflower, virgin, vibrator, dominatrix, hoar, erectile dysfunction, naked, stripper, blackjack, poker, casino, BangBus, Girls Gone Wild, xxx, crucifix, holy rosary, bible, Christianity, Mother Mary, sadomasochism, David Bowie, Boy George, George Micheal, Israel, masturbation, kinky, bdsm, fetish, leather daddy, bareback, hand job and now even the new term “gay chicken” and Oprah’s “vajayjay”

BABE: PIG IN THE CITY

In 2000 my second job was in Riyadh for more than a year, in Dhahran for 2 years, and it’s really hard for a movie buff like me to search info in the net when you’re a graphic designer who likes American Movies, and I’m not even talking about porn,  just mainstream movies like “BABE: Pig in the City”, even my friends who are doctors and nurses can’t search for “breast”cancer because of the word “breast”-even for medical research purposes your not allowed to see tits. Saudi Arabia ranked 161st out of 173 countries for “freedom of the press” according to Reporters Without Borders in 2008. Going online in Saudi Arabia where internet censorship is common is rather like visiting a parallel universe run by the world’s strictest, most bigoted parents. Entire sites disappear without warning. Keyword filtering and ISP blacklists prevent you from accessing any sites that the kingdom doesn’t think you should see. The most aggressive censorship focused on pornography, drug use, gambling, religious conversion of Muslims, and filtering circumvention tools.

SEXUAL NATURE

Incoming press is strictly controlled by censorship officials, primarily for content of sexual nature. Photos of women in books, magazines, and product packaging are routinely censored with black markers if any skin is showing and sometimes pages are just ripped right out. Meanwhile, books, videotapes and electronic media brought into the country may be subjected to censorship at customs. Pork in any form is prohibited, and so is pornography.

Other countries that have censorship in the internet and other medias are Belarus, Burma, Cuba, Iran, Libya, Maldive, Nepal, North Korea, Syria, Tunisia, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, Turkmenistan and China.

The sequel to one of director Paul Verhoeven’s highest-grossing films had a long, troubled history from its initial inception in the mid-90s. When it was released in 2006, Michael Caton-Jones’s ‘Basic Instinct 2’ was greeted with howls of derision—although most of the complaints seemed to be directed at the prospect of a seeing a semi-naked 48-year-old woman than at the idea of a sequel, in and of itself. So, in order to get this out of the way from the beginning, yes, Sharon Stone appears naked in this film. She looks perfectly fine, so let’s move on, shall we?

The bare-bones plot synopsis is this: charged with failing to rescue her passenger after a car crash, author Catherine Tramell (Sharon Stone) is examined by psychiatrist Michael Glass (David Morrissey). Glass has an unfortunate incident in his past, which Tramell exploits, manipulating him and those around him, ostensibly to write her new novel, ‘The Analyst.’ What follows is a cat and mouse game where the body count increases, Glass becomes convinced of Tramell’s guilt while the police, led by a detective played by David Thewlis, become more convinced that Glass is responsible. If that sounds similar to the plot of the first ‘Basic Instinct,’ well, it should; other than the details, it is the same plot.

That said, virtually everything in ‘Basic Instinct 2’ plays with your expectations.  There are near direct repeats of scenes from ‘Basic Instinct,’ but the payoffs are almost always completely different.As a case in point, both films highlight scenes where Tramell spreads her legs while sitting on a chair. In the first film, during an interrogation, she uncrosses her legs, which reveals her lack of underwear to an assembled group of investigators in a calculated display showing that she has nothing to hide (the title of the chapter stop for this scene on the DVD is, indeed, ‘Nothing to Hide’. Please note that I have pixelated the image for sensitive readers). In the second film, this iconic scene is repeated not once but twice. Once, late in the film, she sits back in a chair, in underwear this time, as a voice-over reads from ‘Tramell’s’ latest novel, about a novelist who manipulates a psychiatrist into providing alibis for her murders. Earlier, though, she straddles the back of a chair, simultaneously spreading her legs wider than previously and revealing significantly less of herself.

Time and time again, ‘Basic Instinct 2’ sets up sequences you’ve seen only to go another direction. The first film features a scene where Tramell starts to light a cigarette, only to be told that there is ‘no smoking in here.’ Her reply is to ask, ‘What are you going to do, arrest me for smoking?’ As with the chair scenes, these are also repeated twice in the sequel, but neither time is the punchline delivered.

One can read ‘Basic Instinct 2’ as calculated parody of the entire genre of the erotic thriller. A staple of late night cable television programming, erotic thrillers provide the basic elements of a mystery (a crime of some sort, usually murder or blackmail) but shift the narrative onto an unrelated party who becomes accidentally involved (as a witness, say); this is then coupled this with softcore pornography. On the surface, ‘Basic Instinct 2’ follows this general guideline, but its initial mystery isn’t a mystery (namely, did Tramell not save someone?), the unrelated party is inextricably linked to the sequence of subsequent crimes (and this is true whichever way you choose to read the film’s final set of oblique revelations), and the sex scenes, though prevalent, are almost always interrupted, whether in one case by the telephone ringing or by strangely abrupt scene cuts. There are even a number of sexually explicit scenes that were removed from the film (and no, they are not included on the ‘unrated extended cut’ DVD), arguably the ultimate in un-consummated expectation. The notion of removing sex scenes from an erotic thriller is both absurd and wholly in keeping with the idea that ‘Basic Instinct 2’ is in fact a comedy; a dark comedy for sure, but a comedy nevertheless. Perhaps even at the expense of the first film’s fan base.

Visually it is full of obviously intentional phallic references from London’s rather striking skyscraper at 30 St Mary Axe (also known as the Gherkin) which seems to rise in the frame just prior to each of Tramell’s sessions with Glass to her ‘Big Ben’-shaped cigarette lighter (which is later crushed underfoot—take that Freud!). Another visual joke, seen in the title image above, is Catherine Tramell’s license plate, which reads ‘DIII CAT.’ Dialogue, which is always delivered in an absolute deadpan, features a frequently hilarious lines like ‘She just walked out – how very Lacanian’ and ‘Don’t take it so hard, even Oedipus didn’t see his mother coming.’ Never once is there a knowing smirk, and the script clearly knows exactly which pitches to hit and which to let go.

And as far as the script goes, ‘Basic Instinct 2’ makes one, seemingly simple, change to the first film’s formula, but it is a change that makes all the difference. Whereas the first film remains fixed on tracking the actions of its obnoxious (and that is being unnecessarily charitable) detective, the sequel keeps its focus right where it belongs, on the most interesting character, Catherine Tramell. And it is this shift that makes it a much, much more interesting film.

IMDB link http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103772/

IMDB ratings 6.8/10   51,431 votes
Release Date : 20 March 1992 (USA)

Genre : Mystery | Romance | Thriller

Plot : A former rock star, Johnny Boz, is brutally killed during sex, and the case is assigned to detective Nick Curran of the SFPD. During the investigation, Nick meets Catherine Tramell, a crime novelist who was Boz’s girlfriend when he died. Catherine proves to be a very clever and manipulative woman, and though Nick is more or less convinced that she murdered Boz, he is unable to find any evidence. Later, when Nilsen, Nick’s rival in the police, is killed, Nick suspects of Catherine’s involvement in it. He then starts to play a dangerous lust-filled mind game with Catherine to nail her, but as their relationship progresses, the body count rises and contradicting evidences force Nick to start questioning his own suspicions about Catherine’s guilt.

Direct Download links

ftp://195.189.82.99/Films/Films.MP4/%ce%f1%ed%ee%e2%ed%ee%e9%20%e8%ed%f1%f2%e8%ed%ea%f2/Basic%20Instinct.avi

Yup, you read that correctly. Sharon Stone, star of such memorable films as Basic Instinct 2 and Catwoman and certified crazy, has an IQ of 154 which qualifies her for Mensa membership.

See some other surprising Mensa members (including an adult film star and a 2-year-old) at The Daily Beast.

Day three, Chelsea, London

Standing over the mattress, he took a leisurely sip of wine and stared down at her beautiful naked body, pinned out, star shaped, waiting his attention. The delicious vulnerability made his cock hard. He smiled; she was ready to be cut.

As she slept through the drugs, he had stretched her out on thick plastic sheeting and staked her limbs to the bedposts. He set up two spotlights; one at each end of the bed, their harsh light burnt directly onto her tanned skin, blanching it ethereal white. He gently stroked the length of her body with a wet cloth, bathing away the musky sweat of their sex. Her body glistened, she was beautiful, it was a shame, he would miss her.

He painstakingly applied makeup to her sleeping face; the finishing touch, a slash of whore-red lipstick dragged across her mouth. He stroked the blonde fringe from her forehead and fanned her soft tresses out onto the plastic sheet, gently combing through the tangles, trying not to pull on her scalp. The long blonde hair formed a golden halo around her head. She was his angel… fallen, but his.

The preparation complete, he fist-whipped her face.  Knuckles smashed backwards and forwards until a snap of bone cracked the air; she gave a low moan through the drugged coma. Red welts crept across her skin, lipstick smudged her cheeks. It was time to wake up, time for penance; he had waited nearly twenty years.

Standing over her, he picked up the bottle of red wine and stretched his arm out high over her head, ready to pour. He waited patiently as she regained consciousness. The drugs were wearing off.

She woke to the heat of the spotlights burning her skin; their harsh light piercing her eyelids. Why was it so hot? She tried to move away from the source, but her heavy limbs barely moved. What was happening?  Her mouth was parched, her throat locked tight, a searing pain ran through her jaw as she tried to swallow… what the fuck!

She rocked her head backwards and forwards, groaning with the waves of pain, trying to clear her mind. Where was she? Memories began to tumble back into place… fuck! Where was he?  She knew he was somewhere near; she could smell his expensive cologne, could hear his agitated breathing; he was aroused.

She squinted through the light, her darting eyes anxiously trying to find him. On a bedside table, a few feet from her head, something glistened.  She strained towards it, pulling the glint into focus. Her heart stopped. A neat row of surgical instruments lay on a silver tray, his tools of torture set out in an orderly fashion, soldiers ready for duty, their polished blades shimmering in the light.

‘My God. Fuckinghell! Good for you! You are one gutsy broad!!!! Think about selling this one to Hollywood!’

‘A really good read preferably in daylight! One minute horrified the next laughing outloud, I finished the book covered in goosebumps’. (Amazon)

‘Couldn’t put it down – a real page turner. Nicely crafted and highly unusual format with all the threads coming together right at the end. It’s in a category all of its own and would make a great film. I look forward to the sequels. Well done’. (Amazon)

“DAVID:The Penance List is a compelling novel. I found myself snatching it up every chance I could, wanintg to see what Daivd would do next. The book is dark, naughty…sometimes downright nasty. Cunningham’s first novel will hold your attention to the very end.” Amazon, Author Susan Whitfield..

‘I raise a glass, I’d love to meet anyone who writes like this. Blown away to the point of speechless. Shocking, vivid and bloody well written!! ‘

‘The Penance List. I’m loving it!  I would just say how good it is  Best of luck to you !’

Have to say the book is fabulous … I’m pretending it’s not my cup of tea as supposedly a girlie read but genuinely brilliant !

‘God I loved your book! It was intense, great narration, and wonderful dialogue’.

‘Your prologue grabs the reader and doesn’t give us a chance to catch our breath. Right of the bat with naked bodies – ready to be cut – drugs – we know something very strange is happening here. We are left wondering – how does she know this guy and what he’s done?  By leaving her name out, we are left wondering in chapter two who the victim is. The conversations – on sex – will keep anyone’s attention as we gladly listen as a fly on the wall. Your narrator is top rate. You’ve managed to do what I’ve seen very few people do – give your narrator a personality. That gives this a tone / mood – sometimes tense and scary and sometimes light. How could one not be drawn into their conversation with the creepy “clicks” going on in the background. In chapter three, you’ve given us a reason for David’s behavior. Not an excuse – he’s a scary, sick, bastard – a very scary character. But giving us his background provides some clues to why he’s so sick. Abuse, Catholics, etc. All of this draws us in. You’ve written a very engaging book. It’s hard to stop reading it – I’m bakcing this one without a doubt. ‘

‘Another referral, I’m pleased to say that I didn’t back you out of kinship, you’re a seriously good writer. Twisted, dark, nasty, but excellently written, the characterisation and dialogue (internal and external) reads like a dream. ‘

‘I hadn’t seen this book before today. Where have I been? OMG, that is a vile prologue – horrible, graphically real. Am I put off by it? Not at all. This stuff happens, and it happens every day in towns and cities throughout the world. Why would it be taboo – murder isn’t taboo. This is a glimpse into a human being ruined. We hate him, hate what he’s doing to the girl, but then we learn what had been done to him as a kid. Something snapped. His anger was palpable – uncontrollable, and he went through the motions as those he was destined to them. And maybe he was. Maybe that’s the whole point. I think perhaps readers misunderstood when they see the tag erotica – thinking that this is about kinky sex. But it’s not. This kind of rage is never about sex, right? It’s about pain and rage. You have taken a bold move to write this from his POV, but that’s what will awaken readers to the heart of the story.’

‘My goodness you pull no punches, do you. It’s a little too frank for my taste, but I can still appreciate good writing when I read it. The prologue is amazingly vivid. Chapter 1 is an excellent counter weight with the ladies. Nice touch with the “click, clicks”.

Just to let you know that I have received your book yesterday and I just love it, can’t put it down. I really like the way you write (and it’s sooo interesting — well anything about sex normally is ). I have let everybody know about it so they will buy it too!! ” Marie Ange, France.

‘My God you shocked my shoes off. Excellent work! ‘

‘A hard-hitting, forceful narrative that is about as powerful as anything I’ve seen. This won’t be everyone’s cup of tea, but writing doesn’t get much better than this. This book is hard to ignore and damn near impossible to stop reading. Easily backed.’

‘Your opening paragraph starts out erotic and becomes disturbing, quite an achievment in three sentences. Chapter two, starts with David’s back-story. We already know how the headmaster treated him, so the summons, early in the chapter is ominous.This whole passage was compelling. It shows the genesis of the devil we saw in the prologue, and yet he is sympathetic. I read the whole chapter without taking a single note, which is most unusual for me. This is an incredibly powerful piece of writing. Few could make a man they’d already shown as a monster into an object of pity. This is masterful, dark and suspensful writing, with you expertly exploit tensions between the erotic and the macarbe, and your characterisation of David is phenomenal.’

‘Thanks for the warning, what an explosive and visceral start. You have created a very compelling scene which should draw us more deeply into the book and quickly. Not sure about the tag Chick Lit or Erotica, this seems like a psychological thriller at the moment. I like the title, very interesting, creates a number of questions from the off. Your writing is bold and delivers the narrative quickly and simply, a compelling read, well-constructed, if a bit graphic for my personal tastes, best of luck with it’

‘I wholeheartedly back this. You know how to elicit exactly the reaction you want readers to feel. That’s an awesome gift’

AGENT; Barry Nevill barry@nevill3.freeserve.co.uk
PRESS; Sue Roberts sue@sraltd.com
Media Review Copies; promotions@authorhouse.com

Press Release;
DAVID ‘The Penance List’
By S C Cunningham

A visceral account of the corruptive power of sex and one man’s murderous rampage.
S C Cunningham’s debut novel ushers in a high-octane world of glamour, obsession and pure evil in this summer’s most libidinous thriller.

Life for a select group of London’s glitterati is about to change forever. Their indulgent serenity will be torn asunder because of their unfortunate connection to a man called David. David will seduce them, ruin them and wreck the lives of their friends and family in order to satisfy his desire for revenge, at any cost. They will be lucky to escape with their lives.

David is a damaged idol, a vision of beauty and perfection that masks a dark heart and a tortured soul. Having been brutalised as child at the hands of his school headmaster, he has a distorted world view and a cold disregard for human emotion. He is also a sexual tour de force, bending his victims to his will through his salaciousness, while being consumed by an almost carnal need to exact his own brand of justice. Three Chelsea girls, a Premiership footballer, an ex-army chauffeur and a secretly gay photographer will be his first victims in this warped quest to dominate those he meets.

S C Cunningham’s provocative debut novel David: The Penance List is a graphically violent examination of the indiscriminate nature of evil and the abuse of the power of sex. It’s a brave, terrifying and pulsating read fuelled by Cunningham’s first rate storytelling, astonishingly intense sex scenes and a throbbing, sinister tension. S C Cunningham’s own life experiences — she has twice crossed the paths of serial killers (unscathed) — afford David: The Penance List a level of authority and sincerity rare in fiction. This is the first book in Cunningham’s The David Trilogy series, which will follow her captivating psychopath David as he stalks the movements of London’s showbiz class, offering an ambitious and exciting thriller set to inject new life into the fiction market. She exposes the baseless lives of Londoners captivated by fame and fortune and shows how easily anyone of us can be seduced by money, sex and celebrity. David: The Penance List will be followed by Unfinished Business and For My Sins, which complete The David Trilogy.

About the author: Siobhan Cunningham was born in Surrey, educated in Berkshire and has her roots firmlyplanted in Eire. A former model, she was once married to acclaimed musician Raf Ravenscroft, whose stellar career included providing the saxophone solo for Gerry Raffertys ‘Baker Street’ and working with the Pink Floyd.

Cunningham has worked extensively in both the music and sport industries, notably for Chelsea Football Club and the management company responsible for the careers of David Beckham, Michael Owen, John Terry and Alan Shearer… alongside the infamous Rebecca Loos.

After a five year stint with horseracing’s elite at The Jockey Club she decided to focus on her passion for writing. Cunningham lives in London with her artist daughter Scarlett Raven. Supporters of Scarlett’s work include Take That, the manager of ‘Queen’, Conservative MP, Live Nation HQ, Chairman of Lonhro, England footballer Mathew Upson and actor Orlando Bloom.
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/lifestyle/article-23751757-a-new-easel-angel.do

There are only two methods by which civilizations can operate: sharing and buying.  The sellers are the foundation upon which the rulers are built into a government imposing these conditions on the masses.

The original system imposed on all animals is foraging and sharing.  Foraging is searching for naturally produced foods, which have been purposely removed from all forests on earth except the deepest of rain forests and jungles.  These also will soon be removed purposely for the same reason: to force the human race to buy their food from the sellers, which in turn forces the people to work for their rulers.

Sharing has been replaced methodically by the costs being controlled by the rulers, which in turn could be calculated to an exact amount needed by a person to barely survive.  Once the ability to calculate how much is needed, a person’s costs could be controlled so that he or she would never be able to save or develop enough assets to stop working.

The latest invention of rulers is the granting of credit.  Credit is a new twist on an old method of keeping the workers in debt, in order to keep them working.  It was the company store that provided all the worker’s needs.  The worker couldn’t possibly afford everything they needed with their salary, so the company store gave the worker credit, which kept the worker in debt and from quitting or retiring.

The new twist is banks have become the means of credit, but the purpose is still the same.  Keeping people in debt and from quitting their jobs, or retiring from work.  When a person can never get out of debt, they must continue working for their sellers.

Proof of this is the recent economic crisis.  The government took the people’s taxes and gave the banks a trillion dollars.  The reason for this was to keep the banks from having to sell their assets that they acquired from the bad loans not being paid as the economy soured.  These bank assets would have made some people richer by buying the assets very cheaply.

If the banks couldn’t sell their assets, then it would cause the bankruptcy of many banks forcing banks to sell assets at an even lower price.  Keeping the banks from failing, and keeping the bank’s assets from being sold cheaply was achieved by the government giving the banks your tax money.  This achieved their goal of keeping things from being sold at a lower price, and forcing people to purchase those things at a high price.

Thus, removing people’s ability to survive by having goods for sale available at lower prices.  Credit and bank bailouts effectively remove the existence of a used market for the lower classes, forcing them to work by having to buy new products at higher prices, which seem lower because of purchasing things on credit.

This was a first in Capitalism, not to mention a complete reversal of Capitalistic ideals, which are businesses either make it in business on their own, or go bankrupt due to incapable or greedy people ruining the business.

Banks are business.  This was the case of the recent economic crash.  Instead of rewarding the banks by bailing them out with our tax money, those people running the banks badly should have received the destruction of their own wealth and jobs for mishandling the banks.

The control of the hearts and minds of the people is the essential ingredient rulers need to enslave all the populations of the earth, which is their ultimate goal.  Cheap labor so the rich can maintain their lifestyle.  It is difficult for people to believe their own nation does this to them, because most people are so caught up in surviving that they have no alternative but to believe what they are told by their governments.  The rulers of their own nations have taught them their mentality.  It is the rulers controlling their brains through the media, the schools, the books published, and the religions.

Controlling the heart is just another way of saying, controlling the brain.  President Bush Jr. coined this phrase when the U.S. attacked Iraq in 2002.  His father, President Bush Sr., told us a New World Order had begun in 1991.  The New World Order referred to a Westernization of our globe including all nations.  This is why it was necessary to remove communism as a way for people to live, which included sharing or everyone’s needs being taken care of by the government, by using your taxes for that purpose instead of bailing-out the rich.

Capitalism is the basis of the United States.  Capitalism plainly defined means buying and selling instead of sharing.  Jack Kennedy said it this way:

“Ask not what your government can do for you, but ask what you can do for your government.”

Hog Wash!  A government simply exists for its people, and not the other way around!  This is why we don’t have welfare anymore, or national health care.  You have to buy it!  You work all your lives and inflation is designed to eat-up your assets as you age and are not looking!

As you have recently noticed, your taxes are used by the rulers to support the rulers and fund military that will be used against its own people when they refuse to work.

What I have disclosed thus far is only the tip of the iceberg.  Yet, understanding why a woman and a man operate the way they do can help people to achieve peace in their own lives.  It isn’t necessary to live tormented.  Since we let knowledge replace instinct and oppose instinct, a person’s personal peace has fled.

Worrying is in opposition to peace and a sound mind!  Trying to understand each other will promote peace.  Forgiving each other, because it is not possible to understand why we hurt each other, will promote our own personal peace.  Allowing each other to live according to our instincts will promote peace.  Peace is much better than torment.  Peace and torment cannot live together in the same brain.  If they try to live together, one will kill the other.  The killing of one’s brain results in depression, insanity, murder, or suicide.

The essence of life is living, not imposing rules upon ourselves.

That is true freedom!

~Elijah

Sigourney Weaver

 

Sigourney Weaver (born October 8, 1949) is an American actress. She is best known for her roles as Lieutenant Ellen Ripley in the Alien film series and as Dana Barrett in the Ghostbusters movies. Weaver is also a three-time Academy Award nominee for her performances in Aliens, Gorillas in the Mist and Working Girl. She is still one of the very few actresses who has ever been nominated for an Academy Award for Best Actress for her role in a science fiction movie (Aliens).

Although Weaver has played a number of critically acclaimed roles in movies such as Gorillas in the Mist, The Ice Storm, Dave, and The Year of Living Dangerously, she is best known for her appearances as Warrant Officer/Lieutenant Ellen Ripley in the blockbuster Alien movie franchise. She first appeared as Ripley in Ridley Scott’s 1979 film Alien. She reprised the role in three sequels, Aliens, Alien 3, and Alien Resurrection. She was nominated for a Best Actress Academy Award for portraying Ripley in Aliens. She also starred in two films in 1988, receiving Academy Award nominations for her roles as Katherine Parker in Working Girl and as naturalist Dian Fossey in Gorillas in the Mist. She lost out to Geena Davis and Jodie Foster respectively, although she received Golden Globes for both roles.

Weaver also appeared in Ghostbusters and Ghostbusters II as Dana Barrett. She played the role of agoraphobic criminal psychologist Helen Hudson in the 1995 movie Copycat, and went on to become one of the most highly paid actresses of the 1990s. In addition to her trademark role as Ripley, Weaver has recently concentrated on smaller roles such as 1999’s A Map of the World and 2006’s Snow Cake. She has also appeared in comedic roles, such as Jeffrey (1994), Galaxy Quest (1999), and Heartbreakers (2001), in which she starred with Jennifer Love Hewitt.

In 1997, Weaver won the BAFTA Award for her supporting role in Ang Lee’s The Ice Storm. In 2003, she was voted 20th in Channel 4’s countdown of the 100 greatest movie stars of all time. She was one of only two women in the top 20 (the other was Audrey Hepburn). That year, she also played The Warden in the movie Holes. In 2006, Weaver returned to Rwanda for the BBC special Gorillas Revisited.

Weaver was approached to star in The Accused but felt the nature of the story was too violent. She was considered for the role of Catherine Tramell in Basic Instinct, but Sharon Stone was cast instead.  Bryan Singer originally wanted Weaver for the role of Emma Frost in X-Men: The Last Stand, but Singer (along with screenwriter Dan Harris, who had directed Weaver in Imaginary Heroes) left the project, and the idea to include Frost was dropped. In 2009, Weaver starred as Mary Griffith in her first made-for-TV movie, Prayers for Bobby, for which she was nominated for an Emmy Award. She also guest starred in the TV show Eli Stone in the fall of 2008.

Weaver also has done voice work in television and film. She had a guest role in the Futurama episode “Love and Rocket” in February 2002, playing the female Planet Express Ship. In 2006, she was the narrator for the American version of the Emmy Award-winning series Planet Earth. Also in 2006, Weaver narrated “A Matter of Degrees”. A short film that plays daily at The Natural History Museum of the Adirondacks (The Wild Center) in Tupper Lake, New York. In 2008, Weaver was featured as the voice of the ship’s computer in the Pixar and Disney release, WALL•E. She also voiced a narrating role in another computer-animated film, 2008’s The Tale of Despereaux, based on the novel by Kate DiCamillo. Weaver has also expressed interest in starring in a fifth Alien film. Pre-production details for the film are expected to start soon.

Trivia:

Chosen by Empire magazine as one of the 100 Sexiest Stars in film history (#81). [1995]

Attended the Ethel Walker School in Simsbury, CT.

Her dad Sylvester L. Weaver Jr. (“Pat” Weaver), NBC-TV president (1953- 55), pioneered the desk-and-couch talk show format that still survives on two programs he created – NBC’s “Today” (1952) and “Tonight!” (1953) (aka “The Tonight Show”) shows.

Ranked #71 in Empire (UK) magazine’s “The Top 100 Movie Stars of All Time” list. [October 1997]

Changed her name after reading “The Great Gatsby”.

Debuted in Woody Allen ’s Annie Hall (1977), duration: 6 seconds.

Family: Daughter of NBC-TV executive Sylvester L. Weaver Jr. (“Pat” Weaver) and actress Elizabeth Inglis, older brother, Trajan Weaver. Uncle, actor Doodles Weaver.

Afraid to travel in elevators.

#13 of Sci-Fi’s Sexy 50, by Femme Fatales magazine. [1997]

Eye/hair color: brown

Speaks fluent French and German.

Graduated from Stanford University in 1972 with a bachelor’s degree in English.

Has one daughter, Charlotte Simpson, was born on 13 April 1990.

She is one of the elite eleven thespians to have been nominated for both a Supporting and Lead Acting Academy Award in the same year for their achievements in two different movies. The other nine are Fay Bainter, Teresa Wright, Barry Fitzgerald (he has been nominated in both categories for the same role in the same movie), Jessica Lange, Al Pacino, Emma Thompson, Holly Hunter, Julianne Moore, Jamie Foxx and Cate Blanchett.

Her salary for Alien: Resurrection (1997) was more than the entire cost of the original Alien (1979) movie.

Measurements: 34B-24-35 (Source: Celebrity Sleuth magazine)

Suffered nightmares for two weeks after reading the script for The Village (2004).

Was nominated for Broadway’s 1985 Tony Award as Best Actress (Featured Role – Play) for David Rabe’s “Hurlyburly,” but lost to a co-star, Judith Ivey.

Has worked with three Bagginses. In Alien (1979) she works with Ian Holm, who played Frodo in the BBC radio adaptation and Bilbo in The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001) and The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003). In The Ice Storm (1997) she worked with Elijah Wood, who played the part in the film. In Aliens (1986) the stunt double for Newt was Kiran Shah, who was also Wood’s scale double.

Though they have never worked together she has co-starred with nine actors who have also co-starred with Jamie Lee Curtis: Ray Liotta, Dan Aykroyd, Kevin Kline, Tim Allen, J.E. Freeman, Mel Gibson, Elijah Wood, Philip Bosco and Bill Paxton. Both have co-starred with Michelle Williams. They have also both worked with composer John Ottman and director James Cameron.

In many of her roles her character has had to deal with artificially intelligent spaceships. In the “Alien” movies, she battles them. In Galaxy Quest (1999), much to her character’s chagrin, she repeated whatever the spaceship said. In addition, on an episode of “Futurama” (1999), and in the film WALL·E (2008), she had the chance to voice a spaceship.

Member of jury at the Cannes Film Festival in 1998

Attended the Yale School of Drama

Remains in contact with her former Aliens (1986) co-star Carrie Henn.

In the film Alien: Resurrection (1997) Sigourney actually managed to sink the basketball into the hoop backwards on the first take, even though she wasn’t supposed to or intended to. The shot was almost ruined because Ron Perlman broke character because he was so amazed.

Her performance as Ellen Ripley in Aliens (1986) is ranked #58 on Premiere Magazine’s 100 Greatest Performances of All Time (2006).

Her performance as Ellen Ripley in the “Alien” quadrilogy is ranked #8 on Premiere Magazine’s 100 Greatest Movie Characters of All Time.

Injured her knee during the shooting of Snow Cake (2006) and has been forced to stop exercising for a year.

Friend of Selina Cadell.

Ranked #20 on E4’s 100 Greatest Movie Stars. She was the second highest female on the list behind #13 Audrey Hepburn.

Along with Sissy Spacek, Piper Laurie, Janet Leigh, Jodie Foster, Glenn Close, Kathy Bates, Eileen Heckart, Ruth Gordon, Patty McCormack, Nancy Kelly, Toni Collette, Ellen Burstyn and Linda Blair, she is one of the few actresses to have been nominated for an Oscar for a performance in a horror movie.

Singer/songwriter Mike Garrigan wrote a song entitled “Sigourney Weaver” that pays tribute to the actress.

Dana Barrett, her character in the Ghostbusters films, is the only character among the leads who did not appear in the animated adaptation, The Real Ghostbusters (1986).

Chosen by Empire magazine as one of the 100 Sexiest Stars in film history (#74). [2007].

Ranked #74 on Empires’s 100 Sexiest Movie Stars. (2007).

Has turned down several high-profile roles over the years: the Shelley Duvall role in Annie Hall (1977), the Brooke Shields role in The Blue Lagoon (1980), the Kathleen Turner role in Body Heat (1981), the Debra Winger role in An Officer and a Gentleman (1982), the Michelle Pfeiffer role in Scarface (1983), the Amy Irving role in Yentl (1983), the Linda Hamilton role in The Terminator (1984), the Glenn Close role in Fatal Attraction (1987), the Kelly McGillis role in The Accused (1988), the Nicole Kidman role in Dead Calm (1989), the Natasha Richardson role in The Handmaid’s Tale (1990), the Geena Davis role in Thelma & Louise (1991), the Sharon Stone role in Basic Instinct (1992) and the Holly Hunter role in The Piano (1993).

Amazon Specials!

The female instinct to survive that causes the woman to override her basic instinct to have her eggs fertilized, resulted in the female submitting to the new male even when she was not in heat.  This new way of life resulted in women having two men in their lives as sexual mates: a condition that all women detest instinctually, even though they may live with it.

The two males in every woman’s life was a male in the workplace controlling her income and a male she married at home.  Both men using the same woman for sex.  One man in the workplace using her for sexual gratification and the other man using her for sexual impregnation.

Retraining the modern woman’s brain to survive became the driving force of knowledge forcing her to submit to multiple males.  She would have to choose the one and reject the other; or love the one and hate the other.  This new form of education forced both men and women to hate marriage.  Divorce, promiscuity, and betrayal, was now the new way of life.

Ultimately, husbands concluded women cannot be faithful and became unwilling to marry or remain faithful in marriage.  The wife concluded that she must redesign her own brain to deal with her new way of life, which includes multiple male partners to remain in control of her own existence and sanity, resulting in her unwillingness to marry, and her unwillingness to bear children.

This led many women to kill their own babies either by murder or abortion, and to become promiscuous to justify earning more money by having many male partners.  Her new problem is the removal of guilt.

Now that women were seduced by their governments into abandoning their nests and children for the job and money, it would be easy to seduce women to abandon their husbands, even if their abandonment was only a temporary fling and kept secret.   The watering-down of a man’s traditions, morals, beliefs, and mental instincts had begun, because the woman was now being fertilized by strangers even though she was married.

Let the murderers, rapists and thieves begin!  Rulers had finally found a way to achieve mastery over the human race, and no one could revolt or stop it because it is a well-guarded secret.

Now you know why the government backs science in the pursuit of methods and products designed to free women from producing children.  Now you know why the government forces children to learn about sex.  And now you know why the people’s state of affairs concerning the family is in total disarray.

It was imperative for the government to find a way to release women’s guilt derived from them having multiple male partners and the guilt of the results of the many unwanted children from many male partners.  Women have been trained and educated not to want children.  Child bearing interferes with a woman’s freedom: her right to choose a male partner; her right to earn a living; a right over her own health — these are just a few new ideas programmed into the brains of women.  Instinct gave her no such rights, but rulers gave her these rights for their own selfish purposes and greed.

Understanding the basic instinct of the male and female human being only unravels the basic reasons behind bad marriages, divorce, male and female promiscuity, disease, crime and evil acts.  Human behavior is further complicated by external and internal conditions.

External conditions include the mentality of a nation, the variations of religious mentality, and the personal dreams of each person imposed on them by the media such as music and films, but the greatest of all external conditions imposed on people is buying and selling.  Money is the center of this condition.

To be continued…

Women living in a monogamist society eventually stray from a marriage, while men stray quickly.  Most men and women hold out for a decade or two, but thinking cannot overpower instinct.  When a woman is young, approximately 10 or 12 years of age, she comes into puberty.  Men are a couple of years behind women.  This is not a mistake of nature.  It dictates that females cannot be fertilized by boys of the same age, because they have not matured sufficiently to pass on strong genes.

This sets in motion a law that only older males having proved their survival skills can collect females.  Remember, the female wants the strongest, smartest male to fertilize her.  She instinctively knows which male has learned to survive by his age.  It dictates he has learned to survive.  His knowledge gathered over his lifespan will pass on to her offspring.  These female instincts insure the continuance of a strong species that will survive.

While the male selects young strong females to produce his offspring to insure he gets his genes into the world.  Yet, the rulers are imposing new ways of disrupting nature.  Through sex education, tolerance of misbehavior, tolerance of misguided sex practices, through media training of the masses, and through manipulation by using chemicals, children are being trained and redesigned to become sexually active at ever increasing younger ages.

Societies have allowed younger and younger males to grab-up the females close to their own age.  Thus, removing the older males from the gene pool available for younger women, because these older men possess the survival knowledge that only comes with age.  Survival knowledge the rulers fear and do not want passed on to children.

Producing new generations of children less able to survive and more easily convinced to do things the way the State demands.  Thus, controlling employees by ignorance of survival, which is a threat to rulers remaining in power.

Taking the basic instinct of the female, which is to have her eggs fertilized, we see the only reason a woman needs a man.  The rulers must act swiftly before the people become wise to their plot.  In order for rulers to maintain control of their citizens, they must find a new method of controlling the people, before the people realize they have been deceived and used.  Therefore, finding a new way to release the woman from her male is essential to maintaining their control over the new age slaves (employees).

Rulers’ ultimate goal is to replace the male with something else.  The scientific quest for artificial insemination and cloning is that attempt to replace the male.  The reason for this is to increase the working slaves (employees) for the rulers.  Originally this was achieved during World War II.  The government removed most men from their homes, wives, children, and their workplaces, for the war effort.

The idea was to convince women that the nation needed them to replace their husbands who went off to war; and that women could learn to do the work as well as their husband’s did; and to teach women they could earn sufficient money and be free from the enslavement of their husbands.

Thus, in one stroke of genius, the government devised a plan giving women a taste of earning their own money, being free of husbands, and shedding their responsibilities at home.  The government achieved their goal to wean women away from their nests–their homes, children, while doubling the workforce of employees in the future, and releasing children from the direct training done by mothers so the State could now retrain the kids to change.

We are living in that future, and the result is fatal!

Once this was achieved, women would seek their freedom from their male watchdogs, throwing women’s lives open to managerial raping of wives and daughters, who volunteered their bodies reluctantly to keep their jobs.  Instinctual female promiscuity was then triggered by a perception in women that the stronger male had replaced their dominant male husbands, because the boss controlled their provision through salaries earned.  Things women were never designed to experience.

While the woman was designed to be loyal to the mate of her choice, she was also designed with the ability to shift that loyalty away from the mate of her choice, if he were overthrown by a stronger male.  Thus, the workplace became the new territory she chose to enter, and thereby automatically gave the bosses control over his female employees.

This new territorial boundary replaced the male husband’s territory known as the home.  It released the woman’s instinct for provision and protection of her nest and her children, by allowing a new dominant male to replace her husband by having sex with her.

To be continued…

Women are designed to go without sex for much longer periods of time than men.  In the case of a pregnant human female, a ten month time period after fertilization is necessary before giving birth.  During this time period most women do not want sex, but need consoling and protection.  So, to get their male’s protection and consoling they are willing to give their man sex, but women hate it.

This limits a woman’s need for fertilization, and the lack of needing fertilization reduces the woman’s need for sex to zero.  Not to mention the care period of a newborn child following birth, which for human females should be 2 years, but can be as long as 25 years depending on the female’s self-imposed limitations because of not breeding.

The care period of a newborn child should not be longer than 2 years, but thinking has elongated this responsibility for men and women.  If we take the 2 year period necessary for a woman to insure the survival of her offspring, and add it to the 10 month period from fertilization to birth, then we have a period of 2 years and 10 months the woman instinctively will not need further fertilization.

In the case of monogamy, what is the male who is also driven by his instincts supposed to do?  Remember, the instincts of the male demands fertilizing women every day.  It is what he was designed to do, just as women were designed to be impregnated.

As you can see, this imposes an extreme problem on monogamist societies, of which none actually exist on earth, because men subsidize their monogamist marriages with girlfriends, mistresses and prostitutes.

While Western societies fake an existence rooted in monogamy, the truth is prostitution, mistresses, girlfriends and sometimes daughters, wouldn’t be used as mates if these societies were truly monogamist.  Men in Western Societies mate with many more women during their lifetimes than they marry.  Instinct rules!  If instinct rules, then why are we Western nations based on monogamy?

The reason is simple. Rulers have learned over many ages that it is easier to enslave people who do not have 20 or 30 wives, resulting in 100 or more children, who are willing to fight any ruler threatening their family.  Armed with this knowledge, you can understand why Muslims are a great threat to Western societies.  Islam believes and allows a man to have multiple wives, producing many more children than Western men.  It is the basic reason the Western Hemisphere cannot stop terrorism; and if the West threatens Islam’s way of life (polygamy), there will be a World War III.

A man who has 20 or 30 women as wives will be totally fulfilled instinctively because he will be fertilizing all the time and the three year period a woman does not need fertilization, and is out of action because of childbirth, will no longer interrupt the natural behavior of the male and his many females.

Neither are his women threatened, abused, or imprisoned, because they willingly desire these conditions, which also fulfill all their instincts.

Every man and woman wants their instincts fulfilled.  Fulfilled instincts are the only way to achieve peace, satisfaction and sexual gratification.  Neither our present Western societies, nor the Eastern Westernized societies, can accomplish this by imposing rules and laws upon its citizens to control their sexual behavior, which must result in individual misbehavior and the overthrow of nations by war.  Therefore, women of ancient and modern societies are feeling imprisoned by men when it is the rulers who have imposed the conditions humans live under in civilization.

A woman cannot tell a man what she wants because she doesn’t know her instincts are ruling her, but she knows she needs to be free to follow her instincts.  Not free of her male mate, but free from their rulers who have imposed monogamy on the human race for their own benefit, which is to acquire the wealth from the use of their citizens by controlling their slaves, now known as employees.

For it is cheaper to pay a prostitute by the hour for sex, than to pay for a wife over a lifetime.  In the same way it is cheaper to pay for an employee by the hour, than to pay for a slave over his or her lifetime. Now you know why rulers have done away with slavery and replaced it with employment.

Now you know why rulers have done away with polygamy and replaced it with monogamy.  Now you know why China and America have done away with childbirth (by murdering the woman’s reproductive organs and allowing a woman to murder her child by abortion, and allowing a woman the right over her own body to keep it from reproduction).

To be continued…

One of the strongest drives taught to men and women early in life is to seek the approval of our peers and masters.  When people fail in this arena, they develop a low self esteem or a hatred for authority, amongst other neurosis.  Knowing how life is supposed to work, and how it was originally designed to work, is the basis of ridding oneself of these neuroses.

Torment is not a mental disease, even though it occurs in the brain.  Wild animals are not tormented, but caged animals are tormented.  Animals imprisoned by man, or living amongst man, display various stages of torment.  Yet, domestic animals like dogs and cats freely accept their imprisoned status, as most women also accept their imprisoned status.

Men, whether women believe it, are also prisoners of society.  Their prison cells might be larger, but that ends any difference between male and female imprisonment and torment.

In the wild, the female chooses which clan’s territory to join.  She is fully aware of enslaving herself to the male in charge of the territory.  She has freely chosen to become a part of that man’s life.  Once her choice is made, she loses all rights to making choices.  Her male dominates her.

The female instinct allows her to desire this condition.  In fact, she hungers to be dominated by her male.  Without her male’s domination, she is miserable.  Without children, women are confused.  Unless another male overthrows the superiority of her male, she will contently spend her entire life with her male.  This is because wild animals are only using instinct to direct their lives.

If her male is overthrown by another male, she is designed to submit to her new male freely, which behavior is exhibited in modern women on a daily basis, because women are designed to accept the new dominant male, which their instinct perceives is the guy controlling their workplace, the bar, or the gym.

Since the male is designed to fertilize the female whenever she comes into heat, females often stray from the husband due to a new male being on location when they go into heat at another location, other than the home.

Another natural law in the male is designed to fertilize women many times per day, while the female is not designed for such activity except when she goes into heat, which only occurs sporadically in any given year.  Therefore, we see another natural law.  Men can fertilize ten to twenty women in one day, every day; while a woman will only allow a man to fertilize her during her period of heat, which may only occur once a month.

This female limitation, imposed upon her by nature, imposes a strain upon her male mate in a monogamist society, because the male can fertilize at least ten to twenty women per day.  Has nature made a mistake?  No!  It seems to be a mistake, but is not a mistake.  It is a purposeful plan imposed upon the lower classes of the human race by the ruling class of a nation in civilization.  Rulers have constructed laws limiting the male to one female.

A nation’s law limiting males to one female is the basis of the male not having the availability of many females to fertilize; and the females not having one male to fertilize many women, when they come into heat.  This causes another problem in civilization.

Many women never get a male to fertilize them, or worse, women wind-up being fertilized by a male that cannot, nor will not, bear their responsibility to care of that female.  Leaving her to the mercy and scarcity of providing for herself and her children.

Now mathematically speaking, simple logic shows us that if a female only requires the services of her male mate one day per month, then the number of females that will require the same male’s services during that month would be at least thirty females; and they would solely belong to him.

This logic is based upon the thirty females coming into heat on different days during the same month, but many females in one herd can come into heat on the same day; and many other females can come into heat on different days of the month.

Now if the male can service ten to twenty different women each day, every day, then we can multiply the minimum ten women a day by the thirty days of a month culminating in a harem of at least three hundred women for one male.  Then it is necessary to figure in the supplies needed by the one male to provide for his females, and you can begin to see why a male would have to be a king, like King Solomon in the Bible, to provide for his 300 wives and 700 concubines.

Showing us that a normal number of females owned by one male should be a minimum of 300 females.  Not to mention the joy of a female, who does not have to perform sexually every day for her monogamist male as the sole female trying to satisfy his sexual appetite: which sexual appetite’s demands on the sole wife are considered as another form of enslavement; and not to mention the fact that women desire the company of other women and never desire the company of men, but only need men for fertilization.

Now you can see why monogamy (one man and one woman) cannot work, even though some people are die-hards and remain married for a lifetime.

To be continued…

Wah cepet ya udah Oktober nih… Bentar lagi Andrew ulang tahun, trus Halloween (udah siapin kostum dong buat Andrew… It will be his first Halloween nih!)… Seru!!!

Btw sebelum bener-bener beralih ke bulan Oktober, masih ada cerita dari bulan September yang masuk kategori “dibuang sayang” nih…

1. Tentang Berantem

Sebenernya lumayan banyak orang yang suka tanya ama kita, emangnya kita ini gak pernah berantem ya?

Yah masa sih ada suami istri yang gak pernah berantem? Rasanya sih gak mungkin ya… Nah kebetulan bulan kemaren kita sempet ada berantem sekali, dan juga kebetulan ada yang usul topik tentang berantem ini (Nat, dikau berhasil mendapatkan boneka Stitch! Moga-moga Avel suka ya… Tapi bersabarlah menunggu sampe Desember ya… Hehehe),  jadi ya udah gua tulis deh…

Kenapa gua gak pernah nulis tentang berantem ama Esther? Bukannya gua malu atau merasa tabu ngomongin ini, tapi tepatnya karena gua gak pernah inget! Beneran lho…

Gua ama Esther nih kalo berantem tuh paling gara-gara hal-hal kecil yang jadi besar gara-gara ada yang lagi bad mood aja. Gak pernah (thank God) karena hal-hal yang emang besar dan serius (dan moga-moga selamanya gak pernah ya!). Jadi berantemnya ya gak pake lama-lama.

Tahap berantemnya ya paling kayak begini:
1. Marah-marahan
2. Ngambek-ngambekan (diem-dieman bentar)
3. Dibahas
4. Baikan

Yah menurut gua emang kalo berantem itu gak boleh berlarut lama-lama. Harus diomongin sesegera mungkin. Biar gak ada yang ngeganjel atau dendam. Setelah itu kan jadi lega, dan selesai.

Bener-bener selesai. Makanya itu gua gak pernah inget juga dulu pernah berantem tuh gara-gara apa aja…

Nah tapi kalo nginget-nginget tentang berantem (duh masa berantem kok diinget-inget… ), gak akan lepas dari adanya peranan Andrew juga.

Andrew ini kan emang anaknya sensitif banget ya. Sisi negatif nya ya cenderung gampang nangis. Tapi sisi positifnya, ini anak tuh care banget!

Gua inget nih pernah kita berantem pas Andrew masih bayi (gua masih inget situasinya dengan jelas, tapi gua udah coba inget-inget berantemnya karena apa tuh gak inget lho!). Andrew kan anaknya tuh yang selalu minta diperhatiin, gak mau didiemin sendiri, pokoknya ada aja dah! Nah pas kita berantem itu, si Andrew tau-tau diem seribu bahasa. Diem sediem-diemnya! Sambil ngeliatin gua ama Esther. Apa karena dia kaget? Kayaknya sih gak juga… Soalnya kita kan kalo berantem juga gak seheboh sampe gimana.. Hahaha. Setelah-setelahnya pun, gua perhatiin kalo tiap kali gua ama Esther ada selisih paham, pasti nih anak langsung diem. Diem nya tuh ya antara kayak sedih atau marah kali ya secara dia belum bisa ngomong. Dan dia akan diem terus sampe gua ama Esther baikan. Setelah baikan ya Andrew nya langsung berubah biasa lagi. Lucu ya?

Setelah udah gedean dan bisa ngomong, dia mulai bisa merasa siapa yang bener siapa yang salah. Jadi dia jadi pelerai! Misalnya kalo keliatannya gua yang salah gitu dan gua marah-marah terus, si Andrew bakal ngomong keras ke gua: No, Daddy… Nooo!!! Sambil gua dihalang-halangi kalo gua mau ngintilin Esther yang lagi ngambek untuk nerusin omelan gua. Setelah gua diem, si Andrew bakal nyamperin Esther, trus nemenin Esther yang lagi ngambek. Seolah-olah kayaknya dia mau nyabar-nyabarin Esther gitu kali ya…. Hehehe.

Dan yang terakhir ya pas bulan September kemaren. Kali ini gua masih inget nih apa yang bikin gua ama Esther berantem. Jadi pas gua pulang makan siang, gua main Facebook. Eh lagi asik-asiknya gua main FB, Esther nyuruh gua nyari resep. Gua kesel dong, gak mau gua nyariin resepnya. Esther juga jadi kesel soalnya kan biasa gua gak suka main FB lama-lama, kok giliran disuruh nyari resep malah jadi mau main FB lama-lama. Nah kan persoalannya sepele banget kan?? (Bikin malu aja nulisnya juga, masa gitu aja berantem… Hahaha). Tapi ya begitulah, karena lagi bad mood juga kali ya, jadi ya berantem lah kita berbuntut dengan gua langsung tinggalin buat balik ke kantor.

Eh ternyata Andrew trus ngomong ke Esther gini: Mommy ama Daddy gak boleh berantem-berantem, Andrew gak suka Mommy ama Daddy berantem!

Hahaha. Gua diceritain Esther jadi ngakak. Trus ya kita jadi baikan dah…

Jadi mikir, ini yang anak yang mana, yang orang tua yang mana ya?

2. Tentang Tetangga

Wah ini juga topik usulan dari blogger nih, tepatnya dari Zee. Berhubung Natali ngasih komennya duluan, jadi hadiahnya dikasih ke dia, gak apa ya Zee?? Sebagai hadiah buat lu, seperti yang gua janjikan, gua kasih ucapan terima kasih…

Nah bulan September kemaren, tetangga sebrang kita ngundang house warming. Duh sampe kaget gua. Soalnya orang-orang sini tuh pada cuek-cuek gitu. Paling cuma say hi kalo pas papasan ketemu. Itu pun jarang-jarang ketemu orang. Kayaknya semua kalo udah pulang kerja ya masuk ke condo masing-masing. Gak yang trus ngobrol-ngobrol di depan. Gak ada tuh acara kenal-kenalan juga. Elu elu gue gue dah pokoknya!

Jadi karena udah diundang ya kita dateng dong. Dan karena kita datengnya kepagian, jadi gak ketemu ama tetangga-tetangga yang lain juga. Hahaha.

Tetangga yang ngundang kita ini cowok, masih muda, single… Condo nya rapi banget, perabotannya bagus-bagus… Pinter main piano dan gitar… S1 nya lulusan Berkley (gudangnya orang pinter), S2 nya lulusan UCLA, dan sekarang lagi ngambil Phd di UCLA juga! Gak heran temen-temennya cewek semua.

High quality jomblo banget ya! Sayangnya kagak cakep… Hahaha. Tapi kita sampe amazed, kok hebat banget ya ini orang kayaknya…

Eh trus kelar dari situ, kita kan mau ke Gereja. Di parkiran ketemu tetangga yang lain yang kita tau dia ini tinggal serumah ama salah satu tetangga lain yang namanya Mafuto (orang item). Mafuto ini penyanyi. Kita pernah ngeliat dia lagi nyanyi di tipi pas acara Natal taun lalu. Kita tanya ke temennya, si Mafuto kemana kok gak pernah keliatan udah lama. Temennya bilang, Mafuto nyanyi bareng Chaka Kan dan lagi tour di UK. Gileeeeeeeee… Mantep banget!!!

Belum lagi tetangga gua di kantor (orang Indihe, duduknya persis sebelahan ama gua) yang seorang aktris pemula (dia pernah dapet peran kecil di CSI Miami ama Ghost Whisperer) cerita kalo dia dapet peran kecil (tapi kali ini munculnya di beberapa episode) di film seri baru yang judulnya Three Rivers (bakal tayang hari Minggu ini). Nah temen gua ini pernah ngundang kita ke rumahnya buat Christmas dinner taun lalu. Salah satu temennya ada yang demen ama Andrew. Ngajakin Andrew main mulu…

Nah temen kantor gua ini cerita kalo si temennya itu (duh mabok gak sih ceritanya, kok temennya temen.. hehe) jadi pemeran pembantu  di film layar lebar judulnya Fair Game (bakal keluar taun depan), main bareng ama Sean Penn dan Naomi Watts. Wuiii hebat amat yaaaaa…. Yah gua doain moga-moga jadi bintang film terkenal, jadi at least kita jadi punya foto ama bintang pilem Hollywood (soalnya waktu ketemu itu sempet fotoin dia ama Andrew)! Hahaha…

Nah denger si ini si itu yang pada hebat-hebat, kita jadi mikir, ternyata banyak orang hebat di sekeliling kita ya… Moga-moga kita juga ketularan dah… Jadi hebat dan terkenal! Hehehe… *maunya*

3. Tentang Patrick Swayze

Bulan lalu sempet menghebohkan dunia FB yang pada berduka cita atas meninggalnya Patrick Swayze.

Salah satu status yang gua baca ada yang bilang kalo dia jadi teringet-inget pas waktu SMP kudu nyolong-nyolong waktu mau nonton film Ghost.

Ini yang mau gua bahas. Kenapa harus nyolong-nyolong ya mau nonton film Ghost doang? Kan gak ada apa-apaan kan? Paling ciuman doang… Apa iya anak kecil gak boleh ngeliat orang ciuman?

Pas Ghost main, gua juga masih SMP. Tapi gua nontonnya gak nyolong-nyolong tuh. Gua nonton bareng koko ama cici gua, atas seijin bokap nyokap tentunya. Trus gua inget juga pas jamannya Pretty Woman.

Gua masih inget banget tuh beberapa temen sekelas gua (masih SMP juga waktu itu) yang lagi pada janjian mau ngumpet-ngumpet mau nonton film Pretty Woman. Sementara gua? Gua nonton film itu bareng ama bokap nyokap gua di bioskop!

Bahkan pas SMA, dimana semua juga pada heboh ngumpet-ngumpet nonton Basic Instinct, gua nonton Basic Instinct ini di Laser Disc (yang mana pasti gak disensor) rame-rame sekeluarga, ya tentunya ada bokap nyokap juga dong!

Lha emang kenapa sih sebenernya kalo nonton film-film itu? Apakah tabu sampe anak-anaknya gak boleh nonton?

Kadang gua bingung lho sebenernya apa alasan gak boleh ngasih anak kecil nonton adegan ciuman (yah kalo Basic Instinct emang lebih vulgar ya… tapi buat anak SMA boleh lah kan udah gede.. hehehe)?

Apakah takut nanti anaknya bakal praktek ke temen-temennya?

Hmmm kalo ngeliat dari gua sendiri sih enggak kok ya. Abis nonton film ya gak trus jadi pengen nyium orang kan? Masa iya sih cuma gara-gara nonton film trus langsung pengen nyium orang?

Nah jadinya si Andrew juga lumayan kita bebasin kalo sampe nonton adegan yang ada ciumannya. Kalo ciumannya sampe lama emang kadang kita becandain sambil tutupin matanya. Tapi kalo ama dia dibuka ya udah gak apa. Toh kalo gak ngeliat di tivi juga kan ngeliat papa mamanya juga ciuman. Sama aja toh?

Hehehe. Dan so far sih gua gak ngeliat gelagat Andrew trus jadi pengen nyium-nyium temen-temennya sih… Biasa-biasa aja tuh…

Gua jadi pengen tanya nih ama temen-temen yang rata-rata udah pada punya anak… Apa kalian gak bolehin anak kalian ngeliat adegan ciuman di TV? Kalo iya, alesannya apa? Trus apa kalian juga jadi gak akan mencium pasangan di depan anak kalian? Bukannya mencium pasangan di depan anak itu bagus ya… Jadi menunjukkan ke anak kalo papa mama nya saling cinta, harmonis, mesra gitu?

Mari saling sharing yuk….

Now let’s begin to dissect female behavior.  Remember the question, What do women want?  Like Sigmund Freud, I have personally asked thousands of women the same question during many hours of research I personally conducted.  The only answer I ever received from a woman was, “I do not know.”

The reason women don’t know what they want is, women have not successfully adapted to civilization as men have adapted.  Women operate their bodies and their lives mostly according to their instincts.  While almost all of the male’s instincts have been replaced by society’s laws because of fear.  Therefore we can state: In women, instinct rules!

This is not true for the male, except in one area – sex!  When it comes to sex, men are totally locked into using their basic instinct.  This is why men have no boundaries concerning the female when it comes to sex.  Age, height, color, race, religion, weight, good, and evil, are usually not considerations of a male when it comes to sex.  Yet, like the female, he has certain conditions imposed on him by instinct, which he readily discards in the face of no sex.

The mental conditions imposed on men by society oppose his basic instinct. When a society imposes rules concerning the ownership and use of women, it results in perversions.  This is the basic reason a male shepherd alone for months with the herd of sheep will commit bestiality.  All bringing us back on course, as to why people exhibit bad behavior.

Both male and female are driven by their basic instinct to both fertilize and be fertilized, but when their natural instincts are forbidden or altered, both men and women resort to perversion.  The shepherd would have never committed bestiality if he had a female; and if needing money had not driven the shepherd to be alone tending a flock of sheep to make money; and if the shepherd remained in the natural wild state tending his family instead of sheep.

Another scenario to discuss is the reason for the female’s promiscuity.  While some females become celibate even after marriage, others embark on a road of promiscuity. Both types of women, and all degrees in between, are victims of a single concept.  We began to think!

Humans know we are the only “thinking” species on this planet.  While all wildlife has the ability to think, no animal can use thinking to analyze to the degree learned by Mankind.  Men have mastered learning by recording data.  Human beings are unique for this reason alone.  While most people believe humans are superior to animals, the truth is thinking and analyzing has made us inferior to all other life.  Thinking has caused the human species to self-destruct and destroy other animals.  I don’t have to prove this fact.  The proof is available to everyone today!

Thinking is a process imposed upon us.  From birth, our parents and communities force us to learn.  Unlike other animals, who teach their young the basic survival tools for a short time after birth, humans impose a one-third life sentence upon their children called education.  Survival for the human species no longer depends solely on food, water and air, but encompasses complexities that will take the average person 30 to 40 years to accumulate and never master.

If all animals are born with the necessary instincts to survive life, why was it necessary for mankind to add thinking and analyzing to his brain?  This question demands an answer, without which no person can ever find peace during life. If a person achieves “peace” while alive, it will be his or her greatest achievement.  Mastering survival brings peace.

Torment is the opposite of peace.  Torment is self-imposed.  Torment comes from either within our own brain or from outside the brain.  In either case, information is entering the brain causing conflict with our instincts.  All people suffer from some degree of torment, but some people suffer great torment. Torment ranges from slight to extreme. We have labeled these degrees of torment: anxiety, jealousy, depression, mistrust, and insanity, are a few labels.  Other labels include: whore, adulterer, pimp, thief, murderer, and rapist.  The list is almost endless.

Yet, all these labels merely identify a degree of torment going on inside the brain of the person being tormented, which torment is revealed by a person’s outward behavior.

To be continued…

In an ancient society, men beat their wives physically or just killed them.  This rude behavior sometimes led to the murder of the woman, whereas, in modern societies, men at best tolerate their misbehaving wives, or female partners, or daughters, until they decide to no longer tolerate them.  The result of deciding not to tolerate them is either abuse, divorce or abandonment.

Once a modern man reaches his threshold of tolerance, several results are possible.  The most extreme result is he murders the woman and possibly her children.  The least extreme is he leaves the woman and most times abandons the entire family including his own children.  In either case, ancient or modern, this behavior does not depend on actual facts.  It is imposed on the female mostly based on perception.

It doesn’t matter to a male whether or not evidence exists.  He only has to perceive it exists.  This brings us to the next level of trying to understand human behavior.

Why would a man kill the mother of his own children?  Why would a mother kill her own children?

Well, one basic reason is:  The male can never be sure the children are his; while the woman must get rid of the children to move onto the next male!  When we were animals, instinctively males and females procreated and didn’t care whether or not the child belonged to them, because we lacked the power of thinking and analyzing.  This idea of owning the child is a precursor to the idea of owning the woman.

If a man owns the woman, then he owns his children.  If ownership didn’t exist women would be free, but ownership does exist.

Governments produce the laws that protect the ownership of assets.  No one tolerates the stealing of an auto or goods. Yet, nothing protects a man’s ownership of his wife and children.  The proof of ownership is the production of children.  The ownership of a man’s family was once highly regarded as sacred and protected by law.  Today so called tolerant societies look the other way when a wife steals her husband’s children, or another male steals a man’s wife.

This is a very real problem, because instinct forces men to react.  Once a woman freely chooses a male for sex, he is overwhelmed by the instinct of ownership; and once the instinct of ownership kicks-in, the brain’s thoughts take over and convince the man of his ownership.  In the same way you own your car, he owns his woman and her children.  It doesn’t matter whether she is legally his wife, mistress or daughter.  Therefore, only he can release her from this bond.  In the same way he alone can sell his car.

Now the modern woman hates this fact, and in doing so, she hates the natural order of things, and is therefore rebelling against nature.  Rebelling against nature only brings natural laws into play that are costly.  A man’s method of releasing her can take on any number of ways.  This is the reason fathers give away the bride.

Father’s are men relinquishing their ownership of their daughters to another male for the purpose of sexual reproduction.  There are cases of men temporarily relinquishing their ownership of daughters, girlfriends, and wives, such as: men renting their women to other men for the purpose of earning money for sex.

Yes, some men will let their wives or women go with other men or women even for the purpose of self-gratification.  We call these men pimps and the women prostitutes.  Yet, their behavior is the result of rules imposed upon them, which rules have altered natural life by imposing money as a necessity to buy food and the things that once belonged to the human race and were free for the taking.

As we discuss the male’s behavior, which at times can be extremely dangerous, keep in mind that throughout the ages the male has had to impose rules on the female because of knowledge being acquired and added to the brain.  Knowledge of new things occurring in the human exchange of a society has changed the behavior of men and women, while the knowledge of instinct is mostly lost and unknown to us today.

To be continued…

Let’s investigate a so-called imprisoned female from an ancient eastern society first.  In her brain, she is convinced she is a prisoner in her own home.  Does she really differ from a modern Western woman?  No!  Just 50 years ago in the U.S., a woman felt imprisoned in her own home, because she was not allowed to work in the workplace amongst men.  Yes, Western women felt just as imprisoned!  What is incredible is both sets of women, Eastern and Western, Northern and Southern, only have thoughts of breaking out and being free.

This should not exist, but it does exist, and it even exists to a greater extent in today’s modern Western societies like the United States.  Neither the women in the ancient societies, nor the women in the modern Western societies, are content to stay at home, unless she has many children to tend and a loving husband.

This fact proves it is not the mentality of their societies imposed upon women, but the basic instinctual female mentality that drives this similarity of behavior in every female.  Once the female proves her mentality has no borders or boundaries, unless she imposes boundaries upon herself, we find her mentality does not depend on the society in which she lives.

Just as the female animal imposed her own boundaries thousands of years ago before thinking began, when she decided to enter a particular male’s territory, proving no one is teaching her that mentality.  Thus, we find the universal law that drives all women: their basic instinct to freely choose the male, by unknowingly being in the male’s territory, forces women to want to reproduce with the dominant male in that territory. This means today’s woman believes she is choosing the male she wants to mate and duplicate through sex, while her choice ended at his territorial doorway.

The modern woman feeling trapped, according to her perception, in her own home, considers herself a victim, while in actuality she doesn’t know she trapped herself by entering the bar, the workplace, the party, or the gym, of her choice.  Once she agrees with her own thinking, and doesn’t understand how it works, her newly acquired thinking brain needs to place blame for the condition she alone created by straying from her home.

Her conclusion is men are imprisoning her, while she has imprisoned herself because nature demands it to be so.  She derives at this conclusion because her instinct to have a male dominate her makes men the guardians of female behavior.

Therefore, men must be responsible for imprisoning women and taking away their rights, which nature has never given them, nor ever will.

Now we must look at why men have become the guards keeping women imprisoned.  The main reason at surface level is the society in which they exist demands it.  Yet, a look into those primitive societies reveals that jealousy and honor are thought to be at the root of the male’s behavior.

These men are subject to the other men and women in their society.  It’s called “Peer Pressure”.  It’s the basis of our own legal justice system in the U.S.  A jury of your peers imposes punishment or forgiveness according to their behavioral rules or prejudices.

Honor is the element that is sought inwardly by people in general.  It consists of doing things right, plus being accepted by your peers.  If a man is ridiculed by his neighbors, especially other men, because of his wife’s behavior, then that man’s honor is challenged and damaged.  If the ridicule comes because of promiscuous behavior on a wife’s part, who happens to be the mother of his children, not only is that man’s honor damaged, but jealousy is also instilled in the man’s brain.

The result of such conditions is abusing her, beating, limiting behavior, imprisoning, killing, or divorcing the woman.  This condition not only exists in ancient societies, but actually permeates all of today’s societies also.  The difference is in how this problem is handled rather than:  Does this problem exist?  Some societies kill such women, while others tolerate bad behavior, but all men hate a woman who strays, while they pursue and tempt other men’s women to stray from the marriage bed.

To be continued…

Sigmund Freud established his theory in the 19th century that understanding a woman was impossible, which is why he labeled women “the dark continent”.  He openly wrote that women could not answer his question, which was “What do women want?”

He subjected women to his warped mind.  The reason this question cannot be answered by women is because the answer lies deep at the base of their human instinct.

Since instincts can only be observed by behavioral acts, scientists know little or nothing about instincts.  Since Physiologists like Freud began “Talking Therapy” in an attempt to get patients to reveal the roots of their neurosis, and really have no desire to reinstate human instinct, they can never unravel the most complex subject on earth… Social behavior!

The real reason most people study to become Physiologists is their own personal quest to diagnose their own neurosis.  Thus, Physiologists use people as guinea pigs upon whom they experiment, while they are not really interested in helping cure people: and are only interested in making a name for themselves to achieve a status amongst their peers: while most settle for the good income they’ve derived.

Even Freud attempted diagnosing himself for four years to no avail.  Without understanding the essence of human instinct, it is impossible to unveil the reason why women do what they do, think as they think, and act as they act; and further impossible to get an answer from a woman. As long as scientists believe women are aware of why they behave this way or that way, scientific knowledge is doomed to failure and will remain void on this topic.

Please do not forget that women were designed to be exactly as they are; whether you believe we are designed by God or nature doesn’t matter.  Women are what they are! And women are not freaks of nature, but they are acting exactly the way they are supposed to act.  Whether or not men understand women is not essential, but whether men treat women gently, and kindly, and protect them, and use them for childbirth, is essential.

A woman will never be fulfilled unless she bears children.  Only second to bearing children, is having children to teach and interact if she is barren.  Men are totally in the dark and confused by women, because men were never designed to live-in with women or have the need to understand a woman. Men were only designed to copulate with a woman and provide protection for his extended family.

Women have an understanding for each other, but not of their own behavior. Women do not know why they behave in any situation.  This is because women were also never designed to understand men or themselves, but they were only designed to receive the male’s sperm, reproduce the human race, and work to insure the survival of their children.  Unless we grasp these facts about women, we are all, male and female, groping in the dark, worrying, and making mistakes, instead of just enjoying our moments together.

Women support each other because they all experience these unknowns, even if they do not know each other.  This is a universal unwritten code amongst women.  All women know they have a dark side, as well as men, but do not understand why, which is beginning to reveal itself as the terrible results of extreme depression, suicide, and murder, in huge numbers amongst many nations.

When we can help a woman uncover the simplest instinct that lies at the base of every female’s activities, then light begins to shine on mankind’s oldest problem.  As I said earlier, once the human race wandered off its natural course of being a natural animal, by reconditioning their brains to become thinking analyzing creatures, instead of remaining instinctual creatures, the course of human behavior sank ever deeper into evil.  Then, all the evils of humanity, from misbehavior to serial killers and megalomaniacs, are unleashed upon the human race.  A result no one ever wanted, but is experiencing.

In 1908 there were only 287 murders committed in the entire United States of America.  The fact is that number of murders is now occurring on a daily basis in every city.  This is clear evidence that the human species is declining at a geometric rate, which cannot be slowed or stopped.  It will continue until we exterminate ourselves or we go back to our beginning.  The least we can do in the meantime is understand why we behave the way we behave.  Understanding each other brings the solstice of knowing, and knowledge gives us control of ourselves so we can live with the inevitable reduction of child bearing and ever increasing bad behavior of women.

A female, regardless of race, color, religion or class status, or geographical location on earth, must have her eggs fertilized.  Whether a female is straight or homosexual, good or evil, tall or short, fat or skinny, she must have her eggs fertilized.  This one essential factor is the entire driving force behind a woman’s actions.  Only secondary to this instinct is the instinct that drives every female to choose the strongest male available from amongst all the males available at the moment her body demands fertilization.  Once these two facts are understood, all other female behavior becomes relevant and understandable.

To be continued…

Men are also prone to inflict their misguided knowledge upon women, willing to allow their female instincts to dictate reproduction, by not allowing the female to produce children.  Men’s reasons are also many, the least of which is children cost too much money.  Other reasons include the male’s only reason for marrying are: to have a live-in female for sexual use only; adding a female by marriage for the purpose of increasing his available income; to have a female because she was the only female that would have ever slept with him; to cover-up his being a homosexual; to trade his female with other men for the use of their females; to sell his female to other men; to be a mother to them; to be their own personal live-in maid… and on – and on – and on!

The entire problem can be reduced to its singular source, which is the fertilization of the female human egg or the necessity for reproduction.  The male and female of all species are instinctually designed for this one act so life can continue.  The necessity for reproduction forces us to realize that basic instincts #1 and #2, namely

1.   The instinct to survive, and
2.   The instinct to find food and water

are actually integral parts of the composite instinct #3 to reproduce the human race.

This then reduces the entire meaning of life to one singular instinct and only one reason for living, the reproduction of the human race; and anything that interrupts or tries to supplant this essential act undermines the course of all good human behavior, resulting in bad behavior of every degree.

Males and females do not know why they are driven to think and act.  They do not have a clue to the essential reason their own behavior at times disturbs them.  Ancient man didn’t understand this essential behavior either, but over thousands of years learned as he progressed. He learned the female could not be trusted to think and act by herself.  So societies around the world developed by imposing strict laws governing the human female’s actions.

Once Mankind released the human brain to add information and knowledge, the problems created would become insurmountable: demanding thousands of remedies and laws added to the game of life for human beings. This is the reason all human beings on earth realize our societies do not work, which only bring misery and loss no matter what race, color, creed, class or the geographical location of a person’s nation.

Some of older societies still linger today, trying to impose ancient remedies on female behavior.  One such community is the Muslim peoples.  In the more antiquated countries like Algeria, women are literally imprisoned in their own homes in a vain attempt to control their behavior.  Another is China, which has imposed the deliberate destruction of a woman’s reproductive organs to reduce her ability to have more than one child. The greatest offender was Ancient Rome, whose laws are still affecting today’s Western nations.  The ancient Roman Empire imposed laws limiting men to one woman: thus, reducing the number of children born in one family by reducing the number of women available to one man.

No matter what solution imposed by nations upon the human race, the societies may limit reproduction, but the destructive consequences range from abuse to serial killers.  The mentality of an entire nation teaches women lies to deceive and convince women to stop reproducing because it is necessary to preserve their standard of living or by using religion to limit men’s natural instincts.  Whether or not this is taught directly or indirectly is of no importance.  The results shout that Mankind has interfered with the natural order of things, creating a zoo of crime, disease, misery, and untold bad results.

To be continued…

Heat is a term used for women that explains why a woman needs a man.  (It is said that men burn to have sex with a woman, and women go into heat to tempt a man into burning to have sex with them.)

Women have eggs, which when fertilized by the males’ sperm, begin the process of reproduction of a species.  As in all phases of life, a woman goes through changes: her body changes when she reaches puberty; her body changes chemically after and during impregnation; and her body changes as she increases in age.  Once puberty occurs in the female, she begins releasing eggs, which demands fertilization. At puberty, she will release the most number of eggs more frequently than will ever occur as she grows older.  Therefore, the older a woman becomes, the frequency of eggs released diminishes and the amount of eggs diminishes also.

As the frequency and the number of eggs diminish, so does her moments of “going into heat”. In Civilization this poses a problem for a married couple, since a woman’s body shuts-down sexually much earlier than a Man’s body. No longer desiring to copulate sexually, a woman no longer needs her male mate for purposes of reproduction. Yet, the married man is still instinctively driven to reproduce long after her instinct to reproduce stop.

The woman’s state of ‘being in heat’ dictates her willingness to allow the male to mate with her.  Dramatically opposing this female instinct to mate, is a woman’s natural ’state of heat’ slowing down and stopping with increased age.  This occurs at different times in different women, but universally it will happen between the ages of 35 to 55.  Due to mental knowledge gained and added to the brain of women, a sex stoppage may even occur in women at a much earlier age, even though they are still experiencing “being in heat”.

Another problem caused by the instinct in the female brain is instinct #2, the instinct to find food. If food is scarce, which can be caused by not earning enough money to afford sufficient food, women will cease bearing children.  This is occurring in today’s females all over the world, but especially the women in the Western Hemisphere, because nations are controlling their economies to reduce the wealth of the lower and middle classes; thereby, indirectly causing women’s instincts to limit their own reproduction to one or two children and in most cases… women not wanting to reproduce any children. This phenomenon is a direct cause of divorce, family abandonment, suicide and murder. The direct cause is the male’s overpowering instinct to reproduce.

The instinct to reproduce collides head-on with the overpowering female’s newly acquired knowledge of not reproducing. The male’s reasoning concludes that his female does not love him or want him, culminating in a shut-down of his desire to reproduce with her.  It doesn’t have to be verbal on the woman’s part, but can simply be communicated to the man by her wearing a patch, taking the pill, her demanding he use a condom, or causing him to pull-out. There are many other ways a man detects the unwillingness of his female to reproduce, not the least of which is seeking him for sex.

When the woman refuses to reproduce the male (copulate), it drives him to subconsciously seek other women for purposes of reproduction.  Yet, in today’s world, this male is seen as and labeled a womanizer or a whoremonger, while he is actually the victim of an unscrupulous society forcing unnatural laws on him, which force him into conflict with his own built-in instincts.

To be continued…

At the center of all neurosis and crime, misbehavior and unacceptable acts, is our instinct syndrome.  Human beings began their journey through time as animals.  All the information necessary for us as creatures inhabiting the earth had been already given to us prior to birth. The information is known as “instinct”.  The information known as instinct consists of everything a new human being baby would need to grow, develop, and survive a hostile world.

The use of instinct did not require thinking or analysis.  It only needed circumstances to trigger the correct response.  Circumstances surrounding a situation automatically activate a correct response in our brain.  When something occurred in a new human animal, an automatic response was activated from the vaults of instinctual knowledge inside the human brain.

Time began when humanity decided to embark upon a course in life that would result in the enlargement of the human brain, caused by the eating of blood.  The brain would enlarge itself and extend its use of memory, thinking and analysis.  Thinking led to experimentation, and experimentation led to increasing human knowledge.

The new course of the human animal increasing its brain power would eventually collide with our foundational brain data base known as instinct.  The gathering of information and the development of new concepts amongst human beings only served to postpone, or circumnavigate, the random effect the earth has upon plants, weather, and all its creatures.

Ultimately, the new course of the human animal embarked upon would cause head-on collisions with their initial instinctual information base.  These catastrophic collisions were the results of the opposing information gathered colliding with their initial instincts.  The new information allowed to enter a human being’s brain resulted in humanity’s new journey away from instinct.  We named it Civilization.

Once early human beings embarked upon this new course of life, all people coming after them would become victims of this aggressive journey, which can only be altered by the complete destruction of the civilized world.  The only antidote to cure this problem, other than the complete destruction of the earth, is understanding the essence of all human problems, which is their instincts.  To accomplish this antidotal solution, one has to begin with the seed of life itself.

The seed of life is the sperm men transfer to women to fertilize their eggs.  The sperm of each man is altered by his or her ancestors. As their ancestors faced a problem, their new thinking brain’s capabilities would cause their own selves to be altered mentally and physically.  Thus rendering Darwin’s Theory of evolution an untenable myth.  The essence of life is controlled by absolute laws that cannot be altered or replaced.

The laws responsible are contained in the human brain as instinct.  Regardless of all the knowledge obtained by Mankind, and all the laws imposed by Man upon Mankind, these basic instincts still rule.  The conflict caused by the opposing information gathered and retained as new memory, which is acquired, learned and imposed upon all people, is the root of all crime, discontent, disease, evil, and loss.  To understand this, we must dissect human behavior according to its earliest functions as animals.

There are several human instincts that have dictated the behavior of men and women throughout the ages.  The three greatest driving forces, or instincts, in the male and female are:

1. The instinct to survive,
2. The instinct to find food and water, and
3. The instinct to reproduce the human race.

Concerning instinct #3, to reproduce the human race, men and women possess an associate instinct to the search for the best mate.  The strength and health of the male and female are primal during this search.  Yet, people differ in their approach to achieve their goal.

The male stakes out a territory much like a spider spins a web.  The territory is the male’s trap, like the spider’s web.  It exists and is protected to attract females.  While the female is the choice maker concerning the male’s territory, once she selects a territory, she loses all rights to select the male as a fertilizer of her eggs.  Her choices ended once she selected the male’s territory by entering it.

The territory a female selects is a complex procedure conducted by her instincts.  It encompasses many conditions that her instincts demand be satisfied.  Once the female has made her choice, the male’s dominance instinct kicks into high gear.  She has chosen his territory and loses all rights to change her mind.  It is as if life has purposely imprisoned the female in the male’s territory as a permanent prison, so she cannot escape life’s reproduction process. Thus, creating the family dominated by a single male.

Once entrapped by nature, the female’s interests lie in eating and sleeping until she comes into heat and bears offspring. Then her need of protection for her and her offspring dominate her.  Yet, while her desire for her male mate dominates her actions, she remains quite willing to be engaged in sexual activity by other males available. For which reason, her male mate guards his females from intruding males and even his own sons produced as they reach puberty.   The dominant male owning the territory will drive off male intruders and his own sons after reaching puberty.

To be continued…