<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ben-cousins &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/ben-cousins/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "ben-cousins"</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:52:21 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Such Is Life-Ben Cousins]]></title>
<link>http://aussiecriminals.com.au/2010/08/26/such-is-life/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 01:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Robbo</dc:creator>
<guid>http://aussiecriminals.com.au/2010/08/26/such-is-life/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[My Say Are the Victorian Police serious? They would have to start arresting people by their thousand]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[My Say Are the Victorian Police serious? They would have to start arresting people by their thousand]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Soooo...What's Next?]]></title>
<link>http://newsbitz.wordpress.com/2010/08/26/soooo-whats-next/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 01:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Daniel Pizarro</dc:creator>
<guid>http://newsbitz.wordpress.com/2010/08/26/soooo-whats-next/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[By Daniel Pizarro Okay, the election is semi-over, i&#8217;m on break from The Midday Show for two w]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>By Daniel Pizarro</em></p>
<p>Okay, the election is semi-over, i&#8217;m on break from The Midday Show for two weeks and i&#8217;m enjoying the relaxation. Don&#8217;t worry too much, TRG and SITA will continue as usual, but in the mean time let&#8217;s see what&#8217;s making media news in short sentences:</p>
<ul>
<li>Network Ten will launch new digital TV channel in early 2011, will be named &#8216;Eleven&#8217;</li>
<li>About 2 million people watched the first part of that Ben Cousins Doco on 7 last night</li>
<li>Hamish &#38; Andy will reduce their radio show to a weekly show from next year because of their TV committments</li>
<li>Seven Network&#8217;s new DTV channel 7Mate will launch on September 25th</li>
</ul>
<p>Yeah, that should do it for now. New SITA vlog should be done today, so check back soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Such is Life: The Troubled Times of Ben Cousins (part 1, review)]]></title>
<link>http://2011dreamteamblog.wordpress.com/2010/08/26/such-is-life-the-troubled-times-of-ben-cousins-part-1-review/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 01:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>2011DTBLOG</dc:creator>
<guid>http://2011dreamteamblog.wordpress.com/2010/08/26/such-is-life-the-troubled-times-of-ben-cousins-part-1-review/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[What is it that Ben Cousins wishes to gain from once again putting his name in the headlines?  By sh]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it that Ben Cousins wishes to gain from once again putting his name in the headlines?  By showing footage of himself at his lowest points?</p>
<p>I believe that Ben was<strong> in it for the money </strong>but I also believe <strong>Ben Cousins wishes to set the record straight and put his past behind him</strong>. Ben also shows himself on the field succeeding greatly. Ben Cousins is an amazing athlete and still is massively respected as a footballer, however, off the field Ben is just a party-boy and drug-addict who screwed over his family, friends and workplace. The most shocking of those is that West Coast knew about him being a trouble maker yet kept him on the team UNTIL they won the premiership.</p>
<p>What surprises me the most about this, is that Ben was able to perform on the field from 17 years old, when he began taking drugs all the way until 2005 when Cousins won the Brownlow and in 2006 when Ben was in the West Coast premiership team. Ben Cousins motivation according to him, was <strong>&#8220;how much drugs (he) was going to launch into (after training or a game)&#8221;</strong>.</p>
<p>However I do believe that some of the incredibly low points of Ben&#8217;s life have been shut out from the story. And he almost seems cocky when he is interviewed; as if he is retelling a funny story. I honestly hope Ben is a changed man but now that he is retiring this year I wonder what Ben will be like when he has no motivation to stay off drugs. I think that if Ben doesn&#8217;t gain a job working in the AFL, he may go back to his old ways. Anyway all the best to Ben and his $500,000 gain from making the doco. I hope he is truly reformed.</p>
<p>What will we learn in part two of the documentary? Leave a comment below about what you think of Ben Cousins documentary, <strong>Such is Life: The Troubled Times of Ben Cousins.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Such is Life!]]></title>
<link>http://mrtuzzi.wordpress.com/2010/08/26/such-is-life/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mrtuzzi</dc:creator>
<guid>http://mrtuzzi.wordpress.com/2010/08/26/such-is-life/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Well last night was the first night of the Ben Cousins story, &#8220;Such is Life&#8221;. Amazingly]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well last night was the first night of the Ben Cousins story, &#8220;Such is Life&#8221;. Amazingly it was the most captivating thing I have seen in a while. But everybody agrees, it makes you want to be a drug addict&#8230;</p>
<p>Money, girls, fame, parties&#8230; What else does a young man want? </p>
<p>You feel for Ben a bit and any prejudice against him goes as he did bust his arse to get where he was!</p>
<p>I will update you after I watch part 2 tonight&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Such is life]]></title>
<link>http://themustardjumper.wordpress.com/2010/08/25/such-is-life/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Natalie</dc:creator>
<guid>http://themustardjumper.wordpress.com/2010/08/25/such-is-life/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I watched the first part of the documentary Such is Life: The Troubled Times of Ben Cousins tonight]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://themustardjumper.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/cousins.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-701" title="cousins" src="http://themustardjumper.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/cousins.jpg?w=500&#038;h=331" alt="Former West Coast and Richmond AFL player Ben Cousins." width="500" height="331" /></a></p>
<p>I watched the first part of the documentary <em>Such is Life: The Troubled Times of Ben Cousins </em>tonight and wow. It&#8217;s pretty stark in its honesty and the footage of AFL footballer Cousins when he was at his lowest is absolutely raw. Even if you&#8217;re not a football fan this is definitely worth watching.</p>
<p>The interviews with his family, the football community, counsellors, media and friends are riveting. His family breaking down as they describe a period in his life is just heart-wrenching. There&#8217;s no holds barred, no punches pulled, nothing left on the table as the cliches go. I&#8217;ve never been a huge Cousins fan but this is riveting viewing. Watching him speak directly to camera at the varying stages of being in the grip of his addiction is fascinating &#8211; you can definitely pick when he&#8217;s at his most troubled. The hair, the clothes the attitude all give him away.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s pretty brave to put his story out there like this and hopefully it has a profound effect on everyone watching. As he himself says, if it means even one person reconsiders drug use then it&#8217;s all worth it. I can&#8217;t wait for tomorrow night&#8217;s conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Battlefield Heroes:  Ben Cousin's Tweet.]]></title>
<link>http://toresimonsen.wordpress.com/2010/08/25/battlefield-heroes-ben-cousins-tweet/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 01:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>toresimonsen</dc:creator>
<guid>http://toresimonsen.wordpress.com/2010/08/25/battlefield-heroes-ben-cousins-tweet/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[It has been a long time since I played Battlefield. Being homeless last year certainly curtailed a g]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been a long time since I played Battlefield.  Being homeless last year certainly curtailed a great deal of video game playing.  I returned to play some Battlefield Heroes.  A lot has changed.  <a href="http://www.battlefieldheroes.com/en/forum/showthread.php?tid=162437&#38;page=1">One of the biggest changes is the on-going debate over changes in the pricing system</a>.  Players are currently complaining that Battlefunds may give players an edge over other players by selling weapons.  If so, it marks a major retreat on the BF:H initiative.  BF:H was supposed to provide no real advantage to players playing with Battlefunds over those playing with VP.  <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7199881.stmhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7199881.stm">Weapons were not supposed to  be sold.</a>  Apparently, many players were angered by the changes.  I for one, use VP exclusively, and would be disheartened if that puts me at a competitive disadvantage.</p>
<p>The second goal of Heroes is to incorporate community ideas into the thread.  Some suggested VOIP in game.  (I would support VOIP with the ability to mute players.)  Ben Cousin&#8217;s, of DICE, s<a href="http://www.battlefieldheroes.com/en/forum/showthread.php?tid=5311">aid he would allow a vote on VOIP when BF:H reached several million players.</a>  Using a new twitter account, I tweeted Ben Cousins to ascertain whether he will allow for a vote.  His response seems to indicate no.  </p>
<p><a href="http://toresimonsen.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/replyfrombencousins.jpg"><img src="http://toresimonsen.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/replyfrombencousins.jpg?w=300&#038;h=250" alt="" title="replyfrombencousins" width="300" height="250" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2630" /></a></p>
<p>This would mark a major retreat from the community-driven model as well.</p>
<p>His suggestion that I play another BF game, while well-intended is also rather meaningless as I own BF2, BF2142, BFV, BF1942-RTR-SW).  I have reinstalled 2142 on the new computer and it looks awesome, but again I am waiting for tech support.</p>
<p>Here is the current achievement I&#8217;m working on:</p>
<p><a href="http://toresimonsen.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/heroesachievement.png"><img src="http://toresimonsen.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/heroesachievement.png?w=300&#038;h=41" alt="" title="heroesachievement" width="300" height="41" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2631" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Cousins drug video hits Australia ]]></title>
<link>http://storminbak.wordpress.com/2010/08/23/cousins-drug-video-hits-australia/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 03:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>storminbak</dc:creator>
<guid>http://storminbak.wordpress.com/2010/08/23/cousins-drug-video-hits-australia/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[RELIVING THE NIGHTMARE: Ben Cousins drug video has hit Australia. Photo obtained from: http://images]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_142" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><a href="http://storminbak.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/afl-bencousins-01-600x400.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-142" title="Ben Cousins First Training Run For Richmond" src="http://storminbak.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/afl-bencousins-01-600x400.jpg?w=600&#038;h=400" alt="" width="600" height="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">RELIVING THE NIGHTMARE: Ben Cousins drug video has hit Australia. Photo obtained from: <a href="http://images.triplem.com.au/2009/01/14/106443/AFL-bencousins-01-600x400.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://images.triplem.com.au/2009/01/14/106443/AFL-bencousins-01-600x400.jpg</a></p></div>
<p>Recently retired AFL superstar Ben Cousins has had his fair share of up and downs in the sport. While he was celebrating an end to his glittering career this weekend, his drug addiction video revealing what happened during 2007 was splashed around Australian media, reports the Hearld Sun</p>
<p>Cousins shot to fame as captain and Brownlow medalist winner and led with the Sydney Swans to an AFL premiership in 2005. Two years later, Cousins hit the headlines for all the wrong reasons when it was revealed he had been arrested for drug possession  in 2007. He gained a bad boy reputation within the sport but was handed a lifeline by Richmond and fought his way back to the top before retiring on the weekend.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.perthnow.com.au/sport/first-look-at-ben-cousins-drug-video/story-e6frg1wu-1225903669872" target="_blank">READ MORE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Still a hero against all the odds ]]></title>
<link>http://storminbak.wordpress.com/2010/08/19/still-a-hero-against-all-the-odds/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 03:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>storminbak</dc:creator>
<guid>http://storminbak.wordpress.com/2010/08/19/still-a-hero-against-all-the-odds/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[CHAMPION PLAYER: Ben Cousins has taken the AFL by storm. Photo obtained from: http://www.abc.net.au/]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_99" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><a href="http://storminbak.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/r192796_728269.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-99" title="r192796_728269" src="http://storminbak.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/r192796_728269.jpg?w=600&#038;h=748" alt="" width="600" height="748" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">CHAMPION PLAYER: Ben Cousins has taken the AFL by storm. Photo obtained from: <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/.../2007/11/02/2080185.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.abc.net.au/.../2007/11/02/2080185.htm</a></p></div>
<p>Ben Cousins has faced all the critcism and problems since being arrested for possession of drugs in 2007 and his comeback into AFL has proved he is still one of the best reports Australain newspaper, <em>The Australaian. </em></p>
<p>Cousins has won most of the accolades the sport has to offer the Brownlow Medal and a premiership.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/sport/why-ben-cousins-is-the-one-true-hero/story-e6frg7t6-1225906551411" target="_blank">READ MORE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Such is Life: the troubled times of Ben Cousins]]></title>
<link>http://recordpreserveshare.wordpress.com/2010/08/16/such-is-life-the-troubled-times-of-ben-cousins/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 05:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>recordpreserveshare</dc:creator>
<guid>http://recordpreserveshare.wordpress.com/2010/08/16/such-is-life-the-troubled-times-of-ben-cousins/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The tell-all Ben Cousins documentary, Such is Life: the troubled times of Ben Cousins, is reported t]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;"><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/F0CWhPJdB5E?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></p>
<p>The tell-all <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Cousins" target="_blank">Ben Cousins</a> documentary, <em>Such is Life: the troubled times of Ben Cousins</em>, is reported to screen on Channel Seven on Wednesday 25 August at 8:30pm. The 32-year-old served a 12-month suspension for bringing the Australian Football League (AFL) into disrepute for an addiction to recreational drugs in 2008. Cousins was subsequently cleared to return to football in 2009 and was drafted by Richmond Football Club on 16 December 2008, leading to a surge in Richmond&#8217;s club membership. The doco has been <a href="http://recordpreserveshare.wordpress.com/2009/08/18/the-re-branding-of-ben-cousins/" target="_blank">more than two years in the making</a>, with hundreds of hours of interviews distilled to 90 minutes. Intense speculation has surrounded Cousins&#8217; future. He is on a one-year deal with the Tigers, having gained another contract after his first year at the club in 2009. Media outlets today are reporting that Cousins is set to announce his AFL retirement at a press conference on Tuesday. As Mike Sheahan <a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/ben-cousins-documentary-painful-to-watch-but-a-must-see/story-e6frf9jf-1225904139167" target="_blank">wrote in the Herald Sun</a>, &#8220;Ben Cousins is the young man with the film star face, extraordinary sporting talent and charisma by the truckload who has been a drug user since his teens and an addict for several years.&#8221; After being the subject of so much Australian media scrutiny and gossip, the documentary will provide Cousins the forum to tell his side of the story.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong></p>
<p>So, as expected, the airing of the Ben Cousins doco stirred up controversy. Some punters felt it glamorised drug use, while others felt it was an educated and insightful depiction of the illness of addiction. The documentary was a major ratings winner for the Seven Network with two million people tuning in to the first instalment. Amidst all the hype and opinion pieces written after it&#8217;s screening, there is one <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/08/31/2998427.htm?section=justin" target="_blank">news item</a> from ABC Online that was not so widely picked up. It reports that the airing of the documentary sparked an increase in help line calls.</p>
<p> <em>Geoff Munro from the Australian Drug Foundation says there has been a big increase in activity on its website and on national telephone helplines.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;[A] fifteen fold increase in Victoria, 200 per cent in Sydney 400 per cent in eastern Australia,&#8221; he said.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;So around the country it appears that the documentary has sparked a massive increase in people wanting information.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Whatever your opinion of Cousins, those figures can&#8217;t be scoffed at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[One hit too many]]></title>
<link>http://storminbak.wordpress.com/2010/08/16/one-hit-too-many/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 03:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>storminbak</dc:creator>
<guid>http://storminbak.wordpress.com/2010/08/16/one-hit-too-many/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[QUICK HIT: Ben Cousins drug addiction is to be shown on video. http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200707/r]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_119" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 614px"><a href="http://storminbak.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/r158243_574918.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-119" title="r158243_574918" src="http://storminbak.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/r158243_574918.jpg?w=604&#038;h=840" alt="" width="604" height="840" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">QUICK HIT: Ben Cousins drug addiction is to be shown on video. <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200707/r158243_574918.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200707/r158243_574918.jpg</a></p></div>
<p>AFL centre <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Cousins#2006.E2.80.932007:_Captaincy_resignation.2C_Grand_Final_win_and_AFL_ban" target="_blank">Ben Cousins </a>is back in the media spotlight again after a video detailing his drug addiction is to be released, reports Australia&#8217;s <em>Daily Telegraph</em>.</p>
<p>It overshadows in what is possibly his final game in the code this weekend.</p>
<p>The 238 game superstar was arrested after having his car searched and being charged with drug possession back in October 2007.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/afl/controversy-over-ben-cousins-drug-doco/story-e6frexwr-1225904095341" target="_blank">READ MORE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Round 20 Review - Cocktail Hour]]></title>
<link>http://champagnefootball.com/2010/08/15/63/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 10:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>lzimmet</dc:creator>
<guid>http://champagnefootball.com/2010/08/15/63/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[For Round 20 the ladies come to you from Cocktail Hour in glamourous South Yarra, where they nearly]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Round 20 the ladies come to you from Cocktail Hour in glamourous South Yarra, where they nearly come to blows over the AFL&#8217;s proposed rule changes. But they are both 100% in agreement when it comes to whether Ben Cousins should spend more time in front of the camera with his shirt off!</p>
<span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/39acID2zsBE?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Big news - Ben Cousins does drugs]]></title>
<link>http://iainhall.wordpress.com/2010/08/11/big-news-ben-cousins-does-drugs/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 04:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>SockPuppet</dc:creator>
<guid>http://iainhall.wordpress.com/2010/08/11/big-news-ben-cousins-does-drugs/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I think Akermanis might be right about this - for once I would never have guessed that AFL player Be]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_8100" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 632px"><a href="http://iainhall.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/ben-cousins-documentary.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-8100" title="ben-cousins-documentary" src="http://iainhall.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/ben-cousins-documentary.jpg?w=622&#038;h=194" alt="" width="622" height="194" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">I think Akermanis might be right about this - for once</p></div>
<p>I would never have guessed that AFL player <strong>Ben Cousins</strong> - who once won a Brownlow medal and an AFL Premiership by snorting a bucket load of cocaine up his nose but is now a <em>recovering</em> drug addict &#8211; is actually <strong>a role model for kids</strong> thinking about following him on his drug-crazed, sex-filled, stoned-out, off-field and on-field pursuits.</p>
<p>But butter my bread on both sides, <a href="http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/first-look-at-ben-cousins-drug-video/story-e6frf9jf-1225903649371" target="_blank"><strong>Ben has made a doco &#8216;Such is Life: The Troubled Times of Ben Cousins&#8217;</strong></a> to be shown on TV soon, that he, his new club Ricmond and the AFL reckon will &#8220;serve as a warning&#8221; to young people and is &#8220;all good&#8221;.</p>
<blockquote><p>Richmond has given its blessing to the explosive Ben Cousins documentary &#8230;  The Tigers have seen the documentary and this morning the club issued a statement saying they continued to support their star midfielder.</p>
<p>“This is a confronting story and one we sincerely hope has a positive impact on those that watch it,” Richmond chief executive Brendon Gale said. “If what Ben and his family have been through serves as an important lesson to others then it has been worth doing.”</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>Such is Life: The Troubled Times of Ben Cousins has been seen by AFL boss Andrew Demetriou &#8230; An AFL spokesman last night said the league hoped the documentary would help others.</p></blockquote>
<p>This should be riveting TV and compulsory viewing for all kids and other drug addicts.</p>
<p>I can hardly wait to see the footage of Cousins:</p>
<ul>
<li>DANCING in his underpants with a glass of red wine and a scantily-clad female in the background.</li>
<li>CRYING while under the influence of an unknown substance.</li>
<li>LEANING on a kitchen table covered in beer bottles after a heavy night.</li>
<li>STARING into a camera and declaring: &#8220;My name is Ben Cousins. I&#8217;m a drug addict&#8221;.</li>
</ul>
<p>Yeah .. I mean, if Ben can do all that and have that much fun yet still recover and earn mega bucks playing footy then so can they!</p>
<p>Sheez &#8230; I think I agree with ex-Brisbane &#38; sacked Bulldogs player Jason Akermanis who said it could actually encourage kids to take drugs.</p>
<blockquote><p>Appearing on the Today Show, he said there was a risk of young people seeing the doco and thinking “maybe this is an interesting thing, maybe I’m a bit curious&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Should I as a young person look and Ben Cousins and say, &#8216;No don’t do it&#8217;, or, &#8216;Maybe it’s not so bad&#8217; &#8211; that’s the only question mark we have before we see it,&#8221; Akermanis said.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yep. You see, not everyone (well hardly anyone) is fortunate enough to have (1) the sporting talent (2) the money, and (3) the support network that Cousins had to get him through his crisis.</p>
<p>And actually, there&#8217;s still no guarantee he won&#8217;t relapse and end up in the gutter.</p>
<p>Like a lot of kids who get into drugs.</p>
<p>Helping others! Bullshit &#8211; this is self serving crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Round 15 Review - Inaugural Episode]]></title>
<link>http://champagnefootball.com/2010/07/13/round-15-review/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>lzimmet</dc:creator>
<guid>http://champagnefootball.com/2010/07/13/round-15-review/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The inaugural Champagne Football edition. The ladies discuss James Podsiadly&#8217;s form slump, Mar]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The inaugural Champagne Football edition. The ladies discuss James Podsiadly&#8217;s form slump, Mark William&#8217;s departure and Ben Cousins.</p>
<span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/gfOYeFP0G6Y?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Role Models and the use of Legal Stimulants in Sport]]></title>
<link>http://tbrsm.wordpress.com/2010/07/12/role-models-and-the-use-of-legal-stimulants-in-sport/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 07:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>tbrsm</dc:creator>
<guid>http://tbrsm.wordpress.com/2010/07/12/role-models-and-the-use-of-legal-stimulants-in-sport/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The Ben Cousins Sleeping Tablet affair has sparked off all manner of controversy in the Press this w]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ben Cousins  Sleeping Tablet affair has sparked off all manner of controversy in the  Press this week. Travelling up the highway between Bathurst &#38; Orange  last  night, a radio sports show called &#8220;The Home Straight&#8221;,  featuring Peter &#8220;Spida&#8221; Everett and Scott Sattler, was debating this  issue. Everett was supportive of Cousins,  Sattler was not. Talkback  callers were predominantly anti-Cousins, with the usual shock-jock,  brain-dead, thoughtless old chestnut &#8220;What sort of example does this set   for children, he is a role model&#8221; being dragged out yet again.</p>
<p>As  all of you would be aware, Ben Cousins is a recovering drug addict, his  poison of choice being Ice. After a game for the Richmond Football  Club, Cousins made a silly error and mixed caffeine with a Sleeping  Tablet that has been prescribed by his Richmond Club Doctor. As a matter  of some concern, here was a distinct lack of  concern shown for  Cousins&#8217; welfare. The man was unconscious and possibly comatose, yet  many people&#8217;s first instinct was &#8220;Is he back on the Gear again?&#8221;. Whilst  I have  little sympathy for Cousins&#8217; drug addiction, this was NOT  an overdose, he had nothing even slightly illegal and his well-being  should have been paramount.</p>
<p>Brownlow Medallist James Hird,  speaking on Fox Sports&#8217; &#8220;On The Couch&#8221; stated that the use of prescribed  Sleeping Tablets wide widespread amongst the AFL playing  community,  particularly after night games, where players may hit the bed by  12.30-1.00am and are still wide awake at 4.00am, with their body still  winding down.</p>
<p>Then, a veritable Tidal Wave of Press followed,  focussing on the use of No Doz, Red Bull, Coffee and other  caffeine-based stimulants by players before games and  Sleeping  Tablets after games. This issue has most certainly put the spotlight on  the AFL, with seemingly every man and his dog having a point of view on  the matter.</p>
<p>If a player is prescribed Sleeping Tablets by a  properly-qualified Medical Professional, then it is nobody else&#8217;s  business. How do we know if the player has a medical issue that prevents  sleep (Insomnia, anyone) and that, in conjunction with said Medical  Professional, the best course of action is a controlled dosage of  sleeping pills?</p>
<p>As for the use of stimulants before games, this  is a completely different matter. Working as a shift worker at a large  University, I see students at all times of the  =day and night, madly  cramming for exams or major assignments. Many of these students use No  Doz or Red Bull in order to stay awake. Seeing these students after the  effects of these caffeine-based have worn off is not a pretty sight. You  really worry about what effect long-term use/or abuse of these  stimulants by AFL players are having on their general health.</p>
<p>There  is no question that, at this time, caffeine is not on the list of  banned substances. The use of No Doz raised its head some years ago when  Wallaby captain George Gregan and AFL legend Dermott Brereton were  quite open in admitting they used No Doz (Gregan) and granulated coffee  (Brereton) as stimulants before games.</p>
<p>I certainly would never  encourage anyone I was coaching to use stimulants before games. A  careful diet, proper hydration, a good breakfast or lunch inclusive of a  good carbohydrate loading and some fresh fruit is an example of a  good pre-match preparation.</p>
<p>In the case of AFL players or any  professional athlete, there is a massive difference between what the  general public feels is setting the right example and staying within  ASDA and WADA drug guidelines. Use of caffeine as a match-day stimulant  is bound to continue as long as caffeine remains a legal substance. If  footy clubs feel that caffeine can give players even a 1% improvement,  and that 1% is the difference between finals and oblivion, it is a  certainty that nothing will change anytime soon.</p>
<p>That AFL players  are used as Role Models by society, particularly in Victoria, South  Australia and Western Australia, is pivotal to this discussion. AFL as  Role Models, yeah, right. That is bollocks. Footballers are footballers,  great athletes, well paid, yes, but Role Models? Does the fact that a  man is an exceptional footballer and earns $600,000 a year from his  profession mean that the Press and the wider community has the right to  make these men bastions of society? No, I strongly believe not.</p>
<p>The  people who should be role models in our Society are Parents, Teachers,  Doctors, Religious Leaders and Law Enforcement Personnel. These are the  people the community needs to be upstanding and setting the right  example. Many parents in today&#8217;s society are not up to the task and use  the downfalls of others to make their own massive inadequacies. Permit  me a small personal observation here, whilst I do not play the Role  Model game, I will openly admit that I am an inadequate parent; I wish I  was capable of better.</p>
<p>You have to understand how much the AFL  means to those Australians in our South and West to fully appreciate why  so many journalists, AFL officials and the wider  community put AFL  players on such a pedestal. It is not uncommon for a by-line in the Age  or Herald-Sun to state that player X was spotted having a latte at  10.30 in  the morning in Lygon St. Talk about living in a goldfish  bowl. Collingwood&#8217;s Alan Didak was put through the wringer when he  caught a cab after having a few drinks and  the cab-driver refused  to take his fare. Thankfully, Collingwood President Eddie McGuire came  out strongly in support of Didak (who, to be fair, has transgressed at other  times) and the truth eventually came out.</p>
<p>In summary, hopefully  Ben Cousins will return to good health. It is sincerely hoped that Club  Doctors are putting player interests before those of Club interests  when prescribing any and all medications. Until caffeine is made  illegal, the use of legal stimulants, whilst not a good look, is bound  to continue. The southern Australian Press, indeed society as a  whole, should take a deep breath and have a cold hard look at whom it  really wants as Role Models in our country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sleeping tablets, Benny? Really?]]></title>
<link>http://buttonpushingmonkey.wordpress.com/2010/07/05/sleeping-tablets-benny-really/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 23:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>buttonpushingmonkey</dc:creator>
<guid>http://buttonpushingmonkey.wordpress.com/2010/07/05/sleeping-tablets-benny-really/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s right kids, drugs are... umm... they&#039;re really bad for... see... they aren&#039;t g]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1899" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://buttonpushingmonkey.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/ben-cousins5.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1899" title="ben-cousins5" src="http://buttonpushingmonkey.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/ben-cousins5.jpg?w=400&#038;h=274" alt="" width="400" height="274" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">That&#039;s right kids, drugs are... umm... they&#039;re really bad for... see... they aren&#039;t good for the human... jeez... would you look at those arms? Sorry, what was I saying?</p></div>
<p>Infamous AFL star Ben Cousins <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/cousins-under-sedation-unconscious-in-danger-20100705-zxox.html?autostart=1" target="_blank">remains in Intensive Care at the Epworth Hospital this morning</a>, after being found yesterday suffering what Richmond club officials described as an adverse reaction to a sleeping tablet.</p>
<p>OK.</p>
<p>For those unawares, Cousins is Australian Football&#8217;s most notorious reformed drug addict, having spent time out of the game after being banned for cocaine abuse in 2008.</p>
<p>I sincerely wish Cousins the best of health and a swift recovery &#8211; he&#8217;s had a shitty few years. But sleeping tablets? I find it strange that no one has even made mention of <a href="http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/sport/insomnia-drug-abuse-in-sports-commonplace-pharmacist-20090724-dw1v.html" target="_blank">this possibly tangentially linked story</a> from last year, linking NRL players with Sleeping Tablet / Red Bull benders.</p>
<p>Any chance a recovering cocaine and alcohol addict might be interested in a &#8220;euphoric high&#8221; from legal prescription medication that is undetectable in elite athlete drug testing?</p>
<p>All speculation on my part, I&#8217;ll grant you, and probably 100% wrong. But still&#8230;</p>
<p>I will say that the AFL&#8217;s reaction to this situation will be interesting. Reading between the lines, Richmond has long been aware that Cousins habitually takes sleeping tablets and still enjoys a drink or three. Add that to the fact they&#8217;ve admitted to giving him No-Doz caffeine tablets on match days, and you&#8217;ve got quite the chemical cocktail&#8230;</p>
<p>A solid message to send to the &#8216;children&#8217; that the AFL always spends so much time tip-toeing around:</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><em><strong>So long as you obtain your miscellaneous uppers and downers legally, then it&#8217;s allllllll good.</strong></em></p>
<p style="text-align:left;">Get well soon, Ben.</p>
<p style="text-align:right;"><strong>BPM</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[And now for something painfully familiar.]]></title>
<link>http://hismastersvoice.wordpress.com/2010/06/03/and-now-for-something-painfully-familiar/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 08:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hismastersvoice</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hismastersvoice.wordpress.com/2010/06/03/and-now-for-something-painfully-familiar/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The seizure of white farmland in Zimbabwe posed a problem for the Left to which, fortunately, they h]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The seizure of white farmland in Zimbabwe posed a problem for the Left to which, fortunately, they had easy solutions.<br />
The basic problem was that the seizure was a redistribution of wealth. Some of the wealth, admittedly, was grabbed by the greedy, but some of it went to the needy (even if much of the wealth melted away in their hands). A related problem was that it looked a lot like a revolution. The Left is in favour of the redistribution of wealth and invariably romanticises revolutionary acts and militant behaviour carried out by people who are using Left rhetoric. This explains why the Left across the entire world supported Mugabe&#8217;s actions.<br />
Not.<br />
The way of avoiding having to deal with the problem was by saying that it wasn&#8217;t a revolution and it wasn&#8217;t a redistribution of wealth. Instead, it was a cruel attack on the innocent farm-workers on industrialised white-owned farms, many of whom lost their jobs (though, of course, many seized plots of land on which they could work for themselves). It was also a vicious attack on civil liberties by a brutal authoritarian government. Aha! Problem solved!<br />
Now, when land, or any other means of production, is seized by a government, the Left supports it even if it leads to grave problems. Allende&#8217;s nationalisation of the Chilean mining industry was problematic (quite apart from the impact of sanctions and destabilisation) but the Left supported it. A bit further back was Mossadegh&#8217;s nationalisation of Iranian oil, which the Left also supported. The Left in South Africa is quite noisy about the failure of the South African land redistribution efforts.<br />
Yes, but what was happening in Zimbabwe was the seizure of white farms. Therefore the British and South African white ruling classes were violently opposed to this and so were all the newspapers. The Left did not have the courage or integrity to challenge any ruling class on any substantive issue. It had previously notably failed either to support Zimbabwe in its challenge to the International Monetary Fund (an institution which the Left had constantly demanded that someone challenge, until Zimbabwe actually did it) or in its defense of the independence of the Democratic Republic of the Congo against the Rwandan-Ugandan invasion (whereas the Left shrieked with anger when South Africa invaded Lesotho, even though that was actually at the request of its elected government). So, the Left&#8217;s action was taken out of cowardice. And, to be fair, the Zimbabwean government is an ugly thing to be on the side of, rather like the old Soviet government in some ways. The Left preferred to keep its distance while abandoning its principles, and, incidentally, becoming de facto stooges of white racists and international imperialists.<br />
So, no change there.<br />
Recently, however, the Creator was startled to pick up the Mail and Guardian and discover something interesting &#8212; interesting, that is, to someone who is not a connoisseur and archivist of ruling-class propaganda. This was an article about the Zimbabwean land seizures which did not denounce them. That seemed startling.<br />
It was less startling, perhaps, because it was written by a Trotskyist, Ben Cousins, the Pope of PLAAS, the University of the Western Cape&#8217;s farmworker rights organisation. In the South African ruling class, Trotskyists enjoy a decided benefit of clergy, because they have been so useful in making left-sounding propaganda against the ANC. If Cousins had written an article praising coprophagy, the Mail and Guardian would probably have printed that &#8212; which seems fair, given all the shit which that newspaper expects its readers to swallow.<br />
The article was based on a small study of 400 households around Masvingo, a farming community about 250 kilometres south of Harare. Basically, the researchers went around asking people who they were and what they were up to. The study&#8217;s conclusion, according to the article, was that agriculture had changed rather than being destroyed, and that it was more distributed than concentrated, that it had &#8220;reduced gross racial and class inequalities in land ownership and has brought into being a potentially productive agrarian structure&#8221;.<br />
It is extraordinarily rare that someone actually goes to Zimbabwe and looks around a bit, outside Harare and Bulawayo, the two MDC strongholds in the country where all journalists go. Therefore Cousins&#8217; article was a breath of fresh air. It was also welcome to see that Cousins did not simply assume, as virtually all journalists (not only in South Africa) do, that everything that happens in Zimbabwe must be bad.<br />
On the other hand, there were strong signs that Cousins had instead assumed that, in this particular instance, everything which happened had to be good, and therefore the conclusions which Cousins drew were a lot more optimistic than his data. 25% of the seized Masvingo land was still arranged in large farms, which was mainly controlled by the rich. (Of course, the ruling class would want to be absentee landlords rather than peasants.) In other words, a lot of the land was transferred from the white ruling class to the black ruling class.<br />
But it was, nevertheless, a land redistribution. Was this good for the people? Apparently the people said that they were better off. More people were living on the land concerned than had been employed there when the land had been under mechanised farming or tourism-focused game reserves. Of course, this does not mean that in the end more people were benefiting from the land; tourism and mechanised farming have impacts away from the land, whereas subsistence farming generally does not.<br />
More to the point, in 2008 maize production was still down by 25% on pre-redistribution levels (the previous year it had been down 65%). Cousins ascribes this to the government&#8217;s failure to help the farmers, but it seems likely that this is a structural problem. Export crops such as tea, coffee and sugar had declined sharply, as had the biggest export crop, tobacco. The fact that Cousins provides no figures makes the reader wonder whether he is hiding the bad news. The simple fact being that a lack of export crops, combined with a shortage of staple food, is a devastating indictment of how the system has worked.<br />
The fact that Cousins doesn&#8217;t want to acknowledge this is a problem of his political understanding, and is actually a product of his Trotskyism. On one hand he is hostile to the Zimbabwean government because it is not Trotskyite. On the other hand he is unwilling to criticise the rural poor, because they might someday become Trotskyite. The latter perspective enables him to see that a situation which benefits the rural poor is not necessarily a bad thing, but the former perspective prevents him from seeing that it is not necessarily a good thing, either.<br />
Cousins exults in the redistribution of land (which was carried out by ZANU [PF] ) in a rather questionable fashion. However, his only mention of ZANU (PF) is hostile, as an &#8220;elite&#8221; which must be watched and exposed. He does not mention the MDC at all, although he does mention that some say that a new government should redistribute the land towards the rich. Who these some are, or who the new government is, he does not state. Indeed, his assessment of land redistribution is astonishingly depoliticised.<br />
Cousins may well be right in thinking that a restoration of commercial farming is not a good idea. It would probably, however, be easy to restore commercial farming to that portion of the farms which were seized by the elite &#8212; the 25%+ in Masvingo, and probably considerably more elsewhere. In addition it is probable that some of the small peasant farms could be collectivised. What will probably actually happen, however, will be the reduction of the small peasant farms to grinding poverty followed by wholesale buyouts at very low prices.<br />
In other words, commercial farming will come back in the future, by decree or stealth, unless it is prevented from coming back, and that means securing a government which is interested in preventing it from coming back. It&#8217;s not clear that ZANU (PF) is such a government, but unfortunately they are the only conceivable government which might preserve the status quo. Unless, of course, some outside broker, such as the South African government, compels the preservation of the status quo or even its reformation in an egalitarian direction. But the present South African government is hardly more likely to do that, than the British or American governments are, whereas ZANU (PF) is right there.<br />
The reason why Cousins is taking this stand against the people who took the action which he applauds, and tacitly endorsing the people who are likely to oppose the action which he applauds, is not clear in the article, but fortunately Cousins has clarified his stance on a website called concernedafricascholars.org. (Whenever you hear the word &#8220;concerned&#8221;, release the safety-catch on your pistol; sooner or later you will probably hear the words &#8220;I feel your pain&#8221;, which is the moment to start shooting.) The relevant article is &#8220;A Reply to Mamdani on the Zimbabwean Land Question&#8221;, posted on the 16th March 2009.<br />
Cousins agrees with Mamdani over the notion that Zimbabwean land reform was not a total train-smash, which is tenable provided you define the train-smash as &#8220;going over a cliff and into the mouth of an erupting volcano&#8221; rather than simply &#8220;derailment with many dead&#8221;. However, Cousins disagrees with Mamdani over the question of whether ZANU (PF) enjoys support in Zimbabwe. Mamdani says, reasonably enough, that a regime which survives massive external attack and propaganda must, on some level, command internal support. Cousins declares that Mamdani is &#8220;simplistic and specious&#8221;, quoting Patrick Bond as proof. (Using Patrick Bond against Mahmood Mamdani is like using a peashooter against an armoured car, but obviously Cousins does not realise this.)<br />
Cousins basically says that ethnicity, the urban-rural divide, and foreign efforts to manipulate Zimbabwean politics, all of which are obvious and important factors, are unimportant, whereas repression is important. The repression which Cousins cites is the Gakurahundi massacres in 1982 (which has fairly little impact on contemporary Zimbabwean politics except where the MDC makes propaganda about it), the dispossession of farm workers (which affected a small part of the population) and the forced urban removals of &#8220;Operation Murambatsvina&#8221;; the latter being the only contemporarily significant episode, but happening well into the decline of the authority of ZANU (PF), so not really explaining why ZANU (PF) was able to hold on for so long. Effectively, Cousins is saying that he does not like to hear what Mamdani is saying, so he discounts Mamdani&#8217;s arguments, but has none of his own to account for the non-disappearance of ZANU (PF). No doubt ZANU (PF) has a corrupt ruling class assisting it, but so has the MDC, and the MDC&#8217;s is certainly a lot richer and better-connected in global terms, so one actually has to return to Zimbabwean internal politics, and here Mamdani seems to know what he is talking about far better than Cousins.<br />
Cousins constantly talks about &#8220;Mugabe&#8221;, following the traditional mode of white conservative discourse in personalising the black enemy in order to demonise him. He also claims, likewise following the discourse of white conservatives rather than reality, that the South African government under Mbeki and the SADC organisation supported &#8220;Mugabe&#8221;, a claim with no basis in fact. (What he probably means is that they did not help Western imperialism in their efforts to overthrow ZANU [PF], which is not the same thing at all.) In bolstering his assault on Mamdani, he uses words like &#8220;simplistic&#8221;, &#8220;specious&#8221;, &#8220;selective&#8221;, &#8220;myopic&#8221; and &#8220;fantastical&#8221;, all terms which could much more accurately be applied to Cousins if one wanted to be completely unhelpful.<br />
The question, therefore, is why Cousins wants to be unhelpful; why he wants to smear Mamdani and, in doing so, misrepresent the Zimbabwean situation and indeed his own position on it (towards the end of the article he suddenly admits that &#8220;Even in the most recent elections there was evidence of continued support for Mugabe&#8221; (actually, for ZANU [PF]), which essentially makes nonsense of his attacks on Mamdani. He praises &#8220;property rights&#8221; and &#8220;effective, transparent and accountable institutional frameworks&#8221;, which is obviously desirable. However, he then says that &#8220;Only a government with real democratic credentials can create such institutions, which is why a way must be found to exit Mugabe&#8221;.<br />
Well, a way has been found to &#8220;exit Mugabe&#8221; &#8212; the installation of the MDC in power, under the auspices of Anglo-American finance capital and with the blessing of Anglo-American imperialism. By implication, Cousins is endorsing this, which in the end is why he does not like Mamdani, who (with every other serious intellectual who has studied the matter) is extremely suspicious of Anglo-American finance capital and imperialism. This means that on one hand a Trotskyite is cheering for peasant agriculture, and on the other hand he is cheering for multinational capitalism of a kind which will destroy peasant agriculture. Cousins is abandoning his principles and adopting fresh ones with such sequential speed, and with so little justification or excuse, that it makes the reader quite dizzy.<br />
Clearly, Cousins does not like large-scale mechanised agriculture, and prefers peasant agriculture to this. (Possibly he is hostile to corporate agribusiness, or possibly he believes that peasant agriculture is more empowering.) This is a tenable position (whether or not it is substantiated by the facts on the ground).<br />
Cousins clearly also does not like ZANU (PF). He does not like them because they are repressive, which is also a tenable position (although his attacks on them are fundamentally depoliticised and ahistorical, probably because his attacks are more extreme than circumstances warrant).<br />
The problem is therefore that ZANU (PF) have expanded peasant agriculture and are the only Zimbabwean political organisation likely to maintain it. So a thing which Cousins considers bad has brought about a thing which Cousins considers good. The only question to ask here is whether the good outweighs the bad, or vice-versa; whether peasant agriculture can be sacrificed for the sake of getting rid of ZANU (PF), or whether ZANU (PF) should be allowed to survive, for all its odiousness, for the sake of preserving peasant agriculture. It would be a hard decision for anyone to make.<br />
What Cousins is trying to do is to have things both ways. He wants to be seen as supporting good on both sides, so therefore he pretends that ZANU (PF) can be got rid of without undermining land reform and peasant agriculture. This is rubbish and makes Cousins&#8217; work worthless.<br />
One can only speculate on why Cousins has chosen this path. One reason is Trotskyite loyalty, which is absurdly important. Among the most docile supporters of the MDC in Zimbabwe is Brian Raftopolous, one of about a dozen Trotskyites in Zimbabwe, who has played a leading intellectual role in providing the MDC with some leftist credentials. Cousins has to stick up for Raftopolous, so he has to support the MDC, if only tacitly.<br />
On a larger scale, attacking Mamdani bears powerful political advantages. Mamdani is an &#8220;Africanist&#8221;, meaning that his anti-imperialism and his hostility to neoliberalism is driven by a desire to protect Africa (and by implication all other poor countries) from imperialist assault and immiseration. Therefore he has the &#8220;wrong&#8221; politics for a Trotskyite, and so it is proper to attack him &#8212; the fact that his political conclusions are acceptable to Cousins is less important.<br />
In addition, there are less creditable points. Mamdani has consistently opposed imperialism and neoliberalism and has taken a lot of flak from the Western capitalist press for his stand against them on Zimbabwe and the Sudan. Therefore, attacking Mamdani is bound to earn you brownie points from the Western ruling class. Zimbabwe is a flashpoint for imperialist aggression, and therefore Mugabe has been demonised in the West (he is not a demon, merely a corrupt and opportunistic politician). In South Africa, white racists have hated Mugabe ever since they heard his name, and therefore attacks on him dominate the ruling-class press. If Cousins had stood up for ZANU (PF), he would have faced criticism and perhaps expulsion from ruling-class discourse. (Merely supporting land reform earned him almost unanimous odium from his white readers on the Mail and Guardian website.) Therefore, shouting along with the racists and imperialists seemed safer.<br />
In saying this, Cousins sounds like a quite despicable person. Perhaps he is. However, let&#8217;s not forget that in mid-1939, George Orwell&#8217;s principal concern was to campaign against rearmament and against any attempt to prepare for war against Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. His subsidiary concern, which he took quite seriously, was to set up an underground organisation to overthrow the British government and replace it with a government devoted to opposing rearmament and war. Orwell had fought in the front line in Spain, and knew as well as anyone else in Britain that the Nazis were preparing for war and that a Nazi victory in any such war would be a catastrophe. The Spanish Falangists were murdering his friends after their final victory even as Orwell plotted to facilitate a Nazi victory in Britain. Compared with Orwell, Cousins seems like a man of absolute integrity and good sense.<br />
Orwell&#8217;s problem was almost exactly the same as Cousins&#8217;. He knew what he wanted &#8212; both the overthrow of Fascism and the installation of Socialism. Unfortunately, he couldn&#8217;t possibly get them both. He knew that mobilisation for the war against Fascism would happen under a conservative government, and he did not want that to happen because it would mean lining himself up with Winston Churchill. He therefore decided to proclaim that, as an opponent of Fascism, his first duty was to overthrow his own government, and adopt pacifism into the bargain because mobilization for war would play into the hands of the conservatives. Eventually, as he admitted, he suddenly realised that he couldn&#8217;t in conscience refuse to oppose the Nazis, and since the only people fighting the Nazis were the British and French conservatives, he had to endorse them. But well into the Second World War he had to tell himself that the war was going to bring Socialism, despite all evidence to the contrary, since otherwise he couldn&#8217;t have legitimated it to himself.<br />
So maybe we should feel sorry for Cousins and even support him. To the extent to which he is able, he is trying to tell the truth. Unfortunately, his ideological perspective makes it impossible to do this on any large scale. However, compared with virtually all the other sleazy Trotskyites in South Africa and elsewhere, Cousins smells sweet as a freshly-opened rose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stay in the Closet]]></title>
<link>http://couchcrusader.wordpress.com/2010/05/22/stay-in-the-closet/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 06:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>couchcrusader</dc:creator>
<guid>http://couchcrusader.wordpress.com/2010/05/22/stay-in-the-closet/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[One of the reasons Jason Akermanis believes the “world of AFL football is not ready” for a gay AFL p]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the reasons Jason Akermanis believes the “world of AFL football is not ready” for a gay AFL player is the potential media coverage this player would generate. If you can ignore his other reasons, he has hit one nail on the head.</p>
<p>Since then, reporters have rushed to get Daniel Kowalski’s thoughts on the matter. However, he did not come out until after he had retired from competitive swimming. He “clearly suppressed these thoughts of being gay … because it was &#8216;wrong&#8217;, as a male it&#8217;s &#8216;wrong&#8217; but even more as an elite athlete.&#8221; (The Age, 18 April 2010)</p>
<p>Sadly, this culture still exists.</p>
<p>Want proof? Former NSW Transport Minister has just had to resign from his position because Channel 7 thought it was ‘news’ to broadcast footage of him leaving a gay sex club. He is hardly an elite athlete, but he is a public figure.</p>
<p>Imagine the hysteria if that was an AFL footballer leaving that same club.</p>
<p>Too hard to picture? Well it wasn’t that long ago that journalist Dylan Howard paid for the stolen medical records of AFL players and tried to turn it into ‘news’.</p>
<p>Whoever is the first AFL player to come out will have the honour of joining the now well used list of the three other high profile gay sportsmen; Ian Roberts, Matthew Mitcham and Daniel Kowalski.</p>
<p>That’s three. Out of all the sports we play in Australia, there are only three. Include Welsh rugby international Gareth Thomas, and it leaps to four. Worldwide.</p>
<p>Perhaps that’s the point Jason was trying to make. As a high profile sportsperson, it would be much easier to keep your private life private.</p>
<p>It is inevitable that someone will come out soon. But it will take a person who is willing to sacrifice the private life of themselves and their partner. That partner may not live a high profile life. It wouldn’t take long for that to change.</p>
<p>This couple would have to welcome onto themselves a media hysteria that would rival that of Ben Cousins. Drinking coffee, walking the dog and going out for dinner would become ‘news’.</p>
<p>It will take a person of great courage to wish this upon himself. Someone like Michael Long, who decided that racism was not tolerated anywhere else in society, except on a football field.</p>
<p>Or conversely, it would take someone who would happily welcome and revel in the media and public attention. Funnily enough, someone exactly like Jason Akermanis.</p>
<p>One day, a gay AFL player will come forward. We can only hope that it is on their terms and not as a result of being caught out by a journalist, photographer or TV station and being deemed ‘news’.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Interview: The Rise of Free-To-Play At EA]]></title>
<link>http://tukko.com/2010/04/30/interview-the-rise-of-free-to-play-at-ea/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>The Tukko Gamer</dc:creator>
<guid>http://tukko.com/2010/04/30/interview-the-rise-of-free-to-play-at-ea/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Interview: The Rise of Free-To-Play At EA The last time Gamasutra spoke to Ben Cousins, general mana]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/4408/interview_the_rise_of_.php?utm_source=feedburner&#38;utm_medium=feed&#38;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+GamasutraFeatureArticles+%28Gamasutra+Feature+Articles%29&#38;utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher">Interview: The Rise of Free-To-Play At EA</a></p>
<p>The last time Gamasutra <a href="http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/3599/ea_goes_freetoplay_battlefield_.php">spoke  to Ben Cousins</a>, general manager of Electronic Arts&#8217; new  free-to-play team, was a little over two years ago. At that time he was a  producer at the company&#8217;s DICE studio and was working on the  then-yet-to-be-released free-to-play title <em>Battlefield Heroes</em>.</p>
<p>It appears the experiment paid off &#8212; enough so that Cousins is now the  general manager of EA&#8217;s free-to-play division, which has recently  released <a href="http://www.lordofultima.com/en"><em>Lord of Ultima</em></a>,  the first new game in the Ultima series in many years. Unlike its  forebears, it&#8217;s a strategy title, and very much in the mold of popular  German browser games.</p>
<p>Here, Cousins explains why the company is going this route &#8212; both  specifically with this game and more generally its goal with the  free-to-play division. He also discusses his thoughts on the market at  large, how the company hopes to win back gamers who may have strayed  from playing PC titles, and how multiple entry points into a franchise  can foster active engagement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[St Kilda and Fremantle: The Bizarre Rivalry]]></title>
<link>http://rwb2010.wordpress.com/2010/04/16/st-kilda-and-fremantle-the-bizarre-rivalry/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 04:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Tom Briglia</dc:creator>
<guid>http://rwb2010.wordpress.com/2010/04/16/st-kilda-and-fremantle-the-bizarre-rivalry/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[St Kilda and Fremantle share one of the most bizarre &#8220;rivalries&#8221; in the AFL. As the two]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>St Kilda and Fremantle share one of the most bizarre &#8220;rivalries&#8221; in the AFL.</p>
<p>As the two least successful clubs in VFL/AFL history to date, it&#8217;s not all-important clashes between competition juggernauts that this rivalry has been based on.</p>
<p>Rather, it has been a mixture of the unique, incredible and questionable, with occasional flashes of both genuinely brilliant and sadly woeful football being played.</p>
<p>It began immediately &#8211; although inconspicuously &#8211; in 1995, when Fremantle played their debut AFL match in the Ansett Australia Cup against the Saints at East Fremantle Oval. Whilst the match itself was normal enough (St Kilda would win by 35 points), this would be the only time (to date) the Dockers would actually play in Fremantle in a competitive AFL match.</p>
<p>In Round 14 of the following season, St Kilda would break through for its first win at Subiaco, and in Western Australia &#8211; of course, against Fremantle &#8211; in a game which produced great goals from both sides.</p>
<p>The next clash between the two came on ANZAC Day of 1997, with Fremantle &#8211; in 10th place and the Saints in 16th &#8211; weathering a late St Kilda challenge to win by a straight kick. The return bout was played on a ridiculously blustery day at Waverley in Round 20 of that year, with Fremantle in 10th place (again) going into the match whilst St Kilda was second on percentage, on its way to a second minor premiership. The Saints that time won a scrappy game by 13 points after the Dockers got within a point in the final term.</p>
<p>St Kilda co-captain Stewart Loewe would be stretchered off in Round 9 of 1998 at the WACA after an awkward fall in which his head ended up making contact with his knee. Despite a thrilling running goal from ruckman Peter Everitt, the 4th-placed Saints were overrun by the 13th-placed Dockers in the final term.</p>
<p>After several years of minor quirks, things were about to get really weird.</p>
<p><!--moreContinue reading-->Round 15 of 1999 will be remembered for the mark that was taken by umpire Peter Carey. Early in the match, Docker (and former Saint) Adrian Fletcher centred a short pass to Brad Wira on the wing, only for the experienced Carey, who was in the path of the ball&#8217;s trajectory, to take the mark and call for a ball-up. Needless to say, the incident was a massive talking point in football circles, though ultimately it would take its place in VFL/AFL history as a wonderfully unique and humourous moment in a game that has a habit of throwing those up from time to time. The Dockers would go on to win the game by 23 points, and send St Kilda&#8217;s season into a further downward spiral.</p>
<p>By the time the two teams met in Round 12 of 2001, both teams had new coaches and were sharing 14th (St Kilda) and 16th (Fremantle) places on the ladder; by season&#8217;s end they would be 15th and 16th respectively. On this Saturday night at Subiaco, the Saints won their third game of the year after a young Stephen Milne sprang to life in the final term, on his way to kicking three goals and giving the Saints a 10-point win. However, captain Robert Harvey would seriously injure his knee in a gang tackle that continued well past its use-by date; with the ball locked up amongst the scrum, the umpire inexplicably chose to let play continue, long enough for the Dockers players to force Harvey to the turf as his knee buckled under him.</p>
<p>It would also be Malcolm Blight&#8217;s last victory as coach for the Saints, with his brief tenure at Moorabbin ending just three weeks later.</p>
<p>The next season threw up a couple more notable matches &#8211; in Round 2, the fast-finishing Dockers would roll the Saints by three points at home after trailing for much of the day, and in Round 17 St Kilda played a rare home match at Princes Park and defeat the Dockers in a dead-rubber in front of just 8,078 fans.</p>
<p>A skip to 2004 would find Brent Guerra breaking Docker Byran Schammer&#8217;s arm in a devastating bump as a barnstorming St Kilda extended their winning streak to seven to begin the season, as well as Fremantle wearing their predominantly white away/clash jumper for the first time in the return match in Round 22 at Docklands.</p>
<p>A trio of thrilling matches followed. Strange, thrilling matches.</p>
<p>In round 2 of 2005, St Kilda won their first match of the season by a solitary point at York Park in Tasmania. The Saints would overhaul the Dockers in trying conditions, with Aaron Hamill earning a free kick for holding the ball and scoring the winning point &#8211; but not before a final Fremantle charge into their forward line, with defender Luke Penny expertly safely punching the ball out of bounds in the final seconds from a marking contest.</p>
<p>The infamous &#8220;Whispers in the Sky&#8221; clash was a dire battle in Round 21 at Subiaco. St Kilda were pushing to solidify a top four spot after being outside of the 8 after Round 13, though tipped by many to win the premiership on the eve of the season. Skipper Nick Riewoldt has broken his collarbone in Round 14, and stand-in captain Justin Koschitzke had powered his way to stunning form and lead the Saints&#8217; fight for redemption. He earned 11 Brownlow votes in just five matches, and with Riewoldt back, he was seen as a key component to St Kilda&#8217;s premiership hopes as September neared. Fremantle, meanwhile were hoping to return to finals action after St Kilda had knocked them out on the eve of the 2004 finals series.</p>
<p>What happened on that Friday night is now a part of St Kilda-Fremantle rivalry folklore. Awful and questionable umpiring decisions went Fremantle&#8217;s way all night, gifting the Dockers several goals and depriving the Saints of several chances of their own. Koschitzke would injure a quad muscle in the third quarter, and he would not be fit enough to return to the side, which bowed out in the preliminary final several weeks later (had St Kilda defeated Sydney in that match, he would have been a huge chance to return for the Grand Final).</p>
<p>The final term was an old-fashioned thriller. In the final minute, with the Saints up by a point, Justin Peckett was run down by Luke McPharlin just outside Fremantle&#8217;s 50-metre arc; the resulting kick forward saw Justin Longmuir take a spectacular mark over the top of the pack just 25 metres out from goal. His kick was straight, and the Dockers had won by five points, and were to face reigning premier Port Adelaide the following week in the final round for a spot in the finals.</p>
<p>Channel Nine reporter Tony Jones &#8211; travelling back to Melbourne from the game after Nine&#8217;s coverage &#8211; claimed that he heard umpire Matthew Head, who had made a number of the decisions that went Fremantle&#8217;s way remark, &#8220;Now I know what it feels like to have a victory&#8221;. Several other passengers made the same claim as Jones, but the AFL cleared Head of any wrongdoing after an investigation into the matter that week.</p>
<p>Though they would start strongly, Fremantle lost to Port Adelaide the following week and finish 10th as the Power clinched eighth spot. St Kilda would go on to record two amazing victories over the following two weeks &#8211; their biggest win in the club&#8217;s 132-year history over the Brisbane Lions, by 139 points, and a brave eight-point win over minor premiers Adelaide in the First Qualifying Final at AAMI Stadium, to secure a home Preliminary Final and a week&#8217;s rest.</p>
<p>But the centrepiece of this rivalry &#8211; so far, at least &#8211; came in Round 5, 2006; the final installment of this trilogy taking place where it started &#8211; at York Park (now Aurora Stadium) in Tasmania, referred to as &#8220;Sirengate&#8221;.</p>
<p>The Dockers were truly dangerous in 2006, and were only knocked out a week short of the Grand Final. Though notorious for poor interstate form, on this day they were all over an inept St Kilda, who were making another slow start to a season. Though the Saints would be in with a chance all day, that chance seemed to have disappeared as the clock counted down to zero as a desperate Dockers defence forced a stopped in the Saints forward line, with their team up by a point. The siren sounded, and Fremantle players around the ball began celebrating a hard-fought victory.</p>
<p>But the siren was quite faint, and umpire didn&#8217;t hear it &#8211; and play continued from the stoppage well after full-time. The Saints forced the ball to Steven Baker, whose flying shot at goal &#8211; a number of seconds after the siren &#8211; missed to the left, tying the scores. The umpire then awarded Baker a free kick for a hit he got as he kicked it, and so he was to take the kick again, with the first behind taken back, and the Saints again down by a point. As this was occurring, Fremantle officials had stormed on to the ground to remonstrate with the umpires, with coach Chris Connolly finding himself arguing with St Kilda player Lenny Hayes. Verbal stoushes were springing up between officials, umpires and players left, right and centre, and amongst it all, Baker missed again. The game was a draw.</p>
<p>St Kilda coach Grant Thomas declared the game &#8220;one for the blooper reel&#8221; in the post-match wash-up, whilst Connolly was understandably furious. Fremantle immediately took the issue to the AFL. Sensationally, the AFL overturned the result during the week, with final score officially at 13.15 (93) to 14.10 (94), the Dockers victorious by a point.</p>
<p>The sides would meet again at Subiaco in Round 20. To date, this match is the most important game the clubs have been involved in against each other, with a top four spot up for grabs. Fremantle trounced the Saints, with the only highlight for St Kilda being a goal kicked by Brendon Goddard from an enormous kick late in the match; from just inside the centre square, Goddard&#8217;s kick would go through the goals at post-height.</p>
<p>The Dockers would finish third on the ladder, with fellow Subiaco tenants West Coast in first place. Though they would lose the Second Qualifying Final to Adelaide away, they won their first final of any sort at home against Melbourne a week later. Sydney knocked them out a week later, otherwise the MCG would have been set for an all-Western Australian Grand Final.</p>
<p>Several things of note come out of this. Firstly, St Kilda would have finished third on superior percentage if the &#8220;Sirengate&#8221; result had stood, forcing eventual Grand Finalists Sydney out of the top four, and forcing a Western Derby as a First Qualifying Final. Instead, the Saints finished sixth and limped out of the finals series in the first week, losing to Melbourne in the Second Elimination Final. Of course, if the Saints had won that game &#8211; which was a good chance of happening through the final term &#8211; they would have faced Fremantle in a semi-final, bringing the two teams face-to-face in massive game; as it happened, Grant Thomas would be sacked just days after the loss to the Demons. The other point worth considering &#8211; albeit a hypothetical one &#8211; is if the AFL would have overturned the result the way it did had Baker actually kicked a goal from either of his shots, &#8220;winning&#8221; the game for St Kilda. It&#8217;s one thing to overturn a draw, but to  completely reverse the outcome of a match would have made this issue far, far greater, and a much more daunting prospect for the AFL.</p>
<p>The following season was a disappointment for both teams. When they squared off in Round 20, with the Saints hoping to snatch a finals spot under new coach Ross Lyon, a collision between Steven Baker and Jeff Farmer would be the talking point of the competition for the following week.</p>
<p>Farmer left the ground concussed, with blood pouring from his face, after evidently running into the back of Baker. No umpires nor cameras saw or captured the incident, but a Fremantle trainer said that Baker had been malicious in the collision, and this was influential in the seven-match suspension Baker received. The Saints appealed, but this fell on deaf ears from the AFL. The decision would prove costly for the Saints, who were now without their star tagger as they were coming up against West Coast the following week, a must-win game for the Saints. The Eagles&#8217; midfield of Chris Judd, Ben Cousins and Daniel Kerr were able to run far more freely and eventually the Eagles would win by eight points; though St Kilda defeated Richmond in Round 22, they would finish the season in ninth position after Adelaide also won their final round match to knock St Kilda out of September calculations.</p>
<p>Round 13 of 2008 saw a spluttering Saints wielding the axe on senior players Nick Dal Santo and Stephen Milne after just three wins from the previous ten games of football. Ben McEvoy, Robert Eddy and Jarryd Allen would all debut for the Saints on a dogged Friday night, with the Saints prevailing by eight points. It would be the beginning of a remarkable turnaround for Ross Lyon and his men, who would win eight of their final ten matches in the home-and-away season to finish fourth, including the return game at Subiaco in Round 20 which Stephen Milne played out with a grotesquely swollen cheek. The Saints would fall one week short of the Grand Final.</p>
<p>The Saints would go one better in 2009, as Fremantle were again finding themselves at the wrong end of the ladder. In Round 4, the Saints crushed the Dockers by 83 points, and keeping the visitors to a scoreline of 4.4 (28), the joint-lowest score at Docklands. Of course, that record is shared with St Kilda, who could only manage 3.10 (28) against Collingwood in Round 6 of 2002.</p>
<p>Most recently, their 2010 NAB Cup semi-final match was nearly called off, after storms ravaged the Melbourne CBD, leaving Etihad Stadium with internal roofing damage. The players ran out for a later start to no crowd in attendance, and the 5,000+ fans were eventually let in over the first quarter, but only allowed to be seated on the bottom level. St Kilda would win a position in the Final easily, but would lose that to the Western Bulldogs, who were making their first Final appearance of any kind in 40 years.</p>
<p>And now on Sunday evening, the two teams will be squaring off, and coming into this round are occupying the top two positions on the ladder. It&#8217;s definitely the first time this has happened with these two clubs; Fremantle will be looking to be on top of the AFL ladder at the completion of any round for the first time in their history, whilst the Saints are going to be entering a lengthy period of time with injured captain Nick Riewoldt. The football world will be watching this intriguing clash, which will hopefully be remembered for some good football, promising individual performances and solid teamwork. As long as no umpires take marks or feel like &#8220;having a victory&#8221;, or the siren fails, or there are unseen and inconclusive clashes which result in massive suspensions, or storms unleash fury over Melbourne, then there&#8217;s a good chance that just might happen.</p>
<p>But who knows?</p>
<p><strong>Links</strong></p>
<p>Umpire Peter Carey <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmYDrBY6qiY" target="_blank">takes a mark</a> in Round 15, 1999</p>
<p>Justin Longmuir kicks <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRT9JVGFEzA" target="_blank">a goal after the siren to win the game for the Dockers</a> in the &#8220;Whispers in the Sky&#8221; match, in Round 21, 2005</p>
<p>&#8220;Sirengate&#8221; finish <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IyLZkbqxI8&#38;feature=related" target="_blank">Part 1</a>, Round 5, 2006</p>
<p>&#8220;Sirengate&#8221; finish <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSuPUIbRT5U&#38;feature=geosearch" target="_blank">Part 2</a></p>
<p>Brendon Goddard&#8217;s <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OMxe-_fstk" target="_blank">monster goal</a>, Round 20, 2006</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Family Friendly Condoms. Don't worry, it's just an eye-catching headline.]]></title>
<link>http://andrewbyname.wordpress.com/2010/04/15/family-friendly-condoms-dont-worry-its-just-an-eye-catching-headline/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>andrewbyname</dc:creator>
<guid>http://andrewbyname.wordpress.com/2010/04/15/family-friendly-condoms-dont-worry-its-just-an-eye-catching-headline/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[6 writers allegedly left #thebounce because they allegedly had trouble complying with the show]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6 writers allegedly left #thebounce because they allegedly had trouble complying with the show&#8217;s family friendly image. Now an ad for Cougar Town (you know, that  show that moonlights as a dog turd?) featuring a woman (yes, the &#8220;cougar&#8221;, in case you were wondering) holding a liquid-filled condom.  I don&#8217;t envy the task of the hundreds of thousands of parents now explaining to their kids that these &#8220;water balloons&#8221; are only for adult fluid skirmishes.  Just like THAT scene from Parenthood (A: Is it famous enough to have a capitalised &#8220;that&#8221;? B: Do I care?) in which Steve Martin holds a &#8220;buzzy candle&#8221;. At least that&#8217;s what my parents told me, anyway. What am I saying though? Just like Ben Cousins, The Bounce needs to lift its proverbial game. Although in the case of Ben Cousins, its not just the proverbial side of life he needs to preoccupy his mind about. Enough AFL and back to social proselytising. The only &#8220;skin&#8221; a kid should be hearing about his that red leather one. Oh, hang on&#8230; I once saw a&#8230; never mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Connors fights Cousins and others including toilet seat ]]></title>
<link>http://neitherpedanticnorwild.wordpress.com/2010/04/13/connors-fights-cousins-and-others-including-toilet-seat/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>remydavies</dc:creator>
<guid>http://neitherpedanticnorwild.wordpress.com/2010/04/13/connors-fights-cousins-and-others-including-toilet-seat/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[From today&#8217;s Age: DRUNKEN Richmond player Daniel Connors fought with teammates during an ugly]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste"></div>
<div>From today&#8217;s Age:</div>
<div></div>
<div><a href="http://neitherpedanticnorwild.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/picture-7.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-39" title="Picture 7" src="http://neitherpedanticnorwild.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/picture-7.png?w=291&#038;h=300" alt="" width="291" height="300" /></a></div>
<div><em>DRUNKEN Richmond player Daniel Connors fought with teammates during an ugly early morning rampage, which has seen him suspended for eight matches and three of his teammates, including Ben Cousins, banned for a game each.</em></div>
<div><em><br />
</em></div>
<div id="_mcePaste"><em><strong>Connors’ drunken escapade in which he fought with Cousins, Luke McGuane and Dean Polo, included him smashing his head on a toilet seat</strong> and waking up and upsetting hotel guests.</em></div>
<div><em><br />
</em></div>
<div id="_mcePaste"><em>The players who should feel most aggrieved by Punt Road justice are Dean Polo, Luke McGuane and Ben Cousins, the trio who packed the drunk Connors off to bed. Unfortunately he was not so easily persuaded and returned to the lobby throwing punches when they again tried to convince him he had had enough.</em></div>
<div><em><br />
</em></div>
<div id="_mcePaste"><em>Cousins has been banned for not protesting hard enough, early enough, to his teammate’s behaviour. This was arguably the harshest penalty of all for Cousins is clearly battling on-going issues of self-control without being held responsible for managing the misbehaviour of others.</em></div>
<p><em><br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Is casual gaming destroying the traditional gaming market?]]></title>
<link>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2010/03/18/is-casual-gaming-destroying-the-traditional-gaming-market/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>JP Mangalindan, Writer</dc:creator>
<guid>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2010/03/18/is-casual-gaming-destroying-the-traditional-gaming-market/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Trip Hawkins sees a videogame business at war with itself. It&#8217;s Farmville vs. Halo and the win]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Trip Hawkins sees a videogame business at war with itself. It&#8217;s Farmville vs. Halo and the win]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
