<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bond-insurer &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/bond-insurer/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "bond-insurer"</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:26:18 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sunday September 21, 2008: "Paulson's Monster" needs $700 trilllion.  Moody's questioned.]]></title>
<link>http://shanadonohue.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/sunday-september-21-2008-warren-buffett-to-be-probed/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>shanadonohue</dc:creator>
<guid>http://shanadonohue.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/sunday-september-21-2008-warren-buffett-to-be-probed/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[“Paulson’s Monster”, as it’s being called, has now proposed the need for $700 billion of taxpayer do]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;margin:0;"><span style="font-size:13pt;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;">“Paulson’s Monster”, as it’s being called, has now proposed the need for $700 billion of taxpayer dollars, raising the US debt limit to $11 trillion, to spin off the bad sectors of the financials into its own entity.<span>  </span>Paulson claims his plan will “minimize” the cost to the taxpayer in the long run, but who can really be sure?<span>  </span>As part of the plan, Paulson said that he was currently in talks with other countries for help.<span>  </span>He wouldn’t disclose which countries.<span>  </span><span>    </span><span> </span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;margin:0;"><strong><span style="font-size:small;font-family:Times New Roman;"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;margin:0;"><span style="font-size:13pt;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;">Back in Ratings land, one ABK message boarder claimed that the Feds raided Moody’s on Friday looking for connections between the ratings company and hedge funds.<span>  </span>No link was provided, and given that any Joe Schmo can go on a Google Finance board and post whatever he or she pleases, it could very well be completely fabricated.<span>  </span>However, a Bloomberg article titled “Berkshire&#8217;s Bond Insurer, Moody&#8217;s Stake Face Probe”, reports that one such link may in fact come to light:</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;margin:0;"><span style="font-size:13pt;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;margin:0;"><em><span style="font-size:13pt;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;">“Billionaire Warren Buffett&#8217;s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. faces a probe by Connecticut&#8217;s attorney general for possible conflicts created by owning almost 20 percent of credit ratings company Moody&#8217;s Corp. while also running a new municipal bond insurer.<span>  </span></span></span></em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;margin:0;"><em><span style="font-size:13pt;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;"> </span></span></em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;margin:0;"><em><span style="font-size:13pt;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;">Moody&#8217;s gave its top rating last week to Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp., created in December as existing bond insurers struggled to maintain their AAA ratings. A favorable rating for Berkshire by New York-based Moody&#8217;s, or a lower rating for competitors including MBIA Inc. and Ambac Financial Group Inc., may give Buffett&#8217;s company an advantage.”</span></span></em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;margin:0;"><span style="font-size:13pt;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;margin:0;"><span style="font-size:13pt;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;">So maybe there is truth in rumor.<span>  </span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;margin:0;"><span style="font-size:13pt;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;margin:0;"><span style="font-size:13pt;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;">In other news, Barclays is the proud new owner of Lehman Brothers’s investment banking and trading businesses.<span>  </span>The $1.75 billion deal approved yesterday is a definite bargain as compared to the one Barclays would have had to strike last week for Lehman’s entire assets before bankruptcy.<span>  </span><span>  </span><span>  </span></span></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch files lawsuit involving 7 CDS against XL Capital Assurance/SCA]]></title>
<link>http://acheson.wordpress.com/2008/03/19/merrill-lynch-files-lawsuit-involving-7-cds-against-xl-capital-assurancesca/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
<guid>http://acheson.wordpress.com/2008/03/19/merrill-lynch-files-lawsuit-involving-7-cds-against-xl-capital-assurancesca/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The question is, whether XL&#8217;s termination of 7 Merrill CDS will accelerate the big derivative ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The question is, whether XL&#8217;s termination of 7 Merrill CDS will accelerate the big derivative ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[UK Parliament issues scathing report on bankers]]></title>
<link>http://acheson.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/uk-parliament-issues-scathing-report-on-bankers/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 03:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
<guid>http://acheson.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/uk-parliament-issues-scathing-report-on-bankers/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Digested version:  bankers ignorant, reckless.  The Treasury committee of the Parliament has now iss]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Digested version:  bankers ignorant, reckless.  The Treasury committee of the Parliament has now iss]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Check VIDEO page: Flashback to Ambac CEO telling us Ambac is very safe, its portfolio in very good shape, all AAA ]]></title>
<link>http://acheson.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/check-video-page-flashback-ambac-ceo-telling-us-ambac-is-very-safe-its-portfolio-in-very-good-shape-all-aaa/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
<guid>http://acheson.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/check-video-page-flashback-ambac-ceo-telling-us-ambac-is-very-safe-its-portfolio-in-very-good-shape-all-aaa/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Bill Ackman strikes again against monolines - read his latest letter]]></title>
<link>http://acheson.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/bill-ackman-strikes-again-against-monolines-read-his-latest-letter/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
<guid>http://acheson.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/bill-ackman-strikes-again-against-monolines-read-his-latest-letter/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Here is a copy of Bill Ackman&#8217;s latest letter on the monoline mess, dated January 30, 2008,  t]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Here is a copy of Bill Ackman&#8217;s latest letter on the monoline mess, dated January 30, 2008,  t]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Effect of downgrading monoline on the underlying municipal bond securities]]></title>
<link>http://acheson.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/effect-of-downgrading-monoline-on-the-underlying-municipal-bond-securities/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
<guid>http://acheson.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/effect-of-downgrading-monoline-on-the-underlying-municipal-bond-securities/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[This is a big issue, and Moody&#8217;s tried to explain.  A municipal security apparently will then ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is a big issue, and Moody&#8217;s tried to explain.  A municipal security apparently will then ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How to fix the bond insurer/monoline mess]]></title>
<link>http://acheson.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/how-to-fix-the-monoline-mess/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
<guid>http://acheson.wordpress.com/2008/01/30/how-to-fix-the-monoline-mess/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[We all know the monolines (bond insurers) are a huge mess.  Although they insure massive amounts of ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[We all know the monolines (bond insurers) are a huge mess.  Although they insure massive amounts of ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ACA rating cut to CCC]]></title>
<link>http://bobmorris.wordpress.com/2007/12/20/aca-rating-cut-to-ccc/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 05:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Bob Morris</dc:creator>
<guid>http://bobmorris.wordpress.com/2007/12/20/aca-rating-cut-to-ccc/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[  Bond insurer ACA may have to be propped up by investment banks after being downgraded to S&amp;P. ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MishsGlobalEconomicTrendAnalysis/~3/202935777/financial-day-of-reckoning-approaches.html"><img src="http://bobmorris.wordpress.com/files/2007/12/dominos.jpg" alt="falling dominos" /><br />
Bond insurer ACA</a> may have to be propped up by investment banks after being downgraded to S&#38;P. Reason: The banks have billions in holdings insured by ACA. But, it&#8217;s not at all a given that ACA can be propped up. And bond insurer heavyweights MGIA and Ambak are having similar problems.</p>
<p>The quite real possibility of a cascade of defaults is obvious.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
