Another email forward from the family. This one has been on the internet for a few years. The short version is this: an atheist professor tells a classroom that he’s going to prove that a good g… more →
Tiny Frogtinyfrog wrote 4 months ago: Another email forward from the family. This one has been on the internet for a few years. The short … more →
tinyfrog wrote 8 months ago: In a new article over at Christianity Today, Dinesh D’Souza (Christian apologist) gives a very … more →
tinyfrog wrote 9 months ago: In this clip, Michael Ruse says that Creationism/Evolution is really just one piece of the larger cu … more →
tinyfrog wrote 9 months ago: (This is continued from The Case for Faith, Objection 6, Part 3; where Strobel raises nine objection … more →
tinyfrog wrote 1 year ago: Every once in a while I stumble on some funny Christian apologetics. The most recent one was an onli … more →
tinyfrog wrote 1 year ago: (This is continued from The Case for Faith, Objection 6, Part 2; where Strobel raises nine objection … more →
tinyfrog wrote 1 year ago: DonExodus2 is a YouTube user who does a lot of evolution videos. They’re pretty good stuff, an … more →
tinyfrog wrote 1 year ago: Welcome to circular logic theater. There’s a Christian guy making videos on YouTube. One of hi … more →
tinyfrog wrote 1 year ago: Link to the Entire Review of “The Case for Faith” At this point, Strobel begins to raise nine object … more →
tinyfrog wrote 1 year ago: (As posed by a friend of mine) Argument: “How can something as tasty and delicious as bacon ex … more →
tinyfrog wrote 1 year ago: Entire Series: The non-believers review of “The Case for Faith” Objection #6: “A L … more →
tinyfrog wrote 1 year ago: Link to the chapter by chapter review of “The Case for Faith” Objection #5: It’s O … more →
tinyfrog wrote 1 year ago: < Previous: The non-believers review of “The Case for Faith”, Chapter 4, Part 2 Advancing to the … more →
tinyfrog wrote 1 year ago: < Previous: The non-believers review of “The Case for Faith” – Objection #4, part 1 This ch … more →
tinyfrog wrote 1 year ago: < Previous: The non-believers review of “The Case for Faith” – Objection #3, part 2 Objecti … more →
tinyfrog wrote 1 year ago: < Previous: The non-believers review of “The Case for Faith” – Objection #3, part 1 On abio … more →
tinyfrog wrote 1 year ago: < Previous: The non-believers review of “The Case for Faith” – Objection #2 I w … more →
tinyfrog wrote 2 years ago: Scott raised a question about the “virgin” / “young woman” mistranslation in … more →
tinyfrog wrote 2 years ago: < Previous: The non-believers review of “The Case for Faith” – Objection #1, Part 2 Objecti … more →