Yesterday in Social studies in school, we were watching Bowling For Columbine. It’s a movie where Michael Moore tries to examine, why the massacre at Columbine High School (Colorado, USA) happened, and why there in general are so much violence in the States. It’s a very good movie, which I can definitely recommend for outbounds (and everyone else). It’s incredible how many dies by a gun each year in USA – about 11 thousands, while for example England only has about 68 victims of gunshots! A little information to include in you “grand vision” about the Land of Opportunities?

Believe me when I’m saying that I’m not trying to scare people or make them dislike USA. Personally I love the United States, no matter how much violence their country contain, and if you do too, then this small text should not change that. I forgot to write about this yesterday, and I felt like posting it, since Colorado is one of the States on my list that I’d like to go to. Not because I’ve gotten scared to go to that state, but solely because I felt like sharing the mentioned movie with you all ^^

The Jew, Dylan Klebold, wanted to “shoot the Christian girls in the head.” [INCOG]

The Mother of Hate Crime Hoaxes Continues

CofCC.org News Team, by Kyle Rogers

The media continues to shamelessly insult the memory of the Columbine victims by falsifying information about the killers.

Jew Master Mind, Dylan Klebold

After the horrific Columbine Killings, the media immediately engaged in shameless falsifications of the facts. The left-wing media wanted to exploit the horror for their own purpose. First to vilify firearms, and secondly to vilify people that the media doesn’t like.

The media claimed that the Columbine killers were “racists,” “white supremacists,” and “neo-nazis.” These are terms that left-wing newspapers heap on people they disagree with. However, in this case the media used these terms to falsely associate the Columbine Killers with everyone else whom they had previously denounced with the same terminology.

We soon found out that nothing could be further from the truth. One of the killers, Klebold, was from a practicing Jewish family. However the fact that Klebold is Jewish does not stop the media fabricators. A brand new Reuters articles that came out just the other day claims that Klebold was a “Jewish Neo-Nazi.” The Reuters article contained other fabrications as well.

Columbine killer Harris stated on his website that he wanted to “rip the arms off racists, and Neo Nazis.”

Blood-crazed Jew and his twisted cohort committed suicide after killing 13 innocent Gentiles. [INCOG]

Eric Harris may have been a Jew, too, or had his head twisted into utter hate for his own kind by Jew prescribed drugs and influences.

The pair also wore makeup and held hands in school. In their own writings they described themselves as “anti-racists” and that they “hate racists.”

Some media outlets falsely reported that the date of the massacre was set to commemorate WACO. Other falsely reported that the date was to commemorate Hitler’s Birthday. The actual reason for picking the date was that it was the date their favorite band was set to break up. The bands is KMFDF, which is an acronym for “no mercy for the masses” in German. The band sings violent, nihilistic lyrics, and is most definitely left-wing.

In fact, in 1995 KMFDF singer/songwriter Konietzko stated “It’s pretty obvious that KMFDF is a very left-wing band.”

KMFDF was also the favorite band of the recent school shooter in Finland.

So the Columbine killers exhibited homosexual behavior, listened to violent left-wing music, and in their own writing said they “hate racists.” This has not slowed down the media from making false and outlandish claims.

The two were members of a clique at school that called themselves the “trench coat mafia.” The group was widely identified as homosexuals by other students.

Gentile victims of the Columbine Jew massacre.

Years after the killings, more details came out about the so-called “basement tapes” held by the Sheriffs Department. The killers made several video and audio recordings of themselves. In their own words, the killers hated Christians and women in particular. While excerpts from the tapes can be found online, the complete tapes were sealed by a judge for twenty years. The pair make comments on the tapes that Hollywood directors would fight over who got to make a movie about them.

They expressed a desire to kill “Christian God Loving Whores.” Klebold said “I am glad we killed Christ” and Dylan says “I will shoot the Christian girls in the head.”

The so-called “mainstream” media never mentions that the primary target of the Columbine Killers were “Christians” and secondly “Christian women.” They never mention the obvious homosexual overtones in their behavior and motivations

SOURCE

Crazed Jew Targets Christians at Columbine

…Klebold’s mother, Susan (nee Yassenoff), was a shul-trained Jewess who attended a synagogue named Temple Israel in Columbus, Ohio, where her grandfather, Leo Yassenoff, a construction magnate, built the Jewish Community Centre that bears his name.

For a comprehensive assessment of Klebold’s personality go to: Dylan Klebold Personality

Eric Harris was from New York and transferred to Colorado two years before the massacre. Harris was evidently on an anti-depressant at the time of the killings, and some of his victims were callously shot without mercy at point-blank range.

Harris was dating a Jewess named Sarah Davis and ran a pro-Jewish Website that let him vent his spleen about persecution of Jews, and other issues of race, politics, and religion, and his diary said his mother was Jewish.

A personality profile for Eric Harris, based on his journal entries and inter-personal communications, indicates that his behavioural patterns were consistent with a “malignant narcissism… (with) pathological narcissism, antisocial features, paranoid traits, and unconstrained aggression.”

Some say the killers’ plan was to use dozens of bombs to cause carnage on a vast scale and to then flee the country to the sanctuary of the Talmudic state of Israel. This sounds plausible, because if any of the bombs in the cafeteria had detonated properly the blast could have caused extensive structural damage to the school and resulted in hundreds of casualties.

It’s also plausible because Jews and their accomplices who have killed Gentiles abroad are often lightly prosecuted or get a reprieve in Israel; and they’re very rarely extradited to face judicial proceedings, primarily because the Talmud commends rather condemns Jews who kill Gentiles and actually commands Jews to perpetrate crimes of that sort whenever possible…

To quote the Jews’ most authoritative sacred literature, the Talmud:

‘Take the life of the kliphoth [egos or souls of the "evil beasts" of non-Jews] and kill them, and you will please God the same as one who offers incense to Him’ (Sepher Or Israel 177b).

Read more here…

“The idea that Dylan picked the date of the killings because it wasHitler’s birthday, that’s ridiculous,” Michael Moore said. “People don’t realize the Klebolds are Jewish. That would not have been Dylan’s reasoning.”

Mastermind of the Columbine Massacre

Inspired by the hate crime called the “holocaust” — the gift that keeps on giving

Link to the Christian Party article

Jews forced school officials to remove these crosses put up on school property in remembrance of the dead (because Jews just can’t have Christian symbols on ”public property”). Can you believe the utter Jew bull to force the issue after something like this?

See what they did to four Christian GIRLS KILLED by utter JEW Rage.

My mother called from New Zealand, to ask about the tragic shooting at the Fort Hood military base in Texas. From New Zealand, she was worried about the peace of America.

When you live outside of America, the issue is not whether an American dies or an Afghani muslim dies, the issue is that precious people are dying in war’s futile shadow. Blood is being shed. Human life is unsafe at the hands of guns and war. To see Americans die at the hand of military guns within American shores, made my mother very sad for the Texan families in shock and grief. She felt for them deeply.

So… tonight, in light of the tragic shooting of 13 slain American soldiers and 29 others allegedly wounded, at the hands of American military personnel, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, Horiwood.Com sends condolences to the family of all lost and in pain, in Texas. May the Angel of Peace, heal your hearts, minds and community.

When is a film about Columbine going to happen? A film about guns being used on innocent civilians? A film about innocents being slain in military bases or at American high schools? Or any schools around the world?

Now is the time, for such stories to be made for the screen to raise awareness into issues of tragedy in community at the hands of gunmen.

In Hollywood  this day, my wish is that we all have a real sense of Courage To Love beyond war in America, for all Americans and all global citizens who have a passion for both peace in America and a spirit of World Peace around the world.

I offer this book recommend to the American families of the slain and injured, as a healing balm into the issues behind war, that face us all both in America and around the world in today’s world. Regardless of who we are and what we do, let peace reign. This book recommend in the form of a novel may help a lot.

~posted in Hollywood California USA 11.08.09~

Angelina Jolie started out in Hollywood as a boxer. Here’s the beauty at 16. Jolie always had her eye set on being an action star, with her own weapon room.

Only an American teenager would ever say that, so candidly! I can’t wait for  a film about Columbine to happen. Guns. Weapons. War are a part of a fame  narrative… of, Let’s Make A Name for Ourselves In The World. No one knew this better in pursuing fame, than a young Jolie. 

Love this interview. Enjoy.

~posted by Horiwood.Com in Hollywood,  California, USA 11.07.09~

This has nothing to do with what happened at Fort Hood.

2009 November 6

jeanettepryor permalink

Jihadi Columbine: We are all Nidal Malik Hasan?

What Part of “Allahu Akbar” Do You Not Understand?

It is an insult of criminal magnitude, to the intelligence of the American people, that the Media and Military collectively present the Radical Islamic Terrorist Attack at Fort Hood, resulting in the slaughter of American Soldiers and civilians, as anything but what we all know it to be.

Any journalist or Military authority who “needs to study the situation to ascertain motive for the shooting,” needs to be instantly fired, perhaps prosecuted for endangerment of America.

So, Army, you were literally preparing soldiers to send them to fight “Terror,” and you don’t know why the man yelling “Allahu Akbar,” tried to murder a roomful of American Soldiers? I am concerned that you won’t know who to shoot at, when you do get to Afghanistan. Hint…it will be the Muslims shouting “Allahu Akbar.”

We know that Hasan is a radical Muslim Jihadist. A former fellow officer told Shepard Smith, of Fox NEWS, that Nidal had often spoken of the need for Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan to rise up against “American invaders.” The fact that this “little red flag” went unnoticed by anything with a brain-stem in Post-9-11 America defies credibility.

So, the Islamic Cleric who knew him did not notice any “signs of extremism.” The story here is not that Hasan wasn’t, therefore, an extremist, but rather, the American Cleric’s definition of “extremism.”

We are not all Nidal Malik Hasan. Yehuda Bauer said, “Thou shalt not be a perpetrator. Thou shalt not be a victim. And thou shalt never, but never, be a bystander.”

Which one are we going to be, Media and Military, and President Barack Hussein Obama, and Anita Mao Dunn, and you, dear reader, and me? Perpetrator, by harming our Country? Or more likely a victim or bystander? Would we really rather die at the hands of Jihadis among us than speak the truth about the War waged on Americans by Radical Islamic Americans? Can we justify sending soldiers to die on foreign soil, fighting an enemy we are spineless to destroy here, in Texas?

I do not know how to avoid being a victim, because I cannot take up a weapon to defend myself against the next Radical Muslim who decides Allah wants me to die. But, even if it is only with a silly keyboard, I can, at least for now, refuse to be a bystander and be silent about the War.

I am not Nidal Malik Hasan, and Texas was not Columbine, it was the World Trade Centers, it was the Pentagon, it was a field in Pennsylvania. And Nidal Malik Hasan was not a member of the Trench-Coat Mafia – he was just another missionary of the Religion of Peace.

//

Download it here. It only contains the first episode of the first Doom game. Go to Doom Wiki for more in depth talk about Doom. The best level is Phobos Anomaly (it’s set on one of Mar’s moons). To complete that level, you must defeat the heavily-strong Barons that guard the gate out of Anomaly . The graphics for the game are very old, but the game is still very addictive, it takes an hour to complete it. Do not play it on “Nightmare” difficulty, as it’s nearly imposable to complete, unless your doing speed runs. My difficulty is “Ultra Violent”  and sometimes I tick the “Fast Monsters” box. The game will work on XP/Vista, to exit the game while in game, just press “Ctrl” & “Esc” or the start menu keypad, and your resolution will turn back to normal. Ignore Vista’s notices telling you about the resolution is not right. There are many Doom addicts out their, like the Columbine killers, they played it excessively, & Doom is the mother of all first person shooters.

Brought to you by the same geniuses who linked the Columbine shootings with Marilyn Manson and Black Trench Coats.

via Huffington Post

“ALL WHITES SUFFER FROM CLASSIC AMERICAN RACIAL PSYCHOSIS: ANDREA YATES MURDERED HER CHILDREN BECAUSE OF THE IMPACT INCREASED AMOUNTS OF ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT HAD OWN HER MENTAL FACULTY. B/C OF UV, ALL WHITES ARE SUBJECT TO THESE EPISODES” – Harlem Dyse

Did you know that there is a relationship between the often perversely violent psychotic episodes most often demonstrated by white people and days with sharp surges in ground level ultraviolet light radiation and that white on black racial attacks surge on these days too?

See: UV Index 4: Billy Maxwell Jr.’s Inner White Psycho; Kills Self, Wife & Kids

Despite the urge to party like it’s 1999 (yep, went there), I decided to go a completely different route today.

On April 20th, 1999, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold arrived at Columbine High School, and within 10 minutes began what would become (and remain) the deadliest massacre at an American high school in history.

I am not interested in outlining the details of this event and what it meant to 1999, but rather, I am interested in exploring what this has meant for my generation.

When news broke of this school shooting, I (along with every other typical middle-class 6th grader), was thrown into a new reality that would simply become the norm for my generation: We are distrusting and presumed to be unsafe at any given moment.

Already indoctrinated to believe that all strangers were evil and that we would probably be abducted if we strayed too close to the end of the driveway, we were now faced with a new dilemma. We had to expect attack from the inside, from people we might know and trust, at one of few places that had been deemed to be safe a haven. Everybody turned a suspicious eye to their neighbor, and half expected them to come to school wielding a gun in the days that followed.

In some places, Columbine was the catalyst to installing metal detectors to get into schools, cameras, and  nearly impenetrable locks on the doors. In my life, Columbine made little logistical impact. Sure, we talked about how easy it would be for any student, or even any person off the street, to walk into Woodstock Middle School and have their way with us. Reality was that there simply was not a threat worth allocating education dollars to in Woodstock, Connecticut, but that did not stop faculty from scaring us all shitless.

Since Columbine, I have lived to see a number of heinous, senseless attacks. 9/11 and Virginia Tech are obviously the two that spring most immediately to mind. I have grown up in a culture of violence — not necessarily through war, but through people attacking people.

The status quo is to trust no one, assume that everyone must be guilty, and to never under any circumstance allow anyone the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps as a result of this (or maybe a cause all its own) we have put up walls around ourselves that no other generation has seen. We social network constantly and are arguably in closer contact with more people than ever, but we rarely let people into our lives. We speak with each other only from behind the safety of computer screens and cell phones. We do not interact with people we don’t know, because we don’t trust them. The old lady on the T probably has an automatic weapon in her purse. We barely interact with our friends in the flesh.

Are we scared, or just reclusive?

The Massacre at Columbine High School did more than change public schools and inspire copy-cat shootings. It changed a generation.

Check out this amazing UK Times article. (H/T ECM)

First, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold:

“Harris wore a ‘Natural Selection’ T-shirt on the day of the killings. They made remarks on video about helping out the process of natural selection by eliminating the weak. They also professed that they had evolved to a higher level than their classmates. I was amazed at the frequent references to evolution, and that the press completely ignored that aspect of the tapes.”

[...]As the attorney for the families of six of the students killed at Columbine, the Denver lawyer Barry Arrington has come across more in a similar vein. “I read through every single page of Eric Harris’s journals; I listened to all of the audio tapes and watched the videotapes? It became evident to me that Harris consciously saw his actions as logically arising from what he had learnt about evolution. Darwinism served as his personal intellectual rationale for what he did. There cannot be the slightest doubt that Harris was a worshipper of Darwin and saw himself as acting on Darwinian principles.”

And Pekka-Eric Auvinen:

Before he embarked on his shooting spree, Auvinen posted a lengthy apologia on the internet. Styling himself a “social Darwinist”, he said that natural selection appeared not to be working any more — had maybe even gone into reverse. He had noticed that “stupid, weak-minded people reproduce faster than intelligent, strong-minded ones”. The gene pool was sure to deteriorate if society continued to guarantee the survival of the second-rate. He had pondered what to do about this problem. He understood that life was just a meaningless coincidence, the outcome of a long series of random mutations, so there might not be much point in doing anything at all. But eventually he had decided he would do his bit by becoming a natural selector, aping the pitiless indifference of nature.

Auvinen left a special plea for his motivation to be taken seriously and for the world not merely to write him off as a psychopath, or to blame cult movies, computer games, television or heavy metal music, before concluding: “No mercy for the scum of the Earth! Humanity is overrated. It’s time to put natural selection and survival of the fittest back on track.”

The article continues:

One conclusion implicit in evolutionary theory is that human existence has no ultimate purpose or special significance. Any psychologically well-adjusted person would regard this as regrettable, if true. But some people get a thrill from peering into the void and acknowledging that life is utterly meaningless.

Darwin also taught that morality has no essential authority, but is something that itself evolved — a set of sentiments or intuitions that developed from adaptive responses to environmental pressures tens of thousands of years ago. This does not merely explain the origin of morals, it totally explains them away. Whether an individual opts to obey a particular ethical precept, or to regard it as a redundant evolutionary carry-over, thus becomes a matter of personal choice. Cheerleaders celebrating Darwin’s 200th birthday in colleges across America last February sang “Randomness is good enough for me, If there’s no design it means I’m free” — lines from a song by the band Scientific Gospel. Clearly they see evolution as something that emancipates them from the strict sexual morality insisted upon by their parents. But wackos such as Harris and Auvinen can just as readily interpret it as a licence to kill.

Darwin himself thought that his theory warranted racism and genocide:

Darwin looked forward to a time when Europeans and Americans would exterminate those he termed “savages”. Many of the anthropomorphous apes would also be wiped out, he predicted, and the break between man and beast would then occur “between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon; instead of as now between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla”. He took a sanguine view of genocide, believing it to be imminent and inevitable. “Looking to the world at no very distant date,” he wrote to a friend in 1881, “what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.”

Convinced that the various races of mankind had travelled different distances down the evolutionary highway, and that two races could be fairly described as more or less evolved even when both had a track record of cultural achievement, Darwin insisted that natural selection explained why the Europeans had been able to see off serial invasions by the Ottoman Turks. Some of today’s Turks understandably resent being designated as genetically second-rate, which perhaps explains why the editor of Turkey’s most popular science magazine was instructed by his proprietor to cancel a special edition celebrating Darwin’s anniversary.

[...]Nowhere was the toxic doctrine of racial superiority more enthusiastically taken up than in the Third Reich. The Nazis believed that the Aryan race was already the most highly evolved, but could evolve further if defective genes could be eliminated. To purify the German gene pool, they decided to exterminate all the physically and mentally handicapped.

Darwin summed up his moral philosophy by saying that a man could “only follow those ideas and impulses that seem best to him”. Darwinian ideas, eugenics and its ugly sister, eugenic euthanasia, were accepted by the mainstream of the German scientific and medical professions. Indeed, so convinced were the staff of the clinic at Kaufbeuren-Irsee in Bavaria that they were acting rationally that, even after Germany’s surrender in 1945, they carried on killing handicapped people under the American occupation, until a US officer led a squad of GIs to the hospital and ordered them to desist.

The modern pro-abortion movement is rooted in the thought of Darwinian eugenicists like Margaret Sanger, who was quite explicit about weeding out the poor, the “unfit” and “inferior” races. Many people on the secular left believe that some people are not fit to live, and that these people should be weeded out by force. For example, Obama’s science czar advocates controlling the reproduction of undesirable people and that born babies are not human beings.

After you finish reading the UK Times article, check out this post over at Uncommon Descent. (H/T ECM)

Excerpt:

When we teach our children that their existence is an ultimately meaningless accident and that morals are arbitrary byproducts of random genetic fluctuations and mechanical necessity, should we be surprised that they place a lower value on human life than someone who is taught that all humans have inherent dignity and worth because they are made in the image of God?

[...]There are three and only three options.

1.  We can continue to fill our children’s heads with standard Darwinian theory (which Dennett rightly calls “universal acid”), understanding that at least some of them are going to put two and two together and realize that the acid has eaten through all ethical principles – and act accordingly.

2.  We can try to come up with a secular noble lie.  “OK kids.  You might have noticed that one of the implications of what I just taught you is that your lives are ultimately meaningless and all morals are arbitrary, but you must never act as if that is true because [fill in the noble lie of your choice, such as “morality is firmly grounded on societal norms or our ability to empathize with others”].

3.  We can teach our children the truth – that the universe reveals a wondrous ordered complexity that can only be accounted for by the existence of a super-intelligence acting purposefully.  And one of the implications of that conclusion is that God exists, and, reasoning further, He has established an objective system of morality that binds us all, and therefore the moral imperatives you feel so strongly are not just an epiphenomenon of the electro-chemical states of your brain.

This reminds me of the essay “Men Without Chests” in C.S. Lewis’ “The Abolition of Man”. Lewis writes that moral relativists undermine objective morality, which cannot be grounded rationally by atheism, and yet they are surprised when people actually act as though moral relativism is true.

The good news is that Darwinism is false. The bad news is taxpayer money from working parents is funneled into politicized government-run schools that teach children that Darwinism is true. High taxes ensure that parents are kept away from their children, since they must both work to pay for the government-run schools. The left’s opposition to stay-at-home mothers and fathers, (e.g., sex education, abortion, unilateral divorce, same-sex marriage, subsidies for single motherhood, etc.),  ensures that the government-run schools have more influence on children than the parents do.