Melanie Philips on Question Time calling it a Scam.  This is BBC Question Time.  You can find the clip here.

Also have a clip from Russia Today, once again showing the inadequacy of Auntie Beeb.  Seems like we’re on the wrong side of the wall this time.  Well worth the watch this video as it heats up towards the end.  So much in fact, that the newsman is at a lost as to what to do.

All this talk about CO2 yet it isn’t a poisonous chemical.  The more CO2, the better for the plant life, so the better for us.  No mention of the millions of tonnes of real toxic chemicals dumped by profit-hungry Corporations.

Well said Mr Griffin, give the man a round of applause.  No doubt the papers have more important things to write about than this though, things like Katie “Jordan” Price and the Jedward saga.

Many thanks to xrw5000x for uploading.

Also found this little snippet from Mr Andrew Brons.  It isn’t what he said that is important but the reactions to it.  The European Council looks more like the Cosa Nostra everyday.

Many thanks to simonben for uploading.

Nationalistic MEPs are the bravest of the brave, heading into an organisation whose only ambition is Total European Domination.  And one last thing, do the European Council answer any of the questions put to them?  I only ask as I’ve yet to see one.

The incompetence of Our Political Betters is astounding.  Liars, cheats and thieves the lot of em.  How can anyone trust any of these snakes is beyond me.  If the people get the Government they deserve it, we are truly doomed.

Many thanks to Liarpoliticians for the upload.

Yvette Cooper waffling on about how democratic the European Union is.  27 votes deciding who would reside over 500 million people.  If that is the future of democracy, we’re in for a bumpy ride.

Well done to the ukipwebmaster for a job well done.  Still going to vote BNP though.

Sheer class.

The Express suggests that Britain needs a strong leader to oppose the European Council’s idea of Nationhood.  Well, that is Brown, Cameron and Clegg out of the running.  Afterall, they’ve had plenty of time to stop the behemoth long before the Lisbon Treaty even became part of the political landscape yet have only accelerated the process.

BRITAIN REQUIRES A STRONG LEADER TO RESIST BRUSSELS

WHEN Margaret Thatcher made her famous Bruges Speech opposing those wishing to create a United States of Europe she spoke for millions.

“We have not successfully rolled back the frontiers of the state in Britain, only to see them re-imposed at a European level with a European superstate exercising a new dominance from Brussels, ” she declared. “Europe will be stronger precisely because it has France as France, Spain as Spain and Britain as Britain, each with its own customs, traditions and identity. It would be folly to try to fit them into some sort of identikit European personality.”

But more than 20 years later that is exactly what the unelected Brussels bureaucracy is up to. Political leaders from across Europe have decided to surrender national sovereignty rather than defend it. As the European Union appoints its first president and foreign minister, nowhere is the sense of betrayal greater than in Britain. None of the so-called “mainstream” parties has emerged with credit from this process.

Each, in turn, has buckled in the face of Brussels pressure and abandoned the very notion of democracy.

Oh for a leader prepared to say, as Thatcher once did, what the British people really think: No, no, no.

With the mention of Mrs Thatcher, I have to add, we all remember the knives drawn out for her.  Sometimes a strong leader isn’t enough.  She may have tamed the EU machine for a while but the stooges soon got the European Project back on track by getting rid of the Iron Lady.  No, it isn’t just a strong leader but a strong party that is needed for our salvation.

And if the Big Three are incapable of defending British Sovereignty, they should stand aside and let the BNP, the only Patriotic Party left on these British Isles, to have a go.  Of course the Multi-Culture promoting NUJ doesn’t agree with BNP policy so vilify the Party and its supporters as racists and fascists, when really, the only bone the NUJ has with the BNP is that they’re Nationalistic and that just doesn’t do for the Globalist Cartels that control the planet.

Either we are a free and independent Nation or we are nothing more than a dictated European Vassal.  You decide.

Frederick Forsyth has written an interesting piece in the Daily Express showing that Labour are, as they have always been, traitors.

MOSCOW’S JACK JONES’ FRIENDS ARE STILL AMONG US

MOSCOW’’s Jack Jones’ friends are still among us.

By their friends shall ye know them, ” runs the saying and pretty true it is.

There’s an old man of 88 in Moscow called Anatoli Chernyaev and he has just lived to see the discovery in an archive and translation into English of his secret diary. So what?

Who is, or was, Chernyaev?

Well, for nearly 20 years in the Seventies and Eighties he was the Moscow Comintern’s covert linkman to the British Labour Party and what he reveals is quite an eye-opener. We are not talking about already-named spies like Anthony Blunt. What he exposes are the giants of Labour and the trade union movement who worked as “agents of influence” for Moscow and the KGB.

One of them was Jack Jones, trade union boss and once voted the most powerful man in Britain.

He was a spy and paid for it. When he died recently Gordon Brown delivered a glutinous personal tribute. Why?

Well, it was Jack Jones’s influence, along with other grandees of the party, who secured Gordon Brown his utterly safe seat at Kirkcaldy. There were others around then, all Labour’s bright young stars such as Blair and Mandelson (former Young Communist League), who, although south-based, got rock-solid working-class seats in the north. But so what? Isn’t that all now long-past history? Maybe, maybe not.

WHAT Chernyaev’s diaries reveal is that all Britain’s Marxists, KGB agents and fellow travellers had identical attitudes to government as (in the trade unions) they rigged ballots and intimidated opponents into submission or ruin

Let me list nine of these attitudes.

Deep suspicion of outsiders, loathing of democratic debate, manic secrecy, willingness to character-assassinate those who disagree, love of bureaucracy, preference for behind-closed-doors deals, reliance on a small group of trusted fanatics, ability to lie and lie and lie, and contempt for Parliament and the voters who create that Parliament.
But surely that was 30 years ago?

The trouble is, teachings well taught never die. The eager young pupils then are the cream of Labour today. Old Labour pretends it has become New Labour to kidnap the middle-class vote. But just run your eye over those nine attitudes of the Marxist teacher and KGB spy Jack Jones once again.

Are they not exactly the tenets by which we are governed today?

Do you not recognise every one of them as you look around? Has the ambition of the Comintern to destroy our old democracy not been more than half-achieved?

One last point. Are not these same nine practices exactly the same with which the grandees of the EU govern Europe? Were not the founding fathers of the EU all drawn from the ranks of the European hard Left? And are not Britain’s practitioners of the nine principles also our country’s most passionate EU-fanatics?

Of course it could all be one enormous coincidence. Or maybe not. Certainly the principles of Attlee, Gaitskell and Callaghan are dead as the dodo.

Back then there was no question mark over the primary loyalty of the Labour leadership. I wish I could say the same today.

With the release of Chernyaev’s dairy, it is plain to see which side NuGov is on and the reasoning behind their keen determination into packing us off into the Marxist-inspired European Superstate.

One of the more visible snakes that parade as Our Protectors but all he does is wine and dine with the most powerful corporate entities on earth, who just so happens to own most of it.  A fine example of the clear corruption in ou Political system is the antics of Queen Pete as this BBC article (Wednesday, 24 January, 2001) reports;

Mandelson resigns

The career of Peter Mandelson at the highest political level appears to be over after his resignation from the cabinet for an unprecedented second time.

Mr Mandelson stepped down as Northern Ireland Secretary and was replaced by Scottish Secretary Dr John Reid, triggering a mini-reshuffle.

Mr Mandelson admitted he had made misleading statements over the passport application of controversial Indian billionaire Srichand Hinduja but denied he had done anything wrong.

The resignation prompted furious Conservative condemnation, with Conservative leader William Hague calling Mr Blair’s “career-long dependency” on Mr Mandelson “a monumental error of judgement”.

But the prime minister called his friend’s move “tragic” and paid tribute, saying: “I believe that he is a bigger man than many of his critics.”

Mr Mandelson was called into 10 Downing Street on Wednesday morning to “establish the facts” of his involvement in the passport saga.

Two-time quitter

After talks lasting two hours he emerged to announce his resignation.

It is the second time Mr Blair’s close political confidant has been forced to quit the cabinet in disgrace since Labour came to power in 1997.

Mr Mandelson had come under increasing pressure since the weekend following claims he pulled strings to help Mr Hinduja secure a UK passport after the tycoon pledged £1m in sponsorship for the Millennium Dome while Mr Mandelson was in charge of the project

In his resignation statement Mr Mandelson said: “I do not accept in any way that I have acted improperly in respect of any application for naturalisation as a British citizen.

“I do accept that when my office spoke to a Sunday newspaper at the weekend, I should have been clear that it was me personally, not my officials who spoke to a Home Office minister.

“As a result of that, wrong information was given to the House by the culture secretary and by the prime minister’s spokesman to the press. I accept responsibility for that.”

He insisted his “sole desire and motivation” since the weekend had been to emphasise he had not sought to influence the decision on naturalisation “in any way at all”, and merely wanted to pass on a request for information.

Another factor in his decision, he went on, was the desire to lead “a more normal life” after the “constant media pressure and exposure that has dogged me for the last five or so years”.

After taking his final Northern Ireland questions in the Commons, Mr Mandelson sat impassively alongside Mr Blair as William Hague launched his blistering attack at prime minister’s questions.

The Tory leader said Mr Blair’s decision to reappoint his friend following his previous departure from the cabinet demonstrated “the arrogance with which the prime minister wields his power”.

Liberal Democrat leader Charles Kennedy, who criticised the tone of Mr Hague’s comments, said Mr Mandelson had made the “right decision” and called for an improved ministerial code of conduct.

Earlier, Mr Blair told MPs that although he believed the passport application had been dealt with properly, former Treasury solicitor Sir Anthony Hammond QC had been asked to review the case.

Mr Mandelson was first forced to quit from the cabinet in 1998 after failing to disclose that he had secretly received a £373,000 loan from his then fellow minister Geoffrey Robinson to buy a house in London.

It has not been confirmed whether or not Mr Mandelson will stand at the next general election, although his election agent in his Hartlepool constituency insisted he would.

Remember that?  And then the bastard Blair appointed him Trade Commissioner where he began spending long weekends with oligarchs and dictators, like a Political Arthur Daley, helping ‘investors’ set up company chop-shops in UK, with our workforce to be chopped.  Although when Karma seemed to be getting into gear, our hopes were once more dashed as the Australian (October 08, 2008) reports;

British politician Peter Mandelson ill after yoghurt in China

CONTROVERSIAL British politician Peter Mandelson, who was feted in China for drinking a glass of yoghurt on television in Beijing last week, has been rushed to hospital suffering from a kidney stone.

Thousands of babies across China have suffered kidney stones after drinking formula milk mixed with the industrial plastic melamine.

But there is almost certainly no connection between the two events in the case of Mr Mandelson, whose illness blighted his first day as Business Secretary in Gordon Brown’s cabinet.

But the irony is not lost in China, where the consumption of milk powder contaminated by melamine has caused four babies to die and more than 50,000 to be treated in hospital, chiefly for kidney stones.

Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao told a World Economic Forum conference in Tianjin that he was “deeply moved” to see Mr Mandelson drink the yoghurt to demonstrate his faith in Chinese dairy products, which have been banned around the world.

Products containing traces of melamine were found in several Chinese restaurants in Hungary yesterday. An official said stock would be destroyed if melamine was found in dangerous levels.

Mr Mandelson was visiting Beijing as EU trade commissioner, but has since quit in order to become Business Secretary in Britain. A Business Department spokesman said: “Over the past few days, Peter Mandelson has been experiencing some kidney pain. Hospital tests confirmed that there is a small stone. This will be dealt with by the normal procedures.”

Melamine, used in plastics and fertiliser, has been used to boost the apparent protein content in milk products that have been diluted to increase revenue. The industry has been suffering from a price cap imposed at the start of the year by the Government, anxious about rising inflation.

Late on Monday, the official Xinhua news agency reported that the State Council, China’s cabinet, chaired by Mr Wen, had announced new dairy industry regulations.

The State Council said the cause of the disaster was illegal production and greed: “China’s dairy production and distribution order have been chaotic, and supervision has been gravely absent.”

Police announced six more arrests over the melamine contamination, in Hohhot, the capital of Inner Mongolia, a major milk-producing region.

The people detained are suspected of producing and selling melamine.

Made a full recovery the fuck!  A full fucking recovery!  For the love of God, what happened Karma?  Bad day or was there a bereavement in the family?  Or did the Dark Queen pay you off too?  I only ask as after several years in the European Wilderness, Mangledbum comes mincing back across the Channel to more titles and more privileges while our own continue to dry up and that just doesn’t sem fair at all.  Even the Guardian admits his controversy in this article (Monday 13 October 2008);

Mandelson goes to Lords amid new controversy

Peter Mandelson will take his seat in the House of Lords today, but his return to British politics has been marked by fresh controversy concerning his connections and personal finances from his four years as the European trade commissioner.

Lord Falconer of Thoroton and Baroness Jay of Paddington will introduce Mandelson today. The new business secretary has decided to style himself Baron Mandelson of Foy and Hartlepool. Foy is a village in Herefordshire where he spent holidays as a child, and he was the MP for Hartlepool between 1992 and 2004.

Mandelson was the centre of renewed media attention yesterday. The Sunday Times reported that he attended a reception on a 238ft yacht, Queen K, in Corfu this summer hosted by the Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska, who is a major importer of aluminium into the EU. Mandelson’s presence on the yacht was questioned because he reduced tariffs on aluminium imports into the EU from 6% to 3%.

Mandelson’s spokesman said: “The idea that one individual played a decisive role is ludicrous. This was a hard-fought battle between different member states.”

The spokesman added that he could not have shown favouritism because he launched an anti-dumping investigation into aluminium imports from Armenia. As the main exporter from Armenia, Deripaska would face high EU taxes if the investigation finds against him.

Mandelson also denied that he was profiteering from the EU. He will be entitled to around £78,000 a year for the next three years in “transitional payments”. When he reaches 65 he will then be entitled to a pension of £31,000 at today’s prices.

His spokesman said: “He is not aware of his entitlement.”

Anyone still wondering why there is so much apathy towards the political class can see that Our Rulers know every trick in the book so see no point in voting.  People like the Judas Mangledbum is a disgrace yet is now Lordship fucking Foy, so in essence, being seen to be rewarded for being a crooked bastard.  If it makes people who do take notice of politicians, how does this make the laymen feel?  A hundred-times worse as they see “smarter” people getting away with it and feel there isn’t an answer so retreat into safe zones involving tv, drugs and any other distraction they can afford.

Resistance may be futile as this dirty campaign to destroy Government by the People by destroying the people began long before the new Judas showed up and it seems to be succeeding.  They’re making us scream at the corruption in Westminster and will soon ‘offer’ us the European Council’s age of rule whether we like it or not.  The entire Political Class of every Nation on this Earth is infected with these type of Judas’, from the very top who know every part of the plan to very bottom of the pile who only are told enough to comply.  And the worst do it because they can.

Still, I’m a Millwall fan and have had more than enough spankings to at least remember to stand with pride (although the foetus position is always a good idea if the beating gets too much).  No surrender!  Ever!

The announcer sounds off over the sound system in the newly (Polish) built, Unity Stadium.  “Please all stand for the European Union of Happy Diverse People’s National Anthem” and as the last word leaves the speakers, the supporting guards all rise and the EU citizens follow suit.

Okay, the above hasn’t happened and may have no chance of happening…  well, except the EU’s plan for a National Anthem seeing as Von Rompuy will soon be at the helm.

Favourite to be EU president backs European national anthem

The new front-runner to be the first EU President is committed to a European national anthem and the replacement of a range of nationalistic symbols.

Herman Van Rompuy, 62, the Prime Minister of Belgium for 11 months, is expected to be installed as President of the European Council at a dinner in Brussels on Thursday of the 27 EU leaders.

The Daily Telegraph can disclose that the Flemish Christian Democrat was an architect of his party’s federalist manifesto which calls for a massive extension of the presence of the EU in town halls, schools and sporting events.

The manifesto says: “Apart from the euro, also other national symbols need to be replaced by European symbols (licence plates, identity cards, presence of more EU flags, one time EU sports events, …).”

Mr Van Rompuy suggested a compromise to placate any anger at the perceived dilution of national pride. The manifesto continued: “In order to preserve unity in diversity a national reference can be preserved (as on the national side of euro coins).”

The government had claimed victory after references to Beethoven’s Ode To Joy adopted as the EU’s anthem in 1985 were removed from the revised European ‘constitution’ which was voted down in the Dutch and Irish referendums in 2005.

Mr Van Rompuy, in a speech to the Belgian Parliament after the No votes, said: “We go on with the ratification of the European Constitution in all our parliaments, but we need to admit that for the moment the project is over. However, this doesn’t mean that we cannot continue to work in a creative way in the direction which the Constitution points in.

“I don’t object if we break up the Constitution into smaller parts, as long as we continue to work in the same direction: in the direction of more Europe.“

Mr Van Rompuy, barely known outside Belgium, is the favoured candidate of Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, and Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor.

They want a figure who will not overshadow them on the world stage who will act a chairman rather than a Presidential figure with the stature of a world leader which was why Tony Blair’s chances faded.

He also backs proposals for the EU to be directly funded from a ring-fenced swathe of green taxes such as fuel duty or aviation levies. It could mean all shopping and petrol station receipts in Britain could in future include the amount of VAT or fuel duty that goes directly to Brussels as an “EU tax”. The idea, championed by the federalists, is fiercely resisted by Britain.

Fucking marvellous.  It didn’t atter who the European Council appointed, installed or prop up into the President’s position, the goal was always the same.  The deconstruction of 2000 years worth of an Independent Europe to be replaced by an all-mighty and all-powerful supranational body, all controlled by little puppets blindly following directive after directive laid down by Devil knows who.

And just think, if the European Union are thinking about a National Anthem now, how long till Van Rompuy & Co from insisting on new treason laws to protect the newly founded State from rebellion?

More proof of dishonesty shown by the EU Cosa Nostra.  According to Christopher Booker of the Telegraph, the European Commissioners should have stood down on October 31st yet somehow, are still in charge.  How many more reasons do we need to leave this Fascist State?

EU Commissioners have stayed in office illegally

“A good many people were shocked to learn that the order to break up two of our largest banking empires, RBS and Lloyd’s TSB, at great cost to shareholders and pension funds, was given by the EU’s Dutch Competition Commissioner, Neelie Kroes. They might have been even more shocked to know, as Lord Willoughby de Broke explained in the Lords last week, that this unelected official exercising such enormous power over Britain’s affairs is not even legally entitled to occupy her office.

On October 31 the five-year term of all the Brussels Commissioners expired. Under the Treaty they should therefore have stepped down. But because of the hiatus before the newly-ratified Constitution comes into force next month, the existing Commissioners simply decided to stay on until a new Commission is appointed. When Lord Willoughby pointed out that there is no authorisation for this in the Treaty and that they are therefore acting illegally, the former Commissioner Lord Kinnock leaped up to claim that the Commissioners were perfectly entitled to stay in office under Article 216 of the Treaty.

Had Lord Windbag actually looked at the Treaty before opening his mouth, he would have seen that the sole purpose of Article 216 is to lay down that any Commissioner found “guilty of serious misconduct’ or who “no longer fulfils the conditions required for the performance of his duty” must be “compulsorily retired”. Since the current Commissioners “no longer fulfil the conditions required”, they should all thus be retired immediately.

While they are about it, they might also relieve Lord Kinnock of the £75,000 a year pension he enjoys as a former Commission vice-president, since it is clear that he doesn’t even know how to read the Treaty properly.”

The European Commissioners just cannot help themselves.  They are pathological liars, incapable of telling the truth.  We need out of the European Superstate, for once we lose Our Sovereignty, the only way to regain it will be through war and even then the bastards will profit from that.

We need to make sure our democracy is fraud-free and vote these fools out.  The gallows seems to be the only option to deal with those that have betrayed Britain.  And the only party that is keen to reinstate the death penalty (especially for treason and will especially be retrospective) is the British National Party.  I know it isn’t perfect but in this world, nothing ever is.

Fuck the EU and all its adherents.

Now I am not alone in wanting to hang most of the crooked Parliamentarians currently residing in one of two homes (three if loyal).  However, the question is what would be better, having a hung Parliament consisting of the “lunatic fringe parties” or another five years of NuGov with their supporting acts, the Liberty Takers and the ConservingThemselves?

It is a rhetorical question for me as I would prefer a hung Government, for the simple fact is, too much power resides in the EU controlled Westminster so a hung Government would be more inclined to dilute the powers accumulated by our past successive Governments (which surely means having to leave the EU).

But Ken Clarke, who being the EU stooge that he is, has stated that he’d prefer another Labour term, stating that “in the middle of an acute national crisis a hung parliament would be one of the biggest disasters we could suffer … that would be a bigger danger than a Labour victory”.

Which national crisis are we talking about?

The financial crisis created (and inflated) by NuGov & Co?

The Sovereignty issue regarding the EU crisis aided by NuGov & Co?

The War in Afghanistan crisis instigated by NuGov & Co?

These turncoats are the whole fucking reason why we’re in the shit, helping their major backers find new ways of extracting money from us.  So they’re not about to change tunes and start defending us Britons.  So it is surely time to put the Old Party System to bed and there is surely no better way to start than to have a hung Parliament.

Only then would a Coalition Government look to dilute the power accumulated by previous powers and for that to happen, we would need an instant withdrawal from the European Union.  So instead of European Political Centralisation that will continue to concentrate more power into fewer hands, we should be looking at British Political Localisation with as many Public Officials being elected directly by those who they serve as desired.

And only when we get to elect those who directly affect us will the people truly get the Government it deserves.

The one and only Nick Griffin is interviewed by one of the many BBC-funded far-left journalists, and once again, showing the Beeb up for what they’re really up to.  From the word go, the reporter is set on attack mode.  Many thanks to Chester Nationalist for uploading this clip.

Firstly, regarding new members from the ethnic communities (very PC of me), too many of them support multicultural loving Labour for helping them into the country, so only a few who wish to integrate into our way of life would be bloody interested in joining the British loving BNP.

secondly, the Wembley video that was embedded onto the BNP website (see three showing East London here) is put to Mr Griffin where the leftist-retard of a journalist repeats the question after a more than satisfactory answer.  Today’s journalists must be getting their degrees from the back of cornflake boxes as their stupidity knows no bounds.

Should have stuck to the “no-platform” policy.  They still think you can rely on the NUJ’s guidelines to tarnish the BNP to help subjugate the Country into the multicultural, multi-national and metro-sexual EU.  The NUJ and Newspapers have lost what little credibility they had years ago and will soon go the same way as the Town Crier.

So, My Black Cat, you’re at it again trying to scare the wits out of every one with your conspiracy theories.

You are getting very excited because it is reaching mainstream newspapers!

What is?

Democracy is being put through a mangle.

It is being flattened into something beyond all recognition.

What have you found now?

A columnist in The Telegraph.

I thought it was a blogger.

That was yesterday.

Is this somebody different?

THE END OF THE GREAT DECEPTION

“So the trap has snapped shut. It was somehow apt that the politician who finally let the EU get the constitution it has craved so long should have been President Vaclav Klaus, the veteran anti-Communist who predicted, just before the Czech Republic joined the EU in 2004, that it would mean the end of his country as “an independent sovereign state”. And what a delightful irony that Pravda, of all newspapers, greeted the news last week with the headline: “Twenty years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, the EU is now a reincarnation of the Soviet Union”.

A blogger. A columnist. Different people. Same newspaper.

The columnist article has 201 comments?

You want me to read all the comments too?

OK, I might read it all.

When I get round to it…….

But we witches don’t really understand all this stuff about the European Union, My Black Cat.

And for that matter, you understand it even less!

In fact, probably nobody understands it.

And that is bad.

Very bad.

a red apple ……………………

The Witch Doctor – Link to a random page

_________________________________________________

LINK TO UK MISSING KIDS WEBSITE

LINK TO MISSING PERSONS WEBSITE

_________________________________________________

© Dlundin | Dreamstime.com

I suppose you are all busy getting on with your mundane day as you meander into oblivion, you stupid feeble “citizens” of The Humankind.

In much the same way, The Witch Doctor is dabbling about in The Spell Pantry in total denial that there could possibly be a conspiracy of gigantic proportions going on.

“Creep” she calls it.

Creep.

What the devil is “Creep?”

Anyway, witches cats are not alone with our conspiracy theories.

It now seems to be seeping into that corner of the blogosphere occupied by the mainstream media.

FUNERAL OF FREEDOM

About time too!

And Gordon Brown is using his habitual throw–away term “common purpose” in a speech once more!

BERLIN WALL – BROWN MARKS 20TH ANNIVERSARY OF ITS FALL

As he has done in the past.

The Witch Doctor – Link to a random page

_________________________________________________

LINK TO UK MISSING KIDS WEBSITE

LINK TO MISSING PERSONS WEBSITE

_________________________________________________

© Dlundin | Dreamstime.com

Trust Your Leaders ~ Everything Will Be OK ~ Hope & Change

The Masonic front group “Common Purpose” is a registered charity that charges thousands of pounds for communitarian matrix training courses in Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP), The Delphi Technique, Consensus Creation, Cognitive Dissonance, and other forms of psychological control. Its main initiation rite is called Matrix. Its mantras and rites are based on Rockefeller-Tavistock [inventor of "Israel"] methodologies based on the work of John Rawlings Rees and the World Federation for Mental Health [see pdf].

It has offices and agents in every municipality and region of the UK, as well 10,000 agents in the Republic of Ireland (who campaigned to convince the Irish to vote for slavery). Course participants are mostly from the media, the legal profession, the police, security services, the military, banking and finance, the media, the education industry, and government. Their fees (some courses at £5,750) are subsidised by tax-payers (e.g. The Department for Work and Pensions spent £238,000 sending its people on Common Purpose courses between 2002 and 2007) or written off for tax purposes as charitable donations. There are at least 100,000 Common Purpose graduates in the UK. Prominent graduates run all three branches of Britain’s triune ruling party.

[Please see the videos in the Comments section below.]

If you wish to complain about the infiltration of this “charity” into government structures, you may complain to the Independent Commission on Good Governance in Public Service, which was created by The Office for Public Management [OPM] and The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accounting [CIPFA], “in partnership with the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.”

All of these organizations are led and staffed by Common Purpose “graduates”. The mission statements of all three organizations are riddled with talk of the need for “members and officers working together to achieve a common purpose” — “a common purpose to unite the members,” who must “have a common purpose and work well together,” “providing democratic leadership and common purpose” — “a common purpose and shared commitment” — to “establish a common purpose between partners and work through challenges in a co-operative rather than a competitive way” – ”putting all resources together in a single pot either to serve a common purpose or to even out inconsistencies,” in order to “generate civic pride and bring our communities together with a common purpose.” In fact, “fundamental issues of control and common purpose need to be resolved early.” Their “common purpose is to achieve, through synergy, more than two single parties might achieve alone. This is the guiding principle.” Indeed, they will surely react to your complaints with a common purpose. In this sense, and within the established boundaries put up you, resistance is futile.

[For info on Puppet Obama's "Common Purpose" see Comments below.]

The Joseph Roundtree Trust

The JRF is “an independent social policy researcher committed to funding radical change towards a better world, mainly in the UK, Ireland and South Africa.” One of its main areas of research is genetics. The JRF is “creating” not just a better world, but also a better human being, without the flaws that “God” cursed Man with. Its motto is “Search, Demonstrate, Influence.” “The Joseph Rowntree Foundation has started a UK-wide debate to find out what are The Social Evils of the 21st Century.” — “Sign up for our social evils email alerts if you want to be kept up-to-date about our Social Evils project.

And what are The Social Evils of the 21st Century? Matthew Taylor, in “Reflections on social evils and human nature,” a chapter of the JRT’s 2009 book, Contemporary Social Evils, concludes,

President Obama called for solutions that require leadership, overcoming group victimhood and promoting personal responsibility. Aren’t the best schools the ones with visionary and strong leaders, that want their pupils to thrive as individuals and which create a strong sense of community and pride in the institution? No solution is perfect, and cultural theory insists that each paradigm of social relations gains its strength from competing for power and adherents with the others (selfish memes to go with our selfish genes).

The human race has made great strides, especially in the last few hundred years. But progress has been interspersed with error and tragedy. By privileging one way of thinking over others – as we have recently done with individualism – we at best squander human potential and at worst risk disaster. We could achieve more and be happier about it if our ways of thinking and acting engaged with all the ways in which we are human.

Some may find this inspiring. Personally I believe that St Paul said it all 2000 years ago:

“Our struggle is not against flesh and blood but against the principalities, powers, against the world-rulers of this darkness and against the evil spiritual forces of the supernatural realms.” [Ephesians 6:12]

Fortunately,

“Neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” [Romans 8:38-39]

According to the Joseph Rowntree Trust’s Created Consensus regarding the Social Evils of the 21st century, the “Dominant Opinion” was that,

“Some people identified religion itself as a social evil. This group generally focused on one of three issues: the “erosion of secularism”; religion as cause of intolerance and conflict; and religion as a source of irrationality.

Religion and politics: “the erosion of secularism”

Some participants focused on the role of religion in politics arguing that “we should not be making any political or educational decisions based on religion”. One person criticised the fact that there are faith representatives in the House of Lords, but a more common complaint surrounded the influence of religion in education. For example, citing religion as a social evil, one participant went on to say that “children should be taught to derive their conclusions from evidence and logic, not the ravings of deluded idiots”. Another criticised the fact that “religious doctrinaires [are] increasing their grip on the UK education system with government support”. One participant argued that “the state should become disestablished from the Church of England and there should be an end to state funding of faith schools”. Other participants warned that faith schools “foster a lack of tolerance towards other faiths and lifestyles”.

Religion and social cohesion: “the most divisive agent in our society”

Some people saw religion as a social evil because it “undermines social cohesion” and is “a force for separating people”. Participants also felt that religion can actively encourage intolerance, towards some groups in particular: “Faith in supernatural phenomena inspires hatred and prejudice throughout the world, and is commonly used as justification for continued persecution of women, gays and people who do not have faith”. So in stark contrast to those who see the decline of religion as complicit in a decline of values, some participants blamed religion itself for undermining certain values. Another participant highlighted the deficiencies of religion as the basis of a value system for a different reason:

There are too many of them [religions], and none make any sense. We need to develop a consensus around rules for a decent, open and honest society, perhaps based on a refined Human Rights Act.

Religion and knowledge: “ridiculous hypotheses as unquestionable truth”

Other participants identified religions as social evils because they “promote strong beliefs for which there is no objective evidence [and] undermine rational behaviour”. Another person explained that religion “should no longer be a consideration in the 21st century as we get more scientific in our outlook. But it appears to be going through a resurgence in popularity and this brings intolerance and anti-intellectualism.” One participant cited the example of religions “blocking the distribution of condoms in countries with high rates of HIV” as an example of the harm religious doctrine can cause. Several participants felt that the irrationality of religion is so clear that our tolerance of it is unjustified: “The idea that a person can believe a proposition to be true in spite of no supporting evidence, and even in spite of evidence to the contrary, is something that should not be automatically granted respect, but treated with contempt”.

[What are today’s social evils?: The results of a web consultation, by Beth Watts, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2009, p. 30-31.]

Besides the evils of Individualism and Faith in God, other Social Evils of the 21st Century identified by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation with tax-payer funding, are, predictably, “Unheard Voices”, inequality, intolerance, the criminalization of drugs, out-dated conceptions of Family, lack of social diversity, hostility towards immigration, Islamophobia, homophobia, climate change [sic], insufficient financial support for immigrant workers, and so on.

CIPFA

CIPFA, “the acknowledged champion of the public sector and recognized expert in the PFM international architecture,” also operates extensively in NATO-occupied former Yugoslavia, in China, India, Armenia, Canada, Australia, Ethiopia, South Africa, Russia, the United States of America, Afghanistan, Thailand, Malaysia, Kenya, Moldova, Albania, Iceland, Ghana, Spain, and so on, and so on, and so on, promoting its “whole systems approach” globally; setting standards for the world; gathering information worldwide.

Membership of the gate-keeping Independent Commission on Good Goovernance in Public Service

Chair of the Commission

• Sir Alan Langlands, Principal and Vice Chancellor, University of Dundee

Commission members

• Lord Richard Best, Director, Joseph Rowntree Foundation
• Sir Ian Blair, Deputy Commissioner, Metropolitan Police Service
• Mr Jim Coulter, Chief Executive, National Housing Federation
• Ms Lucy de Groot, Executive Director, Improvement and Development Agency
• Ms Liz Kerry, Chief Executive, Yorkshire and Humber Assembly
• Mr Bob Kerslake, Chief Executive, Sheffi eld County Council
• Mr Ed Mayo, Chief Executive, National Consumer Council
• Dr Greg Parston, Executive Chairman, OPM
• Ms Bharti Patel, to October 2004 Director of Communications, Ethnic Minority Foundation
• The Honourable Barbara Thomas, Deputy Chair, Financial Reporting Council and from September 2004 Chairman, United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority
• Ms Jo Williams cbe, Chief Executive, Mencap

Co-secretaries to the Commission

• Steve Freer, Chief Executive, CIPFA
• Adrienne Fresko cbe, Head of the Centre for Public Governance, OPM
• (to 30 September 2004)
• Jane Steele, Head of Public Interest Research, OPM (from 1 October 2004)

Head of Research for the Commission

• Jane Steele, Head of Public Interest Research, OPM

Research and support team

• Kerry Ace, Finance and Policy Manager, CIPFA
• Andrea Carr, Project Administrator, OPM
• Robert Coffey, Researcher, OPM (from September 2004)
• Kerri Hampton, Senior Researcher, OPM (to September 2004)
• Sandra Harper, Group Administrator, CIPFA

Common Purpose was formed in the 1980s, and has received millions of pounds in public funding, but was mostly unknown to non-participants until 2007, when it was exposed by the aptly-named “Common Purpose Exposed“. Common Purpose is still widely ignored in the media. Any time it is mentioned, critics are mockingly referred to as “akin to flat-earthers, conspiracy nuts, holocaust-deniers, 911-truthers” etc.

Detail of British ₤20 Note

Common Purpose’s Self-Description

Common Purpose is an independent leadership organisation that aims to improve the way organisations and society work. Common Purpose operates throughout the UK and worldwide in France, Germany, Ghana, Hungary, India, Ireland, South Africa, Sweden, and the Netherlands, and is developing programmes in Israel and Turkey.

Very few people emerge from Common Purpose with their prejudices — or working practices — unchanged. As their perspective gets wider, their vision improves. As their vision improves, their decision-making gets better. They forge networks that can have a major impact on their organisation and the community (networks which no other experience can provide).

Common Purpose applies The Chatham House Rule, developed for the RIIA and its sub-groups such as the CFR, the UN and Bilderberg.

The Chatham House Rule was devised at Chatham House (the home of the Royal Institute for International Affairs in London*) in 1927 and was refined in 1992 and 2002. It is an internationally recognised and respected way of conducting meetings and it reads as follows:

“When a meeting is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed”

Common Purpose Programmes

Matrix/Focus

Common Purpose Matrix and Focus are unique, locally rooted programmes for experienced leaders. Both are powerful educational experiences that bring together leaders from all sectors. Matrix is prepared for major cities and larger geographical regions, while Focus is geared towards smaller cities and large towns.

TheKNOW

TheKNOW is Common Purpose’s new flexible programme; designed to appeal to leaders whose schedules make it impossible for them to commit to ten fixed programme days a year.

Meridian

Meridian is the new, international name for TheKNOW. Meridian is being successfully run in six countries. To reflect this, the UK is adopting the name Meridian from 2008 onwards.

InsideOUT

Common Purpose InsideOUT brings together leaders from distinct locations in the “powerhouse circle” that surrounds London.

Profile

A fast and effective two-day briefing for leaders in the areas where they operate.

Common Purpose Navigator

Common Purpose Navigator is the leadership programme for emerging, high-potential individuals tipped as people to watch in their organisations.

International Navigator

International Navigator is a powerful learning experience that brings together high-potential, early-career individuals from widely differing backgrounds – on a local, regional, national and international basis.

Real Edge

To help rising stars to avoid this risk, Common Purpose has designed RealEdge. Based on unique leadership techniques crafted over nearly 20 years, RealEdge is an investment in promising individuals and their careers that continues to stretch their horizons, their networks – and their comfort zones – over time.

20:20

20:20 brings together national leaders from across the UK to examine forces that will drive changes to society over the next twenty years, especially in the areas of wealth creation and governance.

Power Dynamic

A challenging and informative one-day event for both Common Purpose graduates and those new to Common Purpose who need to know more about how power works at a national or European level, and how they can influence it.

Frontrunner

Frontrunner targets pre-career leaders who have already shown evidence of leadership skills in civil society and aims to inspire them to continue campaigning for change in their future careers.

What Next?

What Next? is a joint initiative with Oxford Said Business School. It’s a programme for people who are completing one stage of their career, and are now looking for new and possibly very different opportunities.

From Stop Common Purpose

COMMON PURPOSE METHODS

The methods used by Common Purpose are what you would expect from fraudsters in this Jigsaw of Deception.

The use of political correctness for social control and mental manipulation, deceit, fraudulent agenda, corrupt abuse of public funds, obsessive control freakery, secrecy and bland, banal and meaningless statements.

Many of the methods used by Common Purpose originated at the Tavistock Institute.

Trojan Mice

Although Common Purpose is a ‘Trojan Horse’ operation, some of its methods have been more akin to ‘Trojan Mice’. Trojan Mice operations have their roots in complex adaptive systems and Chaos Theory.

These systems theories get a bit complicated but it boils down to the idea that the best way to change an organisation (or a country for that matter) is by the use of small changes which very few people take any notice of at the time. These small changes increment over time to make large changes. When the large changes become apparent to the organisation’s members or the general public, they may not be able to do anything about it.

Psychological and Mental Manipulative Techniques

Some of the methods of mental manipulation used by Common Purpose are:

• The Consensus Process and How to Fight the Consensus Process
• Neurological Linguistic Programming. This is one of the techniques used to great effect by Derren Brown. How Common Purpose cult leader Julia Middleton uses Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) techniques: explained here.
• Cognitive Dissonance
• The Delphi Technique

Have a look at Creating a new political class – The ‘Great Brainwashed’ by Christopher Story and a video of him discussing the EU Collective here.

It is the manipulation of consensus that has turned the three main political parties in Britain into one party all standing on the same ground. They might offer slightly different policies – and only slightly – but they are all agreed on the fundamentals and this makes elections irrelevant.

This is an interesting read: Psychopolitics - the art and science of asserting and maintaining dominion over the thoughts and loyalties of individuals, officers, bureaus, and masses, and the effecting of the conquest of enemy nations through “mental healing.”

Problem – Reaction – Solution

A classic Common Purpose/New Labour-style ruse is to decide upon an objective, create a problem and then introduce a pre-planned ’solution’ to that problem. Straight from the Hegelian Dialectic – create the problem, manipulate the response, come up with the solution. Problem – reaction – solution. A solution which puts you in the position you wanted to be in in the first place but needed to create the problem in order to get there.

For example:

• Problem: To allow EU police into Britain unhindered.
• Reaction: Allow EU criminals into Britain unhindered.
• Solution: Allow EU police into Britain unhindered.

Common Purpose Doublespeak

• Equality means Inequality
• Cohesion means Fragmentation
• Diversity means Uniformity
• Civic Society means Communism
• Charity means Help the Rich
• Common Purpose means Élite Control
• Training means Brainwashing
• Change means Chaos
• Consensus means Dictatorship
• Democracy means Corporate/State Control
• Cultural Enrichment means Cultural Impoverishment

Leading Beyond Authority

A Common Purpose quote: “People who lead beyond their authority can produce change beyond their direct circle of control”.

The term ‘leading beyond authority’ refers to how Common Purpose deals with those people who are resistant to ‘change’ because of their inertia – not necessarily because they are actively hostile to Common Purpose. People whose inertia – such as the ‘we’ve always done it like this, why do we need to change’ types – are simply by-passed. Common Purpose finds it much more difficult to deal with those people who are actively hostile to them.

Read how Common Purpose counters resistance in their own words. Those actively hostile to Common Purpose are the ‘oncoming vehicle’ referred to in the article.

Leading beyond authority can mean acting ultra vires. Ultra vires a legal concept. It is Latin for ‘beyond the powers’. It can apply to any body which has rules, such as a charity or a local authority. An ultra vires act is one that is outside the specified and/or implied constitutional objects and powers of the body in question. It is ‘beyond the powers’ and therefore illegal.

Also, what are the implications of ‘leading beyond authority’ for services which require a hierarchical management structure to ensure discipline and cohesion, like the armed forces and police which can be manipulated from within for political purposes?

Common Purpose ‘graduates’ are incapable of leading by example because those people who have found out what they are up to do not trust them at all.

Common Purpose PC Brigade

Common Purpose are obsessive control freaks and manipulators. One of their main tools of social control, the Marxist doctrine of political correctness, is used to usurp dissenting voices and paralyse thought.

More Common Purpose Doublespeak

• Consensus Building = Reaching a predetermined outcome through facilitated dialogue, often by ignoring, labeling, intimidating, ridiculing, or ignoring any form of dissent.
• Critical Thinking = Criticizing and challenging traditional beliefs, values and authorities. Often uses ridicule, intimidation and rejection to conform people to the new paradigm.
• Multicultural Education = Becoming a multicultural person, open to the pluralistic beliefs and lifestyles of all except those who cling to Christian values.
• Conflict Resolution = Learning to synthesize beliefs and trade old absolute beliefs and values for compromise positions and a new set of absolutes.
• Promoting Content Standards = Censorship.
• World Citizen = New World Order stooge.

Found this clear cut proof that our freedom is at stake.  A long article (well, a few paragpraphs then having to click through the following five pages) titled “Twenty Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall, the EU is a Reincarnation of the Former Soviet Union” by Hans Vogel on the Pravda website.

“All talk about human dignity, physical and mental integrity, and liberty and security of person is empty. It is empty because the security of the state (the EU and its member states) is deemed to have priority. You can find proof in the Lisbon Treaty, Title II, article 67:2 “ The Union shall endeavour to ensure a high level of security through measures to prevent and combat crime, racism and xenophobia, and through measures for coordination and cooperation between police and judicial authorities and other competent authorities, as well as through the mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters and, if necessary, through the approximation of criminal laws.” The clause seems bland, but it means state security (however defined) takes precedence over the rights of individuals.”

also, the article notes how similar the Lisbon treaty is with the old Soviet inspired treaties of old…

“Similarities between the Lisbon Treaty and its communist predecessors are quite remarkable, for instance in the clauses on equality before the law.

Article 34 of the 1977 Soviet Constitution proclaimed full legal equality for all: “citizens of the USSR are equal before the law, without distinction of origin, social or property status, race or nationality, sex, education, language, attitude to religion, type and nature of occupation, domicile, or other status.” The East German Constitution echoes this. Article 20:1 reads: Independently of his nationality, race, religious ideas, social background and position, every citizen of the German Democratic Republic enjoys the same rights and duties. Freedom of religion and belief are guaranteed. All citizens are equal before the law.” Coincidentally, the Lisbon Treaty is strikingly similar: “ Everyone is equal before the law ” (article 20), and “ Any discrimination based on any ground such as sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation shall be prohibited” (article 21).”

And we all know how the Soviets kept control.  So we can rest assured that we are as freeas the European Council permits.  Welcome to the Post-Democratic Era.

Once again, thanks goes to Liarpoliticians for uploading this item from Euronews.  At 2.50mins, the newsreader gives a cople of interesting points that needs following up though.

The Treaty will come into force on December 1st 2009, “leaving weeks to recruit new figures”…  Devious bastards!

The “revamped” Union will give “more power” to Europe on the world stage creating 2 new jobs (doubt that’ll make a dent in the unemployment figures).  A “full-time president” and  “a powerful new foreign chief” appointed by the unelected European Council to improve “decision-making”…  Their treason knows no bounds the bastards!

And then one of the biggest lies about Europe ever perpetrated, “that old quip, if people wished to speak to Europe, who do they call” is total bullshit.  The English speaking world prefers to speak to Britain and the rest of the world seem to prefer the French (the Argietines and Iraq did anyway).  Lumping us all together as one block is stupid and dangerous for a whole raft of reasons.

Our National Parliaments will be reduced to be nothing more than an oversight commitee and act in  subsidiarity, which is the principle that political power should be exercised by the smallest or least central unit of government,  a fancy word for Outsourcing decisions to more Government-funded quangos maybe?

Although the European Council may have left a gaping loophole.  Seems they’ve adopted the Swiss model of people power, so if more than one million “EU citizens” banded together, they could ask for new legislation to be put forward.  Five-hundred million people in the EU, surely at least half want out of the European Fascist State?  If so, by December 2nd, the EU will have to contemplate it’s own dissolution.  At least it’ll be in the record books as the Shortest Lived Empire in History.  One can hope at least.

And Euronews also delights us with “introduces a.. formal.. possibility.. for a country to leave the EU…” then cut to a scene of the European Golden Stars’ flag being hoisted up, “the conditions are not specified”.  The carrot and stick approach.  Dangling the Holy Grail of carrots of gaining freedom peacefully while the EU set about sharpening their sticks.

We need out of the European Union for a million and one reasons.  They have lied to us, cheating us out of our Birthrights.  The European Council reminds me of a cheating wife.  Imagine your wife owning up to only wanting you as you were a prize and has been sleeping with every other man, women and even children in Europe “while on business” talking you down every chance she got.  The problem we have is that the European Council don’t see it like that.  They see cushy jobs and higher ideals than us mere peasants could comprehend.  They have their experts and their backers and their dependents to worry about, we are just a means to an ends.

A short and simple acoount of the European Project, well worth the watch.  Explains the origins and process we’re witnessing now. Another great upload by JustProud.  The moment I heard the accounts weren’t signed off eight years ago and subsequiently found out about the past unverifiable accounts, knew this Union was anything but a lie.  I have no proof so only a theory, as that money must have gone somewhere and am willing to guess that all those unaccoutable millions misappropriated from the EU Treasuary, didn’t go missing but used to soften tens-of-thousands, possibly hundreds-of-thousands European Government Officials and Representitives.

Vote the same, get the same.  Vote BNP and see the Traitors swing.

"Think of the overtime boys. All that dissent will need us Coppers"

I feel sick.  Sick of the European Council.  Sick of the cheerleaders such as the Beeb.  Sick of the Tweedle Dee, Tweedle Dum pantomime that is Politics.  Sick of the lies, threats and filth the Elites propagate.  And most of all, sick of all the gloating, especially when done by the BBC, the bastards!

I posted a few times before about the Beeb and even sent a complaint once (although this may have bordered on “hate mail” so may not count).  They’re still rubbing my nose in it though so I think I’ll attach my next letter of complaint to a brick and ensure some BBC bigwig gets it personally.  I shall keep my comments to myself for this video as without the swearing, is six words long and would look like  ‘you are… and deserve the noose’

The below video has my thoughts on as I am all sworn out so shouldn’t offend many.

The Conservatives, who will most probably gain power after the next election, promised a referendum and as I already knew, back-tracked and are now chatting about asking for some powers back.  That is correct, asking.  We have been betrayed and manipulated by the most Powerful Families in the World and may soon lose completely.

This is from Channel 4 news, many thanks to Liarpoliticians for uploading.  In this video, listen to William Hague droan on “now that the Treaty is going to become European Law and enter into force” with “the lost of British Veto’s” sprinkled in.  A fucking blind man can see where this is heading.

A piece of paper signed by a bullied elected President Klaus, listen carefully to the translation, it begins with “Good afternoon, good gloomy afternoon” and “had no choice but to sign”.  Did they really think we wouldn’t notice the lack of democracy that is apparent within the European Superstate?

And no EU news segment would be complete without our very own Saviour of the World, the one, the only (thank Christ!), Gordon “boom, boom, bust” Brown.  Moans that it has taken years to get this far and we should all forget bout it and get on with saving the World, I was expecting him to tear his clothes off revealing a badly stitched superhero costume with Gordon exclaiming a little catchphrase before leaping out the window to his impending doom.  Okay, I was hoping the last bit.

Philip Davies, a Conservative MP for Shipley who has called for a referendum in the past then gets an easy ride from Jon Snow.  Jon could hold Phil bang to rights on this matter yet doesn’t.  I’ve seen Jon quiz politicians many times and know he could have done much better here.

"Just think, a third of us British police will become EU police, I fancy Spain"

According to The Times, Local councils and accredited persons maybe given ‘powers’ (if approved by the Court),

“To search homes, seize cash, freeze bank accounts and confiscate property will be given to town hall officials and civilian investigators employed by organisations as diverse as Royal Mail, the Rural Payments Agency and Transport for London… The measure, being pushed through by Alan Johnson, the Home Secretary, comes into force next week and will deploy some of the most powerful tools available to detectives against fare dodgers, families in arrears with council tax and other minor offenders.”

The most messed up thing is that the Police were not even asked about this move at all, which indicates to me maybe more Police will become sympathetic to our movement. They especially dislike ‘accredited persons’ employed by quangos and other private contractors for the local councils doing the work. The National Policing Improvement Agency is another new fucked up quango that will be monitoring the operations. One of the NPIAs objectives is to,

“Implement effective operational processes, practice and doctrine to the Police.”

Am I getting a whiff of some sweet doggy poo? Hang on, it is that same smell UK Column found on the bottom of their shoes, Common Purpose. So are we now seeing an explicit divide within the chambers of the Officers and the private?  And where the bleep do these unknown politicians’ declare all these measures that are unlawful and downright pervasive?

To top it off, the defacto Government and Local Councils are going to offer bounties to private companies for fare dodgers, families in arrears with council tax and other minor offenders according to a memo found by The Times. But the Biggest Bastards Corporation (BBC) arrogantly contradicts all news reports and ‘assures’ people that the Local Councils won’t go that far. WHY has the BBC taken the liberty of reassuring us? I thought they reported the news? Could this be a classic case of NLP? Using influence to deny a little detail, then through application admitting all the facts…

‘Oh, it’s OK dear, those rightwing twits from the Mail and Torygraph have got it all wrong according to the BBC, phew, lucky we’re being looked after [Listen for the plop of a giant poo hitting the toilet of his mind]’.

Even Lawyers are questioning how The Proceeds of Crime Act will successfully be used against people who are not paying taxes or fines and to make it worse, because the Government are using a Statutory Instrument, it doesn’t have to be debated in Parliament.

Every month, I’m seeing the Executive cease more and more power from the elected Government and then passing it down to the 3rd Sector who need to make profit. The result of this is people getting fines for dropping fag buts – these binmen with a purpose are called accredited persons; traffic wardens and community officers are soon to be given powers of arrest and entering peoples homes and these same community officers are even being assigned to threatening ticket inspector teams at London train stations to scare people into paying unlawful fines. Just the other day, a good friend said he had a bailiff call around his house demanding that he coughed up over £350 because he didn’t have a valid £1 bus ticket! He said,

‘The only reason I gave her my details was because she said she wouldn’t report me. She deceived me and now this has happened.’

I sense that confusion is mounting within the people, the Government and the quangos, which is leading to serious chaos, but to what end? Is it a complex campaign of smoke and mirrors to bleed the public dry or is there something more sinister at work? All I know is that when somebody is telling a lie, they will stop at nothing to keep it from me including getting others in on it or deceiving them too. Do they really want to awaken the sleeping dragon of this Great Island?

I will leave you with a fitting exchange between Popeye and a Taxman:

The Tax Man: You just docked?
Popeye: I has.
The Tax Man: Ah ha, let’s see here, that’ll be 25¢ docking tax.
Popeye: What for?
The Tax Man: Where’s your sea craft?
Popeye: It ain’t no sea craft, it’s me dinghy and it’s under the wharf.
The Tax Man: Ah ha. ahh-ha. This your goods?
Popeye: They is.
The Tax Man: Yeah. You’re new in town right?
Popeye: If you call this a town, yes.
The Tax Man: Well, first of all, there’s 17¢ new-in-town tax, and there’s 45¢ rowboat-under-the-wharf tax, and one dollar leaving-your-junk-lying-around-the-wharf tax, so all together, you owe the Commodore $1.87.
Popeye: Uh, who’s this Commodore?
The Tax Man: Is that the nature of question? There’s a nickel question tax.

MediaWise, (registered charity 1076002 – THE MEDIAWISE TRUST) is one of those organisations that “helps” oversee the news we’re fed and train the journalists to be the chefs.  Just a look at some of their past financial backers will give us an idea of whose interest they actually working for.

• European Commission

Surprise surprise!  Of course this institution loves controlling financing the news.

• Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust

A promoter of a multi-ethnic, multi-racial Britain.  Nice to see the priorities are right.

• Home Office/NRIF

Fantastic!  More taxpayers £££ to go towards controlling directing the news.

• Open Society Institute

George Soros, a billionaire with close links to the Rothschilds’.

NUJ guidelines on race reporting

Statement on race reporting

1. The NUJ believes that the development of racist attitudes and the growth of fascist parties pose a threat to democracy, the rights of trade union organisations, a free press and the development of social harmony and well-being.  So now you know why Nationalism is reported as “racist” and “fascist” yet Globalism and Corporatism is progressive and pure.

2. The NUJ believes that its members cannot avoid a measure of responsibility in fighting the evil of racism as expressed through the mass media.  Again, is this the reason why Anthony Walker gets a dozen pages and Kriss Donald gets 6.  As Jo Bland said, “can’t be racist to whites”.

3. The NUJ reaffirms its total opposition to censorship but equally reaffirms its belief that press freedom must be conditioned by responsibility and an acknowledgement by all media workers of the need not to allow press freedom to be abused to slander a section of the community or to promote the evil of racism.  Diet-Censorship is the term I give it.

4. The NUJ believes the methods and lies of the racists should be publicly and vigorously exposed.  Even if they have to infiltrate and instigate it, overexaggerate it or just good old Hollywood style, make it up.

5. The NUJ believes that newspapers and magazines should not originate material which encourages discrimination on grounds of race or colour, as expressed in the NUJ’s rule book and code of conduct. Okay to take the piss out the English in the Hagar strip though, although I do find it funny but then again, I haven’t got a chip on my shoulder.

6. The NUJ recognises the right of members to withhold their labour on grounds of conscience where employers are providing a platform for racist propaganda. Question Time was either a great bit of Freedom of Speech or…  a set-up from the word go.

7. The NUJ believes that editors should ensure that coverage of race stories should be placed in a balanced context.  Just to be safe.

8. The NUJ will continue to monitor the development of media coverage in this area and give support to members seeking to enforce the above aims.  If only the FSA had this much motivation.

Race reporting

Only mention someone’s race if it is strictly relevant. Check to make sure you have it right. Would you mention race if the person was white? Of course not, if it is an ethnic to exaggerate how evil whitey is though, they’d milk it.

Do not sensationalise race relations issues; it harms black people and it could harm you.  Protect the minority and is that a threat???  If so, glad I’m no journalist.  Sounds like a Triad Gang.

Think carefully about the words you use. Words which were once in common usage are now considered offensive, e.g. half-caste and coloured. Use mixed-race and black instead. Black can cover people of Arab, Asian, Chinese and African origin. Ask people how they define themselves.  In Orwell’s 1984, this was called Newspeak.  Years back, before my time, people were addressed as Mr or Missus.  The way this Social Engineering project is going, soon we’ll need written permission to speak to eachother.

Immigrant is often used as a term of abuse. Do not use it unless the person really is an immigrant. Most black people in Britain were born here and most immigrants are white. What the fuck?  Bloody hell, soon we’ll have to call immigrants Sir and Ma’am so not to show offence.

Do not make assumptions about a person’s cultural background – whether it is their name or religious detail. Ask them or where it is not possible check with the local race equality council. Unless it’s an evil whitey, then assume all they like.

Investigate the treatment of black people in education, health, employment and housing. Do not forget travellers and gypsies. Cover their lives and concerns. Seek the views of their representatives.  Equality eh, don’t you love it?  Forget about highlighting poor standards for all, regardless of colour, let’s concentrate on the hard-done by minorities.  If these minorities had one knob, the NUJ would be at the end of it.

Remember that black communities are culturally diverse. Get a full and correct view from representative organisations. Yeah, so diverse the MET have Operation Trident.  And by a “correct view”, they mean PC.

Press for equal opportunities for employment for black staff.  Why not just press for Equal opportunities for ALL???  Affirmative action my arse!

Be wary of disinformation. Just because a source is traditional does not mean it is accurate.  Again, if they’re “racist” or “fascist” or both, free rein to slander, they can fit in an inch-worth of an apology seven months later on page 14.

Reporting racist organisations

When interviewing representatives of racist organisations or reporting meetings or statements or claims, journalists should carefully check all reports for accuracy and seek rebutting or opposing comments. The anti-social nature of such views should be exposed.  KGB style.  The problem I have is that the Globalists’ own the press, so again, Nationalism is what is opposed.

Do not sensationalise by reports, photographs,. film or presentation the activities of racist organisations.  They sensationalize everything for fuck’s sake!

Seek to publish or broadcast material exposing the myths and lies of racist organisations and their anti-social behaviour.  Again aimed at Nationalism.

Do not allow the letters column or ‘phone-in’ programmes to be used to spread racial hatred in whatever guise.  Is this Chinese inspired?

Guidelines on travellers

Only mention the word gypsy or traveller if strictly relevant and accurate.  Wouldn’t it always be relevent?

Give balanced reports, seeking travellers’ views as well as those of others, consulting the local travellers where possible.  Amazing.  Simply amazing.  More consideration in giving us both sides of the story when pikeys are involved but when it comes to mulit-culture and diversity it’s painted with sprinkles and star dust.

Resist the temptation to sensationalise issues involving travellers, especially in their relations with settled communities over issues such as housing and settlement programmes and schooling. Unless of course it’s the pikeys getting discriminated against by the settled folk, then they can call it a “hate-crime” and show whitey how evil still is.

Try to give wide coverage to travellers’ lives and the problems they face. Bloody hell, is this another gig for Bob Geldof>  Jesus fucking H fucking Christ, it’s enough to drive you to drink.  The documentaries I like involve nature a bit bigger than the bits in their hair.

Strive to promote the realisation that the travellers’ community is comprised of full citizens of Great Britain and Ireland whose civil rights are seldom adequately vindicated, who often suffer much hurt and dame through misuse by the media and who have a right to have their special contributions to Irish and British life, especially in music and craft work and other cultural activities, properly acknowledged and reported.  Who pay little to no tax, get first dibs in NHS queues and are also nests of criminality.  And I know that for a fact, I’ve seen the police steam in many times to the site near myself.

But what’s this?  There’s more…

Diversity

MediaWise has taken a keen interest in promoting diversity within the media, not least because minorities are the most vulnerable to misrepresentation and abuse.  Again, part of the agenda to render Nation States into submission.

We contributed to the UK Roundtable Against Racism and Xenophobia , an initiative linked to the European Observatory on Racism and Xenophobia; we supported the IFJ-backed website Diversity Online; built links with the Pan-European UNITED for Intercultural Action; and supported the Creative Collective project to improve opportunities for ethnic minorities media workers, backed by The Chronicle and the now defunct European Centre of the Freedom Forum.  No wonder the Establishment won’t admit this multi-culture don’t work, they’ve invested so much time and effort.  And all this effort yet instead of cohesion they have only helped inflame the situation.

And that ladies and gentlemen, is why the Media lies to you.  What you watch, read and hear has all been manipulated to create tensions and unrest, for the news must be exciting otherwise what is the point?  Just like the Pharmaceutical Corporations sell the remedy and keep the cure and the Military Corporations (along with many other industries) promote the wars, so surely it is logical to see that the Media Corporations must also keep the information flowing, even if it is misinformation (or what I simply call bullshit).

So in the simplest terms, the Globalists believe in Corporate Empire building(Imperial always open to overthrow) so support various programmes to destabilize nations around the planet, be it through mass immigration, mass invasion or mass starvation, all means to an end for these people.  Money isn’t important to them, they own the rights to print it, so it has always been about power.  And they have oh so many more weapons in their arsenals to keep us in our place.  Even MediaWise works with Society of Environmental Journalists who take great delight in deriding the opposition to Global Warming Climate Change.  All means to an end.  Our end most probably.

Freedom of the Press?  Sometimes I wonder how we could all be so stupid (although some more than others of course).

"Damn, the Press. Best be careful"

The latest entry in Powerline A.D.’s Sounds From Across The Pond series features the London-based quartet Common Purpose. They first came to my attention through the BBC Introducing section of the BBC London Web site.

Common Purpose’s sound evokes some of the UK’s finest bands, such as The Jam and The Rifles. The members of Common Purpose are (pictured above, left to right) Harry Watts (drums), Elliot Beasley (lead guitar and vocals), James Evans (lead vocals and rhythm guitar), and Cary Smith (bass). James, Harry, and Cary participated in the Q&A, which you can read here.

For additional information on Common Purpose, go to:
http://www.myspace.com/commonpurpose

Aunty Beeb at in again, this time President Klaus is the traget.

They do themselves no favours at all.  Always banging on about the far-right, when it is these Pravda inspired knob jockeys who are fucking this country up.