Conway’s Game of Life ist eine 1970 entwickelte Simulation eines zellulären Automaten. Auf einer zweidimensionalen Fläche leben Zellen (Pixel) vor sich hin, deren Fort- oder Ableben durch vier Regeln bestimmt wird. Jede Zelle hat acht Nachbarzellen.

1. Tod durch Isolation: Hat eine Zelle weniger als zwei lebende Nachbarzellen, stirbt sie in der nächsten Generation an Einsamkeit.

2. Tod durch Überbevölkerung: Jede Zelle mit vier oder mehr lebenden Nachbarn stirbt in folge von Überpopulation.

3. Neugeburt einer Zelle: Jede tote Zelle (leeres Feld) mit genau drei lebenden Nachbarn wird in der nächsten Generation wiedergeboren.

4. Überleben einer Zelle: Jede Zelle mit zwei lebenden Nachbarn überlebt in die nächste Generation.

Simulieren will ich das ganze mit einem 1024 x 768 Pixel großen Feld und der Programmiersprache C++ in der openFrameworks-Umgebung. Zuerst brauchen wir drei Variablen, die das Feld darstellen. Eine für das aktuelle Feld, eine für das Feld der nächsten Generation und eine temporäre Variable, die für Kopierzwecke benötigt wird. Alle drei Felder sind zweidimensional:

const int width = 1024;
const int height = 768;
int gitter[width][height], gitter_next[width][height], gitter_temp[width][height];

Als nächstes soll das Basisfeld generiert werden. Das mache ich in der setup() Funktion. Die Gesamtanzahl aller Pixel ist 1024 mal 768. Für die Anfangsbevölkerung soll ca. jedes dritte Feld auf 1 (= lebende Zelle) gesetzt werden. Dann wird das Feld durchlaufen und alle auf 1 gesetzten Felder werden gezeichnet. Das mache ich mit ofCircle(x,y,1), da ich das mit dem Pixelsetzen in openFrameworks noch nicht ganz durchschaut habe. ofCircle(x,y,1) setzt also einen Kreis auf die Postion (x,y) mit Radius 1 (= 1 Pixel).

void testApp::setup(){

    float dichte = 0.3 * width * height;

    for (int i = 0; i < dichte; i++)
    {
        gitter[int(rand() % width)][int(rand() % height)] = 1;
    }

    ofBackground(255,255,255);

    for (int x = 0; x < width; x++)
    {
        for (int y = 0; y < height; y++)
        {
            if (gitter[x][y] == 1) {
                ofSetColor(0,0,0);
                ofCircle(x,y,1);
            }
        }
    }
}

Jetzt zur draw() Funktion, die in einer Endlosschleife läuft. Zuerst sollen für jede Zelle alle lebenden Nachbarn ermittelt werden. Dazu schreibe ich eine kleine Funktion:

int zaehle_nachbarn(int x, int y)
{
    int nachbarn = 0;

    if(gitter[x-1][y+1] == 1)
    {
        nachbarn++;
    }
    if(gitter[x-1][y] == 1)
    {
        nachbarn++;
    }
    if(gitter[x+1][y] == 1)
    {
        nachbarn++;
    }
    if(gitter[x+1][y+1] == 1)
    {
        nachbarn++;
    }
    if(gitter[x+1][y-1] == 1)
    {
        nachbarn++;
    }
    if(gitter[x-1][y-1] == 1)
    {
        nachbarn++;
    }
    if(gitter[x][y+1] == 1)
    {
        nachbarn++;
    }
    if(gitter[x][y-1] == 1)
    {
        nachbarn++;
    }
    return nachbarn;
}

Zurückgegeben wird die Anzahl der lebenden Nachbarn. Nun die Hauptengine der Simulation, die draw() Funktion:

void testApp::draw(){

    for (int x = 0; x < width; x++)
    {
        for (int y = 0; y < height; y++)
        {
            int nachbarn = zaehle_nachbarn(x, y);

            if ((gitter[x][y] == 1) && (nachbarn < 2))
            {
                gitter_next[x][y] = 0; // Tod durch Isolation
                ofSetColor(0,0,0);
                ofCircle(x,y,1);
            }
            else if ((gitter[x][y] == 1) && (nachbarn > 3))
            {
                gitter_next[x][y] = 0; // Tod durch Überbevölkerung
                ofSetColor(0,0,0);
                ofCircle(x,y,1);
            }
            else if ((gitter[x][y] == 0) && (nachbarn == 3))
            {
                gitter_next[x][y] = 1; // Drei Nachbarn = Zelle wird geboren
                ofSetColor(255,255,255);
                ofCircle(x,y,1);
            }
            else
            {
                gitter_next[x][y] = gitter[x][y]; // Überlebt
            }
        }
    }

    for (int x = 0; x < width; x++)
    {
        for (int y = 0; y < height; y++)
        {
            gitter_temp[x][y] = gitter[x][y];
            gitter[x][y] = gitter_next[x][y];
            gitter_next[x][y] = gitter_temp[x][y];
        }
    }

}

Für jede Zelle werden die lebenden Nachbarn ermittelt. Dann werden die Regeln angewendet. Zum Schluss wird das aktuelle Feld (gitter) in die temporäre Variable kopiert, das aktuelle Feld mit dem zukünftigen Feld besetzt und das Zukünftige Feld wird das aktuelle Feld.

Fertig!

Das Video zeigt einige Sekunden aus dem Leben der Zellen:

Links:

Quellcode und ausführbare Datei

Es gibt einen sehr schönen Conways Spiel des Lebens Wikipedia-Artikel, der noch ein paar Hintergründe beleuchtet und ein paar sich aus den Zellen entwickelnde Objekte zeigt.

Theist Timothy Conway Referenced Atheist Basava Premanand

PhD Timothy Conway said the following about Basava Premanand (an Atheist, Rationalist and Skeptic who published the Indian Skeptic tabloid):

Timothy Conway: “Though I disagree strongly with his atheist philosophy and rationalist-skeptic approach, the Indian former SSB devotee (1968-74) turned India’s most notorious ‘guru-buster,’ Basava Premanand, a decades-long critic of Sathya Sai in his periodical Indian Skeptic, also deserves acknowledgment here as one taking a firm and enduring stand for accountability and justice, not just in the case of SSB but with other problematic figures as well. (On the case against SSB, see Premanand’s bulky books, including Murders in Sai Baba’s Bed Room, 2004, and, most recently, Failed Sabotage by SSB through Gerald Moreno, 2007, etc., published by the author at 11/7, Chettipalayam Rd., Podanur 641 023, Tamil Nadu, India)”

First and foremost, Basava Premanand was never a Sai Devotee as erroneously alleged by PhD Timothy Conway. Click Here to view screen captures to SaiPetition.net, Robert Priddy’s Ex-Office Bearers Page and the BBC text to the Secret Swami Documentary. Basava Premanand personally made a submission to SaiPetition.net (which was subsequently replicated on Robert Priddy’s Ex-Office Bearers Page) stating that he was a follower of Sathya Sai Baba from 1968 to 1974 and was the “best worker in the SSB Org., Podanur”. However, in the Secret Swami Documentary, Basava Premanand claimed he was never a follower of Sathya Sai Baba and had been trying to investigate the Guru since 1968 itself. Premanand joined the Sai Organization in an attempt to infiltrate it and expose Sai Baba.

In both the GuruBusters Documentary and the The Independent Article Premanand was said to have been exposing Gurus for nearly 50 years (since the age of 21-22). This means that in 1968 (at the age of 38, or 16 years after he was a rationalist) Premanand was not a follower of Sathya Sai Baba when he joined the Sai Organization in Podanur. Premanand lied about being a Sai Devotee (just as he lied about Moreno being sexually abused by Sai Baba, lied about an anonymous letter being written by a Sai Student, among numerous other blatant untruths).

One will also notice how the moralist PhD Timothy Conway cited Premanand’s book against Moreno on his “biggest and best website on spirituality”. Don’t expect Timothy Conway to divulge the fact that Basava Premanand shamelessly libeled Moreno in that book and that it contains numerous unsubstantiated defamations mostly from Robert Priddy (with citations to Brian Steel, Conny Larsson, Sanjay Dadlani and Alan Kazlev). Moreno discussed this issue in his article entitled Is Basava Premanand Senile, Confused, A Liar Or All Of The Above? and on his Indian Skeptic Page.

This is the type of sleaze, slime and defamatory material that PhD Timothy Conway cites against his detractors. PhD Timothy Conway is a pseudo-moralist and pseudo-spiritualist who must reference sleaze, slime and defamatory material because there is absolutely no verifiable, credible or legal information to support any of the criminal allegations made against Sathya Sai Baba. The fact that no one has even tried to file a basic police complaint or court case against Sathya Sai Baba in India is proof enough that the allegations against Baba lack substance and credibility. Neither Sathya Sai Baba nor the Sai Organization have ever been charged with any crime, sexual or otherwise (Refs: 01 – 02).

The burden of proof is on those making the allegations against Sathya Sai Baba. Those making the allegations (including Timothy Conway) have miserably failed to make any leeway against Sathya Sai Baba in a court of law in India despite their loud protests and cry-baby whining to the contrary.

Furthermore, Timothy Conway’s reference to Basava Premanand has amusing repercussions against him, his beliefs and his advocacy of Gurus, Enlightened Masters, Mystics, Hinduism and Eastern Philosophies because Basava Premanand believes that people who believe in these things are Guru promoters, blind believers, brainwashed devotees, cult advocates and superstitionists with weak intellects!

This is even more the case when considering that PhD Timothy Conway is a gullible true believer in Gurus [3], Mystics [3], Enlightened Masters [3], psychics [1] [2] [4], levitation [5], bi-location [5], miracles [5], remote-viewing [4], elementals, meditation [2] [6], paranormal powers [5], aliens [4] [10], rebirth [1] [7], reincarnation [1] [7], karma [8], oracles [2], I-Ching [2], sensitives [1] [2], channelers [1] [2], astrology [2], astrologists [2], palm-reading [2], non-duality [9], etc. (the list goes on and on).

Timothy Conway also attempted to argue that if Sai Baba possesses paranormal powers, he could easily “warp spacetime” by creating an “insular interdimensional environment” where he could engage in abuse without easy detection. That’s right, Timothy Conway believes that it is possible that Sai Baba molested alleged victims on another dimension, which is why it is so difficult for them to prove their allegations and why there is an abysmal lack of witnesses supporting their claims (Ref: Conway Email No. 10).

Attempting to sling mud at Sathya Sai Baba and his detractors, Timothy Conway ended up slinging mud on himself, his Gurus, his belief system and on innumerable religious and spiritual adherents whose beliefs were ridiculed and criticized by atheist Basava Premanand.

These are the types of three-ring circus clowns who are trying to “expose” Sathya Sai Baba.

Inglês, atualmente na Indy, já testou com a extinta Honda em 2008

O inglês Mike Conway voltará a pilotar um carro de F-1 no próximo mês, quando integrará a equipe Mercedes GP, antiga Brawn, nos testes em Jerez de La Frontera.

O atual competidor da Indy foi piloto de testes da extinta Honda em 2007/08, e deve testar pelo time de Ross Brawn de 1 a 3 de dezembro, dias que serão dedicados a pilotos sem experiência a categoria.

Apesar de a equipe alemã não ter confirmado sua participação nos testes, a revista inglesa “Autosport” apurou que seu nome está na lista de inscritos publicada pelo circuito espanhol. Além disso, o agente do piloto confirmou que ele viajará nos próximos dias para Jerez.

Marcus Ericsson, campeão da F-3 japonesa, também está na lista de pilotos que testarão pela Mercedes.

[Fonte: tazio.uol.com.br]

PhD Timothy Conway, Ammachi & Guruphiliac

PhD Timothy Conway (a critic of Sathya Sai Baba who thoroughly eulogizes, promotes and worships Mata Amritanandamayi Devi as a bona-fide Guru) cited Guruphiliac Jody Radzik on his enlightened-spirituality.org website as a notable person who endorsed him. Timothy Conway duplicated the following comments onto his website from Jody Radzik’s blogged article entitled “Conway’s Way Is No Con”:

Timothy Conway Solicited The Integrity Of Guruphiliac Webmaster On His Official Domain

“Timothy [has] got a slew of good stuff up at his Enlightened-Spirituality.org, including a nice little bit about the importance of critical thinking, the precious water and commodity that’s sorely lacking in the infernal desert of ignorance known as New Age spirituality in the West…. It’s good to see someone out there upholding the legacies of Shankara and Vivekananda, especially in these days of enlightenment pyramid scams and lame-brained channelling schemes designed to separate the psychologically needy from their dollars in exchange for a boatload of false hope and occluding nonsense about the truth of the Self. So give Enlightened-Spirituality.org a go when you’ve got a minute and the desire to cleanse your palate of all the superstitious nonsense that chokes the truth right out of spiritual culture in these times. –Jody, creator of the popular and controversial Guruphiliac blog at guruphiliac.blogspot.com.”

Timothy Conway promotes Jody Radzik (a known basher and trasher of Ammachi – Mata Amritanandamayi Ma) on his “spiritual” website. Jody Radzik’s critiques on Ammachi can be found here. As a matter of fact, Jody Radzik accused Ammachi (Mata Amritanandamayi Ma) of being:

• “Greedy”
• Money-hungry (or as Jody puts it, a “money-grubber”)
• A “Hindu Nazi”
• The “Al Qaeda Of India”
• Creator of “Goonsgate”
• The “Mistress Of The Hindu Right”
• A “foaming-at-the-mouth radical nationalist”
• Being allied with “people and goals of the radical, racist, Hindu nationalist right”
• Somehow involved with “murders” of “mysterious circumstances” at her ashram
• Enmeshed in an “Amma ‘Sex Scandal’”
• Involved in a “Mind-Control TV Network” through Amma TV
• Involved with “global domination”
• Manipulative and weakening devotees minds with her “astral breast milk”
• A rip off who “offer mammaries full of occluding nonsense to a world rife with infantilism”
• The slurs go on and on…

As a matter of fact, Guruphiliac Jody Radzik made the following composite image of Amma (see how it is used on his blog here), merging her face with Osama Bin Laden (the image links directy to Radzik’s atman.net website: Ref):

Timothy Conway Promoted Guruphiliac Who Attacked Amma As Osama Bin Laden

This is the type of hate that Timothy Conway promotes on his “biggest and best site on spirituality”. Poor Timothy Conway. His research into the notable people he cites on his behalf is as thorough as his lamentable research into the Sai Controversy. Attempting to bolster his illustrious reputation (sarcasm implied) Timothy Conway cited Jody Radzik (a promoter of raves and illegal psychedelic drugs) on his behalf. Not only does Jody Radzik bash Ammachi, he also bashes and lies about other Gurus as well. Timothy Conway promotes a man who claims he is self-realized, needs “to be stoned ALL the time”, is Kali Ma’s “sex slave” and hears the voice of Kali Ma in his head. Nice friend you got there, Timothy.

This information is going to be very disconcerting to all the Amma devotees who can often be seen citing the following quote from Timothy Conway describing Ammachi as:

“one of the most glorious lights to appear in the history of religion. Just her stamina – embracing these millions of people one by one, day after day, without a break, all over the world-is some kind of divine gift. No mere human resources could accomplish this.”

November 27th 2007 Update: Timothy Conway contacted Gerald Joe Moreno by email and informed him that although he hesitantly posted Jody’s blurbs on his official website, he was fully aware of Jody’s attacks against Amma and her devotees. Timothy Conway defended Jody Radzik and said he is “actually very positive about her (Amma) in many contexts, and has defended her to many of his readers”. Rubbish! Timothy said he was unaware of Jody’s “Amma Bin Laden” photo (how did that escape a PhD researcher?) and removed Guruphiliac Jody Radzik’s comments from his website. Good call and nice damage-control, Timothy. Interested readers can view Timothy Conway’s comment (expressing gratitude to Jody Radzik on his Guruphiliac blog) HERE.

SaiBabaControversy And PhD Timothy Conway

Timothy Conway Recants:
In our previous page on Jack Hawley’s critics, we had reported comments Tim Conway had made about deceased devotees. Our comments are below:

Timothy Conway has made some unsustainable assertions in his circular letter. He refers to longtime devotees who are now dead, whom, he asserts, left Baba over this sexual impropriety.

Here are the quotes:

What Conway said:

“On this point, we should remember the numerous longtime Sai devotees like Professors Gokak and Bhagavathum and others who have left Sathya Sai, ostensibly over the inappropriate sexual activity by Baba.

These longtime close observers obviously perceived a different meaning for Baba’s behavior than the meaning Hawley attributes to this behavior. Hawley thinks Sai’s behavior is evidence of the Divine. Gokak, Bhagavathum, and others apparently thought otherwise.”

The Sai Critic commented:

“Timothy Conway is speaking ill of the dead here. He also forgoes any remaining credibility claiming that these well known names in the Sai Haiography abandoned Sai over these matters. Gokak was Vice Chancellor and lived and died a devotee. Where is the evidence for this scurrillous assertion against a dead man? What evidence, what authorities does he cite for Gokak, Bhagavathum and others? None are offered. The ‘and others’ is a tell-tale give away, it is just a device to throw some speculation in.

Bhagavathum did indeed renounce Swami, but not as a fake, rather Bhagavathum renounced Swami as one who is simply impossible to live with. Witnesses and reputable authorities cite Bhagavathum left primarily because Swami did not give the attention to Bhagavathum’s son which the doctor demanded.

Whatever the reason, it is known Bhagavathum left Swami in a huff, and later manifested Alzheimers, a disease which wasted him unto death. There is no evidence cited by Conway or any others that Dr Bhagavathum left Baba over sexual misdemeanour or any other activity. We confidently challenge Timothy Conway to evidence his unsalutary assertions about these two deceased men of good repute and character.”

What Conway has retracted:

“First, I especially thank you for clarifying that Gokak died a devotee of Swami and that Bhagavantam left Baba for reasons other than any sexual improprieties by Baba. Along this line, I want to directly issue to you and to any other readers a MAJOR APOLOGY and a RETRACTION for passing along, not just second hand hearsay, but third-hand rumor of the most insubstantial and false variety.”

Bravo, Bravo! We salute Timothy Conway. We applaud this first public recant from hearsay, gossip and misreporting in this sorry business of “The Findings”.

Tim Conway Defends:
After his recant, Conway is adamant that there are outraged persons who have departed Sathya Sai Baba. Conway goes on to describe those ex-devotees and assorted supporters of The Findings:

“These charges are simply the cry of anguished devotees attempting to protect young men and boys from behavior that can have a deeply traumatic effect upon their sensitive psyches.”

The accusations we hear are certainly not “the cry of anguished devotees attempting to protect young men”. The loathsome noise we hear is the commotion of the tittle-tattle, the “isn’t-it-awful gossips”, the rumor mongers and the hysterical naysayers who peddle the apocryphal story of Sai and a seven year old boy, for example; a story that has NEVER BEEN VERIFIED by its alleged source. A most fetid and controversial claim that is still peddled as fact. This and most of the other material circulating is NOT the “cry of the anguished devotees”.

These comprise the malignant, repetitive chants of the rumour mill (whom Conway will later label as the “Nasty Naysayers”) designed to shock, horrify and alienate existing devotees. Let Conway investigate the length and breadth of the activities of some of his companions against DEVOTEES; not against Sai Baba, but against devotees. It is part of a well prepared mail-bombing campaign against devotees. “Anguished cry…” … who has Conway been listening to – both sides? It would appear not. Where is the Conway critique of this campaign against devotees? Has all the response tactics and strategy been truthfully revealed to Conway? Is it really the cry of the anguished devotee or an appeal to a vague non-entity as Conway has been steered away from certain facts?

Tim Conway, Chapter and Verse
Timothy Conway presents the Law in the United States of America:

“please remember that, in our law-based society (and Baba has always advocated that citizens abide by their nation’s laws), the sexual harassment and molestation of minors (and, yes, adults) is a prosecutable, criminal offense.” Conway goes on to speak of “the MANDATED REPORTING RULE, which imposes a LEGAL DUTY on any adult with knowledge that sexual molestation of minors is likely occurring TO REPORT SUCH BEHAVIOR and TRY TO PREVENT SUCH BEHAVIOR FROM RE-OCCURRING”

Invitation to Prosecute:
Mr Conway, along with all anguished devotees attempting to protect young men, are all hereby invited to the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Penukonda, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh, India, to lay charges against Sathya Sai Baba. This appears to be the appropriate court of Law. Laying of Charges in other countries is not likely to have any effect. The matter more rightly belongs in the Penukonda Magistrates Court.

Mighty Matters of Faith and Belief:
Conway articulates his doubts of faith and belief:

“At this point in time, I cannot agree that Baba is the ‘Purna Avatar, pure and simple.’ Anyone who tries to rationalize Baba’s behavior by appealing to his Divinity and the corollary that ‘God [Baba] can do whatever he wants’ has not sufficiently proven that Baba is, in fact, the pure expression of Divinity incarnate on this planet. It may be that the formless God or Absolute Spirit (the Infinite Atman/Brahman) is communicating something through the name/form of Sathya Sai and thus has intended that tens of millions of people connect with his mission, at least temporarily until they move beyond the form of Sathya Sai (and has not Baba himself often called for people not to get attached to his form?)”

For a person who freely admits he has been “out of the loop” and not active as a devotee of Sai Baba since he has commenced to actively follow another satguru, Mr Conway presents an unsettled frame of mind. Is he still loyal to Sai Baba? Either he says the formless absolute is engaging in revelation and a mission via the name and form of Sai, or he is not making such an admission. He appears to be presenting both sides of the coin and not settling conclusively for one opinion or the other. Conway presents uncertanty and is not clear himself where he stands.

Certainly he is good at throwing in red herrings:

“But let me remind you–I’m sure you’re aware–that great Mahatmas of the last 150 years like Ramakrishna, Ramana Maharshi, Anandamayi Ma, Mata Amritanandamayi, Anasuya Devi, Devaraha Baba, Shyama Mataji, Bhagavan Nityananda have NEVER needed to sexually molest their followers to ‘test’ them.”

Conway meanders on with his red herring of the other gurus:

“Rather, to take just one example, consider the case of the beautiful Ramana Maharshi. Dozens of reliable accounts indicate that Ramana could awaken people to the completely bodiless, ego-free, infinite, transcendental state of pure Spirit (Atman/Brahman), absolute Being-Awareness-Bliss-Love, SIMPLY BY GAZING AT THEM SILENTLY with his amazingly loving, liberating, Grace-filled look.”

Far from being a devotee who has thrown away his darshan cushion, Conway hangs onto doubt and expresses it often:

“It has to be demonstrated that Sathya Sai’s sexual predatory behavior — apparently involving hundreds, maybe even more than a thousand young men and boys — is ‘restoring Dharma’.”

A little further on, Conway writes:

“(Some nasty naysayers want to say that Baba is actually nothing more than an evil force on the planet, a master of occult powers who masquerades, like the legendary Lucifer, as a being of light and goodness. I don’t accept this analysis of ‘Baba -as-consummate-evil’.”

Conway wants it both ways. He wants the jury to be out, still deciding, and he wants to distance himself from the Some nasty nay-sayers. He has certainly failed to do that, as he has taken up their cause. In email, chat rooms and on the Internet, CAPITALS represent YELLING. Here is Mr Conway again:

“the MANDATED REPORTING RULE, which imposes a LEGAL DUTY on any adult with knowledge that sexual molestation of minors is likely occurring TO REPORT SUCH BEHAVIOR and TRY TO PREVENT SUCH BEHAVIOR FROM RE-OCCURRING…”

So Timothy Conway, is yelling out for all to hear where he stands. Beside the “nasty nay sayers”.

Invitation to Prosecute:
Mr Conway, along with all anguished devotees attempting to protect young men, are all hereby invited to the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Penukonda, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh, India, to lay charges against Sathya Sai Baba. This appears to be the appropriate court of Law. Laying of Charges in other countries is not likely to have any effect.

The matter more rightly belongs in the Penukonda Magistrates Court. Not in any court in the United States of America. Do proceed with haste, with all anguised persons, nay sayers, gossipers and the like. ESPECIALLY do take “young men from around the world who have come forward to describe their victimization by this man masquerading as God”, do instigate and demand investigation, demand the laying of charges, demand the prosecution, with ALL HASTE.

Conway perseveres with admonition:

“The bottom line is that, REGARDLESS of who/what Baba is, we, as mature, responsible aspirants endeavoring to live the values of Satya, Dharma, Shanti, Prema and Ahimsa have A SERIOUS ETHICAL DUTY to rise up and speak out against the longstanding pattern of sexual molestation.”

Hello?

• Are you there Mr Conway?
• Cease acting as a middle man.
• Assist those who report complaints with Sai Baba.
• Provide tickets.
• Get them on a plane.
• Fly with them to Bangalore or Hyderabad.
• Assist with travel to Penukonda, to the Magistrates Court.
• Fulfill your SERIOUS ETHICAL DUTY and lay your charges.
• Assist these traumatised others to lay charges in the proper courts.

Then you will have salvaged your conscience and fulfilled your serious ethical duty. We remind you that Sai Baba is not afraid. After all, he has said, “Why be afraid of the mistake you have not committed?”

SaiBabaControversy Reference

Para nuestros queridos clientes, Conway los invita a un seminario de decoración de navidad

con el reconocido decorador Rogelio González (Fantasyland, Tu Mañana).

Este jueves, 19 de noviembre del 2009

a las 4:00pm

en Conway Albrook Mall

A todos los participantes de este evento, se les regalará un cupón de 15% de descuento en mercancía de Navidad

No pierdas esa oportunidad! Regístrate ya que los cupos son limitados!

Para registrarse:

contact@conwaystore.com o llamando al 302-2170

Decora tu Navidad con Conway - Seminario de Decoración con Rogelio González

A summary of some your ideas on mathematical diseases