This is the video that started the “War On Women”…

So, according to Hilary Rosen, women are “old fashioned” who make the decision to stay at home and raise their children, instead of leaving them in the care of a “nanny” or babysitter while they pursue a working career.  While it is more true than false that Democrat and liberal women value a career more than they value family and raising children, because America as a whole does not yet see it that way, there is still a level of damage control needed to be done by Obama’s campaign staff.  This is why David Axelrod took to Twitter and issued this response:

David Axelrod ‏ @davidaxelrod

Follow

Also Disappointed in Hilary Rosen’s comments about Ann Romney. They were inappropriate and offensive.

In other words, Axelrod, and others in Obama’s circle are beginning a mini war on Hilary Rosen herself.  Remember, Obama is not above throwing anyone in his camp under the bus that might cause him or his reelection campaign damage or create a negative influence on his faux prestige.

And recall that Hilary Rosen was not the only women to complain and criticize about stay at home moms:

It is a long established fact that liberal women hate family, hate the idea of raising their own children, hate the idea of being a stay at home mom and hate the idea of being labeled as a “homemaker”.  Liberal women are the real instigators of the “war on women”, going back all the way to the early 1900′s.  Margaret Sanger might very well have been the woman who started the “war on women”.  In any event, if we are to conclude that a real “war on women” is being waged in America, who do we rightfully put the blame on for having started it?  Conservatives and conservative women, as Hilary Rosen, Hillary Clinton and all liberal women suggest, and for which the Democrat Party, including its cheer-leader, Debbie Wasserman Shultz, have been propagandizing?

Not all women have bought into this phony war.  In fact, most American women are perfectly satisfied with committing more energy to their family, and raising their children. than Democrats have ever given them credit for.

And it is a sure bet liberal women, and Democrats, male and female alike, will lose even more support now as their anti-women, anti-family position becomes clearer to the American public.  Obama has no choice but to throw Rosen under the bus to help save face, and to help save his reelection bid.  Even Obama knows that “homemakers” far out number, and are far more powerful a voting block than women who have abandoned their families for their own selfish and self-interest gains.  But, is it too late for Obama to rectify and reposition himself as a “family-friendly” President?  Has Obama ever been a “family-friendly” President to begin with?  Has Obama ever been a “woman-friendly” President?

Related articles

• David Axelrod Dispatched For ‘War On Women’ Damage Control (tarpon.wordpress.com)
• Ann Romney joins Twitter to respond to radical feminist attack; Hilary Rosen digs in, Axelrod/Messina flees (twitchy.com)
• Obama woos woman vote by pretending not to (and, no, there is no real “war on women”) (miamiherald.typepad.com)
• Obama’s Sickening, Marxist War On Women Continues (Video) (thedaleygator.wordpress.com)
• Reince Priebus on MSNBC: ‘War on women is fiction’ (twitchy.com)
• Obama’s War On Women: HOSTILE WORKPLACE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE PAYS WOMEN LESS THAN MEN, RECORDS SHOW (tarpon.wordpress.com)
• Democrats declare war on women? (Hotair.com)
• Depends on the meaning of “the rights of women everywhere” (legalinsurrection.com)
• Video: Ann Romney responds to stay-at-home mom controversy on “America’s Newsroom” (Hotair.com)