<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>destruction &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/destruction/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "destruction"</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 06:23:23 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Barbarians Inside the Gates]]></title>
<link>http://kotzabasis4.wordpress.com/2009/11/28/barbarians-inside-the-gates-2/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 02:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>kotzabasis</dc:creator>
<guid>http://kotzabasis4.wordpress.com/2009/11/28/barbarians-inside-the-gates-2/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The following paper was written on October 9, 2004. It&#8217;s republished here for the readers of t]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><em>The following paper was written on October 9, 2004. It&#8217;s republished here for the readers of</em> <em>this blog hoping they will find it to be of some interest.</em><em> </em></p>
<p>By <strong><span style="color:#339966;">Con George-Kotzabasis </span></strong></p>
<p><strong>A</strong> deadly Trojan horse has been placed in the midst of the metropolises of Western civilization and, like Troy, is threatening its destruction. Throughout Europe, North America, and Australia, the belly of this deadly Horse is already bursting open delivering and unleashing a horde of fanatic barbarians on the cities of the civilized world, whose holy agenda decrees the wiping -out of Western institutions and their open, tolerant and free societies, and the genocide of their peoples by the fire of Allah&#8217;s hell. This is the nightmare scenario that countries of the economically developed and free world are facing as a result of their <strong>humanitarian </strong>and generous, but <strong>replete with folly, </strong>immigration policies that allowed such vast numbers of mostly <strong>unassimilable </strong>Muslim immigrants with <strong>&#8216;exponential&#8217; birth rates, </strong>to become permanent residents and citizens of their countries. (In the Netherlands almost one third of children under the age of thirteen are Muslim. No wonder that the great Islamic scholar Bernard Lewis argues, that <strong>&#8220;Europe will be Islamic by the end of the century&#8221;.</strong>) As inexorably, not an insubstantial number of these Muslims of the diaspora will become terrorist &#8211; fodder for the likes of bin Laden, as Mohammed Atta, the Western educated ringleader, as well as so many other terrorists who have been also been educated in Western universities, of the murderous group of 9/11 has shown, whose terrorist cell was hatched in Hamburg Germany. This is especially so for many young unemployed Muslims in the West, who have been brought up within the strict confines of their rigid religion and who are therefore psychologically more susceptible to the calls of their fundamentalist imams for a Jihad against the infidels, making them therefore prone to become martyrs in this holy war against them. Hence the terrorist barbarians are not at the gates of civilization but <strong>inside its gates</strong>.</p>
<p>September 11 was a wake up call to all governments of the democratic world to the mortal threat that Muslim fundamentalists posed to their peoples. However, despite the exploding sound of this call, only a few governments are willing to recognize this great danger -whose gathering dark clouds teeming with lightning bolts are hovering over the cities of the world threatening their peoples with total annihilation -and stand-up against it. Apparently, only a handful of them have the intellectual capacity, imagination, and historical insight to perceive this great danger, and the resolve and moral mettle to take the necessary relentless measures and actions to prevent this catastrophe of biblical proportions from happening. America, Britain, Australia, Italy, Poland and the thirty other countries who have deployed their armed forces to fight global terror in Iraq under their politically and morally strong and historically savvy leaderships, will be acknowledged and renowned by history as the countries that saved Western civilization from this lethal attack by this horde of fanatically necrophilous barbarians. The no quarter given, relentless retaliation of these governments to this existential challenge of global terrorism to the civilized peoples of the world, will be totally justified by future historians, as has been the stand of those nations who fought against Nazi and Communist totalitarianism and who made the necessary and stupendous sacrifices to save the world from these two regimes of evil in the Twentieth century.</p>
<p><span style="color:#339966;">DESPITE US ERRORS AN WITHDRAWAL IS UNTENABLE</span></p>
<p>Even if one concedes that serious mistakes have been made by the Americans post March 2003 after the defeat of Saddam, which was <strong>part and parcel </strong>of the war against global terror, such as indiscriminately disbanding all Iraqi military units, and not dealing with the incipient insurgency of urban terrorists last April by using <strong>overwhelming force </strong>against it and nipping it in the bud, instead of ceasing their military offensive, as they did in Fallujah, and passing the control of that city to a former Iraqi general, who proved to be completely inept in disarming the insurgents. The strategic goal of the military planners against the insurgency, should have been the <strong>prompt and devastating defeat </strong>of the insurgents in this city, either by their mass capture or mass annihilation, which would serve as a deadly example to all other insurgents in other hot-bed provinces in Iraq, with the high probability that this would have led to their complete demoralization and surrender, as I had suggested in a previous paper of mine last April, which was sent to the U.S. Embassy in Canberra. (It seems now that the Pentagon is using exactly this strategy, as the capture of Samarra by American and Iraqi forces and the elimination of the insurgents, has shown.) As the outcome of this erratic implementation of the Pentagon&#8217;s military plan, by starting an offensive against the insurgents and then stopping it halfway before achieving its goals, Iraq has now become <strong>&#8220;the crucible of global terror&#8221;, </strong>to quote Tony Blair. This is the glaring fact that all governments who have <strong>committed themselves to fight global terror </strong>are presently confronting.</p>
<p>To turn tail and run now from Iraq would not be merely foolish, it would be the <strong>greatest military error against the war on terror, </strong>as it would deliver a tremendous victory to the terrorists on a global scale. It would reinforce in the minds of the terrorists, as the withdrawal of US forces from Beirut and Mogadishu had done, as a result of the casualties Americans had suffered in these two cities, by presidents Reagan and Clinton respectively, that America and other Western nations lack the resolve to stand-up to them and fight, and will induce them to be even more lethally aggressive against the &#8216;cowardly&#8217; West. Hence the critics and opponents of the war, who blame the Bush administration for exacerbating terrorism in Iraq and call for the US withdrawal from Iraq, are purblind and cannot see that such action would be the greatest error that one could commit against the war on global terror. <strong>It would surpass by a great order of magnitude all the mistakes that the Pentagon committed in Iraq. </strong>If indeed the opponents of the war are right, that the US incursion of the country and the overthrow of Saddam has strengthened and intensified terror in Iraq, then the reasonable course for nations who believe that there is no other alternative but to fight and defeat this global menace, would be for these nations to deploy their armed forces in Iraq and inflict a deadly blow on global terrorism, <strong>by defeating the insurgents decisively. </strong>Or if they are unwilling to spill the blood of their own soldiers, they should at the least support morally and politically the soldiers of the nations, i.e., the American &#8211; led coalition, who are brave enough to sacrifice their own lives in the cause of global security and freedom.</p>
<p>This would be the wise course to follow, to correct the mistakes of the Americans, instead of <strong>aggravating and compounding these mistakes, by running away from Iraq, </strong>and in spite of these errors (in all wars errors are made ), to unflinchingly support America in this historic and deadly confrontation with these medieval barbarians, <strong>whom only America&#8217;s military might can defeat comprehensively, among all other nations in the world. </strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#339966;">THE ENEMY WITHIN</span></p>
<p>But the war against global terror and Muslim fanaticism will not be won, unless the governments who have pledged themselves to fight global terror also deal with and tackle the cunning and deceitful enemy that lies <strong>within their borders. </strong>To carry out this far from easy task, these governments have to realize that they can no longer be tolerant, on the basis of laws of non-discrimination on religious grounds, to the <strong>breeding grounds </strong>of terrorism that entangle, ivy-like, the edifices of Western cities, i.e., the mosques and Islamic schools, of whom a minority of, but highly influential, imams and teachers, preach hate against the mores of Western civilization and of their peoples, inciting young Muslims to enlist in a holy war against the Great Satan, America, and on all other nations that embody the cosmopolitan values of Judeo-Greco-Roman civilization.</p>
<p>The cardinal question therefore is, how to sterilize and make barren the breeding grounds of terrorism that are ensconced in the cities of the West whose deadly offspring are the enemy within. Since the idea of repatriation and resettlement by means of a monetary incentive for millions of Muslims, who have now made their home in Western countries, is no longer feasible &#8211; fathered by that prophet of British politics Enoch Powell, who in his Birmingham &#8220;Rivers of Blood&#8221; speech on April 20 1968, clearly and ominously predicted the deadly conflicts that would arise between Britons and British citizens of colonial background who had settled in England, and who with prescience had opposed the so called <strong>humanitarian immigration policies </strong>of both Labor and Conservative governments &#8211; one has to consider other lines of action. One of them would be the immediate cessation of funding these mosques and schools by governments, unless the former adopt in their curricula a primary undiluted course of <strong>&#8216;no leaks&#8217; assimilation </strong>for their students to the mainstream culture of the nation that they have chosen freely to live in, and put an end to all &#8216;traffickers&#8217; of the <strong>disastrous policy of multiculturalism, </strong>which with mathematical precision divides a nation. Another one would be the swift passing of special, indeed emergency, legislation that would make it easier for the police and for the relevant government officials to jail or deport, radical imams and teachers who propagate, either openly or cunningly and insidiously, a holy war against the West. Furthermore, to attenuate and diminish the high birth rate of Muslim families, governments should introduce a policy of negative incentives, which could stop this high birth rate such as paying to <strong>all families of the nation, </strong>children’s allowances up to the number of four children. Any children born beyond that number would not be entitled to any allowances. Nor would any allowances be paid to children born from a second marriage, whose fathers or mothers already have four children from their previous marriages. This measure would bring the birth rate as close as it is possible to the common standard of Western societies and to the ethos and aspirations of motivated modern nuclear families. It would also stop the &#8216;racketeering&#8217; of phony separations and single motherhoods, whose deliberate purpose is to abuse and defraud the system of family payments, and whose side &#8211; effect is, the perennial continuation of voluntary unemployment among this group of men and women.  </p>
<p>Undoubtedly, these harsh measures will raise a hurricane of protests from Muslim organizations of the diaspora and from Muslim states. This will be followed by a chorus of international lawyers and of the liberal intelligentzia from the well-heeled countries of the West, who will denounce these measures as brutal and heartless to poor families, viciously racist, and chauvinistic, striking a terrible blow to democracy and opening the way to an authoritarian state and even worse. But this soft potpourri of legal and intelligence <strong>gnomes </strong>are unwilling to recognize, and it might be beyond their depth, that the grossly mistaken immigration policies of the nations of the West <strong>are now coming to haunt them with their destruction. </strong>And the only way to prevent this destruction is for the governments of these nations to take tragically severe measures to correct this gross mistake of past governments that <strong>now threatens their peoples with extinction, either by weapons of mass destruction or by the upshot of demographics. </strong></p>
<p><span style="color:#339966;">DEFEAT OF TERROR LIES IN ITS LACK OF SUCCESS </span></p>
<p>One must recognize that the terrorists are <strong>technically educated barbarians, </strong>with PC&#8217;s in one hand and with the <strong>distorted fragments </strong>of the Koran in the other &#8211; who consider it to be the only fountain of knowledge &#8211; lacking the open- mind of a universal education; unread in the great writings and literature of all peoples and of all ages; mentally untouched by their rich Arab culture, literature and philosophy; unread in the great philosophical writings of Al-Farabi, who placed rationality above the revealed truth of the Sharia nor in the equally brilliant writings of Ibn-Sina (Avicenna ) and of Ibn-Rushid (Averroes ), who both placed human reason above religion, and of Omar Khayyam, who never believed in Providence or in any other World but this one, valuing the sensual pleasures of this world as the fill to the brim of life. <strong>Being ignorant of the existence of this great Arab intellectual treasure, that was an essential element of the cornerstone of Western civilization and of the Italian Renaissance, </strong>their minds locked in the fanaticism of fundamentalist Islam and its <strong>death-cult, </strong>they have no respect for any other peoples&#8217; religions except their own. Instead they zealously believe that the followers of all other religions are destined to go to hell and only Muslims will enter the gates of infinite paradise, especially if they are anointed by martyrdom. It is of such stuff that these implacable enemies of Western civilization are made.</p>
<p>Confronting such suicidal fanatics, who fervently believe that the West and its Great Satan, America, are responsible and culpable for all the ills that have befallen upon Muslim countries; determined to destroy this source of evil by chemical, biological and nuclear weapons, as soon as they are in their possession, the political leaders of the West, and especially of America, are deprived of any soft options and are forced to take on the hard option of the &#8220;unsheathed sword&#8221;.</p>
<p>The art of diplomacy, the laudable deliberations of the United Nations for peace making, which could be effective when one deals with a rational foe, are totally ineffective when one confronts an irrational enemy, whose only &#8216;rational&#8217; communication, in his hearing, is with God. That is why the academics who teach their students the &#8216;management&#8217; of terrorism by a diplomatic demarche as the only rational way to counter and thwart it, rather than war, which is so costly in human and economic terms and without making certain its defeat, are not only starry-eyed, but also debar themselves from the disciplines of politics and of war strategy. Management presupposes and involves <strong>rational processes, </strong>which to the terrorists is <em>terra incognita, </em>and therefore with <strong>algorithmic precision is bound to fail.</strong></p>
<p>But wherein lies the answer to this conundrum of how to defeat global terror and its state sponsors? History&#8217;s edict provides the clear and indefeasible answer to this intricate issue. When a nation fights a swarm of religious fanatics, depriving these fanatics of the ability to launch successful operations against their enemies is the most effective way to defeat them, as the terrorists, being no longer successful in their attacks against the West and in their attacks against the American-led coalition in Iraq, will find the &#8220;mouse of doubt&#8221; implanted in their hearts (a doubt whose epiphany will reveal to them, that after all they might <em>not </em>be in God&#8217;s favor) <strong>gnawing, slowly but surely, at their belief that they are the instruments of Allah. </strong>This, in itself, will compel them to abandon their cause.</p>
<p>This is why the successful outcome of the war in Iraq for the U.S. &#8211; led coalition and the introduction of democracy to its ravaged people, is of such vital importance. The decisive defeat of the terrorist insurgents will unfold a dawn of a bright future for the people of Iraq, and also commence the beginning of the quick end of global terror.</p>
<p><em>What is your opinion&#8230;</em></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[She Had Some Horses by Joy Harjo]]></title>
<link>http://littleredelf.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/she-had-some-horses-by-joy-harjo/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>littleREDelf</dc:creator>
<guid>http://littleredelf.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/she-had-some-horses-by-joy-harjo/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[She Had Some Horses She had some horses. She had horses who were bodies of sand. She had horses who ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><h2><a title="She Had Some Horses poetry by Joy Harjo" href="http://www.amazon.com/She-Had-Some-Horses-Poems/dp/039333421X/" target="_blank"><img title="She Had Some Horses by Joy Harjo" src="http://littleredelf.com/elfspeak/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/joyharjo2.jpg" alt="She Had Some Horses by Joy Harjo" width="347" height="350" /></a></h2>
<h3><span style="color:#ff0000;">She Had Some Horses</span></h3>
<p>She had some horses.</p>
<p>She had horses who were bodies of sand.<br />
She had horses who were maps drawn of blood.<br />
She had horses who were skins of ocean water.<br />
She had horses who were the blue air of sky.<br />
She had horses who were fur and teeth.<br />
She had horses who were clay and would break.<br />
She had horses who were splintered red cliff.</p>
<p>She had some horses.</p>
<p>She had horses with long, pointed breasts.<br />
She had horses with full, brown thighs.<br />
She had horses who laughed too much.<br />
She had horses who threw rocks at glass houses.<br />
She had horses who licked razor blades.</p>
<p>She had some horses.</p>
<p>She had horses who danced in their mothers&#8217; arms.<br />
She had horses who thought they were the sun and their bodies shone and burned like stars.<br />
She had horses who waltzed nightly on the moon.<br />
She had horses who were much too shy, and kept quiet in stalls of their own making.</p>
<p>She had some horses.</p>
<p>She had horses who liked Creek Stomp Dance songs.<br />
She had horses who cried in their beer.<br />
She had horses who spit at male queens who made them afraid of themselves.<br />
She had horses who said they weren&#8217;t afraid.<br />
She had horses who lied.<br />
She had horses who told the truth, who were stripped bare of their tongues.</p>
<p>She had some horses.</p>
<p>She had horses who called themselves, &#8220;horse.&#8221;<br />
She had horses who called themselves, &#8220;spirit.&#8221; and kept their voices secret and to themselves.<br />
She had horses who had no names.<br />
She had horses who had books of names.</p>
<p>She had some horses.</p>
<p>She had horses who whispered in the dark, who were afraid to speak.<br />
She had horses who screamed out of fear of the silence, who carried knives to protect themselves from ghosts.<br />
She had horses who waited for destruction.<br />
She had horses who waited for resurrection.</p>
<p>She had some horses.</p>
<p>She had horses who got down on their knees for any savior.<br />
She had horses who thought their high price had saved them.<br />
She had horses who tried to save her, who climbed in her bed at night and prayed as they raped her.</p>
<p>She had some horses.</p>
<p>She had some horses she loved.<br />
She had some horses she hated.</p>
<p>These were the same horses.</p>
<p>~<strong> <em>Joy Harjo</em></strong></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Fig in Leaf]]></title>
<link>http://frmarkdwhite.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/fig-in-leaf/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>frmarkdwhite</dc:creator>
<guid>http://frmarkdwhite.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/fig-in-leaf/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Just before the Lord Jesus embraced His bitter Passion, He sat on the Mount of Olives with His disci]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-6459" title="fig bud" src="http://frmarkdwhite.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/fig-bud.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="141" />Just before the Lord Jesus embraced His bitter Passion, He sat on the Mount of Olives with His disciples and outlined the signs of the end of the world. Almost everything He said was utterly terrifying.</p>
<p>From where the Lord and the disciples were sitting, they could see the enormous Temple built by King Herod the Great.</p>
<p>&#8220;There will not be left one stone upon another that will not be thrown down,&#8221; Christ said.</p>
<p>And it got worse:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Nation will rise against nation, kingdom against kingdom. There will be earthquakes, famines&#8230;&#8221; &#8220;You will be beaten in synagogues&#8230;&#8221; &#8220;Brother will hand over brother to death&#8230;&#8221; &#8220;There will be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people.&#8221; &#8220;The sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will be falling from the sky, and the powers in the heavens will be shaken.&#8221; &#8220;Unless the Lord had shortened the days, no living creature could be saved.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>(see <a href="http://www.usccb.org/nab/bible/matthew/matthew24.htm">Matthew 24</a>, <a href="http://www.usccb.org/nab/bible/mark/mark13.htm">Mark 13</a>, <a href="http://www.usccb.org/nab/bible/luke/luke21.htm">Luke 21</a>)</p>
<p>It was a stunning, confusing discourse&#8211;more full of hellfire and brimstone than anything you have ever heard.</p>
<p>But then He concluded with a parable:</p>
<blockquote><p>Consider the fig tree&#8230;When the buds burst open, you see for yourselves and know that summer is now near.</p></blockquote>
<p>Consider the fig tree, budding. Consider the gentle warm air of the spring. Consider the prospect of a delicious fig, and of the shade under the tree.</p>
<p><img src="http://frmarkdwhite.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/fignewton.jpg" alt="" title="fignewton" width="140" height="114" class="alignright size-full wp-image-6467" />So:</p>
<p>Fear the doom. Death and judgment are terrifying prospects. The Temple <em>was</em> in fact completely demolished. Strife and strain await.</p>
<p>But only fear so much as you can while you are meditating on the bud of a fig tree, and imagining the air of spring, and savoring the prospect of a juicy Fig Newton.</p>
<div id="attachment_6460" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 460px"><img src="http://frmarkdwhite.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/poussin-destruction-temple.jpg" alt="" title="poussin destruction temple" width="450" height="328" class="size-full wp-image-6460" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem by Nicholas Pouissin</p></div>
<p>P.S.  <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/sport/tennis/del-potro-shocks-federer-yet-again-20091127-jwy9.html">Delpo rocked Federer again!</a></p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6456" title="frank earnest" src="http://frmarkdwhite.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/frank-earnest.gif" alt="" width="450" height="135" /></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Professional and Secure Data Destruction Services]]></title>
<link>http://antivirus2010.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/professional-and-secure-data-destruction-services/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ninjarich001</dc:creator>
<guid>http://antivirus2010.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/professional-and-secure-data-destruction-services/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[To give data thieves one litter, it is necessary to safely remove all data. For the complete destruc]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p> To give data thieves one litter, it is necessary to safely remove all data. For the complete destruction of sensitive information, you have to really be careful. In times when you remove the data erasure programs, we are not careful, and you provide the necessary information. To overcome this situation forward, until you either take the backup of important documents can or you can hire a professional secure data destruction services company. </p>
<p> There are many companies around theThe world offer &#34;data destruction services. They have the know-how for the clarification of the financial data of the company. This includes audit reports, budgets, receipts and payments, contract notes and much more. In the same capacity, the experience in the deletion of personal data that the security of your password, contact information includes, bank accounts, etc. also. For the summary to the requirements of different industries, they offer customized solutions. </p>
<p> For the safe destruction of data, theyuse a secure method of creation and destruction of sensitive files, documents, spreadsheets. They can easily verify that the data are cross has been canceled or not using, and then again. They do not compromise on its role and see that no information be deleted according to the customer. This sometimes legal, financial and sensitive information that may affect the business in long-term or result in breach of confidence. </p>
<p> If you are a professional and secure data destructionEnter company check their credentials. There are many competent services of businesses but few are well acquainted with the nuances of data destruction. If your data is an unreliable company, then there are higher chances of information is not secure or removed problem for which you must pay in future earnings </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Homosexuality and Religion.]]></title>
<link>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/homosexuality-and-religion/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>braidzy</dc:creator>
<guid>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/homosexuality-and-religion/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The debate still flares with such passion in a modern context, in regards to homosexuality coincidin]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><a href="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/ethereal1.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-6" title="Ethereal" src="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/ethereal1.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="250" height="196" /></a></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:x-small;"> </span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:x-small;"></span></div>
<p><span style="font-size:x-small;"></p>
<div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><em>The debate still flares with such passion in a modern context, in regards to homosexuality coinciding with religion. Love being the main underlying factor of both of these attributes of humanity creates a tension between the two.</em></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><em>From a Catholic perspective the church condemns the act of homosexuality, that is the act of sexual relations between a man and another man, or a woman and indeed another woman. The church however does not condemn same-sex attraction or personal desires so long as they are contained to within the person. For most this is completely outrageous, as they should be able to express their sexuality in a way in which they feel comfortable and safe. But before one can place the blame entirely upon the church one must understand that the church also condemns sexual practices for mere pleasure (therefore the banning of contraception). It is stated that every act of sex should be open to the creation of a human being, which is the church’s main defence when dealing with matters of homosexuality.</em></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><a href="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/ethereal1.jpg"><em> </em></a></span></div>
<p><span style="font-size:x-small;"><a href="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/ethereal.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/ethereal.jpg"></a>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p></span></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Catholicism. ]]></title>
<link>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/catholicism/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>braidzy</dc:creator>
<guid>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/catholicism/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[There is no doubt, in a Catholic belief system homosexuality is intrinsically &#8220;wrong.&#8221; H]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><span style="font-size:x-small;">There is no doubt, in a Catholic belief system homosexuality is intrinsically &#8220;wrong.&#8221; However, there is a <strong>direct lack of evidence why</strong>. It is almost as though if questioned, a believer would merely say (in a more eloquent manner) <em>&#8220;because God said so.&#8221;</em> If as human beings we were to believe and worship everything with more power than ourselves then where would I society be headed? Would there be any scientific development? <strong>Would there be any progression of humanity?</strong>This other <strong>terribly discriminatory</strong> ideology that homosexual relationships have the capacity to devalue or in effect hinder a heterosexual relationship is completely <strong><em>illogical</em>. </strong><em>How can a relationship that you have no knowledge of, destroy your relationship?</em> In regards to homosexual marriage, American comedian Wanda Sykes puts it into a humorous colloquialism, &#8220;If you don’t believe in same-sex marriage, then don&#8217;t marry somebody of the same-sex.&#8221; Marriage is another topic that is too lengthy to delve into right now, however, people argue that the sanctity of marriage must be protected at all costs. However, marriage existed before religion,<strong> <em>before</em> Christianity, before Islam, before Judaism. In fact many of modern church practices (the use of candles, incense, etc.) were derived from the more ritualistic services of paganism. </strong>The Church&#8217;s view on homosexuality is clear and concise. Clarity is usually beneficial in most situations. But the passion at which the Church argues that these acts of homosexuality are <strong>&#8220;wrong&#8221;</strong> has a direct <strong>relationship</strong> to the amount of discrimination that exists in the wider society. One might even go so far as to argue that it could be the one of the underlying factors in the higher rate of suicide in gay teens. It an absolutely appalling statistic that approximately<em> <strong>30% of GLBT youths will attempt suicide.</strong></em> The Church is also used as a justification for violent and discriminatory acts. Matthew Shepherd’s death is a tragic example of the extent to which fear and text can motivate someone. Imagine if it were you, tied to a fence post, beaten to a bloody pulp and left to die. Why? Merely because of the colour of your skin, the type of men you found attractive, your religion, your political beliefs, the way in which you desired to express your sexuality and who you were as a person.<br />
<a href="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/dark_church_by_loveinelevator.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-10" title="dark_church_by_loveinelevator" src="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/dark_church_by_loveinelevator.jpg?w=1024" alt="" width="423" height="279" /></a><br />
<em><strong>This cycle of discrimination has to be stagnated. If not for the safety of the GLBT community, but so that we can function and develop as a species. The Church had made its stance loud and clear, but there must be logical and rational Christians and Catholics that see the flaw and larger consequences that this stance creates, not only for homosexuals, but for the wider human society.</strong></em>&#8220;Homosexuality is a lifestyle <em>choice.&#8221; -<strong>Wrong</strong>. Homosexuality is <strong>not a choice of lifestyle</strong>, but more of a part of a <em>person perceives himself or herself to be</em>. Modern psychology states that homosexuality is <em>at least 30-70% genetic</em>, therefore it can&#8217;t simply be argued that a man or woman wakes up one morning and decides that from this point in their lives that they will be homosexual. This is not to be confused with a period of discovery that many homosexuals undertake, but as Erikson defined in his stages of psychological development that all teens undergo this stage when they are attempting to find themselves and who they are as a person. The <strong>detrimental</strong> influence of society also creates this <strong>fear</strong> amongst many of today&#8217;s youth that instills into them a <strong><em>fear of being themselves</em>.</strong> Not only around their peers, but also with family and even by themselves. Hiding from one self may also lead to many psychological problems in latter life.<a href="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/dark_church_by_loveinelevator.jpg"></a>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p></em></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stagnation..]]></title>
<link>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/stagnation-2/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>braidzy</dc:creator>
<guid>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/stagnation-2/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The cycle of discrimination has to be stagnated. If not for the safety of the GLBT community, but so]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><strong><em><span style="font-size:x-small;">The cycle of discrimination has to be stagnated. </span></em></strong><span style="font-size:x-small;">If not for the safety of the GLBT community, but so that we can function and <strong>develop</strong> as a species. The Church had made it&#8217;s stance loud and clear, <em>but there must be logical and rational Christians and Catholics that see the flaw and larger consequences that this stance creates, not only for homosexuals, but for the wider human society.</em></span></span></div>
<p><span style="font-size:x-small;"></p>
<div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><em>To bring up a thoroughly visited topic, I thought I might point out that I didn&#8217;t use any biblical quotes or references regarding my discussion on homosexuality.</em></span></span></span></div>
<p><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><em>One of my intellectual and quizzically inclined readers pointed out some interesting biblical quotes regarding the church&#8217;s stance on homosexuality.</em></p>
<p><em>Let us begin:<br />
<strong>Genesis 19:5-8</strong>-&#8221;Calling to Lot they said, &#8216;Where are the men who came to you tonight? Send them out to us so that we may abuse them.&#8217;<br />
Lot came out to them at the door, and having closed the door behind him said, &#8216;I beg you, brothers, do no such wicked thing. Listen, I have two daughters who are virgins. I am ready to send them out to you, to treat as it pleases you. But as for the men, do nothing to them, for they have come under the shadow of my roof.&#8217;&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em>To place this in context the quote was articulated to be within the town of Sodom, and the two &#8220;men&#8221;? Well they were said to be angels of God. The ideologies contained within in the quote are not direct and clear. To begin the quote itself does <strong>not</strong> exclusively denote the act of homosexuality. But also in addition to this it does <strong>not </strong>even state that the abuse of the two angels was intended to be sexual. Regardless of the implications, even if this was intended to be sexual abuse, then would this simply mean that &#8220;Yahweh&#8221; as described in Genesis was condemning Rape, Sexual Abuse and Nonconsentual Sex? Rather than jumping to the discriminatory conclusion of homosexuality? Angels were beings completely void of sexual sin; meaning that even if women intended the same actions it could be stated that this would be &#8220;wicked&#8221; in the context as well.</em></p>
<p><em>The simple fact of the matter is, that Sodom was not an exclusively homosexually inclined town, but a cacophony of sinning did occur. Rape, murder, incest, bestiality were all the norms of this province, meaning that one cannot simply jump to the simplest conclusion to merely justify their own beliefs.</em></p>
<p><span style="font-size:x-small;">
<p>&#160;</p>
<p></span></p>
<p></span></span></span></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Primal Instinct?]]></title>
<link>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/primal-instinct/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>braidzy</dc:creator>
<guid>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/primal-instinct/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Jude 7-&#8220;The fornication of Sodom and Gomorrah and the other nearby towns was equally unnatural]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;">Jude 7</span></span><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;">-<em>&#8220;The fornication of Sodom and Gomorrah and the other nearby towns was equally unnatural, and it is a warning to us that they are paying for their crimes in eternal fire.&#8221; </em></span></span><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;">I&#8217;ll try to stay as simplistic in regards to this quote. It has been scientifically proven that there is direct evidence of gay animal behaviour. In fact homosexuality has been observed in over 1500 species in nature, for a full details please see the live science Website, regarding the <em>Homosexuality of Animals.</em><br />
This thereby proving that this type of sexual practice is not in any way shape or form unnatural. Regarding punishment and eternal fire, philosophers have argued for centuries over life after death and possible implications of our earthy actions, one cannot simply answer that there is a definite heaven and hell, nor a lack of existence.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p></span></span></p>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Biblical Quotations.]]></title>
<link>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/biblical-quotations/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>braidzy</dc:creator>
<guid>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/biblical-quotations/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Leviticus 18:22-23-&#8221;You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abominat]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><em>Leviticus 18:22-23</em><em>-&#8221;You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination.<br />
Also you shall not have intercourse with any animal to be defiled with it, nor shall any woman stand before an animal to mate with it; it is a perversion.&#8221;<br />
Leviticus 20:13- &#8220;And if a man lie with mankind, as with womankind, both of them have committed abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.&#8221;<br />
Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13 are quite direct and exact. The simple question is why is man lying with another man abomination? Or would it be enough to argue that the mere fact that &#8220;God&#8221; interpreted through a cryptic prophet has stated so that this is true. The death penalty for sexuality is also illegal (in western civilisation) in a contemporary context meaning this is in no way applicable.<br />
What is abomination?<br />
Abomination-&#8221;The Biblical words usually translated abomination do not always convey the same sense of moral exceptionalism as the English term does today, as it often may signify that which is forbidden or unclean according to the religion.<br />
To put this into a colloquialism, &#8220;acting on natural homosexual desires is wrong because a deity stated that it was wrong.&#8221;<br />
Regarding bestiality, personally I have entire moral objection to any sexual act encapsulates an animal and human. But the matter is that humans are animals, in fact we are separated from chimpanzees by a tiny 1.2-% of our genetics. This is NOT to say, that bestiality is correct, but merely to prove the way in which the quote was written is not exact and one cannot expect people to blindly follow an ideology, especially when we have the scientific resources that humanity has at it&#8217;s disposal in a modern context. The issue has also been raised, why it is apt for myself to postulate that a man may indeed, love another man, woman and woman, but not a human and animal. But then I would merely state that an animal has no capacity to state its desires. No form of communication to articulate its innermost thoughts. Therefore it would be wrong to love, lay or anything in between with a being that has no choice in the matter. People also postulate that animals lack the capacity to love in the same manner as humanity. Sex in the contexts of animals, is for the sole purposes of reproduction. Whilst animals portray facets of a maternal love, this is not the love of which I speak. The love that transcends, body and flesh, love between two consenting adults, a love that sets the heart of both beings into an uncontrollable fire. <a href="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/love-wallpaper1.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-34" title="love-wallpaper" src="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/love-wallpaper1.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a><br />
NB: Love between two consenting adults might also be viewed as incestuous, which I am also opposed. However, my logical justification for this, is that the love that a brother, sister, father, mother may experience for their relatives is again, a maternal love. Not a passionate fire, it is a love that is philanthropic, not sexual. The reason that these forms of sexual encounters have a logical immorality attached to them, is that, genetically the bodies are rather similar. It would almost be as loving one self, which is again a different kind of love. In addition to the various physiological diseases that can be created through the doubling up of genes – <strong>What kind of intrinsic, morally just love would go on to harm another living being?</strong></em><strong> </strong></span></span></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Progressive Change]]></title>
<link>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/72/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>braidzy</dc:creator>
<guid>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/72/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[1 Corinthians 6:9-&#8221;Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><em>1 Corinthians 6:9-&#8221;Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not <a href="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/human-rights-poster33.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-60" title="human-rights-poster3" src="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/human-rights-poster33.jpg" alt="" width="251" height="400" /></a>be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.&#8221;</em></span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><em>The reference has massive contemporary implications. This quote can’t be applied to a contemporary society context as, the standard to which this ancient society held each other has changed enormously regarding the standard today. What might be considered greed back then may simply be common practice today. This other term, homosexual offenders, can be interpreted in a numerous number of ways, it might simply be those who are violently sexual + homosexual, one may even go so far as to say that a homosexual offender is a being that offends a person of the homosexual persuasion, personally I find it difficult to comprehend people devising their morals from a text published over 2000 years from now, as how could it possibly have any application to a modern society? Romans 1:26-27- &#8220;For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust t one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense [sic] of their error which was meet.&#8221;</em></span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><em>I would merely use the words of another in a situation like this, regarding the Romans passage, there are many view points, two being:<br />
J. Nelson: &#8220;Paul didn&#8217;t write it as a condemnation of homosexuality, but as a criticism of Greek beahaviour in temple worship. Greeks often incorporated sexual behaviour in temple worship.&#8221;<br />
D. Bartlett:  &#8220;This is the tough one. I think one doesn&#8217;t get around this. It&#8217;s the only place in the New Testament where there&#8217;s any extensive discussion of homosexual relations. In Romas, there&#8217;s no question that Paul thinks certain kinds of homosexual beahaviour are a result of the idolatry of the pagan world.&#8221;</em></span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><em>The Archbishop of Cantebury: &#8211; &#8220;Many current ways of reading miss the actual direction of the passage. Paul is making a primary point not about homosexuality but about the delusions of the supposedly law-abiding. [These lines are] for the majority of modern readers the most important single text in Scripture on the subject of homosexuality.<br />
Put in a more simplistic way, it could be said that these passages are often misconceived to give a detrimental view on homosexualirt. Even if this were the intended case, it does not have a substantiating practical application to the wider society and is there by interesting to examine for the purposes of history, but <strong>useless. </strong>It has merely been interpreted by humanity giving a discriminatory yet cryptic impression of that which we refer to as God.</em></span></span></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stagnation.]]></title>
<link>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/stagnation/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>braidzy</dc:creator>
<guid>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/stagnation/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The Church&#8217;s view on homosexuality is clear and concise. Clarity is usually beneficial in most]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div><span style="font-size:x-small;">The Church&#8217;s view on homosexuality is clear and concise. Clarity is usually beneficial in most situations. But the passion at which the Church argues that these acts of homosexuality are <strong>&#8220;wrong&#8221;</strong> has a direct <strong>relationship</strong> to the <em>amount of discrimination that exists in the wider society</em>. One might even go so far as to argue that it could be the one of the <em>underlying factors in the higher rate of suicide in gay teens</em>. It an absolutely appalling statistic that approximately </span></div>
<div><strong><em>30% of GLBT youths will attempt suicide</em>. The Church is also used as a justification for violent and discriminatory acts. <em>Matthew Shepherd’s</em> death is a tragic example of the extent to which fear and text can motivate someone. Imagine if it were you, tied to a fence post, beaten to a bloody pulp and left to die. Why? Merely because of the colour of your skin, the type of men you found attractive, your religion, your political beliefs, the way in which you desired to express your sexuality and who you were as a person.</strong></div>
<div><strong><strong><em>This cycle of discrimination has to be stagnated</em>. If not for the safety of the GLBT community, but so that we can function and <strong>develop</strong> as a species. The Church had made it&#8217;s stance loud and clear, <em>but there must be logical and rational Christians and Catholics that see the flaw and larger consequences that this stance creates, not only for homosexuals, but for the wider human society.</em><br />
</strong></strong></div>
<p><strong>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p></strong></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Progression of Society]]></title>
<link>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/36/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>braidzy</dc:creator>
<guid>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/36/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[1 Corinthians 6:9-&#8221;Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><em>1 Corinthians 6:9-&#8221;Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not <a href="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/human-rights-poster33.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-60" title="human-rights-poster3" src="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/human-rights-poster33.jpg" alt="" width="251" height="400" /></a>be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.&#8221;</em></span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><em>The reference has massive contemporary implications. This quote can’t be applied to a contemporary society context as, the standard to which this ancient society held each other has changed enormously regarding the standard today. What might be considered greed back then may simply be common practice today. This other term, homosexual offenders, can be interpreted in a numerous number of ways, it might simply be those who are violently sexual + homosexual, one may even go so far as to say that a homosexual offender is a being that offends a person of the homosexual persuasion, personally I find it difficult to comprehend people devising their morals from a text published over 2000 years from now, as how could it possibly have any application to a modern society? Romans 1:26-27- &#8220;For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust t one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense [sic] of their error which was meet.&#8221;</em></span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><em>I would merely use the words of another in a situation like this, regarding the Romans passage, there are many view points, two being:<br />
J. Nelson: &#8220;Paul didn&#8217;t write it as a condemnation of homosexuality, but as a criticism of Greek beahaviour in temple worship. Greeks often incorporated sexual behaviour in temple worship.&#8221;<br />
D. Bartlett:  &#8220;This is the tough one. I think one doesn&#8217;t get around this. It&#8217;s the only place in the New Testament where there&#8217;s any extensive discussion of homosexual relations. In Romas, there&#8217;s no question that Paul thinks certain kinds of homosexual beahaviour are a result of the idolatry of the pagan world.&#8221;</em></span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><em>The Archbishop of Cantebury: &#8211; &#8220;Many current ways of reading miss the actual direction of the passage. Paul is making a primary point not about homosexuality but about the delusions of the supposedly law-abiding. [These lines are] for the majority of modern readers the most important single text in Scripture on the subject of homosexuality.<br />
Put in a more simplistic way, it could be said that these passages are often misconceived to give a detrimental view on homosexualirt. Even if this were the intended case, it does not have a substantiating practical application to the wider society and is there by interesting to examine for the purposes of history, but <strong>useless. </strong>It has merely been interpreted by humanity giving a discriminatory yet cryptic impression of that which we refer to as God.</em></span></span></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Biblicality Deconstructed]]></title>
<link>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/30/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>braidzy</dc:creator>
<guid>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/30/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Leviticus 18:22-23-&#8221;You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abominat]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><em>Leviticus 18:22-23</em><em>-&#8221;You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination.<br />
Also you shall not have intercourse with any animal to be defiled with it, nor shall any woman stand before an animal to mate with it; it is a perversion.&#8221;<br />
Leviticus 20:13- &#8220;And if a man lie with mankind, as with womankind, both of them have committed abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.&#8221;<br />
Leviticus 18:22 and Leviticus 20:13 are quite direct and exact. The simple question is why is man lying with another man abomination? Or would it be enough to argue that the mere fact that &#8220;God&#8221; interpreted through a cryptic prophet has stated so that this is true. The death penalty for sexuality is also illegal (in western civilisation) in a contemporary context meaning this is in no way applicable.<br />
What is abomination?<br />
Abomination-&#8221;The Biblical words usually translated abomination do not always convey the same sense of moral exceptionalism as the English term does today, as it often may signify that which is forbidden or unclean according to the religion.<br />
To put this into a colloquialism, &#8220;acting on natural homosexual desires is wrong because a deity stated that it was wrong.&#8221;<br />
Regarding bestiality, personally I have entire moral objection to any sexual act encapsulates an animal and human. But the matter is that humans are animals, in fact we are separated from chimpanzees by a tiny 1.2-% of our genetics. This is NOT to say, that bestiality is correct, but merely to prove the way in which the quote was written is not exact and one cannot expect people to blindly follow an ideology, especially when we have the scientific resources that humanity has at it&#8217;s disposal in a modern context. The issue has also been raised, why it is apt for myself to postulate that a man may indeed, love another man, woman and woman, but not a human and animal. But then I would merely state that an animal has no capacity to state its desires. No form of communication to articulate its innermost thoughts. Therefore it would be wrong to love, lay or anything in between with a being that has no choice in the matter. People also postulate that animals lack the capacity to love in the same manner as humanity. Sex in the contexts of animals, is for the sole purposes of reproduction. Whilst animals portray facets of a maternal love, this is not the love of which I speak. The love that transcends, body and flesh, love between two consenting adults, a love that sets the heart of both beings into an uncontrollable fire. <a href="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/love-wallpaper1.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-34" title="love-wallpaper" src="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/love-wallpaper1.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a><br />
NB: Love between two consenting adults might also be viewed as incestuous, which I am also opposed. However, my logical justification for this, is that the love that a brother, sister, father, mother may experience for their relatives is again, a maternal love. Not a passionate fire, it is a love that is philanthropic, not sexual. The reason that these forms of sexual encounters have a logical immorality attached to them, is that, genetically the bodies are rather similar. It would almost be as loving one self, which is again a different kind of love. In addition to the various physiological diseases that can be created through the doubling up of genes – <strong>What kind of intrinsic, morally just love would go on to harm another living being?</strong></em><strong> </strong></span></span></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Biblical Quotes. ]]></title>
<link>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/biblical-quotes/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>braidzy</dc:creator>
<guid>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/biblical-quotes/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Jude 7-&#8220;The fornication of Sodom and Gomorrah and the other nearby towns was equally unnatural]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;">Jude 7</span></span><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;">-<em>&#8220;The fornication of Sodom and Gomorrah and the other nearby towns was equally unnatural, and it is a warning to us that they are paying for their crimes in eternal fire.&#8221; </em></span></span><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;">I&#8217;ll try to stay as simplistic in regards to this quote. It has been scientifically proven that there is direct evidence of gay animal behaviour. In fact homosexuality has been observed in over 1500 species in nature, for a full details please see the live science Website, regarding the <em>Homosexuality of Animals.</em><br />
This thereby proving that this type of sexual practice is not in any way shape or form unnatural. Regarding punishment and eternal fire, philosophers have argued for centuries over life after death and possible implications of our earthy actions, one cannot simply answer that there is a definite heaven and hell, nor a lack of existence.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p></span></span></p>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Biblical Evidence]]></title>
<link>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/biblical-evidence/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>braidzy</dc:creator>
<guid>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/biblical-evidence/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The cycle of discrimination has to be stagnated. If not for the safety of the GLBT community, but so]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><strong><em><span style="font-size:x-small;">The cycle of discrimination has to be stagnated. </span></em></strong><span style="font-size:x-small;">If not for the safety of the GLBT community, but so that we can function and <strong>develop</strong> as a species. The Church had made it&#8217;s stance loud and clear, <em>but there must be logical and rational Christians and Catholics that see the flaw and larger consequences that this stance creates, not only for homosexuals, but for the wider human society.</em></span></span></div>
<p><span style="font-size:x-small;"></p>
<div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><em>To bring up a thoroughly visited topic, I thought I might point out that I didn&#8217;t use any biblical quotes or references regarding my discussion on homosexuality.</em></span></span></span></div>
<p><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><span style="font-size:x-small;"><em>One of my intellectual and quizzically inclined readers pointed out some interesting biblical quotes regarding the church&#8217;s stance on homosexuality.</em></p>
<p><em>Let us begin:<br />
<strong>Genesis 19:5-8</strong>-&#8221;Calling to Lot they said, &#8216;Where are the men who came to you tonight? Send them out to us so that we may abuse them.&#8217;<br />
Lot came out to them at the door, and having closed the door behind him said, &#8216;I beg you, brothers, do no such wicked thing. Listen, I have two daughters who are virgins. I am ready to send them out to you, to treat as it pleases you. But as for the men, do nothing to them, for they have come under the shadow of my roof.&#8217;&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em>To place this in context the quote was articulated to be within the town of Sodom, and the two &#8220;men&#8221;? Well they were said to be angels of God. The ideologies contained within in the quote are not direct and clear. To begin the quote itself does <strong>not</strong> exclusively denote the act of homosexuality. But also in addition to this it does <strong>not </strong>even state that the abuse of the two angels was intended to be sexual. Regardless of the implications, even if this was intended to be sexual abuse, then would this simply mean that &#8220;Yahweh&#8221; as described in Genesis was condemning Rape, Sexual Abuse and Nonconsentual Sex? Rather than jumping to the discriminatory conclusion of homosexuality? Angels were beings completely void of sexual sin; meaning that even if women intended the same actions it could be stated that this would be &#8220;wicked&#8221; in the context as well.</em></p>
<p><em>The simple fact of the matter is, that Sodom was not an exclusively homosexually inclined town, but a cacophony of sinning did occur. Rape, murder, incest, bestiality were all the norms of this province, meaning that one cannot simply jump to the simplest conclusion to merely justify their own beliefs.</em></p>
<p><span style="font-size:x-small;">
<p>&#160;</p>
<p></span></p>
<p></span></span></span></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ideologies.]]></title>
<link>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/ideologies/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>braidzy</dc:creator>
<guid>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/ideologies/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[There is no doubt, in a Catholic belief system homosexuality is intrinsically &#8220;wrong.&#8221; H]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><span style="font-size:x-small;">There is no doubt, in a Catholic belief system homosexuality is intrinsically &#8220;wrong.&#8221; However, there is a <strong>direct lack of evidence why</strong>. It is almost as though if questioned, a believer would merely say (in a more eloquent manner) <em>&#8220;because God said so.&#8221;</em> If as human beings we were to believe and worship everything with more power than ourselves then where would I society be headed? Would there be any scientific development? <strong>Would there be any progression of humanity?</strong>This other <strong>terribly discriminatory</strong> ideology that homosexual relationships have the capacity to devalue or in effect hinder a heterosexual relationship is completely <strong><em>illogical</em>. </strong><em>How can a relationship that you have no knowledge of, destroy your relationship?</em> In regards to homosexual marriage, American comedian Wanda Sykes puts it into a humorous colloquialism, &#8220;If you don’t believe in same-sex marriage, then don&#8217;t marry somebody of the same-sex.&#8221; Marriage is another topic that is too lengthy to delve into right now, however, people argue that the sanctity of marriage must be protected at all costs. However, marriage existed before religion,<strong> <em>before</em> Christianity, before Islam, before Judaism. In fact many of modern church practices (the use of candles, incense, etc.) were derived from the more ritualistic services of paganism. </strong>The Church&#8217;s view on homosexuality is clear and concise. Clarity is usually beneficial in most situations. But the passion at which the Church argues that these acts of homosexuality are <strong>&#8220;wrong&#8221;</strong> has a direct <strong>relationship</strong> to the amount of discrimination that exists in the wider society. One might even go so far as to argue that it could be the one of the underlying factors in the higher rate of suicide in gay teens. It an absolutely appalling statistic that approximately<em> <strong>30% of GLBT youths will attempt suicide.</strong></em> The Church is also used as a justification for violent and discriminatory acts. Matthew Shepherd’s death is a tragic example of the extent to which fear and text can motivate someone. Imagine if it were you, tied to a fence post, beaten to a bloody pulp and left to die. Why? Merely because of the colour of your skin, the type of men you found attractive, your religion, your political beliefs, the way in which you desired to express your sexuality and who you were as a person.<br />
<a href="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/dark_church_by_loveinelevator.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-10" title="dark_church_by_loveinelevator" src="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/dark_church_by_loveinelevator.jpg?w=1024" alt="" width="423" height="279" /></a><br />
<em><strong>This cycle of discrimination has to be stagnated. If not for the safety of the GLBT community, but so that we can function and develop as a species. The Church had made its stance loud and clear, but there must be logical and rational Christians and Catholics that see the flaw and larger consequences that this stance creates, not only for homosexuals, but for the wider human society.</strong></em>&#8220;Homosexuality is a lifestyle <em>choice.&#8221; -<strong>Wrong</strong>. Homosexuality is <strong>not a choice of lifestyle</strong>, but more of a part of a <em>person perceives himself or herself to be</em>. Modern psychology states that homosexuality is <em>at least 30-70% genetic</em>, therefore it can&#8217;t simply be argued that a man or woman wakes up one morning and decides that from this point in their lives that they will be homosexual. This is not to be confused with a period of discovery that many homosexuals undertake, but as Erikson defined in his stages of psychological development that all teens undergo this stage when they are attempting to find themselves and who they are as a person. The <strong>detrimental</strong> influence of society also creates this <strong>fear</strong> amongst many of today&#8217;s youth that instills into them a <strong><em>fear of being themselves</em>.</strong> Not only around their peers, but also with family and even by themselves. Hiding from one self may also lead to many psychological problems in latter life.<a href="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/dark_church_by_loveinelevator.jpg"></a> 
<p>&#160;</p>
<p></em></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Debate.]]></title>
<link>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/debate/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>braidzy</dc:creator>
<guid>http://braidzy.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/debate/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The debate still flares with such passion in a modern context, in regards to homosexuality coincidin]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><a href="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/ethereal1.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-6" title="Ethereal" src="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/ethereal1.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="250" height="196" /></a></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:x-small;"></span></div>
<p><span style="font-size:x-small;"></p>
<div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><em>The debate still flares with such passion in a modern context, in regards to homosexuality coinciding with religion. Love being the main underlying factor of both of these attributes of humanity creates a tension between the two.</em></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size:x-small;"><em>From a Catholic perspective the church condemns the act of homosexuality, that is the act of sexual relations between a man and another man, or a woman and indeed another woman. The church however does not condemn same-sex attraction or personal desires so long as they are contained to within the person. For most this is completely outrageous, as they should be able to express their sexuality in a way in which they feel comfortable and safe. But before one can place the blame entirely upon the church one must understand that the church also condemns sexual practices for mere pleasure (therefore the banning of contraception). It is stated that every act of sex should be open to the creation of a human being, which is the church’s main defence when dealing with matters of homosexuality.</em></span></div>
<p><span style="font-size:x-small;"><a href="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/ethereal1.jpg"><em> </em></a></p>
<p><a href="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/ethereal.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://braidzy.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/ethereal.jpg"></a>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p></span></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Family of God]]></title>
<link>http://eternallyhopeful.wordpress.com/2009/11/26/family-of-god/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>eternallyhopeful</dc:creator>
<guid>http://eternallyhopeful.wordpress.com/2009/11/26/family-of-god/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Since my divorce, the holidays have always contained a level of dreariness.  Instead of the idea of ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Since my divorce, the holidays have always contained a level of dreariness.  Instead of the idea of ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Thank You]]></title>
<link>http://mdetelj.wordpress.com/2009/11/26/thank-you/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mike Detelj</dc:creator>
<guid>http://mdetelj.wordpress.com/2009/11/26/thank-you/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Today, I realized what makes me the most happy; my closest friends. We have been through a lot and h]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Today, I realized what makes me the most happy; my closest friends.</p>
<p>We have been through a lot and have shared a pretty incredible experience since our first confrontations. I wanted to take this time to thank you, personally, for everything. The arguments, the successes and failures, the moments of truth, the silences and the outlandish activities we have all shared together. There is nothing more that I can ask for in this world other than us all living successful and happy lives. You are the greatest anyone could ever wish for and thus the reason why I have no hesitation when it comes to our chill time together. It is no wonder why my relations with women seem to fail; I give all my time to you guys, art and education. And I don&#8217;t regret a thing.</p>
<p>And to my fellow artists whom I believe I am good friends with, thank you for all your support. It is because of you that I am on this path and enjoying every second of it. Without you, I would not be writing this. I would probably be drunk in class or at some stupid party. You guys, in a way, saved me and gave me the key to truly expressing myself and my beliefs and I would gladly do anything to help you become more successful Ted and Peter. But more importantly, you gave me a key out of the hell I was living in. Once more&#8230;Thank you. It was an honor to help with the book and an honor to paint for hours in the rain with you, Peter. I don&#8217;t think you really understand how much it means to me.</p>
<p>Anyways, hope you and everyone else have a good holiday as I know this was easily the best thanksgiving I have had in years.</p>
<p>-Mike</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[royal flush diamonds and joker]]></title>
<link>http://delihayat.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/royal-flush-diamonds-and-joker/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>delihayat</dc:creator>
<guid>http://delihayat.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/royal-flush-diamonds-and-joker/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&nbsp; royal flush diamonds and joker royal flush diamonds and joker ace,card,flush,gamble,game,hand]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>&#160;</p>
<div id="attachment_50" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 520px"><a href="http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-photo-9312170-cards.phprefnum=delihayat" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-50" title="royal flush diamonds and joker" src="http://delihayat.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/royal-flush-diamonds-and-joker.jpg" alt="royal flush diamonds and joker" width="510" height="766" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">royal flush diamonds and joker</p></div>
<p>royal flush diamonds and joker</p>
<p>ace,card,flush,gamble,game,hand,poker,table,cards,poker  table,hand of cards,best,bet,betting,casino,chance,cheat,fluke,gambler,gambling,hold,luck,lucky,money,play,raise,sneaky,stakes,straight,texas,win,winner,background,cheating,destruction,bizarre,suspicion,success,criminal,thief,dishonesty,agreement,evil,adult,board,las vegas,chip,beverage</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Politically left winged musician destroys table live in TV]]></title>
<link>http://amazingtube.wordpress.com/2009/11/26/politically-left-winged-musician-destroys-table-live-in-tv/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
<guid>http://amazingtube.wordpress.com/2009/11/26/politically-left-winged-musician-destroys-table-live-in-tv/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The drummer of the german band &#8220;ton, steine, scherben&#8221;, who were  famous in the 1970s, d]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>The drummer of the german band &#8220;ton, steine, scherben&#8221;, who were  famous in the 1970s, destroys a table in a live television show.</p>
<p><span style='text-align:center; display: block;'><object width='425' height='350'><param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/sa0rpCgVLs4&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' /><param name='allowfullscreen' value='true' /><param name='wmode' value='transparent' /><embed src='http://www.youtube.com/v/sa0rpCgVLs4&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' allowfullscreen='true' width='425' height='350' wmode='transparent'></embed></object></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nature's Rage]]></title>
<link>http://wilbertcl.wordpress.com/2009/11/26/4/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>wilbertcl</dc:creator>
<guid>http://wilbertcl.wordpress.com/2009/11/26/4/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Nature’s Rage “Abuse God, He’ll always forgive, But abuse nature, it will never forgive”. It’s the m]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Nature’s Rage</strong></p>
<p>“Abuse God, He’ll always forgive,</p>
<p>But abuse nature, it will never forgive”.</p>
<p>It’s the most abhorrent first time in the country’s history of calamity, a tropical storm brought a devastating and enormous flood dipping many places like Metro Manila, Pampanga, Cainta, et al. The nation succumbed on the flash flood happened last September 26, 2009, Saturaday. Just 9 hours of nonstop downpour was enough to equate a month-long rain (410 mm rain gauge range, which was even higher than the normal rain gauge range). Due to the incident, it must be cursed by many for the ruin it brought, tremendously.</p>
<p>Undeniably, tropical storm Ondoy and the flash flood it brought seem as a sample of the perfect “Destroyers and Assassins”. They are envoys of destruction and death – destroying voluminous properties, taking 300 lives, and leaving numerous individuals homeless. What must be the message of these calamities?</p>
<p>Although we grieve from such tragedy, it’s not an excuse for us to ignore the lessons behind it. Really, experiencing such is detestable and once again, proved that experience is a harsh teacher&#8230;it gives the test first before the lesson. I’m sure, we learned a lot from Ondoy.</p>
<p>Why the killer flood happened is an indication of mankind’s negligence. An end justifies the means an action employed; therefore, anything we do has its connection to the outcome. It’s safe to say that we are the cause of the killer flood. Man made the massive pollution causing the world’s threatening “global warming” which contributes to the climate change and the deterioration of the ozone layer.</p>
<p>Mother Earth perhaps is calling for us. Let’s get hand in hand saving the Earth from destruction. Let’s go back to the basic – plant more trees, dispose garbage properly and let’s eliminate burning too much fossil fuel that contributes to the pollution of our land, water/marine and air biodiversity.</p>
<p>We can’t resist from the changing climate as well the uprising calamities, but we can resist wasting lives and properties by ensuring preparedness and safety. Let’s adopt the Boy Scout’s motto: “Be Prepared”. Preparedness won’t make us futile and cry over a spilled milk. The positive side of the tragedy is that it brought us lessons that we must not be too reluctant and numb of what our surrounding needs…it’s an eye-opener for us to perform our duties towards the nature with dedication. And due to the rage, it surfaced many heroic Filipinos who helped willingly their fellows who’re in dire need to save their lives. Some heroic fellows even paid life just so save the rest…flagging the sacred sacrifice, giving their life in exchange other’s safety. The spirit of sharing, concern, help, love and care flourished… awakening everyone the virtue of “Bayanihan”.</p>
<p>A calamity unexpected brings a grotesque disaster but a calamity being prepared brings less ruin and grief. So, when nature’s rage strikes, behold to its possible lessons it may bring which will serve as the mirror to check out what’s lacking in our part. Wait not for another disaster, life is too short to waste on insignificant things…your belongings; your loved ones and your life can be lost in a blink of an eye when you’re hit by nature’s rage.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong> </strong></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The five stages of dollar destruction]]></title>
<link>http://savecapitalism.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/the-five-stages-of-dollar-destruction/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hpx83</dc:creator>
<guid>http://savecapitalism.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/the-five-stages-of-dollar-destruction/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[To simplify things for those of you who are awaiting impact, I made a five point scale. I noted roug]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>To simplify things for those of you who are awaiting impact, I made a five point scale. I noted roughly a month ago that we had reached <a href="http://savecapitalism.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/dollar-destruction-definitely-in-stage-2/">stage 2</a>. The dollar had an extraordinary day down today, losing more than 1%, and accelerating from what looked like a bit of a pause. Thus, I say here is stage 3.</p>
<ol>
<li>General slide downwards, &#8220;fringe&#8221; people worry, mainstream is clueless (Complete)</li>
<li>Continued slide downwards, mainstream are somewhat worried,&#8221;fringe&#8221; people are shouting their heads off (Complete)</li>
<li>Extended slide downwards, mainstream gets seriously worried, &#8220;fringe&#8221; people are already in the bomb shelters (Just started)</li>
<li>Free-fall, multiple percent losses daily, wild fluctuations up and down, regular people are acquiring hard assets, stocking up on food, water, gasoline. Fringe people shut the doors to their bomb-shelters, the government issues statements damning evil &#8220;speculators&#8221; and promise to &#8220;stabilize&#8221; the situation</li>
<li>Hyperinflation due to domestic loss of faith in the currency</li>
</ol>
<p>Once the USD enters stage 4, Bernanke gets to choose whether to kill the economy or the dollar. It may take a while still, but as things look now, <span style="text-decoration:underline;">we will get there. </span></p>
<p>Would you like your currency debased, banana-republic-style or completely worthless? Call a congressman and tell him.</p>
<div id="attachment_3542" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 610px"><a href="http://savecapitalism.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/down-down-down.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-3542" title="Same old story (repeat)" src="http://savecapitalism.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/down-down-down.jpg" alt="Same old story (repeat)" width="600" height="425" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Same old story (repeat)</p></div>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Patch 3.3 - Warlock Changes]]></title>
<link>http://veliaf.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/patch-3-3-warlock-changes/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Veliaf</dc:creator>
<guid>http://veliaf.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/patch-3-3-warlock-changes/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Courtesy Dominic Hobbs of WoW.com This post will be updated as the patch notes are updated. Fun! Exc]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div><a href="http://veliaf.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/patch-33-raid-builds.jpg"></a></div>
<div id="attachment_806" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 235px"><img class="size-full wp-image-806 " title="Patch 33 raid builds" src="http://veliaf.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/patch-33-raid-builds.jpg" alt="Patch 3.3 raid builds" width="225" height="312" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Courtesy Dominic Hobbs of WoW.com</p></div>
<div><strong>This post will be updated as the patch notes are updated.</strong></div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<div>Fun! Excitement! Amazement! All this and more! You will ooh, you will aah, you will scream and you will faint&#8230; Ladies and gentlement, your minds will be blown and your very grasp of reality will be shaken! For you have never seen the likes of these, the three-point-three patch notes!</div>
<div>Okay so they&#8217;re not <em>that</em> amazing, but still, let&#8217;s dive in.</div>
<ul>
<blockquote>
<li>Create Soulstone: The cooldown on this spell and duration of its buff have been lowered from 30 minutes down to 15 minutes. Cannot be used in Arenas.</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;ve always felt that the cooldown on <a href="http://www.wowhead.com/?item=36895">this ability</a> was rather long, and it&#8217;s nice to see it&#8217;s being shortened to bring it in line with the fact that instances these days are much shorter and faster than they used to be. More wipe recovery is good, no?</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration:underline;">Affliction</span></p>
<ul>
<blockquote>
<li>Improved Drain Soul: This talent now reduces threat by 10%/20%, up from 5%/10%.</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p>There have always been issues with Warlock threat, whatever Blizzard have said, and hopefully this will address some of them. The main problem is often that we can&#8217;t simply just let our dps drop to 0 to prevent any threat being generated, as our DoTs will continue to tick. Obviously this problem is therefore especially apparent with Affliction, which relies heavily upon DoTs, and so 20% less threat from two points in this talent will help out the spec quite a bit.</p>
<ul>
<blockquote>
<li>Improved Felhunter: This talent now also reduces the cooldown on the felhunter&#8217;s Shadow Bite ability by 2/4 seconds.</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p>The developers are pushing quite hard for the Felhunter to be viable again (so Affliction will use it instead of the Succubus or <span style="text-decoration:line-through;">mana battery</span> Imp) and allowing the puppy&#8217;s main attack to hit more often &#8211; leading to increased damage &#8211; is a good way of doing it.</p>
<ul>
<blockquote>
<li>Shadow Mastery: This talent now also increases the damage done by the felhunter&#8217;s Shadow Bite ability by 3/6/9/12/15%.</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p>As above &#8211; the more damage done by the pet, the better. Whether or not we&#8217;ll see the Felhunter become the de facto Affliction pet again I&#8217;m unsure, but it&#8217;s certainly going to be more of an option.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration:underline;">Demonology</span></p>
<ul>
<blockquote>
<li>Decimation: Redesigned. When Shadowbolt, Incinerate or Soul Fire hit a target that is at or below 35% health, the cast time of Soul Fire is reduced by 20/40% for 8 seconds. Soul Fires cast under the effect of Decimation cost no shards.</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p>Right, wowee, some major changes happening here. So the <a href="http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=63158">current effect</a> needs <a href="http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=47809">SB</a> or <a href="http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=47838">Incinerate</a> to hit a target at 35% health or less to activate it. This will be the same with the new effect, except <a href="http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=47825">Soul Fire</a> will also proc it, which is nice. However, the current effect will reduce the cast time of the <strong>next Soul Fire by 60%</strong> (assuming two points), whereas the new effect will reduce the cast time of the spell by <strong>40% for 8 seconds</strong>.</p>
<p>What this means is you&#8217;ll be able to cast more SF spells per proc &#8211; the number depends on your haste &#8211; meaning more dps per proc, despite the relatively slower casting times compared to the current effect. I would also assume that casting SF then refreshes the effect, so you can just keep going and spamming it, providing you don&#8217;t have to move or do anything else for more than 8 seconds. I haven&#8217;t tested this on the PTR, but if correct, we can say goodbye to the weaving technique of mixing SB and SF, and hello to constant SF spam under 35%. It&#8217;s simpler, but less interesting. Of course, we still don&#8217;t get charged any shards for Decimated SF spells.</p>
<ul>
<blockquote>
<li>Demonic Pact: This talent now also increases the warlock&#8217;s spell damage by 1/2/3/4/5%.</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p>A simple buff to give us some more damage, since we Demo Warlocks are often bullied into speccing into <a href="http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=47240">this</a> by our raid leaders for the bonus to raid dps, and it&#8217;s only right we should have some personal gain.</p>
<ul>
<blockquote>
<li>Molten Core: Redesigned. This talent now increases the duration of Immolate by 3/6/9 seconds and provides a 4/8/12% chance to gain the Molten Core effect when Corruption deals damage. The Molten Core effect empowers the next 3 Incinerate or Soul Fire spells cast within 15 seconds (Incinerate: increases damage done by 6/12/18% and reduces cast time by 10/20/30%; Soul Fire: increases damage done by 6/12/18% and increases critical strike chance by 5/10/15%). Molten Core now has a new spell effect.</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p>Another pretty large change to dissect. The <a href="http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=47247">effect today</a> (with 3 points) gives our Shadow and DoT spells a 15% chance to increase the damage of our Fire spells by 10% for 12 seconds. Lots of numbers there, but lots more coming up. So the new effect is firstly going to give our <a href="http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=47811">Immolate</a> spell a longer duration &#8211; this is nice; more dps for less mana usage and less time casting. The next part of the redesigned effect will give our <a href="http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=47813">Corruption</a> spell a 12% chance to trigger MC; we therefore have less chance of proccing it, as it can only be from one spell and the % chance is less, although admittedly it&#8217;s a spell we should all have up anyway.</p>
<p>When we do trigger it, instead of a bonus to Fire damage, we&#8217;re going to get a reduced cast time and more damage on the next three Incinerate spells cast in 15 seconds. Alternatively, we get more damage and crit chance on the next three SF spells within 15 seconds. Obviously you can cast either spell and get the respective effect, up to three times. What this change means for you in terms of dps depends on the fight really, but I suspect in general it will be a dps increase when the effect procs &#8211; the downside could be its chance to proc, which is less than it is now, as mentioned. It does definitely mean that we need Corruption up when we&#8217;re Decimating under 35% however, for the SF bonuses.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration:underline;">Destruction</span></p>
<ul>
<blockquote>
<li>Conflagrate: Redesigned. This talent now consumes an Immolate or Shadowflame effect on the enemy target to instantly deal damage equal to 9 seconds of Immolate or 8 seconds of Shadowflame, and causes additional damage over 3 seconds equal to 3 seconds of Immolate or 2 seconds of Shadowflame. In addition, the periodic damage of Conflagrate is capable of critically striking the afflicted target.</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p>This is a nerf unfortunately, but let&#8217;s be fair, <a href="http://www.wowhead.com/?spell=17962">Conflagrate</a> was getting pretty crazy, especially in PvP. The fact that the DoT damage (which only lasts 2-3 seconds) is a slight relief, but it looks like you Destruction folks will just have to <span style="text-decoration:line-through;">spec Demo</span> live with it.</p>
<ul>
<blockquote>
<li>Destructive Reach: This talent now reduces threat by 10%/20%, up from 5%/10%.</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p>Similar to the threat reduction given to Affliction really.</p>
<ul>
<blockquote>
<li>Ruin: This talent now also increases the critical strike damage bonus of the imp&#8217;s Firebolt spell by 100%.</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p>More dps from the pet favoured by most Destro Warlocks in PvE, whilst not increasing damage in PvP too much. This is simply balancing.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration:underline;">Pets</span></p>
<ul>
<blockquote>
<li>Avoidance (passive): Now reduces the damage your pets take from area-of-effect damage by 90%, but no longer applies to area-of-effect damage caused by other players.</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p>More balancing of PvE with PvP &#8211; your pets will die far less often to those nasty bosses, but still will be killable by those nasty players.</p>
<ul>
<blockquote>
<li>Doomguard/Infernal: These pets now innately have Avoidance like all other warlock pets.</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p>Again, just a balance to bring these pets on par with the regular ones.</p>
<ul>
<blockquote>
<li>Inferno: The cooldown on this summoning spell has been reduced from 20 minutes to 10 minutes. Cannot be used in Arenas.</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p>Good for those few of us who use this pet to finish a fight with, or for if you need a really quick AoE stun, as we can now use it more often.</p>
<ul>
<blockquote>
<li>Shadow Bite: This pet ability now does 15% increased damage for each of the warlock&#8217;s damage-over-time effects on the target.</li>
<li>Summon Imp: This ability is now available from the trainer for level 1 warlocks and no longer requires a quest to learn.</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration:underline;">Glyphs</span></p>
<ul>
<blockquote>
<li>Glyph of Life Tap: The effect of this glyph now has a chance of activating when Dark Pact is used.</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p>While you should always be proccing this with Life Tap, because it&#8217;s frankly better and doesn&#8217;t prevent your pet doing damage, it will be nice to proc it &#8220;by accident&#8221; when you do use Dark Pact.</p>
<ul>
<blockquote>
<li>Glyph of Quick Decay: This glyph allows for the warlock&#8217;s haste to reduce the time between periodic damage effects of Corruption.</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p>A thrilling new glyph which looks set to help Affliction back up from the bottom of the spec pile, having this will allow your Corruption to tick faster according to haste, so while the effect will run out faster and require renewing, your dps should increase as it literally is more damage per second. Expect to need to make some changes to your Affliction rotation to allow for more regular refreshing of this spell.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration:underline;">Bug fixes</span></p>
<p>And to finish, a whole swathe of bug fixes&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<blockquote>
<li>Conflagrate: This spell will no longer benefit inconsistently from the talents Emberstorm and Improved Immolate, as well as the Glyph of Immolate and Tier 9 set bonus. Just as for Immolate, all stacking percentage increases will be applied additively instead of multiplicatively (+10% and +20% make +30% instead of +32%). In addition, Conflagrate used with Shadowflame will now scale properly from spell power.</li>
<li>Curse of the Elements: Rank 4 has been increased to 11%, up from 10%.</li>
<li>Drain Soul: This spell now deals 4 times the normal damage for all ranks. Previously it was only ranks 6 and above.</li>
<li>Glyph of Conflagrate: Now updates the tooltip of Conflagrate to remove reference to Conflagrate removing an Immolate or Shadowflame effect on the target.</li>
<li>Glyph of Siphon Life: This glyph will now modify the tooltip on Siphon Life correctly.</li>
<li>Glyph of Unending Breath: Now updates the tooltip on Unending Breath to indicate it increases swim speed.</li>
<li>Hellfire: Dealing damage to another player with this ability will now put the Warlock in combat.</li>
<li>Improved Shadow Bolt: This talent no longer causes a bug that removes all resilience from pets.</li>
<li>Soul Link: Damage transferred via this ability can now be prevented by damage absorption effects.</li>
<li>Suffering (Voidwalker): Ranks 5-8 had the incorrect taunt radius of 5 yards and have all been adjusted to a 10-yard radius.</li>
</blockquote>
</ul>
<p>Overall, it&#8217;s pretty good, and where it&#8217;s bad, it&#8217;s needed for balancing. I&#8217;m looking forward to testing the new Demonology changes in particular, and expect a report once 3.3 hits as to how everything is working. For detailed information on how the different raiding specs will perform with these changes, see the WoW.com article <a href="http://www.wow.com/2009/11/16/blood-pact-patch-3-3-raid-build-roundup/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Feel free to comment on anything I&#8217;ve missed or gotten wrong with regard to the changes. Also, what are you looking forward to most?</p>
<p>Vel.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[MSM: Tony Blair 'was told 10 days before Iraq invasion that Saddam had dismantled WMD'  ]]></title>
<link>http://dprogram.net/2009/11/25/msm-tony-blair-was-told-10-days-before-iraq-invasion-that-saddam-had-dismantled-wmd/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sakerfa</dc:creator>
<guid>http://dprogram.net/2009/11/25/msm-tony-blair-was-told-10-days-before-iraq-invasion-that-saddam-had-dismantled-wmd/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[(DailyMail) &#8211; Tony Blair was told Saddam Hussein may not have been able to use his chemical we]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[(DailyMail) &#8211; Tony Blair was told Saddam Hussein may not have been able to use his chemical we]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
