<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>divorce-laws &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/divorce-laws/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "divorce-laws"</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 10:13:23 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Divorce Laws We Have To Pass]]></title>
<link>http://divorcelaws4us.wordpress.com/2010/11/11/divorce-laws-we-have-to-pass/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>johnson 44</dc:creator>
<guid>http://divorcelaws4us.wordpress.com/2010/11/11/divorce-laws-we-have-to-pass/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Divorce is a acknowledged abortion or you can say acknowledged end of a marriage. Divorce takes abod]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Divorce is a acknowledged abortion or you can say acknowledged end of a marriage. Divorce takes abode back a affiliated brace decides that they can&#8217;t alive calm anymore and alliance doesn&#8217;t serve any purpose anymore. It may complete accessible that a affiliated brace opt for divorce back they acquisition that they can&#8217;t alive calm anymore but in absoluteness it is not that easy. Divorce is an abominable experience. Brace has to go through a lot of affecting and brainy turmoil. The accomplished ancestors gets disturbed. Accouchement are acutely afflicted by the divorce. Divorce additionally involves a lot of acknowledged procedures. Filling divorce forms, authoritative divorce affidavit and cloister audition etc can be backbreaking procedures. There are abundant issues associated with divorce which accept to be acclimatized like acreage settlement, banking adjustment and adolescent aegis etc. If a brace has already absitively to go for a divorce and appetite to apperceive what are the acknowledged procedures? Your states divorce law will adjudge the acknowledged procedures you accept to go through. A few states in US do not accept laws that acquiesce a brace to abstracted accurately until a cloister decides otherwise. In such case with the advice of your advocate book a address with the cloister requesting a audition on your marriage. In these hearings you can appeal for a acting break agreement. If your accompaniment law allows amid accurately again your advocate will address the courts for a break agreement. Many a times couples are clumsy to achieve their differences over property, money and adolescent aegis etc peacefully. They action over these issues and they are alike accessible for continued cloister battle. Surely divorce has abrogating furnishings on the couple, their accouchement and their families. Therefore, divorce should be kept as a aftermost option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Divorce Laws That We Must Understand]]></title>
<link>http://divorcelaws4us.wordpress.com/2010/11/11/divorce-laws-that-we-must-understand/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>johnson 44</dc:creator>
<guid>http://divorcelaws4us.wordpress.com/2010/11/11/divorce-laws-that-we-must-understand/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[divorce laws There is some divorce laws is able and there are abounding characteristics involved. A]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_6" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 155px"><a href="http://divorcelaws4us.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/law.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-6" title="law" src="http://divorcelaws4us.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/law.jpg?w=145&#038;h=161" alt="" width="145" height="161" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">divorce laws</p></div>
<p>There is some divorce laws is able and there are abounding characteristics involved. A Fort Worth divorce lawyer will be able to explain some divorce laws to you and advice you become accustomed with how to access divorce law based on your situation. Frequently asked questions apropos divorce law include:</p>
<p>• How is adolescent abutment calculated?</p>
<p>• How continued do I accept to pay adolescent support?</p>
<p>• Do grandparents accept any rights during divorce?</p>
<p>• How should adolescent aegis be determined?</p>
<p><strong>How is Adolescent Abutment Calculated?</strong></p>
<p>Child abutment is affected by adding allowance for the child(s) and withheld taxes from the amenable party’s gross income. Afterwards these subtractions are fabricated the sum larboard will be disconnected appropriately acquired from how abounding accouchement are in question. For archetype if a affair is amenable for advantageous abutment for one child, the bulk owed is 20% of the amenable party’s net capital, mentioned above. If the alone is amenable for two accouchement they charge pay 25% of their net basic in support; anniversary adolescent increases the bulk of abutment owed by 5%.</p>
<p><strong>How Continued Do I Accept to Pay Adolescent Support?</strong></p>
<p>Child abutment is binding until the adolescent turns 18 years old or until the adolescent graduates from aerial school.</p>
<p><strong>Do Grandparents Accept Any Rights During Divorce?</strong></p>
<p>Unfortunately in Texas grandparents accept no acutely authentic rights to appearance afterwards a divorce is finalized. This agency that a grandparent cannot book a case for visitation. In adjustment to ensure appearance privileges one should do aggregate accessible to ensure aegis is provided to their son or daughter.</p>
<p><strong>How is Adolescent Aegis Determined?</strong></p>
<p>Child aegis is bent based on the alertness and accommodation for an alone to accommodate able parenting. Aegis will not be accepted in situations area a apron is clumsy to accommodate acceptable parenting, for archetype cases of alcoholism and/or absolute calm abuse. If both parents appearance signs of adeptness to accommodate able parenting, aegis will best acceptable be accustomed to both parents based aloft their schedules and responsibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Divorce Lawyers]]></title>
<link>http://divkay.wordpress.com/2010/11/01/divorce-lawyers/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>divkay</dc:creator>
<guid>http://divkay.wordpress.com/2010/11/01/divorce-lawyers/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Image via Wikipedia   Ah, Divorce Lawyers. I have done some research on family law, more specificall]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img">
<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Scales_of_justice.jpg"><img title="Scales of justice" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f0/Scales_of_justice.jpg" alt="Scales of justice" width="150" height="158" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Image via Wikipedia</p></div>
</div>
<p> </p>
<p>Ah, Divorce Lawyers.</p>
<p>I have done some research on family law, more specifically, lawyers. In fact, I work directly with attorneys, just non-litigating attorneys… and definitely not the ones dealing with couples splitting up.</p>
<p>I must say, Family Law Attorneys are sometimes hard to decipher. You&#8217;d think they&#8217;d all be excellent! Or at least okay. Covering the basics, looking out for <strong><em>your</em></strong> wellbeing <strong>and</strong> future (or at least your children&#8217;s). Sometimes I wonder.</p>
<p>I went to see a divorce attorney locally,  right when I got the guts. I made the appointment. It was on my birthday, in December, some time ago. Who keeps count anymore?  But I owed it to myself to seek expert counsel. So I went with the suggestion of a great attorney friend who deals with Personal Injury cases.</p>
<p>She seemed nice. She was located in Downtown Fort Lauderdale, short drive from me taking I-95 and in researching her credentials, seemed like a good match. She met with me after filling out the paperwork, explained  a few things, informed me on some interesting , and even mentioned she got herself out of a similar situation. Perfect! Right?</p>
<p>Wrong.</p>
<p>She proceeded to tell me that although it was a good idea to leave the house, it wouldn’t be easy getting custody and no word on alimony. Offered no new ideas or helpful information regarding Florida Laws or Mediation or even counseling!  In addition, she even went as far as saying she mostly represented the [deadbeat] &#8220;dads&#8221;&#8230; Now, how does that help <strong>me</strong>??</p>
<p>Needless to say, I went home frustrated that day.  So much for a birthday celebration! Still, I went back on search mode. Who can help me the most? An attorney who is out to &#8220;get you&#8221; (or at least your wallet), or myself? After all, I research the law every day&#8230; I can do all the research for free ( mostly) myself. And be a lot more prepared than that.</p>
<p>I am continuing the research, have all my forms filled and set up. I&#8217;ve done the calculations for both support and alimony. And I&#8217;m drawing up the settlement agreement. I like to know things up front.</p>
<p>This past week, however, I ran into a sweet lady whom I&#8217;ve encountered down the hall a few times. Turns out she is a Divorce attorney! Well, what do you know! We&#8217;re having lunch this week. The same week my daughter turns 11. The same week my father flies back home.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all turning out good. I&#8217;m ready for the ride.</p>
<p> *****************************************</p>
<p>Related Articles</p>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/prwebraleigh-domestic-violence/protective-order-lawyer/prweb4691904.htm">Domestic Violence Awareness Month Is A Reminder Of Protections Available Under North Carolina Law, Raleigh Family Law Attorney Says</a> (prweb.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.ecademy.com/node.php?id=156060">&#8220;Divorce is unfair&#8221;&#8211;Baroness Deech. Do you agree? [Andrew Woolley (Family law)]</a> (ecademy.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.globaltvbc.com/world/woman+wins+divorce+settlement+year+after+death/3637418/story.html">Woman wins $250,000 divorce settlement &#8211; 18 year&#8217;s after man&#8217;s death</a> (globaltvbc.com)</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Kelly McParland: Lawyers move to defend divorce gravy train]]></title>
<link>http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2010/09/29/kelly-mcparland-lawyers-move-to-defend-divorce-gravy-train/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Kelly McParland</dc:creator>
<guid>http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2010/09/29/kelly-mcparland-lawyers-move-to-defend-divorce-gravy-train/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Fotolia Aren&#8217;t lawyers great? Here&#8217;s an item from Tuesday&#8217;s paper. It&#8217;s abou]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_13391" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 122px"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-13391" title="divorce" src="http://nationalpostcomment.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/divorce.jpg?w=112&#038;h=140" alt="" width="112" height="140" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Fotolia</p></div>
<p>Aren&#8217;t lawyers great?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/867177--lottery-proposed-to-fund-divorce-reform" target="_blank">Here&#8217;s an item</a> from Tuesday&#8217;s paper.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s about divorce, and how ruinously expensive, time-consuming and agony-inducing the legal system is in dealing with it.</p>
<p>Anyone unfortunate enough to have been caught in the horrors of divorce law knows the reality of the system. It takes an unhappy situation and does everything it can to make it worse. It can be hideously costly, mind-bogglingly unfair and callously apathetic to the pursuit of justice. <!--more-->But it&#8217;s great for lawyers, because the longer and more bitter a case, the more they can bill for it. If either of the parties is even slightly inclined towards payback, it&#8217;s the easiest thing in the world to encourage that bitterness into a drawn-out war of attrition that is disastrous for the client and wonderfully profitable for the law firm.</p>
<p>The Ontario Bar Association is not blind to the defects of the system. This week the association delivered a report to Ontario Attorney General Chris Bentley addressing some concerns. And one of its big concerns? Making sure lawyers get paid.</p>
<p>You see, the system can get so expensive, it might ruin a client and threaten his or her ability to pay. Well, we can&#8217;t have that, so the bar association has come up with a novel plan: Put a tax on marriage licences, and introduce a provincial lottery to ensure no divorce lawyer has to go without.</p>
<blockquote><p>Bentley came to the first session, [co-author Tom]  Dart recalled, and was “pretty  blunt” there wouldn’t be much government funding available, so summit  participants would have to come up with “creative” ideas for financing  reforms.</p>
<p>Channelling a portion of marriage  licence fees to fund divorce services may not conjure up the happiest of  images, but similar schemes have been implemented in Indiana,  Minnesota, New Hampshire and Connecticut, where marriage licence  surcharges have been used to fund rape prevention and victim assistance  programs.</p></blockquote>
<p>Being &#8220;creative&#8221; is something divorce lawyers can do. It&#8217;s amazing how long a case can be dragged out, while the unhappy couple sinks deeper into financial ruin. A lottery is just the thing: even after both parties are broke, there would still be a way to squeeze cash out of the case!</p>
<p>Of course, an alternative would be to change the laws and legal practices so they weren&#8217;t so skewed towards prolonging and inflaming an already rancorous situation. Reducing the opportunities for confrontation, rather than encouraging and nurturing them, would do a lot of good, both emotionally and financially, for the aggrieved parties.</p>
<p>But nah. A lottery is better. Gotta keep those cheques coming in.</p>
<p>National Post</p>
<p>Follow me on Twitter @KellyMcParland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[International couples to pick divorce laws]]></title>
<link>http://ramsdensfamily.wordpress.com/2010/08/19/international-couples-to-pick-divorce-laws/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ramsdensfamily</dc:creator>
<guid>http://ramsdensfamily.wordpress.com/2010/08/19/international-couples-to-pick-divorce-laws/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Couples of differing nationalities living within the European Union could be given the right to deci]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Couples of differing nationalities living within the European Union could be given the right to deci]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Divorce Laws]]></title>
<link>http://familylaws.wordpress.com/2010/08/11/divorce-laws-2/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>familylaws</dc:creator>
<guid>http://familylaws.wordpress.com/2010/08/11/divorce-laws-2/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[There are a number of states that have adopted presumptive joint custody, or in other words, these s]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://familylaws.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/divorce-law.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-90" title="divorce-law" src="http://familylaws.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/divorce-law.jpg?w=255&#038;h=300" alt="" width="255" height="300" /></a>There are a number of states that have adopted presumptive joint custody, or in other words, these states presume in a divorce that absent other evidence, the court should find that joint legal and shared physical custody is in the child&#8217;s best interest. Illinois is not one of these states, unfortunately. Recently, the Illinois Legislature&#8217;s appointed <a href="http://www.family-laws.org">Alaska Divorce Laws</a> Committee has been exploring a number of changes to Illinois&#8217; Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act. Is presumptive joint physical custody coming to Illinois? Is Illinois emerging from the Dark Ages of custody law? It does not look like it.</p>
<p>The word from colleagues is that the adoption of presumptive joint custody in Illinois is not going to occur. The reasons for this failure are not due to the efforts of many good lawyers to seek progressive changes to Illinois law. There are some lawyers and <a href="http://www.family-laws.org">Alaska Divorce Laws</a>, however, for whom positive change for families and children is not a good thing. Unfortunately, progressive changes do not look like they are on the horizon in Illinois.</p>
<p>I have consistently advocated for joint legal and physical custody. Of course, there are exceptions; for example, I just completed a trial where my client was properly awarded sole legal and primary physical custody. Yet, as a general proposition, good, competent, loving parents, both Mother and Father, should share the parenting of their children after divorce. The psychological studies reveal that presumptive joint custody is in the best interest of the children and the parents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Reasons for the divorce]]></title>
<link>http://familylaws.wordpress.com/2010/07/26/reasons-for-the-divorce/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>familylaws</dc:creator>
<guid>http://familylaws.wordpress.com/2010/07/26/reasons-for-the-divorce/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Divorce is a costly endeavor. An inexpensive divorce is rare, and most couples engage in costly liti]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Divorce is a costly endeavor. An inexpensive divorce is rare, and most couples engage in costly litigation to determine acceptable property allocations and future legal obligations. In divorces where there are children involved, the process becomes even more costly as parents attempt to divide custody rights and child support obligations between each other.</p>
<p>Sadly, the petitioner or the spouse filing for <a href="http://family-laws.org/">Alaska Divorce Laws</a> is often inherently in a better legal position from the beginning, since he has had more time to plan and allocate his resources accordingly. Attempting to deal with the ultimate reality and pain of breaking up, the unsuspecting spouse is at a considerable legal and financial disadvantage.</p>
<p>Most Americans would be deeply shocked if they knew what goes on today under the name of divorce. Indeed, many are devastated to discover that they can be forced into divorce by procedures entirely beyond their control. Divorce licenses unprecedented government intrusion into family life, including the power to sunder families, seize children, loot family wealth, and incarcerate parents without trial. Comprised of family courts and vast, federally funded social services bureaucracies that wield what amount to police powers, the divorce machinery has become the most predatory and repressive sector of government ever created in the United States and is today’s greatest threat to constitutional freedom.</p>
<p>You need to decide on which path to take when it comes to a divorce. You can opt for a negotiation or mediation. However you may need to take the case to a court hearing if there are unresolved issues like property distribution and child custody.</p>
<p>Look for a Sarasota divorce attorney who has specialization in the field of family and <a href="http://family-laws.org/">Alaska Divorce Laws</a>. You don&#8217;t visit a dentist to get an eye checkup, for that you need an ophthalmologist. Similarly you need a divorce attorney to take care of a divorce case. No other specialist would suit your requirements.</p>
<p>Your lawyer needs to have a license to practice. Check whether he has an up to date license or not. You also need to check whether his license was ever under suspension. You can acquire all these details from the local bar association.</p>
<p>Ask for client referrals. This is an easy way to check the expertise of the lawyer as well as his success rate. You would also be able to understand whether the lawyer shared a good working relationship with their client or not.</p>
<p>Be sure to visit your lawyer at least once before you appoint him for the case. Give him a detailed account of the marriage, the problem and the reason for the divorce. Discuss all aspects of the case. Seek answers to your queries. If he is capable of answering them properly you have the right lawyer for your case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Brazil changes divorce laws]]></title>
<link>http://eyesonbrazil.com/2010/07/16/brazil-changes-divorce-laws/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>tudobeleza</dc:creator>
<guid>http://eyesonbrazil.com/2010/07/16/brazil-changes-divorce-laws/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Brazil has eliminated a lengthy separation procedure for couples that lasts for up to two yea]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;Brazil has eliminated a lengthy separation procedure for couples that lasts for up to two years and will start the process for rapid divorce. An amendment to the constitution eliminates the two sets of procedures used up to now to dissolve marriages on a consensual basis, one of which required the couple to show they had lived apart for two years. The other procedure asked the couple to wait for 365 days after presenting the divorce petition to a judge. </p>
<p>‘The procedure for the dissolution of marriage was simplified, thus reducing the interference of the state in people’s lives without altering the greater principle of protecting the family,’ Senator Jose Sarney, a former Brazilian president, said.</p>
<p>The promoters of the reform said the simplification of divorce will lighten the load on the courts and save money. Senator Demostenes Torres said expenditures on divorce lawyers would drop by about half, the official Agencia Brasil news service said. The measure would also ‘automatically’ benefit all couples who have initiated the separation process. </p>
<p>In largely Catholic Brasil, 64,869 couples have begun separation procedures on a consensual basis in courts and another 14,623 couples began the process before a notary in 2008, according to the most recent official figures. Brazil first legalised divorce in 1977.&#8221; &#8211; Via <a href="http://paraibaparadise.com/index.php/Joao-Pessoa/2010/07/16/brazil-to-allow-rapid-divorce/">Paraiba Paradise</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Divorce laws]]></title>
<link>http://familylaws.wordpress.com/2010/07/15/divorce-laws/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>familylaws</dc:creator>
<guid>http://familylaws.wordpress.com/2010/07/15/divorce-laws/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[One fact of divorce in Alaska Divorce Laws, no matter what town or city you call home  and child sup]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One fact of divorce in <a href="http://www.family-laws.org/">Alaska Divorce Laws</a>, no matter what town or city you call home  and child support are a definite possibility depending on your means and the needs of your soon-to-be-ex spouse. While most individuals will fight hard not to pay alimony to a former partner, paying child support is usually accepted, albeit grudgingly by some. The fact of the matter is that in Alabama, the age of majority is 19. What this means is that child support comes to an end once that teenager hits 19. (Be careful, though, because there is a provision for post-minority support payments when it comes to helping with college tuition and such).</p>
<p>But for our purposes here, 19 is the age at which child support is terminated. imply put, a parent cannot simply cease payments because they feel the child is now functioning as an autonomous individual, and neither does the child support automatically stop. However, <a href="http://www.family-laws.org/">Alaska Divorce Laws</a> does provide for these kinds of situations, such as an 18-year-old joining the military</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Health Insurance Coverage &amp; Divorce]]></title>
<link>http://rocheleaulaw.wordpress.com/2010/07/05/divorceandinsurance/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>rocheleaulaw</dc:creator>
<guid>http://rocheleaulaw.wordpress.com/2010/07/05/divorceandinsurance/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[There are many health insurance issues that may be overlooked during a divorce, such as: 1.  Is the]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many health insurance issues that may be overlooked during a divorce, such as:</p>
<p>1.  Is the ex-spouse still covered after divorce?  For how long?</p>
<p>2. Can one party cancel health insurance coverage during the divorce?</p>
<p>3. What about health insurance coverage for the kids?</p>
<p>It is a common misconception that a spouse will continue to be covered under their ex-spouse’s plan after divorce.  In fact, the parties need to be advised that as of the date of the decree, the ex-spouse is no longer eligible for coverage.  Any medical treatment incurred, even though the doctor may treat you, will be back-charged at full rate because health insurance coverage ends on the date of divorce.   If you need any medical treatment, get it before the divorce is over, because you will have no coverage after that.</p>
<p>Employment lawyer Andrew Rempfer, Esq. was interviewed by <a href="http://www.rocheleaulaw.com">divorce lawyer</a> Stacy Rocheleau about the possibility of continuation coverage after the divorce.  Mr. Rempfer noted that providing continuing coverage for an ex-spouse is critically important to consider when crafting the divorce decree because an employer sponsored health plan may only provide COBRA coverage, which generally costs 102% of the total premium costs, and expires after 36 months.</p>
<p>Sometimes the party who carries the insurance will spitefully delete the soon to be ex spouse from the company insurance plan, prior to the decree of divorce.   If the spouse who cancels the insurance works for an employer with more than twenty full time employees, then the employer could be violating state and federal laws for allowing the employee to remove a spouse from an employer health plan prior to the decree of divorce.  Mr. Rempfer commented that, “under state laws, IRS Code Section 125, and ERISA, an employer cannot allow an employee to make changes (including canceling coverage) unless there is a COBRA ‘qualifying event’.  A COBRA qualifying event includes the end of the marriage by entry of the divorce decree, or legal separation.  “In other words,” Mr. Rempfer noted “the employer cannot remove the spouse from the employer-sponsored health plan until after the divorce or legal separation is finalized.”  Failing to comply with this could render the Plan in violation of ERISA and COBRA.</p>
<p>If a spouse does cancel insurance coverage during divorce, and the other spouse, relying upon such coverage, incurs medical costs, it may be argued that the medical debt incurred, if incurred prior to a signed divorce decree because one spouse canceled coverage, the debt should be the canceling spouse&#8217;s sole debt.  Any medical costs incurred after divorce, even if one spouse believes there was coverage, would be that person’s sole debt.</p>
<p>Pursuant to state law, parents must provide health insurance coverage for their children after divorce.   Consequently, Mr. Rempfer noted, it is critical that the Court’s divorce decree clearly set forth who bears responsibility for continuing health care coverage for any children.  In a perfect world, the child would stay on an employer-sponsored health plan, and thus not be subject to COBRA.  In reality, if geography or other unique family dynamics may make this impractical.  In that event, there may be no choice but to seek COBRA, and those extra costs associated with COBRA should be addressed in the divorce decree.</p>
<p><em>About the Authors: Stacy M. Rocheleau, las vegas divorce lawyer,  graduated from Whittier College in Los Angeles in 1991 with a Bachelor&#8217;s Degree in Business Adminstration. She then received her Doctorate of Jurisprudence from the University of San Diego Law School in 1996. Stacy may be reached at 702-914-0400 or </em><a href="http://www.rocheleaulaw.com/"><em>www.rocheleaulaw.com</em></a><em>. . </em></p>
<p><em>Andrew L. Rempfer, Esq. has been nominated by his peers in 2009 and 2010 as a “Rising Star” in the field of employment law in 2009 and 2010 by “Super Lawyers” Magazine.  He has been practicing employment law and employee benefits law for over six years in Nevada and has experience in litigating complex employment and employee benefits matters under ERISA, COBRA and HIPAA, to name a few.  He may be reached at Cogburn Law Offices, 9555 S. Eastern Ave., #280, Las Vegas, NV 89123, 702-384-3616; </em><a href="mailto:alr@cogburnlaw.com"><em>alr@cogburnlaw.com</em></a><em> </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What Is The Parenting Class?]]></title>
<link>http://robinroshkind.wordpress.com/2010/06/21/what-is-the-parenting-class/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 19:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>robinroshkind</dc:creator>
<guid>http://robinroshkind.wordpress.com/2010/06/21/what-is-the-parenting-class/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[By Robin Roshkind, Esquire, West Palm Beach, Florida In Palm Beach County, Florida, all parties to a]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Robin Roshkind, Esquire, West Palm Beach, Florida</p>
<p>In Palm Beach County, Florida, all parties to a divorce where children are at issue in the divorce MUST take a parenting class.  It is a four hour class that can be taken in person in the evenings or online.  Each person must file a certificate of completion in the court file in your case, because without it the judge will refuse to grant a divorce, either uncontested or contested. </p>
<p>This is public policy.  The course covers things like the peaceful exchange of children for time sharing with the other parent&#8230;packing clothes, homework etc., and setting up an environment in each parent&#8217;s home where the children can feel relaxed and comfortable.  It covers subjects such as using the children as messengers between the parties, disparaging the other parent to the children and its effects on the children, fighting in the presence of children and the negative effects that has.  The class essentially is child focused and instructs parents about what not to do in front of their children and why. </p>
<p>Children are often used as pawns in divorce and post divorce communications between the husband and the wife.  For example, the mom may buy the kids new clothes but when the children return from dad&#8217;s house, they come back in dirty ill fitting clothes because dad keeps them in order to make mom buy more.  These types of shennanigans happen quite often when the divorce is acrimonious and there are children involved. </p>
<p>In addition to fights over clothing, are fights over sports equipment and homework.  For example, mom may complain that dad never does homework with the kids and this responsibility rests squarely with her.  The statute says SHARED parental responsibility. </p>
<p>When children are involved in a divorce, it gives the parties much more to fight about.  This parenting class illustrates all the wrongs to avoid for the sake of your children and is a must before the court will grant the divorce.  If you are planning to get divorced in Palm Beach County or just want more information, call one of the divorce lawyers at ROBIN ROSHKIND, P.A. at 561 835 9091 or click on the Firm&#8217;s web site at <a href="http://www.familylawwpb.com">www.familylawwpb.com</a> for more information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Finally, a law to deal with dead marriages]]></title>
<link>http://indialawyers.wordpress.com/2010/06/14/finally-a-law-to-deal-with-dead-marriages/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 04:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>NNLRJ INDIA</dc:creator>
<guid>http://indialawyers.wordpress.com/2010/06/14/finally-a-law-to-deal-with-dead-marriages/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[DHANANJAY MAHAPATRA IN THE TIMES OF INDIA Relationships between individuals depend largely on trust,]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align:justify;"><strong><span style="color:#000080;">DHANANJAY MAHAPATRA</span> IN THE TIMES OF INDIA</strong></div>
<div id="storydiv">
<div style="text-align:justify;">Relationships between individuals depend largely on trust, respect and love for each other. Matrimonial relationships are more complex. For, they involve delicate human and  emotional traits coupled with an intrinsic need for adjustment. Amid these  complexities, both must also have breathing space to preserve their own individuality.</p>
<p>Realising that these complexities could impact on husband-wife relations, the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, had made room for  divorce if both or one of them realized that they were caged in a marital bond  and it was better to quit then suffer. Section 13 of the act provided a long  list of grounds for divorce given the complexities of human nature. One could  seek divorce on the following grounds: adultery, conversion from Hinduism to  another religion, unsoundness of mind, suffering from venereal or virulent  diseases in communicable form for three continuous years, renouncing the world,  missing for seven years or more, and no cohabitation for two years.</p>
<p>In addition, it entitled a woman to divorce if the husband was found to be guilty of  marrying again or having a wife prior to marriage and if the earlier wife was  alive; or he was found guilty of rape, sodomy or bestiality after the  solemnization of marriage.</p>
<p>Despite the elaborate grounds, courts in the last two decades came across cases where a man and woman were living a dead  marriage, unable to find a ground to untie the knot, mainly stemming from mental  cruelty inflicted by one on the other.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court for the first time on January 13, 1995, in Romesh Chander vs Savitri [1995 (2) SCC 7],  posed the question whether a marriage which is otherwise dead emotionally and  practically should be continued. The problem — irretrievable breakdown of marriage — kept raising its head with frustrating regularity. A 3-judge bench of the apex court, in 2007, dealt with it elaborately in Samar Ghosh vs  Jaya Ghosh [2007 (4) SCC 511].</p>
<p>Justice Dalveer Bhandari, the author of the unanimous judgment, examined the worldwide judicial trends starting from  the 1864 British case of Prichard vs Prichard, where the court had felt that repeated acts of unprovoked violence by the wife were to be regarded as  cruelty, although they might not inflict serious bodily injury on the husband.</p>
<p>The irretrievable breakdown of marriage theory was first formulated by the Law Commission of India in its report to the  government on April 7, 1978, taking into account a two-decade long problem. This  means, the Union Cabinet ratified the need to address the problem after its ill  effects on marriage was diagnosed more than 50 years ago. The commission had said,  &#8220;In case the marriage has ceased to exist in substance and in reality, there is  no reason for denying divorce, then the parties alone can decide whether their  mutual relationship provides the fulfilment which they seek.</p>
<p>&#8220;Divorce should be seen as a solution and an escape route out of a difficult situation.  Such divorce is unconcerned with the wrongs of the past, but is concerned  with bringing the parties and the children to terms with the new situation  and developments by working out the most satisfactory basis upon which they  may regulate their relationship in the changed circumstances.&#8221;</p>
<p>But the breakdown theory, recognized by the commission and the apex court as a  solid ground for annulling a marriage, does not give licence to any husband to  walk into court seeking divorce claiming that his marriage has broken down irretrievably. The courts examining such pleas must apply the strict  scrutiny test, the SC had said in its 2007 judgment.</p>
<p>A husband or wife must show that &#8220;they have separated and the separation has continued for a  sufficient length of time and one of them has presented a petition of divorce&#8221;  before taking recourse to the breakdown theory. Moreover, the courts faced with  such a case &#8220;no doubt, should seriously endeavour to reconcile the parties;  yet, if it is found that the breakdown is irreparable, then divorce should not be withheld,&#8221; the SC said, adding, &#8220;The consequences of preservation in law  of a unworkable marriage, which has long ceased to be effective, are bound to  be a source of greater misery for the parties.&#8221;</p>
</div>
</div>
<div style="text-align:justify;"><strong></p>
<p><a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Finally-a-law-to-deal-with-dead-marriages/articleshow/6044766.cms" rel="nofollow">http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Finally-a-law-to-deal-with-dead-marriages/articleshow/6044766.cms</a></strong></div>
<p><!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Modification of Alimony...What You Need To Prove To Reduce Your Payments]]></title>
<link>http://robinroshkind.wordpress.com/2010/05/18/modification-of-alimony-what-you-need-to-prove-to-reduce-your-payments/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 15:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>robinroshkind</dc:creator>
<guid>http://robinroshkind.wordpress.com/2010/05/18/modification-of-alimony-what-you-need-to-prove-to-reduce-your-payments/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[By Robin Roshkind, Esquire, West Palm Beach, Florida If you are the payor of alimony to your former]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Robin Roshkind, Esquire, West Palm Beach, Florida</p>
<p>If you are the payor of alimony to your former spouse, there are certain conditions under the laws of the State of Florida which allow you to modifiy to eliminate your alimony obligation.</p>
<p>The first thing you need to look at is whether or not the alimony is &#8216;non modifiable&#8221; by agreement of the parties.  If it is non modifiable, then the judge cannot interfere with that agreement and change the alimony obligation.</p>
<p>Barring that, to modify your alimony obligation, you need to prove the following:</p>
<p>1.  That there is a substantial change in circumstances since the agreement or the trial awarding your spouse the alimony in the first place.</p>
<p>2.  That your spouse is perhaps living with a paramour who is supporting him/her financially.</p>
<p>3.  That you have had either a job loss or substantial pay cut.</p>
<p>4.  That your former spouse has had either a substantial raise/bonus or has won the lottery.</p>
<p>5.  That the lifestyle indicators of your former spouse warrant a change.  For example if you suddenly see your former spouse driving a Rolls  or living in a mansion, you know something is different.</p>
<p>Modification of alimony obligations hardly ever settle.  Usually a court hearing is required and so is the proof of your case.  For help with this issue, call one of the divorce lawyers at ROBIN ROSHKIND, P.A. at 561-835-9091 or click on the Firm&#8217;s web site at <a href="http://www.familylawwpb.com">www.familylawwpb.com</a> for more information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Divorce Rules in India]]></title>
<link>http://timjhonson.wordpress.com/2010/05/06/divorce-rules-in-india/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 17:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mindsprings</dc:creator>
<guid>http://timjhonson.wordpress.com/2010/05/06/divorce-rules-in-india/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A man, a divorcee, is technically an eligible bachelor. But not in this society, not in India, he is]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A man, a divorcee, is technically an eligible bachelor. But not in this society, not in India, he is a bachelor and a very eligible person. Looks like two different designations, and two identities. The label &#8216;divorcee&#8217; is stuck on him with superglue. It can not be peeled off, easily.<br />
Arranged marriages fail some times. The arranged marriages do not break up that easily. There are several reasons why such marriages do not fail so much. A lot of precautions are taken; such as community match, social match, financial stability match and horoscopes match etc. Close friends and relatives come forward to bring about a compromise, if the reasons for break up offer solutions.<br />
At the same time, while moving at a slower pace, the divorce rate in countries such as India, Japan and Latin America has also been on the rise. This trend reflects a combination of factors, including globalization, the rise of women&#8217;s rights, and an overall awareness of life&#8217;s possibilities in the face of adversity.<br />
Christian attitudes toward divorce vary between denominations. Traditionally most groups have been opposed to divorce, but there is a wide spectrum of belief. The Catholic Church considers divorce a permanent, life-long union: only after one of the spouses dies may the other remarry. On the other hand, the Eastern Orthodox Church and many Protestant churches are much more permissive, allowing divorce and remarriage during the spouses&#8217; lifetimes.<br />
The role of men and women within a marriage has evolved over the years. In the past the man was generally considered the breadwinner who went out to work while his wife stayed at home and looked after the children. This has changed a lot over time and there are no longer specific roles in this way. When someone entered a marriage they used to almost fall into these roles.<br />
No European countries have anywhere near the same low divorce rates. The lowest divorce rates in Europe are Macedonia and Bosnia with five per cent, nearly five times more than India. Much of the rest of Europe have much higher rates than this. There is a similar trend in North America. Sweden and the United States have the highest divorce rates, both with nearly fifty-five per cent of marriages ending this way.<br />
There are differing attitudes between the Roman Catholic Church and Protestants. Catholics are completely against divorce, and according to them it can only be dissolved by the death of one of the people involved in the marriage. The Catholic Church does allow annulments if a couple, or one half of a couple, can prove the marriage never existed in the correct form.<br />
The words &#8216;marriage is for keeps&#8217; are true even today and you should try all that you can to salvage a bad marriage. And this is where soul searching comes in. You need to reminisce about the past and see where, when and how did your marriage started to crumble. Unless you do that you can not salvage your marriage.<br />
Your word says that whatever we bind on earth is bound in heaven and whatever we loose on earth is loosed in heaven. Therefore we bind up the lies of the enemy that are coming against the minds and spirits of the men and women of Your church, Lord.</p>
<p><strong>Read About <a href="http://www.nrilegalservices.com/">Legal Services India</a> Also Read About <a href="http://www.nrilegalservices.com/matrimony_divorce.aspx">Divorce India</a> and <a href="http://www.nrilegalservices.com/power_of_attorney.aspx">Power of Attorney India</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Divorce Laws in India]]></title>
<link>http://timjhonson.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/divorce-laws-in-india/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mindsprings</dc:creator>
<guid>http://timjhonson.wordpress.com/2010/04/27/divorce-laws-in-india/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Marriage is the one of the most special bonds in a person&#8217;s lifetime. It marks the start of a]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marriage is the one of the most special bonds in a person&#8217;s lifetime. It marks the start of a new life, the start of a relationship, of something so beautiful some say it is made in the heavens. Then why are people losing faith in this institution, why are more bonds being broken than made we must ask. The reason lies within you.<br />
Christian attitudes toward divorce vary between denominations. Traditionally most groups have been opposed to divorce, but there is a wide spectrum of belief. The Catholic Church considers divorce a permanent, life-long union: only after one of the spouses dies may the other remarry.<br />
An effective social reform movement does need the help of law and a sympathetic judiciary to achieve its objectives. Women empowerment, equal rights to both men and women, equal share of property, etc., are some of the issues which we discuss everyday, in life, newspaper and on television.<br />
Consequently, it can also be said that attendant external factors like work pressure, the need to be independent (in maximum areas), achieving financial goals and relaxation of social norms also play a role in women seeking divorce (Men can breathe easy now, since the statistics do not lay the entire fault at your doorstep).<br />
Presently, in the United States, there is no federal standard governing the enforcement of divorce judgments rendered by foreign courts. Unlike state judgments, foreign judgments are not covered by the full faith and credit clause of the U.S. Constitution and other statutes.<br />
No European countries have anywhere near the same low divorce rates. The lowest divorce rates in Europe are Macedonia and Bosnia with five per cent, nearly five times more than India. Much of the rest of Europe have much higher rates than this. There is a similar trend in North America.<br />
The ease that a divorce can be obtained as been blamed for much of the increase in marriage break ups in America. It is easier than ever now, especially with the no-fault divorce law, which means couples can seek a divorce just because they simply don&#8217;t want to be married anymore.<br />
In any case, once you have gotten in touch with these things that are important to your spouse, think about at least one thing you could do today to help support that thing. It may be a kind word or a kind deed. You will find that, in helping your husband or wife to achieve his or her own goals, you will be creating a reservoir of good will that will encourage your spouse to support your own needs and goals.<br />
Maybe we hate to say it; a divorcee has to admit it. Better be honest! They will dig out the past anyway. After reading this column they may turn their faces away. Never mind, it is better that way. Saves a lot of embarrassment in future.<br />
When considering how poorly some marriages in our country fare, such actions on the half of the community seem very wise. Yet our culture would not stand for it, and label such actions as being &#8220;nosy&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>Read About <a href="http://www.nrilegalservices.com/">Legal Services India</a> Also Read About <a href="http://www.nrilegalservices.com/matrimony_divorce.aspx">Divorce India</a> and <a href="http://www.nrilegalservices.com/power_of_attorney.aspx">Power of Attorney India</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ocean's Ten...]]></title>
<link>http://roughlydaily.com/2010/03/19/oceans-ten/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>LW</dc:creator>
<guid>http://roughlydaily.com/2010/03/19/oceans-ten/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[One can&#8217;t be too careful.  It&#8217;s something of a relief, then, to find Money Mumbo Jumbo]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4060/4441377109_84e725b16e_o.jpg" alt="" width="454" height="308" /><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2799/4441377141_b1aea59e72.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="95" /></p>
<p>One can&#8217;t be too careful.  It&#8217;s something of a relief, then, to find Money Mumbo Jumbo&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://moneymumbojumbo.co.uk/fun-articles/10-safes-capable-of-protecting-the-worlds-riches" target="_blank"><strong>Ten Safes Capable of Protecting the World&#8217;s Riches</strong></a>&#8220;&#8211; from Fort Knox and the Doomsday Seed Vault to Karl Lagerfeld&#8217;s <em>tres chic</em> accessories cache.</p>
<p>Still, lest one rest easy, consider the Antwerp Diamond Center&#8217;s vault (pictured above):  It was considered the safest precious stone repository in the world, protected as it was by 10 layers of security&#8211; including Doppler radar, magnetic field locking system, seismic sensors, infrared detectors and a main door lock with over a 100 million possible combinations.  One can <a href="http://www.wired.com/politics/law/magazine/17-04/ff_diamonds?currentPage=all" target="_blank"><strong>read here</strong></a> how it was that, nonetheless, a team of thieves made off with over $100 million worth of sparklers from the vault.</p>
<p><strong>As we contemplate life in the Age of Schlage</strong>, we might recall that it was on this date in 1931 that the State of Nevada legalized most forms of gambling.  Anxious to cash in the the tourist boom that was expected to follow the (then-imminent) completion of Hoover (nee Boulder) Dam, the state legislature in effect simply legitimized what was an already-flourishing (albeit illegal) gaming industry.  (There was nothing that the State legislature could do about Prohibition, then in effect; but then, liquor was already flowing freely, if illicitly, in Nevada, as elsewhere in the U.S.)</p>
<p>Ever watchful for ways to attract more visitors, Nevada also eased the threshold for divorce&#8211; and became a &#8220;divorce haven.&#8221;  (Prior to the no-fault divorce revolution of the 1970s, divorces were quite difficult to obtain in other states.)</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.newspaperarchive.com/FreePdfViewer.aspx?topic=1931%3a+Nevada+votes+to+legalize+gambling&#38;img=9253780&#38;terms=Gaming&#38;dpviewdate=03%2f17%2f2009&#38;firstvisit=true"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2691/4441377173_3565e5f4d8_o.jpg" alt="" width="205" height="256" /> </a><em>Nevada State Journal</em><br />
March 20, 1931</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The "Embarassment" of Divorce.]]></title>
<link>http://robinroshkind.wordpress.com/2009/12/28/the-embarassment-of-divorce/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>robinroshkind</dc:creator>
<guid>http://robinroshkind.wordpress.com/2009/12/28/the-embarassment-of-divorce/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[By Robin Roshkind, Esquire, West Palm Beach, Florida A long time ago, divorce used to be a vehicle f]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Robin Roshkind, Esquire, West Palm Beach, Florida</p>
<p>A long time ago, divorce used to be a vehicle for the glamourous movie stars of the 1940s and 1950s.  Today it occurs throughout every socioeconomic level.   People tend to view divorce differently, depending upon their upbringing, religion, spirituality, culture and whether or not they are liberal or conservative.</p>
<p>Some see divorce as a vehicle for growth, self awareness, independence, and freedom.</p>
<p>Some see divorce as a failure, a shame, something not to be talked about.</p>
<p>Whatever your individual perspective, keep in mind that marriage is a legal institution, a legal relationship.  Along with it come rights, obligations and privileges.  The same holds true for divorce.  It is a legal entity or remedy.</p>
<p>As in any legal relationship, the parties are bound by contract, in this case the marriage contract.  If there is a breach, the remedy is divorce.</p>
<p>The sub issues are children of the marriage, money of the marriage, mental health, domestic violence and the like.  All are considered in the family court, which is a court of equity, or fairness.  In Florida, there is no right or wrong, only a husband and a wife who wish to not be married any more.  What happens to their relationship is usually up to them if they settle their divorce, or up to the judge if they can&#8217;t settle.  For more information call one of the divorce lawyers at ROBIN ROSHKIND, P.A. at 561-835-9091 or click on the Firm&#8217;s web site at <a href="http://www.familylawwpb.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.familylawwpb.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Divorce Law and Annulment]]></title>
<link>http://legalcatch.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/divorce-law-and-annulment/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 03:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Lawyers Attorneys</dc:creator>
<guid>http://legalcatch.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/divorce-law-and-annulment/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[An annulment is different than a divorce in that it legally makes a marriage null and void. An annul]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An annulment is different than a divorce in that it legally makes a marriage null and void. An annulled marriage is considered to have never existed. There are two types of annulment, legal annulment and religious annulment.</p>
<p><strong>Legal Annulment</strong></p>
<p>In order to have an annulment, it must be shown that the marriage was never valid to begin with. Some common reasons a marriage can be invalidated are:</p>
<ul>
<li>One      spouse was under the legal age to get married at the time of the marriage</li>
<li>One      spouse suffers from mental illness, or was under the effects of alcohol or      drugs at the time of the marriage</li>
<li>One      spouse was already married to someone else at the time of the marriage</li>
<li>One      spouse withheld important facts, such as a desire not to have children,      inability to have children or having a serious illness</li>
<li>The      marriage was never consummated</li>
<li>The      marriage was between two people that are too closely related to be legally      married, such as a parent and a child or aunt and a nephew</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Religious Annulment</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Religious annulments have nothing to do with legal annulments. They are granted by your religious institution, not your state. In some cases people obtain a divorce, and are later granted a religious annulment. Religious annulment requirements vary with each religion.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Differences Between Divorce and Annulment</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>The process of an annulment is very similar to a divorce. Similar papers must be filed and similar hearings are held. An annulment can usually be finalized much more quickly than a divorce. While annulments usually apply to short marriages, the duration of the marriage is not a factor in determining if an annulment is an option. For example, if two people were married for 30 years, but one of them was married to someone else first, it would qualify for annulment.</p>
<p>Because an annulment essentially means the marriage never existed, unlike with a divorce, there can be no claims for alimony or spousal support. Any children that were conceived during a marriage that was later annulled are considered legitimate children and child support, health care and visitation must still be determined for them. Some states are reluctant to grant an annulment for marriages that had children.</p>
<p>This article is for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Please contact an attorney in your local area for more information about divorce law.</p>
<p>Additional Legal Tools: Visit the law offices of Elan Wurtzel for more <a href="http://www.wurtzellaw.com/">information on divorce law</a> and annulments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Tiger Woods to join Jordan in Divorce Court]]></title>
<link>http://alistlawyer.wordpress.com/2009/12/17/tiger-woods-to-join-jordan-in-divorce-court/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>alistlawyer</dc:creator>
<guid>http://alistlawyer.wordpress.com/2009/12/17/tiger-woods-to-join-jordan-in-divorce-court/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Numerous sources are claiming that Elin is consulting famed Los Angeles based divorce attorney Sorre]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Numerous sources are claiming that Elin is consulting famed Los Angeles based divorce attorney Sorrell Trope, who has handled divorces for Hugh Grant, Britney Spears and is currently representing Dodgers owner Frank McCourt.  We at Alistlawyer.com believe that Elin will file for divorce.  The marriage does appear to be somewhat of a sham, if even half of the reports are true.  This should come as no surprise, as Tiger is known to hang out with Michael Jordan and Charles Barkeley. You might remember the 150 Million Dollar settlement Jordan&#8217;s wife obtained. Birds of a feather flock together.</p>
<p>Reports are that Tiger is &#8220;contrite and disoriented,&#8221; according to a source.  <a href="http://www.alistlawyer.com">To find your own divorce attorney, check out this service.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Banning divorce in California]]></title>
<link>http://csburks.com/2009/12/02/banning-divorce-in-california/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>C. S. Burks, Esq.</dc:creator>
<guid>http://csburks.com/2009/12/02/banning-divorce-in-california/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[There is an effort in California to ban divorce. Not only is this hilarious, this shows exactly why]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an effort in California to <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/AP/story/1361286.html">ban divorce.</a>  Not only is this hilarious, this shows exactly why the government should not have control over the marriage industry.  It also shows why rights, <a href="">as previously stated</a>, should not be put up for a popular vote.</p>
<p>Surprisingly, I actually support this measure. </p>
<p> If I lived in California, I could vote away your rights.  That, after all, must be the American way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[It Depends on What Your Definition of Marriage Is]]></title>
<link>http://santitafarella.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/it-depends-on-what-your-definition-of-marriage-is/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Santi Tafarella</dc:creator>
<guid>http://santitafarella.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/it-depends-on-what-your-definition-of-marriage-is/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Dan Savage is absolutely brilliant here. It&#8217;s straight people, not gay people, who have progre]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Savage is absolutely brilliant here. It&#8217;s straight people, not gay people, who have progressively redefined marriage, liberalizing it through history, and now gay people are saying: Hey! What straight people have turned marriage into, we want too. Clear and simple:</p>
<span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/-tM0Pg_KKV8?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
