Blogs about: Earth Movers
Featured Blog
Points To Remember While Buying And Maintaining Earth Movers
Earth movers are known as heavy duty machines and these are specially designed to execute construction task, especially those involving earthwork operations. This construction equipment is not calls f… more →
Latest B2B News | B2B Products Information
Points To Remember While Buying And Maintaining Earth Movers
wrote 3 months ago: Earth movers are known as heavy duty machines and these are specially designed to execute constructi … more →
256/project365
wrote 4 months ago: 10//February/2013 – the gorgeous sunset.. notice the three earth movers in the same position! … more →
Global Heavy Construction Equipment Industry Trends 2012:MarketResearchReports.biz
wrote 5 months ago: TechNavio’s analysts forecast the Global Heavy Construction Equipment market to grow at a CAG … more →
Worldwide Heavy Construction EquipmentMarket Size And Share 2012:MarketResearchReports.biz
wrote 5 months ago: TechNavio’s analysts forecast the Global Heavy Construction Equipment market to grow at a CA … more →
outside
wrote 5 months ago: We decided a messy tree hovering close to the house had to leave so we called in the pros, of course … more →
THE HOLLYWOOD FREEWAY - DOWNTOWN - 1957
— 7 comments
wrote 6 months ago: Looking toward downtown and city hall: . 1956 – construction: . 1956 – at Vineland and A … more →
All Australian-made excavation and earthmoving equipments, mud buckets & digging buckets
wrote 9 months ago: Earth moving equipment is essential in all projects that require the moving of a massive layer of ea … more →
Childhood
wrote 9 months ago: Almost every child spent time digging holes and playing with Tonka Trucks. Almost every child that i … more →
Non Potable Water
wrote 10 months ago: It was around April 2011, and there was some demolition going on behind the Element Case HQ (2011). … more →
Interactive 3D Sandbox - Kinect Hack
wrote 1 year ago: by Fred Abler It’s hard to recall how much fun we used to have in sandboxes as kids. It all came bac … more →
Sandbox Memories
— 1 comment
wrote 1 year ago: It's a Tonka Driving past this scene today at lunch brought back early childhood memories of playing … more →
For Buy / Sell/ Rent of JCB Loader.Model- 432 . Year- 2008.
wrote 1 year ago: Anyone who’s having access to the internet can NOW buy / sell / rent / lease equipment in the … more →
Earth Movers and Its Functions
wrote 1 year ago: Earth movers are heavy machineries used for various construction purposes. It is also used in variou … more →
Daily Divination 9-27-11 Michael Jackson's EARTH SONG - THIS IS IT; I-CHING Kua 60 Limitation and Cultivating Patience
wrote 1 year ago: I believe that I spent time with MJ last night as I woke up this morning with THE EARTH SONG and th … more →
Service Law: Bharath Earth Movers Limited Service Rules: Rule 16-Resignation-Withdrawal of-Permissibility-Employee submitted a letter of resignation on 4.1.1993 and requested to be relieved from his duties `as per company rules'-Resignation accepted on the same day-Employee was informed that he would be relieved `with immediate effect'-However, the employee was informed that his casual leave had been sanctioned from 5.1.1993 to 13.1.1993 and, 14.1.1993 being a holiday, the employee would be relieved by the close of working hours on 15.1.1993-During this period the employee changed his mind and withdrew his resignation by letter dated 8.1.1993-The employee stated that if a suitable reply was not given by 14.1.1993, the letter of resignation dated 4.1.1993 should be treated as withdrawn/cancelled-The employee was informed by a letter dated 15.1.1993 that he would be relieved after officer hours on that day-Service certificate in original along with a cheque was given to him-High Court upheld the company's action and held that it was not open to the employee to withdraw the resignation-Correctness of-Held: Rule 16 makes it clear that a permanent employee may resign from service by giving one month's notice in writing or by paying one month's basic pay in lieu of notice to the company-As the employee has not paid one month's basic pay in lieu of notice the resignation became effective after one month from the date of his resignation letter i.e. from 3.2.1993-Hence, the employee is entitled to withdraw his resignation before 3.2.1993-Therefore, by not giving effect to the letter dated 8.1.1993 whereby the employee withdrew his resignation the company acted contrary to law-Hence, action of company quashed and set aside-Employee entitled to all consequential benefits. Words and phrases Resignation-meaning. The appellant was employed as a Senior Manager in the respondent company and was transferred to the Corporate Office. The appellant was not assigned any work at the Corporate Office and, therefore, the appellant tendered a letter of resignation on 4.1.1993 and requested the respondent-company to relieve him from his duties `as per company rules'. The resignation was accepted on the same day. By another letter, the appellant was informed that his casual leave had been sanctioned from 5.1.1993 to 13.1.1993 and, 14.1.1993 being a holiday, the appellant would be relieved by the close of working hours on 15.1.1993. On 15.1.1993, the appellant was informed that he would be relieved after office hours on that day. The service certificate in original along with a cheque was given to him. The High Court held that since the appellant had submitted his resignation on 4.1.1993 and it was accepted on the same day by the company, by not continuing him in service, no illegality had been committed by the company. Hence, the appeal. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. Rule 16 of the Bharath Earth Movers Limited Service Rules makes it clear that a permanent employee may resign from service by giving one month's notice in writing or by paying one month's basic pay in lieu of notice to the company. Admittedly, the appellant had not paid one month's basic pay in lieu of notice to the company. It is, therefore, clear that since the letter of resignation was as per company rules, it was to become effective after one month. [161-f, g] 2.1. Though the respondent-company had accepted the resignation of the appellant on 4.1.1993 and the appellant was ordered to be relieved on that day, by a subsequent letter, he was granted casual leave from 4.1.1993 to 13.1.1993. Moreover, he was informed that he would be relieved after office hours on 15.1.1993. The vinculum juris, therefore, continued and the relationship of employer and employee did not come to an end on 4.1.1993. The relieving order and payment of salary also make it abundantly clear that he has continued in service of the company up to 15.1.1993. [166-g, h] 2.2. The appellant had asserted that he had not received terminal benefits such as gratuity, provident fund, etc. It is thus proved that up to 15.1.1993, the appellant remained in service. If it is so, as per settled law, the appellant could have withdrawn his resignation before that date. It is an admitted fact that a letter of withdrawal of resignation was submitted by the appellant on 8.1.1993. It was, therefore, incumbent on the company to give effect to the said letter. By not doing so, the company has acted contrary to the law and against the decisions of this Court and hence, the action of the company deserves to be quashed and set aside. The High Court was in error in not granting relief to the appellant. Accordingly, the action of the company as upheld by the High Court is hereby set aside. [167-b, c, d] Union of India v. Gopal Chandra Misra, [1978] 2 SCC 301, Balram Gupta v. Union of India, [1987] Supp. SCC 228, Punjab National Bank v. P.K. Mittal, [1989] Supp. 2 SCC 175, Power Finance Corporation Ltd. v. Pramod Kumar Bhatia,[1997] 4 SCC 280, Shambhu Murari Sinha I v. Project and Development India, [2000] 5 SCC 621 and Shambhu Murari Sinha II v. Project and Development India, [2002] 3 SCC 437, relied on. 3. As the appellant withdrew the resignation and yet he was not allowed to work, he is entitled to all consequential benefits. [167-e] S.N. Bhat, N.P. Panwar and D.P. Chaturvedi for the Appellant. K.K. Mani and K.B. Sandeep for the Respondent.
— 1 comment
wrote 1 year ago: Image via Wikipedia CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 1404 of 2003 PETITIONER: SRIKANTHA S.M. RESPONDENT: BHA … more →
EARTH MOVERS SERVICES
wrote 1 year ago: Global Hawk Corporation diversified into the business of Earth Excavation, Construction and Mining W … more →
Taxpayers Ultimately Pay For Construction Site Thefts
wrote 2 years ago: ST. LOUIS (KMOX) - Heavy equipment – bulldozers, backhoes and earth movers - has been disappe … more →
"I'm afraid a mouse doesn't live for a very long time."
— 1 comment
wrote 2 years ago: Gus’ grandfather got a new roommate at the rehab center where he is recovering from a broken h … more →
Wasted
wrote 3 years ago: Driving twenty miles on the city highway: no animals, no trees, no life. White dust blocks out the … more →
