(SPIEGEL online) – … Das könnte Skeptiker des vom Menschen verursachten Klimawandels bestärken – doch genau davor warnen die Autoren. …

http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/natur/0,1518,663835,00.html

By Clare Boston

Forecasts for the 2009 hurricane season were wide ranging earlier this year, from an active season to a near-normal or below average one.  In reality, 2009 remained much quieter than in a number of recent years, getting off to the slowest start for 17 .  This has been down to a number of factors, but is most likely due to El Niño, which warms surface waters and slows the wind shear required to generate tropical storms.

This quiet  season has caused many people to question the link between hurricane intensity and climate change.  However, events of one particular year, or even a number of years, may not be representative of a more long term trend and therefore cannot be used as evidence for global warming or cooling.

Marshall Shepherd and Thomas Knutson discuss the debate on the linkage between global warming and hurricane activity in an article in Geography Compass.  Research has focussed on the roles of anthropogenic forcing and natural variability in the recent increasing trend in hurricane intensity.  The article highlights the need for significantly more observations, such as sea surface temperatures and vertical wind shear, alongside more modelling of the role of these factors, before the links between global warming and hurricanes can be fully understood.

Read the National Geographic article

Read the article in Metro International

National Hurricane Center website

Read Shepherd and Knutsen (2007). The current debate on the linkage between global warming and hurricanes. Geography Compass.

I’m sure most of you are familiar with these images that have been circulating the blogosphere:

First, let me point out that Al Gore has failed at proving that Global Warming exists. That’s like trying to prove that Santa exists. Sure, wouldn’t it be dandy? But facts are facts and fiction is fiction. So, what does a has-been politician do when his life’s work has been proven time and time again to be a fraud? Well, if this has-been politician is Al Gore; he resorts to Photoshopping “evidence”. I mean, Photoshop trumps science, right? Wrong. Sorry, Al. It doesn’t. Just like whining about pregnant chads doesn’t win an election. YES, we all remember your whiny ass complaining about pregnant chads and dimples on ballots.

In the images above you can clearly see that several massive hurricanes have been Photoshopped. It’s been proven that hurricanes are at a 30 year low. Here are some graphs I found at Watts Up With That:

Both Northern Hemisphere and South Hemisphere AND therefore overall Global hurricane activity has continued to sink to levels not seen since the 1970s. Even more astounding, when the Southern Hemisphere hurricane data is analyzed to create a global value, we see that Global Hurricane Energy has sunk to 30-year lows, at the least. Since hurricane intensity and detection data is problematic as one goes back in time, when reporting and observing practices were different than today, it is possible that we underestimated global hurricane energy during the 1970s.

Using a well-accepted metric called the Accumulated Cyclone Energy index or ACE for short (Bell and Chelliah 2006), which has been used by Klotzbach (2006) and Emanuel (2005) (PDI is analogous to ACE), and most recently by myself in Maue (2009) , simple analysis shows that 24-month running sums of global ACE or hurricane energy have plummeted to levels not seen in 30 years.

Why use 24-month running sums instead of simply yearly values? Since a primary driver of the Earth’s climate from year to year is the El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) acts on time scales on the order of 2-7 years, and the fact that the bulk of the Southern Hemisphere hurricane season occurs from October – March, a reasonable interpretation of global hurricane activity requires a better metric than simply calendar year totals. The 24-month running sums is analogous to the idea of “what have you done for me lately”. During the past 6 months, extending back to October of 2008 when the Southern Hemisphere tropical season was gearing up, global ACE had crashed due to two consecutive years of well-below average Northern Hemisphere hurricane activity. To avoid confusion, I am not specifically addressing the North Atlantic, which was above normal in 2008 (in terms of ACE), but the hemisphere (and or globe) as a whole. The North Atlantic only represents a 1/10 to 1/8 of global hurricane energy output on average but deservedly so demands disproportionate media attention due to the devastating societal impacts of recent major hurricane landfalls.

Interesting, indeed. Visit Watts Up With That for more information. Unless you’re a liberal. From what I understand; you liberals aren’t all that interested in facts and information. But, it’s there if you ever decide to quit being morons.

If you look at the second image I posted; the one with the faux-hurricanes… you’ll notice that the Arctic has magically disappeared! Funny, since the Arctic ice is currently at the SAME levels as 1979. The good people at Daily Tech pointed this out.

(click to enlarge)

Rapid growth spurt leaves amount of ice at levels seen 29 years ago.

Thanks to a rapid rebound in recent months, global sea ice levels now equal those seen 29 years ago, when the year 1979 also drew to a close.

Visit Daily Tech for more information.

Also, NASA points out that the average temperature of the water near the top of the Earth’s oceans has significantly cooled since 2003. CLICK FOR NASA ARTICLE

BBC has found that we have not observed any increase in global temperatures for the last 11 years. Yes, that’s over ONE DECADE. CLICK FOR BBC ARTICLE

So… tell me… Why does Florida appear to be dissolving in Al Gore’s lame Photoshopped images? What the hell happened to CUBA? Last time I checked; Cuba still exists. Also; look at the SIZE of those faux-hurricanes. Anyone who actually believes this Global Warming bullshit simply WANTS to. There is no other conclusion.

Here’s something fun:
Letting Al Gore know we aren’t falling for his junk science, Portland, Oregon 11/18/09

Wake up, people. He’s cashing in and making BILLIONS off of easily influenced MORONS.

Looks like a NW Swell with an angle of about 295 degrees could make it’s way into the south facing region of Santa Barbara in the shoulder high range. Of course around the corner to the north, west facing beaches will see solid overhead lines from this swell.  No rain will be associated with this storm since it heads north before getting too close to us.  water temps in SB are in the low 60’s and central coast upper 50’s.

Last month the Climate Prediction Center announced that El Niño was expected to strengthen and last through the Northern Hemisphere winter 2009-2010.

Recent measurements of sea level height from the Ocean Surface Topography Mission (OSTM)/Jason-2 oceanography satellite showed that El Niño is experiencing late-fall resurgence.  A strong wave of warm water, known as a Kelvin wave, had spread from the western to the central and eastern Pacific. This Kelvin wave was triggered by a large-scale, sustained weakening of trade winds in the western and central equatorial Pacific during October.

El Nino Resurging in November 2009. Acquired October 26, 2009 - November 5, 2009. Credit:NASA image by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Ocean Surface Topography Team.

This image was created with data collected OSTM/Jason 2 during a 10-day period centred on November 1, 2009.

Sea surface height is an indication of temperature because water expands slightly as it warms (thermal expansion) and contracts as it cools. The elevated sea levels in the central and eastern Pacific are equivalent to sea surface temperatures more than one to two degrees Celsius above normal (two to four degrees Fahrenheit).

Red and white areas in the central and eastern equatorial Pacific were 100 to 180 millimetres (4 to 7 inches) above normal. In the western equatorial Pacific, blue and purple areas show where sea levels were between 80 and 150 millimetres (3 and 6 inches) below normal.

El Niño means drought in some parts of the world, such as Indonesia. But for the American west this late charge by El Niño “is a pleasant surprise, upping the odds for much needed rain and an above-normal winter snowpack,” said oceanographer Bill Patzert of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California.

Source and more information: Earth Observatory, NASA

Evidence continues to emerge regarding the effects of declining ice volume and areal extent in the Arctic is affecting weather patterns across the Northern Hemisphere.  In a general sense, some kind of effects are of course to be expected.  But what kind, what are their magnitude, etc. need to be explored.  If it were up to the Cons, science would be defunded and we would have no idea what these emerging trends are.  This is the critical importance that science plays in our society.

I’m going to link to another diary and allow readers to explore the material there.  It’s decently written and links to science centers and refereed journals.  Here is the summary:

Today’s Arctic sea ice extent is hovering at the historic record low level for today’s date observed in 2007. Warm water entering the ice free zone from the Atlantic ocean is adding heat to the Arctic, changing the northern hemisphere atmospheric circulation pattern – the weather of the whole northern hemisphere. Even El Nino is different from what it used to be.

Enjoy.

En mi último artículo hable de la inseguridad, de cómo nos está comiendo, avasallando, modificando nuestras rutinas y llegando hasta el punto de que no estamos usando el celular mientras manejamos por miedo a que nos lo roben y no porque es bien peligroso y nos distrae con las consecuencias que eso trae en el manejo; de hecho pienso que las muy interesantes campañas de la Fundación Seguros Caracas y de MOVILNET pidiéndonos que tengamos la cabeza donde es y no en el celular mientras manejamos serían más útiles si cultivaran o impulsaran valores humanos como el respeto a la propiedad privada, a la persona, a las normas que nos hace más falta… Como añoro los 30 años y más de 1200 episodios de Valores Humanos… Pero bueno, continuemos con el desarrollo de los temas nacionales que me ocupan y que hoy es el del agua y la electricidad que están íntimamente ligados por cierto.

Aquí les va el problema a ver qué solución le consiguen, no hay agua porque se fue la luz y no hay luz porque no hay agua… ¿Qué tal? Pues si, como se los digo, no hay agua porque se fue la luz o más bien se ha reducido la capacidad de producción de electricidad del sistema de generación hidroeléctrica del medio y bajo Caroní porque no hay agua suficiente en el rio Caroní por menores precipitaciones y periodos de sequia más largos con altas temperaturas que generan a su vez mayor evaporación en el Guri. Esto en principio se resolvería si empieza a llover, pero no es así, no es tan fácil la cosa.

El tema Guri/Caroní, generación de hidroelectricidad es uno, pero otro es el de la incapacidad y carencia total de previsión de este gobierno y solo de este gobierno (los otros si invirtieron, prueba es Guri, las Macaguas, Caruachi, Planta Centro, Uribante/Caparo y otras) en no continuar con el plan de expansión, mantenimiento y mejora de la infraestructura de generación que tanto EDELCA, como CADAFE y filiales y la EDC tenían o más bien tienen y que no puede detenerse porque el crecimiento poblacional no se detiene, a menos claro que estemos en Japón donde por ahí leí que hasta están prediciendo decrecimiento en su población.

El todo del problema es lo que digo, no se invirtió, no se pensó ni se calculó el impacto del aumento del poder adquisitivo de la población, el crecimiento poblacional y la migración a centros urbanos de 2do y 1er nivel donde aumentó el consumo de electricidad y claro, el de agua también y nos quedamos pensando que el Guri daba para todo eso y más y no es así, nos viene avisando desde hace cási dos años con los apagones, las interrupciones en el sistema interconectado, pero nada, no le paramos y no se nos ocurrió suplir el déficit o por lo menos prever suplirlo con una planta adicional en el centro del país, algo como una expansión de Planta Centro que funcione con gas o carbón u orimulsión, no somos los reyes del gas ahora pues? Pero no, no se nos ocurrió y como ahora resulta que está haciendo más calor, que somos más y tenemos más real, compramos mas luces y ponemos más aires acondicionados y zas… se nos dispara el breaker porque la luz no da pa´tanto y no nos dimos cuenta… Típico…

Con el agua pasa más o menos lo mismo, no nos preocupamos por fomentar su conservación ni por mantener y mejorar la infraestructura de almacenamiento, distribución y bombeo, ni por ejecutar planes efectivos de control de fugas. Es normal y bien triste también saber cuando está llegando el agua a varias de las zonas de nuestras ciudades por la cantidad de botes que hay cuando las bombas están trabajando y por supuesto que así no hay embalse que sea suficiente, ni lluvia que lo reponga. No le han gastado al sistema y el resultado es este, se puso dura la lluvia, hace más calor, hay más gente y upa!!! Ahora nos falta el agua también, bello pues!!!

Pura y simple ineptitud y desidia porque total, ese rollo es de otro y habrá alguien o algo que lo resuelva temporalmente y no permanentemente que es lo que debemos proponernos y seguro que sale un genio oportunista y montan una siembre de arboles de tapara para las totumas que nos receto el ídolo de las masas.

Creo que la solución no es tan complicada, es más bien sencilla y se resuelve en un quinquenio con el uso de algo que nos sobra, billete. Si, billete proveniente de los impuestos que pagamos todos y de los dólares que ingresan por la venta de petróleo. Si solo invirtiéramos eficientemente el 2% del ingreso petrolero y 5% de la captación de impuestos nacionales en desarrollo y mantenimiento de los sistemas de generación eléctrica y de distribución y procesamiento de aguas se nos acabarían los problemas, y si a eso le sumamos un 0,5% del presupuesto nacional en educación para el consumo racional de los recursos, estaríamos hechos.

Ahí se los dejo… y por cierto para mis estimadas lumbreras del liderazgo revolucionario, esto es más fácil y más amigable con el ambiente que montar bancos de plantas eléctricas diesel para generar electricidad en las urbanizaciones y pueblos. Genios ambientales que tenemos aquí en Corpoelec…. Bestias!!!  ¿O será que leyeron que el Ché no usaba medias y era bien cochinote porque bañarse y usar medias era de capitalistas y ahora nos van a forzar esa también?

A todos nos sorprende el efecto mariposa en la predicción meteorológica, pero a los expertos les sorprende más que el fenómeno de la Oscilación del Sur de El Niño (ENSO) no se limite a la capa inferior de la atmósfera (troposfera) sino que esté conectado con la estratosfera y a través de ella con toda la atmósfera terrestre en su conjunto. Una influencia que parece muy remota pero que ha sido evidenciada gracias a la correlación entre las fluctuaciones de la capa de ozono y las variaciones de temperatura en el Oceáno Pacífico asociadas a ENSO por el Dr. Randel y sus colegas. Los óvalos naranjas corresponden a anomalías positivas y los azules a valores negativos. Estas anomalías no sólo están concentradas en los trópicos y latitudes medias, sino que se extienden hasta las regiones árticas durante el invierno. Las flechas azules representan ondas térmicas que desde la troposfera alcanzan la estratosfera produciendo un proceso de ruptura (similar a la ola que rompe en la playa) que es un motor fundamental en la circulación térmica en toda la estratosfera. Nos lo cuenta Elisa Manzini, “Atmospheric science: ENSO and the stratosphere,” Nature Geoscience 2: 749-750, 2009, quien se hace eco del artículo técnico de William J. Randel, Rolando R. Garcia, Natalia Calvo, Dan Marsh, “ENSO influence on zonal mean temperature and ozone in the tropical lower stratosphere,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 36: L15822, 2009 [versión gratis en la web del primer autor].

El estudio de Randel et al. se ha beneficiado de que estudios anteriores no encontraran ninguna asociación entre ENSO y la estratosfera debido a que las erupciones volcánicas de El Chichón (1982) y el Pinatubo (1991), que ocurrieron durante la fase caliente de ENSO, enmascararon sus efectos sobre la troposfera. Los datos más recientes muestra claramente la correlación entre la temperatura troposférica debida a ENSO y la concentración de ozono estratosférica. Los autores han utilizado el modelo por ordenador de la química del ozono y los gases de efecto invernadero acoplados a la atmósfera global llamado WACCM (Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model) desarrollado por la NCAR. Con dicho programa han analizado la dinámica de la atmósfera entre 0 y 140 km de altitud forzada con la variabilidad de temperaturas superficiales debidas a ENSO. Los resultados muestran una clara correlación entre ambos mediada por la tropopausa, la capa que separa troposfera y estratosfera.

Fortuna asegura que nivel de lago es óptimo este mes

La inminente llegada del fenómeno de El Niño afectará la producción de energía en las plantas hídricas existentes.

FLOR BOCHAREL Q.
FORTUNA, CHIRIQUÍ
nacionales@prensa.com

Ante la inminente presencia del fenómeno de El Niño y la larga sequía que advierten los especialistas en clima, la empresa de generación eléctrica Enel-Fortuna implementará un plan de uso eficiente de energía y, de ser necesario, se utilizará la generación térmica, confirmó Jacques Le Page, gerente de la empresa.

Le Page dijo que no prevé la compra de energía a Centroamérica, porque no esperan una falta de generación cuando llegue la sequía por efectos de El Niño.

En un recorrido se observó que el nivel del lago de Fortuna es bajo, pero el gerente de Enel-Fortuna aseguró que está en los niveles normales.

El nivel del lago estuvo más bajo en los meses de septiembre y octubre, cuando se experimentó un clima seco en la Cordillera Central, sin la presencia de lluvias.

“A la fecha, el nivel del lago de Fortuna es de mil 37 metros con 38 centímetros sobre el nivel del mar; el promedio normal para la temporada es de mil 35 metros con 96 centímetros. “Estamos bien en lo que a generación se refiere en estos momentos”, subrayó el gerente.

Enel-Fortuna aporta el 23% de la energía eléctrica que consume del país y sus instalaciones están ubicadas en el distrito de Gualaca, provincia de Chiriquí.

Ese momento de ilusión que todos tenemos cuando los niños de la suerte cantan número a número las cantidades de dinero correspondientes se puede enmudecer. La  Ley General del Audiovisual establece que cualquier programa con contenido lúdico dedicado a los juegos de azar sea retirado del horario diurno y vespertino. 

La nueva prohibición de emitir programas dedicados al azar y a la suerte antes de la 1 de la madrugada, desarrollada en el Proyecto de Ley General Audiovisual, hace que puedan peligrar las emisiónes del Sorteo de Navidad, El Sorteo del Niño o la Primitiva. Los concursos televisivos serán apartados al horario de madrugada .

     El proyecto esta estudiando la posibililidad de que este tipo de juegos empiecen a la 1 y acaben a las 5 de la mañana. La iniciativa  no contempla ninguna excepción, ni los Juegos de Lotería ni la Once se librarían.

     Por lo visto el objetivo, no son los juegos de Lotería y Apuestas del Estado sino los concursos televisivos en los que el telespectador llama a un número de teléfono, generalmente una línea 905, para poder participar en un sorteo que le permita entrar a jugar en directo y contestar a una pregunta del presentador del programa. Estos concunsos muchas veces son fraudulentos

A la par los loteros protestan por la privatización del sector

Dentro del mismo sector los vendedores de Lotería estan protestando por la pretendida privatización. Asociaciones como Apla, Anapal y Fenapal han convocado una manifestación frente al Círculo de Bellas Artes de Madrid para protestar por “las intenciones del Gobierno de privatizar de forma encubierta la lotería pública”.

     Según la disposición adicional del artículo 34 de la Ley de Presupuestos Generales del Estado del próximo año, cualquier entidad jurídica, mediante contratos privados, podrá comercializar juegos  y apuestas del Estado.

     Según Manuel izquierdo, presidente de Anapal si se privatiza el sector se podrían llegar a destruir cerca de 12.000 puestos de trabajo. Además esto podría ocasionar un mayor descontrol, ya que es Hacienda la que controla estas apuestas. Si cambia a manos privadas sería más difícil garantizar que no hubiera fraudes, lo que repercutiría en perjuicio del consumidor.

Además comienza la campaña de publicidad

El nuevo eslogan será “Hay muchas Navidades pero todas están aquí”. la campaña publicitaria contempla las disitntas formas de celebrar la Navidad: la Navidad de los cuentos, de los viajes, en familia o al estilo hippie.

     En un minuto en el anuncio aparecen una gran diversidad de personajes: desde la familia que celebra feliz la Navidad, una joven que pasea en un descapotable o unos trabajadores de taller descorchando una botella.

(Video – 1:01)

Ahora en Navidad por la crisis si se juega menos

El anhelo por olvidarse de los problemas como llegar a fin de mes o el paro ha producido en muchos bolsillos españoles juagar a la lotería. La esperanza y la suerte no se pierde en tiempos de crisis. Sin embargo el gasto no aumenta, por “lo que pueda pasar”.

Según El director comercial de Loterías del Estado, Juan Antonio Gallardo, “En épocas de crisis juega más gente pero menos cantidad”. Según sus cifras en las ventas de todos los juegos de Loterías del Estado se aprecia un descenso del 3% con respecto a 2008.

Mauricio Fernández presidente minicipal de San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León, cuyos pasos, poses y promesas dejan ver que mantiene presuntos vínculos con el narcotráfico, que ha cedido la plaza al cártel de los Beltrán Leyva y que su promesa de limpieza de narcos y secuestradores al municipio más rico del país.  ¿Quién puede garantizar limpieza de criminales y narcos en tal o cual territorio del país? Sólo los criminales y narcos.

Investigaciones oficiales de la PGR lo vinculan con el narcotráfico, con un seguimiento puntual  de sus pasos, poses y promesas y de los ajustes de cuentas de los cárteles que operan en Nuevo León concluye  que Fernández mantiene presuntos vínculos con el narcotráfico.

Previo a la toma de posesión de Mauricio Fernández, la autoridad federal descubrió una misteriosa ola de crímenes de secuestradores y sicarios al servicio de los Beltrán Leyva. El último fue El Negro Saldaña. Los crímenes parecen la limpia anticipada que ese cártel habría prometido a Mauricio Fernández.

La hipótesis oficial es que los Beltrán Leyva —Arturo es El Jefe de Jefes— habrían vendido protección, limpieza y orden al alcalde de Garza García a cambio de entregar la plaza. Pero los Beltrán Leyva no contaban con la estupidez de El Loco, quien puede terminar en prisión.

El expediente de la SSP federal, que nutrió el interrogatorio al que fue sometido Fernández ayer en la delegación de la PGR en Nuevo León, apunta a que El Jefe de Jefes se llama Arturo Beltrán Leyva, líder del cártel que lleva sus apellidos, aprendiz de El Chapo Guzmán.

El “grupo rudo”, concluye la principal línea de investigación, estaría conformado por sicarios de los hermanos Beltrán Leyva, que desde la campaña del panista habrían establecido comunicación con él para ofrecerle encargarse de la seguridad en San Pedro —cero ejecuciones, secuestros y robos—, a cambio de que pudieran vivir ahí sus familias, usaran Monterrey como ruta clave del trasiego de droga y controlaran los cotizados giros negros regios para la venta al menudeo de sus productos.

Figura en la misma investigación oficial aún no hecha pública: El Negro trabajaba para Mario Pineda Villa El Borrado, asesinado días antes también con narcorrecado de El Jefe de Jefes, quien de acuerdo a la primera indagatoria —incluso de la PGJDF, que se topó con el cadáver de la polémica— estaría realizando una “operación limpieza” en su organización, tras haber detectado que El Borrado, El Negro y José Antonio Jiménez El Niño realizaban actividades paralelas sin informarle,  entre ellas, secuestros como el del joven Fernando Martí.

 No obstante las evidencias en manos de autoridades federales, lo peor del caso sería que el propio PAN gobierno y el presidente del PAN, César Nava decidiera solapar a Mauricio Fernández y que  por razones políticas, pretendiera ocultar sus nexos con criminales.

http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/columnas/80884.html
http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/columnas/80886.html

Il y a trois choses que l’on peut observer dans l’histoire du communisme: des surplus de ce dont la population n’a pas besoin (armement / militarisme), des pénuries de ce dont la population a vraiment de besoin et de la corruption généralisée.

Au Venezuela, c’est de l’eau et de l’électricité dont on manque présentement. Chavez peut bien blâmer la sécheresse causée par El Nino, qui a résulté en une faible hydrologie au principal barrage du pays, il n’en demeure pas moins que le réel coupable est le sous-investissement dans les infrastructures. Cette installation hydroélectrique fournit 60% de l’électricité du pays et la sécheresse a réduit sa production d’environ 10%; pas de quoi causer autant de problèmes. Plusieurs centrales thermiques du pays, supposées prendre le relais lorsque l’hydrologie est mauvaise, sont hors-fonction, puisqu’elles n’ont pas été entretenues adéquatement.

En 2007, Chavez a nationalisé l’industrie de l’électricité. Depuis ce temps, le pays a connu six “blackouts” nationaux. Les budgets alloués à l’entretien et l’expansion des infrastructures électriques du pays n’ont été dépensés qu’à 25%, l’argent ayant été alloué à d’autres postes et dérouté dans les poches des fonctionnaires. Le gouvernement a sous-investi et ses infrastructures sont maintenant inadéquates. Pendant ce temps, les tarifs ont été gelés (trop bas) ce qui fait en sorte que la demande d’électricité demeure élevée et croissante.

Voici ce que M. Chavez propose pour remédier à la situation (tiré d’une récente rencontre du cabinet):

“Il y a des gens qui chantent sous la douche pendant 30 minutes; quel mauvais communisme! Trois minutes, c’est plus qu’assez!”

Pendant ce temps, Chavez a récemment dépensé US$3 milliards en armement, notamment pour “montrer les dents” face à la Colombie. Il a d’ailleurs déployé 15,000 soldats à sa frontière cette semaine.

Pas surprenant que la population soit en rogne et que le taux d’approbation de Chavez soit en chute libre. Il y a néanmoins une chose qui pourra aider Chavez à traverser cette tempête politique: il pourra continuer à utiliser les dizaines de stations de télévision et de radio qu’il a fait fermer ces derniers mois pour diffuser sa propagande communiste et “démontrer hors de tout doute” que les problèmes sont liés à El Nino!

Al recurrir al monte del recuerdo, he imaginado como habríamos de estampar las sombras contra un gorrión. Donde todo empezó y la piedra fue río. Nuestra suerte cayó a un barandal sin fondo. El vidrio roto; siempre desvistiéndose en automático. Así describías la algarabía. Y yo sin decirte nada, más que inclinada sobre un papel contra el mundo, proclamaría:

“La vida es otra”.    -   Hyndra.

Arianna Bañuelos Z.

En aquel tiempo soñaba con estudiar aviación. Siempre me gustaron las cosas vistas desde una pendiente (cosa curiosa). Yo veía caer las hojas, el otoño, los días. Cuando te conocí todo era al revés. Las pendientes se volvían dinámicas. Me soltabas de mis nubes para aterrizar en un campo minado (lleno de juegos, acertijos, cosas extrañas). Todo me maravillaba. Hasta entonces nunca me supe niña (nunca fui).

Muy lentamente, también ocurrió que nos hicimos cómplices. Recuerdo como P. me ponía los pelos de punta. Una mañana decidí encelarme (todavía lo hago), porque seguramente jugabas a los novios con él. Y yo entonces, como no conocía los besos ni las caricias, me entristecía no poder estar a tu lado. Te hubiera buscado, aunque seguramente, mis lágrimas caerían como lo hacen ahora mis ojos cuando por breves momentos te vas. Desconozco si me viste triste o deprimida. La verdad es que yo era una niña distraída (nada más).

Muy rápidamente nos separamos. Después de que te mudaste a tu pueblo, los recreos fueron una tortura. Mis nubes de algodón se volvieron grises y obscuras. Perdí la inocencia y las cosas salieron a relucir (esas calamidades que yo llamaba penas). Después, no me quedó nada más que el recuerdo de tu sonrisa, tus pecas, tus ojos. Por once años recordé tus ojos. Sabría que me volverías a encontrar.

Ahora que la vida* nos ha devuelto, los memorables 80’s regresan a su lugar de origen. Me acuerdo que te gustaba hacerme reír. Todo eso tiene sentido ahora. Con más frecuencia existe un patio iluminado donde solíamos soñar despiertas. Y nada desde ese entonces ha cambiado. Hay detalles que empiezo a recordar (Star Wars, Mario Bros, Los SuperCampeones). Hubo algo de infancia feliz (eso que pudiera salvar a cualquiera; la inocencia).

Por cierto que me debes una dosis de cosquillas. Me lo debes por aquella vez de P. Yo te debo la vida (aunque ni siquiera eso lo compensa). El amor ama cuando es.

Wiele wskazuje na to, że po dłuższym okresie “niezdecydowania” El Nino zaczęło przybierać na sile. Dla przypomnienia dodam, że według prognozy NOAA tegoroczne El Nino ma być wyjątkowo silne; z anomalią sięgającą nawet do ok. +2 oC. Szczyt anomalii powinien przypaść na przełom roku 2009/10.

Zdjęcia: NOAA

Poniżej link do ciekawej animacji przedstawiającej “rozwój” anomalii od 25. maja do 9 listopada. Dane NOAA:

LINK

Thomas H. Maugh II has written an article entitled “Peru’s Nazca culture was brought down with its trees” in the L.A. Times (online) highlighting research which concludes that the decimation of the huarango tree, a massive relative of the mesquite living 1000 years and with roots reaching 180 feet (55 meters) deep used for firewood or housing, is largely responsible for the devastating effects of flooding brought on by El Nino in approximately 500 CE, the results of which left the Nazca with little or no agriculture.

The Nazca are known, of course, for their immense line drawings, found in Peru and fully visible only from the air.

One can say that this may be a rather literal manifestation of “you reap what you sow”, wherein one reaps truly nothing at all, given that, quite simply, nothing may be sown. (Nothing is truly invisible.)

Environmental, social and cultural disasters are, as we know, nothing new.

nothingisinvisible@live.fr

What follows is a general theory of natural climate variation supported by observation of the changing temperature of the atmosphere and the sea between 1948 and September 2009. This work suggests that strong warming after 1978 is an entirely natural phenomenon.

Imagine a small planet about the size of the Earth orbiting a sun just like our own. The planet has an atmosphere composed of nitrogen (76%), oxygen (23%) and trace gases (1%) of which argon makes up half of that one percent.

Let us further imagine that the sun bombards the Earth with radiation so energetic as to destroy the integrity of nitrogen and oxygen in the planet’s upper atmosphere. The region where this occurs may be called the ‘ionosphere’. When superheated at the highest elevations it can be known as the ‘thermosphere’.  The electrically unbalanced particles of the ionosphere possess negative or a positive polarity. Like iron filings scattered across a piece of paper atop a magnetized iron bar, atmospheric ions orient themselves according to the lines of the planets magnetic field. Rotating with the planet, the ionosphere is a place of constant flux.  Particles are energized on the dayside and dragged into a long tail on the night-side by the pressure of the solar wind, a highly magnetized stream of helium and hydrogen emanating from the sun. There is an exchange of energy between the wind and the ionosphere and particles are accelerated in one direction or the other and re-distributed according to the tension imposed by the constantly changing electromagnetic medium.

As ionized particles radiate energy and cool they will join up with particles of opposite polarity. The junction of one with the other moves the union closer to a ‘neutral’ state.  The orgy of irradiation, excitement, and reorientation, begins anew each day as the sun appears above the horizon. Recombination occurs mainly at night.

Nitrogen requires the most energetic short wave radiation to achieve the ionic state. This energy is available at a higher altitude. Oxygen ions are scarce at altitudes where nitrogen ions are formed because when the music stops, ions of nitrogen grab oxygen partners just as happily as nitrogen partners and there are many more nitrogen partners than oxygen partners.

Where free oxygen ions exist, they do so at a lower level where there is insufficient very short wave radiation to ionize nitrogen.

So, we have two regions of an ionosphere, the lower oxygen rich and the upper oxygen poor and nitrogen rich, ‘ionically’ speaking.

Ions of oxygen will hold hands in groups of three in a molecule called ozone. Although this happens only to a limited extent, it nevertheless creates an ozone rich layer. We call it the stratosphere.

The cumbersome ozone molecule has an ability to trap the relatively long wave radiation of the planet and also some radiation from the sun at the long end of the short wave spectrum.  Consequently this ozone rich layer is warmer than the atmosphere above and below it.

The depth of the atmosphere beneath the ozone rich layer is, in the context of the size of the earth, hardly skin deep (only 10Km at mid latitudes and 15Km at the equator) but nevertheless sufficient to effectively cool the Earth. In dry air the lapse rate is 10°C per kilometer. The upper troposphere is very much colder than the surface of the planet. So we must (reluctantly perhaps) conclude that the atmosphere is a very effective vent for surface heat.

Though about three quarters of the atmosphere is below the stratosphere and free of the influence of an electromagnetic field, the remaining portion of the atmosphere is very much under its influence. That part is much more than half of one percent, the quantity of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

The tropical troposphere tends to lose energy by decompression associated with uplift whereas the subtropical latitudes is a place of descending, compressing air where long wave radiation is the chief means of energy removal. Where decompression is vigorous, the upper troposphere cools to minus 85°C. Elsewhere it reaches a temperature of about minus 55°C. As the equatorial region has warmed the quantum of long wave radiation from the near equatorial zone has diminished while in the subtropics where the air is descending, it has increased.

The surface of the planet is 70% water and the atmosphere near the surface is water vapor rich. Because the air at 1000 meters elevation is already between 6 and 10°C cooler than the surface, clouds of moisture form in rising air. At an elevation of two to four kilometers condensing moisture forms, not water droplets, but ice crystals of many and varied patterns and considerable surface area. Ice crystals populate the atmosphere at a density so low as to make them virtually invisible. But, the ice crystal zone stretches from about 2km to 25km in elevation and it is therefore very much deeper and potentially more reflective than the water droplet zone.

Sensibly therefore, we might expect the temperature at the surface of the planet to relate strongly to the extent of ice crystal formation. Since the upper atmosphere tends to have much the same level of moisture all the time, the population of ice crystals varies inversely with air temperature.

How could the temperature of the ice cloud region change?

The concentration of ozone in the stratosphere and upper troposphere depends upon the rate of mixing of oxygen hungry, mesospheric nitrogen ions into the stratosphere. Where does this mixing occur?

Most of the land is in the northern hemisphere but there is none at the northern pole. Strangely there is a massive landmass at the southern pole. Here the surface is very cold all the year round and particularly so in winter.

The temperature of the Antarctic ice mound is always below the freezing point of water. Any precipitation that falls upon it is trapped. Ice surface area doubles in winter by virtue of the freezing of the sea on its margin. A downdraft is present at all times and it is particularly powerful in winter.

The circulation of the atmosphere is driven by differences in surface temperature and the release of latent heat giving rise to columns of rising air particularly over the tropical rain forests. Air descends over the cold oceans in the subtropics and also over the Polar Regions especially in their winter season when the pole is dark and the surface is at its coldest.

The column of descending air over the Antarctic continent stretches into the mesosphere.

Because nitrogen from the mesosphere enters the stratosphere primarily over the Antarctic continent there is less ozone in the southern hemisphere than the northern hemisphere. But when the downward flow of air within the vortex stalls, ozone builds up throughout the stratosphere and to a more limited but very influential extent in the upper troposphere. The mixing rate of ozone into the upper troposphere varies with latitude.

As the ozone content of the ice cloud region rises, so does its temperature. This depletes ice cloud allowing more solar radiation to reach the surface.

Can a reorientation in the direction, mass density or speed of the ‘solar wind’ or perhaps a change in the intensity of ionizing radiation or a change in the Earth’s magnetic field or a mix of all three shift air from high to low latitudes, lowering surface pressure there and raising it somewhere else? Unambiguously, the answer is yes. There is no process internal to the Earth itself that could account for this shift in the atmosphere. It depends wholly upon the magnetic fields in the ionosphere and the exchange of energy between the solar wind and the ionized atmsophere. So, the distribution of the atmosphere by latitude is determined by the sun and the earth together.

Figure 1 shows the loss of atmospheric pressure at 70-90° south latitude after 1948. Most of the depletion occurred before 1976. However, the forces that created this changed state have continued to maintain it.  Not only can the atmosphere move, it can be held in position by the electromagnetic force and it will stay in place until that force relaxes.

Figure 1

Change in surface atmsopheric pressure

Where and when did surface pressure change?

Figure 2 compares the period of global warming after 1977 to the period of relatively stable or cooling temperature prior to 1977. After 1977 we see much lower pressure in winter and spring with the loss of pressure increasing with latitude between 40° and 90° south latitude.

Between the equator and 30° south latitude surface atmospheric pressure has increased. At 40-50° south, which may be a transition zone, surface pressure increased in summer and fell in winter with greatest loss in September. Very similar dynamics manifest at 30-40° south but by and large this latitude has been once of increasing atmospheric pressure.

Figure 2

Looking now at the northern hemisphere as represented in figure 3, we observe a loss of pressure in the winter months at high latitudes with losses also in June, August and September. However, the loss of pressure is no more than 1mb, much less than in the southern hemisphere where pressure fell by 2 to 8mb south of 50° south latitude.

After 1977 atmospheric pressure increased in mid year between the equator and 50° north latitude. There is obviously a tendency for pressure to increase at high latitudes in the northern summer at the same time as pressure falls in the southern hemisphere. This represents an atmospheric shift from high latitudes of the southern hemisphere into the entirety of the northern hemisphere in northern summer. This should tend to increase northern vortex activity in the wing months of the northern winter.

Peak months for loss of pressure in high latitudes of the northern hemisphere are November through to February. At this time pressure rises at 40-50° south latitude (aqua line in figure 2). This represents an atmospheric shift from the northern to the southern hemisphere in northern winter. However, there is another contributing factor. It is probable that the Arctic vortex suffers from competitive downdraft activity over the very cold Siberian and North American land masses. It is noticeable that pressure loss in midwinter is greater at 60-70°N (olive green) than at 80-90°N (red).

The ‘Arctic Oscillation Index’ records change in the relationship between surface pressure close to the northern pole and that at mid latitudes in the northern hemisphere. Change in the index goes along with change in the nature of western European weather.  It is apparent that there are complex influences driving the Arctic Oscillation and paradoxically the most important of these influences is the state of the competing downdrafts over Antarctica, continental Asia and North America. But in physical terms, the real driving force is electromagnetic.

Figure 3

The relationship between pressure and surface temperature in the tropics

Figure 4 shows the relationship between atmospheric pressure near the equator and sea surface temperature at 20° north to 20° south globally. Warming of the tropics goes hand in hand with increased surface atmospheric pressure. This is a key understanding. It is counter-intuitive because hot air is less dense and will rise in the middle of a low pressure area. But here we have hot air under increased pressure. We are accustomed to observing high pressure air that is associated with subsidence and cloud free skies in the subtropics. This is different. This pressure regime is determined by a shift in the atmosphere from high to low latitudes.

The relationship between these variables is mediated by the change in atmospheric moisture levels. An illustration of this relationship is the failure of the tropics to warm when pressure increased in the year 1999-2000. The precipitation event that followed the marked increase in atmospheric moisture during the El Nino event of 1997-8 created its own momentum (increased atmospheric moisture and cloud cover) and overwhelmed the possibility of a response to the increase in pressure a year later, itself a response to electromagnetic activity in the upper atmosphere. If one appreciates this, we can dispense with the usual statistical tests, proceeding according to logic and the eye. Many a baby has been thrown out with the bathwater after the application of an inappropriate statistical test.

Figure 4

We know that El Nino activity in the Pacific is accompanied by a slackening of the Trades as the pressure difference between the south east Pacific (high pressure) and Indonesia (low pressure) falls away. Figure 5shows that, when pressure rises in the Indonesian region, it falls very strongly in the waters off the coast of Chile. The weakening of the trade winds is a marker for El Nino activity in the Pacific. The change in pressure relations driving the trade winds is due to the movement of the atmosphere. That movement has its origin in electromagnetic activity in the upper atmosphere.

A glance at figure 5 reveals that the globe cools when surface atmospheric pressure in the Indonesian region falls below its long term mean.  There is much greater activity in terms of pressure change in the waters off Chile than in the Indonesian theatre.  Change in Chilean waters appears to precede change in Indonesia.

A shift in the atmosphere from high to low latitudes increases pressure at 30-40° south latitude. However, in the waters off Chile, we see a loss of pressure as pressure builds at the equator and this is particularly noticeable in March and September when geomagnetic activity peaks due to the favorable orientation of the Earth to the sun at the equinoxes. Surface pressure off Chile at 30-40° south behaves atypically for the latitude. It moves with polar pressure rather than low latitude pressure. This makes the Pacific particularly susceptible to influence from shifts in the atmosphere.

Figure 5

Figure 6 shows that when atmospheric pressure falls off Chile (in figure 6 pressure is inverted so that a rise in the pressure line actually represents falling pressure) sea surface temperature in the intake region for Nino 1 and Nino 2 warms. An increase in the temperature of tropical waters follows as a matter of course. The thing that controls the atmospheric pressure controls the temperature of tropical waters and ultimately the globe. That ‘thing’ is the electromagnetic force in the upper atmosphere. The change in surface temperature is due to a change in the ratio between radiation received at the limits of the atmosphere (almost a constant) and radiation reflected by ice crystals. Variation in reflection is responsible for change in the intensity of radiation received at the surface.

Figure 6

The temperature of the polar stratosphere increases at the time of the year when atmospheric pressure falls.

Figure 7 indicates a marked increase in stratospheric temperature at 10hPa post 1977 that is coincident with the fall in atmospheric pressure illustrated in figure 2.

There can be no shadow of doubt that the increase in the temperature of the upper stratosphere over Antarctica is associated with falling atmospheric pressure, the collapse of the vortex and a diminution of the flow of mesospheric nitrogen ions into the stratosphere. This allows an increase in ozone concentration which accounts for the increase in temperature both in the stratosphere and at the surface.

Ozone absorbs long wave radiation from the earth and UVB from the sun and this energy is rapidly transmitted to adjacent molecules. The upper atmosphere warms and as ice crystal population falls in southern winter and spring, the temperature of the sea increases in the intake zones for the equatorial currents. In the Pacific this is called El Nino. The conventional explanation of this warming is at odds with reality. Most of the warming activity occurs outside the tropics. It is most pronounced in late winter and spring in the southern hemisphere and it is patently a phenomenon that shows up with greater intensity after the climate shift of 1978. Indeed, the increased frequency and intensity of southern hemisphere warming in spring lies at the heart of the warming of the globe after 1978.

Figure 7

Figure 8 shows that the warming of the northern stratosphere at 10hpa in the middle of northern winter is insignificant if compared to the warming of the southern stratosphere. Stratospheric warming and cooling is just as lopsided as the distribution of the land between the hemispheres.

Some observers attribute sudden stratospheric warming in the polar night to ‘planetary waves’. But planetary waves are more evident in the northern than the southern hemisphere. These observers  maintain that the Earthly climate system is free of external influences.  Copernicus feared the response of the keepers of the conventional wisdom when he suggested that the sun was at the centre of the solar system rather than the Earth. He kept his opinions to himself until his theories were published close to his death in 1543. Galileo supported the Copernican viewpoint in a forthright fashion in 1632, was tried by his peers in the ‘Inquisition’ and spent the rest of his life in detention.  Geo-centrism is alive and well to this day and it thrives in the field of climate science. Trial by ones peers can be a harrowing affair. As Galileo would no doubt observe, if he were here to tell us:  ‘Most of them are a bunch of ignorant ******.

Figure 8

The extent of warming of the polar stratosphere in winter increases with elevation

Figure 9 reveals that temperature gain in the Antarctic stratosphere after 1977 increases with elevation. This is in conformity with the notion that a mesospheric influence on stratospheric ozone is the driver of stratospheric temperature at the poles and it acts via a variation in vortex activity brought on by change in the weight of the atmospheric column as expressed in changing surface pressure.

Figure 9

Figure 10, relating to the northern hemisphere shows temperature gain increasing with altitude as is the case in the southern hemisphere. Peak temperature gain is in February when surface pressure loss after 1977 is maximal (see figure 3).

Figure 10

Figure 11 shows the relationship between surface atmospheric pressure in the tropics and the aa index of geomagnetic activity. Anomalies are calculated with respect to mean monthly data for the period 1948-2009. The trend lines are third order polynomials selected for best fit.  It appears that this cycle may be about 80 years from trough to trough. A cycle of about this length has been called the Gleissburg cycle. The currently falling pressure at the equator heralds cooling. A simple projection of trend indicates perhaps thirty years of cooling ahead.

In considering figure 11 one must bear in mind that the atmosphere must first be ionized before it comes under the influence of the solar wind. We know little about the cycles in very short wave ionizing radiation. Nor, it seems do we know much about the driving force behind the change in the Earth’s magnetic field. The electromagnetic movement of the atmosphere is a multi-factorial phenomenon. Figure 11 deals with a single contributing factor and compares its oscillation with surface pressure near the equator. The field of change is much wider than the equator. The dynamics of pressure change are driven by many factors including the tilt of the Earth’s axis of rotation, the revolution of the earth around the sun, the distribution of the land and the sea, the variation in the temperature of the sea at the same latitude, variations in the magnetic emanations from the Sun and variations in the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field from place to place. At times surface pressure at both poles moves in the same direction and at other times pressure increases at one pole and decreases at the other. The atmosphere behaves quite differently when the earth is warm to when it is cool. The pressure systems move at quite different latitudes along with the jet stream.

Accordingly, one cannot say that geomagnetic activity drives surface temperature. It contributes as one element of a complex matrix in a constantly changing climate system. Do the climate modelers realize this?

Figure 11

Figure 12 is astonishing in its symmetry.  Prior to 1977 peak anomalies in 30hpa temperature at 80-90°S latitude occurred in April-May. After 1977 peak anomalies occur in October.  After 1977 October anomalies are as strongly positive as they were negative prior to 1977. This change relates directly to the warming of the southern oceans in southern winter-spring that is expressed in El Nino activity in the Pacific. But the Pacific is only one of the theatres of action in the global tropics. All theatres of action are affected by change in atmospheric pressure in Antarctica.

Figure 12

Figure 13 shows 30hpa temperature anomalies at 80-90°north in the Arctic. Again the symmetry is astonishing. Let there be no mistake. Here is evidence that the climate system is alternating between two very different modes of activity. One is a cooling mode and the other a warming mode. Temperature anomalies are positive only for a period of time, and they move to the  negative. When October anomalies are positive in Antarctica they are negative in the Arctic and vice versa.

Figure 13

Consequences of the warming mode of 1977-2009 for the temperature in the ice cloud zone of the upper troposphere

Figure 14 shows the character of the warming mode that prevailed after 1977 in the northern upper troposphere at 200hPa. There is sufficient ozone at this level for temperature to be driven by vortex phenomena rather than surface phenomena. At 200hPa, temperature change seems to be an amplified version of what happens at the surface. Of course this is nonsense. Changes at the surface reflect in miniature the more exaggerated and independently determined change that occurs above. But I diverge, and must return to the narrative.

In relation to the northern hemisphere: After 1977, at latitudes greater than 50° north, the upper troposphere warmed slightly in summer between June and November but is actually cooler during the winter months.  At low latitudes the troposphere is warmer all year but particularly so in northern winter. I hope some greenhouse theorists read this. Perhaps they can explain how the upper troposphere can warm when outgoing long wave radiation is at its annual minimum.

Figure 14

Figure 15 illustrates the dramatic influence of the warm mode on temperature in the southern hemisphere upper troposphere. Strong warming occurs between 20 and 70° south latitude. Peak warming occurs about the time of the equinoxes when the coupling of the solar wind with the Earth’s atmosphere is strongest.

When the polar vortex stalls, it allows ozone levels to rise at high altitudes above the pole. A strong peak in 200hpa temperature occurs in September at 80-90° south latitude and this peak appears at mid latitudes within a month, testifying to the speedy rate of mixing of ozone into the upper troposphere at 200hpa.

Figure 15

Surface temperature follows the lead of the stratosphere via change in ice cloud density

Figure 16 shows the relationship between the 20hpa temperature anomaly at 10° north to 10° south latitude on the one hand and  sea surface temperature in the in-feed zone in the south east Pacific near Chile on the other. The obvious way that the stratosphere and upper troposphere can affect surface temperature is via change in ice cloud density affecting the reflectivity of the atmosphere. An increase in temperature reduces ice cloud density allowing more radiation to reach the surface.

High amplitude variation in 20hPa temperature is seen between 1950 and 1976 when geomagnetic activity, stratospheric and surface temperature was depressed. This phenomenon might be interpreted this way: When stratospheric temperature is low due to low ozone content (high surface pressure at the pole and strong vortex) a small reduction in the inflow of nitrogen ions from the mesosphere can produce a large change in ozone and 20hpa temperature. The law of diminishing returns applies.  In periods where ozone levels are already high (low atmospheric pressure and collapsed vortex), the extent of change in 20hpa temperature from further collapse in the vortex is small.

After the year 2000 the flux in 20hpa temperature is large as it was during the cooling period prior to 1977.

Sea surface temperature in the south east Pacific follows 20hpa temperature with more fidelity and vigour after 1978 when change in southern hemisphere 200hpa temperature became the dominant mode of ENSO variation. Patently, the heating trend between 1977 and 2000 is due to a marked increase in the temperature of the ice cloud zone.

Figure 16

Figure 17 shows the relationship between 200 hPa (upper troposphere ice cloud zone) temperature and sea surface temperature at 40-50° north.

When the upper troposphere warms strongly, relative humidity must fall and the surface temperature response to high amplitude change in upper troposphere temperature then lacks coherence and vigour. Compare the cooling period after 1998 with the warming period ten years earlier. This observation suggests there is little increase in atmospheric moisture content as the troposphere warms. Moisture content, if it increases at all, lags the temperature increase. There is no amplifier here for a greenhouse effect.

Figure 17

Figure 18 shows the increase in surface pressure that accompanies warming at 40-50° north latitude.  The increase in pressure relates to falling pressure at the poles and an increase in the temperature of the stratosphere as ozone content builds.

Figure 18

Figure 19 shows the repeating pattern of positive anomalies in 20hpa temperature in southern spring  at 70-90° south and the frequent symmetry in the rise in sea surface temperature at 40-50° north. The relationship between these two variables will never be absolutely deterministic because of the other influences that impinge. Firstly, there is the independent activity in the northern vortex as it becomes more or less active leading into northern winter. Secondly, the flux in high altitude specific humidity determines the response rate. Thirdly, the atmosphere is never homogeneous consisting as it does of a series of traveling pressure cells responding to forces that move them as a band either towards or away from the poles.

Repeating positive anomalies in southern spring is the essence of the change that occurred in the climate system after 1978. When these anomalies disappear, the earth will cool. This can only happen as the atmospheric shift away from Antarctica goes into reverse.

Figure 19

There is great interest in the driver of sea surface temperature in the North Atlantic and the North Pacific. Enormous  store is put in the notion that the Pacific Decadal Oscillation is capable of influencing global temperatures and potentially reversing the trend in global warming. However, the actual forces determining sea surface and global temperature lie in the upper atmosphere rather than in the oceans themselves. There is no mystery as to where warm water appears or does not appear. It is always at the surface and it is always dissipating into the atmosphere via evaporative transfer, surface contact and radiation. There is only one thing that can warm the surface of the sea on a large scale and that is solar radiation.

The temperature of the southern stratosphere increased much more than the northern stratosphere after 1977

In line with the dominance of the southern vortex in determining stratospheric temperature we would expect a strong increase in temperature in the high latitudes of the southern hemisphere over the period of study. Figure 20 shows a 12 month moving average of 30hpa temperature in selected latitude bands of the southern hemisphere. It is apparent that the last great rise in 30hpa temperature at 80-90° south occurred just prior to the climate shift of 1978. Can planetary wave theorists explain this warming of the stratosphere above Antarctica at this time?

What theory explains why the high latitudes of the southern hemisphere have warmed so strongly while in low latitudes the stratosphere has cooled? Changes in gas composition will not suffice. Planetary waves will not suffice.

As the atmosphere shifts to mid and low latitudes the zone of heaviest ozone concentration in the stratosphere moves a little further away from the earth. This produces cooling. There has been a continuous fall in 30hpa temperature at 0-10° south latitude over the period. This may be due in part to the reduction in outgoing long wave radiation as cooling via decompression has become more important close to the equator. But, between 20° and 40° south the cooling of the stratosphere is likely related to the local thickening of the atmosphere.

Figure 20

Figure 21 shows that, as the atmosphere in the northern hemisphere has ‘thickened’, due to the atmospheric shift, 30hpa temperature has declined slightly at all latitudes. This has nothing to do with greenhouse gas activity in the troposphere. Greenhouse theorists who maintain that the stratosphere cools while the troposphere increases in temperature may care to comment on the rise in the temperature of the rctic stratosphere between 1948 and 1978!

Figure 21

Two climate modes

“Mad dogs and Englishmen go out in the midday sun. The sun is much too sultry and one must avoid its ultry violet rays”. Noel Coward 1932.

Perhaps Noel Coward’s observation is particularly pertinent in the southern hemispherewhere there is less ozone to absorb UVB. During the warming mode, protective ice crystals evaporate, allowing the surface to warm. Most of the warming activity post 1978 has been in the southern hemisphere in late winter and spring. This warming activity is plainly driven by shifts in atmospheric pressure affecting vortex activity.

The warming mode:

1. There is a shift of the atmosphere from the poles towards mid and low latitudes under electromagnetic forcing of ionized air.
2. Weakening of the polar vortexes curtails the flow of ionized nitrogen into the upper stratosphere allowing the survival of oxygen ions and increased ozone formation.
3. Intermixing of ozone into the upper troposphere raises temperature in the ice cloud zone. Ice crystals evaporate.
4. More solar radiation reaches the surface which warms.
5. In the southern hemisphere 200hpa temperature rises much more than in the northern hemisphere exhibiting strong equinoctial maxima.
6. Peak anomalies in stratospheric temperature occur in September-October rather than March.
7. A southern spring deficit in ice cloud density promotes warming across all southern latitudes which promotes the El Nino pattern of sea surface temperature at the equator.

The Cooling Mode

1. Surface atmospheric pressure increases at the poles as the electromagnetic force in the ionosphere/thermosphere relaxes.  This happens at solar minimum as the quantum of ionizing radiation falls to its lowest levels. It also tends to happen at solar maximum as the suns magnetic polarity reverses and magnetic fields emanating from the sun tend to be self cancelling. The manifestation in the Pacific Ocean is La Nina cooling.
2. Strengthening of the polar vortexes introduces ionized nitrogen into the stratosphere reducing the population of oxygen ions and ozone.
3. A loss of ozone in the ice cloud zone reduces temperature enhancing the formation of reflective ice crystals.
4. Less solar radiation reaches the surface which cools.
5. A generally low ozone level in the stratosphere results in high amplitude change in stratospheric temperature during the ENSO cycle. This is expressed in high amplitude variation in 20hpa temperature at the equator. At the surface the swing from El Nino warming to La Nina cooling is more violent and extreme.
6. Change is more extreme in the southern hemisphere where the polar vortex is generally cooler especially at the highest altitudes. In the cool mode stratospheric temperature exhibits a March maximum probably in line with enhancement of orbital rather than geomagnetic influences on stratospheric temperature. The earth is closest to the sun in January.
7. A cooler stratosphere and upper troposphere in southern spring promotes ice cloud formation reducing the flux of solar radiation to the surface establishing a La Nina dominant regime in the Pacific Ocean.

The pattern of change from the cool to the warm mode and back again is well expressed in figure 22 showing the pattern of change of the (Darwin –Tahiti) Southern Oscillation Index when compartmentalized according to solar cycle time intervals. A fall in this index represents warming. A dramatic fall in the index occurred about 1978. With the end of solar cycle 23 the globe is emerging from the strongest period of warming in the period of the instrumental record. The Southern Oscillation Index, based on barometric pressure, is not affected by the distortions present in the temperature record.

Figure 22

The smoking gun for natural climate variation is an increase in the temperature of the southern stratosphere and troposphere increasing with latitude all the way to the southern pole with a marked variation in southern hemisphere temperature in winter/spring between cool and warm episodes. This determines the strength of El Nino warming events across the tropics.

The smoking gun for greenhouse effects should be a generalized warming at all latitudes without any marked seasonal bias. If there were to be a seasonal bias it should be present as an increase in temperature above the norm when outgoing long wave radiation is maximal in the summer season. There should be no great difference between the hemispheres. That is far from what is actually observed. The evidence suggests that natural variation rather than anthropogenic influences drives climate change.

Conclusion

Between 1948 and 1976 the tropics and the globe as a whole was fairly stable in temperature with obvious cooling discernable in the decade prior to 1976. From 1977 through to 2000 the tropics and the globe warmed. By comparing data from the earlier period with that for the later period one can discern change in the atmosphere that resulted in more solar radiation reaching the surface of the earth causing it to warm.

Atmospheric conditions in the near earth environment are strongly influenced by the sun. The observed warming of the last decades of the twentieth century can be attributed to natural influences. There is no evidence of any warming signature due to the increased presence of so called ‘greenhouses gases’. It is suggested that the greenhouse hypothesis takes little cognizance of the manner in which the atmosphere actually functions. The atmosphere cools the planet but a change in its temperature causes a change in ice crystal density and the quantum of radiation reaching the surface.

Climatic models suggest that any greenhouse effect should be strongest in the tropical upper troposphere where water vapor is in higher concentration. In point of fact warming of the upper troposphere at the equator is less likely as the globe warms because the quantum of outgoing radiation diminishes as convection and de-compressive cooling is enhanced. It is in the subtropics that outgoing long wave radiation increases and in particular in the high pressure cells where the air is descending and warming and the sky tends to be cloud -free both in terms of liquid and ice crystal density.  A water vapor feedback mechanism would require an increase in specific humidity levels in these high pressure areas. The reverse is observed. If a greenhouse effect were present it would be unamplified and tiny. Any warming tendency in these areas is more likely to be due to a loss of ice cloud density than a greenhouse effect.

If the Earth enters a period of cooling, as it has since 1998, it suggests that the natural factor is pre-eminent. If there is a strong relationship between ice cloud density and surface temperature it confirms the point that moisture in the upper troposphere cools rather than warms the planet and the basis of the greenhouse feedback mechanism is negated. Without a water vapor amplifier a change in so called ‘greenhouse gas’ levels can have little or no effect upon surface temperature.

If we can rid ourselves of the foolish mantra that surface temperature is governed by so called greenhouse gas, much unnecessary pain can be avoided. We are threatened by zealous governments keen to interfere in markets, raise taxation and redistribute incomes. The absurd notion that carbon is a pollutant is daily promoted.  ‘Will of the wisp’ schemes to generate renewable energy burden the public purse. Nothing is to be gained by these stratagems. Innovation has its own rewards and investment in all forms of innovation is already well enough subsidized and feverishly exploited. Man needs no urging to innovate and will do so quite happily in the absence of artificially inflated monetary incentives. The introduction of market distorting incentives and disincentives destroys rather than creates wealth. This is the tool of the central planner, the social activist, the miscreant.

Distraction and absurdity are our unhappy lot, parading as morality and virtue. Snake oil salesmen multiply by the minute. These are unfortunate times.

There are none so blind as those who will not see. The authority of ‘Science’ and the United Nations organization has been subverted to the activists cause. This is a sorry time for mankind. It is a time when belief is substituted for science and the two are irretrievably tangled and confused.

DATA

The data used in this study can be downloaded from: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/cgi-bin/data/timeseries/timeseries1.pl

As I understand it the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis project uses a computer model to cross check the validity of data from many sources with the aim of representing the surface and the atmosphere of the entire globe. Data for one atmospheric parameter is related to other parameters that vary together in a known fashion. When a temperature recording station shifts site there is a discontinuity in the data. The reanalysis project is designed to overcome this sort of problem. This dataset is particularly valuable for research on climate change.

The sea surface data from the NCEP/NCAR dataset exhibits much greater variability than other datasets. The NCEP/NCAR data reflecs skin temperatures that respond to atmospheric change. Winter minima are lower while summer maxima are similar. Change is faster in the skin data with earlier seasonal maxima and minima. Sea surface temperature data incorporates ice and land surface temperature at high latitudes.

I understand that satellite derived sea surface temperature data for areas beyond about 60° latitude requires an adjustment for the extent of floating ice. Some SST datasets do not extend to higher latitudes. Because the NCEP/NCAR dataset provides skin temperature it covers all latitudes.

Some sources of SST data relate more to a near surface rather than a skin temperature reflecting the origin of data in the measurement of water temperature from engine intake, bucket or floating buoy. This is not the case with the NCEP/NCAR dataset.

Falta de agua obliga el uso de térmicas

 Los dos motores de Egesa, ubicados en el área de Condado de El Rey, funcionan con diésel y son unos de los más ineficientes del sistema.

WILFREDO JORDÁN S.
wjordan@prensa.com

En pocos días los embalses de Fortuna y Bayano disminuyeron su nivel, con lo cual el Centro Nacional de Despacho (CND) decidió comenzar a utilizar los motores de la Empresa de Generación, S.A. (Egesa) a partir de hoy, 21 de noviembre.
Los dos motores de Egesa, ubicados en el área de Condado de El Rey, funcionan con diésel y son unos de los más ineficientes del sistema.
“Esta decisión del CND obedece a los bajos niveles que presentan los lagos de Fortuna y Bayano, la presencia del fenómeno El Niño y las probabilidades de déficit que presentan los resultados del planeamiento semanal”, indica un comunicado de la estatal Egesa.
Además de estos inconvenientes, hay la indisponibilidad de algunas máquinas de generación térmica de los Agentes del Mercado Eléctrico Nacional, añade el comunicado.
Los motores de Egesa se utilizan solo en casos de emergencia y generan un gran ruido, hecho que en ocasiones anteriores ha provocado protestas de los moradores que residen en ese sector de la ciudad.
En el comunicado, Egesa se adelanta a pedir disculpas a los residentes de las urbanizaciones adyacentes por los inconvenientes que “podamos causarles durante la operación de estos equipos”.
Los motores funcionarán entre las 5:00 a.m. y las 9:00 p.m. desde hoy.
Las hidroeléctricas de Fortuna y Bayano generan casi el 50% de la energía que produce el sistema.
Aunque las constantes lluvias que se registraron a principios de noviembre incrementaron los niveles de agua, durante estos últimos días prácticamente no hay lluvias en la región donde se encuentran.
La Secretaría de Energía informó que busca diferentes alternativas para no ocasionar un racionamiento en el servicio de energía. Entre estas medidas promueve el ahorro de energía en las residencias y el Gobierno.