Blogs about: Errancy 2

Featured Blog

Is the Bible’s chronology of the kings of Israel accurate?7 comments

Jonathan Burke wrote 1 year ago: The Challenge In the late 19th century, critical scholar Julius Wellhausen claimed the Biblical chro … more →

Tags: Apologetics, Bible archaeology, Bible historicity, Biblical errancy, Old Testament, accuracy, Apologetics, archaeology, Bible chronology

Is Solomon’s wealth a literary fiction?1 comment

Jonathan Burke wrote 2 years ago: The Challenge The Biblical account of Solomon’s wealth has been described as unrealistic, in standar … more →

Tags: Apologetics, Bible archaeology, Bible historicity, Biblical errancy, Errancy, Old Testament, Alan Millard, archaeology, Archeology

What is archaeological ‘minimalism’?

Jonathan Burke wrote 2 years ago: Definition The ‘minimalist’ view is that archaeology provides little or no support for the Biblical … more →

Tags: Old Testament, Apologetics, Biblical errancy, Bible historicity, Bible archaeology, Apologetics, historicity, accuracy, errors

Were camels domesticated in the time of Abraham?2 comments

Jonathan Burke wrote 2 years ago: The Challenge WF Albright, one of the most famous 20th century archaeologists, argued that the camel … more →

Tags: Old Testament, Errancy, Apologetics, Bible historicity, Bible archaeology, Apologetics, historicity, accuracy, Genesis

Did Luke use Josephus when writing Acts?58 comments

Jonathan Burke wrote 2 years ago: The Claim It has been claimed that Luke used the writings of Josephus (specifically ‘Antiquities of … more →

Tags: Apologetics, Bible historicity, Errancy, New Testament, accuracy, acts, Apologetics, errors, historicity

The Historicity of the book of Acts (5)

Jonathan Burke wrote 2 years ago: Paul’s Commission: Acts 9:1-2 It has been claimed there is no historical basis for Paul’s commission … more →

Tags: New Testament, Christianity, Apologetics, Biblical errancy, Bible historicity, acts, Apologetics, historicity, accuracy

Article: The Historicity of the book of Acts (4)1 comment

Jonathan Burke wrote 2 years ago: The historicity of Acts is taken seriously (though not accepted completely), even by highly regarded … more →

Tags: Errancy, Apologetics, Bible historicity, acts, Apologetics, historicity, accuracy, errors

Archaeology 2: Hezekiah's Tunnel3 comments

Jonathan Burke wrote 2 years ago: Discovery of the tunnel built by King Hezekiah to provide water to Jerusalem in time of siege (2 Kin … more →

Tags: Old Testament, Apologetics, Bible historicity, Bible archaeology, Apologetics, historicity, accuracy, errors, Archeology

Article: The Historicity of the book of Acts (3)

Jonathan Burke wrote 2 years ago: Peter’s address: Acts 4:4 Robert Grant claimed that the population of Jerusalem was too small for 5, … more →

Tags: New Testament, Errancy, Christianity, Apologetics, Biblical errancy, Bible historicity, acts, Apologetics, historicity

Article: The Historicity of the book of Acts (2)

Jonathan Burke wrote 2 years ago: Some verses in Acts use the second person plural (‘we’), indicating that the writer is participating … more →

Tags: New Testament, Errancy, Apologetics, Biblical errancy, Bible archaeology, acts, Apologetics, historicity, accuracy

Article: The Historicity of the book of Acts

Jonathan Burke wrote 2 years ago: How historically accurate is the book of Acts? Current scholarly attitudes range widely; [1] German … more →

Tags: New Testament, Errancy, Apologetics, Bible historicity, Bible archaeology, acts, Apologetics, historicity, accuracy


Related Tags
All →

Follow this tag via RSS