<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>factors &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/factors/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "factors"</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:35:09 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Properties for sale in Cyprus - 5 factors that you need to take up posts]]></title>
<link>http://pharmacycareers.wordpress.com/2009/12/24/properties-for-sale-in-cyprus-5-factors-that-you-need-to-take-up-posts/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>imafiary</dc:creator>
<guid>http://pharmacycareers.wordpress.com/2009/12/24/properties-for-sale-in-cyprus-5-factors-that-you-need-to-take-up-posts/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Each property for sale in Cyprus is unique in its kind. There are a number of upcoming projects that]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p> Each property for sale in Cyprus is unique in its kind. There are a number of upcoming projects that seem very lucrative on first glance. Are they right for you? What are the things that you should look at any property in Cyprus? Let&#39;s take a look at the key points you should consider before buying a property in Cyprus: </p>
<p> • Go on the right path </p>
<p> Do you have a clear idea about your wishes and needs. For example, you are looking for a property in the vicinitythe sea or that has a fabulous view of the mountains? Are you looking for a property or a property as an investment? A residential property must have facilities such as a nearby <b>school, pharmacy,</b> etc. So once you decide on a location, look for user reviews on these places. </p>
<p> • Research, research, research </p>
<p> Any investment in real estate is a serious matter. You might experience a number of properties for sale in Cyprus. The company website can befull of glossy pictures, which promise you the world! If you are the real picture, you need to look to the viewer&#39;s reviews on other sites. You will get a real picture of the location, facilities and inconvenience of the place, only if you research it well. </p>
<p> When you drag your property for tourists into consideration, you might want, where, after areas close to the beach or a golf course. The best way to get it would be a few places that you like and then collect all the information you will identifycan about these areas. </p>
<p> • Take A Trip </p>
<p> Follow your instincts and go for a trip. Drive around the area and try to understand the pulse. You can even speak a few hints of a café with a cup of coffee! Residents can click on each property for sale in Cyprus guide! This will help you eliminate areas that appear on the glossy brochure, but look left, at first glance. </p>
<p> • Go for local staff </p>
<p> Local staff can click on each Property Guidefor sale in Cyprus. Make sure you inform them about your budget. Insist on properties that are just in your price range. If a property meets your expectations, provide a moment to visit. Take your own car. You can always leave when the agent behind you do not like what you see, even before you enter the site! </p>
<p> • Keep the regulations in Mind </p>
<p> Any Property for Sale in Cyprus has to be accompanied by legal documents. The division of Cyprus in 1974 in 4 formatsunder which land is held. Property in Turkey before 1974 command a premium freehold title. So expect more pay for these properties. </p>
<p> Each property for sale in Cyprus with its own set of advantages and disadvantages. Choose with care and you enjoy the benefits for years to come! </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What factors determine the outcome of your application Mesothelioma?]]></title>
<link>http://attorneymesotheliomasettlements.wordpress.com/2009/12/20/what-factors-determine-the-outcome-of-your-application-mesothelioma/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 23:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>iforyouz</dc:creator>
<guid>http://attorneymesotheliomasettlements.wordpress.com/2009/12/20/what-factors-determine-the-outcome-of-your-application-mesothelioma/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Since mesothelioma, once diagnosed, it kills its victims within a few years, the goal of any claim m]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p> Since <b>mesothelioma,</b> once diagnosed, it kills its victims within a few years, the goal of any claim <b>mesothelioma</b> is to obtain a ruling as soon as possible. If you are using a law firm specializing in the processes of AA <b>mesothelioma</b> who take the chances of a successful verdict or settlement are higher than if you went with another company. To argue that waiting to pass through the legal system, end up in court and are being discussed, are those who usually take the longestbe solved. The cases are resolved by the court can be resolved fairly quickly in general. But what determines the outcome of your application? </p>
<p> The two most important factors for success and the amount of your claim <b>mesothelioma</b> are subject to error and the amount of damages that can be given. Accountability is the biggest obstacle to overcome. Your <b>lawyer</b> will try to demonstrate to the court that the defendant is appropriate for your condition. In some states like Texas, all that is needed to demonstratethat the defendant has at least 51%, which is used for your condition and level of evidence have been met. </p>
<p> The damages another issue to consider. Your <b>attorney</b> informs the jury () in a study of how much damage you&#39;re looking for and this damage will be divided into two parts &#8211; action for compensatory and punitive off. Damages are funds), sacrifice (hence the name of the victim for money, the victim as a result of damage to the payment of the balance has been lostadded. Most states cap damages. Punitive damages are not limited, which is a good thing. Such damage must be punished once again (and therefore) the concept of society for your condition. </p>
<p> The penalty is intended to prevent companies have the same activity in the future. The punitive damages can in fact quite high, if the jury believes that the deliberate actions of the defendant and counsel. And because the actions for the death of an individual and penaltiesThe damages are not limited to those damages in <b>cases of asbestos-related mesothelioma</b> can be run in millions of dollars. Most of the time, according to the jury that the company knew the danger of asbestos and refused to no longer use or to ensure adequate safety equipment and procedures for employees. </p>
<p> If you are diagnosed with <b>mesothelioma,</b> you have no time to lose. Check with a <b>lawyer specializing</b> in such cases, immediately. </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[QuickBooks - Tracking Vehicle Mileage for accurate write -]]></title>
<link>http://notereceivable.wordpress.com/2009/12/15/quickbooks-tracking-vehicle-mileage-for-accurate-write/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>iforyouz</dc:creator>
<guid>http://notereceivable.wordpress.com/2009/12/15/quickbooks-tracking-vehicle-mileage-for-accurate-write/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Vehicle tracking states is driven often overlooked in small businesses and the preparation of tax ac]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p> Vehicle tracking states is driven often overlooked in small businesses and the preparation of tax accounting. Often, or mileage is considered undervalued due to lack of documentation or afraid, or too pointed, even in the absence of documents or &#34;I know how hard I drove it&#34; attitude. </p>
<p> Although it is better if the taxpayer is a miniature car to actual mileage, &#34;every time you enter a work, this is cumbersome, and many people do not want to do.Accurate records are a must, because mileage deduction must be able to check against in the event of an IRS audit. </p>
<p> QuickBooks can help. Use the following procedure for the production and the mileage of the vehicle registration. </p>
<p> 1. If you do not have mileage records collected already in QuickBooks, go to step 2. If you have taken a few kilometers records in QuickBooks, go through them and make sure that everyone has the destination in the Notes field as &#34;ABC Print&#34; (fromthe Company menu, click Record MILEAGE, then page through the records of them) for the control. Then, create a mileage of the vehicle detailed report (the Report menu, choose Jobs, Time &#38; Mileage, and select) with a vehicle mileage Detail. In the field events, select the fiscal year to date. Eliminating the &#34;Edit&#34; button, all columns except the vehicle, Trip End Date, Total Miles, and notes. Version for printing. </p>
<p> 2. Create a profit and loss account details (from the Report menu, select corporate communications and financialSo the profit and loss account details). Fixing the date of this fiscal year to date. Eliminating the &#34;Edit&#34; button, all other columns of type, date, name, exactly, and the amount. Version for printing. </p>
<p> 3. If your company is the kind where you drive customers to see generate a list of transaction log from the client. Report menu, select customers and accounts receivable management, and select Transaction List by Customer. With the Modify button, select the Filters tab. In the Filter box, select the type of transaction.Changes the nature of the transaction by all the bills. Click OK, then print the report. </p>
<p> 4. Compare the reports. Look at every entry to see if there is a place that you actually went to buy something, whether the services rendered, or cause to work for a client. If it is missing from the goals of the vehicle mileage reports, enter (from the Company menu, click Enter Vehicle Mileage). Do not forget to enter your destination in the Notes field. Use one of theOnline map sites (like Yahoo! Maps or MapQuest to generate) for information printed on the distance between the office and the target. Save the reports and the information printed on the setup file. </p>
<p> <b>Caveat</b> </p>
<p> I am not my claim that this method will surely withstand IRS scrutiny. But this is certainly better than would simply book a test without lines. Here is a quote from IRS publication 17 for the year 2004, on page 193, where he focused on properRecords: &#34;The evidence is usually considered sufficient if it indicates the amount, date, place and nature of the costs.&#34; Unless you can produce a receipt or invoice to the travel, and the paper on the distance, this method meets these requirements. </p>
<p> Nobody wants one of their unauthorized deductions because of lack of evidence. If you do not want to use a notebook kilometers by car, this method will help ensure that is not what they say on foot,is well documented. </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Boötes &amp; Corona Borealis HD]]></title>
<link>http://dslrastrophotography.wordpress.com/2009/12/15/bootes-corona-borealis-hd/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>woogunner</dc:creator>
<guid>http://dslrastrophotography.wordpress.com/2009/12/15/bootes-corona-borealis-hd/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Astrophotography with Canon EOS 450d (Rebel XTi). This is a series of continuous shots to the night ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Astrophotography with Canon EOS 450d (Rebel XTi). This is a series of continuous shots to the night sky from an urban area. This video was taken after sunset, at dusk, so the background is getting dark as long the time passes. Each frame is an 8 seconds single exposure. Boötes constellation is in the center of the image. The brightest star is Arcturus, alfa Boötis. At its left, it is a group of stars that resemble a circle. It is Corona Borealis. Several satellites may be seen in this &#8230;</p>
<p><span style='text-align:center; display: block;'><object width='425' height='350'><param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/iMLfJcJUOs4&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' /><param name='allowfullscreen' value='true' /><param name='wmode' value='transparent' /><embed src='http://www.youtube.com/v/iMLfJcJUOs4&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' allowfullscreen='true' width='425' height='350' wmode='transparent'></embed></object></span></p>
<p><a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMLfJcJUOs4&#38;hl=en' rel='nofollow'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMLfJcJUOs4&#38;hl=en</a>
<p>Thanks To :  <a href="http://www.cleverclickonline.com/" rel="dofollow" title="">canon dslr</a> </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Question #8]]></title>
<link>http://esotericallyspeaking.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/question-8/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Esoteric</dc:creator>
<guid>http://esotericallyspeaking.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/question-8/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Hello everyone! How are y&#8217;all? Yeah, yeah, I know. The weekend was short and cold if you live ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Hello everyone! How are y&#8217;all? Yeah, yeah, I know. The weekend was short and cold if you live in the northeast and it&#8217;s Gloomy Monday. Nevertheless, I hope you all enjoyed your weekend and are at least enthusiastic about seeing my next post. <strong><em>Today I&#8217;m going to talk about  New Year&#8217;s resolutions. As we wind down the year known as 2009, its that time of the year of again.  Time to break out the champagne or liquor for those who have a bit of  &#8221;social drinker&#8221; within. Time to get snazzy for that party you&#8217;re going to or to that religious gathering you&#8217;ll be at or in  some cases time to party in Times Square freezing your butt of  and risking frostbite at the same time. The time in which we say, &#8220;out with the old and in with the new&#8221;.  The time when after we&#8217;ve reflected on the the past 12 months and we&#8217;re wondering what lies ahead in a mysterious futures. Some of us are coming into the new year single and others are beginning yet another year into a relationship. Some have lost their jobs in the past year and vice versa. Traditionally, a lot of people are making so called &#8220;resolutions&#8221; to bring in the year in a attempt to improve themselves, whether it be in the body, soul and mind. A vast majority  keep up these oaths until somewhere around spring and then they go back to their old habits. I can admit, I too have been amongst that majority. While it is noble to go beyond your natural self and make some changes in your life for the better, it is often easier said than done. Old habits truly die hard whether it be to put the Breyers away and substitute it with low fat frozen yogurt or to put that pack of Newports away for good and replace it with gum or a patch.  Life can simply overwhelm ones self at times depending on your level of  stress tolerance and sometimes one just has to have some sort of getaway to cope.  Others are simply great at starting things and have a hard time keeping up the trend. Such is life.Considering these factors, why do you think it is so hard to  for people to keep their New Years Resolutions throughout the year?  As always, comments are deeply appreciated. </em></strong></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Faktor-faktor yang menjadikan web site portal intranet dimanfaatkan sebagai medium komunikasi internal di PT. Telkom Divre V]]></title>
<link>http://dvanhlast.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/faktor-faktor-yang-menjadikan-web-site-portal-intranet-dimanfaatkan-sebagai-medium-komunikasi-internal-di-pt-telkom-divre-v/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 07:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>dvanhlast</dc:creator>
<guid>http://dvanhlast.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/faktor-faktor-yang-menjadikan-web-site-portal-intranet-dimanfaatkan-sebagai-medium-komunikasi-internal-di-pt-telkom-divre-v/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Author : , JUSTINE Era komunikasi interaktif semakin berkembang pesat sejak kehadiran internet. Sala]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Author : , JUSTINE</p>
<p>Era komunikasi interaktif semakin berkembang pesat sejak kehadiran internet. Salah satu perusahaan BUMN di Indonesia yang menerapkan teknologi komunikasi melalui internet dalam komunikasi internalnya adalah PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia. Media itu bernama Web Site Portal Intranet PT. Telkom Divre V. Ada banyak alasan mengapa para karyawan PT. Telkom Divre V ingin memilih dan memanfaatkan Web Site Portal Intranet PT. Telkom Divre V sebagai medium komunikasi internalnya. Alasan-alasan inilah yang dianalisis peneliti secara kualitatif melalui wawancara mendalam dan observasi partisipan. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh menunjukkan alasan-alasan ini yang menjadi faktor-faktor mengapa Web Site Portal Intranet dapat dipercaya, digunakan, dan diandalkan sebagai salah satu medium utama komunikasi internal di PT. Telkom Divre V. Faktor-faktor tersebut meliputi faktor dari sisi Web Site Portal itu sendiri, faktor dari sisi muatan komunikasi internal, serta faktor dari sisi penggunanya (karyawan).</p>
<p>Keyword : factors, web site portal, internal communication</p>
<p>Sumber : http://repository.petra.ac.id/2670/</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Risk Factors for Homelessness: Evidence From a Population-Based Study]]></title>
<link>http://lancashirecare.wordpress.com/2009/12/13/risk-factors-for-homelessness-evidence-from-a-population-based-study-2/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sjennings29</dc:creator>
<guid>http://lancashirecare.wordpress.com/2009/12/13/risk-factors-for-homelessness-evidence-from-a-population-based-study-2/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Risk Factors for Homelessness: Evidence From a Population-Based Study, Psychiatric Services,2009, 60]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><span style="color:#000080;"><strong>Risk Factors for Homelessness: Evidence From a Population-Based Study, </strong><span style="color:#339966;">Psychiatric Services,2009, 60: 465-472</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"> </span><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="color:#339966;"><span style="color:#000080;">Dr. Shelton is affiliated with the School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, United Kingdom </span><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="color:#339966;"><span><a href="mailto:' + u + '@' + d + '"></a></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="color:#339966;"><strong>Abstract:</strong></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="color:#339966;">This study examined factors associated with lifetime<sup> </sup>experience of homelessness among young adults. <em><strong>METHODS:</strong></em> Data<sup> </sup>were analyzed for 14,888 young adults (mean±SD age 21.97±1.77;<sup> </sup>7,037 men and 7,851 women) who participated in the National<sup> </sup>Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), a U.S.<sup> </sup>nationally representative, population-based sample. Data were<sup> </sup>collected from young adults through computer-assisted interviews<sup> </sup>six years after they had enrolled in the study as adolescents.<sup> </sup>Variables that have been associated with lifetime homelessness<sup> </sup>in at least one service sample were mapped to Add Health survey<sup> </sup>items. Data were analyzed by logistic regression. <em><strong>RESULTS:</strong></em> A<sup> </sup>total of 682 respondents (4.6%) were classified as ever being<sup> </sup>homeless. Several factors related to childhood experiences of<sup> </sup>poor family functioning, socioeconomic disadvantage, and separation<sup> </sup>from parents or caregivers were independently associated with<sup> </sup>ever being homeless. Other significant independent factors included<sup> </sup>current socioeconomic difficulty, mental health problems, and<sup> </sup>addiction problems. Indicators of involvement in crime and addiction<sup> </sup>problems with gambling and alcohol were not independently associated<sup> </sup>with homelessness. <em><strong>CONCLUSIONS:</strong></em> The findings underscore the<sup> </sup>relationship between specific indicators of adversity in childhood<sup> </sup>and risk of homelessness and point to the importance of early<sup> </sup>intervention efforts. Consistent with the extant research literature,<sup> </sup>mental health problems also appear to be associated with homelessness,<sup> </sup>highlighting the potentially complex service needs of this population.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="color:#339966;">Lancashire Care staff can request the full-text of this paper, email: </span></span></p>
<p></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="color:#339966;"><a href="mailto:susan.jennings@lancashirecare.nhs.uk">susan.jennings@lancashirecare.nhs.uk</a></span></span><span style="color:#000080;"><span style="color:#339966;"><br />
</span></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Pregnancy Remedy - Teenage Pregnancy Causes - Factors Responsible For Pregnancy Among Teens]]></title>
<link>http://pregnancyremedy.wordpress.com/2009/12/13/pregnancy-remedy-teenage-pregnancy-causes-factors-responsible-for-pregnancy-among-teens/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>caksub1</dc:creator>
<guid>http://pregnancyremedy.wordpress.com/2009/12/13/pregnancy-remedy-teenage-pregnancy-causes-factors-responsible-for-pregnancy-among-teens/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[pregnancy remedy Sexual action is the capital acumen abaft any pregnancy. Best of the advisers did a]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 260px"><img title="pregnancy remedy" src="http://pregnancyremedy.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/remedy3.jpeg?w=250&#038;h=200" alt="pregnancy remedy" width="250" height="200"><p class="wp-caption-text">pregnancy remedy</p></div>
<p>Sexual action is the capital acumen abaft any pregnancy. Best of the advisers did analysis to amount out the acumen of boundless boyish pregnancy. Some bodies accept a allegory that adolescence accept a admiration to get abundant but this is not accurate as about of pregnancies in boyhood age are unintentional.</p>
<p>According to the researchers the capital acumen abaft this is the abridgement of maturity apprenticeship apropos animal intercourse contraception and abridgement of claimed albatross in boyhood age. Moreover it has been begin that boyish abundance is additionally due to the application opportunities and bound apprenticeship or poverty.</p>
<p>No ability apropos bearing ascendancy or <a href="http://pregnancyremedy.wordpress.com" title="pregnancy remedy"><b>pregnancy remedy</b></a> compassionate sex is one of the capital axiological account of boyish pregnancy. Ignorance is additionally a above acumen abaft boyish pregnancy. If we attending to the book in America we can calmly acquisition teens abnormally girls get so abundant letters about sex. But these letters do not explain the after-effects of boyish sex. It is apparent as an actual delight which prepares babe for sex after able education. Although sex can be apparent advertised in movies and television but there is no according action to brainwash about the <a href="http://pregnancyremedy.wordpress.com/2009/12/03/pregnancy-cures-natural-cures-for-yeast-infection-cure-yeast-infection-at-home/" title="Pregnancy Cures">Pregnancy Cures</a> bearing control. Open discussions should be <a href="http://pregnancyremedy.wordpress.com/2009/12/07/pregnancy-cures-early-pregnancy-symptom-how-to-detect-pregnancy-by-yourself/" title="Pregnancy Cures">Pregnancy Cures</a> accomplished about sex but this is actual <a href="http://pregnancyremedy.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/cure-for-infertility-cure-ringing-ears-home-remedies-will-work-better-for-you-for-tinnitus-than-confused-doctors/" title="Cure For Infertility">Cure For Infertility</a> rare.</p>
<p>Any changeable could become abundant if she has abridgement of ascendancy on her activity or has low expectations apropos her future. In some cases it has been begin that boyish <a href="http://pregnancyremedy.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/pregnancy-remedy-unusual-pregnancy-symptoms-of-different-women/" title="Pregnancy Remedy">Pregnancy Remedy</a> preganancy is additionally a aftereffect of abasement that directs them appear chancy animal activities. Some boyish girls end up in abundance due to booze or drugs corruption which is the acumen abaft bare use of contraception.</p>
<p>Inadequate adulation from ancestors or absence of a ancestor amount causes the mindset of the boyish babe to be admiring <a href="http://pregnancyremedy.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/cure-for-infertility-pregnancy-miracle-review-lisa-olsons-infertility-ebook/" title="Cure For Infertility">Cure For Infertility</a> appear an earlier man to accept amore which ability end up in her abundance if that man has some added desires. In best of the cases boyfriends accept been the antecedent of abundance in boyish girls as girls accept an consequence that sex would accompany their boyfriends added abutting to them.</p>
<p>Researchers accept apparent a ample aberration amid the abundance ante in European countries <a href="http://pregnancyremedy.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/pregnancy-remedy-pregnancy-symptom-detect-pregnancy-before-pregnancy-test/" title="Pregnancy Remedy">Pregnancy Remedy</a> and others due to bigger contraceptive services low adolescent poverty accepting of boyish female and bigger sex education. For example there is a -fold aberration amid Holland and US.</p>
<p>To appearance the account abaft the boyhood abundance abounding surveys accept been <a href="http://pregnancyremedy.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/pregnancy-cures-lisa-olsons-pregnancy-miracle-reviewed" title="Pregnancy Cures">Pregnancy Cures</a> conducted on adolescents to try to accept their viewpoint. According to a abstraction done in on of boys and of <a href="http://pregnancyremedy.wordpress.com/2009/12/03/pregnancy-remedy-chinese-pregnancy-calendar-girl-or-boy-how-to-use-it-and-predict-your-babys-gender/" title="Pregnancy Remedy">Pregnancy Remedy</a> girls best of the boyish girls had sex aloof to amuse their boyfriends. One <a href="http://pregnancyremedy.wordpress.com/2009/12/08/cure-for-infertility-find-repo-cars-for-sale-bargain-hunting-for-autos/" title="Cure For Infertility">Cure For Infertility</a> of the three adolescence of age amid to accept agreed that they were pressurized to accept sex by their friends.</p>
<p>To shock the masses in a abstraction of it was appear that of girls feels ashamed to acquirement bearing ascendancy or accretion ability on sex from a doctor. It is actual difficult to actuate the affiliation <a href="http://pregnancyremedy.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/pregnancy-cures-pregnancy-week-by-week/" title="Pregnancy Cures">Pregnancy Cures</a> amid the boyhood abundance and its factors. However advisers accept agreed on a actuality that teenagers should be accomplished about the contraceptive methods <a href="http://pregnancyremedy.wordpress.com/2009/12/08/pregnancy-remedy-teenage-pregnancy-7-traumatic-effects-of-teenage-pregnancy/" title="pregnancy remedy"><b>pregnancy remedy</b></a> and after-effects of caught sex.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Investors worry about Greece]]></title>
<link>http://sovins.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/investors-worry-about-greece-calculation-of-risk/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Brian Hunt</dc:creator>
<guid>http://sovins.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/investors-worry-about-greece-calculation-of-risk/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[According to the BBC, investors are concerned that Greece may default on its debt. From the article:]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>According to the BBC, investors are concerned that Greece <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8407605.stm">may default on its debt</a>. From the article:</p>
<blockquote><p>This week two-year bond yields have surged to 3.09% from 1.9%. Ten-year Greek bonds had their worst weekly decline since January, with the yield up to 5.3% from 4.99%.</p></blockquote>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p><a href="https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/gr.html">Greece</a> (CIA World Factbook) may become insolvent or default in the immediate future &#8211; the relevant factors in the analysis include:</p>
<ol>
<li>Greece can be (and it is perceived that it may be) bailed out by the <a href="http://www.ecb.int/">ECB</a></li>
<li>Greece has relatively low unemployment at 7.7% (and generally its economy is vibrant and sustainable)</li>
<li>The Greek culture (and perceived culture) isn&#8217;t one of reneging on obligations (notably, they don&#8217;t have a history of sovereign default)</li>
<li>The Greek external debt is $500bn according to the CIA World Factbook</li>
<li>Greek&#8217;s population is just over 10 million people</li>
<li>Greek&#8217;s GDP in 2008 was US$357.5bn, meaning the debt:GDP ratio is approximately 1.4:1</li>
<li>The public perception is that Greek sovereign bonds have exposure to a risk of default.</li>
</ol>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Question#5]]></title>
<link>http://esotericallyspeaking.wordpress.com/2009/12/08/question5/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Esoteric</dc:creator>
<guid>http://esotericallyspeaking.wordpress.com/2009/12/08/question5/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Hello all! I&#8217;m back today with another interesting question for y&#8217;all and I hope you enj]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Hello all! I&#8217;m back today with another interesting question for y&#8217;all and I hope you enjoy. <strong><em>The concept of dating has changed vastly over the past 10 years or so with the advent and further acceptance of online dating. At one point and time online dating was met with a certain level of skepticism and was considered taboo in many circles. However, as we all know that perception has considerably changed with the rising popularity of sites such as Facebook, MySpace, Datehookup.com, Plentyoffish.com,Match.com, and many,many others. As  someone whom has tried it before, I actually met a former girlfriend online on a social site. It was almost no different from meeting someone in the club,bar or out in public. Although, it didn&#8217;t pan out in the end due to personal differences, It was a cherished experience and I would not object to trying it again. On the flip side of that equation, there have been situations whereas the experiences weren&#8217;t as good as my las relationship was and weren&#8217;t good at all. Some of you can that have tried online dating can probably identify with some of the cons associated with such. Things such as a person not looking anything like their profile pictures indicate, pictures not being clear but enough to hide that part of their appearance that may not be appealing to you and many other factors. So, with that in mind, my questions for y&#8217;all today is Is online dating rewarding in the sense that there are an endless amount of  potential greatness in love and relationships or imminent disaster? Comments are deeply appreciated. </em></strong></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mesothelioma - Risk Factors]]></title>
<link>http://attorneymesotheliomasettlements.wordpress.com/2009/12/07/mesothelioma-risk-factors/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>iforyouz</dc:creator>
<guid>http://attorneymesotheliomasettlements.wordpress.com/2009/12/07/mesothelioma-risk-factors/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Almost all cases of mesothelioma patients have been reported with any reports of asbestos, although ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p> Almost all cases of <b>mesothelioma patients</b> have been reported with any reports of asbestos, although rare, that no link to the needs of patients, suggest that particles of asbestos. In these cases, the reasons, such as intrapleural throium inhalation of carbon dioxide and exposure Erionite suspects. </p>
<p> Asbestos is so used in the manufacture of a wide range of products, including textiles, roofing, cement, brake linings, insulation of flooring productsIn the manufacture of these products are small particles of asbestos, air and those in surrounding areas, you inhale. Unlike other substances that accidentally inhale asbestos harmless and can be life-threatening effects such as <b>mesothelioma.</b> Not <b>only mesothelioma,</b> but also other diseases like lung cancer, asbestosis, larynx and kidney damage and cancer caused by asbestos diseases are on the list. </p>
<p> Furthermore, if a person smokes a lot,may increase the risk of <b>mesothelioma.</b> In ancient times, some brands of cigarettes, asbestos, substances used to manufacture their filters and people that smoking was reported to have been infected with <b>mesothelioma</b> through the filter of a cigarette. However, this practice is no longer used and is not involved in these incidents. Other than that, a monkey virus has been reported that a link with cancer <b>mesothelioma.</b> </p>
<p> Inearly days were numerous cases of <b>mesothelioma</b> in the United States between the work involved in asbestos factories. Employees who have worked in shipyards, it was reported that <b>mesothelioma,</b> as early as 1940 on a large scale have. But today, the United States government has laws to keep workplaces free of asbestos, in accordance with safety standards and the British Government has gone in the right to protection of workers in asbestos factories. </p>
<p> However, thereare still countries that do not govern effectively protect the right of workers in these places and many cases of <b>mesothelioma</b> have been reported every year due to the negligence of the authorities of this terrible subject. </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Laptop Buying Guide - Ten Most Important Factors to Consider]]></title>
<link>http://laptop91.wordpress.com/2009/12/04/laptop-buying-guide-ten-most-important-factors-to-consider/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>laptop91</dc:creator>
<guid>http://laptop91.wordpress.com/2009/12/04/laptop-buying-guide-ten-most-important-factors-to-consider/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ I have faced this question several times in the past from my friends, office colleagues, relatives ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p> I have faced this question several times in the past from my friends,  office colleagues, relatives and also those networked with me through various  social networking websites and online communities. They ask me how to choose  a laptop computer that will perfectly meet up their needs. And invariably I initiate dialog by asking this question &#8211; What is the purpose of this purchase? What do you  expect it to do? And based on the responses so far I have received I would like  to classify the purpose of purchasing a laptop under four broad categories and  I believe a laptop, being more personalized in nature in comparison to its Desktop  counterpart, you can not expect it to satisfy multiple intersecting purposes  of every individual at your home or work place. After all, like your Mobile  Phone &#8211; a laptop is basically engineered to meet up personal needs. But  anyway, as you are so determined to procure your new laptop, so, please read  on to have some guideline, which have helped my friends in making a decision.</p>
<p>Based on the requirements of the end users we may classify needs under four different categories:</p>
<p><strong>1) </strong><strong>For High School/College students</strong></p>
<p><strong>2) </strong><strong>For Official Use</strong> - mostly for official correspondences, business presentation with little Internet Use.  </p>
<p><strong>3)</strong> <strong>Mostly  for accessing Internet</strong> for online communications, chatting, emailing  etc.</p>
<p><strong>4)</strong> <strong>Heavy  duty operations</strong> &#8211;  A laptop for performing heavy-duty operations  &#8211; which includes processing of multi-media applications gaming, graphics design  etc. &#8211; expected to be acting as a desktop replacement in the truest sense.</p>
<p>Irrespective of your specialized need you should be made aware about few basic concepts that constitute the backbone of any laptop, and you will also learn their effects on your choice. Here are the details:</p>
<p><strong>1) Processor:</strong> Today&#8217;s <b>laptops</b> support wide range of processors  including Intel Core 2 Duo, Intel Celeron M, AMD&#8217;s Turion X2, and so on. Matter  of fact is that the price of a laptop largely depends on the processor it supports.  As such, Intel Core 2 Duo processor series like T7200/7300/T7400/T7500 is highly  recommended for a laptop to be used as a desktop replacement, or for running  high-end multimedia applications, or to have a joyful gaming experience; whereas,  laptop with Intel Celeron Processor is priced moderately and good for running  office applications. For <b>laptops</b>, which feature AMD processors, are both reasonably  priced and optimized for reasonable processing speed. And because of the price  benefit without compromising efficiency much these are my recommendations for  school/college children, and these models are also good for accessing Internet.  In a nutshell, if you feel that you need a laptop with heavy-duty processing  capacity then only investment in rather costly processor worth. Otherwise, there  is no point in such investment.</p>
<p><strong>2. Installed Memory: </strong>Besides processor, this is the second  major factor, which differentiates the price and efficiency of a laptop and  this is the installed memory. Most modern laptop supports DDR2 Memory, and though  1GB is good enough for processing office documents, or for running those applications  required by school/ college students, and even great for browsing Internet but  for Windows Vista you need to have a minimum of 2GB memory. As such it is so  common to find a laptop with even up to 3 &#8211; 4 GB memory but there is no point  in investing that much unless you have some reason for doing so. Also, you can  almost effortlessly upgrade laptop memory anytime later.</p>
<p>
<blockquote><strong>There is a word of caution:  </strong></p>
<p><em>Check well to confirm the amount of installed memory. It has come to my notice that few retailers brand a laptop model as &#8216;up to 4GB memory capacity&#8217;, whereas actual memory physically installed in that model may be 1GB only. Obviously, you have the flexibility to add extra 3 GB memory anytime but presently what you get is 1 GB. So, you need to know the amount of memory physically installed in a laptop.    </em><br />
</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>3. Hard Disk Space:</strong> Space is no more a problem unless you have planned to save all your Music/ Movie collections in your precious laptop Hard Drive. <b>Laptops</b> with 80GB to 160 GB space is a reasonable choice for all purposes. Though for school/college students you may consider to keep the storage capacity on the higher side to accommodate enough room for those massive sized music/movie files.</p>
<p><strong>4.Screen Size:</strong> Once again this is one parameter that is to  be considered with precision for laptop to be used as a replacement for desktop  counterpart. You will do better going for 17&#8243; to 19&#8243; inch screen size,  whereas, 14&#8243; to 16&#8243; screen size will keep the laptop portable without  compromising its usability; but laptop with 13.3&#8243; or Less screen size are  often referred to as Ultra Portable model obviously you can travel really light  and travel freely while carrying the set with you. And laptop with screen size  10&#8243; or less, termed as Netbook, offers more flexibility in terms of portability  but may not be the best option if you want to use it for presentation purpose!</p>
<p><strong>5.Portability and Weight:</strong>	  This is something rather overlooked often while selecting a laptop model;  and this is the factor that is not at all important for a laptop that is more  likely to be placed on a table top for the most of its lifetime. However, if  you plan to move a lot carrying the laptop with you consider models that are  designated as Ultra portable. From my experience, I know, carrying 7 lbs. +  weighed laptop is not a very exciting experience in the long run.  Ultra  portable model weighing less than 2.5 lbs is the best alternative to consider.</p>
<p><strong>6.Battery:</strong> Current <b>laptops</b> utilize lithium ion batteries,  with more recent models using the new lithium polymer technology.  Typical  battery life for standard <b>laptops</b> is two to five hours for light-duty operations.  Once you have chosen a particular model, read for reviews on that model, take  a scrap paper, and note down end users&#8217; feedback on battery performance if you  need to rely on battery more. This is the best way to learn about battery performance  of any laptop model. You may not rely on Manufacturers&#8217; claims in this issue  at least. </p>
<p><strong>7.Networking and Connectivity:</strong> It is desirable for every modern laptop to have support for various connectivity interfaces like Ethernet Card, built-in 802.11 a/b/g/n and Bluetooth connectivity, and to have built in modem. Besides, a laptop that features Expansion Ports like USB 2.0 ports (minimum three in number recommended), DVI, RJ-45, RJ-11, and Cable Lock Slot etc. offers better flexibility in terms of its usage.</p>
<p><strong>8.Built-in components:</strong> For <b>laptops</b> to be used for Internet  access, browsing, online networking or communications, or for playing multimedia  files, or for gaming purposes the one that comes with built-in stereo speakers  with microphone, and a Webcam is a good choice. In particular Webcam is very  essential for online communications.</p>
<p><strong>9. Graphics Card: </strong>Besides, for avid gamers, or the individual who wants to run graphics applications, it is always the best option to select a model that incorporates NVIDIA or ATI graphics card. </p>
<p><strong>10. Warranty: </strong>And finally, it is desirable to invest on a laptop model that come with a legitimate warranty coverage provided by the Manufacturer.  </p>
<p>So, my conclusion is that instead of being trapped by feature-rich expensive models, try to address your needs at the first instance and try to keep a balance between your requirements and available features without exceeding the limit of your budget while purchasing a new laptop. </p>
<p>Author, John Rice, is the editor of a popular online shopping magazine, <a target="_new" href="http://fancy-shoppe.com" rel="nofollow,external">http://fancy-shoppe.com</a>, which integrates coupons from renowned online retail stores.</p>
<p>For a comprehensive list of coupons on top selling laptop models, please visit: <a target="_new" href="http://fancy-shoppe.com/cat/all/Laptops.html" rel="nofollow,external">http://fancy-shoppe.com/cat/all/<b>Laptops</b>.html</a></p>
<p>This article is free for distribution for any/all purposes, provided the content of the Author Signature is kept intact.</p>
<p> <a href="http://laptops91.blogspot.com" rel="dofollow" title="Laptops">Laptops</a> </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Vehicle Code 23104 Helps California Accident Attorneys Settle Claims With Insurance Companies For Vehicle Accident Injuries]]></title>
<link>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-23104-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sebastiangibson</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-23104-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[When California Vehicle Code Section 23104 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an aut]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>When California Vehicle Code Section 23104 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an auto accident in California, and the person found to be in violation of this Vehicle Code Section is the other driver involved in your accident, this can greatly assist a personal injury lawyer in settling your accident insurance claim for a substantial settlement or even the policy limits if your injuries are extensive.  This is even more true in the case of fatal accidents which cause one or more fatalities.  Although a traffic collision report is not evidence, insurance companies treat them as if they are as discussed below.</p>
<p>	However, due to how insurance companies treat individuals without an attorney, a person injured in an auto accident should always retain an attorney to represent them at the earliest possible date after an accident.  Unless you haven’t been injured and won’t be needing medical treatment, an experienced and reputable personal injury lawyer will almost always be able to obtain a considerably larger settlement from an insurance company and a larger amount for you, even after the attorney’s fees and costs are paid. </p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we work on a contingency fee basis, which means that unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your case, there is no fee payable to us.  Even if we’ve incurred costs, such as the costs of obtaining your medical records, no fee is payable to us, unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your favor.  Starting with the personal injury consultation which is also free, and which can be by phone or in person depending on our mutual availability, you never receive a bill from us on any case we take on contingency.  Unlike other attorneys who ask you to pay the costs involved with your case, we simply don’t believe you should have to pay those costs yourself.</p>
<p>	We’ll also advise you how to obtain reimbursement for your car repairs or if your vehicle is totaled, for the value of your vehicle, and any amount you receive for the vehicle is yours to be used by you for the repairs or to replace your vehicle.   At the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson we never take any portion of your property damage settlement and we can also advise you how to obtain payment for a new child safety seat if one was in use at the time of the accident. </p>
<p>	California Vehicle Code Section 23104 provides:</p>
<p>23104. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), whenever reckless driving of a vehicle proximately causes bodily injury to a person other than the driver, the person driving the vehicle shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for not less than 30 days nor more than six months or by a fine of not less than two hundred twenty dollars ($220) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both the fine and imprisonment. (b) A person convicted of reckless driving that proximately causes great bodily injury, as defined in Section 12022.7 of the Penal Code, to a person other than the driver, who previously has been convicted of a violation of Section 23103, 23104, 23105, 23109, 23109.1, 23152, or 23153, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison, by imprisonment in the county jail for not less than 30 days nor more than six months or by a fine of not less than two hundred twenty dollars ($220) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000) or by both the fine and imprisonment.</p>
<p>	When a Police or CHP Officer, or a Sheriff’s Deputy states in his or her report either that the primary collision factor in an auto accident was one party’s violation of a certain vehicle code section such as the one above, and that one of the parties is at fault for violating that code section, the Officer or Deputy is stating what he or she believes to be the underlying cause of the accident.  </p>
<p>	The reason insurance companies treat the collision reports as if they are admissible evidence is that they know if put on the witness stand, the investigating officer or deputy will almost always testify in a manner consistent with the conclusions in his or her report.  That testimony becomes evidence and will often sway a jury in their determination of fault for an accident.</p>
<p>	While an investigating officer’s job is to determine if there was a violation of the law and not to determine who should be at fault in a civil dispute such as a car accident claim, insurance companies often view these two determinations as one and the same.</p>
<p>	A police officer assigned to investigate the scene of an accident does not have the role that a trier of fact does in a courtroom.  The officer is not there to render a verdict and determine who is responsible for the damages.  Rather, the officer is there to determine if any laws were broken.   The officer makes such a determination based on his or her having seen the damage to the vehicles, and having spoken to the drivers and the witnesses when their memories are freshest.  He or she is thus often in a position to make a well-educated determination of who caused the accident.</p>
<p>	Unfortunately, despite the experience of most investigating officers who are dispatched to the scene of an accident, sometimes mistakes are made by these officers.  Quite often one or both parties to an accident will lie to them and an officer or deputy will not always be able to determine which of the parties is telling the truth.  The evidence from the scene, while important, may also be misleading as to what actually occurred to cause the accident.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto, truck, motorcycle, bike, pedestrian or car accident, or if you’ve lost a loved one in a wrongful death vehicle accident, call our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can also e-mail Attorney Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com  Additionally, we invite you to visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website for more information at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
<p>	Sometimes an Officer or Deputy cannot determine with any degree of certainty which party was at fault and will cite two possible Vehicle Code Sections, one for each party in a two-party collision, that may have been violated.  In that case, the Police or CHP Officer or Deputy will often state that the primary collision factor is unknown.</p>
<p>	Even if there are witnesses to an accident, the Officer of Deputy may discount the statements of some or all of the witnesses if they were friends or relatives of one of the drivers.</p>
<p>	Although, as stated above, the conclusion of fault by an officer or deputy does not carry the same weight as a determination of fault by a judge or jury, the importance of the citation of this or any other California code section in the police report is that insurance companies treat the conclusions in these traffic collision reports in a great majority of cases as if the conclusions were written in stone and evaluate a party’s claim based on the findings of fault in these reports.</p>
<p>	A traffic collision report may be amended by the police department or the CHP where it contains obvious mistakes, such as when the officer or deputy has mixed up the names of the parties.  Supplemental reports are sometimes written when new evidence comes to light, such as when a hit and run party is located.  But for the most part, most police departments, Sheriff’s offices and the California Highway Patrol will not amend a report when a party complains and states why he or she doesn’t feel they should have been found at fault for a collision.  They will, however, in most cases allow a person to fill out a Counter Report, which, unfortunately simply does not carry much weight with an insurance company.</p>
<p>	If the Primary Collision Factor for an accident is unknown, one should look on the traffic collision report to see if the Police or California Highway Patrol Officer or Sheriff’s Deputy cited any “Other Associated Factors” in the traffic collision report as having had a role to play in causing the collision.  There may have been faulty equipment, as with some truck accidents, or the roadway itself may have been dangerous.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident in California that has been determined by the investigating Police or CHP Officer or a Sheriff’s Deputy to be the fault of another driver as a result of his or her violation of Vehicle Code Section 23104, call the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson as soon after an accident as possible before important evidence disappears, such as skid marks that are washed away with the rain.</p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we specialize in California auto accidents caused by violations of the California Vehicle Code, such as Section 23104, and will represent you to obtain the compensation you deserve for your injuries.</p>
<p>	In over thirty years of practice, Attorney Sebastian Gibson has obtained millions of dollars in settlements and multiple million dollar or larger settlements.  We handle auto accident cases on a contingency fee basis so there is no fee payable unless we win your case and obtain either a settlement, an arbitration, mediation, jury, judge or court award.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident, call to speak with a lawyer at our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can speak to Attorney Sebastian Gibson personally by phone or you can e-mail Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com or visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Vehicle Code 23103 Helps California Accident Attorneys Settle Claims With Insurance Companies For Vehicle Accident Injuries]]></title>
<link>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-23103-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sebastiangibson</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-23103-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[When California Vehicle Code Section 23103 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an aut]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>When California Vehicle Code Section 23103 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an auto accident in California, and the person found to be in violation of this Vehicle Code Section is the other driver involved in your accident, this can greatly assist a personal injury lawyer in settling your accident insurance claim for a substantial settlement or even the policy limits if your injuries are extensive.  This is even more true in the case of fatal accidents which cause one or more fatalities.  Although a traffic collision report is not evidence, insurance companies treat them as if they are as discussed below.</p>
<p>	However, due to how insurance companies treat individuals without an attorney, a person injured in an auto accident should always retain an attorney to represent them at the earliest possible date after an accident.  Unless you haven’t been injured and won’t be needing medical treatment, an experienced and reputable personal injury lawyer will almost always be able to obtain a considerably larger settlement from an insurance company and a larger amount for you, even after the attorney’s fees and costs are paid. </p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we work on a contingency fee basis, which means that unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your case, there is no fee payable to us.  Even if we’ve incurred costs, such as the costs of obtaining your medical records, no fee is payable to us, unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your favor.  Starting with the personal injury consultation which is also free, and which can be by phone or in person depending on our mutual availability, you never receive a bill from us on any case we take on contingency.  Unlike other attorneys who ask you to pay the costs involved with your case, we simply don’t believe you should have to pay those costs yourself.</p>
<p>	We’ll also advise you how to obtain reimbursement for your car repairs or if your vehicle is totaled, for the value of your vehicle, and any amount you receive for the vehicle is yours to be used by you for the repairs or to replace your vehicle.   At the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson we never take any portion of your property damage settlement and we can also advise you how to obtain payment for a new child safety seat if one was in use at the time of the accident. </p>
<p>	California Vehicle Code Section 23103 provides:</p>
<p>23103. (a) A person who drives a vehicle upon a highway in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property is guilty of reckless driving. (b) A person who drives a vehicle in an offstreet parking facility, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 12500, in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property is guilty of reckless driving. (c) Persons convicted of the offense of reckless driving shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for not less than five days nor more than 90 days or by a fine of not less than one hundred forty-five dollars ($145) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment, except as provided in Section 23104 or 23105.</p>
<p>	When a Police or CHP Officer, or a Sheriff’s Deputy states in his or her report either that the primary collision factor in an auto accident was one party’s violation of a certain vehicle code section such as the one above, and that one of the parties is at fault for violating that code section, the Officer or Deputy is stating what he or she believes to be the underlying cause of the accident.  </p>
<p>	The reason insurance companies treat the collision reports as if they are admissible evidence is that they know if put on the witness stand, the investigating officer or deputy will almost always testify in a manner consistent with the conclusions in his or her report.  That testimony becomes evidence and will often sway a jury in their determination of fault for an accident.</p>
<p>	While an investigating officer’s job is to determine if there was a violation of the law and not to determine who should be at fault in a civil dispute such as a car accident claim, insurance companies often view these two determinations as one and the same.</p>
<p>	A police officer assigned to investigate the scene of an accident does not have the role that a trier of fact does in a courtroom.  The officer is not there to render a verdict and determine who is responsible for the damages.  Rather, the officer is there to determine if any laws were broken.   The officer makes such a determination based on his or her having seen the damage to the vehicles, and having spoken to the drivers and the witnesses when their memories are freshest.  He or she is thus often in a position to make a well-educated determination of who caused the accident.</p>
<p>	Unfortunately, despite the experience of most investigating officers who are dispatched to the scene of an accident, sometimes mistakes are made by these officers.  Quite often one or both parties to an accident will lie to them and an officer or deputy will not always be able to determine which of the parties is telling the truth.  The evidence from the scene, while important, may also be misleading as to what actually occurred to cause the accident.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto, truck, motorcycle, bike, pedestrian or car accident, or if you’ve lost a loved one in a wrongful death vehicle accident, call our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can also e-mail Attorney Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com  Additionally, we invite you to visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website for more information at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
<p>	Sometimes an Officer or Deputy cannot determine with any degree of certainty which party was at fault and will cite two possible Vehicle Code Sections, one for each party in a two-party collision, that may have been violated.  In that case, the Police or CHP Officer or Deputy will often state that the primary collision factor is unknown.</p>
<p>	Even if there are witnesses to an accident, the Officer of Deputy may discount the statements of some or all of the witnesses if they were friends or relatives of one of the drivers.</p>
<p>	Although, as stated above, the conclusion of fault by an officer or deputy does not carry the same weight as a determination of fault by a judge or jury, the importance of the citation of this or any other California code section in the police report is that insurance companies treat the conclusions in these traffic collision reports in a great majority of cases as if the conclusions were written in stone and evaluate a party’s claim based on the findings of fault in these reports.</p>
<p>	A traffic collision report may be amended by the police department or the CHP where it contains obvious mistakes, such as when the officer or deputy has mixed up the names of the parties.  Supplemental reports are sometimes written when new evidence comes to light, such as when a hit and run party is located.  But for the most part, most police departments, Sheriff’s offices and the California Highway Patrol will not amend a report when a party complains and states why he or she doesn’t feel they should have been found at fault for a collision.  They will, however, in most cases allow a person to fill out a Counter Report, which, unfortunately simply does not carry much weight with an insurance company.</p>
<p>	If the Primary Collision Factor for an accident is unknown, one should look on the traffic collision report to see if the Police or California Highway Patrol Officer or Sheriff’s Deputy cited any “Other Associated Factors” in the traffic collision report as having had a role to play in causing the collision.  There may have been faulty equipment, as with some truck accidents, or the roadway itself may have been dangerous.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident in California that has been determined by the investigating Police or CHP Officer or a Sheriff’s Deputy to be the fault of another driver as a result of his or her violation of Vehicle Code Section 23103, call the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson as soon after an accident as possible before important evidence disappears, such as skid marks that are washed away with the rain.</p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we specialize in California auto accidents caused by violations of the California Vehicle Code, such as Section 23103, and will represent you to obtain the compensation you deserve for your injuries.</p>
<p>	In over thirty years of practice, Attorney Sebastian Gibson has obtained millions of dollars in settlements and multiple million dollar or larger settlements.  We handle auto accident cases on a contingency fee basis so there is no fee payable unless we win your case and obtain either a settlement, an arbitration, mediation, jury, judge or court award.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident, call to speak with a lawyer at our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can speak to Attorney Sebastian Gibson personally by phone or you can e-mail Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com or visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Vehicle Code 21651 Helps California Accident Attorneys Settle Claims With Insurance Companies For Vehicle Accident Injuries]]></title>
<link>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-21651-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sebastiangibson</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-21651-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[When California Vehicle Code Section 21651 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an aut]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>When California Vehicle Code Section 21651 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an auto accident in California, and the person found to be in violation of this Vehicle Code Section is the other driver involved in your accident, this can greatly assist a personal injury lawyer in settling your accident insurance claim for a substantial settlement or even the policy limits if your injuries are extensive.  This is even more true in the case of fatal accidents which cause one or more fatalities.  Although a traffic collision report is not evidence, insurance companies treat them as if they are as discussed below.</p>
<p>	However, due to how insurance companies treat individuals without an attorney, a person injured in an auto accident should always retain an attorney to represent them at the earliest possible date after an accident.  Unless you haven’t been injured and won’t be needing medical treatment, an experienced and reputable personal injury lawyer will almost always be able to obtain a considerably larger settlement from an insurance company and a larger amount for you, even after the attorney’s fees and costs are paid. </p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we work on a contingency fee basis, which means that unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your case, there is no fee payable to us.  Even if we’ve incurred costs, such as the costs of obtaining your medical records, no fee is payable to us, unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your favor.  Starting with the personal injury consultation which is also free, and which can be by phone or in person depending on our mutual availability, you never receive a bill from us on any case we take on contingency.  Unlike other attorneys who ask you to pay the costs involved with your case, we simply don’t believe you should have to pay those costs yourself.</p>
<p>	We’ll also advise you how to obtain reimbursement for your car repairs or if your vehicle is totaled, for the value of your vehicle, and any amount you receive for the vehicle is yours to be used by you for the repairs or to replace your vehicle.   At the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson we never take any portion of your property damage settlement and we can also advise you how to obtain payment for a new child safety seat if one was in use at the time of the accident. </p>
<p>	California Vehicle Code Section 21651 provides:</p>
<p>21650.1. A bicycle operated on a roadway, or the shoulder of a highway, shall be operated in the same direction as vehicles are required to be driven upon the roadway.</p>
<p>	When a Police or CHP Officer, or a Sheriff’s Deputy states in his or her report either that the primary collision factor in an auto accident was one party’s violation of a certain vehicle code section such as the one above, and that one of the parties is at fault for violating that code section, the Officer or Deputy is stating what he or she believes to be the underlying cause of the accident.  </p>
<p>	The reason insurance companies treat the collision reports as if they are admissible evidence is that they know if put on the witness stand, the investigating officer or deputy will almost always testify in a manner consistent with the conclusions in his or her report.  That testimony becomes evidence and will often sway a jury in their determination of fault for an accident.</p>
<p>	While an investigating officer’s job is to determine if there was a violation of the law and not to determine who should be at fault in a civil dispute such as a car accident claim, insurance companies often view these two determinations as one and the same.</p>
<p>	A police officer assigned to investigate the scene of an accident does not have the role that a trier of fact does in a courtroom.  The officer is not there to render a verdict and determine who is responsible for the damages.  Rather, the officer is there to determine if any laws were broken.   The officer makes such a determination based on his or her having seen the damage to the vehicles, and having spoken to the drivers and the witnesses when their memories are freshest.  He or she is thus often in a position to make a well-educated determination of who caused the accident.</p>
<p>	Unfortunately, despite the experience of most investigating officers who are dispatched to the scene of an accident, sometimes mistakes are made by these officers.  Quite often one or both parties to an accident will lie to them and an officer or deputy will not always be able to determine which of the parties is telling the truth.  The evidence from the scene, while important, may also be misleading as to what actually occurred to cause the accident.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto, truck, motorcycle, bike, pedestrian or car accident, or if you’ve lost a loved one in a wrongful death vehicle accident, call our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can also e-mail Attorney Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com  Additionally, we invite you to visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website for more information at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
<p>	Sometimes an Officer or Deputy cannot determine with any degree of certainty which party was at fault and will cite two possible Vehicle Code Sections, one for each party in a two-party collision, that may have been violated.  In that case, the Police or CHP Officer or Deputy will often state that the primary collision factor is unknown.</p>
<p>	Even if there are witnesses to an accident, the Officer of Deputy may discount the statements of some or all of the witnesses if they were friends or relatives of one of the drivers.</p>
<p>	Although, as stated above, the conclusion of fault by an officer or deputy does not carry the same weight as a determination of fault by a judge or jury, the importance of the citation of this or any other California code section in the police report is that insurance companies treat the conclusions in these traffic collision reports in a great majority of cases as if the conclusions were written in stone and evaluate a party’s claim based on the findings of fault in these reports.</p>
<p>	A traffic collision report may be amended by the police department or the CHP where it contains obvious mistakes, such as when the officer or deputy has mixed up the names of the parties.  Supplemental reports are sometimes written when new evidence comes to light, such as when a hit and run party is located.  But for the most part, most police departments, Sheriff’s offices and the California Highway Patrol will not amend a report when a party complains and states why he or she doesn’t feel they should have been found at fault for a collision.  They will, however, in most cases allow a person to fill out a Counter Report, which, unfortunately simply does not carry much weight with an insurance company.</p>
<p>	If the Primary Collision Factor for an accident is unknown, one should look on the traffic collision report to see if the Police or California Highway Patrol Officer or Sheriff’s Deputy cited any “Other Associated Factors” in the traffic collision report as having had a role to play in causing the collision.  There may have been faulty equipment, as with some truck accidents, or the roadway itself may have been dangerous.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident in California that has been determined by the investigating Police or CHP Officer or a Sheriff’s Deputy to be the fault of another driver as a result of his or her violation of Vehicle Code Section 21651, call the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson as soon after an accident as possible before important evidence disappears, such as skid marks that are washed away with the rain.</p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we specialize in California auto accidents caused by violations of the California Vehicle Code, such as Section 21651, and will represent you to obtain the compensation you deserve for your injuries.</p>
<p>	In over thirty years of practice, Attorney Sebastian Gibson has obtained millions of dollars in settlements and multiple million dollar or larger settlements.  We handle auto accident cases on a contingency fee basis so there is no fee payable unless we win your case and obtain either a settlement, an arbitration, mediation, jury, judge or court award.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident, call to speak with a lawyer at our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can speak to Attorney Sebastian Gibson personally by phone or you can e-mail Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com or visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Vehicle Code 20002 Helps California Accident Attorneys Settle Claims With Insurance Companies For Vehicle Accident Injuries]]></title>
<link>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-20002-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sebastiangibson</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-20002-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[When California Vehicle Code Section 20002 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an aut]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>When California Vehicle Code Section 20002 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an auto accident in California, and the person found to be in violation of this Vehicle Code Section is the other driver involved in your accident, this can greatly assist a personal injury lawyer in settling your accident insurance claim for a substantial settlement or even the policy limits if your injuries are extensive.  This is even more true in the case of fatal accidents which cause one or more fatalities.  Although a traffic collision report is not evidence, insurance companies treat them as if they are as discussed below.</p>
<p>	However, due to how insurance companies treat individuals without an attorney, a person injured in an auto accident should always retain an attorney to represent them at the earliest possible date after an accident.  Unless you haven’t been injured and won’t be needing medical treatment, an experienced and reputable personal injury lawyer will almost always be able to obtain a considerably larger settlement from an insurance company and a larger amount for you, even after the attorney’s fees and costs are paid. </p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we work on a contingency fee basis, which means that unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your case, there is no fee payable to us.  Even if we’ve incurred costs, such as the costs of obtaining your medical records, no fee is payable to us, unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your favor.  Starting with the personal injury consultation which is also free, and which can be by phone or in person depending on our mutual availability, you never receive a bill from us on any case we take on contingency.  Unlike other attorneys who ask you to pay the costs involved with your case, we simply don’t believe you should have to pay those costs yourself.</p>
<p>	We’ll also advise you how to obtain reimbursement for your car repairs or if your vehicle is totaled, for the value of your vehicle, and any amount you receive for the vehicle is yours to be used by you for the repairs or to replace your vehicle.   At the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson we never take any portion of your property damage settlement and we can also advise you how to obtain payment for a new child safety seat if one was in use at the time of the accident. </p>
<p>	California Vehicle Code Section 20002 provides:</p>
<p>20002. (a) The driver of any vehicle involved in an accident resulting only in damage to any property, including vehicles, shall immediately stop the vehicle at the nearest location that will not impede traffic or otherwise jeopardize the safety of other motorists. Moving the vehicle in accordance with this subdivision does not affect the question of fault. The driver shall also immediately do either of the following: (1) Locate and notify the owner or person in charge of that property of the name and address of the driver and owner of the vehicle involved and, upon locating the driver of any other vehicle involved or the owner or person in charge of any damaged property, upon being requested, present his or her driver&#8217;s license, and vehicle registration, to the other driver, property owner, or person in charge of that property. The information presented shall include the current residence address of the driver and of the registered owner. If the registered owner of an involved vehicle is present at the scene, he or she shall also, upon request, present his or her driver&#8217;s license information, if available, or other valid identification to the other involved parties. (2) Leave in a conspicuous place on the vehicle or other property damaged a written notice giving the name and address of the driver and of the owner of the vehicle involved and a statement of the circumstances thereof and shall without unnecessary delay notify the police department of the city wherein the collision occurred or, if the collision occurred in unincorporated territory, the local headquarters of the Department of the California Highway Patrol. (b) Any person who parks a vehicle which, prior to the vehicle again being driven, becomes a runaway vehicle and is involved in an accident resulting in damage to any property, attended or unattended, shall comply with the requirements of this section relating to notification and reporting and shall, upon conviction thereof, be liable to the penalties of this section for failure to comply with the requirements. (c) Any person failing to comply with all the requirements of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months, or by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both that imprisonment and fine. </p>
<p>	When a Police or CHP Officer, or a Sheriff’s Deputy states in his or her report either that the primary collision factor in an auto accident was one party’s violation of a certain vehicle code section such as the one above, and that one of the parties is at fault for violating that code section, the Officer or Deputy is stating what he or she believes to be the underlying cause of the accident.  </p>
<p>	The reason insurance companies treat the collision reports as if they are admissible evidence is that they know if put on the witness stand, the investigating officer or deputy will almost always testify in a manner consistent with the conclusions in his or her report.  That testimony becomes evidence and will often sway a jury in their determination of fault for an accident.</p>
<p>	While an investigating officer’s job is to determine if there was a violation of the law and not to determine who should be at fault in a civil dispute such as a car accident claim, insurance companies often view these two determinations as one and the same.</p>
<p>	A police officer assigned to investigate the scene of an accident does not have the role that a trier of fact does in a courtroom.  The officer is not there to render a verdict and determine who is responsible for the damages.  Rather, the officer is there to determine if any laws were broken.   The officer makes such a determination based on his or her having seen the damage to the vehicles, and having spoken to the drivers and the witnesses when their memories are freshest.  He or she is thus often in a position to make a well-educated determination of who caused the accident.</p>
<p>	Unfortunately, despite the experience of most investigating officers who are dispatched to the scene of an accident, sometimes mistakes are made by these officers.  Quite often one or both parties to an accident will lie to them and an officer or deputy will not always be able to determine which of the parties is telling the truth.  The evidence from the scene, while important, may also be misleading as to what actually occurred to cause the accident.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto, truck, motorcycle, bike, pedestrian or car accident, or if you’ve lost a loved one in a wrongful death vehicle accident, call our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can also e-mail Attorney Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com  Additionally, we invite you to visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website for more information at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
<p>	Sometimes an Officer or Deputy cannot determine with any degree of certainty which party was at fault and will cite two possible Vehicle Code Sections, one for each party in a two-party collision, that may have been violated.  In that case, the Police or CHP Officer or Deputy will often state that the primary collision factor is unknown.</p>
<p>	Even if there are witnesses to an accident, the Officer of Deputy may discount the statements of some or all of the witnesses if they were friends or relatives of one of the drivers.</p>
<p>	Although, as stated above, the conclusion of fault by an officer or deputy does not carry the same weight as a determination of fault by a judge or jury, the importance of the citation of this or any other California code section in the police report is that insurance companies treat the conclusions in these traffic collision reports in a great majority of cases as if the conclusions were written in stone and evaluate a party’s claim based on the findings of fault in these reports.</p>
<p>	A traffic collision report may be amended by the police department or the CHP where it contains obvious mistakes, such as when the officer or deputy has mixed up the names of the parties.  Supplemental reports are sometimes written when new evidence comes to light, such as when a hit and run party is located.  But for the most part, most police departments, Sheriff’s offices and the California Highway Patrol will not amend a report when a party complains and states why he or she doesn’t feel they should have been found at fault for a collision.  They will, however, in most cases allow a person to fill out a Counter Report, which, unfortunately simply does not carry much weight with an insurance company.</p>
<p>	If the Primary Collision Factor for an accident is unknown, one should look on the traffic collision report to see if the Police or California Highway Patrol Officer or Sheriff’s Deputy cited any “Other Associated Factors” in the traffic collision report as having had a role to play in causing the collision.  There may have been faulty equipment, as with some truck accidents, or the roadway itself may have been dangerous.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident in California that has been determined by the investigating Police or CHP Officer or a Sheriff’s Deputy to be the fault of another driver as a result of his or her violation of Vehicle Code Section 20002, call the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson as soon after an accident as possible before important evidence disappears, such as skid marks that are washed away with the rain.</p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we specialize in California auto accidents caused by violations of the California Vehicle Code, such as Section 20002, and will represent you to obtain the compensation you deserve for your injuries.</p>
<p>	In over thirty years of practice, Attorney Sebastian Gibson has obtained millions of dollars in settlements and multiple million dollar or larger settlements.  We handle auto accident cases on a contingency fee basis so there is no fee payable unless we win your case and obtain either a settlement, an arbitration, mediation, jury, judge or court award.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident, call to speak with a lawyer at our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can speak to Attorney Sebastian Gibson personally by phone or you can e-mail Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com or visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Vehicle Code 20001 Helps California Accident Attorneys Settle Claims With Insurance Companies For Vehicle Accident Injuries]]></title>
<link>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-20001-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sebastiangibson</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-20001-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[When California Vehicle Code Section 20001 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an aut]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>When California Vehicle Code Section 20001 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an auto accident in California, and the person found to be in violation of this Vehicle Code Section is the other driver involved in your accident, this can greatly assist a personal injury lawyer in settling your accident insurance claim for a substantial settlement or even the policy limits if your injuries are extensive.  This is even more true in the case of fatal accidents which cause one or more fatalities.  Although a traffic collision report is not evidence, insurance companies treat them as if they are as discussed below.</p>
<p>	However, due to how insurance companies treat individuals without an attorney, a person injured in an auto accident should always retain an attorney to represent them at the earliest possible date after an accident.  Unless you haven’t been injured and won’t be needing medical treatment, an experienced and reputable personal injury lawyer will almost always be able to obtain a considerably larger settlement from an insurance company and a larger amount for you, even after the attorney’s fees and costs are paid. </p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we work on a contingency fee basis, which means that unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your case, there is no fee payable to us.  Even if we’ve incurred costs, such as the costs of obtaining your medical records, no fee is payable to us, unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your favor.  Starting with the personal injury consultation which is also free, and which can be by phone or in person depending on our mutual availability, you never receive a bill from us on any case we take on contingency.  Unlike other attorneys who ask you to pay the costs involved with your case, we simply don’t believe you should have to pay those costs yourself.</p>
<p>	We’ll also advise you how to obtain reimbursement for your car repairs or if your vehicle is totaled, for the value of your vehicle, and any amount you receive for the vehicle is yours to be used by you for the repairs or to replace your vehicle.   At the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson we never take any portion of your property damage settlement and we can also advise you how to obtain payment for a new child safety seat if one was in use at the time of the accident. </p>
<p>	California Vehicle Code Section 20001 provides:</p>
<p>20001. (a) The driver of a vehicle involved in an accident resulting in injury to a person, other than himself or herself, or in the death of a person shall immediately stop the vehicle at the scene of the accident and shall fulfill the requirements of Sections 20003 and 20004. (b) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), a person who violates subdivision (a) shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison, or in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine of not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000) nor more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by both that imprisonment and fine. (2) If the accident described in subdivision (a) results in death or permanent, serious injury, a person who violates subdivision (a) shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years, or in a county jail for not less than 90 days nor more than one year, or by a fine of not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000) nor more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by both that imprisonment and fine. However, the court, in the interests of justice and for reasons stated in the record, may reduce or eliminate the minimum imprisonment required by this paragraph. (3) In imposing the minimum fine required by this subdivision, the court shall take into consideration the defendant&#8217;s ability to pay the fine and, in the interests of justice and for reasons stated in the record, may reduce the amount of that minimum fine to less than the amount otherwise required by this subdivision. (c) A person who flees the scene of the crime after committing a violation of Section 191.5 of, or paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of Section 192 of the Penal Code, upon conviction of any of those sections, in addition and consecutive to the punishment prescribed, shall be punished by an additional term of imprisonment of five years in the state prison. This additional term shall not be imposed unless the allegation is charged in the accusatory pleading and admitted by the defendant or found to be true by the trier of fact. The court shall not strike a finding that brings a person within the provisions of this subdivision or an allegation made pursuant to this subdivision. (d) As used in this section, &#8220;permanent, serious injury&#8221; means the loss or permanent impairment of function of a bodily member or organ. </p>
<p>	When a Police or CHP Officer, or a Sheriff’s Deputy states in his or her report either that the primary collision factor in an auto accident was one party’s violation of a certain vehicle code section such as the one above, and that one of the parties is at fault for violating that code section, the Officer or Deputy is stating what he or she believes to be the underlying cause of the accident.  </p>
<p>	The reason insurance companies treat the collision reports as if they are admissible evidence is that they know if put on the witness stand, the investigating officer or deputy will almost always testify in a manner consistent with the conclusions in his or her report.  That testimony becomes evidence and will often sway a jury in their determination of fault for an accident.</p>
<p>	While an investigating officer’s job is to determine if there was a violation of the law and not to determine who should be at fault in a civil dispute such as a car accident claim, insurance companies often view these two determinations as one and the same.</p>
<p>	A police officer assigned to investigate the scene of an accident does not have the role that a trier of fact does in a courtroom.  The officer is not there to render a verdict and determine who is responsible for the damages.  Rather, the officer is there to determine if any laws were broken.   The officer makes such a determination based on his or her having seen the damage to the vehicles, and having spoken to the drivers and the witnesses when their memories are freshest.  He or she is thus often in a position to make a well-educated determination of who caused the accident.</p>
<p>	Unfortunately, despite the experience of most investigating officers who are dispatched to the scene of an accident, sometimes mistakes are made by these officers.  Quite often one or both parties to an accident will lie to them and an officer or deputy will not always be able to determine which of the parties is telling the truth.  The evidence from the scene, while important, may also be misleading as to what actually occurred to cause the accident.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto, truck, motorcycle, bike, pedestrian or car accident, or if you’ve lost a loved one in a wrongful death vehicle accident, call our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can also e-mail Attorney Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com  Additionally, we invite you to visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website for more information at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
<p>	Sometimes an Officer or Deputy cannot determine with any degree of certainty which party was at fault and will cite two possible Vehicle Code Sections, one for each party in a two-party collision, that may have been violated.  In that case, the Police or CHP Officer or Deputy will often state that the primary collision factor is unknown.</p>
<p>	Even if there are witnesses to an accident, the Officer of Deputy may discount the statements of some or all of the witnesses if they were friends or relatives of one of the drivers.</p>
<p>	Although, as stated above, the conclusion of fault by an officer or deputy does not carry the same weight as a determination of fault by a judge or jury, the importance of the citation of this or any other California code section in the police report is that insurance companies treat the conclusions in these traffic collision reports in a great majority of cases as if the conclusions were written in stone and evaluate a party’s claim based on the findings of fault in these reports.</p>
<p>	A traffic collision report may be amended by the police department or the CHP where it contains obvious mistakes, such as when the officer or deputy has mixed up the names of the parties.  Supplemental reports are sometimes written when new evidence comes to light, such as when a hit and run party is located.  But for the most part, most police departments, Sheriff’s offices and the California Highway Patrol will not amend a report when a party complains and states why he or she doesn’t feel they should have been found at fault for a collision.  They will, however, in most cases allow a person to fill out a Counter Report, which, unfortunately simply does not carry much weight with an insurance company.</p>
<p>	If the Primary Collision Factor for an accident is unknown, one should look on the traffic collision report to see if the Police or California Highway Patrol Officer or Sheriff’s Deputy cited any “Other Associated Factors” in the traffic collision report as having had a role to play in causing the collision.  There may have been faulty equipment, as with some truck accidents, or the roadway itself may have been dangerous.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident in California that has been determined by the investigating Police or CHP Officer or a Sheriff’s Deputy to be the fault of another driver as a result of his or her violation of Vehicle Code Section 20001, call the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson as soon after an accident as possible before important evidence disappears, such as skid marks that are washed away with the rain.</p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we specialize in California auto accidents caused by violations of the California Vehicle Code, such as Section 20001, and will represent you to obtain the compensation you deserve for your injuries.</p>
<p>	In over thirty years of practice, Attorney Sebastian Gibson has obtained millions of dollars in settlements and multiple million dollar or larger settlements.  We handle auto accident cases on a contingency fee basis so there is no fee payable unless we win your case and obtain either a settlement, an arbitration, mediation, jury, judge or court award.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident, call to speak with a lawyer at our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can speak to Attorney Sebastian Gibson personally by phone or you can e-mail Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com or visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Vehicle Code 34501.2 Helps California Accident Attorneys Settle Claims With Insurance Companies For Vehicle Accident Injuries]]></title>
<link>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-34501-2-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sebastiangibson</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-34501-2-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[When California Vehicle Code Section 34501.2 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an a]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>When California Vehicle Code Section 34501.2 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an auto accident in California, and the person found to be in violation of this Vehicle Code Section is the other driver involved in your accident, this can greatly assist a personal injury lawyer in settling your accident insurance claim for a substantial settlement or even the policy limits if your injuries are extensive.  This is even more true in the case of fatal accidents which cause one or more fatalities.  Although a traffic collision report is not evidence, insurance companies treat them as if they are as discussed below.</p>
<p>	However, due to how insurance companies treat individuals without an attorney, a person injured in an auto accident should always retain an attorney to represent them at the earliest possible date after an accident.  Unless you haven’t been injured and won’t be needing medical treatment, an experienced and reputable personal injury lawyer will almost always be able to obtain a considerably larger settlement from an insurance company and a larger amount for you, even after the attorney’s fees and costs are paid. </p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we work on a contingency fee basis, which means that unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your case, there is no fee payable to us.  Even if we’ve incurred costs, such as the costs of obtaining your medical records, no fee is payable to us, unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your favor.  Starting with the personal injury consultation which is also free, and which can be by phone or in person depending on our mutual availability, you never receive a bill from us on any case we take on contingency.  Unlike other attorneys who ask you to pay the costs involved with your case, we simply don’t believe you should have to pay those costs yourself.</p>
<p>	We’ll also advise you how to obtain reimbursement for your car repairs or if your vehicle is totaled, for the value of your vehicle, and any amount you receive for the vehicle is yours to be used by you for the repairs or to replace your vehicle.   At the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson we never take any portion of your property damage settlement and we can also advise you how to obtain payment for a new child safety seat if one was in use at the time of the accident. </p>
<p>	California Vehicle Code Section 34501.2 provides:</p>
<p>34501.2. (a) The regulations adopted under Section 34501 for vehicles engaged in interstate or intrastate commerce shall establish hours-of-service regulations for drivers of those vehicles that are consistent with the hours-of-service regulations adopted by the United States Department of Transportation in Part 395 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as those regulations now exist or are hereafter amended. (b) The regulations adopted under Section 34501 for vehicles engaged in intrastate commerce that are not transporting hazardous substances or hazardous waste, as those terms are defined by regulations in Section 171.8 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as those regulations now exist or are hereafter amended, shall have the following exceptions: (1) The maximum driving time within a work period shall be 12 hours for a driver of a truck or truck tractor, except for a driver of a tank vehicle with a capacity of more than 500 gallons transporting flammable liquid, who shall not drive for more than 10 hours within a work period. (2) No motor carrier shall permit or require a driver to drive, nor shall any driver drive, for any period after having been on duty for 80 hours in any consecutive eight days. (3) A driver employed by an electrical corporation, as defined in Section 218 of the Public Utilities Code, a gas corporation, as defined in Section 222 of that code, a telephone corporation, as defined in Section 234 of that code, a water corporation, as defined in Section 241 of that code, or a public water district as defined in Section 20200 of the Water Code, may be permitted or required to drive more than the number of hours specified in subdivision (a) while operating a public utility or public water district vehicle during the emergency restoration of service. (4) Any other exceptions applicable to drivers assigned to governmental fire suppression and prevention, as determined by the department. (5) A driver employed by a law enforcement agency, as defined in Section 390.3(f)(2) of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as that section now exists or is hereafter amended, during an emergency or to restore the public peace. (c) The regulations adopted under Section 34501 for vehicles engaged in the transportation of farm products in intrastate commerce shall include all of the following provisions: (1) A driver employed by an agricultural carrier, including a carrier holding a seasonal permit, or by a private carrier, when transporting farm products from the field to the first point of processing or packing, shall not drive for any period after having been on duty 16 hours or more following eight consecutive hours off duty and shall not drive for any period after having been on duty for 112 hours in any consecutive eight-day period, except that a driver transporting special situation farm products from the field to the first point of processing or packing, or transporting livestock from pasture to pasture, may be permitted, during one period of not more than 28 consecutive days or a combination of two periods totaling not more than 28 days in a calendar year, to drive for not more than 12 hours during any workday of not more than 16 hours. A driver who thereby exceeds the driving time limits specified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) shall maintain a driver&#8217;s record of duty status, and shall keep a duplicate copy in his or her possession when driving a vehicle subject to this chapter. These records shall be presented immediately upon request by any authorized employee of the department, or any police officer or deputy sheriff. (2) Upon the request of the Director of Food and Agriculture, the commissioner may, for good cause, temporarily waive the maximum on-duty time limits applicable to any eight-day period when an emergency exists due to inclement weather, natural disaster, or an adverse economic condition that threatens to disrupt the orderly movement of farm products during harvest for the duration of the emergency. For purposes of this paragraph, an emergency does not include a strike or labor dispute. (3) For purposes of this subdivision, the following terms have the following meanings: (A) &#8220;Farm products&#8221; means every agricultural, horticultural, viticultural, or vegetable product of the soil, honey and beeswax, oilseeds, poultry, livestock, milk, or timber. (B) &#8220;First point of processing or packing&#8221; means a location where farm products are dried, canned, extracted, fermented, distilled, frozen, ginned, eviscerated, pasteurized, packed, packaged, bottled, conditioned, or otherwise manufactured, processed, or preserved for distribution in wholesale or retail markets. (C) &#8220;Special situation farm products&#8221; means fruit, tomatoes, sugar beets, grains, wine grapes, grape concentrate, cotton, or nuts. </p>
<p>	When a Police or CHP Officer, or a Sheriff’s Deputy states in his or her report either that the primary collision factor in an auto accident was one party’s violation of a certain vehicle code section such as the one above, and that one of the parties is at fault for violating that code section, the Officer or Deputy is stating what he or she believes to be the underlying cause of the accident.  </p>
<p>	The reason insurance companies treat the collision reports as if they are admissible evidence is that they know if put on the witness stand, the investigating officer or deputy will almost always testify in a manner consistent with the conclusions in his or her report.  That testimony becomes evidence and will often sway a jury in their determination of fault for an accident.</p>
<p>	While an investigating officer’s job is to determine if there was a violation of the law and not to determine who should be at fault in a civil dispute such as a car accident claim, insurance companies often view these two determinations as one and the same.</p>
<p>	A police officer assigned to investigate the scene of an accident does not have the role that a trier of fact does in a courtroom.  The officer is not there to render a verdict and determine who is responsible for the damages.  Rather, the officer is there to determine if any laws were broken.   The officer makes such a determination based on his or her having seen the damage to the vehicles, and having spoken to the drivers and the witnesses when their memories are freshest.  He or she is thus often in a position to make a well-educated determination of who caused the accident.</p>
<p>	Unfortunately, despite the experience of most investigating officers who are dispatched to the scene of an accident, sometimes mistakes are made by these officers.  Quite often one or both parties to an accident will lie to them and an officer or deputy will not always be able to determine which of the parties is telling the truth.  The evidence from the scene, while important, may also be misleading as to what actually occurred to cause the accident.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto, truck, motorcycle, bike, pedestrian or car accident, or if you’ve lost a loved one in a wrongful death vehicle accident, call our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can also e-mail Attorney Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com  Additionally, we invite you to visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website for more information at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
<p>	Sometimes an Officer or Deputy cannot determine with any degree of certainty which party was at fault and will cite two possible Vehicle Code Sections, one for each party in a two-party collision, that may have been violated.  In that case, the Police or CHP Officer or Deputy will often state that the primary collision factor is unknown.</p>
<p>	Even if there are witnesses to an accident, the Officer of Deputy may discount the statements of some or all of the witnesses if they were friends or relatives of one of the drivers.</p>
<p>	Although, as stated above, the conclusion of fault by an officer or deputy does not carry the same weight as a determination of fault by a judge or jury, the importance of the citation of this or any other California code section in the police report is that insurance companies treat the conclusions in these traffic collision reports in a great majority of cases as if the conclusions were written in stone and evaluate a party’s claim based on the findings of fault in these reports.</p>
<p>	A traffic collision report may be amended by the police department or the CHP where it contains obvious mistakes, such as when the officer or deputy has mixed up the names of the parties.  Supplemental reports are sometimes written when new evidence comes to light, such as when a hit and run party is located.  But for the most part, most police departments, Sheriff’s offices and the California Highway Patrol will not amend a report when a party complains and states why he or she doesn’t feel they should have been found at fault for a collision.  They will, however, in most cases allow a person to fill out a Counter Report, which, unfortunately simply does not carry much weight with an insurance company.</p>
<p>	If the Primary Collision Factor for an accident is unknown, one should look on the traffic collision report to see if the Police or California Highway Patrol Officer or Sheriff’s Deputy cited any “Other Associated Factors” in the traffic collision report as having had a role to play in causing the collision.  There may have been faulty equipment, as with some truck accidents, or the roadway itself may have been dangerous.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident in California that has been determined by the investigating Police or CHP Officer or a Sheriff’s Deputy to be the fault of another driver as a result of his or her violation of Vehicle Code Section 34501.2, call the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson as soon after an accident as possible before important evidence disappears, such as skid marks that are washed away with the rain.</p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we specialize in California auto accidents caused by violations of the California Vehicle Code, such as Section 34501.2, and will represent you to obtain the compensation you deserve for your injuries.</p>
<p>	In over thirty years of practice, Attorney Sebastian Gibson has obtained millions of dollars in settlements and multiple million dollar or larger settlements.  We handle auto accident cases on a contingency fee basis so there is no fee payable unless we win your case and obtain either a settlement, an arbitration, mediation, jury, judge or court award.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident, call to speak with a lawyer at our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can speak to Attorney Sebastian Gibson personally by phone or you can e-mail Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com or visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Vehicle Code 27360.5 Helps California Accident Attorneys Settle Claims With Insurance Companies For Vehicle Accident Injuries]]></title>
<link>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-27360-5-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sebastiangibson</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-27360-5-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[When California Vehicle Code Section 27360.5 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an a]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>When California Vehicle Code Section 27360.5 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an auto accident in California, and the person found to be in violation of this Vehicle Code Section is the other driver involved in your accident, this can greatly assist a personal injury lawyer in settling your accident insurance claim for a substantial settlement or even the policy limits if your injuries are extensive.  This is even more true in the case of fatal accidents which cause one or more fatalities.  Although a traffic collision report is not evidence, insurance companies treat them as if they are as discussed below.</p>
<p>	However, due to how insurance companies treat individuals without an attorney, a person injured in an auto accident should always retain an attorney to represent them at the earliest possible date after an accident.  Unless you haven’t been injured and won’t be needing medical treatment, an experienced and reputable personal injury lawyer will almost always be able to obtain a considerably larger settlement from an insurance company and a larger amount for you, even after the attorney’s fees and costs are paid. </p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we work on a contingency fee basis, which means that unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your case, there is no fee payable to us.  Even if we’ve incurred costs, such as the costs of obtaining your medical records, no fee is payable to us, unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your favor.  Starting with the personal injury consultation which is also free, and which can be by phone or in person depending on our mutual availability, you never receive a bill from us on any case we take on contingency.  Unlike other attorneys who ask you to pay the costs involved with your case, we simply don’t believe you should have to pay those costs yourself.</p>
<p>	We’ll also advise you how to obtain reimbursement for your car repairs or if your vehicle is totaled, for the value of your vehicle, and any amount you receive for the vehicle is yours to be used by you for the repairs or to replace your vehicle.   At the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson we never take any portion of your property damage settlement and we can also advise you how to obtain payment for a new child safety seat if one was in use at the time of the accident. </p>
<p>	California Vehicle Code Section 27360.5 provides:</p>
<p>27360.5. (a) No parent or legal guardian, when present in a motor vehicle, as defined in Section 27315, may permit his or her child or ward who is six years of age or older, but less than 16 years of age, or who is less than six years of age and weighs 60 pounds or more to be transported upon a highway in the motor vehicle without properly securing the child or ward in an appropriate child passenger restraint system or safety belt meeting applicable federal motor vehicle safety standards. (b) No driver may transport on a highway any child who is six years of age or older, but less than 16 years of age, or who is less than six years of age and weighs 60 pounds or more in a motor vehicle, as defined in Section 27315, without properly securing the child in a child passenger restraint system or safety belt meeting applicable federal motor vehicle safety standards. This subdivision does not apply to a driver if the parent or legal guardian of the child is also present in the vehicle and is not the driver. (c) (1) A first offense under this section is punishable by a fine of one hundred dollars ($100), except that the court may reduce or waive the fine if the defendant establishes to the satisfaction of the court that he or she is economically disadvantaged, and the court, instead, refers the defendant to a child restraint education program that includes, but is not limited to, demonstration of the proper installation and use of child passenger restraint systems for children of all ages, and provides economically disadvantaged families with a child passenger restraint low-cost purchase or loaner program. Upon completion of the program, the defendant shall provide proof of participation in the program that includes an inspection of a child passenger restraint system that meets applicable federal safety standards. If an education program on the proper installation and use of a child passenger restraint system is not available within 50 miles of the residence of the defendant, the requirement to participate in that program shall be waived. If the fine is paid, waived, or reduced, the court shall report the conviction to the department pursuant to Section 1803. The court may, at its discretion, require any defendant described under this section to attend an education program that includes demonstration of proper installation and use of child passenger restraint systems and provides certification to the court that the defendant has presented for inspection a child passenger restraint system that meets applicable federal safety standards. (2) A second or subsequent offense under this section is punishable by a fine of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), no part of which may be waived by the court, except that the court may reduce or waive the fine if the defendant establishes to the satisfaction of the court that he or she is economically disadvantaged, and the court, instead refers the defendant to a community education program that includes, but is not limited to, education on the proper installation and use of child passenger restraint systems for children of all ages, and provides certification to the court of completion of that program. Upon completion of the program, the defendant shall provide proof of participation in the program. If an education program on the proper installation and use of a child passenger restraint system is not available within 50 miles of the residence of the defendant, the requirement to participate in that program shall be waived. If the fine is paid, waived, or reduced, the court shall report the conviction to the department pursuant to Section 1803. The court may at its discretion, require any defendant described under this section to attend an education program that includes demonstration of proper installation and use of child passenger restraint systems and provides certification to the court that the defendant has presented for inspection a child passenger restraint system that meets applicable federal safety standards. (d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the fines collected for a violation of this section shall be allocated as follows: (1) Sixty percent to county or city health departments where the violation occurred, to be used for an education program that includes, but is not limited to, the demonstration of proper installation and use of child passenger restraint systems for children of all ages and provides child restraints for loan or low-cost purchase. (2) Twenty-five percent to the county or city for the administration of the program. (3) Fifteen percent to the city, to be deposited in its general fund except that, if the violation occurred in an unincorporated area, this amount shall be allocated to the county for purposes of paragraph (1). </p>
<p>	When a Police or CHP Officer, or a Sheriff’s Deputy states in his or her report either that the primary collision factor in an auto accident was one party’s violation of a certain vehicle code section such as the one above, and that one of the parties is at fault for violating that code section, the Officer or Deputy is stating what he or she believes to be the underlying cause of the accident.  </p>
<p>	The reason insurance companies treat the collision reports as if they are admissible evidence is that they know if put on the witness stand, the investigating officer or deputy will almost always testify in a manner consistent with the conclusions in his or her report.  That testimony becomes evidence and will often sway a jury in their determination of fault for an accident.</p>
<p>	While an investigating officer’s job is to determine if there was a violation of the law and not to determine who should be at fault in a civil dispute such as a car accident claim, insurance companies often view these two determinations as one and the same.</p>
<p>	A police officer assigned to investigate the scene of an accident does not have the role that a trier of fact does in a courtroom.  The officer is not there to render a verdict and determine who is responsible for the damages.  Rather, the officer is there to determine if any laws were broken.   The officer makes such a determination based on his or her having seen the damage to the vehicles, and having spoken to the drivers and the witnesses when their memories are freshest.  He or she is thus often in a position to make a well-educated determination of who caused the accident.</p>
<p>	Unfortunately, despite the experience of most investigating officers who are dispatched to the scene of an accident, sometimes mistakes are made by these officers.  Quite often one or both parties to an accident will lie to them and an officer or deputy will not always be able to determine which of the parties is telling the truth.  The evidence from the scene, while important, may also be misleading as to what actually occurred to cause the accident.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto, truck, motorcycle, bike, pedestrian or car accident, or if you’ve lost a loved one in a wrongful death vehicle accident, call our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can also e-mail Attorney Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com  Additionally, we invite you to visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website for more information at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
<p>	Sometimes an Officer or Deputy cannot determine with any degree of certainty which party was at fault and will cite two possible Vehicle Code Sections, one for each party in a two-party collision, that may have been violated.  In that case, the Police or CHP Officer or Deputy will often state that the primary collision factor is unknown.</p>
<p>	Even if there are witnesses to an accident, the Officer of Deputy may discount the statements of some or all of the witnesses if they were friends or relatives of one of the drivers.</p>
<p>	Although, as stated above, the conclusion of fault by an officer or deputy does not carry the same weight as a determination of fault by a judge or jury, the importance of the citation of this or any other California code section in the police report is that insurance companies treat the conclusions in these traffic collision reports in a great majority of cases as if the conclusions were written in stone and evaluate a party’s claim based on the findings of fault in these reports.</p>
<p>	A traffic collision report may be amended by the police department or the CHP where it contains obvious mistakes, such as when the officer or deputy has mixed up the names of the parties.  Supplemental reports are sometimes written when new evidence comes to light, such as when a hit and run party is located.  But for the most part, most police departments, Sheriff’s offices and the California Highway Patrol will not amend a report when a party complains and states why he or she doesn’t feel they should have been found at fault for a collision.  They will, however, in most cases allow a person to fill out a Counter Report, which, unfortunately simply does not carry much weight with an insurance company.</p>
<p>	If the Primary Collision Factor for an accident is unknown, one should look on the traffic collision report to see if the Police or California Highway Patrol Officer or Sheriff’s Deputy cited any “Other Associated Factors” in the traffic collision report as having had a role to play in causing the collision.  There may have been faulty equipment, as with some truck accidents, or the roadway itself may have been dangerous.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident in California that has been determined by the investigating Police or CHP Officer or a Sheriff’s Deputy to be the fault of another driver as a result of his or her violation of Vehicle Code Section 27360.5, call the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson as soon after an accident as possible before important evidence disappears, such as skid marks that are washed away with the rain.</p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we specialize in California auto accidents caused by violations of the California Vehicle Code, such as Section 27360.5, and will represent you to obtain the compensation you deserve for your injuries.</p>
<p>	In over thirty years of practice, Attorney Sebastian Gibson has obtained millions of dollars in settlements and multiple million dollar or larger settlements.  We handle auto accident cases on a contingency fee basis so there is no fee payable unless we win your case and obtain either a settlement, an arbitration, mediation, jury, judge or court award.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident, call to speak with a lawyer at our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can speak to Attorney Sebastian Gibson personally by phone or you can e-mail Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com or visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Vehicle Code 27360 Helps California Accident Attorneys Settle Claims With Insurance Companies For Vehicle Accident Injuries]]></title>
<link>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-27360-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sebastiangibson</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-27360-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[When California Vehicle Code Section 27360 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an aut]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>When California Vehicle Code Section 27360 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an auto accident in California, and the person found to be in violation of this Vehicle Code Section is the other driver involved in your accident, this can greatly assist a personal injury lawyer in settling your accident insurance claim for a substantial settlement or even the policy limits if your injuries are extensive.  This is even more true in the case of fatal accidents which cause one or more fatalities.  Although a traffic collision report is not evidence, insurance companies treat them as if they are as discussed below.</p>
<p>	However, due to how insurance companies treat individuals without an attorney, a person injured in an auto accident should always retain an attorney to represent them at the earliest possible date after an accident.  Unless you haven’t been injured and won’t be needing medical treatment, an experienced and reputable personal injury lawyer will almost always be able to obtain a considerably larger settlement from an insurance company and a larger amount for you, even after the attorney’s fees and costs are paid. </p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we work on a contingency fee basis, which means that unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your case, there is no fee payable to us.  Even if we’ve incurred costs, such as the costs of obtaining your medical records, no fee is payable to us, unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your favor.  Starting with the personal injury consultation which is also free, and which can be by phone or in person depending on our mutual availability, you never receive a bill from us on any case we take on contingency.  Unlike other attorneys who ask you to pay the costs involved with your case, we simply don’t believe you should have to pay those costs yourself.</p>
<p>	We’ll also advise you how to obtain reimbursement for your car repairs or if your vehicle is totaled, for the value of your vehicle, and any amount you receive for the vehicle is yours to be used by you for the repairs or to replace your vehicle.   At the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson we never take any portion of your property damage settlement and we can also advise you how to obtain payment for a new child safety seat if one was in use at the time of the accident. </p>
<p>	California Vehicle Code Section 27360 provides:</p>
<p>27360. (a) A parent or legal guardian, when present in a motor vehicle, as defined in Section 27315, may not permit his or her child or ward to be transported upon a highway in the motor vehicle without properly securing the child or ward in a rear seat in a child passenger restraint system meeting applicable federal motor vehicle safety standards, unless the child or ward is one of the following: (1) Six years of age or older. (2) Sixty pounds or more. (b) (1) A driver may not transport on a highway a child in a motor vehicle, as defined in Section 27315, without properly securing the child in a rear seat in a child passenger restraint system meeting applicable federal motor vehicle safety standards, unless the child is one of the following: (A) Six years of age or older. (B) Sixty pounds or more. (2) This subdivision does not apply to a driver if the parent or legal guardian of the child is also present in the vehicle and is not the driver. (c) (1) For purposes of subdivisions (a) and (b), and except as provided in paragraph (2), a child or ward under the age of six years who weighs less than 60 pounds may ride in the front seat of a motor vehicle, if properly secured in a child passenger restraint system that meets applicable federal motor vehicle safety standards, under any of the following circumstances: (A) There is no rear seat. (B) The rear seats are side-facing jump seats. (C) The rear seats are rear-facing seats. (D) The child passenger restraint system cannot be installed properly in the rear seat. (E) All rear seats are already occupied by children under the age of 12 years. (F) Medical reasons necessitate that the child or ward not ride in the rear seat. The court may require satisfactory proof of the child&#8217; s medical condition. (2) A child or ward may not ride in the front seat of a motor vehicle with an active passenger airbag if the child or ward is one of the following: (A) Under one year of age. (B) Less than 20 pounds. (C) Riding in a rear-facing child passenger restraint system. (d) (1) (A) A first offense under this section is punishable by a fine of one hundred dollars ($100), except that the court may reduce or waive the fine if the defendant establishes to the satisfaction of the court that he or she is economically disadvantaged, and the court, instead, refers the defendant to a community education program that includes, but is not limited to, education on the proper installation and use of a child passenger restraint system for children of all ages, and provides certification to the court of completion of that program. Upon completion of the program, the defendant shall provide proof of participation in the program. If an education program on the proper installation and use of a child passenger restraint system is not available within 50 miles of the residence of the defendant, the requirement to participate in that program shall be waived. If the fine is paid, waived, or reduced, the court shall report the conviction to the department pursuant to Section 1803. (B) The court may require a defendant described under this section to attend an education program that includes demonstration of proper installation and use of a child passenger restraint system and provides certification to the court that the defendant has presented for inspection a child passenger restraint system that meets applicable federal safety standards. (2) (A) A second or subsequent offense under this section is punishable by a fine of two hundred fifty dollars ($250), no part of which may be waived by the court, except that the court may reduce or waive the fine if the defendant establishes to the satisfaction of the court that he or she is economically disadvantaged, and the court, instead, refers the defendant to a community education program that includes, but is not limited to, education on the proper installation and use of child passenger restraint systems for children of all ages, and provides certification to the court of completion of that program. Upon completion of the program, the defendant shall provide proof of participation in the program. If an education program on the proper installation and use of a child passenger restraint system is not available within 50 miles of the residence of the defendant, the requirement to participate in that program shall be waived. If the fine is paid, waived, or reduced, the court shall report the conviction to the department pursuant to Section 1803. (B) The court may require a defendant described under this section to attend an education program that includes demonstration of proper installation and use of a child passenger restraint system and provides certification to the court that the defendant has presented for inspection a child passenger restraint system that meets applicable federal safety standards. (e) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the fines collected for a violation of this section shall be allocated as follows: (1) (A) Sixty percent to health departments of local jurisdictions where the violation occurred, to be used for a community education program that includes, but is not limited to, demonstration of the installation of a child passenger restraint system for children of all ages and also assists an economically disadvantaged family in obtaining a restraint system through a low-cost purchase or loan. The county or city health department shall designate a coordinator to facilitate the creation of a special account and to develop a relationship with the court system to facilitate the transfer of funds to the program. The county or city may contract for the implementation of the program. Prior to obtaining possession of a child passenger restraint system pursuant to this section, a person shall attend an education program that includes demonstration of proper installation and use of a child passenger restraint system. (B) As the proceeds from fines become available, county or city health departments shall prepare and maintain a listing of all child passenger restraint low-cost purchase or loaner programs in their counties, including a semiannual verification that all programs listed are in existence. Each county or city shall forward the listing to the Office of Traffic Safety in the Business, Transportation and Housing Agency and the courts, birthing centers, community child health and disability prevention programs, county clinics, prenatal clinics, women, infants, and children programs, and county hospitals in that county, who shall make the listing available to the public. The Office of Traffic Safety shall maintain a listing of all of the programs in the state. (2) Twenty-five percent to the county or city for the administration of the program. (3) Fifteen percent to the city, to be deposited in its general fund except that, if the violation occurred in an unincorporated area, this amount shall be allocated to the county for purposes of paragraph (1). </p>
<p>	When a Police or CHP Officer, or a Sheriff’s Deputy states in his or her report either that the primary collision factor in an auto accident was one party’s violation of a certain vehicle code section such as the one above, and that one of the parties is at fault for violating that code section, the Officer or Deputy is stating what he or she believes to be the underlying cause of the accident.  </p>
<p>	The reason insurance companies treat the collision reports as if they are admissible evidence is that they know if put on the witness stand, the investigating officer or deputy will almost always testify in a manner consistent with the conclusions in his or her report.  That testimony becomes evidence and will often sway a jury in their determination of fault for an accident.</p>
<p>	While an investigating officer’s job is to determine if there was a violation of the law and not to determine who should be at fault in a civil dispute such as a car accident claim, insurance companies often view these two determinations as one and the same.</p>
<p>	A police officer assigned to investigate the scene of an accident does not have the role that a trier of fact does in a courtroom.  The officer is not there to render a verdict and determine who is responsible for the damages.  Rather, the officer is there to determine if any laws were broken.   The officer makes such a determination based on his or her having seen the damage to the vehicles, and having spoken to the drivers and the witnesses when their memories are freshest.  He or she is thus often in a position to make a well-educated determination of who caused the accident.</p>
<p>	Unfortunately, despite the experience of most investigating officers who are dispatched to the scene of an accident, sometimes mistakes are made by these officers.  Quite often one or both parties to an accident will lie to them and an officer or deputy will not always be able to determine which of the parties is telling the truth.  The evidence from the scene, while important, may also be misleading as to what actually occurred to cause the accident.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto, truck, motorcycle, bike, pedestrian or car accident, or if you’ve lost a loved one in a wrongful death vehicle accident, call our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can also e-mail Attorney Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com  Additionally, we invite you to visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website for more information at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
<p>	Sometimes an Officer or Deputy cannot determine with any degree of certainty which party was at fault and will cite two possible Vehicle Code Sections, one for each party in a two-party collision, that may have been violated.  In that case, the Police or CHP Officer or Deputy will often state that the primary collision factor is unknown.</p>
<p>	Even if there are witnesses to an accident, the Officer of Deputy may discount the statements of some or all of the witnesses if they were friends or relatives of one of the drivers.</p>
<p>	Although, as stated above, the conclusion of fault by an officer or deputy does not carry the same weight as a determination of fault by a judge or jury, the importance of the citation of this or any other California code section in the police report is that insurance companies treat the conclusions in these traffic collision reports in a great majority of cases as if the conclusions were written in stone and evaluate a party’s claim based on the findings of fault in these reports.</p>
<p>	A traffic collision report may be amended by the police department or the CHP where it contains obvious mistakes, such as when the officer or deputy has mixed up the names of the parties.  Supplemental reports are sometimes written when new evidence comes to light, such as when a hit and run party is located.  But for the most part, most police departments, Sheriff’s offices and the California Highway Patrol will not amend a report when a party complains and states why he or she doesn’t feel they should have been found at fault for a collision.  They will, however, in most cases allow a person to fill out a Counter Report, which, unfortunately simply does not carry much weight with an insurance company.</p>
<p>	If the Primary Collision Factor for an accident is unknown, one should look on the traffic collision report to see if the Police or California Highway Patrol Officer or Sheriff’s Deputy cited any “Other Associated Factors” in the traffic collision report as having had a role to play in causing the collision.  There may have been faulty equipment, as with some truck accidents, or the roadway itself may have been dangerous.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident in California that has been determined by the investigating Police or CHP Officer or a Sheriff’s Deputy to be the fault of another driver as a result of his or her violation of Vehicle Code Section 27360, call the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson as soon after an accident as possible before important evidence disappears, such as skid marks that are washed away with the rain.</p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we specialize in California auto accidents caused by violations of the California Vehicle Code, such as Section 27360, and will represent you to obtain the compensation you deserve for your injuries.</p>
<p>	In over thirty years of practice, Attorney Sebastian Gibson has obtained millions of dollars in settlements and multiple million dollar or larger settlements.  We handle auto accident cases on a contingency fee basis so there is no fee payable unless we win your case and obtain either a settlement, an arbitration, mediation, jury, judge or court award.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident, call to speak with a lawyer at our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can speak to Attorney Sebastian Gibson personally by phone or you can e-mail Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com or visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Vehicle Code 24604 Helps California Accident Attorneys Settle Claims With Insurance Companies For Vehicle Accident Injuries]]></title>
<link>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-24604-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sebastiangibson</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-24604-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[When California Vehicle Code Section 24604 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an aut]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>When California Vehicle Code Section 24604 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an auto accident in California, and the person found to be in violation of this Vehicle Code Section is the other driver involved in your accident, this can greatly assist a personal injury lawyer in settling your accident insurance claim for a substantial settlement or even the policy limits if your injuries are extensive.  This is even more true in the case of fatal accidents which cause one or more fatalities.  Although a traffic collision report is not evidence, insurance companies treat them as if they are as discussed below.</p>
<p>	However, due to how insurance companies treat individuals without an attorney, a person injured in an auto accident should always retain an attorney to represent them at the earliest possible date after an accident.  Unless you haven’t been injured and won’t be needing medical treatment, an experienced and reputable personal injury lawyer will almost always be able to obtain a considerably larger settlement from an insurance company and a larger amount for you, even after the attorney’s fees and costs are paid. </p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we work on a contingency fee basis, which means that unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your case, there is no fee payable to us.  Even if we’ve incurred costs, such as the costs of obtaining your medical records, no fee is payable to us, unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your favor.  Starting with the personal injury consultation which is also free, and which can be by phone or in person depending on our mutual availability, you never receive a bill from us on any case we take on contingency.  Unlike other attorneys who ask you to pay the costs involved with your case, we simply don’t believe you should have to pay those costs yourself.</p>
<p>	We’ll also advise you how to obtain reimbursement for your car repairs or if your vehicle is totaled, for the value of your vehicle, and any amount you receive for the vehicle is yours to be used by you for the repairs or to replace your vehicle.   At the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson we never take any portion of your property damage settlement and we can also advise you how to obtain payment for a new child safety seat if one was in use at the time of the accident. </p>
<p>	California Vehicle Code Section 24604 provides:</p>
<p>24604. Whenever the load upon any vehicle extends, or whenever any integral part of any vehicle projects, to the rear four feet or more beyond the rear of the vehicle, as measured from the taillamps, there shall be displayed at the extreme end of the load or projecting part of the vehicle during darkness, in addition to the required taillamp, two red lights with a bulb rated not in excess of six candlepower plainly visible from a distance of at least 500 feet to the sides and rear. At any other time there shall be displayed at the extreme end of the load or projecting part of the vehicle a solid red or fluorescent orange flag or cloth not less than 12 inches square. </p>
<p>	When a Police or CHP Officer, or a Sheriff’s Deputy states in his or her report either that the primary collision factor in an auto accident was one party’s violation of a certain vehicle code section such as the one above, and that one of the parties is at fault for violating that code section, the Officer or Deputy is stating what he or she believes to be the underlying cause of the accident.  </p>
<p>	The reason insurance companies treat the collision reports as if they are admissible evidence is that they know if put on the witness stand, the investigating officer or deputy will almost always testify in a manner consistent with the conclusions in his or her report.  That testimony becomes evidence and will often sway a jury in their determination of fault for an accident.</p>
<p>	While an investigating officer’s job is to determine if there was a violation of the law and not to determine who should be at fault in a civil dispute such as a car accident claim, insurance companies often view these two determinations as one and the same.</p>
<p>	A police officer assigned to investigate the scene of an accident does not have the role that a trier of fact does in a courtroom.  The officer is not there to render a verdict and determine who is responsible for the damages.  Rather, the officer is there to determine if any laws were broken.   The officer makes such a determination based on his or her having seen the damage to the vehicles, and having spoken to the drivers and the witnesses when their memories are freshest.  He or she is thus often in a position to make a well-educated determination of who caused the accident.</p>
<p>	Unfortunately, despite the experience of most investigating officers who are dispatched to the scene of an accident, sometimes mistakes are made by these officers.  Quite often one or both parties to an accident will lie to them and an officer or deputy will not always be able to determine which of the parties is telling the truth.  The evidence from the scene, while important, may also be misleading as to what actually occurred to cause the accident.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto, truck, motorcycle, bike, pedestrian or car accident, or if you’ve lost a loved one in a wrongful death vehicle accident, call our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can also e-mail Attorney Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com  Additionally, we invite you to visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website for more information at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
<p>	Sometimes an Officer or Deputy cannot determine with any degree of certainty which party was at fault and will cite two possible Vehicle Code Sections, one for each party in a two-party collision, that may have been violated.  In that case, the Police or CHP Officer or Deputy will often state that the primary collision factor is unknown.</p>
<p>	Even if there are witnesses to an accident, the Officer of Deputy may discount the statements of some or all of the witnesses if they were friends or relatives of one of the drivers.</p>
<p>	Although, as stated above, the conclusion of fault by an officer or deputy does not carry the same weight as a determination of fault by a judge or jury, the importance of the citation of this or any other California code section in the police report is that insurance companies treat the conclusions in these traffic collision reports in a great majority of cases as if the conclusions were written in stone and evaluate a party’s claim based on the findings of fault in these reports.</p>
<p>	A traffic collision report may be amended by the police department or the CHP where it contains obvious mistakes, such as when the officer or deputy has mixed up the names of the parties.  Supplemental reports are sometimes written when new evidence comes to light, such as when a hit and run party is located.  But for the most part, most police departments, Sheriff’s offices and the California Highway Patrol will not amend a report when a party complains and states why he or she doesn’t feel they should have been found at fault for a collision.  They will, however, in most cases allow a person to fill out a Counter Report, which, unfortunately simply does not carry much weight with an insurance company.</p>
<p>	If the Primary Collision Factor for an accident is unknown, one should look on the traffic collision report to see if the Police or California Highway Patrol Officer or Sheriff’s Deputy cited any “Other Associated Factors” in the traffic collision report as having had a role to play in causing the collision.  There may have been faulty equipment, as with some truck accidents, or the roadway itself may have been dangerous.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident in California that has been determined by the investigating Police or CHP Officer or a Sheriff’s Deputy to be the fault of another driver as a result of his or her violation of Vehicle Code Section 24604, call the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson as soon after an accident as possible before important evidence disappears, such as skid marks that are washed away with the rain.</p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we specialize in California auto accidents caused by violations of the California Vehicle Code, such as Section 24604, and will represent you to obtain the compensation you deserve for your injuries.</p>
<p>	In over thirty years of practice, Attorney Sebastian Gibson has obtained millions of dollars in settlements and multiple million dollar or larger settlements.  We handle auto accident cases on a contingency fee basis so there is no fee payable unless we win your case and obtain either a settlement, an arbitration, mediation, jury, judge or court award.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident, call to speak with a lawyer at our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can speak to Attorney Sebastian Gibson personally by phone or you can e-mail Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com or visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Vehicle Code 24002 Helps California Accident Attorneys Settle Claims With Insurance Companies For Vehicle Accident Injuries]]></title>
<link>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-24002-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sebastiangibson</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-24002-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[When California Vehicle Code Section 24002 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an aut]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>When California Vehicle Code Section 24002 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an auto accident in California, and the person found to be in violation of this Vehicle Code Section is the other driver involved in your accident, this can greatly assist a personal injury lawyer in settling your accident insurance claim for a substantial settlement or even the policy limits if your injuries are extensive.  This is even more true in the case of fatal accidents which cause one or more fatalities.  Although a traffic collision report is not evidence, insurance companies treat them as if they are as discussed below.</p>
<p>	However, due to how insurance companies treat individuals without an attorney, a person injured in an auto accident should always retain an attorney to represent them at the earliest possible date after an accident.  Unless you haven’t been injured and won’t be needing medical treatment, an experienced and reputable personal injury lawyer will almost always be able to obtain a considerably larger settlement from an insurance company and a larger amount for you, even after the attorney’s fees and costs are paid. </p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we work on a contingency fee basis, which means that unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your case, there is no fee payable to us.  Even if we’ve incurred costs, such as the costs of obtaining your medical records, no fee is payable to us, unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your favor.  Starting with the personal injury consultation which is also free, and which can be by phone or in person depending on our mutual availability, you never receive a bill from us on any case we take on contingency.  Unlike other attorneys who ask you to pay the costs involved with your case, we simply don’t believe you should have to pay those costs yourself.</p>
<p>	We’ll also advise you how to obtain reimbursement for your car repairs or if your vehicle is totaled, for the value of your vehicle, and any amount you receive for the vehicle is yours to be used by you for the repairs or to replace your vehicle.   At the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson we never take any portion of your property damage settlement and we can also advise you how to obtain payment for a new child safety seat if one was in use at the time of the accident. </p>
<p>	California Vehicle Code Section 24002 provides:</p>
<p>24002. (a) It is unlawful to operate any vehicle or combination of vehicles which is in an unsafe condition, or which is not safely loaded, and which presents an immediate safety hazard. (b) It is unlawful to operate any vehicle or combination of vehicles which is not equipped as provided in this code.</p>
<p>	When a Police or CHP Officer, or a Sheriff’s Deputy states in his or her report either that the primary collision factor in an auto accident was one party’s violation of a certain vehicle code section such as the one above, and that one of the parties is at fault for violating that code section, the Officer or Deputy is stating what he or she believes to be the underlying cause of the accident.  </p>
<p>	The reason insurance companies treat the collision reports as if they are admissible evidence is that they know if put on the witness stand, the investigating officer or deputy will almost always testify in a manner consistent with the conclusions in his or her report.  That testimony becomes evidence and will often sway a jury in their determination of fault for an accident.</p>
<p>	While an investigating officer’s job is to determine if there was a violation of the law and not to determine who should be at fault in a civil dispute such as a car accident claim, insurance companies often view these two determinations as one and the same.</p>
<p>	A police officer assigned to investigate the scene of an accident does not have the role that a trier of fact does in a courtroom.  The officer is not there to render a verdict and determine who is responsible for the damages.  Rather, the officer is there to determine if any laws were broken.   The officer makes such a determination based on his or her having seen the damage to the vehicles, and having spoken to the drivers and the witnesses when their memories are freshest.  He or she is thus often in a position to make a well-educated determination of who caused the accident.</p>
<p>	Unfortunately, despite the experience of most investigating officers who are dispatched to the scene of an accident, sometimes mistakes are made by these officers.  Quite often one or both parties to an accident will lie to them and an officer or deputy will not always be able to determine which of the parties is telling the truth.  The evidence from the scene, while important, may also be misleading as to what actually occurred to cause the accident.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto, truck, motorcycle, bike, pedestrian or car accident, or if you’ve lost a loved one in a wrongful death vehicle accident, call our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can also e-mail Attorney Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com  Additionally, we invite you to visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website for more information at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
<p>	Sometimes an Officer or Deputy cannot determine with any degree of certainty which party was at fault and will cite two possible Vehicle Code Sections, one for each party in a two-party collision, that may have been violated.  In that case, the Police or CHP Officer or Deputy will often state that the primary collision factor is unknown.</p>
<p>	Even if there are witnesses to an accident, the Officer of Deputy may discount the statements of some or all of the witnesses if they were friends or relatives of one of the drivers.</p>
<p>	Although, as stated above, the conclusion of fault by an officer or deputy does not carry the same weight as a determination of fault by a judge or jury, the importance of the citation of this or any other California code section in the police report is that insurance companies treat the conclusions in these traffic collision reports in a great majority of cases as if the conclusions were written in stone and evaluate a party’s claim based on the findings of fault in these reports.</p>
<p>	A traffic collision report may be amended by the police department or the CHP where it contains obvious mistakes, such as when the officer or deputy has mixed up the names of the parties.  Supplemental reports are sometimes written when new evidence comes to light, such as when a hit and run party is located.  But for the most part, most police departments, Sheriff’s offices and the California Highway Patrol will not amend a report when a party complains and states why he or she doesn’t feel they should have been found at fault for a collision.  They will, however, in most cases allow a person to fill out a Counter Report, which, unfortunately simply does not carry much weight with an insurance company.</p>
<p>	If the Primary Collision Factor for an accident is unknown, one should look on the traffic collision report to see if the Police or California Highway Patrol Officer or Sheriff’s Deputy cited any “Other Associated Factors” in the traffic collision report as having had a role to play in causing the collision.  There may have been faulty equipment, as with some truck accidents, or the roadway itself may have been dangerous.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident in California that has been determined by the investigating Police or CHP Officer or a Sheriff’s Deputy to be the fault of another driver as a result of his or her violation of Vehicle Code Section 24002, call the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson as soon after an accident as possible before important evidence disappears, such as skid marks that are washed away with the rain.</p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we specialize in California auto accidents caused by violations of the California Vehicle Code, such as Section 24002, and will represent you to obtain the compensation you deserve for your injuries.</p>
<p>	In over thirty years of practice, Attorney Sebastian Gibson has obtained millions of dollars in settlements and multiple million dollar or larger settlements.  We handle auto accident cases on a contingency fee basis so there is no fee payable unless we win your case and obtain either a settlement, an arbitration, mediation, jury, judge or court award.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident, call to speak with a lawyer at our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can speak to Attorney Sebastian Gibson personally by phone or you can e-mail Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com or visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Vehicle Code 23270 Helps California Accident Attorneys Settle Claims With Insurance Companies For Vehicle Accident Injuries]]></title>
<link>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-23270-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sebastiangibson</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-23270-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[When California Vehicle Code Section 23270 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an aut]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>When California Vehicle Code Section 23270 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an auto accident in California, and the person found to be in violation of this Vehicle Code Section is the other driver involved in your accident, this can greatly assist a personal injury lawyer in settling your accident insurance claim for a substantial settlement or even the policy limits if your injuries are extensive.  This is even more true in the case of fatal accidents which cause one or more fatalities.  Although a traffic collision report is not evidence, insurance companies treat them as if they are as discussed below.</p>
<p>	However, due to how insurance companies treat individuals without an attorney, a person injured in an auto accident should always retain an attorney to represent them at the earliest possible date after an accident.  Unless you haven’t been injured and won’t be needing medical treatment, an experienced and reputable personal injury lawyer will almost always be able to obtain a considerably larger settlement from an insurance company and a larger amount for you, even after the attorney’s fees and costs are paid. </p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we work on a contingency fee basis, which means that unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your case, there is no fee payable to us.  Even if we’ve incurred costs, such as the costs of obtaining your medical records, no fee is payable to us, unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your favor.  Starting with the personal injury consultation which is also free, and which can be by phone or in person depending on our mutual availability, you never receive a bill from us on any case we take on contingency.  Unlike other attorneys who ask you to pay the costs involved with your case, we simply don’t believe you should have to pay those costs yourself.</p>
<p>	We’ll also advise you how to obtain reimbursement for your car repairs or if your vehicle is totaled, for the value of your vehicle, and any amount you receive for the vehicle is yours to be used by you for the repairs or to replace your vehicle.   At the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson we never take any portion of your property damage settlement and we can also advise you how to obtain payment for a new child safety seat if one was in use at the time of the accident. </p>
<p>	California Vehicle Code Section 23270 provides:</p>
<p>23270. (a) No person shall commence to tow any vehicle or other object on any vehicular crossing unless authorized to do so by the Department of Transportation and unless the towing is done by means of a tow truck as defined in Section 615. No person, other than a member of the California Highway Patrol or an employee of the Department of Transportation, shall, by means of pushing with another vehicle, propel any vehicle or object on a vehicular crossing. No person, other than an employee of the Department of Transportation, shall, on any vehicular crossing, tow any vehicle or other object except a vehicle or object constructed and designed to be towed by a vehicle of a type similar to that being used for this purpose. (b) The California Transportation Commission shall, by regulation, establish the maximum towing fee which may be charged by any person authorized to tow a vehicle pursuant to subdivision (a). No authorized person shall charge a fee for towing a vehicle which is in excess of the maximum fee established by the California Transportation Commission. (c) The Director of Transportation may grant a special permit to any person to tow any vehicle or object over and completely across any vehicular crossing when in his or her judgment the towing vehicle is so constructed and equipped that the vehicle or object can be towed across the vehicular crossing without endangering persons or property and without interrupting the orderly traffic across the vehicular crossing. (d) The prohibitions of this section shall apply only on those vehicular crossings upon which a towing service is maintained by the Department of Transportation.</p>
<p>	When a Police or CHP Officer, or a Sheriff’s Deputy states in his or her report either that the primary collision factor in an auto accident was one party’s violation of a certain vehicle code section such as the one above, and that one of the parties is at fault for violating that code section, the Officer or Deputy is stating what he or she believes to be the underlying cause of the accident.  </p>
<p>	The reason insurance companies treat the collision reports as if they are admissible evidence is that they know if put on the witness stand, the investigating officer or deputy will almost always testify in a manner consistent with the conclusions in his or her report.  That testimony becomes evidence and will often sway a jury in their determination of fault for an accident.</p>
<p>	While an investigating officer’s job is to determine if there was a violation of the law and not to determine who should be at fault in a civil dispute such as a car accident claim, insurance companies often view these two determinations as one and the same.</p>
<p>	A police officer assigned to investigate the scene of an accident does not have the role that a trier of fact does in a courtroom.  The officer is not there to render a verdict and determine who is responsible for the damages.  Rather, the officer is there to determine if any laws were broken.   The officer makes such a determination based on his or her having seen the damage to the vehicles, and having spoken to the drivers and the witnesses when their memories are freshest.  He or she is thus often in a position to make a well-educated determination of who caused the accident.</p>
<p>	Unfortunately, despite the experience of most investigating officers who are dispatched to the scene of an accident, sometimes mistakes are made by these officers.  Quite often one or both parties to an accident will lie to them and an officer or deputy will not always be able to determine which of the parties is telling the truth.  The evidence from the scene, while important, may also be misleading as to what actually occurred to cause the accident.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto, truck, motorcycle, bike, pedestrian or car accident, or if you’ve lost a loved one in a wrongful death vehicle accident, call our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can also e-mail Attorney Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com  Additionally, we invite you to visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website for more information at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
<p>	Sometimes an Officer or Deputy cannot determine with any degree of certainty which party was at fault and will cite two possible Vehicle Code Sections, one for each party in a two-party collision, that may have been violated.  In that case, the Police or CHP Officer or Deputy will often state that the primary collision factor is unknown.</p>
<p>	Even if there are witnesses to an accident, the Officer of Deputy may discount the statements of some or all of the witnesses if they were friends or relatives of one of the drivers.</p>
<p>	Although, as stated above, the conclusion of fault by an officer or deputy does not carry the same weight as a determination of fault by a judge or jury, the importance of the citation of this or any other California code section in the police report is that insurance companies treat the conclusions in these traffic collision reports in a great majority of cases as if the conclusions were written in stone and evaluate a party’s claim based on the findings of fault in these reports.</p>
<p>	A traffic collision report may be amended by the police department or the CHP where it contains obvious mistakes, such as when the officer or deputy has mixed up the names of the parties.  Supplemental reports are sometimes written when new evidence comes to light, such as when a hit and run party is located.  But for the most part, most police departments, Sheriff’s offices and the California Highway Patrol will not amend a report when a party complains and states why he or she doesn’t feel they should have been found at fault for a collision.  They will, however, in most cases allow a person to fill out a Counter Report, which, unfortunately simply does not carry much weight with an insurance company.</p>
<p>	If the Primary Collision Factor for an accident is unknown, one should look on the traffic collision report to see if the Police or California Highway Patrol Officer or Sheriff’s Deputy cited any “Other Associated Factors” in the traffic collision report as having had a role to play in causing the collision.  There may have been faulty equipment, as with some truck accidents, or the roadway itself may have been dangerous.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident in California that has been determined by the investigating Police or CHP Officer or a Sheriff’s Deputy to be the fault of another driver as a result of his or her violation of Vehicle Code Section 23270, call the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson as soon after an accident as possible before important evidence disappears, such as skid marks that are washed away with the rain.</p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we specialize in California auto accidents caused by violations of the California Vehicle Code, such as Section 23270, and will represent you to obtain the compensation you deserve for your injuries.</p>
<p>	In over thirty years of practice, Attorney Sebastian Gibson has obtained millions of dollars in settlements and multiple million dollar or larger settlements.  We handle auto accident cases on a contingency fee basis so there is no fee payable unless we win your case and obtain either a settlement, an arbitration, mediation, jury, judge or court award.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident, call to speak with a lawyer at our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can speak to Attorney Sebastian Gibson personally by phone or you can e-mail Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com or visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Vehicle Code 23116 Helps California Accident Attorneys Settle Claims With Insurance Companies For Vehicle Accident Injuries]]></title>
<link>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-23116-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sebastiangibson</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blog.californiaattorneyslawyers.com/2009/12/03/how-vehicle-code-23116-helps-california-accident-attorneys-settle-claims-with-insurance-companies-for-vehicle-accident-injuries/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[When California Vehicle Code Section 23116 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an aut]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>When California Vehicle Code Section 23116 is cited as being the primary collision factor for an auto accident in California, and the person found to be in violation of this Vehicle Code Section is the other driver involved in your accident, this can greatly assist a personal injury lawyer in settling your accident insurance claim for a substantial settlement or even the policy limits if your injuries are extensive.  This is even more true in the case of fatal accidents which cause one or more fatalities.  Although a traffic collision report is not evidence, insurance companies treat them as if they are as discussed below.</p>
<p>	However, due to how insurance companies treat individuals without an attorney, a person injured in an auto accident should always retain an attorney to represent them at the earliest possible date after an accident.  Unless you haven’t been injured and won’t be needing medical treatment, an experienced and reputable personal injury lawyer will almost always be able to obtain a considerably larger settlement from an insurance company and a larger amount for you, even after the attorney’s fees and costs are paid. </p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we work on a contingency fee basis, which means that unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your case, there is no fee payable to us.  Even if we’ve incurred costs, such as the costs of obtaining your medical records, no fee is payable to us, unless we obtain a settlement or judgement in your favor.  Starting with the personal injury consultation which is also free, and which can be by phone or in person depending on our mutual availability, you never receive a bill from us on any case we take on contingency.  Unlike other attorneys who ask you to pay the costs involved with your case, we simply don’t believe you should have to pay those costs yourself.</p>
<p>	We’ll also advise you how to obtain reimbursement for your car repairs or if your vehicle is totaled, for the value of your vehicle, and any amount you receive for the vehicle is yours to be used by you for the repairs or to replace your vehicle.   At the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson we never take any portion of your property damage settlement and we can also advise you how to obtain payment for a new child safety seat if one was in use at the time of the accident. </p>
<p>	California Vehicle Code Section 23116 provides:</p>
<p>23116. (a) No person driving a pickup truck or a flatbed motortruck on a highway shall transport any person in or on the back of the truck. (b) No person shall ride in or on the back of a truck or flatbed motortruck being driven on a highway. (c) Subdivisions (a) and (b) do not apply if the person in the back of the truck is secured with a restraint system. The restraint system shall meet or exceed the federal motor vehicle safety standards published in Sections 571.207, 571.209, and 571.210 of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations. (d) Subdivisions (a), (b), and (c) do not apply to any person transporting one or more persons in the back of a truck or flatbed motortruck owned by a farmer or rancher, if that vehicle is used exclusively within the boundaries of lands owned or managed by that farmer or rancher, including the incidental use of that vehicle on not more than one mile of highway between one part of the farm or ranch to another part of that farm or ranch. (e) Subdivisions (a), (b), and (c) do not apply if the person in the back of the truck or the flatbed is being transported in an emergency response situation by a public agency or pursuant to the direction or authority of a public agency. As used in this subdivision, &#8220;emergency response situation&#8221; means instances in which necessary measures are needed in order to prevent injury or death to persons or to prevent, confine, or mitigate damage or destruction to property. (f) Subdivisions (a) and (b) do not apply if the person in the back of the truck or flatbed motortruck is being transported in a parade that is supervised by a law enforcement agency and the speed of the truck while in the parade does not exceed eight miles per hour.</p>
<p>	When a Police or CHP Officer, or a Sheriff’s Deputy states in his or her report either that the primary collision factor in an auto accident was one party’s violation of a certain vehicle code section such as the one above, and that one of the parties is at fault for violating that code section, the Officer or Deputy is stating what he or she believes to be the underlying cause of the accident.  </p>
<p>	The reason insurance companies treat the collision reports as if they are admissible evidence is that they know if put on the witness stand, the investigating officer or deputy will almost always testify in a manner consistent with the conclusions in his or her report.  That testimony becomes evidence and will often sway a jury in their determination of fault for an accident.</p>
<p>	While an investigating officer’s job is to determine if there was a violation of the law and not to determine who should be at fault in a civil dispute such as a car accident claim, insurance companies often view these two determinations as one and the same.</p>
<p>	A police officer assigned to investigate the scene of an accident does not have the role that a trier of fact does in a courtroom.  The officer is not there to render a verdict and determine who is responsible for the damages.  Rather, the officer is there to determine if any laws were broken.   The officer makes such a determination based on his or her having seen the damage to the vehicles, and having spoken to the drivers and the witnesses when their memories are freshest.  He or she is thus often in a position to make a well-educated determination of who caused the accident.</p>
<p>	Unfortunately, despite the experience of most investigating officers who are dispatched to the scene of an accident, sometimes mistakes are made by these officers.  Quite often one or both parties to an accident will lie to them and an officer or deputy will not always be able to determine which of the parties is telling the truth.  The evidence from the scene, while important, may also be misleading as to what actually occurred to cause the accident.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto, truck, motorcycle, bike, pedestrian or car accident, or if you’ve lost a loved one in a wrongful death vehicle accident, call our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can also e-mail Attorney Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com  Additionally, we invite you to visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website for more information at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
<p>	Sometimes an Officer or Deputy cannot determine with any degree of certainty which party was at fault and will cite two possible Vehicle Code Sections, one for each party in a two-party collision, that may have been violated.  In that case, the Police or CHP Officer or Deputy will often state that the primary collision factor is unknown.</p>
<p>	Even if there are witnesses to an accident, the Officer of Deputy may discount the statements of some or all of the witnesses if they were friends or relatives of one of the drivers.</p>
<p>	Although, as stated above, the conclusion of fault by an officer or deputy does not carry the same weight as a determination of fault by a judge or jury, the importance of the citation of this or any other California code section in the police report is that insurance companies treat the conclusions in these traffic collision reports in a great majority of cases as if the conclusions were written in stone and evaluate a party’s claim based on the findings of fault in these reports.</p>
<p>	A traffic collision report may be amended by the police department or the CHP where it contains obvious mistakes, such as when the officer or deputy has mixed up the names of the parties.  Supplemental reports are sometimes written when new evidence comes to light, such as when a hit and run party is located.  But for the most part, most police departments, Sheriff’s offices and the California Highway Patrol will not amend a report when a party complains and states why he or she doesn’t feel they should have been found at fault for a collision.  They will, however, in most cases allow a person to fill out a Counter Report, which, unfortunately simply does not carry much weight with an insurance company.</p>
<p>	If the Primary Collision Factor for an accident is unknown, one should look on the traffic collision report to see if the Police or California Highway Patrol Officer or Sheriff’s Deputy cited any “Other Associated Factors” in the traffic collision report as having had a role to play in causing the collision.  There may have been faulty equipment, as with some truck accidents, or the roadway itself may have been dangerous.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident in California that has been determined by the investigating Police or CHP Officer or a Sheriff’s Deputy to be the fault of another driver as a result of his or her violation of Vehicle Code Section 23116, call the Law Offices of Sebastian Gibson as soon after an accident as possible before important evidence disappears, such as skid marks that are washed away with the rain.</p>
<p>	At the Law Firm of Sebastian Gibson, we specialize in California auto accidents caused by violations of the California Vehicle Code, such as Section 23116, and will represent you to obtain the compensation you deserve for your injuries.</p>
<p>	In over thirty years of practice, Attorney Sebastian Gibson has obtained millions of dollars in settlements and multiple million dollar or larger settlements.  We handle auto accident cases on a contingency fee basis so there is no fee payable unless we win your case and obtain either a settlement, an arbitration, mediation, jury, judge or court award.</p>
<p>	If you’ve been injured in an auto accident, call to speak with a lawyer at our offices for a free personal injury consultation by phone.  You can speak to Attorney Sebastian Gibson personally by phone or you can e-mail Sebastian Gibson at sgibsonesq@aol.com or visit the Sebastian Gibson law firm website at www.CaliforniaAttorneysLawyers.com </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
