<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>fastest-portable &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/fastest-portable/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "fastest-portable"</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 09:21:31 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[MacWorld Publishes Mac Book Pro benchmarks.]]></title>
<link>http://thunkdifferent.wordpress.com/2007/12/03/macworld-publishes-mac-book-pro-benchmarks/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Web Media</dc:creator>
<guid>http://thunkdifferent.wordpress.com/2007/12/03/macworld-publishes-mac-book-pro-benchmarks/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[James Galbraith Apple began November introducing a revamped line of MacBook laptops. Let’s close out]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>  <a href="http://www.macworld.com/info/contact/form.php?e=James%20Galbraith&#38;t=e">James Galbraith</a></p>
<p>Apple began November introducing a revamped line of MacBook laptops. Let’s close out the month with a few words about another product announced alongside the MacBook<img src="http://iuseapple.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/macbookspaces.png" alt="mac book pro" align="right" height="192" width="247" /> updates—a build-to-order configuration of the MacBook Pro.</p>
<p>If you remember, on the same day Apple boosted the processor speeds and made other internal changes to its MacBook line, it also announced <a href="http://www.macworld.com/news/2007/11/01/macbookupdate/index.php">the availability a new, faster 2.6GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor for the MacBook Pro</a>. The 2.6GHz processor is a $250 upgrade over the $2,499 and $2,799 models that ship with the 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo.</p>
<p>Macworld Lab ordered and received a 15-inch MacBook Pro with the faster processor. It should come as no surprise that this custom-built MacBook Pro is the fastest portable Mac to date.<!--more--></p>
<p>Apart from the processor, the customized MacBook Pro shares the <a href="http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/specs.html" target="_blank">same tech specs</a> as the high-end laptop models <a href="http://www.macworld.com/news/2007/06/05/macbookpro/index.php">introduced in June</a>. In the case of the 15-inch MacBook Pro we used in this test, that means a 160GB hard drive and an Nvidia GeForce 8600M GT graphics processor. For the purposes of comparison, we also included a newly updated MacBook—the top-of-the-line 2.2GHz model—in this latest round of tests.</p>
<p class="statsTable">&#160;</p>
<h2>2.6GHz MacBook Pro Benchmarks</h2>
<table class="stats" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<th></th>
<th>Speedmark 5</th>
<th>Adobe Photoshop CS3</th>
<th>Cinema 4D XL 10.5</th>
<th>Compressor 3</th>
<th>iMovie HD</th>
<th>iTunes 7.5</th>
<th>Unreal Tournament 2004</th>
<th>Quake 4</th>
<th>Finder</th>
<th>HandBrake</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&#160;</td>
<td>OVERALL SCORE</td>
<td>SUITE</td>
<td>RENDER</td>
<td>MPEG2 Encode</td>
<td>Aged Effect</td>
<td>MP3 ENCODE</td>
<td>FRAME RATE</td>
<td>FRAME RATE</td>
<td>ZIP ARCHIVE</td>
<td>H.264 ENCODE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>15-inch MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo/2.6GHz*</td>
<td><strong>208</strong></td>
<td><strong>1:14</strong></td>
<td><strong>0:51</strong></td>
<td><strong>1:57</strong></td>
<td><strong>0:47</strong></td>
<td><strong>1:02</strong></td>
<td><strong>77.8</strong></td>
<td><strong>51.3</strong></td>
<td><strong>4:47</strong></td>
<td><strong>2:52</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>15-inch MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo/2.4GHz</em></td>
<td><em>198</em></td>
<td><em>1:17</em></td>
<td><em>0:55</em></td>
<td><em>2:07</em></td>
<td><em>0:50</em></td>
<td><em>1:05</em></td>
<td><em>75.4</em></td>
<td><em>46.3</em></td>
<td><em>5:02</em></td>
<td><em>3:05</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><em>MacBook Core 2 Duo/2.2GHz (black)</em></td>
<td><em>184</em></td>
<td><em>1:17</em></td>
<td><em>1:00</em></td>
<td><em>2:05</em></td>
<td><em>0:51</em></td>
<td><em>1:13</em></td>
<td><em>25.7</em></td>
<td><em>7.8</em></td>
<td><em>5:13</em></td>
<td><em>3:14</em></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>&#160;</td>
<td>&#62;Better</td>
<td>&#60;Better</td>
<td>&#60;Better</td>
<td>&#60;Better</td>
<td>&#60;Better</td>
<td>&#60;Better</td>
<td>&#62;Better</td>
<td>&#62;Better</td>
<td>&#60;Better</td>
<td>&#60;Better</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p class="notes">Best results in <strong>bold</strong>. Reference system in <em>italics</em>. * denotes build-to-order model.</p>
<p class="caption">Speedmark 5 scores are relative to those of a 1.5GHz Core Solo Mac mini, which is assigned a score of 100. Adobe Photoshop, Cinema 4D XL, iMovie, iTunes, and Finder scores are in minutes:seconds. All systems were running Mac OS X 10.5.1 with 2GB of RAM. The Photoshop Suite test is a set of 14 scripted tasks using a 50MB file. Photoshop’s memory was set to 70 percent and History was set to Minimum. We recorded how long it took to render a scene in Cinema 4D XL. We used Compressor to encode a 6 minute, 26second DV file using the DVD: Fastest Encode 120 minutes &#8211; 4:3 setting. In iMovie, we applied the Aged Film effect from the Video FX. menu to a one minute movie. We converted 45 minutes of AAC audio files to MP3 using iTunes’ High Quality setting. We used Unreal Tournament 2004’s Antalus Botmatch average-frames-per-second score; we tested at a resolution of 1,024 by 768 pixels at the Maximum setting with both audio and graphics enabled. We ran Quake 4 timedemo at a resolution of 1,024 by 768 pixels at High Quality settings. We created a Zip archive in the Finder from a 2GB folder. To compare Speedmark 5 scores for various Mac systems, visit our <a href="http://www.macworld.com/products/apple/">Apple Hardware Guide</a>.—MACWORLD LAB TESTING BY JAMES GALBRAITH, JERRY JUNG, AND BRIAN CHEN</p>
<p>The 2.6GHz MacBook Pro showed about a 5-percent performance boost over the 2.4GHz in our <a href="http://www.macworld.com/info/speedmark/">Speedmark 5</a> benchmark. That’s a little bit less than the 8-percent difference in clock speed, but the tests that make up Speedmark measure more than just processor performance.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.macworld.com/2007/11/firstlooks/26ghzmacbookpro/index.php">&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;Full Article</a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
