Courts have struggled with the interpretation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 which allows production as documents are maintained in the usual course of the producing party’s business. In attempting to de… more →
Post Processbowtielaw wrote 5 days ago: In Cenveo Corp. v. Southern Graphic Sys., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108623 (D. Minn. Nov. 18, 2009), the … more →
rjbiii wrote 6 days ago: Courts have struggled with the interpretation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 which allows production as docum … more →
rjbiii wrote 3 months ago: Post Process: Previous decisions in this contentious case required, among other things, that the pro … more →
bowtielaw wrote 3 months ago: Understandably, taking an electronic document such as a spreadsheet, printing it, cutting it up, and … more →
bowtielaw wrote 3 months ago: California Code of Civil Procedure 2031.280(e) states, in relevant part: If necessary, the respondin … more →
bowtielaw wrote 3 months ago: Discussing the California Electronic Discovery Act provisions on stating the form of production in a … more →
bowtielaw wrote 3 months ago: In re NetBank, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69031 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 7, 2009) has form of production argu … more →
bowtielaw wrote 3 months ago: In re In re Operadora DB Mex., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68078 (M.D. Fla. May 28, 2009), is the story of … more →
bowtielaw wrote 4 months ago: This motion centers on electronic discovery. The proper handling of electronic discovery is a new an … more →
bowtielaw wrote 5 months ago: Just as the Def Leppard Song Goes: All I got is a photograph — and it is not enough. (from the … more →
bowtielaw wrote 5 months ago: Gamesmanship is the harbinger of bad lawyer reputations. Not obeying Court orders can be the death … more →
bowtielaw wrote 6 months ago: It is beyond cavil that this entire problem could have been avoided had there been an explicit agree … more →
bowtielaw wrote 7 months ago: Bray & Gillespie Mgmt. LLC v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21250 (M.D. Fla. Mar. 4, … more →
bowtielaw wrote 7 months ago: Rahman v. Smith & Wollensky Rest. Group, Inc., is an employment discrimination case where the De … more →
bowtielaw wrote 9 months ago: “OCR, while perhaps not absolutely necessary to litigation, is a tool that greatly decreases t … more →
bowtielaw wrote 9 months ago: In Spieker v. Cherokee, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88103 (D. Kan. Oct. 30, 2008), the parties became enta … more →
rjbiii wrote 9 months ago: On August 4, 2008, [Producing Party] advised [Requesting Party] that it had additional responsive do … more →
bowtielaw wrote 9 months ago: This lawsuit demonstrates why it is so important that parties frilly discuss their ESI early in the … more →
bowtielaw wrote 9 months ago: The sensitivity courts are showing to text messages and public employees’ reasonable expectati … more →