LAPORAN POLIS DATUK SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM
20hb Februari 2009

——————————————————–

Saya, ANWAR BIN IBRAHIM, merujuk kepada LAPORAN SURUHANJAYA DIRAJA UNTUK MENYIASAT KECEDERAAN DATO’ SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM SEMASA DALAM TAHANAN POLIS (Suruhanjaya Tersebut) yang telah dipersembahkan kepada DYMM SPB YANG DIPERTUAN AGONG PADA 6 APRIL 1999.

Saya melaporkan bahawa Laporan Polis Travers Rpt:3977/98 yang dibuat pada jam 2.00 pagi 21.9.1998 oleh ACP Koh Hong San (kini Commissioner Datuk Koh Hong Sun) (“Koh”), mengandungi maklumat palsu bertulis yang direka. Sekalipun menyedari Laporan Polis ini mengandungi maklumat yang palsu berkaitan perkara yang mustahak, Koh telah menggunakannya dalam suatu prosiding penghakiman sepertimana ditunjukkan sebagai Ekshibit A1 Suruhanjaya Tersebut.

Dakwaan ini saya buat adalah berasaskan maklumat dalam pengetahuan saya sendiri dan keterangan dokumen dan penemuan yang direkodkan dalam Suruhanjaya Tersebut antara lainya yang penting seperti berikut:

Petikan keterangan bersumpah Koh dalam VOLUME II-NOTES OF EVIDENCE muka surat antara 18 hingga 33.

“On the 20th September 1998 at about 8.10pm. I received instruction from Ketua Polis Kuala Lumpur, Dato Kamaruddin bin Mohd. Ali to arrest Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim at his house Number 8, Jalan Setia Murni 1, Bukit Damansara, Kuala Lumpur. I was instructed by my Chief Police Officer, Dato’ Kamaruddin to arrest Dato’ Seri Anwar under Section 377B Penal Code”

Dalam muka surat 19
———————-
“I went over to him, I touched his left arm and said I was arresting him under Section 377D”.

“The instruction which I received was to arrest Dato Seri Anwar under Section 377B. But when I told Dato Seri I was arresting him under Section 377D. I made a mistake. It should be Section 377B.”

Dalam muka surat 24,25 dan 26.
———————————–
“Shortly after, I left the place and went to my original place waiting for further instruction.Later we were told to walk to the 11th Floor.My officers and I were told to go upstairs. Dato Ramli told us.We went up to to the 11th Floor to discuss the question of arrest of Dato’Seri Anwar. We had a meeting at the 11th Floor at the Meeting Room. If I’m not mistaken, those who were present were Dato’ Ramli, ASPAbdul Aziz, ASP Thomas, Supt.Robiah and a few others that I could not remember. Dato’Ramli chaired the meeting.”

“Dato Ramli left the discussion shortly after. Then he came back and instructed me to arrest Dato Seri Anwar under ISA. At the time when we had the discussion and before Dato Ramli left, I knew that I had arrested Dato Seri Anwar under Section 377B. I cannot remember whether I told Dato Ramli that I had arrested Dato Seri Anwar earlier for an offence under Section 377B. I now say that I did tell Dato Ramli that I have earlier arrested Dato Seri Anwar under Section 377B”.

“I cannot remember how long after he left that he returned. He came back and then told me that I should now make a formal arrest under ISA. I was given the relevant documents to be served on Dato Seri Anwar. With the documents I went down to see Dato Seri Anwar at 1.43am on 21st September 1998. I went to the cell and I served the documents on Dato Seri Anwar and then I left. At the time I served him with the documents he was conscious. I spoke to him. He responded to whatever I told him. He spoke to me. After I served him I left the cell and subsequently lodged a formal report of arrest.”

Keterangan bersumpah Koh sebahagiannya seperti di atas, mengesahkan pengakuan Koh bahawa maklumat bertulis yang dibuatnya sendiri dan terkandung dalam Travers Report 3977/98 bertarikh 21.9.1998 itu adalah palsu. Saya mengsyaki Koh, telah mereka keterangan palsu sedemikian itu adalah untuk menyembunyikan kecederaan yang saya alami setelah dibelasah oleh Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Noor(TSRN) Ketua Polis Negara ketika itu, daripada pengetahuan masyarakat umum. Dakwaan saya ini diperkukuhkan dengan catatan rekod prosiding Suruhanjaya Tersebut seperti petikan diperturunkan dibawah;

Petikan rekod prosiding Suruhanjaya Tersebut “VOLUME 1-PART TWO”muka surat 66 perenggan 6.1.

It was strongly submitted that, had the offence for which DSA was arrested remained one under Section 377 of the Penal Code, DSA would have had to be produced in Court within 24 hours, and a charge under the I.S.A was added on to obviate this necessity, because the face of DSA was such a sorry mess after the assault that it would have been most inexpedient to expose him to the public view. Again, there is a sharp conflict of evidence as to when the I.S.A charge was decided upon. TSRN insists that this matter had already been discussed earlier and the decision was taken at 8.20pm on the night of the 20th September 1998, by four senior officers, including himself, and communicated to a larger group a little later. TSRN could have applied to the Commissioners that they be called to give evidence in support of his testimony, but did not do so. He claims that the arrest under Section 377B was the result of a miscommunication. With the presence of the A.G’s representative at the Ops Theatre on the 30th floor, and almost everybody carrying a handset, it is difficult to follow how such a miscommunication could have taken place. Dato’ Yaacob was emphatic that there was no communication of the decision to effect an arrest under the ISA until after a discussion which went on till well past midnight. There would have been no need for such a discussion if the decision had been made earlier.

Saya percaya “the A.G’s representative at the Ops Theatre on the 30th Floor”yang dimaksudkan oleh Suruhanjaya Tersebut ialah Datuk Abdul Gani Patail (kini Tan Sri Peguam Negara)(“Gani Patail”). Dakwaan saya ini diperkukuhkan oleh keterangan bersumpah SAC I Dato’ Meor Chek Hussein bin Mahayuddin(Meor), ketika itu Komander Pasukan Gerak Tugas Khas PDRM, sepertimana petikan keterangan beliau dalam Suruhanjaya Tersebut seperti berikut;

Petikan keterangan bersumpah Meor dalam VOLUME II NOTES OF EVIDENCE muka surat antara 7 hingga 17.

After leaving the lockup I went up to the 30th floor at Bukit Aman to see my senior officers including Timbalan Pengarah 1, DCP Dato Mohd Yusof and other senior officer to brief them of what happen.

Apart from Dato Mohd Yusof, I remember there were Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Noor, Tan Sri Norian Mai, Deputy IGP, DCP Dato Mohd Yusof Said, TP 1 Keselamatan Dalam Negeri dan Ketenteraman Awam, DCP Ali Hanafiah Hashim and Datuk Ghani Patail from AG’s Chamber present.

I arrived at the 30th floor at around 10.00pm. The others who were there were CP Datuk Mohd Jamil Johari and other officers which I cannot remember. It was not a formal briefing because I did not see anyone taking down notes. The briefing was not given in the conference room but it was outside. The briefing was given in a spontaneous manner.

When I arrived on the 30th floor, these officers were already in the hall. These officers were already seated in the hall and this is the time I had briefed them on what had happened to Dato Seri Anwar and where he was taken. After the briefing I did not receive any instruction from any officers present. They merely listened.

Then I left the place and went back to my office to debrief my officers.My office is near the main entrance to Bukit Aman.On the ground floor.My office is another building.

I did not at any time assault Dato’Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

After I left the 30th Floor,I was not involved in this case.

Selanjutnya daripada keterangan saksi W15, SUPT. Abdul Halim bin Hj.Siraj pula, dalam muka surat 130 hingga 139 dalam Suruhanjaya Tersebut, menjelaskan peranan SAC I Musa Hassan (kini Tan Sri Musa Hassan,Ketua Polis Negara)(“Musa Hassan”). Serta keterangan-keterangan dan dokumen-dokumen lain dalam milik saya berkaitan penglibatan Musa Hassan dalam penangkapan dan penahanan saya, maka saya mempunyai alasan yang kukuh untuk mengsyakki bahawa Musa Hassan pada waktu yang matan itu turut berada di-Tingkat 30 Bukit Aman bersama sama dengan pucuk impinan tertinggi PDRM dan juga Gani Patail, sepertimana yang dijelaskan oleh Meor.

Saya menegaskan bahawa Musa Hassan dan Gani Patail pada waktu yang matan itu juga telah mempunyai pengetahuan bahawa saya telah dicederakan oleh TSRN, sebaik ditangkap dan ditahan di-lokap Polis Bukit Aman. Saya juga ada alasan yang kukuh untuk mengsyakki bahawa kedua-dua Musa Hassan dan Gani Patail terlibat dan/atau mengambil bahagian dalam mesyuarat bersama-sama TSRN dan beberapa Pegawai Tertinggi PDRM membincangkan dan membuat keputusan serta kemudianya mendorong Koh untuk memberikan maklumat palsu dan atau mengelirukan berkaitan dengan tangkapan dan kecederaan keatas diri saya dalam Travers Report No:3977/98 bertarikh 21.9.1998 jam 2.00 pagi yang kemudiannya dikemukakan dalam suatu pembicaraan kehakiman sepertimana ditunjukkan sebagai Ekshibit A1 dalam Suruhanjaya Tersebut.

Berdasarkan kepada urutan peristiwa yang dinyatakan diatas khasnya berkaitan penglibatan Musa Hassan dan Gani Patail secara langsung dan nyata dalam episode tersebut, saya ada alasan yang kukuh untuk mengsyakki bahawa laporan Polis Brickfields 4350/08 bertarikh 28th Jun 2008 yang dibuat oleh seorang Mohd.Saiful Bukhari Azlan (Saiful) terhadap diri saya, telah diubahsuai dan/atau dipesongkan serupa dengan caramana Travers Report No:3977/98 bertarikh 21.9.1998 dilakukan. Saya juga ada alasan yang kukuh untuk mengsyakki bahawa laporan Polis Saiful dibuat adalah sebagai tindakan lanjutan kepada konspirasi jenayah dengan niat bersama untuk menyebabkan saya bolih disabitkan atas kesalahan yang bolih diseksa dengan hukuman penjara yang lama demi kepentingan peribadi Musa Hassan dan Gani Patail serta kepentingan politik sesaorang atau orang-orang tertentu.

Saya telah dinasihati bahawa perbuatan “mereka keterangan palsu” adalah suatu kesalahan jenayah yang serius terhadap “Keadilan Awam” dibawah Seksyen 193 Kanun Keseksaan yang membawa hukuman penjara 7 tahun jika disabitkan kesalahan.

Saya membuat laporan ini demi keadilan dan mendesak pihak berwajib menjalankan siasatan yang rapi, telus dan saksama serta mengambil tindakan-tindakan yang wajar yang dibenarkan oleh undang-undang keatas pesalah atau pesalah-pesalah berkenaan yang terlibat atau sesiapa yang bersubahat melakukannya.

Bersama-sama ini, saya sertakan salinan muka-surat muka-surat daripada laporan Suruhanjaya Diraja yang disebut di atas untuk rujukan.

ANWAR IBRAHIM
20 Februari 2009

Sumber:http://anwaribrahimblog.com

Is this part of the so-called massive operation to flush out illegal immigrants which is costing the Government RM50 million? This is not flushing out but sucking in by those suckers in the Government!

I urge the people of Sabah especially the local political leaders of all parties to visit the National Registration Department offices statewide and see for yourself who are the people that are congesting the NRD office. You leaders must be blind, stupid, arrogant, selfish if you say that the majority queuing to inquire about the green card in the NRD offices are locals. Our local Sabahans must be exceptionally brilliant or have been magically transformed overnight so much so that they have now become tagalog/bisaya/ speaking citizens. One can see and hear them conversing at the NRD offices not in any local dialects but of foreign dialects.

LOCAL SABAHAN LEADERS MUST BE GETTING BLIND!

With the exception of YB Donald Mojuntin, where are the other so-called leaders especially from UMNO? Their lips must be sealed by the central Government or by their position. Leaders like Datuk Pairin, Datuk Maximus Ongkili, Tan Sri Joseph Kurup, Datuk Yong TeckLee etc who at one time or another has been so vocal on this issue? Then again I can understand Datuk Yong TeckLee’s position at the moment and where he stands so I will excuse him in my bombarding of local leaders for now. BUT the rest? I don’t and can’t accept any excuses other then them going against the proposal of issuing the green card to foreigners who may be armed with birth certs issued by hospitals in Sabah. We the Sabah people have had enough of being fooled by you politicians!

As for the Umno leaders who have been very very silence regarding “Project I/Cs” and illegal immigrants as of todate…what can I say of you people! Naturally only a fool like Anakdesa would make noise as it does not benefit him having all these illegals around! But the voice of one Anakdesa will not make much impact, that I do understand but I’m fulfilling my obligations to my future generations and wouldn’t want them to think that their forefather didn’t do anything to make this world a better place for them.

What we don’t want is this exercise further aggravating the perception among the genuine Sabah populace that it is easier for illegals to obtain identity documents than for locals to do so,” he said.

No doubt about this, it is easier for the illegals to obtain I/Cs in Sabah compared to the locals. Maybe the locals are too poor to “buy” the documents from these NRD officers. Speaking about NRD officers, money and illegals, it bring back memory, the case of a few NRD officers caught selling I/Cs last year by the ACA. Todate these officers have not been charged and the case has been swept under the carpet once again by the authority. The Government or for that matter the AG, a Sabahan by virture, are condoning to treason. Tan Sri Gani Patail in not taking action on these traitors is in fact portraying himself a traitor to the Sabah people in particular and Malaysia in general. It is sad to have a Sabahan/Malaysian as this!

dipetik dari http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/91024

A retired senior police officer who probed the infamous ‘black eye’ incident involving Anwar Ibrahim in 1998 has made startling claims on how attorney-general (AG) Abdul Gani Patail allegedly tampered with evidence in the case

In a set of court documents revealed this week, Mat Zain Ibrahim implied that the actions of Abdul Gani, then a senior deputy public prosecutor, delayed the investigation process and concealed facts from then AG, the late Mohtar Abdullah.

Malaysiakini contacted Abdul Gani’s office for comments today, but has yet to receive a response to the voice-mail message.

Mat Zain, who had led the investigation team, made his revelations in a 18-page statement of claim in a RM30 million defamation suit that he filed against Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim on Aug 11, in the Shah Alam High Court. Mat Zain retired from the police force in 2001.

He claimed he had been defamed in Anwar’s police report lodged on July 1 implying that he had fabricated evidence relating to the ‘black eye’ incident (left), in cooperation with Abdul Gani and inspector-general of police (IGP) Musa Hassan (while a senior investigation officer in 1998).

In his statement of claim, Mat Zain pleaded innocence to Anwar’s claims and instead pointed the finger at Abdul Gani by recounting how the latter had allegedly interfered in the case.

Mat Zain’s claims were first made public on Wednesday, during Anwar’s sodomy trial in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court. Anwar’s lawyer Sulaiman Abdullah had read out the document in court during submissions on why Abdul Gani should not be involved in any aspect of the sodomy case.

However, the media was told not to report the details pending the court’s decision on the admissibility of the evidence. The gag order was lifted yesterday.

According to the document, Mat Zain was instructed on Sept 27, 1998 by then IGP Abdul Rahim Mohd Noor (left) to head an investigation team, after Anwar lodged a report that day that he had been beaten up while in police custody, thereby sustaining injuries including a ‘black eye’.

Mat Zain said he had immediately instructed two forensic experts, Dr Halim Mansar and Dr Zahari Noor, from the Kuala Lumpur Hospital to examine Anwar.

Abdul Rahim met him privately that night and told him to conduct an in-depth investigation and “to leave no stone unturned” in order to uphold the image of the police force, he said in the document written in Bahasa Malaysia.

“I was ordered to only brief Rahim and (Mohtar) on the progress of the investigation and given the assurance that no other senior police officer will disrupt me in carrying out my duty.”

A similar message was conveyed to Mat Zain in a meeting with then premier Dr Mahathir Mohamad (right) about two weeks later, to brief the latter on the progress of the investigation.

“During that meeting, I explained what actually happened to Anwar and identified the person who hurt him.

“The prime minister advised me that there should be no cover-up in the probe and stated that the government may set up an independent commission to investigate the case if there is any attempt to cover up the incident; (and if a commission had to be appointed) would tarnish not only the credibility of the police force but also mine,” the document added.

On Oct 16, 1998, Mat Zain said he met with Abdul Gani to hand over his first investigation report, after directed to liaise with him because Mokhtar was busy with official duties.

Gani’s role explained

Abdul Gani’s alleged interference came into the picture when Mat Zain alleged in his court document that:

- A questionable medical report was prepared by one Dr Abdul Rahman Yusof, allegedly on Abdul Gani’s order.

Mat Zain stated that he found out there was an attempt to “insert irrelevant and suspicious statements” into the investigation report, especially in relation to “Abdul Rahman’s report which was done on the instructions of Abdul Gani” (right). Mat Zain said he was confident that Abdul Rahman has never examined Anwar physically.

-  Mat Zain claimed he had obtained information that Abdul Gani was on the 30th floor of the federal police headquarters in Bukit Aman when Anwar was assaulted and he believed Abdul Gani knew of the incident either at the time or soon after.

- On Oct 30, 1998, Mat Zain personally handed over his second investigation paper and report to Abdul Gani, and briefed him on the details. Among the conclusions were that the Anwar’s injury was consistent with assault and not self-inflicted; and that Abdul Rahim was the person who caused the injury.

- Although two investigation reports had been given to Abdul Gani on Oct 26 and 30 respectively, Mohtar was quoted in the media on Nov 7 as saying that his chambers had not received any such report.

- It was only on Nov 20 that Mohtar reportedly said he had received the report. Mat Zain said he believed Mohtar’s statement was made after he (Mat Zain) had “pressured” Abdul Gani a day earlier to confirm the status of his two reports.

- On Nov 25, Musa informed Mat Zain that Mohtar wanted to meet him (Mat Zain) at Bukit Aman and to visit the lock-up where Anwar was held. Musa and Abdul Gani were present during the visit.

- Mat Zain later found out that Abdul Rahman’s second medical report had mentioned there was a visit to the lock-up (where Anwar was held) and a “reconstruction of the incidence”, where Mat Zain was named as the person who had accompanied Abdul Rahman to the

lock-up. Mat Zain denied this had ever taken place.

- On Jan 6, 1999, Mohtar (left) had reportedly said Mat Zain’s investigations were incomplete and that the latter had yet to identify the perpetrator (despite the findings given to Abdul Gani on Oct 30, 1998).

- Mat Zain said he “believed Abdul Gani concealed important facts from Mohtar’s knowledge” and had personally appointed Abdul Rahman as the medical officer to prepare the report in October 1998. His conclusion was based on the fact that Mohtar had only appointed Abdul Rahman two months later.

- Mat Zain said Abdul Rahman later testified before the royal commission on the ‘black eye’ incident in March 1999 and gave conflicting statements with regard to his own findings. The proceedings came to an end when Abdul Rahim admitted that he had caused the injury to Anwar.

At the end of his court document, Mat Zain vehemently denied Anwar’s accusation that he had plotted any fabrication of evidence with Abdul Gani and Musa.

“The truth is I had acted to the best of my abilities to prevent any party from influencing me to do anything unlawful while investigating Anwar’s injury,” Mat Zain said.

Musa filed a defamation suit against Anwar on July 21 while Abdul Gani has threatened to do the same.

KEPALA BATAS, July 19 (Bernama) — Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has given the assurance that Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Tan Sri Musa Hassan and Attorney-General (AG) Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail will not be involved in the investigation into the sodomy allegation involving Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

Saya, Anwar bin Ibrahim (No K/P: 470810-07-5095), sesungguhnya di sini membuat laporan polis berikut berdasarkan maklumat yang telah saya perolehi baru-baru ini.

1. Laporan ini adalah berkaitan dengan siasatan terdahap serangan fizikal yang dilakukan ke atas saya oleh bekas Ketua Polis Negara, Tan Sri Rahim Noor (“Rahim Noor”) pada 20hb September 1998. Saya percaya Tan Sri Rahim Noor, selepas didakwa, telah mengaku bersalah atas tuduhan serangan fizikal tersebut. Saya telah membuat laporan polis berkenaan serangan fizikal tersebut pada 27.9.98.

2. Berkaitan dengan penyiasatan terhadap serangan fizikal tersebut, saya percaya bahawa Pegawai Penyiasat, ACP Mat Zain bin Ibrahim (sekarang Datuk Mat Zain) telah melakukan satu penyiasatan yang mendalam dan menyeluruh dan menyediakan satu kertas siasatan (“IP”) yang telah kemudiannya pada Oktober 1998, menyerahkannya kepada bekas Peguam Negara, Tan Sri Mokhtar Abdullah (“Tan Sri Mokhtar”) serta pasukannya yang antaranya termasuklah Peguam Negara sekarang Tan Sri Gani Patail untuk tindakan lanjut.

3. Kertas siasatan tersebut telah menyimpulkan bahawa Tan Sri Rahim Noor adalah pelaku serangan fizikal tersebut ke atas saya. Kertas tersebut telah membuat kesimpulan setelah siasatan menyeluruh dilakukan, dengan mengambilkira laporan perubatan daripada pakar forensik daripada Hospital Kuala Lumpur seperti Dr. Ab. Halim Haji Mansar dan Dr. Zahari bin Noor dan kenyataan dari sekurang-kurangnya 60 orang saksi.  Laporan perubatan tersebut menyimpulkan bahawa kesan kecederaan yang dilakukan ke atas saya adalah konsisten dengan satu serangan fizikal.

4. Walaupun kandungan kertas siasatan dan lapuran perubatan yang tersedia, Tan Sri Mokhtar dengan bantuan Peguam Negara hari ini dan, Tan Sri Gani Patail telah mendapatkan khidmat seorang pegawai perubatan bernama Dr. Abdul Rahman bin Yusof (Dr. Abdul Rahman).

5. Dr. Abdul Rahman dalam satu laporan tidak bertarikh menyediakan laporan kedua yang menyentuh “lakonan semula tempat kejadian” pada 14 Disember 1998. Saya percaya bahawa “lakonan semula tempat kejadian” tersebut tidak pernah berlaku. 

6. Adalah satu fakta yang tidak disangkalkan bahawa laporan perubatan Dr Abdul Rahman berhubung serangan yang dilakukan terhadap saya disediakan tanpa langsung melakukan pemeriksaan fizikal ke atas saya terlebih dahulu.  

7. Walaupun sudah ada kertas siasatan dan laporan kesihatan yang lengkap, Tan Sri Mokhtar dalam kenyataan akhbarnya bertarikh 5 Januari 1999, menerima pandangan yang diberikan oleh Dr. Abdul Rahman mengenai apa yang dikatakan sebagai “perkara-perkara tidak konsisten” dalam laporan perubatan doktor-doktor lain yang telah menjalankan pemeriksaan fizikal ke atas saya. 

8. Kenyataan akhbar Tan Sri Mokhtar juga menyatakan siasatan yang telah dijalankan tidak dapat mengenalpasti individu atau mereka yang menyebabkan kecederaan ke atas saya. Ini sesungguhnya bercanggah dengan laporan siasatan yang selesai dilakukan menjelang Oktober 1998 yang menyimpulkan bahawa Rahim Noor menyerang saya. Tan Sri Mokhtar dan pasukannya dengan itu telah secara sengaja mengelirukan masyarakat. Apabila siasatan polis menjadi tidak lengkap, orang ramai menjadi resah dan menuntut ditubuhkan satu Suruhanjaya Siasatan Diraja. Tan Sri Mokhtar juga telah membuat kenyataan palsu bahawa kertas siasatan telah diserahkan kepada beliau hanya pada 19.11.98. Saya percaya Tan Sri Gani Patail ada makluman penuh tentang kenyataan palsu yang terkandung dalam kenyataan akhbar tersebut. 

9. Saya juga percaya Tan Sri Musa Hassan dan Tan Sri Gani Patail telah hadir di Bukit Aman pada 20 September 1998 dan mengetahui mengenai serangan Tan Sri Rahim Noor terhadap saya. Tan Sri Musa dan Tan Sri Gani selanjutnya menyembunyikan fakta mengenai serangan terhadap saya dari pengetahuan umum sehinggalah mata saya yang lebam dan kecederaan yang saya alami didedahkan di mahkamah. 

10. Saya percaya kedua-dua Tan Sri Musa dan Tan Sri Gani Patail secara aktif terlibat dalam menyediakan laporan kedua tidak bertarikh oleh Dr. Abdul Rahman yang telah membuat kesimpulan palsu dan pelik seperti “the pattern and nature of the injuries are not consistent with a direct blow” [“bentuk dan ciri kecederaan adalah tidak konsisten dengan pukulan secara langsung”], “accidental nature of the injuries could not be ruled out” [“kemungkinan kecederaan ini disebabkan oleh kemalangan tidak boleh ditolak”] dan “self-inflicted nature of the injury should be considered” [kemungkinan kecederaan disebabkan perbuatan sendiri harus diberikan pertimbangan”]. Mereka mengarahkan Dr. Abdul Rahman untuk menyediakan lapuran kedua ini dan bertindak di bawah pengarahan dan/atau bersama Tan Sri Mokhtar Abdullah. 

11. Semua fakta-fakta ini menunjukkan Tan Sri Musa Hassan, Tan Sri Gani Patail dan SAC II Datuk Mat Zain bin Ibrahim (individu, yang menurut Dr. Abdul Rahman dalam lapurannya, telah mengiringi beliau ke sel di Bukit Aman di mana saya ditahan dan terlibat dalam apa yang didakwa ‘lakonan semula tempat kejadian’) telah berpakat dengan Dr. Abdul Rahman untuk menyediakan lapuran kedua ini. Ini telah dilakukan agar lapuran polis saya bertarikh 27.9.98 mengenai serangan tersebut akan dikira sebagai lapuran polis palsu dan saya boleh didakwa, atau sekurang-kurangnya merosakkan kredibiliti saya bagi memberi kesan buruk terhadap pembelaan saya dalam kes-kes jenayah yang mana saya telah didakwa melakukan ‘korupsi’ dan liwat bagi membolehkan saya didapati bersalah.  

12. Saya ingin menyatakan bahawa Tan Sri Gani Patail adalah pegawai pendakwa kanan yang membantu Tan Sri Mokhtar dalam membuat pendakwaan ke atas saya. Tan Sri Musa Hassan adalah Pegawai Penyiasat dalam pendakwaan terhadap saya. Saya juga percaya, satu tindakan yang tidak pernah dibuat sebelum ini telah diambil apabila satu bilik operasi khusus telah disediakan di Bukit Aman untuk menguruskan pendakwaan saya dan di mana mereka akan berjumpa secara kerap. 

13. Ini bukanlah kali pertama dakwaan mengenai pemalsuan bukti dibuat berkaitan Tan Sri Gani Patail. Saya dimaklumkan bahawa dalam keputusan Mahkamah Persekutuan Zainur bin Zakaria v Public Prosecutor [2001] 3 MLJ, Steve Shim, Hakim Besar, dalam penghakiman beliau menyatakan bahawa “… was he not justified, on a prima facie basis, in complaining that Tan Sri Gani Patail’s conduct at the meeting on 2.10.1998 was an attempt to get Nalla to fabricate evidence in order to perfect charges against him for other alleged sexual offences?”  

Perkataan “he” dan “him” dalam ayat di atas merujuk kepada diri saya.  

14. Berkenaan perkara di atas, saya merujuk kepada dokumen berkenaan bagi membantu siasatan polis:  

a. Kenyataan akhbar Tan Sri Mokhtar yang dibuat pada 5.1.99. 
b. Nota prosiding dalam lapuran Suruhanjaya DiRaja berkaitan keterangan Dr Abdul Rahman 
c. Laporan Kesihatan kedua yang dibuat oleh Dr. Abdul Rahman yang terkandung dalam lapuran Suruhanjaya. 

15. Saya memohon diadakan satu siasatan baru terhadap pemalsuan bukti yang mana saya telah dinasihati sebagai satu kesalahan di bawah seksyen 192 Kanun Keseksaan yang boleh membawa hukuman penjara 7 tahun. Saya memohon agar setiap individu yang terlibat dalam menyediakan laporan kedua oleh Dr Abdul Rahman ini iaitu Tan Sri Gani Patail, Tan Sri Musa Hassan, Dr. Rahman dan Datuk Mat Zain bin Ibrahim disiasat secara terperinci agar kebenaran diperolehi dan sebarang salah laku dihukum. 

Anwar bin Ibrahim
1 Julai 2008

JUN 29, 2008, KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA

Saya mengeluarkan kenyataan ini dari Kedutaan Republik Turki di Kuala Lumpur. Saya dihantar ke kedutaan tersebut awal pagi ini kerana menyedari nyawa saya di dalam bahaya. Saya berterima kasih kepada mereka yang menawarkan bantuan di saat yang memerlukan dan saya terhutang budi kepada Duta Turki di sini atas kesediaan beliau untuk menerima saya.

Semenjak dari pilihanraya 8hb Mac, ada beberapa sumber yang boleh dipercayai dari dalam kerajaan dan juga perisikan tentera yang menasihati saya bahawa terdapat agen-agen kepimpinan Barisan Nasional telah pun memulakan plot untuk mencederakan saya, keluarga saya serta penyokong saya. Saya diberitahu kemungkinan adanya usaha untuk membunuh saya sebagai salah satu cara untuk menidakkan kehendak rakyat dan untuk mengakhiri proses perubahan yang sudah pun bermula di Malaysia.

Meskipun berhadapan dengan ancaman yang bertujuan untuk menutup mulut saya, keterangan baru mengaitkan Ketua Polis Negara Musa Hassan dan Peguam Negara Gani Patail dengan perbuatan jenayah di dalam memalsukan bukti-bukti kes yang melibatkan saya pada tahun 1998 akan tetap didedahkan kepada umum.

Tuduhan yang dibuat pada hari Sabtu tersebut tidak lebih dari satu ulangan peristiwa yang berlaku pada tahun 1998 apabila saya dipecat dari jawatan Timbalan Perdana Menteri, lalu dikurung dan dipukul, kemudiannya didakwa serta disabitkan bersalah di atas perbuatan yang tidak saya lakukan oleh sebuah mahkamah kangaroo.

Penipuan ini jelas dirancang oleh kepimpinan korup Barisan Nasional yang menggunakan seluruh aparat kekuasaan kerajaan termasuklah dengan mengawal badan kehakiman, pihak polis dan juga cengkaman ke atas media perdana. Perancangan jahat ini diulangi oleh kerajaan Barisan Nasional, bertujuan untuk melemahkan arus perubahan dan pembaharuan yang meletus semenjak pilihanraya Mac 2008.

Saya ingin menyatakan kepada keluarga saya, rakan-rakan dan juga penyokong di Malaysia bahawa saya berada di dalam keadaan selamat dan tetap teguh seperti sebelumnya untuk terus berjuang demi Malaysia yang bebas dan adil.

ANWAR IBRAHIM

Sumber dipetik terus dari laman web Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

http://www.anwaribrahimblog.com

Saya tiba ke Kedutaan awal pagi, berlepas dari Quality Inn. Tahniah diatas kelincahan pasukan khas kita!

Pastilah keletihan kerana hampir tidak tidur malam tadi mendengarkan asakan hujah pimpinan. Pastinya kami menganggap Turki negara sahabat dan keputusan untuk ke sini adalah kerana isu keselamatan semata.

Pengalaman lalu mengajar kita bahawa tindakan ganas dan rakus bisa saja dari pendendam. Dan dalam konteks ini cadangan laporan polis saya terhadap Musa Hasan dan Gani Patail adalah berkaitan. Kita dapat buktikan bagaimana mereka berdua terlibat dalam merekayasa bukti, mendera dan menakutkan orang terlibat.

Maka apa yang dipohon adalah jaminan tegas pimpinan negara agar kecurangan lalu tidak berulang! Sebaik ada jaminan keselamatan diri dan keluarga, kami akan segera pulang.

Meskipun layanan di sini agak lumayan, tidak mungkin sama dengan keselesaan di rumah. Dan tidak diizinkan sebarang pertemuan dengan media atau sahabat. Hanya Azizah dan anak-anak dibenar menziarah saya.

Muda-mudahan pihak pemerintah segera memberikan jaminan keselamatan kepada saya sekeluarga. Jika tegas pengumuman sedemikian, saya akan segera pulang meninggalkan Kedutaan.

ANWAR IBRAHIM

p/s: Harapan sekalian penyokong dan sahabat agar Dato’ Seri dilindungi Allah dan mendapat pembelaan yang sewajarnya.

Insha-Allah.

ahlifiQir