Aku sedang berpikir tentang hujan di luar ruangan ini dan halilintar yang sesekali menyapa. Pasti dingin tanpa jaket merah ini di luar. Riuh rintik hujan beradu dengan sayup ceramah ba’da Ashar yang keluar dari pengeras suara mesjid Salman. Kutengok ke kiri meja, sahabatku sedang tenggelam dalam bacaan yang memadai diri dalam mengurus sang buah hati. Tebakanku, sebentar lagi pasangan suami istri ini akan dikaruniai momongan lagi. Satu jiwa menawan yang akan menghiasi dunia dengan warnanya.Sementara di belakang, sahabatku yang lain tengah berharap reda menjelang. Hari sudah terlalu sore untuk dilalui di balik meja kerja.

Lamunanku dihentikan pintu yang terbuka. Sepasang mata imam menawarkan selaksa kebaikan. Kuterima dengan hati terbuka. Lagipula siapa yang mampu menolak kebaikan dari sang imam? Namun aku kembali berpikir.. Atas nama apa langkah-langkah kaki terasa ringan sampai disini?  Atas nama apa rela melalui ribuan kilometer untuk menjaga sesama? Atas nama apa paparan ini berubah dari lamunan jadi torehan tinta?

Atau belajar mencintai memang tak semudah memahami jutaan bintang di langit malam?

Hmmm, apa yang kau pikirkan saat kita berbincang siang lalu?

A court in Orsk, Russia, has fined the imam of the local mosque after he ignored a previous warning from an administrative commission and continued to call prayers before the legally permitted time of 7am, reports the oren.ru website. Equivalent to £10 ($17, €12, or 700 Haitian Gourdes) the 500 ruble fine comes in the wake of repeated complaints by city residents, who objected to the 5:30am loudspeaker-fed adhan (call to prayer) disturbing their children’s sleep.

How can anyone be disturbed by that?

(Bx)

Was wäre München ohne “ausländische” Unternehmer? – Die Damen und Herren, die am 23.11. im Alten Rathaussaal zum “Tag des ausländischen Unternehmers” auf dem Podium saßen, waren sich (fast) einig, dass hier ein Musterbeispiel gelungener Integration zu begrüßen sei.

Nur der Generalkonsul der Türkei, Herr Köksal, deutete an, dass es schon auch mal Vorbehalte seitens der Behörden gegenüber türkischen Geschäftsleuten gebe. Herr Reiter, der neue Referent für Arbeit und Wirtschaft, widersprach. In München sei es wirklich egal, aus welchem Land ein Unternehmer oder Unternehmensgründer komme, jeder werde gleich willkommen geheißen.

Auch in der Visafrage gab es leise Kritik: Es sei nicht unbedingt förderlich, wenn es ausländischen Unternehmen in München schwer gemacht werde, Visas für angeforderte ausländischen Mitarbeiter zu bekommen.

Übrigens, 5000 türkische Unternehmer (oder Unternehmen?) soll es in München geben. Wohl hauptsächlich Einfamilienbetriebe. Um diese ganz Kleinen ging es denen, die auf dem Podium saßen, nicht unbedingt. Sarrazin war nicht dabei; der hätte bissig-destruktiv begründet, warum — und dann wär was los gewesen im historisch ohnehin vorbelasteten Alten Rathaussaal, vor allem, wenn man den Beschwörer der Elite zum Beispiel mit jemandem wie Sigi Benker konfrontiert hätte.

Das Podiumsgespräch war weder temperament- noch gehaltvoll. Es fehlte die Kontroverse, und es wäre außerdem hilfreich gewesen, wenn der türkische und der indische Generalkonsul hätten Deutsch sprechen können … Alle auf dem Podium betonten, dass ein Unternehmer, um in München erfolgreich zu sein, unbedingt sehr gut Deutsch können sollte! Ist es nicht peinlich, wenn es dann die geladenen Generalkonsule in München – als Mittler zwischen ihrem Land und Deutschland – nicht können?

Das bringt mich auf ein anderes Thema:

Die Türkei könnte aus einem großen Reservoir von in Deutschland aufgewachsenen Türken schöpfen – da müsste man doch genügend diplomatisches Personal finden oder heranbilden können, das fließend Deutsch spricht.

(Ähem, ich hoffe, Botschafter und Generalkonsule aus Deutschland in der Türkei sprechen Türkisch. Weiß das jemand?)

Wichtig wäre es, wenn die aus der Türkei geschickten Imame Deutsch könnten. Da ist gerade ein Fortschritt zu melden:

Seit dem 2. November lernen 17 Imame der DITIB, die meisten erst vor kurzem aus der Türkei gekommen, in der Dortmunder Merkez-Moschee Deutsch. 768 Unterrichtsstunden liegen vor ihnen und ein ganzes Jahr. „Wir hoffen, dass sie nach einem halben Jahr schon islamisch-religiöse Sachverhalte in deutscher Sprache verfassen können”, sagt Dr. Renate Müller, pädagogische Leiterin der Auslandsgesellschaft. Am Ende sollen die Imame beim Freitagsgebet Kurzfassungen ihrer Predigt auch in deutscher Sprache halten.

Lob für das Dortmunder Projekt spendete NRW-Integrationsminister Armin Laschet. Er wünscht sich, dass sich die DITIB hier stärker, flächendeckender engagiert und „dieses Erfolg versprechende Modell auf andere Kommunen überträgt.” Das sei, wie die DITIB versichert, auf lange Sicht geplant. Zunächst sollen alle 77 Imame des Bezirks Essen die Sprache ihres Aufnahmelandes lernen.

Immerhin ein Schritt vorwärts – aber er geht nicht weit genug: Die türkischen Muslime bräuchten Imame, die in Deutschland aufgewachsen sind — damit sie richtig verstehen können, wo ihre Gläubigen der Schuh drückt und wie man dann erfolgreich raten und helfen kann.

—

PS zur Veranstaltung im Alten Rathaussaal: Es gab ein Buffet. Das hat versöhnt.

Recebi por email, mas achei tão fantástico que decidi postar algumas imagens aqui. Os iranianos, que já revelaram grande capacidade no cinema com filmes belos como O Jarro, O Balão Branco, Tartarugas Podem Voar e outros; agora chegam até nós por meio da pintura. Ótima notícia, não?

O pintor iraniano Imán Maleki, é um dos maiores representantes do realismo na actualidade. Foi galardoado com o prémio William Bouguereau e o prémio “Chairmanás Choise” na II Competição Internacional do “Art Renewal Center”.

Repare o pó de giz na perna da criança

Alguns consideram-no o melhor pintor de arte realista do mundo. “Os seus desenhos competem com as melhores câmaras digitais”, asseguram.

Detalhes precisos e minuciosos na barra da calça

Detalhes de claro e escuro nesta pintura

Retrato de um emigrante: força e crueldade na realidade cotidiana do artista

Em seu blog, Arlindo SantAnna trouxe mais informações:

Iman Maleki nasceu em 1976 em Teerã e sempre foi fascinado pela Arte de Pintar desde que era criança. Na idade de 15 anos começou aprender pintura pelas mãos de seu primeiro e único mestre – MORTEZA KATOUZIAN – no qual é o maior pintor realístico do Irã. Em 1999 se graduou em Desenho Gráfico pela Universidade de Artes de Teerã.
Desde 1998 participou de vários eventos e exposições. Casou-se no ano de 2000 e em 2001 fundou o Studio de Pinturas ARA e logo iniciou o ensinamento de pintura considerando os valores clássicos e tradicionais.

Conheça mais sobre o artista visitando seu site oficial aqui.

HAVE YOU HEARD ABOUT THIS SHOCKING STORY IN THE U.S. MEDIA?…..NO!

The following article is almost unbelievable and potentially deadly for our nation.  And while it poses a very serious and detrimental danger to the United States, I have not heard anything about it from the mainstream media.

The information was obtained from Israel National News and is located at http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/134466, which thankfully to the Lord, DOES NOT worship Barack Obama nor props him up on some sort of throne.

With that said, take a look at what they have discovered about the guy sitting in the White House.

Obama ‘Reaches Out’ by Naming ‘Devout’ Muslims to Security Posts

by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu

(IsraelNN.com) U.S. President Barack Obama continues to “reach out to Muslims” by appointing them to key security posts amid charges he wrongly ignored internal Muslim terror. One recent appointee was harshly criticized for appearing on a British-based television station whose host is a member of a radical Muslim group.

His “reaching out Muslims” speech in Cairo last June has been followed by action, the latest being this past week’s swearing-in of a Muslim rights advocate to the Homeland Security Advisory Council, shortly after the Fort Hood massacre. HSAC members are involved in expertise on national security.

The new member is Syrian-born Kareem Shora, who was the national executive director of the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination (ADC), which previously has called on the United States to stop providing Israel with weapons because of alleged “atrocities” against Arabs. Her background for her new security post is having been a legal counsel and advocate for Muslim civil rights.

She also has been a frequent guest on the pro-Hamas al-Jazeera satellite network.

Shora, who has been described as a “devout Muslim, joins another devout member of the faith, Arif Alikhan, who was appointed as Assistant Secretary for Policy Development in the Department of Homeland Security. His qualifications for the job were listed as having been in charge of public safety in Los Angeles during his term of deputy mayor. One of his actions was to remove the plan that tracked Muslims in the city who were suspected of terrorist activities.

Americans have been jolted by several lethal attacks and confrontations with Muslims over the past year, including a plot to attack synagogues and down U.S. military aircraft, the manufacture of bombs, an alleged attempt to explode a Texas skyscraper, a plot to blow up malls in Boston, and last month’s Fort Hood massacre by a Muslim psychiatrist who was an officer in the army.

A desire to avoid the appearance of labeling all Muslims as terrorists lunged out from the shadows last month after President Obama faced criticism for not taking seriously the threat of Muslim terrorism within American society as well as in the Middle East, Asia and Africa.

Several months ago, President Obama appointed Dalia Mogahed, a “devout Muslim,” to his Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. She quickly came under fire for appearing in a telephone interview on a London-based Muslim television station, whose host is a member of an extreme Islamic group.

She said was unaware of the affiliations of her host, whose program included questions and comments favoring the implementation of Islamic Law (“sharia”).

Mogahed explained that she did not hang up the phone in the middle of the interview because “I assumed that very few people would watch this show but that doing something more dramatic would bring more attention.”

In the current issue of Newsweek, columnist Jacob Weisberg, citing former Secretary of State Colin Powell, wrote that “Obama’s [Muslim] heritage feeds a broader suspicion that he is too casual about the threat from America’s Islamist enemies.”

The journalist added, “With the massacre in Texas, Obama now confronts something that George W. Bush did not face in the years after September 11—not just a major act of domestic terrorism, but one struck from inside our security apparatus…. America does not face a threat from the perversion of faith in general. We face a threat from the perversion of one faith in particular.”

End

I want to encourage all of you to pray and to draw ever so close to the Son of the Living God, the LORD JESUS CHRIST……THE ONLY SAVIOR.

By all appearances, judgment seems to be heading for the United States of America.  As a watchman giving warning, I am urging everyone who is reading this to please follow the Lord’s Word from Isaiah chapter 55 verses 6-7 which is as follows:

Seek ye the Lord while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near:  Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the Lord, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon.

May we all take heed to this warning while we still have the chance, because a time is coming when we will not.

Mange vil nu tænke, Yasser hvem? Andre vil tænke ÅHH NEJ IKKE HAM, og så er der nogen der tænker han er Sej!

Yasser Al-habib er lidt ligesom Klaus Bondam nu, enten hader man ham, eller også elsker man ham. Men han er en forholdsvis ung shiamuslimsk imam der oprindelig stammer fra Kuwait. Manden har i længere tid holdt små taler der omhandler shia-sunni relaterede emner, men så er det også der historien rigtigt begynder! han er i forhold til mange andre ikke typen der går stille for sig, men rent faktisk er han hård i hans kritik, og det blev ikke bedre efter Saddam Hussein faldt, og shiismen pludslig stod stærkere, så blev han ikke længere en lokal Imam fra Kuweit, hans videor fik andre betydninger, de florerede rundt på youtube i forskellige udgaver, visse udgaver var klippet og redigeret til et enkelt formål at stille shiismen generelt i dårligt lys, eksempelvis blev et af hans taler cuttet således at han skulle have sagt:

Sunnimuslimske moskeer skulle sprænges i luften

Senere har han kommet med hele hans tale hvor den generelt omhandlede sunnimuslimske moskeer der har våben gemt, og de derfor ikke kan betegnes som moskeer.

Men ifølge yassir al-habib kom der visse salafi-wahabistiske bevægelser og sagsøgte ham for at få ham fængslet, i første omgang fik han 1 års fængsel, og da anklageren ikke var tilfreds fik han 10 år i efter sagen blev anket. Resultatet var at han flygtede til hans nuværende bopæl i London.

Men her slutter historien ikke, Yasser fortsatte sit virke -nu på engelsk- og emnerne var de samme! da han i interviewet blev spurgt hvorfor han fortsatte med samme retorik svarede han

Vil du have jeg skal ændre min retorik for at få skabe fred folk af modsat mening, mens de stadig vil kører deres ligende retorik?

og til spørgsmålet til hvorfor han bander over De første 3 kaliffer sagde han

Jeg vil her rette dig, jeg bander ikke over dem, jeg forbander, og jeg vil først stoppe med at forbande den dag, dem jeg er uenige i vil stoppe med at lovprise samme personer, forvent ikke at jeg stopper mit virke, mens de fortsætter deres propaganda! Hvad skal jeg gøre når modparten ikke tolerere det mindste kritik af historiske begivenheder, at de ser mange af profetens venner som gode mennesker det gør vi ikke shiamuslimer ikke, det er almen kendt ligesom vi kritisere de første 3 (kaliffer) så kan de kritisere os det vil jeg personligt ikke have noget imod. ham der dræbte Ammar bin Yassir var muslim (ifølge sunnimuslimer), ham der dræbte Kallifen Othman var muslim (ifølge sunnimuslimer) men ham der dræbte omar var en “Persisk ild tilbeder” selvom mange historiske kilder siger det modsatte, hvorfor lyve over os selv?

Interviewet er kommet i den arabiske tv-station ANB, og desværre er der ikke engelske undertekster. Selvom Hans retorik er Hardcore og ikke noget for svage sjæle, så kan man rent faktisk opfange visse pointer som jeg synes er gode, jeg er ikke ligefrem enig i hans måde at føre diskussion på, men alligevel har han fået mig til at tænke på mange ting.

Ummu Salamah (isteri Nabi saw) berkata bahwa Rasulullah saw bersabda:“Ali bersama Al-Qur’an dan Al-Qur’an bersama Ali, keduanya tak akan terpisahkan sehingga keduanya kembali kepadaku di telaga surga.”

Hadis ini juga terdapat dalam kitab berikut:
1. Faydh Al-Qadir, Al-Manawi, jilid 4 halaman 356.
2. Kanzul ummal, jilid 6 halaman 153, hadis ke 32912.
3. Majma’ Az-Zawaid, jilid 9 halaman 134…. Read More… Read More
4. Nurul Abshar, Asy-Syablanji, halaman 72.
5. Ash-Shawa’iq Al-Muhriqah, Ibnu hajar, halaman 75

En riktig och sällsynta fall i världen dess hjältar är några imamer och lärare i islamiska skolor, anklagad för att ha våldtagit 500 barn! Naturligtvis det måste finnas andra, men av vissa skäl, har inte de  framfört klagomål. Emellertid, i Pakistan , den islamiska staten som är känd för de vackra moskéer och muslimska skolor, har polisen deklarerat att man  utreder 500 fall av sexuella övergrepp mot barn. Uttalandet tillade att hjältarna är muslimska imamer  som är  lärare för barn i muslimska skolor och hem. 

Tidningen som publicerade fallet i Kuwait

Och vi  undrar :

1. Eftersom moskéer och islamiska centra och skolor i den viktigaste islamiska staten inte är säker för barn, så hur kan samma islamiska center och skolor i vårt land vara säkra för barn!

2. Hur vågade de imamer och muslimska föreningar och islamisterna i vårt Sverige , såsom Mahmud Aldibe och journalisten Yahia Abu Zakria, ljuga och påstå att våra skolor är ruttet och korrumperat, medan   våldtäkt av barn inträffar i de islamiska skolor och hem i Pakistan !

محمود الدبعي - Mahmud Aldabai  som är ”ordförande i Förbundet för muslimer i Sverige” hävdar att:

   ” muslim undkomma denna ruttna miljön (i  icke islamiska skolor )

till säkerhet och trygghet av den islamiska skolor ”  

تستغرب الجهات الرسمية والشعبية السويدية من فرار المسلم بأبنائه من هذه البيئة العفنة إلى حيث الأمن والأمان والسلامة والإسلام في أحضان المدارس الإسلامية 

 Bilden visar    Mahmoud Aldbai med Mona Salin !      

3.Hur kan alla Islamiska centers och imamer i vårt Sverige garantera att sådana incidenter inte  förekommer i vårt Sverige ?

4. När kommer våra politiker att vakna ?

 Resultatet är:

• Barn i Sverige bör gå bara till våra svenska skolor
• Alla Islamiska skolor  måste stängas.
• För att behålla barnen och av säkerhetsskäl, måste förhindras alla  islamistister och imamer att övervaka undervisningen av barn
• måste installera kameror, i alla centra, moskéer och muslimska föreningar
• Läger av  muslimska  barn och unga bör utföras under överinseende av polis och socialen

Att vidta försiktighetsåtgärder nu är bättre än beklaga och bita i fingrarna senare

1. Announced Attendees
   1. IIC Representatives
   2. IMAM Staff
   3. Muslim Advocates
2. Introduction
   1. General review of events of last week
      1. Announcement of government’s intention to seize mosques.
      2. Statements from IIC, MPAC, CAIR, UMAA, ISNA, & Muslim Advocates
      3. There were no statements issued from any secular or religious Iranian/Persian organizations; only 2 Shia organizations commented.
      4. Statement from the attorney of Alavi Foundation.
3. Discussion on Legal Aspects
   1. The situation of the 4 masjids in question
      1. Beyond the legal aspects, the perception is concerning. Most of our community members are not going to understand/care about the detailed legalities.
      2. Larger issue is mosque seizures.
      3. Mosque seizure is based upon civil claim relating issue of how much the Alavi Foundation controls these centers, and works with Iran. The basis is money issues.
      4. Must determine from the mosques how much are owned by Alavi and how much percentage is owned by others.
      5. FBI has said they’re not interested in the mosque, but are interested in the property. This is confusing, what is their intention?
      6. If they do seize the mosque, will they keep it or give it to a third party?
      7. Language in news media has gone from “seizure” to “possible seizure” – so we are hoping that the case against the mosques will be dropped.
      8. When talking to community members, we need to know what the DOJ wants.
      9. Schools and masjids are still operating.
      10. This issue has been open since 2008, related to law called “IEEPA”, which is typically used for money laundering cases or terrorism funding case.
      11. Government is primarily concerned between the relationship with Alavi and Iran.
      12. Government has said that there is no accusation of wrongdoing by the masjids themselves, or their constituents.
      13. Muslim Advocates is planning a conference call between AUSA and attorneys office.
          1. This call serves the purpose of answering questions that the community may have, and focus on the 4 masjids. Another attorney who focuses on asset forfeiture will be present. First part of the call will just be the prosecutor, and then the second part will be a talk from the forfeiture attorney.
          2. This call is only for organizations concerned about Alavi contributions to their organizations. To become involved please contact Muslim Advocates
   2. Behind the scenes legal aspects
      1. This ties into the “charitable giving” issue to foreign governments. Masjids are advised to maintain strong accounting measures to prevent such problems in the future.
      2. Any organization is open to such an investigation.
      3. If your masjid is contacted by authorities, please be cooperative and contact an attorney immediately.
      4. These masjids will have the right to show their disassociation with Iran.
      5. Masjids are not a part of these charges and are free to operate as normal.
      6. Usually the law targets groups that send money, but this is a reversal of the situation, where groups are being focused upon for receiving money.
   3. Probable short term/long term outcomes.
      1. AUSA and South District of NY statements are positive signs that they’re not pursuing the masjids for forfeiture, but we are hoping to get more details from the prosecutor on Thursday. The right questions are: what is the relationship between the masjid and the Alavi foundation?
      2. Looking down the road: if the school has nothing to do with Alavi foundation, but the land does, we don’t know. Only the forfeiture attorney can indicate the possible results. Issue may be dependent upon each state’s laws on forfeiture and tenancy.
         1. According to the 2007 tax records, Alavi records indicate that 25 masjids received funding.
         2. 2008 tax records have not yet been filed.
         3. These are only allegations; case has not been to court yet.
         4. Questions of how various donations from the Alavi foundation to other centers will affect other masjids is best for the forfeiture attorney on Thursday. There is no clear answer on the government’s policy in this regard. ADC has been pushing for Dept of Treasury to set parameters, but has not been accomplished. Decision is in the personal discretion of prosecutor of each case. In his opinion, someone in NY overreacted with attempting to seize the masjids. This is evidenced by changes in media message and press statements from the government.
         5. US Attorney’s Office (DOJ) in NY is using Dept of Treasury rules, Executive Orders, and “Emergency Powers”
         6. It is good news that there are no criminal charges, this points to a positive resolution.
         7. All Alavi foundation assets are frozen, masjids cannot “return” funds or “buy” properties back from Alavi. Alavi can apply for exception for the purpose of legal council.
4. Know Your Rights
   1. Rights of the 4 masjids
      1. Any organization is open to such an investigation.
      2. If your masjid is contacted by authorities, please be cooperative and contact an attorney immediately.
      3. These masjids will have the right to show their disassociation with Iran.
      4. Even if a center is 100% owned by the Alavi foundation, the nature of the relationship determines if the masjid can obtain its own attorney. Each center should speak with the Alavi foundation about the nature of the relationship and what their legal status is, in regards to retaining their own attorneys.
      5. v.      It should be made clear that these are not criminal charges, each center has the right to remain open and operate as it so pleases. Community should be made aware that this is a civil case and there is no accusation of nefarious activities. Communities should support their masjids.
   2. Rights of other masjids
      1. Same as above.
      2. Any organization is open to such an investigation.
         1. Research any outgoing money to other organizations
         2. Research any incoming
   3. How to protect your community from future similar issues
      1. Any organization is open to such an investigation.
         1. Research any outgoing money to other organizations
         2. Research any incoming money
         3. Maintain strong accounting methods and openness. Communities should push for “good governance”, transparency, and proper legal leadership at their centers.
         4. iii.      Keep a “Straight” ledger, of who donated to you, who you donated to.
         5. Do research of who you are giving money too, learn about the organization and their background
         6. Muslim Advocates Training – can help in preventing future such issues.
         7. Keep accounting “books” in order.
         8. Rights of the community are critically important, but we must recognize our legal responsibilities.
            1. Communities should scrutinize their own money that either goes abroad or comes in from abroad, to ensure that prohibited money transfers do not occur.
            2. If an organization has questions about where money is going/coming from, Muslim Advocates
            3. Move from “cash based” accounting to “accrual based” accounting.
            4. Use 3^rd party accounting.
            5. No substitute for a good board of directors who are transparent.
5. Media, Social and Grassroots Campaign to Help Prevent Seizure of Masjids
   1. Unity programs at the 4 masjids
      1. Must show our support for these centers, we do not want anyone to leave the center or stop donating to the centers.
      2. Unity Jummah – require the support of the center if its held there, or at other masjids.
      3. Letters of support to the centers.
      4. Avoid publically discussing intricate and detailed legal issues. Let the attorney’s do the talking about the legal aspects.  Let the foundation’s attorney’s foundation speak for them.
   2. Urge centers to release statements on their websites.
   3. Urge community members to ask for better policy from the government, to ask that masjids remain in the community – are not seized by the government.
   4. Prepare talking points for the community and for the masjids.
   5. Other initiatives to help the masjids.
6. The Need for Unity
   1. Unprecedented time in American history
   2. Must stick together
   3. In the spirit of Islam, extend hands of welcome and friendship to as many Muslims and non-Muslims as possible. The Quran says to fight badness “with that which is better.”
   4. Sunni centers have shown support to the masjids, even approaching them to create a combined legal defense fund.
7. Contact Muslim Advocates for Invite to Conference Call
   1. For any centers who are concerned about Alavi Foundation contributions and would like to speak to the lead prosecutor, please contact Muslim Advocates representative Akil Vohra : 415-692-1486, akil@muslimadvocates.org

By
 Brother Daniel S
Specialist in strategic & Security Studies 

Artikeln  från http://mosquesdanger.wordpress.com 

News talking about the possibility of building a new Islamic center in a Swedish city “Helsingborg”. Of course the Swedish government believes that this Center will help to integrate muslims into Swedish society, they will become loyal to Sweden and they will maintain the national security! They may also think that their good treatment and support to muslims, despite the strong and growing opposition, would protect Sweden from the muslims Jihad! Such wrong beliefs, prove what we have always affirmed, that no one can understand the danger of the mosques ideology, if he was not born an Arab Muslim, received education at the hands of imams, had a daily contacts with them, and was active in the mosques. However, let us provide you with some of the evidence, which confirm that these beliefs wrong and dangerous. 

Ahlalhdeeth or ‘Ahl al-Sunna wal-Jama`a
Al-Shabab “Youth” and the Ahlu Sunna wal Jama’a sect … Members of the Al-Sunna wal Jamma 

‘Ahl al-Sunna wal-Jama`a is the most dangerous official sect in all over the world because of their dangerous strategy based on brain-wash people especially children, girls and young Muslims in Europe through Islamic organizations , mosques and young associations and through the exploitation of both the European governments and politicians and they who want a new mosque in that city. They emphasizing: 

( The Sunna of the Prophet, salallahu alaihi wa sallam, and the people who follow it. Praise belongs to God Who in every century inspires a group of scholarly people to defend the Way of the Prophet, salallahu alaihi wa sallam. Islam in the understanding of Muslims from every generations from the prophet on down is that the only Islam is the Islam of ahlu-sunnah wal jama’ah, the jam’ah being the jama’ah of the salafu-saalih. Their Islam was Islam and other than their Islam is not the correct Islam and Islam is only looked at from the route of how they viewed the Islamic etiquettes from manners all the way to fiqh and aqeedah to be ) 

“That his’ Ummah will split into seventy-three factions, all of them in Hell except one: The Jama’ah (the Community).” (Reported by Ahmad Ibn Hanbal)
And (the Prophet) (peace be upon him) said in another hadith: “They are those who will follow what I am and what my companions are today.” (at-Tirmidhi) 

Those referred to in this saying, those who hold firmly to pure, unadulterated Islam, became the people of the Sunnah and the Jama’ah. Amongst them are the Siddiqs, The martyrs, the righteous, included in them are the cairns of guidance, the lamps for darkness, the masters of memorable merits, the ever-remembered virtues; Among them are the Abdal 1 the Imams about whose judgment and understanding all Muslims agree. These are the victorious ones about whom the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “A group of my ‘Ummah will continue to follow the truth prominently. Whoever betrays them or opposes them can never harm them to the Day of Judgment.” (al-Bukhari and Muslim)
The creed and the aims of Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’a 

They believe that the situation of Muslims now is identical to the Saudi Prophet Mohammed at the beginning of his missionary . So, their policy now , especially in Europe, is not to use violence for For certain reasons such as fear of expulsion, which will lead to the integration of generations of Muslims in European societies and that violence will not lead to the opening of Europe. This is the difference between them and terrorists muslims. Therefore, the most important of their current employment in Europe is to present the mosques ideology peacefully and to fight the integration through the islamic centers , mosques and schools and working to raise generations of Muslim on the doctrine of the mosques. And then, those of the generations will be a strong base, can be moved and used for the implementation of the mosques strategic plan. However, the points below show a part of their ideolgy and policy: 

• As you know they believe in the imams sunna – the Saudis Mohamad teaching – which asserts beating women, amputation of hands, cursed the Christians and Jews, to prevent alcohol, stoning of women, forcing women to veil, killing mockers, fighting secularism, prevent Muslims from paying taxes, prevent Muslims from converting to another religion…..
• Anti-Christian missionaries, churches and Jewish centers and secular parties. They asserted : ( The duty of the Muslim community — in order to preserve its identity — is to combat apostasy in all its forms and wherefrom it comes, giving it no chance to pervade in the Muslim world.)
• ( The four main schools of jurisprudence (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi`i, and Hanbali) as well as the other four schools of jurisprudence (the four Shiite schools of Az-Zaidiyyah, Al-Ithna-`ashriyyah, Al-Ja`fariyyah, and Az-Zaheriyyah) agree that apostates must be executed.)
• ( “The blood of a Muslim who testifies that there is no god but Allah and that I am the Messenger of Allah is not lawful to shed unless he be one of three: a married adulterer, someone killed in retaliation for killing another, or someone who abandons his religion and the Muslim community.) ( such me. I deny the doctrine of mosques, and I believe in secular countries and the ethics and the law of Europe )
• ( Religion occupies the very first place here as believers may sacrifice themselves, their country, and their wealth for the sake of their religion.)
• ( Refrain from fighting anyone whose death will cause more harm to the muslims ) ( This also one of the reasons whay they deny and refuse to use the mosques official violence because it would harm musims such as expel them from Europe and the closure of mosques
• They asserted : ( The principle aim of a mosque is to save the Muslims from melting in the Swedish society )
• The asserted : ( One of the most important basic principles of our religion is that of al-walaa’ wa’l-baraa’, loyalty (walaa’) to Islam and its people, and diavowal (baraa’) of kufr and its people ( Christians, Jews and all non muslims ) )

What will be their work ? 

The mosque would be aimed at matching other mosques aims because it same ideology , such as the: 

• Cursing the Swedish people dozens of times each day
• To remind Muslims, especially young people, children and women that to love and follow the non-Muslims is forbidden . All mosques and imams agreed that a true believer does not love non
• muslims ,for whoever loves a kaafir is not a believer
• To prevent Muslims from integrating
• To convince Swedish people to turn to the imams ideology
• To prevent Muslim women from emancipation
• To prevent any Muslim to cooperate or recognize Israel
• To organize demonstrations against any citizen to criticize Islam, mosques
• Bring the Saudis and other imams to give lectures to young people to be trained in Sharia and anti integration
• Organizing trips for youth Muslim to States full of terrorists such as Yemen, under the pretext of learning the Arabic language
• collecting children in mosques to teach them the  doctrine of imams
• The establishment of official relations with politicians, for reasons I will mention in another article
• The most important goal is to open Europe through Sweden, as provided in the doctrine of mosques

Therefore, to allow them to establish this mosque means helping to destabilize the national security and prevent the integration of Muslims. Of course, our politicians refuse to accept my scientific and strategic advices , for reasons I mentioned earlier as well as they use the excuse of religious freedom. Forgetting that freedom of religion does not allow teaching people to be criminals by teaching them convictions and criminal acts such as amputations of hands and stoning and beating of women and children and endangering the national and global security . In any case, I’m sure they will regret later, because the presence and the increasing number of mosques and Islamic centers and associations, will lead to very serious damage And would cause great suffering to our future generations too. 

Faktiska bevis från ahelalsunnah i Helsingborg.

OBS: Texter i blått, är mina kommentarer

 http://ahelalsunnah.se/guide_1_Vad-vet-du-om-Islam.html 

 ( Islam – vad betyder det?
Ordet Islam  är ett ord som innebär att känna sig undergiven och ödmjuk inför Gud. Det betyder också underkastelse och lydnad. …) 

 Komment: Med andra ord bör varje muslim skall tillämpas i lag och lära av moskéer såsom amputation av händer, stening äktenskapsbrytare, slående av  kvinnor, förbanna icke-muslimer, bekämpa  sekularism, hindrar kvinnor från att dansa, simma, sång och mixning ….. 

 (  UPPENBARELSEN 

 Från mänsklighetens bygynnelse sände Allah budskap för att visa människor vägen till verklig frid och lydnad till en enda sann Gud; detta är Islam. Detta budskap har förmedlats till människor genom olika profeter. Alla inbjöd människor till en och samma väg. Några av dem hade skrifter som vägledning och varning för endast speciella nationer. Zabur till David, Torah till Moses, Injeel till Jesus. Ingen av dessa skrifter kvarstår i sin originalform idag.  Dess värre har alla Guds tidiga budskap eller uppenbarelser blivit förvrängda genom tiden av människor från de senare generationerna. Resultatet av detta blev att Guds ursprungliga uppenbarelse förvrängts av myter och föreställningar, som saknar underlag i verkligheten och meningslösa filosofiska ideologier. Guds religion var förlorad i en övermättad mängd av andra påhittade religioner….) 

 Komment: De attackera  och kritisera Icke-muslimska religiösa böcker och hävdar t.ex att bibeln är en bluff och falsk, samtidigt bekämpa och hota alla som kritiserar moskéer, islam och Mohammed ! Detta trots att imamerna har förfalskat den sanna koranen som var identisk med europeiska lagar och etik och kultur . 

( Sedan finns det helt plötsligt fyra evangelier Matteus, Markus, Lukas och Johannes. Vilka är dessa män? Fyra olika evangelium skrivna i olika tider där ingen av dessa män skrev sitt efternamn på böckerna. Om jag ger dig en check för utbetalning och på den checken står bara mitt förnamn, skulle du acceptera den? Skulle  banken acceptera den?  Nej. Om polisen stoppar någon, kan han då identifiera sig med bara förnamnet?  Är det acceptabelt? Nej! Om du ansöker om att få ett pass, räcker det bara med förnamn? Gav våra föräldrar oss bara förnamn? Var i hela människans historia är det accepterat som identifiering av dokument? Ingenstans utom i Bibeln….Ingen visste då, och vi vet inte heller idag vem var de verkliga författarna ? Hur kan människorna tro på dessa fyra böcker som Guds ord fastän det är anonyma människor som har skrivit dem? Större delen av dagens, reviderade biblar innehåller orimliga påståenden inbakade i bibelverserna som i sig själva har ett skumt budskap och som är uppdiktade av okända författare. Och varför skulle vi idag acceptera deras odokumenterade och ohållbara påståenden ? I dessa böcker kan vi för första gången finna att Gud var nämnd som en man, för första gången Gud var nämnd som tre och för första gången att Gud har en son. Hur har detta accepterats av förnuftiga människor? Tänk efter! ) 

Komment: Detta avsnitt är en av de indikationer som bevisar att  moskéer och islamiska centra mål är  att bekämpa evangeliet och kyrkan.  

 ( ……Likaväl som Jesus sopade undan många konstlade regler, kom den Heliga Koranen  för att sopa bort den kristna kyrkans korruption  och  åter göra rent. …Konstigt nog, nämnde Jesus själv aldrig något om treenigheten. Han sa aldrig någonting  om att det fanns tre gudomliga personer i Gud…..Treenigheten är rationellt sett ohållbar. Den är inte bara bortom förnuftet utan även stridande mot sunt förnuft. ….) 

Komment: Som jag nämnde tidigare. Med andra ord, att all Islamiska Center är centrum för kampen mot icke-muslimer . Emellertid:  

1. Vad de säger är en läxa som de tog  från ett islamiskt center i Sydafrika och imamer i de islamska länderna för användning i Europa och att utbilda unga muslimer i moskéer och islamska centers för att kunna bekämpa kristendomen och för att inte konvertera från islam
2. De ligger Eftersom kyrkan inte är korrupt. Det är inte kyrkornas läran som uppmuntrar amputation av händer och slående av  barnen att be, slående av kvinnor, att döda  kritiker mm.
3. De ljuger, eftersom kristna inte tror att det finns tre gudar.
4. Den sanna koranen bekräftar att moskén inte erkänner Gud, men gudsförklarad imamer.

 So, vad förväntar man att vara resultatet av dessa moskéer och islamiska centra ?  

Vad förventar man att vara resultatet av en Islamisk center som hävdar: 

( Den person som förnekar Profetens ahadith (berättelser om vad Profeten Muhammed, frid vare med honom, sa och gjorde) och håller sig endast till Koranen, räknas inte som muslim) ? Med andra ord måste muslimerna  döda honom om han inte ångrar sig ! 

Trots allt detta har regeringen hjälpt och hjälper dem och känna igen dem som officiella  företrädare! 

 

Bismillah…

Al-Imam Abu Hanifah berkata, “Tidak halal atas seorangpun mengambil perkataan kami selama dia tidak tahu dari mana kami mengambilnya” Dalam riwayat lain beliau berkata, “Orang yang tidak tahu dalilku, haram atasnya berfatwa dengan perkataanku” [Dinukil oleh Ibnu Abidin dalam Hasyiyahnya atas Bahru Raiq 6/293 dan Sya’ rany dalam Al-Mizan 1/55]

Al-Imam Malik berkata : “Sesungguhnya aku adalah manusia yang bisa benar dan keliru. Lihatlah pendapatku, setiap yang sesuai dengan Kitab dan Sunnah maka ambillah, dan setiap yang tidak sesual dengan Kitab dan Sunnah maka tinggalkanlah” [Diriwayatkan oleh Ibnu Abdil Barr dalam Al-Jami’ 2/32]

Al-Imam Asy-Syafi’i berkata, “Jika kalian menjumpai sunnah Rasulullah Shallallahu alaihi wa sallam , ittiba’lah kepadanya, janganlah kalian menoleh kepada perkataan siapapun” [Diriwayatkan oleh Abu Nu’aim dalam Hilyatul Auliya’ 9/107 dengan sanad yang shahih] Beliau juga berkata, “Setiap yang aku katakan, kemudian ada hadits shahih yang menyelisihinya, maka hadits Nabi , lebih utama untuk diikuti. Janganlah kalian taqlid kepadaku”. [Diriwayatkan olehAbu Hatim dalamAdab Syafi’i hal.93 dengan sanad yang shahih] Al-Imam Ahmad berkata, “Janganlah.engkau taqlid dalam agamamu kepada seorangpun dari mereka, apa yang datang dari Nabi dan para sahabatnya ambillah” Beliau juga berkata, “Ittiba’ adalah jika seseorang mengikuti apa yang datang dari Nabi Shallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam dan para sahabatnya” [Masa’iI Al-Imam Ahmad oleh Abu Dawud hal.276- 277]

http://www.almanhaj.or.id/content/2194/slash/0

   la  crédulité  fut  de toutes  époques  ,  largement  utilisée  , pour  manoeuvrer  les  masses ;

    le  shéma  est  aproximativement  ,le même ,  dans  tous  les  continents ,  la  force  et  son emploi  ne peut  être  bénéfique  que  pour  un laps  de temps ..

   donc  les  classes  qui  dominent  eurent  recours  au  système  de la  domination mentale ,  pour  celà  , sous  certaines latitudes ,  il  fut  étudié  des  modes  de  manipulation .

    en   d’autres  lieux  ,  ils  furent  copiés  et la méthode  s’enrichit  de techniques  nouvelles …

    il  est  bien  plus  avantageux  , pour  les  chefs  d’avoir  leurs  désirs  et  l’asservissement  des masses  ,  dans la paix  (du moins  visible )  que  dans la  guerre  perpétuelle …

    il  suffit  de voir  les  bases  , dans  n’importe  quel  manuel  de  psychologie  ,  pour  comprendre que  l’homme  est  en quête de  choses  et  en craint  d’autres

  on peut  dominer  ; en diffusant  “”la  peur  “”  l’angoisse  “”  la  faim “”  celà  semble  facile !!  mais  c’est  tout  un art  !

     celui  ci  , copié  sur  toutes les  civilisations  passées ,  de la chine  , l’inde  , les  sumériens  ; égyptiens; perse  ,  grec  ;  romains  ;et  celto/germaniques ;  pour  ce qui est  des influences de  nos  nations  méditerranéene,et  européenne ….

  ce  n’est  pas  les  techniques  qui  manquèrent !  ainsi  naquirent les  religions  ,  assises  sur  des bases  que  je  ne  vais pas  dévelloppé  ici !

elles  ont  toutes  un héritage  commun ;  puisque  l’homme  se sert  toujours  de quelque  chose  qui  a  fait  ses  preuves !

   ces  sectes  , ont  toujours  été  reprises par le pouvoir  en place et  prirent  rapidement  …une  part importante  si  ce ne  fut  parfois , la  seule  et unique  voix  (alors  ceux  sont les  prêtres  qui  dominent  sans partage )

  la  théocratie !

   elle  n’as  pas  perdue  de sa  vigueur  , et  aujourd’hui  encore  ; comme  un virus  ; malgré  que les dirigeants  ont bien  d’autres moyens  modernes de nous  asservir  et  rendre  soumis  ;

  ces systèmes  sont  toujours  en place  ,et  même  tiennent  toujours  une  place  forte !

    le  besoin  crée  , devint  tel  et  s’inscrit  si  fortement  dans les  “”insconcients  collectifs “”  et”"  les  traditions    des peuples  “”,  qu’il  devint  absolument  , impossible  de ne  plus  composer  avec  …

CONSTANTIN  , aux  confins  de l’europe  ,  fut  le  1er  a  édifier  la  religion chrétienne  , en religion d’état  ; 

unifiant  ainsi  les  diverses  peuplades et  anéantissant  les  autres  sectes et  croyances ! constantin;  lui même ;  ne  croyait pas  à  cet  histoire  de messie  juif  , mais  il  ordonna  cette secte !

  et paradoxalement , les  10.premiers  évêques  furent  des juifs  ,  qui non plus  ne  croyaient  pas  en ce   zélote  de jésus   de  galilé.

___   cette  religion  mit  plus  de  3…à…4  siècles  pour  savoir  comment  faire  pour  former  , de toutes  pièces  une  religion ;  basée  sur  l’esprit  oriental  (dont  ils  copièrent  tous les  mythes);   et  l’esprit  européen …

   des conciles  et  bien  des  disputes  , éclatèrent  et les  premiers  bûchers  afin de faire  disparaître  l’opposition ,  et  de former  une  régle  commune  et  qui  devait  tenir  le  coup    (sic…)

  celà  fut  fait  ,  et  le  dogme  se renforça  !

  voilà comment  fut  crée  notre  religion ;  avec  des  légendes  indiennes  et  perses ..et  des rites  syriaques !

   à l’époque  c’était  la  grande  mode , un souverain  était  lui même  ;  légitimement  , le représentant  reconnu  par  les  autorités  religieuses  comme  “”"représentant  du  législateur  “” voulu  par  DIEU!

  c’est  le  dictat  de la pensée  unique !

   le monde  est ainsi  interprêté  , par les  religieux  , et  il ne  doit plus  bouger  de  ce  qui  fut  décidé,  sinon ??

c’est  la  mort  assurée , après  avoir  assouvie  les  penchants  pervers  des  représentants   de  la  dîte  “”vérité “”

   et  la  fin  était  généralement sur les  places  publiques  ; par  le  feu  salvateur !!!!

   créant  ainsi  la  peur  et  la  servitude  dans le  peuple  !

  tout  les  principes  sont  là  réunis; les  pressions  mentales  et  morales  , et

 l’emploi de la  force  dans  toute  son horreur  ;

  ceci pour  rabaisser  le  niveau  d’évolution des peuples  ,  qui  vivent  dans l’oppression  tyranique …

    une  des  choses  , importantes  pour  le pouvoir  et  vraiment  essentielle ; est  de détenir  le  rôle  suprême  de  juge  et  de sacraliser  celà  !

    eux  seuls  détiennent  le pouvoir  de vie  ou de  mort  et  ce  droit  est  appellé  “”"JUSTICE   “”" 

nos  sociètés  actuelles  ,  sont  issues  de  celà  , encore  de nos  jours  …bien sur  celà  a pris  une  ampleur  incroyable  , et  , nous  allons  en parler  donc  retenez  , bien cette  adresse ; 

   le  sujet  est  les  intrigues  du  pouvoir  et l’aservissement  des  nations  ; l’abêtissation de  l’homme  !

Bismillah, berikut ini link situs yang berisi tentang hukum-hukum seputar masjid, semoga bermanfaat.

http://www.alimam.ws/

The veil and even headscarves are considered  dangerous and endanger the womans life  and the national and global security for several reasons :

Artikeln finns :

http://mosquesdanger.wordpress.com

9. Lead to the impossibility of integration of Muslims in any European country

10.Lead to charge non-Muslim as racists and the exploitation of those charges to obtain money

 11.  Lead to the commission of crimes such as Sex trade , murder, theft ….

 12. Lead to terrorism and crimes  Women who wear the hijab and believe in it as the base and a way to get to heaven, it is easier to recruit to carry out terrorist acts. It happened that veiled women they blew themselves up in suicide terrorist attacks , to prove also that the veil is logo of devout believers. Therefore, you see them wearing the veil when they kill civilians

13 . The hijab and (not the niqab ) is  one of the most dangerous reasons that lead to  Islamic Jihad . All Islamic parties and  terrorist organizations struggle politically and military to establish islamic states to forced all women to veil. This is what happened in Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan and Iran.

14. The veil is a serious weapon in the hands of Islamic centers in Europe,  where they can use it to provoke Muslims when needed. And as long as do exist Islamic centers, schools and mosques and imams in non islamic countries , the  problems of the veil will  continue .

Therefore it is incumbent upon the entire world to prevent the headscarf  since religious freedom does not mean the oppression of women and does not mean to endanger the national  and global security

He entered the house of his girl friend disguised in a niqab an was arrested

A Muslim, was arrested near a school for girls,  wearing veil .
The Muslims claim , as they used to , that he is mentally ill

 ا11 November, 2009 08:15:00  

تمكن رجال الأمن العام في مديرية شرطة ….. صباح أمس من القاء القبض على رجل متنكر بزي امرأة يرتدي خمارا في ….. بالقرب من مدرسة بنات ….  الثانوية .وقد تم تحويل الرجل المشتبه به الى الحاكم الاداري حيث تم ربطه بكفالة عدلية وتبين انه يعاني من مرض نفسي .  

Criminals have carried out terrorist attacks, wearing the veil to go to heaven