<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>imprimis &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/imprimis/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "imprimis"</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:51:29 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[&gt;Excellent Article Related To Economic Liberty]]></title>
<link>http://lonewolfarcher.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/excellent-article-related-to-economic-liberty/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>LoneWolfArcher</dc:creator>
<guid>http://lonewolfarcher.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/excellent-article-related-to-economic-liberty/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&gt;Dealing With A Robin Hood Government Dr. Walter Williams, Professor of Economics at George Mason]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#62;<span style="font-weight:bold;">Dealing With A Robin Hood Government</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/images/userImages/mvanderwei/Page_4221/walterwilliams.jpg"><img src="http://www.hillsdale.edu/images/userImages/mvanderwei/Page_4221/walterwilliams.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><br />Dr. Walter Williams, Professor of Economics at George Mason University, wrote an excellent piece for Hillsdale College&#8217;s Imprimis monthly publication.</p>
<p>Click here for the article: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis.asp">Future Prospects for Economic Liberty</a></p>
<p>Here are some highlights from the article:</p>
<blockquote><p>So while I am not saying that we should pay no taxes, I am saying that they should be much lower—as they would be, if the government abided by the Constitution and allowed the free market system to flourish.</p></blockquote>
<p>What a great statement. It amazes me how many people that I talk to about taxes who will complain about how much we are forced to pay. When I start mentioning things the government funds, that it really has no business funding, these same people will then give justifications as to why the government should be funding those things. Sorry people, you can&#8217;t have it both ways. You can&#8217;t have the government babysit you, provide a safety net for every aspect of life, and still have low taxes. Speaking of which:<br />
<blockquote>Ironically, the free market system is threatened today not because of its failure, but because of its success. Capitalism has done so well in eliminating the traditional problems of mankind—disease, pestilence, gross hunger, and poverty—that other human problems seem to us unacceptable.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here is the crux of the issue I just mentioned. Americans think that we should be able to live completely stress free, with no worries. The result is they are willing to let government act to try to prevent every potential pitfall that we face as humans. Something the government is incapable of doing.</p>
<p>So what do I mean by a Robin Hood government? Dr. Williams explains:<br />
<blockquote>Again, the primary justification for increasing the size and scale of government at the expense of liberty is that government can achieve what it perceives as good. But government has no resources of its own with which to do so. Congressmen and senators don&#8217;t reach into their own pockets to pay for a government program. They reach into yours and mine. Absent Santa Claus or the tooth fairy, the only way government can give one American a dollar in the name of this or that good thing is by taking it from some other American by force. If a private person did the same thing, no matter how admirable the motive, he would be arrested and tried as a thief. That is why I like to call what Congress does, more often than not, &#8220;legal theft.&#8221; The question we have to ask ourselves is whether there is a moral basis for forcibly taking the rightful property of one person and giving it to another to whom it does not belong. I cannot think of one. Charity is noble and good when it involves reaching into your own pocket. But reaching into someone else&#8217;s pocket is wrong.</p></blockquote>
<p>Very well said! There is no morality in stealing. Even if the motive is noble. My daughter quoted Robin Hood a few weeks ago. She is 6 and she said something about stealing from the rich to give to the poor. I explained to her that stealing is wrong, period. And that there is nothing that justifies it, even giving the spoils to the poor. That is a lesson more of our nation&#8217;s youth needs to hear.</p>
<p>But isn&#8217;t big business the enemy of the common people? No it isn&#8217;t, as Dr. Williams continues:<br />
<blockquote>Another common argument is that we need big government to protect the little guy from corporate giants. But a corporation can&#8217;t pick a consumer&#8217;s pocket. The consumer must voluntarily pay money for the corporation&#8217;s product. It is big government, not corporations, that have the power to take our money by force. &#8230; It is big government that the little guy needs protection against, not big business. And the only protection available is in the Constitution and the ballot box.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ah, now we are getting to the root of the problem. As Ronald Reagan said: &#8220;Government is not the solution, government <span style="font-style:italic;">is</span> the problem.&#8221; The mainstream media has hammered on big business for so long that our society at large has aligned them mentally with Satan. However, big government is a much bigger threat to our liberty than big business ever was.</p>
<p>The problem is that our politicians get hedged in by special interests:<br />
<blockquote>This reminds me of a lunch I had a number of years ago with my friend Jesse Helms, the late Senator from North Carolina. He knew that I was critical of farm subsidies, and he said he agreed with me 100 percent. But he wondered how a Senator from North Carolina could possibly vote against them. If he did so, his fellow North Carolinians would dump him and elect somebody worse in his place.</p></blockquote>
<p>As Dr. Williams goes on, even principled politicians find themselves in the position of voting for big government initiatives that they know are not in the nation&#8217;s best interest. Think about that in relation to the current big government proposal for health care reform and you quickly realize how precarious our economic liberty has become.</p>
<p>Dr. Williams makes some excellent points in this article. If we are to restore our economic liberty in this nation we need to get rid of big government. That is a daunting task, but one that is crucial to our remaining the greatest nation on God&#8217;s green earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Kings of The Road to Roadkill]]></title>
<link>http://reyadel.wordpress.com/2009/08/02/kings-of-the-road-to-roadkill/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 23:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>reyadel</dc:creator>
<guid>http://reyadel.wordpress.com/2009/08/02/kings-of-the-road-to-roadkill/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[While reading the book Comeback (1994), written by two Wall Street Journal&#8217;s bureau chiefs, Pa]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[While reading the book Comeback (1994), written by two Wall Street Journal&#8217;s bureau chiefs, Pa]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The changing of this blog's theme]]></title>
<link>http://imprimis.wordpress.com/2008/12/31/the-changing-of-this-blogs-theme/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Imprimis</dc:creator>
<guid>http://imprimis.wordpress.com/2008/12/31/the-changing-of-this-blogs-theme/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I know, I know, you are all probably wondering &#8220;what in the world is going on?  I mean every t]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color:#993300;">I know, I know, you are all probably wondering &#8220;what in the world is going on?  I mean every time I come to imprimis the background is, well totally different from my last visit.&#8221;  Correct you are, I had a hard time deciding on what theme I should settle after the Christmasy one I had for a couple of weeks (snow fall included).  </span></p>
<p><span style="color:#993300;">The theme I have now and will keep until I decide to change is the first theme I had when I started this blog.  I hope that you like it as much as I do, and no, I won&#8217;t be changing it too soon. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   </span></p>
<p><span style="color:#993300;">Have a blessed day!</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#993300;">~Abby</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#993300;">Philippians 3:7-11 be Thou my Vision</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[500 and counting.... ]]></title>
<link>http://imprimis.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/500-and-counting/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Imprimis</dc:creator>
<guid>http://imprimis.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/500-and-counting/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Dear Imprimis readers, I am happy to announce that I have reached 500 visits to my blog!   Thank you]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color:#800000;">Dear Imprimis readers,</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000;">I am happy to announce that I have reached 500 visits to my blog!   <strong>Thank you</strong> to all who have visited and left your comments (which I love), thoughts and opinions.   I am quite pleased and surprised that I have received this much traffic in the almost 2 months that Imprimis has been up on the web.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000;">I look forward to more exciting times in the future, and am excited that <strong><em>you</em></strong> will be a part of them! <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000;">God bless you all this Christmas season!</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000;">Gratefully,<br />
Abby &#8211; editor of [im-pri-mis]</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Christianity Shaped the West--BIRKEYBLOG]]></title>
<link>http://ragamuffin08.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/how-christianity-shaped-the-west-birkeyblog/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 04:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Duane TeWinkel</dc:creator>
<guid>http://ragamuffin08.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/how-christianity-shaped-the-west-birkeyblog/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[BirkeyBlog the personal musings and art of Randal Birkey by rbirkey on December 6, 2008 The November]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="header">
<p><a href="http://www.birkeyblog.com/">BirkeyBlog</a></p>
<p>the personal musings and art of Randal Birkey</p></div>
<div class="post_box hentry top">
<div class="headline_area">
<h1 class="entry-title"></h1>
<p class="headline_meta">by <span class="author vcard fn">rbirkey</span> on <abbr class="published" title="2008-12-06">December 6, 2008</abbr></p>
</div>
<div class="format_text entry-content">
<p><a href="http://www.birkeyblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/story.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-947 alignleft" title="Dinesh D'Souza" src="http://www.birkeyblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/story.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="272" /></a>The November issue of <a title="Imprimis" href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis.asp" target="_blank">Imprimis</a>, the monthly newsletter of Hillsdale College, features an article adapted from a speech delivered by <a title="Dinesh D'Souza website" href="http://www.dineshdsouza.com/" target="_blank">Dinesh D’Souza</a>. Dinesh is a conservative author, thinker and speaker who worked as a policy analyst in the Reagan White House. His articles currently appear in the <em>New York Times</em>, <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, <em>The Atlantic Monthly</em>, <em>Vanity Fair</em>, <em>The New Republic</em> and <em>National Review</em> to name a few.</p>
<p>His speech draws heavily from the research he did for his latest book called: <em><a title="What's So Great About Christianity" href="http://www.dineshdsouza.com/books/christianity-jacket.html" target="_blank">What’s So Great About Christianity</a>. </em></p>
<p>Dinesh uses the example of Thomas Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence to connect the dots between what American’s believe about “self-evident” freedoms, and the roots of that idea in Christianity. He further strengthens that connection through writings of Alexander Hamilton, John Adams and others.</p>
<p>In contrast to the earlier Greek and Roman democracies, Christianity contributed a much higher view of human life, worth and dignity that radically affected slaves, women and children, and in more recent years, African-Americans for the good.</p>
<p>When it comes to our own history as a country, the First Great Awakening set the religious and spiritual groundwork for our nations Independence. Historian Paul Johnson writes that the War for Independence was,</p>
<blockquote><p>“inconceivable… without this religious background.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Likewise, John Adams wrote,</p>
<blockquote><p>“What do we mean by the American Revolution? The war? That was no part of the Revolution; it was only an effect and consequence of it. The Revolution was in the hearts and minds of the people… a change in their religious sentiments.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Dinesh points out that Christianity played a vital role in establishing a new concept of freedom based upon it’s assertion that humans are created in God’s image and are moral agents, with the ability/responsibility to be the architects of their own lives.</p>
<p>In conclusion Dinesh issues a warning. It was Friedrich Nietzsche who said that the ideas that formed Western civilization were based on Christianity. He warned us that if we remove Christianity, the ideals will fall also. Nietzche warned that with a decline in Christianity, new and opposing ideas would arise. We see this happening today with the redefinition of family, marriage, the revival of eugenics, and even arguments for infanticide. These are all signs of the gradual extinction of the foundational principles that uphold human dignity.</p>
<p>If we cherish the distinctive principles of Western civilization &#8211; no matter what our own personal religious views &#8211; we would do well to respect, rather than denigrate our Christian roots.</p>
<p>&#60;!&#8211;    &#8211;&#62;Tagged as: 						<a rel="tag" href="http://www.birkeyblog.com/tag/american-history/">american history</a>,  						<a rel="tag" href="http://www.birkeyblog.com/tag/christianity/">Christianity</a>,  						<a rel="tag" href="http://www.birkeyblog.com/tag/dinesh-dsouza/">Dinesh D&#8217;Souza</a>,  						<a rel="tag" href="http://www.birkeyblog.com/tag/friedrich-nietzsche/">Friedrich Nietzsche</a>,  						<a rel="tag" href="http://www.birkeyblog.com/tag/john-adams/">John Adams</a>,  						<a rel="tag" href="http://www.birkeyblog.com/tag/politics/">Politics</a>,  						<a rel="tag" href="http://www.birkeyblog.com/tag/western-civilization/">western civilization</a><span class="bracket">}</span></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[This'n'That; October 30th[Wlth Re-dist;Hillsdale;]]></title>
<link>http://justincase505.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/thisnthat-october-30thwlth-re-disthillsdale/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>justincase505</dc:creator>
<guid>http://justincase505.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/thisnthat-october-30thwlth-re-disthillsdale/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Spread The Wealth Around O-bomb-a&#8217;s mantra seems to be having the desired affect!! The DandC r]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="font-size:130%;">Spread The Wealth Around</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size:130%;">O-bomb-a&#8217;s mantra seems to be having the desired affect!! </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:130%;">The DandC reported in this morning&#8217;s paper that a coupla local dentists [Dr Sandra Elczko, Livonia and Dr Steve Thompson, Holley] are going to redistribute the &#8220;Halloween Wealth!!&#8221; </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:130%;">I don&#8217;t have a clue&#8230;.. What&#8217;s Halloween candy going for these days ?? $4/lb-$5/lb?? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:130%;">These dentists are intending to &#8220;buy back&#8221; the candy collections of local children for a <em><strong>buck-a-pound</strong></em> and send it to the troops in Iraq and Afganistan. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:130%;">There&#8217;s a coupla things amiss here&#8230;&#8230; The kids are gettin&#8217; scammed and the troups are gettin&#8217; a visit from Mr Tooth Decay!!!! I hope there&#8217;ll be lotsa tooth brushes in the &#8220;CARE&#8221; packages!! </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:130%;"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:130%;"><strong>A Conservative College&#8230;..No, Really!!!</strong> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:130%;">From time to time, I make reference to Hillsdale College&#8217;s monthly publication-<strong><em>Imprimis</em></strong>. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:130%;">Hillsdale was established in Hillsdale, Michigan, in 1844 as an indepenedent, co-educational, non-sectarian, liberal arts college. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:130%;">The college refuses federal and state aid in any form and as such, must finance it&#8217;s entire $46 million through private donations. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:130%;">Imprimis is a free-subscription monthly speech digest that reaches over 1.6 million households. Imprimis contributors include the late Tony Snow, the late Senator Jesse Helms and many others equally as intelligent, conservative and famous.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:130%;">Check out both the college and the publication at: </span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/">http://www.hillsdale.edu/</a></p>
<p><span style="font-size:130%;"></span>Til Nex&#8217;time&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p><span style="font-size:130%;"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:130%;"></span>
<div class="blogger-post-footer"><a href="http://www.fubowear.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.fubowear.com</a><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2741788531680601803-7210213550273515461?l=justincase505.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Who Should Confront the Iranian Time Bomb - Obama or McCain ]]></title>
<link>http://blogs4mccain.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/who-should-confront-the-iranian-time-bomb-obama-or-mccain/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 03:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Dr. Bill Smith (OzarkGuru)</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blogs4mccain.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/who-should-confront-the-iranian-time-bomb-obama-or-mccain/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Bill Smith, ARRA Editor: With the presidential election upon us, many people are also focused on the]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="post-body">
<div><a href="http://arkansasgopwing.blogspot.com/2008/10/who-should-confront-iranian-time-bomb.html"><img style="float:left;width:123px;height:132px;margin:0 10px 10px 0;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ZTsdiIlN_8s/SQN2jZUD9kI/AAAAAAAAGu8/Gr0JR_eT5lE/s200/billsmith4.jpg" border="0" alt="Dr. Bill Smith" /></a><strong><span style="color:#cc0000;"><a href="http://arkansasgopwing.blogspot.com/2008/10/who-should-confront-iranian-time-bomb.html"><span style="color:#cc0000;">Bill Smith, ARRA Editor</span></a>:</span></strong> With  the presidential election upon us, many people are also focused on the economy.  However, we know from history that we will be able to correct our economic  problem even if it takes longer than our American tendency to want instant  solutions for everything. However, because of the economic crisis, many voters  are ignoring the most significant issue that our next president is directly  responsible to address. That issue is the very real global threat to America&#8217;s  very survival. Since confronting this threat every day is not part of our  personal daily routine and responsibilities (until it is too late), we tend to  be myopic and look at the &#8220;me things.&#8221;</p>
<p>If inexperienced or burdened down  with domestic and economic cares, voters may not comprehend or may even forget  the bigger picture &#8212; surviving the very &#8220;real&#8221; foreign enemies that literally  hate our culture, democracy, traditions, freedoms, religions, materialism, and  way of living. In fact, they hate us (i.e., you). In our daily bickering over  small things, we tend to ignore the big dangers because we can we do nothing  about them individually.</p>
<p>To put &#8220;just one&#8221; of the threats into  perspective, consider an article in the <a href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis/archive/issue.asp?year=2008&#38;month=10"><strong><span style="color:#000000;">October issue of <em>Imprimis</em></span></strong> </a>published by Hillsdale College that addresses Iran. The article was adapted  from a speech by Michael Ledeen. Michael Ledeen is the Freedom Scholar at the  Foundation for Defense of Democracies and a contributing editor at National  Review Online. Previously, he served in the White House as a national security  advisor and in the Departments of Defense and State. He is author of more than  20 books, including The Iranian Time Bomb. His articles have appeared in the  Wall Street Journal, the American Spectator, International Economy, Commentary,  and the Washington Times.</p>
<p>The article is too long to quote here so I  encourage you to <a href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis/archive/issue.asp?year=2008&#38;month=10"><strong><span style="color:#000000;">visit and the read the article  online</span></strong></a>. However, below are Lendeen&#8217;s closing words which  highlight just one of the many countries whose government leaders hate America  and who wish our demise as the principle leader of the &#8216;free world&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The bottom line is that Iran is our principal enemy in the Middle  East, and perhaps in the entire world. It is also a terribly vulnerable regime,  and it knows that—which is why it makes up stories about airplanes and missiles  that it doesn’t have. As for the question of nuclear weapons, it seems hard to  imagine that Iran does not already have them. Iranians are not stupid, and they  have been at this for a minimum of 20 years in a world where almost every major  component needed for a nuclear weapon—not to mention old nuclear weapons—are for  sale. A lot of these components are for sale nearby in Pakistan. And if the  Iranians do have a weapon, it is impossible to imagine that, at a moment of  crisis, they will not use it. The point is, we have an implacable enemy which  has no intention of negotiating a settlement with us. They want us dead or  dominated, just as our enemies did in the 1930s and ’40s. You can’t make deals  with a regime like that.</p>
<p>Our choices with regard to Iran are to challenge  them directly and win this war now, to do so only after they kill a lot more of  us in some kind of attack, or to surrender. There is no painless way out, and  the longer we wait, the greater the pain is going to be.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>So, who is  best to challenge Iran and other enemies of our Nation &#8211; Obama or McCain? The  most critical and therefore, important issue is not &#8220;change&#8221; but survival &#8212; how  will America continue to physically exist as a country and a democracy with  guaranteed individual freedoms and rights. Who will be the best president to  protect us from our foreign enemies (even while we continue our internal  domestic bickering over almost everything)?</p>
<p>Do we pick Obama &#8211; a younger  inexperienced (i.e., non-experienced) smooth talking candidate who is an  anti-traditional family values advocate and unfortunately already has a past  full of bad choices and savory associations? Following the mantra of &#8220;Change&#8221; is  not the answer because the issue is then &#8220;change from what and to what&#8221; and  importantly, the consequences of the &#8220;change.&#8221; Change can mean a lot of things.  We have recently experienced a lot of negative economic change which can be  directly associated with Obama&#8217;s associates in and out of Congress. And how can  a person who voted &#8220;present&#8221; verses &#8220;yes or no&#8221; on a majority of his votes in  the Illinois and US Senates be prepared to address the most important issues of  our time? Voting present is not good enough when dealing with threats to  America. Obama promises talk and compromise and appears willing to concede  ground to our enemies (i.e., using an appeasement approach).</p>
<p>Or, do we  pick McCain &#8212; an older but scarred and proven warrior who is the straight  talking man who is called a maverick for taking consistent stands and speaking  the truth even within his own party? An experienced candidate who understands  the threats to our country from outside our borders. A man who served his  country in war and understands the pain and suffering. A man who while  addressing the enemy understands compassion and forgiveness towards those who  even tortured him. McCain is willing and able to clearly detail to our enemies  (those who wish us harm and / or even destroy us) the limits of our tolerance  and a clear understanding of the consequences for pursuing further aggressive  acts, actions that threaten America.</p>
<p>The American people have voiced poll  after poll their continued negative opinion of the present Congress lead by  Democrats and have given the Democrat leadership the lowest ratings in history.  It is from this pool of Democrats that a junior inexperienced member has come  forth to be their candidate for president. Not a person who stood on principles  against his own failing political party leadership but instead pandered for  items he wished and voted absent or present on the other issues. If Obama were  to become president, he will be again supporting these same failing &#8220;tax and  spend&#8221; liberal leaders: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Speaker of the  House Nancy Pelosi. And then who will save us from our enemies?</p></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[decreto]]></title>
<link>http://leimprecation.wordpress.com/2008/10/06/decreto/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Edson Junior</dc:creator>
<guid>http://leimprecation.wordpress.com/2008/10/06/decreto/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Jornalistas: usem marrom.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jornalistas: usem marrom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[O intelectual é um consagrado ]]></title>
<link>http://leimprecation.wordpress.com/2008/10/01/o-intelectual-e-um-consagrado/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 04:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Edson Junior</dc:creator>
<guid>http://leimprecation.wordpress.com/2008/10/01/o-intelectual-e-um-consagrado/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Falar de vocação equivale a designar os que pretendem fazer do trabalho intelectual a sua vida, ou p]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><em>Falar de vocação equivale a designar os que pretendem fazer do trabalho intelectual a sua vida, ou porque dispõem de vagar para se entregarem ao estudo, ou porque, no meio de ocupações profissionais, reservam para si, como feliz suplemento e recompensa, o profundo desenvolvimento do espírito. Digo profundo, para descartar a ideia de tintura superficial. Uma vocação não se satisfaz com leituras vagas nem com pequenos trabalhos dispersos. Requer penetração continuidade e esforço metódico, no intuito duma plenitude que responda ao apelo do Espírito e aos recursos que lhe aprouve comunicar-nos. Este apelo não se deve conjecturar. Quem se aventura a um caminho, que não pode trilhar, com pé firme, conte de antemão com decepções. O trabalho pesa sobre todos e, após a primeira formação sempre custosa, seria loucura deixar descambar o espírito na primitiva indigência. Uma coisa é a conservação pacífica do que se adquiriu, e outra coisa é retomar pela base uma instrução puramente provisória e que se considera simples ponto de partida. Este último estado de espírito é o de um chamado. Implica uma resolução grave, porque a vida de estudo, sendo austera, impõe duros encargos. Paga, e abundantemente; mas exige uma entrada de capital de que poucos são capazes. Os atletas da inteligência, Como os atletas do desporto, têm de prever privações, longos treinos e tenacidade por vezes sobre-humana. Precisam de se dar de alma e coração à conquista da verdade, visto que a verdade só presta serviços a quem a serve.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align:right;">[A. D. Sertillanges. A Vida Intelectual]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[as russas]]></title>
<link>http://leimprecation.wordpress.com/2008/10/01/as-russas/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 04:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Edson Junior</dc:creator>
<guid>http://leimprecation.wordpress.com/2008/10/01/as-russas/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="../files/2008/10/22_ruslan_lobanov.jpg"><img src="../files/2008/10/22_ruslan_lobanov.jpg?w=300" alt="" title="22_ruslan_lobanov" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-14" width="300" height="280"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[oi]]></title>
<link>http://leimprecation.wordpress.com/2008/10/01/oi/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 03:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Edson Junior</dc:creator>
<guid>http://leimprecation.wordpress.com/2008/10/01/oi/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[é tão bonito este template que dá vontade de postar algo por aqui. mas tenho nada p&#8217;ra dizer n]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>é tão bonito este template que dá vontade de postar algo por aqui. mas tenho nada p&#8217;ra dizer não.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[]]></title>
<link>http://leimprecation.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/6/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Edson Junior</dc:creator>
<guid>http://leimprecation.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/6/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Uma relação em que há demasiado amor é a mesma em que há demasiada escatologia.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:justify;">Uma relação em que há demasiado amor é a mesma em que há demasiada escatologia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ “No Energy Exhaustion” by Petr Beckmann - Imprimis, January 1975]]></title>
<link>http://townline.wordpress.com/2008/01/18/%e2%80%9cno-energy-exhaustion%e2%80%9d-by-petr-beckmann-imprimus-january-1975/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>poststop</dc:creator>
<guid>http://townline.wordpress.com/2008/01/18/%e2%80%9cno-energy-exhaustion%e2%80%9d-by-petr-beckmann-imprimus-january-1975/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the Imprimi]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the <a href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis.asp">Imprimis</a> newsletter from Hillsdale college.</i></p>
<p><b>Author</b></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petr_Beckmann">Petr Beckmann</a>, born in 1924, died in 1993.</li>
<li>Challenged Einsteins&#8217; theory of relativity and advocation of nuclear power.</li>
<li>This presentation was delivered in 1974, five years before <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Mile_Island_accident">Three Mile Island</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Overview</b></p>
<ul>
<li>One of the present malaises of society  is a strong anti-scientific, anti-technological trend coming from outside and inside the scientific community which results in a blatant disregard of the facts.</li>
<li>The book &#8216;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limits_to_Growth">The Limits of Growth</a>&#8216; is cited as an example of this disregard.</li>
<li>There is no lack of energy (even clean energy), but access to that energy is blocked by restrictions on the free market by govt. and public opinion (driven by propagandizing)</li>
<li>Beckmann discusses the power OPEC has to set oil prices and five solutions to the problem. The first four are dismissed (tough talk and military action among them) in favor of opening up access to existing U.S. energy resources.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Is &#8216;<a href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis/archive/issue.asp?year=1975&#38;month=01">No Energy Exhaustion</a>&#8216; worth reading?</b></p>
<p>Probably not. It was interesting that use of military force was at mentioned as one of the possibilities in dealing with OPEC, although it was dismissed. I had to ask myself what would the U.S. response be if Saudi Arabia refused to sell us oil? I believe use of the military is the undeniable answer. It is foolish to separate our conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan with the fact that our country needs a stable supply of oil.</p>
<p>I have a friend who is very much an expert on &#8220;green&#8221; energy and he has mentioned a number of times to me (with some regret) that nuclear power offers our country the greatest chance of freeing itself from our dependence on oil.</p>
<p><b></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[“The Crisis in International Economic Relations” by Hans F. Sennholz - Imprimis, March 1973]]></title>
<link>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/12/01/%e2%80%9cthe-crisis-in-international-economic-relations%e2%80%9d-by-hans-f-sennholz-imprimis-march-1973/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 05:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>poststop</dc:creator>
<guid>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/12/01/%e2%80%9cthe-crisis-in-international-economic-relations%e2%80%9d-by-hans-f-sennholz-imprimis-march-1973/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the Imprimi]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the <a href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis.asp">Imprimis</a> newsletter from Hillsdale college.</em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-style:normal;">In the <a href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis/archive/issue.asp?year=1973&#38;month=03"><span>March 1973 issue of Imprimis</span></a> Dr. Sennholz (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Sennholz"><span>Wik</span><span>i</span><span>pedia</span></a>) asserts that the United   States is on a path towards self-destruction. He provides three particular sets of political and economic thought that are the primary reasons for this.</span></em></p>
<p style="margin-left:0.5in;text-indent:-0.25in;"><!--[if !supportLists]--><em><span style="font-style:normal;"><span>1.<span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;">      </span></span></span></em><!--[endif]--><em><span style="font-style:normal;">“the continuous growth of socialist and, in particular, Marxian economic thought has led to a renewed attack on private property and the profit motive”</span></em></p>
<p style="margin-left:0.5in;text-indent:-0.25in;"><!--[if !supportLists]--><em><span style="font-style:normal;"><span>2.<span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;">      </span></span></span></em><!--[endif]--><em><span style="font-style:normal;">Economic nationalism.</span></em></p>
<p style="margin-left:0.5in;text-indent:-0.25in;"><!--[if !supportLists]--><em><span style="font-style:normal;"><span>3.<span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;">      </span></span></span></em><!--[endif]--><em><span style="font-style:normal;">“the rise of governmental planning and control has given birth to an age of world-wide inflation that threatens to disrupt the international monetary system”</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-style:normal;">Dr. Sennholz died in June of 2007 but some of his recent writings can be <a href="http://www.sennholz.com/current.html"><span>found here</span></a>. The same site contains a page with some quotes (<a href="http://www.sennholz.com/quote.html"><span>worth a peek</span></a>) from Sennholz. This one is from his book ‘The Politics of Unemployment’.</span></em></p>
<blockquote><p><em><span style="font-style:normal;">“While governments and unions are forever raising labor costs and causing unemployment, business is forever adjusting to prevent the unemployment. When the federal government raises its Social Security exactions and state governments boost unemployment compensation taxes, which may significantly raise labor costs, business is straining to prevent the unemployment through cost adjustments. It may seek to offset the mandated costs with other cost reduction. In particular, it may reduce fringe benefits, delay inflation adjustments, elicit greater effort on the part of workers, and otherwise use labor more productively. Whenever and wherever business is successful in offsetting the boost in labor costs, it succeeds in preventing threatening unemployment. If laws, regulations, and work rules prohibit the necessary cost adjustment, business has no choice but to discharge loss-inflicting workers. If it is unable to remove the employment obstacles erected by government or union, it is forced to dismiss the labor that fails to surmount the obstacles.&#8221;</span></em></p></blockquote>
<p><em><span style="font-style:normal;">The most rewarding benefit of reading these old articles has been the joy of discovering men like Dr. Sennholz. I am most frustrated to discover the message that many of these men trumpeted thirty years ago is still falling on deaf ears.</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-style:normal;">This <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north541.html"><span>obituary by Gary North</span></a> is also worth reading. Sennholz is a man of from the Austrian school of economics which is something I have just begun to learn about. If you would like to learn more then I suggest heading over to the <a href="http://www.mises.org/"><span>Mises Institute</span></a>. There is an enormous wealth of material there.</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[“Towards a Theology of Politics” by Rousas J. Rushdoony- Imprimis, February 1973]]></title>
<link>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/11/16/%e2%80%9ctowards-a-theology-of-politics%e2%80%9d-by-rousas-j-rushdoony-imprimis-february-1973/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 06:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>poststop</dc:creator>
<guid>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/11/16/%e2%80%9ctowards-a-theology-of-politics%e2%80%9d-by-rousas-j-rushdoony-imprimis-february-1973/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the Imprimi]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the <a href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis.asp">Imprimis</a> newsletter from Hillsdale college.</em></p>
<p>Rousas Rushdoony was a leading proponent of a Christian theological view called Theonomy. He is very well known and either loved or decried within conservative Christian circles. I was surprised to see that he spoke at Hillsdale in 1973 which is the same year he published his best known work &#8220;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0875524109?ie=UTF8&#38;tag=townline-20&#38;linkCode=as2&#38;camp=1789&#38;creative=9325&#38;creativeASIN=0875524109">The Institutes of Biblical Law, Vol. I</a>&#8220;.</p>
<span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/oZhpSmsTm70?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span>
<p>Here is a link <a href="http://forerunner.com/revolution/rush.html">to a page</a> with more videos of Rushdoony, (disclaimer, I don&#8217;t know anything about the site I found them on).</p>
<p>The central thesis of the article is demonstrate the unavoidable religious nature of the state. When the state rules apart from God it is in conflict with God. Rushdoony provides a brief history of the Roman ruled landscape leading up to birth and ministry of Jesus and then goes on to examine the radical claims of the disciples which would have been in direct opposition to Rome&#8217;s own claims.</p>
<blockquote><p>In not too many years, a disciple of Jesus Christ was to declare, in a challenge to the religious and civil leaders of Judea, and to all authorities: “Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved” (Acts 4:12). Warfare between Christ and Caesar was thus inescapable: here were two rival gods claiming the same jurisdiction over man. It was not a struggle between church and state but between two kingdoms each claiming ultimate and divine powers, Rome and the Kingdom of God.</p></blockquote>
<p>In Genesis man is commanded by God to exercise dominion and subdue creation. Sinful men, apt to twist the words of God, instead attempt to centralize power and control in the state. The state then exercises dominion and subdues creation by enslaving men by enacting thousands of laws and regulations apart from any higher authority. Rushdoony makes the point that when the state claims jurisdiction beyond the realms ordained by God, it is sin.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Bible gives us numerous examples of what constitutes signal evil on the part of the state. Drafting youth for non-military services to the state and taxing beyond the head tax to as much as 10% (a tithe) of a man&#8217;s wealth or income is cited as evil (I Sam. 8). For the state to claim a priestly role, and &#8216; the control of religion, is evil (II Chron. 26: 16-21). Expropriation of property by the state is a very serious transgression (I Kings 21). Debasing the coinage is charged against Judah as part of God&#8217;s indictment (“Thy silver is become dross,” Isa. I:22). Much, much more could be cited. 10 Suffice it to say that the state is at every point under law, God&#8217;s law.</p></blockquote>
<p>Rushdoony has much more to say in the article and it is well worth reading. Let me end with thus poignant quote.</p>
<blockquote><p>In the modern world, we have the messianic fervor of election campaigns, in which the candidates pre-sent themselves as heroes whose election will mark the advent of a new world. The religious fervor of partisans is the mark of a political theology. Modern man&#8217;s religious hope is in politics, and the result is the politics of Babel and the growing confusion or confounding of man&#8217;s hopes, and his enslavement. In effect, modern man, with his political faith, says to the state, “Hail, Caesar! We who are about to die salute you!</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[“Your Brother's Keeper: From Genesis to Galbraith” by F.A. Harper - Imprimis, January 1973]]></title>
<link>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/%e2%80%9cyour-brothers-keeper-from-genesis-to-galbraith%e2%80%9d-by-fa-harper-impimus-january-1973/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 05:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>poststop</dc:creator>
<guid>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/11/14/%e2%80%9cyour-brothers-keeper-from-genesis-to-galbraith%e2%80%9d-by-fa-harper-impimus-january-1973/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the Imprimi]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the <a href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis.asp">Imprimis</a> newsletter from Hillsdale college.</em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis/archive/issue.asp?year=1973&#38;month=01">Dr. Harper’s article</a> examines our obligation to be charitable from Genesis to Galbraith. If you can get past poor use of Biblical texts you will find some helpful thoughts regarding charity. Here are a few of the points he makes.</p>
<ul>
<li class="MsoNormal">We can      only give what has been produced. Therefore production is the source of      all giving.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">If the      producer gives $1 directly to the recipient, the recipient receives $1. In      order for the federal government to give the same dollar they must first      obtain $3 from sources of production.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Who      defines what charity is? Is charity giving a man a meal or teaching a man      to fish?</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">The      best method to reduce poverty is to increase production. This is most      easily achieved by allowing companies to reinvest resources back into      production instead of confiscating it and giving only a third of it to the      benefactor.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">The      one who produces should be the one to direct its fate.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Who      defines the ‘needy’? Is a necessity ‘something you have to have, or you      die’?</li>
</ul>
<p>If you wondering who Galbraith is <a href="http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Kenneth_Galbraith">read here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Imprimis 1972 - Debrief]]></title>
<link>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/imprimis-1972-debrief/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>poststop</dc:creator>
<guid>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/imprimis-1972-debrief/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The World&#8217;s Most Important Man - Government is organized force. The Dangers of Price Controls]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/10/20/the-worlds-most-important-person-by-leonard-e-read-imprimis-june-1972/">The World&#8217;s Most Important Man </a>- Government is organized force.</li>
<li><a href="http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/the-dangers-of-price-controls-by-henry-hazlitt-imprimis-july-1972/">The Dangers of Price Controls</a> &#8211; Nixon fixed prices in 72, nobody payed attention. Hazlitt&#8217;s books are available online. Fixing prices is a bad idea.</li>
<li><a href="http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/whats-going-on-by-phil-crane-imprimis-august-1972/">Whats Going On</a> &#8211; Everything is not a always a crisis. Government uses these issues to usurp control. Less federal power, more state power.</li>
<li><a href="http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/consumerism-by-arthur-shenfield-imprimis-september-1972/">Consumerism</a> &#8211; Everyone but me is a fool. Government needs to protect you.</li>
<li><a href="http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/reflections-by-george-roche-iii-imprimis-october-1972/">Reflections</a> &#8211; Big Bird is dangerous.</li>
<li><a href="http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/11/02/urban-crime-its-causes-and-control-by-william-a-stanmeyer-imprimis-november-1972/">Urban Crime: Its Causes and Control</a> &#8211; Justice must be swift and decisive.</li>
<li><a href="http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/there-is-no-urban-crisis-by-m-stanton-evans-imprimis-december-1972/">There Is No Urban Crisis</a> &#8211; The size and scope of government is the real crisis.</li>
</ul>
<p>I am a bit surprised to see that many of the issues of 1972 are the issues of today. I think the best article in terms of getting me to think was &#8220;The World&#8217;s Most Important Man&#8221;. The most interesting article with broad appeal is likely the section on Sesame Street in &#8220;Reflections&#8221;. To 1973 and beyond!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA["There Is No Urban Crisis" by M. Stanton Evans - Imprimis, December 1972]]></title>
<link>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/there-is-no-urban-crisis-by-m-stanton-evans-imprimis-december-1972/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 07:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>poststop</dc:creator>
<guid>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/there-is-no-urban-crisis-by-m-stanton-evans-imprimis-december-1972/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the Imprimi]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the <a href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis.asp">Imprimis</a> newsletter from Hillsdale college.</em></p>
<p>As the title states, Evans takes on the idea that our cities are in the midst of an urban crisis. Evans believes that rather than being in a state of crisis the cities are just a dramatic example of the result of identifiable governmental policy errors. Evans goes on to list a number of these policies and a few possible remedies. I found this particular article very difficult to read so I won&#8217;t bother to summarize much more. The most interesting part of the article was the section below discussing the forced implementation of Medicaid.</p>
<blockquote><p>Three years ago we were told by the federal government that unless we instituted a Medicaid program we would lose some eight million dollars in federal welfare funds. In order to save this eight million in “free” money, our Legislature enacted a minimal program that would supposedly cost only $300,000 or so a year. But once Medicaid was on the books, the federal government came back with still more demands, guidelines, and standards that we had to adopt. This year the program that was going to save us eight million dollars is costing $45 million in state money alone, and in the next biennium, as currently projected, is supposed to go to $107 million a year. We have lost both our autonomy and our money.</p></blockquote>
<p>Free money is never free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA["Urban Crime: Its Causes and Control" by William A. Stanmeyer - Imprimis, November 1972]]></title>
<link>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/11/02/urban-crime-its-causes-and-control-by-william-a-stanmeyer-imprimis-november-1972/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>poststop</dc:creator>
<guid>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/11/02/urban-crime-its-causes-and-control-by-william-a-stanmeyer-imprimis-november-1972/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the Imprimi]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the <a href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis.asp">Imprimis</a> newsletter from Hillsdale college.</em></p>
<p>Stanmeyer begins with a description of a brutal and senseless crime. He then documents some of the heinous inefficiencies and injustices of a justice system that has been swayed in favor of the accused to the point of absurdity by the Supreme Court. Stanmeyer remarks about the radical changes that were occurring in the 60&#8242;s.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;During the ten year period, 1960 to 1970, our population increased by 13%, but serious crimes increased by 148%. This was also the period when the greatest prosperity in the world&#8217;s history was accompanied by the greatest waves of shoplifting, drug abuse, and delinquency in the most prosperous areas, the suburbs — a fact that shatters the simplistic notion that poverty “causes” crime. It was a period when pundits made the phrase, “the Puritan Ethic,” a term of opprobrium, and “intellectuals” extolled the virtues of young people who “do their own thing,” whatever the harm to other citizens or to a Rule of Law. And it was a time that courts throughout the land, particularly the U.S. Supreme Court, embarked on a relentless pursuit of constitutional abstractions, whatever the cost in terms of outraged common sense or the suffering victims of crime.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Stanmeyer believes we have wandered from our legal forebear (the British legal system) and lost common sense flexibility which it was characterized by. He proposes ten reforms which would return the common sense to our system. I cite three below which I would like to see enacted.</p>
<ol>
<li>Permit all voluntary statements.</li>
<li>Allow non-unanimous juries.</li>
<li>Liberalize the exclusionary rule (the article cites great examples of this)</li>
</ol>
<p>Here is another great quote from the article.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Many factors generate crime. That &#8216;inner morality&#8217; necessary to resist the temptation to rape, rob, or kill weakens in an environment of broken homes, systemic poverty, ethical relativism, religious decline. Poverty &#8217;causes&#8217; crime in general in the same way that pornography causes sex crimes and television violence causes violence by children: it is a predispositive condition. The &#8216;underlying causes&#8217; of crime are spiritual as often as economic, psychological as often as material. If we could strengthen family life, raise the living standard, instill character values, and convert the citizenry to a religious outlook we would doubtless lower the crime rate. But these improvements take years. And experience shows that in these areas government action is singularly ineffective.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>It is hard to believe there are still people who research the causes of crime. Stanmeyer acknowledges his detractors.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Some readers will find this essay distressing. They will allege that these recommendations make it easier to violate the rights of the innocent. My answer is that they make it much, much easier to convict the guilty and thereby protect the rights of the innocent.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This is the sixth Imprimis article I have read. I am struck most that the issues and many of the solutions have not changed much since 1972. Another 400+ to go.</p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Quotes by Justice Clarence Thomas]]></title>
<link>http://sylviaallen.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/quotes-by-justice-clarence-thomas/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 02:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sylviaallen</dc:creator>
<guid>http://sylviaallen.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/quotes-by-justice-clarence-thomas/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I get a monthly publication called Imprimis published by Hillsdale College. This month had a convers]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get a monthly publication called <em>Imprimis</em> published by Hillsdale College.  This month had a conversation with Justice Thomas talking about his book<em> My Grandfather&#8217;s Son.  </em>I have long admire Justice Thomas and really enjoyed this article.  I am only going to give a few quotes from the article because of copyright laws but,  if you would like to get <em>Imprimis, </em>which is sent free from Hillsdale you can write to:Hillsdale College, 33 E. College St., Hillsdale, MI 49242-9989.  I highly recommend it.</p>
<p>Justice Thomas: &#8220;When my grandfather was raising me, people didn&#8217;t talk about their rights so much.  They talked about civil rights, yes, but they didn&#8217;t simply talk about rights and freedom.  They talked more about the responsibilities that came with freedom &#8211; about the fact that if you were to have freedom, you had to be responsible for it.  What my grandfather believed was that people have their responsibilities, and that if they are left alone to fulfill their responsibilities, that is freedom.  Honesty and responsibility, those are the things he taught.&#8221;</p>
<p>Justice Thomas: &#8220;It&#8217;s the same thing in civil society.  We&#8217;re too focused on the benefits of a civil society and we think too little about the obligations we have- the obligations to be civil, to learn about our history and our government, to conduct ourselves in a disciplined way, to help others, to take care of our homes.  Too many conversations today have to do with rights and wants.  There is not enough talk about responsibilities and duties.&#8221;</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more with Justice Thomas and his grandfather.   That is what I feel we have lost in America with all our big government programs it hasn&#8217;t help people be independent and free but dependent.  A whole generation has not been taught the customs and culture of our Nation.  They do not know where we have come from and what principles have made us the most prospersous people with a middle class that has had the blessings of abundances little known by millions in the world.</p>
<p>Frederick Bastiat the French political economist said, &#8220;Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws.  On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ours is the oldest Constitution in the world.  For the last six thousand years of human history perhaps less than 1 percent of the human family has experienced freedom, as we know it.   I ask this question?  Have we been wise beneficiaries of the gift entrusted to us?</p>
<p>Sylvia Tenney Allen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA["Reflections" by George Roche III - Imprimis, October 1972]]></title>
<link>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/reflections-by-george-roche-iii-imprimis-october-1972/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 03:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>poststop</dc:creator>
<guid>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/reflections-by-george-roche-iii-imprimis-october-1972/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the Imprimi]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the <a href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis.asp">Imprimis</a> newsletter from Hillsdale college.</em></p>
<p>This issue contains a few thoughts (reflections) by Mr. Roche on four different topics.</p>
<ol>
<li>The Right Hand and Left Hand &#8211; Federal money always means federal control. Federal control means federal oversight. Federal oversight means growth of federal agencies.</li>
<li>Sesame Street</li>
<li>Parental Responsibility &#8211; Roche discusses the intrusion of the state upon the schooling system in the name of &#8220;sociological jurisprudence&#8221;.</li>
<li>London the Price of Socialism &#8211; It costs a lot, and still does.</li>
</ol>
<p>Roche&#8217;s comments on Sesame Street or well worth reading.  I recently read a chapter from the book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1566634954?ie=UTF8&#38;tag=townline-20&#38;linkCode=as2&#38;camp=1789&#38;creative=9325&#38;creativeASIN=1566634954">Liberation&#8217;s Children: Parents and Kids in Postmodern Age</a> in which many of the same thoughts are expressed. In short, Sesame Street isn&#8217;t all that it is cracked up to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA["Consumerism" by Arthur Shenfield - Imprimis, September 1972]]></title>
<link>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/consumerism-by-arthur-shenfield-imprimis-september-1972/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>poststop</dc:creator>
<guid>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/consumerism-by-arthur-shenfield-imprimis-september-1972/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the Imprimi]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the <a href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis.asp">Imprimis</a> newsletter from Hillsdale college.</em></p>
<p>The target of this article is the consumerist or &#8220;champion of the consumer&#8221;.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The so-called consumerist movement is a movement of self-appointed friends of the consumer whose activities, if they were successful, would destroy him.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The brunt of the attack focuses on the activities of Ralph Nader. He attributes the source of Mr. Nader&#8217;s popularity to a few points, I will cite two here.</p>
<ul>
<li>Citizens think of others as fools (as consumers) in need of protection by the government. I loved this quote.&#8221;The grim joke is that while Mr. Nader tells the people that they are fools as consumers (for that is his real message, though he does not put it that way), he assures them that they are not fools as voters with the power to implement his legislative proposals. Yet all experience shows that most people are much wiser as consumers than as voters.&#8221;</li>
<li>The myth that corporations hold great power.</li>
</ul>
<p>In regards to the latter point I agree that the hostility towards corporations is quite irrational at times. However, I do disagree somewhat. A number of large (usually very large) corporations presently exercise great power through political donations and lobbyists. Taking agriculture as an example (and I think some of this may be true of the telecom industry) there are many laws which are backed by large corporations but actually stifle competition by making it impossible for small producers to operate (see <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0963810952?ie=UTF8&#38;tag=townline-20&#38;linkCode=as2&#38;camp=1789&#38;creative=9325&#38;creativeASIN=0963810952">Everything I Want To Do Is Illegal: War Stories From the Local Food Front</a>).</p>
<p>Shenfield goes on to document the methods of the consumerist.</p>
<ul>
<li>The establishment of new, better and stricter standards of quality, safety, fitness etc.</li>
<li>The regulation of industry.</li>
<li>The appointment of public interest representatives on the boards of large corporations.</li>
</ul>
<p>He ends strong with the following quote.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The consumerist movement is a typical populist movement. Its roots are ignorance and discontent. There will always be ignorance and there will always be discontent. Therefore there will always be populist movements. But like the others the consumerist movement will have its day and fade away. We shall not hear much of Mr. Nader in a few years&#8217; time.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>How I wish that had been true. Some of the research I did while reading this article turned up what looks to be an <a href="http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2006/11/peltzman_on_reg.html">interesting podcast from Sam Pelztman of Econotalk</a>.</p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA["What's Going On?" by Phil Crane - Imprimis, August 1972]]></title>
<link>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/whats-going-on-by-phil-crane-imprimis-august-1972/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 04:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>poststop</dc:creator>
<guid>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/10/24/whats-going-on-by-phil-crane-imprimis-august-1972/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the Imprimi]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the <a href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis.asp">Imprimis</a> newsletter from Hillsdale college.</em></p>
<p>Simply put this article is a warning about ineptitude of government. Crane begins the article with three assumption held in Washington in 1972 (and still relevant).</p>
<ol>
<li>The disposition to treat problems as crises.</li>
<li>The notion that government, particularly the national government has the answer to all our dilemmas.</li>
<li>That the mere allocation and spending of money will eliminate these problems.</li>
</ol>
<p>Crane goes on in the article to offer up some examples by discussing the Water Control Act of 1972, attempts at a nationalized health care system, and the inefficiency of the US. Postal Service. The answer to most of these problems (then and now) is found in the quote below.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Possibly there is still a better way. Under a truly federalist system, not only is there a division of powers within the national government but also a distinct division between the national, state, and local realms of authority. The real powers, as Jefferson pointed out, were intended to be vested in county government, and never were we to turn over to government that which is better solved in the private sector. Further, everything, unless specified to the contrary in the Constitution, should have remained in the private domain.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>In &#8220;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/014303653X?ie=UTF8&#38;tag=townline-20&#38;linkCode=as2&#38;camp=1789&#38;creative=9325&#38;creativeASIN=014303653X">Amusing Ourselves To Death</a>&#8221; Neil Postman writes that the invention of the telegraph brought us information from all over the world, most of it being of a trivial nature in the sense that it had no immediate effect on the life of the person receiving it. Information intake has been growing ever since and the depth of that information is shallower than ever. Initially one effect of this was to see problems and their solutions as being of a national nature. Two world wars, the depression, and the cold war must have reinforced these views. Additionally nationalism was still cool. We are presently moving towards the view that every issue is a global issue requiring a global solution. Instead of solving the problem of poverty in our neighborhood, city or state we are now going to wipe out poverty from an entire continent (thank you Bono).</p>
<p>Crane ends with this remark.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The Gulliver in our private enterprise economy is being strangled by the proliferation of Lilliputians in all phases of government. Witness the endless stream of entangling legislation, implemented by an ever enveloping bureaucracy, and enforced by a multiplying cast of alphabet agencies. A time may soon come when Gulliver will be unable to rise again.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p align="center">I think Gulliver may be down for the count.  I will end with a chart of our national debt adjusted for inflation. I really don&#8217;t know a whole heck of a lot about economics but I do ask myself the question, &#8220;Is anyone else a little worried about this?&#8221;</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/faq.html"><img src="http://townline.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/debt.gif?w=418&#038;h=357" alt="debt.gif" height="357" width="418" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA["The Dangers of Price Controls" by Henry Hazlitt - Imprimis, July 1972]]></title>
<link>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/the-dangers-of-price-controls-by-henry-hazlitt-imprimis-july-1972/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>poststop</dc:creator>
<guid>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/the-dangers-of-price-controls-by-henry-hazlitt-imprimis-july-1972/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the Imprimi]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the <a href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis.asp">Imprimis</a> newsletter from Hillsdale college.</i></p>
<p>This issue of Imprimis is about price controls. The assertion being made is plain.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The first thing to be said about wage and price fixing is that it is harmful at any time and under any conditions.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I found that a number of books by Henry Hazlitt are available for free . Look at the bottom of this <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Hazlitt">wikipedia entry</a> for links.  I already believe that the government has no business setting prices (this would not include profiteering during a disaster) . I am limiting my remarks to things that are either new to me or generate some new thought. Here are my take-aways.</p>
<ul>
<li>Nixon fixed prices in 1972 for a few months, I didn&#8217;t know that. I need to research the history of price controls in the United States. &#8220;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0691041474">Monetary History of the United States</a>&#8221; by Milton Friedman looks like an interesting start. Sure hope that library has a copy!</li>
<li>Pricing is an extremely complicated process and there is no reason to put confidence in a large federal bureaucracy for this task.</li>
<li>There are potentially constitutional issues to consider.</li>
</ul>
<p><i>Dec. 31, 2007 &#8211; Listening to some audio from Mises.org today and one of the books that is mentioned as required reading is Hazlitt&#8217;s &#8220;Economics in One Lesson&#8221; which is <a href="http://jim.com/econ/contents.html">available online here</a>. If you happen to be a homeschooler I hope you will consider a solid foundation in economics as part of your curriculum.</i></p>
<p><b><a href="http://poststop.wordpress.com/tag/economics/">Click here</a> to see more of my thoughts on economics.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA["The World's Most Important Person" by Leonard E. Read - Imprimis, June 1972]]></title>
<link>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/10/20/the-worlds-most-important-person-by-leonard-e-read-imprimis-june-1972/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 07:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>poststop</dc:creator>
<guid>http://townline.wordpress.com/2007/10/20/the-worlds-most-important-person-by-leonard-e-read-imprimis-june-1972/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the Imprimi]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>A series of short posts summarizing my thoughts as I work my way through the archives of the <a href="http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis.asp">Imprimis</a> newsletter from Hillsdale college.</em></p>
<p>As you might guess the most important person is you, no surprise there (although I don&#8217;t agree). He begins well by pointing out that we should seek to live life consistently and we should do so by adopting a basic premise from which all reasoning begins. In his case he asked himself the most probing question possible, &#8220;what is man&#8217;s earthly purpose?&#8221; Based on three assumptions he makes he comes to the following conclusion.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It is to see how close one can come during his earthly moments to expanding his own consciousness into a harmony with Infinite Consciousness. Or, in lay terms, to see how close one can come during his earthly moments to a realization of those creative potentialities uniquely his own, all of us being greatly varied in this respect.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Read bases his conclusion upon three assumptions. His first assumption is that &#8220;man did not create himself&#8221;. I am not convinced the other two are right (you can read these for yourself)  but it is a great question.  The first question from the Westminster Shorter Catechism asks &#8220;What is the chief end of man?&#8230;Mans&#8217; chief end is to glorify God and enjoy him forever.&#8221; The Shorter Catechism comes to a clearer and more succinct conclusion.</p>
<p>Moving on Read continues to argue for the importance of working through all of life in consistent accordance with your premises.  He then goes on to offer a helpful explanation of one of Immanuel Kant&#8217;s premises by using the following maxim.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I have a moral right to my life, my livelihood, my liberty. Is that good? According to Kant, that is good only if you can concede that same right to every other human being—universality. Can I? Yes, I can. Therefore, it is good. Let me reverse the maxim and watch it come through. I have a moral right to take the life, the livelihood, the liberty of another. Is that good? According to Kant, that is good only if you can rationally concede the right of murder, theft, enslavement to every other person on earth. Can I? I cannot. Therefore, it is not good.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Read points out that it is unlikely that Kant could have lived in manner consistent with this premise and therefore it is critical that we continue to seek truth and expand our consciousness through introspection and improvement of self. Read goes on to comment about governments and this is where his speech offers the most provocative insights.</p>
<blockquote><p><font color="red"> &#8220;In order to know what government should and should not do, you must know what government is and is not. I have been saying for years that the essential nature of government is organized force.&#8221;</font></p>
<p><font color="red">&#8220;The distinction between you as an agent of government and you as a private citizen is as an agent of government you have a constabulary—an organized force—behind you: you issue an edict and I obey or take the consequences. If this organized force be removed from behind you, you are restored to private citizenship&#8221;</font></p>
<p><font color="red">&#8220;It (government) can inhibit, restrain, prohibit, penalize. The next logical question is, what in all good conscience should be restrained, penalized, prohibited?&#8221;</font></p>
<p><font color="red">&#8220;What we have to recognize is that this physical force is definitely not a creative force.&#8221;</font></p>
<p><font color="red">&#8220;All of this is by way of saying that we should confine government to inhibiting the destructive actions of men, and that all creative actions, without any exception whatsoever, should be left to men acting freely, privately, cooperatively, voluntarily, competitively. That is how I draw the line.&#8221;</font></p></blockquote>
<p>Read&#8217;s point here is to say that a government should not act in such a way as to inhibit this pursuit of what I will call the &#8220;grand premise&#8221; (although that is exactly the system most of us unknowingly live happily within today in my opinion). Read uses the image of a clenched fist in describing the role of government, I can only add that perhaps a better image is a Nanny with a clenched fist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
