Tags » Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change

IPCC very quietly released Part 3 of AR5 The Movie

UPDATE: 07/20/2014 07:39 PM (PDT)

In a comment below, the amazingly awesome Alex has provided a link to his transcript of Part 3 of AR5 The Movie. 339 more words

Climateria

Illinois peeps, check out - Skeptic of Climate Change Finds Himself a Target of Suspicion

John Christy, a highly credentialed University of Alabama professor, says warming predictions have been greatly overstated. His critics are many.. via NYT U.S. http://ift.tt/W7A1sT

IFTTT

Sustainability Reads of the Week: 7/7-7/13

All About climate change this week-

To Improve Accuracy, BBC Tells Its Reporters To Stop Giving Air Time To Climate Deniers

The BBC recently announced that they would give significantly less airtime to “people who deny climate change exists.. 396 more words

Sustainability Reads Of The Week

UN enters US$4.5 trillion twilight zone

By way of introduction, just in case you missed it, there are at least two new kids on the new, improved, ever-growing UNEP (United Nations Environment Program) block (or… 1,274 more words

Climateria

IPCC Method Of Proving The 'Human Caused Warming' (AGW) Hypothesis Forced Deliberate Creation of Misinformation

Guest essay by Dr. Tim Ball

“Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people, who have a right, from the frame of their nature, to knowledge, as their great Creator, who does nothing in vain, has given them understandings, and a desire to know; but besides this, they have a right, an indisputable, unalienable, indefeasible, divine right to that most dreaded and envied kind of knowledge; I mean, of the characters and conduct of their rulers.” — John Adams, Dissertation on Canon and Feudal Law, 1765… 1,537 more words

Opinion

Ken McMurtrie reblogged this on The GOLDEN RULE and commented:

An impressive article that explains the lack of valid science and the extent of political manipulation that props up the warmist alarmism. An extract: "What is a “bombshell” paper? Invariably, it was one that contradicted their claims. Normally, these were ones that showed current climate is well within natural variability and not linked to human activity. The fundamental objective of the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) hypothesis is to show human behavior and particularly industrial development is unnatural and creating unnatural changes. This illusion allows them to point to any natural event and imply it is unnatural. Skeptical evidence consistently showed it was not, but most people didn’t know, so, sadly, it was effective." Ample evidence to back up all the skeptic's criticisms of "climate change" theories and actions.

NOAA/NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000

Prior to the year 2000, NASA showed US temperatures cooling since the 1930′s, and 1934 much warmer than 1998.

NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate?

304 more words

Ken McMurtrie reblogged this on The GOLDEN RULE and commented:

Are readers now prepared to think clearly about what they have been told about catastrophic global warming requiring drastic financial, political and social upheavals? There never was sufficient scientific evidence to support the alarmists claims. Now that this is becoming obvious to the alarmists, they are resorting to even more extreme behaviour, blatant cheating, in fact.

Moore's Law: CO2 Good; Climate Change Bunk; Greens Follow Religious Fundamentalism

“Climate change” is a theory for which there is “no scientific proof at all” says the co-founder of Greenpeace. And the green movement has become a “combination of extreme political ideology and religious fundamentalism rolled into one.” 236 more words

Climate News

Ken McMurtrie reblogged this on The GOLDEN RULE and commented:

A meaningful contribution by a once supporter of "global warming" need for action, provides much needed rational discussion. "“The certainty among many scientists that humans are the main cause of climate change, including global warming, is not based on the replication of observable events. It is based on just two things, the theoretical effect of human-caused greenhouse gas emissions, predominantly carbon dioxide, and the predictions of computer models using those theoretical calculations. There is no scientific “proof” at all.” "