Blogs about: Junk Dna
Featured Blog
Hammering nails in the "junk-DNA" coffin
Image via Wikipedia Enough talk (see this previous post and links within), on to the peer-reviewed science. Below you will find a list of references that I hope will contribute to the fall of the… more →
BIOpinionated
Junk DNA gets a voice
empower2go wrote 3 weeks ago: "Junk DNA" Courtesy Crystal Links.com 2009 By Amy Price PhD Not so many years ago we w … more →
How 'Junk DNA' Can Impact Evolvability
Kambiz Kamrani wrote 1 month ago: Many have written how the term ‘junk DNA’ is an imperfect one, and how junk DNA may have … more →
More Function for Junk DNA
The Reactionary Researcher wrote 1 month ago: I’ve never been fond of the term “junk DNA”; the term seems to be loaded with a st … more →
Noi date asupra ADN-ului necodificator
liftingshadows wrote 1 month ago: Junk-DNA era denumirea dată de oamenii de ştiinţă la ceea ce este ADN-ul necodificator din genomul u … more →
The Concept of Junk DNA Is Slowly Becoming No More
— 1 comment
Michael wrote 2 months ago: Non-coding DNA and RNA have been a major topic of debate in the realm of science between creationist … more →
Discovery: the Higher Coding of DNA
— 2 comments
pluribusone wrote 2 months ago: An exciting discovery has been made through the use of Noetitek™: The structure of human DNA is a d … more →
good news: HIV can be cured using our own "junk" DNA
Species without Junk DNA Risked Extinction
HO wrote 3 months ago: Murdoch University scientists have made an exciting discovery. Their hypothesis, argues that DNA jun … more →
"Junk-RNA" Going the Same Direction as "Junk-DNA" - Evolution News and Views
Donatello wrote 3 months ago: A good article by Casey Luskin over at Evolution News and Views: When large-scale function was dete … more →
Faith & Science Forum Questions: Part 3
Jordan wrote 4 months ago: Question: How does the human genome project help prove or disprove evolution/God etc. Answer: That i … more →
Do We Need Darwinism To Advance the Biological Sciences?
— 1 comment
Bill Pratt wrote 4 months ago: Dr. Philip Skell, in a recent article posted on Forbes.com, says “no.” Skell correctly … more →
Junk DNA?
Rev. Tommy Davis, DDCS wrote 6 months ago: Revealing Purpose in “Junk” DNA by Frank Sherwin, M.A.* Chromosomes are compact linear e … more →
More DNA Alteration Research
hiddenlight777 wrote 8 months ago: More DNA Research Each DNA strand is like a computer that connects with all and receives all. DNA … more →
Restul inutil al ADN-ului este functional
— 6 comments
liftingshadows wrote 8 months ago: Cromozomii sunt structurile nucleare care au rolul de transmitere a informatiei genetice. Acestia su … more →
Hammering nails in the "junk-DNA" coffin
— 8 comments
sciphu wrote 8 months ago: Image via Wikipedia Enough talk (see this previous post and links within), on to the peer-revie … more →
Hitting three peeves with one stone
— 4 comments
sciphu wrote 9 months ago: Everyone’s talking about their pet peeves, I thought maybe I should too. Here are three of … more →
ID has problems with keeping its dogma straight
glen1davidson wrote 9 months ago: But in fact, DNA isn’t exactly like a blueprint. Only a fraction of its sections are directly … more →
Hey junk people, I accept your challenge (part II)
— 4 comments
sciphu wrote 9 months ago: A follow up from this post and an ongoing discussion with Professor Larry Moran over at Sandwalk. Le … more →
Hey junk people, I accept your challenge (part I)
— 5 comments
sciphu wrote 9 months ago: Some say that almost a half of the human DNA is “junk”, I say that the evidence indicati … more →
Have your say. Start a blog.
See our free features →
An 
Contraption
