I will have a detailed and reasoned critique of The Sedona Conference® Commentary on Achieving Quality in the E-Discovery Process out as soon as possible. I think this is pretty important stuff, so I … more →
Mullen on Law 2.0+R. Mullen wrote 6 months ago: I will have a detailed and reasoned critique of The Sedona Conference® Commentary on Achieving Quali … more →
proforozco wrote 6 months ago: With the rise of Twitter it was inevitable that intellectual property issues would surface regarding … more →
proforozco wrote 7 months ago: I met Allan Tokuda when I was a Teaching and Research Fellow at Northwestern University. I was helpi … more →
R. Mullen wrote 9 months ago: Found an incredible site today, the H5 site. It’s a lot easier doing this when you have 30 ind … more →
proforozco wrote 10 months ago: A few weeks ago I was part of a panel on intellectual property controversies at Michigan Tech. One o … more →
R. Mullen wrote 10 months ago: I didn’t think so. So, I totally agree that we can do away with the Bates system for identifyi … more →
proforozco wrote 10 months ago: The Web has transformed how we gather, process and view information. Yet, the legal system has large … more →
R. Mullen wrote 10 months ago: Something to think about, that goes beyond the issue of multi-byte data ( a problem that can be solv … more →
annewelsh wrote 1 year ago: James Mullan (AKA The Running Librarian) has posted the slides from his presentation to the City Leg … more →
R. Mullen wrote 2 years ago: Here’s something that promises to be worth sticking to the bedpost tonight: Proceedings of the … more →
lawvol wrote 2 years ago: Once again, the folks at TechnoLawyer and the TechnoLawyer Blog have released their yearly Blawg and … more →