<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>marriage-licenses &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/marriage-licenses/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "marriage-licenses"</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:22:36 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Story County Recorder Vandekamp is a yes]]></title>
<link>http://iowadefensealliance.com/2009/04/22/story-county-recorder-vandekamp-is-a-yes/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>amesvoter</dc:creator>
<guid>http://iowadefensealliance.com/2009/04/22/story-county-recorder-vandekamp-is-a-yes/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[April 27th should be just another spring day in Iowa. Not this year. Citizens will be watching what ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[April 27th should be just another spring day in Iowa. Not this year. Citizens will be watching what ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[FindLaw: Iowa's Supreme Court: State's Same-Sex Marriage Ban for Gays, Lesbians is Unconstitutional]]></title>
<link>http://californiafamilylawparalegal.wordpress.com/2009/04/06/findlaw-iowas-supreme-court-states-same-sex-marriage-ban-for-gays-lesbians-is-unconstitutional/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Lori Paul</dc:creator>
<guid>http://californiafamilylawparalegal.wordpress.com/2009/04/06/findlaw-iowas-supreme-court-states-same-sex-marriage-ban-for-gays-lesbians-is-unconstitutional/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[This is an interesting article related to same sex marriages where the Iowa county which declined to]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>This is an interesting article related to same sex marriages where the Iowa county which declined to issue marriage licenses to the gay and lesbian plaintiffs offered no particular governmental reason for not issuing the marriage licenses.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Marriage Question]]></title>
<link>http://janesoffensive.wordpress.com/2009/03/15/the-marriage-question/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>janesoffensive</dc:creator>
<guid>http://janesoffensive.wordpress.com/2009/03/15/the-marriage-question/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The Marriage Question Why not get the government out of the marriage discussion altogether? Let the ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center;margin:0 0 10pt;"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&#34;"><strong><em>The Marriage Question</em></strong></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0 0 10pt;"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&#34;">Why not get the government out of the marriage discussion altogether? Let the churches, synagogues, temples, mosques, etc., handle marriages—<em>after</em> the couples have their domestic partner licenses. Not every couple would choose to marry, but the government can require licenses for <em>all</em> domestic partnerships. That would take care of recording the certificates, the legalities of taxation, survivor’s rights, hospital visitation, inheritance, and so on. Then those partnerships <em>would not have to be just between cohabitating husbands and wives</em>. There are many old people with no children who would benefit from living with their old widowed sister or brother, and thus both could have some tax benefits and a legally defined sharing of expenses. More and more old people who own a home can’t afford the taxes or the upkeep and have a dear friend in similar circumstances. They could live together as licensed domestic partners, again with tax benefits and legal protections. Obviously, there would have to be rules and agreements worked out on the money arrangements, especially if they have previous heirs, but it would be better than both of them winding up in nursing homes or having to move in with their children. Certainly there would have to be strong rules against the licensing of short-term roommate situations. AARP, please see what your readership thinks of this.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0 0 10pt;"><span style="font-size:12pt;line-height:115%;font-family:&#34;">When I married in a religious ceremony in 1959, not only did we have to go to the government first to get our license, we also had to have a blood test. In the face of AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases, should we also re-institute blood tests? Is it worth the financial cost? </span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[WeHo Marriage Photos, or How I Joined the Media Circus]]></title>
<link>http://transpassage.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/weho-marriage-photos-or-how/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>transpassage</dc:creator>
<guid>http://transpassage.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/weho-marriage-photos-or-how/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Although this totally isn&#8217;t my picture &#8211; I had a video camera at the event for the organ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><img style="float:left;margin:3px;" src="http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa320/projsafe/Transpose%20blog/2587087019_6c2e9fc76c1.jpg" border="2" alt="" width="500" height="333" />Although this totally isn&#8217;t my picture &#8211; I had a video camera at the event for the organization that I work for, so I was unable to take my own shots &#8211; I totally had to share this with everyone. The shot was taken from on top of the stage in the front of the gymnasium at the West Hollywood park across from the Pacific Design Center on San Vicente and Santa Monica. It shows the amazingly crazy media mob that took over while George Takei (yes, of Star Trek) and his partner, Brad Altman, got their marriage license in WeHo.  How romantic, right? </p>
<p>Actually, I just realized that you can see me in the french blue polo on the right side of the image jockeying for a place with my video camera over the heads of other media folks in front of me.  That&#8217;s highly entertaining.</p>
<p>In fact, here I am too, filming the opening press conference (blurred, sitting down, french blue polo again, left side): </p>
<p><img style="float:left;margin:3px;" src="http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa320/projsafe/Transpose%20blog/2587078413_6b2a1a55601.jpg" border="2" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></p>
<p>I have no idea why I find these photos so amusing. </p>
<p>Really all I wanted to say was that it was incredibly exciting being present at such a historic moment &#8211; and that the media are kind of like man-eating piranhas (whom I apparently fit in too well with, because I forcibly ejected from the main room after disobeying the &#8220;no filming&#8221; policy).  Oh &#8211; and that I never want forget the sound of the small tinkling bells mingled with applause inside the gym everytime someone&#8217;s number was called to go up and get their marriage license. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a big proponent of marriage, at least not marriage in an assimilationist way (unless that&#8217;s what you want); however, it was nonetheless an incredibly moving event to witness.  Also, have I mentioned that I was paid to be at this event?  How cool is my job!     </p>
<p>For more photos of the media circus that occurred at the park when WeHo started handing out marriage licenses on Tuesday, check out the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/weho/sets/72157605668626249/">West Hollywood Gets Married photostream</a> on the City of West Hollywood&#8217;s official Flickr account.</p>
<p>(Photo credits<strong>: </strong>Brett White)<strong> </strong></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Marriage Licenses In Texas]]></title>
<link>http://errolllevant.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/marriage-licenses-in-texas/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 20:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>errolllevant</dc:creator>
<guid>http://errolllevant.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/marriage-licenses-in-texas/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The governor is about to receive a bill that is stirring some discussion in the state. The cost of a]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>The governor is about to receive a bill that is stirring some discussion in the state. The cost of a marriage license is &#8220;proposed&#8221; to be &#8220;wed&#8221; to pre-marital counseling. If the couple has gone through an eight hour counseling course on how to be good mates, the license is free. If you reject the counseling, the cost will be $60, twice the current fee!</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
