<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>marthas-mulligan-tour &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/marthas-mulligan-tour/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "marthas-mulligan-tour"</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:20:10 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Boston Globe Un-Unlikes Martha]]></title>
<link>http://campaignoutsider.com/2010/05/14/boston-globe-un-unlikes-martha/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 05:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Campaign Outsider</dc:creator>
<guid>http://campaignoutsider.com/2010/05/14/boston-globe-un-unlikes-martha/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Post in haste, repent at leisure. The hardworking staff&#8217;s rare midday post on Thursday, which]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post in haste, repent at leisure.</p>
<p>The hardworking staff&#8217;s rare midday <a href="http://campaignoutsider.com/2010/05/13/gail-unlikes-martha/">post</a> on Thursday, which detailed New York Times op-ed bridesmaid Gail Collins&#8217; drive-by snarking of Martha Coakley, went up before we caught that day&#8217;s <a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/2010/05/13/">Boston Globe</a> Coakley-palooza.</p>
<p>Page One <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/05/13/coakley_changes_tack_on_trail/?page=full">headline</a> about Martha&#8217;s Mulligan Tour:</p>
<h5>
<blockquote>
<h5><span style="color:#444444;"><strong>Unopposed Coakley goes all out</strong></span></h5>
<h5><span style="color:#444444;">Does the meet, greet she’d been accused of shunning</span></h5>
</blockquote>
</h5>
<p><em>Yeah but</em> graf:</p>
<blockquote><p>She remains stung by the impression that many voters formed during her Senate campaign — that she was aloof, that she took them for granted, and that she didn’t want it badly enough.</p></blockquote>
<p>But wait &#8211; there&#8217;s more. Globe op-ed columnist Joan Vennochi also <a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2010/05/13/for_coakley_a_lonely_reinvention/">jumped on</a> the Coakley Express Thursday, albeit in a less upbeat fashion.</p>
<p>Headline:</p>
<blockquote>
<h5><span style="color:#444444;"><strong>For Coakley, a lonely reinvention</strong></span></h5>
</blockquote>
<p>Vennochi&#8217;s <em>yeah but</em> graf:</p>
<blockquote><p>She was lampooned on “Saturday Night Live’’ and ripped apart in post-mortems that used words like complacency, entitlement, and incompetence to describe her failed strategy. Hell hath no fury like a political party scorned by the electorate. Massachusetts Democrats are still bitter over the GOP win and they still blame Coakley for running a poor campaign.</p></blockquote>
<p>But never accused her of being &#8220;unpleasant.&#8221;</p>
<p>Gail Collins, take note.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
