Barack Obama wants to create a “Civilian National Security Force” that is “just as strong, just as well funded” as the US military.

Why?  What is wrong with the US Coast Guard and the US National Guard?

Ah, the difference is that the “National Security Force” will be under the direct control of the president.

That should strike all of you as being a reproduction of Adolf Hitler’s Gestapo and Schutzstaffel (the SS): security forces under the direct control of the party/national leader.

Barack Obama is clearly a socialist who is borrowing from the greatest leaders in socialims including Adolf Hitler.

That is a radical departure from the US Constitution which puts the control of the military under Congress not the president.

By Kellene Bishop

September 8, 2009. Make it a Day of Freedom!

In response to a recent article posted by World Net Daily: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=108653

I implore you to remember.  Remember that as parents and guardians, you have a choice. You can choose freedom or indoctrination and manipulation. Remember that parents are responsible to watch and be wary of what their children are subjected to. I wouldn’t subject my children, grandchildren, nieces, nephews, or kids of my friends to this man’s words any more than I would to pornography or a Muslim hate speech.

September 8, 2009 is a day in which ALL parents/guardians should exercise their freedom by keeping their children at home. Come on. We keep the children at home so that teachers can mentally regroup or so that we can honor the veterans who fought for our country.  Surely this date is just as deserving.  Make this date a true a FREEDOM DAY! Show Washington D.C. that you will NOT allow them to raise your children. That you don’t condone this man’s methods. That you don’t respect him as a guardian to the youth in your life. Show them that liars, thieves, and whoremongers do not merit the attention and focus of our children except in moments of self-defense. Show the powers that be that they exist solely to serve you, and not the other way around. Remind them who really rules this nation–We the People. Do not force your children to bow down to the self-anointed King Obama!

I’m not asking you to stand on the bridge at Lexington with a loaded gun.  I’m not asking you to sacrifice the lives of your sons and daughters as they go off to fight in a war for freedom. I’m not asking you to sacrifice your uttermost farthing. I’m not asking you to attend a Tea Party or other rally. I’m begging you to do this one simple act so that you can clearly show your demand of freedom—freedom from governmental oppression. Freedom from forced indoctrination. Freedom to act and choose that which is good over that which is questionable!

If you can’t take this one simple stand on Sept. 8, 2009, then what can you really do? Then begs the question “do you deserve the freedom that’s provided to you every day?” What will your children have in 10 years from now?

Show your children that freedom isn’t a passive gift. Show them that it’s a gift from God, not from some man standing in front of a fancy seal and mocking the flag of our nation.  This is the SAME man who threatens to forcibly vaccinate your children, steal thousands of dollars from you to give to criminal CEO heads, lies to you about his health care plan, lies to you about what the real state of inflation and the Consumer Price Index really is, and disrespects your religious beliefs by claiming that they don’t exist or that they are akin to those of right wing extremists. Is this a man you want your children to listen to? Frankly, you would truly educate your children more if you had them listen with you to a tirade by Hitler, Mussolini, Charles Manson, or Karl Marx.

Obama’s Army or the  G.I.V.E. bill has passed bother the House and Senate and is now in the “compromise” committee where the two bills will be fused into one.   The following clause was stripped from the House bill but it can always be put back in behind closed doors.

From Family Security Matters  March 30, 2009

“here was something else in the original bill that should give us pause (emphasis mine):

(6) Whether a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people could be developed, and how such a requirement could be implemented in a manner that would strengthen the social fabric of the Nation and overcome civic challenges by bringing together people from diverse economic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds.

“This wording was stripped out of the original bill before being sent to the Senate, but as the DC Examiner notes, “The section could be restored during the Senate-House conference committee meeting. A new, separate bill containing that language has since been introduced in the House.” The GIVE Act has since passed in the Senate, 79-19.”

See also:
H.R. 1388: Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act (GovTrack.us)

“A bill entitled “The Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act, an Act to reauthorize and reform the national service laws.”

Another  most important report! SEE HERE.

From FoxNews:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/23/fusion-centers-expand-criteria-identify-militia-members/

‘Fusion Centers’ Expand Criteria to Identify

Militia Members

Do you like Ron Paul or oppose abortion? You may be a member of a militia, according to a new report by a government information collection agency.

If you’re an anti-abortion activist, or if you display political paraphernalia supporting a third-party candidate or a certain Republican member of Congress, if you possess subversive literature, you very well might be a member of a domestic paramilitary group.

That’s according to “The Modern Militia Movement,” a report by the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC), a government collective that identifies the warning signs of potential domestic terrorists for law enforcement communities.

“Due to the current economical and political situation, a lush environment for militia activity has been created,” the Feb. 20 report reads. “Unemployment rates are high, as well as costs of living expenses. Additionally, President Elect Barrack [sic] Obama is seen as tight on gun control and many extremists fear that he will enact firearms confiscations.”

MIAC is one of 58 so-called “fusion centers” nationwide that were created by the Department of Homeland Security, in part, to collect local intelligence that authorities can use to combat terrorism and related criminal activities. More than $254 million from fiscal years 2004-2007 went to state and local governments to support the fusion centers, according to the DHS Web site.

During a press conference last week in Kansas City, Mo., DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano called fusion centers the “centerpiece of state, local, federal intelligence-sharing” in the future.

“Let us not forget the reason we are here, the reason we have the Department of Homeland Security and the reason we now have fusion centers, which is a relatively new concept, is because we did not have the capacity as a country to connect the dots on isolated bits of intelligence prior to 9/11,” Napolitano said, according to a DHS transcript.

[snip]

Now we know that it’s not just the 9/11-type incidents but many, many other types of incidents that we can benefit from having fusion centers that share information and product and analysis upwards and horizontally.”

But some say the fusion centers are going too far in whom they identify as potential threats to American security.

People who supported former third-party presidential candidates like Texas Rep. Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and former Georgia Rep. Bob Barr are cited in the report, in addition to anti-abortion activists and conspiracy theorists who believe the United States, Mexico and Canada will someday form a North American Union.

“Militia members most commonly associate with 3rd party political groups,” the report reads. “It is not uncommon for militia members to display Constitutional Party, Campaign for Liberty or Libertarian material.”

Other potential signals of militia involvement, according to the report, are possession of the Gagsden “Don’t Tread on Me” flag or the widely available anti-income tax film “America: Freedom to Fascism.”

[snip]

“It seems to implicate people who are engaging in First Amendment protected activities and suggest that something as innocuous as supporting a political candidate for office would mean that you’re harboring some ill-intent,” German told FOXNews.com. “It’s completely inappropriate.” 

[snip]

German � who claims the number of fusion centers nationwide is closer to 70 � said the centers present several troubling concerns, including their excessive secrecy, ambiguous lines of authority, the use of data mining and military participation. 

“No two are alike,” German said. “And these things are expanding rapidly.”

But MIAC officials defended their report, saying it’s not a basis for officers to take enforcement action.

“These reports sometimes mention groups or individuals who are not the subject of the document, but may be relevant to describing tendencies or trends concerning the subject of the document,” MIAC said in a statement.

Read the rest HERE:

Amazing…..just amazing!

Once again our military steps up to the plate to uphold the
US Constitution and protect the citizens of the US. Major
General Carroll D. Childers has joined Dr. Orly Taitz’
lawsuit to challenge the eligibility of Barack Obama. Not
only does Major General Childers question Obama’s eligibility,
but he is aware of the many crime and corruption connections
to Obama:

Rep. Paul Broun, a Republican congressman from Georgia, is concerned about Obama’s plans of constructing a National Security Force. He warns that it is what Hitler did in Nazi Germany.

Well I have been thinking about this for quite some time. Our President Elect, the worshipped one, he who can do no wrong, the second coming of Martin Luther King, proposes that we have a “National Civil Defense Force” that rivals the military in numbers and funding. It is a compulsory service (read as draft on a diet). I have heard of forces like this in the past, say 1920’s German “youth groups”….

So here is the background. On July 2, 2008, in a campaign speech in Colorado Springs, Barrack Obama stated that he intends to create a National Civil Defense Force. About this force he stated, “We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we set. We must have a civilian National Security Force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, and just as well funded.”

WOW! I know you are thinking I had to have made that up. Do some research. I didn’t. Let’s put that into perspective shall we? As of July of 2008, when this speech was made, The United States military consisted of approximately 1,436,500 active duty personnel with an additional 848,000 in the seven reserve components. The US defense budget in 2007 was 431.7 billion dollars with an additional 169.2 billion added to that for the war on terror. So we are talking about 2 million personnel and over 600 billion dollars. 

Thus far no one wants to press the chosen one for answers on what he might have meant on this. And the ever supportive media certainly isn’t talking about it. If Sean Hannity had said it, can you imagine the outcry? No one is even asking. But talk to Rahm Emanuel, the newly appointed White House Chief of Staff, and you can get some answers. Directly from the mouth of Rahm:

Every single American between the ages of 18 and 25 must complete 3 months of compulsory training. He feels that this will allow for a similar shared experience that will allow every participant to experience what it is like to be an American. Wait, did he just say that this service will be required in order for everyone to know what it means to be an American? That taking away someone’s rights or freedoms are necessary in order to share in the American experience? (Truer words may never have been spoken).

When asked if we are talking about living in Barracks he dodged the question. He stated rather than thinking of it as a train ride or barracks, think of it this way, it will be a common experience. Just a thought on that statement. During the Nazi eradication of Jews, it was often said that they shouldn’t think of the yellow symbols as singling them out as bad, but instead that they were “special”.

This sounds like a draft. Of course he cannot say draft or the American public would go crazy, especially those on the left. But mandatory service in the Civilian National Security Defense Force, doesn’t sound like the all volunteer army we have now. Rahm discussed this force in his book outlining the plan for America. You should look that up too. It is an interesting and sometimes scary read.

Hitler had a very similar mandatory force in Germany in the 1920’s. They were the “youth groups” of boys age 14-18. Such a fine plan to help restore the country after the devastation of World War I. These youth groups grew into the “Brownshirts”, better known as the “Storm Trooper” shock troops of the Nazi army. Russia had a civilian defense force too, of course they were better known as the “secret police”.

Now those that know me know that I think that serving in the military is a good thing, and I think everyone should do it because it assists your country while building you into a better adult. But forcing people to serve?

And what is the purpose of this massive Civilian National Security Force that is as big as our military and equally funded (bringing the annual cost of US Defense to over a trillion dollars a year)? Are we talking about a civilian police force that will eventually be the controlling forces of a police state? I mean what does he want to do with such a massive force?

I don’t want to sound like a radical here, but this is worth noting, and I am not saying that Obama wants to do what Hitler did. Hitler didn’t rise to power talking about raising up an army or seizing control or being what he would later become. He came to power under the guise of healing a ruptured country, taking care of one another, believing in the German people and their spirit. His rise to power sounded very similar to the one we are seeing today from the President Elect. That isn’t a judgement, just an observation. I am not saying that the President Elect is looking to do what Hitler did. I am just saying that this in conjunction with the sudden jump towards socialism during this campaign has me a little bit worried. 

So what do you guys think of this? Were you aware of it? Is it a good idea?

I’ve received a couple comments recently asking what we can do to prepared. First of all let me say we mere mortals have no idea on what the future has in store for us or our Republic. We can look to history to get a glimmer of what has happened in the past and knowledge of a potential future, but the exact timing or outcome of events we will never know before hand.

What I can say is, in Martial Arts we focus on three areas, MIND, BODY and SPIRIT.  To be feeble in the basic foundation of man increases the risk of failure and sorrow. There is no need to lecture or spend time on the importance of strengthening these core principles, we get enough of that in our daily lives. However, for those of you who prefer to limit victimization ask yourself, are you doing enough to reinforce what you already know? Do you remember the images of Katrina or the faces of those who fled the horrific affair of 911. How much trust do you place in the government to protect you and your loved ones.

There are those who will consistently rely upon the government. Maybe the President elects new National Security force will be there for you, or maybe this time FEMA will get it right. I recommend you read an article published by Investors Business daily. I’ve placed the link for your convenience. www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/obama_fear_and_the_security_fo.html

As for those who recall the past, I found an interesting site a couple years ago. http://www.endtimesreport.com/Site_Index.htm  Some of the information includes somewhat controversial material, and yes some of this is fixed on a scenario of doom and gloom, but better to be over prepared than caught with your pants down.

Is Obama the new Hitler? In a word, “yes”.  On Monday, Georgia Congressman and Republican Paul Brown issued a dire warning to his constituents of Obama’s plans for America. I warn you before reading any further that this posting is not for the faint of heart.

“It may sound a bit crazy and off base, but the thing is, he’s the one who proposed this national security force,” Rep. Paul Broun said of Obama in an interview Monday with The Associated Press. “I’m just trying to bring attention to the fact that we may — may not, I hope not — but we may have a problem with that type of philosophy of radical socialism or Marxism.”

What Broun is referring to is a plan that Obama first unveiled at a speech in Colorado where he called for doubling the size of the Peace Corps.  “We need to be able to deploy teams that combine agricultural specialists and engineers and linguists and cultural specialists who are prepared to go into some of the most dangerous areas alongside our military,” he said.

We these people act as Obama’s brown shirts?  In a word, “yes”.  “That’s exactly what Hitler did in Nazi Germany and it’s exactly what the Soviet Union did,” Broun said. “When he’s proposing to have a national security force that’s answering to him, that is as strong as the U.S. military, he’s showing me signs of being Marxist.”

In some ways Obama’s plans are even scarieir than Stalin’s or Hitler’s because Obama’s Gestapo will also most likely be multi-lingual and able to build dams.  Broun went on to say that he expects Obama to outlaw gun ownership leaving parts of this country very vulnerable to prarie dogs.  It would be as simple as getting a Constitutional Convention through both houses of congress and ratified through 3/4 of the states–there are a lot of unamerican states who don’t respect gun rights. Broun said, “We can’t be lulled into complacency,” Broun said. “You have to remember that Adolf Hitler was elected in a democratic Germany. I’m not comparing him to Adolf Hitler. What I’m saying is there is the potential.”  Maybe you won’t say it Representative Broun, but I will.

via Newsmax.com – Congressman Warns of Obama Dictatorship

In my past blogs I have spoke of Barack Obama having “Dictator Tendencies”  This has been what I see in the way he addresses the nation. It is the persona that he presents to me.  I have had discussions about this with other people and they have told me that to them he speaks just like a normal person.  I have argued that it is not so.  Just look at the way he delivered his speeches in comparison to any other president or president elect.  Any other person would have showed their human compassionate side.  It was so obvious that Barack Obama delivered speeches that made him look like he is the “Only Voice of Authority” and he should never be allowed to be challenged.

In the conversations people have told me that I was the only one that ever saw that in Barack Obama.  But he often also said things that seemed to just slip by the mass crowds and be absorbed as absolute truth. Like for example that “Electing John Mc Cain is the same as putting George W. Bush back into office.” That was the most absurd lie that he ever told. 

So now we analyze more things that he has said. 

Ok so what is a “National Security Force?”  Please explain.  Another more creative person than I maybe makes a “National Security Force” a lot clearer.

Some how or other I think a “National Security Force” is a lot different than the individual states “National Guard.” If Barack Obama intended to indicate that he wanted to bolster the “National Guard” why did he not use the term “National Guard?”  To me the National Guard is an organization of “Peace Keepers” and humanitarians that come to the aid of one specific incident or disaster at a time like a hurricane, Tornado or even a local civil disturbance.  The National Guard is not a “Federal Police Force” like Barack Obama suggests in one of his speeches above. If Barack Obama had said “In addition to our armed forces we have to build up our National Guard to protect our borders from any hostile invasion, illegal immigration and insuring our national security.” I would have been a lot more comfortable with his speech.  

And again it would seem by most of my friends that I am reading to much into this.  But I’m not the only one that sees this pattern with Barack Obama.

Republican Warns of Obama Dictatorship

And again I have to go back to this logo

What does this mean?  OK Red, white and blue that is were the similarity to the US flag ends.

What do the three strips represent?

The dot in the center represents one unified country with no states or opposing entities.

The blue could mean blue sky.

What does this mean? Is this the new logo for the “National Security Force?”

I have to go back to young Barack’s Mentor Frank Marshal Davis who was a member of the Communist Party of the United States of America (CPUSA).

It just seems that so much of Barack’s persona leads back to the possible conversations that Barack had between himself and Frank Marshal Davis when Barack was 10-18 years old.  I still believe that this fact is a ticking time bomb with Barack Obama.

ST

A Republican congressman from Georgia said Monday he fears that President-elect Obama will establish a Gestapo-like security force to impose a Marxist or fascist dictatorship.

“It may sound a bit crazy and off base, but the thing is, he’s the one who proposed this national security force,” Rep. Paul Broun said of Obama in an interview Monday with The Associated Press. “I’m just trying to bring attention to the fact that we may — may not, I hope not — but we may have a problem with that type of philosophy of radical socialism or Marxism.”

Broun cited a July speech by Obama that has circulated on the Internet in which the then-Democratic presidential candidate called for a civilian force to take some of the national security burden off the military.

“That’s exactly what Hitler did in Nazi Germany and it’s exactly what the Soviet Union did,” Broun said. “When he’s proposing to have a national security force that’s answering to him, that is as strong as the U.S. military, he’s showing me signs of being Marxist.”

Obama’s comments about a national security force came during a speech in Colorado about building a new civil service corps. Among other things, he called for expanding the nation’s foreign service and doubling the size of the Peace Corps “to renew our diplomacy.”

“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set,” Obama said in July. “We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

Broun said he also believes Obama likely will move to ban gun ownership if he does build a national police force.  As an Illinois state lawmaker, Obama supported a ban on semiautomatic weapons and tighter restrictions on firearms generally

SOURCE: READ MORE HERE

I have been thinking all along why Obama wanted a civilian security force as large and as well equiped as our Military and on top of that he wants to ban guns from the American citizen! I sure hope our congressmen and women are awake with at least one eye open!  This is not funny people its serious!  Why would he need such a security force?

 
LINKS:
Is Obama the New Hitler?

The Obama Youth In Obama, The Conservative Radical

Gun Sales Boom in Advance of Obama’s Inauguration

OBAMA READY TO RULE ON FIRST DAY?

LINKS:
(1) Obama’s Secret Army

Is Obama advocating a massive expenditure into a civilian corp that operates oversees as ‘ambassadors’ or a ‘community’ outreach corp to carry on the inculcation of the community organizers? If Moonbattery’s budgetary calculations are correct, where does the ‘civilian national security force’ acquire $400+ billion dollars? This budget is one half of the recent grotesque bailout figure. 

More to the point, beyond the obvious answer to the above…this is blatant brown shirt thuggery looming. I am beginning to feel like a paranoid twit as I envision the slippery slope we are being pushed toward and the inevitable confrontations that will ensue. The class warfare mentality is continually hammered home. The selfishness concept is starting. Hate speech and obedience will follow. The results of all this will not be pretty. Even if this is an overseas focus…foreign aid needs to be reconsidered downward, not upward. Another Obama priority for the great continent?    

 We’re talking about a “civilian national security force” with an annual budget of $439 billion. If you have anything negative to say about socialism or the global warming hoax, you’d better get it out of your system before this American version of the Gestapo is created, because it will certainly have the resources to discover your errant opinions and readjust them as The One and his friends deem necessary.

“No wonder the income level defining Obama’s intended victims as “the rich” keeps plummeting. To pay for this internal army, he’ll have to loot everyone down to children running lemonade stands. No doubt he’ll make up some of the costs by pulling the plug on the military, which might have incorrect notions about serving the country and the Constitution, rather than serving The One and Change.”

http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2008/11/obamas_gestapo.html

I am cross-posting this from Rose 4 Hillary where the focus is academic. Here the focus is military and defensive. This long video clip and the PDF file attachment include Barack Obama’s plan for an enormous National Defense Force composed of a multitude of “corps” including many that already exist.

On the surface, the terminology is not offensive, but if we question everything, then we have to wonder who this force is intended to defend against. I don’t think the answer is necessarily terrorists. The confidence with which Obama declared that he would “get” me/us to vote for him somehow hints that if I don’t, I am somehow the enemy. Here is the post:

If this doesn’t make your blood run cold, then this Halloween you truly are a zombie – a dead voter.

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

Obama’s Blueprint for Change proposes the establishment of a Classroom Corps (p.31). I am guessing that K – 8 teachers who have had to pass a Praxis exam, 9-12 teachers who were required to follow a liberal arts curriculum, and professors with liberal arts degrees are familiar with The Cultural Revolution and the Red Guards.

It is odd to me that colleagues of mine who voice concerns about the issue of academic freedom fail to see the implication of this Classroom Corps which echoes not only the Red Guards but also the Hitler Youth who reported statements made by teachers and professors in the classroom. Have they forgotten?

The legacy of my generation in academia includes faculty evaluation, revisionist history, and multiculturalism which is marked by a refusal to admit the existence of an American culture. To me, this adds up to cathetical principles which now are espoused according to individual philosophy but can, given the implementation of this Blueprint for Change, become the required new way of thinking , teaching, and speaking in a USA transformed by Obama.

Be careful what you wish for academicians. You just may get it! And you thought you had it bad with ratemyprofessors.com. HA! You may live to regret those chili peppers.

Now the focus above is narrow and academic, but whether you are a parent or a teacher you can see the implications of this plan. Youthful members of these corps who join to pay for college are potential spies in your own house or classroom. Another issue altogether is the degree to which these corps ARE intended to be voluntary. Is the next step conscription? Will we be impressed that first day we file for social security?

This entire entry on “conscription” is noteworthy, but one item that jumped off the page for me was the origin of military slavery (in the Middle East), another was the use of conscription for subjugation.

Oh my Homegirls, we must be very, very careful! Keep your ears close to the ground if he gets elected. National service is good. VISTA, The Peace Corps, The Teachers’ Corps – these are honorable and valuable initiatives. But national service can also be subverted for nefarious purposes which are myriad. In light of our mission, Homegirls, we must guard against the guard. Even if they are our own kids and students.

Also of interest: Impressment.

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”     ~ The Messia-uh.

We have Obama saying that he wants to fund a “national security force.” What exactly is a national security force, and what will it be protecting us from? Here is a suggested uniform for this force.

AMERICA WAKE UP, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=69601

A speech given months ago (link sent earlier) shows Obama saying that he will immediately create a national ‘security force’ with as much strength and power as the military.

Here is the link to the speech mentioned just over 1/2 way through – about a National Security Force
Here is the full speech on July 2, 2008 in Colorado Springs, Colorado  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Df2p6867_pw

And that would be for what? WHY do you need a costly armed security force in this country when we have city police, county sheriffs, FBI, fire department and state police? WHY? I leave you to your own conclusions.

BUT may I bring up another instance when a similar force was called for, and what happened then? Harkin back to your personal knowledge of, or from the history books (or just Google) the time when the infamous Brown Shirts and Black Shirts were created. And what happened then?

The potential for comparison is frankly frightening!

PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD TODAY – ALL AMERICANS MUST MUST MUST KNOW WHO THIS MAN IS AND WHERE HE WILL TAKE US. SEND EMAILS NOW PLEASE !!!!!

A flattering earthy shade of brown, perhaps?

“For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”–John F. Kennedy

Jennifer Joyce, a high-profile prosecuting attorney, is one of two who will be “reminding voters that Barack Obama is a Christian who wants to cut taxes for anyone making less than 250K$ a year.”

The video above repeats what I have previously said: this is impossible given the fact that not everyone even pays income taxes.

Aside from that, I want to know why people in Missouri or any state should tolerate prosecuters proseletysing for the Barack Obama campaign or go after ads that are “misleading”–subjective to begin with–or false, especially when Obama himself not only has lied but been caught at it.

Joyce says, “[W]e’re here to respond to any character attacks, to set the record straight,” and prosecutor Bob McColloch declares: “If they’re not going to tell the truth, then somebody’s got to step up and say, ‘Wait a minute, that’s not true, this is the truth.’” So what happens when Obama’s own campaign lies? Is this the kind of oppressive rule he intends to force of the American people?

The people of the United States have the right to hear from both parties and make determinations on their own. Not only is Obama’s technique another step towards a nanny state–deciding what is good for us–but also is a reprehensible and flagrant violation of our right to information, free speech and freedom to assemble.

Read Missouri Governor Blunt’s statement

Is this the beginning of the “national security force” he proposes to establish?

More and more every day, each time Barack Obama opens his mouth I am reminded of two scary words: Cultural Revolution. Mao had people getting in the faces and business of those he didn’t like and going after people who made critical discussions on the actions of the state. He had bands of people running around engaging in “keeping order” as well. Now Obama is advocating that his minions get in people’s faces and form a group called the “truth squad” to silence his opponents by shouting them down and attempting to deprive Americans of their constitutional rights.

So how long until he asks for criticisms and recommendations and then gulags those who respond? When comes the day in which some of us will be required to publicly account for our sins and beg for the holy status of rehabilitated?

I’d like to believe all of this is as absurd as it sounds. Fear mongering is never an effective strategy, nor is a hyperventilating kind of activism. However, questions as addressed above, extreme as they appear on the surface, should give pause to those who like or dislike Obama and consider the effects of such behavior on the part of the Illinois senator, even if no one actually is jailed or prosecuted for their dissenting views.

As Allahpundit at Hot Air writes:

[N]o one actually has to be prosecuted for this to work. Prosecution will be impossible anyway in most cases thanks to the First Amendment. The point isn’t to jail critics but merely to price the cost of prospective litigation into their decision on whether to publicly criticize The One. Add this to the threatening letters his lawyers sent to station managers over the NRA ads, the flash-mob smearingof David Freddoso, and the appeal to the Justice Department to prosecute the American Issues Project for its perfectly factual yet devastating Ayers ad. Oh, the fun we’ll have with a deep blue Congress and an Obama-run DOJ and FCC. He promised you a “new type of politics,” didn’t he?

It’s stated well and I agree, but there also should be the caution to those who will silence or be silenced on the basis of fear.

During a speech on July 2, 2008 in Colorado Spring, CO, home of US Air Force Academy, Obama states we can not rely only on the military for national security that we need a civilain National Security Force that is just as powerful and just as well funded as the military. Of note that this line was not in the prepared speech given out to the press. What is the role of this force, is it to spy on your neighbors. Is it to report on any activity that is against Obama? Where is the money to come from for this force? The fact that he said this shows that he is dangerous and that we really do not know what he and his wealthy backers have in mind for us and our country. Hear him in his own words at the YouTube link below:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igDoHZ0hVUY&eurl=http://stuckon-stupid.com/2008/07/17/what-barack-obama-proposes-formation-of-civilian-army-equal-in-size-to-us-military/

I don’t think this was what Thomas Jefferson had in mind when he wrote the Declaration of Independence.

The Obama quote is, “We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

This was slipped into a speech addressing public service, and I’m going to have to confess that I’m dumbfounded. What in the world is he proposing? A non-military security force that is funded the same as the miltary? What are their powers and why are civilians being put in charge of national security? Why shouldn’t we rely on our military to achieve national security objective? Isn’t that’s the whole reason for having a military. This needs some serious explaining. Any new government organization comparable in size and funding to the military would need explaining, but a civilian national security force is radical and illogical.

Hat Tip to Savage Politics

Posted: July 15, 2008
1:00 am Eastern

© 2008

With all the reporters covering the major presidential candidates, it amazes me no one ever seems to ask the right questions.

For several days now, WND has been hounding Barack Obama’s campaign about a statement he made July 2 in Colorado Springs – a statement that blew my mind, one that has had me scratching my head ever since.

In talking about his plans to double the size of the Peace Corps and nearly quadruple the size of AmeriCorps and the size of the nation’s military services, he made this rather shocking (and chilling) pledge: “We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

Now, since I’ve never heard anyone inside or out of government use the phrase “civilian national security force” before, I was more than a little curious about what he has in mind.

(Column continues below)

Is it possible I am the only journalist in America who sought clarification on this campaign promise?

What does it mean?

If we’re going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn’t this rather a big deal?

I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military. How is it possible their candidate is seeking to create some kind of massive but secret national police force that will be even bigger than the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put together?

Now, maybe he was misquoted by the Congressional Quarterly and the Chicago Tribune. I guess it’s possible. If so, you would think he would want to set the record straight. Maybe he misspoke. That has certainly happened before. Again, why wouldn’t the rest of my colleagues show some curiosity about such a major and, frankly, bone-chilling proposition?

Are we talking about creating a police state here?

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=69601