<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>omnifone &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/omnifone/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "omnifone"</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 08:22:09 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[El "spotify" de las empresas]]></title>
<link>http://portodalared.com/2009/10/09/spotify-de-las-empresas/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>cvillalobosv</dc:creator>
<guid>http://portodalared.com/2009/10/09/spotify-de-las-empresas/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Si el mercado de la música para el usuario final ha sido revolucionado por Spotify para las empresas]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Si el mercado de la música para el usuario final ha sido revolucionado por <a href="http://portodalared.com/2009/10/05/spotify-mercado-de-la-musica/">Spotify</a> para las empresas <a href="http://www.omnifone.com/services.php?cat=1&#38;page=1">Omnifone </a>se quiere convertir en el proveedor de música de las empresas que ofrecan música a sus usuarios tales como las operadoras de móviles o de banda ancha.</p>
<p>Omnifone ha llegado a acuerdos con las principales majors para que sus clientes puedan ofrecer música de manera ilimitada por un precio fijo y así no tener que negociar tarifas con cada productora.</p>
<p>Si parecía que la música tenía los días contados con el tema de la piratería sólo hay que pensar en &#8220;agregación&#8221; una palabra que en estos días tiene sentido para todos los sectores y así surgen ideas como spotify u omnifone, agregación para satisfacer una necesidad existente en el mercado</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What the ISPs and the Record Labels Need to Do Next]]></title>
<link>http://musicindustryblog.wordpress.com/2009/02/17/what-the-isps-and-the-record-labels-need-to-do-next/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mark Mulligan</dc:creator>
<guid>http://musicindustryblog.wordpress.com/2009/02/17/what-the-isps-and-the-record-labels-need-to-do-next/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The UK music industry and ISPs have been working towards the goals of the government-brokered Memora]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><!--[if gte mso 9]&#62;  Normal 0   false false false        MicrosoftInternetExplorer4  &#60;![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]&#62;   &#60;![endif]--><!--[if !mso]&#62;--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;">The UK music industry and ISPs have been working towards the goals of the government-brokered Memorandum of Understanding since last summer but we’ve yet to see concrete results, in particular with regards to new music offerings.<span> </span>All stakeholders recognize the crucial importance of having a big fat carrot to accompany the stick.<span> </span>Yet we still seem to be some distance from the ISPs being empowered with truly compelling music services they can offer to their subscribers as a genuine alternative to file sharing.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;">On the surface of things this week’s <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/technology/mobile-phones/4640486/Mobile-World-Congress-Omnifone-to-launch-unlimited-online-music-download-service-with-ISPs.html">reported tie up with Sky and Omnifone</a> for a music subscription services seemed like a positive step forward.<span> </span>However, the lightest of scratches beneath the surface reveal it to actually be a microcosm of broader problems.<span> </span><a href="http://www.omnifone.com/announcements.php?announcement=17">Omnifone’s press announcement pointedly doesn’t even mention Sky as a partner</a> for their new ISP white label offering.<span> </span>Although many press reports imply Sky have signed up, the only actual substance is that Sky are considering using Omnifone to power some of the technology on its offering.<span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;">The nuanced specifics here are important.<span> </span>Last year Sky and Universal Music proudly announced a music JV.<span> </span>Details were scarce in the extreme but the strategic ambition was bold.<span> </span>Sky has since then not been able to add any of the other 3 majors onto the JV roster.<span> </span>Part of this may well relate to the other majors getting increasingly narked about UMG’s highly proactive (even aggressive) digital strategy.<span> </span>But more broadly it talks to the fact that there is a lot of distance between what Sky wants to be able to offer its customers and what the labels feel they can provide for the financial terms Sky are willing to consider. This follows on the heels of Virgin Media dropping pursuit of PlayLouder’s MSP offering due to label concerns and also 7Digital so far failing to get any ISP to take up their white label offering.<span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;">The root of the problem is that the ISPs want to offer consumers more content and flexibility for less money (and pay the labels less) than the labels are willing to countenance.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;">But most UK ISPs have good reason for having high demands, as do many other continental European ISPs. <span> </span>They’ve been burnt once, launching poorly featured, weakly differentiated services near the turn of the century. <span> </span>Their inadequacies (and the subsequent failures) weren’t the fault of the ISPs per se, rather they were products of their time, restricted to the terms that the major record labels were willing to countenance back then. <span> </span>(e.g. 99 cents downloads that could only be played on your computer)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;">Apple changed the rules of the game and the failings of the ISP services were only accentuated.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;">The ISPs know now that if they get back in the game they have to be differentiated and be able to compete with Apple. <span> </span>But they also know that most of their file sharing subscribers are unlikely to be able or willing to pay much either. <span> </span>So the ISPs want compelling (ideally MP3) services that cost little or nothing to consumers. <span> </span>The labels business models can’t support that model without the ISPs picking up a lot of the cost, which they can’t afford to do due to falling broadband ARPU.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;">So we’re in a stalemate that nobody really expected to be in. <span> </span>(Indeed back in the summer of last year BMR CEO Feargal Sharkey said he expected to have something to announce “within a matter of weeks”). <span> </span>The labels thought the ISPs would lap up what they had to offer, and the ISPs thought they’d get more. <span> </span>The record labels are not about to change the fundamentals of how they value their IP, but there are some viable mid term compromises that can get us out of this malaise:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;"> </span></p>
<ul style="margin-top:0;" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;">A series of Joint Ventures</span></strong><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;">: MySpace have created a blue      print for using this approach to get favourable licensing terms to deliver      free music that wouldn’t have been financially viable otherwise. <span> </span>And the labels get lots of potential      upside and to extend their role in the value chain. <span> </span>JVs would bind the ISPs and labels closer      together, create common purpose and engender greater strategic flexibility.</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;">Focus on free, not MP3:</span></strong><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;"> the success of Spotify has      shown that MP3 isn’t everything. <span> </span>Free      music streaming with good catalogue and easy to use UI is actually a      winning formula. <span> </span>The business case      for hiding the cost of a streaming service in the access subscription is a      lot stronger than for MP3 downloads</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;">Leverage all elements of the multiplay: </span></strong><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;">ISPs typically have multiple      products (TV, mobile etc.).<span> </span>Fully      leverage these.<span> </span>Creating a      compelling music offering means going beyond a balkanized online vs mobile      vs TV strategy. <span> </span>Fully integrate and      actually drive other business areas in the process e.g. extending a streaming      music offering to mobile via an on-handset app will drive mobile data      usage</span></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;">Time is of the essence: every day that goes by, file sharing grows in popularity and becomes more entrenched. <span> </span>So agreeing on intermediate solutions with a view to a longer term roadmap is far favourable to stalling until the perfect solution can be agreed upon. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[MusicStation Max offers unlimited free music downloads to your mobile]]></title>
<link>http://quadmaster.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/musicstation-max-offers-unlimited-free-music-downloads-to-your-mobile/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Quad Master</dc:creator>
<guid>http://quadmaster.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/musicstation-max-offers-unlimited-free-music-downloads-to-your-mobile/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[After the QTrax debacle, we were a little wary when we started hearing rumbles about a similar servi]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/02/2-11-08-musicstation.jpg" /></div>
<p>After the <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/qtrax">QTrax</a> debacle, we were a little wary when we started hearing rumbles about a similar service from OmniFone called MusicStation Max that promised, flat-fee, unlimited downloads from all the major labels to your cellphone with no expiration dates &#8212; but color us surprised, it&#8217;s for real. OmniFone&#8217;s <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/06/24/omnifone-goes-live-with-musicstation-service/">MusicStation</a> is already a player in the European mobile music game, partnered with giants like <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/19/vodafone-preps-unlimited-music-download-service/">Vodafone</a>, and the MusicStation Max launch seems like a natural evolution in the vein of Nokia&#8217;s <a href="http://engadget.com/tag/comes+with+music">Comes With Music</a> program: consumers will buy a pre-licensed MSM phone &#8212; the first will be available from LG in a few months &#8212; and be able to download away for 12 to 18 months, with the ability to sideload back to a computer or to other licensed phones. The exciting part, of course, is that unlike almost every other subscription program on the market your music will still play when the license expires. Add to that the fact that everything from the tracks to playlists to friend recommendations will be backed up on the network in case you lose your device, and we&#8217;re definitely intrigued &#8212; but we&#8217;ll wait to see how well all this DRM actually works before we call this thing a winner.</p>
<p><font color="#ffcc00"><b>Source :</b></font> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/11/musicstation-max-offers-unlimited-free-music-downloads/" target="_blank">engadget</a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Unlimited Music Download Service from Vodafone]]></title>
<link>http://cellaz.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/unlimited-music-download-service-from-vodafone/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jason Nigel</dc:creator>
<guid>http://cellaz.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/unlimited-music-download-service-from-vodafone/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Vodafone and Omnifone plan to launch a new music service in November, called MusicStation, which wil]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><a href="http://www.cellaz.com/news/1183/unlimited-music-download-service-from-vodafone/"><strong>Vodafone</strong> and <strong>Omnifone</strong> plan to launch a new music service in November, called <em>MusicStation</em>, which will allow customers to download any number of songs they want for just $4.02 weekly.</a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[<em>missed</em>babble; Joost, Omnifone, Veoh, and PermissionTV.]]></title>
<link>http://inbabble.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/missedbabble-joost-omnifone-veoh-and-permissiontv/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>inbabble</dc:creator>
<guid>http://inbabble.wordpress.com/2007/06/18/missedbabble-joost-omnifone-veoh-and-permissiontv/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Here are a couple of announcements that caught my eye in the week past that we did not feature; Joos]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Here are a couple of announcements that caught my eye in the week past that we did not feature; Joost, Omnifone, Veoh, and PermissionTV.<!--more--></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/15/embedded-joost-will-change-the-market/">Joost is apparantly talking to hardware vendors</a></strong> to embed its Internet TV software into set top boxes. This would move the PC based viewing experience to the TV. This is a key step making <strong><a href="http://inbabble.com/2007/05/02/countdown-to-joost/">Joost</a></strong> available to larger audiences.</p>
<p>UK company <strong><a href="http://www.omnifone.com/news_detail_musicstation_launch.htm">Omnifone lauched MusicStation</a></strong>, an all-you-can-eat, full-track mobile music service. Importantly the service has agreements with four major labels; Universal Music Group, Sony BMG, EMI Music and Warner Music International. Scandinavia is the first country to get the service with pricing for unlimited downloads, including data, set at 2.99 Euros per week (US$4).</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://inbabble.com/tag/video/internet-tv/">Internet TV</a></strong> company <strong><a href="http://www.pehub.com/wordpress/?p=1118">Veoh, has raised an additional US$26</a></strong>. The company is backed by Time Warner amongst others, and includes user generated, and studio content.</p>
<p>Another Internet TV company, <strong><a href="http://www.permissiontv.com/">PermissionTV</a></strong>, <strong><a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-draft-internet-video-provider-permissiontv-closes-9-million-round/">has raised US$9m</a></strong>.  PermissionTV provides a platform to build a web based video channel while incorporating a form of permission based advertising (a short ad with a link to watch the full ad). Corporate customers have been using the platform to embed video content on their existing websites.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
