<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>on-what-matters &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/on-what-matters/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "on-what-matters"</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 05:38:55 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[On bad writing in philosophy: Derek Parfit on Kant]]></title>
<link>http://jseliger.wordpress.com/2012/11/02/on-bad-writing-in-philosophy-derek-parfit-on-kant/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 06:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jake Seliger</dc:creator>
<guid>http://jseliger.wordpress.com/2012/11/02/on-bad-writing-in-philosophy-derek-parfit-on-kant/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&#8220;It is Kant who made really bad writing philosophically acceptable. We can no longer point to]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is Kant who made really bad writing philosophically acceptable. We can no longer point to some atrocious sentence by someone else, and say &#8216;How can it be worth reading anyone who writes like that?&#8217; The answer could always be &#8216;What about Kant?&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>—Derek Parfit on Kant, in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/What-Matters-Berkeley-Tanner-Lectures/dp/0199572801/?ie=UTF8&#38;tag=thstsst-20&#38;linkCode=as2&#38;camp=1789&#38;creative=390957"><em>On What Matters</em></a></p>
<p>(Reading reviews of philosophy is often more interesting than the philosophy itself, since the reviews tend to be more comprehensible. That was certainly true for <em>On What Matters</em>. Despite, for example, <a href="http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2011/07/on-what-matters-vol-i-review-of-derek-parfit.html">Tyler Cowen&#8217;s review</a>, I still wonder if a lot of philosophy, in its quest for rigor, paradoxically cannot find rigor in a confusing world limited by our language&#8217;s ability to describe it. Recursiveness in language is great right up to the point where you have to endlessly drill down to figure out what words mean. Cowen says, &#8220;In the subject areas of <em>On What Matters</em> the semantics are too slack, too open to multiple interpretation, and too many of the central concepts cry out for formalization.  There are not compelling new metaphors and examples to pin down the discourse.&#8221; I wonder if the semantics of philosophy in general are simply &#8220;too slack&#8221; for them to do much. Note how I say &#8220;I wonder&#8221; at the start of the preceding sentence: this is not a rhetorical device. I also wonder if technology drives culture far more than vice-versa; when I read some philosophy, I think &#8220;yes.&#8221; </p>
<p>Two caveats: I haven&#8217;t read enough philosophy to grok it. In addition, what philosophy I do read I often view as material for fiction rather than in its own terms. One reason I may have liked Richard Rorty&#8217;s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Contingency-Irony-Solidarity-Richard-Rorty/dp/0521367816?ie=UTF8&#38;tag=thstsst-20&#38;linkCode=as2&#38;camp=1789&#38;creative=390957"><em>Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity</a></em> is simply because he argues that fiction goes places philosophy can&#8217;t and thus might have the intellectual high ground. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Kitcher reviews Parfit]]></title>
<link>http://manwithoutqualities.com/2012/01/18/kitcher-reviews-parfit/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 04:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>manwithoutqualities</dc:creator>
<guid>http://manwithoutqualities.com/2012/01/18/kitcher-reviews-parfit/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Philip Kitcher reviews Derek Parfit&#8217;s massive two-volume tome On What Matters.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Philip Kitcher reviews Derek Parfit&#8217;s massive two-volume tome On What Matters.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[On What Matters, Volume I and II]]></title>
<link>http://thephilosopherseye.com/2011/06/17/on-what-matters/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Lisa Evans</dc:creator>
<guid>http://thephilosopherseye.com/2011/06/17/on-what-matters/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Not quite the top of the mountain&#8221; Derek Parfit’s On What Matters has been the most eag]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family:Calibri;"><span style="font-size:small;"><strong>&#8220;Not quite the top of the mountain&#8221;</strong></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Calibri;"><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small;"><a href="http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-140519698X.html" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4821" title="Essays on Derek Parfit's On What Matters " src="http://philosophycompass.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/parfit-book.jpg?w=112&#038;h=157" alt="" width="112" height="157" /></a></span></span>Derek Parfit’s <em>On What Matters </em>has been the most eagerly awaited work in philosophy since Ludwig Wittgenstein&#8217;s <em>Philosophical Investigations</em>. Read Constantine Sandis’ <a href="http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=416411" target="_blank">review of this book in the<em> Times Higher Education </em>online</a>.</span></span><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small;"><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small;">The journal </span><strong><a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9329"><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small;">Ratio</span></a></strong><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small;"> which has a focus on analytic philosophy, recently produced a special issue book entitled ‘</span><strong><a href="http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-140519698X.html"><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small;">Essays on Derek Parfit&#8217;s On What Matters</span></a><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small;">’, </span></strong><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small;">edited by<strong> </strong>Jussi Suikkanen and John Cottingham. In <em>Essays on Derek Parfit&#8217;s On What Matters,</em> seven leading moral philosophers (including Princeton&#8217;s Michael Smith, one of the world&#8217;s leading meta-ethicists) offer critical evaluations of the central ideas presented in the greatly anticipated work by world-renowned moral philosopher Derek Parfit. </span><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small;"> </span></p>
<p><a href="http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-140519698X.html"><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small;">Click here</span></a><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:small;"> to find out more and buy your copy. </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Derek Parfit: On What Matters]]></title>
<link>http://manwithoutqualities.com/2011/03/15/derek-parfit-on-what-matters/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>manwithoutqualities</dc:creator>
<guid>http://manwithoutqualities.com/2011/03/15/derek-parfit-on-what-matters/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Derek Parfit&#8217;s latest book On What Matters is about to hit the shelves. I guess this must qual]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Derek Parfit&#8217;s latest book On What Matters is about to hit the shelves. I guess this must qual]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
