<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>philip-parker &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/philip-parker/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "philip-parker"</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:57:44 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Un guión Disney]]></title>
<link>http://hermanbeiro.wordpress.com/2009/11/29/un-guion-disney/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hermanbeiro</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hermanbeiro.wordpress.com/2009/11/29/un-guion-disney/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[La fórmula de Disney aún es la regla principal, desde mi punto de vista. En estos tiempos las pelícu]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://hermanbeiro.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/disney.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-454" title="disney" src="http://hermanbeiro.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/disney.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="214" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="color:#ff0000;">La fórmula de Disney</span> aún es la regla principal, desde mi punto de vista. En estos tiempos las películas familiares siguen la fórmula de Disney y hasta las novedades de Pixar se rigen por ese modelo dándole su toque personal. La fórmula parecería ser más o menos esta:</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="color:#ff6600;">1)</span> Desear plenamente. Ser una princesa, una hormiga inteligente, un juguete valiente, ser amado por un monstruo verde, ser un mago, etc</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="color:#ff6600;">2)</span> Amigos. Los niños aman a sus amigos y si (Dios no lo permita) no tienen ningún amigo, quieren alguno. Entonces Cenicienta tiene pajaritos y ratones. La Bella tiene a la tetera, el reloj, el candelabro; Ariel tiene a su pececito y a Sebastián el cangrejo; Harry Potter tiene a Harmonie y Ron; Woody tiene a Buzz.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="color:#ff6600;">3)</span> Familia. Muchas películas clásicas giran alrededor de una familia o pseudo-familia. En 101 Dálmatas Roger y Anita son de hecho mamá y papá de los 101 dálmatas. En Blancanieves los enanitos actúan como chicos y son cuidados por su mamá Aurora/Rosa. Flik, la hormiga es miembro de una enorme familia de hormigas, discute con ellos y tiene que irse de la casa, hace amigos con los insectos del circo y al final se amiga con su familia y vuelven a estar juntos. Matilda es adoptada por su maestra, Miss Honey, quien se transforma en esa adorable mamá que ella siempre se mereció.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="color:#ff6600;">4)</span> Personajes de comedia. Todos los personajes en Disney son “tipos”. Son la tipología héroe/heroína, con la valentía habitual (el príncipe), o con una belleza cautivante (la princesa). Hay “tipos” de comedia como los siete enanitos que pueden ser fácilmente identificados con un solo adjetivo: gracioso (el ratón en Dumbo), malvado (el capitán Hook), servicial (Mr. Smee en el filme homónimo), exagerado (Tigger), gracioso (Timón, en el Rey León), etc. Esta es una aproximación a la comedia. Lo llamativo es que en Disney la mayoría de los personajes son animales.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="color:#ff6600;">5)</span> Humor del tipo gag. Las frases con diálogos inteligentes y desarrollados son para adultos, los niños prefieren gente cayendo o dando cachetazos</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="color:#ff6600;">6)</span> Brevedad. Las películas familiares no son interminables o con final abierto sino que siguen una estructura clásica que llega al final y allí terminan. .</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="color:#ff6600;">7)</span> Finales felices. Los adolescentes tal vez sean mas difíciles de convencer pero los chicos, aún aquellos que discuten más, en sus corazones aman creer en los sueños, por ejemplo en el ratón Pérez. Entonces el espíritu optimista tiene que preponderar en orden de capturar a la audiencia infantil. Matilda no muere, Blancanieves se despierta, Shrek no hierve y come el burro.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Es debatible cuáles de los requisitos arriba mencionados para las películas familiares son ciertos o cuáles son sólo trucos. Más allá de todo, lo descripto conforma una buena fórmula. Estas son cosas que nuestros chicos y nosotros queremos ver: la realización de nuestros sueños, sentirnos bien, disfrutar del buen humor. Desde mi punto de vista esto es al fin y al cabo la familia.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Fuente: <a href="http://www.philippalmer.net"><span style="color:#ff6600;">Philip Palmer</span></a>.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[He Wrote 200,000 Books (but Computers Did Some of the Work)]]></title>
<link>http://googlebuzz.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/he-wrote-200000-books-but-computers-did-some-of-the-work/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>clickry</dc:creator>
<guid>http://googlebuzz.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/he-wrote-200000-books-but-computers-did-some-of-the-work/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Sandy Huffaker for The New York Times Philip Parker says he has computers do the substantial amount ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div class="image" id="wideImage"> <img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/04/14/business/14link-span2-600.jpg" alt="" border="0" height="310" width="600" />
<div class="credit">Sandy Huffaker for The New York Times</div>
<p class="caption"> Philip Parker says he has computers do the substantial amount of repetitive work that is required in the writing of so many books.</p>
<p>
<p class="caption"></p>
<p>It’s not easy to write a book. First you have to pick a title. And then there is the table of contents. If you want the book to be categorized, either by a bookseller or a library, it has to be assigned a unique numerical code, like an ISBN, for International Standard Book Number. There have to be proper margins. Finally, there’s the back cover.</p>
<div id="articleInline">
<div id="inlineBox"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/14/business/media/14link.html#secondParagraph" class="jumpLink">Skip to next paragraph</a>
<div class="image">
<div class="enlargeThis"><a href="//www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2008/04/14/business/14link.inline.ready.html', '14link_inline_ready', 'width=720,height=600,scrollbars=yes,toolbars=no,resizable=yes')">Enlarge This Image</a></div>
<p> <a href="//www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2008/04/14/business/14link.inline.ready.html', '14link_inline_ready', 'width=720,height=600,scrollbars=yes,toolbars=no,resizable=yes')"> <img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/04/14/business/14link-inline1-190.jpg" alt="" border="0" height="127" width="190" /> </a>
<div class="credit">Sandy Huffaker for The New York Times</div>
<p class="caption"> Philip Parker is now turning his efforts to video.  </p>
</p></div>
</p></div>
</p></div>
<p><a name="secondParagraph"></a>
<p>Oh, and there is all that stuff in the middle, too. The writing.</p>
<p>Philip M. Parker seems to have licked that problem. Mr. Parker has generated more than 200,000 books, as an advanced search on <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/amazon_inc/index.html?inline=nyt-org" title="More information about Amazon.com Inc.">Amazon.com</a> under his publishing company shows, making him, in his own words, “the most published author in the history of the planet.” And he makes money doing it. </p>
<p>Among the books published under his name are “The Official Patient’s Sourcebook on Acne Rosacea” ($24.95 and 168 pages long); “Stickler Syndrome: A Bibliography and Dictionary for Physicians, Patients and Genome Researchers” ($28.95 for 126 pages); and “The 2007-2012 Outlook for Tufted Washable Scatter Rugs, Bathmats and Sets That Measure 6-Feet by 9-Feet or Smaller in India” ($495 for 144 pages). </p>
<p>But these are not conventional books, and it is perhaps more accurate to call Mr. Parker a compiler than an author. Mr. Parker, who is also the chaired professor of management science at Insead (a business school with campuses in Fontainebleau, France, and Singapore), has developed computer algorithms that collect publicly available information on a subject — broad or obscure — and, aided by his 60 to 70 computers and six or seven programmers, he turns the results into books in a range of genres, many of them in the range of 150 pages and printed only when a customer buys one. </p>
<p>If this sounds like cheating to the layman’s ear, it does not to Mr. Parker, who holds some provocative — and apparently profitable — ideas on what constitutes a book. While the most popular of his books may sell hundreds of copies, he said, many have sales in the dozens, often to medical libraries collecting nearly everything he produces. He has extended his technique to crossword puzzles, rudimentary poetry and even to scripts for animated game shows. </p>
<p>And he is laying the groundwork for romance novels generated by new algorithms. “I’ve already set it up,” he said. “There are only so many body parts.” </p>
<p>Perusing a work like the outlook for bathmat sales in India, a reader would be hard pressed to find an actual sentence that was “written” by the computer. If you were to open a book, you would find a title page, a detailed table of contents, and many, many pages of graphics with introductory boilerplate that is adjusted for the content and genre.</p>
<p>While nothing announces that Mr. Parker’s books are computer generated, one reader, David Pascoe, seemed close to figuring it out himself, based on his comments to Amazon in 2004. Reviewing a guide to rosacea, a skin disorder, Mr. Pascoe, who is from Perth, Australia, complained: “The book is more of a template for ‘generic health researching’ than anything specific to rosacea. The information is of such a generic level that a sourcebook on the next medical topic is just a search and replace away.”</p>
<p>When told via e-mail that his suspicion was correct, Mr. Pascoe wrote back, “I guess it makes sense now as to why the book was so awful and frustrating.”Mr. Parker was willing to concede much of what Mr. Pascoe argued. “If you are good at the Internet, this book is useless,” he said, adding that Mr. Pascoe simply should not have bought it. But, Mr. Parker said, there are people who aren’t Internet savvy who have found these guides useful.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/14/business/media/14link.html"><span style="text-decoration:underline;">Source</span></a></div>
<div class="blogger-post-footer">
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[He Wrote 200,000 Books (but Computers Did Some of the Work)]]></title>
<link>http://clickry.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/he-wrote-200000-books-but-computers-did-some-of-the-work/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>clickry</dc:creator>
<guid>http://clickry.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/he-wrote-200000-books-but-computers-did-some-of-the-work/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Sandy Huffaker for The New York Times Philip Parker says he has computers do the substantial amount ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div class="image" id="wideImage"> <img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/04/14/business/14link-span2-600.jpg" alt="" border="0" height="310" width="600" />
<div class="credit">Sandy Huffaker for The New York Times</div>
<p class="caption"> Philip Parker says he has computers do the substantial amount of repetitive work that is required in the writing of so many books.</p>
<p>
<p class="caption"></p>
<p>It’s not easy to write a book. First you have to pick a title. And then there is the table of contents. If you want the book to be categorized, either by a bookseller or a library, it has to be assigned a unique numerical code, like an ISBN, for International Standard Book Number. There have to be proper margins. Finally, there’s the back cover.</p>
<div id="articleInline">
<div id="inlineBox"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/14/business/media/14link.html#secondParagraph" class="jumpLink">Skip to next paragraph</a>
<div class="image">
<div class="enlargeThis"><a href="//www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2008/04/14/business/14link.inline.ready.html', '14link_inline_ready', 'width=720,height=600,scrollbars=yes,toolbars=no,resizable=yes')">Enlarge This Image</a></div>
<p> <a href="//www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2008/04/14/business/14link.inline.ready.html', '14link_inline_ready', 'width=720,height=600,scrollbars=yes,toolbars=no,resizable=yes')"> <img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/04/14/business/14link-inline1-190.jpg" alt="" border="0" height="127" width="190" /> </a>
<div class="credit">Sandy Huffaker for The New York Times</div>
<p class="caption"> Philip Parker is now turning his efforts to video.  </p>
</p></div>
</p></div>
</p></div>
<p><a name="secondParagraph"></a>
<p>Oh, and there is all that stuff in the middle, too. The writing.</p>
<p>Philip M. Parker seems to have licked that problem. Mr. Parker has generated more than 200,000 books, as an advanced search on <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/amazon_inc/index.html?inline=nyt-org" title="More information about Amazon.com Inc.">Amazon.com</a> under his publishing company shows, making him, in his own words, “the most published author in the history of the planet.” And he makes money doing it. </p>
<p>Among the books published under his name are “The Official Patient’s Sourcebook on Acne Rosacea” ($24.95 and 168 pages long); “Stickler Syndrome: A Bibliography and Dictionary for Physicians, Patients and Genome Researchers” ($28.95 for 126 pages); and “The 2007-2012 Outlook for Tufted Washable Scatter Rugs, Bathmats and Sets That Measure 6-Feet by 9-Feet or Smaller in India” ($495 for 144 pages). </p>
<p>But these are not conventional books, and it is perhaps more accurate to call Mr. Parker a compiler than an author. Mr. Parker, who is also the chaired professor of management science at Insead (a business school with campuses in Fontainebleau, France, and Singapore), has developed computer algorithms that collect publicly available information on a subject — broad or obscure — and, aided by his 60 to 70 computers and six or seven programmers, he turns the results into books in a range of genres, many of them in the range of 150 pages and printed only when a customer buys one. </p>
<p>If this sounds like cheating to the layman’s ear, it does not to Mr. Parker, who holds some provocative — and apparently profitable — ideas on what constitutes a book. While the most popular of his books may sell hundreds of copies, he said, many have sales in the dozens, often to medical libraries collecting nearly everything he produces. He has extended his technique to crossword puzzles, rudimentary poetry and even to scripts for animated game shows. </p>
<p>And he is laying the groundwork for romance novels generated by new algorithms. “I’ve already set it up,” he said. “There are only so many body parts.” </p>
<p>Perusing a work like the outlook for bathmat sales in India, a reader would be hard pressed to find an actual sentence that was “written” by the computer. If you were to open a book, you would find a title page, a detailed table of contents, and many, many pages of graphics with introductory boilerplate that is adjusted for the content and genre.</p>
<p>While nothing announces that Mr. Parker’s books are computer generated, one reader, David Pascoe, seemed close to figuring it out himself, based on his comments to Amazon in 2004. Reviewing a guide to rosacea, a skin disorder, Mr. Pascoe, who is from Perth, Australia, complained: “The book is more of a template for ‘generic health researching’ than anything specific to rosacea. The information is of such a generic level that a sourcebook on the next medical topic is just a search and replace away.”</p>
<p>When told via e-mail that his suspicion was correct, Mr. Pascoe wrote back, “I guess it makes sense now as to why the book was so awful and frustrating.”Mr. Parker was willing to concede much of what Mr. Pascoe argued. “If you are good at the Internet, this book is useless,” he said, adding that Mr. Pascoe simply should not have bought it. But, Mr. Parker said, there are people who aren’t Internet savvy who have found these guides useful.</p>
<p> It is the idea of automating difficult or boring work that led Mr. Parker to become involved. Comparing himself to a distant disciple of <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/f/henry_ford/index.html?inline=nyt-per" title="More articles about Henry Ford.">Henry Ford</a>, he said he was “deconstructing the process of getting books into people’s hands; every single step we could think of, we automated.”</p>
<p>He added: “My goal isn’t to have the computer write sentences, but to do the repetitive tasks that are too costly to do otherwise.”</p>
<p>In an interview from his home in San Diego and his offices nearby, Mr. Parker described his motivation as providing content that the marketplace has otherwise neglected for lack of an audience. That can mean a relatively obscure language is involved, or a relatively obscure disease or a relatively obscure product.</p>
<p>Take, for example, the study of bathmats in India. </p>
<div id="pageLinks">
<ul>
<li> 1 </li>
<li> <a title="Page 2" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/14/business/media/14link.html?pagewanted=2">2</a> </li>
</ul>
<p><a class="next" title="Next Page" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/14/business/media/14link.html?pagewanted=2">Next Page »</a></div>
</p></div>
<div class="blogger-post-footer">
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Le notizie del giorno (5-febb-08)]]></title>
<link>http://mononeuronico.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/le-notizie-del-giorno-in-ordine-di-importanza/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mononeuronico</dc:creator>
<guid>http://mononeuronico.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/le-notizie-del-giorno-in-ordine-di-importanza/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Biscotti al cioccolato naufragati sulle spiagge britanniche. Il dolce carico era imbarcato sulla nav]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Biscotti al cioccolato naufragati sulle spiagge britanniche. Il dolce carico era imbarcato sulla nav]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google Clouds and Automatic Writing]]></title>
<link>http://futureperfectpublishing.com/2007/12/23/google-clouds-and-automatic-writing/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 07:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>orionwell</dc:creator>
<guid>http://futureperfectpublishing.com/2007/12/23/google-clouds-and-automatic-writing/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[We knew it had to happen sooner or later.  Computers writing books.  A recent article in BusinesWeek]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><a href="http://orionwell.wordpress.com/files/2007/12/robot-writer.jpg" title="robot writer"><img border="0" vspace="5" align="left" width="111" src="http://orionwell.wordpress.com/files/2007/12/robot-writer.thumbnail.jpg" hspace="10" alt="robot writer" height="129" /></a>We knew it had to happen sooner or later.  Computers writing books.  A <a target="_blank" href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_51/c4063btw717580_page_2.htm" title="These Books Write Themselves - Businessweek - 12-17-2007">recent article in <em>BusinesWeek</em></a> highlighted the exploits of Philip Parker, who has patented a process for using computer software to write books automatically.  <a target="_blank" href="http://faculty.insead.edu/parker/resume/personal.htm" title="Philip M. Parker web page">According to his web page</a>, Parker is a Chaired Professor of Management Science at INSEAD, a French business school.  The article claims that to date, Parker has written 300,000 books this way.  The works are non-fiction and tend to be highly specific.  His software searches databases for information on a specific topic and then populates a template.  He is as circumspect about his sales as he is about the details of the process. </p>
<p>Could this be the end game for the long tail of book publishing?  Perhaps not in general, but his use of technology shows that software automation could someday play a bigger role in very formulaic or highly structured genres.  Imagine HAL, the demented computer from <em>2001: A Space Odyssey</em>, writing romance novels. </p>
<p><a href="http://orionwell.wordpress.com/files/2007/12/cloud-computing.jpg" title="cloud computing"><img border="0" vspace="5" align="right" width="82" src="http://orionwell.wordpress.com/files/2007/12/cloud-computing.thumbnail.jpg" hspace="10" alt="cloud computing" height="129" /></a>Google servers, which are at the heart of web search engines, have been a boon for book marketers wanting to get the word out about their titles, or for authors doing research.  But now, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_52/b4064048925836.htm" title="Google and the Wisdom of Clouds - Stephen Baker - BusinessWeek - 12-24-2007">Google is exploring a new kind of computing</a>, &#8221;cloud computing,&#8221; which allows hundreds or thousands of computers to tackle large problems.  These computers are linked by algorithms similar to those the company uses to manage the millions of daily search requests.  In a sense, it is industrial computing.  Other companies with large server famrs &#8211; Yahoo!, Microsoft, IBM and Amazon &#8211; are also exploring this new form big utility computing power for sale.  This approach to computing essentially frees the user from <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore's_law" title="Moore's Law - wikipedia">Moore&#8217;s Law</a> for single processors. </p>
<p>Now imagine a few years hence when cloud computing has the kinks worked out and sports an affordable entry price point for aspiring authors.  Turn your high strength algorithms loose on an information rich environment and you might produce some interesting reads.  Our ability to imagine what we could do with such tools may be our only limiting factor.</p>
<hr />
<h5>Related Posts</h5>
<ul>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://futureperfectpublishing.com/2007/10/16/can-a-computer-write-a-novel/" title="Can a Computer Write a Novel? - FPP">Can a Computer Write a Novel?</a></li>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://futureperfectpublishing.com/2007/09/03/long-tail-dynamics/" title="Long Tail Dynamics vs. the 80-20 Rule - PP">Long Tail Dynamics vs. the 80-20 Rule</a></li>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://futureperfectpublishing.com/2007/08/08/239/" title="The Quiet Revolution in Book Writing - FPP">The Quiet Revolution in Book Writing </a></li>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://futureperfectpublishing.com/2007/06/25/create-rip-mix-and-burn-the-rise-of-open-source-publishing/" title="Create. Rip, Mix and Burn - The Rise of Open Source Book Publishing - FPP">Create. Rip, Mix and Burn &#8211; The Rise of Open Source Book Publishing </a></li>
</ul>
<h5>Bookmark this Post</h5>
<h4><a href="http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php"><img border="0" width="125" src="http://s3.addthis.com/button1-bm.gif" height="16" /></a></h4>
<hr />
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
