<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>philip-stanier &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/philip-stanier/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "philip-stanier"</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:52:39 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Buzzcut Day 3]]></title>
<link>http://simongwynn.wordpress.com/2012/03/17/buzzcut-day-3/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Simon Gwynn</dc:creator>
<guid>http://simongwynn.wordpress.com/2012/03/17/buzzcut-day-3/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The Old Hairdressers, Friday 16 March 2012 After missing out on the first two nights, I was itching]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Old Hairdressers, Friday 16 March 2012</p>
<p>After missing out on the first two nights, I was itching to plunge into some baffling performance at Friday’s installment of the Buzzcut festival. First up was Philip Stanier with <strong>Prologue</strong> (3 stars), a prolonged ribbon-cutting ceremony in which Stanier diverges from his grand announcement with a number of footnotes, redundancies and personal notes covering all manner of subjects, but vaguely connected by the impossibility of neatly defining the beginning or the end of a period in time. It’s rather like going on Wikipedia to look up <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vince_Cable#Early_years">Vince Cable’s early political career</a> and finding yourself still sat at the screen four hours later reading about the taxonomy of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_spadefoot_toads">Scaphiopodidae</a> (the American spadefoot toad): often fascinating, but too long and demanding focus. Stanier describes this as a permanent work in progress, which seems apt considering the subject matter.</p>
<p>An interactive performance work in the bar from <strong>Chris Hall</strong> (2 stars) involved sitting down in front of a stranger and reading a short script to them, before they take the mantle and read it to the next person. It is a nice idea that needs much more intrigue to really grip the imagination.</p>
<p>The second main slot was Louise Orwin’s <strong>Humiliation Piece</strong> (3 stars), a game of dares with the audience reminiscent of Marina Abramovic’s famous <em><a href="http://www.moma.org/explore/multimedia/audios/190/1972">Rhythm 0</a></em>, in which Abramovic invited the audience to use a series of objects on her body. In this, Orwin invites us to dare her to perform gross and ridiculous acts using various birthday party-related items dotted around the stage, in exchange for which she gets to ask the audience member a question about her performance or herself. Orwin is superb at probing the uncomfortable idea of audience complicity &#8211; especially when she drinks six raw eggs and washed them down with the best part of a bottle of Lambrini &#8211; but unlike Stanier’s work, this is actually too short, and the dramatic graph too abrupt, which lessened the impact of some of the things she was being asked to do.</p>
<p>Another bar-based project is from <strong>Thom Scullion </strong> (3 stars), who attempts to crowd-source the completion of a video game, <em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lost_World:_Jurassic_Park_(console_game)">The Lost World: Jurassic Park</a></em>, which he describes as one of the most ‘unforgiving, unrewarding’ games of all time. The set-up involves having a go at the game and sharing tips on a wall chart to help future generations succeed where you have failed. Unfortunately, it’s too busy for me to actually have ago, so I can’t vouch for whether the game is the unholy bitch that Scullion makes it out to be.</p>
<p>Finally, we have Tom Marshman with <strong>Legs 11</strong> (2 stars), a by-the-numbers autobiographical performance about his relationship with his legs. The centrepiece is the story of how he entered a <a href="http://www.prettypolly.co.uk/">Pretty Polly</a> best legs competition and was up against 10 female finalists, and this is quite a good wee yarn. Marshman is very charismatic but there is very little to this piece and it feels like he is performing to his friends. It’s described as a work in progress, but aren’t they always?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
