NOWTRUTH.ORG
NEWS NOW!
(510) 394-4701
EMAIL: nowtruth1@gmail.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/griotz

Herein below is an email to Twitter regarding their engaging in censorship to protect California Attorney General Jerry Brown, Oakland City Attorney John Russo and Alameda County D.A. Tom Orloff’s corruption in an ongoing case reported to the U. S. Attorney General, Department of Justice.

Ginger,

On October 17, and 21, 2009  I sent emails to Twitter complaining about a “suspension” of my account (@nowtruth) for allegedly replying to tweets sent to me and “suspicious activity”!
I have not received any response to my rejection of the claims and contesting of the “suspension”. The idea that someone can have their account suspended for replying to tweets sent to them is preposterous!!! Isn’t that the process? Further, there were @mentions, not replys, for which your system does not seem to be able to distinguish the difference!!
However, when someone tweets you, you can and should reply with a meaningful response. ALL of the @mentions/replies/responses were to related items or news of a related nature to the attention of those mentioned, not anyone else. So there is no spamming issue. What’s the offense?
There is NOTHING suspicious about this action! Were you contacted with a report of reply spam? Our tweets are all you need to establish their validity. The tweet was regarding the corruption on behalf of California Attorney General Jerry Brown, Oakland City Attorney John Russo and Alameda County D.A. Tom Orloff in an ongoing case reported to the U. S. Attorney General, Department of Justice. We have received several @mentions from people sympathetic to those parties had have tried tirelessly to silence this case and the information about it from getting out to the masses in an effort to protect them. The specific tweet in question was displaying an email from John Russo threatening a KPFA reporter, Gabrielle Wilson, if she proceeded with a radio broadcast of a show with Brown, Russo and the plaintiff in the case.

During the week of August 23, 2009 Miss Wilson received a phone call from Evan Westrep from Brown’s office. He left a voice mail message for her at radio station KPFA stating he would pass her interview request along to Brown’s schedulers.

During that same week, Miss Wilson received emails and phone calls from Oakland City Attorney Russo’s press director Alex Katz. One email Katz sent to her and Sasha Lilley, interim Program Director at KPFA, with a cc: to Mark Moromodi, Supervising Deputy for the Oakland City Attorney, proclaiming that City Attorney John Russo was not involved in the case, yet he wanted her to answer questions as to why she wanted to provide a forum for the plaintiff, al-Hakim whom he alleged had posted threatening videos about John Russo. Heres an copy of that email that was a twitpic sent to our followers:

Katz followed up that email with a voicemail message he left for Miss Wilson after the close of business just hours before the scheduled broadcast was to occur threatening her and warned Miss Wilson not to broadcast the interview and demanded she speak with him before she aired the scheduled program. He did this though he wanted Miss Wilson and KPFA to believe that John Russo and the City Attorney’s office was not involved in the case and had nothing to hide! You can listen to that voicemail message here.

Download now or listen on posterous

Gabby-Katz 2nd Call.m4a (1821 KB)

Download now or listen on posterous

Gabby-Katz 2nd Call.mp3 (1821 KB)

Luis Medina, a manager in the music director’s office at KPFA then calls Miss Wilson just hours prior to the scheduled broadcast and leaves a voicemail message warning her that it was very important for the broadcast not to occur. He also stated that there might be very serious repercussions taken if she were to proceed as planned. She even received a phone call from the long-time regular show host, Emmitt Powell whom was contacted by the station in response to Russo’s effort to censor the show.
Miss Wilson proceeded to host the program all alone to comply with the City Attorney and KPFA’s censorship directive…without any of her invited guests. You can listen to that voicemail message here.

Download now or listen on posterous

Gabby VM-KPFA MD,Luis Medina.m4a (2742 KB)

Download now or listen on posterous

Gabby VM-KPFA MD,Luis Medina.mp3 (2742 KB)

Miss Wilson was forced to make at least three announcements to inform the public whom had tuned in to hear this intriguing panel examine this critical civil rights and corruption case in an important election year, that this incredible show had been canceled due to KPFA’s censorship by Oakland City Attorney John Russo! You can listen to those announcements here.
First Announcement:

Download now or listen on posterous

Gabby Aborted Corrupt Show-1stAnn.m4a (1079 KB)

Download now or listen on posterous

Gabby Aborted Corrupt Show-1stAnn.mp3 (1079 KB)

Second Announcement:

Download now or listen on posterous

Gabby Aborted Corrupt Show-2ndAnn.m4a (1610 KB)

Download now or listen on posterous

Gabby Aborted Corrupt Show-2ndAnn.mp3 (1610 KB)

Third Announcement:

Download now or listen on posterous

Gabby Aborted Corrupt Show-3rdAnn.m4a (1953 KB)

Download now or listen on posterous

Gabby Aborted Corrupt Show-3rdAnn.mp3 (1953 KB)

Russo proceeded to engage in censorship by forcing the cancellation of the show and trying to conceal it from the public. Russo and Brown claim that they are not involved in the case yet irrefutable evidence prove otherwise! If they are not involved and have nothing to hide, why censor the show? Those actions are public now as the reporter released a statement on their crimes of which this is merely another instance of. Now for you.
You aren’t engaging in censorship are you? Have you been contacted by any of these parties or their representatives, including Alex Katz, Joe Trippi, Jeremy D. Thompson, or anyone else regarding this alleged violation of Twitter policy? Is this a problem of your system not being able to differentiate between a reply and an @mention?
I certainly know that if you were investigating suspicious activity in this case, you need to take a look at the actions of those that got you to comply with their desire to censor this case and their continuing crimes for which Twitter founder Evan Williams, co-founder Biz Stone, and Twitter are now involved. We will not stop our civil and criminal investigation in this matter as we proceed, it only widens and deepens in it’s breadth and depth.
There’s nothing even remotely suspicious about our tweets, we will not be censored, and we are continuing to investigate yours and their suspicious activity and to prosecute those involved in these continuing crimes. Anything you need to further investigate feel free to call.

We look forward to your response.

@nowtruth
510.394.4701

Previous message October 21, 2009:
Re: Twitter Support: update on “To Whom It May Concern,    How can an account be suspende…”

Ginger,

How can an account be suspended for replying to messages sent to YOU? Isn’t that the process? When someone tweets you, you can and should reply with a meaningful response. ALL of the replies/responses were to related items or news of a related nature. What’s the offense?
There is NOTHING suspicious about this action! Were you contacted with a report of reply spam? Our tweets are all you need to establish their validity. You aren’t engaging in censorship are you?
Thanks for the response.

ginger wrote:

## In replies all text above this line is added to the ticket ##

Ticket #605636: To Whom It May Concern, How can an account be suspende…

ginger, Oct 21 03:04 pm (PDT):Hello from Twitter,This is an automated confirmation that we received your ticket. If you’re contesting a suspension, be sure to read this entire email; you will need to take further action in order to reopen your ticket.   Please be sure your account is actually suspended. You should visit your own profile page to make sure you’re suspended and not viewing another person’s suspended profile page–many people think they are suspended when they aren’t. You’ll also know you’re suspended if you log in and see a red notice announcing your suspension on your account. Twitter primarily suspends accounts for Terms of Service violations or spam investigation. If you are suspended, it’s most likely for one or more of these reasons: · aggressive following or follower churn (repeatedly following and unfollowing users) · trend spamming (posting unrelated updates to trending topics to gain attention) · misuse of the reply feature · updates consist of links pointing to phishing sites, malware, or other harmful material · updates consist of duplicate links and/or text · updates consist mainly of links duplicated across multiple accounts, and not personal updates · account identified as potentially being part of a spam cluster · a large number of people block the profile or write in with spam complaints Please review the Twitter Rules for a more comprehensive list: http://help.twitter.com/forums/26257/entries/15790 If you feel you’ve been suspended in error, please reply to this email with a short explanation and be sure to include your username. Responding to this email will reopen this ticket and put your ticket in queue for support, but you need to reply from the address this mail was sent to. If you use an alias (such as username+alias@gmail.com), ensure that your reply comes from the alias address or your ticket may not be seen by our support staff. We will do our best to get back to you within 30 days. If this did not answer your inquiry, responding to this email will reopen this ticket. Thanks, Twitter Support nowtruth, Oct 17 10:39 pm (PDT):To Whom It May Concern,How can an account be suspended for replying to messages sent to YOU? Isn’t that the process? When someone tweets you, you can and should reply with a meaningful response. ALL of the replies/responses were to related items or news of a related nature. What’s the offense? There is NOTHING suspicious about this action! Were you contacted with a report of reply spam? Our tweets are all you need to establish their validity. You aren’t engaging in censorship are you? Thanks for the response.   ———- Review the status of your request and add additional comments here: help.twitter.com/tickets/605636

This email is a service from Twitter Support

On Saturday, September 5, 2009 at 8:30 A.M. on Radio Station KPFA 94.1 FM, in Berkeley CA,- The Gospel Experience Program Host and Producer Gabrielle Wilson will cover corruption in the California Superior Court, Alameda County case  of al-Hakim vs CSAA(No. 811337-3). Invited guests are California Attorney General Jerry Brown, Oakland City Attorney John Russo and plaintiff in the case Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim.

California Attorney General Jerry Brown, responsible for carrying out investigation of Alameda County Superior Court and State Appeals Court judges, District Attorney Tom Orloff, Oakland City Attorney John Russo and various corporate defendants is himself defending some of the criminals and covering up the very same corruption he is supposed to be investigating and prosecuting! Full Story with Videos and Documents at http://tinyurl.com/ljk8av

Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, the uber-successful sports and entertainment manager/agent with Superstar Management, filed a federal complaint with the United States Attorney General, Department of Justice, of a hate crime of Islamophobia and Xenophobia committed against him during a trial in Superior Court of Alameda County, California. More on al-Hakim at http://SuperstarManagement.WordPress.com/

This case is the subject of an ongoing investigation into the actions of various Judges, court administration, State Attorney General, Alameda County District Attorney, Oakland City Attorney, various attorneys, defendants and their employees, agents, contractors, experts, and witnesses. This case is returning back to the United States Attorney General, Department of Justice,, the local and Federal Courts.
Contact:  Martin Silverman, newsnow1@gmail.com;

Gabrielle Wilson / KPFA
1929 Martin Luther King Jr Way
Berkeley, CA 94704 | USAwww.pacifica.org | 510.848.6767 Ext.634
: missgabrielle.wordpress.com

Posted via email from Newsnow!

7633 Sunkist Drive, Oakland CA  94605-3032 (510) 638-0808,  Fax (510) 638-8889 http://www.Superstarmanagement.com http://www.Ex-Why.com BLOG: http://superstarmanagement.wordpress.com Abdul-Jalil’s Profile Ziggs Profile of Abdul-Jalil Linked In Profile on Abdul-Jalil Abdul-Jalil on Twitter AIM, Video Chat Screen Name:  jalil@superstarmanagement.com Skype Video Chat Screen Contact Name: Superstarmanagement Portrait of Abdul-Jalil by Artist Buford Delaney in Paris, France Articles on Abdul-Jalil: The Man Who Turns Hits Into Million$, One Special Case,  ESPN Bostock 5th & Jackson TV Special Part 1, and Part 2,  ESPN Bostock Magazine Special, the “al-Hakim Tax Code Ruling”, Smart Agent, Busy Agent, Dellums for Mayor, Hip Hop’s Islamic Influence, 1979 National BALSA Conference,  Oakland Police Officers Arrested for Computer Store Burglaries, Police Found Guilty in Burglaries, Police Officers Sentenced for Burglaries, Email Abdul-Jalil here

You can click on any highlighted word to view or download that item

Posted via email from Superstar Management

“Democracy is good. I say this because other systems are worse.” – Jawaharlal Nehru.

If those words are taken on face value, there is a need for some changes in the existing system of selecting the rulers. India, the largest democracy in the world, is fast approaching its general elections for 15th Lok Sabha. In the flavor of the election season, many campaigns associated with the election are burgeoning. One among them is the issue of Negative Voting [NV].

What is Negative Voting ? Negative Voting is simply the choice of pressing a button across “None of the above”. It is the option of saying “I dont like any of the candidates in the election”.

According to the present system, most of Indian voters use electronic voting machine [EVM] to cast their votes. The use of electronic voting machines have revolutionised Indian elections in such a way that elections results are coming out and a general outcome of who won or who lost is possible within minutes after the closing of the poll hours. One thing with the EVM is that it won’t allow a voter to cast multiple votes, there by making the vote illegitimate. When the voting was conducted on classic ballot papers, it was too easy to cast a “No-Vote” by choosing to vote for more than candidate. But, technical advancement of EVM does not allow such a scenario. Even if one voter ‘press’ two buttons at a time, the machine is technically brawny enough to know which the button that is ‘pressed’ last – there by, giving a vote for one candidate instead of two.

Why do we need Negative Voting ? It is true that Negative Voting is not a must to elect the next government, but it will increase the participation of people in the choice of electing the next government. It will allow one to walk into the supermarket and come out empty-handed if he did not like anything he saw on the shelf. As against in the present system, he have to buy one even if he thinks it is of no use.

NV is a good instrument in the hands of general public to send a message across to political parties if they dont stand with the ambitions and like of the mass even if the candidate of that party wins the elction.

There are other good side-effects of NV systems. It will increase the political knowledge of an average citizen. It will also increase the political participation of the mob. Further NV can cut down the political cynicism which prevalent nowadays. It will also make the political parties to force field a “good” candidate who have no rape or murder charges on his head.

What if the NV wins the elections ? It is an interesting scenario. It is defenetly a case of “egg on the face” of political parties. But, I dont think it is practical to go for a revote in such situations. I think the candidate with max vote should be considered as the winner even if NV has more votes than him. If we go for a revote – it may result in making multiple ouroboros situation, which is good for no one.

Current Government Position: Negative voting is negative in character. It is also too difficult to educate the people on NV [?????]

Current legal position: A two judge bench of Justices B N Agrawal and G S Singhvi said the issue needs to be examined by a larger bench as the question involved interpretation of a citizen’s fundamental right.

[Add-in: Voters can currently cancel his vote and remain aloof by signing a form with the presiding officer of the polling booth. But who in the right mind is gona do that and face the threats from the goons of political parties ??]

From Aidan Kavanagh’s Elements of Rite:

To be consumed with worry over making a liturgical mistake is the greatest mistake of all. Reverence is a virtue, not a neurosis, and God can take care of himself.

Presiding Bishop Charles E. Blake is a preacher’s preacher! The Church of God in Christ, Inc. is blessed to have such a great leader!

Presiding Bishop Charles E. Blake is a preacher’s preacher! The Church of God in Christ, Inc. is blessed to have such a great leader!

(Pollock, Male and Female)