<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>purpose-driven &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/purpose-driven/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "purpose-driven"</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 17:24:03 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Slow Down and get Centered this Christmas says Scazzero]]></title>
<link>http://muddystreams.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/slow-down-and-get-centered-this-christmas-says-scazzero/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>the olives</dc:creator>
<guid>http://muddystreams.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/slow-down-and-get-centered-this-christmas-says-scazzero/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Does Rick Warren want you to be centered this Christmas in the contemplative way? By his current pro]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Does Rick Warren want you to be <em>centered</em> this Christmas in the contemplative way? By his current promotion of contemplative pastor Peter Scazzero, it appears Warren is not opposed to it. This Christmas, Scazzero is telling his followers on his blog how to be centered by doing a spiritual practice called <em>slowing</em>. This includes things like: </p>
<blockquote><p>
-intentionally driving in the slow lane<br />
-choosing the longest line at the store<br />
-sitting longer over a meal<br />
-taking a longer shower<br />
-breathing relaxation<br />
-using the “<a href="http://www.lessons4living.com/three_fold_path.htm">palms up, palms down</a>” method of the contemplation method<br />
-intentionally chewing your food slower</p></blockquote>
<p>These tortoise-like, snail pace practices, Scazzero teaches, will help you experience the presence of God. [Scazzero will be speaking at one of Saddleback Churches upcoming conferences in 2010.]</p>
<p>Read more <a href="http://muddystreams.wordpress.com/2009/12/21/rick-warren-leads-the-way-over-the-bridge-to-rome/">here</a>.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[To Quote Ignatius ]]></title>
<link>http://muddystreams.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/to-quote-ignatius/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>the olives</dc:creator>
<guid>http://muddystreams.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/to-quote-ignatius/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[“The servant of God earns half a doctorate through illness” – Ignatius of Loyola Ignatius of Loyola ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><blockquote><p>“<em>The servant of God earns half a doctorate through illness</em>”<br />
– <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignatius_of_Loyola">Ignatius of Loyola</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Ignatius of Loyola was &#8216;<em>the founder of the militantly pro-Roman Catholic Church spiritual Gestapo Unit known as the Jesuits</em>&#8216; [<a href="http://apprising.org/2009/12/21/rick-warren-on-ignatius-of-loyola/">1</a>]. To quote Ignatius would indicate an approval of his teachings and practices. Many well known contemplative writers, teachers of mysticism, and spiritual directors do this often. But last week, this was the quote that Rick Warren, America’s favorite evangelical pastor, saw fit to place on his Twitter account, for all to see. </p>
<p>More here:</p>
<p><strong>RICK WARREN ON IGNATIUS OF LOYOLA</strong><br />
<a href="http://apprising.org/2009/12/21/rick-warren-on-ignatius-of-loyola/">http://apprising.org/2009/12/21/rick-warren-on-ignatius-of-loyola/</a></p>
<p><strong>WHO IS IGNATIUS OF LOYOLA?</strong><br />
<a href="http://apprising.org/2008/12/13/who-is-ignatius-of-loyola/">http://apprising.org/2008/12/13/who-is-ignatius-of-loyola/</a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Rick Warren leads the way over the bridge to Rome]]></title>
<link>http://muddystreams.wordpress.com/2009/12/21/rick-warren-leads-the-way-over-the-bridge-to-rome/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>the olives</dc:creator>
<guid>http://muddystreams.wordpress.com/2009/12/21/rick-warren-leads-the-way-over-the-bridge-to-rome/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Saddleback Church is having a conference called Radicals, which is 10 conferences in one. Here is co]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Saddleback Church is having a conference called <a href="http://www.pastors.com/groups/pd_conferences/pages/individual-tracks.aspx">Radicals</a>, which is 10 conferences in one.</p>
<p>Here is conference #8:</p>
<blockquote><p>8. Developing Emotionally Healthy Leadership with Pastor Peter Scazzero</p>
<p>The overall health of any church or ministry depends primarily on the emotional and spiritual health of its leadership. In fact, the key to successful spiritual leadership has much more to do with the leader’s internal life than with the leader’s expertise, gifts, or experience. Learn how to minister out of who you are and not what you do.</p></blockquote>
<p>The link at the above description leads us to more details:</p>
<blockquote><p>Peter Scazzero is the founder and senior pastor of New Life Fellowship Church in Queens, New York City–a large, multiracial, international church with over sixty-five countries represented. A graduate of Gordon-Conwell (MDiv) and Eastern Baptist Theological Seminary (DMin in marriage and family), he is also the author of Emotionally Healthy Spirituality (Nelson, 2006), The Emotionally Healthy Church: Expanded (Zondervan, 2010), and The Daily Office (WCA, 2009). Pete, along with his wife, Geri, are co-founders of Emotionally Healthy Spirituality, a groundbreaking ministry that integrates emotional health and contemplative spirituality to pastors, leaders and local churches. For more information, visit www.emotionallyhealthy.org<br />
-<a href="http://www.pastors.com/groups/pd_conferences/pages/speakers-pete-scazzero.aspx">pastors.com</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Why is Rick Warren promoting such an obvious proponent of Roman Catholicism?</p>
<p>On his blog, Scazzero writes how he recently spent four days with the Trappists at the  St. Joseph’s Abbey in Spencer Massachusetts for his annual retreat with the 70+ monks who live there. Also on his blog, Peter Scazzero teaches contemplative practices such as the Prayer of Examen (Ignatius Loyola), the “Rule of Life”, the power of silence, and the Daily Offices. His latest blog entry is about 10 ways to be centered this Christmas:</p>
<p><strong>Remaining Centered This Christmas</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.emotionallyhealthy.org/blog/?p=544">http://www.emotionallyhealthy.org/blog/?p=544</a></p>
<p>In step number two, he tells his readers:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>2. Your first work is to be contemplative before God (to be with him).</strong></p>
<p>Our goal during this season is to lead people to Jesus and help them center on him. But you cannot bring people where you have not gone in God. We are not CEOs or even preachers first. We are called to be contemplatives first (Psalm 27:4). Above all else, cultivate a pure heart before God, loving him.   </p>
<p>Adele Ahlberg Calhoun, in her book, <a href="http://www.ivpress.com/cgi-ivpress/book.pl/features/code=3330">Spiritual Disciplines Handbook: Practices that Transform us</a> (IVP), introduces a creative, unique spiritual practice called slowing. This includes things like: intentionally driving in the slow lane, choosing the longest line at the store, sitting longer over a meal, or taking a longer shower. “Slowing,” she writes, “is a way to counter our culture’s mandate to tend to the bottom line, to move it or lose it, to constantly be on the go. It is a way we honor our limits and the fact that God is found in the present moment.”</p></blockquote>
<p>As you can see by taking a quick glance at the <a href="http://www.ivpress.com/cgi-ivpress/book.pl/toc/code=3330">table of contents</a>, Calhoun&#8217;s book which Scazzero elevates is completely contemplative. This chapter by Calhoun on the spiritual practice called <em>slowing</em> that Scazzero refers to can be read <a href="http://books.google.ca/books?id=9XCQmD8LjCgC&#38;printsec=frontcover&#38;source=gbs_navlinks_s#v=onepage&#38;q=slowing&#38;f=false">HERE</a>.</p>
<p>In this chapter, the directions for this practice include breathing relaxation and using the “palms up, palms down” method of the contemplation method. It also involves intentionally chewing your food slower or taking longer showers to be in the presence of God.</p>
<p>These practices all <em>completely</em> negate the complete work of Jesus to gain us access into the presence of God through the blood of His Son, the perfect lamb who died in our place so that we could have a right relationship with the Father. </p>
<p>By giving Peter Scazzero a platform to speak at one of his Saddleback conferences, Rick Warren is the pied piper who is leading his flock back over the bridge to the church of Rome. </p>
<p>But this comes as no surprise, as Lighthouse Trails Research has already told us:</p>
<blockquote><p>
One of the authors in the Saddleback Spiritual Growth Center is Adele Ahlberg Calhoun author of Spiritual Disciplines Handbook (the one Saddleback is recommending). The book is promoting mantra meditation, giving detailed instructions on several types of contemplative practices. In addition, the author quotes from many New Age sympathizers and New Age contemplatives. In Spiritual Disciplines Handbook, Ahlberg Calhoun encourages the use of centering prayer, breath prayers, contemplative prayer, labyrinths, palms-up, palms-down exercises, and recommends for further reading a who&#8217;s who of mystics. One of those she lists is Tilden Edwards (p. 62). Edwards, the founder of the Shalem Prayer Institute, said that contemplative prayer is the bridge between Christianity and Eastern religion. 1 The Shalem center is a hub of New Age spirituality with an emphasis on the divinity in all. In her book, Ahlberg Calhoun also calls Basil Pennington one of her &#8220;spiritual tutor[s].&#8221; It was Pennington who stated:</p>
<p>    We should not hesitate to take the fruit of the age-old wisdom of the East and &#8220;capture&#8221; it for Christ. Indeed, those of us who are in ministry should make the necessary effort to acquaint ourselves with as many of these Eastern techniques as possible.</p>
<p>By turning to Ahlberg Calhoun, along with the other contemplative authors, Saddleback is promoting methods of prayer that will bring spiritually tragic results in the long run to those who embrace these non-biblical approaches to God. Rick Warren, wittingly or unwittingly, has placed his church in the sphere of Karl Rahner, the mystic who said &#8220;The Christian of the future will be a mystic or he will not exist at all.&#8221;2</p>
<p>-<strong>Rick Warren Promotes and Endorses Contemplative Spirituality</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/warrentwo.htm">http://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/warrentwo.htm</a></p></blockquote>
<p>There is no longer any speck of doubt that Rick Warren and his empire is responsible for helping to build a major bridge over the muddy convergence of the different streams of contemplative spirituality, Roman Catholic mysticism, and Eastern religions. </p>
<p>*RELATED:</p>
<p><strong>RICK WARREN WANTS US TO KNOW PETER SCAZZERO</strong><br />
<a href="http://apprising.org/2009/12/15/rick-warren-wants-us-to-know-peter-scazzero/">http://apprising.org/2009/12/15/rick-warren-wants-us-to-know-peter-scazzero/</a></p>
<p><strong>Emotional Healthy Spirituality and Willow Creek Partner to Spread Contemplative Spirituality</strong><br />
by Mike Stanwood<br />
<a href="http://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/blog/?p=1148">http://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com/blog/?p=1148</a></p>
<p><strong>HOME TO ROME</strong><br />
by Roger Oakland<br />
<a href="http://www.understandthetimes.org/commentary/c60.shtml">http://www.understandthetimes.org/commentary/c60.shtml</a></p>
<p><strong>The Emerging Church: Another Road to Rome</strong><br />
Commentary by Roger Oakland<br />
<a href="http://www.understandthetimes.org/commentary/c46.shtml">http://www.understandthetimes.org/commentary/c46.shtml</a></p>
<p>VIDEO:<br />
<strong>Emerging Church The Road to Rome</strong> &#8211; Roger Oakland<br />
<a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2354082808894087473#">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2354082808894087473#</a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Church Takeover or Resurrection?]]></title>
<link>http://christianlady.wordpress.com/2009/12/19/church-takeover-or-resurrection/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>christianlady</dc:creator>
<guid>http://christianlady.wordpress.com/2009/12/19/church-takeover-or-resurrection/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I recently discovered a declining church in our area has looked to my former church for some sort of]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>I recently discovered a declining church in our area has looked to my former church for some sort of help.  I listened to podcasts, and the meetings were very interesting.  The direction seems to be a slow take-over by my former church.  *If* this melding happens, the small 50 member church will be under the authority of the eldership of my former church.  They will also get a new name, and no one can answer for sure who will own the paid off property from this little church.  Another issue is that this little church with it&#8217;s long history, has a Christian school that appears to be doing pretty well. </p>
<p>I found a podcast of a meeting also on my former church&#8217;s site, and combining all podcasts available (for transparency), I hear a few concerns.  First, a church is down to 50 and that is deemed a failure. This is now an emergency according to both parties (actually, there&#8217;s some 3rd party involved) and because of this, the small church must be lead by the larger church.   I hear on the podcasts that the small church is going to get 3 pastors, at least one from my former church, one from outside (I think&#8230;it&#8217;s different) and the 3rd may currently be in leadership of the small church.  I am not clear on this exactly, but there is not a vote or anything really (they mentioned a vote of affirmation&#8230;).  The smaller church is likely going to get a name change, and the arrangements for the school are going to change.  One woman was very foward in asking why this little church wasn&#8217;t contacting former members who had left for help or relying and waiting on God instead of going to a big church to come in and run things.  Others have asked why my former church elders have to be in authority rather than the pastors and leadership at their site.  The leadership of the smaller church keeps mentioning (in podcast) the pastor who will be teaching there not from my former church who they like but have not met&#8230;but like him because people who have met him like him.  Uh&#8230;okay. </p>
<p>Seems my former church is bringing a team over???and so is the outside pastor guy no one has met from the little church.  So, there will be familes coming in and becoming a part of the whole thing. The three parts joined are to make decisions, but of course, my former church elders are really the ones with authority.</p>
<p>I really feel very bad for this little church.  What say does the congregation have?  The focus is so much on outreach to the community with growth as the hoped end.  However, I only heard the word &#8220;worship&#8221; mentioned by one woman talking about how the little church has family worship.  The mention of glory to God, focus on Christ, being bible centered is not a factor.  It&#8217;s all business.  Sad.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Daily Truth Bible Study  Acts 9:22-43 part 1]]></title>
<link>http://truthinator.wordpress.com/2009/12/18/daily-truth-bible-study-acts-922-43-part-1/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>truthinator</dc:creator>
<guid>http://truthinator.wordpress.com/2009/12/18/daily-truth-bible-study-acts-922-43-part-1/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Daily Bible Study Acts 9 Daily Bible Study Acts 9 Daily Bible Study Acts 9 Bible Daily Truth Bible S]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><h6><span style="color:#ffffff;">Daily Bible Study Acts 9 Daily Bible Study Acts 9 Daily Bible Study Acts 9 Bible</span></h6>
<p>Daily Truth Bible Study  Acts 9:22-43   Let us continue to follow what God is doing in the Church during its formation. How does this compare with what is happening in the &#8220;church&#8221; today?</p>
<p>Verse 22 tells us that Saul/Paul confounded the Jews who lived in Damascus proving that Jesus is the Christ. Now we know that it was not the lesser of the Jews he was confounding because, in every other situation we have seen, the leadership of the Jews is always out in front of the confrontation. It was true in the very beginning. The Jews who were leading the battle against Jesus were the leadership and that continued. So do not think that Saul/Paul was sneaking around and talking to the lowest level of Jew only. He was confounding the leadership and proving that Jesus was indeed who He had said He was.</p>
<p>How did Saul/Paul do this? I would say that he did it the same way he continued to do it throughout his ministry. He taught that Jesus is the Son of God who died, rose, and ascended to be with the Father. He taught that there is salvation in no other name except Jesus. This is the same message Paul taught throughout his ministry. The power of God was also involved without question. God&#8217;s power was at work to accomplish His purpose. Saul/Paul was only as able as God made him to be.</p>
<p>Now, I would like to combat the thought popular today that &#8220;since modern people do not want to hear about doctrine, we need to be relevant to them and meet them where they live&#8221;. This type of thinking is bankrupt. It implies that God and His word is not relevant unless man gives it the right to be. This is an abomination! God is Holy, Holy, Holy. He is all-knowing, all-powerful, and all-encompassing. He determines what is relevant.</p>
<p>The &#8220;relevance to the world&#8221; crowd are working from the belief that man is sovereign in determining whether or not he will accept God. They may not admit it but it is true. Why else would a person think it necessary to the relevant to a group in order to tell the group what it needs to hear? They are trying to get the group&#8217;s approval or buy-in.</p>
<p>We have already covered the fact that God is sovereign and determines those who will be saved and is justified in doing so. God predetermines and calls those who will be saved unto Himself. This is why God is always relevant. People need to hear the truth so the elect will come to God in repentance (which is a sign they are the elect). </p>
<p>Saul/Paul could talk the talk and reason with the educated. He was a well-educated pharisee before his conversion. If he had wanted, he could have argued Jewish beliefs all day long. As an educated man, he could have also argued Roman politics and world events. He did not do this however. He preached Christ alone as the savior of the world.</p>
<p>Next, look at verse 23. After many days, the Jews plotted to kill him. Here we go again. Not much has changed. The Jews realized they were in trouble of loosing their hold over the people. Saul/Paul&#8217;s message threatened to undo their religious system. Their hardened hearts were not capable of repenting (apparently) and thus they planned to kill the messenger so as to remove the problem.</p>
<p>Wow, what a religion! They could not win the argument with facts and they did not apparently have a great deal of faith in their religion so they plotted to kill Saul/Paul to quiet him.</p>
<p>What does this tell you about Saul/Paul and his message. There was real power there. If not, would the Jews desire to kill? Maybe. Saul/Paul&#8217;s message was considered blasphemous to them. However, watch how they planned to kill him. They were not planning to walk up to him and kill him publicly. They waited at the gates to catch him. This may suggest the Jews were not acting with the popular opinion of the population of the area.</p>
<p>Regardless of the exact reason for their plans, Saul/Paul was not to be stopped. God made a way for his escape. Saul/Paul was a force to be feared by the Jews. He carried the message of redemption to his part of the world.  </p>
<h6><span style="color:#ffffff;">Baptist Bible Brian McLaren Christianity Church Emerging Church Emergent Church Conservative Creation Discernment Doug Pagitt Evolution Faith Fundamentalist God Gospel Intelligent Design James McDonald Jesus Christ John MacArthur Joel Osteen John Piper Liberal Logic Relevance Missions New Age New Testament Old Testament Paul Washer Politics Post-modern Purpose Driven Religion Rick Warren Rob Bell Scripture Spiritual Theology Truth Inspirational Intellectual Calvinist Orthodox Bible Study Bible Study Theology Doctrine Daily Truth Calvinist Calvinist Calvinist Baptist Bible Brian McLaren Christianity Church Emerging Church Emergent Church Conservative Creation Discernment Doug Pagitt Evolution Faith Fundamentalist God Gospel Intelligent Design James McDonald Jesus Christ John MacArthur Joel Osteen John Piper Liberal Logic Relevance Missions New Age New Testament Old Testament Paul Washer Politics Post-modern Purpose Driven Religion Rick Warren Rob Bell Scripture Spiritual Theology Truth Inspirational Intellectual Calvinist Orthodox Baptist Bible Brian McLaren Christianity Church Emerging Church Emergent Church Conservative Creation Discernment Doug Pagitt Faith Fundamentalist God Gospel Intelligent Design James McDonald Jesus Christ John MacArthur Joel Osteen John Piper Liberal Logic Relevance Missions New Age New Testament Old Testament Paul Washer Politics Post-modern Purpose Driven Religion Rick Warren Rob Bell Scripture Spiritual Theology Truth Inspirational Intellectual Calvinist Orthodox Bible Study Bible Study Bible Study Christian Christianity Religion Religion Religion Reigion Grace Grace Grace Hope Hope Hope Change Change Change  Doctrine Doctrine Bible Bible Bible Relevant Relevant Relevance Post-Modern Church Truth Truth Truth Truth Truth Emergent Church Emerging Church Emergent Church Emerging Church Emerging Church Discernment Discernment Discernment Discernment Discernment Discernment Soteriology Apologetics Hermeneutics Soteriology Apologetics Hermeneutics Soteriology Apologetics Hermeneutics Peace Mercy Grace Peace Mercy Grace Apologetics, Hermeneutics, Soteriology, Mercy, Grace, Peace, Hope, Change, Bible Study Perry Noble Perry Noble Perry Noble Perry Noble Perry Noble Perry Noble Perry Noble Mark Driscoll Mark Driscoll Mark Driscoll Mark Driscoll Mark Driscoll Mark Driscoll Perry Noble</span></h6>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Perry Noble: “This Sh_t Is Awesome!” December 14, 2009]]></title>
<link>http://davidjosephhorn.wordpress.com/2009/12/15/perry-noble-%e2%80%9cthis-sh_t-is-awesome%e2%80%9d-december-14-2009/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>davidjosephhorn</dc:creator>
<guid>http://davidjosephhorn.wordpress.com/2009/12/15/perry-noble-%e2%80%9cthis-sh_t-is-awesome%e2%80%9d-december-14-2009/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Check out the latest blog from Pastor CEO Perry Noble at http://www.perrynoble.com/2009/12/14/this-s]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://davidjosephhorn.wordpress.com/files/2009/12/screen-shot-2009-12-14-at-10-37-17-pm.png"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-597" title="Screen shot 2009-12-14 at 10.37.17 PM" src="http://davidjosephhorn.wordpress.com/files/2009/12/screen-shot-2009-12-14-at-10-37-17-pm.png?w=1024" alt="" width="614" height="442" /></a></p>
<p>Check out the latest blog from <span style="text-decoration:line-through;">Pastor</span> CEO Perry Noble at <a href="http://www.perrynoble.com/2009/12/14/this-sh_t-is-awesome/">http://www.perrynoble.com/2009/12/14/this-sh_t-is-awesome/</a>. Read the article and ask yourself why this man is a pastor of a church? The filth and warped logic coming from Perry Noble is nothing but pure rebellion and sin. Perry Noble scoffs at the Scriptures and openly brings reproach upon the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. I&#8217;m not sure which Jesus Perry Noble follows, but my Jesus warned us against using filthy speech (<a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Col%203:8&#38;version=NIV">Col 3:8</a>) and living in the culture that the world promotes all around us (<a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20John+2:14-16&#38;version=NIV">1 John 2:14-16</a>).</p>
<blockquote><p>If you want to build a great church then go after the people that no one else wants!  That’s what Jesus did…and because of that we are included in HIS Kingdom.  Quite often something will happen in our church that will remind me that, though we are far from perfect, we are going after the people that I believe Jesus would have gone after…</p>
<p>So…the other day in our children’s area this happened…</p>
<p>A first time visitor (probably around 9 or 10 years old) walked into our 4th-5th grade room in KidSpring at our Anderson campus and was BLOWN away!</p>
<p>He looked at the children’s worker who met him at the door, and, after looking around the room he said, “you guys have a wii?”</p>
<p>“Yep,” she said.</p>
<p>“And you guys have a PSIII?” he said!</p>
<p>“Yes sir, we sure do,” she replied.</p>
<p>“And we can play these for free?”  He asked.</p>
<p>“Yep,” she answered.</p>
<p>Then he turned to his friend and said out loud, “This Sh_t is awesome!”</p>
<p>Now I am quite sure that makes some of you very uncomfortable; after all, you don’t want the cussing kids coming into church and messing up your perfect child.</p>
<p>However…after hearing this story from one of our children’s staff I was INCREDIBLY pumped up because I thought, “THAT is why we do church!”  I know many churches would not want a kid like that…but we do because HE MATTERS TO JESUS…even though his behavior is not perfect!(<a href="http://www.perrynoble.com/2009/12/14/this-sh_t-is-awesome/">source</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>Don&#8217;t you want your children going to NewSpring? Maybe when they get old enough to go to FUSE, Brad Cooper will have them saying &#8220;BAMF&#8221; see: <a href="http://davidjhorn.blogspot.com/2009/07/my-concern-with-brad-cooper-from.html">My concern with Brad Cooper from NewSpring Church</a> and <a href="http://davidjhorn.blogspot.com/2009/07/brad-coopers-twisted-defense-for.html">Brad Cooper&#8217;s twisted defense for cussing</a>. Before that they can follow the NewSpring Children&#8217;s <span style="text-decoration:line-through;">minister</span> life coach Pudge Huckaby and learn all the bonuses of listening to filthy rap music in order to see the love of Jesus see: <a href="http://davidjosephhorn.wordpress.com/2009/09/09/the-sour-fruit-of-perry-noble-newspring-childrens-minister-defends-his-love-of-filthy-rap-music/">The sour fruit of Perry Noble: NewSpring Children’s minister defends his love of filthy rap music!</a></p>
<p>The filth pouring from this <a href="http://davidjosephhorn.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/the-seeker-sensitive-purpose-driven-church-for-the-carnal-nature-of-mankind/">The Seeker-Sensitive Purpose Driven Church for the Carnal Nature of Mankind</a> is shameful. May god convict Perry Noble so that he will repent of this sin and stop making a mockery of the Church of Jesus Christ.</p>
<p>Perry Noble and all from NewSpring Church who reads this blog need to ponder the following:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>1</strong><em> </em><a href="#_ftn1"><sup>a</sup></a>Therefore be imitators of God, as beloved children; <em> </em></p>
<p>2   and <a href="#_ftn2"><sup>a</sup></a>walk in love, just as Christ also <a href="#_ftn3"><sup>b</sup></a>loved <a href="#_ftn4"><sup>1</sup></a>you and <a href="#_ftn5"><sup>c</sup></a>gave Himself up for us, an <a href="#_ftn6"><sup>d</sup></a>offering and a sacrifice to God <a href="#_ftn7"><sup>2</sup></a>as a <a href="#_ftn8"><sup>e</sup></a>fragrant aroma.</p>
<p><strong>3</strong> But <a href="#_ftn9"><sup>a</sup></a>immorality <a href="#_ftn10"><sup>1</sup></a>or any impurity or greed must not even be named among you, as is proper among <a href="#_ftn11"><sup>2</sup></a>saints;</p>
<p>4   and <em>there must be no </em><a href="#_ftn12"><sup>a</sup></a>filthiness and silly talk, or coarse jesting, which <a href="#_ftn13"><sup>b</sup></a>are not fitting, but rather <a href="#_ftn14"><sup>c</sup></a>giving of thanks.</p>
<p>5   For this you know with certainty, that <a href="#_ftn15"><sup>a</sup></a>no <a href="#_ftn16"><sup>1</sup></a>immoral or impure person or covetous man, who is an idolater, has an inheritance in the kingdom <a href="#_ftn17"><sup>b</sup></a>of Christ and God.</p>
<p><strong>6</strong> <a href="#_ftn18"><sup>a</sup></a>Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things <a href="#_ftn19"><sup>b</sup></a>the wrath of God comes upon <a href="#_ftn20"><sup>c</sup></a>the sons of disobedience.</p>
<p>7   Therefore do not be <a href="#_ftn21"><sup>a</sup></a>partakers with them;</p>
<p>8   for <a href="#_ftn22"><sup>a</sup></a>you were formerly <a href="#_ftn23"><sup>b</sup></a>darkness, but now you are Light in the Lord; walk as <a href="#_ftn24"><sup>c</sup></a>children of Light</p>
<p>9   (for <a href="#_ftn25"><sup>a</sup></a>the fruit of the Light <em>consists </em>in all <a href="#_ftn26"><sup>b</sup></a>goodness and righteousness and truth),</p>
<p>10   <a href="#_ftn27"><sup>1</sup></a><a href="#_ftn28"><sup>a</sup></a>trying to learn what is pleasing to the Lord.</p>
<p>11   <a href="#_ftn29"><sup>a</sup></a>Do not participate in the unfruitful <a href="#_ftn30"><sup>b</sup></a>deeds of <a href="#_ftn31"><sup>c</sup></a>darkness, but instead even <a href="#_ftn32"><sup>1</sup></a><a href="#_ftn33"><sup>d</sup></a>expose them;</p>
<p>12   for it is disgraceful even to speak of the things which are done by them in secret.</p>
<p>13   But all things become visible <a href="#_ftn34"><sup>a</sup></a>when they are <a href="#_ftn35"><sup>1</sup></a>exposed by the light, for everything that becomes visible is light.</p>
<p>14   For this reason <a href="#_ftn36"><sup>1</sup></a>it says,</p>
<p>“<a href="#_ftn37"><sup>a</sup></a>Awake, sleeper,</p>
<p>And arise from <a href="#_ftn38"><sup>b</sup></a>the dead,</p>
<p>And Christ <a href="#_ftn39"><sup>c</sup></a>will shine on you.”</p>
<p><strong>15</strong> Therefore <a href="#_ftn40"><sup>1</sup></a>be careful how you <a href="#_ftn41"><sup>a</sup></a>walk, not <a href="#_ftn42"><sup>b</sup></a>as unwise men but as wise,</p>
<p>16   <a href="#_ftn43"><sup>1</sup></a><a href="#_ftn44"><sup>a</sup></a>making the most of your time, because <a href="#_ftn45"><sup>b</sup></a>the days are evil.</p>
<p>17   So then do not be foolish, but <a href="#_ftn46"><sup>a</sup></a>understand what the will of the Lord is.</p>
<p>18   And <a href="#_ftn47"><sup>a</sup></a>do not get drunk with wine, <a href="#_ftn48"><sup>1</sup></a>for that is <a href="#_ftn49"><sup>b</sup></a>dissipation, but be <a href="#_ftn50"><sup>c</sup></a>filled with the Spirit,</p>
<p>19   <a href="#_ftn51"><sup>a</sup></a>speaking to <a href="#_ftn52"><sup>1</sup></a>one another in <a href="#_ftn53"><sup>b</sup></a>psalms and <a href="#_ftn54"><sup>c</sup></a>hymns and spiritual <a href="#_ftn55"><sup>d</sup></a>songs, <a href="#_ftn56"><sup>e</sup></a>singing and making melody with your heart to the Lord;</p>
<p>20   <a href="#_ftn57"><sup>a</sup></a>always giving thanks for all things in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ to <a href="#_ftn58"><sup>1</sup></a><a href="#_ftn59"><sup>b</sup></a>God, even the Father;</p>
<p>21   <a href="#_ftn60"><sup>1</sup></a><a href="#_ftn61"><sup>a</sup></a>and be subject to one another in the <a href="#_ftn62"><sup>2</sup></a><a href="#_ftn63"><sup>b</sup></a>fear of Christ. <a href="#_ftn64"><sup>[1]</sup></a></p></blockquote>
<hr size="1" /><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>Matt 5:48; Luke 6:36; Eph 4:32</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>Rom 14:15; Col 3:14</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>b</sup></a>John 13:34; Rom 8:37</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>1</sup></a>One early ms reads <em>us</em></p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>c</sup></a>John 6:51; Rom 4:25; Gal 2:20; Eph 5:25</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>d</sup></a>Heb 7:27; 9:14; 10:10, 12</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>2</sup></a>Lit <em>for an odor of fragrance</em></p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>e</sup></a>Ex 29:18, 25; 2 Cor 2:14</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>Col 3:5</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>1</sup></a>Lit <em>and all</em></p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>2</sup></a>Or <em>holy ones</em></p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>Matt 12:34; Eph 4:29; Col 3:8</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>b</sup></a>Rom 1:28</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>c</sup></a>Eph 5:20</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>1 Cor 6:9; Col 3:5</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>1</sup></a>I.e. one who commits sexual immorality</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>b</sup></a>Col 1:13</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>Col 2:8</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>b</sup></a>Rom 1:18; Col 3:6</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>c</sup></a>Eph 2:2</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>Eph 3:6</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>Eph 2:2</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>b</sup></a>Acts 26:18; Col 1:12f</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>c</sup></a>John 12:36; Rom 13:12</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>Gal 5:22</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>b</sup></a>Rom 15:14</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>1</sup></a>Lit <em>proving what</em></p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>Rom 12:2</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>1 Cor 5:9; 2 Cor 6:14</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>b</sup></a>Rom 13:12</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>c</sup></a>Acts 26:18; Col 1:12f</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>1</sup></a>Or <em>reprove</em></p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>d</sup></a>1 Tim 5:20</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>John 3:20f</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>1</sup></a>Or <em>reproved</em></p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>1</sup></a>Or <em>He</em></p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>Is 26:19; 51:17; 52:1; 60:1; Rom 13:11</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>b</sup></a>Eph 2:1</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>c</sup></a>Luke 1:78f</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>1</sup></a>Lit <em>look carefully</em></p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>Eph 5:2</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>b</sup></a>Col 4:5</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>1</sup></a>Lit <em>redeeming the time</em></p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>Col 4:5</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>b</sup></a>Gal 1:4; Eph 6:13</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>Rom 12:2; Col 1:9; 1 Thess 4:3</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>Prov 20:1; 23:31f; Rom 13:13; 1 Cor 5:11; 1 Thess 5:7</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>1</sup></a>Lit <em>in which is</em></p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>b</sup></a>Titus 1:6; 1 Pet 4:4</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>c</sup></a>Luke 1:15</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>Col 3:16</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>1</sup></a>Or <em>yourselves</em></p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>b</sup></a>1 Cor 14:26</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>c</sup></a>Acts 16:25</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>d</sup></a>Rev 5:9</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>e</sup></a>1 Cor 14:15</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>Rom 1:8; Eph 5:4; Col 3:17</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>1</sup></a>Lit <em>the God and Father</em></p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>b</sup></a>1 Cor 15:24</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>1</sup></a>Lit <em>being subject</em></p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>Gal 5:13; Phil 2:3; 1 Pet 5:5</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>2</sup></a>Or <em>reverence</em></p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>b</sup></a>2 Cor 5:11</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>[1]</sup></a>New American Standard Bible : 1995 update. 1995 (Eph 5:1-21). LaHabra, CA: The Lockman Foundation.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apprising Ministries - CATHLIMERGENT NETWORK]]></title>
<link>http://narrowisthepath.wordpress.com/2009/12/12/apprising-ministries-cathlimergent-network/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Reformed Joe</dc:creator>
<guid>http://narrowisthepath.wordpress.com/2009/12/12/apprising-ministries-cathlimergent-network/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[KEN SILVA AND CATHLIMERGENT NETWORK By Ken Silva pastor-teacher Dec 11, 2009 on Apprising Ministries]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><h2><a title="Permanent Link to KEN SILVA AND CATHLIMERGENT NETWORK" rel="bookmark" href="http://apprising.org/2009/12/ken-silva-and-cathlimergent-network/">KEN SILVA AND CATHLIMERGENT NETWORK</a></h2>
<p>By <a title="Posts by Ken Silva pastor-teacher" href="http://apprising.org/author/ken-silva-pastor-teacher/">Ken Silva pastor-teacher</a> Dec 11, 2009 on <a href="http://apprising.org/" target="_blank">Apprising Ministries Blog</a></p>
<div>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="Roman Catholicism" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2297/2427315635_be2f4a6491.jpg" alt="" width="242" height="187" />I’ve mentioned a few times now at <a href="http://apprising.org/" target="_blank">Apprising Ministries</a> that I am a former Roman Catholic that, through absolutely no effort of my own, God mercifully delivered from the religious bondage of the Church of Rome into the glorious liberty of the sons of God, by His grace alone, through faith alone, in the finished work on the Cross of Christ alone. </p>
<p>This is why the other day in <a href="http://apprising.org/2009/12/roman-catholic-church-infiltrating-evangelicalism/" target="_blank">Roman Catholic Church Infiltrating Evangelicalism </a> I again discussed a nauseating slide away from the proper biblical doctrine of the Reformation by more and more within now largely pretending to be Protestant evangelicalism. For example, previously in the AM article <a title="Permanent Link to SBC PROTESTANT PASTOR RICK WARREN DOUBLE-MINDED ON THE REFORMATION AND ROMAN CATHOLICISM" href="http://apprising.org/2008/10/sbc-protestant-pastor-rick-warren-double-minded-on-the-reformation-and-roman-catholicism/" target="_blank">SBC Protestant Pastor Rick Warren Double-Minded On The Reformation And Roman Catholicism</a> I documented for you the personal position of Purpose Driven Pope <a href="http://apprising.org/category/rick-warren/" target="_blank">Rick Warren,</a> concerning the Roman Catholic Church, “I really do feel that these people <strong>are brothers and sisters in God’s family</strong>.” </p>
<h2><strong><a href="http://apprising.org/2009/12/ken-silva-and-cathlimergent-network/" target="_blank">To Cont. Reading &#8230;&#8230;</a></strong></h2>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[We are here to belong]]></title>
<link>http://robpetersen.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/we-are-here-to-belong/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>robpetersen</dc:creator>
<guid>http://robpetersen.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/we-are-here-to-belong/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Let me say at the outset this is a nondenominational blog.  I&#8217;ve been reading Rick Warren]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><a href="http://robpetersen.wordpress.com/files/2009/12/images2.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-471" title="images[2]" src="http://robpetersen.wordpress.com/files/2009/12/images2.jpg?w=104" alt="" width="104" height="150" /></a>Let me say at the outset this is a nondenominational blog.  I&#8217;ve been reading Rick Warren&#8217;s <em>The Purpose Driven Life </em>which might sound like a self-help book, but it&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>Whereas self-help books tell you purpose, essential change or course correction in life comes from within, the point of view here is you&#8217;re not here by accident.  Your purpose in life has already been individually thought out and finding it happens, not by looking within, but surrendering to something larger than yourself.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also deals with community as good as any book I&#8217;ve read.  One reason, as the book devotes a chapter, is we are here to belong.  Because, through belonging, we learn and put in practice the seven characteristics of fellowship which are to:</p>
<ul>
<li>Share our true feeling (authenticity)</li>
<li>Encourage one other (mutuality)</li>
<li>Support each other (sympathy)</li>
<li>Forgive each other (mercy)</li>
<li>Speak the truth in love (honesty)</li>
<li>Admit our weaknesses (humility)</li>
<li>Make group a priority (frequency)</li>
</ul>
<p>Although it could be read faster, the book is meant to be read and considered a chapter a day for 40 days  because 40 days is considered a time spiritually significant for  transformation.</p>
<p>There have been 133,000,000 blogs indexed by Technorati since 2002.  They have been read by 346,000,000 people since 2008.  There are 900,000 blog posts within any given 24 hour period.  Positive perceptions of a company increase by 36% if they have a blog on their web site.</p>
<p>With numbers so large, it may seem no individual blog really matters.  I believe just the opposite.  It&#8217;s significant proof of our need to belong and commitment to fellowship.  So, if you blog or you read blogs, keep it up and keep the seven characteristics in mind.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[PERRY NOBLE SAYS YOU’RE A JACKASS by Ken Silva]]></title>
<link>http://davidjosephhorn.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/perry-noble-says-you%e2%80%99re-a-jackass-by-ken-silva/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>davidjosephhorn</dc:creator>
<guid>http://davidjosephhorn.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/perry-noble-says-you%e2%80%99re-a-jackass-by-ken-silva/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Perry Noble, lead vocalist pastor of NewSpring Church, says that the Christian who wants to go deepe]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><a href="http://davidjosephhorn.wordpress.com/files/2009/12/screen-shot-2009-12-09-at-9-23-21-am.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-583" title="Screen shot 2009-12-09 at 9.23.21 AM" src="http://davidjosephhorn.wordpress.com/files/2009/12/screen-shot-2009-12-09-at-9-23-21-am.png" alt="" width="500" height="267" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Perry Noble, lead vocalist pastor of <em>NewSpring Church</em>, says that the Christian who wants to go deeper into God’s Word is a “jackass.” He also quotes John Maxwell telling us the following pietistic foolishness that supposedly “most Christians are educated way beyond their level of obedience anyway.”<a href="http://apprising.org/2009/12/perry-noble-says-youre-a-jackass/?utm_source=feedburner&#38;utm_medium=feed&#38;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+apprising%2F2+%28Apprising+Ministries%29">source</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Click<a href="http://apprising.org/2009/12/perry-noble-says-youre-a-jackass/?utm_source=feedburner&#38;utm_medium=feed&#38;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+apprising%2F2+%28Apprising+Ministries%29"> PERRY NOBLE SAYS YOU’RE A JACKASS</a> to be read the whole article by Pastor Ken Silva</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Manhattan Declaration: Why didn't you sign it, R.C.?]]></title>
<link>http://narrowisthepath.wordpress.com/2009/12/08/the-manhattan-declaration-why-didnt-you-sign-it-r-c/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Reformed Joe</dc:creator>
<guid>http://narrowisthepath.wordpress.com/2009/12/08/the-manhattan-declaration-why-didnt-you-sign-it-r-c/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The Manhattan Declaration: Why didn&#8217;t you sign it, R.C.? December 8, 2009 @ 4:45 PM   by R.C. ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<h2><a href="http://www.ligonier.org/blog/2009/12/the-manhattan-declaration-why-didnt-you-sign-it-rc.html">The Manhattan Declaration: Why didn&#8217;t you sign it, R.C.?</a></h2>
<div>December 8, 2009 @ 4:45 PM  </div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div><strong>by R.C. Sproul<br />
</strong></div>
<div>On November 20, 2009, a document called the Manhattan Declaration was presented to the public by a coalition of cobelligerents. The document is concerned primarily with three very important biblical and cultural issues: the sanctity of life, the meaning of marriage, and the nature of religious liberty. Without question, these issues are up for grabs in our nation.</div>
<div>As anyone familiar with my ministry will know, I share the document&#8217;s concern for defending the unborn, defining heterosexual marriage biblically, and preserving a proper relationship between church and state. However, when the document was sent to me and my signature was requested a few weeks ago, I declined to sign it.</div>
<h2><a href="http://new.ligonier.org/blog/the-manhattan-declaration/" target="_blank">Read the full statement here</a>.</h2>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The White Horse Inn - What is Discipleship?]]></title>
<link>http://narrowisthepath.wordpress.com/2009/12/08/the-white-horse-inn-what-is-discipleship/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Reformed Joe</dc:creator>
<guid>http://narrowisthepath.wordpress.com/2009/12/08/the-white-horse-inn-what-is-discipleship/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[What is Discipleship? Sunday, December 06, 2009 What does it mean to be a follower of Christ? Should]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div><a href="http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/The_White_Horse_Inn/archives.asp?bcd=2009-12-6" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft" style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;border:0;" src="http://media.salemwebnetwork.com/oneplace/images/hosts/big/b-host-wi.jpg" border="0" alt="Dr. Michael Horton" hspace="0" width="260" /></a></div>
<div>
<div><a href="http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/The_White_Horse_Inn/archives.asp?bcd=2009-12-6" target="_blank"><img src="http://media.salemwebnetwork.com/oneplace/images/logos/big/logo-wi.gif" border="0" alt="White Horse Inn" hspace="0" width="98" /></a></div>
<div><a href="http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/The_White_Horse_Inn/"></a><br />
<a href="http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/The_White_Horse_Inn/archives.asp?bcd=2009-12-6" target="_blank"><strong><span>What is Discipleship?</span></strong><br />
</a></div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div><em></p>
<div><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">Sunday, December 06, 2009</span></strong></div>
<p></em></p>
<div>What does it mean to be a follower of Christ? Should Christians focus more on &#8220;being the church&#8221; rather than going to church? Can we really &#8220;live the gospel?&#8221; On this edition of the White Horse Inn the hosts will interact with these questions and more as they discuss the nature and meaning of discipleship.</div>
<div><a href="//www.oneplace.com/ministries/the_white_horse_inn/archives.asp&#38;Refresh=&#38;AdsCategory=MINISTRY.WI&#38;Show_ID=26','player','toolbar=no,location=no,status=no,directories=no,menubar=no,scrolling=auto,scrollbars=auto,width=653,height=412,resizable=yes'));"></a></div>
<div><a href="//www.oneplace.com/ministries/the_white_horse_inn/archives.asp&#38;Refresh=&#38;AdsCategory=MINISTRY.WI&#38;Show_ID=26','player','toolbar=no,location=no,status=no,directories=no,menubar=no,scrolling=auto,scrollbars=auto,width=653,height=412,resizable=yes'));"></a></div>
<div><a href="showFeedInfo(26)"></a></div>
</div>
</div>
<div><!-- TheDate: 12/8/2009 --></p>
<div><span style="color:#ff0000;"><strong>RECENT BROADCASTS</strong></span></div>
<div>
<div><img src="http://media.salemwebnetwork.com/oneplace/images/arrow_new.gif" border="0" alt="" width="10" height="8" /></div>
<div><a name="12/6/2009"></a><a href="http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/The_White_Horse_Inn/archives.asp?bcd=2009-12-6" target="_blank">What is Discipleship?</a> &#8211; <span><em>12/6/2009</em></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div><img src="http://media.salemwebnetwork.com/oneplace/images/arrow_new.gif" border="0" alt="" width="10" height="8" /></div>
<div><a name="11/29/2009"></a><a href="http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/The_White_Horse_Inn/archives.asp?bcd=2009-11-29" target="_blank">Christianity Confronts Islam</a> &#8211; <span><em>11/29/2009</em></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div><img src="http://media.salemwebnetwork.com/oneplace/images/arrow_new.gif" border="0" alt="" width="10" height="8" /></div>
<div><a name="11/22/2009"></a><a href="http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/The_White_Horse_Inn/archives.asp?bcd=2009-11-22" target="_blank">The Preached Word</a> &#8211; <span><em>11/22/2009</em></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div><img src="http://media.salemwebnetwork.com/oneplace/images/arrow_new.gif" border="0" alt="" width="10" height="8" /></div>
<div><a name="11/15/2009"></a><a href="http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/The_White_Horse_Inn/archives.asp?bcd=2009-11-15" target="_blank">Is Living Like Jesus Enough?</a> &#8211; <span><em>11/15/2009</em></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Rick Warren &amp; Mark Driscoll]]></title>
<link>http://narrowisthepath.wordpress.com/2009/12/06/rick-warren-mark-driscoll/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Reformed Joe</dc:creator>
<guid>http://narrowisthepath.wordpress.com/2009/12/06/rick-warren-mark-driscoll/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[RICK WARREN RADICALIS By Ken Silva pastor-teacher from The Apprising Ministries Blog Well ok, it’s n]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><h2><a title="Permanent Link to RICK WARREN RADICALIS" rel="bookmark" href="http://apprising.org/2009/12/rick-warren-radicalis/">RICK WARREN RADICALIS</a></h2>
<p>By <a title="Posts by Ken Silva pastor-teacher" href="http://apprising.org/author/ken-silva-pastor-teacher/">Ken Silva pastor-teacher</a> from <a href="http://apprising.org/2009/12/rick-warren-radicalis/" target="_blank">The Apprising Ministries Blog</a></p>
<div>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="Rick Warren" src="http://chattahbox.com/images/2009/07/rick_warren.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="403" />Well ok, it’s not so much that Purpose Driven Pope <a href="http://apprising.org/category/rick-warren/" target="_blank">Rick Warren</a> himself is any radical, but he does want to make sure you know that his next generation seeker-sensitive boyz sure r. I’m sorry about being plain; you see, I don’t have a keyboard that can reverse the letter r to be more rad.</p>
<p>However, today via the mass email “Chat Live With Pastor Mark Driscoll tomorrow, December 2 about Radicalis,” Warren announces that we can, “Chat live with Pastor Mark Driscoll” tomorrow at 11AM West Coast time. Warren then tells us that we’ll “learn more about what [Driscoll will] be speaking on at Radicalis this February.” </p>
<p>According to Rick Warren one can “ask questions and interact with this dynamic pastor and Christian leader.” The speakers for <a href="http://www.radicalis.com/" target="_blank">Radicalis</a>, “10 Conferences in One,” include familiar names around the “seeker” driven section of the man-centered Church Growth Movement like Andy Stanley, Perry Noble, Kerry Shook, and now Mark Driscoll.</p>
<p>We’re told that the “Radicalis Experience” at <em>Saddleback Church </em>promises to be one of “Absolute Surrender, Sacrificial Lifestyle, Authentic Christianity… A Radical Experience” which is why:</p>
<h2><a href="http://apprising.org/2009/12/rick-warren-radicalis/" target="_blank">To Cont. Reading &#8230;.</a></h2>
<p> </p>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Calling on the people of NewSpring to demand Perry Noble to repent and meet with James Duncan]]></title>
<link>http://davidjosephhorn.wordpress.com/2009/12/07/calling-on-the-people-of-newspring-to-demand-perry-noble-to-repent-and-meet-with-james-duncan/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>davidjosephhorn</dc:creator>
<guid>http://davidjosephhorn.wordpress.com/2009/12/07/calling-on-the-people-of-newspring-to-demand-perry-noble-to-repent-and-meet-with-james-duncan/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I am truly at a loss for words at the lack of care coming from NewSpring Church concerning James Dun]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><a href="http://davidjosephhorn.wordpress.com/files/2009/12/perry_hero.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-566" title="perry_hero" src="http://davidjosephhorn.wordpress.com/files/2009/12/perry_hero.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="193" /></a></p>
<p>I am truly at a loss for words at the lack of care coming from <a href="http://www.newspring.cc/">NewSpring Church</a> concerning James Duncan from  <a href="http://www.jduncan.com/blog/">Pajama Pages</a> over the harassment put on him by some at NewSpring Church. Instead of reaching out and truly trying to resolve this issue, NewSpring releases a post <a href="http://www.newspring.cc/blog/an-announcement-to-the-newspring-church-family">http://www.newspring.cc/blog/an-announcement-to-the-newspring-church-family</a> which basically moves the blame away from NewSpring Church. Please read <a href="http://www.pajamapages.com/?p=3780">Holy rage at the ‘Spring</a> to see what some at NewSpring did to Mr. James Duncan. It is evident that Mr. Duncan tried to contact Perry Noble only to be ignored by NewSpring Church. All of this could have been stopped months ago if NewSpring Church actually cared about people rather than their perceived image.</p>
<p>I tried to contact a staff member today that I used to talk to from the Greenville Campus  in hopes that he/she would go to Perry Noble concerning this matter.  At the very least, the people of NewSpring should demand that Perry Noble publicly state that all such slanderous and/or criminal attacks upon Mr. Duncan be stopped immediately!</p>
<p>I am asking the people who attend NewSpring Church to contact NewSpring Church to join me and demand that Senior Pastor Perry Noble publicly apologize to James Duncan and his family. If NewSpring Church had taken the time to talk to James Duncan and allow him to speak with Perry Noble this could have been stopped, therefore NewSpring Church is responsible for what happened to James Duncan.</p>
<p>NewSpring Church and Perry Noble should be reaching out to Mr. Duncan over what has happened to him and his family. Instead of trying to paint James Duncan as a greedy evil man, Perry Noble and NewSpring Church should be concerned about his well being and should be there to correct the wrongs done to Mr. Duncan and his family. This shows everyone the arrogance and pride that has consumed the hearts of Perry Noble and NewSpring&#8217;s leadership.</p>
<p>All this mess aside, regardless of who is right and wrong, Perry Noble &#8211; as a pastor &#8211; should be concerned and seeking peace in this matter. NewSpring Church should be taking bold steps to ensure that no NewSpring staff member, member, or volunteer is harassing Mr. Duncan or any other person who disagrees with Perry Noble and NewSpring Church. Perry Noble should echo this from the stage, his blog, and on NewSpring Church&#8217;s home page to show the people of NewSpring that he does not condone these actions by some NewSpring people.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>1 Corinthians 13:1-13 (NASB) </strong></p>
<p><sup><span style="color:#000000;">13:1 </span></sup>If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but do not have love, I have become a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal.<br />
<sup><span style="color:#000000;">2 </span></sup>If I have <em>the gift of</em> prophecy, and know all mysteries and all knowledge; and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing.<br />
<sup><span style="color:#000000;">3 </span></sup>And if I give all my possessions to feed <em>the poor,</em> and if I surrender my body to be burned, but do not have love, it profits me nothing.<br />
<sup><span style="color:#000000;">4 </span></sup>Love is patient, love is kind <em>and</em> is not jealous; love does not brag <em>and</em> is not arrogant,<br />
<sup><span style="color:#000000;">5 </span></sup>does not act unbecomingly; it does not seek its own, is not provoked, does not take into account a wrong <em>suffered,</em><br />
<sup><span style="color:#000000;">6 </span></sup>does not rejoice in unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth;<br />
<sup><span style="color:#000000;">7 </span></sup>bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.<br />
<sup><span style="color:#000000;">8 </span></sup>Love never fails; but if <em>there are gifts of</em> prophecy, they will be done away; if <em>there are</em> tongues, they will cease; if <em>there is</em> knowledge, it will be done away.<br />
<sup><span style="color:#000000;">9 </span></sup>For we know in part and we prophesy in part;<br />
<sup><span style="color:#000000;">10 </span></sup>but when the perfect comes, the partial will be done away.<br />
<sup><span style="color:#000000;">11 </span></sup>When I was a child, I used to speak like a child, think like a child, reason like a child; when I became a man, I did away with childish things.<br />
<sup><span style="color:#000000;">12 </span></sup>For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face; now I know in part, but then I will know fully just as I also have been fully known.<br />
<sup><span style="color:#000000;">13 </span></sup>But now faith, hope, love, abide these three; but the greatest of these is love.</p>
<p><strong>1 Timothy 3:1-7 (NASB) </strong></p>
<p><sup><span style="color:#000000;">3:1 </span></sup>It is a trustworthy statement: if any man aspires to the office of overseer, it is a fine work he desires <em>to do.</em><br />
<sup><span style="color:#000000;">2 </span></sup>An overseer, then, must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, prudent, respectable, hospitable, able to teach,<br />
<sup><span style="color:#000000;">3 </span></sup>not addicted to wine or pugnacious, but gentle, peaceable, free from the love of money.<br />
<sup><span style="color:#000000;">4 </span></sup><em>He must be</em> one who manages his own household well, keeping his children under control with all dignity<br />
<sup><span style="color:#000000;">5 </span></sup>(but if a man does not know how to manage his own household, how will he take care of the church of God?),<br />
<sup><span style="color:#000000;">6 </span></sup><em>and</em> not a new convert, so that he will not become conceited and fall into the condemnation incurred by the devil.<br />
<sup><span style="color:#000000;">7 </span></sup>And he must have a good reputation with those outside <em>the church,</em> so that he will not fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.</p></blockquote>
<p><img style="border:medium none;position:absolute;z-index:2147483647;opacity:0.6;display:none;" src="image/png;base64,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%3D" alt="" width="24" height="24" /></p>
<p><img style="border:medium none;position:absolute;z-index:2147483647;opacity:0.6;display:none;" src="image/png;base64,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%3D" alt="" width="24" height="24" /></p>
<p><img style="border:medium none;position:absolute;z-index:2147483647;opacity:0.6;display:none;" src="image/png;base64,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%3D" alt="" width="24" height="24" /></p>
<p><img style="border:medium none;position:absolute;z-index:2147483647;opacity:0.6;display:none;" src="image/png;base64,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%3D" alt="" width="24" height="24" /></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How we shop this holiday season]]></title>
<link>http://robpetersen.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/how-we-shop-this-holiday-season/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>robpetersen</dc:creator>
<guid>http://robpetersen.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/how-we-shop-this-holiday-season/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[In a year where we&#8217;re more interested in the best deals and with more reason to be, here]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><a href="http://robpetersen.wordpress.com/files/2009/12/8376919011.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-456" title="83769190[1]" src="http://robpetersen.wordpress.com/files/2009/12/8376919011.jpg?w=300" alt="" width="300" height="259" /></a>In a year where we&#8217;re more interested in the best deals and with more reason to be, here&#8217;s a snapshot of where we&#8217;ll look this holiday season before we hit the stores (according to Deloitte)</p>
<p>40% turn to print</p>
<p>29% look at flyers</p>
<p>27% check out websites focused on holiday deals</p>
<p>24% go to retailers&#8217; websites</p>
<p>Newspapers, magazines and flyers are still the most popular.  The internet is not far behind and growing faster while print and flyers slowly decline.  This means we&#8217;ll do more shopping online than ever before we buy offline.</p>
<p>Many x-mas info and retailers sites now have connections to social media sites like <em>Facebook</em>, <em>Twitter</em>, <a href="http://momslikeme.com/">MomsLikeMe </a>, <a href="http://trianglemom2mom.com/">TriangleMom2Mom</a> and <a href="http://myblackfridaydeals.com/">MyBlackFridayDeals</a>.  This means we&#8217;ll go to stores with more recommendations, reviews and advice from others and we&#8217;ll be more certain about what we&#8217;re going to buy. We&#8217;ll feel more satisfied about having made smarter decisions. We&#8217;ll spend less time in crowded stores.</p>
<p>This means this holiday season the two biggest purchase drivers, word on mouth and content on the web, will be put to use more often and in more measurable ways.  Kasey Lobaugh, a principle at Deloitte&#8217;s retail practice says &#8220;if you send out a URL on Twitter, you know how many people clicked on that URL.&#8221;</p>
<p>And it costs a whole lot less than print and flyers for manufacturers to know a lot more about what it takes to find advocates for their brands.</p>
<p>This means we should expect to see manufacturers offer great deals that we actually want for many more Xmas&#8217;  because it&#8217;s more affordable and consumers will reward the ones who do a good job at it with more business.</p>
<p>Happy shopping this holiday season where ever your journey, online or offline, takes you.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Digging for Certainty?]]></title>
<link>http://theblissfulignoramus.com/2009/12/05/digging-for-certainty/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 04:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>The Blissful Ignoramus</dc:creator>
<guid>http://theblissfulignoramus.com/2009/12/05/digging-for-certainty/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I Don&#8217;t Know why we are slaves to our desire for control. I do know, it is better to be flying]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><em>I Don&#8217;t <strong>Know</strong></em> why we are slaves to our desire for control.</p>
<p>I do know, it is better to be flying on inspiration than digging for certainty.</p>
<p>I am enjoying the feeling of being hungry today.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[RECIPE FOR SPIRITUAL MUD PIE DISASTER]]></title>
<link>http://muddystreams.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/recipe-for-spiritual-mud-pie-disaster/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>the olives</dc:creator>
<guid>http://muddystreams.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/recipe-for-spiritual-mud-pie-disaster/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[RECIPE FOR SPIRITUAL DISASTER by Ken Silva First you begin with a great big bowl full of years of sh]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><blockquote><p><strong>RECIPE FOR SPIRITUAL DISASTER</strong><br />
by Ken Silva</p>
<p>First you begin with a great big bowl full of years of shallow self-centered “what does this verse mean to me” Bible studies. Next stir in a large measure of biblical illiteracy, while adding a small dose of the yeast of refusing to refute error; and make sure to blend in more than a moderate proportion of women pastors.</p>
<p>Then add to the mix an unhealthy amount of “let’s make church an entertaining experience” smoothly blended together with tasty man-centered “tell ‘em what they want to hear.” Now ignore at your leisure; let the bitter batter fester until completely dense, then frost with critical-reasoning skills killing contemplative spirituality, and finally, dabble on top just a touch of postmodern pudding in its embrace of “mystery and ambiguity.”</p></blockquote>
<p>SOURCE:</p>
<p><a href="http://apprising.org/2009/12/recipe-for-spiritual-disaster/">http://apprising.org/2009/12/recipe-for-spiritual-disaster/</a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A Review of the Manhattan Declaration by Dr. Michael Horton]]></title>
<link>http://narrowisthepath.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/a-review-of-the-manhattan-declaration-by-dr-michael-horton/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Reformed Joe</dc:creator>
<guid>http://narrowisthepath.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/a-review-of-the-manhattan-declaration-by-dr-michael-horton/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A Review of the Manhattan Declarationby Dr. Michael Horton The Manhattan Declaration, released Novem]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><h2><a href="https://www.whitehorseinn.org/archives/250.html" target="_blank">A Review of the Manhattan Declaration</a>by Dr. Michael Horton</p>
<div>
<div><a href="http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/The_White_Horse_Inn/host_bio.asp?show_id=26','Host_Bio','toolbar=no,location=no,status=no,directories=no,menubar=no,scrolling=yes,scrollbars=yes,width=460,height=400,resizable=yes'));"><img class="alignleft" style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;border:0;" src="http://media.salemwebnetwork.com/oneplace/images/hosts/big/b-host-wi.jpg" border="0" alt="Dr. Michael Horton" hspace="0" width="260" /></a><a href="http://www.manhattandeclaration.org/"></a>The Manhattan Declaration, released November 20, 2009, firmly yet winsomely takes the stand in defense of truths that are increasingly undermined in contemporary Western societies, including our own.  Drafted by Princeton law professor Robert George and evangelical leaders Chuck Colson and Timothy George, this declaration focuses on three issues: (1) the inherent dignity and rights of each human life (including the unborn) by virtue of being created in God’s image; (2) the integrity of marriage as a union of one man and one woman, and (3) religious liberty, also anchored in the image of God.</div>
<p>There is a lot of wisdom in this document.  For one, it does not breathe the vitriol that is often too common on the religious right and left.  In this declaration one will find more light than heat, yet a sense of personal concern for the humaneness of the common culture, even for those who are pursuing antithetical agendas.  May this more thoughtful approach to public engagement become more characteristic!</p>
<p>The framers wisely appeal to natural law as well as to Scripture and its revealed doctrines.  After all, these three issues are grounded in creation.  They are deliverances of the law that God inscribed on every human conscience, not of the gospel that God announced beforehand through his prophets and fulfilled in his incarnate Son’s life, death, and resurrection.</p>
<p>However, it is just for that reason that I stumbled over a few references to the gospel in this declaration.  It took me back to the old days of “Evangelicals and Catholics Together,” when I joined others in raising concerns with Chuck Colson, Richard John Neuhaus, J. I. Packer, and others that this 1996 document announced agreement on the gospel while recognizing remaining disagreement over justification, merit, and the like. Many true and wonderful things were affirmed in that ECT document, but the gospel without “justification through faith alone apart from works” is, as I said then, like chocolate chip cookies without the chips.</p>
<h2><a href="https://www.whitehorseinn.org/archives/250.html" target="_blank">To Cont. Reading</a></h2>
</div>
</h2>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[More from Dr. James White on The Manhattan Declaration]]></title>
<link>http://narrowisthepath.wordpress.com/2009/11/30/more-from-dr-james-white-on-the-manhattan-declaration-2/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Reformed Joe</dc:creator>
<guid>http://narrowisthepath.wordpress.com/2009/11/30/more-from-dr-james-white-on-the-manhattan-declaration-2/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><span style='text-align:center; display: block;'><object width='425' height='350'><param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/2H_tb2DBkyE&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' /><param name='allowfullscreen' value='true' /><param name='wmode' value='transparent' /><embed src='http://www.youtube.com/v/2H_tb2DBkyE&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' allowfullscreen='true' width='425' height='350' wmode='transparent'></embed></object></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[An Observation on Hypocrisy in the Church - #14]]></title>
<link>http://cdye.wordpress.com/2009/11/30/an-observation-on-hypocrisy-in-the-church-14/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Carey Dye</dc:creator>
<guid>http://cdye.wordpress.com/2009/11/30/an-observation-on-hypocrisy-in-the-church-14/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[In pondering the contrast between modern ministry methodologies and the actual Word of God: 1. Would]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><strong>In pondering the contrast between modern ministry methodologies and the actual Word of God</strong>:</span></p>
<ol><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><br />
<strong>1</strong>. Would God have preserved Sodom, if only they had a “be a better you” book?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><strong>2</strong>. Was Nineveh spared, because Jonah preached, “God loves you and has a wonderful plan for your life?”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><strong>3</strong>. Were the early churches in shambles, at Paul’s death, because he was not purpose-driven?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><strong>4</strong>. Was God threatening the churches of Asia Minor, because their leadership principles were lacking?</ol>
<p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><strong>Asinine!</strong> The depth of meaning from each of the above reveals weightier matters nearly lost in preaching today. The lessons contain not the accomplishments made by the schemes of man, but by the Hand of the Lord.<em> </em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><em>“…&#8217;Not by might nor by power, but by my Spirit&#8217;, says the LORD Almighty.” Zec 4:6 </em> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><strong>1</strong>. God knew Sodom as a city of brazen wickedness (Gen 13:13). “The people were guilty of the most notorious crimes and addicted to the most scandalous and unnatural lusts” (John Gill). Their sin was most glaring and grievous before the Lord God (Gen 18:20). No matter the greatness of the city’s sin, God was still willing to spare it with as little as 10 righteous God-fearing citizens. The city failed to produce even 10. God did not grant them principles to better their life or a means to improve their nature. Though he spared Lot’s family, God simply destroyed the city with no message, no hope, and no warning.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><em><strong>Lost Message</strong> – God abhors sin and will destroy, without mercy, all that violate their conscience by ardently persisting in it (Rom 1:16-32). In the same way, the earth, and all creation, will be one day violently destroyed with fire and therefore by, through, and because of the Grace of God Christians should love holy and godly in this present evil age (2 Pet 3:10-11, Titus 2:11-12).</em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><em><br />
</em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><strong>2</strong>. God told Jonah go to Nineveh and “cry against the city” for “their wickedness has come up before me” (Jon 1:2). The city was a violent place. Jonah’s message, “Because of your great wickedness, you have 40 days until your great city will be overthrown” (Jon 3:4). Though His mercy is clearly seen, there was no message of His love. God did not comfort or encourage the Ninevites nor did He articulate their worth, but His anger. They were struck by the blunt edge of a solemn admonition. The God of all creation was personally displeased (Jon 3:9). They repented and turned to God in humility. God spared the city from His judgment by granting them a warning against their great sin, which they heeded (Jon 3:10).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><em><strong>Lost Message</strong> – God will speak strong words of correction and rebuke when he is displeased (Heb 12:5-6). These reprimands are intended to bring repentance, a turning or returning to Him (2 Cor 7:10-11, 2 Tim 3:16) and correction for our souls (Prov 3:11, Heb 12:9). God rebukes those He loves (Rev 3:19).</em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><em><br />
</em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><strong>3</strong>. Paul preached an offensive (Gal 5:11) and illogical message (1 Cor 1:18) that stirred disdain from his culture and violent anger from the religious community (Acts 13:50). God established his purpose with the revelation he received from no man (Gal 1:11-16). In addition, the fledgling church struggled to survive as Christians were attacked with gruesome Roman persecution. That which remained, in times of peace, was picked over by false ministers (2 Cor 11:13) who crept in to subvert the Truth (2 Pet 2:1).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><em><strong>Lost Message</strong> – All who live Godly will suffer persecution (2 Tim 3:12). There is no escaping the true costly selfless Biblical Christianity seen in the lives of Stephen, Peter, James, Paul and all others “who loved not their lives unto death” (John 12:25, Rev 12:11).</em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><em><br />
</em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><strong>4</strong>. The churches of Asia Minor were strongly chastised by the Lord for forsaking their first love (Rev 2:4-5), possessing a lax attitude that tolerated preaching that led His people into sexual sin and idolatry (Rev 2:14 &#38; 20) and maintaining religious practice, but remaining indifferent to it (Rev 3:15-16).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><em><strong>Lost Message</strong> – The Lord Jesus was neither impressed nor concerned with the organizational savvy of church leadership. He was not aroused to remove the source of spiritual light from their midst (Rev 2:5), because of a lack of influence. He was sovereignly disturbed by the passivity; which allowed the teaching that led His people into whoredom with the world (Rev 2:14, 15 &#38; 20). He becomes fiercely displeased with the general unfaithfulness of His bride and will repay all according to their deeds (Rev 2:23).</em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><em><br />
</em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;">God is a jealous God (2 Cor 11:2) for we are his purchased possession (Eph 1:14) and therefore tempting the Lord God ultimately brings strong retribution (1 Cor 10:9).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;">The absence of these pivotal and basic doctrinal messages has left Christ’s church impotent against the devastation of sin and the spirit of the world. The incessant and unbalanced heralding of God’s love has created a society of rebels with no fear of God. The profuse delivery of self-centered, </span>man-centered, <span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;">non-challenging, flesh-friendly, superficial and baseless lectures lay partially to blame for the masses of religious consumers possessing “itchy-ears” (2 Tim 4:3).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;">In coping with the loss of Divine power, the carnal and apostate have developed clever devices to overcome the lack of Christian influence in the post-modern world. While one may argue, “Observe our numbers, see our leadership and judge our success”, the proper defense should rather be, “Observe our devotion, see our passion and judge our fruit.”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"><strong>Those who will not heed these warnings will grow weary of this Cry For Repentance, but there is only one answer for the gross error of this Laodicean age</strong>:</span><br />
<span style="font-family:times new roman;font-size:16px;"></p>
<ol>“<span style="text-decoration:underline;">if my people</span>, who are called by my name, will <span style="text-decoration:underline;">humble</span> themselves and <span style="text-decoration:underline;">pray</span> and <span style="text-decoration:underline;">seek</span> my face and <span style="text-decoration:underline;">turn</span> from their wicked ways, then will I hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and will heal their land.” 2 Chron 7:14</ol>
<p></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Manhattan Declaration-The Marshall Amendment]]></title>
<link>http://crninfo.wordpress.com/2009/11/28/the-manhattan-declaration-the-marshall-amendment/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>pastorboy</dc:creator>
<guid>http://crninfo.wordpress.com/2009/11/28/the-manhattan-declaration-the-marshall-amendment/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I propose that something be added to the Manhattan Declaration, something that is woefully missing. ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>I propose that something be added to the Manhattan Declaration, something that is woefully missing. While I agree that Christians must stand up for Jesus Christ and the standards that are laid forth in scripture. I believe that the government is often at odds with our Christian standards. However, despite what Focus on the Family says <em> &#8220;represent the foundation of our faith and the pivot point from which everything else flows. This is the bedrock. If we can’t agree on these areas of doctrine, everything else will be of reduced value&#8221;.  </em>(emphasis added)</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>These four areas are:</p>
<p>1. The sanctity of human life.<br />
2. The sanctity of marriage.<br />
3. The protection of religious liberty.<br />
4. The rejection of unjust laws.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>While I agree that these are very important issues, these are
<ul>
not</ul>
<p> the <strong>bedrock of our faith</strong>. The bedrock of our faith has to do with who Jesus is (Christology) and what He did on our behalf in Salvation (Soteriology) and how He would have us follow Him as a result (Christianity). </p>
<p>Now, I know that I am not a wordsmith like the ones who crafted this document, so I do not believe that I will do this justice. But for a first draft I would propose something like this:</p>
<p>We believe that Jesus Christ is fully human and fully divine, God Himself coming in the flesh 2000 years ago, making His dwelling among us. He lived as a human, being tempted in every way as we are, but without sin. He was hungry, and thirsty. He had emotions, and felt pain. He showed Himself as fully God by performing supernatural miracles, including healing many infirm and raising people from the dead. He taught with authority, speaking the very words of God. Ultimately, he showed He was both in His passion, death, and resurrection. No one took His life from Him, he laid it down, and had the authority to take it up again. He did, three days later, and He lives forever, seated at the right hand of the Father, ever making intercession for us. He dwells with us today by the indwelling power of the Holy Spirit. One day, He will come again in power to judge the living and the dead. His kingdom will have no end. </p>
<p>This Christ came and provided this sacrifice that was sufficient for all mankind, but it is only efficient for those who, regenerated by the Spirit of God, respond in repentance from sin and faith towards God. The act of salvation from start to finish is an act of God, it is not of works, lest any one should boast. Salvation is an act of God towards an <em><strong>individual</strong></em>, and those He saves become a part of a universal body of Christ. The grace that God gives us in salvation transforms us into new creations, the old is gone and the new has come. We are no longer slaves to sin, but willing bondservants of Christ. We no longer live by the flesh, but we live by the Spirit. We no longer must obey our flesh and the desires thereof, but we can live holy and righteous lives in this body by the power of the Holy Spirit. While we have these new lives, and we understand that we have been changed, we also still realize that we can take no pride in our own righteousness, for we understand that it is only in Christ that we are righteousness. </p>
<p>On this earth, these individuals gather in houses of faith all over the earth to celebrate the life of Christ and their life in Christ. These houses of faith have people in them at all places in their life journey. Some people are converted by the power of Jesus Christ, others trust in their religious works and church membership to save them. The Bible, God&#8217;s perfect and Holy Word,  clearly teaches that we are justified by faith alone in Christ alone, and that good works are a sign of true conversion, rather than a requirement to be converted. In other words, people who are saved do good works because Christ has saved them, and understand they add no merit to their salvation in performing them. We are Justified by faith, meaning we are declared not guilty. No amount of prayers, religious service, or religious sacraments add to our righteousness. Not performing religious acts do not cause us to spend time in hell or in purgatory. Christ&#8217;s blood has sufficient merit to save us entirely. </p>
<p>That being said, we are called as Christians to live in this world as those who have compassion towards others as Christ had. This means in practical terms that we proclaim the Gospel while we live the Gospel. We have been blessed with the Freedom of Religion and the Freedom of Speech for over 200 years in this country, which has recently been threatened by legislation involving &#8216;hate&#8217; speech, or speech that is offensive for certain groups. While we believe it is our right to proclaim the whole council of God, and will continue to do so despite prosecution by our government, we believe it is also our duty to minister the love of Christ to people, regardless of their faith or non-faith,  who are less fortunate in the US and around the world. Christians for years have been those who have shown love by ministering by giving food, clothing, and housing. Many hospitals and educational institutions were founded by Christians with Christian principles. These institutions are staffed by a wide variety of people, some of whom consider their lives call to minister the love of Christ through charity without any prejudice.  </p>
<p>As a result in our shared faith in Christ, we understand that we must live in this world as Christians first, and as members of our countries second. Therefore, we believe that our lives are to be dictated by Biblical principles and Biblical laws which supersede any law made by man. Of late, their have been laws made in this country that have directly or indirectly flown in the face of Biblical standards. They are enumerated in the following paragraphs, and we sign on to this document with this Marshall Amendment, in agreement with the principle that we must obey God rather than man, and that, while we desire to live in peace, and we honor the king, we must Honor Christ above all, and to do so requires that we stand against these clear violations of our  Christ-given conscience and the law of God. </p>
<p>This is my proposal, and if something like this was added that would describe the Gospel and Christianity in this manner, I would be able to add my signature to the document. I understand that many of the mainline signatories would have to drop their names, because while they claim the Christian faith, it does not claim them if there is a belief that anything but Christ alone saves us. </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Dr. James White on The Manhattan Declaration]]></title>
<link>http://narrowisthepath.wordpress.com/2009/11/26/dr-james-white-on-the-manhattan-declaration/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Reformed Joe</dc:creator>
<guid>http://narrowisthepath.wordpress.com/2009/11/26/dr-james-white-on-the-manhattan-declaration/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The Troubling Aspects of the Manhattan Declaration 11/23/2009 &#8211; James White Because we honor j]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><h2><a href="http://narrowisthepath.wordpress.com/files/2009/10/albumart_c55b3aae-f446-4094-ada3-502f95e5348c_large.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-582 alignleft" title="AlbumArt_{C55B3AAE-F446-4094-ADA3-502F95E5348C}_Large" src="http://narrowisthepath.wordpress.com/files/2009/10/albumart_c55b3aae-f446-4094-ada3-502f95e5348c_large.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>The Troubling Aspects of the Manhattan Declaration</h2>
<p>11/23/2009 &#8211; James White</p>
<blockquote><p>Because we honor justice and the common good, we will not comply with any edict that purports to compel our institutions to participate in abortions, embryo destructive research, assisted suicide and euthanasia, or any other anti life act; nor will we bend to any rule purporting to force us to bless immoral sexual partnerships, treat them as marriages or the equivalent, or refrain from proclaiming the truth, as we know it, about morality and immorality and marriage and the family. We will fully and ungrudgingly render to Caesar what is Caesar’s. But under no circumstances will we render to Caesar what is God’s.</p></blockquote>
<p>These words conclude the Manhattan Declaration, promulgated November 20, 2009. There is much in this document that any serious-minded Christian not only can agree with, but simply must agree with. There is no question that the forces of secularism are moving quickly, under the guise of &#8220;social advancement&#8221; and &#8220;equal rights,&#8221; to attack, denigrate, and, in their highest hopes and aspirations, relegate the Christian worldview to the trash heap of history. Evil men, and women, hold positions of power in Western societies, and since it is inevitably true that the Christian witness enrages those who love the darkness (John 7:7), they are doing all they can to subvert and silence that witness which so exposes their consciences. The general statements of the document relating to life, abortion, marriage, sexuality, and religious liberty, are well stated and timely. There is something reassuring in realizing that the concerns we have had are shared across a broad spectrum.</p>
<p>But there are a number of troubling things that I cannot get past in examining this document and considering its implications. When I see some of the leading ecumenists in the forefront of the documents&#8217; production, I am made uneasy, and for good reason. Great damage has been done to the cause of Christ by those who have sought to promote the Kingdom by compromising the gospel, the only power given to the church that can change hearts, and hence change societies. By relegating the gospel to a matter of opinion and difference, but not something that defines the Christian faith, these ecumenists have left their followers with a cause without power, a quest without a solution. And though their open-mindedness fits better with our current post-modern culture, from a biblical perspective, they have truly betrayed the apostolic example.</p>
<p>This document presents a Christianity ostensibly based upon bare Trinitarianism. I listened to Chuck Colson speak on the Hugh Hewitt program this afternoon. He made it very clear that this is, in fact, a theological document, despite the assertions of others that it is not. He was asked why Jews, Mormons, and others, were not invited to sign the document. He said they were not asked because this is a specifically Christian statement, quoting from the Christian scriptures. Once again we are led to the inevitable conclusion that &#8220;Christian&#8221; then is &#8220;Trinitarianism plus agreed upon historical truths such as the crucifixion and resurrection, but, most importantly, without any gospel content.&#8221; It does no good to muddle this discussion with &#8220;Well, what about the medieval church&#8221; questions, since we are talking about a day and age when the issues are well known. We are not talking about a dark period of biblical ignorance. There is more light available today than ever before. And for many, the gospel is simply no longer part of the &#8220;non-negotiables.&#8221;</p>
<p>But I am left confused by the inconsistency of the document. Mormons are not invited. Understandable, given that the LDS faith is the most polytheistic faith I&#8217;ve ever encountered. Trinitarians only need apply. I can fully understand that. So&#8230;why are we told toward the end of this Declaration that Martin Luther King, Jr., wrote from an explicitly Christian perspective? A brief visit to Martin Luther King&#8217;s writings will reveal he was hardly orthodox even using the limited definition utilized by this Declaration. For example, <a href="http://mlk-kpp01.stanford.edu/index.php/encyclopedia/documentsentry/doc_500215_008/" target="_blank">writing in a paper while in seminary</a>, Martin Luther King, Jr. said:</p>
<blockquote><p>The orthodox attempt to explain the divinity of Jesus in terms of an inherent metaphysical substance within him seems to me quite inadaquate. To say that the Christ, whose example of living we are bid to follow, is divine in an ontological sense is actually harmful and detrimental. To invest this Christ with such supernatural qualities makes the rejoinder: &#8220;Oh, well, he had a better chance for that kind of life than we can possible have.&#8221; In other words, one could easily use this as a means to hide behind behind his failures. So that the orthodox view of the divinity of Christ is in my mind quite readily denied.</p></blockquote>
<p>So why put forth King as explicitly Christian, but not invite the Jehovah&#8217;s Witnesses, who would &#8220;quite readily deny&#8221; the deity of Christ as well? Perhaps a document that identifies Papal actions as explicitly Christian actions can be excused for its inherent self-contradiction.</p>
<p>There is no question that all believers need to think seriously about the issues raised by this declaration. But what is the only solution to these issues? Is the solution to be found in presenting a unified front that implicitly says &#8220;the gospel does not unite us, but that is not important enough to divide us&#8221;? I do not think so. What is the only power given to the church to change hearts and minds? United political power? Or the gospel that is trampled under foot by every Roman Catholic priest when he &#8220;re-presents&#8221; the sacrifice of Christ upon the Roman altar, pretending to be a priest, an &#8220;alter Christus&#8221;? Am I glad when a Roman clergyman calls abortion murder? Of course. But it exhibits a real confusion, and not a small amount of cowardice, it seems, to stop identifying the man&#8217;s false gospel and false teaching simply because you are glad to have a few more on the &#8220;right&#8221; side of a vitally important social issue.</p>
<p>This takes me back to <a href="http://vintage.aomin.org/Evangelicals_and_Catholics_Together.html" target="_blank">my original response to the ECT document</a>. I have seen so many re-organize their priorities in light of having made &#8220;common cause&#8221; with those who have a false gospel all in the name of doing social good. I am glad Rome retains elements of God&#8217;s truth and morality. But when did being good or moral bring one salvation, as if anyone is ever truly good, or truly moral?</p>
<p>These are the matters that truly concern me about the Manhattan Declaration. Why does God have the right to determine human sexuality, marriage, and to define life itself? It all goes back to the gospel, does it not? If we are going to give a consistent, clear answer to our culture, we dare not find our power in a false unity that overshadows the gospel and cripples our witness.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Fighting for the Faith - No Christians Allowed??]]></title>
<link>http://narrowisthepath.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/fighting-for-the-faith-no-christians-allowed/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Reformed Joe</dc:creator>
<guid>http://narrowisthepath.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/fighting-for-the-faith-no-christians-allowed/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[For some time I&#8217;ve noticed a disturbing tend with some of these Purpose Driven and Emergent gu]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>For some time I&#8217;ve noticed a disturbing tend with some of these Purpose Driven and Emergent guys substituting the phrase Christ Follower in the place of Christian. Chris of Fighting of the Faith does excellent job picking part this methodology in the sermon review here.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.piratechristianradio.com/" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.piratechristianradio.com/images/PCRwidgetsmall.jpg" alt="Pirate Christian Radio" /></a></p>
<p>November 19, 2009</p>
<h2><a href="http://www.fightingforthefaith.com/2009/11/no-christians-allowed.html" target="_blank"><span style="color:#0000ff;">No Christians Allowed??</span></a></h2>
<h2><a href="http://podcast.fightingforthefaith.com/fftf/F4F111909.mp3"><img title="Dowload" src="http://crosebrough.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/11/23/dowload.jpg" border="0" alt="Dowload" /></a></h2>
<ul>
<li> 
<ul>
<li> 
<ul>
<li> 
<ul>
<li>
<h3>• Seeker Driven Pastor Answers the Question, &#8220;Are Mormons Christians?&#8221;<br />
• Archbishop of Canterbury Claims Higher Taxes Would Be Good for Society<br />
• The Parable of the Talents is NOT About Time Management<br />
• Sermon Review, &#8220;No Christians Allowed&#8221; by Bill Maye of Brick City Community Church, Sanford, NC</h3>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h2>&#8212;</h2>
<h2><strong><a href="http://www.fightingforthefaith.com/" target="_blank">Please Support This Important Radio Outreach</a></strong></h2>
<h2> </h2>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comparison: Rick Warren vs. Truth... Is Purpose Driven Church Deceptive?]]></title>
<link>http://truthinator.wordpress.com/2009/11/22/comparison-rick-warren-vs-truth/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>truthinator</dc:creator>
<guid>http://truthinator.wordpress.com/2009/11/22/comparison-rick-warren-vs-truth/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Deception Driven Church? You decide&#8230;   Stuart L. Brogden compiled this comparison between wha]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div><img src="http://www.crosstalkblog.com/wp-content/themes/WhosWho/timthumb.php?src=http://www.crosstalkblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/RickWarren.jpg&#38;h=120&#38;w=120&#38;zc=1&#38;q=100" alt="Reader’s Digest Drops Rick Warren Connection" width="129" height="152" /> Deception Driven Church? You decide&#8230;</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Stuart L. Brogden compiled this comparison between what Relevant Rick teaches in <span style="text-decoration:underline;">Purpose Driven Church</span> and what the Bible teaches.</div>
<div>
<p>All the work of all men contains error.  That I perceive error in Rick Warren’s work is not note worthy.  But the repeated patterns of false teaching over 20 or more years and 25 million or so books combine for something to take notice of.  This book proclaims an Armenian, man-centered view of the world and its Creator, claiming all the while to be a Biblically sound God-centered work.  I think it is actually Biblically bankrupt, gilded with the false gospel of pragmatism.  As subtle and dangerous as the serpent in the garden, Warren calls us to believe a lie.</p>
<p>Curious – Many people have criticized Rick Warren by calling him a disciple or associate of Robert Schuller.  Warren has denied in this in myriad letters and articles, wanting to put distance between himself and the father of “possibility thinking”.  So why does Warren include Schuller’s effusive endorsement of this book (on the third page of the endorsements in the front of the book)?  And why does so much of Warren’s instruction sound so much like Schuller (see quotes at the end of this review)?</p>
<p>“The Purpose Driven Church” (PDC) is a humanistic, psychological view of how to handle a church, sprinkled with scripture in whichever translation or version can most easily be used to allegedly support Warren’s claims.  Whereas “The Purpose Driven Life” started out with a truth and spent itself in contradiction, so does PDC – claiming rightfully (page 14) “Only God makes the church grow” – and spending nearly 400 pages telling man how to manipulate people into something that only looks like church growth.</p>
<p>The foreward is a sugary sweet, sappy tribute from a once credible W.A. Criswell.  In his opening statement, Criswell declares that “God could not have a given me a more beloved and effective ‘son in the ministry’ than Rick Warren.”  You know a man is wrong when he limits God or assigns human characteristics to Him.  Criswell claims Saddleback “has grown <em>without compromising the mission or the doctrine</em> of a New Testament church.”  (Italics in the original.)  We shall see.  Criswell parrots the Schuller/Warren principal – “If churches are to be successful in evangelizing our society, which is becoming more pagan by the day, they must learn to think like an unbeliever.”  (Sic)  Right there, Criswell shows that he has lost sight of the New Testament church.</p>
<p>In what appears to be the introduction, Warren tells us the church must “look for the spiritual waves” of church growth, saying “because our churches haven’t been taught the needed skills, we are missing the spiritual waves that could bring revival, health, and explosive growth to our churches.”  Evidently, Warren’s Bible is not adequate instruction to the church or its members on the topic of spiritual outreach and discipleship.  He shows us right off that he is focused on “growth”.  And in this introduction, as well as throughout the book, Warren pays lip service to God while heralding and teaching humanistic methods.</p>
<p>It appears, even in the introduction, that Warren has slipped into an Armenian worldview, saying churches need to ask, “What barriers are blocking the waves God wants to send our way?”  (pages 15 &#38; 16)  Poor, God Almighty – needs the church to move barriers out of the way.  Warren tells us (page 17) “the key issue for churches in the twenty-first century will be church <em>health</em>, not church growth.”  He then goes on to tell us, same page, that he’s “been a student of growing churches” for over twenty years. </p>
<p>On page 18, Warren rightly lauds the Bible, and then declares, “My greatest source of learning, however has been watching what God has done in the church I pastor.”  This pragmatic view – study men and how to motivate them &#8211; pervades this whole book, and everything of Warren that I’ve read.</p>
<p>In Part One, page 26 &#38; 27, Warren reciprocates Criswell’s sappy sweet foreword, quoting a Criswell prayer/prophecy of church growth for Warren, convinced that God had called him to pastor a church – sounding much like a mutual admiration society.  Warren admonishes us (page 27) to not “copy things we did without considering the context”, but to look at the “transferable principles”.  We will see what these “transferable principles” are shortly. </p>
<p>Still on page 27, Warren states, “Very little of Saddleback’s ministry was preplanned.”  Remember this claim.  He then devotes the balance of chapter 1 describing all the planning that went into the “planting” of Saddleback.  His research led Warren to conclude that the pastor is the key figure in the health and growth of the church, describing the pastor as the “daddy” of the church!  Any church that has this view of its pastor has already failed. </p>
<p>In spite of telling us that only God grows the church, Warren’s research drew him to the fastest growing population center in the country, a fact that “grabbed me by the throat and made my heart start racing.”  Lots of people moving into an area typified by upper middle class Americans certainly set a solid stage for numerical growth – a very pragmatic view. </p>
<p>On page 38, Warren recommends a list of preachers he heard on the radio.  While several on Warren’s list are sound pastors, he recommends to his reader Robert Schuller and John Wimber as well.  No disciple of Christ should recommend these false teachers to anyone, much less the wide and long term audience of a book. </p>
<p>And on the next page, Warren says that, with Saddleback, he ”determined to <em>begin</em> with unbelievers, rather than a core of committed Christians.”  Consider this statement carefully.  In the first case, the church is comprised of believers, not those who don’t believe.  By purposefully refusing to build his church surrounded by mature saints, there was nobody to hold Warren accountable as a preacher.  Who in this group of lost folks that he gathered could understand anything spiritual?  The Bible tells us those who are lost cannot discern spiritual matters.  A “pastor” with only lost people in his “church” is no pastor.  What Warren started was an evangelistic outreach to middle class lost Americans – not a church.  Near the end of this page Warren tells us he spent <em>12 weeks</em> studying lost folks in order to know what his “church” should be like.  “No planning” went into the founding of Saddleback, he told us.  Studying heathens, rather than scripture, was how he planned Saddleback.  Apparently without any elders or other biblical safeguards, he was swept away by one of the “spiritual waves” he was surfing for.</p>
<p>Page 44 – “pastor” Warren excitedly recounts how Saddleback “caught a wave”, when over 200 heathens showed up to the service designed with them in mind.  While many churches have operated in temporary settings, Warren touts Saddleback’s “homeless” years as if they were a special virtue.  Thankfully, he recounts a proper understanding of the Great Commission (page 46), yet he leaves this reader wondering how many of his “seekers” make it around the “bases” to becoming a “servant-hearted Christian.” </p>
<p>Starting on page 47, Warren uses “conventional wisdom” to create several straw-man myths to knock down.</p>
<ul>
<li>“Myth #1: The Only Thing That Large Churches Care About Is Attendance.”  While many have rightfully pointed out the tendency of many large churches to focus too much attention on attendance, I have never heard of any rational person saying it’s the <em>only</em> thing.  Warren’s own words, with the series of “if” statements leave out the essential bit of the Gospel, wherein the lost are confronted with their sin and the attendant need of a Savior.  He “validates” his Gospel-lite by observing, “it’s happening all over the world.”  On page 49 we are told that “Intentionally setting up a strategy and a structure to force ourselves to give equal attention to each purpose is what being a purpose-driven church is all about.”  None of Warren’s 5 listed purposes (page 49) convey the Gospel of Jesus Christ.</li>
<li>Myths 2, 3, &#38; 4: Once again, Warren touts all-or-nothing myths that are, in truth, common failings among many churches.  In talking about purpose #4, Warren discloses that his view of church discipline consists of dropping from membership those rogues who fail to fulfill the membership covenant.  I don’t think that’s what the Lord tells us in Matthew 18.</li>
<li>“Myth #5: If You Are Dedicated Enough, Your Church Will Grow.”  Any pastor who believes this “myth” has lost sight of Who builds the church.  To counter “good, godly pastors” who are dedicated yet have churches that are not growing, Warren provides a prescription that follows the same rabbit trail as his “myth” – relying on human effort.</li>
<li>“Myth #7: All God Expects of Us Is Faithfulness” In the short list that follows, Warren tells us we must also bear fruit (true) and makes it sound as if we can make ourselves be fruitful.  Bearing spiritual fruit is the work of the Holy Spirit in the lives of saints, not a trait the person can develop.</li>
</ul>
<p>Let me take a break and say that I think pages 64, 65, 68 – 79, and 393 &#38; 394 are sound teaching.  Not all in this book is worthless or dangerous, but even these passages are mere “spiritual cotton candy”.</p>
<p>On page 77, Warren uses metaphorical, non-Biblical definitions to build a case for churches being driven.  In Scripture, the word drive and derivatives are used in conjunction with people being punished.  Those being treated kindly by God are led, as sheep, not driven.  Context is key to proper interpretation, and Warren strips a word out of its Biblical context and uses its tertiary meaning to lay the foundation for his whole trademarked “driven” model, pulling people away from the Biblical view of how God leads His children.</p>
<p>Near the bottom of page 79, Warren gives a welcome warning to not “allow seekers to drive the total agenda of the church.” – but I must confess that this book, as a whole, leads me to believe Warren allows “seekers” to drive entirely too much of his church’s agenda. </p>
<p>After listing, on pages 77 – 79, seven things that should not drive churches (tradition, personality, finances, programs, buildings, events, and seekers), he reveals, on page 80, “What is needed today are churches that are driven by purpose instead of by other forces.”  And, “You must begin to look at everything your church does through the lens of five New Testament purposes”.  Warren’s 5 purposes are culled from scripture, but, again, churches and saints are to be led by the Spirit of God – not driven by anything.  And his 5 purposes are not “the lens” of the Word.</p>
<p>On pages 86 &#38; 87, Warren uses different Bible paraphrases to ensure the word “purpose” is used.  On page 91, he tells us that the church in Philippi was “captivated by Paul’s mission” (Philippians 4:15); whereas Paul makes it clear that he preached Christ crucified and resurrected – people were captivated by Christ and led by His Spirit, not Paul’s “mission”.</p>
<p>On page 93, we are pointed to scripture for the correct question, but led to Warren’s self-proclaimed mentor, heathen business guru Peter Drucker, for the diagnostic standard: “Your church’s purpose statement must become the standard by which you measure your congregation’s health and growth.”  Oops.  I thought the Bible and the Holy Spirit give us everything needed to live a righteous life in Christ Jesus (2 Peter 2:1 – 3)</p>
<p>Page 95: Warren tells about a church that he claims was “theologically sound” and “sound asleep”.  He says, “the church leaders had become lazy and lethargic.”  That does not sound like a “theologically sound” church to me.  It appears to be labeled as such to create a straw man to be knocked down by Warren.</p>
<p>On the next page, Warren tells us, “Prior to starting Saddleback Church I took six months to do an extensive, personal Bible study on the church”.  Remember page 27 – not much planning went into Saddleback?  As part of Warren’s Bible study on the church, about a third of his listed scripture passages are from the four Gospel accounts – they describe Christ’s life, but not the church.  Remember – most of the life of Christ took place <em>before</em> the New Testament church was founded.</p>
<p>In Part Two, Warren describes “the 5 purposes for the church” – Biblically sound purposes but not completely sound in his exposition on them.  “Purpose #3: Go and make disciples.  This purpose we call <em>evangelism</em>.”  One must indeed evangelize (preach the Gospel to) lost folks before they can be discipled, but the focus of this aspect of the Great Commission is on the making of disciples – not evangelism.  Seeker sensitive churches are widely critiqued as being ineffective in discipleship – this error may explain that, in part.</p>
<p>In describing Saddleback’s purpose statement, Warren notes “three important distinctives”, the first of which is, “it is stated <em>in terms of results</em> rather than in terms of activity.”  This is a common failing of man – trying to control the results of his activities; pragmatism defined.  (From John MacArthur: “What is pragmatism?  Basically it is the philosophy that results determine meaning, truth, and value–what will work becomes a more important question than what is true.  As Christians, we are called to trust what the Lord says, preach that message to others, and leave the results to Him. But many have set that aside.  Seeking relevancy and success, they have welcomed the pragmatic approach and have received the proverbial Trojan horse.”)  Throughout His Word, God calls His people to obedience – not to results.  Often, the results He brings about are not what man expects or would seek.  I believe the Biblical pattern is to remind us that our efforts have no merit before God – only the work of Jesus does. </p>
<p>On page 109, Warren sums up his argument for your church to adopt his purpose-driven model by saying, “To do less <em>is to leave to chance</em> the great responsibility we’ve given by our Lord Jesus Christ.”  (emphasis mine)  This is another glimpse into what appears to be Warren’s Armenian view of God.  And if recommending Schuller and Wimber are not enough, Warren touts David (or Paul) Yonggi Cho’s occult Central Church in Seoul, Korea.  This man has written &#8220;You can create the presence of Jesus with your mouth.  He is bound by your lips and by your words.&#8221;  He and Schuller are fans of one another and disciples of the risen Lord Jesus should view neither of them credibly.</p>
<p>In chapter 6, Warren teaches pastors how to communicate their purposes.  He reviews the narrative of Nehemiah’s rebuilding of the wall around Jerusalem and discovers what he calls, “the Nehemiah principle”.  Since the Jews working on the wall grew discouraged after 26 days of work, Warren projects that onto every church and declares, “<em>Vision and purpose must be restated every twenty-six days to keep the church moving in the right direction.</em>”  Certainly, a degree of repetition is a hallmark of effective communication.  But the larger issue is that of deriving a key principle from a narrative contained in scripture.  This is a dangerous practice, the best example I can think of being Bruce Wilkerson’s subtly deceptive book, “The Prayer of Jabez”.</p>
<p>On pages 113 and 114, Warren encourages good personal management techniques – once again showing how to create “good results” by manipulating people and calling it God’s work.  “People tend to do whatever gets rewarded, so make heroes of people in your church when they do the work of the church.”  God tells us not to seek the applause or rewards of men, but to trust God who is faithful to reward those walk by faith, not by sight.  Biblical leadership often flies in the face of accepted “good personal management techniques.”</p>
<p>Warren stays on track into chapter 7, opening with a story about George Whitfield and John Wesley.  Whitfield preached 18,000 sermons to 100,000 people but left no organization behind, whereas Wesley left us the Methodist denomination – as if what we can see today determines the value of the work these men did.  And as far as I can tell, the Lord Jesus did not leave us much of an organization – what would Warren say about His legacy?  Further in this chapter, pages 126 &#38; 127, Warren recommends false teachers among others who are Biblically sound.  Check out the teachings of Dallas Willard, Richard Foster, and Peter Wagner – men who think themselves modern prophets and apostles of the church. </p>
<p>In discussing Saddleback’s “5 Circles of Community”, pages 131 and following, Warren tells us he focuses evangelism efforts on those who have already attended his church.  He is either derelict in failing to send witnesses out into the lost world or admitting his “church” is fairly well full of lost folks.  He admits that a heathen cannot worship God, but is “convinced that genuine worship is a powerful witness to unbelievers if it is done in a style that makes sense to them.”  Genuine worship is a spiritual act and impossible for a lost person to comprehend.  But note that Warren emphasizes the <em>style</em> of worship, as if the emotional connection with the music can save anyone.  And this from a man who adamantly maintains style and methods don’t matter in justifying his use of all sorts of culturally relevant music and drama.  He goes on to say, “If an unbeliever makes a commitment to regular attendance at Saddleback, I believe it will be just a matter of time until he accepts Christ.”  With Warren’s declared determination to avoid preaching the law or anything that would convict a lost person of his sin, one wonders what in Saddleback would cause anyone to be saved.  Time hanging with supposed saints won’t save anyone unless the Gospel is preached – which does not appear to happen at Saddleback.</p>
<p>On page 133, Warren describes Saddleback’s membership covenant, which requires “a commitment to three spiritual habits: (1) having a daily quiet time, (2) tithing ten percent of their income (Nowhere in scripture are Christian instructed – even implicitly – to tithe, but give as the Spirit of God leads and not under compulsion. &#8211; 2 Corinthians 9:6 &#38; 7), and (3) being active in a small group.”  This sounds like the chains of legalism – whereas the Bible tells Saints to be led by the Spirit in such matters.  He sets up this disclosure by describing people who are “dedicated to growing in discipleship” … “but they have not yet gotten involved in ministry.”  This is a contradiction in terms, indicating that pastor Rick has a non-Biblical definition of discipleship. </p>
<p>Warren says, “Jesus started where people were – at their level of commitment – but he never left them there.”  I do not see this when I read the Bible: lost folks have NO commitment to Christ.  He says Jesus “didn’t lay any heavy requirement” on John and Andrew, but every Jewish boy <em>knew</em> the total commitment required when a Rabbi bid one, “come”.  Further on page 135, Warren claims that Christ did not issue “his ultimate challenge to the crowd” until these people had hung around Him for three years and saw the ways in which He loved them.  “Jesus was able to ask for that kind of commitment only after demonstrating his love for them and earning their trust.”  Unlike sinful man, Jesus the Christ does not need to <em>earn</em> anything before He speaks Truth to anyone.  Warren puts too much emphasis on the lost person rather than on the Gospel. </p>
<p>In chapter 8, Warren tells us “There are ten areas you must consider as you begin to reshape your church into a purpose-driven church.”  Where in Scripture are pastors advised to “reshape” the churches they shepherd?  He says he cautions other churches to <em>not</em> clone Saddleback, yet lists 10 mandatory “principles”, 5 purposes, and his own “circles of influence” that these churches must embrace.  “Notice that I suggest you grow your church from the outside in, rather than from the inside out.”  Read the book of Acts – the church was made up of saints and disciples who were sent out into the cities, the reverse of what Pastor Rick suggests.  “The problem I have found with an ‘inside-out’ approach is that by the time the church planter has ‘discipled’ his core, they have often lost contact with the community and are actually afraid of interacting with the unchurched.”  This is another indication that Pastor Rick knows very little of Biblical discipleship, but at least gives credit for this backwards idea where it is due – false apostle C. Peter Wagner!</p>
<p>On page 139, we find out that the first year of Saddleback, when ostensibly everyone was lost except (?) Pastor Rick, he “preached very simple, straightforward evangelistic series such as ‘Good News About Common Problems’ and ‘God’s Plan for Your Life.’”  There are pop-psychology messages with a Bible flavor – not evangelistic, or Gospel, presentations.  How can he say that “most of them (the 200 attenders) were brand new believers.” considering his messages?  God’s Word shows the error of this approach: “<em>Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God  Which things also we speak, not in the words which man&#8217;s wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.  <strong>But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.</strong></em>”  1 Corinthians 2:12 – 14</p>
<p>In a highlight box on page 156, we are admonished, “Never criticize any method that God is blessing!”  Yet all the criteria Warren urges us to use are that which the eye can see, and ignores the Biblical command to “<em>test all things, hold on to that which is good</em>” (1 Thessalonians 5:21), with “good” being in accordance with God’s view.  On page 157 we are urged to use market research to determine “when, where, and how” evangelism should be pursued and on page 158 tells us a church “driven by market forces rather than the Word of God” will be “unstable and unbiblical.”  One page is wrong, one is right. </p>
<p>Page 160, Warren continues in his study of man as first priority: “I must pay as much attention to the geography, customs, culture, and religious background of my community as I do to those who live in Bible times if I am to faithfully communicate God’s Word.”  The Word of God cannot be understood or communicated unless one seeks to know the literal, grammatical, and historical context of the text.  Nobody in scripture paid that much attention to the spiritually dead people they encountered.  They proclaimed the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus and commended men to believe on Him!</p>
<p>Pastor Rick advises us to tailor the presentation based on the worldly concerns our “crowd” is perceived as having – resulting in a false gospel that might as well be delivered by Joel Osteen.  By telling lost folks how God can make their marriage better, we teach people to look to the Lord for temporal rewards that satisfy our flesh.  But in truth, lost people need to know they are dead in sin, convicted by the Law, so they might realize their deepest need and cry out to the Lamb of God for mercy.  If “god” makes their life more comfortable and they are not confronted with their rebellion against the Holy Creator God, we have made their path to hell all the more pleasant – heaping judgment on ourselves (James 3:1).</p>
<p>Opening up chapter 10, page 173, Warren declares, “Even a casual reading of the New Testament will show that the Gospel spread primarily through relationships.”  Relationships are important, but the Gospel was and is spread through the <em>preaching</em> of it – mostly to people the preacher knows only superficially.  In the next page, we are told, “The people your church is most likely to reach are those who match the existing culture of your church.”  This is true if you do not make disciples and send them out into the world to proclaim the Gospel to all tongues and nations.  The church is not intended to be a reflection of the culture – it is, by definition, counter culture and intended to make a difference in the world.  Warren’s advice is for the church to be conformed to patterns of the world, contrary to Romans 12:1 – 2.</p>
<p>Pastor Rick reinforces this un-Biblical nonsense on pages 188 – 189, where we are told to think like lost people.  This is Warren’s interpretation of the scriptural mandate to “understand the times”?  He shows a shallow view of the Lord: “Jesus <em>often</em> knew what unbelievers were thinking.  He was effective in dealing with people because he understood and was able to defuse the mental barriers they held.”  (emphasis mine)  We are to believe that Jesus sometimes did not know what people were thinking – a limited God.  Warren tells us Christ relied on popular psychological theory in order to effectively deal with His creatures.  And we are once again told, “We must learn to think like unbelievers in order to win them. … “The problem is, the longer you are a believer, the less you think like an unbeliever.”  The Bible tell us the old man is dead – we have been re-born as children of God and are now “a peculiar people”; that we are to be salt and light; that lost folk love darkness because their deeds are dark; and that we are not to hide our light under a bushel.  Pastor Rick thinks the church exists to be valued by pagans!  Paul gives a different prescription in 2 Corinthians 4:3 – 6: “<em>But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them. For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord; and ourselves your servants for Jesus&#8217; sake. For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.</em>”</p>
<p>You can read many objections from Rick Warren anytime someone publicly associates him with Robert Schuller.  But again, on page 190, Warren shows us how big an impact Schuller had on him.  It should not be a surprise that so many of Schuller’s people pleasing ways are embraced and endorsed by Warren.  Near the bottom of Page 191, this pearl: “The unchurched aren’t asking for watered-down messages, just practical ones.  They want to hear something on Sunday that they can apply on Monday.”  Warren’s idea of church is to help lost folks have a better life, according to the world’s standard.  The Creator’s idea of church is for the saints to come together for worship, discipleship, fellowship, and be sent into the world proclaiming the life, death, and resurrection of the Lord Jesus.  And yes, we welcome lost people into the church – we simply don’t expect them to be comfortable there.  They should be confronted with the Word of God and their sinful nature.</p>
<p>Warren’s own “tale of success” in the early days of Saddleback tells the sad truth in what is left unsaid.  He defined Saddleback as “a church for the unchurched”, and he attracted many of them, summing up with, “You have to decide who you want to impress.”  Warren wants to impress lost folk – his charge, however, is to honor God.  On page 195: “This is the heart of Saddleback’s evangelism strategy: We must be willing to catch fish on their own terms.”  Fish don’t want to be caught!  And lost men do not seek after God.  His Word doesn’t tell us to be on the same wavelength as lost men, He tells us to be fishers <em>of</em> men – different from them, with a mission they cannot understand.  Warren tells us (page 197) that he has determined that Jesus had no “standard approach” in evangelism.  He is talking about “style points”, not content or motive.  I am convinced that a careful reading of the New Testament shows that Jesus did have a “standard approach.  Evangelist Ray Comfort sums it up thusly – “With the Law we break the proud heart; with the gospel we heal the broken heart.”  And, “If we care about the lost, we will not hesitate to speak to them about sin, righteousness, and judgment … the way Jesus did.”  In Mark 10:17 – 22, the Lord used the law to expose the rich man as idolater, in John 5:45 – 47, Jesus confronts the Jews with the accusation of the Law of Moses.  In John 4:4 – 26 the Lord seeks out the woman at the well and uses the law to gently confront her with her sin – violating the 7<sup>th</sup> commandment.</p>
<p>On page 219, Pastor Rick says, “Jesus often established a beachhead for evangelism in a person’s life by meeting a felt need.”  And he cites not one example &#8211; because there are none.  Dr. Luke records this encounter with the “crowd”: “<em>And there went great multitudes with him: and he turned, and said unto them<strong>, If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.</strong>  And whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple.</em>”  (Luke 14:25 – 27)  The Apostle John recorded this encounter (John 6:24 – 27):  “<em>When the people therefore saw that Jesus was not there, neither his disciples, they also took shipping, and came to Capernaum, seeking for Jesus.  And when they had found him on the other side of the sea, they said unto him, Rabbi, when camest thou hither?  Jesus answered them and said, Verily, verily, I say unto you, <strong>Ye seek me, not because ye saw the miracles, but because ye did eat of the loaves, and were filled.</strong>  Labour not for the meat which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto everlasting life, which the Son of man shall give unto you: for him hath God the Father sealed.</em>”  And in verses 52 – 61: ”<em>The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat?  Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.  Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.  For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.  He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.  As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.  This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.  These things said he in the synagogue, as he taught in Capernaum.  Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it?  <strong>When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you?</strong></em><strong>” </strong> Culminating in verses 65 &#38; 66: “<em>And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father. <strong> From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.</strong></em>”</p>
<p>Jesus doesn’t sound like Rick Warren.  To Whom shall we listen?</p>
<p>Ever the pragmatist, Warren tells us (page 224) that a passage in Luke 4 is all about Jesus “meeting needs and healing hurts.”  Jesus used that well known passage from Isaiah to establish His claim as Messiah, not “meet needs or heal hurts”.  On page 230, he beats the same drum: “The unchurched are not asking that we change the message or even dilute it, only that we show its relevance. …  I’ve found that the unchurched in America are very interested in Bible doctrine when it is applied in practical and relevant ways to their lives.”  What I’ve observed is that lost folks – whether they be “churched” or “unchurched” – want their ears tickled.  They want to be told that God loves them and wants them to be healthy and wealthy – things that are “practical and relevant”.  This is why prosperity gospel pimps such as T.D. Jakes and Joel Osteen can fill up stadiums!  The Word of God tells us to preach the simple Truth and not work to earn the approval of men.  Lost folk do not need motivational messages on how to “live large with Jesus” – they need to repent and be saved.</p>
<p>Warren thinks (page 232) that the major purpose of Christ’s parables was to entertain folk and ensure they would remember His story.  But in Matthew 15, Mark 4, Mark 7, Luke 8, John 10 and other passages, His very own disciples failed to understand the parable and sought an explanation.  And while Pastor Rick cites Matthew 13:34, he did so as a proof-text, as verse 35 makes clear: He spoke in parables to fulfill scripture, not to satisfy the felt needs of unchurched Harry.  But if His purpose was as Warren claims, why did so many people need – and still need – an explanation of them?  To close this question, the Lord Himself gives us the answer in Matthew 13:10 – 13 (<strong><em>And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables?  He answered and said unto them, Because</em></strong><em> <strong>it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given. </strong> For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.  Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.</em>)  And Luke 8:9 – 10 (<em>And his disciples asked him, saying, What might this parable be?  And he said, <strong>Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to others in parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand</strong>.</em>)</p>
<p>On page 241, “America’s Pastor” tells us “More people are won to Christ by <em>feeling God’s presence</em> than by all our apologetic arguments combined.”  This is a false argument: apologetics is not what wins people to Christ – the Gospel does that.  It is by preaching the Word of the Lord that people are saved – not by feeling anything.  He ascribes the salvation of the 3,000 people recorded in Acts 2 to their having felt God’s presence.  But the Bible makes it clear that the Spirit of God empowered Peter and it was the Word of God proclaimed by Peter that caused the response.  Read Acts 2:1 – 36 to see the set-up and the message of Christ crucified.  Then in verses 37 &#8211; 41: “<em>Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do?  Then <strong>Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins</strong>, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.  For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.  And with many other words did he testify and exhort, saying, Save yourselves from this untoward generation.  <strong>Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls.</strong></em>”</p>
<p>Do you perceive these people were saved by having “felt God’s presence” or by the Word of God piercing their sinful hearts?</p>
<p>Page 243, Warren joins countless seeker sensitive fans by misappropriating 1 Corinthians 14:23.  Paul’s main argument was not to restrict the use of tongues so lost people wouldn’t think them foolish – this is a final argument in Paul’s long, passionate discourse against the improper use of this spiritual gift.  His main point was to encourage the saints to speak in a known tongue so others in the church could understand them.  It’s almost “and by the way, don’t you see how a heathen who might wander in here could think you mad?”  It was not normative in the early church for lost people to fill up the meeting place.  The church was of and for believers.</p>
<p>On pages 244 and 245 Warren furthers his humanistic view that unchurched people ought to have their felt needs addressed from the pulpit.  He again tells us these unchurched “expect to hear the Bible when they come to church.”  How would such a person know what to expect from the Word of God?  Go back to 1 Corinthians 2:12 – 14.  Pastor Rick tells us “They are looking for solutions, not a scolding.”  The problem for Rick and other seeker sensitive pastors is that unless a lost person is confronted with his condition (being dead is sin) he will not see any value in the Lamb of God.  The Gospel is not a scolding – but neither is it offering solutions to life’s circumstantial problems.  Warren instructs, “Design one worship service to edify believers and another service to evangelize the unchurched friends brought by your members.”  He then describes how he has marginalized the Saints by devoting weekends at Saddleback to lost folks.  We can readily surmise that Saddleback is a church on Wednesday evenings, but not on Saturdays or Sundays.</p>
<p>In chapter 14 – Designing a Seeker-Sensitive Service, Warren once again relies on and recommends a false prophet to make his point – citing “Apostle” Peter Wagner on page 267:  “When you run out of space, you experience what Pete Wagner calls ‘sociological strangulation’.”  But many churches have experienced true fellowship and spiritual growth while struggling with the logistical constraints of what experts see as too little space.  My wife heard a pastor in such a situation say, “Some pastors think you need 200 square feet per person.  We have 200 people per square feet!”  And he was praising God – not complaining about being “sociologically strangled.”</p>
<p>On to chapter 16 – Preaching to the Unchurched, Pastor Rick says, “The common ground we have with unbelievers is not the Bible, but our common needs, hurts, and interests as human beings.”  This is fine guidance on how to start a fraternal organization, such as a Rotary Club – the Bible tells us that unbelievers’ greatest need is salvation.  That we saints share some of the same sinful “habits and hang-ups” as the “unchurched” can be an encouragement to the lost, as we teach them that <em>all</em> are unworthy apart from Christ.  Nowhere in this chapter does Pastor Rick advise the use of the law to convict people of their sin; he only wants the lost folk to know they are valuable and loved, etc.  They may well go to hell thinking this, having never been convicted of sin or saved by grace.  Good feelings save nobody.</p>
<p>On page 312, Warren poses a handful of questions that unchurched people want answered before they are willing to join the church:</p>
<ul>
<li>Do I fit here?</li>
<li>Does anybody want to know me?</li>
<li>Am I needed?</li>
<li>What is the advantage of joining?</li>
<li>What is required of members?</li>
</ul>
<p>Rick shows us, once again, that his focus is on growing the “church” by answering the “felt needs” of the flesh – not following the Biblical mandate on how to lead a flock of believers.  He is building a social fraternity and calling it “church”.</p>
<p>In chapter 16 – Turning Members into Ministers, Warren mixes some solid Biblical instruction with a humanistic, Jungian psychological matrix appraisal of people – his five SHAPE factors.  A detailed comparison of Warren’s SHAPE to Jungian psychology and God’s Word can be found at the end of this review.</p>
<p>Page 384, Warren again confirms he sees man as more important than does our Creator: “The most critical factor in a new ministry isn’t the <em>idea</em>, but the <em>leadership</em>.”  Jesus, the most important human ever, said this about Himself vs. the message (or idea): “<em>When ye have lifted up the Son of man, then shall ye know that I am he, and that <strong>I do nothing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me, I speak these things</strong>.</em>  (John 8:28)”, “<em>but I have called you friends; for <strong>all things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you</strong>.  Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you,</em> (John 15:15b – 16a).”  The Bible tells us the main thing is the message, not the messenger.</p>
<p>Lastly, page 395 – “Purpose-driven churches are led by purpose-driven leaders.”  Although I care nothing for Warren’s penchant for using “purpose-driven”, leave it aside.  Consider this – Churches are led by leaders.  Now consider the Words of the One Who “wrote the Book” on “how to do church”:  “<em>Thou therefore, my son, be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus.</em></p>
<p><em>And the things that thou hast heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also.”</em>  (2 Timothy 2:1 – 2)  And recall the Words of Jesus, above – He spoke and worked only what His Father told Him.  <strong>The only leadership is from God and the truly effective pastor will be purposeful and Spirit led.</strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration:underline;">Quotes from Schuller – or is it Rick Warren?</span></p>
<p>Rick Warren denies virtually every connection and influence with or of Robert Schuller.  But judge for yourself – read a few choice quotes from Schuller and see if Warren’s teaching doesn’t line up near perfectly.  Read more at <a href="http://www.letusreason.org/Popteac23.htm">http://www.letusreason.org/Popteac23.htm</a></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> </span></p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Yes, here is a theology for church growth.  Here is a theology for success, for the secret of success is to find a need and fill it.  Truly, when the church reforms and refines all of its theological expressions around every person&#8217;s daily need for self-affirmation, it shall flourish &#8216;like trees planted by rivers of water.&#8217;&#8221;  (Robert Schuller, &#8220;Self-Esteem: the New Reformation,&#8221; page 175)</strong></p>
<p><strong>&#8220;People who have studied our work and read our materials have said that historically we are not like other churches.  Denominations and religions started with teaching a theology about God.  Whenever there was disagreement with each other about a certain detail, the result was to establish a new religion or branch thereof, so today there are many different denominations and lots of different religions.  When I started this ministry, I chose to focus on human need and said, </strong></p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Let&#8217;s ask what a human being really is?  What does he need?&#8221;  And is there a God who can provide for those needs and what kind of God does he need?  So we started talking about the needs in humanity and we defined the single deepest need of the human being.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p><strong>(Robert Schuller, &#8220;Mirror or Window People: Which Are You?”  August 2, 2004)</strong></p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Classical theology has erred in its insistence that theology be &#8216;God-centered,&#8217; not &#8216;man-centered&#8217;.&#8221;  (Robert Schuller, &#8220;Self-Esteem: the New Reformation,&#8221; page 64) </strong></p>
<p>&#8220;The classical error of historical Christianity is that we have never started with the value of the person.  Rather, we have started from the &#8216;unworthiness of the sinner,&#8217; and that starting point has set the stage for the glorification of human shame in Christian theology.&#8221;  (Robert Schuller, &#8220;Self-Esteem: the New Reformation,&#8221; page 162)</p>
<p><a href="http://brogdensmuse.menofhonorministry.org/">Home</a></p>
<p>CHARTING THE WARREN-JUNG CONNECTION</p>
<h1> </h1>
<p>(extracted from <a href="http://www.sacredsandwich.com/warren_jung_chart.htm">http://www.sacredsandwich.com/warren_jung_chart.htm</a>)</p>
<h1>THEIR CONNECTION ON PERSONALITY THEORY</h1>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="32%" valign="top"><strong>WARREN</strong></td>
<td width="32%" valign="top"><strong>JUNG</strong></td>
<td width="33%" valign="top"><strong>BIBLE</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="32%" valign="top">“When you minister in a manner consistent with the <span style="text-decoration:underline;">personality</span> God gave you, you experience <span style="text-decoration:underline;">fulfillment</span>, satisfaction, and fruitfulness.” (The Purpose Driven Life, p. 246)“…when you are forced to minister in a manner that is “out of character” for your <span style="text-decoration:underline;">temperament</span>, it creates tension and discomfort, requires extra effort and energy, and produces less than the best results. This is why mimicking someone else’s ministry never works. You don’t have <em><span style="text-decoration:underline;">their</span></em><span style="text-decoration:underline;"> personality</span>.” (PDL, p. 245)</td>
<td width="32%" valign="top">“…the ultimate aim and strongest desire of all mankind is to develop that <span style="text-decoration:underline;">fulness</span> (sic) of life which is called <span style="text-decoration:underline;">personality</span>… To the extent that a man is untrue to <span style="text-decoration:underline;">the law of his being</span> and does not rise to personality, he has failed to realize his <span style="text-decoration:underline;">life’s meaning</span>.” (The Development of Personality, Collected Works 17; from The Essential Jung, pg. 191, 207)</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top">There is absolutely no biblical precedent for this position. Personality typology has <em>never</em> been a criteria for God choosing someone for ministry, but is in great part grounded in Jungian psychology. Did Paul rely on personality assessment to guide his ministry? Hardly&#8230;</p>
<p>“God has chosen the weak things of the world to shame the things which are strong, and the base things of the world and the despised, God has chosen, the things that are not, that He might nullify the things that are, that no man should boast before God.” 1 Cor 1:27-29</p>
<p>“And He has said to me, ‘My grace is sufficient for you, for power is perfected in weakness.’ Most gladly, therefore, I will rather boast about my weaknesses, that the power of Christ may dwell in me. Therefore I am well content with weaknesses, with insults, with distresses, with persecutions, with difficulties, for Christ&#8217;s sake; for when I am weak, then I am strong.” 2 Cor 12:9-10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr size="2" /><strong>THEIR CONNECTION ON A MUTUAL BELIEF IN THE &#8220;UNCONSCIOUS&#8221;</strong></div>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%"><strong>WARREN</strong></td>
<td width="33%">
<h2>JUNG</h2>
</td>
<td width="34%">
<h1>BIBLE</h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top">“You may be driven by a painful memory, a haunting fear, or an <span style="text-decoration:underline;">unconscious</span> belief.” (PDL, p. 27)“(Guilt-driven people) often <span style="text-decoration:underline;">unconsciously</span> punish themselves by sabotaging their own success.” (PDL, pp. 27-28)</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top">“The <span style="text-decoration:underline;">unconscious</span> . . . is the source of the instinctual forces of the psyche and of the forms or categories that regulate them, namely the archetypes.” (The Structure of the Psyche, CW 8, par. 342)“Constant observation pays the <span style="text-decoration:underline;">unconscious</span> a tribute that more or less guarantees its cooperation. One of the most important tasks of psychic hygiene [is] to pay continual attention to the symptomatology of <span style="text-decoration:underline;">unconscious</span> contents and processes.” (The Portable Jung, New York: Penguin Books, 1986, p. 156)</td>
<td width="34%" valign="top">The “unconscious” is the foundational concept of both Freudian and Jungian psychology, and has no biblical basis whatsoever. In fact, Scripture does not allow for the idea that people are “driven” by an “unconscious belief.” By endorsing the idea of the unconscious, Warren is promoting the Jungian belief that people must analyze the forces of the unconscious to discover their life’s purpose. According to Scripture, any driving force outside of God’s will is sin, no matter where it resides. Psychology, however, downplays our personal accountability for sin by making the “unconscious” the ultimate reservoir and bastion of unavoidable human instinct.</p>
<p>“And he that doubteth is damned if he eat, because [he eateth] not of faith: <span style="text-decoration:underline;">for whatsoever [is] not of faith is sin.</span>” Romans 14:23</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr size="2" /><strong>THEIR CONNECTION ON UNCONSCIOUS METAPHORS &#38; IMAGES</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%"><strong>WARREN</strong></td>
<td width="33%"><strong>JUNG</strong></td>
<td width="34%"><strong>BIBLE</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top">“If I asked how you picture life, what image<em> </em>would come to your mind? That <span style="text-decoration:underline;">image</span> is your <span style="text-decoration:underline;">life metaphor</span>. It’s the view of life that you hold, <span style="text-decoration:underline;">consciously or</span> <span style="text-decoration:underline;">unconsciously</span>, in your mind.” (PDL, pp. 41-42)“Your <span style="text-decoration:underline;">unspoken life metaphor</span> <span style="text-decoration:underline;">influences</span> your life more than you realize. It <span style="text-decoration:underline;">determines</span> your expectations, your values, your relationships, your goals, and your priorities.” (PDL, p. 42)</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top">“An archetypal content expresses itself, first and foremost, in <span style="text-decoration:underline;">metaphors</span>.” (“The Psychology of the Child Archetype,” CW 9i, par. 267)Archetypes are not inborn ideas, but “typical forms of behaviour which, once they become <span style="text-decoration:underline;">conscious</span>, naturally present themselves as <span style="text-decoration:underline;">ideas</span> and <span style="text-decoration:underline;">images</span>, like everything else that becomes a content of <span style="text-decoration:underline;">consciousness</span>.” (Collected Works 8, par. 435)</p>
<p>“Indeed, the <span style="text-decoration:underline;">fate of the individual</span> is largely dependent on <span style="text-decoration:underline;">unconscious factors</span>.” (“Conscious, Unconscious, and Individuation” CW 9)</td>
<td width="34%" valign="top">The analysis of “metaphors” housed in the unconscious is a trademark concept of psychology, not of Scripture. The use of images, fantasies, and dreams to better understand our “unconscious” is a signature feature of Jungian psychotherapy that borders on the occult.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr size="2" /><strong>THEIR CONNECTION ON USING JUNGIAN TERMINOLOGY</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%"><strong>WARREN</strong></td>
<td width="33%"><strong>JUNG</strong></td>
<td width="34%"><strong>BIBLE</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top">“God made <em><span style="text-decoration:underline;">introverts</span></em> and <em><span style="text-decoration:underline;">extroverts</span></em>… He made some people <em>‘<span style="text-decoration:underline;">thinkers</span>’ </em>and others <em>‘<span style="text-decoration:underline;">feelers</span>.’” </em>(PDL, p. 245)“Your personality will affect <em>how</em> and <em>where</em> you use your spiritual gifts and abilities. For instance, two people may have the same gift of evangelism, but if one is <span style="text-decoration:underline;">introverted</span> and other is <span style="text-decoration:underline;">extroverted</span>, that gift will be expressed in different ways.” (PDL, p. 245)</p>
<p>“Ask yourself questions:… Am I more <span style="text-decoration:underline;">introverted</span> or <span style="text-decoration:underline;">extroverted</span>? Am I more a <span style="text-decoration:underline;">thinker</span> or a <span style="text-decoration:underline;">feeler</span>?” (PDL, pp.251-252)</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top">“Two types (of typical differences in human psychology) especially become clear to me; I have termed them the <span style="text-decoration:underline;">introverted</span> and the <span style="text-decoration:underline;">extraverted</span> types.” (“Introduction” Psychological Types, CW 6 par. 1)“I have found from experience that the basic psychological functions, this is, functions which are genuinely as well as essentially different from other functions, prove to be <em><span style="text-decoration:underline;">thinking</span>, <span style="text-decoration:underline;">feeling</span>, sensation</em>, and <em>intuition</em>. If one of these functions habitually predominates, a corresponding type results. I therefore distinguish a thinking, a feeling, a sensation, and an intuitive type. <em>Each of these types may moreover be either <span style="text-decoration:underline;">introverted</span> or <span style="text-decoration:underline;">extraverted</span>…</em>” (“Introduction” Psychological Types, CW 6)</td>
<td width="34%" valign="top">Warren is explicitly using the specific terminology of the psychological typology theory originally conceived by Carl Jung. Despite the claims of his supporters, Warren has clearly based his Personality Theory (the &#8220;P&#8221; in his SHAPE teaching) on the unbiblical foundation of Jungian psychology.“Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.” Colossians 2:8</p>
<p>“Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is from God, that we might know the things freely given to us by God, which things we also speak, not in words taught by human wisdom, but in those taught by the Spirit, combining spiritual thoughts with spiritual words.” 1 Cor 2:12-13</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr size="2" /><strong>THEIR CONNECTION ON THE FOUR TEMPERAMENTS</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%"><strong>WARREN</strong></td>
<td width="33%"><strong>JUNG</strong></td>
<td width="34%"><strong>BIBLE</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top">“The Bible gives us plenty of proof that God uses all types of personalities. Peter was a <em><span style="text-decoration:underline;">sanguine</span></em>. Paul was a <em><span style="text-decoration:underline;">choleric</span></em>. Jeremiah was a <em><span style="text-decoration:underline;">melancholy</span></em>. When you look at the personality differences in the twelve disciples, it’s easy to see why they sometimes had interpersonal conflict.” (PDL, p. 245)“There is no ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ <span style="text-decoration:underline;">temperament</span><em> </em>for ministry.” (PDL, p. 245)</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top">“…the physicians of ancient times…tried to reduce the bewildering diversity of mankind to orderly groups… The very names of the Galenic <span style="text-decoration:underline;">temperaments</span> betray their origin in the pathology of the four “humours.” <em><span style="text-decoration:underline;">Melancholic</span></em> denotes a preponderance of black bile, <em><span style="text-decoration:underline;">phlegmatic</span></em> a preponderance of phlegm or mucus, <em><span style="text-decoration:underline;">sanguine</span></em> a preponderance of blood, and <em><span style="text-decoration:underline;">choleric</span></em> a preponderance of choler, or yellow bile.” (“Psychological Typology” CW 6)“The whole make-up of the body, its constitution in the broadest sense, has in fact a very great deal to do with psychological <span style="text-decoration:underline;">temperament</span>…” (“Psychological Typology” CW 6)</td>
<td width="34%" valign="top">Despite Warren’s claim, the Bible never gives “proof” of the classification of personalities; it is a purely pagan concoction. The four temperaments, as conceived by Hippocrates and later developed by Galen, was a prevalent Greek philosophy during the time of Paul’s apostolic ministry. Unlike Warren and Jung, however, Paul did not implement these Greeks ideas into his teachings. In fact, he categorically rejected them and “determined to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ, and Him crucified” (I Cor 2:2).“O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane [and] vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:” I Timothy 6:20</p>
<p>Worse yet, Warren is teaching that a person’s “no right or wrong” personality is somehow unaffected by the fall and is always beneficial for ministry. How, we ask, does a “phlegmatic temperament” towards laziness and slothfulness serve God’s purpose in ministry?</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr size="2" /><strong>THEIR CONNECTION ON PERSONALITY TESTING</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%"><strong>WARREN</strong></td>
<td width="33%"><strong>JUNG</strong></td>
<td width="34%"><strong>BIBLE</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top">“Today there are many books and tools that can help you understand your personality so you can determine how to use it for God.” (PDL, p. 246)</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top">MBTI is “based on Jung’s theory of psychological types.” (Isabel Briggs Myers, Introduction to Type, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1983, p.4)“The (MBTI) Indicator was developed specifically to carry Carl Jung’s theory of type (Jung, 1921, 1971) into practical application.” (Dr. Gordon Lawrence, People Types &#38; Tiger Stripes, p. 6, also p. x)</p>
<p>“Carl Jung’s psychology lies behind&#8230;the MBTI.” (Robert Innes, Personality Indicators and The Spiritual Life, p.8)</td>
<td width="34%" valign="top">Without qualifying this statement, Warren is promoting any and all Jungian personality and temperament tests and theories, including the widely-used Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), the Kiersey Temperament Sorter (an offshoot of the MBTI), and the Enneagram Test, which has its origin in Sufism, a mystical offshoot of Islam. (Click <a href="http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0146a.html" target="_blank">here</a> for more information on Enneagram).Despite the contrary advice offered by Warren, Christians must acknowledge the Bible as the only book needed to understand the human condition:</p>
<p>“For the word of God [is] quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and [is] a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.” Hebrews 4:12</p>
<p>(See also II Timothy 3:16-17)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr size="2" /><strong>THEIR CONNECTION ON THE ENDORSEMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%"><strong>WARREN</strong></td>
<td width="33%"><strong>JUNG</strong></td>
<td width="34%"><strong>BIBLE</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top">“Every behavior is motivated by a belief, and every action is prompted by an attitude. God revealed this thousands of years <span style="text-decoration:underline;">before psychologists understood it</span>.” (PDL, p. 181)</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top">“(Unconscious phenomena) manifest themselves in the individual’s behaviour… ” (“Conscious, Unconscious, and Individuation” CW 9)“Modern psychological development leads to a <span style="text-decoration:underline;">much better understanding</span> as to what man really consists of.” (“Psychology and Religion” CW 11)</td>
<td width="34%" valign="top">Warren is suggesting here that psychologists have the same understanding as God on the issue of human behavior, thus putting man’s “wisdom” on equal footing with God’s revelation.If Warren truly believes in the preeminence of God’s revelation to understand man, then why does he rely so heavily on the “useless wisdom” of psychology instead of Scripture?</p>
<p>“For the wisdom of this world is foolishness before God. For it is written, ‘He is THE ONE WHO CATCHES THE WISE IN THEIR CRAFTINESS‘; and again, ‘THE LORD KNOWS THE REASONINGS of the wise, THAT THEY ARE USELESS.’” I Cor 3:19-20</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr size="2" /><strong>THEIR CONNECTION ON FINDING AND DEVELOPING PERSONALITY</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%"><strong>WARREN</strong></td>
<td width="33%"><strong>JUNG</strong></td>
<td width="34%"><strong>BIBLE</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="33%" valign="top">“The best use of your life is to serve God out of your shape. To do this you <span style="text-decoration:underline;">must discover your shape</span>, learn to <span style="text-decoration:underline;">accept</span> and <span style="text-decoration:underline;">enjoy</span> it, and then <span style="text-decoration:underline;">develop it</span> to its fullest potential.” (PDL, p. 249)The SHAPE program states: “To <span style="text-decoration:underline;">discover your S.H.A.P.E.</span> is to discover where God is calling you to do His work in the world.”</td>
<td width="33%" valign="top">“Only the man who can <span style="text-decoration:underline;">consciously assent to the power of the inner voice</span> becomes a personality.” (“The Development of Personality” CW 17)“The <span style="text-decoration:underline;">achievement of personality</span> means nothing less than the <span style="text-decoration:underline;">optimum development</span> of the whole individual human being.” (“The Development of Personality” CW 17)</p>
<p>“In so far as every individual has the <span style="text-decoration:underline;">law of his life</span> inborn in him, it is theoretically possible for any man to follow this law and to <span style="text-decoration:underline;">become a personality</span>, this is, to <span style="text-decoration:underline;">achieve wholeness</span>.” (“The Development of Personality” CW 17)</td>
<td width="34%" valign="top">Finding your SHAPE has no biblical support. Warren’s teaching that one must “discover his shape” is philosophically and systematically akin to Jung’s teaching that a man must “consciously assent to the power of the inner voice” and be true to “the law of his being.”While Warren has rightly acknowledged God’s sovereign purpose in creating us, he has mistakenly made God’s divine purpose synonymous with our so-called “shape” by advocating the Jungian idea of developing the personality to “achieve wholeness.” This Jungian process, however, does not serve God, but serves the god within us.</p>
<p>Scripture calls for an active, heartfelt obedience to God’s will through the transforming power of the Spirit, not a misguided exploration of our natural psychological makeup to define our God-given purpose.</p>
<p>“Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.” Proverbs 3:5-6</p>
<p>“…your faith should not rest on the wisdom of men, but on the power of God.” 1 Cor 2:5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr size="2" /><strong>CONCLUSION: THIS IS NOT SIMPLY &#8220;GUILT BY ASSOCIATION&#8221;</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" width="83%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="100%">Yes, Jesus associated with sinners, but he certainly didn&#8217;t borrow his teachings from the Pharisees or any other false teachers. Clearly there is a very tangible connection between Rick Warren&#8217;s SHAPE teaching on personality and the psychological theories of Carl Jung. Not only does Warren base his teachings on parallel psychological concepts, but he uses <em>exact</em> Jungian terms to make his case. By focusing on assessing and developing one’s personality as the key to a successful life or ministry, Warren, like Jung, is promoting a reliance on one’s inner self instead of on God’s transcendent truth and the working of the Holy Spirit. As a popular Christian teacher, how can Warren ignore the crucial biblical truths of the sufficiency of Scripture and the power of the Holy Spirit to perfectly furnish every Christian with the ability to minister according to God&#8217;s purpose?</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> Stuart L Brogden <a href="http://brogdensmuse.menofhonorministry.org/">Home</a></p>
<h6><span style="color:#ffffff;">Rick Warren Purpose Driven Rick Warren Purpose Driven Rick Warren Rick Warren Purpose Driven Rick Warren Purpose Driven Rick Warren Rick Warren Purpose Driven Rick Warren Purpose Driven Rick Warren Rick Warren Purpose Driven Rick Warren Purpose Driven Rick Warren Rick Warren Purpose Driven Rick Warren Purpose Driven Rick Warren Rick Warren Purpose Driven Rick Warren Purpose Driven Rick Warren</span></h6>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Baby preacher]]></title>
<link>http://davidjosephhorn.wordpress.com/2009/11/19/baby-preacher/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>davidjosephhorn</dc:creator>
<guid>http://davidjosephhorn.wordpress.com/2009/11/19/baby-preacher/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[My wife sent me a link to this disturbing video tonight. I can not express my feelings of grief, pit]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><span style='text-align:center; display: block;'><object width='425' height='350'><param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/LMzwAEI56-4&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' /><param name='allowfullscreen' value='true' /><param name='wmode' value='transparent' /><embed src='http://www.youtube.com/v/LMzwAEI56-4&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' allowfullscreen='true' width='425' height='350' wmode='transparent'></embed></object></span></p>
<p>My wife sent me a link to this disturbing video tonight. I can not express my feelings of grief, pity, anger, and sorrow that filled my heart as I watched this child perform like a puppet on a string. These people encouraging this should be ashamed. This is not something I find amusing because it is sickening the extremes some preachers will go to just to rake in the people and cash. These people in this video do not care how this will effect this child in the future. This is a mockery of the preaching of the gospel bringing reproach upon the name of the Lord.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>1</strong><em> </em>But <a href="#_ftn1"><sup>a</sup></a>false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will also be <a href="#_ftn2"><sup>b</sup></a>false teachers <a href="#_ftn3"><sup>c</sup></a>among you, who will <a href="#_ftn4"><sup>d</sup></a>secretly introduce <a href="#_ftn5"><sup>e</sup></a>destructive heresies, even <a href="#_ftn6"><sup>f</sup></a>denying the <a href="#_ftn7"><sup>g</sup></a>Master who <a href="#_ftn8"><sup>h</sup></a>bought them, bringing swift destruction upon themselves. <em> </em></p>
<p>2   Many will follow their <a href="#_ftn9"><sup>a</sup></a>sensuality, and because of them <a href="#_ftn10"><sup>b</sup></a>the way of the truth will be <a href="#_ftn11"><sup>c</sup></a>maligned;</p>
<p>3    and in <em>their </em><a href="#_ftn12"><sup>a</sup></a>greed they will <a href="#_ftn13"><sup>b</sup></a>exploit you with <a href="#_ftn14"><sup>c</sup></a>false words; <a href="#_ftn15"><sup>d</sup></a>their judgment from long ago is not idle, and their destruction is not asleep. <a href="#_ftn16"><sup>[1]</sup></a></p></blockquote>
<p>&#160;</p>
<hr size="1" /><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>Deut 13:1ff; Jer 6:13</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>b</sup></a>2 Cor 11:13</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>c</sup></a>Matt 7:15; 1 Tim 4:1</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>d</sup></a>Gal 2:4; Jude 4</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>e</sup></a>1 Cor 11:19; Gal 5:20</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>f</sup></a>Jude 4</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>g</sup></a>Rev 6:10</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>h</sup></a>1 Cor 6:20</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>Gen 19:5ff; 2 Pet 2:7, 18; Jude 4</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>b</sup></a>Acts 16:17; 22:4; 24:14</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>c</sup></a>Rom 2:24</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>a</sup></a>1 Tim 6:5; 2 Pet 2:14; Jude 16</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>b</sup></a>2 Cor 2:17; 1 Thess 2:5</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>c</sup></a>Rom 16:18; 2 Pet 1:16</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>d</sup></a>Deut 32:35</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref"><sup>[1]</sup></a>New American Standard Bible : 1995 update. 1995 (2 Pe 2:1-3). LaHabra, CA: The Lockman Foundation.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
