<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>rififi &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/rififi/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "rififi"</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:26:55 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Rififi (Dassin, 1955)]]></title>
<link>http://roomoverthegarage.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/rififi-dassin-1955/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Beth Hanna</dc:creator>
<guid>http://roomoverthegarage.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/rififi-dassin-1955/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The crime film is a strange animal.  At its most uninspired, it can sink to banal dichotomies of goo]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-176" title="rififi1" src="http://roomoverthegarage.wordpress.com/files/2009/10/rififi1.jpg" alt="rififi1" width="270" height="206" /></p>
<p>The crime film is a strange animal.  At its most uninspired, it can sink to banal dichotomies of good and evil, littered with gimmicky and ultimately uninteresting McGuffins.  But at its best, it can expose human nature to be simultaneously ruthless and well-intentioned, and the human mind to be at once terrifically focused and hopelessly impulsive and corruptible.  Jules Dassin’s <em>Rififi</em> is an example—perhaps the example—of the crime film at its best.  It opens with Tony (the unbeatable Jean Servais), a middle-aged man with a tired yet detectably pleasant face, already in a backroom gambling after just finishing up a five-year stretch behind bars for a jewel heist.  To the criminals of Paris, Tony is known formidably as the Stéphanois. Within a matter of hours, Tony is reunited with his old friends Jo and Mario (crooked, good-hearted fellows) and involved in strategizing the most complicated and lucrative jewel heist in decades.<br />
<!--more--></p>
<p>The target is Mappin &#38; Webb, a posh jewelry store Jo has cased on several occasions.  With the help of the twinkle-eyed skirt-chaser Cesar (played with panache by Dassin himself), Mario’s Italian friend and the best safe cracker in western Europe, the men devise a beautifully intricate and imaginative heist scenario. A heist scenario that, when executed, goes off with breathless aplomb.  However the euphoria of perfect technique is not long for the world of <em>Rififi</em>, and when Mario visits a lady friend against Tony’s strict orders to maintain a low profile, the glass house develops a fissure.  Grutter, a king thug who owns the night club L’Age d’Or, begins to torture or pick off Tony’s friends in an attempt to get to the loot.  Mario and his doting girlfriend get their throats slit.  Tonio, Jo’s sunny little boy and Tony’s godchild, gets abducted. Cesar is tied to a wooden beam and tortured for answers.  When Tony finds Cesar, a retreating POV shot followed by three sickening gunshots reveals what happens to men who betray their friends.  In the wake of a grand crime, all hell has broken loose.</p>
<p>“Rififi” is a song crooned by the coquettish nightclub singer Vivianne.  As she wiggles and shimmies seductively on the foot of the stage at L’Age d’Or, she tells us in melody of the transformation her man undergoes when the mysterious power of “rififi” takes hold: “It’s the lingo of the streetwise, the battle cry of real tough guys…So don’t fry your brain and grumble, all it means is ‘rough n’ tumble.’”  Men under the spell of “rififi” go into an irrepressible tough-guy mode, destined hypnotically toward the allure of crime.  Yet it is the women dotted throughout <em>Rififi</em> who seem to feel the sting of this spell most acutely.  Vivianne’s song reoccurs at various points in the film, most notably when the men involved in the heist say goodbye to their respective ladies.  During this expertly cross-cut sequence, each woman senses silently that her man is off to commit an unlawful deed, yet she knows the futility of protesting.  <em>Rififi</em> subtly transcends the gender stereotypes of the crime genre by implying that these men and women stand on the same tragic plane, equally powerless to the destructive coaxing of “rififi.”  (It should be noted that Mado, Tony’s ex-lover, does emerge as strong-willed.  She neither succumbs to supplying Grutter with information that would get Tony killed, nor does she need Tony back in her life.  This is a very interesting arc for a character initially forced to withstand a hateful belt lashing while naked.)</p>
<p>The term “cinema of process” has been coined for the great French director Jean-Pierre Melville and his oeuvre of beautifully methodical crime films, beginning with <em>Bob Le Flambeur</em> in 1956.  Yet Dassin’s <em>Rififi</em> is a magnificently-honed work of obsessive process that in fact pre-dates <em>Bob</em> by one year.  (After <em>Rififi</em>’s release in 1955, Melville forced himself to wait until 1970 to make <em>The Red Circle</em>, a heist film with substantial structural similarity to <em>Rififi</em>.)  The “cinema of process” refers to the filmic technique of showing an act, and every detail integral to that act, in a patient, meticulous way.  The heist sequence in <em>Rififi</em>, which consists of nearly 30 utterly transfixing and wordless minutes of the elaborate, creative strategy (umbrellas! fire extinguishers!) used by the four men to relieve Mappin &#38; Webb of its entire jewelry selection, is without a doubt the epitome of a cinema of process.  Yet the question remains: why<em> </em>show the process of an act?  And further more, why use this technique in <em>Rififi</em>?</p>
<p><em>Rififi</em> is not only a heist film, <em>Rififi</em> is a film (similar to many others, and arguably matched by none) about a heist that is pulled off with bravado and then goes grievously, tragically wrong.  The process of the heist is not only fascinating, it also adds to the ultimate visual catharsis of the film.  It is more excruciating for one to see exactly how something irreparably falls apart when one has first cheered for the brilliant way it was put together.  Cesar spends tense, impressive minutes drilling an artful hole in a safe, and then later completely unhinges a perfectly executed heist by giving a hot ring to Vivianne.  The Stéphanois has the inspired thought to douse Mappin &#38; Webb’s security alarm with fire extinguisher foam, only to later impulsively and secretly save Jo’s little boy from Grutter’s thugs (a save that costs Jo his life).  The elegant science of the process is followed by the senseless irrationality of the undoing.</p>
<p>The final sequence of the film is the haunting Afterward to the heist.  As a bullet-struck Tony drives little Tonio back to safety, he slumps deliriously over the steering wheel, his face ashen while blood drips mercilessly out of his pant leg.  Quick, crazed edits show trees flying by in a surreal blur, and the adorable Tonio looks alarmingly maniacal as he bounces around in the backseat, his toy gun waving and his baby teeth flashing.  The child laughs uncontrollably, the score blares, and we queasily feel the strength it takes for the dying Stéphanois to even press his foot to the brake pad.</p>
<p>The quiet, methodical minutes in Mappin &#38; Webb are now a distant memory.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Lisez Le Ruyet !]]></title>
<link>http://ecriposoph.wordpress.com/2009/08/06/lisez-le-ruyet/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>francis lepioufle</dc:creator>
<guid>http://ecriposoph.wordpress.com/2009/08/06/lisez-le-ruyet/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Vous voulez sourire de notre société et en rire, lisez Le Ruyet !Vous ne connaissez pas ! Vous perde]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Vous voulez sourire de notre société et en rire, lisez Le Ruyet !Vous ne connaissez pas ! Vous perdez beaucoup ! Un personnage essentiel si l&#8217;on veut connaître un tant soit peu la vie (pas si tranquille que cela) de nos villages, ses querelles, la vie chloroformée de nos maisons de retraites ! Dans &#8220;Du rififi au gagatorium&#8221;, nous voilà embarqués pour une farce bouffonne au village de Kervraz ; tout le monde a son Kervraz, sa chapelle, son café, son jeune iroquois. Pas besoin de ramer longtemps, l&#8217;écriture enfle son courant jubilatoire jusqu&#8217;à faire sortir de ses gonds une petite vieille Maryannick Carréric qui ne tarde pas à faire le ménage au pays des actionnaires crapuleux de maisons de vieux .</p>
<p>Et si dans le train, vous êtes littéralement emporté par le courant dévastateur des mots et du rire, il est  superflu d&#8217;essayer de contrôler ses zygomatiques car les situations vont rebondir et vous secouer en cascades à la ligne suivante : L&#8217;auteur  jongle sur les mots alors que Maryannic Carréric, la petite vieille s&#8217;active, montée sur ses ressorts.</p>
<p>A retenir : &#8220;Du Rififi au Gagatorium&#8221; d&#8217;André Le Ruyet ; contact par   le biais de l&#8217;Association des écrivains bretons.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[History of Movies Poster - Desktop]]></title>
<link>http://filmstudies.wordpress.com/2009/06/27/history-of-movies-poster-desktop/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>filmstudies</dc:creator>
<guid>http://filmstudies.wordpress.com/2009/06/27/history-of-movies-poster-desktop/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Desktop 800&#215;600 1024&#215;768 1280&#215;768 Print Hi-Resolution (3.9MB) 1890 Monkeyshines 1891 ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><strong>Desktop <a href="http://filmstudies.wordpress.com/files/2007/07/film-studies-101-desktop-800x600.jpg" target="_blank">800&#215;600</a> <a href="http://filmstudies.wordpress.com/files/2007/07/film-studies-101-desktop-1024x768.jpg" target="_blank">1024&#215;768</a> <a href="http://filmstudies.wordpress.com/files/2007/07/film-studies-101-desktop-1280x768.jpg" target="_blank">1280&#215;768</a> </strong><strong></p>
<p>Print <a href="http://filmstudies.wordpress.com/files/2007/07/film-studies-101-hi-resolution.jpg" target="_blank">Hi-Resolution (3.9MB)</a> </strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://filmstudies.wordpress.com/files/2007/07/film-studies-101-desktop-1024x768.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://filmstudies.wordpress.com/files/2007/07/thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="" height="425" /></a></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size:.1pt;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;">1890 Monkeyshines 1891 Dickson Greeting 1891 Edison &#8211; Newark Athlete, Part I 1893 Men in Blacksmith Shop 1894 Annie Oakley shooting at targets 1894 Edison &#8211; Chinese Laundry &#8211; November 26, 1894 1894 Edison &#8211; Kinetoscope Films from 1894-1896 1895 Arrival of a Train at La Ciotat (The Lumière Brothers) 1895 Edison &#8211; The execution of Mary, Queen of Scots &#8211; August 28, 1895 1895 L&#8217;Arroseur arrosé 1895 The Dickson Experimental Sound Film 1896 Bataille de Boules de Neige (Louis Lumière, 1896) 1896 Edison &#8211; The Kiss 1896 Fred Ott&#8217;s Sneeze 1896 Louis Lumiere &#8211; New York,Broadway At Union Square 1896 Rip Van Winkle 1897 Edison &#8211; Admiral Cigarette advertisement 1898 Turkish Dance, Ella Lola 1899 Cripple Creek Bar-room Scene (Edison) 1899 Edison &#8211; Bicyclist tricks 1900 Edison &#8211; Grandma&#8217;s Bad Boys 1901 Edison &#8211; Boxing Woman 1901 Edison &#8211; Circular panorama of electric tower &#8211; Pan-American Exposition, 14 August 1901 1901 Edison &#8211; The Martyred Presidents 1901 What Happened on Twenty-Third Street, New York City 1902 Le voyage dans la lune 1903 Life of an American Fireman &#8211; Edwin S. Porter 1903 Move On 1903 NYC Ghetto Fish Market 1903 The Great Train Robbery Part 1 &#8211; Thomas A. Edison 1904 Westinghouse Works Part 1 1906 San Francisco earthquake and fire 1909 Princess Nicotine 1910 Jack Johnson -vs- James Jeffries 1914 Cabiria Giovanni Pastrone 1914 Charlie Chaplin &#8211; The Kid Auto Race 1914 Der Golem or, The Monster of Fate 1914 Gertie the Dinosaur 1914 The Exploits of Elaine 1915 The Birth of a Nation 1915 The Italian 1916 Intolerance 1917 The Immigrant 1919 Broken Blossoms 1920 The Cabinet of Dr Caligari 1920 The Mark of Zorro 1921 Charlie Chaplin &#8211; The Kid 1921 Manhatta 1921 The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse 1922 Buster Keaton &#8211; Cops (1 of 2) 1922 Nanook of the North 1922 Nosferatu 1923 Le retour a la raison &#8211; Man Ray 1923 Safety Last! 1923 Salome 1924 Body and Soul 1924 Buster Keaton &#8211; Sherlock Jr 1924 Buster Keaton &#8211; The Navigator 1924 Peter Pan 1924 The Thief of Bagdad 1925 Battleship Potemkin &#8211; Odessa Stairs Massacre &#8211; Pram 1925 Battleship Potemkin &#8211; Son Shot 1925 Charlie Chaplin &#8211; The Gold Rush 1925 The Freshman 1925 The Lost World 1925 The Phantom of the Opera 1925 Theodore Case Sound Test &#8211; Gus Visser and his Singing Duck 1926 Flesh and the Devil 1926 Son of the Sheik 1927 Buster Keaton &#8211; The General 2 1927 It &#8211; Clara Bow 1927 Metropolis &#8211; Montage 1927 Oktober &#8211; 1 1927 Sunrise 1927 The Jazz Singer 1927 Wings 1928 Charlie Chaplin &#8211; The Circus 1928 Steamboat Willie 1928 The Cameraman &#8211; Breaking the Bank 1928 The Wedding March 1929 Luis Bunuel &#8211; Un chien andalou Part 1 1929 Man with a Movie Camera 1929 St. Louis Blues 1929 The Broadway Melody 1930 All Quiet Along the Western Front &#8211; Trailer 1930 Morocco 1931 Charlie Chaplin &#8211; City Lights 1931 Dracula 1931 Frankenstein 1931 Fritz Lang&#8217;s M, ending, 1st part 1931 Le million 1931 Little Caesar 1931 The Champ 1931 The Public Enemy 1932 Freaks 1932 Grand Hotel 1932 Love Me Tonight 1932 Shanghai Express 1932 The Music Box 1932 Trouble In Paradise 1933 42nd Street 1933 Duck Soup 1933 King Kong – ending 1933 She Done Him Wrong &#8211; Mae West 1933 Snow White 1933 The Emperor Jones 1934 It Happened One Night 1934 It&#8217;s A Gift 1934 Little Miss Marker 1934 Tarzan and His Mate 1934 The Goddess 1934 The Man Who Knew Too Much 1934 The Thin Man 1935 A Night at the Opera 1935 Bride of Frankenstein 1935 Mutiny On The Bounty 1935 Naughty Marietta 1935 The 39 Steps 1935 Top Hat 1935 Triumph of the Will 1936 Camille 1936 Modern Times 1936 My Man Godfrey 1936 Popeye the Sailor Meets Sindbad the Sailor &#8211; Part 1 1936 Rose Hobart 1936 Show Boat 1936 Swing Time &#8211; Trailer 1936 The Great Ziegfeld 1937 A Star Is Born 1937 Hindenburg disaster 1937 Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs &#8211; hi ho 1937 Stage Door 1937 The Awful Truth 1937 The Life of Emile Zola 1937 Way Out West &#8211; &#8216;Blue Ridge Mountains&#8217; 1938 Bringing Up Baby 1938 Love Finds Andy Hardy &#8211; Trailer 1938 Olympia 1938 Porky in Wackyland 1938 You Can&#8217;t Take It with You 1939 Destry Rides Again 1939 Gone with the Wind 1 &#8211; kiss 1939 Gunga Din 1939 La Règle du jeu 1939 Mr. Smith Goes to Washington 1939 Ninotchka clip 1939 Stagecoach 1939 The Wizard of Oz 1939 Wuthering Heights 1939 Young Mr Lincoln 1940 Charlie Chaplin &#8211; The Great Dictator 1940 Fantasia 1940 His Girl Friday 1940 Pinocchio 1940 Rebecca 1940 The Bank Dick 1940 The Grapes Of Wrath 1940 The Philadelphia Story 1940 The Shop Around the Corner 1941 Citizen Kane &#8211; Final Words 1941 Meet John Doe 1941 Sullivan&#8217;s Travels 1941 The Lady Eve 1941 The Maltese Falcon 1942 Casablanca 1 &#8211; play it again 1942 Cat People 1942 Holiday Inn &#8211; White Christmas 1942 Jam Session 1942 Random Harvest &#8211; She&#8217;s Ma Daisy 1942 Road to Morocco 1942 The Battle of Midway 1942 The Magnificent Ambersons 1942 To Be Or Not To Be 1942 Tulips Shall Grow 1942 Woman of the Year 1942 Yankee Doodle Dandy 1943 Meshes of the Afternoon &#8211; Part 1 1943 Shadow of a Doubt 1943 Stormy Weather 1943 The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp 1944 Arsenic and Old Lace 1944 Double Indemnity 1944 Going My Way 1944 Henry V &#8211; Trailer 1944 Laura &#8211; Trailer 1944 The Miracle of Morgan&#8217;s Creek 1945 Blithe Spirit 1945 Brief Encounter &#8211; end 1945 Detour 1945 Les Enfants du Paradis 1945 Mildred Pierce &#8211; Trailer 1945 Roma Citta Libera 1945 Spellbound 1945 The Body Snatcher 1945 The Lost Weekend 1946 It&#8217;s A Wonderful Life &#8211; ending 1946 La Belle et la bête 1946 My Darling Clementine 1946 Notorious 1946 The Best Years of Our Lives 1946 The Big Sleep 1947 Black Narcissus 1947 Brighton Rock 1947 Crossfire 1947 Miracle on 34th Street 1947 Out of the Past 1948 Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein 1948 Bicycle Thieves 1948 Hamlet 1948 Letter From An Unknown Woman 1948 Mr.Blandings Builds His Dream House 1948 Red River 1948 The Red Shoes 1948 The Treasure Of The Sierra Madre 1949 All the King&#8217;s Men 1949 Kind Hearts and Coronets 1949 The Heiress 1949 The Third Man &#8211; ending 1949 Twelve O&#8217;Clock High 1949 White Heat &#8211; Top of the World 1950 All About Eve 1950 Gerald McBoing-Boing 1950 Harvey 1950 In A Lonely Place 1950 Rashomon 1950 Sunset Boulevard 1951 A Place in the Sun 1951 A Streetcar Named Desire 1951 An American in Paris 1951 Duck and Cover 1951 Flying Padre &#8211; Stanley Kubrick 1951 Strangers on a Train 1951 The African Queen 1951 The Day the Earth Stood Still 1951 The Thing from Another World 1952 High Noon 1952 Hurlements en faveur de Sade &#8211; Guy Debord 1952 Ikiru 1952 Magical Maestro 1952 Singin&#8217; in the Rain 1952 The Bad and the Beautiful 1952 The Greatest Show on Earth 1952 The Quiet Man 1952 Umberto D 1953 From Here to Eternity 1953 Le Salaire de la peur 1953 Let&#8217;s All Go to the Lobby 1953 Mr Hulot&#8217;s Holiday 1 &#8211; start 1953 Roman Holiday 1953 Shane 1953 Stalag 17 1953 The Band Wagon &#8211; That&#8217;s Entertainment 1953 The Hitch-Hiker 1953 The Tell-Tale Heart 1953 The War Of The Worlds 1953 Tokyo Story 1953 Ugetsu 1954 A Star Is Born 1954 Carmen Jones 1954 Creature from the Black Lagoon 1954 Dial M For Murder 1954 House in the Middle Pt 1 1954 La Strada 1954 On The Waterfront 1954 Rear Window 1954 Sabrina 1954 Seven Brides for Seven Brothers 1954 Seven Samurai &#8211; Akira Kurosawa 1954 The Caine Mutiny 1954 The Dam Busters 1954 White Christmas 1955 Blackboard Jungle 1955 Kiss Me Deadly clip 1955 Les Diaboliques 1955 Marty 1955 One Froggy Evening 1955 Pather Panchali 1955 Rebel Without A Cause &#8211; knife 1955 Richard III 1955 Rififi 1955 The Night of the Hunter 1956 Around the World in 80 Days &#8211; Trailer 1956 Don&#8217;t Knock The Rock &#8211; &#8216;Tutti Frutti&#8217; 1956 Giant 1956 Invasion Of The Body Snatchers 1956 The Court Jester 1956 The Killing 1956 The Searchers &#8211; Trailer 1956 The Ten Commandments &#8211; Trailer 1957 12 Angry Men 1 1957 Bridge On The River Kwai 1 1957 Jailhouse Rock 1957 Le notti di Cabiria &#8211; Fellini 1957 Paths of Glory 1957 Pyaasa 1957 Rock You Sinners &#8211; Brighton Rock 1957 Smultronstället 1957 Sweet Smell of Success 1957 The Seventh Seal 1957 What&#8217;s Opera, Doc 1957 Will Success Spoil Rock Hunter 1957 Witness for the Prosecution 1958 Cat on a Hot Tin Roof 1958 Mon Oncle 1958 The Defiant Ones &#8211; Trailer 1958 The Vikings 1958 Touch of Evil 1958 Vertigo &#8211; The Stairs, first time 1959 Anatomy of a Murder &#8211; Trailer 1959 Ben Hur &#8211; Trailer 1959 Les quatre cents coups 1959 North By Northwest &#8211; The Airplane 1959 Shadows 1959 Some Like It Hot 1960 A bout de souffle 1960 House of Usher 1960 La Dolce Vita 1960 Psycho 1960 Saturday Night and Sunday Morning &#8211; Trailer 1960 Spartacus 1960 The Alamo 1960 The Apartment 1961 Breakfast at Tiffany&#8217;s 1961 Dog Star Man &#8211; Prelude 1961 Judgment At Nuremberg 1961 Jules et Jim 1961 West Side Story 1961 Yojimbo 1961The Hustler 1962 Dr No 1962 How the West Was Won 1962 Lawrence of Arabia 1962 Lolita 1962 O Pagador de Promessas 1962 Ride the High Country 1962 The Manchurian Candidate 1962 The Music Man 1962 To Kill a Mockingbird 1963 8 1-2 &#8211; dream 1963 Charade 1963 Dog Star Man &#8211; Part II 1963 Shock Corridor 1963 The Birds 1963 The Great Escape 1963 The Nutty Professor 1963 The Servant 1964 A Hard Day&#8217;s Night 1964 Bande à part 1964 Deus e o diabo na terra do Sol 1964 Dog Star Man &#8211; Part III 1964 Dr. Strangelove 1 1964 Empire &#8211; Andy Warhol 1964 Goldfinger 1964 Mary Poppins &#8211; Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious 1964 My Fair Lady &#8211; Wouldn&#8217;t It Be Loverly 1964 Zulu 1965 Darling 1965 Dr. Zhivago 1965 For A Few Dollars More 1965 Repulsion &#8211; Catherine Deneuve 1965 The Sound of Music 1966 A Man For All Seasons &#8211; Trailer 1966 Alfie 1966 Blow-up 1966 Fahrenheit 451 1966 Georgy Girl 1966 La Battaglia di Algeri 1966 Persona 1966 The Endless Summer 1966 The Good The Bad and the Ugly 1966 Who&#8217;s Afraid of Virginia Woolf 1967 Belle de Jour &#8211; Luis Bunuel 1967 Bonnie and Clyde 1967 Cool Hand Luke &#8211; boiled eggs 1967 Far From The Madding Crowd 1967 Guess Who&#8217;s Coming to Dinner 1967 In the Heat of the Night &#8211; Trailer 1967 Mouchette 1967 Playtime 1967 Stop, Look and Listen 1967 The Graduate 1967 The Jungle Book &#8211; I Wanna Be Like You 1968 2001 Space Odyssey 1 &#8211; start 1968 Bullitt 1968 Carry on Up the Khyber 1968 If&#8230; 1968 Night Of the Living Dead 1968 Oliver! 1968 Once Upon a Time in the West 1968 Planet of the Apes 1968 Rosemary&#8217;s Baby 1968 The Producers &#8211; Springtime for Hitler 1968 Why Man Creates 1969 Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid 1969 Easy Rider &#8211; ending 1969 Goodbye, Mr. Chips 1969 Kes &#8211; cane 1969 Midnight Cowboy &#8211; I&#8217;m walking here 1969 The Italian Job &#8211; doors 1969 The Sorrow and the Pity &#8211; bourgeois 1969 The Wild Bunch 1969 Women in Love 1970 Five Easy Pieces 1970 Love Story 1970 MASH 1970 Multiple Sidosis 1970 Patton 1971 A Clockwork Orange &#8211; droog fight 1971 A Touch Of Zen 1971 Fiddler On The Roof &#8211; To Life 1971 Get Carter 1971 Harold And Maude 1971 Shaft 1971 Sweet Sweetback&#8217;s Baadasssss Song 1971 The French Connection 1971 The Hospital 1971 The Last Picture Show 1971 Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory &#8211; Pure Imagination 1972 Aguirre the Wrath of God 1972 Cabaret 1972 Deliverance &#8211; &#8216;Dueling banjos&#8217; 1972 DT 1972 Frenzy 1972 Last Tango in Paris 1 1972 OffOn 1972 Sleuth 1972 Solaris 1972 The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie 1972 The Godfather &#8211; offer 1972 The Poseidon Adventure 1973 American Graffiti 1973 Badlands 1973 Coffy 1973 Don&#8217;t Look Now 1973 Enter the Dragon 1973 Frank Film 1973 La Nuit americaine 1973 Mean Streets 1973 Sleeper 1973 The Day of the Jackal 1973 The Exorcist &#8211; Pt.1 1973 The Sting 1973 The Wicker Man 1974 A Woman Under the Influence 1974 Blazing Saddles 1974 Chinatown 1974 Foxy Brown 1974 The Conversation 1974 The Godfather, Part II 1974 The Texas Chainsaw Massacre &#8211; ending 1974 The Towering Inferno &#8211; Trailer 1974 Young Frankenstein &#8211; Puttin&#8217; on the Ritz 1975 One Flew Over the Cuckoo&#8217;s Nest &#8211; ending 1975 Barry Lyndon 1975 Dog Day Afternoon 1975 Flåklypa Grand Prix &#8211; 1 1975 Jaws 1975 Monty Python and the Holy Grail 1975 Nashville 1975 One Flew Over the Cuckoo&#8217;s Nest 1975 Picnic At Hanging Rock &#8211; Trailer 1975 The Return Of The Pink Panther &#8211; Karate Kick 1975 The Rocky Horror Picture Show &#8211; Damn it Janet 1976 All the President&#8217;s Men &#8211; Trailer 1976 Car Wash 1976 Marathon Man 1976 Network 1976 Nuts in May 1976 Rocky &#8211; Adrian 1976 Taxi Driver &#8211; Talking To Me 1976 The Omen 1976 The Outlaw Josey Wales 1976 The Pink Panther Strikes Again 1977 Abigail&#8217;s Party 1977 Annie Hall 1977 Close Encounters of the Third Kind 1977 Eraserhead 1977 Killer of Sheep 1977 Looking for Mr. Goodbar 1977 Powers of Ten 1977 Saturday Night Fever 1977 Soldaat van Oranje 1977 Star Wars Episode IV &#8211; A New Hope &#8211; Deathstar1 1978 Dawn Of The Dead &#8211; mall 1978 DDD 1978 Every Which Way But Loose 1978 Grease &#8211; Summer Nights 1978 Halloween 1978 Midnight Express 1978 National Lampoon&#8217;s Animal House 1978 Pennies From Heaven 1978 Superman The Movie 1978 The Deer Hunter 1978 The Last Waltz &#8211; The Weight 1979 Alien 1979 All That Jazz &#8211; Bye Bye Life 1979 Apocalypse Now &#8211; Napalm in the morning 1979 Mad Max and Feral Boy 1979 Manhattan &#8211; start 1979 Monty Python&#8217;s Life of Brian 1979 Stalker &#8211; Tarkovsky 1979 Star Trek The Motion Picture 1979 The Black Stallion 1979 Woyzeck &#8211; Herzog 1980 Airplane! 1980 Atlantic City 1980 Flash Gordon 1980 Gregory&#8217;s Girl 1980 Heaven&#8217;s Gate 1980 Mon oncle d&#8217;Amerique 1980 Raging Bull 1980 Superman II 1980 The Elephant Man 1980 The Empire Strikes Back 1980 The Long Good Friday &#8211; ending 1980 The Shining &#8211; Here&#8217;s Johnny 1981 Chariots of Fire 1981 Das Boot 1981 Gallipoli 1981 Mommie Dearest 1981 Raiders Of The Lost Ark 1981 The Cannonball Run &#8211; 1 1981 The Evil Dead 1981 The Postman Always Rings Twice 1982 Blade Runner 1982 Boys from the Blackstuff 1982 Conan The Barbarian 1982 ET 1982 Fast Times At Ridgemont High 1982 First Blood 1982 Fitzcarraldo 1982 Gandhi 1982 Koyaanisqatsi 1982 Made in Britain 1982 Poltergeist 1982 Porky&#8217;s 1982 Raymond Briggs&#8217; The Snowman 1982 Sophie&#8217;s Choice 1982 Star Trek II &#8211; The Wrath of Khan 1982 The Draughtsman&#8217;s Contract 1982 The Thing 1982 The Thing 1983 A Christmas Story &#8211; Oh, Fuuudge 1983 Return of The Jedi 1983 Scarface 1983 Terms of Endearment 1983 The King of Comedy 1983 Trading Places 1983 WarGames 1984 1984 1984 A Passage To India 1984 Amadeus 1984 Dune 1984 Ghostbusters 1984 Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom 1984 Once Upon A Time In America 1984 Paris, Texas 1984 Police Academy 1984 Repo Man 1984 Stop Making Sense 1984 Stranger Than Paradise 1984 Supergirl 1984 The Karate Kid 1984 The Killing Fields 1984 The Never Ending Story &#8211; Trailer 1984 The Terminator 1984 This is Spinal Tap 1985 After Hours 1985 Back to the Future 1985 Brazil 1985 Clue 1985 My Beautiful Laundrette 1985 Out of Africa 1985 Ran 1985 Teen Wolf 1985 The Black Cauldron 1985 The Breakfast Club &#8211; dancing 1985 The Color Purple 1985 The Goonies 1985 The Official Story 1985 Weird Science 1985 Witness 1985 Young Sherlock Holmes 1986 9 1-2 Weeks 1986 A Better Tomorrow 1986 A Room with a View 1986 Betty Blue 1986 Big Trouble In Little China 1986 Blue Velvet &#8211; start 1986 Caravaggio &#8211; Derek Jarman 1986 Ferris Bueller&#8217;s Day Off 1986 Flight of the Navigator 1986 Hannah and Her Sisters 1986 Hoosiers 1986 Jean de Florette 1986 Labyrinth 1986 Little Shop of Horrors 1986 Manon des Sources 1986 Mona Lisa 1986 Platoon 1986 Rita, Sue and Bob Too &#8211; Bananarama 1986 Short Circuit &#8211; Trailer 1986 Stand By Me &#8211; 1 1986 The Fly 1986 The Money Pit 1986 The Name of The Rose 1986 The Singing Detective 1986 Top Gun 1986 When the Wind Blows 1987 Der Himmel über Berlin Wings of Desire 1987 Dirty Dancing 1987 Fatal Attraction 1987 Full Metal Jacket &#8211; drill sergeant 1987 Harry and the Hendersons 1987 Naayagan 1987 Planes, Trains and Automobiles &#8211; waking up 1987 Robocop 1987 The Last Emperor 1987 The Princess Bride 1987 The Untouchables 1987 The Witches of Eastwick 1987 Throw Momma from the Train 1987 Withnail and I &#8211; Camberwell carrot 1988 A Fish Called Wanda 1988 Akira 1988 Big 1988 Child&#8217;s Play 1988 Coming to America &#8211; bride 1988 Dangerous Liaisons 1988 Die Hard 1988 Distant Voices, Still Lives &#8211; Trailer 1988 Mississippi Burning 1988 Rain Man 1988 The Accused &#8211; lawyer 1988 The Last Temptation Of Christ 1988 The Naked Gun 1988 Who Framed Roger Rabbit 1989 Back to the Future II 1989 Batman 1989 Born on the Fourth of July 1989 Cinema Paradiso clip 1989 Dead Poets Society &#8211; ending 1989 Do The Right Thing &#8211; 1 1989 Glory 1989 Henry V 1989 Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade 1989 My Left Foot 1989 Sex, Lies and Videotape 1989 Uncle Buck 1989 Weekend at Bernie&#8217;s 1990 Back To The Future III 1990 Dances With Wolves 1990 Edward Scissorhands 1990 Ghost 1990 Goodfellas 1990 Home Alone 1990 Miller&#8217;s Crossing 1990 Nuns on the Run 1990 Pretty Woman 1990 Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 1990 The Hunt for Red October 1991 Beauty and the Beast 1991 Boyz n the Hood 1991 Cape Fear 1991 Daughters of The Dust 1991 Delicatessen clip 1991 Fried Green Tomatoes 1991 Robin Hood Prince of Thieves 1991 Terminator 2 1991 The Commitments 1991 The Silence of the Lambs &#8211; fava beans 1991 Thelma and Louise 1992 A Few Good Men 1992 El Mariachi 1992 Home Alone 2 1992 Howards End 1992 Leolo 1992 Malcolm X 1992 Peter&#8217;s Friends &#8211; song 1992 Reservoir Dogs 1992 The Bodyguard 1992 The Crying Game 1992 The Last of the Mohicans 1992 The Player &#8211; Trailer 1992 Unforgiven 1993 Carlito&#8217;s Way 1993 Falling Down 1993 Farewell My Concubinet 1993 Groundhog Day 1993 In the Name of the Father 1993 Jurassic Park 1993 Naked 1993 Philadelphia 1993 Schindler&#8217;s List 1993 The Fugitive 1993 The Piano 1993 The Remains of the Day 1993 The Wrong Trousers 1993 Three Colours Blue 1993 What&#8217;s Eating Gilbert Grape 1994 Chungking Express 1994 Clerks &#8211; corpse 1994 Drunken Master II &#8211; Final Fight Scene (Part 1 of 2) 1994 Ed Wood 1994 Forrest Gump 1994 Four Weddings and a Funeral 1994 Il postino 1994 Leon The Professional 1994 Muriel&#8217;s Wedding 1994 Pulp Fiction &#8211; dancing 1994 The Madness Of King George 1994 The Shawshank Redemption 1995 Braveheart 1995 Heat 1995 La Haine 1995 Nine Months 1995 Richard III 1995 Se7en 1995 Sense and Sensibility 1995 The Usual Suspects 1995 The White Balloon 1995 Toy Story 1995 Twelve Monkeys 1996 Brassed Off 1996 Fargo 1996 Jerry Maguire 1996 Romeo and Juliet 1996 Secrets and Lies 1996 Shine 1996 The English Patient 1996 Trainspotting 1997 As Good as It Gets 1997 Boogie Nights 1997 Good Will Hunting 1997 L.A. Confidential 1997 La Vita è blla 1997 Nil By Mouth 1997 The Full Monty &#8211; ending 1997 Titanic 1997 Waiting for Guffman 1998 American History X 1998 Elizabeth 1998 Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas 1998 Festen 1998 Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels 1998 Lola Rennt 1998 Rushmore 1998 Saving Private Ryan &#8211; D-day Scene (1-4) 1998 Taxi 1998 The Big Lebowski 1998 The Truman Show 1999 American Beauty 1999 Being John Malkovich 1999 Fight Club 1999 Magnolia 1999 Office Space &#8211; 1 1999 The Green Mile 1999 The Matrix 1999 The Sixth Sense 2000 Amores Perros 2000 Billy Elliot 2000 Chocolat 2000 Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon 2000 Dancer in the Dark 2000 Erin Brockovich 2000 Gladiator 2000 Meet the Parents 2000 Memento 2000 Quills 2001 Amelie 2001 Donnie Darko 2001 Kandahar 2001 Legally Blonde 2001 Lord Of The Rings 2001 No Man&#8217;s Land 2001 The Royal Tenenbaums 2001 Wit 2002 Bowling for Columbine 2002 Chicago 2002 City of God 2002 Dirty Pretty Things 2002 Spider-Man 2002 Spirited Away 2002 Talk to Her 2002 The Magdalene Sisters 2002 The Pianist 2003 Finding Nemo 2003 Lost in Translation 2003 Monster 2003 Oldboy 2004 Crash 2004 Der Untergang 2004 Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind 2004 Fahrenheit 9/11 2004 Gegen die Wand 2004 Hotel Rwanda 2004 Million Dollar Baby 2004 Napoleon Dynamite 2004 Shaun Of The Dead 2004 Sideways &#8211; Trailer 2004 Tropical Malady 2005 Brokeback Mountain 2005 Good Night, And Good Luck 2005 March of the Penguinsm &#8211; Trailer 2005 The Tulse Luper Suitcases 2005 V for Vendetta 2006 Borat &#8211; Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan 2006 Lage Raho Munna Bhai 2006 Little Miss Sunshine 2006 The Lives Of Others </span></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Reruns enhance the experience]]></title>
<link>http://wowtourist.wordpress.com/2009/05/19/reruns-enhance-the-experience/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 08:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Devilhoof</dc:creator>
<guid>http://wowtourist.wordpress.com/2009/05/19/reruns-enhance-the-experience/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[So I logged in 20 minutes late yesterday, only to find my Naxxramas spot had been filled. Serves me ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>So I logged in 20 minutes late yesterday, only to find my Naxxramas spot had been filled. Serves me right, as I beleve in keeping schedules or else run the risk of losing out. It was a little pity though, since we only had Sapphiron and Kel&#8217;Thuzad left. On the other hand this gave me the opportunity to do some questing. I will down those two with Rififi soon enough anyway.</p>
<p>As I know have entered Ulduar on my main Devilhoof, there is a lot of new content to experience. New areas and new encounters are uplifting, and makes it fun to play. When I now fly around Storm Peaks with Rififi, on my brand new epic carpet thank you very much (slow flying actually made me cry), I notice another aspect that heightens my gaming experience. I get reminded once again about the history around these new encounters. Yesterday I got to meet Thorim, and help him mend the relationship with King Jokkum and the sons of Hodir. I got to see Veranus before she got twisted into Razorscale. At a point where I did not care that much about reading the quest text anymore, because I already done it once, I now feel that I get a better understanding for the overall history. It is kind of watching a film you already seen &#8211; you get to notice the little things that you did not see the first time. I love it, and yesterday the game grew for me once again.</p>
<p>Because of this, I got the quest achievment that told me I was done with Storm Peaks without knowing I was that close. So now I should get on to Icecrown &#8211; only, I am not done. I still have to watch Thorim try to take on Loken, and the events that follow. Good times!</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Eyes on Deathchill]]></title>
<link>http://wowtourist.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/eyes-on-deathchill/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 12:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Devilhoof</dc:creator>
<guid>http://wowtourist.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/eyes-on-deathchill/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Rather slow evening yesterday, but at least I got one step closer to aquiring the pattern for that n]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Rather slow evening yesterday, but at least I got one step closer to aquiring the pattern for that nice caster dps cloak; Deathchill Cloak.</p>
<p>I enjoy spending a lot of time reading about different aspects of the game that can enhance my gaming experience. To me, enhancing the experience means setting an above ordinary goal, such as getting the Loremaster title for my main (not there quite yet) even it it can seem useless in terms of gaming advantages. In other cases, that goal can get me something that my toon can benefit from. Such as the pattern for the Deathchill cloak, which you get as a reward for completing the Loremaster of Northrend achievment. Yesterday I had a small achievement rain when I first finished the Nesingwary quest line, then got to explore all of Scholazar Basin and finally finished the required number of quests for the area. I actually chose not to do the finishing quest from the avatar of Freya where you get to travel through the rainy portal to Un&#8217;goro crater to check out what has happened to the watchers that were left there by the makers. It is a really nice chunk of lore right there, and I recommend anyone to do it at least once &#8211; it is actually building up to the events that take place in Ulduar. Since I have done it on Devilhoof and still do not have an epic flyer, I decided to push forward in my Deathchill pursuit instead.</p>
<p>As of now, I only need Storm Peaks and Icecrown to get my hands on that pattern &#8211; which will be about the time one of my guildies reaches that goal as well, making it somewhat redundant. No matter, I like being able to see to my own needs in the game whenever possible. It remains to be seen whether or not I will have the patience to grind Hodir reputation for Rififi. She is an Inscriber, and therefore has access to the best shoulder enchant in the game as it is, but getting exalted with Hodir gets you the pattern for those 22 slot bags that are really nice to have. And on top of that I learned that the Kul&#8217;uak now sells a pattern for a humongous herb bag that I also want. One really has to salute Blizzard for introducing these &#8220;got to have&#8221; things in the game that keeps you going. If I ever have the patience to level Rififi&#8217;s fishing skill, the only fishing pole I ever want (for now at least) is also sold by those nice walrus people, which makes that slightly more interesting for me. From a business standpoint the Hodir bag pattern is probably better to go after though, since the market potential is bigger. Wonder what Gevlon would do? Probably neither &#8211; he would find a more profitable way to spend his time.</p>
<p>Well, looks like I have enough time sinks to last me a while yet. I just hope I do not lose interest from the repetition.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Animation Domination (3.22.09 and 3.29.09)]]></title>
<link>http://childrenofsaintclare.wordpress.com/2009/03/30/animation-domination-32209-and-32909/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>marcusandstevi</dc:creator>
<guid>http://childrenofsaintclare.wordpress.com/2009/03/30/animation-domination-32209-and-32909/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The Husband: I’m sorry to say it, but it hasn’t been a very good two weeks for Animation Domination.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div style="margin:1ex;">
<div>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;"><strong>The Husband:</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">I’m sorry to say it, but  it hasn’t been a very good two weeks for Animation Domination. The  only episode I unabashedly liked was <em>King Of The Hill</em> (which  focused almost entirely on a verrrrry supporting character), then about  half of an <em>American Dad</em> and a third of a <em>Family Guy</em>. The  rest had their moments, but something just seemed to be in the water  over at Fox and all the offices and buildings where they make these  shows. I’ll just get last week’s <em>KOTH </em> out of the way, pretty much.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;"><em><span style="text-decoration:underline;">King Of The Hill </span></em> <span style="text-decoration:underline;">13.13 “Nancy Does Dallas”</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">When Dale’s wife Nancy breaks  a silly but attention-getting newstory at Arlen’s local affiliate,  Dallas takes notice and invites her to become an anchorwoman with them.  And Dale couldn’t be happier, even if this means she’d be hours  away for days on end making her dreams come true.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">&#8220;Come on, you&#8217;re a  genius at making something from nothing. You made Joseph.&#8221; –  Dale to Nancy</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Arriving in Dallas, Nancy notices  the major strife between the male and female lead anchors Gwen and Wade,  and tries to exploit this hostility as much as she can.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Gwen: I hate that man.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Nancy: I always thought you  and Wade were having an affair.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Gwen: We are. It&#8217;s good for  ratings.</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Unfortunately, Nancy gets so  in over her head with ego and douchiness that it’s rubbing everybody  the wrong way, and when she drunkenly collapses off of a parade float,  it’s curtains for her. This is fine, since Dale, now unsupervised,  is wreaking his own special havoc on Arlen, resulting in him nearly  setting his own house on fire. But when Nancy finally returns, it becomes  clear to their neighbors that while Nancy does a good job at keeping  Dale on a tight leash, he has his own power over Nancy, her drinking  and her ego.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">This episode also had the best  quotes of all seven episodes I collected for this write-up. Here are  some of the ones I jotted down:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">&#8220;Breakfast race!&#8221;  – Dale and Joseph</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">&#8220;That wasn&#8217;t even a story.  It was just a bunch of &#8216;ifs.&#8217;&#8221; – Hank</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">&#8220;Nancy, your prison fan  mail is about to quadruple!&#8221; – Dale</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">&#8220;Security breach! Joseph,  sniff the bags.&#8221; – Bobby</span></li>
<li> <span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">&#8220;Dale, you giblet-head!&#8221;  – Hank</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">&#8220;It sure is great that  you&#8217;re home, and not just for fire-retardant purposes.&#8221; – Dale  to Nancy</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Now onto the lesser eps, grouped  via show.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;"><em><span style="text-decoration:underline;">The Simpsons </span></em> <span style="text-decoration:underline;">20.14 “In The Name Of The Grandfather”</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">When Homer forgets to show  up at the retirement community’s father/son day, Homer learns of Abe’s  very own bucket list and decide to follow up on one: to revisit Tom  O’Flanagan’s Pub, where Abe had one of the best days of his entire  life. Problem is, Tom O’Flanagan’s Pub is in Ireland, so the family  jets out to the Emerald Isle to fulfill this wish. Unfortunately, Ireland  is no longer the quaint village-driven country of yore and instead has  been yuppified, including the presence of rhyming Yuprechauns. The bar,  however, still exists, but it hasn’t been patronized in ages (despite  having cabbage on tap). When Abe and Homer share a good drunken night  with Mr. O’Flanagan, they wake up the next morning having discovered  that they bought the pub while intoxicated, so to keep business up they  allow the now-illegal practice of smoking inside bars, attracting all  those patrons who feel cheated by the recent law.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">I’ve spent some time in Ireland  (three times to be exact), and there was definitely a noticeable difference  in spirit between my second and third time visiting wherein the law  was passed. I do not smoke, and I do not appreciate it as a lifestyle  choice, but I just always associated Ireland with smokey bars, and something  just felt off.</span></p>
<div id="attachment_1769" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 366px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1769" title="simpsonsbar" src="http://childrenofsaintclare.wordpress.com/files/2009/03/simpsonsbar.jpg" alt="In a bar once I met this guy Dewey. And he bought me, like, 14 beers. And he told me that he was from Ireland, so I lived with him 10 years." width="356" height="442" /><p class="wp-caption-text">In a bar once I met this guy Dewey. And he bought me, like, 14 beers. And he told me that he was from Ireland, so I lived with him 10 years.</p></div>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Unfortunately, the episode  just kind of sputtered along, and other than the remarkably esoteric  send-up of the Academy Award-winning film <em>Once</em> (“Stop buying  pianos for my wife!&#8221;) and the amusement I had in recognizing that <em> The Simpsons </em>had no freakin’ clue what the Guinness factory actually  looked like, it was pretty much a bust.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Some quotes:</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">“It’s like getting a  backrub from an orgasm.” – Carl re: hot tub</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">“Lousy old man, making  me look up at an airplane…” – Homer</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">“So it’s our syntax  you’re criticizing!” – Irish cop</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;"><em><span style="text-decoration:underline;">The Simpsons </span></em> <span style="text-decoration:underline;">20.15 “Wedding For Disaster”</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">What could have been a very  sweet story goes awry when the show takes a page from that really bizarre  Marilyn Monroe-Ginger Rogers ensemble film <em>We’re Not Married</em> when Reverend Lovejoy realizes that, due to some legal mumbojumbo, several  of the ceremonies he blessed were always invalid. This would include  Homer and Marge’s second marriage, and so the two of them decide to  throw a third wedding, this time pulling out all the stops. But as Marge  begins to turn into a Bridezilla, Homer begins really resenting her,  to the point where he doesn’t even show up at their wedding.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Ah, but he’s actually been  kidnapped and put into a <em>Saw</em>-like torture room, where he has  to do such tasks as get to the key in the center of a hot sauce lollipop.  Meanwhile, Bart and Lisa track some clues, including a keychain initialed  “SB,” to Sideshow Bob, who for once has nothing to do with tormenting  the Simpsons. Turns out, it’s just Patty and Selma Bouvier playing  a trick on Homer, but when they look on, via a security camera, Homer  read aloud his written vows to Marge, they relent and let him go.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">The wedding stuff was nice,  but the rest was far too haphazard and/or introduced to late to be either  clever or properly referential, and so it’s another mostly laughless  episode.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">I also wonder how many people  got all the Bing Crosby jokes in regards to the Presbyterian pastor  who came to town and acted as a catalyst to Lovejoy’s story. Hint:  rent the best picture winner <em>Going My Way</em>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;"><em><span style="text-decoration:underline;">Family Guy </span></em> <span style="text-decoration:underline;">7.10 “FOX-y Lady”</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Michael Moore jokes are <em> so</em> 2004, and jokes about handicapped ducks are <em>so</em>…never.  And that’s pretty much all this episode was about.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">First, Lois gets hired as an  investigative reporter at Fox News, and aside from a not-bad Ann Coutler  slam and Brian doing a pretty piss-poor job at vocalizing the country’s  true problem with the troubling network, we didn’t get much. It was  interesting to find out, however, that Michael Moore and Rush Limbaugh  are actually both simply characters created and acted out by Fred Savage  (among many other celebrities I did not write down), and thus Mr. Savage’s  bizarre second run of his career (or if I counted that show <em>Working</em>,  this may be his third career run) continues down a line of strange “underground”  comedy such as this and episodes of <em>It’s Always Sunny In Philadelphia</em>. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Meanwhile, now that Lois is  affiliated with Fox, Peter and Chris decide to create their own animated  sitcom for the network, which becomes the poorly animated and unsubtle <em> Handiquacks</em>, featuring such characters as Red Heinie Monkey, Col.  Tushfinger, Poopy-Face Tomato Nose and Bitch Duck. When <em>South Park</em> created the show-within-the-show of <em>Terence and Philip</em>, it was  a way to hit back at the critics who called their show poorly animated  and vulgar, showing them what a truly shit-animated and vulgar show  looked like, and that in itself was a bold statement to make. <em>Handiquacks</em> is no <em>Terence And Philip</em>, though, so the point was completely  lost amidst the dumbness.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Okay, there was one incredibly  funny moment, when everybody around town is screaming, and we cut to  Adam West sitting on a park bench.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;"> “Aaaaaaaaa…I have to  get all the A’s out of my body. Aaaaaaaaa…”</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;"><em><span style="text-decoration:underline;">Family Guy </span></em> <span style="text-decoration:underline;">7.11 “Not All Dogs Go To Heaven”</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Atheism and its relation to  religion is a tough thing to deal with and even harder to turn into  a proper narration, so I wasn’t surprised that <em>FG</em> ultimately  failed to explain itself and its concept of secularism. Me, I’m baffled  at how misunderstood atheism truly is. Religion does not corner the  market on morality, and despite the fact that I do not believe in a  god(s), that does not mean I believe in nothing. That’s nihilism.  I believe in the goodness and spirit of my fellow man and have an optimism  about the human race and its own concepts of morality, and I don’t  need to worship somebody to get that done. I don’t need to reread  a book hundreds of times to do that. But you wouldn’t know that from  this episode, and so I consider its base-level understanding of the  atheism-religion battle to be completely unimportant and pretty much  dumb.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">But as Meg and Brian go through  that argument, one-third of the episode is hilarious. That would be  Stewie’s story, where he gets so huffy about not being to ask <em>Star  Trek</em>-related questions at a sci-fi convention that he teleports  the cast of <em>Star Trek: The Next Generation</em> into his bedroom and  tries to continue along his own line of questions, only to realize that  the entire cast is immature, silly and continues to harbor 15-year grudges  against each other.</span></p>
<div id="attachment_1771" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 484px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1771" title="startrek" src="http://childrenofsaintclare.wordpress.com/files/2009/03/startrek.jpg" alt="LeVar and I were going to pool our tickets together to get the fuzzy troll pencil topper!" width="474" height="355" /><p class="wp-caption-text">LeVar and I were going to pool our tickets together to get the fuzzy troll pencil topper!</p></div>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">(I also must point out that  Gates McFadden, a.k.a. Dr. Beverly Crusher, taught a class on clowning  my sister attending during her time at USC, a fact I’ll never tire  of telling people.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">And this section had a great  variation of visual jokes (the unknown-to-me Denise Crosby getting shot  after one line) and great lines.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Stewie: Hey, did you hook up  with Whoopie Goldberg on the show?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Patrick Stewart: All the time.</span></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;"> “Look at me! I’ve got  girl boobs!” – Patrick Stewart</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Too bad the Stewie-with-<em>TNG</em> story was so short. I would have watched a two-parter just about that  situation. But nope, my wish was not fulfilled.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Some good stuff:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">The bevy of 90s references  for a show more known for its influx of 70s and 80s references. This  would include name-dropped Dan Cortese as well as a short bit regarding <em> Calvin &#38; Hobbes</em>.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">“Why would he wear these?!  Who would make these for him?!” – Peter after looking through the  LeVar Burton <em>TNG</em> shades, which turned every person he saw into  a KKK klansman.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">The inexplicable live-action  ending with Adam West and Rob Lowe.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;"><em><span style="text-decoration:underline;">American Dad </span></em> <span style="text-decoration:underline;">4.14 “Bar Mitzvah Shuffle”</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Here’s the episode that I  like half of. To be fair, I actually liked the central story quite a  bit from a plotting perspective, but can admit that it wasn’t necessarily  very <em>funny</em>. And since this is a sitcom, that’s sort of an issue  with which we shouldn’t have to deal.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">When Steve learns that Debbie,  his chubby girlfriend, is starting to have eyes for the ridiculously  egomaniacal Jewish peer Etan Cohen (voice of Seth Green), he decides  to try to ruin the kid’s bar mitzvah.</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">“I like my women like  I like my dreidels – bottom-heavy.” – Etan</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">(I was going to make a point  as to why they decided to choose the name Etan Cohen, like the screenwriter  of <em>Tropic Thunder </em>and <em>Madagascar 2</em>, who is also not to  be confused with Ethan Coen of the Oscar winning Coen Brothers, but  then I noticed that the real Etan is one of <em>AD</em>’s producers  and a former writer. Just another weird in-joke, I guess, like Neil  Goldman over on <em>FG</em>.)</span></p>
<div id="attachment_1770" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 483px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1770" title="etancohen" src="http://childrenofsaintclare.wordpress.com/files/2009/03/etancohen.jpg" alt="It was an inside joke all along . . ." width="473" height="358" /><p class="wp-caption-text">It was an inside joke all along . . .</p></div>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">The manner in which Steve,  Roger and Snot go about to destroy the bar mitzvah, with its <em>Ocean’s  Eleven</em> references (and pretty much any heist movie post-<em>Rififi</em>),  was pretty ingenious, involving several switches and a nasty double-cross  by Roger (who just wanted to put on a silly accent but wasn’t allowed  to.) But unlike most Steve-centric episodes, there were very few great  nerd references or Roger non-sequiturs, so I just can’t in good conscious  give it a positive review.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;"><em><span style="text-decoration:underline;">American Dad </span></em> <span style="text-decoration:underline;">4.15 “Wife Insurance”</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Despite the genius Amy Sedaris  doing not one but two voices in this episode, it was another blah episode  from a show I desperately love, but also desperately want it to return  to its peak sometime midway through season 3. When Stan gets lost during  a mission, Francine is completely devastated, until Stan returns home  (thanks to a fellow spy who can get out of any predicament by seducing  women with a verse of Marc Anthony’s “I Need To Know”) and devastates  her in his own very special way – by telling her on Valentine’s  Day that he has a back-up wife, his dentist Meg, who he lined up years  earlier just in case Francine kicked the bucket. To get back at him,  Francine decides to make Stan’s spy friend her back-up husband, resulting  in many confused hearts and a brutal bit of hand-to-hand combat later  on. (And somewhere in the middle, the handsome spy pushed Stan out of  a moving plane, who survived when he landed on the World’s Biggest  Falafel.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">Other than some quick bits  regarding the return of Steve and Rogers TV detective duo Wheels &#38;  The Legman, as well as a the reappearance of Reginald the CIA koala,  not much was very funny about the ep. And once again, this is a comedy,  so that’s an issue. Stan’s stories especially this week have been  more desperate and bizarre than laugh-inducing. Maybe somebody should  sideline him until they find a story that really <em>works</em>, like  in s3 when he traveled to Heaven, and we learned that Jim Henson isn’t  dead so much as stuck in the Phantom Zone with Kermit.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">The two lines I liked from  this episode, one severely tasteless, the other punny but funny:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">“In two hours I can have  a dead baby stuffed with heroin planted in your mom’s car.” –  Steve</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;">“My heart has a cavity  that only you can fill.” – Meg the dentist</span></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[I Know Noir, But What Am I?]]></title>
<link>http://drbristol.wordpress.com/2009/03/27/i-know-noir-but-what-am-i/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>drbristol</dc:creator>
<guid>http://drbristol.wordpress.com/2009/03/27/i-know-noir-but-what-am-i/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Who is cooler than Lee Marvin, anyway? I was thinking about how it&#8217;s been a year since we lost]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter">
<div id="attachment_794" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 260px"><img class="size-full wp-image-794" title="the-killers" src="http://drbristol.wordpress.com/files/2009/03/the-killers1.jpg" alt="Who is cooler than Lee Marvin, anyway?" width="250" height="352" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Who is cooler than Lee Marvin, anyway?</p></div>
</div>
<div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter" style="text-align:left;">I was thinking about how it&#8217;s been a year since we lost <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jules_Dassin" target="_blank"><strong>Jules Dassin</strong></a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Widmark" target="_blank"><strong>Richard Widmark</strong></a>, both of whom lived into their nineties and died within a week of each other. Dassin, of course, was <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_blacklist" target="_blank">blacklisted </a>in the famous McCarthy-influenced purge in Hollywood but moved to France and had a tremendous career. Widmark is one of the greatest actors to ever grace the silver screen, from his debut as psychotic killer <strong>Tommy Udo</strong> in <strong>Kiss of Death</strong> through a litany of westerns, war films and crime movies. In 1950, they collaborated on <strong>Night and The City</strong>, about a street hustler who tries to gain control of the wrestling racket in London, but of course is way over his head. It was a brilliant film, and like most <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_film_noir" target="_blank"><strong>noir</strong> </a>features less-than-savory characters trying to make a move, and getting tantalizingly close before everything starts to fall apart. In a way, these are twisted morality plays, but I was first attracted to the genre because the stories seemed to be far more realistic than the typical Hollywood happy ending.</div>
<p><div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter" style="text-align:left;">The noir era was before my time, but as an avid reader I devoured books by <strong>Jim Thompson</strong> and <strong>James M. Cain</strong>, and when lucky enough to catch them on pre-cable TV I would be mesmerized by <strong>Double Indemnity</strong> and <strong>D.O.A. </strong>and <strong>Out Of The Past.</strong> Stanley Kubrick&#8217;s <strong>The Killing</strong> is a masterpiece, and one of the first instances of retelling of the plot from each character&#8217;s perspective. Now, thanks to cable channels like <strong>TCM</strong> and <strong>AMC</strong>, many of these films found a whole new audience, and the advent of DVD made most available for fans like me. With few exceptions, these aren&#8217;t going to be at Blockbuster, but I&#8217;m thrilled to be able to buy and enjoy them in my own home. Recently both <strong>Fox</strong> and <strong>Warner</strong> <strong>Brothers</strong> issued film noir series, and apparently sales are good, because more surface every day. The <strong>Criterion</strong> <strong>Collection</strong> also releases many noir titles and they&#8217;re meticulous about print quality, bonus features and whatever extras (booklets, interviews, etc.) they can assemble to present as complete an experience as possible. Their releases can be a bit pricey, but you can find many of them at decent used rates, and better library systems will probably carry quite a few.</div>
<p><div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter" style="text-align:left;">One of my favorites, and a steal even at the retail price, is <strong>The Killers</strong>, with both the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0038669/" target="_blank">1946 film </a>starring <strong>Burt Lancaster</strong> and the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058262/" target="_blank">1964 TV movie</a> directed by Don Siegel and starring <strong>John Cassavetes</strong> and <strong>Lee Marvin</strong>, the latter having one of the greatest closing lines in movie history. Oh yeah, and there was this <strong>Ronald Reagan</strong> guy playing a bad man, which some Americans swear he did again years later in real life. And today - the event that led up to all those thoughts about noir and Widmark and Dassin &#8211; Criterion announced the April release of one of the best post-noir classics, <strong>The Friends of Eddie Coyle</strong>, starring <strong>Robert Mitchum</strong> and <strong>Peter Boyle</strong>. I am geeked!</div>
<p><div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter" style="text-align:left;">I could list dozens of great films and probably fill a book about my love of film noir&#8230;and perhaps I will someday. But I wanted to use today&#8217;s blog feature to pay tribute to some of my film heroes like Widmark, Mitchum, Marvin, Lancaster and Cassavetes, as well as directors like Dassin, <strong>Sam Fuller</strong>, <strong>Don Siegel</strong> and <strong>Jean-Pierre Melville</strong>. I am so thankful that they were inspired to create such wonderfully vivid stories that are as thrilling to watch today as they must have been at the time. So if you are one who can appreciate that a great film is a <em>transcendent journey</em>, I encourage you to make the time to immerse yourself on the dark side of the street.</div>
<p>
<p>A series of noir and neo-noir films are being featured by <a href="http://www.criterion.com/explore/17" target="_blank"><strong>Criterion</strong> </a> right now.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foxclassics.com/categories.php?id=filmnoir" target="_blank"><strong>FOX studios</strong> </a>has a noir series.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wbshop.com/on/demandware.store/Sites-WB-Site/default/Search-Show?q=film+noir" target="_blank"><strong>Warner Brothers</strong></a> does too.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;">***</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ETATS-UNIS ? Du rififi entre travailleurs immigrés]]></title>
<link>http://iluvfre.wordpress.com/2009/03/13/etats-unis-du-rififi-entre-travailleurs-immigres/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>iluvfre</dc:creator>
<guid>http://iluvfre.wordpress.com/2009/03/13/etats-unis-du-rififi-entre-travailleurs-immigres/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Veuillez-vous identifier afin d&#8217;accéderau contenu complet de cette page. L&#8217;arrivée dans ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Veuillez-vous identifier afin d&#8217;accéderau contenu complet de cette page.</p>
<p>L&#8217;arrivée dans certaines villes de travailleurs immigrés musulmans venus de Somalie a suscité la méfiance des autres communautés à leur encontre, plus particulièrement celle des Latinos.</p>
<p>Reportage du New York Times à Grand Island, dans le Nebraska.</p>
<p>© Courrier international 2009 &#124; Fréquentation certifiée par l&#8217;OJD &#124; ISSN de la publication électronique : 1768-3076 &#124;</p>
<p>Source: http://www.courrierinternational.com/article.asp?obj_id=90912 </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA["King Lear": Al Pacino sarà Re Lear nell'adattamento cinematografico dell'opera di Shakespeare]]></title>
<link>http://cartoonmagmovie.wordpress.com/2009/02/04/king-lear-al-pacino-sara-re-lear-nelladattamento-cinematografico-dellopera-di-shakespeare/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>danytelefilm</dc:creator>
<guid>http://cartoonmagmovie.wordpress.com/2009/02/04/king-lear-al-pacino-sara-re-lear-nelladattamento-cinematografico-dellopera-di-shakespeare/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Cinque anni dopo Il mercante di Venezia, Al Pacino torna a collaborare con Michael Radford per un nu]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1463" title="al_pacino" src="http://cartoonmagmovie.wordpress.com/files/2009/02/al_pacino.jpg" alt="al_pacino" width="220" height="275" />Cinque anni dopo<strong><em> Il mercante di Venezia</em></strong>, <strong>Al Pacino</strong> torna a collaborare con <strong>Michael Radford </strong>per un nuovo adattamento di un&#8217;opera di <strong>William Shakespeare</strong>, <em><strong>King Lear</strong></em>. Radford ha curato la sceneggiatura del film, le cui riprese inizieranno entro la fine dell&#8217;anno e si svolgeranno in Europa.</p>
<p>Nonostante abbia già interpretato numerosi personaggi shakespeariani, Pacino non aveva mai accettato il ruolo di Re Lear &#8211; un sovrano che si ritrova a dividere il suo regno tra le sue tre figlie &#8211; semplicemente perchè non si sentiva pronto, come ha rivelato il produttore <strong>Barry Navidi</strong>: &#8220;<em>Adesso però può interpretare questo ruolo. Radford ha scritto un adattamento molto convincente, la cui impronta classica ricorda quello de <strong>Il Mercante di Venezia</strong>, e sia io che Al Pacino abbiamo accettato subito di lavorare con lui</em>&#8220;</p>
<p><!--more-->Dopo<em><strong> Sfida senza regole &#8211; Righteous Kill</strong></em>, Al Pacino dovrebbe tornare sul set per interpretare <strong>Salvador Dalì </strong>in una biopic sull&#8217;artista spagnolo e un remake di<strong> Rififi</strong>, il poliziesco diretto da<strong> Jules Dassin</strong> negli anni &#8216;50, ma non si sa quale  di questi progetti sarà il primo ad andare in produzione.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.movieplayer.it">www.movieplayer.it</a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Leone - Once Upon a Time in the West]]></title>
<link>http://somefragments.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/leone-once-upon-a-time-in-the-west/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>somefragments</dc:creator>
<guid>http://somefragments.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/leone-once-upon-a-time-in-the-west/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Although there is much that is endearing in the work of Leone, nothing has left its mark as complete]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Although there is much that is endearing in the work of Leone, nothing has left its mark as completely as his sense of sound.  It is not just his rather extreme use of dubbing, where every character seems immense and impossibly near, that gives his use of sound its uniqueness.  Indeed, the tactic is remarkably ambiguous, taking the viewer from the pole of excitement and agitation at the vocal depth and emotiveness of each speaker, to the other pole of mere foreign-film parody, a laughable hash-up of dubbed kung fu flicks and their curious translations that never feel adequate.</p>
<p>Adequacy is a good term for it, because the dubbing work leaves the viewer with a constant experience of the inadequate, the sense that the speaker and their word are separate and in some ways autonomous.  In &#8216;Once upon a time in the West,&#8217; the voices are matched in their autonomy by the uncanny playing of the harmonica, which seems to come from nowhere and yet is so loud as to be everywhere.  It is this feature of directionless and omnipresent, though, that Leone uses to great affect in the other sounds.  Not just the music, which is brilliant to be sure, but in the buzzing of the fly and dripping water that opens the film.  It is the interest in the minute distraction that marks Leone&#8217;s use and might be considered the systematic principle for his sound.  The voices must be ever so slightly off, too real and thus unreal, too close and thus artificial.  The fly must be nowhere and invisible so its buzzing can be everywhere, overwhelming, all-consuming.  The mournful playing of the harmonica is always off-screen, even when it is displayed explicitly, in the same way the telephone in &#8216;Once upon a time in America&#8217; rings even after picked up, as if the sounds and their referents are always somewhere else.  Sound is not, indeed, representing anything, but speaking of its own world, which is all the more vibrant because it is a different world than the one seen, much as the sea is heard by merely staring at a painting.  This inadequacy is not merely felt as an accident, but becomes something of substance in the work, as if the world is always out of joint.  And perhaps this reference to Hamlet is apropos, for each movie begins seemingly with the arrival of the ghost, as if each movie must be put in play by some deus ex machina that awaits being put right in the last scene.</p>
<p>Tt would be wrong to make the sound omnipresent without pointing out his great love of silence, which is the mark of any true appreciation of sound.  Long panning shots of the desert and long stretches without a single auditory interruption are essential to his works, evidence of the great control Leone had and the care for his material.  The silence, though, is not a fetish with Leone; there are no scenes such as in &#8216;A Band of Outsiders&#8217; where the effect is to shock or unnerve the viewer, nor as in &#8216;There Will be Blood&#8217; where the scene is silent though indifferently, equally capable of having music or sound as not.  It is more the silence of &#8216;Rififi&#8217; or even &#8216;Pulp Fiction,&#8217; in the scene where Willis returns by backways to his apartment; it is silent because there can be no music and where every sound is a threat, dangerous and invasive.  The scenes are comparable to Leone&#8217;s opening scene, with the three assassins coming upon the station agent.  Every word the agent says reverberates and strikes the viewer as too loud, too piercing, much as every car that passes spells doom in &#8216;Rififi.&#8217;</p>
<p>In a sense, the beauty of Leone&#8217;s work is only seen alongside something like &#8216;There Will be Blood,&#8217; where everything that Leone took such care to underplay becomes fetishized and made easily-digestable.  The silent characters that are the forte of Leone, where an Eastwood or a Bronson gain all their power from their presence and the ambiance of their world and the understatedness of their acting, instead collapses into the sometimes-sullen, sometimes-frenetic Day-Louis who feels he must own every moment.  The silence that Leone handles with such care is given often and with little forethought, alongside the affective but often unexpected and misleading music of Greenwood.  Alongside such a work, Leone&#8217;s accomplishment stands out because of its sense of itself, much as the quiet and bombast of Orff&#8217;s &#8216;Carmina Burana&#8217; shows to more clearly the subtlety and care of that same interplay of quiet and bombast in Mahler&#8217;s &#8216;Dad Lied von der Erde.&#8217;</p>
<p>Kitsch brings out art, much against art&#8217;s will, by showing how fragile is art&#8217;s bonds, how easily they can be torn or, worse, overdone so as to make a piece of art into a parody, as one often feels reading the early Pinter.  The danger of too much or not enough is constant, and Leone never seems capable of avoiding the extremes entirely, not least notable in the staggering length of his works.  But it is truly a wonder to watch, not least because if ever there were a director whose work seemed directed towards parody and mere mimesis, it is Leone.  It might be fitting to say that the inadequacy and out-of-jointness he achieves in the music and often in his narratives is an apt metaphor to his relation to the western in general: it is not too much, and neither too little, nor is it just right.  It is off, and it benefits all the more for it.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Top! Filmes de Golpe]]></title>
<link>http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/11/06/top-filmes-de-golpe/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Luis Henrique Boaventura</dc:creator>
<guid>http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/11/06/top-filmes-de-golpe/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[É dia de planejar cuidadosamente os tops. Estudar a estrutura, desconfiar dos integrantes e mandar t]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p style="text-align:justify;">É dia de planejar cuidadosamente os tops. Estudar a estrutura, desconfiar dos integrantes e mandar tudo pra puta que pariu ao menor sinal de traição. Compareça a 18th street, tenha cuidado pra não ser seguido, peça fogo ao homem que está amarrando os sapatos, e poste o seu top nos comentários.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><strong>Top! do Leitor:</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Caio Lucas</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Guy Ritchie é o rei.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class=" aligncenter" style="border:black 2px solid;margin:2px;" src="http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/9177/snacthmpwv8.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="320" /></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">01. Snatch &#8211; Porcos e Diamantes (Guy Ritchie, 2000)<br />
02. Jogos, Trapaças e Dois Canos Fumegantes (Guy Ritchie, 1998)<br />
03. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/tragam-me-a-cabeca-de-alfredo-garcia-sam-peckinpah-1974/">Tragam-me a Cabeça de Alfredo Garcia</a> (Sam Peckinpah, 1973)<br />
04. Cães de Aluguel (Quentin Tarantino, 1992)<br />
05. Um Dia de Cão (Sidney Lumet, 1975)<br />
06. O Grande Lebowski (Irmãos Coen, 1998)<br />
07. Duro de Matar (John McTiernan, 1988)<br />
08. Meu Ódio Será Sua Herança (Sam Peckinpah, 1969)<br />
09. O Homem Que Não Estava Lá (Irmãos Coen, 2001)<br />
10. Gosto de Sangue (Irmãos Coen, 1984)</p>
<p><strong>Tops! da Equipe:</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Daniel Dalpizzolo</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Procurei deixar de fora os mais abstratos (o que exclui pelo menos dois dos que lutariam pelo podium), exceto Carmen e Bang Bang, e também os que se misturam com outros gêneros fortes, como noir e western (embora alguns considerem filmes como O Segredo das Jóias e Rififi noir, o que é questionável dependendo do ponto de vista que se tem acerca da definição de gênero). Alguns belos filmes sobre o tema ficaram de fora (e aí vale lembrar que Lumet voltou este ano com uma interessantíssima revitalização dos filmes de golpe e que é um de seus melhores filmes).</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="media aligncenter" style="border:black 2px solid;margin:2px;" src="http://i539.photobucket.com/albums/ff358/danfou/vlcsnap-5532.png?t=1226003500" alt="vlcsnap-5532.png picture by danfou" width="455" height="288" /></p>
<p>01. Armadilha a Sangue Frio (Joseph Losey, 1960)<br />
02. A Força do Mal (Abraham Polonsky, 1948)<br />
03. Carmen (Jean-Luc Godard, 1982)<br />
04. Bang Bang (Andrea Tonacci, 1970)<br />
05. Os Implacáveis (Sam Peckinpah, 1973)<br />
06. O Segredo das Jóias (John Huston, 1950)<br />
07. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/rififi-jules-dassin-1955/">Rififi</a> (Jules Dassin, 1955)<br />
08. Mortalmente Perigosa (Joseph H. Lewis, 1950)<br />
09. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/07/07/o-grande-golpe-stanley-kubrick-1956-2/">O Grande Golpe</a> (Stanley Kubrick, 1956)<br />
10. O Quinteto da Morte (Alexander Mackendrick, 1955)</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Pedro Kerr</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Ficou foda mesmo, consegui fazer o meu, mas achei meio estranho. Mas engraçado desse é que praticamente quase todos os filmes dos Coen se encaixam aqui, heheh. (enquanto eu tentava lembrar aqui eu pensei num gênero assim que pudesse cair depois, &#8220;mans in a mission&#8221;, definição by Tarantino, hehehe).</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class=" aligncenter" style="border:black 2px solid;margin:2px;" src="http://img354.imageshack.us/img354/4237/meudiomppg3.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="215" /></p>
<p>01. Meu Ódio Será Sua Herança (Sam Peckinpah, 1969)<br />
02. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/07/25/rabid-dogs-mario-bava-1974/">Rabid Dogs</a> (Mario Bava, 1974)<br />
03. Cães de Aluguel (Quentin Tarantino, 1992)<br />
04. O Grande Lebowski (Irmãos Coen, 1998)<br />
05. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/trilogia-dos-dolares-sergio-leone-196419651966/">Por Uns Dólares a Mais</a> (Sergio Leone, 1965)<br />
06. Um Dia de Cão (Sidney Lumet, 1975)<br />
07. Duro de Matar (John McTiernan, 1988)<br />
08. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/07/07/o-grande-golpe-stanley-kubrick-1956-2/">O Grande Golpe</a> (Stanley Kubrick, 1956)<br />
09. Arizona Nunca Mais (Irmãos Coen, 1987)<br />
10. Colateral (Michael Mann, 2004)</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Desert Island Discs]]></title>
<link>http://stuartcondy.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/desert-island-discs/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>stuartcondy</dc:creator>
<guid>http://stuartcondy.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/desert-island-discs/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Picture the scene&#8230;.. The FED EX plane you&#8217;re travelling in has been struck by lightning,]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Picture the scene&#8230;.. The FED EX plane you&#8217;re travelling in has been struck by lightning, causing it to plunge into the ocean. You get washed up on the beach of a nearby island which is apparently without habitants. Instead of a football for company you find a 50 inch plasma TV with attached DVD player which was miraculously wrapped in waterproof packaging. Somehow you discover a power supply and are delighted that 10 movies have escaped unscathed in the over the shoulder folder holder you had on your person at the time of the tragedy.</p>
<p>These are the 10 films that will prevent you going insane whilst you wait for McDonalds to discover this is the one place they don&#8217;t have a restaurant&#8230;.</p>
<p>My picks are:</p>
<p><a href="http://stuartcondy.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/did-1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-745" title="did-1" src="http://stuartcondy.wordpress.com/files/2008/10/did-1.jpg" alt="" width="295" height="425" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0047396/"><em>REAR WINDOW, Alfred Hitchcock (1954</em>)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://stuartcondy.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/did-2.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-746" title="did-2" src="http://stuartcondy.wordpress.com/files/2008/10/did-2.jpg" alt="" width="306" height="425" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118715/"><em>THE BIG LEBOWSKI, Joel &#38; Ethan Coen (1998)</em></a></p>
<p><a href="http://stuartcondy.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/did-3.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-747" title="did-3" src="http://stuartcondy.wordpress.com/files/2008/10/did-3.jpg" alt="" width="308" height="450" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062622/"><em>2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY, Stanley Kubrick (1968)</em></a></p>
<p><a href="http://stuartcondy.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/did-4.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-748" title="did-4" src="http://stuartcondy.wordpress.com/files/2008/10/did-4.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="324" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0035979/"><em>HEAVEN CAN WAIT, Ernst Lubitsch (1943)</em></a></p>
<p><a href="http://stuartcondy.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/did-5.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-749" title="did-5" src="http://stuartcondy.wordpress.com/files/2008/10/did-5.jpg" alt="" width="364" height="565" /></a><br />
<em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070379/">MEAN STREETS, Martin Scorsese (1973)</a></em></p>
<p><a href="http://stuartcondy.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/manhat1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-751" title="manhat1" src="http://stuartcondy.wordpress.com/files/2008/10/manhat1.jpg" alt="" width="310" height="450" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079522/"><em>MANHATTAN, Woody Allen (1979)</em></a></p>
<p><a href="http://stuartcondy.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/did-6.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-753" title="did-6" src="http://stuartcondy.wordpress.com/files/2008/10/did-6.jpg" alt="" width="256" height="372" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0042876/"><em>RASHOMON, Akira Kurosawa (1950)</em></a></p>
<p><a href="http://stuartcondy.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/did-8.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-754" title="did-8" src="http://stuartcondy.wordpress.com/files/2008/10/did-8.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="385" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048021/"><em>RIFIFI, Jules Dassin (1955)</em></a></p>
<p><a href="http://stuartcondy.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/did-9.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-755" title="did-9" src="http://stuartcondy.wordpress.com/files/2008/10/did-9.jpg" alt="" width="454" height="320" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0063850/"><em>IF&#8230;., Lindsay Anderson (1968)</em></a></p>
<p><a href="http://stuartcondy.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/did-10.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-757" title="did-10" src="http://stuartcondy.wordpress.com/files/2008/10/did-10.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="589" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0457430/"><em>PAN&#8217;S LABYRINTH, Guillermo Del Toro (2006)</em></a></p>
<p>This was a really hard thing to do, and the selections could well change as I think about it more. There&#8217;s no Welles, Antonioni, Bergman, Ozu, Lynch, Powell &#38; Pressburger&#8230;. God, the list is huge. These are the 10 films that tick as many boxes as possible whilst being infinitely watchable. I also think that each of these 10 films gives you something very different, from the half an hour of silence during the robery scene in Rififi to the technicolor joy of HEAVEN CAN WAIT. Although there are many other top ten lists that could be made, these movies would keep me going for a LONG time.</p>
<p>Although this post could be considered cliche, arbitrary or even downright lazy, there are rules&#8230;.. </p>
<p><strong>Trilogies are allowed, maximum of 4 (no more than a trilogy though, so you can&#8217;t select the POLICE ACADEMY series, not that you would&#8230;. I hope)<br />
TV shows aren&#8217;t.<br />
Box sets aren&#8217;t (unless it&#8217;s specifically a trilogy)<br />
I say DVD, this of course includes blu ray. (That&#8217;s for Matt, the high def philistine )</strong></p>
<p>So over to you good people. The ten movies that would keep you happy in times of hardship, let&#8217;s have it.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[O Círculo Vermelho (Jean-Pierre Melville, 1970)]]></title>
<link>http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/10/08/o-circulo-vermelho-jean-pierre-melville-1970/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Luis Henrique Boaventura</dc:creator>
<guid>http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/10/08/o-circulo-vermelho-jean-pierre-melville-1970/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A atmosfera épica de Le Cercle Rouge é suficientemente vasta para compreender tanto este neo-noir pi]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p style="text-align:center;"><img class=" aligncenter" style="border:black 2px solid;margin:2px;" src="http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/8254/ocrculovermelhompoz5.jpg" alt="" width="468" height="240" /></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">A atmosfera épica de Le Cercle Rouge é suficientemente vasta para compreender tanto este neo-noir pintado pela óptica metódica de Melville quanto o próprio gênero de sombras e fumaça fundado do outro lado do Atlântico. São mais de duas horas de elegância, beleza, emoldurações frame-a-frame com precisão matemática e muito, muito pessimismo, assumido aliás como discurso explícito.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Já disse no post do Un Flic mas repetir não custa, até porque nenhum outro traz este elemento tão evidente quanto O Círculo Vermelho: os personagens de Jean-Pierre Melville suplantam sua humanidade pelos dogmas e pela moral do seu trabalho, e é exatamente pelas vias dessa mecânica profissional que, sempre, ao fim de tudo, é necessário o sangue incandescente, como apenas o homem possui, para mover essas engrenagens. Porque a maldade, a ambição e as rotas da traição acabam entregando que são apenas fracos e suscetíveis seres humanos os que se escondem sob as máquinas que desfilam sempre tão imponentes de sobretudos ao longo dos noirs de Melville.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Levando a doutrina de Jules Dassin debaixo do braço, Melville volta a filmar o tempo real com lentes forjadas do hipnotismo. São 25 minutos de assalto a uma joalheria (e o estilo todo do diretor é perpetrado pela contemplação tributária à ação da cena, mas este é sempre o melhor exemplo) que, embora não tencionem reproduzir a mesma e quase insuportável tensão dramática de Rififi, prendem o espectador com uma linha invisível da pura mágica que o mestre francês faz com a câmera e o som, amplificado aqui ao terreno de uma bem orquestrada sucessão, simplesmente, de passos, portas fechando, ferramentas funcionando.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Admiro profundamente quem consegue fazer tanto com, aparentemente, tão pouco. Com a quase inexistência de artifícios aos quais um cineasta comodamente pode recorrer pra seqüências bacanudas e planos ishpertos. O mesmo ocorre com Alain Delon, que sendo o mesmo Edouard Coleman ou Jeff Costello, ainda sem mover um músculo do rosto, consegue ser simplesmente perfeito, insubstituível. Pode ser no modo de olhar, de se mover, de falar, pouco importa&#8230; Delon é brilhante sem precisar de um milímetro de esforço pra tanto, e insinuar que seja menor ator por isso é qualquer coisa à qual eu ainda darei nome no meio de um estado de fúria durante uma próxima goleada que o meu time sofra no Gre-nal.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">De qualquer forma, obra-prima (outra&#8230;) do francês, embora menor que <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/o-samurai-jean-pierre-melville-1967/">O Samurai</a> e <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/10/05/expresso-para-bordeaux-jean-pierre-melville-1972/">Expresso Para Bordeaux</a>, mais pela inspiração encantada que os governa do que qualquer eventual demérito do Le Cercle Rouge. Mas algo é preciso deixar claro: independente da ordem, o filme do círculo é o que até agora melhor representa este casamento entre o minimalismo de Melville e a depressão do film noir clássico pra composição de uma identidade mais sólida que nunca pro noir europeu, algo digno de ser documentado pra posterioridade, tratado ilustrativo de uma visão cética e talvez mais realista que pessimista sobre as motivações humanas, porque, pra Melville, todos os homens, sem qualquer exceção, terminam sob o alvo iridescente de um círculo vermelho.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">4/4</p>
<p style="text-align:right;"><em>Luis Henrique Boaventura</em></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Top! Film Noir]]></title>
<link>http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/top-film-noir/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Luis Henrique Boaventura</dc:creator>
<guid>http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/top-film-noir/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Nada mais apropriado, após um especial cujo tema é por natureza recorrente à tragédia e à melancolia]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p style="text-align:justify;">Nada mais apropriado, após um especial cujo tema é por natureza recorrente à tragédia e à melancolia, que os mais densos e dolorosos sentimentos humanos fossem elencados, na forma de um top 10, por esse gênero que guarda, às vezes mais discreta, outras mais saliente, a tristeza como pedra angular da sua arquitetura. Como sempre, primeiro top nos comentários sobe aqui pra cima.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><strong>Top! do Leitor:</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Fábio Rockenbach</strong></p>
<div class="entry">
<p style="text-align:justify;">De novo eu? hehehe<br />
O que é um noir, afinal? Em Panoram du Film Americain, apontam-se algumas características: um crime, visão invertida das tradicionais fontes de autoridade, alianças e lealdades instáveis, a “femme fatale”, violência bruta, moticações e mudanças em complôs. Outros atribuem o gênero ao fato de que “noir” seria, simplesmente, “preto, escurecido”. Cenas noturnas, alto contraste de luz e sombras aliado aos elementos acima. Paul Schrade acha que o noir vai de 1941 até 1958. Noir pra mim é uma mescla de tudo, mas sem tempo pré-definido. Tem a ver, e muito, com policiais dúbios, a femme fatale, a sensação de falibilidade da justiça &#8211; por isso, filmes mais novos com esses aspectos entraram na lista, e deixei O Mensageiro do Diabo e Crepúsculo dos Deuses de fora.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" style="border:black 2px solid;margin:2px;" src="http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/341/pactodesanguemply3.png" alt="" width="459" height="290" /></p>
<p>01. Pacto de Sangue (Billy Wilder, 1944)<br />
02. A Marca da Maldade (Orson Welles, 1958)<br />
03. Relíquia Macabra (aka O Falcão Maltês) (John Huston, 1941)<br />
04. O Terceiro Homem (Carol Reed, 1949)<br />
05. Los Angeles, Cidade Proibida (Curtis Hanson, 1997)<br />
06. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/chinatown-roman-polanski-1974/">Chinatown</a> (Roman Polanski, 1974)<br />
07. Laura (Otto Preminger, 1944)<br />
08. Paixões em Fúria (John Huston, 1948)<br />
09. Gilda (Charles Vidor, 1946)<br />
10. À Beira do Abismo (Howard Hawks, 1946)</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Tops! da Equipe:</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Daniel Dalpizzolo</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Como o noir é vasto e normalmente incorporado a outros estilos preferi citar apenas aqueles genuinamente noirs, os que eu apresentaria a alguém que tivesse interesse de conhecer exemplos diretos das características do gênero. Grandes filmes ficaram de fora, mas além de ser mais condizente com a proposta, faz com que eu fique menos insatisfeito com as ausências. E a lista, mesmo assim, só tem obra-prima, obviamente o critério base de qualquer top.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" style="border:black 2px solid;margin:2px;" src="http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/8536/nosilnciodanoitempcs4.jpg" alt="" width="473" height="278" /></p>
<p>01. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/no-silencio-da-noite-nicholas-ray-1950/">No Silêncio da Noite</a> (Nicholas Ray, 1950)<br />
02. A Marca da Maldade (Orson Welles, 1958)<br />
03. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/a-morte-num-beijo-robert-aldrich-1955/">A Morte Num Beijo</a> (Robert Aldrich, 1956)<br />
04. Cinzas Que Queimam (Nicholas Ray, 1951)<br />
05. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/almas-perversas-fritz-lang-1945/">Almas Perversas</a> (Fritz Lang, 1945)<br />
06. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/imperio-do-crime-joseph-h-lewis-1955/">Império do Crime</a> (Joseph H. Lewis, 1955)<br />
07. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/laura-otto-preminger-1944/">Laura</a> (Otto Preminger, 1944)<a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/o-beijo-amargo-samuel-fuller-1964/"></a><br />
08. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/o-beijo-amargo-samuel-fuller-1964/">O Beijo Amargo</a> (Samuel Fuller, 1964)<br />
09. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/curva-do-destino-edgar-g-ulmer-1945/">Curva do Destino</a> (Edgar G. Ulmer, 1945)<br />
10. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/fuga-do-passado-jacques-tourneur-1947/">Fuga do Passado</a> (Jacques Tourneur, 1947)</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Thiago Duarte</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Acho que tirando Chinatown, nenhum outro da minha lista pode ser chamado de um noir genuíno, daquele incontestável e até o talo. Todos podem tranquilamente ser enquadrados em outros gêneros, e vá lá pra suspense, romance, ficção, etc. Mas como é lista de favoritos, não me preocupei em me apegar exclusivamente a definição de noir por gênero, mas sim em filmes que, entre outras coisas, preservam a alma desse estilo.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" style="border:black 2px solid;margin:2px;" src="http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/4240/eyeswideshutmpkv9.jpg" alt="" width="464" height="355" /></p>
<p>01. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/de-olhos-bem-fechados-stanley-kubrick-1999-2/">De Olhos Bem Fechados</a> (Stanley Kubrick, 1999)<br />
02. Cidade dos Sonhos (David Lynch, 2001)<br />
03. O Homem que Não Estava Lá (Joel Coen, 2001)<br />
04. Seven (David Fincher, 1995)<br />
05. Mistérios e Paixões (David Cronenberg, 1991)<br />
06. Sin City (Robert Rodriguez, 2005)<br />
07. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/06/13/blow-up-depois-daquele-beijo-michelangelo-antonioni-1966/">Blow Up</a> (Michelangelo Antonioni, 1966)<br />
08. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/07/26/blade-runner-ridley-scott-1982/">Blade Runner</a> (Ridley Scott, 1982)<br />
09. Oldboy (Chan-wook Park, 2004)<br />
10. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/chinatown-roman-polanski-1974/">Chinatown</a> (Roman Polanski, 1974)</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Pedro Kerr</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:center;" align="center"><img class="aligncenter" style="border:black 2px solid;margin:2px;" src="http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/3310/thenakedkisscevci001361pv5.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="275" /></p>
<p style="text-align:left;">01. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/o-beijo-amargo-samuel-fuller-1964/">O Beijo Amargo</a> (Samuel Fuller, 1964)<br />
02. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/no-silencio-da-noite-nicholas-ray-1950/">No Silêncio da Noite</a> (Nicholas Ray, 1950)<br />
03. Pacto de Sangue (Billy Wilder, 1944)<br />
04. À Beira do Abismo (Howard Hawks, 1946)<br />
05. A Dama de Shanghai (Orson Welles, 1947)<br />
06. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/chinatown-roman-polanski-1974/">Chinatown</a> (Roman Polanski, 1974)<br />
07. A Sombra de uma Dúvida (Alfred Hitchcock, 1943)<br />
08. A Marca da Maldade (Orson Welles, 1958)<br />
09. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/07/07/o-grande-golpe-stanley-kubrick-1956-2/">O Grande Golpe</a> (Stanley Kubrick, 1956)<br />
10. O Falcão Maltês (John Huston, 1941)</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Djonata Ramos</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong></strong><img class="aligncenter" style="border:black 2px solid;margin:2px;" src="http://basetta.pupazzo.org/site_media/postings/godfather.jpg" alt="http://basetta.pupazzo.org/site_media/postings/godfather.jpg" /></p>
<p style="text-align:left;">01. Poderoso Chefão (Francis Ford Coppola, 1971)<br />
02. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/fogo-contra-fogo-michael-mann-1995/">Fogo Contra Fogo</a> (Michael Mann, 1995)<br />
03. Bons Companheiros (Martin Scorsese, 1992)<br />
04. Era Uma Vez na America (Sergio Leone, 1984)<br />
05. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/no-silencio-da-noite-nicholas-ray-1950/">No Silêncio da Noite</a> (Nicholas Ray, 1950)<br />
06. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/crepusculo-dos-deuses-sunset-boulevard-1950/">Crepúsculo dos Deuses </a>(Billy Wilder, 1950)<br />
07. Casablanca (Michael Curtiz, 1942)<br />
08. Oldboy (Chan-Wook Park, 2003)<br />
09. Os Intocáveis (Brian de Palma, 1987)<br />
10. Dália Negra (Brian de Palma, 2006)</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Adney Silva</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Hollywood na sua chamada &#8216;Era de Ouro&#8221; teve os musicais como um dos seus maiores símbolos, Mas, á sombra desses filmes, surgia também o mais autoral e, por que não dizer, o mais &#8220;sujo&#8221; gênero cinematográfico, que, tal qual os filmes de terror, irrompeu das profundezas para influenciar um sem-número de filmes e diretores. Por conta dessa influência, algumas pessoas podem estranhar a presença de alguns filmes na minha lista.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" style="border:black 2px solid;margin:2px;" src="http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/2971/touchofevilmp2jf5.jpg" alt="" width="469" height="260" /></p>
<p style="text-align:left;">01. A Marca da Maldade (Orson Welles, 1956)<br />
02. Pacto de Sangue (Billy Wilder, 1945)<br />
03. O Falcão Maltês (John Huston, 1941)<br />
04. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/chinatown-roman-polanski-1974/">Chinatown</a> (Roman Polanski, 1974)<br />
05. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/06/01/o-homem-errado-alfred-hitchcock-1956/">O Homem Errado</a> (Alfred HItchcock, 1956)<br />
06. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/no-silencio-da-noite-nicholas-ray-1950/">No Silêncio da Noite</a> (Nicholas Ray, 1950)<br />
07. Operação França (Willian Friendkin, 1973)<br />
08. Bonnie &#38; Clyde (Arthur Penn, 1968)<br />
09. A Dama no Lago (Robert Montgomery, 1947)<br />
10. Prisioneiro do Passado (Delmer Daves, 1949)</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Du Rififi Chez Les Hommes (Dassin, 1955)]]></title>
<link>http://sarcastig.wordpress.com/2008/09/22/du-rififi-chez-les-hommes-dassin-1955/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Hedwig</dc:creator>
<guid>http://sarcastig.wordpress.com/2008/09/22/du-rififi-chez-les-hommes-dassin-1955/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[They observed it on filmspotting, and it&#8217;s absolutely true: nobody does &#8220;cool&#8221; lik]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><a href="http://sarcastig.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/rififi.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-459" title="rififi" src="http://sarcastig.wordpress.com/files/2008/09/rififi.jpg" alt="" width="273" height="350" /></a>They observed it on <a href="http://www.filmspotting.net">filmspotting,</a> and it&#8217;s absolutely true: nobody does &#8220;cool&#8221; like the french, maybe because they don&#8217;t even seem to try. Tony (dit: le Stéphanois) isn&#8217;t cool at all if you hear the description: he&#8217;s just spent 5 years in jail, he has a nasty cough, he beats his former girl with a belt (ouch), and during the magnificent, achingly tense heist at the center of this movie, his forehead is glistening with nervous sweat.</p>
<p>But cool? That he is, indubitably, maybe even <em>because</em> of his all-too-obvious humanity. He&#8217;s cool because even when he&#8217;s so stressed out, he never pauzes to wipe the beads of sweat off, and he never succumbs to the temptation to talk, make a joke, whatever: like in the heist scene in <em>Le Cercle Rouge</em>, not a word is spoken. Everyone knows exactly what they should do when, and while it takes longer than they had planned, they just keep on working. <!--more--></p>
<p><a href="http://sarcastig.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/rififi2.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-460" title="rififi2" src="http://sarcastig.wordpress.com/files/2008/09/rififi2.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>Of course, seeing the heist being prepared and pulled off, that&#8217;s just half of the fun of heist movies. The other half is seeing how it will all go wrong in the end (those who consider that a spoiler probably haven&#8217;t seen any heist films from that period). Like in <em>The Killing</em>, and even, to a certain extent, <em>Le Cercle Rouge</em>, the weak point of the enterprise is indicated early on: &#8220;on dit que dans le monde, il n&#8217;y a pas un coffre qui puisse resister à César, ni aucune femme à qui César puisse resister&#8221;: in the whole world, there&#8217;s not a safe that can resist Cesar&#8230; nor a woman Cesar can resist&#8221;. There you have it: the one weak spot that will make everything unravel, and seeing it unravel &#8211; including another instance of Tony being very, very cool &#8211; is a pleasure to behold.</p>
<p>There really are many pleasures in this film, including the lovely musical number of which you can see an image here. It&#8217;s interesting, how an American in exile managed to capture the french atmosphere and mood so well, while at the same time staying within the confines of one of the prototypical American genres. I don&#8217;t mean the heist film in particular, but more generally the gangster movie , which would later inspire many leaders of the french new wave, which would, in turn, influence some seminal American films from the sixties.</p>
<p>Ok. Now: back to <em>Infinite Jest</em>, before my lounging-around-and-doing-nothing time is up!</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Rififi - noir av bästa märke]]></title>
<link>http://crippasfilmblogg.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/rififi-noir-av-basta-marke/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Crippa</dc:creator>
<guid>http://crippasfilmblogg.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/rififi-noir-av-basta-marke/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Jean Servais som Tony le Stéphanois. Jag har ett minne av att ha sett Rififi på tv för en ohygglig m]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div id="attachment_332" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 490px"><img class="size-full wp-image-332" src="http://crippasfilmblogg.wordpress.com/files/2008/08/rififi480.jpg" alt="Jean Servais som Tony le Stéphanois." width="480" height="256" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Jean Servais som Tony le Stéphanois.</p></div>
<p style="text-align:left;">Jag har ett minne av att ha sett <strong><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048021/" target="_blank">Rififi</a></strong> på tv för en ohygglig massa år sedan, men hade glömt i princip allt utom själva inbrottet. Därför var det väldigt trevligt att se om den på en fräsch dvd-utgåva och konstatera att inte bara inbrottet utan hela filmen står sig väldigt väl.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">I centrum står Tony, spelad av <strong><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0785771/" target="_blank">Jean Servais</a></strong> som gör honom till en hårding med något sorgset över sig. Tony har just kommit ut från kåken och upptäcker att hans gamla flamma, Mado, numera kilar med klubbägaren Pierre Grutter. När hans gamla kompanjon Jo föreslår en kupp mot en juvelerarbutik accepterar Tony, men han modifierar planen &#8211; istället för att bara sikta på grejorna i skyltfönstret ska gänget ge sig på att plundra kassaskåpet.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">Tonys metod är betydligt mer komplicerad, men efter att vi har fått ta del av gängets förarbete följer den klassiska, 28 minuter långa inbrottsscenen som utspelas under total tystnad &#8211; varken dialog eller musik bryter koncentrationen. Rififi brukar anses vara filmen som alla moderna kuppfilmer står i tacksamhetsskuld till, och det beror på inbrottssekvensen. (Faktum är att filmen till och med satte avtryck  i språket: det är härifrån ordet &#8216;<strong><a href="http://archive.corren.se/archive/2005/6/21/i87axsjoa27jusz.xml?category1=1096984640-4&#38;category2=1096984640-6&#38;" target="_blank">rififikupp</a></strong>&#8216; kommer.)</p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><strong><a href="http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20020901/REVIEWS08/209010301/1023" target="_blank">Som Roger Ebert påpekat</a></strong> skulle själva kuppen ha utgjort filmens klimax i en modern rulle. Nu kommer den någonstans i mitten, varefter berättelsen går vidare med det bittra efterspelet. Kassaskåpsexperten César &#8211; spelad av regissören <strong><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0202088/" target="_blank">Jules Dassin</a></strong> själv men under pseudonym &#8211; kan inte låta bli att ge bort en diamantring från kuppen till en sångerska på Pierre Grutters klubb, vilket sätter fart på en blodig händelsekedja.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">Filmen är cirka två timmar lång men känns inte utdragen alls &#8211; tvärtom är det spännande och intressant hela vägen. Jean Servais har en smått magnetisk utstrålning, och filmen hämtar massor av stämning ur det vackra svartvita fotot av ett nattligt Paris. Rekommenderas helhjärtat!</p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><em>Andra bloggar om <a rel="tag" href="http://bloggar.se/om/dvd">dvd</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://bloggar.se/om/film">film</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://bloggar.se/om/film+noir">film noir</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://bloggar.se/om/rififi">rififi</a></em></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hooray for Mondays]]></title>
<link>http://gerrycanavan.wordpress.com/2008/08/11/hooray-for-mondays/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>gerrycanavan</dc:creator>
<guid>http://gerrycanavan.wordpress.com/2008/08/11/hooray-for-mondays/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Hooray for Mondays. * Yesterday we went to New York to see After Nature at the New Museum and Rififi]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><a href="http://gerrycanavan.wordpress.com/files/2008/08/screen-capture2.png"><img src="http://gerrycanavan.wordpress.com/files/2008/08/screen-capture2.png?w=300" border="0" /></a><b>Hooray</b> for Mondays.</p>
<p>* Yesterday we went to New York to see <a href="http://www.newmuseum.org/exhibitions/399/after_nature">After Nature at the New Museum</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rififi"><i>Rififi</i></a>&#8212;the film that singlehandedly gave birth to the very idea of French film noir, according to a quote Ryan saw in the newspaper&#8212;<a href="http://www.filmforum.org/films/crimewave.html">at the Film Forum&#8217;s French Crime Wave series</a>. I officially pronounce both things Worth Doing&#8482;, with an extra-special deliciousness shout-out to <a href="http://www.bridgeandtunnelclub.com/bigmap/manhattan/menus/kates.htm">Kate&#8217;s Joint</a> at 58 Avenue B in the East Village.</p>
<p>* <a href="http://www.metafilter.com/74022/Who-is-the-Man-Dead-at-65">Rest in peace, Isaac Hayes.</a></p>
<p>* YouTube video tribute to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17eeZPl_Pgo&#38;feature=related">Jack Kirby</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHdmyuJZs0Q&#38;feature=related">king of comics</a>. Via <a href="http://www.metafilter.com/74018/Galactus-is-here">MeFi</a>.</p>
<p>* I&#8217;ve already made what I consider <a href="http://gerrycanavan.blogspot.com/2008/08/calvin-on-polls.html">the definitive comment on election polling</a>, but in case you need more I recommend <a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/08/the_three_day_itch.php">Matthew Yglesias&#8217;s post today on tracking polls</a>:<br />
<blockquote>Or maybe none of that happened. As everyone knows, there’s sampling error associated with polling. As a result, if you poll 1,000 people on August 1 and then you poll 1,000 different people on August 2 you shouldn’t be surprised to see the results differ by several percentage points even in the absence of any change in the underlying public opinion. Beyond that, doing one poll per day throughout a long campaign would mean that you’d expect to see one or two relatively rare outlier results per month even under circumstances of total stasis. And as Alan Abramowitz points out if you look at the daily results this is actually what you see — incredible volatility with Obama’s lead oscillating violently around an average of 3-4 points. Since it’s not plausible that the public mood is really swinging anywhere near as rapidly as a very naive reading of the Gallup daily results would suggest, people could see that this is basically statistical noise in a stable race.</p>
<p>But Gallup doesn’t report its daily results, they report a multi-day rolling average. Abramowitz notes that if you report a ten day rolling average, you get a chart where nothing happens — Obama maintains a flat lead of 3-4 points. Again, a stable race. But if instead of doing either of those things you do what Gallup actually does and report a three day rolling average, you get these pleasant looking peaks and valleys in the race. The change over time here is large enough in magnitude (unlike on the ten day chart) but also slow enough in pace (unlike on the one day chart) to be plausibly interpreted as public opinion shifting in response to events. And since the human mind is designed to recognize patterns and construct narratives, and since it suits the interests of campaign journalists to write narratives, people interpret the peaks and valleys of the three day average as real shifts in public opinion. But while I have no way of proving that it’s just statistical noise and nothing’s really happening, the “nothing happening” narrative is completely consistent with the data, and it’s telling that the conventional narratives collapse when the data is presented in different ways whereas the “noise” narrative is consistent with multiple ways of displaying the information.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ll only add that given the extent to which polls serve as a bulwark for functional democracy and accountable elections, the increasing sensationalization of polls as a means to drive news ratings rather than to reliably monitor public opinion is a very, very disturbing trend. </p>
<p>Polls should be boring. They should be so boring no one cares what they say.</p>
<p>* And Jesse Taylor has <a href="http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/a_meteor_woulda_won_this_thing_for_us/">the best hypothetical history of the presidential primary</a> I&#8217;ve seen:<br />
<blockquote>Any number of things could have swayed the primary.  But at the end of the day, Clinton apologizing for her Iraq vote (or just not having voted that way in the first place) would have guaranteed her the nomination.  Or her running for Senate in Illinois. </p></blockquote>
<p>I really think that&#8217;s right. If she&#8217;d decided to run for Senate in Illinois rather than New York, she&#8217;d have had it.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Rififi (Jules Dassin, 1955)]]></title>
<link>http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/rififi-jules-dassin-1955/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Luis Henrique Boaventura</dc:creator>
<guid>http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/rififi-jules-dassin-1955/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Dassin na frente de um espelho “hm, a cena do roubo deve ser especial&#8230; que trilha será que eu ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.web-libre.org/medias/affiche-films/03255088ed63354a54e0e5ed957e9008.jpg" alt="" width="347" height="444" /></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Dassin na frente de um espelho “hm, a cena do roubo deve ser especial&#8230; que trilha será que eu uso? Que diálogos, meu Deus?&#8230; Como farei pra criar o clima de tensão necess&#8230; OPA! Mas que caralho eu tô pensando? O que pode ser mais tenso do que fazer do espectador um dos membros do grupo, enclausurando-o no silêncio e no processo exato da ação? Ah, seu gênio filho da mãe&#8230;” e daí que a meia hora do assalto à joalheria merece uma cadeira de 4 créditos em qualquer faculdade de cinema. Nada poderia tornar a cena mais sufocante do que deixá-la virgem, bruta, utilizando do mínimo de elementos fílmicos possível para preservar a tensão natural que, de todo modo, o ato de um roubo arriscado provoca.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Mas Rififi é bem mais que o assalto, que na verdade fecha na primeira metade do filme. É um noir de um charme europeu incomparável, um amargo tratado sobre a decadência, da memória morrente daquele homem deslocado do seu tempo. Mais que o dinheiro, Stéphanois precisa provar-se útil e convencer a si mesmo de que pode vencer o homem que ficou com sua mulher enquanto ele esteve na prisão. Não são as jóias, não é a criança. É a necessidade incondicional que faz da morte de Grutter praticamente uma cura para este câncer que corrói o orgulho de um homem numa época em que a palavra “honra” ainda não havia tido seu significado anestesiado.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">E mesmo que o assalto seja espetacular e tudo mais, os últimos cinco minutos são os meus favoritos. E o final é das coisas mais tristes do mundo, e inevitável, como ele bem sabia o tempo inteiro.</p>
<p>4/4</p>
<p style="text-align:right;"><em>Luis Henrique Boaventura<br />
</em></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ten Questions with Darcy James Argue]]></title>
<link>http://glowsinthedark.wordpress.com/2008/08/02/ten-questions-with-darcy-james-argue/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 18:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>glowsinthedark</dc:creator>
<guid>http://glowsinthedark.wordpress.com/2008/08/02/ten-questions-with-darcy-james-argue/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Darcy James Argue is a New York based composer that leads the truly sweet Secret Society Big Band wh]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><img class="alignleft" src="http://secretsociety.typepad.com/photos/secret_identity/_15_0016.jpg" alt="" width="215" height="320" />Darcy James Argue is a New York based composer that leads the truly sweet Secret Society Big Band which performs in and around NY.  He writes all of the material for this 18 piece monster, and with it (said monster), he manages to create an original sound that still leaves plenty of space for monster members to add their own improvised contributions.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a great video of the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-tkRZ495W4">monster in action</a>.</p>
<p>In addition, he is a constant blogger of interesting thoughtful content, and was a major influence on me in the creation of this site.  Check out his band&#8217;s blog <a href="http://secretsociety.typepad.com/">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>1: What got you into creative/improvised music making, and what keeps you there?</strong></p>
<p>What got me into it? I played trumpet in the highschool bigband, but I was a really terrible trumpet player. Piano was a lot less frustrating &#8212; you put your finger down on the right key, and the note you want actually comes out. Every time. Not like trumpet. Playing piano also allowed me to listen more to the big picture, to what the whole band was playing. I very quickly got the idea, &#8220;Hmm, that doesn&#8217;t actually sound all that hard. I bet I could do that.&#8221;</p>
<p>What keeps me in it? Believe me, if it was remotely possible for me to do something other with my life than lead an 18-piece bigband, I&#8217;d do that. In a heartbeat.</p>
<p><strong>2: Breakthrough album(s) and Why?</strong></p>
<p>One record: <strong>Maria Schneider&#8217;s</strong> <em>Evanescence</em>. Especially the first tune, &#8220;Wyrgly.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why? Goddamn, just listen to that track, fercrissakes. For better or worse, &#8220;Wyrgly&#8221; convinced me that bigband wasn&#8217;t a dead end. No, more than that &#8212; it convinced me that a bigband could express the precise kind of forward-looking jazz I was interested in, and do it better than a smaller ensemble.</p>
<p>The juxtaposition of those climbing half-time shuffle figures grinding against the wispy, scattershot double-time stabs (about a minute into the tune) remains one of the most audacious rhythmic conceits I&#8217;ve ever heard. And that noise <strong>Ben Monder</strong> makes during his solo break is everyone&#8217;s favorite <strong>Ben Monder</strong> moment.</p>
<p><strong>3: How do other art disciplines affect your work?</strong></p>
<p>Storytelling is key. The difference between good musicians and great musicians is that great musicians are genius storytellers. Any other art that happens in real time &#8212; theatre, film, television, dance, standup comedy, spoken word, performance art &#8212; is (or should be) tremendously instructive for the creative musician. But ultimately, everything always comes back to storytelling.</p>
<p><strong>4: Favorite Film(s)?</strong></p>
<p>How long do you have? Okay&#8230; limiting myself to a desert island Top 10 list? <em>Citizen Kane</em> for its punkrock badassery (who the hell does <em>that</em> with their first movie?); <em>The Big Sleep</em> for being the definitive noir; <em>Notorious</em> for the camera + <strong>Ingrid Bergman</strong>; <em>The Third Man</em> for showing everyone how to really introduce a character; <em>Seven Samurai</em> for being the most awesomest epic movie ever; <em>Rififi</em> for merging French existentialism with the cynicism of a casualty of McCarthy, and also for that breathtaking heist scene; <em>The Sweet Smell of Success</em> for being the definitive New York City film (now and forever), and for actually using <strong>Chico Hamilton&#8217;s</strong> band; <em>McCabe and Mrs. Miller</em> for the ecstatic patience, for being filmed in my backyard, and for making <em>Deadwood</em> possible; <em>The Godfather Part II</em> for <strong>Fredo</strong>; <em>Blue Velvet</em> for <strong>Dean Stockwell</strong>; and <em>Goodfellas</em> for the obsessive attention to detail. (Yeah, okay, I realize that&#8217;s eleven. No, fuck <em>you</em>.)</p>
<p><strong>5: Favorite Film Score(s)?</strong></p>
<p>Oh come now. Okay, fine &#8212;  I will limit myself to just two:</p>
<p><em>Psycho</em> and <em>Vertigo</em>.</p>
<p>(See, that was easy.)</p>
<p><strong>6: Favorite Fiction Reading?</strong></p>
<p>Ever? <em>Crime and Punishment</em>, with <strong>David Foster Wallace&#8217;s</strong> <em>Infinite Jest</em> a close second.</p>
<p>Lately? Honestly, I need to find a much healthier balance between online reading/writing and dead-tree reading. The last novel I read that really killed me was <strong>Jonathan Lethem&#8217;s</strong> <em>The Fortress of Solitude</em>. At the moment I am (slowly) making my way through <em>Against The Day</em> (god, that one chapter with Webb Traverse and the railroad bridge is effing brilliant).</p>
<p><strong>7: Favorite Non-Fiction Reading?</strong></p>
<p>I am currently enjoying <strong>Rick Perlstein&#8217;s</strong> <em>Nixonland</em>, which already, in the first 100 pages, contains everything anyone needs to know about contemporary American politics. On deck is <strong>Jeremy Scahill&#8217;s</strong> <em>Blackwater: The Rise of the World&#8217;s Most Powerful Mercenary Army</em>.</p>
<p><strong>8: Favorite Guilty Pleasure Music?</strong></p>
<p>No such thing. Seriously. You might (justifiably) feel guilty about, like, cheating on your spouse, or betting your kid&#8217;s college fund on an online poker game. But feeling guilty about enjoying music? Life&#8217;s too short, dude.</p>
<p><strong>9: Favorite Under Rated Musician(s)?</strong></p>
<p>Oy. Um&#8230; <strong>Mary Lou Williams</strong>. <strong>George Russell</strong>. <strong>Booker Little</strong>. <strong>Jimmy Giuffre</strong> (still). Late <strong>Duke Ellington</strong>. <strong>Sun Ra</strong> and his inner circle. <strong>Thad Jones</strong> as a cornet player. <strong>Bob Brookmeyer</strong> as a valve trombone player. <strong>Mel Lewis</strong>. <strong>Lewis Taylor</strong>. Post-1970 <strong>Gil Evans</strong>. <strong>Henry Threadgill</strong>. <strong>Scott Robinson</strong>. <strong>Andrew D&#8217;Angelo</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>10: Recommended Artist(s)/Shout Outs?</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://sherisserogers.com/">Sherisse Rogers</a>. <a href="http://www.numinousmusic.com/">Joe Phillips</a>. <a href="http://www.matanaroberts.com/">Matana Roberts</a>. <a href="http://www.toddsickafoose.com/">Todd Sickafoose</a>. <a href="http://www.automaticheartbreak.com/">Corey Dargel</a>. Everyone who has ever played a Secret Society gig or rehearsal.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Top! Décadas: 50 ]]></title>
<link>http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/07/31/top-decadas-50/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Luis Henrique Boaventura</dc:creator>
<guid>http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/07/31/top-decadas-50/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A década americana por excelência chega ao Multiplot!, e com metade de filmes &#8216;estrangeiros]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p style="text-align:justify;">A década americana por excelência chega ao <em>Multiplot!</em>, e com metade de filmes &#8216;estrangeiros&#8217; no top 1. Participe também, compartilhe com a gente essa doentia obsessão por tops!. E como de costume, o primeiro nos comentários vem aqui pra cima.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><strong>Top! do Leitor:</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Fábio Rockenbach</strong></p>
<div class="entry">
<p style="text-align:justify;">Dolorido escolher apenas 10 filmes daquela que eu considero a mais rica, bela, inovadora e influente década da história do cinema. Pela produção de obras primas, considero que 3 foram os “donos” dela: Kurosawa, Wilder e Hitchcock, mas a grande marca, a meu ver, foi o fato de o Ocidente ter conhecido efetivamente o maravilhoso cinema oriental &#8211; e sou fã incondicional dele. O mestre Kurosawa ganhou por pouco de Ray e Welles, mas há espaço para Mizoguchi, Ford, Laughton e Stanley Donen no barco.<br />
Grande década, a maior de todas (a vontade é rever todos esses filmes em um final de semana estonteante).</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.filmsquish.com/guts/files/images/SevenSamurai.JPG" alt="" /></p>
<p>01. Os Sete Samurais (Akira Kurosawa, 1954)<br />
02. A Marca da Maldade (Orson Welles, 1958)<br />
03. A Canção da Estrada (Satyajit Ray, 1955)<br />
04. Trono manchado de Sangue (Akira Kurosawa, 1957)<br />
05. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/rastros-de-odio-john-ford-1956/">Rastros de Ódio</a> (John Ford, 1956)<br />
06. Contos da Lua Vaga (Kenji Mizoguchi, 1950)<br />
07. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/08/06/o-mensageiro-do-diabo-charles-laughton-1955/" target="_blank">O Mensageiro do Diabo</a> (Charles Laughton, 1955)<br />
08. Cantando na Chuva (Stanley Donen/Gene Kelly, 1952)<br />
09. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/crepusculo-dos-deuses-sunset-boulevard-1950/">Crepúsculo dos Deuses</a> (Billy Wilder, 1950)<br />
10. Janela Indiscreta (Alfred Hitchcock, 1954)</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Tops! da Equipe</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Sílvio Tavares</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Diversificada e encrustrada de clássicos e temáticas complexas, a década de 50 constitui uma das mais belas épocas da história do cinema. Seja na face deslumbrante de Bette Davis no magnífico A Malvada, na inquietante <em>femme fatale</em> vivida por Gloria Swason no noir <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/crepusculo-dos-deuses-sunset-boulevard-1950/">Crepúsculo dos Deuses</a>, na filosofia peculiar da obra prima O Sétimo Selo, de Ingmar Bergman ou mesmo na simpatia expontânea de um jovem Jimmy Stewart contemplando um grande amigo (um coelho de 2 metros de altura invisível!), há uma convergência inevitável da magia da sétima arte para tal período. Pessoalmente aconselho muita atenção ao cinéfilo a essa maravilhosa época. Você se emocionará, roerá suas unhas de tensão e gargalhará alto com as diferentes e riquíssimas vertentes das obras nela contidas.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b9/Machiko_Kyo_in_Rashomon.jpg" alt="" width="448" height="336" /></p>
<p>01. Rashomon (Akira Kurosawa, 1950)<br />
02. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/07/08/gloria-feita-de-sangue-stanley-kubrick-1957-2/">Glória Feita de Sangue</a> (Stanley Kubrick, 1957)<br />
03. Harvey (Henry Koster, 1950)<br />
04. Os Sete Samurais (Akira Kurosawa, 1954)<br />
05. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/crepusculo-dos-deuses-sunset-boulevard-1950/">Crepúsculo dos Deuses</a> (Billy Wilder, 1950)<br />
06. O Sétimo Selo (Ingmar Bergman, 1957)<br />
07. Um Corpo que Cai (Alfred Hitchcock, 1958)<br />
08. A Ponte sobre o Rio Kwai (David Lean, 1957)<br />
09. A Malvada (Joseph L. Mankiewicz, 1950)<br />
10. Noites Brancas (Luchino Visconti, 1957)</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Marcelo Dillenburg</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">A década de 1950 foi, essencialmente, todos contra Hitchcock. E por pouco, muito pouco, Hitch perdeu a primeira posição. Foi uma das decisões mais complicadas, as duas obras-primas de dois diretores que tinham uma visão sobre-humana para o enquadramento, o uso de claro e escuro, a composição de cena e a utilização do rosto de seus personagens. No fim, Kurosawa levou o topo. Mas Hitch emplacou três filmes entre os dez. Ah, e outra, me deu pena colocar Truffaut em sexto, mas não tinha como evitar, mesmo.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://cinema.cornell.edu/EarlyFall07/images/SevenSamurai.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="246" /></p>
<p>01. Os Sete Samurais (Akira Kurosawa, 1954)<br />
02. Janela Indiscreta (Alfred Hitchcock, 1954)<br />
03. Um Corpo que Cai (Alfred Hitchcock, 1958)<br />
04. 12 Homens e uma Sentença (Sidney Lumet, 1957)<br />
05. O Sétimo Selo (Ingmar Bergman, 1957)<br />
06. Os Incompreendidos (François Truffaut, 1959)<br />
07. Noites Brancas (Luchino Visconti, 1957)<br />
08. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/crepusculo-dos-deuses-sunset-boulevard-1950/">Crepúsculo dos Deuses</a> (Billy Wilder, 1950)<br />
09. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/06/01/o-homem-errado-alfred-hitchcock-1956/" target="_blank">O Homem Errado</a> (Alfred Hitchcock, 1956)<br />
10. Ben-Hur (William Wyler, 1959)</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Amílcar Figueiredo</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Acabadas as férias, volto com a Década de 50, quase tão querida pra mim quanto a posterior. Aqui o <em>American Way of Life</em> choca-se frontalmente com a maneira que a Europa e o Japão encontraram para rever o impacto de suas próprias idéias, mais precisamente o custo delas em vidas humanas. Menos o eu, e mais o nós. Até hoje eu me identifico mais com essa segunda forma de ver a vida. Rápidas menções honrosas: Invasores de Corpos (Siegel), O Prazer (Ophüls), Cantando na Chuva (Donen e Kelly), <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/crepusculo-dos-deuses-sunset-boulevard-1950/">Crepúsculo dos Deuses</a> (Wilder), Palavras ao Vento (Sirk).</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v24/Green13/images%20for%20blog/b6.jpg" alt="" width="482" height="211" /></p>
<p>01. Os Incompreendidos (François Truffaut, 1959)<br />
02. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/08/06/o-mensageiro-do-diabo-charles-laughton-1955/" target="_blank">O Mensageiro do Diabo</a> (Charles Laughton, 1955)<br />
03. As Noites de Cabíria (Federico Fellini, 1957)<br />
04. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/o-batedor-de-carteiras-robert-bresson-1959/">O Batedor de Carteiras</a> (Robert Bresson, 1959)<br />
05. Nazarín (Luis Buñuel, 1959)<br />
06. Um Corpo que Cai (Alfred Hitchcock, 1958)<br />
07. Oharu &#8211; A Vida de Uma Cortesã (Kenji Mizogushi, 1952)<br />
08. O Sétimo Selo (Ingmar Bergman, 1957)<br />
09. Anatomia de um Crime (Otto Preminger, 1959)<br />
10. Os Sete Samurais (Akira Kurosawa, 1954)</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Djonata Ramos</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Complicadíssimo. Os 4 primeiros, na realidade, não têm ordem de preferência, eu fui jogando uma moeda e ordenando, tanto faz ali quem fica na frente de quem, todos são obras-primas maravilhosas, coisa do diabo mesmo.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://thisdistractedglobe.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/Rear%20Window%20pic%202.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>01. Janela Indiscreta (Alfred Hitchcock, 1954)<br />
02. Noites Brancas (Luchino Visconti, 1957)<br />
03. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/no-silencio-da-noite-nicholas-ray-1950/">No Silêncio da Noite</a> (Nicholas Ray, 1950)<br />
04. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/crepusculo-dos-deuses-sunset-boulevard-1950/">Crepúsculo dos Deuses</a> (Billy Wilder, 1950)<br />
05. Onde Começa o Inferno (Howard Hawks, 1959)<br />
06. 12 Homens e uma Sentença (Sidney Lumet, 1957)<br />
07. Alice no País das Maravilhas (Clyde Geronimi e<br />
Wilfred Jackson, 1951)<br />
08. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/rastros-de-odio-john-ford-1956/">Rastros de Ódio</a> (John Ford, 1956)<br />
09. Sindicato de Ladrões (Elia Kazan, 1954)<br />
10. Um Corpo que Cai (Alfred Hitchcock, 1958)</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Pedro Kerr</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Uma década que eu gostaria de explorar mais, ver todos os lados (três filmes a mais, três filmes a menos mudam tudo, fazer tops é uma arte, hehe). Mas o que já vi já torna a época peculiar e interessante, tanto que se vários diretores se repetem. A maioria é fera mesmo.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/ff/Howard_Hawks'Rio_Bravo_trailer_(15).jpg" alt="" width="448" height="242" /></p>
<p>01. Onde Começa o Inferno (Howard Hawks, 1959)<br />
02. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/rastros-de-odio-john-ford-1956/">Rastros de Ódio</a> (John Ford, 1956)<br />
03. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/no-silencio-da-noite-nicholas-ray-1950/">No Silêncio da Noite</a> (Nicholas Ray, 1950)<br />
04. Um Corpo Que Cai (Alfred Hitchcock, 1958)<br />
05. Johnny Guitar (Nicholas Ray, 1955)<br />
06. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/07/07/o-grande-golpe-stanley-kubrick-1956-2/">O Grande Golpe</a> (Stanley Kubrick, 1956)<br />
07. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/crepusculo-dos-deuses-sunset-boulevard-1950/">Crepúsculo dos Deuses</a> (Billy Wilder, 1950)<br />
08. Os Incompreendidos (François Truffaut, 1959)<br />
09. Intriga Internacional (Alfred Hitchcock, 1959)<br />
10. Era Uma Vez em Tóquio (Yasujiro Ozu, 1953)</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Daniel Dalpizzolo</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Poderia ter fechado a lista somente com policiais e faroestes, são os dois melhores gêneros do cinema e juntos provavelmente digam respeito a pelo menos 50% do que há de mais incrível nessa que foi a grande década do cinema norte-americano &#8211; nada mais natural do que os dois gêneros mais típicos dos EUA e dos mais característicos da época serem destaque. Infelizmente, tanto de um quanto do outro lado a lista ficou pouco expressiva, ainda mais por ter conseguido colocar apenas dois faroestes. Mas tinha que dar espaços a alguns filmes de fora dessa esfera, não teve jeito. Depois faço algumas considerações nos comentários.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://img31.picoodle.com/img/img31/4/5/16/f_inalonelyplm_d500691.jpg" alt="" width="440" height="258" /></p>
<p>01. No Silêncio da Noite (Nicholas Ray, 1950)<br />
02. Onde Começa o Inferno (Howard Hawks, 1959)<br />
03. A Marca da Maldade (Orson Welles, 1958)<br />
04. O Quimono Escarlate (Samuel Fuller, 1959)<br />
05. A Noite do Demônio (Jacques Tourneur, 1957)<br />
06. A Morte Num Beijo (Robert Aldrich, 1955)<br />
07. O Pequeno Rincão de Deus (Anthony Mann, 1958)<br />
08. Assim Estava Escrito (Vincent Minnelli, 1952)<br />
09. Salário do Medo (Henri-Georges Clouzot, 1953)<br />
10. Bom Dia, Tristeza (Otto Preminger, 1958)</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Cassius Abreu</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Uma década sobre a qual ainda tenho muito a conhecer, mas que marca o ápice de Bergman e David Lean, uma grande fase de Billy Wilder e Hitchock, o lançamento de um dos maiores cineastas franceses de todos os tempos, con e o Chaplin melancolicamente falante e tem o único do Buñuel que eu vi &#8211; dizem que é o mais normal e mesmo assim é brilhante.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://keitholbermannisevil.files.wordpress.com/2006/09/seventh-seal.jpg?w=443&#038;h=308" alt="" width="443" height="308" /><a href="http://keitholbermannisevil.files.wordpress.com/2006/09/seventh-seal.jpg"></a></p>
<p>01. O Sétimo Selo (Ingmar Bergman, 1957)<br />
02. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/crepusculo-dos-deuses-sunset-boulevard-1950/">Crepúsculo dos Deuses</a> (Billy Wilder, 1950)<br />
03. A Montanha dos Sete Abutres (Billy Wilder, 1951)<br />
04. A Ponte do Rio Kwai (David Lean, 1957)<br />
05. Um Corpo que Cai (Alfred Hitchcock, 1958)<br />
06. Os Sete Samurais (Akira Kurosawa, 1954)<br />
07. Robinson Crusoé (Luis Buñuel, 1954)<br />
08. Luzes da Ribalta (Charles Chaplin, 1952)<br />
09. Disque M Para Matar (Alfred Hitchcock, 1954)<br />
10. Os Incompreendidos (François Truffaut, 1959)</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Adney Silva</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">A fase de ouro do &#8220;Mestre do Suspense&#8221; na Universal; a fase final do cinema noir e do faroeste (gerando obras fantásticas); Chaplin flertando com o cinema falado, gerando uma das obras mais comoventes dos últimos tempos; a grande disputa no Oscar de 1950 entre dois filmes que criticavam ácidamente duas das maiores indústrias do entreterimento norte-americano na época (Hollywood e Broadway); Lumet e Preminger abordando o mundo dos tribunais de forma memorável; o musical norte-americano através do ícone Gene Kelly, gerando uma das obras mais memoráveis e lembradas do cinema; Kurosawa colocando o mundo dos samurais na vanguarda cinematográfica; David Lean revisitando magistralmente a Segunda Guerra; Bergman nos fazendo dialogar com a Morte através de um jogo de xadrez&#8230; Isso é uma tortura!!! Já citei mais de 10 filmes nesse texto!!!!! Vou ter que deixar algum de fora, mas qual??? [desesperado]</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Perceberam o porquê dessa década ser uma das mais complicadas (senão a mais complicada) de fazer um top 10?</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://pwp.netcabo.pt/0210980301/m/sunset.jpeg" alt="" width="454" height="340" /></p>
<p>01. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/crepusculo-dos-deuses-sunset-boulevard-1950/">Crepúsculo dos Deuses</a> (Billy Wilder, 1950)<br />
02. A Marca da Maldade (Orson Welles, 1957)<br />
03. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/no-silencio-da-noite-nicholas-ray-1950/">No Silêncio da Noite</a> (Nicholas Ray, 1950)<br />
04. Os Sete Samurais (Akira Kurosawa, 1954)<br />
05. Luzes da Ribalta (Charles Chaplin, 1952)<br />
06. Doze Homens e Uma Sentença (Sidney Lumet, 1957)<br />
07. Anatomia de um Crime (Otto Preminger, 1959)<br />
08. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/06/01/a-tortura-do-silencio-alfred-hitchcock-1953/" target="_blank">A Tortura do Silêncio</a> (Alfred Hitchcock, 1953)<br />
09. Cantando na Chuva (Stanley Donen/Gene Kelly, 1952)<br />
10. O Sétimo Selo (Ingmar Bergman, 1957)</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><strong>Thiago Macêdo Correia</strong></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">A década derradeira da old hollywood, digna dos últimos grandes músicais da MGM, grandes estudos de personagens baseados na literatura (Um Lugar ao Sol, Uma Rua Chamada Pecado), grandes momentos de observação da própria arte (<a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/crepusculo-dos-deuses-sunset-boulevard-1950/">Crepúsculo dos Deuses</a>, A Malvada). Mas é também a década do nascimento artístico de alguns gênios, como Fellini, Bergman e Resnais, e reafirmação da maestria de gênios anteriores, como Wilder (em seus melhores momentos, foi difícil colocar somente um filme), Ford e Hawks.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://cache.eb.com/eb/image?id=77228&#38;rendTypeId=4" alt="" width="440" height="312" /></p>
<p>01. Noites de Cabíria (Federico Fellini, 1957)<br />
02. Cantando na Chuva (Stanley Donen, Gene Kelly, 1952)<br />
03. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/08/06/o-mensageiro-do-diabo-charles-laughton-1955/" target="_blank">O Mensageiro do Diabo</a> (Charles Laughton, 1955)<br />
04. Quanto Mais Quente Melhor (Billy Wilder, 1959)<br />
05. <a href="http://multiplot.wordpress.com/2008/05/16/rastros-de-odio-john-ford-1956/">Rastros de Ódio</a> (John Ford, 1956)<br />
06. O Sétimo Selo (Ingmar Bergman, 1957)<br />
07. Os Sete Samurais (Akira Kurosawa, 1954)<br />
08. Hiroshima Mon Amour (Alain Resnais, 1959)<br />
09. Disque M Para Matar (Alfred Hitchcock, 1954)<br />
10. Onde Começa o Inferno (Howard Hawks, 1959)</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[R.I.P. Rififi]]></title>
<link>http://gynomite.wordpress.com/2008/07/31/rip-rififi/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Emily Gordon is.....Gynomite!</dc:creator>
<guid>http://gynomite.wordpress.com/2008/07/31/rip-rififi/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[When we moved to NYC last October, one of the first things we did was go to the Rififi, which housed]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><img class="aligncenter" src="http://rififinyc.com/images/pinup.jpg" alt="" width="301" height="231" /></p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p>When we moved to NYC last October, one of the first things we did was go to the Rififi, which housed one of the most amazing comedy shows ever on Wednesday nights.  I remember approaching the club, which was dark and bright at the same time, spilling people onto the sidewalks.  I remember feeling intimidated in a way that I haven&#8217;t in years and years, maybe since going to my first &#8220;nightclub&#8221; in NC as a teenager.  I fought my way through the crowd, gawking at all the interesting people, semi-famous people, beautiful people, and strangers.  I found the two people I knew inside and together we stood, staring.</p>
<p>Things have changed.  Since that first time, I have been to Rififi at least once a week for comedy shows, burlesque shows, movie screenings, and just to see friends.  I went from feeling intimidated to feeling welcomed and at home there.  I love the couches, I love the natty velvet seats, I love how you can see people like Zach Galifianakis and Arj Barker as well as overly serious hipsters there in equal amounts, I love the venue, and I love the people that work there and hang out there.  I can&#8217;t tell you how many times we&#8217;ve stayed there till the wee hours, running to the back room to dance when the mood strikes.</p>
<p>Last night was my last night going to Rififi, because as of today, it is closed.  And I am sad.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter" src="http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v234/135/1/646579519/n646579519_430056_9064.jpg" alt="" width="436" height="295" /></p>
<p style="text-align:center;">Notice the badass bright red velvet couch!</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Gabe and Max's Internet Thing]]></title>
<link>http://yourdailychum.com/2008/06/20/gabe-and-maxs-internet-thing/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 03:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Your Daily Chum</dc:creator>
<guid>http://yourdailychum.com/2008/06/20/gabe-and-maxs-internet-thing/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Gabe and Max&#8217;s How To Get the Dreamlife of Your Dreams Using the Internet&#8221;. Funny]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>&#8220;Gabe and Max&#8217;s How To Get the Dreamlife of Your Dreams Using the Internet&#8221;.  Funny stuff.</p>
<p><span style='text-align:center; display: block;'><object width='425' height='350'><param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/PPsUmhqncAg&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' /><param name='allowfullscreen' value='true' /><param name='wmode' value='transparent' /><embed src='http://www.youtube.com/v/PPsUmhqncAg&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' allowfullscreen='true' width='425' height='350' wmode='transparent'></embed></object></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
