<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ropey-writing &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/ropey-writing/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "ropey-writing"</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:28:25 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Use of language]]></title>
<link>http://blog.frankwales.com/2009/03/21/use-of-language/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blog.frankwales.com/2009/03/21/use-of-language/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Opening the brand aperture&#8221; and disappearing right up it, the Sci Fi Channel uses sever]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>&#8220;Opening the brand aperture&#8221; and disappearing right up it, the Sci Fi Channel uses several paragraphs of run-on sentences and abstract nouns to <a href="http://www.syfy.com/press.html" target="_blank">explain their decision</a> to reduce even further the amount of science fiction they actually show. Sadly, it doesn&#8217;t explain why they didn&#8217;t just have the  guts to rebrand properly, instead of to a mockable homophone; maybe they should have asked <a href="http://dave.uktv.co.uk/" target="_blank">Dave</a> for advice.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, a substantially more coherent and moving piece of writing has bobbed up on various forums, <a href="http://www.symphonymusicians.com/WelcomeAddressbyKarlPaulnack/tabid/87/Default.aspx">Karl Paulnack&#8217;s 2004 welcome address to the parents of new students at the Boston Conservatory</a>. </p>
<p>And a <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2009-03-19a.368.0">surprisingly informative debate</a> took place yesterday in the House of Lords, saying what a jolly useful chap that Darwin fellow turned out to be; ideal for passing the time on your next long trip up the Amazon, perhaps.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Daze of Our Heroes]]></title>
<link>http://blog.frankwales.com/2008/10/23/the-daze-of-our-heroes/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
<guid>http://blog.frankwales.com/2008/10/23/the-daze-of-our-heroes/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Now five episodes into season three of Heroes, my diagnosis is that the writers are suffering from t]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Now five episodes into season three of <em>Heroes</em>, my diagnosis is that the writers are suffering from the same malady that afflicted <em>Star Trek: Nemesis</em>. Namely, they decided that they could recreate a previous success (in <em>Heroes&#8217;</em> case, their first season; in <em>Trek&#8217;s</em> case, <em>The Wrath of Khan</em>) by cutting-and-pasting the plot of that success right over whatever characters happened to be left standing at the end of their previous outing.</p>
<p>In both cases, the results look disastrous, because they turn something that was compellingly character-driven into something that is depressingly plot-driven.</p>
<p>Previously well-drawn characters are being scribbled into increasingly blurry shapes in order to fit the plot&#8217;s unravelling contours. Whatever dopey thing that some erstwhile honorable or intelligent character has to do to push the McGuffin off the chess board, that&#8217;s what they do:</p>
<ul>
<li>kill their best friend or themselves because the plot demands a surprise;</li>
<li>be strong or weak, trusting or suspicious, with little regard for their character&#8217;s journey;</li>
<li>fail to use their power because it would wind things up too soon;</li>
<li>ignore their prime directive or vital instructions on a whim;</li>
<li>forget about what happened last time in just this situation;</li>
<li>act like dorks in moments of crisis because it&#8217;s not their turn to shout;</li>
<li>create the world-threatening jeopardy that they themselves ranted at everyone to avoid;</li>
<li>be surprisingly more related to one another than a bag of rabbits;</li>
<li>and generally behave like day-time soap characters at a cliff-hanging convention.</li>
</ul>
<p>To <em>Heroes</em>&#8216; credit so far when compared with <em>Nemesis</em>, at least none of the villains has made a dramatic entrance down a Bette Davis staircase (such as you might find on any standard war ship), nor leered around through Bela Lugosi eye-lighting.</p>
<p>(Although it does look suspiciously like <em>Heroes</em> might have an uber-villain executing the most complicated and long-winded world-destruction-plot-cum-sudoku-game ever, despite being moments from the bottom of Death&#8217;s downward escalator. Even Dick Dastardly would cut to the chase under such time pressure, I think.)</p>
<p>Given the way things have gone so far this season, I expect Jeff Goldblum to turn up soon (as Dr Suresh&#8217;s hitherto-unmentioned aristocratic half-clone, Machiavelli Petrelli) just so he can do a double-take when he sees Mohinder hanging from the rafters with his skin peeling off and cocoons everywhere, before mutating into a flying shark and jumping over the freshly-decapitated Henry Winkler. Whose scalp, it turns out, was tattooed at birth with the secret, missing formula for credibility. In Welsh.</p>
<p>As the plot gets ground into a deliciously gritty gruel by Ando&#8217;s cold, robotic heart (courtesy of Primatech&#8217;s Organ Lab and Cookware Salon on Level 51); after the writers have gone blind from hanging lanterns on everything; and after every <em>TOS</em> alumnus (except Shatner) has had a walk-on part, Patrick Stewart floats down on an Oceanic  parachute, says: &#8220;Computer, end program&#8221;,  and returns Our Heroes to the holo-jungle, bringing to an end another brain-poking, eye-twinkling season of <em>Star Trek: Mystery Island</em>.</p>
<p>But wait!</p>
<p>That sound, in the trees; is it&#8230;<em>banjos</em>?</p>
<p>That symbol, in the sky; is it&#8230;a <em>swastika</em>?</p>
<p>And that guy, in the tuxedo; is it&#8230;<em>Ricardo Montalban</em>?</p>
<p>Find out in&#8230;  <em>Volume Four: We don&#8217;t know what happened either.</em></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
