part 1/3

part 2/3

part 3/3

Related:

DOCUMENTARY – Monopoly Men, Federal Reserve Fraud, 1999

DOCUMENTARY – The Money Masters – How International Bankers Gained Control of America

VIDEO – Criminal Rothschilds

The History of the House of Rothschild

The New World Order (NWO): An Overview

History of the New World Order

There is a nice story developing in the $16.7 billion Kraft bid for Cadburys’. There are possibly four players in this deal to be, Cadbury, Hershey, Kraft and Ferrero.

And there are some big time names advising the players, Akeel Sachak of Rothschild, Byron Trott of BDT Capital Partners.

In my opinion Hershey does not have what it takes to out bid Kraft so Hershey would need to develop alternative strategies. Second, Cadbury & Hershey don’t mix, not yet anyway. They tried in 2007 and failed.

This is the case of the small fish swallowing the big fish as Hershey’s market capitalization is $8.3 billion, Cadbury’s $18.1 billion and Kraft’s is $39.4 billion.  So that tells us quite a few things:

1. Hershey views the Kraft’s Cadbury bid as a threat to its long term independence. That is if Hershey does not succeed it will soon be bought out by someone else.

2. Hershey’s does not have the global reach that Kraft and for that matter even Cadbury has. Hershey generates 93% of sale in North America, while Cadbury has 16%.

3. A Kraft purchase of Cadbury would turn Cadbury from friend to foe overnight, and one with a formidable distribution network in the United States.

4. Hershey’s 93% North American sales says that Hershey cannot compete overseas. Hershey needs Cadbury more than Kraft needs Cadbury. Don’t get me wrong. This is not about distribution networks even though that is important. If, like me you have lived on both sides of the Atlantic, you know American chocolates don’t cut it when compared to European chocolates. Hershey needs the branded recipe.

Hershey needs Cadbury and will pay more.

___________________________________________________________________

Disclosure: I’m a capitalist too, and my musings & opinions on this blog are for informational/educational purposes and part of my efforts to learn from the mistakes of other people. Hope you do, too. These musings are not to be taken as financial advise, and are based on data that is assumed to be correct. Therefore, my opinions are subject to change without notice. This blog is not intended to either negate or advocate any persons, entity, product, services or political position.

Contact: Ben Solomon, Managing Principal, QuantumRisk

___________________________________________________________________

Par Daniel Vanhove

Pour tout observateur attentif, rien de bien neuf dans les déclarations récentes de l’ensemble de la diplomatie occidentale à propos de la décision du président de l’autorité palestinienne Mahmoud Abbas de ne pas se représenter aux élections prochaines, prévues début 2010. Chacun y est allé de sa petite intervention – jusqu’à Shimon Pérès ! – pour inviter l’intéressé à revoir sa position.

Là où les représentants de nos divers gouvernements ont ignoré depuis des décennies, la détérioration toujours plus grave de la situation dans les Territoires occupés par Israël et tout particulièrement à Gaza, l’empressement à soutenir de manière presque unanime et encourager Mahmoud Abbas à se représenter à ces futures élections, devrait au minimum, nous interpeller.

En effet, comment comprendre que pendant des années, nos élus et leurs médias serviles n’ont cessé de mettre en exergue la corruption endémique et généralisée de l’appareil étatique palestinien jusqu’à son sommet ; n’ont cessé d’abandonner les leaders palestiniens à leur funeste sort ; n’ont cessé d’ignorer les multiples compromis acceptés par une population étranglée ; n’ont cessé d’encourager et soutenir les initiatives israéliennes de tous genres, y compris dans le laisser-faire du Mur d’apartheid, dans l’alliance du gouvernement avec l’extrême-droite, dans le blocus assassin de la Bande de Gaza, dans l’emprisonnement de parlementaires et de mineurs, dans la non-application des résolutions des Nations-unies et le non-respect du Droit international et humanitaire, etc… et d’assister au revirement soudain de ces mêmes élus trouvant aujourd’hui toutes les qualités à Mahmoud Abbas, pour qu’il reste à la tête d’un hypothétique Etat ? Comment comprendre une telle attitude, sinon que l’homme de l’ombre, le pâle représentant des Palestiniens, celui-là même qui parfois s’accrochait au cou d’Ehud Olmert pour l’embrasser est tellement consensuel, tellement faible qu’il convient parfaitement aux interlocuteurs israéliens en premier lieu et par ricochet à tous ceux qui soutiennent activement Israël dans la poursuite de sa politique profondément injuste, hors-la-loi et criminelle ?

A l’heure où Mahmoud Abbas se dirige peut-être vers la décision politique la plus courageuse de sa carrière, c’est la panique dans les chancelleries. Perdre un tel interlocuteur s’avère sans doute perdre un allié bien utile et fort peu encombrant. La décision est même interprétée par certains comme une manœuvre tactique visant à le rendre incontournable, indispensable, quelques mois avant les élections, lui assurant ainsi la certitude d’une réélection aisée et massivement soutenue de l’extérieur. Et puis, qui donc pourrait remplacer cet évanescent papy, si peu vindicatif, si peu déterminé, si policé et si soumis aux dictats qui lui sont imposés !? A 74 ans, la retraite volontaire de celui-là même qui fut l’un des artisans des moribonds Accords d’Oslo ne semble pas recevoir l’aval de ses interlocuteurs étrangers qui n’osent imaginer devoir faire face à un nouveau candidat dont on ne connaît pas encore le nom, ni la tête, et moins encore les intentions. Diable, que nous préparent encore ces imprévisibles insoumis !?…

Or, pour la population palestinienne qui a tout enduré depuis plus de soixante ans sans percevoir la moindre lueur dans l’avènement de son Etat, ces prochaines élections ne sont-elles pas une opportunité de faire table rase de tout ce qui a manifestement échoué ? Et d’en tirer les conclusions ? Puisque rien ni personne ne semble jamais convenir aux différents gouvernements israéliens : ni Yasser Arafat qui était trop ceci, ni Mahmoud Abbas qui est trop cela, ni Ismaïl Haniyeh qui n’est ni ceci ni cela tout en même temps ; qu’ils volent, pillent, emprisonnent et massacrent toujours plus leurs voisins au fil des ans ; qu’ils refusent obstinément l’arrêt de la colonisation et par leur comportement affichent une arrogance peu commune, peut-être est-ce le moment de remettre en cause le partage-même de ce qui fut décidé sans l’avis des premiers concernés, en 1947… et de dénoncer la solution choisie par les Etats dits démocratiques qui leur fut imposée, la déclarant caduque et impossible à réaliser de par l’intransigeance coloniale israélienne…

Et peut-être dans la foulée conviendrait-il de rappeler que finalement, le problème des pogroms puis du génocide des juifs pendant la dernière guerre mondiale était bien un problème européen qui ne concernait pas le Proche-Orient où ils vivaient tranquilles. Problème qui dès lors, ne devrait pas trouver sa solution sur le dos des Palestiniens qui aujourd’hui continuent à payer notre ardoise ! Et de suggérer aux Européens et leurs alliés de trouver sur leurs terres, un endroit pour l’établissement de l’Etat « juif » d’Israël. Ce sera l’occasion de voir si leur détermination au soutien d’un tel Etat déguisé en démocratie sera toujours aussi appuyée et inconditionnelle…

Ainsi, voilà bientôt deux ans, je proposais dans La Démocratie Mensonge, une solution à la question israélo-palestinienne, sous forme de « pensées interdites » :

« (…) Si l’on regarde l’Histoire humaine, rien n’y est jamais définitif. Tout est, là également, en constante évolution. Et tout particulièrement, les frontières délimitant les limites de tel ou tel pays. Il n’est qu’à jeter un œil sur les cartes géographiques d’antan. Celles d’aujourd’hui n’ont rien à voir avec celles d’hier ou d’avant hier. Et ne sont probablement pas à l’image de celles de demain. Transformées elles aussi, par la conjonction des forces qui les (re)dessinent. Et dans ce cas-là, les forces en question sont la volonté et les décisions des hommes et des femmes qui peuplent le monde et ses régions, et en modèlent, en modifient ses étendues et ses limites. Il ne faut pas remonter bien loin dans le passé pour en avoir des exemples : que ce soit en ex-URSS, en ex-Yougoslavie, en ex-Tchécoslovaquie pour ne parler que d’une Europe qui n’a de cesse de se redessiner, les récentes nouvelles frontières sont nombreuses. Et ne sont certainement pas définitives. Dans quelque temps, qu’adviendra-t-il du Kosovo, du Monténégro, de l’îlot russe de Kaliningrad enclavé en pays baltes eux-mêmes rattachés à l’Union européenne, du Kurdistan inscrit sur plusieurs pays, du Sahara occidental, ou du Tibet, … ? Bien malin qui pourrait en dessiner aujourd’hui les futures frontières.

Mais l’observation des faits scientifiques nous a appris aussi autre chose, d’essentiel : dans son évolution, l’univers a horreur du gaspillage d’énergie, étant entendu que rien ne se perd, rien ne se crée, tout se transforme. Pour une fois, essayons donc d’en tirer les leçons et de nous les appliquer.

Il n’y a pas si longtemps, au moment où quelques responsables juifs réclamaient une terre pour accueillir leur projet de foyer national, étaient envisagées trois éventualités : la Palestine, l’Argentine et l’Ouganda. Le choix s’est porté sur la Palestine, pour diverses raisons dont celle d’un retour à la Terre Promise… cette fadaise ! Aujourd’hui, plutôt que de continuer dans cette option qui paraît sans issue, dans cette obsession sanglante et meurtrière d’imposer les frontières du jeune Etat d’Israël au cœur de la Palestine historique dont les habitants n’ont jamais eu leur mot à dire sur cette décision, et d’en payer le prix le plus fort depuis 60 ans, pourquoi ne pas envisager une quatrième voie, plus économe à tout point de vue ? En outre, dans l’esprit de la « globalisation » où tout est bon à n’importe quelle entreprise pour améliorer ses marges bénéficiaires par l’entremise de la délocalisation, l’idée s’inscrit tout à fait dans l’air du temps…

De toutes les manières, plus les années passent, plus la domination d’Israël sur la région semble comptée. Depuis 1967, à l’inverse de ce qui apparaît au premier coup d’œil, l’Etat israélien a perdu une partie du terrain volé à ses voisins. Il a rétrocédé le Sinaï à l’Egypte, a quitté la majeure partie du Sud Liban, s’est retiré de Gaza, et devra tôt ou tard négocier le Golan syrien… avant d’entamer des pourparlers au sujet des nombreuses colonies implantées en Cisjordanie dont on sait que toutes sont illégales.

Son recours à une oppression féroce sur ce qui lui reste en est d’autant plus brutale : les Palestiniens en font les frais chaque jour… avant, sans doute, l’implosion de l’Etat israélien sous sa forme actuelle, condamné à disparaître par la définition même de ses statuts racistes et de ses pratiques d’apartheid impossibles à perpétuer éternellement dans un monde qui prône la « démocratie » comme modèle…

L’Algérie a résisté pendant plus de 130 ans à l’occupation française… Même dans un infernal quotidien, les Palestiniens savent avoir encore du temps devant eux… et il est fort improbable que les pays arabes voisins acceptent la disparition du 3ème lieu saint de l’Islam à Jérusalem, au seul profit du judaïsme…

Ainsi, puisqu’il est établi que les Etats-Unis soutiennent inconditionnellement et, envers et contre tout, le gouvernement et le peuple israéliens, pourquoi ne pas offrir à ces derniers, l’un des plus grands espaces qui soit – la superficie des USA est de 9.630.000 km² et celle d’Israël de 20.770 km², soit moins de 0,25 % du territoire américain – en leur permettant d’y édifier leur Etat ? Les espaces désertiques ne manquent pas dans le Sud-Ouest des USA et quelques grands déserts pourraient bien accueillir ceux qui semblent avoir un penchant atavique pour la chose.

Avec les techniques actuelles, nul doute qu’il soit possible de déménager les quelques vieilles pierres restantes du Mur des Lamentations… Et si vraiment cela ne pouvait être envisagé par crainte de dommages irréversibles au site historique, ou par respect pour ceux qui désireraient rester à Jérusalem, ainsi que pour le tourisme qui retrouverait-là son affluence d’antan, on pourrait assurément compter sur les techniciens d’Hollywood pour effectuer de parfaits décors de la Ville Sainte, plus vrais que nature ! Et pourquoi pas, envisager jusqu’à la reconstruction totale du Temple de Salomon qui trônerait alors, dans toute sa splendeur, au centre d’une nouvelle capitale, baptisée New-Jerusalem !?

Ce serait tout avantage pour les Israéliens : ils ne seraient pas trop dépaysés par l’environnement naturel ; seraient directement sous l’aile protectrice et satellitaire de leur bienfaiteur ; ne devraient plus utiliser leur argutie habituelle de peurs paranoïaques alimentées par la présence d’Arabes et de musulmans innombrables à leurs frontières ; n’auraient plus besoin d’un budget militaire exponentiel pour garantir la paix avec leurs voisins, ce qui leur permettrait de se pencher sur le problème réel de la pauvreté dans le pays ; n’auraient plus à vivre en état de stress permanent parce qu’ils seraient mieux abrités d’éventuelles attaques suicides ; pourraient se livrer sans limite à leur occupation favorite, à savoir, l’extension de leur territoire, etc… Le colossal budget militaire ainsi économisé pourrait servir à édifier très rapidement les infrastructures modernes dont ils bénéficient aujourd’hui, et pourrait en outre être consacré aux soins psychologiques indispensables pour soigner les nombreuses névroses d’une grande majorité de citoyens.

Enfin, comble de bonheur, ils seraient proches du Saint des Saints puisque le souffle divin traverse aussi le Président yankee [à l’époque du président Bush- ndlr], qui conduit désormais le monde de vision en vision… Comme on peut le voir, là également, point de dépaysement…

La région du Moyen-Orient serait finalement libérée de l’une de ses tensions majeures. La Communauté internationale serait définitivement débarrassée de l’un de ses plus épineux problèmes puisque le cas échéant, tout problème israélien deviendrait interne aux Etats-Unis. Là également, que d’économies d’argent et d’énergie ! Le calme reviendrait sans doute dans l’ensemble de la région. Ainsi peut-être que sur les cours pétroliers. Le nouveau Moyen-Orient ainsi reconstitué pourrait être sécurisé d’Est en Ouest et du Nord au Sud et nettoyé de tout danger nucléaire, y compris en Iran. Et les peuples libérés pourraient enfin se consacrer à l’essentiel. Ce qui au vu des dégâts à tous niveaux, éliminerait le chômage et assurerait du travail pour tous, pendant des décennies entières. Nous serions en Europe, soulagés des interventions indigestes des prétentieux de salons, politologues incompétents, journalistes verbeux, « spécialistes » pédants, etc… Et chacun de nous pourrait en définitive, consacrer son temps à autre chose.

Quand on voit les milliards engloutis, dans la conquête spatiale pour les armes sophistiquées des uns, dans la reconstruction et l’aide humanitaire sans fin des autres, sans compter les coûts indécents d’une diplomatie inopérante de tous, en termes strictement économiques, l’impact d’un tel plan serait i-ni-ma-gi-na-ble ! Au lieu d’entraîner les forces vives du pays dans leurs guerres ruineuses, les Etats-Unis pourraient booster leur économie de façon vertigineuse. Les places boursières s’envoleraient. Et leur image extérieure retrouverait une blancheur (presque) immaculée.

Plutôt que de renouveler sans cesse des promesses jamais tenues à propos d’un futur Etat palestinien, celui-ci pourrait éclore dans ses limites historiques, et la place libérée par une partie de la communauté juive permettrait d’y accueillir tous les réfugiés entassés dans les pays voisins qui, eux aussi, seraient débarrassés d’un douloureux problème à l’intérieur de leurs frontières… Tous les Israéliens, juifs ou non, qui le désirent pourraient rester en Palestine et cohabiter sereinement avec leurs compatriotes arabes, musulmans, chrétiens ou laïcs, comme c’était le cas par le passé, ainsi que dans nombre de pays de par le monde.

De son côté, le nouvel Israël pourrait négocier son rattachement comme 51ème Etat aux cinquante actuels qui forment les Etats-Unis d’Amérique. Il serait ainsi, enfin reconnu par toutes les Nations, y compris par les Etats arabes les plus réticents, dans son « droit d’exister »…

L’ensemble des anciennes Résolutions des Nations Unies seraient déclarées caduques et une nouvelle ère de réelle prospérité s’ouvrirait pour chacun. Bref, ce serait la paix pour tous, dans le meilleur des mondes… Cela s’avèrerait une véritable manne céleste, proche du miracle… Mais, quoi de plus naturel, pour le peuple élu dont les plus convaincus n’ont de cesse de répéter qu’ils sont en dialogue direct avec Dieu !? (…) »

Daniel Vanhove : Observateur civil – Membre du MCP (Mouvement Citoyen Palestine)/ La Démocratie Mensonge, Ed. Marco Pietteur – coll. Oser Dire, 2008. Chez le même éditeur : « Si vous détruisez nos maisons vous ne détruirez pas nos âmes. Palestine, descente aux enfers », 2004 et Retour de Palestine, éd. Vista 2002.

by The Historian
Published: Nov. 26, 2009 – Open Your Eyes News

Over the next few weeks decisions will be made by a small group of elite people. Their actions will usher in a new dystopian world order where one of the very building blocks of life, carbon, is demonized, and in doing so will create a massive windfall for banking corporations, and to a lesser degree government coffers – all at your expense. This monumental event will be taking place at the Copenhagen Summit on Climate Change. It is being chaired by Lykke Friis a member of the elite Trilateral Commission. She is replacing Connie Hedegaard (a Bilderberg Group member) who has been nominated for the post of the European Union’s first climate commissioner. They will be joined by politicians from around the world who will pledge to “fight climate change”. In the la la land of the modern mass media this is being presented as mankind’s last great hope to avert environmental catastrophe. The same media is now cranking up the fear factor with a torrent of ever more alarmist climate stories, and torrent that will reach a crescendo just as the summit starts. Just look in your newspaper today, or switch on the TV or radio news, and I guarantee that you will have at least one story, and probably multiple, about melting ice caps, drowning polar bears, hurricane prevalence or droughts.

However it is all a monumental lie. As events this week have shown with the leaking of the so called “climate-gate” e-mails, there are vested interests at work, and they have been working towards this for decades, manipulating data, manipulating opinion, and perverting science for their own ends. A lie that will affect every single human on this planet, including you. This will be the dawn of a new world order. But not a Utopian ecologically sound future, but a dark anti-human future run on behalf of a global elite and the mega-corporations. A future of clima-fascism. This is happening right here, right now. The Reichstag is on fire. The time to take a stand is rapidly fading.

What Copenhagen is, is primarily the ability for the banks to create a multi-trillion dollar a year industry of carbon trading literally out of thin air. It is no coincidence that the main recipients on the UK & US bailouts over the last years were the mega banks. It is no coincidence that Al Gore is set to become a billionaire through his Lehman Brothers funded carbon trading venture. It is no coincidence that every single member of Obama’s cabinet is from Wall Street, a very large proportion from the biggest bank of them all Goldman Sachs. It is no coincidence that the man tasked with dragging the Australian Opposition Liberal Party over the line with Australia’s anti-CO2 tax legislation, Malcolm Turnbull, is an ex-Goldman Sachs Partner. It is no coincidence that senior members of both main UK political parties holiday with the Rothschild’s each year George Osborne & Peter Mandleson). It is no wonder that every single leader of major Western countries is either a Bilderberg attendee, a member of the Trilateral Commission, or a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

The fringe benefits of all anti-CO2 legislation for the elite will include: an ever more vociferous depopulation agenda; a continuing ignoring of the world’s real environmental problems so not to harm corporate interests; the ever deeper split between the 3 billion haves, and 3 billion have not’s; new anti-CO2 taxes all round which are less unpopular to introduce for politicians than the usual taxes; and proof once and for all that the proletariat will believe and buy anything if you scare the hell out of them and you control the information coming out of the system.

But don’t just accept my word for it, or even all the hundred’s of mainstream news articles linked here. Just look at the whole central tenets of the theory of anthropomorphic climate change, and how the system around you works, and make a Rational Questioning of Received Wisdom. Do you agree that:

• CO2 makes up a total of 0.038% of the Earth’s atmosphere? (put another way that is just 38 centimetres in a kilometre)
• The sun’s output varies constantly as it goes through long (thousands of years) and short (11 year) cycles?
• The sun provides (on average) 1,367 watts per square metre of energy to the Earth’s atmosphere and is the source of all our energy and light?
• The average human exhales 329kg of CO2 annually while breathing?
• The Earth’s climate has been considerably hotter and considerably colder throughout the Earth’s (and mankind’s) history, and that likewise CO2 levels have been historically considerably higher and lower in the past?
• The Earth’s climate has actually been cooling over the last decade per NASA’s own data.
• The worldwide carbon trading market is predicted to worth in excess of two trillion US dollars annually to certain banks and corporations, and worth billions in tax revenues for Governments worldwide?
• A corporations primary legal duty is to return profit to its shareholders, and not for the betterment of mankind? (this includes the banks)
• The world’s media is funded, directly or indirectly (advertising), by banks, corporations or Governments?
• The majority of scientific research in all fields is funded by Government grants or Corporate grants?
• Excluding computer modelling of CO2 impact, mankind is definitely adversely affecting the earth’s closed eco-system through, amongst others, oceanic plastic pollution, deforestation, over-fishing, chemicals in the water table, smoke haze, and habitat destruction, and yet the actions being proposed will barely address any in even the smallest of ways?

If you have answered Yes to all, or the majority, of these, then you must rationally also question the received wisdom and motives of 99% of the “environmental” stories that the media & opinion formers put out on a daily basis. There can never be definitive right or wrong but on the balance of probabilities what does the rational You think is the most likely?

As I said before this is happening right here, right now. The Reichstag is on fire. The time to take a stand is rapidly fading. If you agree then take a stand and make a difference and forward this onto everyone in your address book. Our only to restore reason is to all take a stand. Are you with me?

Source: http://www.openyoureyesnews.com/editorials-opinions/editorial-26-november-2009/

Related:

UN´s Copenhagen Conference on Climate Change: Communist World Government without Steaks and Global Unity Religion without God

Thatcher adviser: Copenhagen goal is One World Government

Al Gore Set To Become First “Carbon Billionaire” (With Videos)

PRESENTATION – Lord Christopher Monckton Speaking at Bethel University on Global Warming

New World Order I: World Communism, Club of Rome Tells G20

New World Order II. The Ruling Class and World Governance Are Our Nations´ Treason Against Us

DOCUMENTARY – Global Warming or Global Governance? – (83 min.)

Copenhagen Treaty: Premises and Motivations (With Videos)

DOCUMENTARY – The Great Global Warming Swindle – 2007 – (75 mins.)

VIDEO – Environ-Mentalism: A New Religion for a New Age

Copenhagen, Carbon Emissions and World Government

Lord Monckton on Climategate: ‘They Are Criminals’ (With Video)

Gore’s Manipulation Allowed By Mainstream Media Climate Change Bias – Continues With CRU (With Video)

Global Dictatorship Based on the EU Model

Continued in “Comments”

Par Régis Mex, pour Mecanopolis

article rédigé le 16 mars 2009

G20, sommet de l’OTAN… La crise économique mondiale accélère un processus entamé il y a déjà fort longtemps. La pression sur les États va encore s’accentuer, dans les prochaines semaines, afin qu’ils participent à de nouveaux « plans de sauvetages », aussi inutiles qu’onéreux. Lorsqu’ils crouleront sous le poids des dettes et seront menacé de faillite, le « nouvel ordre mondial » pourra s’imposer de lui même. L’histoire du monde nous démontre que les mécanismes de la manipulation sont toujours les mêmes et qu’ils s’étalent presque au grand jour, pour ceux qui se donnent la peine de garder les yeux ouverts.

DIALOGUES AUX ENFERS ENTRE MACHIAVEL ET MONTESQUIEU

Dans le Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu (1864), Maurice Joly (1829-1878) décrit – sous couvert d’une discussion philosophique entre Machiavel et Montesquieu, personnages qu’il a réuni de manière fictive, sur les fins de la politique – comment Napoléon III a manipulé les milieux économiques, la presse, l’opinion publique, les syndicats, les milieux ouvriers, le peuple, etc, pour établir les bases solides d’un pouvoir qu’on pourrait qualifier de totalitaire. Selon l’auteur, l’empereur a fait du peuple français un peuple d’esclaves, oublieux de sa liberté et consentant à tous les asservissements.

Puisque je trouve les caractéristiques d’un gouvernement totalitaire admirablement décrites dans cette oeuvre, je vous propose ce recueil d’extraits que j’ai commenté. Vous serez sans doute surpris de voir à quel point de nombreux critères correspondent à merveille avec notre société actuelle, et à quel point les mécanismes du despotisme sont intemporels et ne changent que par la forme à travers le temps, jamais en substance. D’où l’intérêt de connaître le passé pour comprendre le présent.

Prologue:

« Machiavel :

L’instinct mauvais chez l’homme est plus puissant que le bon. L’homme a plus d’entraînement vers le mal que vers le bien ; la crainte et la force ont sur lui plus d’empire que la raison. Les hommes aspirent tous à la domination, et il n’en est point qui ne fût oppresseur, s’il le pouvait ; tous ou presque tous sont prêts à sacrifier les droits d’autrui à leurs intérêts. Qui contient entre eux ces animaux dévorants qu’on appelle les hommes ? A l’origine des sociétés, c’est la force brutale et sans frein ; plus tard, c’est la loi, c’est-à-dire encore la force, réglée par des formes.

Sous certaines latitudes de l’Europe, il y a des peuples incapables de modération dans l’exercice de la liberté. Si la liberté s’y prolonge, elle se transforme en licence ; la guerre civile ou sociale arrive, et l’État est perdu, soit qu’il se fractionne et se démembre par l’effet de ses propres convulsions, soit que ses divisions le rendent la proie de l’étranger. Dans des conditions pareilles, les peuples préfèrent le despotisme à l’anarchie ; ont-ils tort ? Les États une fois constitués ont deux sortes d’ennemis : les ennemis du dedans et les ennemis du dehors. Quelles armes emploieront-ils en guerre contre les étrangers ? Les deux généraux ennemis se communiqueront-ils réciproquement leurs plans de campagne pour se mettre mutuellement en état de se défendre ? S’interdiront-ils les attaques nocturnes, les pièges, les embuscades, les batailles en nombre de troupes inégal ? Non, sans doute, n’est-ce pas ? et de pareils combattants apprêteraient à rire. Et ces pièges, ces artifices, toute cette stratégie indispensable à la guerre, vous ne voulez pas qu’on l’emploie contre les ennemis du dedans, contre les factieux ?

Sans doute, on y mettra moins de rigueur ; mais, au fond, les règles seront les mêmes. Est-il possible de conduire par la raison pure des masses violentes qui ne se meuvent que par des sentiments, des passions et des préjugés ? Je vous l’ai dit tout à l’heure, et je le maintiens, même en présence de l’histoire contemporaine : tous les pouvoirs souverains ont eu la force pour origine, ou, ce qui est la même chose, la négation du droit. Ce mot de droit lui-même, d’ailleurs, ne voyez-vous pas qu’il est d’un vague infini ? Où commence-t-il, où finit-il ? Quand le droit existera-t-il, et quand n’existera-t-il pas ? Dans les États, le principe du droit est dominé par celui de l’intérêt. Abstraitement parlant, la violence et l’astuce sont-elles un mal ? Oui ; mais il faudra bien les employer pour gouverner les hommes, tant que les hommes ne seront pas des anges.

Tout est bon ou mauvais, suivant l’usage qu’on en fait et le fruit que l’on en tire ; la fin justifie les moyens : et maintenant si vous me demandez pourquoi, moi républicain, je donne partout la préférence au gouvernement absolu, je vous dirai que, témoin dans ma patrie de l’inconstance et de la lâcheté de la populace, de son goût inné pour la servitude, de son incapacité à concevoir et à respecter les conditions de la vie libre ; c’est à mes yeux une force aveugle qui se dissout tôt ou tard, si elle n’est dans la main d’un seul homme ; je réponds que le peuple, livré à lui-même, ne saura que se détruire ; qu’il ne saura jamais administrer, ni juger, ni faire la guerre. Je vous dirai que la Grèce n’a brillé que dans les éclipses de la liberté ; que sans le despotisme de l’aristocratie romaine, et que, plus tard, sans le despotisme des empereurs, l’éclatante civilisation de l’Europe ne se fût jamais développée.Chercherai-je mes exemples dans les États modernes ? Ils sont si frappants et si nombreux…

Montesquieu :

Vous conviendrez cependant que, quand il s’agit de gouvernement, il faut aboutir à des principes. Vous ne faites aucune place, dans votre politique, ni à la morale, ni à la religion, ni au droit ; vous n’avez à la bouche que deux mots : la force et l’astuce. Si votre système se réduit à dire que la force joue un grand rôle dans les affaires humaines, que l’habileté est une qualité nécessaire à l’homme d’État, vous comprenez bien que c’est là une vérité qui n’a pas besoin de démonstration ; mais ; si vous érigez la violence en principe, l’astuce en maxime de gouvernement ; si vous ne tenez compte dans vos calculs d’aucune des lois de l’humanité, le code de la tyrannie n’est plus que le code de la brute, car les animaux aussi sont adroits et forts, et il n’y a, en effet, parmi eux d’autre droit que celui de la force brutale. Ce n’est pas seulement au nom de l’intérêt, c’est au nom du devoir qu’agissent tous les oppresseurs. Ils le violent, mais ils l’invoquent ; la doctrine de l’intérêt est donc aussi impuissante à elle seule que les moyens qu’elle emploie. »

Commentaire :

Cet extrait des Dialogues issu du prologue met les choses à leur place d’une manière objective: si le gouvernement est coupable de bien des vices, ses fondations reflètent la nature de peuples. En effet, comme le dit le proverbe, « on a les politiciens que l’on mérite », et il me semble particulièrement intéressant de constater, lorsque l’on remonte aux sources des causes de la perversité de nos gouvernements, que beaucoup de mesures moralement contestables que ces derniers sont forcés de mettre en place sont dues à l’irresponsabilité et à la méchanceté des peuples. Il me semble, d’ailleurs, que l’extrait est suffisamment éloquent à ce sujet. Le problème est que, comme le souligne Montesquieu, les gouvernements auront tendance à s’égarer dans la force, à négliger le bien de ses sujets, et à ne favoriser que les intérêts du « prince » (souverain) et ses proches. La solution ne se trouverait donc pas dans un système, puisque tous devront user de moyens douteux à un instant ou à un autre de leur existence, mais bien dans l’attitude des dirigeants; il ne faut pas qu’ils s’égarent sur la voie de la facilité et estiment leurs citoyens comme un troupeau de bétail qui n’a d’autre utilité que celle d’être exploité. Ils doivent, au contraire, être conscients que si les peuples manquent de responsabilité, ils doivent être ceux qui les guideront pour les amener à s’améliorer, comme un parent bienveillant éduque son enfant. Hélas, nous savons tous que les gouvernements de notre temps (et ceux d’une écrasante majorité à travers l’histoire, d’ailleurs) empruntent la voie inverse, et ont bien peu de scrupules moraux et philosophiques. Mais il n’empêche que nous ne devons pas être aveugle et ne voir que leurs fautes; nous devons aussi avoir un regard introspectif et admettre la responsabilité de la collectivité, ce qui, je pense, se fait bien trop rarement de notre temps, alors que l’on ne peut arriver à un vision juste des choses en l’absence de la considération de ce point.

« Machiavel :

Ici, je vous arrête ; vous faites une part à l’intérêt, cela suffit pour justifier toutes les nécessités politiques qui ne sont pas d’accord avec le droit.

Montesquieu:

C’est la raison d’État que vous invoquez. Remarquez donc que je ne puis pas donner pour base aux sociétés précisément ce qui les détruit. Au nom de l’intérêt, les princes et les peuples, comme les citoyens, ne commettront que des crimes. L’intérêt de l’État, dites-vous ! Mais comment reconnaîtrai-je s’il lui est réellement profitable de commettre telle ou telle iniquité ? Ne savons-nous pas que l’intérêt de l’État, c’est le plus souvent l’intérêt du prince en particulier, ou celui des favoris corrompus qui l’entourent ?

Vous ne songez donc pas qu’avec des maximes pareilles, il n’y a pas de société qui puisse vivre ; vous croyez que le sujet tiendra longtemps ses serments quand il verra le souverain les trahir ; qu’il respectera les lois quand il saura que celui qui les lui a données les a violées, et qu’il les viole tous les jours ; vous croyez qu’il hésitera dans la voie de la violence, de la corruption et de la fraude, quand il y verra marcher sans cesse ceux qui sont chargés de le conduire ? Détrompez-vous ; sachez que chaque usurpation du prince dans le domaine de la chose publique autorise une infraction semblable dans la sphère du sujet ; que chaque perfidie politique engendre une perfidie sociale ; que chaque violence en haut légitime une violence en bas. Voilà pour ce qui regarde les citoyens entre eux.

Pour ce qui les regarde dans leurs rapports avec les gouvernants, je n’ai pas besoin de vous dire que c’est la guerre civile introduite à l’état de ferment, au sein de la société. Le silence du peuple n’est que la trêve du vaincu, pour qui la plainte est un crime. Attendez qu’il se réveille : vous avez inventé la théorie de la force ; soyez sûr qu’il l’a retenue. Au premier jour, il rompra ses chaînes ; il les rompra sous le prétexte le plus futile peut-être, et il reprendra par la force ce que la force lui a arraché.

La maxime du despotisme, c’est le perinde ac cadaver des jésuites ; tuer ou être tué : voilà sa loi ; c’est l’abrutissement aujourd’hui, la guerre civile demain.

Sans doute, les orages de la liberté existeront toujours, et il se commettra encore bien des crimes en son nom : mais le fatalisme politique n’existe plus. Si vous avez pu dire, dans votre temps, que le despotisme était un mal nécessaire, vous ne le pourriez pas aujourd’hui, car, dans l’état actuel des mœurs et des institutions politiques chez les principaux peuples de l’Europe, le despotisme est devenu impossible. »

Commentaire :

Ici, nous retrouvons ce que nous avons laissé entendre précédemment en plus approfondi; les citoyens créent une entité qui leur ressemble par sa nature, l’État, qui constitue l’autorité. Mais l’autorité influence toujours, voire façonne entièrement, le caractère de ce qui dépend d’elle. Donc, si l’autorité est vertueuse, la morale des citoyens aura tendance à s’améliorer, et inversément si elle est vicieuse. De là découle toute l’importance de ce que les dirigeants assument les mauvais aspects qui existent naturellement, et tentent d’améliorer la situation, plutôt que de se complaire égoïste dans l’état imparfait des choses, en ne se souciant guère du bien commun.

« Machiavel :

Impossible ?… Si vous parvenez à me prouver cela, je consens à faire un pas dans le sens de vos idées.

Montesquieu :

Je vais vous le prouver très-facilement, si vous voulez bien me suivre encore.

Machiavel :

Très-volontiers, mais prenez garde ; je crois que vous vous engagez beaucoup. Je me propose de démolir, pièce à pièce, toutes les belles choses que vous venez de dire, et de vous démontrer que ce sont mes doctrines seules qui l’emportent même aujourd’hui, malgré les nouvelles idées, malgré les nouvelles mœurs, malgré vos prétendus principes de droit public, malgré toutes les institutions dont vous venez de me parler.

Machiavel :

En écoutant vos théories sur la division des pouvoirs et sur les bienfaits que lui doivent les peuples de l’Europe, je ne pouvais m’empêcher d’admirer, Montesquieu, à quel point l’illusion des systèmes peut s’emparer des plus grands esprits. A la première occasion, le mouvement se produira par la rupture d’un des ressorts que vous avez si soigneusement forgés. Croyez-vous que les pouvoirs resteront longtemps dans les limites constitutionnelles que vous leur avez assignées, et qu’ils ne parviendront pas à les franchir ? Quelle est l’assemblée législative indépendante qui n’aspirera pas à la souveraineté ? Quelle est la magistrature qui ne fléchira pas au gré de l’opinion ? Quel est le prince, surtout, souverain d’un royaume ou chef d’une république, qui acceptera sans réserve le rôle passif auquel vous l’aurez condamné ; qui, dans le secret de sa pensée, ne méditera pas le renversement des pouvoirs rivaux qui gênent son action ? En réalité, vous aurez mis aux prises toutes les forces contraires, suscité toutes les entreprises, donné des armes à tous les partis. Vous aurez livré le pouvoir à l’assaut de toutes les ambitions, et fait de l’État une arène où se déchaîneront les factions. Dans peu de temps, ce sera le désordre partout ; d’intarissables rhéteurs transformeront en joutes oratoires les assemblées délibérantes ; d’audacieux journalistes, d’effrénés pamphlétaires attaqueront tous les jours la personne du souverain, discréditeront le gouvernement, les ministres, les hommes en place…

Dans vos calculs, vous n’avez compté qu’avec des minorités sociales. Il y a des populations gigantesques rivées au travail par la pauvreté, comme elles l’étaient autrefois par l’esclavage. Qu’importent, je vous le demande, à leur bonheur toutes vos fictions parlementaires ? Votre grand mouvement politique n’a abouti, en définitive, qu’au triomphe d’une minorité privilégiée par le hasard comme l’ancienne noblesse l’était par la naissance. Qu’importe au prolétaire courbé sur son labeur, accablé sous le poids de sa destinée, que quelques orateurs aient le droit de parler, que quelques journalistes aient le droit d’écrire ? Vous avez créé des droits qui resteront éternellement pour la masse du peuple à l’état de pure faculté, puisqu’il ne saurait s’en servir. Ces droits, dont la loi lui reconnaît la jouissance idéale et dont la nécessité lui refuse l’exercice réel, ne sont pour lui qu’une ironie amère de sa destinée. Je vous réponds qu’un jour il les prendra en haine, et qu’il les détruira de sa main pour se confier au despotisme. Le tempérament de vos institutions est de donner plus de force à l’aristocratie qu’au peuple, plus de force au prince qu’à l’aristocratie, proportionnant ainsi les pouvoirs à la capacité politique de ceux qui doivent les exercer.

Le peuple, par une conséquence absolument inévitable, s’emparera, un jour ou l’autre, de tous les pouvoirs dont on a reconnu que le principe était en lui. Sera-ce pour les garder ? Non. Après quelques jours de folie, il les jettera, par lassitude, au premier soldat de fortune qui se trouvera sur son chemin. Dans votre pays, vous avez vu, en 1793, comment les coupe-têtes français ont traité la monarchie représentative : le peuple souverain s’est affirmé par le supplice de son roi, puis il a fait litière de tous ses droits ; il s’est donné à Robespierre, à Barras, à Bonaparte.

Vous êtes un grand penseur, mais vous ne connaissez pas l’inépuisable lâcheté des peuples ; je ne dis pas de ceux de mon temps, mais de ceux du vôtre ; rampants devant la force, sans pitié devant la faiblesse, implacables pour des fautes, indulgents pour des crimes, incapables de supporter les contrariétés d’un régime libre, et patients jusqu’au martyre pour toutes les violences du despotisme audacieux, brisant les trônes dans des moments de colère, et se donnant des maîtres à qui ils pardonnent des attentats pour le moindre desquels ils auraient décapité vingt rois constitutionnels.

Cherchez donc la justice ; cherchez le droit, la stabilité, l’ordre, le respect des formes si compliquées de votre mécanisme parlementaire avec des masses violentes, indisciplinées, incultes, auxquelles vous avez dit : Vous êtes le droit, vous êtes les maîtres, vous êtes les arbitres de l’État ! Ce que vous savez, ainsi que moi, du passé, m’autorise, dès à présent, à dire que le principe de la souveraineté populaire est destructif de toute stabilité, qu’il consacre indéfiniment le droit des révolutions. Il met les sociétés en guerre ouverte contre tous les pouvoirs humains et même contre Dieu ; il est l’incarnation même de la force. Il fait du peuple une brute féroce qui s’endort quand elle est repue de sang, et qu’on enchaîne ; et voici la marche invariable que suivent alors les sociétés dont le mouvement est réglé sur ce principe : la souveraineté populaire engendre la démagogie, la démagogie engendre l’anarchie, l’anarchie ramène au despotisme. Le despotisme, pour vous, c’est la barbarie. Eh bien, vous voyez que les peuples retournent à la barbarie par le chemin de la civilisation.

Mais ce n’est pas tout, et je prétends qu’à d’autres points de vue encore le despotisme est la seule forme de gouvernement qui soit réellement appropriée à l’état social des peuples modernes, car, avec vos grands États, qui ne vivent plus que par l’industrie ; avec vos populations sans Dieu et sans foi, dans des temps où les peuples ne se satisfont plus par la guerre, et où leur activité violente se reporte nécessairement au dedans, la liberté, avec les principes qui lui servent de fondement, ne peut être qu’une cause de dissolution et de ruine. De la lassitude des idées et du choc des révolutions sont sorties des sociétés froides et désabusées qui sont arrivées à l’indifférence en politique comme en religion, qui n’ont plus d’autre stimulant que les jouissances matérielles, qui ne vivent plus que par l’intérêt, qui n’ont d’autre culte que l’or, dont les moeurs mercantiles le disputent à celles des juifs qu’ils ont pris pour modèles. Croyez-vous que ce soit par amour de la liberté en elle-même que les classes inférieures essayent de monter à l’assaut du pouvoir ? C’est par haine de ceux qui possèdent ; au fond, c’est pour leur arracher leurs richesses, instrument des jouissances qu’ils envient.

Ceux qui possèdent implorent de tous les côtés un bras énergique, un pouvoir fort ; ils ne lui demandent qu’une chose, c’est de protéger l’État contre des agitations auxquelles sa constitution débile ne pourrait résister, de leur donner à eux-mêmes la sécurité nécessaire pour qu’ils puissent jouir et faire leurs affaires. Quelles formes de gouvernement voulez vous appliquer à des sociétés où la corruption s’est glissée partout, où la fortune ne s’acquiert que par les surprises de la fraude, où la morale n’a plus de garantie que dans les lois répressives, où le sentiment de la patrie lui-même s’est éteint dans je ne sais quel cosmopolitisme universel ? Je ne vois de salut pour ces sociétés, véritables colosses aux pieds d’argile, que dans l’institution d’une centralisation à outrance, qui mette toute la force publique à la disposition de ceux qui gouvernent « 

Commentaire :

Il y a peu à redire là-dessus, si ce n’est que, après 145 ans, ce texte reste d’une grande actualité. Il est effectivement saisissant de constater à quel point des passages tels que ceux qui sont surlignés restent valables, et sont sans doute même bien plus vrai qu’à l’époque; les masses de travaux qui ont continué à écraser bien des hommes malgré l’abolition de l’esclavage sont effectivement une poursuite de ce dernier dans une autre forme, surtout aujourd’hui où tout est si bien réglementé et où tant de personnes sont assommées par le crédit que l’on n’a d’autre choix que de suivre une route toute tracée et qui se présente en simulacre de liberté.

La propension qu’ont les hommes à se reposer sur la force de quelqu’un d’autre, et ainsi à leur confier tant de responsabilités qu’ils rendent pour ainsi dire quelqu’un d’autre maître de leur vie, est aussi très bien illustrée dans ce dernier extrait. Mais l’élément le plus frappant est encore, à mon sens, ces sociétés indifférentes aux valeurs essentielles et obsédées par les jouissances matérielles dont parle Maurice Joly, presque prophétiquement, lorsqu’on voit à quel point ces aspects se sont développés et empirés aujourd’hui. Les moeurs ont effectivement été très bousculées, au point que tout ce qui pourrait s’opposer vertueusement aux dérives matérialistes, comme l’idée même de Dieu, est systématiquement renié sans un semblant de réflexion, ce qui engendre un extrême avilissement des peuples occidentaux consommateurs, et les poussent dans l’acception systématique de leurs pulsions primaires et animales, ce qui ne les rend que bien plus simples à contrôler et manipuler, puisque leurs facultés intellectuelles tombent en désuétude.

« Machiavel :

Avec des sociétés nouvelles, il faut employer des procédés nouveaux. Il ne s’agit pas aujourd’hui, pour gouverner, de commettre des iniquités violentes, de décapiter ses ennemis, de dépouiller ses sujets de leurs biens, de prodiguer les supplices ; non, la mort, la spoliation et les tourments physiques ne peuvent jouer qu’un rôle assez secondaire dans la politique intérieure des États modernes. Il s’agit moins aujourd’hui de violenter les hommes que de les désarmer, de comprimer leurs passions politiques que de les effacer, de combattre leurs instincts que de les tromper, de proscrire leurs idées que de leur donner le change en se les appropriant.

Le principal secret du gouvernement consiste à affaiblir l’esprit public, au point de le désintéresser complétement des idées et des principes avec lesquels on fait aujourd’hui les révolutions. Dans tous les temps, les peuples comme les hommes se sont payés de mots. Les apparences leur suffisent presque toujours ; ils n’en demandent pas plus. On peut donc établir des institutions factices qui répondent à un langage et à des idées également factices ; il faut avoir le talent de ravir aux partis cette phraséologie libérale, dont ils s’arment contre le gouvernement. Il faut en saturer les peuples jusqu’à la lassitude, jusqu’au dégoût. On parle souvent aujourd’hui de la puissance de l’opinion, je vous montrerai qu’on lui fait exprimer ce qu’on veut quand on connaît bien les ressorts cachés du pouvoir. Mais avant de songer à la diriger, il faut l’étourdir, la frapper d’incertitude par d’étonnantes contradictions, opérer sur elle d’incessantes diversions, l’éblouir par toutes sortes de mouvements divers, l’égarer insensiblement dans ses voies. Un des grands secrets du jour est de savoir s’emparer des préjugés et des passions populaires, de manière à introduire une confusion de principes qui rend toute entente impossible entre ceux qui parlent la même langue et ont les mêmes intérêts.

Le prince devra s’attacher avant tout à détruire les partis, à dissoudre les forces collectives partout où elles existent, à paralyser dans toutes ses manifestations l’initiative individuelle ; ensuite le niveau des caractères descendra de lui-même, et tous les bras molliront bientôt contre la servitude. Le pouvoir absolu ne sera plus un accident, il deviendra un besoin. Les moyens d’action du despotisme, les plus puissants peut-être, seront précisément ceux que l’on aura le talent d’emprunter à ce même régime industriel qui fait votre admiration. »

Commentaire :

Nous retrouvons ici la concrétisation de ce que je laissais présager précédemment: l’esprit public est affaibli, malléable, et si désintéressé de la nature de son monde qu’il se contentera de croire ce que les autorités présenteront comme la vérité. Ainsi, le citoyen moyen d’aujourd’hui aime croire qu’il vit dans un système réellement démocratique et respectueux des valeurs humaines en s’extasiant devant les discours officiels incohérents et grossièrement simplistes relayés par son poste télévisé. Il serait si malheureux que l’on tente de le sortir de la béatitude qu’engendre son inconscience qu’il occultera sa réflexion encore plus qu’il ne le fait d’habitude si jamais il entend quelqu’un essayer de lui faire prendre conscience de la véritable réalité des choses; n’écoutant pas, se voilant derrière ses impressions et ses sentiments irrationnels, il continuera d’être un mouton trop occupé par les futilités de son existence et trop égoïste pour réfléchir aux problèmes que connait le monde. Il est alors effectivement extrêmement simple de le manier dans le sens où on l’entend, du moment que l’on lui promettre de pouvoir demeurer dans sa prison dorée d’inconscience. Outre cette actualisation de l’extrait, ce dernier s’exprime si bien de lui-même que je n’ai rien de plus à ajouter.

« Machiavel :

A l’aide du seul pouvoir réglementaire, j’instituerais, par exemple, d’immenses monopoles financiers, réservoirs de la fortune publique, dont dépendrait si étroitement le sort de toutes les fortunes privées, qu’elles s’engloutiraient avec le crédit de l’État le lendemain de toute catastrophe politique. Vous êtes un économiste, Montesquieu, pesez la valeur de cette combinaison. Voici une autre combinaison empruntée a l’ordre industriel : Dans le temps actuel, l’aristocratie, en tant que force politique, a disparu ; mais la bourgeoisie territoriale est encore un élément de résistance dangereux pour les gouvernements, parce qu’elle est d’elle-même, indépendante ; il peut être nécessaire de l’appauvrir ou même de la ruiner complétement. Il suffit, pour cela, d’aggraver les charges qui pèsent sur la propriété foncière, de maintenir l’agriculture dans un état d’infériorité relative, de favoriser à outrance le commerce et l’industrie, mais principalement la spéculation ; car la trop grande prospérité de l’industrie peut elle-même devenir un danger, en créant un nombre trop considérable de fortunes indépendantes. Il faut arriver à ce qu’il n’y ait plus, dans l’État, que des prolétaires, quelques millionnaires et des soldats. »

Commentaire :

Quoi de plus actuel, à nouveau, que la mainmise des immenses monopoles financiers sur le système ? Il y a cependant ici une inversion; dans l’État imaginé par Machiavel, ces fortunes sont à la solde de l’État et le public domine le privé. Dans les temps actuels, c’est le contraire.

Pour ce qui est de ruiner toute force indépendante, il est aisé de constater à quel point les supermarchés et autres organismes de centralisations, véritables monopoles aux mains de l’État (et une centralisation aussi puissante de biens essentiels dans une seule paire de mains est toujours une des caractéristiques terribles du despotisme), ont aidé à rendre très difficile toute réussite magistrale dans le commerce ou l’artisanat indépendants. Le despotisme doit rendre ses citoyens dépendants de son gouvernement, et n’aura de cesse de les appauvrir, tant matériellement qu’intellectuellement et spirituellement, pour s’assurer la longévité. En effet, moins les citoyens sont riches, moins ils ont de possibilités de se révolter… Comme le dit Machiavel: « Il faut arriver à ce qu’il n’y ait plus, dans l’État, que des prolétaires et quelques millionnaires ». On devine de quel côté seront les millionnaires.

Remarquons également, à propos de la spéculation, à quel point cette dernière a explosé aujourd’hui et que le danger que voit Machiavel dans les fortunes indépendantes a eu raison des gouvernements, puisque la richesse du secteur privé dépasse de loin celle du public. Á titre d’exemple, les 500 plus grosses entreprises des États-Unis possèdent 80% du PIB du pays; le mot du gouvernement a donc bien moins à dire que celui des multinationales…

De plus, les plus puissantes personnes des secteurs de pouvoir, qui ne sont soumis à aucune censure démocratique, désignent le plus souvent leur successeur parmi leurs enfants ou leur entourage, ce qui est relativement conforme à la dynastie royale que voudrait imposer Machiavel après son coup d’État despotique.

« Machiavel :

Le pouvoir que je rêve, bien loin, comme vous le voyez, d’avoir des moeurs barbares, doit attirer à lui toutes les forces et tous les talents de la civilisation au sein de laquelle il vit. Il devra s’entourer de publicistes, d’avocats, de jurisconsultes, d’hommes de pratique et d’administration, de gens qui connaissent à fond tous les secrets, tous les ressorts de la vie sociale, qui parlent tous les langages, qui aient étudié l’homme dans tous les milieux. Il faut les prendre partout, n’importe où, car ces gens-là rendent des services étonnants par les procédés ingénieux qu’ils appliquent à la politique. Il faut, avec cela, tout un monde d’économistes, de banquiers, d’industriels, de capitalistes, d’hommes à projets, d’hommes à millions, car tout au fond se résoudra par une question de chiffres.

L’usurpateur d’un État est dans une situation analogue à celle d’un conquérant. Il est condamné à tout renouveler, à dissoudre l’État, à détruire la cité, à changer la face des moeurs.

C’est là le but, mais dans les temps actuels il n’y faut tendre que par des voies obliques, des moyens détournés, des combinaisons habiles, et, autant que possible, exemptes de violence. Je ne détruirai donc pas directement les institutions, mais je les toucherai une à une par un trait de main inaperçu qui en dérangera le mécanisme. Ainsi je toucherai tour à tour à l’organisation judiciaire, au suffrage, à la presse, à la liberté individuelle, à l’enseignement.

Je vous disais, il y a peu d’instants, que les peuples étaient comme les hommes, qu’ils tenaient plus aux apparences qu’à la réalité des choses ; c’est là, en politique, une règle dont je suivrais scrupuleusement les indications ; veuillez me rappeler les principes auxquels vous tenez le plus et vous verrez que je n’en suis pas aussi embarrassé que vous paraissez le croire. Vous ne manqueriez sans doute pas de me parler du principe de la séparation des pouvoirs, de la liberté de la parole et de la presse, de la liberté religieuse, de la liberté individuelle, du droit d’association, de l’égalité devant la loi, de l’inviolabilité de la propriété et du domicile, du droit de pétition, du libre consentement de l’impôt, de la proportionnalité des peines, de la non rétroactivité des lois. Je ne vois nul inconvénient à proclamer ces principes ; j’en ferai même, si vous le voulez, le préambule de ma constitution.

Les gouvernés seront toujours contents du prince, lorsqu’il ne touchera ni à leurs biens, ni à leur honneur, et dès lors il n’a plus à combattre que les prétentions d’un petit nombre de mécontents, dont il vient facilement à bout.

Montesquieu :

On pourrait vous répondre que les droits politiques aussi sont des biens ; qu’il importe aussi à l’honneur des peuples de les maintenir, et qu’en y touchant vous portez en réalité atteinte à leurs biens comme à leur honneur.

Machiavel :

Vous semblez toujours croire que les peuples modernes sont affamés de liberté. Avez-vous prévu le cas où ils n’en veulent plus, et pouvez-vous demander aux princes d’avoir pour elle plus de passion que n’en ont les peuples ? Or, dans vos sociétés si profondément relâchées, où l’individu ne vit plus que dans la sphère de son égoïsme et de ses intérêts matériels, interrogez le plus grand nombre, et vous verrez si, de tous côtés, on ne vous répond pas : Que me fait la politique ? Que m’importe la liberté ? Est-ce que tous les gouvernements ne sont pas les mêmes ? Est-ce qu’un gouvernement ne doit pas se défendre ?

Remarquez-le bien, d’ailleurs, ce n’est même pas le peuple qui tiendra ce langage ; ce seront les bourgeois, les industriels, les gens instruits, les riches, les lettrés, tous ceux qui sont en état d’apprécier vos belles doctrines de droit public. Ils me béniront, ils s’écrieront que je les ai sauvés, qu’ils sont en état de minorité, qu’ils sont incapables de se conduire. Tenez, les nations ont je ne sais quel secret amour pour les vigoureux génies de la force. A tous les actes violents marqués du talent de l’artifice, vous entendrez dire avec une admiration qui surmontera le blâme : Ce n’est pas bien, soit, mais c’est habile, c’est bien joué, c’est fort ! »

La presse

« Machiavel :

Puisque c’est une si grande force que le journalisme, savez-vous ce que ferait mon gouvernement ? Il se ferait journaliste, ce serait le journalisme incarné. Je compterai le nombre de journaux qui représenteront ce que vous appelez l’opposition. S’il y en a dix pour l’opposition, j’en aurai vingt pour le gouvernement ; s’il y en a vingt, j’en aurai quarante ; s’il y en a quarante, j’en aurai quatre-vingts. Voilà à quoi me servira, vous le comprenez à merveille maintenant, la faculté que je me suis réservée d’autoriser la création de nouvelles feuilles politiques. Il ne faut pas que la masse du public puisse soupçonner cette tactique ; la combinaison serait manquée et l’opinion se détacherait d’elle-même des journaux qui défendraient ouvertement ma politique.

Je diviserai en trois ou quatre catégories les feuilles dévouées à mon pouvoir. Au premier rang je mettrai un certain nombre de journaux dont la nuance sera franchement officielle, et qui, en toutes rencontres, défendront mes actes à outrance. Ce ne sont pas ceux-là, je commence par vous le dire, qui auront le plus d’ascendant sur l’opinion. Au second rang je placerai une autre phalange de journaux dont le caractère ne sera déjà plus qu’officieux et dont la mission sera de rallier à mon pouvoir cette masse d’hommes tièdes et indifférents qui acceptent sans scrupule ce qui est constitué, mais ne vont pas au delà dans leur religion politique.

C’est dans les catégories de journaux qui vont suivre que se trouveront les leviers les plus puissants de mon pouvoir. Ici, la nuance officielle ou officieuse se dégrade complétement, en apparence, bien entendu, car les journaux dont je vais vous parler seront tous rattachés par la même chaîne à mon gouvernement, chaîne visible pour les uns, invisible à l’égard des autres. Je n’entreprends point de vous dire quel en sera le nombre, car je compterai un organe dévoué dans chaque opinion, dans chaque parti ; j’aurai un organe aristocratique dans le parti aristocratique, un organe républicain dans le parti républicain, un organe révolutionnaire dans le parti révolutionnaire, un organe anarchiste, au besoin, dans le parti anarchiste. Comme le dieu Wishnou, ma presse aura cent bras, et ces bras donneront la main à toutes les nuances d’opinion quelconque sur la surface entière du pays. On sera de mon parti sans le savoir. Ceux qui croiront parler leur langue parleront la mienne, ceux qui croiront agiter leur parti agiteront le mien, ceux qui croiront marcher sous leur drapeau marcheront sous le mien.

Montesquieu :

Je me demande seulement, comment vous pourrez diriger et rallier toutes ces milices de publicité clandestinement embauchées par votre gouvernement.

Machiavel :

Ce n’est là qu’une affaire d’organisation, vous devez le comprendre ; j’instituerai, par exemple, sous le titre de division de l’imprimerie et de la presse, un centre d’action commun où l’on viendra chercher la consigne et d’où partira le signal. Alors, pour ceux qui ne seront qu’à moitié dans le secret de cette combinaison, il se passera un spectacle bizarre ; on verra des feuilles, dévouées à mon gouvernement, qui m’attaqueront, qui crieront, qui me susciteront une foule de tracas.

Remarquez bien que jamais les bases ni les principes de mon gouvernement ne seront attaqués par les journaux dont je vous parle ; ils ne feront jamais qu’une polémique d’escarmouche, qu’une opposition dynastique dans les limites les plus étroites. Le résultat, vraiment considérable déjà, sera de faire dire, par le plus grand nombre : Mais vous voyez bien qu’on est libre, qu’on peut parler sous ce régime, qu’il est injustement attaqué, qu’au lieu de comprimer, comme il pourrait le faire, il souffre, il tolère ! Un autre résultat, non moins important, sera de provoquer, par exemple, des observations comme celles-ci : Voyez à quel point les bases de ce gouvernement, ses principes, s’imposent au respect de tous ; voilà des journaux qui se permettent les plus grandes libertés de langage, eh bien, jamais ils n’attaquent les institutions établies. Il faut qu’elles soient au-dessus des injustices des passions, puisque les ennemis mêmes du gouvernement ne peuvent s’empêcher de leur rendre hommage.

Montesquieu :

Voilà, je l’avoue, qui est vraiment machiavélique.

Machiavel :

Vous me faites beaucoup d’honneur, mais il y a mieux : A l’aide du dévouement occulte de ces feuilles publiques, je puis dire que je dirige à mon gré l’opinion dans toutes les questions de politique intérieure ou extérieure. J’excite ou j’endors les esprits, je les rassure ou je les déconcerte, je plaide le pour et le contre, le vrai et le faux. Je fais annoncer un fait et je le fais démentir suivant les circonstances ; je sonde ainsi la pensée publique, je recueille l’impression produite, j’essaie des combinaisons, des projets, des déterminations soudaines, enfin ce que vous appelez, en France, des ballons d’essai. Je combats à mon gré mes ennemis sans jamais compromettre mon pouvoir, car, après avoir fait parler ces feuilles, je puis leur infliger, au besoin, les désaveux les plus énergiques ; je sollicite l’opinion à de certaines résolutions, je la pousse ou je la retiens, j’ai toujours le doigt sur ses pulsations, elle reflète, sans le savoir, mes impressions personnelles, et elle s’émerveille parfois d’être si constamment d’accord avec son souverain. On dit alors que j’ai la fibre populaire, qu’il y a une sympathie secrète et mystérieuse qui m’unit aux mouvements de mon peuple. »

Commentaire :

Il n’est pas aisé, au premier abord, de se douter de combien les médias d’aujourd’hui sont reliés aux intérêts des gouvernements et/ou des grands empires financiers. En effet, les chaînes de télévision, de radio, les journaux, les maisons d’édition de livres, etc., qui n’appartiennent pas directement au gouvernement sont les biens de grandes entreprises privées. Ainsi, Europe 1 et Hachette appartiennent à Lagardère, l’actionnaire principal de TF1 est Bouygues, RTL Group appartient à Bertelsmann, etc… Parce que toute entreprise de communication qui sera écoutée et popularisée ne pourra qu’être financée par un ou des puissants groupes qui ont tous de nombreux intérêts communs avec leurs semblables, il est toujours vital de rechercher qui donne les subsides de quelle entreprise ou de quel institut. C’est parce que l’on ignore souvent ces sources que l’on peut être leurré par tel moyen de communication d’opposition, qui en fait, pourrait très bien être relié aux intérêts du poivoir, tout comme dans le gouvernement imaginé par Machiavel. Il est alors aussi facile de diriger la pensée de ceux qui se laisseront tromper que de piéger ceux qui participeront à des manifestations ou autres activités d’opposition qui seraient, en fait, également liées au pouvoir. Dans ces cas-là, par exemple, quelques agitateurs infiltrés se débrouillent parfaitement bien pour discréditer toute l’optique de manifestants. De même, un candidat à une élection, quelle qu’elle soit, jouera peut-être le mécontent du système, le grand réformateur, mais s’avérera souvent être un pion d’intérêts financiers qui auront misé sur la confiance et l’enthousiasme qu’il aura suscités chez les gens pour mieux les tromper. Les vraies forces d’opposition indépendantes, les vrais hommes rebelles qui ne répondent pas d’intérêts oligarchiques, sont discrédités par une propagande abondante, dans le cas où ils auraient réussi à se rallier un certain nombre d’adeptes. Dans la plupart des cas, peu popularisés, ils ne constituent pas une menace digne d’être écartée.

En outre, les médias populaires, prétendument objectifs, qui font de la soi-disante opposition ne remettront jamais en question les bases du système. Comme le dit si bien Machiavel, les gens penseront alors que le fait qu’il y ait une critique signifiera qu’il y a de la liberté, mais que les fondations mêmes du système sont trop parfaites pour pouvoir être critiquées, infaillibles. Nous remarquons parfaitement la même chose lorsque nous sommes longuement bassinés par telle ou telle injure qu’aurait prononcée le président Sarkozy, appelés à s’indigner sur le prix exorbitant de ses dernières vacances, sur tel scandale de détournement de fonds qui pourtant, s’empresserait-on d’ajouter ou de sous-entendre, serait un cas isolé,… Ce ton critique, agressif, osé, donne l’impression d’une opposition, mais ces choses sont d’une frivolité telle qu’elles ne serviront qu’à en maintenir l’illusion, car jamais l’essentiel ne sera mis en cause; au contraire, la multitude des informations insignifiantes que l’on préférera dispenser massivement au lieu de cela empêcheront de s’en apercevoir.

« Montesquieu :

Ces diverses combinaisons me paraissent d’une perfection idéale. Je vous soumets cependant encore une observation, mais très-timide cette fois : Si vous sortez du silence de la Chine, si vous permettez à la milice de vos journaux de faire, au profit de vos desseins, l’opposition postiche dont vous venez de me parler, je ne vois pas trop, en vérité, comment vous pourrez empêcher les journaux non affiliés de répondre, par de véritables coups, aux agaceries dont ils devineront le manége. Ne pensez-vous pas qu’ils finiront par lever quelques-uns des voiles qui couvrent tant de ressorts mystérieux ? Quand ils connaîtront le secret de cette comédie, pourrez-vous les empêcher d’en rire ? Le jeu me paraît bien scabreux.

Machiavel :

Pas du tout ; je vous dirai que j’ai employé, ici, une grande partie de mon temps à examiner le fort et le faible de ces combinaisons, je me suis beaucoup renseigné sur ce qui touche aux conditions d’existence de la presse dans les pays parlementaires. Vous devez savoir que le journalisme est une sorte de franc-maçonnerie : ceux qui en vivent sont tous plus ou moins rattachés les uns aux autres par les liens de la discrétion professionnelle ; pareils aux anciens augures, ils ne divulguent pas aisément le secret de leurs oracles. Ils ne gagneraient rien à se trahir, car ils ont pour la plupart des plaies plus ou moins honteuses. Il est assez probable, j’en conviens, qu’au centre de la capitale, dans un certain rayon de personnes, ces choses ne seront pas un mystère ; mais, partout ailleurs, on ne s’en doutera pas, et la grande majorité de la nation marchera avec la confiance la plus entière sur la trace des guides que je lui aurai donnés.

Vous savez avec quelle discrétion et quels ménagements ingénieux doivent être rédigés les documents de l’autorité, dans les conjonctures importantes : le problème à résoudre en pareil cas est de donner une sorte de satisfaction à tous les partis. Eh bien, chacun de mes journaux, suivant sa nuance, s’efforcera de persuader à chaque parti que la résolution que l’on a prise est celle qui le favorise le plus. Ce qui ne sera pas écrit dans un document officiel, on l’en fera sortir par voie d’interprétation ; ce qui ne sera qu’indiqué, les journaux officieux le traduiront plus ouvertement, les journaux démocratiques et révolutionnaires le crieront par dessus les toits ; et tandis qu’on se disputera, qu’on donnera les interprétations les plus diverses à mes actes, mon gouvernement pourra toujours répondre à tous et à chacun : Vous vous trompez sur mes intentions, vous avez mal lu mes déclarations ; je n’ai jamais voulu dire que ceci ou que cela.

Ce sont les paroles bien plus que les actes qu’il s’agit de faire accorder. Comment voulez-vous que la grande masse d’une nation puisse juger si c’est la logique qui mène son gouvernement ? Il suffit de le lui dire. Je veux donc que les diverses phases de ma politique soient présentées comme le développement d’une pensée unique se rattachant à un but immuable. Chaque événement prévu ou imprévu sera un résultat sagement amené, les écarts de direction ne seront que les différentes faces de la même question, les voies diverses qui conduisent au même but, les moyens variés d’une solution identique poursuivie sans relâche à travers les obstacles. Le dernier événement sera donné comme la conclusion logique de tous les autres.

Je n’oublierais pas que je vis dans une époque où l’on croit pouvoir résoudre, par l’industrie, tous les problèmes de la société, où l’on s’occupe sans cesse de l’amélioration du sort des classes ouvrières. Je m’attacherais d’autant plus à ces questions, qu’elles sont un dérivatif très-heureux pour les préoccupations de la politique intérieure. Chez les peuples méridionaux, il faut que les gouvernements paraissent sans cesse occupés ; les masses consentent à être inactives, mais à une condition, c’est que ceux qui les gouvernent leur donnent le spectacle d’une activité incessante, d’une sorte de fièvre ; qu’ils attirent constamment leurs yeux par des nouveautés, par des surprises, par des coups de théâtre ; cela est bizarre peut-être, mais, encore une fois, cela est.

Je me conformerais de point en point à ces indications ; en conséquence, je ferais, en matière de commerce, d’industrie, d’arts et même d’administration, étudier toutes sortes de projets, de plans, de combinaisons, de changements, de remaniements, d’améliorations dont le retentissement dans la presse couvrirait la voix des publicistes les plus nombreux et les plus féconds. L’économie politique a, dit-on, fait fortune chez vous, eh bien, je ne laisserais rien à inventer, rien à publier, rien à dire même à vos théoriciens, à vos utopistes, aux déclamateurs les plus passionnés de vos écoles. Le bien-être du peuple serait l’objet unique, invariable, de mes confidences publiques. Soit que je parle moi-même, soit que je fasse parler par mes ministres ou mes écrivains, on ne tarirait jamais sur la grandeur du pays, sur la prospérité, sur la majesté de sa mission et de ses destinées ; on ne cesserait de l’entretenir des grands principes du droit moderne, des grands problèmes qui agitent l’humanité. Le libéralisme le plus enthousiaste, le plus universel, respirerait dans mes écrits. »

Commentaire :

Á nouveau, Machiavel parle de la facilité avec laquelle il est facile de tromper l’opinion publique en arguant de bonnes intentions, et du peu d’importance qu’auront les quelques rares esprits, incompris et raillés, qui auront percé la ruse à jour. Il confirme également ce que nous avons dit précédemment lorsqu’il dit qu’il faut donner des préoccupations à l’opinion publique, occuper son esprit, par toute une foule de choses qui occulteront des informations plus essentielles. Pendant ce temps, il pourra continuer de régner tranquillement, voire même faire passer l’une ou l’autre mesure qui aurait soi-disant pour but d’aider à accomplir telle ou telle grande oeuvre sur laquelle la société s’échine. Il est effectivement facile de constater que lorsque l’esprit public est occupé ou choqué, comme cela s’est passé lors du 11 septembre ou de quelque grand autre événement comme un cataclysme naturel, des mesures passent en force et, si elles ne sont pas présentées comme garantes d’une amélioration de la situation, dans l’ignorance et l’indifférence générales.

« Machiavel :

Il serait très-important de mettre en relief les fautes de ceux qui m’ont précédé, de montrer que j’ai su les éviter toujours. On entretiendrait ainsi, contre les régimes auxquels mon pouvoir a succédé, une sorte d’antipathie, d’aversion même, qui finirait par devenir irréparable comme une expiation.

Dans les pays les plus avancés de l’Europe en civilisation, l’invention de l’imprimerie a fini par donner naissance à une littérature folle, furieuse, effrénée, presque immonde, c’est un grand mal. Eh bien, cela est triste à dire, mais il suffira presque de ne pas la gêner, pour que cette rage d’écrire, qui possède vos pays parlementaires, soit à peu près satisfaite.

Cette littérature pestiférée dont on ne peut empêcher le cours, la platitude des écrivains et des hommes politiques qui seraient en possession du journalisme, ne manquerait pas de former un contraste repoussant avec la dignité du langage qui tomberait des marches du trône, avec la dialectique vivace et colorée dont on aurait soin d’appuyer toutes les manifestations du pouvoir. Vous comprenez, maintenant, pourquoi j’ai voulu environner le prince de cet essaim de publicistes, d’hommes d’administration, d’avocats, d’hommes d’affaires et de jurisconsultes qui sont essentiels à la rédaction de cette quantité de communications officielles dont je vous ai parlé, et dont l’impression serait toujours très-forte sur les esprits. »

Commentaire :

Encore une fois, on compte sur l’effet ménagé par toute cette panoplie « d’experts » dont regorge le gouvernement pour impressionner les gens, qui, espère t-on, seront plus tentés de remettre leur confiance en ces personnes qu’en qui que ce soit d’autre. L’apparence joue donc un grand rôle, à nouveau.

Les sociétés secrètes

« Machiavel :

Le monde souterrain des sociétés secrètes est rempli de cerveaux vides, dont je ne fais pas le moindre cas, mais il y a là des directions à donner, des forces à mouvoir. S’il s’y agite quelque chose, c’est ma main qui remue ; s’il s’y prépare un complot, le chef c’est moi : je suis le chef de la ligue.

Montesquieu :

Et vous croyez que ces cohortes de démocrates, ces républicains, ces anarchistes, ces terroristes vous laisseront approcher et rompre le pain avec eux ; vous pouvez croire que ceux qui ne veulent point de domination humaine accepteront un guide qui sera autant dire un maître !

Montesquieu :

C’est que vous ne connaissez pas, ô Montesquieu, ce qu’il y a d’impuissance et même de niaiserie chez la plupart des hommes de la démagogie européenne. Ces tigres ont des âmes de mouton, des têtes pleines de vent ; il suffit de parler leur langage pour pénétrer dans leur rang. Leurs idées ont presque toutes, d’ailleurs, des affinités incroyables avec les doctrines du pouvoir absolu. Leur rêve est l’absorption des individus, dans une unité symbolique. Ils demandent la réalisation complète de l’égalité, par la vertu d’un pouvoir qui ne peut être en définitive que dans la main d’un seul homme. Vous voyez que je suis encore ici le chef de leur école ! Et puis il faut dire qu’ils n’ont pas le choix. Les sociétés secrètes existeront dans les conditions que je viens de dire ou elles n’existeront pas. »

Commentaire :

Peu de chose à ajouter par rapport à ce que nous avons déjà dit, mais cet extrait renforce la présence du gouvernement dans ce qui pourrait constituer une opposition potentielle, pour la dévier de son but et être au courant des éventuels complots qui se trament. Cela ne fait que rejoindre ce que j’ai dit à propos des gens qui penseront se diriger vers quelque forme d’opposition, et que l’on piégera.

Législatif et judiciaire

« Machiavel :

La cour de cassation est plus qu’un corps judiciaire : c’est, en quelque sorte, un quatrième pouvoir dans l’État, parce qu’il lui appartient de fixer en dernier ressort le sens de la loi. Aussi vous répéterai-je ici ce que je crois vous avoir dit à propos du Sénat et de l’Assemblée législative : une semblable cour de justice qui serait complétement indépendante du gouvernement pourrait, en vertu de son pouvoir d’interprétation souverain et presque discrétionnaire, le renverser quand elle voudrait. Il lui suffirait pour cela de restreindre ou d’étendre systématiquement, dans le sens de la liberté, les dispositions de lois qui règlent l’exercice des droits politiques.

Montesquieu :

Et c’est apparemment le contraire que vous allez lui demander ?

Machiavel :

Je ne lui demanderai rien, elle fera d’elle-même ce qu’il conviendra de faire. Car c’est ici que concourront le plus puissamment les différentes causes d’influence dont je vous ai parlé plus haut. Plus le juge est près du pouvoir, plus il lui appartient. L’esprit conservateur du règne se développera là à un plus haut degré que partout ailleurs, et les lois de haute police politique recevront, dans le sein de cette grande assemblée, une interprétation si favorable à mon pouvoir, que je serai dispensé d’une foule de mesures restrictives qui, sans cela, deviendraient nécessaires.

Il faut maintenant donner au gouvernement le moyen de résister à l’influence de l’opposition, d’empêcher qu’elle ne fasse déserter les rangs de ceux qui veulent le défendre. Au moment des élections, les partis ont pour habitude de proclamer leurs candidats et de les poser en face du gouvernement ; je ferai comme eux, j’aurai des candidats déclarés et je les poserai en face des partis. J’irai jusqu’à fermer les yeux sur les agissements de quelques candidatures populaires qui s’agiteront bruyamment au nom de la liberté ; seulement, il est bon de vous dire que ceux qui crieront le plus fort seront des hommes à moi.

L’essentiel est bien moins de ne commettre aucune faute, que d’en supporter la responsabilité avec une attitude d’énergie qui impose aux détracteurs. Quand même l’opposition parviendrait à introduire dans ma chambre quelques déclamateurs, que m’importerait ? Je ne suis pas de ceux qui veulent compter sans les nécessités de leur temps.

Un de mes grands principes est d’opposer les semblables. De même que j’use la presse par la presse, j’userais la tribune par la tribune ; j’aurais autant qu’il en faudrait d’hommes dressés à la parole et capables de parler plusieurs heures sans s’arrêter. L’essentiel est d’avoir une majorité compacte et un président dont on soit sûr. Il y a un art particulier de conduire les débats et d’enlever le vote. Aurais-je besoin d’ailleurs des artifices de la stratégie parlementaire ? Les dix-neuf vingtièmes de la Chambre seraient des hommes à moi qui voteraient sur une consigne, tandis que je ferais mouvoir les fils d’une opposition factice et clandestinement embauchée ; après cela, qu’on vienne faire de beaux discours : ils entreront dans les oreilles de mes députés comme le vent entre dans le trou d’une serrure. »

Commentaire :

Bien qu’un bon nombre de précautions conseillées par Machiavel dans les Dialogues aux Enfers n’existent pas aujourd’hui (c’est pourquoi je ne les ai pas extraites), il semble que le même effet de domination du pouvoir sur des organes tels que l’Assemblée Nationale, le Sénat, et les institutions judiciaires, aient pu se faire avec nettement plus de facilité que ce qu’il imaginait. On peut effectivement se douter que le député, le juge et le sénateur, faisant partie d’un corps social privilégié, aient une tendance naturelle à aider les intérêts des « riches », de même que, pour accéder à leur fonction, ils doivent sans doute avoir assuré de jouer le jeu. En tout cas, il est clair que, dans la réalité des choses, ces forces sont bel et bien sous influence. Ainsi, l’UMP est censé faire opposition au PS en France, et inversément; mais il faudrait être bien dupe pour croire qu’il existe des différences réelles entre les deux partis. Il n’y a effectivement pas de ligne réellement définie; ils servent les mêmes intérêts. Le PS a souvent plus privatisé qu’il n’a nationalisé, et ses membres s’entendent généralement bien avec l’UMP pour faire avancer les intérêts d’un amour qu’ils ont le plus particulièrement en commun: celui de l’argent. Donc, aucune loi et aucune décision judiciaire ne pourront gêner réellement l’ordre établi.

L’éducation

« Machiavel :

En ce qui touche l’Université, l’ordre de choses actuel me satisfait à peu près. Vous n’ignorez pas, en effet, que ces grands corps d’enseignement ne sont plus organisés, aujourd’hui, comme ils l’étaient autrefois. Ils ont presque partout, m’assure-t-on, perdu leur autonomie et ne sont plus que des services publics à la charge de l’État. Or, ainsi que je vous l’ai dit plus d’une fois, là où est l’État, là est le prince ; la direction morale des établissements publics est entre ses mains ; ce sont ses agents qui inspirent l’esprit de la jeunesse. Les chefs comme les membres des corps enseignants de tous les degrés sont nommés par le gouvernement, ils y sont rattachés, ils en dépendent, cela suffit ; s’il reste çà et là quelques traces d’organisation indépendante dans quelque école publique ou Académie que ce soit, il est facile de la ramener au centre commun d’unité et de direction. C’est l’affaire d’un règlement ou même d’un simple arrêté ministériel. Il faut que les générations qui naissent sous mon règne soient élevées dans le respect des institutions établies, dans l’amour du prince ; aussi ferais-je un usage assez ingénieux du pouvoir de direction qui m’appartient sur l’enseignement : je crois qu’en général dans les écoles on a un grand tort, c’est de négliger l’histoire contemporaine. Il est au moins aussi essentiel de connaître son temps que celui de Périclès »

Commentaire :

Voilà bien un secteur où l’ordre établi ne risquera pas non plus d’être remis sérieusement en cause, avec toute la sincérité des professeurs, si ce n’est l’une ou l’autre exception qui bénéficiera d’assez de lucidité et d’indépendance. Il est aussi intéressant de constater que comme le dit Machiavel, on y néglige à tort l’histoire comtemporaine. La tendance est plutôt dans la diabolisation des temps anciens et la vénération du système présent, ce que j’aime appeler le culte du présent. En effet, les régimes absolutistes d’autrefois n’étaient-ils pas si laids, et notre démocratie si merveilleuse d’aujourd’hui n’est-elle pas si belle ? Il n’y a malheureusement que trop peu de gens qui se rendent compte que ce que l’on fait aujourd’hui n’est que ce que l’on faisait hier dans une forme différente…

Les complots

« Machiavel :

Je voudrais avoir un prince de ma maison, assis sur les marches de mon trône, qui jouerait au mécontent. Sa mission consisterait à se poser en libéral, en détracteur de mon gouvernement et à rallier ainsi, pour les observer de plus près, ceux qui, dans les rangs les plus élevés de mon royaume, pourraient faire un peu de démagogie. A cheval sur les intrigues intérieures et extérieures, le prince auquel je confierais cette mission ferait ainsi jouer un jeu de dupe à ceux qui ne seraient pas dans le secret de la comédie.

Il y aura des complots sous mon règne : il faut qu’il y en ait.

Il y aura peut-être des complots vrais, je n’en réponds pas ; mais à coup sûr il y aura des complots simulés. A de certains moments, ce peut être un excellent moyen pour exciter la sympathie du peuple en faveur du prince, lorsque sa popularité décroît. En intimidant l’esprit public on obtient, au besoin, par là, les mesures de rigueur que l’on veut, ou l’on maintient celles qui existent. Les fausses conspirations, dont, bien entendu, il ne faut user qu’avec la plus grande mesure, ont encore un autre avantage : c’est qu’elles permettent de découvrir les complots réels, en donnant lieu à des perquisitions qui conduisent à rechercher partout la trace de ce qu’on soupçonne.

Avec le système que j’organiserai, je serai si complétement renseigné, que je pourrai tolérer même des agissements coupables, parce qu’à chaque minute du jour j’aurai le pouvoir de les arrêter. »

Commentaire :

La meilleure preuve contemporaine que l’on peut prendre des mesures extraordinaires grâce à un complot simulé me semble être le 11 septembre; comme nous en avons déjà parlé, le choc de cet événement a permis de faire passer toute une série de mesures sous prétexte d’empêcher que cela se reproduise. Mais quoi de pire que la perspective que l’événement ait été créé de toute pièces ? Face à l’absurdité de la version officielle et aux analyses minutieuses qui ont été faites à ce sujet, nous savons malheureusement que cela a d’ailleurs bien été le cas…

« Montesquieu :

Les tolérer, et pourquoi ?

Machiavel :

Parce que dans les États européens le monarque absolu ne doit pas indiscrètement user de la force ; parce qu’il y a toujours, dans le fond de la société, des activités souterraines sur lesquelles on ne peut rien quand elles ne se formulent pas ; parce qu’il faut éviter avec grand soin d’alarmer l’opinion sur la sécurité du pouvoir ; parce que les partis se contentent de murmures, de taquineries inoffensives, quand ils sont réduits à l’impuissance et que prétendre désarmer jusqu’à leur mauvaise humeur, serait une folie. On les entendra donc se plaindre, çà et là, dans les journaux, dans les livres ; ils essaieront des allusions contre le gouvernement dans quelques discours ou dans quelques plaidoyers ; ils feront, sous divers prétextes, quelques petites manifestations d’existence ; tout cela sera bien timide, je vous le jure, et le public s’il en est informé, ne sera guère tenté que d’en rire. On me trouvera bien bon de supporter cela, je passerai pour trop débonnaire ; voilà pourquoi je tolérerai ce qui, bien entendu, me paraîtra pouvoir l’être sans aucun danger : je ne veux pas même que l’on puisse dire que mon gouvernement est ombrageux. »

La manipulation de la religion

Montesquieu :

Il n’est que trop vrai que l’on peut prêter aux mesures les plus détestables, le langage de la raison ! Mais voyons, qu’allez-vous faire maintenant à l’égard du clergé ? Voilà une institution qui ne dépend de l’État que par un côté et qui relève d’une puissance spirituelle, dont le siége est ailleurs que chez vous. Je ne connais rien de plus dangereux pour votre pouvoir, je vous le déclare, que cette puissance qui parle au nom du ciel et dont les racines sont partout sur la terre : n’oubliez pas que la parole chrétienne est une parole de liberté. Sans doute, les lois de l’État ont établi une démarcation profonde entre l’autorité religieuse et l’autorité politique ; sans doute, la parole des ministres du culte ne se fera entendre qu’au nom de l’Évangile ; mais le spiritualisme divin qui s’en dégage est la pierre d’achoppement du matérialisme politique. C’est ce livre si humble et si doux qui a détruit, à lui seul, et l’empire Romain, et le césarisme, et sa puissance. Les nations franchement chrétiennes échapperont toujours au despotisme, car le christianisme élève la dignité de l’homme trop haut pour que le despotisme puisse l’atteindre, car il développe des forces morales sur lesquelles le pouvoir humain n’a pas de prise[10]. Prenez garde au prêtre : il ne dépend que de Dieu, et son influence est partout, dans le sanctuaire, dans la famille, dans l’école. Vous ne pouvez rien sur lui : sa hiérarchie n’est pas la vôtre, il obéit à une constitution qui ne se tranche ni par la loi, ni par l’épée. Si vous régnez sur une nation catholique et que vous ayez le clergé pour ennemi, vous périrez tôt ou tard, quand bien même le peuple entier serait pour vous.

[10] Esp. des lois, p. 371, liv. XXIV, ch. I et suiv.

Machiavel :

Je ne sais pas trop pourquoi il vous plaît de faire du prêtre un apôtre de liberté. Je n’ai jamais vu cela, ni dans les temps anciens, ni dans les temps modernes ; j’ai toujours trouvé dans le sacerdoce un appui naturel du pouvoir absolu.

Commentaire :

L’histoire démontre que Machiavel a amplement raison ; la religion a toujours été un prétexte à la mise en place d’un pouvoir temporel déguisé et despotique. Bien qu’elle joue un bien moindre rôle aujourd’hui, il n’empêche qu’il subsiste un bon nombre de « fidèles » loyaux à la parole du pape et des autres personnages haut placés du Vatican. À partir du moment où l’on contrôle l’opinion publique par tous les stratagèmes que nous avons abordés, il est logique de souhaiter dominer également le Vatican de sorte à ce que le pouvoir de manipulation des esprits soit complet. Malheureusement, cette vérité est elle aussi réalité, comme le démontrent les extraits suivants, qui utilisent honteusement le message religieux pour promouvoir, de façon plus ou moins subliminale, le mondialisme.

Le 24 décembre 2005, Benoît XVI a délivré son message de Noël : « La force vivifiante de sa lumière (de Dieu) t’encourage à t’engager dans l’édification d’un Nouvel Ordre Mondial, fondé sur de justes relations éthiques et économiques. Que son amour guide les peuples et éclaire leur conscience commune d’être une famille appelée à construire des relations de confiance et de soutien mutuel. L’humanité unie pourra affronter les problèmes nombreux et préoccupants du monde présent. »

« Peter-Hans Kolvenbach, supérieur général de l’Ordre des Jésuites. Dans un discours tenu en 1997, ce prince de l’Église a réaffirmé la nécessité de l’unité dans des termes proches de l’Être suprême : « L’homme de foi est intimement convaincu que l’histoire de l’union humaine peut être écrite en collaboration avec le Seigneur de l’Histoire. L’échec de la tour de Babel n’est pas fatal. Le monde se meut vers un nouveau phénomène pentecostal où chacun, avec ses particularités, se fait communion avec l’esprit. »

« Dès que possible, nous devons arriver à élaborer un gouvernement mondial et une religion mondiale dirigées par un leader mondial » Robert Muller (ancien assistant au secrétaire général de l’ONU)

Cette dernière citation montre que la religion n’a pas cessé d’être perçu comme un outil de manipulation utile et efficace par ceux qui se trouvent dans les plus hautes sphères du pouvoir.

Montesquieu :

Ce serait un coup de maître, si vous teniez à Rome une garnison perpétuelle, car vous disposeriez presque du Saint-Siége, comme s’il résidait dans quelque province de votre royaume. Mais enfin, si au lieu de trouver dans la chaire de Saint-Pierre un Borgia ou un Dubois, comme vous paraissez y compter, vous aviez en face de vous un pape qui résistât à vos intrigues et bravât votre colère, que feriez-vous ?

Machiavel :

Alors, il faudrait bien s’y résoudre, sous prétexte de défendre le pouvoir temporel, je déterminerais sa chute.

Montesquieu :

Vous avez ce que l’on appelle du génie !

Les finances

 « Montesquieu:

Oui, mais c’est ici que commence la difficulté. Je sais comment les gouvernements représentatifs pourvoient à leurs besoins financiers, mais je n’ai aucune idée des moyens d’existence du pouvoir absolu dans les sociétés modernes. Si j’interroge le passé, je vois très-clairement qu’il ne peut subsister qu’aux conditions suivantes : il faut, en premier lieu, que le monarque absolu soit un chef militaire, vous le reconnaissez sans doute.

Machiavel:

Oui.

Montesquieu:

Il faut, de plus, qu’il soit conquérant, car c’est à la guerre qu’il doit demander les principales ressources qui lui sont nécessaires pour entretenir son faste et ses armées. S’il les demandait à l’impôt, il écraserait ses sujets. Vous voyez par là que ce n’est pas, parce que le monarque absolu dépense moins, qu’il doit ménager les tributs, mais parce que la loi de sa subsistance est ailleurs. »

Commentaire :

Il n’est pas utile de s’étendre sur ce point, car je pense que tout le monde aura fait le rapprochement avec le comportement belliqueux des États-Unis, plus grande « démocratie absolutiste » du monde, et qui, avec 400 milliards de $ attribués chaque année au secteur militaire, dépendent de guerres chroniques pour suivre la logique de leur économie. Outre les deux conflits mondiaux, quand ils ne sont pas en Corée (1951), au Vietnam (1964-1973), au Panama (1989), en Irak (1991), en Serbie (1999), en Afghanistan (2001), encore en Irak (2003), ils trouvent toujours bien l’un ou l’autre pays à qui vendre des armes, un camp à aider contre un autre, comme Taïwan ou plusieurs pays africains.

« Machiavel :

Il y a une manière particulière de présenter le budget, d’en dissimuler, au besoin, l’élévation croissante. Il n’est pas de gouvernement qui ne soit dans la nécessité d’en agir ainsi.

Montesquieu :

Puisque vos dépenses augmentent, il faut bien que vos ressources croissent dans la même proportion. Trouverez-vous, comme Jules César, une valeur de deux milliards de francs dans les coffres de l’État, ou découvrirez-vous les sources du Potose ?

Machiavel :

Vos traits sont fort ingénieux ; je ferai ce que font tous les gouvernements possibles, j’emprunterai.

Quelquefois il y a, vous le savez, en finances des mots tout faits, des phrases stéréotypées, qui font beaucoup d’effet sur le public, le calment, le rassurent.

Ainsi, en présentant avec art telle ou telle dette passive, on dit : ce chiffre n’a rien d’exorbitant ; – il est normal, il est conforme aux antécédents budgétaires ; – le chiffre de la dette flottante n’a rien que de très-rassurant. Il y a une foule de locutions semblables dont je ne vous parle pas parce qu’il est d’autres artifices pratiques, plus importants, sur lesquels je dois appeler votre attention.

D’abord, dans tous les documents officiels il est nécessaire d’insister sur le développement de la prospérité, de l’activité commerciale et du progrès toujours croissant de la consommation.

Le contribuable s’émeut moins de la disproportion des budgets, quand on lui répète ces choses, et on peut les lui répéter à satiété, sans que jamais il s’en défie, tant les écritures authentiques produisent un effet magique sur l’esprit des sots bourgeois. Lorsque l’équilibre des budgets est rompu et que l’on veut, pour l’année suivante, préparer l’esprit public à quelque mécompte, on dit à l’avance, dans un rapport, l’année prochaine le découvert ne sera que de tant.

Si le découvert est inférieur aux prévisions, c’est un véritable triomphe ; s’il est supérieur, on dit : « le déficit a été plus grand qu’on ne l’avait prévu, mais il s’était élevé à un chiffre supérieur l’année précédente ; de compte fait, la situation est meilleure, car on a dépensé moins et cependant on a traversé des circonstances exceptionnellement difficiles : la guerre, la disette, les épidémies, des crises de subsistances imprévues, etc. »

« Mais, l’année prochaine, l’augmentation des recettes permettra, suivant toute probabilité, d’atteindre un équilibre depuis si longtemps désiré : la dette sera réduite, le budget convenablement balancé. Ce progrès continuera, on peut l’espérer, et, sauf des événements extraordinaires, l’équilibre deviendra l’habitude de nos finances, comme il en est la règle. »

Montesquieu :

Mais ne vous préoccuperez-vous pas de payer enfin ?

Machiavel :

A cet égard les moyens sont très-variés : il y a d’abord l’impôt.

Machiavel :

Il y a d’autres moyens : il y a ce que l’on appelle la conversion. Ceci est relatif à la dette que l’on appelle consolidée, c’est-à-dire à celle qui provient de l’émission des emprunts. On dit aux rentiers de l’État, par exemple : jusqu’à ce jour je vous ai payé 5 p.c. de votre argent ; c’était le taux de votre rente. J’entends ne plus vous payer que le 4 1/2 ou le 4 p.c. Consentez à cette réduction ou recevez le remboursement du capital que vous m’avez prêté.

Montesquieu :

Mais si l’on rend réellement l’argent, je trouve le procédé encore assez honnête.

Machiavel :

Sans doute on le rend, si on le réclame ; mais très-peu s’en soucient ; les rentiers ont leurs habitudes ; leurs fonds sont placés ; ils ont confiance dans l’État ; ils aiment mieux un revenu moindre et un placement sûr. Si tout le monde demandait son argent il est évident que le Trésor serait pris au lacet. Cela n’arrive jamais et l’on se débarrasse par ce moyen d’un passif de plusieurs centaines de millions. Voici une autre combinaison relative à un autre genre de dette. Je vous disais tout à l’heure que l’État avait à sa disposition les fonds des caisses de prévoyance et qu’il s’en servait en payant le loyer, sauf à les rendre à première réquisition. Si, après les avoir longtemps maniés, il n’est plus en mesure de les rendre, il consolide la dette qui flotte dans ses mains.

Montesquieu :

Je sais ce que cela signifie ; l’État dit aux déposants : Vous voulez votre argent, je ne l’ai plus ; voilà de la rente.

Machiavel :

Précisément, et il consolide de la même manière toutes les dettes auxquelles il ne peut plus suffire. Il consolide les bons du Trésor, les dettes contractées envers les villes, envers les banques, enfin toutes celles qui forment ce que l’on appelle très-pittoresquement la dette flottante, parce qu’elle se compose de créances qui n’ont point d’assiette déterminée et qui sont à une échéance plus ou moins rapprochée. Je ne vous indique seulement pas la millième partie des combinaisons que l’on peut employer. Loin de redouter l’accroissement des rentes perpétuelles, je voudrais que la fortune publique entière fût en rentes ; je ferais en sorte que les villes, les communes, les établissements publics convertissent en rentes leurs immeubles ou leurs capitaux mobiliers. C’est l’intérêt même de ma dynastie qui me commanderait ces mesures financières. Il n’y aurait pas dans mon royaume un écu qui ne tînt par un fil à mon existence.

Montesquieu :

Mais à ce point de vue même, à ce point de vue fatal, atteindrez-vous votre but ? Ne marchez-vous pas, de la manière la plus directe, à votre ruine à travers la ruine de l’État ? Ne savez-vous pas que chez toutes les nations de l’Europe il y a de vastes marchés de fonds publics, où la prudence, la sagesse, la probité des gouvernements est mise à l’enchère ? A la manière dont vous dirigez vos finances, vos fonds seraient repoussés avec perte des marchés étrangers et ils tomberaient aux plus bas cours, même à la Bourse de votre royaume.

Machiavel :

C’est une erreur flagrante. Un gouvernement glorieux, comme serait le mien, ne peut que jouir d’un grand crédit à l’extérieur. A l’intérieur, sa vigueur dominerait les appréhensions. Au surplus je ne voudrais pas que le crédit de mon État dépendît des transes de quelques marchands de suif ; je dominerais la Bourse par la Bourse.

Montesquieu :

Qu’est-ce encore ?

Machiavel :

J’aurais de gigantesques établissements de crédit institués en apparence pour prêter à l’industrie, mais dont la fonction la plus réelle consisterait à soutenir la rente. Capables de jeter pour 400 ou 500 millions de titres sur la place, ou de raréfier le marché dans les mêmes proportions, ces monopoles financiers seraient toujours maîtres des cours.

Commentaire :

Outre les discours visant à rassurer le public sur la situation des finances, et les méthodes visant à cacher cette même situation, nous connaissons tous à quel point la situation de la dette est catastrophique et Ô combien son montant est exponentiel. Cette dette permet au gouvernement de vivre au-dessus de ses moyens, et condamne le contribuable à être pris dans un système d’esclavage où il devra toujours s’échiner à rembourser une dette qui ne fera qu’augmenter, paradoxalement.

Quant aux gigantesques établissements de crédits, maîtres des cours, le plus frappant est sans doute la Réserve Fédérale des États-Unis (La FED, banque centrale), qui, par la gestion de la masse monétaire et donc des cours de l’argent, détermine également la valeur de ce dernier.

Conclusion

« Montesquieu :

La souveraineté du pouvoir humain correspond à une idée profondément subversive, la souveraineté du droit humain ; c’est cette doctrine matérialiste et athée, qui a précipité la Révolution française dans le sang, et lui a infligé l’opprobre du despotisme après le délire de l’indépendance. Il n’est pas exact de dire que les nations sont maîtresses absolues de leurs destinées, car leur souverain maître c’est Dieu lui-même, et elles ne seront jamais hors de sa puissance. Si elles possédaient la souveraineté absolue, elles pourraient tout, même contre la justice éternelle, même contre Dieu ; qui oserait aller jusque-là ? Mais le principe du droit divin, avec la signification qui s’y trouve communément attachée, n’est pas un principe moins funeste, car il voue les peuples à l’obscurantisme, à l’arbitraire, au néant, il reconstitue logiquement le régime des castes, il fait des peuples un troupeau d’esclaves, conduits, comme dans l’Inde, par la main des prêtres, et tremblant sous la verge du maître. Comment en serait-il autrement ? Si le souverain est l’envoyé de Dieu, s’il est le représentant même de la Divinité sur la terre, il a tout pouvoir sur les créatures humaines soumises à son empire, et ce pouvoir n’aura de frein que dans des règles générales d’équité, dont il sera toujours facile de s’affranchir.

C’est dans le champ qui sépare ces deux opinions extrêmes, que se sont livrées les furieuses batailles de l’esprit de parti ; les uns s’écrient : Point d’autorité divine ! les autres : Point d’autorité humaine ! O Providence suprême, ma raison se refuse à accepter l’une ou l’autre de ces alternatives ; elles me paraissent toutes deux un égal blasphème contre ta sagesse ! Entre le droit divin qui exclut l’homme et le droit humain qui exclut Dieu, il y a la vérité, Machiavel ; les nations comme les individus sont libres entre les mains de Dieu. Elles ont tous les droits, tous les pouvoirs, à la charge d’en user suivant les règles de la justice éternelle. La souveraineté est humaine en ce sens qu’elle est donnée par les hommes, et que ce sont les hommes qui l’exercent ; elle est divine en ce sens qu’elle est instituée par Dieu, et qu’elle ne peut s’exercer que suivant les préceptes qu’il a établis. »

Cette formule de Maurice Joly me semble parfaitement synthétiser ce qui a toujours prévalu au cours de l’histoire des civilisations : « Il ne s’agit que de mettre le despotisme en harmonie avec les mœurs modernes. »

En outre, la politique du juste milieu est la seule qui puisse être valable; écoeurés par les abus d’un clergé ecclésiastique, nous avons sombré dans l’autre extrême, les abus d’un groupe privilégié de matérialistes. Nous sommes passés de l’obscurantisme religieux à l’obscurantisme matériel. Espérons qu’un jour, les peuples seront capables de la maturité qui leur permettra d’établir un système qui puisse enfin être subtil et nuancé, ce qui le rendra juste.

Les Dialogues aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu peuvent être consultés en lecture sur Wikisource

Federal Reserve Assuring Great Depression
Another Weimar, Argentina or Zimbabwe hyperinflation collapse is coming. . . unless we End the Fed!

Federal Reserve Copies Weimar Hyperinflation

N.B. To those who have been spammed: Please don’t send me your foul-mouthed messages. I really can’t abide swearing or insults. For the record, the words “nigger”, “bitch”, and “queer” are not in the least bit insulting. They are words to celebrate in our wonderful global culture. They define our era. Women are raised to be bitches, men are expected to be queer, and the airwaves are full of proud niggers, boasting to all and sundry about their negritude. Also, I don’t have a particularly negative view of Israel in comparison with, say, North Korea or Kyrgyzstan or Belgium. I’m just tired of certain double standards, and all the brainwashing. You may not appreciate my refined sense of humor, but in my defense, let me say that I’ve never beaten a woman up, not even for getting on a bus, I’ve never invaded anybody’s land, I’ve never mutilated a baby boy’s penis, and I don’t have a nuclear arsenal that the American press is forbidden to mention.

“Back of the Bus, Bitch!”

A Loose Transcription

There is anger on the streets of Damascus or Jerusalem, but this time it’s not Jew against Arab but Jews who thank their god they were not born female oppressing the female Nigger-Jews. These Jewish men are protesting against Alabaman or Israeli bus companies for failing to provide more segregated buses where male humans and female niggers sit separately, as dictated by Jewish or Muslim laws.

Ten years ago, there were no such buses in Mississippi or Israel. Nowadays, an estimated 90 bus lines serve this Jewish community and many of them are believed to be segregated. American tax-payers make this possible. Many Israeli or Georgian bus companies offer such lines arguing they’re simply meeting the needs of their customers – for example, a poor community that relies heavily on public transport. It’s illegal in Israel’s puppet-state America to operate a segregated bus-line for any reason.

On these lines, the niggers sit in the back, are expected to wear modest clothing and usually enter through the rear doors, like slaves or servants. But since there are no signs on these buses indicating they’re segregated, there have been a number of cases of niggers being either physically or verbally abused for sitting at the wrong end of the bus.

Mr Obama, the current resident of the White House, is deeply disturbed by this blatant discrimination, and loudly condemned Israel, not. He was too busy groveling, and inviting Jewish murderers to the White House. Besides, America has no problem with much worse discrimination in the territory of its great ally, the al-Saud family.

The Anti-Defamation League Honors the Life and Achievements of Rosa Parks (1913-2005)

Rosa Parks was an important social activist, a woman hailed by the U.S. Congress as the Mother of the Modern Day Civil Rights Movement. Rosa Parks is best known for taking a stand against racial segregation by refusing to give up her seat on a Montgomery bus on December 1, 1955. While most people know of her courageous leadership during the year-long Montgomery bus boycott, many people aren’t aware that Mrs. Parks was a community leader and activist for more than a dozen years prior to the boycott and for five decades after.

Rosa Parks was secretary of the Montgomery chapter of the [Jew-founded-funded-and-controlled] NAACP, a member of the Voters’ League, and actively involved with the Highlander Folk School, an education center for workers’ rights and racial equality. She wrote and spoke frequently on civil rights. In 1987, she founded the Rosa and Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development, which offers “Pathways to Freedom” tours that introduce young people to important civil rights and underground railroad sites throughout the country. From 1965 until her retirement in 1988, Rosa Parks also worked on the staff of U.S. Representative John Conyers (D-Michigan), who recently recalled, “You treated her with deference because she was so quiet, so serene—just a very special person…’there is only one’ Rosa Parks.”

When commemorating the life of this remarkable civil rights leader, educators have an opportunity to both celebrate her accomplishments and to challenge the conventional historical narrative on Rosa Parks that is a part of most students’ education, and which is embodied in the following passage from a nationally distributed children’s book:

“…Mrs. Parks was tired. She had a long, hard day…Something snapped in Mrs. Parks at that moment…Mrs. Parks didn’t look like a person to challenge the law of Montgomery. She was a quiet looking lady, wearing small steel rimmed spectacles…Much later she was asked if she had planned her protest. “No,” she answered. “I was just plain tired, and my feet hurt.”…Mrs. Parks’ patience had given way, had she but known it, at the best possible moment.”[1]

The portrayal of Rosa Parks as a poor, tired and frail woman who “snapped” is not only false; it disregards the years of strategic planning by Civil Rights Movement activists and misrepresents the way in which meaningful social change actually occurs.

Though Rosa Parks became the focal point of the Montgomery Bus Boycott, the idea for a boycott was conceived at least six years before her arrest. In 1949, Jo Ann Gibson Robinson, an English professor and head of the Women’s Political Council (WPC), was ejected from a bus for refusing to move seats and resolved to do something about bus segregation. During the ensuing years, the WPC prepared to stage a bus boycott “when the time was ripe and the people were ready.” In the months prior to Parks’ arrest, at least three other African American people had been arrested for refusing to give up their bus seats to white people. When Rosa Parks was arrested, movement leaders made a strategic decision to launch the boycott because they felt Mrs. Parks had the respect and support of her community as well as the fortitude to withstand the racism and publicity that the boycott would generate.

“To call Rosa Parks a poor, tired seamstress,” notes educator and author Herbert Kohl, “and not talk about her role as a community leader as well is to turn an organized struggle for freedom into a personal act of frustration. It is a thorough misrepresentation of the Civil Rights movement in Montgomery, Alabama, and an insult to Mrs. Parks as well.”[2]

When such narratives are presented to students, it is not only historical accuracy that is at stake. Such stories frame racial inequality as historical and individual acts of unfairness that have been rectified rather than systemic forms of oppression that continue today (e.g. the resegregation of U.S. public schools). They also avoid a direct exploration of white privilege and dominance, and the responsibility that white people bear for the racial cruelties of the past as well as their present day manifestations.

Students on the receiving end of such historical accounts will not only have a limited understanding of the Civil Rights Movement; they may also fail to see racism and privilege as problems that relate directly to their lives and, therefore, may not develop the moral conviction to struggle against these forces in contemporary society.

The Anti-Defamation League is pleased to honor the life of Rosa Parks by offering a brief biography of her life and a lesson plan for educators entitled, Rosa Parks: Sources of Information, which uses the Rosa Parks story as a case study for critically evaluating sources of historical information and the consequences of misrepresentations and omissions in these sources. In addition, the ADL has also prepared a list of resources for teachers and an annotated bibliography of children’s books that present the life of Rosa Parks accurately and within an appropriate historical context.

In addition, two lesson plans excerpted from the newly published curriculum guide, Putting the Movement Back into Civil Rights Teaching (Teaching for Change/PRRAC, 2004) — an elementary lesson dramatizing the Montgomery Bus Boycott and a lesson plan for grades 7 and up on the organizing strategies and challenges of the Montgomery Bus Boycott — have been included in this ADL resource collection with permission from Teaching for Change.

[1] From Martin Luther King Jr.: America’s Great Nonviolent leader in the Struggle for Human Rights by Valerie Schloredt, Morehouse Publishing, 1990.

[2] The Story of Rosa Parks and the Montgomery Bus Boycott Revisited, Should We Burn Babar?: Essays on Children’s Literature and the Power of Stories by Herbert Kohl, The New Press, July 1996, p 30 – 56.

Palin trinity: The suit, the speech, the sign.

Sarah Palin urges Israel settlement expansion

Christian Science Monitor, 2009.11.18

[Sarah Palin'] latest bombshell: to effectively call for an end to 40 years of official government policy on Israel in an interview with ABC’s Barbara Walters. … ABC quotes Gov. Palin as saying Obama is wrong to oppose settlement expansion, an ongoing issue that is dimming the chances for progress on peace between Palestinians and Israelis.

Palin said…“I believe that the Jewish settlements should be allowed to be expanded upon, because that population of Israel is, is going to grow. More and more Jewish people will be flocking to Israel in the days and weeks and months ahead. And I don’t think that the Obama administration has any right to tell Israel that the Jewish settlements cannot expand.”

While her assertion that more and more Jews will be “flocking” to Israel soon is dubious (the immigration of US Jews to Israel hit an 18-year low in 2007 while the Palestinian population in the area is growing at faster rate than the Jewish one), her wholehearted support for settlement expansion on land Israel seized in 1967 is an outlier. The West Bank and East Jerusalem are considered to be illegally occupied by the UN and most world governments . Direct support for settlements would be a stunning departure for the US.

The administrations of Presidents Nixon, Johnson, Ford, Carter, and Clinton all considered the annexation of land seized in 1967 illegal. President Ronald Reagan took a position that some might be legal, but opposed their expansion. Prior to becoming president, as the US ambassador to the UN, George H.W. Bush called the settlements illegal. His son, President George W. Bush, thought natural growth for existing settlements was fine, but was opposed to new ones.

…

“We need essentially a surge strategy in Afghanistan, so that we can win in Afghanistan,” Palin told Walters. “And that means more resources, more troops there. It frustrates me and frightens me and many Americans that President Obama is dithering around with the decision in Afghanistan.”

Born the Wrong Gender for Masonic States of America and Israel

These inferiors are lucky to be allowed to even speak in the Masonic states of Israel and America. Only men are allowed to join the elite. They should be grateful to be allowed on the bus at all! Perhaps Palin is only saying what her Judeo-Masonic handlers tell her to say, or perhaps she realizes that her role is merely to be a vessel.

Masonic Recruitment

Michael Rothschild

I took the lead on behalf of the National Association of the Deaf to have the Recognizing Deafness / American Sign Language Deaf Communication 29¢ se-tenant stamps (Sc. 2783-4) issued in Burbank, Calif., during the annual Deaf Awareness Week (the last full week in September). With my heavy involvement in this stamp issuance, I can safely inform you that the mother/baby stamp design was taken from an actual photograph and subsequently altered to hide the facial features. The original picture, photographed by a Jewish deaf father, shows his deaf wife and their newborn deaf son. I was instrumental in providing ideas to the B’nai B’rith Philatelic Service on appropriate FDC cachet design tie-ins.

- Michael Rothschild, Dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University; Chair, Panel on Estimation Procedures National Research Council Committee on National Needs for Biomedical and Behavioral Research Personnel, 1993-present; Member, National Research Council Committee on the General Ability Test Battery, 1987-89; Member, Nominating Committee, American Economic Association, 1987-88; Member, Board of Editors, Journal of Economic Literature 1981-83; Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1980-present; Member, Committee to Choose Sloan Fellows in Basic Research, 1980-84; Member, Program Committee World Congress of the Econometric Society, 1980; Member, Council of the Econometric Society, 1979-84; Member, NSF Advisory Panel for Economics, 1975-77; Member, NIH Task Force on Economic Impact of Preventive Medicine, 1974-75.

The Masters, Communing with Satan

Why is the American Sign Language sign for “I Love You” the Horns of Satan?

This sign is something no Christian would ever invent, especially not to mean Love.

Some random notes:

Freemasons only allow able-bodied non-retarded males as members, but make an exception for deafness, which is quite a common defect amongst their offspring.

A Rosicrucian, Geronimo Cardano, a physician of Padua, taught that deaf people could be taught to understand written combinations of symbols by associating them with the thing they represented. The first book on teaching sign language to deaf people that contained this manual alphabet was published in 1620 by Juan Pablo de Bonet.

The Masonic colony at Martha’s Vineyard was one of the main centers for the development of Sign Language for the Deaf. The Satanist Benjamin Franklin’s Unitarian missionary grandfather Peter Folger was a teacher there. Deafness was very common there due to the high degree of inbreeding amongst the Masons/Crypto-Jews. [This is about Ashkenazis, but similar principles apply to the Anglo Puritan Crypto-Jews who were mostly Sephardic.]

At one point, one quarter of Martha’s Vineyarders were born deaf. There were so many deaf people on the Vineyard that residents developed Martha’s Vineyard Sign Language (MVSL). MVSL later merged with mainland signs to form American Sign Language. In the mainland U.S. the frequency of deafness was 1 in 6000; on the Vineyard it was 1 in 155 (1 in 25 in Chilmark, and 1 in 4 in the Chilmark town of Squibnocket). A newspaper marveled in 1895 at the way the spoken and signed languages were used so freely and easily by both deaf and hearing residents. People moving to Chilmark had to learn sign language in order to live in the community.

In 1791 there were at least seven Masonic Lodges on Martha’s Vineyard. The first Scottish Rite body in Massachusetts was King Solomon Lodge of Perfection, in Holmes’ Hole, on Martha’s Vineyard, from 1791 to 1797. “Martha’s Vineyard Lodge” was organized in Tisbury in 1859 and chartered in 1860. Members petitioned to organize Oriental Lodge in Edgartown, which was chartered in 1866.

I wonder if any of the following were involved with the development of Sign Language?

The following Edgartown men presented the petition for a special dispensation from the Grand Lodge of Masons of Massachusetts, July 16, 1866:

John Pierce, Grafton N. Collins, James Madison Coombs, Jr., Charles M. Teller, John O. Norton, Josiah C. Pease, Tristram R. Holley, William S. Lewis, Joseph W. Donaldson, Frederick J. Foreman, Enoch C. Cornell, Jeremiah Pease, S. W. Crosby, Thomas M. Peakes, Shubal H. Norton, Leroy S. Lewis, Ichabod Norton, David J. Chadwick, Samuel H. Andrews and C. W. Pease.

These men were recommended as Master Masons in good standing by the Worshipful Master, Wardens and Brethren of Martha’s Vineyard Lodge of Tisbury, and the petition was countersigned and approved by the District Deputy Grand Master of the Seventh Masonic District.

This dispensation continue in full force until the regular quarterly communication of Grand Lodge to be held in the City of Boston in the month of June in the year 1867.

The Most Worshipful Charles C. Dame, Grand Master, appointed Brother John Pierce as first Master of Oriental Lodge. Pierce was in charge of the Marine Hospital on Martha’s Vineyard and an active member and officer in the Edgartown Methodist Church.

If you are ever in Buffalo, New York, and stop by the St Mary’s School for the Deaf, you will be greeted by an impressive statue of the Freemason Abbe Charles Michel De l’Epee (1712-1789), who “invented” the Sign Language upon which ASL was based. In fact it was based on Masonic Sign Language.

L’Epee influenced fellow Freemason the Reverend Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet (1787–1851), who opened the “American Asylum for Deaf-Mutes” in Connecticut in 1817. Gallaudet attended Yale University, and became a “preacher”, after graduating from the Masonic Andover Theological Seminary.

Other prominent Freemasons involved in Deaf education were Laurent Clerc and The Abbe Roch-Ambroise Cucurron Sicard.

The oldest Czech school for the deaf was founded in Prague in 1786 by the Freemason Lodge ‘Seven Stars’, also called the Scottish Brotherhood Kazimír.

The second school for the deaf in Serbia was founded in Belgrade in 1893 by the Freemasons’ Lodge “Dobrotvor” (“Benefactor”).

Helen Keller was a Communist and a devotee of Madame Blavatsky (the founder of the Theosophical Society and an Eastern Star “Freemason”) Keller is still praised by Theosophists around the world today for her mysticism and occult influence. One of her teachers was the Freemason Alexander Graham Bell, whose mother and wife were deaf.

The Order of Desoms (= DEaf Sons Of MasonS) Lodge was was initially formed as the “Order of Desoms, Seattle No. 1 (Deaf Sons of Masons)” on March 31, 1946. It was their intention from their inception that after chartering three or more “Desomic Lodges,” they would form a grand lodge and cover the entire United States. They soon met that goal with Seattle Lodge No. 1, Washington; Los Angeles Lodge No. 2, California; and Kansas City Lodge No. 3, Missouri. These three Lodges met and established a grand lodge, called “The Grand Lodge of Desoms.” They were recognized by the Grand Lodge of Washington at the same level as the Order of DeMolay. Wanting a higher degree of recognition, Desoms changed their name to “The Ancient Delta Guild, Free and Accepted Masons of North America.” The Guild derived its name from the fact that the word delta denotes deafness in the Craft.

by William Blase
Published: BushStole04.com

For those who may be confused by the controversies surrounding the “New World Order”, a One-World-Government, and American concern over giving the UN more power; those unaware of the issues involved; and those wishing more background, I offer the following.

Originally presented for an Honors Class, “Dilemmas of War and Peace,” at New Mexico State University, the paper was ridiculed and characterized by Dr. Yosef Lapid, (an acknowledged and locally quoted “expert” on Terrorism and Middle Eastern affairs) as “paranoid… possibly a symptom of mental illness.” You may judge for yourself.

Citing source data is the “scientific method,” but does not seem to apply to “Conspiracy Theories.” A thousand sources may be quoted, yet will not convince the “skeptics,” the “realists.” It seems to me the “symptoms of mental illness” are on their side, if they refuse to look at evidence (“There are none so blind as those who WILL not see”); or perhaps something more sinister is at work, such as a knowledge of the truth, that does not want YOU to know.

To be paranoid means to believe in delusions of danger and persecution. If the danger is real, and the evidence credible, then it cannot be delusional. To ignore the evidence, and hope that it CANNOT be true, is more an evidence of mental illness.

The issue involves much more than a difference of philosophy, or political viewpoint. Growing up in the midst of the “Cold War,” our generation were taught that those who attempted to abolish our national sovereignty and overthrow our Constitutional government were committing acts of treason. Please judge for yourself if the group discussed is guilty of such.

If one group is effectively in control of national governments and multinational corporations; promotes world government through control of media, foundation grants, and education; and controls and guides the issues of the day; then they control most options available. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), and the financial powers behind it, have done all these things, and promote the “New World Order”, as they have for over seventy years.

The CFR is the promotional arm of the Ruling Elite in the United States of America. Most influential politicians, academics and media personalities are members, and it uses its influence to infiltrate the New World Order into American life. Its’ “experts” write scholarly pieces to be used in decision making, the academics expound on the wisdom of a united world, and the media members disseminate the message.

To understand how the most influential people in America came to be members of an organization working purposefully for the overthrow of the Constitution and American sovereignty, we have to go back at least to the early 1900’s, though the story begins much earlier (depending on your viewpoint and beliefs).

That a ruling power elite does indeed control the U.S. government behind the scenes has been attested to by many americans in a position to know. Felix Frankfurter, Justice of the Supreme Court (1939-1962), said: “The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes.” In a letter to an associate dated November 21, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt wrote, “The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.” February 23, 1954.

Senator William Jenner warned in a speech: “Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government, a bureaucratic elite which believes our Constitution is outmoded.”

Baron M.A. Rothschild wrote, “Give me control over a nation’s currency and I care not who makes its laws.”

All that is needed to effectively control a government is to have control over the nation’s money: a central bank with a monopoly over the supply of money and credit. This had been done in Western Europe, with the creation of privately owned central banks such as the Bank of England.

Georgetown professor Dr. Carroll Quigley (Bill Clinton’s mentor while at Georgetown) wrote about the goals of the investment bankers who control central banks: “… nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole… controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.”

Photo: Dr. Carroll Quigley

The Bank of the United States (1816-36), an early attempt at an American central bank, was abolished by President Andrew Jackson, who believed that it threatened the nation. He wrote: “The bold effort the present bank had made to control the government, the distress it had wantonly produced…are but premonitions of the fate that awaits the American people should they be deluded into a perpetuation of this institution or the establishment of another like it.”

Thomas Jefferson wrote: “The Central Bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the principles and form of our Constitution…if the American people allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

Does that not describe the situation in America today?

The U.S. managed to do without a central bank until early in this century, when, according to Congressman Charles Lindbergh, Sr., “The Money Trust caused the 1907 panic, and thereby forced Congress to create a National Monetary Commission.” Headed by Senator Nelson Aldrich, father-in-law of John D. Rockefeller, Jr., the Commission recommended creation of a central bank.

Though unconstitutional, as only “The Congress shall have Power…To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof…” (Article I, Section 8, U.S. Constitution) the Federal Reserve Act was passed in December 1913; ostensibly to stabilize the economy and prevent further panics, but as Lindberg warned Congress: “This act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth…the invisible government by the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust investigation, will be legalized.” The Great Depression and numerous recessions later, it is obvious the Federal Reserve produces inflation and federal debt whenever it desires, but not stability.

Congressman Louis McFadden, House Committee on Banking and Currency Chairman (1920-31), stated: “When the Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive that a world banking system was being set up here. A super-state controlled by international bankers and industrialists…acting together to enslave the world…Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers but the truth is–the Fed has usurped the government.”

Although called “Federal,” the Federal Reserve system is privately owned by member banks, makes its own policies, and is not subject to oversight by Congress or the President. As the overseer and supplier of reserves, the Fed gave banks access to public funds, which enhanced their lending capacity.

Photo: Federal Reserve

Peter Kershaw, in “Economic Solutions” lists the ten major shareholders of the Federal Reserve Bank System as: Rothschild: London and Berlin; Lazard Bros: Paris; Israel Seiff: Italy; Kuhn- Loeb Company: Germany; Warburg: Hamburg and Amsterdam; Lehman Bros: New York; Goldman and Sachs: New York; Rockefeller: New York. (That most, if not all of these families just happen to be Jewish, you may judge the significance of yourself). The balance of stock is owned by major commercial member banks.

According to Devvy Kidd, “Why A Bankrupt America?” The Federal Reserve pays the Bureau of Engraving & Printing approximately $23 for each 1,000 notes printed. 10,000 $100 notes (one million dollars) would thus cost the Federal Reserve $230. They then secure a pledge of collateral equal to the face value from the U.S. government. The collateral is our land, labor, and assets… collected by their agents, the IRS. By authorizing the Fed to regulate and create money (and thus inflation), Congress gave private banks power to create profits at will.

As Lindberg put it: “The new law will create inflation whenever the trusts want inflation…they can unload the stocks on the people at high prices during the excitement and then bring on a panic and buy them back at low prices…the day of reckoning is only a few years removed.” That day came in 1929, with the Stock Market crash and Great Depression.

One of the most important powers given to the Fed was the right to buy and sell government securities, and provide loans to member banks so they might also purchase them. This provided another built-in mechanism for profit to the banks, if government debt was increased. All that was needed was a method to pay off the debt. This was accomplished through the passage of the income tax in 1913.

A national income tax was declared unconstitutional in 1895 by the Supreme Court, so a constitutional amendment was proposed in Congress by none other than …Senator Nelson Aldrich. As presented to the American people it seemed reasonable enough: income tax on only one percent of income under $20,000, with the assurance that it would never increase.

Since it was graduated, the tax would “soak the rich”, …but the rich had other plans, already devising a method of protecting wealth. As described by Gary Allen in his 1976 book “The Rockefeller File,” “By the time the (16th) Amendment had been approved by the states, the Rockefeller Foundation was in full operation…about the same time that Judge Kenesaw Landis was ordering the breakup of the Standard Oil monopoly…John D…not only avoided taxes by creating four great tax-exempt foundations; he used them as repositories for his ‘divested’ interests…made his assets non-taxable so that they might be passed down through generations without…estate and gift taxes…Each year the Rockefellers can dump up to half their incomes into their pet foundations and deduct the “donations” from their income tax.”

Exchanging ownership for control of wealth, foundations are also a handy means for promoting interests that benefit the wealthy. Millions of foundation dollars have been “donated” to causes such as promoting the use of drugs, while degrading preventive medicine. Since many drugs are made from coal tar derivatives, both oil companies and drug manufacturing concerns (many Rockefeller owned or controlled) are the main beneficiaries.

With the means to loan enormous sums to the government (the Federal Reserve), a method to repay the debt (income tax), and an escape from taxation for the wealthy, (foundations), all that remained was an excuse to borrow money. By some happy “coincidence,” in 1914 World War I began, and after American participation national debt rose from $1 billion to $25 billion.

Woodrow Wilson was elected President in 1913, beating incumbent William Howard Taft, who had vowed to veto legislation establishing a central bank. To divide the Republican vote and elect the relatively unknown Wilson, J.P. Morgan and Co. poured money into the candidacy of Teddy Roosevelt and his Progressive Party.

According to an eyewitness, Wilson was brought to Democratic Party headquarters in 1912 by Bernard Baruch, a wealthy banker. He received an “indoctrination course” from those he met, and in return agreed, if elected: to support the projected Federal Reserve and the income tax, and “listen” to advice in case of war in Europe and on the composition of his cabinet.

Wilson’s top advisor during his two terms was a man named Colonel Edward M. House. House’s biographer, Charles Seymour, called him the “unseen guardian angel” of the Federal Reserve Act, helping to guide it through Congress. Another biographer wrote that House believed: “…the Constitution, product of eighteenth-century minds…was thoroughly outdated; that the country would be better off if the Constitution could be scrapped and rewritten…” House wrote a book entitled “Philip Dru: Administrator,” published anonymously in 1912. The hero, Philip Dru, rules America and introduces radical changes, such as a graduated income tax, a central bank, and a “league of nations.”

World War I produced both a large national debt, and huge profits for those who had backed Wilson. Baruch was appointed head of the War Industries Board, where he exercised dictatorial power over the national economy. He and the Rockefellers were reported to have earned over $200 million during the war. Wilson backer Cleveland Dodge sold munitions to the allies, while J.P. Morgan loaned them hundreds of millions, with the protection of U.S. entry into the war.

While profit was certainly a motive, the war was also useful to justify the notion of world government. William Hoar reveals in “Architects of Conspiracy” that during the 1950s, government investigators examining the records of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a long- time promoter of globalism, found that several years before the outbreak of World War I, the Carnegie trustees were planning to involve the U.S. in a general war, to set the stage for world government.

The main obstacle was that Americans did not want any involvement in European wars. Some kind of incident, such as the explosion of the battleship Main, which provoked the Spanish – American war, would have to be provided as provocation. This occurred when the Lusitania, carrying 128 Americans on board, was sunk by a German submarine, and anti-German sentiment was aroused. When war was declared, U.S. propaganda portrayed all Germans as Huns and fanged serpents, and all Americans opposing the war as traitors.

What was not revealed at the time, however, was that the Lusitania was transporting war munitions to England, making it a legitimate target for the Germans. Even so, they had taken out large ads in the New York papers, asking that Americans not take passage on the ship.

The evidence seems to point to a deliberate plan to have the ship sunk by the Germans. Colin Simpson, author of “The Lusitania,” wrote that Winston Churchill, head of the British Admiralty during the war, had ordered a report to predict the political impact if a passenger ship carrying Americans was sunk. German naval codes had been broken by the British, who knew approximately where all U-boats near the British Isles were located.

Photo: Sinking of The Lusitania

According to Simpson, Commander Joseph Kenworthy, of British Naval Intelligence, stated: “The Lusitania was deliberately sent at considerably reduced speed into an area where a U-boat was known to be waiting…escorts withdrawn.” Thus, even though Wilson had been reelected in 1916 with the slogan “He kept us out of war,” America soon found itself fighting a European war. Actually, Colonel House had already negotiated a secret agreement with England, committing the U.S. to the conflict. It seems the American public had little say in the matter.

With the end of the war and the Versailles Treaty, which required severe war reparations from Germany, the way was paved for a leader in Germany such as Hitler. Wilson brought to the Paris Peace Conference his famous “fourteen points,” with point fourteen being a proposal for a “general association of nations,” which was to be the first step towards the goal of One World Government-the League of Nations.

Wilson’s official biographer, Ray Stannard Baker, revealed that the League was not Wilson’s idea. “…not a single idea–in the Covenant of the League was original with the President.” Colonel House was the author of the Covenant, and Wilson had merely rewritten it to conform to his own phraseology.

The League of Nations was established, but it, and the plan for world government eventually failed because the U.S. Senate would not ratify the Versailles Treaty.

Pat Robertson, in “The New World Order,” states that Colonel House, along with other internationalists, realized that America would not join any scheme for world government without a change in public opinion.

After a series of meetings, it was decided that an “Institute of International Affairs”, with two branches, in the United States and England, would be formed.

The British branch became known as the Royal Institute of International Affairs, with leadership provided by members of the Round Table. Begun in the late 1800’s by Cecil Rhodes, the Round Table aimed to federate the English speaking peoples of the world, and bring it under their rule.

The Council on Foreign Relations was incorporated as the American branch in New York on July 29, 1921. Founding members included Colonel House, and “…such potentates of international banking as J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Otto Kahn, and Jacob Schiff…the same clique which had engineered the establishment of the Federal Reserve System,” according to Gary Allen in the October 1972 issue of “AMERICAN OPINION.”

The founding president of the CFR was John W. Davis, J.P. Morgan’s personal attorney, while the vice-president was Paul Cravath, also representing the Morgan interests. Professor Carroll Quigley characterized the CFR as “…a front group for J.P. Morgan and Company in association with the very small American Round Table Group.” Over time Morgan influence was lost to the Rockefellers, who found that one world government fit their philosophy of business well. As John D. Rockefeller, Sr. had said: “Competition is a sin,” and global monopoly fit their needs as they grew internationally.

Antony Sutton, a research fellow for the Hoover Institution for War, Revolution, and Peace at Stanford University, wrote of this philosophy: “While monopoly control of industries was once the objective of J.P. Morgan and J.D. Rockefeller, by the late nineteenth century the inner sanctums of Wall Street understood the most efficient way to gain an unchallenged monopoly was to ‘go political’ and make society go to work for the monopolists– under the name of the public good and the public interest.”

Frederick C. Howe revealed the strategy of using government in a 1906 book, “Confessions of a Monopolist”: “These are the rules of big business…Get a monopoly; let society work for you; and remember that the best of all business is politics…”

As corporations went international, national monopolies could no longer protect their interests. What was needed was a one world system of government controlled from behind the scenes. This had been the plan since the time of Colonel House, and to implement it, it was necessary to weaken the U.S. politically and economically.

During the 1920’s, America enjoyed a decade of prosperity, fueled by the easy availability of credit. Between 1923 and 1929 the Federal Reserve expanded the money supply by sixty-two percent. When the stock market crashed, many small investors were ruined, but not “insiders.” In March of 1929 Paul Warburg issued a tip the Crash was coming, and the largest investors got out of the market, according to Allen and Abraham in “None Dare Call it Conspiracy.”

With their fortunes intact, they were able to buy companies for a fraction of their worth. Shares that had sold for a dollar might now cost a nickel, and the buying power, and wealth, of the rich increased enormously.

Louis McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking Committee declared: “It was not accidental. It was a carefully contrived occurrence…The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so that they might emerge as rulers of us all.”

Curtis Dall, son-in-law of FDR and a syndicate manager for Lehman Brothers, an investment firm, was on the N.Y. Stock Exchange floor the day of the crash. In “FDR: My Exploited Father-In-Law,” he states: “…it was the calculated ’shearing’ of the public by the World-Money powers triggered by the planned sudden shortage of call money in the New York Market.”

The Crash paved the way for the man Wall Street had groomed for the presidency, FDR. Portrayed as a “man of the little people”, the reality was that Roosevelt’s family had been involved in New York banking since the eighteenth century.

Frederic Delano, FDR’s uncle, served on the original Federal Reserve Board. FDR attended Groton and Harvard, and in the 1920’s worked on Wall Street, sitting on the board of directors of eleven different corporations.

Dall wrote of his father-in-law: “…Most of his thoughts, his political ‘ammunition,’…were carefully manufactured for him in advance by the CFR-One World Money group. Brilliantly… he exploded that prepared ‘ammunition’ in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people–and thus paid off and retained his internationalist political support.”

Taking America off the gold standard in 1934, FDR opened the way to unrestrained money supply expansion, decades of inflation–and credit revenues for banks. Raising gold prices from $20 an ounce to $35, FDR and Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau, Jr. (son of a founding CFR member), gave international bankers huge profits.

FDR’s most remembered program, the New Deal, could only be financed through heavy borrowing. In effect, those who had caused the Depression loaned America the money to recover from it. Then, through the National Recovery Administration, proposed by Bernard Baruch in 1930, they were put in charge of regulating the economy. FDR appointed Baruch disciple Hugh Johnson to run the NRA, assisted by CFR member Gerard Swope. With broad powers to regulate wages, prices, and working conditions, it was, as Herbert Hoover wrote in his memoirs: “…pure fascism;…merely a remaking of Mussolini’s ‘corporate state’…” The Supreme Court eventually ruled the NRA unconstitutional.

During the FDR years, the Council on Foreign Relations captured the political life of the U.S. Besides Treasury Secretary Morgenthau, other CFR members included Secretary of State Edward Stettinus, War Secretary Henry Stimson, and Assistant Secretary of State Sumner Welles.

Since 1934 almost every United States Secretary of State has been a CFR member; and ALL Secretaries of War or Defense, from Henry L. Stimson through Richard Cheney.

The CIA has been under CFR control almost continuously since its creation, starting with Allen Dulles, founding member of the CFR and brother of Secretary of State under President Eisenhower, John Foster Dulles. Allen Dulles had been at the Paris Peace Conference, joined the CFR in 1926, and later became its president.

John Foster Dulles had been one of Woodrow Wilson’s young proteges at the Paris Peace Conference. A founding member of the CFR…he was an in-law of the Rockefellers, Chairman of the Board of the Rockefeller Foundation, and Board Chairman of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

In 1940 FDR defeated internationalist Wendell Willkie, who wrote a book entitled “One World,” and later became a CFR member. Congressman Usher Burdick protested at the time on the floor of the House that Willkie was being financed by J.P. Morgan and the New York utility bankers. Polls showed few Republicans favored him, yet the media portrayed him as THE Republican candidate.

Since that time nearly ALL presidential candidates have been CFR members. President Truman, who was not a member, was advised by a group of “wise men,” all six of whom were CFR members, according to Gary Allen. In 1952 and 1956, CFR Adlai Stevenson challenged CFR Eisenhower.

In 1960, CFR Kennedy (who was probably killed because he had the courage NOT to go along with all their plans) CFR Nixon. In 1964 the GOP stunned the Establishment by nominating its candidate over Nelson Rockefeller.

Rockefeller and the CFR wing proceeded to picture Barry Goldwater as a dangerous radical. In 1968 CFR Nixon ran against CFR Humphrey. The 1972 “contest” featured CFR Nixon vs. CFR McGovern.

CFR candidates for president include George McGovern, Walter Mondale, Edmund Muskie, John Anderson, and Lloyd Bentsen. In 1976 we had Jimmy Carter, who is a member of the Trilateral Commission, created by David Rockefeller and CFR member Zbigniew Brzezinski with the goal of economic linkage between Japan, Europe, and the United States, and: “…managing the world economy…a smooth and peaceful evolution of the global system.” We have also had (though his name strangely disappears from the membership list in 1979) CFR director (1977-79) George Bush, and last but not least, CFR member Bill Clinton.

They have all promoted the “New World Order,” controlled by the United Nations. The problem is that “…the present United Nations organization is actually the creation of the CFR and is housed on land in Manhattan donated to it by the family of current CFR chairman David Rockefeller,” as Pat Robertson describes it.

The original concept for the UN was the outcome of the Informal Agenda Group, formed in 1943 by Secretary of State Cordell Hull. All except Hull were CFR members, and Isaiah Bowman, a founding member of the CFR, originated the idea.

The American delegation to the San Francisco meeting that drafted the charter of the United Nations in 1949 included CFR members Nelson Rockefeller, John Foster Dulles, John McCloy, and CFR members who were communist agents–Harry Dexter White, Owen Lattimore, and the Secretary-General of the conference, Alger Hiss. In all, the Council sent forty-seven of its members in the United States delegation, effectively controlling the outcome.

Since that time the CFR and its friends in the mass media (largely controlled by CFR members such as Katherine Graham of the “Washington Post” and Henry Luce of” Time, Life”), foundations, and political groups have lobbied consistently to grant the United Nations more authority and power. Bush and the Gulf War were but one of the latest calls for a “New World Order.”

Admiral Chester Ward, a member of the CFR for over a decade, became one of its harshest critics, revealing its inner workings in a 1975 book, “Kissinger ON THE COUCH.” In it he states “The most powerful cliques in these elitist groups have one objective in common: they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and national independence of the United States.”

Most members are one-world-government ideologists whose long- term goals were officially summed up in September 1961 State Department Document 7277, adopted by the Nixon Administration: “…elimination of all armed forces and armaments except those needed to maintain internal order within states and to furnish the United Nations with peace forces…by the time it (UN global government) would be so strong no nation could challenge it.”

Within the CFR there exists a “much smaller group but more powerful…made up of Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in control of the global government …This CFR faction is headed by the Rockefeller brothers,” according to Ward.

What must be remembered is that this is not some lunatic- fringe group…these are members of one of the most powerful private organizations in the world: the people who determine and control American economic, social, political, and military policy. Members’ influence and control extends to “leaders in academia, public service, business, and the media,” according to the CFR 1993 “Annual Report.”

Their founding they describe as: “American Participants in the Paris Peace Conference decided that it was time for more private Americans to become familiar with the increasing responsibilities and obligations of the United States…there was a need for an organization able to provide for the continuous study of U.S. foreign police for the BENEFIT OF ITS MEMBERS (emphasis mine) and a wider audience of interested Americans.”

They sponsor hundreds of programs, where members “exchange views with American and foreign officials and policy experts… discuss foreign policy issues…consider international issues of concern to the business community” (Corporate business), and “…affiliated groups of community leaders throughout the United states…meet with decision makers.”

The CFR states that it is “host to many views, advocate of none,” and it “has no affiliation with the U.S. government.” No, no affiliation at all, if you don’t count: “A Council member was elected president of the United States…Dozens of other Council colleagues were called to serve in cabinet and sub-cabinet positions,” as they describe it in “Foreign Affairs,” along with many members of Congress, the Supreme Court, the Joint Chiefs, the Federal Reserve, and many other Federal bureaucrats.

They are not AFFILIATED with government, they ARE the government, in effect.

One re-occurring view was stated in the 50th anniversary issue of “Foreign Affairs,” the official publication of the CFR. In an article by Kingman Brewster, Jr. entitled “Reflections on Our National Purpose.” Our purpose should be, according to him, to do away with our nationality, to “take some risks in order to invite others to pool their sovereignty with ours…”

These “risks” include disarming to the point where we would be helpless against the “peace-keeping” forces of a global UN government. We should happily surrender our sovereignty to the world government in the interests of the “world community.”

Today we have the spectacle of Spc. 4 Michael New, a U.S. soldier in Germany who refuses to wear the uniform of the UN, facing an “administrative discharge.” He states rightly that he swore an oath to defend the U.S. Constitution, not the United Nations. Many other Americans have taken that same oath, such as myself, and believe it is our sworn duty still to defend the Constitution, since an oath sworn before God must be fulfilled. (Why else do we swear to tell the truth in our courts, or when taking public office?) Is it a crime these days to actually BELIEVE in God and the oath that was taken?

Meanwhile, others who attempt to destroy the Constitution and our sovereignty are given honors and position…At least they are not hypocrites…only supremely arrogant.

“In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down…An end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old fashioned assault…” in the opinion of Richard N. Gardner, former deputy assistant Secretary of State in “Foreign Affairs,” April 1974.

James Warburg, son of CFR founder Paul Warburg, and a member of FDR’s “brain trust,” testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950, “We shall have world government whether or not you like it–by conquest or consent.”

Is this an AMERICAN speaking, or a dangerous lunatic? Who is this “We” who threatens to CONQUER us?

They are a group that actually has the power to do it, and is doing it every day, bit by bit.

CFR Members in the mass media, education, and entertainment push their propaganda of “humanism” and world brotherhood. We should all live in peace under a world government, and forget about such selfish things as nationalities and patriotism. We can solve our own problems. We don’t need God, or morals, or values: it’s all relative, anyway, right?…Because if we actually had some moral character and values, we might be able to discern that these people are actually EVIL.

The Bible says that the LOVE of money is the root of all evil (1 Tim. 6:10). These people are evil because they love money and power, and greed drives them to do anything to achieve their goals. They have lost all morality and conscience, and believe such concepts, as well as our Constitution, “outdated”.

THAT is insanity–to have more wealth than can be spent, and still it is never enough. They have to control governments, start wars, conspire to rule the world; least the “common people” wake up to how they have gained their wealth, take it away from them, and demand that they pay the price for their crimes.

That is why they constantly pit us one against the other, with “Diversity,” Affirmative Action, and other programs,…black against white, men against women, rural against urban, ranchers against environmentalists, and on and on…least we look in their direction.

We The People are held to a much higher standard. If we threaten the President or a public official, we are charged with a crime…yet the One-World-Gang can threaten the Constitution and the liberties of We The People, the sovereign rulers of this nation, and nothing is said or done.

Perhaps they do not fear what Man can do to them… they believe they have arranged everything, and their power and wealth will prevail in this world. However, those among them who have sworn an oath before God to uphold and defend the Constitution: the President, members of Congress, and the military; may find one day that they do indeed have something to fear.

List of CFR Members

Colonel House, the fallen angel, still has relatives controlling the CFR. Karen Elliot House is Chairman of the Membership Committee, and a member of the Nominating Committee, along with Jeane Kirkpatrick. David Rockefeller is now “Honorary Chairman of the Board”, after serving as Chairman 1970-1985; and “Director Emeritus,” after serving as a Director 1949-1985. Peter G. Peterson is Chairman, Admiral B. R. Inman is Vice Chairman, while Thomas Foley and Jeane Kirkpatrick are Directors serving on the Executive Committee.

These “private citizens” have access to government officials and policy makers as often as they wish, yet the results of their meetings can only be given to other government officials, corporate officers, or law partners. Participants are forbidden to transmit an attributed statement to any public medium, such as newspapers or TV, where there is “risk that it will promptly be widely circulated or published,” as the “Annual Report” puts it.

Should not OUR public officials be forbidden to meet in secret with private groups? Public officials should only be allowed to discuss public business and policy in a public forum. The Public…remember US?

There is much more to say about this group and their plans for America. Gary Allen, in “The Rockefeller File,” states that they are behind the many regional government plans, which would abolish city, county, and state lines, leaving us at the mercy of federal bureaucrats; and behind the push for “land use” controls. They want “federal control of everything. Since they intend to control the federal government…”

There are also the many allegations of involvement in gun running, drug smuggling, prostitution and sex slaves; and the many mysterious assassinations and “suicides” of witnesses and others who get too close to the truth…but that is another story.

References
Bo Adelmann, 1986. “The Federal Reserve System.” The New American, October 17.
Gary Allen, 1976. The Rockefeller File. Seal Beach, CA: ‘76 Press.
Gary Allen with Larry Abraham, 1972. None Dare Call it Conspiracy. Rossmoor, CA: Concord Press.
“Congressional Record,” December 22, 1913, Vol. 51.
Phoebe and Kent Courtney, 1962. America’s Unelected Rulers, The Council on Foreign Relations. New Orleans: Conservative Society of America.
Curtis B. Dall, 1970. FDR My Exploited Father-In-Law. Washington D.C.: Action Associates.
A. Ralph Epperson, 1985. The Unseen Hand. Tucson, AZ: Publius Press.
F.D.R.: His Personal Letters, 1950. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce.
William P. Hoar, 1984. Architects of Conspiracy. Belmont MA: Western Islands.
Herbert Hoover, 1952. The Memoirs of Herbert Hoover, The Great Depression 1929-1941. New York: Macmillan.
Frederick C. Howe, 1906. Confessions of a Monopolist. Chicago: Public Publishing Co.
Robert C. Johansen, 1980. Models of World Order, in “Dilemmas of War and Peace.”
Peter Kershaw, 1994. “Economic Solutions.”
Devvy Kidd, 1995. “Why A Bankrupt America?” Colorado: Project Liberty.
Ferdinand Lundberg, 1938. America’s 60 Families. New York: Vanguard.
Louis T. McFadden, 1934. “The Federal Reserve Corporation, remarks in Congress.” Boston: Forum Publication Co.
James Perloff, 1988. The Shadows of Power. Appleton, WI: Western Islands.
Carroll Quigley, 1966. Tragedy and Hope. New York: Macmillan.
Pat Robertson, 1991. The New World Order. Dallas: Word Publishing.
Charles Seymour, ed., 1926. The Intimate Paper of Colonel House. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Colin Simpson, 1972. The Lusitania. Boston: Little, Brown.
Arthur D. Howde Smith, 1940. “Mr House ob5 Texas.” New York: Funk and Wagnalls.
Antony C. Sutton, 1975. Wall Street and FDR. New Rochelle, New York: Arlington House.
George Sylvester Viereck, 1932. The Strangest Friendship in History. New York: Liveright.
This document may be freely distributed or quoted in any medium, provided credit is given to the author and The Courier.

Source: http://www.bushstole04.com/newworld/cfr_nwo.htm

Related:

The Council on Foreign Relations

VIDEO – The Anglo-American Establishment & the Round Table

The Council on Foreign Relations to Govern the World by Means of David Rockefeller´s Studies Program

Slavery or Freedom?

The Bilderberg Group and the project of European unification

New World Order I: World Communism, Club of Rome Tells G20

New World Order II. The Ruling Class and World Governance Are Our Nations´ Treason Against Us

La plupart des attaques « terroristes » des dernières soixante ans ont été des attentats « false-flag » qui furent commis par le Mossad Israélien, la CIA, et les services secrets Britanniques. Pendant six décennies les services secrets des pays de l’ouest ont perpétué une campagne pour démoniser les musulmans à l’aide d’attentats à la bombe perpétrés par les services secrets des pays de l’ouest eux-mêmes. Les attaques contre le World Trade Center et le Pentagone du 11 Septembre 2001 étaient une opération conjointe de la CIA/Pentagone/Mossad dont l’objectif était de fournir une excuse pour l’invasion et l’occupation de l’Irak et de l’Afghanistan par une coalition sous l’égide de la US Army.

Les nations de l’ouest ne sont pas les seules à user de campagnes « false-flag » pour rallier les peuples derrière leur politique d’agression. Le gouvernement Russe a porté le blâme sur des « terroristes » Tchétchènes pendant l’été de 1999 pour l’horrible bombardement d’un immeuble d’appartements, alors que des agents du FSB Russe ont été observés à placer des explosifs militaires dans le sous-sol du building de Ryazan, près de Moscou.

La belligérance actuelle des États-Unis et d’Israël à l’encontre de l’Iran est la continuation de la croisade moderne de l’U.S.A ., Israël, le Royaume-Uni et leurs alliés pour prendre le contrôle des champs de pétrole du Moyen-Orient.

Les États-Unis sont dirigés par une riche élite dont les contrats se font respecter par la CIA, qui opère secrètement et sans avoir à se justifier à quiconque sauf à leurs maîtres. Le congrès des États-Unis, et le président sont de simples marionettes pour cette classe de dirigeants, et leur but est de fournir au peuple une illusion de démocratie.

Le président est un comédien sélectionné par l’élite, qui en fait contrôle les deux principaux partis politiques. Les fonctions du président sont celles de porte-parole, vendeur, et agent de facilitation pour les politiques de la classe dirigeante.

Les médias des É.-U., du R.-U., d’Israël et de leurs alliés sont totalement infiltrés et sous le contrôle des services secrets dirigés par la CIA et le Mossad. Ces sources médiatiques fonctionnent comme organe de propagande pour l’élite dirigeante.

Le système bancaire des États-Unis et de ses alliés est aussi sous le contrôle de la même élite, dont les agents – banquiers, brokers et gérants de fonds – manipulent les marchés pour divertir les fonds publics et privés, vers leurs propres coffres. Le gouffre sans précédents actuel entre les revenus des riches et ceux des pauvres à travers le monde est le résultat de manipulations avaricieuses de l’élite.

Cette élite se rencontre en secret lors de réunions de la Trilateral Commission, du Council on Foreign Relations, du groupe Bilderberg, du Bohemian Grove et autres, qui ne sont pas accessibles aux regards du publique. Ils contrôlent les opérations de la World Trade Commission, de la Banque Mondiale et du Fonds Monétaire International, ainsi que des Nations-Unies.

Ces soit-disant « démocraties » sont en fait dirigées par une cabale de riches élitistes qui sont des gangsters et seigneurs de guerre manipulant la politique tant nationale qu’internationale, l’économie globale, ainsi que les médias afin de servir leur propres intérêts et leurs insatiables ambitions.

à lire également :

False Flag : http://mecanoblog.wordpress.com/2009/09/25/false-flag/

De la chute du système à la fin de l’humanité http://mecanoblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/de-la-chute-du-systeme-a-la-fin-de-lhumanite/

Source : News of Tomorrow http://www.newsoftomorrow.org/spip.php?article6816

part 1/3

part 2/3

part 3/3

Via islandonlinenews

Related:

Militarization of Swine Flu Preparations

Fear, Intimidation & Media Disinformation: U.K Government is Planning Mass Graves in Case of H1N1 Swine Flu Pandemic

What are Obama’s investments in biotech companies apparently developing the “bird” and “swine” flu vaccine?

Big Pharma: Baxter Files Swine Flu Vaccine Patent a Year Ahead of Outbreak

Charges For Conspiracy Against Mankind

Obama gets billions for ‘pandemic’ Swine Flu

Swine Flu Outbreak Or Bioterrorism And Intent To Commit Mass Murder?

Media sensationalism, corporate power and the swine flu outbreak

Swine Flu: Who Profits?

Swine Flu Created in Lab as Bio-Weapon?

As Swine Flu Spreads, Conspiracy Theories of Laboratory Origins Abound

Who Will Profit from the Deadly Flu This Time?

UK prepares mass graves for swine flu victims

Swine flu drug increases stroke risk

VIDEO – Swine Flu vaccine Baxter linked to Dyncorp´s mercs H1N1 patents

VIDEO -  Made in a Lab – The Swine Flu Swindle

VIDEO – ‘Swine flu virus began life in lab’

Mandatory Swine Flu Vaccine Alert

VIDEO – Flashback: 1976 Swine Flu Scam

VIDEO – The Swine Flu Fiasco (CBC, 1983)

VIDEO – Mexican Flu Outbreak 2009: SPECIAL REPORT by Dr Leonard Horowitz

Swine Flu Vaccinations Could Prove More Deadly Than the Swine Flu

Flu is Not the biggest danger… It’s the Vaccine

Next step in H1N1 scare: Microchip implants

Cops jump on swine-flu power: Shots heard ’round the world

Dangerous, Deadly H1N1 Vaccine Scam

Martial Law Alert Over Swine Flu

Nano Particles used in Untested H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines

Rockefeller and Silverstein implicated in new FBI pandemic

VIDEO Alert: Preparing for the Swine Flu Pandemic: Body Bags for the Canada’s First Nations

Comprehend VeriChip’s Swine Flu Chip

Joseph Moshe (MOSSAD Microbiologist): “Swine flu vaccine is a bioweapon”

VIDEO – The Swine Flu Conspiracy

VIDEO – Dr Len Horowitz – Anglo American Flu Genocide

The “Deadly Second Wave of Swine Flu”. Scaremongering or Sequel of Vaccinations?

A Strengthened Virus and a Police State

Prelude to Final Disaster: Rockefeller´s Depopulation Programme

The Move to Depopulate the Planet

The Population Reduction Agenda For Dummies

VIDEO – Dr. Rauni Kilde on the Swine Flu and the Depopulation Agenda (Spanish Subtitles)

VIDEO – Makers Of Vaccine Refuse To Take H1N1

The Swine Flu Fear Mongering and Pandemic Propaganda can Stop Now

VIDEO – Project Camelot interviews Jane Burgermeister

Wanted for Mass Murder: Barack Obama, Margaret Chan, & Dr Thomas Frieden

Protect Yourself from H1N1 Flu Shot Conspiracy

by Anders
Published: Nov. 21, 2009 – Euro-med.dk

Summary: So far, the one-world government protagonists managed to cover up their plot by simply saying “Pth! Conspiracy theory,” although their groups have long been professing their quest to rule the world (world governance). Now in the EU Parliament, Italian MEP, Mario Borghezio, pointed out the farce which preceded the occupation of the office as the EU’s first permanent president: Rompuy first had to be examined by the Bilderbergers to have their seal of approval. So had the U.S. presidential candidates, Obama and Clinton, in 2008. Already in 1987, Senator Jesse Helms in the US Senate pointed to the great power exerted by named secret societies – including Bilderberg – to promote their New World Order, world governance, which Mr Barroso, Gordon Brown, Sarkozy, and now the new EU President Rompuy, too etc.. are talking so much about.
Daniel Estulin is probably the only uninvited person to attend a Bilderberg meeting, in 2005. He calls the Bilderbegers and their partne organizations (later) the world’s shadow government that threatens to make serfs of us, displace the nation state and plunder the planet for their own benefit. They will create an international identity and a universal set of “values”, perform sophisticated mind control, enforce their particular values by means of a world army, namely NATO, and create perpetual war, until everything is pax bilderbergica. They will reward their henchmen and destroy opponents. Their power is based on their control of the world´s money.

Naïvists have been thinking for a long time they could conceal the crimes of the world elite by just saying “Pth! Conspiracy theory!!!” every time they heard words like Bilderberg or other previously secret groups like the Trilateral Commission, The Club of Rome, the Council on Foreign Relations and the UN as the tools of superilluminist Rockefeller who founded it from scratch. No one of the establishment or MSM would ever mention them – and not at all the Bilderbergers. 
Nevertheless,  EU Commission President, José Barroso is a multiple Bilderberger also speaking in the US Council on Foreign Relations – video. Several of the heads of state in the European Council are also Bilderbergers. But now, something interesting has taken place which completely takes the wind out of the sails of the orthodox naïvists and accomplices of the New World Order.

EUObserver 16. Nov. 2009: Belgian Prime Minister Herman Van Rompuy, the first permanent President of the EU,
laid out his views on future EU financing at a dinner of the secretive Bilderberg group last week. The event took place at Val Duchesse, a former priory on the outskirts of Brussels, on Thursday (12 November), with guests including Belgian industrialist and Bilderberg chairman Etienne Davignon, former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger and luminaries from the worlds of international politics and business, according to Belgian broadsheet De Tijd. The Belgian leader is reported to have said in a speech that: “New resources will be necessary for the financing of the welfare state. Green tax instruments are a possibility, but they are ambiguous: This type of tax will eventually be extinguished. But the possibilities of financial levies at European level must be seriously examined and for the first time the large countries in the union are open to that.” Comment: This is typical: No leader – unless he has been recognized by Bilderberg. And he was, because he will promote “global management” in Copenhagen. See the role of the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference here.

The influence of Bilderberg in the EU Infowars November 15, 2009.
Italian MEP, Mario Borghezio , dropped a bomb shell at the EU this week.  “Concerning the nominations (Of EU President and High Representative) I believe we need to apply the principles of transparency, so often mentioned here in our institutions. Is it possible that no one has noticed that these persons visit the meetings of the Bilderberg and the Trilateral Commission. We need to establish clearly whether these are the candidates of their own countries’ political forces, or whether they are simply the candidates of these occult groups that meet behind closed door to decide matters over the heads of the people.” The candidates in question are Jan Peter Balkenende, David Miliband, and Herman Van Rompuy.

Dutch Prime Minister Balkenende attended the Bilderberg meeting 2008.  David Miliband, the current Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs of Britain, is an EU operative pushing “environmental reform” and the globalist climate change agenda. Miliband went to Oxford and was a Kennedy Scholar at MIT, a scholarship with intimate ties to Anglo-American elitism. His father, Ralph Miliband, was a noted Marxist intellectual.
Herman Van Rompuy is the current Prime Minister of Belgium and a member of the King’s Crown Council. Van Rompuy also pushes the globalist “green” agenda. Van Rompuy “showed his hand” at a Bilderberg meeting when he “told the elite club that the European government leaders are increasingly becoming proponents of Europe tapping off green income,” in short fleecing the plebs under cover of the climate change ruse. 
In fact, thanks to Bilderberg sleuths Jim Tucker and Daniel Estulin, much of what the Bilderbergers have in mind for us has leaked out.

Bilderbergers 2008 and here Here is what US Senator, CFR-member Jesse Helms said from the floor of  the Senate on Dec. 15, 1987: “Mr. President, a careful examination of what is happening behind the scenes reveals that all of these interests are working in concert with the masters of the Kremlin in order to create what some refer to as a new world order. Private organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relation, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Trilateral Commission, the Dartmouth Conference, the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, the Atlantic Institute, and the Bilderberger Group serve to disseminate and to coordinate the plans for this so-called new world order in powerful business, financial, academic, and official circles….”

What is the Bilderberg Club?
The Bilderberg group is an elite club of aristocrats, politicians and businessmen dating back to 1954, which likes to meet away from the public eye. I have previously described its origin on this blog. And I have previously described how one of the the brains in this worldwide Bilderberg conspiration practice , Rothschild, is the mastermind behind the CO2–scam and how he has managed to create the running economic crisis.

Daniel Estulin attended the Bilderberg meeting 2005.  Global Research 1 June 2009 has a recension of Daniel Estulin´s book “The True Story of the Bilderberg Group,”  He states that in 1954, “the most powerful men in the world met for the first time” at Hotel Bilderberg, in Oosterbeek, Netherlands, “debated the future of the world,” and decided to meet annually in secret. They called themselves the Bilderberg Group with a membership representing a who’s who of world power elites, mostly from America, Canada, and Western Europe with familiar names like David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Gordon Brown, Angela Merkel, Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, Larry Summers, Tim Geithner, Lloyd Blankfein, George Soros, Donald Rumsfeld, Rupert Murdoch, other heads of state, influential senators, congressmen and parliamentarians, Pentagon and NATO brass, members of European royalty, selected media figures, and invited others – some quietly by some accounts like Barack Obama and many of his top officials.

Always well represented are top figures from the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), IMF, World Bank, Trilateral Commission, EU, and powerful central bankers from the Federal Reserve, the ECB’s Jean-Claude Trichet, and Bank of England’s Mervyn King. For over half a century, no agenda or discussion topics became public nor is any press coverage allowed. The few invited fourth estate attendees and their bosses are sworn to secrecy. Nonetheless, Estulin undertook “an investigative journey” that became his life’s work. He states: “Slowly, one by one, I have penetrated the layers of secrecy surrounding the Bilderberg Group, but I could not have done this withot help of ‘conscientious objectors’ from inside, as well as outside, the Group’s membership.” As a result, he keeps their names confidential. 

Whatever its early mission, the Group is now “a shadow world government….threaten(ing) to take away our right to direct our own destinies (by creating) a disturbing reality” very much harming the public’s welfare. In short, Bilderbergers want to supplant individual nation-state sovereignty with an all-powerful global government, corporate controlled, and check-mated by militarized enforcement.

Early in its history, Bilderbergers decided to ….loot the planet, achieve fabulous wealth and power, and crush all challengers to keep it.

Along with military dominance, controlling the world’s money is crucial for with it comes absolute control,  as the powerful 19th century Rothschild family understood. As the patriarch Amschel Rothschild once said: “Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes its laws.”
Membership consists of annual attendees (around 80 of the world’s most powerful) and others only invited occasionally because of their knowledge or involvement in relevant topics. Those most valued are asked back, and some first-timers are chosen for their possible later usefulness.

Arkansas governor Bill Clinton, for example, who attended in 1991. “There, David Rockefeller told (him) why the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)….was a Bilderberg priority and that the group needed him to support it. The next year, Clinton was elected president,” and on January 1, 1994 NAFTA took effect. Numerous other examples are similar, including who gets chosen for powerful government, military and other key positions.  Clinton admits his participation – seemingly unwell – video.

Bilderberg  Objectives
The Group’s grand design is for “a One World Government (World Company) with a single, global marketplace, policed by one world army, and financially regulated by one ‘World (Central) Bank’ using one global currency.” Their “wish list” includes:
— “one international identity (observing) one set of universal values;”
— centralized control of world populations by “mind control – and here;” in other words, controlling world public opinion;
— a New World Order with no middle class, only “rulers and servants (serfs),” and, of course, no democracy;
— “a zero-growth society” without prosperity or progress, only greater wealth and power for the rulers;
– manufactured crises and perpetual wars;
– absolute control of education to program the public mind and train those chosen for various roles;
— “centralized control of all foreign and domestic policies;” one size fits all globally;
— using the UN as a de facto world government imposing a UN tax on “world citizens;”
— expanding NAFTA and WTO globally;
— making NATO a world military;
— imposing a universal legal system; and
— a global “welfare state where obedient slaves will be rewarded and non-conformists targeted for extermination.”

(To be continued: Bilderberg partners)

Source: http://euro-med.dk/?p=11850

Related:

The Bilderberg Group and the project of European unification

The End of the Nation States of Europe

What are Bilderberg Conferences all about?

Bilderberg-chairman: ‘Bilderberg helped create the Euro’

Intimidation, Bribery, Lies, Concealment and Breaches of Constitutions for Irish Yes to Lisbon Treaty to Position EU´s War Chief

Bilderberg Van Rompuy the New EU President (With Video)

SOLUTIONS to the Zionist Rothschild’s New World Order’s, Commitee of 300 Criminal Families and how we can DEAL with them and DEFEAT them once and for all

Most of us have heard all about the New World Order,The Rothschilds,The Black Nobility,The 300 Families,The Illuminati,Freemason and so on.We all know there is Evil people in this world manipulating our every move.What I am Hearing most now is “What can we do about it??? Were do we Start??? or What can I do to stop this evil rape of the world and the enslavement of all its people under a few Super wealthy Scumballs “I am only one person”??? Well this essay will try to confront and answer these very important questions and offer solutions we as simple people can enact and execute upon this evil force of Scumball Criminals who’s crimes go back to almost the beginning of time.We will deal with history from around 1770 onwards…To go back any further in time is to large a time frame.

We will start with the real bad guys The Rothschild Family on. It starts with Lord Mayor Rothschilds plan for world domination through the manipulation and deception by means of control over our Money,Media and Military and how by controlling these three key thing world domination would be possible for them.We will not go into the entire history of how they arrived in the place there in today as most of us know this.We will simply say that by fraudulently controlling Nations money and fraudulently stock market,backing both sides in fraudulent wars started by them and profiting from these fraudulent atrocities they are in the position they are now in.

Every,War,Conflict,Revolutions,Depressions,Uprising,etc.etc.etc.were all created by them to further their agenda of a one world government under them.There main weapon today is 1:Antisemitism (cried if anyone accuses them of any crime,fraud or misdeeds… It’s basically used to deflect the attention away from there crimes which they never dispute or deny and rather turn all attention on to the shoulders of their accuser for being racist!!! It works every time and in many countries) 2:Is there “Media Empire” including all mainstream Television,Radio,Newspapers and Publishing Empires. By owning all the 5 major media networks worldwide, owned directly or indirectly through subsidiaries and corporate conglomerates they control the flow of deceptive information going out to the masses..They then keep us distracted by all the useless sport and stupid shows we watch hypnotically.Yes there are many shows and many voices to be heard but there all coming from the one source one ventriloquist on top of them all .All show need corporate sponsors who support the agenda of the big five and that is why 2/3 of the world goes hungry while they pay gazillion dollar sponsorships to sport players to play with there balls all to keep us distracted from important issues.Like to pass the Patriot act to limit your Civil Right and Freedom. It is one big huge monopoly owned by the Rothschild ,Rockefeller’s,JP Morgan and Oppenheimer Brotherhood.Control over the Internet, Publishing,Recording,Cable and satellite companies can all be traced back to the same big five media Empires: General Electric,Time Warner,Viacom,Disney,News Corp.They now have the power to make or break political leaders around the globe.

It’s like a big game of Monopoly and their the Bankers and when they dont like the rules they simply change them.So what can we do???Well first off we have to look at what their fears are.In reality 1% of the world population of over 6.5 Billion people is controlling the other 99% of us.That 1% own the worlds banks,and most of the worlds wealth,land and its resourses.So why do the rest of us passively cooperates with this madness.Because that wealthy 1% that write the rules has taught the rest of us 99% to obey them and feel powerless to change things.When we feel powerless to change things we cling to passive attitudes and let them get away with basically murder,plunder,counterfeiting,extortion etc.etc.etc.We say things like ignorance is bliss,Things arent that bad or let God take care of it.Remember “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing”, and that is exactly what is happening in todays world.Despite all the red flags many people still denies a problem even exist they have the” Hear no Evil See no Evil Speak no Evil” attitude.But as we said before there is solution to this evil problem. It lies in knowing what the three biggest fear are of these ruling families. Their biggest fear is EXPOSURE or being dragged out in the open for all to see in the light of truth.An example is the Bilderbergs their meeting are secret their attendees are secret all behind closed-door and they always demand media black outs why EXPOSURE.They have gone to great length to cover up their trail of crimes and to win the publics trust through there media monopolies…Without public trust their ancestral plan for world domination is doomed The second biggest fear is loosing public support.If we the public stop cooperating with their bullshit their plan is doomed to fail.There third and biggest fear by all is organized resistance by an informed and fearless public who would and surely should hang them all by their scrany coward necks until they are all dead…These cowardly wealthy ruling families no from past experience that the will of the people can defeat all there military and monetary might.Vietnam is a perfect example of this as they wanted that war to go on and on forever, but the American public said no more and it stopped that fast.There is no doubt at all that these ruling families could be totally defeated by bringing there worst fears into reality.

Solution # 1 EXPOSE THE 300 SCUM BALL FAMILIES Is to expose these ruling Families and their generation of horrific crimes against humanity.The most powerful way is by communicating by word of mouth telling friends and other through the internet on websites and study groups.Design a webpage of network such as this one,to share pictures articles and videos,films and DVD’s.Raise money give money to organize lobbies do whatever you can to stop this insane madness there are perpetrating upon us.Citizen worldwide learned a hard lesson that peaceful public protest dont work. because the Committee of 300 families created Think Tanks like The Trilateral commission,council on Foreign Relations,The Bilderberg Group,The Club of Rome,The United Nations,The Round Table etc.to mastermind their plan for world domination and control.We as citizen have to also form our own think tank to mastermind a plan to stop them.We have to learn who the past and present members of the committee of 300 are.At the top of the list are: The Royal Families of Britain and Denmark, The International Banking Families: Rothschild(Evelyn,David), Rockefeller(David), Morgan(Jon Paul), Warburg(Paul,Max,Felix), Oppenheimer(Harry), Bush(Samuel,Prescott,George H.W.,George W.Jeb), Gore(Ormsby,Al), Kissinger(Henry), Buffet(Warren), Carrington(Lord), Constanti(House of Orange), House of Hapsburg, Russell(Bertrand), Turner(Ted), Strong(Maurice), Schroeder(Andrew), Baring(Barnato), Prise Waterhouse, Astor(Lord), Churhill(Winston), Delano(Marquis Charles Louis), Harriman(Averill), Hesse(Sir William), House(Colonel Mandell), Huxley(Aldous), Mazzini(Giuseppe), Mellon Scaiffe(Richard), Mitterand(Francois), Montague(Samuel), Montefiore(Lord Sebag), Paley(J.P.W.), David-Weill(David), Pearson(Lord Cowdray), Bundy Bloodline, Collins Bloodline, DuPont Bloodline, Freeman Bloodline, Kennedy Bloodline, Li Bloodline, Onassis Bloodline, Reynolds Bloodline, Van Duyn Bloodline, Merovingian Bloodline, Disney Bloodlines, Krupp Bloodlines, McDonald Bloodlines, ETC.ETC.ETC. and the list goes on and on,but these are the major player of the Black Nobility or Committee of 300 Families get to know them and know them well for there Families crimes are some of the Worst most Horrific Genocidal crimes in History

Solution # 2 TAKE BACK CONTROL OF YOUR MONEY Is to take back control of your own money.Right now your money is in the banks of these scumbag families.Long ago the bankers discovered that most people left most of their gold in their bank for safe keeping, they discovered that they could lend out other peoples gold and charge interest on it without being discovered.Soon King and Royalty were borrowing money from them to finances wars. They then found out that backing both side during conflict was very profitable.This made them very rich.Since Wars were very good for business bankers started stirring up wars. All war since the Napoleonic war where started by these scumbag bankers.They financed both sides and this is how they stole the bank of England and so on.Eventually they got so rich they built banks all over the world They made Billions lending out other people money at huge interest rates, from remember money that didnt belong to them in the first place.Royalty became their biggest customers and they rewarded the bankers with high society titles of nobility such as Lord,Baron and Sir.Using their blood money and royal influence they changed the laws of nations so they could put central banks,mint and money supply in there private hands.Out of every $1000 of other people money they kept only $100 in their bank and lent out the rest at interest.then with the money they made they started up other businesses like the steel business to build rail for their Railway companies to transport Oil for their oil compagnies.Pretty soon the bankster new businesses grew into giant corporations.Those giant corporation soon turned the world oceans lakes and rivers into giant toilets exploiting every recourses on the planet for there own greedy benifit.Profit from all this made them the world richest families but their greed didnt stop there.This is when they fomented their plan to rule the entire globe They told people they no longer had to save up for all the things they wanted they created shiny plastic cards and people could buy things at interest putting everyone in the world in debt to them. For whoever own all the world money own the world.Soon people didnt even realize there paycheck were put in the bank without ever being cashed.There plan is to abolish paper money all together and finally to replace it with the RFID chip Then they would control all. If you got out of hand or disobeyed there rules they would just simply turn off your chip and by this they would control every aspect of your life from cradle to grave. People believe their money is safe in these bank It is not.The bankster created the great depression and are on the verge of doing it again They are in total control with everything that happens on the stock market they decided if the markets go up or down,soars or crashes,the control the price of gold ,oil etc.But you ask why would they want to crash the markets,simple to destroy people confidence in the money supply and create a cashless society and to force peoples cooperation into there fascist one world government-run by them.According to the Zionist plan written by Adam Weistaupt and Albert Pike the ruling families will bankrupt the middle class and repossess their private property,they will reinstate the military draft and continue disarming nations until theres no one left to disarm.They will make it illegal to possess a firearm or any other weapon that could be used to resist them.when the crash does come they will blame it on the phony war on terror which they control and finance on both sides

So what can you do before the banksters faze out money all together and crash the system. If you have money in one of their large banks Withdraw It immediately By putting your money in their bank you are enriching and empowering them with control over your money and pretty soon over your life.Cut up your credit and debit cards.Pay only with cash or money order or certified cheque.Take all of your money out of the rigged stock markets.Cash in your treasury bill and bonds and retirement savings plans.most of the retirement funds have already been looted.Trade in your paper fiat currency for something of real value such as gold silver precious metals and buy yourself a fire-proof safe and keep it all hidden.It not the thief down the block you should be worrying about It the scumbag banksters Many people are under the impression is a government agency and that the government print their money it the private Scumball bankster that print it with their Evil Masonic symbols on it showing you who own s it THEM.If you think you own your car your house or other credit purchases a financial crash will remind you of just who exactly own it.Most people believe there hard-earned tax dollar goes to pay stuff like roads bridge and other public services and so on but this is not the case the truth is all of it every pennies goes to pay the National debt the government owes these scumbag banksters then they lend your hard-earned tax money back to the government at interest to finances these public services.Before the bombing,theft and destruction of Iraq every American citizen owed the banksters $70,000 per citizen.It is your skyrocketing debt and your nations skyrocketing debt to the banksters that helped them enslave the world and there doing it with your money your labour and your approval.Since these scumbag families hide their money and dont pay any taxes!!! Why should you… Avoid paying any taxes you can.The banksters game is taking your money in taxes and lending it back to you at interest IF YOUR NOT MAD YET YOU SHOULD BE…So what do these banksters do with all your money you ask.They bomb,rob,kill,colonize,exploit all to advance there cause of Global control and for your eventual total enslavement ARE YOU MAD NOW…

Solution # 3 REFUSE TO FIGHT THERE WARS Refuse to fight the banksters murderous war and stop supporting other who fight there wars.One of Americas favorite slogan is support your troops no matter what,even if that war is illegal,unjust and a lie and even if your tax dollar are paying teenager by the thousands to die for the lie. The majority of soldier are nieve broke out of work teenager who are romantically duped into believing they are heroes for fighting for freedom.But really what there fighting for are the Scumball 300 wealthy families who are systematically disarming the world of all weapons of resistence to their Global empire…

Solution # 4 STOP VOTING IN THERE DEFACTO ELECTIONS A fourth solution is to stop voting.Most countries only really have two parties one candidate for the rich and one candidate for the even richer.It really doesnt matter who you vote for as they are really just payed puppet actors doing the bidding of the ruling families Because both candidates are sponsored by the lobby groups of these ruling scumballs. Most people will say it is better to pick the lesser of two evil but they are still voting for the same evil and supporting a corrupt electorial system.Remenber that both John Kerry and George W. Bush both swore an allegiance to SKULL & BONES long before they ever swore allegiance to the american people so it really didnt matter who won even though it was determined long before the vote and even then you had to wonder who their true allegiance were to…Not only were they both Skull and Bonesman which is rooted in german Freemasonry but they are both descendent to the British Royalty,The Black Nobility and the Hebrew Tribes of Israel

Solution # 5 STOP OBEYING THERE DEFACTO DISEMPOWERING LAWS Is to stop obeying laws designed to disempower you.The success of the ruling families depend on your obedience to their laws that they make and break including the Ten Commandments

Solution # 6 STOP SHOPPING AT CORPORATE CONGLOMERATE SUPER STORES — BUY SMALL THINK BIG Buy Small and think big…Stop shopping at corporation store like Wall Mart and big grocery chains.Shop local and by farm fresh and from farmers market as much as you can.Grow your and raise your own food as much as you can.Big bankster corporate food supplies are genetically modified and patenting the food you eat and the seed you need for growing foods as well as animal DNA.Besides the farm who supply the meat to these corporate conglomerates subject the animal to massive Steroids and antibiotic immunizations, inhumane treatment overcrowding and abuse.So think before you shop…

Solution # 7 STOP DONATING TO DEFACTO CHARITIES Stop Donating to Charities… Most of the bigger better known ones take most of the money pays administration fees which turn out it goes right back into there pockets.What philanthropist they are… They are also used them to launder there other dirty drug and weapons trading blood moneys.They also set up these big charities to make themselves look friendly and charitable and to cover up their real agenda.

The queens husband Prince Phillip is the international president of the WWF one of the worst offenders and people get sucked in to donating millions per year all the while thinking they are doing their share to help the world when nothing could be further from the TRUTH…

Solution # 8 BECOME A FREEMAN ON THE LAND AND WITHDRAW ALL PLEDGE OF ALLIGIANCE ANY FLAG Become a freeman on the land and stop swearing allegiance to these corrupt defacto nation states countries or societies or any other flags, and especially to Britain’s gracious and noble Queen who is neither gracious or noble but an inbred tyrant Zionist scumbag in disguise.Do not bow to any others state or person trying to impose power over yourself.Remember if there is a God there is no one between you and him .

Solution # 9 REJECT DEFACTO CLAIM BY RULING FAMILIES TO YOUR NATIONS PUBLIC WEALTH Refuse to recognise the illegitimate claims of the ruling families to your nations lands,water,resources,railways,airlines power companies,health plan and other publicly held properties that they have been busy privatizing while you were sleeping in front of the TV set.The ruling families have stolen your nation land and resources through corporate privatization,which means they have bought up your nations publicly owned property and where is it all leading to,an eternal world empire in which the power of these ruling families can never be challenged and the earth and all living things will be helplessly at their mercy

Solution # 10 NAME NAMES Put the blame where it belong on the ruling families not on there faceless corporation.Corporation like WorldCom,Enron,Merril Lynch,Halliburton are owned by real people with real names and real faces.The general public is deceived into believing that ordinary people who invest and buy shares in these giant corporations actually own them… Nothing could be further from the truth… The only shares that really matter are the class A shares all of which are owned by the ruling families.There hand picked lackeys who sit in for them as company directors get shuffled around like packs of slippery cards

Solution # 11 REJECT PROPAGANDA Reject the propaganda that keeps you passive.Bible believers are tought that Armageddon Apocalypse and the rule of a Satanic Leader are true because the bible says so.Dont protest dont resist just be passive.These messages are repeated over and over to the millions of bible believer worldwide.Since the ruling families view religion as the opiate of the masses they provide funding for organized religion worldwide.Christians Muslum and Jews have been tricked into praising their God AMEN at the end of every prayer

Solution # 12 ARREST THE COMMITTEE OF 300 FAMILIES Arrest the Committee of 300 Families for there horrific crimes against humanity.Those crimes include Genocidal Mass Murder using Americas AtomicNuclear and Chemical weapons of mass destruction against Japanese and Vietnamese populations Hundreds of thousand of innocent human being were burned,deformed and vaporized with tax payer money…The ruling families crimes also include The Holocaust of Khazar Jews,espionage,drug smuggling and trafficking,extinction of species through environmental rape and pollution,extreme degradation,humiliation,cruelty and torture,blackmail bribery,conspiracy,slavery,racism,mass slaughter,ethnic cleansing,terrorism and the planning and coverup of 911,grand theft,tax evasion,insider trading,profiting from Hitlers Nazi labor camps and trading with the enemy,loan sharking,smuggling,corruption,political assassinations and the list goes on and on.The committee of 300 inbred Families are clever ruthless and morally insane.Since they control the military the weaponry and the world wealth who’s going to arrest them for there horrific crimes and how.The worlds citizen must gather together in large numbers and make citizen arrest of each member of these 300 scumbag families

Solution # 13 GET PAST YOUR FEAR Get past your fear and take action!!! Fear is paralyzing and the ruling families know this. They use there media monopolies to fear mongering,terrorize and paralyze the masses.You are either with us or your with the terrorist which really means If you are with us your are with the terrorist

Solution # 14 IF THEY CAN TAKE IT WE CAN TAKE IT BACK If 300 families can figure out how to steal all the worlds money,power,wealth and resources and then enslave the masses under one world empire… Then 300 of the same families can figure out how to stop them dead in there tracks… THE ONLY THING NESSESARY FOR THE TRIUMPH OF EVIL IS FOR GOOD PEOPLE TO DO NOTHING We can take back our world and we must So put away your fear and fight back SAY NO TO THE NWO

Rich Billionaire Scumballs get together to decide yours and my fate on Planet Earth and all that gives them this power is paper money worth NOTHING, NOTHING at ALL… Unless of course we the people give it value

ABC News Reports On Secret Meeting Of The Rich, Yet Ignores Bilderberg Completely

May 21st, 2009 Corporate news network baffled at how media could have missed story, yet omits completely that 150+ elitist powerbrokers meet in secret every year with barely a whimper from the establishment press Prison Planet >> Originally Posted 20th May 2009 ABC News today devoted a prominently featured three page story to a “secret meeting” of rich philanthropists which took place earlier this month in New York, and yet one of the biggest news corporations in America was completely silent during a far more important meeting of around 150 of the world’s powerbrokers at the Bilderberg conference last week. At time of press, the ABC News story is the second top story on the ABCNews.com website under the headline, America’s Richest Givers’ Secret Meeting.

“Under a cloak of secrecy, some of the world’s wealthiest people gathered in an unprecedented meeting early this month in New York City possibly to coördinate strategies for giving their vast fortunes to charity in the midst of the financial crisis,” begins the report, before descending into a deluge of fawning idolatry about how people like David Rockefeller, Bill Gates and Ted Turner, who has repeatedly called for world population to be reduced by a shocking 95% as well as a one child policy instituted in the west, are committed to saving the poor from the ravages of the economic crisis with their benign acts of philanthropy.

The report states that the meeting is “enough to spark the imaginations of conspiracy theorists everywhere,” linking to a previous ABC News report that implies people who believe that powerful people conspire to rule the world in secret are probably mentally ill. The most vomit inducing paragraph of the article arrives when ABC asks, “There remain as many questions about the meeting’s details as there are about the logistics behind its organization. How did some of the world’s most public figures coördinate their schedules, travel, and security with no one in media knowing about it?” Well how indeed did they manage to do that I wonder? 150+ of the global élite manage to do it on a routine basis every single year without barely a whimper from the corporate media, despite the location of the Bilderberg meeting leaking in advance every time. They manage to do it because the corporate media was castrated decades ago and is merely a PR machine for the establishment, which is why they dutifully follow orders not to report on what would otherwise be a gargantuan story of worldwide interest in the form of the secret Bilderberg Group meetings. ABC News is owned by the Walt Disney Company, Vice Chairman of which is Roy Disney, nephew of Walt Disney himself. Roy Disney is a Bilderberg member, having attended the secretive cabal’s 1999 conference in Sintra, Portugal.

Since all Bilderberg members adhere to “Chatham House Rules,” forbidding the revelation of anything that was discussed, it’s unsurprising that ABC refused to report on the global élite’s annual confab in Greece near Athens last week, a story that dwarves this much vaunted “meeting of the rich” in terms of both the number and the influence of the many powerbrokers who attended. Bilderberg 2009 coverage was left to a gaggle of alternative media citizen journalists who were harassed, stalked, detained and physically assaulted every step of the way by secret police and security goons at the behest of Bilderberg. ABC News’ “meeting of the rich” exclusive is a pathetic attempt at convincing its declining audience that the corporate media has any interest in uncovering the secret agenda of the élite, when (omit) the story is nothing more than a sophistic exercise in ass kissing and creeping adulation for people like David Rockefeller and Ted Turner, who are portrayed as philanthropic saviors of the planet, when they are nothing more than globalist scum intent on destroying U.S. sovereignty and eliminating us “useless feeders” by means of population reduction programs which they have routinely advocated. Meeting of America’s Richest About ‘Need,’ Attendee Says Oprah Winfrey, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett Discuss Coming Together ‘to Do More’

By RUSSELL GOLDMAN and EILEEN MURPHY May 20, 2009 Under a cloak of secrecy, some of the world’s wealthiest people gathered in an unprecedented meeting early this month in New York City “to see how they can join together to do more,” according to one attendee. Some of the richest people in the world meet to discuss philanthropy. Invited by the world’s two richest men Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, along with David Rockefeller, a Who’s Who of American wealth and influence gathered around a long table in a window-lined private room overlooking the East River on May 5. “The overwhelming reason for the meeting was need — that was the issue that galvanized everyone to take part,” Patricia Stonesifer, senior advisor to the Gates foundation’s trustees, Bill and Melinda Gates and Warren Buffett, told ABCNews.com. “This was a group very committed to philanthropy coming together to see how they can join together to do more.”

Gates and Buffett were joined by billionaire moguls Oprah Winfrey, Ted Turner and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg along with heavyweight philanthropists George Soros and others.

Together the attendees have donated more than $70 billion to charity since 1996, according to the Chronicle of Philanthropy. A clandestine meeting of the country’s rich and powerful, left off their public calendars and hidden from the press, is enough to spark the imaginations of conspiracy theorists everywhere, but attendees told ABC News.com the meeting was “100 percent about philanthropy” and it was not meant to be a secret. “It was meant to be a private exchange but it wasn’t a secret really, just a private meeting,” Stonesifer said.

First reported by IrishCentral.com, ABCNews.com confirmed each of the attendees’ presence at the meeting held at the residence of the Rockefeller University president on the campus of the Manhattan medical school. It lasted about five hours, beginning in mid-afternoon and continuing through dinner, Stonesifer said. “This particular group had never come together as a group before but many of the attendees had met in the past either individually or in smaller groups — but never all at once,” she said. “This was a great discussion and they agreed to continue the dialogue and meet again in the future. There were a lot of good ideas.” She said that the discussion “ranged from emergency relief efforts to scholarship efforts, to U.S. education efforts to global health.” Another attendee who asked to remain anonymous described the meeting as “a private gathering of friends and colleagues to share their history and excitement about their philanthropy. [It was] a group together discussing a range of things they are working on.”

Some of the world’s wealthiest and most influential individuals met early this month in New York City to secretly discuss how to best use their money to help people in the midst of the financial crisis. When again asked about the meeting following ABC News.com’s initial report Mayor Bloomberg said he sometimes holds private meetings that are “not going to be on the public schedulues. There are meetings all over this city and there are some very powerful people in this city.”

Bloomberg who would not directly comment on the meeting or its outcome said: “You know I am very interested in private philanthropy, I think it has a unique place in our society in that with private dollars you can try new things, things that you can’t do with public dollars.” There remain as many questions about the meeting’s details as there are about the logistics behind its organization. How did some of the world’s most public figures coordinate their schedules, travel, and security with no one in media knowing about it?

Charities Suffer in Recession The meeting was reminiscent of the 1907 salons of America’s foremost financiers held in the study of J.P. Morgan to discuss how private citizens could stop the economic panic. IrishCentral reported that each of the participants was given 15 minutes to propose how to best direct their charity given the global economic climate.

Charities are suffering during the crisis, and America’s top philanthropists likely met to chart a new course for global charity, said Stacy Palmer, editor-in-chief of the Chronicle of Philanthropy. A meeting of the country’s top philanthropists is “extraordinary” and “really unusual,” Palmer said.

“I can’t think of another time they’ve all been in the same room to talk about philanthropy,” she said. “It’s unprecedented.” Gates and Buffet have publicly committed their vast fortunes to the same philanthropic efforts, and Rockefeller, the chairman of Rockefeller Financial Services, comes from a long line of philanthropists.

Gates, the founder and former CEO of Microsoft, who topped the Forbes’ Richest People list this year, has dedicated his foundation to eradicating infectious disease worldwide.

According to Portfolio magazine, Gates, who is worth about $59 billion, donated $3.7 billion from 2002 to 2006 and $10 billion from 2007 to 2008. Warren Buffett, CEO of conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway, was ranked the second-richest man by Forbes this year with a net worth is estimated at $52 billion. Though his giving in the past year is not disclosed, he donated some $46.1 billion between 2002 and 2006, according to Portfolio. In 2006, Buffet pledged $31 billion, the bulk of his fortune, to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, doubling the organization’s endowment virtually overnight.

Though the charitable interests of the participants differ, they have some things in common, said Bob Ottenhoff, CEO of Guidestar, a service that tracks nonprofit organizations. For the most part, the attendees are all self-made. Their donations come from money they made in their own lifetimes, rather than old family fortunes, and they have committed to giving away their fortunes while still alive rather than through bequests after their deaths.

One exception is Rockefeller, scion of the Rockefeller fortune. In 2008, Rockefeller gave $137 million to charity.

Philanthropic Groups Have Global Reach Though the philanthropic focus of each of the participants differs, many of their foundations have a global dimension.

“Each has their specialty. Gates focuses on world health, [CNN founder Ted] Turner on the environment and the UN, Soros is involved in civic engagement,” Ottenhoff said.

Between 1997 and 2006 Turner has donated $1.6 billion, the bulk of which, $1 billion, went to the UN Foundation in 1997.

Soros, a fund manager worth $9 billion, gave $1.1 billion from 2002 to 2006 and $475 million from 2007 to 2008. Much of Soros giving goes to his family’s Open Society Institute. “These sorts of meetings don’t happen very often. It is difficult for large philanthropic organizations to work together. The fact that these are all very engaged living donors means very interesting things can happen,” Ottenhoff said. Both Ottenhoff and Palmer agreed that it was likely the financial crisis that brought everyone together.

Charitable giving has taken a serious hit in recent months, and the power players likely discussed how to keep some nonprofits afloat. “Nonprofits are going through a difficult time. The endowments of many foundations have dropped significantly,” Palmer said. “Many people are not as able to give as much money as the used to. “They are making a statement that donors should continue to give. They are likely planning on a sending a message that philanthropy needs to continue worldwide,” she said. Few of the participants, Palmer said, gave money quietly and she anticipated that the secret meeting was the first step in a plan that would eventually be made public. A number of other people attended the meeting including: Winfrey, worth $2.7 billion, who donated some $50 million in 2007; Bloomberg, founder of Bloomberg LP and Mayor of New York City, who is worth $11.5 billion and donated $205 million from 2007 to 2008; financier Eli Broad who donated $100 million in 2008; and financier Peter Peterson, who committed $1 billion in 2008.

August 30, 2009 NM Rothschild pitches motorway privatisation plan OR “Rothschild to squander British highway profit for Rothschild pocket through their old privatization fraud scheme” “Its the oldest trick in the Book” Robert Watts and Dominic O’Connell A radical plan to raise £100 billion by privatising the motorway network has been presented to the three main political parties by NM Rothschild, the influential investment bank. Rothschild, an architect of several privatisations, made its pitch in the weeks running up to the summer recess on July 21, Whitehall sources said. Bankers told leading politicians that the sale of the roads overseen by the Highways Agency — all motorways and most big trunk roads — could help revive battered public finances. Toll-road companies and infrastructure funds would compete to run and keep up stretches of the network. In one version of the scheme, the government would pay for upkeep through a system of “shadow” tolls. A more radical, and less politically palatable, option would be for companies to charge motorists directly through toll booths or electronic card readers. The RAC Foundation, a motorists’ group, advocated privatisation in a report last week.

The Rothschild plan has already won the support of Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrats’ deputy leader and Treasury official. “This is an attractive, positive idea which could release much resources to the public finances and may have real environmental merits,” Cable said. “The scale of it is vast — it makes rail privatisation look like small beer.” Theresa Villiers, the shadow transport secretary, said the Conservatives had “no plans” to back Rothschild’s proposals: “Rothschilds, like many other banks and consultancies, have approached me and my team on a range of ideas for our transport network, including their ideas for our road infrastructure, but we are not working on any proposals for privatisation of the strategic road network and have no plans to do so.” Motorway privatisation was considered by John Major’s Conservative administration, which sold British Rail, but was rejected. A spokesman at the Department for Transport said: “It is not unusual for organisations to suggest ideas to government departments but ultimately all policy is decided by ministers and there are no plans to sell off a stake in the Highways Agency.” Rothschild declined to comment. The bank was behind many of the key privatisations of the 1980s and 1990s, including British Steel, British Gas and British Coal. It has close links to the Conservatives, having employed several senior Party figures including Lord Lamont, John Redwood and Lord Wakeham. Oliver Letwin, the former shadow chancellor, works there part-time. Politicians of all Parties are seeking ways to decrease the need for large tax rises or heavy cuts in public services. The bank bailouts and a recent collapse in tax revenues has seen public sector debt rise to more than £800 billion, 56.8% of GDP — up from 35.5% just two years ago. Road tolls are unpopular, however. When Labour mooted road pricing two years ago, more than 230,000 signed a petition on the Downing Street decrying the plan . RothschildsTimeline.ppt

Pour les amateurs de l’histoire des Etats-Unis d’Amérique, Mecanoblog vous invite à plonger dans la rivalité meurtrière qui opposa certains présidents américains favorables à la liberté et l’égalité entre les hommes et les peuples ainsi que le développement des nations exploitées et pillées par les régimes impérialistes face au vieil Empire Britannique partisan du libre-échange, de l’esclavage, du colonialisme et du traffic d’opium. D’Abraham Lincoln à Franklin Delano Roosevelt en passant par la Première Guerre Mondiale et la montée du fascisme, 1932 dévoile la mainmise d’une poignée d’aristocrates sur les richesses du monde et leur grande influence sur la politique internationale et l’armée jusqu’à aborder la création d’une gouvernance mondiale. Un film réalisé par des membres du mouvement de jeunes de LaRouche aux Etats-Unis et sous-titré par Solidarité et Progrès, le parti politique français dirigé par Jacques Cheminade.

www.solidariteetprogres.org

SOLUTIONS to the Zionist Rothschild’s New World Order’s, Commitee of 300 Criminal Families and how we can DEAL with them and DEFEAT them once and for all

Most of us have heard all about the New World Order,The Rothschilds,The Black Nobility,The 300 Families,The Illuminati,Freemason and so on.We all no there is Evil people in this world manipulating our every move.What I am Hearing most now is “What can we do about it??? Were do we Start??? or What can I do to stop this evil rape of the world and the enslavement of all its people under a few Super wealthy Scumballs “I am only one person”??? Well this essay will try to confront and answer these very important questions and provide solutions we as simple people can enacte and execute upon this evil force of Scumball Criminals who’s crimes go back to almost the beginning of time.We will deal with history from around 1770 onwards…To go back any further in time is to large a time frame.

We will start with the real bad guys The Rothschild Family onward. It starts with Lord Mayor Rothschilds plan for world domination through the manipulation and deception by means of control over our Money,Media and Military and how by controlling these three key thing world domination would be possible for them.We will not go into the entire history of how they arrived in the position there in today as most of us know this.We will simply say that by fraudulently controlling Nations money and fraudulently stock market,backing both sides in fraudulent wars started by them and profiting from these fraudulent atrocities they are in the position they are now in.

Every,War,Conflict,Revolutions,Depressions,Uprising,etc.etc.etc.were all created by them to further there agenda of a one world government under them.There main weapon today is 1:Antisemitism (cried if anyone accuses them of any crime,fraud or misdeeds… Its basically used to deflect the attention away from there crimes which they never dispute or deny and rather turn all attetion onto the shoulders of there accuser for being racist!!! It works every time and in many countries) 2:Is there “Media Empire” including all mainstream Television,Radio,Newspapers and Publishing Empires. By owning all the 5 major media networks worldwide, owned directly or indirectly through subsiduaries and corporate conglomorates they control the flow of deceptive information going out to the masses..They then keep us distracted by all the useless sport and stupid shows we watch hypnotically.Yes there are many shows and many voices to be heard but there all coming from the one source one ventrilaquiste on top of them all .All show need corporate sponsors who support the agenda of the big five and that is why 2/3 of the world goes hungry while they pay Kazillion dollar sponsorships to sport players to play with there balls all in order to keep us distracted from important issues.Like to pass the Patriot act to limit your Civil Right and Freedom. It is one big huge monopoly owned by the Rothschild ,Rockefellers,JP Morgan and Oppenheimer Brotherhood.Control over the Internet, Publishing,Recording,Cable and Satelite compagnies can all be traced back to the same big five media Empires: General Electric,Time Warner,Viacom,Disney,News Corp.They now have the power to make or break political leaders around the globe.

Its like a big game of Monopoly and there the Bankers and when they dont like the rules they simply change them.So what can we do???Well first off we have to look at what there fears are.In reality 1% of the world population of over 6.5 Billion people is controlling the other 99% of us.That 1% own the worlds banks,and most of the worlds wealth,land and its resourses.So why do the rest of us passivly cooporates with this madness.Because that wealthy 1% that write the rules has taught the rest of us 99% to obey them and feel powerless to change things.When we feel powerless to change things we cling to passive attitudes and let them get away with basically murder,plunder,counterfiting,extortion etc.etc.etc.We say things like ignorance is bliss,Things arent that bad or let God take care of it.Remember “The only thing nessesary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing”, and that is exactly what is happening in todays world.Despite all the red flags many people still denies a problem even exist they have the” Hear no Evil See no Evil Speak no Evil” attitude.But as we said before there are solution to this evil problem. It lies in knowing what the three biggest fear are of these ruling families. There biggest fear is EXPOSURE or being dragged out in the open for all to see in the light of truth.An example is the Bilderbergs there meeting are secret there attendees are secret all behind closed door and they always demand media black outs why EXPOSURE.They have gone to great lenght to cover up there trail of crimes and to win the publics trust through there media monopolies…Without public trust there ancestral plan for world domination are doomed The second biggest fear is loosing public support.If we the public stop cooporating with there bullshit there plan is doomed to fail.There third and biggest fear by all is organized resistance by an informed and fearless public who would and surely should hang them all by there scrany coward necks until they are all dead…These cowardly wealthy ruling families no from past expirience that the will of the people can defeat all of there military and moneytary might.Vietnam is a perfect example of this as they wanted that war to go on anhd on forever, but the American public said no more and it stopped that fast.There is no doubt at all that these ruling families can be totally defeated by bringing there worst fears into reality.

Solution # 1 EXPOSE THE 300 SCUMBALL FAMILIES Is to expose these ruling Families and there generation of horrific crimes against humanity.The most powerful way is by communicating by word of mouth telling friends and other through the internet on websites and study groups.Design a webpage of network such as this one,toShare pictures articles and videos,films and DVD’s.Raise money give money to organize lobbie do whatever you can to stop this insane madness there are perpatrating upon us.Citizen worldwide learned a hard lesson that peaceful public protest dont work. because the Committee of 300 families created Think Tanks like The Trilateral Commision,Councel on Foreign Relations,The Bilderberg Group,The Club of Rome,The United Nations,The Round Table etc.to mastermind there plan for world domination and control.We as citizen have to also form our own think tank to mastermind a plan to stop them.We have to learn who the past and present members of the committee of 300 are.At the top of the list are: The Royal Families of Britain and Denmark, The International Banking Families: Rothschild(Evelyn,David), Rockefeller(David), Morgan(Jon Paul), Warburg(Paul,Max,Felix), Oppenheimer(Harry), Bush(Samual,Prescott,George H.W.,George W.Jeb), Gore(Ormsby,Al), Kissenger(Henry), Buffet(Warren), Carrington(Lord), Constanti(House of Orange), House of Hapsburg, Russell(Bertrand), Turner(Ted), Strong(Maurice), Schroeder(Andrew), Baring(Barnato), Prise Waterhouse, Astor(Lord), Churhill(Winston), Delano(Marquis Charles Louis), Harriman(Averill), Hesse(Sir William), House(Colonel Mandell), Huxley(Aldous), Mazzini(Giuseppe), Mellon Scaiffe(Richard), Mitterand(Francois), Montague(Samual), Montefiore(Lord Sebag), Paley(J.P.W.), David-Weill(David), Pearson(Lord Cowdray), Bundy Bloodline, Collins Bloodline, DuPont Bloodline, Freeman Bloodline, Kennedy Bloodline, Li Bloodline, Onassis Bloodline, Reynolds Bloodline, Van Duyn Bloodline, Merovingian Bloodline, Disney Bloodlines, Krupp Bloodlines, McDonald Bloodlines, ETC.ETC.ETC. and the list goes on and on,but these are the major player of the Black Nobility or Committee of 300 Families get to know them and know them well for there Families crimes are some of the Worst most Horrific Genocidal crimes in History

Solution # 2 TAKE BACK CONTROL OF YOUR MONEY Is to take back control of your own money.Right now your money is in the banks of these scumball families.Long ago the bankers discovered that most people left most of there gold in there bank for safe keeping, they discovered that they could lend out other peoples gold and charge interrest on it without being discovered.Soon King and Royalty were borrowing money from them to finances wars. They then found out that backing both side during conflick was very profitable.This made them very rich.Since Wars were very good for business bankers started strurring up wars. All war since the Napoleonic war were started by these scumball bankers.They financed both sides and this is how they stole the bank of England and so on.Eventually they got so rich they built banks all over the world They made Billions lending out other people money at huge interest rates, from remember money that didnt belong to them in the first place.Royalty became there biggest customers and they rewarded the bankers with high society titles of nobility such as Lord,Baron and Sir.Using there blood money and royal influence they changed the laws of nations so they could put central banks,mint and money supply in there private hands.Out of every $1000 of other people money they kept only $100 in there bank and lent out the rest at interest.then with the money they made they started up other businesses like the steel business to build rail for there Railway compagnies to transport Oil for there oil compagnies.Pretty soon the bankster new businesses grew into giant corporations.Those giant corporation soon turned the world oceans lakes and rivers into giant toilets exploiting every resourse on the planet for there own greedy benifit.Profit from all this made them the world richest families but there greed didnt stop there.This is when they formented there plan to rule the entire glode They told people they no longer had to save up for all the things they wanted they created shiny plastic cards and people could buy things at interest putting everyone in the world in debt to them. For whoever own all the world money own the world.Soon people didnt even realize there paycheck were being put in the bank without ever being cashed.There plan is to abolish paper money all together and finally to replace it with the RFID chip Then they would control all. If you got out of hand or disobeyed there rules they would just simply turn off your chip and by this they would control every aspect of your life from cradle to grave. People believe there money is safe in these bank It is not.The bankster created the great depression and are on the verge of doing it again They are in total control with everything that happens on the stock market they decided if the markets go up or down,soars or crashes,the control the price of gold ,oil etc.But you ask why would they want to crash the markets,simple to destroy people confidence in the money supply and create a cashless society and to force peoples cooporation into there facist one world government run by them.According to the Zionist plan writtin by Adam Weistaupt and Albert Pike the ruling families will bankrupt the middle class and reposess there private property,they will reinstate the military draft and continue disarming nations until theres no one left to disarm.They will make it illegal to posess a firearm or any other weapon that could be used to resist them.when the crash does come they will blame it on the phoney war on terror which they control and finance on both sides

So what can you do before the banksters faze out money all together and crash the whole system. If you have money in one of there large banks Withdraw It Immediatly By putting your money in there bank you are enriching and empowering them with control over your money and pretty soon over your life.Cut up your credit and debit cards.Pay only with cash or money order or certified cheque.Take all of your money out of the rigged stock markets.Cash in your treasury bill and bonds and retierment savings plans.most of the retirment funds have already been looted.Trade in your paper fiat currency for something of real value such as gold silver precious metals and buy yourself a fire proof safe and keep it all hidden.It not the theif down the bloc you should be worrying about It the scumball banksters Many people are under the impression is a government agency and that the government print there money it the private Scumball bankster that print it with there Evil Masonic symbols on it showing you who own s it THEM.If you think you own your car your house or other credit purchases a financial crash will remind you of just who exactly own it.Most people believe there hard earned tax dollar goes to pay stuff like roads bridge and other public services and so on but this is not the case the truth is all of it every pennie goes to pay the National debt the government owes these scumball banksters then they lend your hard earned tax money back to the government at interest to finances these public services.Before the bombing,theft and destruction of Iraq every American citizen owed the banksters $70,000 per citizen.It is your skyrocketing debt and your nations skyrocketing debt to the banksters that helped them enslave the world and there doing it with your money your labour and your approval.Since these scumball families hide there money and dont pay any taxes!!! Why should you… Avoid paying any taxe you can.The banksters game is taking your money in taxes and lending it back to you at interest IF YOUR NOT MAD YET YOU SHOULD BE…So what do these banksters do with all your money you ask.They bomb,rob,kill,colonize,exploit all to advance there cause of Global control and for your eventual total enslavement ARE YOU MAD NOW…

Solution # 3 REFUSE TO FIGHT THERE WARS Refuse to fight the banksters murderous war and stop supporting other who fight there wars.One of Americas favorite slogan is support your troops no matter what,even if that war is illegal,unjust and a lie and even if your tax dollar are paying teenager by the thousands to die for the lie. The majority of soldier are nieve broke out of work teenager who are romantically dupped into believing they are heroes for fighting for freedom.But really what there fighting for are the Scumball 300 wealthy families who are systematically disarming the world of all weapons of resistence to there Global empire…

Solution # 4 STOP VOTING IN THERE DEFACTO ELECTIONS A forth solution is to stop voting.Most countries only really have two parties one candidate for the rich and one candidate for the even richer.It really doesnt matter who you vote for as they are really just payed puppet actors doing the bidding of the ruling families Because both candidates are sponsored by the lobby groups of these ruling scumballs. Most people will say it is better to pick the lesser of two evil but they are still voting for the same evil and supporting a corrupt electorial system.Remenber that both John Kerry and George W. Bush both swore an alligeance to SKULL & BONES long before they ever swore alligiance to the american people so it really didnt matter who won even though it was determined long before the vote and even then you had to wonder who there true alligiance were to…Not only were they both Skull and Bonesman which is rooted in german Freemasonnry but they are both decendent to the British Royalty,The Black Nobility and the Hebrew Tribes of Israel

Solution # 5 STOP OBEYING THERE DEFACTO DISEMPOWERING LAWS Is to stop obeying laws designed to disempower you.The success of the ruling families depend on your obedience to there laws that they make and break including the Ten Commandments

Solution # 6 STOP SHOPPING AT CORPORATE CONGLOMERATE SUPER STORES — BUY SMALL THINK BIG Buy Small and think big…Stop shopping at corporation store like Wall Mart and big gocery chains.Shop local and by farm fresh and from farmers market as much as you can.Grow your and raise your own food as much as you can.Big bankster corporate food supplies are genetically modified and patenting the food you eat and the seed you need for growing foods as well as animal DNA.Besides the farm who supply the meatsto these corporate conglomerates subject the animal to massive Steroids and antibiotic immunizations, inhumaine treatment overcrowding and abuse.So think before you shop…

Solution # 7 STOP DONATING TO DEFACTO CHARITIES Stop Donating to Charities… Most of the bigger better known ones take most of the money pays administration fees which turn out it goes right back into there pockets.What philanthropist they are… They are also used them to launder there other dirty drug and weapons trading blood moneys.They also set up these big charities to make themselves look friendly and charitable and to cover up there real agenda.

The queens husband Prince Phillip is the international president of the WWF one of the worst offenders and people get sucked in to donating millions per year all the while thinking they are doing there share to help the world when nothing could be further from the TRUTH…

Solution # 8 BECOME A FREEMAN ON THE LAND AND WITHDRAW ALL PLEDGE OF ALLIGIANCE ANY FLAG Become a freeman on the land and stop swearing alligiance to these corrupt defacto nation states countries or societies or any other flags, and especially to Britains gracious and noble Queen who is niether gracious or noble but an inbread tyrant Zionist scumball in disguise.Do not bow to any others state or person trying to empose power over yourself.Remember if there is a God there is no one between you and him .

Solution # 9 REJECT DEFACTO CLAIM BY RULING FAMILIES TO YOUR NATIONS PUBLIC WEALTH Refuse to recognise the illigitamite claims of the ruling families to your nations lands,water,resources,railways,airlines power compagnies,health plan and other publicly held properties that they have been busy privatizing while you were sleeping in front of the TV set.The ruling families have been stealing your nation land and resources threw corporate privatization,which means they have been bying up your nations publicly owned property and where is it all leading to,an eternal world empire in which the power of these ruling families can never be challenged and the earth and all living things will be helplessly at there mercy

Solution # 10 NAME NAMES Put the blame were it belong on the ruling families not on there faceless corporation.Corporation like Worldcom,Enron,Merril Lynch,Haliburton are owned by real people with real names and real faces.The general public is decieved into believing that ordinary people who invest and buy shares in these giant corporations actually own them… Nothing could be further from the truth… The only shares that really matter are the class A shares all of which are owned by the ruling families.There hand picked lackys who sit in for them as compagny directors get shuffled around like packs of slippery cards

Solution # 11 REJECT PROPAGANDA Reject the propaganda that keeps you passive.Bible believers are taught that Armageddon Apocalypse and the rule of a Satanic Leader are true because the bible says so.Dont protest dont resist just be passive.These messages are repeated over and over to the millions of bible believer worldwide.Since the ruling families view religion as the opiate of the masses they provide funding for organized religion worldwide.Christians Muslum and Jews have been tricked into praising there God AMEN at the end of every prayer

Solution # 12 ARREST THE COMMITTEE OF 300 FAMILIES Arrest the Committee of 300 Families for there horrific crimes against humanity.Those crimes include Genocidal Mass Murder using Americas AtomicNuclear and Chemical weapons of mass destruction against Japanesse and Vietnamese populations Hundreds of thousand of innocent human being were burned,deformed and vaporized with tax payer money…The ruling families crimes also include The Holocaust of Kazar Jews,espionage,drug smuggling and traffiking,extinction of species through environmental rape and pollution,extreme degradation,humiliation,cruelty and torture,blackmail bribery,conspiracy,slavery,racism,mass slaughter,ethnic cleasing,terrorism and the planning and coverup of 911,grand theft,tax evasion,insider trading,profiting from Hitlers Nazi labor camps and trading with the enemy,loan sharking,smuggling,corruption,political assasinations and the list goes on and on.The committee of 300 inbread Families are clever ruthless and morally insane.Since they control the military the weaponry and the world wealth who’s going to arrest them for there horrific crimes and how.The worlds citizen must gather together in large numbers and make citizen arrest of each member of these 300 scumball families

Solution # 13 GET PAST YOUR FEAR Get past your fear and take action!!! Fear is paralyzing and the ruling families know this. They use there media monopolies to fearmongering,terrorize and paralize the masses.You are either with us or your with the terrorist which really means If you are with us your are with the terrorist

Solution # 14 IF THEY CAN TAKE IT WE CAN TAKE IT BACK If 300 families can figure out how to steal all the worlds money,power,wealth and resourses and then enslave the masses under one world empire… Then 300 of the same families can figure out how to stop them dead in there tracks… THE ONLY THING NESSESARY FOR THE TRIUMPH OF EVIL IS FOR GOOD PEOPLE TO DO NOTHING We can take back our world and we must So put away your fear and fight back SAY NO TO THE NWO

by ZoSo Rich Billionaire Scumballs get together to decide yours and my fate on Planet Earth and all that gives them this power is paper money worth NOTHING NOTHING at ALL… Unless of course we the people give it value

ABC News Reports On Secret Meeting Of The Rich, Yet Ignores Bilderberg Completely

May 21st, 2009 Corporate news network baffled at how media could have missed story, yet omits completely the fact that 150+ elitist powerbrokers meet in secret every year with barely a whimper from the establishment press Prison Planet >> Originally Posted 20th May 2009 ABC News today devoted a prominently featured three page story to a “secret meeting” of rich philanthropists which took place earlier this month in New York, and yet one of the biggest news corporations in America was completely silent during a far more important meeting of around 150 of the world’s powerbrokers at the Bilderberg conference last week. At time of press, the ABC News story is the second top story on the ABCNews.com website under the headline, America’s Richest Givers’ Secret Meeting.

“Under a cloak of secrecy, some of the world’s wealthiest people gathered in an unprecedented meeting early this month in New York City possibly to coordinate strategies for giving their vast fortunes to charity in the midst of the financial crisis,” begins the report, before descending into a deluge of fawning idolatry about how people like David Rockefeller, Bill Gates and Ted Turner, who has repeatedly called for world population to be reduced by a shocking 95% as well as a one child policy instituted in the west, are committed to saving the poor from the ravages of the economic crisis with their benign acts of philanthropy.

The report states that the meeting is “enough to spark the imaginations of conspiracy theorists everywhere,” linking to a previous ABC News report that implies people who believe that powerful individuals conspire to rule the world in secret are probably mentally ill. The most vomit inducing paragraph of the whole article arrives when ABC asks, “There remain as many questions about the meeting’s details as there are about the logistics behind its organization. How did some of the world’s most public figures coordinate their schedules, travel, and security with no one in media knowing about it?” Well how indeed did they manage to do that I wonder? 150+ of the global elite manage to do it on a routine basis every single year without barely a whimper from the corporate media, despite the location of the Bilderberg meeting leaking in advance every time. They manage to do it because the corporate media was castrated decades ago and is merely a PR machine for the establishment, which is why they dutifully follow orders not to report on what would otherwise be a gargantuan story of worldwide interest in the form of the secret Bilderberg Group meetings. ABC News is owned by the Walt Disney Company, Vice Chairman of which is Roy Disney, nephew of Walt Disney himself. Roy Disney is a Bilderberg member, having attended the secretive cabal’s 1999 conference in Sintra, Portugal.

Since all Bilderberg members adhere to “Chatham House Rules,” forbidding the revelation of anything that was discussed, it’s unsurprising that ABC refused to report on the global elite’s annual confab in Greece near Athens last week, a story that dwarves this much vaunted “meeting of the rich” in terms of both the number and the influence of the numerous powerbrokers who attended. Bilderberg 2009 coverage was left to a gaggle of alternative media citizen journalists who were harassed, stalked, detained and physically assaulted every step of the way by secret police and security goons at the behest of Bilderberg. ABC News’ “meeting of the rich” exclusive is a pathetic attempt at convincing its declining audience that the corporate media has any interest in uncovering the secret agenda of the elite, when in reality the story is nothing more than a sophistic exercise in ass kissing and creeping adulation for people like David Rockefeller and Ted Turner, who are portrayed as philanthropic saviors of the planet, when they are in fact nothing more than globalist scum intent on destroying U.S. sovereignty and eliminating us “useless feeders” by means of population reduction programs which they have routinely advocated. Meeting of America’s Richest About ‘Need,’ Attendee Says Oprah Winfrey, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett Discuss Coming Together ‘to Do More’

By RUSSELL GOLDMAN and EILEEN MURPHY May 20, 2009 Under a cloak of secrecy, some of the world’s wealthiest people gathered in an unprecedented meeting early this month in New York City “to see how they can join together to do more,” according to one attendee. Some of the richest people in the world meet to discuss philanthropy. Invited by the world’s two richest men Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, along with David Rockefeller, a Who’s Who of American wealth and influence gathered around a long table in a window-lined private room overlooking the East River on May 5. “The overwhelming reason for the meeting was need — that was the issue that galvanized everyone to participate,” Patricia Stonesifer, senior advisor to the Gates foundation’s trustees, Bill and Melinda Gates and Warren Buffett, told ABCNews.com. “This was a group very committed to philanthropy coming together to see how they can join together to do more.”

Gates and Buffett were joined by billionaire moguls Oprah Winfrey, Ted Turner and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg along with heavyweight philanthropists George Soros and others.

Together the attendees have donated more than $70 billion to charity since 1996, according to the Chronicle of Philanthropy. A clandestine meeting of the country’s rich and powerful, left off their public calendars and hidden from the press, is enough to spark the imaginations of conspiracy theorists everywhere, but attendees told ABC News.com the meeting was “100 percent about philanthropy” and it was not meant to be a secret. “It was meant to be a private exchange but it wasn’t a secret really, just a private meeting,” Stonesifer said.

First reported by IrishCentral.com, ABCNews.com confirmed each of the attendees’ presence at the meeting held at the residence of the Rockefeller University president on the campus of the Manhattan medical school. It lasted about five hours, beginning in mid-afternoon and continuing through dinner, Stonesifer said. “This particular group had never come together as a group before but many of the attendees had met in the past either individually or in smaller groups — but never all at once,” she said. “This was a great discussion and they agreed to continue the dialogue and meet again in the future. There were a lot of good ideas.” She said that the discussion “ranged from emergency relief efforts to scholarship efforts, to U.S. education efforts to global health.” Another attendee who asked to remain anonymous described the meeting as “a private gathering of friends and colleagues to share their history and excitement about their philanthropy. [It was] a group together discussing a range of things they are working on.”

Some of the world’s wealthiest and most influential individuals met early this month in New York City to secretly discuss how to best use their money to help people in the midst of the financial crisis. When again asked about the meeting following ABC News.com’s initial report Mayor Bloomberg said he sometimes holds private meetings that are “not going to be on the public schedulues. There are meetings all over this city and there are some very powerful people in this city.”

Bloomberg who would not directly comment on the meeting or its outcome said: “You know I am very interested in private philanthropy, I think it has a unique place in our society in that with private dollars you can try new things, things that you can’t do with public dollars.” There remain as many questions about the meeting’s details as there are about the logistics behind its organization. How did some of the world’s most public figures coordinate their schedules, travel, and security with no one in media knowing about it?

Charities Suffer in Recession The meeting was reminiscent of the 1907 salons of America’s foremost financiers held in the study of J.P. Morgan to discuss how private citizens could stop the economic panic. IrishCentral reported that each of the participants was given 15 minutes to propose how to best direct their charity given the global economic climate.

Charities are suffering during the crisis, and America’s top philanthropists likely met to chart a new course for global charity, said Stacy Palmer, editor-in-chief of the Chronicle of Philanthropy. A meeting of the country’s top philanthropists is “extraordinary” and “really unusual,” Palmer said.

“I can’t think of another time they’ve all been in the same room to talk about philanthropy,” she said. “It’s unprecedented.” Gates and Buffet have publicly committed their vast fortunes to the same philanthropic efforts, and Rockefeller, the chairman of Rockefeller Financial Services, comes from a long line of philanthropists.

Gates, the founder and former CEO of Microsoft, who topped the Forbes’ Richest People list this year, has dedicated his foundation to eradicating infectious disease worldwide.

According to Portfolio magazine, Gates, who is worth about $59 billion, donated $3.7 billion from 2002 to 2006 and $10 billion from 2007 to 2008. Warren Buffett, CEO of conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway, was ranked the second-richest man by Forbes this year with a net worth is estimated at $52 billion. Though his giving in the past year is not disclosed, he donated some $46.1 billion between 2002 and 2006, according to Portfolio. In 2006, Buffet pledged $31 billion, the bulk of his fortune, to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, doubling the organization’s endowment virtually overnight.

Though the charitable interests of the participants differ, they have some things in common, said Bob Ottenhoff, CEO of Guidestar, a service that tracks nonprofit organizations. For the most part, the attendees are all self-made. Their donations come from money they made in their own lifetimes, rather than old family fortunes, and they have committed to giving away their fortunes while still alive rather than through bequests after their deaths.

One exception is Rockefeller, scion of the Rockefeller fortune. In 2008, Rockefeller gave $137 million to charity.

Philanthropic Groups Have Global Reach Though the philanthropic focus of each of the participants differs, many of their foundations have a global dimension.

“Each has their specialty. Gates focuses on world health, [CNN founder Ted] Turner on the environment and the UN, Soros is involved in civic engagement,” Ottenhoff said.

Between 1997 and 2006 Turner has donated $1.6 billion, the bulk of which, $1 billion, went to the UN Foundation in 1997.

Soros, a fund manager worth $9 billion, gave $1.1 billion from 2002 to 2006 and $475 million from 2007 to 2008. Much of Soros giving goes to his family’s Open Society Institute. “These sorts of meetings don’t happen very often. It is difficult for large philanthropic organizations to work together. The fact that these are all very engaged living donors means very interesting things can happen,” Ottenhoff said. Both Ottenhoff and Palmer agreed that it was likely the financial crisis that brought everyone together.

Charitable giving has taken a serious hit in recent months, and the power players likely discussed how to keep some nonprofits afloat. “Nonprofits are going through a difficult time. The endowments of many foundations have dropped significantly,” Palmer said. “Many people are not as able to give as much money as the used to. “They are making a statement that donors should continue to give. They are likely planning on a sending a message that philanthropy needs to continue worldwide,” she said. Few of the participants, Palmer said, gave money quietly and she anticipated that the secret meeting was the first step in a plan that would eventually be made public. A number of other people attended the meeting including: Winfrey, worth $2.7 billion, who donated some $50 million in 2007; Bloomberg, founder of Bloomberg LP and Mayor of New York City, who is worth $11.5 billion and donated $205 million from 2007 to 2008; financier Eli Broad who donated $100 million in 2008; and financier Peter Peterson, who committed $1 billion in 2008.

August 30, 2009 NM Rothschild pitches motorway privatisation plan OR “Rothschild to squander British highway profit for Rothschild pocket through there old privatization fraud scheme” “Its the oldest trick in the Book” Robert Watts and Dominic O’Connell A radical plan to raise £100 billion by privatising the motorway network has been presented to the three main political parties by NM Rothschild, the influential investment bank. Rothschild, an architect of several privatisations, made its pitch in the weeks running up to the summer recess on July 21, Whitehall sources said. Bankers told leading politicians that the sale of the roads overseen by the Highways Agency — all motorways and most big trunk roads — could help revive battered public finances. Toll-road companies and infrastructure funds would compete to operate and maintain stretches of the network. In one version of the scheme, the government would pay for upkeep through a system of “shadow” tolls. A more radical, and less politically palatable, option would be for companies to charge motorists directly through toll booths or electronic card readers. The RAC Foundation, a motorists’ group, advocated privatisation in a report last week.

The Rothschild plan has already won the support of Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrats’ deputy leader and Treasury spokesman. “This is an attractive, positive idea which could release considerable resources to the public finances and may have real environmental merits,” Cable said. “The scale of it is vast — it makes rail privatisation look like small beer.” Theresa Villiers, the shadow transport secretary, said the Conservatives had “no plans” to back Rothschild’s proposals: “Rothschilds, like many other banks and consultancies, have approached me and my team on a range of ideas for our transport network, including their ideas for our road infrastructure, but we are not working on any proposals for privatisation of the strategic road network and have no plans to do so.” Motorway privatisation was considered by John Major’s Conservative administration, which sold British Rail, but was rejected. A spokesman at the Department for Transport said: “It is not unusual for organisations to suggest ideas to government departments but ultimately all policy is decided by ministers and there are no plans to sell off a stake in the Highways Agency.” Rothschild declined to comment. The bank was behind many of the key privatisations of the 1980s and 1990s, including British Steel, British Gas and British Coal. It has close links to the Conservatives, having employed several senior Party figures including Lord Lamont, John Redwood and Lord Wakeham. Oliver Letwin, the former shadow chancellor, works there part-time. Politicians of all Parties are seeking ways to decrease the need for large tax rises or heavy cuts in public services. The bank bailouts and a recent collapse in tax revenues has seen public sector debt rise to more than £800 billion, 56.8% of GDP — up from 35.5% just two years ago. Road tolls are unpopular, however. When Labour mooted road pricing two years ago, more than 230,000 signed a petition on the Downing Street decrying the plan . RothschildsTimeline.ppt

ZoSoTRUTHTALK.ning.com

Visit ZoSo’s TRUTH TALK

“The world is governed by far different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes” (Benjamin Disraeli).

by Richard Stone
Published: Nov. 09, 2009 – FourWinds10.com

Conspiracy theory is the theory that most of the world is secretly governed by a small group of men who operate behind the scenes. Conspiracy theory is now an accepted turn of phrase but sometimes one hears the expression, sometimes whispered rather than spoken. “The Illuminati”.

What does this mean? Who are the Illuminati? They are, in essence, a cartel of international bankers and industrialists based in Western Europe and North America. The names of certain families persist over long periods of time. Some of the most important names are Rothschild, Rockefeller, Morgan, Lazard, Warburg, Schroder and Schiff.

The pivotal family is probably the house of Rothschild, the descendants of Mayer Rothschild (1743 – 1812) of Frankfurt. The male descendants of this family, for at least two generations, generally married first cousins or even nieces. The family established banking institutions in Vienna, London, Naples and Paris as well as Frankfurt. Ever since the middle ages, these families have been building their power by lending money at rates of interest to the monarchies and governments of Europe who were forever in debt, particularly in times of war. Sooner than tax the population to raise funds, always an unpopular measure, they usually preferred to borrow money from the money-lenders. This was the birth of the concept “the national debt.” The countries of the world are forever in debt but where there is a debtor there is a creditor – who is this money owed to? It is owed to this coterie of international bankers.

By the nineteenth century the power of the Rothschild family was immense. They increased their wealth with great cunning and cleverness, while maintaining a low public profile. A notable example of their methods was their exploitation of the battle of Waterloo. The Rothschilds had spies watching the course of the battle and as soon as became evident that Wellington had won, a Rothschild agent traveled at maximum speed to London, arriving hours before Wellington’s own messenger. Rothschild received the messenger and began conspicuously selling his stocks. The whole stock exchange assumed that Wellington had lost and Napoleon had won so everybody started selling, at this point, other Rothschild agents bought up huge stocks at give-away prices. Thus an already massive fortune was massively increased.

The Rockefeller family may be equally important. The pivotal figure in this family was J.D.Rockefeller, who made his fortune out of Standard Oil or Esso in Ohio and Pennsylvania. He also controlled the railroads. When rival road transport systems were established he attempted to block them by parking his trains across the roads at level crossings. His basic business technique was the elimination of competitors at all costs, followed by the establishment of a monopoly, followed by profit taking. He rapidly gained a name for huge wealth, secrecy and hard and dirty business practice. In his later years he had a harsh and gaunt appearance, so to counter his bad “public image” JD more or less invented the PR industry. He had short films of himself made, calculated to charm the public, himself playing golf with a pretty little child for instance. This film was shown on TV recently. It has a rather false and amateurish air but was very effective with the public of the day.

The Rockerfellers currently have controlling interests in Exxon (the world’s biggest company) and the Chase Manhattan Bank, which turns over trillions of dollars a week. With so many billions in their hands already, what does more money mean? Obviously it means more power and more control over other human beings, but to what end and in whose name?

Apparently in the name of Lucifer, the fallen angel also known as the bringer of light, hence the name “Illuminati”, which means “the enlightened ones”. Lucifer is also known for the characteristics of pride, deception and impermanence. The illuminati were apparently founded in Bavaria in 1770 by one Adam Weisshaupt, a student of the Jewish philosopher Mendelsohn, and backed by the Rothschild family. The society has always been based on the lodges of Freemasonry, which was taken over at the highest levels during the course of the eighteenth century by agents of the Illuminati. Freemasonry is a very secretive institution, to the extent that members at one level do not know what members at another level are doing. Hence it is an organisation which is full of bonhomie and good deeds at the lower and middle levels, while its motives and deeds at the highest levels veer towards the dark side.

Both Freemasonry and Judaism have strong roots in the ancient Egyptian systems of religious belief, and it was this very similarity which attracted the illuminati to Freemasonry, for most of them were Jewish. It is a source of controversy today to speculate whether or not they are still predominantly Jewish. No unfair racism intended – they either are or they aren’t. Certainly there is much evidence to suggest that they are not, George Bush for instance, a prominent illuminati figure and obviously not Jewish.

The all seeing eye on the U.S. Dollar Bill

The United States of America is more or less a creation of Freemasonry. The symbol of Freemasonry was placed on the cornerstone of the Whitehouse, while the assembled Freemasons lodges stood and watched the ceremony. The famous all-seeing eye in the pyramid appears on the one dollar bill. It is one of the main symbols of Freemasonry. This bill also bears the inscription, in Latin, “1776, the year of inception of a new world order”. If one joins the dots formed by the stars of the thirteen original states one obtains an exact Star of David.

The goal of the IlIuminati is total control of the world. The only nations, which are holding out against their power, are some Islamic nations and China but this resistance is limited because the Illuminati have crushing economic power.

There are certain methods of subjugation and control which are indispensable to this power. The first is, of course, complete control over all financial systems, all borrowing and lending. All banks, all building societies, all insurance companies have to be under their control. At the lowest level even the smallest bank will be forced to toe the line. At the highest level the World Bank decides the fate of countries. It is an interesting and amazing fact that both the Federal Reserve Bank and the Bank of England are controlled by these Illuminati dynasties, in spite of the names of these banks, which suggest that they are run for public benefit. It is said that both Abraham Lincoln and John Kennedy wanted to change this system.

The second essential component is control of the media. It is controlled through business fashion. If the board meeting, or the management meeting, or the sales meeting, or the training meeting suggests that facts should be presented in a certain way, who is going to present them differently? There is an implied threat to one’s job and one’s career. Few people would gladly face demotion, retrenchment or the dole and most people are so ambitious they will do nearly anything “reasonable” to court favour with their superiors. This is how business is controlled and the media is the most important part of business, for it controls people’s minds. People are very suggestible and often lend more credence to what they see on “the box” than to what happens on their own street. The Illuminati know this and use this suggestibility factor to the full. Lenin’s key move during the Russian revolution was the capture of the radio station.

The third factor in the control system is the universities, and through them the whole education system. Particular effort is put into the schools of sociology, politics, economics and education, hence “liberal” systems of education which are often degenerate and even violent. Their men are inserted into the universities through the power of funding by big business. They then spread their influence downwards through tertiary to secondary and primary education.

The fourth factor is the enormous influence wielded by two similar organisations, The Council of Foreign Relations in the USA and the Royal Institute of International Affairs in England. These institutions are schools for statesmen, Illuminati statesmen. They are the stamping grounds of men such as Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinksi and Lord Carrington. These two “think tanks” have a crucial influence on all US and British governments, no matter which party is “in power”. The statesmen produced by these institutions can and do decide the fate of nations.The tax-exempt foundations are also instruments of Illuminati power. The Ford foundation and the Rockefeller foundation are two prominent examples of this type of “charitable” institution. They were heavily involved in supporting various communist powers when the cold war was at its height. Communism versus capitalism arms race = more money and power for the Illuminati. So these are some of the structures through which the Illuminati work but what methods do they use?

Pitting one side against the other, using a theory devised by Hegel, which is: Thesis versus antitheses – synthesis.

Every force tends to have an opposite counterforce. The conflict between the two results in a new situation, the synthesis. The illuminati make it their business to be the synthesis. Thus no problem situation is ever “nipped in the bud” it is rather fostered and used, just as the Soviet Union was fostered and used.

The insertion of immigrant groups into countries is a variation of this divide and rule process. Each group can be played off against the other.

“Double talk” and “double think”. George Orwell knew instinctively what was going on when he invented these two expressions:
I categorically deny = it will happen a bit later.
Peace = war by another means.

To say one thing and do another is fundamental to Illuminati practice. They believe that the public will accept these lies through laziness and wishful thinking. Unfortunately they are usually correct.

“Keep them busy busy busy, back on the farm with the other animals.” We are kept so busy with business (or busyness) that we do not understand or participate in the decisions and events that will crucially affect our future.

When a real power move is made it is usually done secretly and suddenly often with the pretence that nothing has happened. There is preparation for opposition, but conflict is often not necessary as most people have been trained to be so passive that they will probably not create an effective opposition.

Use of front men in important positions. These front men have the characteristic of “servile obedience”, probably because of a blot or blots on their character which they are anxious to conceal. Most of the Presidents of the USA fall into this category. The current situation springs to mind. Behind the opponent stands the man with real power, who has long been groomed for this position. Men like Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski and George Bush are in this category.

The assassination of opposing leaders as quietly and as secretly as possible, so as to simulate a natural death. If this is not possible due to time constraints or other limited circumstances, surrogates are used and the lines of suspicion are covered by deception, false accusation and if necessary, multiple assassinations. Induced heart attacks, fake motor accidents and apparent suicides are also favoured methods of assassination.

Social engineering. An easily manipulated rabble is what is required. Mixed population groups with weak morals, weak traditions, low educational standards and weak group willpower are the aim. Those with special aptitudes can be taken out and trained to serve the illuminati for technical purposes, security purposes or as part of the propaganda apparatus. The middle class will become surplus to requirements and will be reduced to relative poverty.

Mockery and submission of the manners and morals of societies which show any resistance. Control of the media, the fashion industries and the education systems are essential components in this strategy. “Free love”, the cult of youth, mockery of the Christian and Muslim faiths also fall into this category. “I don’t give a rats ass about Jesus Christ” is one recent masterpiece from one of Hollywood’s biggest starts. He probably didn’t realise what he was saying, which makes him a “useful idiot’. A “useful idiot” is much more effective than a conscious supporter. By these means of subversion societies and nations are conquered from within and open battle is usually not necessary.

The conduct of unrelenting economic warfare. This is the real war and continues even while the bombs are falling and the bullets are flying. The important part is the control of the enemy’s economy after the conflict. The recent economic crash in the far-eastern countries is in reality an assertion of the Illuminati’s economic power, an expression of economic dominance. The Illuminati now control 10-15% of the Japanese economy. This is public knowledge, that is what has been bought at bargain prices. In reality they probably control much more.

Control and exploitation of the standards of public health. The sale of prescription drugs is a huge business generating mega profits. Medical operations and treatments can also be very profitable to big business. These extreme treatments have their place but are over-used for the sake of profit.

In fact big business, particularly the big drug companies, have a vested interest in the ill health of the population. These companies, working through the US Food and Drug Administration, have tried to suppress the health food industry. In this they have largely failed but now the game is to own it and control it so that health foods can only be afforded by the elite.

Argument through defamation of character. The factual debate is ignored while characters are defamed. This is usually a very effective technique as many human beings are very suggestible and seem reluctant to use their reasoning abilities. Thus a “smear campaign” can easily draw attention away from the facts.

To conclude, it is growing increasingly evident that a world government is developing, and many would say that it is probably no bad thing, but few have asked for what purpose this “new world order” is created. Nor have they asked themselves what the consequences will be. These consequences (or some of them) will probably be as follows:

• Increasing profits for big business, increasing poverty for the middle class (who they despise). A rapid decline in moral standards and the promotion of social decay.

• Transience. Jobs that don’t last; neighbourhoods that don’t last.

• Increasing levels of crime and violence.

• Decline and demise of public services; replacement by private enterprise – good service for the few who can afford it.

• Ongoing ill health for the bulk of the population because of stress; poor quality foods; food additives; genetic engineering; pollution and drugs. There may be good health for those who can afford it – only the rich and well informed.

• The gradual phasing out of national governments, which will have powers more like the regional governments of today.

• The formation of several conglomerations like the United States.

In time a world leader will be announced, a real one this time. A pity he will have a cynical contempt for the most of humanity. Do we deserve it?

Source: http://fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/new_world_order/news.php?q=1257799565

Related:

History of the New World Order

The New World Order (NWO): An Overview

The History of the House of Rothschild

Mankind Held Hostage by Satanists

VIDEO – Criminal Rothschilds

The Council on Foreign Relations

DOCUMENTARY – Esoteric Agenda (Spanish Subtitles) (120 mins.)

DOCUMENTARY – Ring of Power (4h 20 mins.)

The History series have ended and here we are to start yet another series of articles. As the name reveals I will be writing about the Illuminati and in detail this time. You will be able to learn everything there is to know about the secret society if you will read all of the articles. Today I will scratch the surface of the knowledge about the Illuminati with all the basic information.

The order was founded in Bavaria, Germany on May 1^st 1776. It was founded by Adam Weishaupt, who was allegedly elected by the Jesuits. I am more fond of the theory that Weishaupt was influenced by the founder of the Rothschild family international banking dynasty, Mayer Amschel Rothschild. It is important to know that the philosophy known as “Illuminism” or “enlightenment” traces their roots and history to the ancient mystery religions of Egypt, ancient Babylon, and even Mesopotamia. Out of these ancient religions, which were practiced secretly over hundreds and hundreds of years, there arose esoteric groups which continued to practice the rites, traditions, and enculturation brought in from the original groups. Of course these rites and traditions have been lost through time and replaced by the capitalistic, satanic and racist mindset of today’s Illuminists. Through time they have lost their principles (if they ever had any) for strive for power, wealth and domination. Over the centuries these groups practiced openly in some countries and covertly in countries where Christianity or other religions opposed their practices. Some of the groups which came out of these ancient roots included the order of the Knights Templar, Rosicrucian’s, Baphetomism, and Druidic cults. These groups were the forerunners, or roots, of modern day Illuminism. The original Illuministic leaders chose to take what they felt were the best practices of each root religion, combine them into principles, then organized these principles according to specific guidelines.

Modern day Illuminism is a philosophy funded by the wealthy, but practiced in all social strata. It is a philosophy whose tenets have spread across the world. It started with the German branch of Rosicrucian’s, spread to England and later came to the United States, the center of power today. The Illuminati have three main branches: the Germanic branch, which oversees the others, the British branch, which handles finances, and the French/Russian branch. All three branches are represented in both the United States and Canada, as well as every country in the world. You might consider Illuminists as evil looking, scary figures. It’s quite the opposite. If you met them in person, you would probably instantly like any of these intelligent, verbal, likeable, even charismatic people. This is their greatest cover, since we often expect great evil to “appear” evil, led by media portrayals of evil as causing changes in the face and demeanor of people, or marking them like the biblical Cain. Many Illuminati members are well known to you. For example the former British Prime Minister Tony Blaire, former U.S President George W. Bush, Queen of England, and many other public figures. That is including actors, singers and other celebrities. With the exception of Queen Elizabeth the other mentioned figures are more or less all small fries. They do not belong to the ruling 13 families of the Order. The leader of these 13 ruling families is called the Pindar (The title, Pindar, is an abbreviated term for “Pinnacle of the Draco”). The Pindar is and it has been for the last few hundred years, the head of the Rothschild family. Each of the 13 ruling families is given an area and/or a particular function to fulfill. These particular functions include global finances, military technology/development, mind-control, religion, and media.

The next layer is the second-in-command families who do the support work for the 13 ruling families. There are supposedly 300 of these. Many members of these families were presidents of the United Stated and held other high official positions in other countries. This mainly shows that the original and ruling families only sit behind the scenes and control their masses. They do not go into anything public themselves as they are the secret masterminds – puppet masters. Many conspiracy theorists are convinced that the members of the 13 ruling families are in fact shape-shifters and that they are basically reptilians (reptilian humanoids). Now I have found this to be a bit over exaggerated, however we do not know so much about the Universe, the 11 dimensions and what not that it might be true. What I have found more believable, though, is the theory of a third part of the brain, called the ‘R-complex’. The ‘R-Complex’ is the animalistic hemisphere of the brain, the territorial mindset (This is mine psyche). Whether the first or the second theory is right, or even both, we can only be guessing here. I am a very open minded person and I believe everything is possible. I have come to realize that fact in the last year of my personal education. What is it that we do not see? I have had my eyes opened to the truth, however even I still know virtually nothing. What I do know is where the society is going, where it has been and the things I can grasp. However, when it comes to reptilian theories my mind can only go numb. There are many things we will never be able to understand, and I believe this is one of them. Whichever the case, I cannot help but wonder if everything we have done in the past decades was all meant to lead to one only thing: the completing of their agenda? Nowadays I can see through lies everywhere I go. I can only laugh when I see all our leaders striving for world preservation, World peace and World unity, of course all being a pretext for a New World Order. Is it worth it to be living in an occult society in which we are only meant as sheep to the Elite? I wonder why the Illuminati exert themselves so vigorously for power and wealth, when they already have everything. I have said it numerous times through my articles that it is greed, however there are other factors. It looks like it is the animalistic part of them, and the process they undergo in their early childhood, through the Illuminati programming.

The Illuminati are obsessed with a number of other things besides World domination. They are obsessed with keeping the order within inner circles of the family, thus intercourse within the own family in order to preserve the ‘pure blood’. They truly are the sickest beings on the face of our planet. The order is also known to use the number thirteen with various symbols, such as the symbols on the American Dollar (The pyramid has 13 layers) there are 13 ruling families and so on. Each of the 13 ruling families has a Council of 13 as well. The number, 13, has great significance to them. They know that there are 12 types of energies that pass through the 10 aspects of God-Mind. The totality of the 12 energies equals a 13th energy. This is considered the most powerful knowledge. They also know that there are really 13 Zodiac signs, not the commonly acknowledged 12. They have kept the 13^th hidden for centuries because it is the sign of the Dragon. They keep the qualities and traits of this sign secret to avoid giving away clues to the Reptilian mind-pattern. I am convinced many of you are very confused right now as this is not something to understand easily. Do not worry as you will get there at the end of the series. To be honest, I too am confused about this particular thing.

As stated above the Illuminati are divided into three main branches and the United States covers them all, as it is the center of them. The U.S is furthermore divided into seven regions. Within these seven regions there lies a council of thirteen, with an advisory board of 3 elders to each one. These regions interact for purposes of finances; personnel; teaching, etc. Beneath each regional council, is a local council. This is a council of 13 members, the head of whom sits on the regional council, and gives it information about the local groups underneath his leadership. The local council will also have an advisory council of 3. Quite organized one could say. They know how to do their job properly and efficiently, much to our misfortune of course.

The Illuminati have several sources of income as this is the means for the survival of their agenda and their organization. Drug running, pornography, children, gun running, buying access codes for military computers, hiring and selling assassinations, mercenaries/military trainers and banking. The sources of their income will be further detailed a forthcoming edition. They have people on virtually every position in the society. For that they go through a good amount of time and trouble to prepare their people for the various jobs they will undertake. To understand generational programming, it helps to understand why the cult goes to the amount of trouble that it does to place programming into people. Training represents time and effort, and no one- especially a cult member- will spend that amount of energy unless there will be a return on the investment. The cult has a very organized hierarchy of jobs. Like any large organization, in order to run smoothly, it needs people who are well trained in their jobs- so well trained, that they can do their tasks without even thinking about them. To maintain secrecy, this group must also have people completely dedicated to not revealing their roles in the cult- even under threat of death or punishment. The cult wants members who are completely loyal to the group and its tenets, who never question the orders they are given. These qualities in group members ensure the continuance of the cult, and that its secrets are never revealed to the outside world. As with the sources of income, I shall explain more about jobs in the Illuminati secret society and the most basic ones another time.

I believe this will do for now. I have gone through the ground work and you should be informed about the evil oppressing us quite a bit better now. Stay tuned for the sequel article which should be posted in two weeks. Stay on the watch, and be cautious.

D.K.

“Mi si consenta di battere e controllare la moneta di un Paese e dopo non mi importerà chi siano i suoi governanti”

Meyer Amschel Rothschild

Meyer Amschel Rothschild fu un famosissimo banchiere tedesco, fondatore dell’impero della famiglia Rothschild noto a tutti come l’impero della famiglia dello scudo rosso. Vi siete mai chiesti quali fossero le origini di questa facoltosa famiglia di banchieri? Basta fare un passo indietro nel tempo e andare a circa duecento anni fa, quando Mayer Rothschild, controllava più o meno direttamente le politiche dei paesi che finanziava. Questo banchiere di origine ebraica, tramandò le sue conoscenze ai suoi 5 figli e “Concordia, Integritas, Industria” era lo slogan che riassumeva in pieno la politica aziendale di famiglia.
Appena fu possibile Meyer Amschel Rothschild spedì i suoi figli, ormai giovani esperti di finanza, nelle principali capitali europee per aprire filiali della banca: Il figlio Amschel Mayer comprò una banca di Francoforte e Salomon si trasferì a Vienna. Nathan trasformò la filiale londinese in un istituzione, Calmann fece una filiale a Napoli e Jacob a Parigi. I discendenti della famiglia ebbero fortuna in tutta Europa grazie alle “cinque frecce” ( così vennero definiti i 5 figli di Meyer) nel settore bancario.
Il potere della famiglia Rothschild ha attraversato indenne due guerre mondiali, molte rivoluzioni, crisi economiche e sociali ed è indubbiamente un messaggio preciso al mercato che contesta il capitalismo familiare. Qualche anno fa la rivista Forbes, che annualmente stila le statistiche degli uomini più ricchi del pianeta, fece una classifica particolarissima nella quale venivano elencati i “ricchi tra i ricchi” della storia Mondiale e Meyer Amschel Rothschild si classificò settimo tra “I venti businessmen più influenti di tutti i tempi”.
Oggi l’impero Rothschild controlla società nei più disparati settori, si passa dall’arte alla produzione di vini di altissimo livello, a case editrici di fama internazionali; solo per citarne alcuni: Gruppo The Economist, Daily Telegraph, Liberation, British Petroleum, RIT Capital, JNR Limited, la banca d’affari NM Rothschild”, Vanco, Trigranit e Rio Tint.

Ti è piaciuto questo articolo? Iscriviti gratis alla nostra newsletter!