<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>screen-capture &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/screen-capture/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "screen-capture"</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:58:37 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Getting Help with Jing]]></title>
<link>http://techtalktopic.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/getting-help-with-jing/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>terryagray</dc:creator>
<guid>http://techtalktopic.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/getting-help-with-jing/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I have been carrying on a discussion on our Facebook wall about the use of Jing.  It strikes me that]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have been carrying on a discussion on our Facebook wall about the use of Jing.  It strikes me that]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[WACO Aircraft 360 Panoramic Photography of Cockpit!]]></title>
<link>http://designslink2.wordpress.com/2010/02/07/waco-aircraft-360-panoramic-photography-of-cockpit/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Pat M</dc:creator>
<guid>http://designslink2.wordpress.com/2010/02/07/waco-aircraft-360-panoramic-photography-of-cockpit/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been promising it and here it is! Here&#8217;s the link to one of our WACO Classic Aircra]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>I&#8217;ve been promising it and here it is! Here&#8217;s the link to one of our WACO Classic Aircraft Corporation <a title="WACO biplane cockpit 360 panoramic" href="http://dy360.bz/B09" target="_blank">biplane cockpit 360 panoramic&#8217;s!</a></p>
<div id="attachment_378" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://dy360.bz/B09"><img class="size-full wp-image-378" title="WACO biplane cockpit 360 panoramic screenshot" src="http://designslink2.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/waco-pano-screenshot.jpg?w=480&#038;h=350" alt="WACO biplane cockpit 360 panoramic screenshot" width="480" height="350" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">WACO biplane cockpit 360 panoramic screenshot. Click link in blog post or this image to see the high quality full screen panoramic for yourself!</p></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Screen capture tool for Windows Vista – SnippingTool]]></title>
<link>http://comp-tools.com/2010/02/07/snippingtool/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 06:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>comptools</dc:creator>
<guid>http://comp-tools.com/2010/02/07/snippingtool/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Using the Print Screen and Shift Print Screen in Windows system is usually the case to capture the s]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Using the Print Screen and Shift Print Screen in Windows system is usually the case to capture the screen. This is helpful for sending error messages on your applications to remote technical support personnel by email. Windows Vista has a built-in tool that does more. It is normally found in your windows\system32 directory.</p>
<p>%SystemRoot%\system32\SnippingTool.exe</p>
<p>By running the snipping tool, you can select the region you wish to capture. After that, highlight the specific region and give a short description. </p>
<div id="attachment_26" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://comptools.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/edit_screen.jpg"><img src="http://comptools.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/edit_screen.jpg?w=300&#038;h=218" alt="Editing the website using SnippingTool" title="edit_screen" width="300" height="218" class="size-medium wp-image-26" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Editing the Screen using SnippingTool</p></div>
<p>This is useful for us to send change request to webmaster. Circle the link with a highlighter and mark it as dead link. Circle the text and mark the spelling mistake. Strike-out the entire unnecessary paragraphs. Highlight the web browser address so that the actual document can be found easily. This is so much like working on HTML hardcopy and making notes without having to waste paper by printing. The only problem here is that you cannot capture the active cursor or drop down list on the web browser. For displaying drop down list, please revert to the old school screen capture and Windows Paint under the Accessories menu.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Record sound without Stereo Mix / Wave-Out  Mix (audio recording and screen capturing software)]]></title>
<link>http://streamrecorder.wordpress.com/2010/02/06/record-sound-without-stereo-mix-wave-out-mix-audio-recording-and-screen-capturing-software/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 09:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>streamrecorder</dc:creator>
<guid>http://streamrecorder.wordpress.com/2010/02/06/record-sound-without-stereo-mix-wave-out-mix-audio-recording-and-screen-capturing-software/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[In our Audio/video stream recording forum we posted last year that some programs allow to record aud]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>In our <a href="http://stream-recorder.com/forum">Audio/video stream recording forum</a> we posted last year  that some <a href="http://stream-recorder.com/forum/missing-sound-recording-option-stereo-mix-record-t4876.html">programs allow to record audio even without Stereo Mix / Wave-Out Mix</a>. Some of them use Universal Audio Driver created by Applian Technologies Inc.:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.applian.com/sound-recorder/">Freecorder 4</a> (freeware sound recording program),</li>
<li><a href="http://www.applian.com/replay-music/">Replay Music</a> (shareware sound recording program that can split and tag songs automatically),</li>
<li><a href="http://www.applian.com/replay-music/">Replay AV</a> (shareware stream recorder that is good for scheduling online audio recordings),</li>
<li><a href="http://www.applian.com/replay-video-capture/index.php">Replay Video Capture</a> (shareware screen recorder that allows to record both audio and video),</li>
<li><a href="http://www.applian.com/download-videos/">Replay Media Catcher</a> (shareware stream recorder that can record audio from your sound card as well),</li>
<li><a href="http://www.applian.com/asktoolbar/">Ask &#38; Record Toolbar</a> (freeware sound recording program)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.wmrecorder.com/wm_capture.php">WM Capture</a> (shareware screen video capture software)</li>
</ul>
<p>You are not limited to Windows XP when using the Universal Audio Driver. Sound recording with it works just fine in Windows Vista and Windows 7. In fact this could be the only solution to record sound in the latter OS due to restrictions posed by Microsoft and hardware manufacturers.</p>
<p>And here is another program that can record in Windows 7<br />
<a href="http://www.stereo-mix.com/stereo-mix-issues/stereo-mix-no-longer-required.html">111</a></p>
<p>Besides using software that allows to record sound without Stereo Mix / Wave-Out Mix, you can try to <a href="http://stream-recorder.com/forum/missing-sound-recording-option-stereo-mix-record-t4876.html">enable your Stereo Mix / Wave-Out Mix by changing settings, installing a driver,&#8230;</a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What Are You Waiting For?]]></title>
<link>http://accentphoto.wordpress.com/2010/02/05/what-are-you-waiting-for/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>accentphoto</dc:creator>
<guid>http://accentphoto.wordpress.com/2010/02/05/what-are-you-waiting-for/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I saw this via Seth Godin&#8217;s blog, and had to share it. Even though it&#8217;s in the same post]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>I saw this via Seth Godin&#8217;s <a title="blog" href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2010/02/bonus-inspiration-and-insight.html" target="_blank">blog</a>, and had to share it. Even though it&#8217;s in the same post as the <em>Lemonade</em> one I blogged about the <a title="other day" href="http://accentphoto.wordpress.com/2010/02/03/lemonade-the-movie/" target="_blank">other day</a>, I must have missed this earlier.</p>
<p>Anyway, in light of some reading I&#8217;ve been doing lately I thought this was one to remember forever and a great tribute. You can click on the screen capture to watch the video, and hope you share it with everyone in your life. </p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gePQuE-7s8c"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2968" title="Gabrielle Bouliane (Austin Poetry Slam)" src="http://accentphoto.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/youtube-gabrielle-bouliane-austin-poetry-slam1.jpg?w=500&#038;h=292" alt="" width="500" height="292" /></a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A Game to Get Started With Jing]]></title>
<link>http://techtalktopic.wordpress.com/2010/02/03/a-game-to-get-started-with-jing-3/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>terryagray</dc:creator>
<guid>http://techtalktopic.wordpress.com/2010/02/03/a-game-to-get-started-with-jing-3/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[As many of you know who have attended Academic Technology events, we are high on Jing.  Jing is a fr]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As many of you know who have attended Academic Technology events, we are high on Jing.  Jing is a fr]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[too white guys]]></title>
<link>http://barbecueorboogaloo.com/2010/01/31/too-white-guys/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>acesix</dc:creator>
<guid>http://barbecueorboogaloo.com/2010/01/31/too-white-guys/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[too white guys, originally uploaded by sizzled. he may have gotten rid of the sidekick, but he can]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div style="text-align:left;padding:3px;">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/aaaaalbundy/4319777582/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2698/4319777582_a692b9e3ae.jpg" style="border:solid 2px #000000;" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size:.8em;margin-top:0;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/aaaaalbundy/4319777582/">too white guys</a>, originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/aaaaalbundy/">sizzled</a>.</span>
</div>
<p>
he may have gotten rid of the sidekick, but he can&#8217;t get rid of my random attacks on prominent figures of the hip hop community.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Super rather inexpensive smaller screen lcd]]></title>
<link>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/super-rather-inexpensive-smaller-screen-lcd/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hdtvreviewman</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/super-rather-inexpensive-smaller-screen-lcd/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[This is very little television. It was very well packed and very easy to adjust. Rate this TV would ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>This is very little television. It was very well packed and very easy to adjust. Rate this TV would really around 4 and 1 / 2 stars if I could, because the image is quite good, although not perfect. We still have 26 &#8220;720p TV (Sharp) and I would rate that one a little better. You have to tweak settings to reduce the fading slightly Panasonic, when viewed from the side, even when the image is very good when you look directly at or at least a slight angle. My 26 &#8220;Sharp slighly better side viewing. Picture of my Panasonic Blu-ray on the Panasonic TV is excellent. I love the iPod adapter &#8211; it works well. The sound is quite the TV &#8211; the volume is good and sound is perfectly acceptable. Because I run through the TV speakers, I was worried a separate TV speakers. The TV is just sitting in the cabinet and that controls the other is useless for me. I just use the remote &#8211; which is quite simple and works well. Previous reviewer is a warning message 26 &#8220;720p TV and I do not know why. As such, this TV has a 26&#8243; Sharp is very high. 720p is more than adequate for 26 &#8220;TV. I also have a 4 year old 30&#8243; Sharp 720p to 1080p is good painting, a 46 &#8220;Mitsubishi. You definitely need to go to 1080p screen size bigger, but not 26&#8243;. It also pointed out earlier, &#8220;I found the image very different from the format station and the station does not signal for other files.&#8221; I do not know what it means to comment, but I think Panasonic has a single image and automatically adjust to changes in the output signal through my Comcast box. You can not go wrong on television. Amazon service, as usual, wonderful.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[looks ]]></title>
<link>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/looks/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hdtvreviewman</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/looks/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[through]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>through </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Great Pictures]]></title>
<link>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/great-pictures/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hdtvreviewman</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/great-pictures/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I have been loyal to Canon for many years, but it ended SD1200is. The camera has great features. Unf]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>I have been loyal to Canon for many years, but it ended SD1200is. The camera has great features. Unfortunately, the internal image quality is poor. I bought this camera to replace an aging Canon S50, which is 5 or 6 years old, 5-megapixel camera. After using the SD1200 Christmas Eve and testing of various shooting modes, I concluded that the SD1200 is unable to ensure good indoor photos. Almost all of my photos are grainy and washed out, very less than my old Canon S50, Canon SD870 or my husband. Although this camera can take great pictures and outside (do not know, because I did not take any pictures out there with him), does not take good pictures inside the limited light. Because I use the camera primarily paintings, that is unacceptable, and I&#8217;m sure there are better cameras. I&#8217;m back, I bought this camera and various camera makes good pictures and beyond.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Good compact camera]]></title>
<link>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/good-compact-camera/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 08:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hdtvreviewman</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/good-compact-camera/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I bought it with my wife and she likes it a lot. I tried it, and I saw pictures are very good. My wi]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>I bought it with my wife and she likes it a lot. I tried it, and I saw pictures are very good. My wife&#8217;s not stupid like me, but on how to use it a few minutes to tell me that everything is very intuitive. Size, the camera feels solid and heavy, and it probably means that the design is good and durable. Flash is very good in the dark. My two boys, 3 and 7, is very active, and the camera has trouble catching up with action. In general statements, the cross or two to respond to my commands, but other than that everything is good. It&#8217;s very tight, so it fits very comfortably in your pocket, Jean. It also takes video, so it is good.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Needs improvement]]></title>
<link>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/needs-improvement/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hdtvreviewman</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/needs-improvement/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I love the phone, but it is difficult to use if you are still in operation. This phone offers me man]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>I love the phone, but it is difficult to use if you are still in operation. This phone offers me many opportunities for each operation. Even dailing connection, you must first select a contact, press the call key, and then his second quick menu where you can select a call to vote &#8230;.. I like the touch screen, but I think this phone is the RAM is not good enough because it freezes all the time. Battery is not the best, but it is a day and a half. It would be nice if this phone came with FM transmitter, such as N-version. I think it is good, given the price, but it could be better for small work on it. Oh, before I forget dont use OVI, PC Suite is much better I think. Do not forget to search Office and PDF programs on the web.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Great Multiuse Phone]]></title>
<link>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/great-multiuse-phone/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hdtvreviewman</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/great-multiuse-phone/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I do not usually write reviews, but I love this phone so much that I felt that I should write. First]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>I do not usually write reviews, but I love this phone so much that I felt that I should write. Firstly, I do not usually buy a Nokia &#8211; I&#8217;m a fan of Sony Ericsson. However, I have quad-band phone, I wanted to travel to Europe and over the phone. SE Satie was released, but not in the U.S. and it&#8217;s expensive. I went to Nokia. I love the look and feel of the phone. I had absolutely no problems &#8211; do not appear cold and the battery is very very good. Fee for quickly. It is easy to open and lock the phone manually. It auto-lock feature that you can turn off or set longer than automatically locks. Calls are simple and call quality is good. Before the reviewer said that it is difficult to call, but I do not think that this is the case. You can place images or an icon people call frequently (I think up to 5) at the start screen, or set the speed dial number. I think it is easy to use touch screen, but you need to use some pressure &#8211; more than the iPhone, but it works well. I&#8217;m not a big internet user, but it connects quickly. I have not tried GPS yet. I must say that the camera is not so big, so if you are looking for a good camera phone, I would not buy this phone. Also I do not know why the phone icon in the applications, and not to the main menu (maybe I can change). I&#8217;m still learning to use all the many features this phone offers. If you are looking for an affordable phone has many features, you should definitely consider the Nokia 5800th</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Wonderful TV]]></title>
<link>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/wonderful-tv/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hdtvreviewman</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/wonderful-tv/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I bought this television to give a gift to someone. I was afraid because it was cheap, and the negat]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>I bought this television to give a gift to someone. I was afraid because it was cheap, and the negative comments on your point of view. I do not understand the angle of complaints. Viewing angle is good. I have a 23-inch Samsung, viewing angle is worse. Panasonic must be literally at the end of the television image depreciate to the point where it is no longer enjoyable. Viewing angle of small channels are generally not large. The sound is good and iPod dock is a wonderful thing. It is good to see all the videos downloaded from the larger screen and use the TV remote. I want to join the sound had more options, but the speakers are decent. I was stuck between television and 26-inch Samsung, but I&#8217;m glad I opted for this one. Negative comments from Samsung 26-inch TV in dying scared me. Plus, Consumer Reports rates Panasonic TV one of the marks, which is the least problematic. I am thinking about buying another one in my room. That is a lot!</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nice TV for the price]]></title>
<link>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/nice-tv-for-the-price/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hdtvreviewman</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/nice-tv-for-the-price/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[We do not have cable or SatTV (yet). Instead, it is a nice little TV in our computer until I tried /]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>We do not have cable or SatTV (yet). Instead, it is a nice little TV in our computer until I tried / entertainment system for more surround-sound speakers. Set-up was minimal and simple. (Long-handled Phillips screwdriver should not be!) I could not be happier. Fortunately, the manual is accompanied by detailed instructions on how to connect to the beauty of PC. However, this 26 &#8220;screen you only get 22-inch viewing area through your computer, and I had to manually adjust the angle through the&#8221; Menu / video format. It is two inches on the left and right edges of a black computer screen. Television is small because we do all DVD / PC by remote control. The whole screen to restore, if we go to see the DVD. My complaint, if any, is that the TV sound is average at best. But because our TV is hooked up to auxiliary speakers, no problem . For a more complete stereo speakers enhance the experience of the system.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Good camera]]></title>
<link>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/good-camera/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hdtvreviewman</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/good-camera/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I was looking for a small camera on a 200 dollar price range, so large optical zoom range is possibl]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>I was looking for a small camera on a 200 dollar price range, so large optical zoom range is possible. O course, I wanted all the other aspects of the activity, which is expected in the 10-megapixel camera. Previously owned a Kodak digital camera was made very well, so I bought another Kodak M380 on-line retailer. It did not work. Auto focus does not exist. I renewed search. Several friends have a Canon camera and photograph the results of their search convincesd me forget zoom and greater zoom range is 3-1 against the camera that actually works. I chose the Canon SD 1200 IS. I am very happy with my decision. The camera continues to impress me. Performance is more than I expected.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Good Phone, not great and definitely not an iphone killer]]></title>
<link>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/good-phone-not-great-and-definitely-not-an-iphone-killer/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hdtvreviewman</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/good-phone-not-great-and-definitely-not-an-iphone-killer/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[This phone is gose phone is good, very good, even the good features (WiFi, GPS, good music, manageme]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>This phone is gose phone is good, very good, even the good features (WiFi, GPS, good music, management, video, etc.) and nice touch screen. However, it does not believe that this is even close to the iPhone touch screen. The main problem is the synchronization software for your computer. It is completely useless. Just look at the on-line, you&#8217;ll see a lot of complaints. This is just stupid that Nokia can not be correct. I know that Vista is probably a mistake, but I think it is Nokia, which should be adjusted. The funny thing is that older versions of software used on E71, for example, works perfectly. I think that if you are a fan of great music and have patience to know that your phone and set it up, it is very good. If you are looking for something easy to use touch screen and the main thing is, maybe you should look for another telefoni.od, even very well with a good set of features (WiFi, GPS, good management of music, videos, etc.) and a nice touch screen. However, I do not think that this touch screen is even close to iPhone. The main problem, even when software is used to synchronize the phone with your PC. It&#8217;s absolutely useless. Just look at it on the internet that a lot of complaints. It&#8217;s just stupid that Nokia can not get this right. I realize that Vista is probably a mistake, but I think that Nokia, which would adapt. The funny thing is that the previous version of the software used on E71, for example, works perfectly. I think that if you&#8217;re a big music fan and you have the patience to get this phone and know where to set it up, it&#8217;s very good. If you are looking for something easy to use and the main thing is the touch screen maybe you should look for another phone.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[I love it!]]></title>
<link>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/i-love-it/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hdtvreviewman</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/i-love-it/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I was looking for small, affordable space and shoot camera. Sometimes, good reviews and recommendati]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>I was looking for small, affordable space and shoot camera. Sometimes, good reviews and recommendations of friends, I bought a Canon SD1200IS camera. I had about 3 months and love it! This is a very fast and power between images. Photos are large and easy to use. It offers a wide range of devices, which is one of the aquarium. I thought that I was great, but if I ever need? Oh, just two weeks after I had the camera Monterey Bay Aquarium. What the hell, I&#8217;ll try. Worked perfect! No other aquarium has been a very difficult time taking good pictures with all creatures great, but special, that I could have perfect pictures. I recommend the camera.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[For most people]]></title>
<link>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/for-most-people/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 07:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hdtvreviewman</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/for-most-people/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I had to replace my Nikon point and shoot, because I was angry blur. Nikon I bought about 2 years ag]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>I had to replace my Nikon point and shoot, because I was angry blur. Nikon I bought about 2 years ago because of their smaller size Canon point and shoot. But in the last 2 years I was somewhat disappointed with the quality of the image. Therefore, I looked around, and after reading reviews, I bought 1200IS. I&#8217;ve used it for about 3 weeks and I am very surprised that other reviewers have quality photos prices. This is a very simple camera, but it is a complete compact point and shoot. I would say that 5 of 10 photos from my old Nikon came out, too. So far, I would say that 8 out of 10 images that Canon is well-here! I would recommend the camera, looking for basic point and shoot, it has some advanced manual settings.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[best assistant ever]]></title>
<link>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/best-assistant-ever/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 06:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hdtvreviewman</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/best-assistant-ever/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[It is easy to understand, use the phone. Touch is very delicate. The display is absolutely fantastic]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>It is easy to understand, use the phone. Touch is very delicate. The display is absolutely fantastic. Browsing is a great experience if you Operamini 5th Call quality is very clear. I did not ask for better reception. Music player is good. The phone is very strong, and confident of my hand. Battery is not as strong as my N79 or N78, but it takes a few days, a very serious web browsing (3-4 hours). This is probably due to a touch screen. Videos play very well. Again, the picture quality is excellent. This is a very powerful phone, which takes time to learn and gain peak. So be patient and read the instructions. I say this because the more things you can do over the phone and you can imagine. The market, this phone is in operation. It takes a bit difficult, especially when lying in bed, surf the Internet, but not excessively so. I am a businessman, so I will be your business, and my personal entertainment. Bluetooth works well. From reading some negative comments, I think that some people do not take time to learn how to use the phone. I can not compare Apple touch screen, because I never had the product Apple. But I can say unequivocally that 5800 is touch screen works very well. Some applications require that one accept the other two associations. After some time, it is natural to do. Then, N78 and N79, I can say is a large touch keys for improving the physical keyboard. After using the touch screen, I&#8217;m not sure if I would never go back and re-embrace of more traditional phone.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Good]]></title>
<link>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/good/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 06:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hdtvreviewman</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/good/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Its a nice phone. I&#8217;ve always been a fan of Nokia. But after I did for 4 days, he shot me. Whe]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Its a nice phone. I&#8217;ve always been a fan of Nokia. But after I did for 4 days, he shot me. When I switched it off and then back, and he shot White Blue Nokia logo screen. Then I tried everything, nothing worked. Nokia also contact the customer support could not figure out the problem. Then I showed it to Amazon. First of all, I remembered the money back, but then I thought, when this work was a good price for the phone, loaded with many features. So I called Amazon sent me a refund and replacement on the same day. I got it for 1 week and now its working fine so far. As one wrong, later I found the problem itself. Remove the memory card and the phone is switched off, bingo, it worked, then I put the card back on, and it worked. But later in the day when I tried again, and he shot again. The same trick again, trying to turn. But the problem always returns. I sent back the defective today, after the transfer of data to a replacement piece. Shop door is cool, you get a lot of fun games and applications, such as the iPhone or iPod touch. 3.5 out of 5 (half marks, I was in trouble)</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nokia 5800 Navigation Edition Unlocked Phone]]></title>
<link>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/nokia-5800-navigation-edition-unlocked-phone/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 06:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hdtvreviewman</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/nokia-5800-navigation-edition-unlocked-phone/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I just (not) worth 2 cents to add more comments. From all I can say on a regular basis, and XM Nav 5]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>I just (not) worth 2 cents to add more comments. From all I can say on a regular basis, and XM Nav 5800 edition is physically the same. It appears that the photos I saw that the regular 5800 has a black trim around the edges of the front and sides of a thin colored band around. Nav version is a chrome strip in the front panel without. It&#8217;s even a &#8220;classic written at the top of the screen, but some see the word&#8221; Nav Edition. &#8220;I was really surprised how this small phone. All the pictures that I saw, seems to imagine that much greater. Replaced the old Nokia XM-5300, which was shorter (when closed), but much thicker in comparison. I have no data plan, but I have T-Mobile &#8220;cheap&#8221; internet plan and use your phone to access my e-mail and web browsing. It&#8217;s fast, but enough for me. I ordered a screen protector and hard case (includes the back and hips) with the phone. One of the concerns prior to purchase was that the (relatively soft), the screen is too easy to scratch. remove the screen protector to cover.&#8217;d rate sensitivity on the screen is very good. Every time you need second valve, a little resistance. I would rate average camera (mobile). It&#8217;s not bad, but not at the point of sale. video and audio quality is very good, excellent. Buttons and controls are well laid out and there is a lot of menus. the phone feels solid and compact, easy to fits in your pocket. I&#8217;m still learning all the features, but I love and have no other thoughts in my purchase. Nice phone, good price!</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Great camera!
]]></title>
<link>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/great-camera/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 05:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hdtvreviewman</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/great-camera/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[We bought this camera to replace our aging 5 MP camera. My shooting ability is an amateur. This came]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>We bought this camera to replace our aging 5 MP camera. My shooting ability is an amateur. This camera is for me to look I know what I&#8217;m doing. If there is a simple point-and-shoot that you want, this camera is for you. If your looking for professional images you want, this camera is for you too. One makes the switch to automatic, manual and video mode. One of the company and also, in the case of manual settings on the camera will remember. Although the camera is turned off, a. This is useful when two different people taking pictures during the day ( &#8220;I like the manual mode, my wife prefers the automatic). This is the general settings like portrait, night snapshot, kids and pets etc., but also have specific settings such as ISO, AWB, My Colors (vivid, sepia, etc.) and sharply CONTINUS. can be mounted on a tripod. Screen size is adequate and the brightness can be adjusted. View button appears on the screen , display off, or simply an object. It comes with manual and software CD (Sorry, no book). There is a little &#8220;Getting Started&#8221; booklet included. software allows the user to change the image before sending them, or afterwards. It also includes USB and video cable. I did not take time to fully evaluate the software, but so far I am satisfied. To look at you, how much memory is needed, we bought a 4 gigabyte card i. At the highest resolution, this card can store more than 1,400 pictures. The camera is not in his memory. size is slightly smaller than I used to. This is the same size as a credit card and slightly thicker than half an inch. One small con is that the battery must be removed and spun into the wall, including the charger. There is &#8220;without full light that lights up when fully charged. The full charge will be completely dead for about 1 hour and 45 minutes. Battery life seems great, but we get only about 25 shots so far.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Check the lens]]></title>
<link>http://techieproducts.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/check-the-lens/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 05:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>techieproducts</dc:creator>
<guid>http://techieproducts.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/check-the-lens/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[It is generally remarkable camera size and price. Wide aperture photography, lighting, where he exce]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>It is generally remarkable camera size and price. Wide aperture photography, lighting, where he excels, such as shooting portraits indoors or in shade. Unfortunately, the size of the camera is very strict restrictions on the conditions under which you can get good photos. Go to a high f / # (ie if the hole is completed to have less-than-light) is so small that you feel in the diffraction blur. Take pictures outdoors on a sunny day scene landscape mode (which stops the lens to increase depth of field), for example, image blur and you will see a small hole. Another problem is the automatic mode the camera. For reasons I have not found, but the camera seems to do a good job of choosing the correct mode (ie portrait against nature), brings the car is almost never as good, if you leave it on P (program) mode. For some reason the automatic mode usually leads to excessive exposure and ISO setting is too high. This is particularly true for the use of Flash technology. I&#8217;m guessing the camera errs on the side is too easy to work, rather than underexposing, but the results are abysmal compared to what you can do with P most of the time. Despite the photo quality restrictions, many of which are necessary for the camera of this size, it is a very nice camera. As they say, the best camera is one of you and the reputation of this compact camera is that most of them have is the best camera. You will almost always good places, sometimes a lot of risk, but using the automatic mode. If you know what you&#8217;re doing, you can get surprisingly good results from this camera. Overall, while it should be noted that the victims were made this small camera optics, this is about as good a camera as you can in this photo. I recommend it.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Review of Cannon SD1200IS]]></title>
<link>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/review-of-cannon-sd1200is/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>hdtvreviewman</dc:creator>
<guid>http://hdtvreviewman.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/review-of-cannon-sd1200is/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Wow This is the 3rd Cannon Elph camera that I own. Cannon hit the home run it. Of course I can not t]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Wow This is the 3rd Cannon Elph camera that I own. Cannon hit the home run it. Of course I can not take a bad picture with this camera. I use it at work all day and take pictures in different situations. That&#8217;s all automatic, even the camera automatically switches between macro-and long-distance case. This can produce a lot of pictures in different lighting situations, where my other cameras are not in the past. This is my 25th digital camera that I bought, actually we used to wear out, and I bought the same camera again and would recommend it to you. You have been fulfilled. Only negative I can say that the camera is too small for his big hands and the camera disappears, his pockets, and forget that you are who? Indeed, it is not a problem, and in fact likely, and in addition, if you are on vacation and do not want to lug around some big war, the club has some pictures of the old camera. I do not recommend this camera yet. I just love it.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
