There is always ‘a rat’ in ’separate’:

Sep A RAT e

Separate.

You will see ’separate’ spelt ’seperate’ everywhere. Just remember the rat to avoid this all too common error:

Separate

Separated

Separately

Separation

Do you have any spelling tips? Let me know.

- Nude Underwire Seamless Bra – 36B Review

Check Price Now!

- Nude Underwire Seamless Bra – 36B Feature

• Nursing Bra
• Soft Cups
• Racerback Style
• Made of 95% cotton, 5% spandex ; Hand Wash
• Lace Knit Stretches and Supports, Underwire Uniquely Designed to Alleviate Pressure
• Get a Perfect Fit with Adjustable Straps
• Slim Fit

- Nude Underwire Seamless Bra – 36B Overview

- Nude Underwire Seamless Bra – 36B Specifications

*** Product Information and Prices Stored: Dec 22, 2009 19:06:27

We have been naming human parts like nose, ear, eyes etc and also things like cells etc. This is because we consider each of these things an independent being or thing. Each of these things is an individual thing but also part of bigger function called “human body”. So how did humans define human body to include some things and not other things? This is because there are lots of things at sub atomic level and at cosmic level. Each of these things are individual things existing independently and at the same time part of a bigger thing. A bigger thing is sum total of its smaller constituents parts (things). But it should be observed that when we refer to a thing we are including certain set of smaller things in it and also at the same time excluding lot of other things. The question posed is “is there a reason why human mind considers sum set of things as a specific bigger thing to the exclusion of others?” To cite examples; How did human mind arrive at the conclusion that a human body is sum total of eyes, ears, nose etc and all the sub particles of all such parts but not sand, stone, leaves, dog shit etc? Is it arbitrary or is there a reason for defining certain set of things as certain thing?

The question is important since it questions human perception of beings or things. This is because as we have seen a thing is basically a set of things which are included in the set and also a constituent of a bigger set where the bigger set is another thing. Is there a reason for such classification or is it simply axiomatic?

Is world a thing? Is Universe a thing? If they are things then they are one of the biggest set of things. But humans perceive only some things with their senses or rather were able to identify. I can identify another human body or being, a tree, a stone without much effort. But i find it hard perceive or identify a microscopic thing with human mind for which I would be requiring some scientific apparatus. I am not able to perceive universe or world also because this set is far too big for my size and reach of my senses. So human being can perceive things which are reachable to his senses. Although he might know that universe might be having certain set of things.

To put this in the form of an analogy for better understanding:
Suppose there is one lenovo laptop. We say lenovo laptop exists when we see it and perceive it through our senses. But we also say lenovo laptop has lan card, usb port, wifi card, dvd writer, monitor etc. Each of these are also things which exist. Lenovo laptop also exists as a thing. Then there are microscopic things. Like the lan card of lenovo laptop has xyz chip embedded in it. if we go on and on with better sense perception or with the help of technology we can find smaller and smaller things inside the lan card laptop. One might give very obvious answer that lenovo as a thing exists because humans defined it to inlcude certain set of parts. This being analytic truth lenovo exists only if humans who made it define lenovo. When i define lenovo laptop to include sum set of parts and it is manufactured and assembled with all this parts i say lenovo laptop exists.But what if do not define lenovo laptop and people had this practice of buying “assembly of !+2+3+4 parts” and using it for various purposes. Does the thing called lenovo laptop exists in such a situation? Some might answer smartly to say lenovo laptop exists whether you call it a thing or not as long as there exists “assembly of !+2+3+4 parts”.

But if we say a thing exists as something (not identified as a thing) whether we call it or define it as a specific thing then is it not true to say a thing is mere human practice of identifying certain set of things? So is it like saying a thing exists but not as a thing? This is because we concluded that calling a ‘something’ a ‘thing’ (identity) is purely based on human perception. The physical existence of this something is not in dispute here.

It might be concluded that a thing exists but it does not exist separately from another. This is because if something is the only one then it has no name or form. The purpose of giving identity is to distinguish one from another each being separate from another. When there is no another then there is no purpose of name. By going into the purpose and meaning of identity of a physical being we found that it is mere axiomatic grouping or defining of sets. Separation exists when you think something is separate. When I look at a piece of clock i see clock as a whole. Some might not see clock. He may be looking only at needles, numbers, plastic and battery and each of them separately. Our own way of looking at things is limited by our limitation of senses like our own size, strength of eyes etc.

Separate the bipolar from the person.

I hear this all the time. In books. On websites. In therapy. In support groups. On blogs. From my DH.

MUCH easier said than done.

Logically, I know that my husband would never willingly blow through our savings, make ridiculous purchases without consulting me, argue with me for the sake of arguing, throw things, sleep for days on end—or stay up for days on end. I would like to think that he would not willingly jeopardize his safety, my safety and that of my daughter. I would like to think that if he knows the consequences of his actions, he will make the right choices. I would like to think that he would want to go to work, be dependable and be considerate of others.

But it doesn’t make it hurt any less when he does those things because he is manic or depressed and suffering from a bipolar episode. Because the reality is that physically…HE still did those things. There is no one else to hold accountable. I can’t ignore the reality of the situation. And how do you hold someone accountable for something that they very often either have no recollection of doing or can’t control. It’s such a gray area. A slippery slope, if you will.

I can’t ignore the facts. I can’t wish the (bad) actions and choices away.

And I can’t along the way, ignore the reality is that this bipolar and the actions and choices that are made as a result of it do some serious damage. Beyond the financial damage, far more important to me is the emotional stuff: the damage to trust and respect.

We’ve always had a very trusting relationship. I was never the jealous type. I always went into things with the idea that at the end of the day if he was going to cheat (or do anything I would obviously disapprove of), he would do it regardless of whether I was all jealous about it. And if/when that time came he would need to deal with the consequences of his actions. No sense getting all worked up over something in the mean time. Live your life and treat your partner with respect and in the end it will all work out. Well, this BP thing throws a whole new wrench into that game. Because now he’s doing things that he knows I’m completely against…is breaking my trust in the process, disrespecting me, and in turn making me lose respect for him. And I’m left asking how much of this is his fault? And how much can I hold him accountable for? And probably most important HOW do I hold him accountable? (suggestions please?)

Like, when I say, point blank that I will not tolerate marijuana use in our marriage. Not because I’m some prude, but because, there is a time and a place for it, it’s illegal, and we have a toddler. That’s not an ultimatum in my mind. (I’m not a fan of those either, generally speaking) That’s just being clear about what I feel is acceptable at this point in my life. From my husband. So when it’s disregarded—time and time again—how many chances do I give for redemption? Especially when it’s blamed on the bipolar (self-medicating, addictive behavior, etc) and I’m met with apology after apology, which just seems hollow after a while.

The fact is I hate being put into a position to HAVE to hold him accountable. Because in the end: no one wins. Least of all: our daughter.

So I continue with this ongoing battle of trying to separate the bipolar from the person and cling to whatever little bits of respect and trust still exist in our marriage. And I pray that in the end, I’m doing the right thing for me. And for us.

this tutorial will teach you how to divide your hard disk.

before this post, i put the star on the procedure number 11. that is the place where you need to divide your hard disk.

if you only have one partion , it good to see that you divide your hard disk into 2 or 3. it is depend on how big is your hard disk spaces.

for example, you have 320gb of hard disk, but it only have 1 partion. so how do you devide your hard disk?

* if you do not want your thing in the hard disk missing, make sure you are not format your hard disk

**but if you realy want to remove all of the thing inside your hard disk, you can format it.

1) in the step “WHERE DO YOU WANT TO INSTALL WINDOWS”

*move your mouse to your hard disk, press driver option(advance), then choose expand. make sure that the number that appear is the total of the free spaces. so it depend on your whether to devide it into 2 or 3.  press ENTER and it will continue to proceed the process

**move your mouse to your hard disk, press driver option(advance), then choose format.it will format the hard disk. after that, press expand.  make sure that the number that appear is the total of the free spaces. so it depend on your whether to devide it into 2 or 3.  press ENTER and it will continue to proceed the process.

ANNOUNCEMENT : BYOND2FAST is now working to SELL the LATEST KASPERSKY ANTIVIRUS / KASPERSKY INTERNET ANTIVIRUS for UNIMAS STUDENT. IT IS REALY CHEAP. START FROM RM 40 ONWARD. STAY TUNE.

LIST OF PRODUCT

1) KASPERSKY ANTIVIRUS 1 YEAR GENUINE (LATEST VERSION2010)

2) KASPERSKY INTERNET SECURITY 1 YEAR GENUINE (LATEST VERSION2010)

3) KASPERSKY INTERNET SECURITY 300 DAYS GENUINE (LATEST VERSION2010)

4)KASPERSKY INTERNET SECURITY 2 YEAR GENUINE(LATEST VERSION2010)

IF YOU ARE WILLING TO BUY,PLEASE wait for the ADVERTISMENT.

*** FIRST COME FIRST SERVE. TQ

Jesus of the Electric by striatic on Flickr

This advent season finds me dwelling on the understanding of God as a part of this physical reality, not as a divine entity that is somehow separate from it.  For many years I have known that this was the unique teaching of Christianity.  But, for some reason, I still have always seen God more as something that was separate from me and this world rather than intricately woven into its fabric.  This difference has immense implications for our spiritual life.  For, if we see God as separate from our physical existence, dwelling in some spiritual plane apart from our world who only chooses to break through the barrier from time to time, then it becomes very easy, and much more logical, to separate our lives into dual spheres:  the religio-spiritual and the physical or “real” world. In this way of living I can exist and live my daily life apart from God, with my faith having no real impact on me.  This is because my life is the “real” world and has no connection to God. I can then limit God to Sunday or wherever I want to put him. But, if God is a part of this world, every corner of it, and every event and being in it, then how I live and interact with God and life is very different.

When I finally understand and embrace this reality the entire physical world becomes divine.  Everyone we encounter, our friends and enemies alike, become for us the image of God.  The earth itself contains his presence.  Every action and decision I make becomes a spiritual decision.  Heaven and earth are joined forever and the physical world is made part of the Kingdom of God. This view is part of the reason for the traditional aversion of the Christian faith to cremation.  The human body is the icon of God.  It is to be treasured and preserved intact in hope of the resurrection.  It is never to intentionally be discarded or destroyed.  It is in it’s essence divine.

I used to conceive of the incarnation of Christ as simply the ultimate “breaking through” of the divine into this world.  In this mistaken concept, I viewed God as separate from us.  I saw the incarnation as God simply interrupting or breaking through some sort of mystical or spiritual barrier, and coming temporarily into our world to instruct us in how to leave the physical world when we die for the much better spiritual world.  The incarnation, seen rightly, is not like that. The incarnation is in fact the communion of the physical and the divine.  Through Christ’s advent this world and the next are woven together into a seamless whole so intricately that they cannot be separated without ripping the world apart. This is what the word emmanuel means-”God with us.”

If God is with us then God is a part of us. By the participation of God in all of life, and all of creation, God redeems everything.

Pax Vobis

de⋅seg⋅re⋅ga⋅tion /ˌ [dee-seg-ri-gey-shuh n] 

–noun

Origin:                                                                                             
1950–55; de- + segregation
Related forms:

de⋅seg⋅re⋅ga⋅tion⋅ist, noun

We are not the isolated, separate individuals it appears,

but rather we are inextricably woven into one single fabric of being.

You wouldn’t believe it from most of my blogging, but there are several Republicans I support and admire. You may have noticed over the life of Is It Luck that the one Republican blog I consistently draw material from is called Little Green Footballs. Its author, Charles Johnson, is committed to Republican principles, but he rejects the torrents of nonsense spewing from the right wing.

Last night, he posted a list of theses that succinctly explains his own distaste for the stupidity that has become the day-to-day preoccupation of the right wing. Coming from a Republican, it means more than it would coming from me, so here’s the list:

1. Support for fascists, both in America (see: Pat Buchanan, Robert Stacy McCain, etc.) and in Europe (see: Vlaams Belang, BNP, SIOE, Pat Buchanan, etc.)

2. Support for bigotry, hatred, and white supremacism (see: Pat Buchanan, Ann Coulter, Robert Stacy McCain, Lew Rockwell, etc.)

3. Support for throwing women back into the Dark Ages, and general religious fanaticism (see: Operation Rescue, anti-abortion groups, James Dobson, Pat Robertson, Tony Perkins, the entire religious right, etc.)

4. Support for anti-science bad craziness (see: creationism, climate change denialism, Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, James Inhofe, etc.)

5. Support for homophobic bigotry (see: Sarah Palin, Dobson, the entire religious right, etc.)

6. Support for anti-government lunacy (see: tea parties, militias, Fox News, Glenn Beck, etc.)

7. Support for conspiracy theories and hate speech (see: Alex Jones, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Birthers, creationists, climate deniers, etc.)

8. A right-wing blogosphere that is almost universally dominated by raging hate speech (see: Hot Air, Free Republic, Ace of Spades, etc.)

9. Anti-Islamic bigotry that goes far beyond simply criticizing radical Islam, into support for fascism, violence, and genocide (see: Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, etc.)

10. Hatred for President Obama that goes far beyond simply criticizing his policies, into racism, hate speech, and bizarre conspiracy theories (see: witch doctor pictures, tea parties, Birthers, Michelle Malkin, Fox News, World Net Daily, Newsmax, and every other right wing source)

It’s refreshing to see a principled objection to right wing bullshit coming from someone who is no friend of the Democratic Party.

the site of the day – Real estate web site design and templates.

Mystery has surrounded communal sites, web shape forums, crystal clear design boards. The question that seems to come up as surplus and at an end again: What font does Facebook use for it’s logo? Admittedly, it’s been a suspect I too have had on my mind recently. I usually be amazed about many major site loggos and specifically font choose to become part of their brand, what that situate will be recognized instantly for.

A font habituated to in lay out is very personal. As a designerr it is important and can often be a huge roadblock when it comes the font that compel be used in or in any stratagem serving for that matter. The font should be relative to what the design trying to wring or what it stands in the course of, it’s meaning, it’s purpose. It all needs to metaphrase is design elements as well as the font used. For exempli gratia, the Facebook font is take a bath, professional, simple and it’s my opinion that it translates well to what Facebook does a worship army.

On to what you really after to separate: What font does Faceboook use? simple answer is that there no font that is exactly what Facebook uses. In order to bring to an end a bypass the Facebook font look you’ll just have to do some good old fashion research. Thhere is a as much as possible variety fonts that look very similar to the font used on Facebook but the truth is that none of them are exactly what you want. It’s my impression that Facebook’s graphic originator simply stretched, moved, distorted, recreated the to suit the company better.

we can all learn from one another. some people within christianity might think that those in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community can’t teach christians anything. i want to assert that anyone can learn anything from anyone if they are willing to listen, if they are willing to be humble, if they are willing to see people as God sees them…

take for example…we can learn that:

God applauds diversity
God creates and sustains all of his creation
God doesn’t have a plumbline within which he accepts people, he accepts all people
God is fiercely committed to who he has made us, whoever we are
God is proud of us because we are his and shouldn’t be ashamed of being His
God’s grace doesn’t extend to those who say that they might see the world through a ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ narrative

This is just a few things we can add to the list of things we can gain to learn about God from the LGTBQ community.
We must be embrace all people as God and strip ourselves of condescending labels that separate us from the relationships that God has intended all of us to be in with one another. In fact, he does say when we are all one, we are most like the divine.

As readers of this Blog would know, I have been reading ‘The Reformers and Their Stepchildren,’ by Leonard Verduin. I have now completed this book and maintain that this is a book that should be read by all Reformed believers. It is a brilliant treatment of both the Reformers and those who sought a more ‘radical’ reform, in order to bring the church back to that which was modelled on the New Testament example.

Verduin deals with many of the disputed areas between the Reformers and the Stepchildren, and in so doing shows how the Reformers chose to go only so far in their work of reformation and indeed how some chose to back peddle in some areas. As much as I respect many of the Reformers (if not all), I have always been saddened by their refusal to fully reform the church/separate from it, and to set up a church based on the New Testament model, which was something the stepchildren also sought. The Reformers treatment of the stepchildren will always be a blight on their legacy also.

Read this book without being biased either way and allow the truth of the Scriptures to determine the path on which you walk. There is much food for thought in this book and a real challenge for Reformed believers throughout.

If  i could re-born and meet with you anymore..

Let’s meet early..

Let’s love each other..

So there will be no pain..

no hurt..

and no need to separate,, like this..

MELBOURNE, Nov 16, 2009 (AFP) – A team of Australian doctors began marathon and risky surgery on Monday to separate a pair of Bangladeshi twins who are joined at the head, giving only a one in four chance of both surviving.

The 16-strong team was on “tenterhooks” over the delicate bid to separate Trishna and Krishna, aged two, which will take about 16 hours, plastic surgeon Tony Holmes told reporters at Melbourne’s Royal Children’s Hospital.

Plastic surgeon Tony Holmes (C) gives the gathered media an update as a team of Australian doctors begins risky and highly complex operation separate the pair of Bangladeshi twins on Nov. 16 (AFP photo)

“It is a stressful time for any group of surgeons with this sort of case, they only come along really once in a lifetime and I think everybody has been on tenterhooks,” he said.

Doctors had already started cutting through the bone which joins the girls via the top of the head and will then separate the connected section of brain and blood vessels, Holmes added.

“The unknown … is what actually happens when you separate finally the cerebral circulations, because that is a change in haemodynamics (blood movement) so the pressures will be different in each twin,” Holmes said.

“It’s over those few early minutes when the pressures equilibrate in the brain, they’re the things that we’re worried about.

“But the children are prepared as well as could possibly be and we’re cautiously optimistic that everything is going particularly well.”

Krishna was close to death when the twins arrived in Australia in January last year but both are now thriving and have undergone a series of preparatory operations.

The Children First Foundation (CFF) flew the girls to Australia in January 2008 because of poor separation survival rates in their native Bangladesh, where only two children have survived four operations in recent years.

Holmes said the children’s legal guardian, Moira Kelly, looked “relatively distressed” as Trishna and Krishna were wheeled into the operation.

“When the children went into the operating theatre … Moira was there giving them, you know, a farewell kiss and good luck,” he said.

“She was relatively distressed as one would be if it was your child. The kids were fine, OK, they looked as healthy and happy as anything but they were sedated.”

The girls should be apart by 6:00 pm (0700 GMT) and plastic surgeons will then replace the missing bone and skin. The whole procedure is expected to finish at around midnight.

Separating conjoined twins is a notoriously difficult procedure with attempts in Britain and Bangladesh both failing over the past year, although Saudi doctors successfully divided a pair of Egyptian brothers in February.

In one of the best known cases, Singapore doctors in 2003 failed in an attempt to separate adult twins — Iranian law graduates Laleh and Ladan Bijani, 29 — who died from severe blood loss after 52 hours of surgery.

Bookmark & Share

When I see you ,, when I miss you ,,
I remember the day we were together ..

Will you close your eyes?
So that about now I can hold you
I pray that you don’t know
The gaze shaken with awkwardness and
that smile that just passed by
My love you, do you believe I didn’t like it and
I’ve forgetton it?
They say that after a hard break up, I’m to rest my heart.

I love you because I love you
Whatever the words, they can’t replace you.
Whoever may come in this world, I can’t share.
That’s why I’m the one leting you go.
I love you .. because I love you ..
I go to that girl and love you instead.
Promise me your last love..  I’m fine with that.
But still I love you.

When I see you when I miss you
I remember the day we were together

Tell me now my love ..
That you came looking for someone ..
I was so young then that I wasn’t .,
strong enough for your sadness

Whenever by chance I pass you without plan ..
With cruel words,, I was the one to make you hurt again ..
Forgive me..

I’ll love you..

Even if I can’t have everything ..
I’ll be happy..

So that my love that has even your pain
will be even more forever. .
But I still love you ..

What to do when love leaves
That, I never learned
Like I’m going to love today as well
I wait for you
I saw her in your embrace
Looking so happy
I want to tell her, that where she is
Is my spot
Don’t love her, don’t forget me
Am I not enough for you

You were the one you said
That having only love would make everything possible
In a world without you, without you
I have no will to live another day
Give my lonely heart courage
So I can wait..

Along with the night sky, if I draw you
It’s like the spot of a sad star
Even if I cover it with my hand, it can’t be covered
You’re like fate
Don’t love her, don’t forget me
Am I not enough for you

I want to let you go, to forget you
Because there were so many days of love
I don’t know where to start erasing you
When can you smile again
Even if I see someone who looks like you, brushing past by chance
I feel like if I turn around, you’ll be there
I guess nothing is really possible without you
Come back to me..

Please love me for one more day..
You picked me up warmly..
Than you froze me coldly like ice..
So that I can’t even cry..

I would melt at just the touch of your hand..

your kisses, i love the way you kissed me..

the way you touch me with your warm..

But now are you just going to leave me like this till the end?

We were everything, so that was even better..
It would have been better if I valued you more..
Maybe I couldn’t find anyone else..
Maybe I liked you too much..
Please hold me warmly just once more..

I’ll love you for just today..

Where are you?

Show yourself..
I’ll start to forget you tomorrow..
Only today, let me borrow you..
please..
I wont cling onto you, I won’t even cry..
Please just once more, show me yourself..

You had me, and you liked that too..
If you valued me, you would not have left me..
Thats not love, you said you didn’t like that kind of love..
I even love all your lies..

Your lies… even those I love…

How should I know rain comes again
tell me why you’re leaving me again
please don’t go..

stay here however (now and forever)
come back to me..

please..

I cannot breathe
I won’t be healed
I want to see what I was
I must be blind
I want to get back to that light..

[on BELIEF and ACTION]

It is possible to know one’s beliefs by looking at their actions, but it is impossible to know one’s actions simply by looking at one’s beliefs.

For belief is different than action, and rare is the person who acts according to his or her professed belief.

Humans are mortal, by definition, and know for certain very little about things immortal.

Hypothesis and superstitions, often termed belief, aim to simplify what is supernatural, i.e., what is not of this earth.

One’s beliefs cannot change reality, they cannot explain the past or define the future. At most, a belief may shape the present, and only our actions can agree with our beliefs.

If our actions do not match our beliefs, then it is only the present that we disgrace in the name of the future.

A belief which does not match our actions is but another’s, whose existence is never real enough to call our own. In this light, it is only possible to say that actions exist and beliefs are as only as real as said actions.

The action which differs from belief must relinquish any ties to that belief, for they are separate, they are an ‘other’ unto each other.

A fool professes a belief and guides not his actions to follow. The wise guide their own actions accordingly, and in doing so, set forth a belief which no soul can dispute, as it is backed with action.