by Dr. Harrell Rhome
Published: gnosticliberationfront.com

In spite of the ready availability of information found online as well as in libraries, like other neglected topics in so-called “history books”, the real origins of the United States are ignored and/or misrepresented.  One must have the skills (now rare, no longer taught in the schools) of critical thinking to research, find the facts and separate them from outright lies and misstatements.   Many books contain little more than untruths, repeated again and again.  The answer can be as complex and arcane as you want, but it’s pretty simple.  It’s all about the money!

“Many times, academic researchers will ‘adjust’ the information they find so that it can be published.  For quite often publishers will take only the data that fits the current beliefs and theories.  The reason being that only that which is ‘politically correct’ will be accepted and sell.  This often happens with history.  In reality, this has been going on since the first histories were written down.  History was made to fit into the accepted legends and myths rather than to objectively express what has occurred.  Then as time goes on, the talks became accepted and ‘adjusted’ to fit the current belief structure promoted by those in charge to fit the prevailing practices.”  Alexander S. Holub, The Gospel Truth, The Heresy of History, 2004.

Naturally, with the Internet Information Revolution, we are in a new era of publishing.  Hence, alternative ideas and theories are more available.  But in spite of that, many Americans don’t appreciate being told that the things they learned as school children – and later taught their children – were, at best, a bunch of highly embellished and thoroughly cleansed folktales.  Those who try to look at the facts and write about them are most often resented and ignored.  Needless to say, bestselling authors, publishers and columnists do not want to be seen in this light, hence the facts are suppressed.  In most cases, they are simply ignored and remain unmentioned.

OUR FREEMASONIC FOUNDING FATHERS.

“This new faith in the future of humanity that spread in the eighteenth century was not simply an abstract fact of a mental force.  It became a social force and a concrete fact through the agency of Freemasonry which at once accepted it and advocated it; the great historical importance of modern Freemasonry results from this attitude that it took then and to which it has since consistently adhered.  Thus Freemasonry has become the most efficient social power of the civilized world.  But it has been a hidden power, difficult to trace, to describe and to define.  Consequently most historians have avoided treating it seriously and giving it due credit.”

“Political revolutions have been often and minutely studied; and it is logical that it should be so, because they are very colorful and offer a mixture of glory and horror that impresses people.  But, after all, they are mere reflections of deeper movements; they are light and unreal, like the shadows of a moving picture on the silver screen.  True reality lies in the passions, dreams and hopes of men, in those impulses which urge them to act and which lead in the game.  …

In order to promote these new ideas and help put them into practice, a new tool was required and that new tool was ready – Freemasonry.”  Bernard Fay, Revolution and Freemasonry 1680-1800, 1929, pp. viii-ix.

Let’s start in the beginning.  We are, more often than not, told that we are a Christian nation, founded on solid Biblical principles, but this does not hold up under scrutiny.  Far from it!  Practically all the key figures in the colonial separatist movement were Freemasonic occultists.  If they publicly practiced a religion other than that, it was usually philosophical Deism and/or ultra liberal semi-Christian Unitarianism and Universalism.  Even then, none were ever known as regular churchgoers.  Religion, as expressed in various Christian creeds and confessions, means utterly nothing to devout Freemasons, especially at the levels of the higher adepts.  They see themselves as above all of that.

“Being persuaded that a just application of the principles, on which the Masonic Fraternity is founded, must be promote of private virtue and public prosperity, I shall always be happy to advance the interests of the Society, and to be considered by them as a deserving brother.”  George Washington.

WHAT DOES THE MASONIC RELIGION REALLY BELIEVE?

The Freemasons were Illuminati Globalists, part of an elitist society who felt they had the best ideas for governing the world.  Their successes at the turn of the eighteenth century placed them in charge of two major nations, one old and one new.   Their principles were not only expressed in internationalist political philosophies, but in spiritual matters as well.  Freemasonry is a perfect model for a one-world religion.  Since its origins are philosophically and symbolically in the Temple of Solomon and various Old Testament folktales, its basic Hebraic heritage cannot be denied.  Of course, this is also makes a convenient kindred link to Christianity.  For the most part then, Freemasonry can be seen as a form of Kabalistic Judaism.  Of course, this creates an influential international support group for political movements such as Zionism.  When we read the infamous Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, we see that the entire program is framed in a Freemasonic format.  Why is this?  The Lodge’s deepest and most arcane mysteries come from that part of the Judaic Talmud called the Kabala.  In Hebrew, Kabala translates as the “whispered tradition”.  The deeper mysteries are rarely written and even then, never completely.  In the full meaning of the Hebrew word, the dogma and doctrines are transmitted only from mouth to ear.  This is the true origin of the teachings deep at the heart of Freemasonic occultism.  If you have a doubt about this, read Morals and Dogma, first published in 1871 after decades of research.  More than anything else, it is best described as a manual of Kabalistic numerology and mysticism.  It was written by 33^rd degree Mason, General Albert Pike, but with considerable input by the master magus and Kabalist of the nineteenth century, Eliphas Levi.  Even if you only read a little, selecting here and there, you’ll see the truth of what I say.  Lodge members are taught to use all religions to their advantage.  A 33^rd degree modern-day Mason, tells us more.

“The true Mason is not creed-bound. He realizes with the divine illumination of his lodge that as a Mason his religion must be universal: Christ, Buddha or Mohammed, the name means little, for he recognizes only the light and not the bearer. He worships at every shrine, bows before every altar, whether in temple, mosque or cathedral, realizing with his truer understanding the oneness of all spiritual truth.”  Manly P. Hall, The Lost Keys of Freemasonry, p. 65.

The Lodges were thoroughly entrenched in early America, even before they were in Europe.  Once the American Revolution was done, they staged the French one, which turned out to be much more violent and bloody than what happened here, but both Revolutions were part of a larger Freemasonic-Illuminati geopolitical game plan.  And, it began right here in the colonies.

“…Masonry made its way among the important men, among the intellectuals and the most intelligent of the upper middle class.  It spread over the United States with the same success.  Philadelphia had its lodge in 1727, Boston in 1733, Georgia in 1734, South Carolina in 1735, etc.  In Europe, Paris had its first lodge in 1725, but Florence had to wait until 1733, Hamburg till 1737, Berlin, 1740, and St. Petersburg, 1771.  America wasn’t behind the times.”  Bernard Fay, Franklin, the Apostle of Modern Times, 1929, p. 145.

IS AMERICA A PART OF MASONIC DESTINY AND THEIR GLOBALIST PROGRAM?

Manly P. Hall thought so, and we assume the sophisticated Masons of the American Revolutionary era knew the same story.  The Lodge is not only filled with Old Testament Hebrew imagery, but also gloms onto the Egyptian mysteries and symbolism.  This explains our unique double-sided Great Seal as well as the Egypto-Masonic images on our currency.  Read how this Illuminati Freemasonic vision underlies today’s multicultural Globalist New World Order agenda.

“I dedicate this book to the proposition that American Democracy is part of a Universal Plan.”  …

“Thousands of years ago, in Egypt, these mystical orders were aware of the existence of the western hemisphere and the great continent which we call America.  The bold resolution was made that this western continent should become the site of the philosophic empire.  Just when this was done it is impossible now to say, but certainly the decision was reached prior to the time of Plato, for a thinly veiled statement of this resolution is the substance of his treatise on the Atlantic Islands.”  …

“And so it is from the remote past, from the deep shadows of the medieval world as well as from the early struggles of more modern times, that the power of American democracy has come.  But we are only on the threshold of the democratic state.  Not only must we preserve that which we have gained through ages of striving, we must also per­fect the plan of the ages, setting up here the machinery for a world brotherhood of nations and races.”

“By preserved symbols we can know that it is from the remote past, from the deep shadows of the medieval world, as well as from the early struggles of more modern times, that the power of American democracy has come.”  Manly P. Hall, The Secret Destiny of America, 1944.

SECRET LODGES AND RESTRICTED RITUALS.

Not all the names connected with the Lodges are known.  There are covert lodges with secret oaths and degrees totally unknown to Masons in the lower levels.  The more ordinary members and a few selected others are the ones known to the public; the others are not.  Satellite societies like Skull and Bones also figure in.  It seems reasonable to assume that if the bizarre and obscene rituals of Skull and Bones are at all typical, then this is just the tip of an ugly iceberg.  Do some secret ceremonies involve ritualized homicide?  In February 1998, the remains of four adults and six children were found in the basement of a London home once occupied by Benjamin Franklin.  All showed signs of dismemberment and dissection.  Anatomy lessons presented by Dr. Franklin, the scientist?  Or macabre magical rites?  Old Ben was active in the infamous Hellfire Club, legendary for its obscene, drunken and demonic doings.  To sum up, both today and yesterday, there are extremist sects under the broader Masonic umbrella.  This was certainly the case at the end of the eighteenth century.

“Masonry… had grown so quickly that its chiefs could not control the spirit of it, or regulate its development.  Europe swarmed with dissenting, irregular, fantastic lodges which were Masonic only in name.  These ‘Masons’ practiced all kinds of bizarre and sometimes shocking rites which had nothing in common with the central organization, the Grand Lodge of London.”  Fay, Franklin….

“Towards the middle of the eighteenth century, Europe basked in the light of a thriving Freemasonry.  Masons were to be found everywhere.  Everywhere brethren congregated in secret and mysterious meetings. ” Fay, Revolution and Freemasonry.

Most members never go beyond the Master Mason third degree.  In that position, they may preside over a Lodge.  To pursue advanced degrees means investing considerable time, effort, travel and money.  Most are satisfied with what they learn in the basic “Blue Degrees”, and think they have hints to the rest.  This, of course, creates a worldwide cadre of “useful idiots”.  Of course, other candidates are pre-selected for higher degrees and roles as soon as they join.

“The Blue Degrees are but the outer court or portico of the Temple. Part of the symbols are displayed there to the Initiate, but he is intentionally misled by false interpretations. It is not intended that he shall understand them; but it is intended that he shall imagine he understands them. Their true explication is reserved for the Adepts, the Princes of Masonry.”  …  It is well enough for the mass of those called Masons, to imagine that all is contained in the Blue Degrees; and whoso attempts to undeceive them will labor in vain.”  Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, 1871.

WHAT WAS THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION ALL ABOUT?

Another myth we’re taught is that the Revolution was an across the board popular movement for freedom, supported by almost all the people.  In truth, it was not.  Like most revolutions, it was led by a minority activist faction.  Indeed, most colonists were loyal to the crown.  The independence movement was led by a wealthy clique with interests in trade, shipping and agriculture.  However, some were more conservative and a bit hesitant to embrace the revolution.  The Declaration of Independence was not fully signed until five years after the conflict was over!  Why was this?  Most did not sign this Freemasonic document until well after the fact because they either thought secession was a bad idea, or wanted to see if the new nation was going to last before committing themselves.  Thus, the revolution was staged by a small party, almost all of whom were Masons.  In Revolution and Freemasonry, 1680-1800, Professor Fay says the Lodge was the unifying factor that brought off the revolution.  It probably would not have happened without it.

“Masonry alone undertook to lay the foundation for national unity in America, because through the very nature of its organization, it could spread throughout all the colonies and work steadily and silently.  It created in a limited but very prominent class of people a feeling of American unity without which the American liberty could not have developed – without which there would have been no United States.”  pp. 229-230.

“Freemasonry cannot deny the outstanding role played by its leaders in the Revolution, or that the Continental Congress, where the delegates from the colonies met to prepare a common political program and to organize the defense against England, was in majority composed of Masons. These congresses were imbued with the purest Masonic spirit, as proved by their actions, which finally was expressed in the Declaration of Independence.”  …  George Washington and Benjamin Franklin were the columns without which the Temple of American liberty would have crumbled; Washington and Franklin were the two outstanding Masons of the time.  During the long and bitter conflict which disrupted the country, they never stopped their Masonic activities.”  pp. 241-242.

The Continental Army was led by General Washington, who succeeded because of his utterly committed leadership style.  He was a true spiritual inspiration to his troops.  Under his command, they won significant victories over both the British troops and their German mercenary forces.  Indeed, they almost always held their own against the much better-trained European professional soldiers.  Without Washington, a dedicated and proud Mason at the helm, this might not have happened.  Indeed, the Continental Army could be called a Masonic organization, especially in the upper ranks.

“All the staff officers Washington trusted were Masons, and all the leading generals of the army were Masons; Alexander Hamilton, John Marshall, James Madison, Gen. Greene, Gen. Lee, Gen. Sullivan, Lord Stirling, the two Putnams, Gen. Steuben, Montgomery, Jackson, Gist, Henry Knox and Ethan Allen were Masons.  They all gathered around their Master Mason Washington and they all met at the ‘Temple of Virtue’, ‘a rude structure forming an oblong square forty by sixty feet, one story in height, a single entrance which was flanked by two pillars’.  The monument had been built by order of the Commander in Chief as an Assembly Hall for the meetings of the field lodges.  The atmosphere which surrounded Washington was Masonic and it may be said that the framework of his mind was Masonic. His opinion of Masonry was that which he expressed later in life: ‘The virtues that ennoble mankind are taught, nourished and fostered in the heart of the Freemason; they encourage domestic life and serve as a standard for the highest duties of the state.’  No wonder that he had given such an impulse to Masonic life in the army. p. 250.

“Eighteenth century Freemasonry had fostered the revolutionary spirit, the revolutionary spirit had brought about the American and French Revolution.”  p. 305.  …

“Freemasonry itself did not make the revolutions, but prepared and achieved them.  It impelled its members to play their part in the revolution, but when the revolution actually started it disappeared, to appear again later more brilliant and alive than ever. This fact has enabled many historians to state that Freemasonry had nothing to do with revolutions.  This is an error.”  p. 314.

The internationalist forces of Freemasonry brought the same revolutionary spirit to France, but to a more extreme degree.  The French Revolution followed very quickly on the heels of the American one.

FREEMASONRY AND THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.

Because of their close connection with the Founding Fathers, today’s Masons proudly claim that the Constitution is solidly based in Lodge traditions.  It appears that, in several ways, the document was Masonically-inspired.  But (either because of or in spite of this) we have to admit they did an exceptional job!  Without a doubt, this truly revolutionary document is a genuine and lasting political and spiritual miracle.  No other governmental system is more on the side of the people, protecting them from oppression, than the principles and precepts found in our original American Constitutional Republic, but not in the debased mockery that exists today.

“Another connection lies between the philosophic ideologies and symbols of the American Revolution and those of Freemasonry.  For example, as Bailyn pointed out, ‘the word constitution and the concept behind it was of central importance to the colonists’ political thought; their entire understanding of the crisis in Anglo-American relations rested upon it.’  [See Bernard Bailyn, Ideological Origins of the American Revolution, 1992.]  What Bailyn did not discuss is how Masonic the focus on a constitution is. The Masonic constitution had been written by Reverend James Anderson under the guidance and direction of the newly formulated Grand Lodge of England in 1723, and updated and expanded in 1738.  Consisting of more than merely the rules of the Fraternity it also compiled one of the first historical portrayals of the Craft.  After the formation of the Grand Lodge of England in 1717, the role of constitutionality and distribution of legitimate Charters began to dominate the politics of Masonry. Brothers would naturally see a constitution as a necessary aspect of the revolutionary aims of the colonies.”   The Relationship Between Revolutionary Freemasonry and South Africa, Parts I, II & III, by SP Isaiah Kirk 32º AASR Valley of Albany NY, 2009.

FREEMASONRY AND THE SEAT OF POWER.

Washington DC seems planned and laid out according to Masonic Kabalistic symbolism and numerology.  I’ll not overload you with photos and diagrams and references; they are easy enough to find.  If you’ve ever visited our capital, you know the climate is often abominable.  Until air conditioning came along, many governments gave hardship pay to diplomats who had to endure the uncomfortable living conditions.  Obviously, there were other reasons for locating the capital of the new nation in such a place, such as Ley Lines.  In addition to obelisks and other occult symbolism in DC and on our currency, the House of the Temple is the most impressive Masonic monument in the world.  With an impressive library of over 250,000 volumes, it is prominently featured in Dan Brown’s 2009 novel and movie, The Lost Symbol.  Albert Pike is interred and enshrined there.  His statue is the only one in the Union capital of a Confederate general.  While the Masons deny it, Pike was supposedly the chief judicial officer of the original Ku Klux Klan.  Given his lifelong interest in researching and preserving old lodge records about obscure degrees and rituals, if asked, he probably would have (confidentially, of course) helped to properly organize and launch the Masonically-inspired Klan.  As you might expect, his statue still creates controversy, especially since it is located on public property in Judiciary Square.  However, there are no plans to remove it.  If interested, in more, begin with Masonic and Kabbalistic Symbols in the Washington, D.C. Map. http://dcsymbols.com/index.htm.

CONCLUSION.

As you’ve seen, we really don’t have to go all that far to find clear and certain evidence pointing to the rather peculiar Kabalistic doctrines, dogma and occult rituals (ceremonial magic) of Freemasonry in the founding of the American republic.  Even limiting their influence to the publicly known Lodge Brothers, absolutely no other social group comes anywhere near their overwhelming and long-lasting impact on the beginning of the new confederation of former colonies.  A short time later, they created the Constitution, thus founding the United States.  In the final analysis, we must conclude — regardless of feelings about secret societies and their agendas — that Freemasonic occultism played a distinct, direct and definitive role in the creation of our nation.  Of course, this poses a pertinent question.  For better or worse, does their influence continue?  Is it with us today?  While several covert cabals play the Powers-Behind-the-Throne game, Freemasonic Illuminati occultists are omnipresent.  Given what we’ve learned from our investigation, why would you assume otherwise?

Source: http://gnosticliberationfront.com/occult_origins__of_the_american_revolutioni.htm

Related:

The Skull and Bones secret society of Yale University

History of the New World Order

DOCUMENTARY – History of Freemasonry (2005), by Juri Lina

Who Are The Illuminati?

Mankind Held Hostage by Satanists

Fritz Springmeier es uno de los investigadores número uno en el mundo sobre los Illuminati que aparecieron en la década de los 90; el cual fue detenido y encarcelado por planear el robo de bancos según la versión oficial, dando al traste con 25 años de investigación sobre las familias Illuminati.

El hecho de que fuese encarcelado a una condena de 9 años, demuestra que Fritz es uno de los investigadores más genuinos que podáis encontrar. Así como el hecho de que otros investigadores se limitan a mencionarle ignorando partes importantes de su investigación.

No hace falta decir que lo más imprescindible de su trabajo se encuentra en sus magníficos, aunque imperfectos, libros que muchas veces son de tamaño enciclopédico. Lamentablemente de momento solo están en inglés.

Entrevista subtitulada y subida a youtube por MiliganAjonegro

Parte 1/7

Parte 2/7

Parte 3/7

Parte 4/7

Parte 5/7

Parte 6/7

Parte 7/7

The New World Order came into being at 4:25 Tuesday afternoon.

It arrived at the Capitol, until that moment the seat of American government, in the form of the stooped and bespectacled figure of Ban Ki-moon, who as U.N. secretary general is the de facto leader of what conspiracy theorists call the One World Government. One floor beneath the Senate chamber, Ban, a South Korean national, took his place behind a lectern bearing the Senate seal and spelled out his demands.

“I would certainly expect the Senate to take the necessary action; that’s what I have encouraged the senators,” he told reporters as a trio of lawmakers stood at his side. He added an admonition for the chamber to deliver “as soon as possible.”

The One World Government has specific requirements, Ban added, namely a “legally binding” commitment to “25 to 40 percent greenhouse gas reduction . . . as recommended by the IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.”

Uh-oh. A U.N. official standing in the Capitol telling U.S. lawmakers what binding commitments intergovernmental authorities expect from them? Glenn Beck was going to burst a blood vessel.

But the man who orchestrated this putsch by the New World Order, Senate Foreign Relations Chairman John Kerry (D-Switzerland), did not appear concerned by the imagery. He called the secretary general “Your Excellency.” Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana (a Republican, but he drives a Prius) was equally deferential as he spoke of “the privilege of this distinguished visitor.”

And Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) hailed Ban for “the accelerated leadership role” that the United Nations has taken. “Your vision, that in Copenhagen there can be a politically binding agreement that will lead to a legally binding agreement to follow . . . is a very reasonable, sensible and hopeful course.”

Somewhere in Manhattan, Sean Hannity was tearing up his script for the night’s broadcast.

Kerry invited Ban to lecture the Foreign Relations Committee, but it’s not clear what the chairman hoped to gain from the photos of him standing with Ban in the Capitol’s Brumidi Corridors. Indeed, it seemed quite possible that a U.N. endorsement of Kerry’s climate efforts would embolden its foes, who like the world body even less than they like cap-and-trade. In the pantheon of conspiracy theories, the United Nations is right up there with the Illuminati, the Trilateral Commission, the Federal Reserve and the Council on Foreign Relations — which, as it happens, Kerry addressed a couple of weeks ago.

Even Americans who don’t come from the grassy-knoll tradition tend not to regard the United Nations with great confidence. A Gallup poll earlier this year found that 65 percent of respondents thought it was doing a bad job, compared with 26 percent who think it is doing a good job. Ban himself is not terribly nefarious, if only because he is unknown. A Wall Street Journal poll found that 81 percent of those surveyed didn’t know who he was. The others may have confused him with the Unification Church’s Rev. Sun Myung Moon.

Ban’s profile could become much higher, and not in a good way, if Americans start to perceive him as meddling in Senate consideration of climate legislation. Even before he stormed the Capitol, Fox News was drawing a connection between global warming talks in Copenhagen next month and One World Government.

“America, if you believe this country is great but you’re not really into that whole One World Government thing, watch out,” Fox News Channel’s Beck warned a couple of weeks ago. His guest, Lord Christopher Monckton of Britain, told Beck that “at Copenhagen, a treaty will be signed that will, for the first time, create a world government with powers to intervene directly in the economy and in the environmental affairs of individual nations.” Earlier on Fox News, Dick Morris informed Hannity that President Obama “believes in One World Government.” And author Jerome Corsi went on Hannity’s show to warn about a One World Government in which “our sovereignty would be subject to the dictates” of the United Nations and other international organizations.

The One World Government was on open display at the Capitol on Tuesday, as international U.N. staffers waited outside the room where Ban spoke to the senators. The secretary general had come with his own world government (armed?) security detail, who stood alongside the Capitol police.

Ban, wearing a gold U.N. lapel pin, unfolded his speech. “Less than a month from now, the leaders of the world will gather in Copenhagen,” he said. “They must conclude a robust global agreement,” that is “comprehensive, binding, equitable and fair.”

Speaking softly but firmly, the South Korean cautioned the Americans that “the world is not standing still,” and that “all the eyes of the world are looking to the United States.”

After a few minutes, Kerry cut off questioning. “Folks, the secretary general has to get to the airport.”

Ban needed to catch the U.S. Airways shuttle to New York. The One World Government Air Force isn’t what it’s cracked up to be.

SOURCE: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/10/AR2009111015034.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

CNN

CNN reports on the secret seociety based at Yale, including how Bonesmen stole the skull of Native American leader Geronimo.

Bus(c)h-Piloten ? – Painful Deceptions (2003) von Eric Hufschmid Daß der 11. September 2001 ein Tag war, der die Welt veränderte, ist so ziemlich das Einzige, auf was sich die Kommentatoren jenes Anschlags auf das World Trade Center und auf das Pentagon einigen können. Denn danach gehen die offizielle Version der Bush-Regierung und die der Bush-Kritiker nach den Drahtziehern der Attacke, die mehrere Tausend Opfer forderte, auseinander. Eric Hufschmid, ein kritischer US-Journalist, hat schon mit seinem Buch „Painful Questions” — „schmerzliche Fragen” — gestellt, die er jetzt mit seinem Film fortsetzt: · Wie konnten die Entführer von vier US-Flugzeugen ohne Bordkarten unbemerkt boarden, obwohl sie auf keiner Passagierliste standen? · Wie konnten diese Unbekannten innerhalb so kurzer Zeit identifiziert werden? · Wieso konnten sich von diesen Identifizierten, die alle in ihren Maschinen starben, plötzlich welche aus Saudi-Arabien melden? · Wie konnten Fluganfänger eine solche fliegerische Meisterleistung schaffen? · Wie konnten zwei mit extremen Stahlgerüsten versehene Hochhäuser durch den Einschlag zweier Flugzeuge (und ohne gesprengt worden zu sein) nahezu in Fallgeschwindigkeit in sich zusammenbrechen — zum ersten Mal in der Geschichte von Hochhauskatastrophen? · Und warum finden sich, wenn eine Verkehrsmaschine mit zahlreichen Passagieren an Bord ins Pentagon stürzte, keinerlei Teile des Flugzeuges, des Gepäcks und vor allem keine Opfer? . . … Fragen über Fragen, die bis heute unbeantwortet blieben und die die offizielle Version ins Wanken bringen.

The President Who Told The TRUTH

Courtesy of ‘NuffRespect
This vid contains one of the most awesome, inspiring and truthful speeches ever given by a president. This very speech must have caused a lot of panic among the higher echelons of the elite. Kennedy had been in office for only 3 months and he was already taking unprecedented steps to empower ordinary people. Kennedy did more for civil rights than any other president since Abraham Lincoln. Kennedy was a big supporter of the constitution, he was against the tyranny of big government. He wanted to withdraw US troops from Vietnam. He wanted to abolish the CIA and Federal Reserve, and he warned us of criminal elements within the establishment who wanted to cease an opportunity to restrict peoples freedoms. He urged the press to be more open and to fulfill its obligation to inform the American people about pertinent facts. And on top of that he spoke openly and candidly about the dangers of secret societies and their influence over the way government works. So is it any wonder that he was dramatically silenced only two years after making this epic speech?

You can hear the full “President And The Press” speech using the Google Video link below:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?doc...

And here is a transcript of the speech:
http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+…

For this video I have included the main parts of JFK’s speech, where he warns us about the dangers of secret societies.

It seems that Kennedy wanted to blow the whistle when he found out about the true scale of corruption within the establishment and how freemasonry and other secret societies play an integral part in this corrupt agenda. It also seems that Kennedy wanted to speak out about the closed and secretive nature of organisations like the freemasons, especially at the higher levels. And it is only when a freemason reaches the higher levels that he can gain a fuller understanding of the kind of organisation he is part of. Freemasonry also has its own set of rules, oaths, allegiances and rituals that are considered higher in importance than the ordinary code of conduct that we ordinary people live by. And the higher up you go in freemasonry, the more strange and daring the initiation rituals become; this is a hallmark of the way criminal gangs operate. Remember, just because someone wears a suit and a tie, that doesnt necessarily make them a better person than the mugger in the alley with the baseball bat.

I find it very curious that some people compare Obama with Kennedy, as if they are both one and the same. But you only have to look at the people that Obama has recruited to work alongside him to realise where he’s coming from. Employing Zbigniew Brzezinski as his Chief Foreign Policy advisor is just one example. Then on top of that, Obama admits to being a globalist and he has publically admitted to attending a CFR meeting where he gave a speech. But what makes me feel most uncomfortable is the way that Obama stuttered and lied about the significance of his speech at the CFR. When question about his CFR involvement, Obama said: “I dont know if I’m an official member.” – He wants us to believe that the CFR would allow someone to attend their meeting and give a speech, and yet not even discuss the issue of membership. You’re either a member of something or you’re not, so the word “official” is an irrelevant filler word. If he doesn’t know that he’s a member then that could only mean that he is not a member – in which case, why didn’t he just say: “I am not a member, although I did speak there once?” Why not just be open and honest about it instead of stuttering and lying in an attempt to downplay the significance of it?

JFK’s assassination was probably executed by CIA resources developed in the anti-Castro campaign that Kennedy was cancelling, and redirected against the internal threat, Kennedy. The investigation which followed the assassination was overseen and directed by Freemasons, who could influence the selection of the rest of the investigative team and effectively control the results.

The JFK assassination appears to have been part a campaign of assassinations against a generation of leaders who posed challenges to the entrenched power structure. The death toll included John F. Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X. Viewed as a whole, one is driven to the conclusion that anyone advocating or supporting serious social reforms will not be tolerated in a leadership position.

by Alfred Mendes
Published: Jul. 2006 – bilderberg.org

Eugenics (Greek for ‘good birth’) is the study of methods to improve the human race by controlled selective breeding – bolstered by its concomitant term ‘population control’.

The colonisation of the so-called ‘under-developed’, poorer countries of this world by the more ‘developed’ capitalist-orientated countries (primarily European), benefitted the latter greatly – at the expense of the former. Slavery was one of the more tragic outcomes – another being that thecolonisers were now imbued with racist perceptions, which led to widespread usage within the English-speaking countries of such derogatory terms as: ‘niggers/coons’; ‘coolies’; ‘wogs/ragheads’; ‘yids’ – and-the-like.

Organisations reflecting this were subsequently set up, and the fact that the membership lists of these organisations flaunt the names of very influential politicians/statesmen, business tycoons and bankers, surely calls for a closer look at the matter. And because of America’s currently leading role in this matter, it is necessary to recall that she gained ‘independence’ as the United States of America after much infighting between the colonisers (primarily British) who had invaded that country of Indian Tribes – which led to genocidal attacks on those ‘Red Indians’. A story not unlike Britain’s colonisation of Australia, wirh its indigenous Aborigines.

As a backdrop to this, in 1798, an English clergyman-cum-economist, Thomas Robert Malthus published a theory with eugenic (a term not then used) overtones, arguing that an un-planned population grew faster than food production – adding that famine and poverty were God’s way of coping with man’s laziness. This was a theory much-welcomed by the colonisers and the organisations mentioned above.

Moreover, the close relationship noted above between Corporate America (with its ‘Skull and Bones’-ridden Administration) and Nazi/fascist Germans makes a mockery of the former’s claim to democracy. Using eugenicists’ terminology, they could more accurately be described as ‘crypto-democrats (fascists). The definition of ‘Fascism’ in a dictionary is “a philosophy or system of government that advocates or exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with the ideology of belligerent nationality’. In plain English: capitalism lies at the core of fascism. But, as noted above, this is a fact which must be hidden by these global capitalists.

This article will consider three such organisations: the Order of the Skull & Bones; the Eugenic Societies; and Population Control organisations, in a more-or-less chronological order, thereby leading to a more rational grasp of the subject matter.

Of the three, the Skull & Bones (of Yale University) was the earliest formed. ‘The Order’, as it is referred to by its members, bears the aura of secrecy and freemasonry, and is a bastion of White Anglo Saxon Protestant (WASP) culture, wealth and influence. A partial list of its more prominent members reflects said influence: The Russell Family; Alphonso Taft; William Howard Taft (his son); Henry Lewis Stimson; Averell Harriman; Robert A Lovett (partner of merged Brown Brothers Harriman in1926); Harold Stanley (of Morgan Stanley); Robert A. Taft; Prescott Bush Snr.; George Herbert Walker Bush; G.W. Bush (current President); McGeorge Bundy (National Security Advisor to JFK); the Heinz family – et al. In other words, the ‘corporate establishment’, as it is more popularly known.

The following very brief story of its birth is intriguing, to put it mildly: In 1823, using the old pirates’ ‘Skull & Crossbones’ as its logo, Samuel Russell founded an opium-smuggling company, Russell & Co. – and by 1829, he had bought out the Perkins & Co., which had controlled the smuggling of Turkish opium into China since 1789. In 1833, Samuel’s second cousin, William Huntington Russell and Alphonso Taft (who had served as Secretary of War under President Rutherford B. Hayes) founded the Order of Skull & Bones.

In 1856, said William Huntington Russell (who had been valedictorian of his class at Yale in 1833) incorporated Skull & Bones as the ‘Russell Trust Association’. It must be recalled here that the opium trading noted above was still being run by the British East India Company (BEIC) – Britain then being the great empire-builder – and that without Britain’s collaboration Russell & Co. would have collapsed. Simply put – the birth of Skull & Bones (whose members are more commonly known as the ‘Bonesmen’) – was paid for by opium drug-smuggling! While on the subject of Russell & Co., it is intriguing to note that Warren Delano Jnr. (grandfather of that popular ‘democrat’, FDR), though not a ‘Bonesman’ – while acting as US Vice-Consul in Canton, acted as Chief of Operations for Russell during the Opium War of 1839 – ‘42, which resulted in the legalisation of opium in China, and the acquisition of Hong Kong by the British.

In the 1860’s, Francis Galton (a cousin of Charles Darwin) took this Malthusian theory (see above) a step further: in his own words he defined ‘Eugenics’ ( a word he coined) as “the science of improvement of the human race germ plasm through better breeding” – adding that the poor were biologically inferior – and he further advocated state intervention to solve the problem. In 1904, he founded a research chair in eugenics at University College of London University.

In 1905, Dr. Alfred Ploetz and Dr. Ernst Rudin founded the Society of Race-Hygiene in Germany. (about which, more later).

In 1907, the Eugenic Education Society (which later became the Eugenic Society) was founded in England.

In 1910, the Eugenics Record Office (ERO) was founded in America. In their own words, the ERO felt that “ultimate economic betterment should be sought by breeding better people, not fewer of the existing sort.”

In 1912, the First International Eugenics Congress was held at London University. It demonstrated the growing strength of the movement especially in England, Germany and the United States. The opening speech at this congress was given by Arthur James Balfour, who had been British Prime Minister from 1902 – 5; and, as Foreign Secretary under Lloyd George from 1916 – ‘19, made a deal with the Zionists whereby Britain would support the setting up of a ‘home’ for the Jews, in return for the Zionists using their considerable political clout to persuade America to enter the war against Germany. (Britain was by then in dire economic straits). This secular Zionist group of Ashkenazi Jews were surely not entitled to a ‘homeland’ in Palestine, as their country of origin had been the Khazar Empire (which had adopted Judaism) of southern Russia.

In 1916, Margaret Sanger opened the first birth control clinic in the United States. It was renamed the Planned Parenthood Federation of America in 1942. She wrote: ” the unbalance between the birth rate of the ‘unfit’ and the ‘fit’ is admittedly the greatest present menace to civilisation … The most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective.”

In 1922, the American Eugenics Society was founded. One of its co-founders, Henry Laughlin (who had been Superintendent of the Eugenics Record Office from l910 to 1921) later became President of the Pioneer Fund, a white supremacist organisation. Another co-founder, Dr. Henry Fairfield Osborn, in 1923, during a national debate on restricting immigration, spoke enthusiastically about the results of intelligence testing carried out by the Army: “I believe those tests were worth what the war (World War I) cost, even in human life…We have learned once and for all that the Negro is not like us.” He also became president of the Pioneer Fund from 1947 to 1956.

Well documented is the fact that in between WW1 and WW2, Prescott Bush Snr. – as an executive of W.A.Harriman & Co. (later becoming Brown Bros. Harriman) – had, through a number of mergers with German companies, helped finance Hitler’s Nazi regime. Furthermore, in 1926, as a board member of bankers Dillon Read, Major (as he then was) William Draper co-operated with W.A. Harriman & Co. (Prescott S. Bush Snr. was Vice-President then) in the handling of the corporate banking for Fritz Thyssen’s German Steel Trust. Thyssen had helped to fund the Nazi Party. By 1931, sterilisation laws had been enacted in 27 states in the United States, and by 1935 enacted in Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Switzerland and Germany. As for Germany: as noted above, Ploetz and Rudin had set out an effective eugenics program which resulted in the tragic killing of millions of Jews, communists et al. by the Nazi Regime of Hitler. In fact, Rudin had been the chief architect of Law for the Prevention of Hereditary Disease in Posterity passed July 1933 four months after Hitler came to power. An inriguing aside: as noted in the Rockefeller Foundation Annual Reports 1928 1939, Rockefeller gave money for the “Kaiser Wilhelm Institute” and thus subsidized Rudin. From 1932 – 1972, the US Public Health Service studied the natural history of syphilis in hopes of justifying treatment programs for blacks. It was called the “Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male”, and involved 600 black men–399 with syphilis and 201 who did not have the disease. Researchers told the men they were being treated for “bad blood”. In fact, the men were never given adequate treatment for their disease. Even when penicillin became the drug of choice for syphilis in 1947, researchers did not offer it to the subjects. In 1972, as a result of a New York Times article, an Ad Hoc Advisory panel reviewed the study and found that the Tuskegee Study was “ethically unjustified”.

In August 1932 – and financed by the eugenicist, Major William Draper (see above) – the third “International Conference on Eugenics” was held in New York’s American Museum of Natural History under the supervision of the International Federation of Eugenics Societies. The proceedings were dedicated to Averell Harriman’s mother, who had financed the foundation of the Eugenics Record Office back in 1910 (see above). Dr. Ernst Rudin (see above) travelled to attend the Congress via the Hamburg-Amerika line (owned by W.A.Harriman & Co) – and was unanimously elected president of the International Federation of Eugenics Societies!

A few years after WW 2, Professor Dr. Otmar Freiherr von Verschuer, who, in 1937,had been Director of the Third Reich Institute for Heredity, Biology and Racial Purity (and Josef Mengele’s mentor) founded the Institute of Human Genetics in Munster, and also became a foreign member of the American Eugenics Society.

The setting up of the state of Israel by the Zionists in 1948 was an irrational act (as implied above), the main beneficiary being America, which would now have a well-armed, suborned ally in an Arab region rich in oil. The resulting deaths of the many Arabs at the hands of the Israelis could have been stopped by America many years ago. That it was not stopped can only mean that it was in keeping with the policy of the eugenicist-dominated US Administration – after all, Arabs are merely ‘ragheads’.

In 1950 and ‘51`, John Foster Dulles, then chairman of the Rockefeller Foundation (later to be appointed Secretary of State by Eisenhower), led John D. Rockefeller III on a series of world tours, “focussing on the need to stop the expansion of the non-white populations”. In 1952, Frederick Osborn (1889-1981) nephew of Henry Fairfield Osborn Sr. (see above), an officer of the American Eugenics Society/SSSB for more than 30 years, helped John D. Rockefeller III establish the Population Council in 1952, served as the council’s first administrator and was on its board of trustees for many years.

In 1958, Eisenhower appointed Draper (see above) as head of a committee to study the proper course for military aid to other countries. Draper changed the focus of the committee and recommended that the US goverment react to the threat of the population explosion by formulating plans to depopulate the poorer countries, as the growth of the world’s non-white population should be regarded as dangerous to the national security of the United States! Eisenhower had the sense to reject this.

In the1960’s Draper founded the Population Crisis Committee and the Draper fund, and joined with the Rockerfeller and Du Pont families to promote eugenics as population control…

While serving in Congress – and with Draper as his ‘population expert’ – George H.W. Bush chaired the Republican Task Force on Earth Resources and Population and invited Professors William Shockley and Arthur Jensen to explain to the committee how allegedly runaway birth-rates for African-Americans were down-breeding the American population. On August 5 1969, Bush summed up the testimony his black-inferiority advocates had given to the Task Force before Congress.

With the term ‘eugenics’ now, in the Post-War period, tainted with an aura of genocide and racism, Major General Frederick Osborn, founder member of both the American Eugenics Society and the Pioneer Fund, stated the public relations problem bluntly: “Eugenic goals are most likely to be attained under a name other than eugenics.”…In other words, the goals must be camouflaged – it would now be known as crypto-eugenics. In 1960, the British Eugenics Society agreed with this, stating “The Society’s activities in crypto-eugenics should be pursued vigorously…” – and adopted the proposal. In 1973, this resulted in the American Eugenics Society becoming the more academic-sounding ‘Society for the Study of Social Biology’. Crypto-eugenics would now be the order-of-the-day.

On June 9th 1969, Dr.D.M. MacArthur, Deputy Director of Research & Technology for the Pentagon, requested a sum of $10 million from the Congressional House Subcommittee on Appropriations to develop a new contagious micro-organsm capable of destroying the human immune system – in order to counteract any possible future virus capable of affecting said human immunity. It would therefore be necessary, first, to create such a virus! This resulted in a ‘virus’ discovered some ten years later in America which became known as ‘acquired immune deficiency syndrome’ (AIDS). It should be stressed that this virus first appeared in America, and, as noted by Neville Hodgkinson on the website businessonline.com in May 2006: increasingly complex procedures were taken to diagnose this virus in a reliable manner – “but the basic problem – not being able to validate any of these procedures against pure virus taken from patients – still remains”. Furthermore, he reveals in comprehensive detail, that both the HIV tests and statistics concerning AIDS have been manipulated in a duplicitous manner. It would seem that the main beneficiaries have been the pharmaceutical firms!

In April 1974, Kissinger drew up a secret plan for population control called the ‘National Security Plan of Action 200′ (NSSM 200), which was endorsed by the National Security Decision Memorandum 314, and finally declassified in 1900. In brief, it claimed that population growth in the less-developed countries was “..creating political or even national security problems for the US”, and it would seek help from the UN Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA founded in 1969) – but stressing that it would be under US leadership. NB: this was at a time when America was being wracked by the Watergate scandal, as a result of which its president, Richard Nixon, had to resign. At the very least, it would seem that – in the eyes of the Administration – the policy of ‘population control’ stood high in its list of priorities. In August 1974, at a meeting in Bucharest, the UN passed a resolution adopting The World Population of Action as proposed by the US delegation. It would seem that US leadership was indeed essential! The UNFPA was to hold similar meetings at 10-year intervals thereafter.

On October 2nd 1979, Robert McNamara (President of the World Bank) addressed a group of international bankers thus: “We can begin with the most critical problem of all, population growth”..concluding that “..either the current birth rates must come down more quickly, or the death rates must go up…There are, of course, many ways in which the death rates can go up. In a thermonuclear age, we can accomplish it very quickly and decisively”(as indeed they had done in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in1945). Not surprising statements, coming, as they do, from a man who was Secretary of Defense during the genocidal Vietnam War – but surprising in view of the crypto-eugenic stand taken by the American Eugenics Society noted above, a stand which McNamara, a self-evidently keen eugenicist, would have certainly been aware of. It can only be assumed that he did not agree with the society’s stand, and was arrogant enough to ignore it.

In 1980, William Draper III (General Draper’s son) served as co-chairman for financing G.H.W. Bush’s campaign for the presidency that year. Reagan won and appointed Bush as his Vice President.

In 1986 – as a result of Vice President George H.W.Bush’s advice to Reagan – William Draper III was appointed Administrator and CEO of the UN Development Program (UNDP), which was founded in 1965 by merging two existing U.N. organizations: the Expanded Program of Technical Assistance (EPTA), and the U.N. Special Fund. Since 1971, it has been responsible for coordinating all development assistance supplied by the United Nations system. UNDP was a key player in the global aid network – and the UNFPA (see above).

The foregoing is not a comprehensive list by any means – but is surely enough evidence that eugenics, population control (call it what you will) has played, and continues to play a crucial role in the policy-making of the so-called ‘developed’ countries – America in particular.

A recent event of pertinence follows: an earthquake of magnitude 9.0 on the Richter scale struck the Indian Ocean region on December 26th 2004, resulting in a Tsumani which killed approximately a quarter-of-a-million people. It was subsequently revealed that the Americans – with their European partners/acolytes – were aware of this earthquake almost immediately, as they controlled a number of seismic stations in the region (to say nothing of their earth-scouring satellites), the most important being the American military base on Diego Garcia. However, thay had not notified those countries threatened by the Tsunami. The only conclusion to be drawn from this is that this was a deliberate act on the part of the Euro-Americans, and, keeping in mind the chronological events listed above, it can justifiably be assumed that, in this instance, the eugenists and their cohort ‘Bonesmen’ had scored a hit!

Moreover, the close relationship noted above between Corporate America (with its ‘Skull and Bones’-ridden Administration) and Nazi/fascist Germans makes a mockery of the former’s claim to democracy. Using eugenicists’ terminology, they could more accurately be described as ‘crypto-democrats’ (fascists). The definition of ‘Fascism’ in a dictionary is “a philosophy or system of government that advocates or exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with the ideology of belligerent nationality’. This, in turn, reveals that capitalism lies at the core of fascism. But, as noted above, this is a fact which must be hidden by these global capitalists.

It is therefore imperative that this subject of eugenics/population control is subjected to far greater public scrutiny than it has received from ‘our media’ – which, after all, is in hock to its corporate owners: it says what it is paid to say!

Source: http://www.bilderberg.org/skulbone.htm#POPULATION

Related:

The Skull and Bones secret society of Yale University

VIDEO – Interview – Professor Antony Sutton on the Skull and Bones secret society

FREE BOOK ONLINE  (pdf)- America’s Secret Establishment (An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones by Antony Sutton 

The Population Reduction Agenda For Dummies

The Move to Depopulate the Planet

Prelude to Final Disaster: Rockefeller´s Depopulation Programme

H,

I appreciate you sending me the forwards and other messages. Thanks. Please keep me updated if there are any events, etc, that I can attend or come support.

I do have some things I want to start to dialogue with you about, though.

I feel like I have a lot in common with what your end goals and desires are. We want a safe and secure future. We want an end to a meddling government. We don’t want to have to scrape together pennies just to survive. We want liberty.

However, I think we have far different takes on who the enemy is that we should be fighting. Your literature is filled with comments about Jews and other types of secretive quasi-religious groupings that are trying to control us.

I feel that this analysis misses many key concepts and points about what is really going on here. The world is divided between rich and poor. Those who control property relationships, and those that work to maintain those property relationships. This is something we can see everyday at play in our communities, neighborhoods, workplaces, schools, etc.

I would argue that the rich are not made up of any one demographic. They are made up of those that have exploited the rest of us for centuries. You call them Jews. I call them bosses, politicians, and the ruling elite. Most Jews I know are poor and working class. They’ve been hunted down and destroyed for centuries.

If anything, the ruling class created a buffer middle class and managerial class of Jewish people over the last several centuries, so that we, as working people, would fight the Jews, not the real people pulling the strings and controlling our lives.

I understand your want to do something, to confront the people who are merely parasites who ruin the lives of the vast majority of us. However, labeling them Jews or trying to associate them with some mythical cultish organizations does nothing to help this struggle.

First, it marginalizes allies in this struggle. Let’s be real. Jewish folks have historically been a people that struggled against ruling elites. The movements of Jewish workers in this country and others created a base for confrontation with the rich and business owners at the turn of the last century that we can only dream of today. By labeling Jews as the enemy, not only are we adding to the oppressive power of the state structure by helping in the oppression of a people based merely on their ethnicity/religious identity, but we’re also pushing away natural allies in a struggle for a world of liberty and freedom against tyrannical rule. We are harming our own struggle while we also harm other people who are struggling against the same conditions that we are.

Secondly, by pinpointing that cause of our problems on secretive cult-like groups such as the Skulls and Bones, we are creating a mythology that prevents us from strategically understanding the situation we find ourselves in. The Patriot movement’s focus on these types of conspiracy theories only undermines any goals of liberty or freedom it may have. These theories prevent us from having a concrete analysis of our social conditions. We ignore the relationships between those in power and those without power. We ignore the plain realities we see of predatory economic, social, and political models within our own communities. We fictionalize the enemy. If we keep chasing after these cults, then we don’t chase after the power relationships that cause these conditions in the first place.

We chase the Skull and Bones cloak and dagger types. But we don’t chase our own bosses. We chase the NWO but ignore the internal contradictions of global empire. We can never strategically change our social conditions by creating a mythological enemy and trying to fight it.

Lastly, the insistence by the Patriot Movement that immigrants are also an enemy in this struggle will ensure that yet again, our movement is not only marginal and ineffective at creating actual freedom and liberty, but that we are denying that same liberty and freedom to other people engaged in similar struggles as us. If we continue to be the foot soldiers of the state’s form of oppression, especially when it comes to issues on the border, then we must immediately strike the word liberty from our websites, pamphlets, and dvds. We are not fighting for liberty. We are helping destroy it.

I want to work with you and other folks who are genuinely concerned about our futures and who want to build a real movement for freedom and liberty, that is why I opened up this dialogue the way that I have. Let’s work together, because that is what will make us strong. And let’s start fighting the real enemy. The time to take sides is far overdue, and unfortunately, the vast majority of us have chosen the wrong side for our entire lives. I just recently have come to understand how my role in similar Patriot style movements back in Kansas has been a part of strengthening our enemies. I hope more folks will join me in this critical analysis.

In the end, deep down, I cling to the idea that we want similar things, but we’ve been duped into thinking that the current strategy of the Patriot Movement will get us those things, when in reality, it has only kept them even further away from us.

Respectfully,
D

A rare look inside Skull and Bones, the Yale secret society

by Alexandra Robbins
Published: SkullandCrossBones.org

On High Street, in the middle of the Yale University campus, stands a cold-looking, nearly windowless Greco-Egyptian building with padlocked iron doors. This is the home of Yale’s most famous secret society, Skull and Bones, and it is also, in a sense, one of the many homes of the family of George W. Bush, Yale ‘68.

Bush men have been Yale men and Bonesmen for generations. Prescott Bush, George W.’s grandfather, Yale ‘17, was a legendary Bonesman; he was a member of the band that stole for the society what became one of its most treasured artifacts: a skull that was said to be that of the Apache chief Geronimo. Prescott Bush, one of a great many Bonesmen who went on to lives of power and renown, became a U.S. senator. George Herbert Walker Bush, George W.’s father, Yale ‘48, was also a Bonesman, and he, too, made a conspicuous success of himself. Inside the temple on High Street hang paintings of some of Skull and Bones’s more illustrious members; the painting of George Bush, the most recently installed, is five feet high.

There were other Bush Bonesmen, a proud line of them stretching from great uncle George Herbert Walker Jr. to uncle Jonathan Bush to cousins George Herbert Walker IIIand Ray Walker. So when George W. was “tapped” for Skull and Bones, at the end of his junior year, he, too, naturally became a Bonesman — but, it seems, a somewhat ambivalent one.

New members of Skull and Bones are assigned secret names, by which fellow Bonesmen will forever know them. Some Bonesmen receive traditional names, denoting function or existential status; others are the chosen beneficiaries of names that their Bones predecessors wish to pass on. The leftover initiates choose their own names. The name Long Devil is assigned to the tallest member; Boaz (short for Beelzebub) goes to any member who is a varsity football captain. Many of the chosen names are drawn from literature (Hamlet, Uncle Remus), from religion, and from myth. The banker Lewis Lapham passed on his name, Sancho Panza, to the political adviser Tex McCrary. Averell Harriman was Thor, Henry Luce was Baal, McGeorge Bundy was Odin. The name Magog is traditionally assigned to the incoming Bonesman deemed to have had the most sexual experience, and Gog goes to the new member with the least sexual experience. William Howard Taft and Robert Taft were Magogs. So, interestingly, was George Bush.

George W. was not assigned a name but invited to choose one. According to one report, nothing came to mind, so he was given the name Temporary, which, it is said, he never bothered to replace; Temporary is how Bush’s fellow Bonesmen know him today. (In recent interviews I asked a number of Bush’s Bonesmen classmates about the name and elicited no denials.)

The junior George’s diffidence in the matter of his secret name seems to reflect a larger ambivalence toward Yale and its select, the most elite of whom are the members of Skull and Bones. The elder George holds his fellow Yalies — particularly his Bones brethren — in great esteem, and over the years has often gone to them for advice. George W., in contrast, has publicly made a point of his disdain for the elite northeastern connections that shaped his father’s world and, to some extent, his own. Fay Vincent, the former commissioner of baseball, who is a Bush family friend and himself the son of a Bonesman, says, “Young George is as unlikely a Bonesperson as I’ve ever met.” Young George has not attended a Yale reunion since he graduated.

Bush’s dismissal of Yale and all it stands for may be a response to the repeated charges of political opponents that he is not much more than a papa’s boy. Kent Hance, who trounced Bush in his 1978 congressional race, insinuated that Bush was not a true Texan and accused him of “riding his daddy’s coattails.”

If George W. truly wanted to detach himself from his father and from the traditions of a long line of ancestors, he chose a curious path — in effect, retracing his father’s footsteps.

SKULL and Bones is the oldest of Yale’s secret societies and by far the most determinedly secretive. As such, it has long been an inspiration for speculation and imagination. It still is. The society is, of course, the inspiration for the new Universal Pictures thriller The Skulls, about a nefarious secret society at an Ivy League school in New Haven. In 1968, when George W. Bush was in Skull and Bones, there were eight “abovegrounds,” or societies that met in their own “tombs,” and as many as ten “undergrounds,” which held meetings in rented rooms. In an article in the 1968 Yale yearbook Lanny Davis, a 1967 Yale graduate and a secret-society member who would go on to become a White House special counsel in the Clinton Administration, described how Bones, famous for its distinguished list of members, held more sway than the others.

Come “Tap Day” … if you’re a junior, despite the fact that you’ve banged your fist at the lunch table and said, “This is 1968,” and have loudly denounced societies as anachronisms, when the captain of the football team is standing by your door and when the tower clock strikes eight he rushes in and claps your shoulder and shouts, “Skull and Bones, accept or reject?” you almost always scream out, “Accept!” and you never, never, pound your fist at the lunch table, not for that reason ever again.

Fewer than a tenth of Yale’s 1,400 seniors are members of the university’s secret societies, which many undergraduates view as self-serving vehicles for real and aspiring aristocrats. Certainly this view seems to have some validity when it comes to Bonesmen. Until 1992, when it became one of the last two secret societies to admit women, Skull and Bones had a history of picking the same kinds of people over and over. Davis’s yearbook article explained,

If the society had a good year, this is what the “ideal” group will consist of: a football captain; a Chairman of the Yale Daily News; a conspicuous radical; a Whiffenpoof; a swimming captain; a notorious drunk with a 94 average; a film-maker; a political columnist; a religious group leader; a Chairman of the Lit; a foreigner; a ladies’ man with two motorcycles; an ex-service man; a negro, if there are enough to go around; a guy nobody else in the group had heard of, ever.

Indeed, George W.’s 1968 brethren slip easily into the desired slots: among them were the Olympic swimmer and gold medalist Don Schollander; a future Harvard Medical School surgeon, Gregory Gallico; a future Rhodes scholar, Robert McCallum; the Whiffenpoofs’ pitch, Robert Birge; Donald Etra, an Orthodox Jew; Muhammed Saleh, a Jordanian; a future deputy director of the National Institute of Mental Health, Rex Cowdry; and the black soccer captain Roy Austin. Only George W. himself fell into none of the aforementioned categories. He was generally regarded as a legacy tap.

Given the society’s history as an incubator and meeting point for rising generational elites, it is not surprising that an especially susceptible kind of “barbarian” — the Bones term for a nonmember — has long seen the society as a locus of mystery, wealth, and conspiracy. One doesn’t need to scratch deeply to uncover accusations of sinister ties with the CIA, the Trilateral Commission, the Illuminati, the Council on Foreign Relations, even the Nazis. It turns out that the Yale admissions committee that voted to admit George W., despite his poor record at Andover, included three members (out of seven) who were Bonesmen; those seeking evidence of malign influence will surely raise an eyebrow. (For the conspiracy-minded, the most useful omnium gatherum is the British writer Antony C. Sutton’s feverish 1983 tract An Introduction to the Order.) World domination aside, the most pervasive rumors about Bones are that initiates must masturbate in a coffin while recounting their sexual exploits, and that their candor is ultimately rewarded with a no-strings-attached gift of $15,000. Bonesmen, who are sworn to secrecy at initiation, have not publicly denied or confirmed these rumors; they have usually made a point of refusing to speak to the press about the society at all. As The Skulls was about to be released, and as George W.’s quest for the Republican presidential nomination looked increasingly certain to succeed, the society sent all members a memo reminding them of their vow of silence. Still, as I recently discovered in the course of looking into Skull and Bones, not all Bonesmen see the necessity of remaining tight-lipped about a society whose biggest secret may be that its secrets are essentially trivial.

THE story of Skull and Bones begins in December of 1832. Upset (according to one account) by changes in the Phi Beta Kappa election process, a Yale senior named William Russell and a group of classmates decided to form the Eulogian Club as an American chapter of a German student organization. The club paid obeisance to Eulogia, the goddess of eloquence, who took her place in the pantheon upon the death of the orator Demosthenes, in 322 B.C., and who is said to have returned in a kind of Second Coming on the occasion of the society’s inception. The Yale society fastened a picture of its symbol — a skull and crossbones — to the door of the chapel where it met. Today the number 322, recalling the date of Demosthenes’ death, appears on society stationery. The number has such mystical overtones that in 1967 a graduate student with no ties to Skull and Bones donated $322,000 to the society.

(The number 322 has also been a particular favorite of conspiracy-minded hunters for evidence of Skull and Bones’s global connections. It was the combination to Averell Harriman’s briefcase when he carried classified dispatches between London and Moscow during World War II. Antony C. Sutton claims that 322 doubles as a reminder of the society’s mother organization in Germany; the American group, founded in 1832, is the second chapter — thus 32-2.)

In 1856 Daniel Coit Gilman, who went on to become the founding president of Johns Hopkins University, officially incorporated the society as the Russell Trust Association, and Skull and Bones moved into the space it still occupies. The Bones tomb is forbidding only on the outside. Marina Moscovici, a Connecticut conservator who recently spent six years restoring fifteen paintings from the Skull and Bones building, describes the atmosphere inside as “funny spooky.” She says, “Sort of like the Addams Family, it’s campy in an old British men’s-smoking-club way. It’s not glamorous by any means.”

“Bones is like a college dorm room,” a 1980s Bonesman told me. “Ours was a place that used to be really nice but felt kind of beat up, lived in. There were socks underneath the couch, old half-deflated soccer balls lying around.” Dozens of skeletons and skulls, human and animal, dangle from the walls, on which German and Latin phrases have been chiseled (“Whether poor or rich, all are equal in death”), among moose heads, sconces, medieval armor, antlers, boating flags, manuscripts, statuettes of Demosthenes, and a pair of boots that one member wore throughout his active duty with American forces in France during World War II. The gravestone of Elihu Yale, the eponymous eighteenth-century merchant, was stolen years ago from its proper setting in Wrexham, Wales, and is displayed in a glass case, in a room with purple walls.

As noted, for many years the society has possessed a skull that members call Geronimo. In the 1980s, under pressure from Ned Anderson, a former Apache tribal chairman in Arizona, the society produced the skull in question. The skull didn’t match Anderson’s records, and it was returned to the society’s tomb. Anderson wasn’t finished. He reportedly took the issue up with his congressman, John McCain; McCain tried to arrange a meeting between Anderson and George Bush, who was then the Vice President. Bush wasn’t interested, and the matter was dropped. “We still call it Geronimo anyway,” a Bonesman says. The issue of Geronimo’s skull never surfaced in the public record during the bitter contest between McCain and George W. for the Republican nomination.

The most private room in the building, known as the Inner Temple, or (this will be no surprise) Room 322, is approximately fourteen feet square and guarded by a locked iron door. Inside, a case contains a skeleton that Bonesmen refer to as Madame Pompadour. Compartments in the case guard the society’s cherished manuscripts, including the secrecy oath and instructions for conducting an initiation.

The initiation ceremony, held in April, involves as many alumni, or “patriarchs,” as possible, one of whom in each instance serves as the supervisor, known as Uncle Toby. The Inner Temple is cleared of furniture except for two chairs and a table, and Bonesmen past and present assemble: Uncle Toby in a robe; the shortest senior, or “Little Devil,” in a satanic costume; a Bonesman with a deep voice in a Don Quixote costume; one in papal vestments; another dressed as Elihu Yale; four of the brawniest in the role of “shakers”; and a crew of extras wearing skeleton costumes and carrying noisemakers. According to the initiation script, Uncle Toby “sounds like the only sane person in the room.”

As an initiate enters the room, patriarchs standing outside the Inner Temple shout, “Who is it?” The shakers bellow the initiate’s name, which the patriarchs echo. The shakers push the initiate toward the table, where the secrecy oath has been placed, and he is enjoined to “Read! Read! Read!” The shakers then half-carry the initiate to a picture of Eulogia, and the Bonesmen shriek, “Eulogia! Eulogia! Eulogia!” After another trip to the oath, the shakers fire the initiate toward a picture of a woman that Bonesmen call Connubial Bliss.

Rituals along these lines go on for quite some time, recalling a cross between haunted-house antics and a human pinball game — “like something from a Harry Potter novel,” in the words of one Bonesman, now an engineer. It is perhaps worth noting, in light of George W.’s controversial episode at Bob Jones University and the specter of anti-Catholicism, that at one point in the proceedings every initiate kisses the slippered toe of the “Pope.” At last the initiate is formally dubbed a Knight of Eulogia. Amid more raucous ritual he is cast from the room into the waiting arms of the patriarchs.

WITHIN the tomb students run on Skull and Bones time, which is five minutes ahead of the time in the rest of the world. “It was to encourage you to think that being in the building was so different from the outside world that you’d let your guard down,” a Bonesman (‘72) explains. At 6:30 on Thursdays and Sundays the Bonesmen gather in the Firefly Room for supper. The room is dim and intimate; light shines through the gaping eyeholes of fixtures shaped like skulls. Bonesmen drink various refreshments from skull-shaped cups, but never alcohol. The dry-society rule, fervently enforced, was designed to keep members level-headed for discussions — a change of pace for George W., who drank heavily during his college years.

At 7:55 barbarian time Uncle Toby rings a bell to summon the members to the session. When the knights are seated, they sing two sacred anthems before the Hearing of Excuses, during which members are assessed fines for errors, such as arriving late or using a society name outside the tomb. Uncle Toby then draws debate topics and an order of speakers from the Yorick, a skull divided into compartments. The ninety-minute period of debate can be frivolous or grave.

One of the standard pieces of lore about Skull and Bones is that each member must at some point give an account of his sexual history, known as the CB (for “Connubial Bliss”). “After the first one or two times it’s like guys listing their conquests, and that gets old,” one young Bonesman told me recently. “There’s just not that much to talk about” — and so CBs have evolved into relationship discussions. “It’s the kind of stuff a lot of guys do with their teammates,” says another Bonesman (‘83). “There was nothing perverse or surreal or prurient — just an open exchange. It’s like TV’s Ricki Lake — there’s now a national mania for purging thoughts at large. This is a way of doing it in a very private, non-sensationalist way that benefits the people who are listening and the people who are telling.”

By mid-autumn, after each member has presented a CB, the time slot shifts to Life Histories, when Bonesmen spend one or more nights giving their autobiographies. George Bush’s autobiography focused on his military service but also looked ahead, a 1948 member told me. “He was talking about the future, first about his family and then about being able to have an impact in public service.” George W., in contrast, spoke often about his father. George W.’s fellow Bonesmen have been unwilling to elaborate.

WHEN U.S. News & World Report asked President Bush in 1989 why he had chosen to attend Yale, he replied, “My family had a major Yale tradition.” Today George W. Bush distances himself from Yale (although supporters cite his alma mater to combat charges that he is a lightweight). He has criticized its “intellectual snobbery” and has maintained that the school epitomizes “a certain East Coast attitude” and an “intellectual arrogance.” George W.’s attitude toward Yale extends to its most elite society. Whereas George Bush returned to the tomb in 1998 to be the dinner speaker at the annual Skull and Bones commencement party, George W. has stayed away. In his 1999 campaign autobiography, A Charge to Keep, George W. Bush mentions his membership in Skull and Bones only in passing: “My senior year I joined Skull and Bones, a secret society, so secret I can’t say anything more.”

Yet Skull and Bones was not relegated entirely to George W.’s past after he graduated. In 1971, having been rejected by the University of Texas Law School and needing a job, Bush called a Bonesman, Robert H. Gow. Gow, who later told The Washington Post that his Houston-based agricultural company had not been looking for anyone at the time, hired Bush as a management trainee. In 1977, when Bush formed Arbusto Energy, his first company, he once again applied to Skull and Bones for financial aid. With assistance from his uncle Jonathan Bush (Bones ‘53), he lined up $565,000 from twenty-eight investors. One of them contributed $93,000 — the California venture capitalist William H. Draper III (Bones ‘50). Twelve Bonesmen (including family members)and the son of a patriarch gave a total of $35,500 to Bush’s 1998 gubernatorial campaign. At least forty-six Bonesmen or sons of patriarchs have given approximately $1,000 apiece to his presidential campaign — the maximum allowed by law.

Not surprisingly, loyalty often flows in the other direction. In 1984 Bush flew to Tennessee to accompany the Republican Senate nominee and Bonesman (‘67) Victor Ashe on a seven-city tour. Ashe lost to Al Gore.

That George W. keeps his Skull and Bones connections in repair is hardly a sign of anything insidious; it’s just business as usual in America. Compared with his family connections and his family’s Yale connections, the Skull and Bones network is just a sideshow. But in the eyes of the conspiracy-minded, interconnections of any kind, especially when cloaked in mystery and ritual, constitute virtual proof of dark doings. Skull and Bones will probably never rid itself of innuendo — innuendo that has not helped the Bonesmen Bushes in the pursuit of politics.

Conspiracy theories, which George W. has called “the kind of connect-the-random-dots charges that are virtually impossible to refute,” contributed to Bush’s defeat in his 1978 congressional campaign. Bill Minutaglio, in his biography of Bush, First Son, recalls an afternoon debate moderated by the radio talk-show host Mel Turner:

Turner … wanted to know if the young Bush was a tool of some shadow government; it was the same thing people had confronted his father with when they had called him a “tool of the eastern kingmakers.”

“Are you involved in, or do you know anybody involved in, one-world government or the Trilateral Commission?”

Bush, who had been telling people he was tired of being hammered for having “connections” through his father to the eastern establishment, was fuming. “I won’t be persuaded by anyone, including my father,” he said, with a biting tone in his voice.

On the way out of the restaurant, Bush was still livid. He refused to shake hands with Turner. “You asshole,” Turner heard him hiss as he walked by.

George W.’s father has certainly felt that membership in Skull and Bones damaged him politically. When Fay Vincent made a consolation call to Bush after his 1980 loss of the Republican presidential nomination to Ronald Reagan, the weary candidate said, “Fay, let me tell you something. If you ever decide to run for office, don’t forget that coming from Andover, Yale, Skull and Bones, and the Trilateral Commission is a big handicap. People don’t know what they are, so they don’t know where you’re coming from. It’s really a big, big problem.”

In The Skulls, members of the secret society murder a student journalist who is attempting to probe its mysteries. Real-life journalists have not met the same fate, so far as we know, although Ron Rosenbaum, the author of a 1977 Esquire article on Skull and Bones, wrote that a Bonesman warned him not to get too close: “The alumni still care,” the source warned.

“Don’t laugh. They don’t like people tampering and prying. The power of Bones is incredible. They’ve got their hands on every lever of power in the country. You’ll see — it’s like trying to look into the Mafia.”

When I read this excerpt to one young Bonesman, he laughed and said, “I really don’t think I’d be working nights as a paralegal while trying to be an actor if I had access to some golden key.”

SKULL and Bones doesn’t own an opulent island hideaway like the one depicted in The Skulls. It does own an island on the St. Lawrence River — Deer Island, in Alexandria Bay. The forty-acre retreat is intended to give Bonesmen an opportunity to “get together and rekindle old friendships.” A century ago the island sported tennis courts and its softball fields were surrounded by rhubarb plants and gooseberry bushes. Catboats waited on the lake. Stewards catered elegant meals. But although each new Skull and Bones member still visits Deer Island, the place leaves something to be desired. “Now it is just a bunch of burned-out stone buildings,” a patriarch sighs. “It’s basically ruins.” Another Bonesman says that to call the island “rustic” would be to glorify it. “It’s a dump, but it’s beautiful.”

The fading of Deer Island exemplifies the dwindling finances of Skull and Bones, which can no longer claim the largest society endowment at Yale. Unlike members of other societies, Bonesmen pay no dues, though patriarchs receive an annual letter requesting a “voluntary contribution to the Russell Trust Association.” In truth, Skull and Bones has never been wealthy.

The society’s accounts are much fatter in the ineffables department. A Skull and Bones document states,

The experience we have come to value in our society depends on privacy, and we are unwilling to jeopardize that life in order to solicit new members. The life which we invite you to share in our society is based on such intangible factors that we cannot meaningfully convey to you either its nature or quality.

Hardly a tool of Hades, but rather a staid wayside for students, its heyday past, its glory faded, Skull and Bones may have little more than this to conceal.

As for the $15,000 graduation gift, George W.’s contemporary Rex Cowdry says, “I’m still waiting for mine.”

Source: http://skullandcrossbones.org/articles/skullandbones.htm

Related:

Skull & Bones Membership List in Alphabetical Order

VIDEO – Interview – Professor Antony Sutton on the Skull and Bones secret society

FREE BOOK ONLINE  (pdf)- America’s Secret Establishment (An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones by Antony Sutton 

New World Order

The current world affairs are manipulated by the financial dynasties, being the Rockefellers, Morgans, Rothschilds and their centralized banking cartel, being the Federal Reserve Bank. These are some of the prominent American and European ruling families who control the world by virtue of the fact that they control the world’s natural resources. They organize themselves under the banner of private and secret organizations such as the Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and many others.

The aim of these groups is to establish a one-world dictatorial government which they call the “New World Order”. In South Africa there was the Broederbond which is now called the Afrikanerbond. In the US the dominant secret society is the Skull and Bones which recruits from Yale University. Well known members of this group are George Bush, his father and Senator John Kerry.

In the 1880’s Skull and Bones created the American Historical Association, the American Psychological Association and the American Economic Association so that the society could ensure that history would be written under its terms and promote its objectives. This means those from other parts of world who go and study in the US imbibe and regurgitate what they will have learnt at US institutions and some of them come and brag and say, “I have a PhD from Harvard or Yale”.

The mainstream history books usually present a biased worldview so that the ruling class can govern without interference. Skull and Bones members dominate financial institutions such as JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Dean Witter and Brown Brothers Harriman. This is similar to what the ANC does through ‘Black Economic Empowerment’ (BEE).

The ANC has also messed up the education system and teach their own version of history which extols the virtues of the ANC while ignoring the contribution of the PAC and BCM. As the saying goes “history is the lie commonly agreed upon” and it is written in the corridors of power. It has been established that the ANC got its 1994 election funding from the Rockefellers. Before the 22 April 2009 general election ANC President, Jacob Zuma, who is now South Africa’s President was invited to address Rockefeller’s Council on Foreign Relations.

Prior to the 1994 general election Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan criticized then ANC President who eventually became South Africa’s President Nelson Mandela saying he raised funds from the wrong people; the Rockefellers. In the early 1990’s Harry Oppenheimer was funding the ANC to the tune of R15 million a year. And when there was a fallout between the ANC and Oppenheimer and he withheld the funding, the Rothschilds picked up the tap until the ANC and Oppenheimer made up. These guys don’t fund organizations without getting anything in return, a sort of a quid pro quo deal. He who pays the piper calls the tune. What has the ANC given in exchange for the funds they got from the controllers of the world?

Those who still remember, around 1991/92 Mandela shocked many people except the controllers of the world when he announced that African people should not have false expectations and recanted his previous statements concerning nationalization. It was his administration which in 1996 adopted the neo-liberal economic policy of the Washington Consensus called Growth, Employment and Redistribution (GEAR) strategy which I criticized in the New Nation weekly newspaper of 16 August 1996. At that time Cosatu said it had mixed feelings but after my article they took a firm stand against GEAR. The PAC also failed to adopt the anti-GEAR position and run with it. The PAC should weed out agents of the controllers of the world in their midst.

The Vatican is also one of the institutions that are fighting for the establishment of the “New World Order”. David Yallop’s book, In God’s Name is a helpful resource in understanding the workings of the Vatican. Another one is The Vatican Moscow Washington Alliance by Avro Manhattan. The Vatican is supposed to be the headquarters of Catholics but it is a state within a state and has embassies in many countries including South Africa.

The people who control the world control key strategic resources such as energy and currency. They now want to control food production through the contamination of our natural seeds by their genetically modified organisms (GMO’s). Once our soils are contaminated we are going to depend on GMO’s which they have patented and this patenting is going to be enforced through the World Trade Organization (WTO) which, like the United Nations (UN), is controlled by the same people.

The UN is for the international bankers who control the world and it is being used to collect debts for the same bankers. The Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Morgans and the whole caboodle control the world’s central banks. One Mayer Amschel Rothschild once said, “Give me control of a country’s currency and I don’t care who makes its laws”.

The International bankers are interested in creating a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. To students and graduates who are studying and who have studied Economics, Political Science, Public Administration and Commerce, have you ever been taught all these revelations? Those who are still students ask your lecturers and Professors why they don’t teach you about what is happening on the ground, about reality. Even those leaders you have elected to lead you are just as ignorant. So you are being led by blind people who will lead you into a precipice. Everybody should read Frantz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth.

Those who have more interests on this subject can consult the following references: Behold A Pale Horse by William Cooper, The New World Order & The Throne Of The antichrist by Robert O’Driscoll, Des Griffin et al, En Route To Global Occupation by Gary Kah, The Rockefeller File by Gary Allen, Judge for Yourself by John Judge, Rule by Secrecy by Jim Marrs and Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley.

By Sam Ditshego

Halloween…updated Order of Death video to page

click here

Están Vivos- de John Carpenter, seres extraterrestres que dominan la Tierra sin que los humanos lo perciban, antenas que emiten extrañas señales para controlarnos.Una Pelicula De Hace Años Pero Con Mucho Mensaje.

Infiltración Alien en la Oligarquía Mundial, Control Inconsciente de las Sociedades, Crisis Economica Mundial,Mensajes Subliminales,Policía al Servicio de “Ellos”, Bases Subterráneas Alienigenas y Mucho Mas en Este Extraño Film de “Ficción “que Metaforicamente nos Recuerda Mucho de lo que Puede que Realmente este Ocurriendo.Esta Pelicula En Lo Personal Es Una De Mis Favoritas La Historia De Esta Pelicula Es Muy Parecida a Como La Elite Podria Estar Operando Para Manipular Y Controlan A Todos Nosotros.Aqui Pongo Este Audioprograma Muy Bueno Que Relata Un Poco Los Mensajes Ocultos De La Pelicula Mundodesconocido.com

Parte 1

Parte 2

parte 3

Parte 4

Parte 5

Parte 6

Parte 7

Parte 8

Parte 9

“Everything you know is a lie. The powers that be are turning the United States in to one big internment camp; Rex-84. Yet another warning from El*A*Kwents about the imminent danger to worldwide, human freedom. The Time Is Always Now.”

The Scriptures are clear that a holiday such as this should not be partaken of by believers in the Elohim of Yisrael.

1Co 10:20  But the things the nations sacrifice, “they sacrifice to demons, and not to God.” Deut. 32:17 But I do not want you to become sharers of demons;
1Co 10:21  you cannot drink the cup of the Lord and a cup of demons; you cannot partake of the table of the Lord, and a table of demons.
1Co 10:22  Or do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? Are we stronger than He?
Deut. 32:21

Eph 5:11  And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather even reprove them.

Deu 18:9  When you come to the land which YHWH your God is giving to you, you shall not learn to do according to the hateful acts of those nations.
Deu 18:10  There shall not be found in you one who passes his son or his daughter through the fire, one that uses divination, an observer of clouds, or one divining, or a whisperer of spells,
Deu 18:11  or a magic charmer, or one consulting mediums, or a spirit-knower, or one inquiring of the dead.
Deu 18:12  For all doing these things are an abomination to YHWH. And because of these filthy acts YHWH your God is dispossessing these nations before you.
Deu 18:13  You shall be perfect with YHWH your God.
Deu 18:14  For these nations whom you shall expel listen to observers of clouds, and to those divining. But as to you, YHWH your God has not given to you to do so.

History of Halloween

Origin of name

The term Halloween, originally spelled Hallowe’en, is shortened from All Hallows’ Even – e’en is a shortening of even, which is a shortening of evening. This is ultimately derived from the Old English Eallra Hālgena ǣfen. It is now known as “Eve of” All Saints’ Day, which is November 1st.

A time of pagan festivities, Pope Gregory III(731–741) and Gregory IV (827–844) tried to supplant it with the Christian holiday (All Saints’ Day) by moving it from May 13 to November 1.

In the 800s, the Church measured the day as starting at sunset, in accordance with the Florentine Calendar. Although All Saints’ Day is now considered to occur one day after Halloween, the two holidays were once celebrated on the same day.

Halloween begins well over 2,000 years ago in the British Isles. Here, we find the holiday stripped to its most essential element: a night when Celtic tribes communed with the spirits of the ancestral dead. These grand and glorious pagan celebrations were assimilated by the Catholic church. . . Rather than extinguish old customs, the church leaders provided Christian versions of them: from the Middles Ages on, All Saints’ Day and All Souls’ Day replaced the ancient Celtic celebrations of the dead. (Bannatyne, Lesley Pratt, Halloween: An American Holiday, an American History, Facts on File, Inc., New York, 1990 p. x)

The origin of Halloween is the Celtic Festival of Samhain (meaning summer’s end), lord of death and evil spirits. Long before Messiah (at least 2000 years), Druids in Britain, Ireland, Scotland, France, Germany and other Celtic countries observed the end of summer by making sacrifices to Samhain (pronounced sow-een). The Celts considered November 1st as being the day of death because the leaves were falling, it was getting darker sooner and temperatures were dropping. They believed Muck Olla, their sun god was losing strength and Samhain, lord of death, was overpowering him. Further, they believed that on October 31st Samhain assembled the spirits of all who had died during the previous year. These spirits had been confined to inhabit animals bodies for the past year, as punishment for their evil deeds. They were allowed to return to their former home to visit the living on the eve (Oct. 31) of the Feast of Samhain. Druid priests led the people in wicked worship ceremonies in which horses, cats, black sheep, oxen, human beings and other offerings were rounded up, stuffed into wicker cages and burned to death. This was done to appease Samhain and keep spirits from harming them. It is clear to see that HALLOWEEN HAS ALWAYS BEEN A CELEBRATION OF DEATH.
Our Pilgrim forefathers well knew of Halloween’s occultic roots. In fact they banned celebrating Halloween in America. Halloween was not celebrated in this country until 1845. At that time multiplied thousands of Irish emigrants flooded into New York because of the Irish Potato Famine of 1845-46. They brought with them the old Druid holiday of Halloween. Gradually celebrating this day spread throughout the rest of the country.
Halloween.- Celtic peoples (Britons, Gauls, Scots, Irish). They observed the end of summer with sacrifices to SAMAN (Shamhain). He was “the lord of death and evil spirits”. This marked the beginning of the Celtic New Year.
Depending on your source material, the Druid lord of death and evil spirits was called Saman, Samana, Shamhain or Samhain. His “holiday” was called “The Vigil Of Saman” or Samhain (pronounced so-wein). You probably have seen a modern day version of SAMAN without even knowing it. This pagan god was shown as a ghostly, skeleton holding a sickle in his hand. He later came to be known as THE GRIM REAPER.

It is also given the name of the Angel of Death (מַלְאַךְ הַמָּוֶת‎ Malach HaMavet) stemming from the Bible.  There are numerous traditions about the Angel of Death in Rabbinic literature.  Many times the Angel of Death is compared to satan.  One such example is a story about how the Angel of Death was not able to take the soul of Moses, rather the Almighty drew Moses’ soul out of his body by a kiss.  This is very reminiscent to what Jude speaks of in Jude 1:9

From Wikipedia

In the Bible, the fourth horseman of Revelation 6 is called Death, and is pictured with Hades following him. The “Angel of the Lord” smites 185,000 men in the Assyrian camp (II Kings xix. 35). When the Angel of Death passes through to smite the Egyptian first-born, God prevents “the destroyer” (shâchath) from entering houses with blood on the lintel and side posts (Ex. xii. 23). The “destroying angel” (“mal’ak ha-mashḥit”) rages among the people in Jerusalem (II Sam. xxiv. 16). In I Chronicle xxi. 15 the “angel of the Lord” is seen by King David standing “between the earth and the heaven, having a drawn sword in his hand stretched out over Jerusalem.” The biblical Book of Job (xxxiii. 22) uses the general term “destroyer” (“memitim”), which tradition has identified with “destroying angels” (“mal’ake Khabbalah”) and Prov. xvi. 14 uses the term the “angels of death” (“mal’ake ha-mavet”).

The Druids – They were occult practitioners, witches of sorts. In the century preceding the birth of Christ, Caesar conquered the Britains and he records very carefully the account of the DRUID PRIESTS (early witches)…”All Gallic nations are much given to superstition…they either offer up men as victims to the gods, or make a vow to sacrifice themselves. The ministers in these offerings are the Druids, and they hold that the wrath of the immortal gods can only be appeased, and man’s life redeemed, by offering up human sacrifice, and it is a part of their national institutions to hold fixed solemnities (Ceremonies) for this purpose.”

Ba’al worship

Holiday researcher George Douglas adds some interesting information when he says “Many of Halloween’s customs are derived from the ancient Baal Festivals. Other customs originate from the taking of omens from the struggles of victims in the fires of druidic sacrifices.” (From: The American Book of Days, by George William Douglas revised by Helen Douglas Compton).

Alexander Hislop in his book, The Two Babylons, says, “The god whom the Druids worshipped was Baal, as the blazing Baal-fires show — We know that they offered human sacrifices to their bloody gods. We have evidence that they made `their children pass through the fire to Molech’, and that makes it highly probable that they also offered them in sacrifice; for, from Jeremiah 32:35, compared with Jeremiah 19:5, we find that these two things were parts of one and the same system.” Further, it is to be noted that the “priests of Nimrod or Baal were necessarily required to eat of the human sacrifices; and thus it has come to pass that `Cahna-Bal’, (Cahna is the emphatic form of Cahn which means `a priest’) meaning the priest of Baal, is the established word in our tongue for a devourer of human flesh.” (from The Two Babylons, Hislop. See page 232).

On November first was Samhain [Halloween] . . . Fires were built as a thanksgiving to Baal. . . (Kelley, Ruth Edna, The Book of Hallowe’en, Lothrop, Lee and Shepard Co. Boston, 1919)

The mystic rites and ceremonies with which Hallow’en was originally observed had their origin among the Druids . . . ancient Baal festivals from which many of the Hallow’en customs are derived. (Douglas, George William. The American Book of Days, p. 569)

Trick or Treat

Sacrifices – Druid priests and people would go from house to house asking for fatted calves, black sheep, and human beings. Those who gave were promised prosperity and those who refused to give were cursed and threatened. In addition, it was likely that all of the “wandering spirits” would get hungry. If you set out a treat for them, they would not trick or curse you. Hence we have THE ORIGIN OF TRICK OR TREAT. “Trick or Treat” is a reenactment of the Druidic practices. The candy has replaced the human sacrifices of old, but it is still an appeasement of those deceptive evil spirits. The traditional response to those who do not treat is to have a trick played on the. When you give out Halloween candy, you are, in essence providing a sacrifice to false gods. You are participating in idolatry” says the former high priest of Wicca, Tom Sanguinet.

According to Doc Marquis, this was the phrase ‘trick or treat’ was used by Druid priests on the eve of Samhain when arriving at the homes of their ‘victims’.  If the resident of the house choose treat, the ‘lord of the manor’ would give the druids a member of his household as a human sacrifice offering that night.  The druids would leave a treat, a hallowed out pumpkin filled with human fat and lit it up.  This was to serve as a protection against the demonic forces unleashed that night.  The trick was if the resident did not agree to their terms.  The druids would paint a hexagram on the residents door with human blood to summon demons to this plane of existence to kill someone at that home.
This sounds a lot like Passover and putting the blood of the lamb on the doorpost so that the Angel of Death would pass over your home.  Here we see the blood painted on the door so that death would come to the person’s home.  Yet another perversion of principles set forth in the Torah.  When you study the customs of the heathen this is seen over and over again.  It is also interesting that a hexagram was placed upon the victims doors as this is a perfect picture of the mark of the beast which is nothing more than a counterfeit of the mark of YHWH.

Passover/Chag Ha’Matzot is a mark of YHWH

Exo 13:6  Seven days thou shalt eat unleavened bread, and in the seventh day shall be a feast to the LORD.
Exo 13:7  Unleavened bread shall be eaten seven days; and there shall no leavened bread be seen with thee, neither shall there be leaven seen with thee in all thy quarters.
Exo 13:8  And thou shalt shew thy son in that day, saying, This is done because of that which the LORD did unto me when I came forth out of Egypt.
Exo 13:9  And it shall be for a sign unto thee upon thine hand, and for a memorial between thine eyes, that the LORD’S law may be in thy mouth: for with a strong hand hath the LORD brought thee out of Egypt.

At Pesach the blood was applied to the doors unto LIFE.  At Halloween, the blood is applied to the doors unto DEATH.  This is what it all comes down to.  The way of truth which leads unto life or the way of falsehood which leads to death.
Deu 30:19  I call Heaven and earth to witness against you today that I have set before you life and death, the blessing and the curse. Therefore, choose life, that you may live, you and your seed,

First-born sacrifices are mentioned in a poem in the Dindshenchas, which records that children were sacrificed each Samhain . . . (Rogers, Nicholas. Halloween: From Pagan Ritual to Party Night, p. 17)

Halloween. That was the eve of Samhain . . . firstborn children were sacrificed. . . Samhain eve was a night of dread and danger. (National Geographic. May 1977, pp. 625-626)

Halloween glorifies death and darkness. Passover glorifies life and light.

Passing children through the fire to Molech

Halloween. That was the eve of Samhain . . . firstborn children were sacrificed. . . Samhain eve was a night of dread and danger. (National Geographic. May 1977, pp. 625-626)

Alexander Hislop in his book, The Two Babylons, says, “The god whom the Druids worshipped was Baal, as the blazing Baal-fires show — We know that they offered human sacrifices to their bloody gods. We have evidence that they made `their children pass through the fire to Molech’, and that makes it highly probable that they also offered them in sacrifice; for, from Jeremiah 32:35, compared with Jeremiah 19:5, we find that these two things were parts of one and the same system.” Further, it is to be noted that the “priests of Nimrod or Baal were necessarily required to eat of the human sacrifices; and thus it has come to pass that `Cahna-Bal’, (Cahna is the emphatic form of Cahn which means `a priest’) meaning the priest of Baal, is the established word in our tongue for a devourer of human flesh.” (from The Two Babylons, Hislop. See page 232).

The Burning of the Wicker Man of the Druids of Stonehenge, in which children were offered to the burning flames of sacrifice to the sun god. In Canaanite, Egyptian, and Babylonian times, the wicker man was in the form of Molech, Apis, Baal, Bel, and others

2Ki 23:10  And he defiled Topheth in the valley of the sons of Hinnom, so that no man could cause his son and his daughter to pass through the fire of Molech.

which is the valley of the children of Hinnom; a valley that belonged to the posterity of a man of this name, near to Jerusalem, see Jos_15:8, hence the Greek word “geenna” for hell, in the New Testament:

Gehinnom…translated as hell in most english versions comes from this concept of human sacrifice at the valley of Hinnom.  Halloween is a picture of this ‘hell on earth’.  Demons and evil spirits let loose on the earth.  At the fall of Babylon this is what is seen.  Babylon falls and becomes a habitation of evil spirits and unclean beasts.

Jer 32:34  But they set their idols in the house on which My name has been called, to defile it.

Jer 32:35  And they built the high places of Baal in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to cause their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire to Molech, which I did not command them, nor did it come into My heart, that they should do this detestable thing, to cause Judah to sin.

Jer 7:30  For the sons of Judah have done evil in My eyes, says YHWH. They have set their idols in the house on which is called My name, in order to defile it.
Jer 7:31  They have built the high places of Tophet in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire, which I did not command, nor did it come into My heart.

John Gill commentary

to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire: which was done, as Jarchi says, by putting them into the arms of the brasen image Moloch, heated hot. The account he gives of Tophet is this,

“Tophet is Moloch, which was made of brass; and they heated him from his lower parts; and his hands being stretched out, and made hot, they put the child between his hands, and it was burnt; when it vehemently cried out; but the priests beat a drum, that the father might not hear the voice of his son, and his heart might not be moved:”

but in this he is mistaken; for “Tophet” was not the name of an idol, but of a place, as is clear from this and the following verse. There is some agreement between this account of Jarchi, and that which Diodorus Siculus (z) gives of Saturn, to whom children were sacrificed by the Carthaginians; who had, he says, a brasen image of Saturn*, which stretched out his hands, inclining to the earth; so that a child put upon them rolled down, and fell into a chasm full of fire:

*This is important to note.  The worship of Saturn = Ba’al worship.  This is what Halloween is.  This brazen image of Saturn is the origin of placing children into the lap of Santa Claus.  Halloween (death) and Christmas (birthdays) are intimately connected.  Birthdays originally were celebrations of the dead which can be seen by the Greek word that is translated into ‘birthday’.  This is seen in more detail below on the section of mourning for the dead.  The symbol of Saturn is the hexagram and is associated with this holiday of witchcraft and magic.  The hexagram was placed on the doors of those who would not offer their family members for human sacrifices to the Druid priests as a ‘X marks the spot’ for demonic spirits to attack these homes.

1Ki 11:1  And King Solomon loved many foreign women, even the daughter of Pharaoh, Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidonians, Hittites;
1Ki 11:2  of the nations which Jehovah said to the sons of Israel, You shall not go in to them, and they shall not go in to you; they shall turn aside your heart after their gods; Solomon clung to these in love.

1Ki 11:5  And Solomon went after Ashtoreth, goddess of the Sidonians, and after Milcom, the abomination of the Ammonites;
1Ki 11:6  and Solomon did evil in the sight of Jehovah, and did not go fully after Jehovah like his father David.
1Ki 11:7  Then Solomon built a high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab, in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and for Molech, the abomination of the sons of Ammon;

Jack – O- Lantern

The Jack-O-Lantern – The World Book Encyclopedia, 1977 edition, volume 9, page 24-26 says, “The apparently harmless lighted pumpkin face of `Jack-O-Lantern’ is an ancient symbol of a damned soul.” In the book Occult Conceit the author says on page 190, “The candlelit pumpkin or skull served as a signal to mark those farms and homes that were sympathetic to the Satanists and thus deserving of mercy when the terror (“trick or treat”) of the night began.” Further, an old edition of The World Book Encyclopedia says “The apparently harmless lighted pumpkin face of the Jack-O-Lantern is an ancient symbol of a damned soul.”

The name jack-o’-lantern can be traced back to the Irish legend of Stingy Jack, a greedy, gambling, hard-drinking old farmer.  He tricked the devil into climbing a tree and trapped him by carving a cross into the tree trunk. In revenge, the devil placed a curse on Jack, condemning him to forever wander the earth at night with the only light he had: a candle inside of a hollowed turnip.

Carved and illuminated by a candle, they are symbolic of death and the spirit world. (Thompson, Sue Ellen. Holiday Symbols and Customs, p. 256)

. . . the jack-o’-lantern is generally presented in its traditional form as a festive euphemism for the death’s-head,* the triangular nose hole and rictus grin being the “dead” giveaways. (Skal, David J. Death Makes a Holiday: The Cultural History of Halloween, p. 38)

*This is important to note.  Halloween is a celebration of death which is something that Secret Societies are obsessed with, even today.  The Jack-O-Lantern is seen as the skull & cross-bones today which was/is the symbol of the Thule Society which Adolph Hitler was a member and the Skull & Bones which The Bushes, and many other powerful men are members.

Another interesting connection to these secret societies and Halloween is a place known as Bohemian Grove.  Once a year in the summer, powerful men (mostly Republicans) meet in a heavily secluded ‘campground’ in Monte Rio California.  Much of what they do is secret but the Grove has been infiltrated in the past with video footage taken.  One ritual that was videotaped was the ‘Cremation of Care’.  It is a ceremony where priests dress up like the Druids and offer a ‘mock human sacrifice’ to a giant owl idol which traces back to Molech.

COSTUMES

They originated with these terrible Druid death rites also. As people and animals were screeching in agony while being burned to death the observers would dress in costumes made of animal skins and heads. They would dance, chant and jump through the flames in hope warding off the evil spirits. Again, the early origin of costumes is repulsive. On the evening of October 31st, the Druids, who were the occultic priests and teachers of the Celts, ordered the people to put out their hearth fires. The Druids built a huge new year’s bonfire of oak branches, which they considered sacred. They burned animals, crops and human beings as sacrifices to their sun god Muck Olla and Samhain, their god of death. During this diabolical ceremony the PEOPLE WORE COSTUMES made of animal heads and skins. They then practiced divination, looked for omens in the struggle of the victims sacrificed in the fires, jumped over the flames or dashed through them, danced and sang. All of this was done to frighten the evil spirits away.
According to Man, Myth & Magic, volume 1, page 68, “The guisers went from house to house, singing and dancing. Their bloodcurdling masks and grotesque costumes may have been meant to keep evil at bay, or more likely, were visible representations of the ghosts and goblins that lurked in the night…”
In the 11th edition of Encyclopedia Britannica, volume 12, page 8578 it states, “It was the Druids belief that on the eve of this festival (November 1st, Celtic New Year) Samhain, lord of death, called together the wicked souls (Spirits) that within the past twelve months had been condemned to inhabit the bodies of animals.” Samhain would then send these evil spirits to attack people on the eve before the November 1st celebration. The only way these people could escape was by assuming disguises and looking like evil spirits themselves. (See Christianity Today, October 22, 1982, p.32).

In rituals, a person wearing a mask of a god or spirit often feels possessed by the supernatural being. . . (World Book 2005, p. 263)

The person wearing the mask feels internally transformed and takes on temporarily the qualities of the god or demon represented by the mask. (Biedermann, Hans. Dictionary of Symbolism, p. 218)

BOBBING FOR APPLES

In A.D. 43 the Roman Empire was in solid control of the Celtic people. As a result of this control the idol worshipping Romans introduced another ceremony honoring their false gods to the already demoniacal Druid New Year’s celebration. It was in honor of their goddess of fruit trees. They would try to grasp fruit, floating in water, without the use of their hands. This is the origin of BOBBING FOR APPLES according to the Atlanta Journal & Constitution, Associated Press quote, October 16, 1977.

According to Doc Marquis, this custom traces back to the Druids who used to bring forth victims and give them a choice to bob for apples in a boiling cauldron of oil and if they could successfully pull our the apple they would be set free or they could have their heads chopped off right then and there.

The Black Cat

In the 1959 edition of World Book Encyclopedia, under Halloween it was noted that Druid priests believed that cats were once human beings but were reincarnated as punishment for evil deeds. Because of this they held cats sacred and involved them in their idol worship of October 31st and November 1st.
Druids believed “the cat was sacred and…that cats had once been changed (from being human & reincarnated) into that form as punishment for evil deeds.” (The American Book of Days, by George Douglas)
“Even after Christianity spread to Europe…oxen were sacrificed on October 31st…and in medieval Europe, black cats [were] chosen as victims in the belief that they were witches in disguise [and] were burned on that day (Halloween).” (The American Book of Day, third edition by Hatch)

It is plain to see that cats, particularly BLACK CATS were thought to represent EVIL. Further, they were a symbol of REINCARNATION.

Black cats were associated with darkness and death . . . they embodied demons who performed the witches’ task of maleficia against their neighbors. . . Black cats are said to be the devil himself.” (Guiley, Rosemary Ellen. The Encyclopedia of Witches and Witchcraft, p. 49)

Owls

“On Halloween night, demons in the form of owls were said to have traveled with Witches and their cats . . . some were even believed to be Witches in disguise. . . (Interestingly, the owl was called a strix by the Romans—a word that means “Witch.”)” (Dunwich, Gerina. The Pagan Book of Halloween, p. 43)

Halloween and Babylon

“The first Halloween ritual was celebrated
thousands of years ago in the post-Flood world
in Mesopotamia (now called Iraq). While we do not
know the exact name of this ancient festival,
we do know that it involved worship of fire
and serpents; astrology; witchcraft; magic;
communicating with the spirits; and human
sacrifice. The first of these festivals was
instituted by Nimrod at the Tower of Babel.
Nimrod was a mighty leader of the Babylonian
people and he persuaded them that he was a god
who had come down to earth and as such,
was to be worshipped. The Babylonian people
worshipped him under a variety of names
and titles such as Samas – the Sun God,
Marduk, Merodach, Ninus, Bel / Baal,
Attis – the list is practically endless.
Nimrod, along with his wife, founded what
the Bible refers to as Mystery Babylon –
a pagan, false religious system that included
worship of many gods and goddesses, fire,
serpents, the sun and moon, and the planets.”
-Traditions -The Real Origins of Halloween
by J. R. Terrier ; 2007

“When we think about the history of Halloween
we generally trace its roots back to the time
of the Druids in England, Scotland and Ireland.
In truth, its roots go much further back than that.
The celebration of the “Lord of the Dead” (later
known as Halloween) can be traced to ancient Babylon
and to the trinity worship of Nimrod, the sun god
and his son Tamaz, and the Queen of heaven Samarimas,
wife of Nimrod, mother of Tamaz. This triune god
of Babylon battled with Saman, (also known by a
variety of other names including Samana, Shamhain,
Satan and others), god of the underworld, death,
sin and evil. The ancient priests from Babylon
would roam the countryside demanding contributions
from the people in an effort to appease the god
of death and keep him at bay.”

In Ancient Babylon – “On the eve of all hallows,
a gigantic fire was lighted to ward off the death
god. In the midst of the fire large cages were
suspended containing sacrifices to the god of the
underworld. These sacrifices ranged from beasts,
to children and adults both men and women.
The priests would observe the writhing of the
burning victims and make predictions for the future
based upon the manner in which these poor creatures
screamed and gyrated in their agony within the
confines of those cages.”

“When Julius Caesar entered the British Isles
he was amazed to find that the Druids had adopted
the complete Chaldean (Babylonian) system -
in almost its pure form. In these gruesome
ceremonies – the bodies of the victims were
often eaten by the priests. It is interesting to note
that the Chaldean (Babylonian) word for priest
is “Cahna” and the word for lord is “Baal”
hence, “Cahna-Baal” or priests of Baal (Nimrod)
from which we derive our English word for the
eaters of human flesh, cannabal.”

-Halloween, the Counterfeit “Last Great Day”

By Carl R. Dillenback

The BonFires of Halloween – were originally
called – “bone”Fires – “Sacrificial victims
were led through the streets of the village
by “MASKED” Celtic priests, the Druids,
who ceremonially offered the victims to the
Lord of Death, Satan. From the death agonies
of the “living” victim placed on the altar of
sacrifice, the priests divined the future of
the village from the way the soul departed the
body. This custom originated in BABYLON where the
Babylonian priests’ prayed to the symbolic deity -
Nimrod. The victims were furiously consumed
by the roaring flames, and in the morning, all
that was left were the bones and ashes.
Today without realizing it, people everywhere
practice a similar ritual during the Harvest
Festival, not as “bone fires,” but as “bon fires.”
-The Dark Night of the Soul- Halloween
Excerpts taken from the October 1998,
Lampholder Newsletter

Halloween and the fall of Babylon

Each year millions of children walk through the streets wearing customs and masks, traditionally in the guise of demonic and wicked creatures.

Rev 18:2  And he cried in a strong, great voice, saying, Babylon the great has fallen! It has fallen, and it has become a dwelling-place of demons, and a prison of every unclean spirit, and a prison of every unclean bird, even having been hated,

Isa 13:19  And Babylon, the glory of the kingdoms, the beauty of the pride of the Chaldeans, shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah.
Isa 13:20  It shall not be lived in forever, nor shall it be lived in from generation to generation. And the Arabian shall not pitch a tent there, nor shall the shepherds make flocks lie down there.
Isa 13:21  But the desert creatures (tziyiy yellers) shall lie there; and their houses shall be full of howling creatures (LXX sirens/mermaids); and daughters of owls shall dwell there; and he goats (sair – satyr, demon) shall skip there.
Isa 13:22  And hyenas (iy- wild beast) shall cry along with his widows; and jackals in palaces of delight. Yea, her time to come is near, and her days shall not be prolonged.

Isa 14:22  For I will rise against them, says YHWH of Hosts, and I will cut off the name and remnant, the son and grandson, from Babylon, declares YHWH.
Isa 14:23  Also I will make it a possession of the hedgehog and pools of water; and I will sweep it with the broom of ruin, says YHWH of Hosts.

Isa 34:8  For the day of vengeance is to YHWH, the year of repayments for Zion’s cause.
Isa 34:9  And its torrents shall be turned to pitch, and its dust to brimstone; and its land shall become burning pitch.
Isa 34:10  It shall not be put out night or day; its smoke shall go up forever. From generation to generation, it shall lie waste; no one shall pass through it forever and forever.
Isa 34:11  But the owl (unclean bird that vomits) and the hedgehog (one that shrinks) shall possess it; and the eared owl (unknown bird of the twilight) and the raven shall live in it. And He shall stretch out on it the line of shame, and the stones of emptiness.
Isa 34:12  They shall call its nobles to a kingdom, but none shall be there; and all her rulers shall be nothing.
Isa 34:13  And thorns shall grow in her palaces, nettles and thistles in its fortresses; and it shall be a home for jackals (tan-dragon LXX monsters), a court for daughters of ostriches (LXX daughter of sirens).
Isa 34:14  The desert creatures (Targum – monsters) shall also meet with the howlers; and the shaggy goat (satyr) shall cry to his fellow. The screech owl (Heb. lillith Vulgate- lamla (witch)) shall also settle there, and find a place of rest for herself.
H3917 לילית li^yli^yth
BDB Definition:
1) “Lilith”, name of a female goddess known as a night demon who haunts the desolate places of Edom
1a) might be a nocturnal animal that inhabits desolate places
Līlīth (Syr. and Zab. lelitho), lit., the creature of the night, was a female demon (shēda^h) of the popular mythology; according to the legends, it was a malicious fairy that was especially hurtful to children, like some of the fairies of our own fairy tales.

Here is a short reference to the Owl, Lilith, and Mayday.
“The Sabine flower Goddess Flora holds games when the flowers bloom. Chloris the green Goddess and her followers dance costumed as animals. At the May festival of the sea God Poseidon, flowers were thrown into salt or running water. On May Day by the old-style Julian calendar in Spain, Mary of Fatima appeared above an oak tree, wearing a crown of roses. Old May Day is Garland Day in England. Passing a child through a garland of flowers heals any illness “Blodeuwedd, the original Queen of the May, was created from nine flowers: trefoil, meadowsweet, broom, primrose, bean, oak, cockle, nettle, and chestnut. Transformed into an owl, she is rearing her hatchlings by May Day. Lilith, the owl Goddess of women and wisdom, is celebrated on April 30th

“The Phoenician moon Goddess Tanit was honored at a bare tree woven all around with ribbons. For her Sabbat in May, the great Goddess Ishtar wears a tall conical hat with a wide brim, covered over with flowers. The bonnet of Ishtar became the traditional witch’s hat.”
http://www.webofoz.org/heritage/Beltane.shtml

Isa 34:15  The snake shall nest there, and shall lay, and hatch, and shall gather in her shadow. Vultures shall also be gathered together, each with its mate.

Halloween is a rehearsal of the Fall of Babylon and the dwelling of demons and unclean creatures in that fallen land.  Those who share in this rehearsal now are proclaiming they want to share in its fulfillment.  This is a very scary warning to those who think this holiday is just an innocent night of fun for kids to get candy.

Rev 18:4  And I heard another voice out of Heaven saying, My people, come out of her, that you may not share in her sins, and that you may not receive of her plagues;

Halloween and the Occult

Samhain: This is the “Witch’s New Year” and the primary Sabbat from which all others flow. (RavenWolf, Silver. Teen Witch, p. 42)

Halloween is one of the four major Sabbats celebrated by the modern Witch, and it is by far the most popular and important of the eight that are observed. . . Witches regard Halloween as their New Year’s Eve, celebrating it with sacred rituals. . . (Dunwich, Gerina. The Pagan Book of Halloween, p. 120)

Satanic High Priestess Blanche Barton, on The Church of Satan web site, praises Halloween:

It [Halloween] gives even the most mundane people the opportunity to taste wickedness for one night. They have a chance to dance with the Devil . . . I see Satanists all over the world meeting in small groups this night and Hallowe’ens 500 years hence, to raise a glass to the Infernal Hosts. . .

Festivals of the Dead

The Festival of the Dead is held by many cultures throughout the world in honor or recognition of deceased members of the community, generally occurring after the harvest in August, September, October, or November. In Japanese Buddhist custom the festival honoring the departed (deceased) spirits of one’s ancestors is known as Bon Festival. In Inca religion the entire month of November is Ayamarca, which translates to Festival of the Dead.
In many cultures a single event, Festival of the Dead, lasting up to 3 days, was held at the end of October and beginning of November; examples include the Peruvians, the Hindus, the Pacific Islanders, the people of the Tonga Islands, the Australians, the ancient Persians, the ancient Egyptians, the Japanese, ancient Romans, and the northern nations of Europe.

The souls of the dead

Ecc 9:5  For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten.
Ecc 9:10  Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest.
Psa 146:4  His breath goeth forth, he returneth to his earth; in that very day his thoughts perish.

Haunted Houses?

Job 7:9  As the cloud fades, it goes, so he who goes down to Sheol shall not come up.
Job 7:10  He shall return no more to his house; nor shall his place know him any more.

Ghosts?
1Sa 28:7  Then said Saul unto his servants, Seek me a woman that hath a familiar spirit, that I may go to her, and enquire of her. And his servants said to him, Behold, there is a woman that hath a familiar spirit at Endor.
1Sa 28:8  And Saul disguised himself, and put on other raiment, and he went, and two men with him, and they came to the woman by night: and he said, I pray thee, divine unto me by the familiar spirit, and bring me him up, whom I shall name unto thee.
1Sa 28:9  And the woman said unto him, Behold, thou knowest what Saul hath done, how he hath cut off those that have familiar spirits, and the wizards, out of the land: wherefore then layest thou a snare for my life, to cause me to die?
1Sa 28:10  And Saul sware to her by the LORD, saying, As the LORD liveth, there shall no punishment happen to thee for this thing.
1Sa 28:11  Then said the woman, Whom shall I bring up unto thee? And he said, Bring me up Samuel.
1Sa 28:12  And when the woman saw Samuel, she cried with a loud voice: and the woman spake to Saul, saying, Why hast thou deceived me? for thou art Saul.
1Sa 28:13  And the king said unto her, Be not afraid: for what sawest thou? And the woman said unto Saul, I saw gods ascending out of the earth.

Samuel was not brought up from the grave but a ‘god’, a demon.

1Sa 28:14  And he said unto her, What form is he of? And she said, An old man cometh up; and he is covered with a mantle. And Saul perceived that it was Samuel, and he stooped with his face to the ground, and bowed himself.
1Sa 28:15  And Samuel said to Saul, Why hast thou disquieted me, to bring me up? And Saul answered, I am sore distressed; for the Philistines make war against me, and God is departed from me, and answereth me no more, neither by prophets, nor by dreams: therefore I have called thee, that thou mayest make known unto me what I shall do.

Eternity has been set in our hearts
Ecc 3:11  He has made everything beautiful in its time. Also, He has set eternity in their heart, without which man cannot find out the work that God makes from the beginning even to the end.

Heathen cultures have a fascination with the dead.  Halloween/Festivals of the Dead etc are a perfect example of this.  The Scriptures always focus on life.  The heathens focused on the afterlife of the dead and where the soul would dwell.  The Scriptures point us to the resurrection FROM the dead and eternal life.

We are not to partake in the vain customs of the heathen in regards to the dead

Deu 14:1  You are sons to YHWH your God; you shall not cut yourselves, nor make any baldness between your eyes for the dead.

John Gill commentary
ye shall not cut yourselves; for the dead, as appears from the next clause, as the Heathens did, who not only tore their garments, but their flesh in several parts of their bodies, in their mouths, cheeks, breasts, &c. (r); and used other extravagant signs of mourning, which the apostle cautions against, 1Th_4:13 and were condemned by the Heathens themselves (s). Though some think this refers to incisions the Heathens made in their flesh to the honour of their gods, cutting the names of them therein to whom they devoted themselves; or lashing their bodies at the worship of them, as the worshippers of Baal did when they called upon him, 1Ki_18:28 and so the Jerusalem Targum,”make not marks, marks,”that is, here and there, in many places, or bruises black and blue by striping and beating themselves, for strange worship, or at it, in honour of their gods; but the former sense seems best to agree with what follows; see Lev_19:28,

nor make any baldness between your eyes for the dead; by shaving the forepart of their head or their eyebrows, or both, which used to be done in lamentations for the dead; see Jer_16:6 if this could be thought to have any respect to rites and ceremonies used in the worship of dead and lifeless idols, the customs of the Egyptians might be referred to, who are said to shave their heads and their eyebrows in their sacred rites to Isis (t).

(r) Vid. Virgil. Aeneid. 12. ver. 870, 871. and Servium in Aeneid. 1. ver. 78. and in l. 12. (s) Vid. Cicero de Leg. l. 2. c. 23. and Tusculan. Quaest. l. 3. c. 27. (t) Ambros. Epist. l. 4. c. 30. p. 259.

Lev 19:28  And you shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead; and you shall not put on yourself any etched mark; I am YHWH.

John Gill commentary
Lev 19:28  Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead,…. Either with their nails, tearing their cheeks and other parts, or with any instrument, knife, razor, &c. Jarchi says, it was the custom of the Amorites, when anyone died, to cut their flesh, as it was of the Scythians, as Herodotus (d) relates, even those of the royal family; for a king they cut off a part of the ear, shaved the hair round about, cut the arms about, wounded the forehead and nose, and transfixed the left hand with arrows; and so the Carthaginians, who might receive it from the Phoenicians, being a colony of theirs, used to tear their hair and mouths in mourning, and beat their breasts (e); and with the Romans the women used to tear their cheeks in such a manner that it was forbid by the law of the twelve tables, which some have thought was taken from hence: and all this was done to appease the infernal deities, and to give them satisfaction for the deceased, and to make them propitious to them, as Varro (f) affirms; and here it is said to be made “for the soul”, for the soul of the departed, to the honour of it, and for its good, though the word is often used for a dead body: now, according to the Jewish canons (g), whosoever made but one cutting for a dead person was guilty, and to be scourged; and he that made one for five dead men, or five cuttings for one dead man, was obliged to scourging for everyone of them:

nor print any marks upon you; Aben Ezra observes, there are some that say this is in connection with the preceding clause, for there were who marked their bodies with a known figure, by burning, for the dead; and he adds, and there are to this day such, who are marked in their youth in their faces, that they may be known; these prints or marks were made with ink or black lead, or, however, the incisions in the flesh were filled up therewith; but this was usually done as an idolatrous practice; so says Ben Gersom, this was the custom of the Gentiles in ancient times, to imprint upon themselves the mark of an idol, to show that they were his servants; and the law cautions from doing this, as he adds, to the exalted name (the name of God): in the Misnah it is said (h), a man is not guilty unless he writes the name, as it is said, Lev_19:28; which the Talmudists (i) and the commentators (k) interpret of the name of an idol, and not of God:

I am the Lord; who only is to be acknowledged as such, obeyed and served, and not any strange god, whose mark should be imprinted on them.

(d) Melpomene, sive, l. 4. c. 71. (e) Alex. ab Alex. Genial. Dier. l. 3. c. 7. (f) Apud Servium in Virgil. Aeneid. 3. (g) Misn. Maccot, c. 3. sect. 5. (h) Ibid. sect. 6. (i) T. Bab. Maccot, fol. 21. 1. (k) Jarchi, Maimon. Bartenora, & Ez Chayim in Misn. ut supra. (g))

Adam Clarke
Lev 19:28
Any cuttings in your flesh for the dead – That the ancients were very violent in their grief, tearing the hair and face, beating the breast, etc., is well known. Virgil represents the sister of Dido “tearing her face with her nails, and beating her breast with her fists.”
“Unguibus ora soror foedans, et pectora pugnis.”
Aen., l. iv., ver. 672.
Nor print any marks upon you – It was a very ancient and a very general custom to carry marks on the body in honor of the object of their worship. All the castes of the Hindoos bear on their foreheads or elsewhere what are called the sectarian marks, which distinguish them, not only in a civil but also in a religious point of view, from each other. Most of the barbarous nations lately discovered have their faces, arms, breasts, etc., curiously carved or tattooed, probably for superstitious purposes. Ancient writers abound with accounts of marks made on the face, arms, etc., in honor of different idols; and to this the inspired penman alludes, Rev_13:16, Rev_13:17; Rev_14:9, Rev_14:11; Rev_15:2; Rev_16:2; Rev_19:20; Rev_20:4, where false worshippers are represented as receiving in their hands and in their forehead the marks of the beast. These were called στιγματα stigmata among the Greeks, and to these St. Paul refers when he says, I bear about in my body the Marks (stigmata) of the Lord Jesus; Gal_6:17. I have seen several cases where persons have got the figure of the cross, the Virgin Mary, etc., made on their arms, breasts, etc., the skin being first punctured, and then a blue colouring matter rubbed in, which is never afterward effaced. All these were done for superstitious purposes, and to such things probably the prohibition in this verse refers. Calmet, on this verse, gives several examples. See also Mariner’s Tonga Islands, vol. i. p. 311-313.

Mourning for the dead and birthdaysclick here

Where did the custom of cutting oneself for the dead come from?  It was a celebration of the birthday of Saturn.

From Alexander Hislop’s Two Babylons:

Two Babylons
When it is remembered that Saturn himself was cut in pieces, it is easy to see how the idea would arise of offering a welcome sacrifice to him by setting men to cut one another in pieces on his birthday, by way of propitiating his favour.
The practice of such penances, then, on the part of those of the Pagans who cut and slashed themselves, was intended to propitiate and please their god, and so to lay up a stock of merit that might tell in their behalf in the scales of Anubis.

Mat 14:6  But a birthday* feast for Herod being held, the daughter of Herodias danced in the midst and pleased Herod.

John Gill

This they did, believing him to be the Messiah: and it is further to be observed, that the word here used (for birthday), is said to be proper to the dead, and not to the living;

*G1077 γενέσια genesia
Thayer Definition:
1) a birthday celebration, a birthday feast
1a) the earlier Greeks used this word of funeral commemorations, a festival commemorative of a deceased friend
Part of Speech: noun neuter plural
A Related Word by Thayer’s/Strong’s Number: from a derivative of G1078

“These (say they) are the feasts of idolaters; the “Calends” {New Year’s}, and the “Saturnalia” {Christmas}, the time kept in memory of subduing a kingdom (or when a king takes possession of it, the day of his accession), ויום גנוסיא של מלכים, “and the birthday of kings” (when they are made and crowned, the day of coronation), and the day of birth, and the day of death.” (celebrating the day of birth and death goes back to the Greek word Genesia) Misn. Avoda Zara, c. 1. sect. 3. (pg 660)

Birthdays, Sacrifices

Josephus (Wars of the Jews, vii. 3. 1) refers to Titus’ celebration of his brother’s and father’s birthdays (genéthlia) by slaughtering Jewish captives.

Astrology, & Horoscopes

The Encyc. Of Religion and Ethics (ERE), art. Birth (Assyro-Babylonian), Vol. 2, p. 643).

We know beyond doubt from tablets of later date that the hour of birth was carefully noted and the horoscopes were cast, based on careful notations of celestial observations. From tablet K 1285 we deduce that ceremonies were carried out in the Temple of Ishtar, or Istar (Easter), at least for children of people of note. In this tablet she is addressed as Queen of Nineveh (ibid., p. 644).

At Halloween, it was believed that predicting the future was at its most opportune time based on astrology and reading the reactions of those who were being sacrificed etc…

“From the death agonies
of the “living” victim placed on the altar of
sacrifice, the priests divined the future of
the village from the way the soul departed the
body.”  -The Dark Night of the Soul- Halloween
Excerpts taken from the October 1998,
Lampholder Newsletter

Holiday researcher George Douglas adds some interesting information when he says “Many of Halloween’s customs are derived from the ancient Baal Festivals. Other customs originate from the taking of omens from the struggles of victims in the fires of druidic sacrifices.” (From: The American Book of Days, by George William Douglas revised by Helen Douglas Compton).

Purim connection

Est 3:5  And when Haman saw that Mordecai did not bow nor worship him, then Haman was filled with fury.
Est 3:6  And it was light in his eyes to reach forth a hand against Mordecai alone; for they had revealed to him Mordecai’s people. And Haman sought to destroy all the Jews in all the kingdom of Ahasuerus, the people of Mordecai.
Est 3:7  In the first month, it is the month Nisan, in the twelfth year of King Ahasuerus, they made fall Pur, that is, the lot, before Haman day by day, and from month to month, to the twelfth month, the month Adar.

פּוּר is an Old-Persian word meaning lot (sors); in modern Persian, bâra signifies time,

Adam Clarke

We see plainly intimated by the Hebrew text that they cast lots, or used a species of divination, to find which of the twelve months would be the most favorable for the execution of Haman’s design; and, having found the desired month, then they cast lots, or used divination, to find out which day of the said month would be the lucky day for the accomplishment of the enterprise. But the Hebrew text does not tell us the result of this divination; we are left to guess it out; but the Greek supplies this deficiency, and makes all clear. From it we find that, when they cast for the month, the month Adar was taken; and when they cast for the day, the fourteenth (Heb. thirteenth) of that month was taken.

Albert Barnes

“Pur” is supposed to be an old Persian word etymologically connected with the Latin “pars”, and signifying “part” or “lot.” The practice of casting lots to obtain a lucky day still obtains in the East, and is probably extremely ancient. A lot seems to have been cast, or a throw of some kind made, for each day of the month and each month of the year. The day and month which obtained the best throws were then selected. Assyrian calendars note lucky and unlucky days as early as the eighth century B.C. Lots were in use both among the Oriental and the Classical nations from a remote antiquity.

Adolph Hitler is known as a modern day Haman.  As seen above, Hitler was a member of a ‘death’s head’ secret society known as the Thule society.  Hitler marked those who were doomed to death with a hexagram, much like the doors that were painted with the same symbol by the Druids.

What is the Thule Society?

They were Satanists who practiced Black Magic — this means that they were “solely concerned with raising their consciousness by means of rituals to awareness of evil and nonhuman intelligences in the universe; and with achieving means of communication with these intelligences.” (Ravenscroft, Spear of Destiny p. 161).

Thule members practiced a form of Sexual Magic derived from a lodge of which Aleister Crowley was a member. Crowley was recognized as the foremost worshipper of Satan in the 19th Century. “The origin of this…medieval magic…can be traced to a Freemason, Robert Little, who founded the Societas Rosicruciana in 1865… (Ravenscroft, Spear of Destiny, p. 164-5). While the actual sexual perversions which were practiced are too offensive to share, the results are not. Author Revenscroft stated that “indulgence in the most sadistic rituals awakened penetrating vision into the workings of Evil Intelligences and bestowed phenomenal magical powers.” (Ibid. p. 167).

These sexual perversions can be seen today at the Bohemian Grove.  There has been much documentation of homosexual activities being wide-spread amongst the members of this club.

Thule society believed in “communication with a hierarchy of Supermen — The Secret Chiefs of the Third Order”. (Ibid) The quality which make these beings supermen was occultic spirituality. Further, they believed in Madame Blavatsky’s Secret Doctrine, which teaches that certain superman had survived the destruction of Atlantis with their higher levels of consciousness intact. These supermen were Aryans. These two beliefs combined into one through the Thule Society and Hitler, culminating into the Nazi Death Camps. (Ibid, p. 166).

• Thule society believed in “communication with a hierarchy of Supermen — The Secret Chiefs of the Third Order”. (Ibid) The quality which make these beings supermen was occultic spirituality. Further, they believed in Madame Blavatsky’s Secret Doctrine, which teaches that certain superman had survived the destruction of Atlantis with their higher levels of consciousness intact. These supermen were Aryans. These two beliefs combined into one through the Thule Society and Hitler, culminating into the Nazi Death Camps. (Ibid, p. 166). When one group of people incorporate into their spiritual belief structure that they are inherently superior to another group of people, it is inevitable that genocide will be attempted as soon as possible.
• The Thule Society regularly held occultic seances, during which time they communicated with demons who were either masquerading as a dead person or who were just appearing as their guiding spirits. Dietrich Eckart, Alfred Rosenberg, and Adolf Hitler invoked the Anti-Christ into manifestation at the mediumistic seances of the Thule Group in Munich.” (Ravenscroft, Spear of Destiny, p. 168) Eckert believed he had been told by his guiding spirit he would have the privilege of training the coming Great One, the Anti-Christ. From the beginning of their association, Eckert believed Hitler was Anti-Christ. Therefore, Eckert spared no occultic knowledge, ritual, or perversion in his attempt to fully equip Hitler for the role. Once the training was completed, Hitler believed he was “born anew with that super-personal strength and resolution he would need to fulfill the mandate … ordained for him.” (p. Ravenscroft, p. 93-4)

The Skull and Bones also incorporates sexual activities into their practices. “The death of the initiate will be as frightful as the use of human skeletons and ritual psychology can make it…” (Esquire Magazine, “The Last Secrets of Skull and Bones”, Ron Rosenbaum, p. 89). Sexual perversion is part of ritual psychology. Ron Rosenbaum, author of the Esquire Magazine article, stated that on initiation night, called tap night, “…if one could climb to the tower of Weir Hall, the odd castle that overlooks the Bones courtyard, one could hear strange cries and moans coming from the bowels of the tomb as the 15 newly tapped members were put through what sounded like a harrowing ordeal…” (Esquire, September, 1976, p. 86).

Further,[initiates] “lay naked in coffins and tell their deepest and darkest sexual secrets as part of their initiation.” (Esquire, p. 85). These experiences in the coffins incorporated sexual pain and resulted in being born-again, into the Order, as we mentioned above. (Cooper, p.95) Powerful force charges through the participants of these ceremonies, transforming their lives dramatically. This type ritual is classic Satanism. Anton LaVey states, in his book The Satanic Rituals: Companion To The Satanic Bible, (p. 57)

“The ceremony of rebirth takes place in a large coffin..This is similar to the coffin symbolism that…is found in most lodge rituals.”

To the un-initiated these secret societies are obsessed with death, just as Halloween appears to be an obsession with death.  On a deeper level they are actually obsessed with life.  Death to bring life.  This is the theory of evolution.  The death of the weak brings forth a more evolved being.  Sacrifice the weak so that the strong can become stronger and obtain the favor of the ‘gods.’    Ultimately the goal of these secret societies/mystery religion priests is to bring about a utopian society of evolved men known as homo-noeticus (supermen).

Why does it say 322 at the bottom of the Skull & Bones symbol?

Gen 3:22  And YHWH God said, Behold! The man has become as one of Us, to know good and evil. And now, lest he put forth his hand and also take from the Tree of Life, and eat, and live forever,

Also notice that the skull in the above picture has a head wound…

Rev 13:3  And I saw one of its heads, as having been slain to death, and its deadly wound was healed. And all the earth wondered after the beast.

Ultimately, this is what Halloween points to.  The Antichrist.  The Feasts (holidays) in the Holy Scriptures are wedding rehearsals for the Messiah and His Bride.  Halloween, Christmas, Easter etc are wedding rehearsals for the Antichrist and his bride.

In the Scriptures, there is no custom of honoring the dead or giving worship to the dead.  Contact with the dead brought uncleanness and kept you from drawing close to the Most High who dwelt in the midst of the camp.

Contact with the dead brings uncleanness
Num 19:11  He that touches the dead body of any man shall be unclean seven days.
Num 19:12  He shall cleanse himself for it on the third day, and on the seventh day he shall be clean. And if he does not cleanse himself on the third day, then on the seventh day he shall not be clean.
Num 19:13  Anyone who touches the dead body, the body of a man who dies, and does not cleanse himself, he shall have defiled the tabernacle of YHWH; and that person shall be cut off from Israel, for the water of impurity shall not be sprinkled upon him. He shall be unclean; his uncleanness shall be still on him.

The unclean were to dwell outside of the camp

Num 5:1  And YHWH spoke to Moses, saying,
Num 5:2  Command the sons of Israel, and they shall send every leper out of the camp, and everyone with an issue, and everyone defiled by a dead body.
Num 5:3  You shall send out from male and female. You shall send them to the outside of the camp. And they shall not defile their camps in the midst of which I dwell.
Num 5:4  And the sons of Israel did so, and put them outside the camp. As YHWH spoke to Moses, so the sons of Israel did.

Lepers were as dead and not allowed within the camp
Num 12:12  I pray, do not let her be as one who is dead, of whom the flesh is half consumed when he comes out of his mother’s womb.

Nazarite Vow
Num 6:6  All the days of his separation to YHWH he shall not go near a dead person.

High priest
Lev 21:10  And the high priest of his brothers, on whose head the anointing oil is poured, and whose hand is consecrated to put on the garments, his head shall not be uncovered, nor his garments torn;
Lev 21:11  nor shall he come near any dead person; he shall not defile himself for his father or for his mother;

Priesthood
Lev 21:1  And YHWH said to Moses, Speak to the priests, Aaron’s sons, and you shall say to them, None shall be defiled for the dead among his people.
Lev 21:2  But for his relative who is near to him, for his mother, and for his father, and for his son, and for his daughter, and for his brother,
Lev 21:3  and for his sister, the virgin, who is near to him, who has not been with a man, for her he may be defiled.
Lev 21:4  A leader shall not defile himself among his people, to pollute himself;
Lev 21:5  they shall not make their heads bald, and they shall not shave the corner of their beard; and they shall not make a cutting in their flesh;
Lev 21:6  they are holy to their God, and they shall not pollute the name of their God. For they offer the fire offerings of YHWH, bread of their God, and they are holy.

The Messiah teaches us not to get caught up in focusing on the dead.

Mat 8:22  But Jesus said to him, Follow Me, and allow the dead to bury their own dead.
Secondary burial;  Ossilegium…during this time there was a custom amongst Jews that a year after the burial of a person a loved one would come back to the grave when the flesh had rotted off of the bones and this had to do with atoning for sins.

The Jerusalem Talmud states: When the flesh had wasted away, the bones were collected and placed in chests (ossuaries).  On that day (the son) mourned, but the following day he was glad, because his forebears rested from judgment (Moed Qatan 1:5).

Messiah teaches us to leave off these superstitions about the dead and to follow Him.  Eternal life is a gift that is given by putting our faith in Him.  Not elaborate burial procedures and customs that the living do for the dead.  The dead do not need us to pray for them or to them.  Those who partake of these vain customs usually have a skewed view of what the Scriptures teach about death.  We are to seek first the Kingdom and His righteousness.  The Kingdom is about life.  It is about resurrection FROM the dead, not the continuation of life after death.  It is about the restoration of the Garden of Eden.

2 Esdras 9:13 And therefore be thou not curious how the ungodly shall be punished, and when: but enquire how the righteous shall be saved, whose the world is, and for whom the world is created.

Rom 6:23  For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is everlasting life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Triennial Torah portion 2009

Deut 11:26-12:19…speaks of destroying the idols, Asherah and high places of the heathen
Isa 54:11-55:6
Psalm 119:49-72…

Psa 119:55  O YHWH, I have remembered Your name in the night and have kept Your Law.

Here we see that the righteous believer remembers the Name & Torah of YHWH in the night.  Halloween represents the night & darkness.

Layil comes from the root lamed lamed which means night/howl.

Lilith is the demon of the night…interesting.

Psa 119:61  The cords (to bind with a rope) of the wicked encircle* (KJV robbed) me; I have not forgotten Your Law.
*from the root:

Halloween is a festival that ‘binds’ believers and is celebrated in a repeated fashion each year on the same day.  This is the same root word for mo’edim which is translated as the feasts/appointed times of YHWH.  Here we see in Psalm 119 that believers are not to forgot the Torah even though we are bound on all sides by pagan feasts.  We are to keep the Torah in the night and be lights to this fallen world.

Luke 6:20-49

Videos
click here…Halloween is at the 2 hour 30 minute mark of the video on this website.  A documentary on Halloween by the History channel is on this page as well as the Order of Death by Alex Jones about Bohemian Grove and the Death’s Head cult.

littleguyintheeye@gmail.com

Subscribe to Little Guy in the Eye

LittleGuyintheEye

The Pharaohs must have been bisexual, like the Freemasons, Illuminati, Skulls & Bones members, etc.

From: Jeff Fenske

“The entire purpose of masonry is a continual progression toward THE LIGHT.”

“LUCIFER, is it he who bears THE LIGHT? Doubt it not.”

— Albert Pike, founder:
Scottish Rite Freemasonry & Ku Klux Klan

Alex talks with Chris Pinto, award-winning filmmaker and director of Secret Mysteries of America’s Beginnings, a documentary revealing the esoteric tradations hidden within the signs and symbols of the infrastructure of the United States. The DVD is available at the Infowars Store.

.
“…170 to 200 million people were slaughtered by corrupt governments
just in the 20th century.”

— Chris Pinto

Chris Pinto also quotes from this comment from Skull-and-Bonesman George W. Bush, emphasizing the fire-burning part:

“Because we have acted in the great liberating tradition of this nation, tens of millions have achieved their freedom. And as hope kindles hope, millions more will find it. By our efforts we have lit a fire as well, a fire in the minds of men. It warms those who feel its power; it burns those who fight its progress. And one day this untamed fire of freedom will reach the darkest corners of our world.”

Antiwar explains what is likely the true origin of Bush’s comment, saying:

“In Dostoevsky’s novel, that fire in the minds of men is not a yearning for liberty, but a nihilistic will to power that can only end in destruction. Put in George W. Bush’s mouth, those words are not a paean to freedom, but a manifesto of pure destructionism.”

Related: Masonry: Conspiracy Against Christianity — “After the 30th degree, every Mason takes a vow with the sword in his hand to destroy Christianity”

Gracias Al Blog http://despiertaya.wordpress.com/ Por Publicar Este Documental Que Aporta Mucha Informacion Sobre el 11 S

Lo Que  Realmente Paso Ese Dia Del 9/11 del 2001.Y Gracias Por Publicar Nuestro Blog En Su Pagina ,Saludos Dios Los Bendiga.

Tenemos Que Realizar Nuestras Propias Investigaciones Sobre Lo que Realmente Sucedio Aquel Dia Tragico,No dejemos Que La Media Nos Manipule y Trate De Engañarnos. Investigemos Mas Sobre El Tema Usando Nuestro Propio Criterio Y Asi Obtener Nuestra Propia Conclusion De Ello,Zero Documental Sobre el 11 S.

Con argumentos científicos en la mano, un grupo de personas de primera línea mediática perteneciente a diferentes ámbitos: Giulietto Chiesa (Europarlmentario), Dario Fo (Premio Nobel de literatura), Gore Vidal (Escritor americano) o Andreas von Bülow (ex-ministro de defensa alemán) entre otros, desgranan los hechos punto por punto desmontando las inconsistencias de la versión oficial.

La diferencia de este documental con respecto a otros de la misma temática, aparte del doblaje y no la subtitulación del film, es que por primera vez un grupo de la vanguardia social demanda una nueva investigación de los hechos. No son los únicos, en una encuesta de la CNN, se concluye que nada menos que el 84% de la población Estadounidense cree que el gobierno de los EE.UU. ha ocultado los verdaderos acontecimientos del 11-S.

Parte 3

Parte 4

Para Mirar el Resto De La Pelicula (Aqui)

Anmerkung: Der vorliegende, zweiteilige Text umfasst das erste (Teil 1) und das letzte Kapitel (Teil 2) des Buches Order out of Chaos – Elite Sponsored Terrorism and the New World Order des in England lebenden Infowars-Journalisten und Autoren Paul Joseph Watson. Das Buch erschien bereits 2003 und ist aktueller denn je.

—–

ORDNUNG AUS CHAOS– Elitär gesponserter Terrorismus und die Neue Weltordnung

von Paul Joseph Watson

Kapitel 1

Einführung

Eine Neue Weltordnung wird derzeit errichtet und es ist die größte Gefahr, der sich die Menschheit wohl jemals gegenüber sah. Mehr noch, sie ist eine Bedrohung für jeden Einzelnen von uns, auch auf individueller Basis. Sie ist eine Gefahr für unsere Familie, unsere Art zu leben und die Zukunft unserer Kinder. Sie werden lernen, was es ist, wer dahinter steckt und was diese Leute tun um es zu verwirklichen und warum sie es tun. Und Sie werden auch erfahren was wir selber tun können um seine Zerstörung sicherzustellen.

Der größte Teil dieses Buches besteht aus Namen, Orten und Daten. Alles wird von Berichten in den Mainstream-Medien dokumentiert. Die vorliegende Menge an Zitaten aus der Mainstream-Presse, die ich hier einfüge, war vor gut zehn Jahren noch nicht denkbar aber heute schon, denn die Agenda ist mittlerweile so offen einsehbar, dass wir uns ihr nicht mehr verschließen können. Der überwiegende Teil des Buches konzentriert sich exklusiv auf neue Informationen, die nach dem 11. September 2001 ans Tageslicht kamen. Während ich dort, wo es absolut nötig ist, Hintergrundinformationen anbiete, wie zum Beispiel im ersten Kapitel, müssen viele Themen übergangen werden. Ereignisse wie der Bombenanschlag von Oklahoma City oder die Kennedy-Ermordung sind zwar Teil der Agenda, sie wurden jedoch bereits von anderen investigativen Forschern zur Genüge dokumentiert und es wäre reine Zeitverschwendung, hier altes Material neu aufzuwärmen. Dieses Buch ist bloss einer von vielen Schlüsseln, die Sie brauchen werden um die Wahrheit aufzuschlüsseln womit ich die Empfehlung aussprechen möchte, sich auch mit all jenen Themen zu beschäftigen, die in diesem Buch nicht behandelt werden können, falls Sie das nicht schon getan haben.

Der Hunger, die Gewalt, das Leiden, die Völkermorde und der blanke Horror, die so viele Teile der “Dritten Welt” so lange heimgesucht haben kommen nun in unsere Breitengrade. Es ist jedoch nichts in Stein gemeißelt und wir können diesen Prozess zu jedem Zeitpunkt rückgängig machen. Jeder von uns hat nun die Gelegenheit, die Welt in einem Bereich, in dem er oder sie außergewöhnliche Fähigkeiten vorweist, zum Besseren zu verändern. Leider ergreifen viele diese Chance jedoch nicht weil sie nicht darauf vorbereitet sind, sich dem Risiko auszusetzen, vom für sie in manipulativer Weise vorgesehenen Pfad abzuweichen.

“Die meisten Menschen können nicht denken, und viele der Übrigen wollen nicht denken. Die kleine Fraktion derjenigen, die tatsächlich denkt, kann es jedoch oft nicht auf eine angemessen gute Weise tun. Die extrem winzige Gruppe derjenigen, die regelmäßig, akkurat, kreativ und ohne Selbstbetrug denken sind langfristig betrachtet genau die Leute, auf die es wirklich ankommt.“

- Robert Heinlein

Das Wesen der Intelligenz definiert sich im Rahmen der von der Allgemeinheit akzeptierten, konditionierten „Norm“ dadurch, wie viele Nummern man zusammenzählen oder wie viele Namen man bestimmten historischen Daten zuordnen kann. Das ist keine Intelligenz des Geistes, sondern lediglich ein System des Verstandes. Solche Systeme sind wie Maschinen oder Computer, ihr Potential wird durch die Intelligenz derer limitiert, die diese erschaffen haben. So kommt es, dass die Denksysteme, die sich hinter dem Begriff der „Intelligenz“ verstecken nur so effektiv funktionieren wie die Qualität des „Treibstoffs“, der ihnen von Beginn an zugestanden wird. Denksysteme können jederzeit vom Kontrolleur des Systems (z.B. der Regierung) verändert werden. Sie könnten sagen, dass 2 + 2 = 5 sei und der überweigende Teil der Leute würde es nicht hinterfragen. Das zeigt uns, dass solche Denk- und Verstandesmuster nicht mit Intelligenz zu verwechseln sind, denn Intelligenz ist endlos, ganzheitlich und unveränderlich. Es würde uns nicht weiterbringen einfach nur an all die Ereignisse zu erinnern, über die ich hier in diesem Buch schreibe und diese mit Datumsangaben, Namen und Orten zu verknüpfen um das dann einfach jemandem zu präsentieren. Sie müssen die harten Fakten mit persönlicher Einsicht kombinieren. Nur das wird die Leute dazu bringen die Dinge auf einem Level von echter Intelligenz zu betrachten.

Wer sind ‘sie’ und was wollen ‘sie’ überhaupt?

Worum geht es in diesem Buch? Die Neue Weltordnung ist keine ‚Verschwörung‘ im eigentlichen Sinne sondern eine Agenda. Diese Agenda wird von einer machtvollen Elite vorangetrieben, die von sich selbst glaubt, dass sie das göttliche Recht habe eine totale Kontrolle über unser Leben auszuüben. Aber wer sind ‚sie‘? Wer gehört dieser ‚Machtelite‘ im Einzelnen an? Es ist die UN, die EU, der Council on Foreign Relations, die Bilderberg-Gruppe, die Trilaterale Kommission, die Rockefeller-Familie, die Rothschild-Familie, das Royal Institute of International Affairs, der Club of Rome. Die Liste ist noch länger und es wurden bereits viele Bücher über die Geschichte dieser Gruppen geschrieben und wie sie miteinander verwoben sind. Die Absicht dieses Buches besteht darin aufzuzeigen wie sich deren vereinigte Agenda in wichtigen Ereignissen unserer Tage manifestiert wobei diese vor allem unter dem Aspekt der Hegelschen Dialektik betrachtet werden sollen. Diese Gruppen und ihre gemeinsame Agenda zu erforschen bedeutet zu erkennen, wer unser Schicksal steuert und wo dieser Planet enden wird, wenn wir uns nicht gegen ihre Agenda aussprechen.

Die Agenda sieht eine weltweite Konsolidierung und Zentralisierung von Macht in den Händen einer alles umfassenden Weltregierung vor. Dieses System wird aus der (bereits existierenden) Europäischen Union, der (aus NAFTA abgeleiteten) Nordamerikanischen Union und der Asiatischen Union entstehen. Wenn diese drei Regionalmodelle stehen wird man sie miteinander verschmelzen um die One-World-Regierung zu schaffen.

Das Gesellschaftsmodell an dem sie arbeiten und die im Aufbau befindlichen Kontroll-mechanismen um jene Weltregierung zu ‘ergänzen’ vereinen in sich die jeweils extremsten Aspekte von Kommunismus und Faschismus, vermischt mit einer alptraumhaften, orwellianischen Technokratie. Im Einzelnen (und ohne besondere Reihenfolge) beinhalten diese: eine Weltarmee; ein global zentralisiertes Bankensystem; die komplette Zerstörung von nationaler Identität und Patriotismus; die Zerstörung aller Religionen, außer ihrer eigenen, neuen ‚Welt-Religion‘; die Fähigkeit, jede einzelne Person durch Gedankenkontrolle zu steuern (in Verbindung mit Mikrochips); das Ende der Industrialisierung; die Übernahme der Umweltbewegung an den jeweiligen Spitzen ihrer Hierarchie um sie für umfassende Beschlagnahmungen von Privatland zu mißbrauchen; die Durchführung eines Programmes zur Depopulation (Entvölkerung) mittels Kriegen, Impfprogrammen, Hungersnöten und Krankheiten um am Ende bis zu 80% der Weltbevölkerung auszulöschen; die Förderung des Konsums und schließlich auch die Legalisierung von harten Drogen; die Verklärung von Pornographie und anderen hedonistischen Auswüchsen zu einer „Kunstform“; die Unterdrückung wissenschaftlicher Entwicklung mit der Ausnahme von Technologie, welche die Realisierung ihrer Agenda vorantreibt (ein Beispiel hierfür wären Kalte Fusion und andere Technologien, die unsere Abhängigkeit von fossilen Brennstoffen beenden könnten); die Demoralisierung der Menschheit und die Schaffung einer Kultur, die immer dekadenter und dekadenter wird, in der das Kranke und Absurde zur Normalität wird – dies schafft man über Drogen, Pornographie, geistloses Fernsehen, degenerierte Rock, Pop, Rap und Hip-Hop-Musik (neben anderer); die Förderung von ‚Multikulturalismus‘, Immigration und die Bezeichnung aller, die vor den Gefahren dieser warnen als „Rassisten“; den Versuch, Pädophilie, Vergewaltigungen und sexuelle Wilderei als akzeptabel und respektabel zu etablieren; die Verursachung eines totalen wirtschaftlichen Zusammenbruches der Weltwirtschaft und politischem Chaos als Folge dessen; die Durchdringung und Unterwanderung aller Regierungen und deren Nötigung, die nationale Souveränität zu zerstören; die Kontrolle über das Bildungssystem in der entwickelten Welt mit dem Ziel, Informationen, die nicht dem Konsens unterliegen zu unterdrücken und linksliberale, sozialistische Standpunkte zu verbreiten (der Sozialismus maskiert sich als Bewegung der unterdrückten Massen ist aber in Wahrheit ein Versuch der Elite, Reichtum und Macht zu konsolidieren); die Benutzung von Terrorismus oder „Schreckorrismus“ als Mittel um die Zustimmung der Bevölkerung zu bekommen, damit diese jene Agenda unterstützt und ihre Grundrechte aufgibt wenn man ihr die Agenda als die „Lösung“ für das Terrorismusproblem präsentiert.

Es gibt viele untergeordnete Ziele innerhalb dieser Agenda, die unter eines der oben genannten Fallen. Wie Ihnen sicher schon aufgefallen ist, wurden viele dieser Ziele bereits realisiert.

Die Wege um diese Agenda zu besiegen werden wir später in diesem Buch behandeln aber es ist schon ein großer Schritt getan wenn man zunächst einmal weiß, was diese Agenda ist und wenn man anderen davon erzählt, wie sie direkt unter dieser zu leiden haben. Das wird die Leute aus ihrer Apathie holen, sie wachrütteln und sie realisieren lassen, dass sie angegriffen werden. Ihr Überlebensmechanismus wird einsetzen und sie werden sich selbst und andere über diese Angelegenheiten informieren. Erinnern wir uns daran, dass diejenigen, die im Zuge der Amerikanischen Revolution für die Freiheit kämpften und starben lediglich 5% der Bevölkerung hinter sich hatten. Um zu vermeiden, dass wir für die Freiheit sterben müssen ist es notwendig den Informationskrieg zu gewinnen.

Die Neue Weltordnung in den Abendnachrichten

Während der letzten Jahre sahen wir etwas, das wir als das In-Erscheinung-treten der Hierarchie bezeichnen können. Mit anderen Worten: Die Mainstream-Medien berichten mittlerweile offen, dass es eine Agenda zum Aufbau einer Weltregierung gibt und das diese von Geheimgesellschaften vorangetrieben werde. Eine der mächtigsten und bekanntesten von ihnen ist Skull and Bones, die von William H. Russell in den 1830er Jahren gegründet wurde und ein Ableger der Geheimgesellschaft der Illuminaten aus dem 18. Jahrhundert ist. Sie hat ihren Sitz in der Yale Universität und bezeichnet sich selbst als die „Bruderschaft des Todes“ („The Brotherhood of Death“). George W. Bush gibt in seiner eigenen Autobiographie zu, Mitglied von Skull and Bones zu sein. Im April 2001 gelang es Journalisten von ABC News und dem New York Observer heimliche Aufnahmen von bizarren Ritualen zu machen bei denen Mitglieder anderen in simulierter Weise die Kehle durchschneiden.

Die meisten der spekulativen Geschichten um das Aufnahmeritual von Skull and Bones dreht sich um dessen Todesfixierung. Abgesehen vom offensichtlichen Logo der Gesellschaft, das einen Totenkopf mit gekreuzten Knochen zeigt, dreht sich eine der immer wieder bestätigten Geschichten darum, dass sich die Anwärter während ihres Abschlussjahres im Keller der Krypta, dem sogenannten Bones Tomb, aufhalten, wo sie sich in einen Sarg legen müssen und in zwei langen, intensiven psychodramatischen Sitzungen autobiographische Details von sich Preis geben müssen was insbesondere deren persönliche sexuelle Vergangenheit mit einschliesst. Dies erzählen sie jeweils den anderen nur 14 Neumitgliedern, die jedes Jahr angeworben werden. Damit sollen sie ein Leben lang aneinander gebunden werden und sich auf ihr Schicksal als Verwalter der herrschenden Klasse vorbereiten. [Quelle: ‚At Skull and Bones, Bush’s Secret Club Initiates Ream Gore‘ – Ron Rosenbaum, The New York Observer, 23. April 2001; http://www.nyobserver.com/pages/story.asp?ID=4136]

Bei den Wahlen von 2004 werden mit George W. Bush und höchstwahrscheinlich John Kerry gleich zwei Skull-and-Bones-Mitglieder gegeneinander antreten. Vor ein paar Jahren noch wurde jeder, der über Skull and Bones sprach als „Verschwörungstheoretiker“ verunglimpft. Mittlerweile jedoch berichten sogar USA Today seelenruhig über jenen Verein.

‘Bonesmen’ haben Bush seit langer Zeit geholfen. Er erhielt einen erheblichen Teil seiner ersten Finanzierungsgeschäfte durch sie und fragte sie stets um Hilfe wenn er einen neuen Job brauchte oder auf der Suche nach Investoren und Wahlkampfhilfen war. Sogar in seinen Kauf eines Baseball-Teams war mindestens ein ‚Bonesman‘ verwickelt. Während seiner Zeit als Präsident gab Bush seinen dunklen Brüdern Jobs in hohen Positionen, wie etwa im Fall von Edward McNally, Chefjurist beim Office of Homeland Security und assoziierter Rechtsberater für nationale Sicherheit. Und obwohl eines seiner ersten gesellschaftlichen Beisammensein im Weißen Haus eine Skull-and-Bones-Versammlung war spielte Bush den Unwissenden als er kürzlich dazu befragt wurde: „Diese Sache ist so geheim dass ich mir nicht mal sicher bin ob sie überhaupt existiert“, war seine Antwort. [Quelle: ‚White House Bonesman leads nation into the dark‘, Alexandra Robbins, USA Today, 25. September 2002, http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2002-09-25-opcom_x.htm]

Die Bilderberg-Gruppe ist eine der wichtigsten Organisationen bei der Beeinflussung von globalen Entwicklungen. Zweifellos gibt es noch viele hierarchisch höhere Gruppen von denen wir bislang nichts wissen.

Seit 1954 hat sich die geheime Bilderberg-Gruppe (benannt nach einem niederländischen Hotel in dem sie ihr erstes Treffen abhielten) jedes Jahr getroffen um über Veränderungen in der Politik, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft auf globaler Ebene zu diskutieren und viele Veränderungen soweit möglich auch durch eigene Initiative herbeizuführen. Natürlich können ranghohe Funktionäre aus der Welthandelsorganisation, der Federal Reserve, aus Finanzinstitutionen wie den Rockefeller-Banken, der EU, der UN und den Ölkonzernen nicht zu ein und der selben Gruppe gehören wie führende Politiker und Vertreter der Massenmedien? Doch, das können sie. Sie alle gehören zur Bilderberg-Gruppe.

In den frühen 1990er Jahren wurde ein relativ unbekannter innenpolitischer Sprecher der Labour Party, Tony Blair, zu einer Bilderberg-Konferenz eingeladen. Im Jahr 1997 war er bereits Premierminister von Großbritannien. In einem ähnlichen Fall Ende der 80er Jahre nahm ein wenig bekannter Gouverneur von Arkansas namens Bill Clinton die Einladung zu einem Bilderberg-Treffen mit Freude an. Ein paar Jahre später war er als US-Präsident Anführer der sogenannten „freien“ Welt. William Hague ist ein Bilderberger, der während der letzten Wahlen einen falschen „Oppositionellen“ gegenüber Tony Blair simulierte. Er schob eine schwache Anti-EU-Position vor, mit der er jämmerlich versagte. Damit sollte eine Anti-EU-Haltung (eigentlich eine Haltung, die orwellsche Machtblöcke ablehnt) als veraltet und im Zusammenhang mit dem lächerlichen Wahlkampf der Tories dargestellt werden. Europa ist gut und liebt uns alle, Souveränität ist böse, rechtsextrem, rassistisch und nicht mehr zeitgemäß. Es stimmt, ich las es genau so in der Zeitung. Und wem gehört jene Zeitung? Der Bilderberg-Gruppe.

Wer gehört nun also zu den anderen, mehr oder weniger geheimen Lenkungsorganisationen wie etwa dem Council on Foreign Relations und der Trilateralen Kommission? Es sind die selben Leute. Unten finden Sie eine Liste mit Bilderberg-Teilnehmern. Diese Liste ist keineswegs vollständig. Mehr als 50 der Teilnehmer weigern sich, namentlich genannt zu werden. Die unten stehenden Personen nahmen am Treffen des Jahres 2000 in Belgien statt, welches im Chateau du Lac Hotel in Genvel nahe Brüssel abgehalten wurde. Die Bilderberger veröffentlichten eine kurze Pressenotiz nach der sie bloß zu einem harmlosen Gedankenaustausch zusammenkommen wollen ohne irgendwelche politisch verbindlichen Maßnahmen zu beschließen. Wenn die Show also vorbei ist gehen diese mächtigen Entscheider und Mainstream-Politiker einfach wieder nach Hause und trinken eine Tasse Tee. Übrigens, das war sarkastisch gemeint.

Die Mitglieder und wen sie repräsentieren

Legende: A=Österreich, B=Belgien, CDN=Kanada, D=Deutschland, DK=Dänemark, E=Spanien, F=Frankreich, FIN=Finnland, GB=Großbritannien, GR=Griechenland, INT=International, I=Italien, IRL=Irland, NL=Niederlande, S=Schweden, USA=Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika.

Finanzwirtschaft

— USA: David Rockefeller – Vorsitzender des Beirats, Chase Manhattan Bank International.

— USA: Jessica T. Mathews – Präsidentin, Carnegie Institute for International Peace.

— USA: George Soros – Vorsitzender, Soros Fund Management.

— USA: Henry A. Kissinger – Vorsitzender, Kissinger Associates.

UN- und EU-Repräsentanten

— INT: Carl Bildt – Sondergesandter des Generalsekretärs der UNO für den Balkan.

— INT: Louise Frechette – Vize-Generalsekretärin, Vereinte Nationen.

— A: Wolfgang Petritsch – EU-Verhandlungsführer bei den Kosovo-Friedensgesprächen in Rambouillet und Paris.

— INT: Javier Solana – Generalsekretär, Rat der Europäischen Union.

Finanzpolitik

— INT/USA: James D. Wolfensohn – Präsident, Weltbank.

— USA: William J. McDonough – Präsident, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

— F: Jean-Claude Trichet – Vorsitzender, Banque de France

— INT: Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa – Vorstandsmitglied, Europäische Zentralbank.

— DK: Nyboe Andersen – Vorsitzender, Dänische Zentralbank.

— D: Hilmar Kopper – Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates, Deutsche Bank AG.

Politik

— USA: James B. Steinberg – Vizeassistent des Präsidenten für Angelegenheiten der Nationalen Sicherheit.

— USA: John M. Deutch – Professor am MIT-Institut und ehemaliger Direktor der CIA.

— USA: Bill Richardson – Energieminister.

— NL: Dick Benschop – Außenminister für Europa-Angelegenheiten.

— GB: Kenneth Clarke – Mitglied des britischen Parlamentes (Konservative Partei)

— USA: Christopher J. Dodd – Senator (Demokratische Partei), Conneticut.

— USA: Chuck Hagel – Senator (Republikanische Partei), Nebraska

— FIN: Paavo Lipponen – Premierminister.

— DK: Anders Rasmussen – Vorsitzender, Liberale Partei.

Medien

— USA: Donald E. Graham – Publizist, The Washington Post.

— CDN: Conrad Black – Vorsitzender, Telegraph Group Ltd.

— D: Matthias Nass – Stellvertretender Chefredakteur, Die Zeit.

— I: Gianni Riotta – Stellvertretender Chefredakteur, La Stampa.

— DK: Toger Seidenfaden – Chefredakteur, Politiken.

— GB: Martin Wolf – Mitherausgeber/Wirtschaftskommentator, The Financial Times.

— GB: John R. Micklethwait – Chefredakteur USA, The Economist.

— GB: Adrian D. Wooldridge – Auslandskorrespondent, The Economist.

Wirtschaft

— INT: Mike Moore – Generaldirektor, Welthandelsorganisation.

— NL: Jeroan van der Veer – Generaldirektor, Royal Dutch Shell und designierter Vorsitzender, Royal Dutch Petroleum Company.

— GB: Martin J. Taylor – Vorsitzender, WH Smith Group PLC, und Berater Internationales, Goldman Sachs International, Honorar-Generalsekretär der Bilderberg-Gruppe.

— IRL: Peter D. Sutherland – Vorsitzender, Goldman Sachs International und Vorsitzender, BP Amoco PLC.

— USA: John L. Thornton – Vorstandsvorsitzender, Goldman Sachs Inc.

— I: Giovanni Agnelli – Honorarvorsitzender, Fiat SpA.

— FIN: Jorma Ollila – Vorstandsvorsitzender, Nokia Corporation.

— USA: James A. Johnson – Vorstandsvorsitzender, Johnson Capital Partners.

— S: Leif Johansson – Vorstandsvorsitzender, Volvo AB.

— USA: Esther Dyson – Vorsitzender, EDventure Holdings Inc.

— S: Percy Barnevik – Vorsitzender, Investor AB.

— CDN: Israel Asper – Vorsitzender, CanWest Capital Group Inc.

— USA: Paul Allaire – Vorstandsvorsitzender, Xerox Corporation.

Hochadel

— NL: Königin Beatrix – Ihre Majestät, die Königin der Niederlande und des Hauses Oranje.

“In der Politik geschieht nichts zufällig. Wenn etwas passiert, dann können Sie darauf wetten, dass es geplant war.“

– Franklin D. Roosevelt

Zum Verständnis der Hegelschen Dialektik

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel wurde 1770 in Deutschland geboren und wurde während der 1820er Jahre zu einem erfolgreichen Philosophen des Geistes, der Geschichte und der Religion. Obwohl sich die Hegelsche Dialektik heute in der Praxis anders manifestiert als sie von Hegel in der Theorie entwickelt wurde bleiben die Grundprinzipien nach wie vor gleich.

Hegel sagt, dass alle spirituellen, intellektuellen und historischen Entwicklungen (egal ob positiv oder negativ) aus dem Gegensatz von zwei sich gegenüberstehenden Idealen entstehen. Eine These prallt auf eine Antithese woraus die Synthese entsteht. Die herrschende Elite nutzt diese Dialektik heutzutage um ein durch die Massen getragenes Gruppendenken zu erschaffen, mit welchem ihre Agenda ohne nennenswerten Widerstand vorangetrieben werden soll. In seiner einfachsten Form handelt es sich um nichts anderes als Gehirnwäsche. In der Vergangenheit hat man diese Dialektik verwendet um Kriege zu fabrizieren. Sowohl die Bolschewisten als auch die Nazis wurden von der globalen Elite finanziert und unterstützt. Diese beiden Kräfte prallten dann schließlich aufeinander, woraus das Chaos des Zweiten Weltkrieges erwuchs.

Ein von heutigen Forschern oft verwendeter Begriff ist ‘Problem-Reaktion-Lösung’, eine Taktik, die hauptsächlich benutzt wird um Bevölkerungen zu unterdrücken, den Ausbau des Polizeistaates voranzutreiben und die geopolitischen Ziele der Neuen Weltordnung ein Stück weiter zu realisieren. Es funktioniert folgendermaßen: Die im Hintergrund agierenden Kräfte schaffen heimlich ein Problem und lenken die Aufmerksamkeit der Massenmedien dann auf dieses, auf dass die Medien sich damit unerlässlich zu beschäftigen haben. Erinnern wir uns, dass man nur die Spitze der Pyramide kontrollieren muss, denn das Gros der Medienberichterstattung besteht lediglich darin, dass wiederzukauen was die großen Zeitungen und TV-Sender berichten. Das Problem kann alles mögliche sein – ein Krieg, ein Kollaps der Finanzwirtschaft, eine Serie von Kindesentführungen oder ein Terroranschlag. Die Medien haben die Macht, den Leuten falsche Vorstellungen von einem „großen Problem“ in die Köpfe zu setzen, auch wenn dieses in Wirklichkeit vielleicht gar nicht existiert. Ein Beispiel hierfür wäre die Kindesentführungs-„Epidemie“ des Jahres 2002, die von den Medien gezielt hochgespielt wurde obwohl offizielle Zahlen belegten, dass die Zahl der jährlichen Kindesentführungen seit den 70er Jahren tatsächlich konsequent zurückgegangen war. Ein anderes Beispiel ist die SARS-„Epidemie“ von 2003, die allein das Produkt einer medial geschürten Hysterie war. SARS tötete weltweit einige hundert Menschen in wenigen Monaten während die normale Grippe jährlich etwa 250.000 Menschen das Leben kostet.

Sobald man ein entsprechendes Problem erschaffen hat sorgt man dafür, dass ein Individuum, eine Gruppe oder ein Aspekt einer Gesellschaft dafür verantwortlich gemacht wird. Das führt dann dazu, dass sich die Bevölkerung auf der verzweifelten Suche nach einer Lösung des Problems aufhetzen und vereinen lässt. „Es muss etwas getan werden!“ schreien sie dann unisono. Die Leute, die das Problem selbst geschaffen haben kommen dann zurück und bieten genau die „Lösung“ an, welche die Leute fordern. Erinnern wir uns daran, dass die Leute, die nach der „Lösung“ schreien nicht wissen, dass das Problem von vornherein sowieso künstlich geschaffen wurde.

Die “Lösung” für jene Probleme ist dann immer eine weitere Beschneidung von Freiheit und die Realisierung eines weiteren Teilaspekts der Agenda der Neuen Weltordnung, egal ob nun geopolitische Expansion, neue Gesetze oder die Einführung neuer gesellschaftlicher Weltbilder. Schauen wir uns hierzu einige Beispiele an.

Ein Terroranschlag trifft Amerika. Obwohl die Behörden behaupten, dass sie in keiner Weise wissen konnten, dass so ein Angriff passieren würde liefern sie der Öffentlichkeit bereits wenige Stunden nach den Ereignissen die vermeintlichen Verantwortlichen und das noch bevor irgendeine offizielle Untersuchung ihre Arbeit abgeschlossen hat. Die Bilder der Beschuldigten und ihres Anführers werden auf den Fernsehbildschirmen dieser Welt in einer Endlosschleife präsentiert, was der Öffentlichkeit sofort die „offizielle Version der Ereignisse“ einimpft. Das Entsetzen über diesen Anschlag ist so umfangreich, dass die Menschen sofort nach einer Einschränkung von persönlichen Freiheiten und nach einem Krieg im Ausland rufen auf das sich derartiges nicht mehr wiederhole. In den folgenden Wochen und Monaten schränkt die Regierung Amerikas schließlich die persönlichen Freiheiten mittels Gesetzen ein und startet einen Krieg im Ausland.

Was ich hier gerade beschrieben habe waren die Anschläge vom 11. September 2001.

Eine Regierung stattet ein kleines Land mit chemischen und biologischen Waffen aus welche von jenem Land dann gegen ein anderes eingesetzt werden. Ein paar Jahre später erzählt die Regierung, die jenes Land mit chemischen und biologischen Waffen ausrüstete, ihren Bürgern, dass es ein Problem gäbe, weil jenes Land über chemische und biologische Waffen verfüge welche es gegen ein anderes Land einsetzen könnte. Trotz einiger Opposition sind sich viele Leute darüber einig, dass jenes kleine Land bombardiert und besetzt werden müsse. Die Regierung befiehlt seinem Militär schließlich jenes kleine Land zu bombardieren und zu besetzen.

Was ich hier gerade beschrieben habe waren der erste Golfkrieg und der Irak-Krieg von 2003.

Die Medien erzählen den Leuten, dass die Zahl der Kindesentführungen zunehme und dass dies zu einem immer größeren Problem werde. Bilder von unschuldigen Kindern und Aufnahmen ihrer weinenden Eltern werden landesweit im Fernsehen ausgestrahlt. Die Trägodie dieser Ereignisse ist so herzzerreißend, dass die Leute sofort danach rufen, dass Eltern Lizenzen beantragen müssten, dass die Kommunikationsnetze in Notfällen übernommen werden sollen um Leute zu benachrichtigen wenn mal wieder ein Kind entführt wurde und dass implantierbare Mikrochips eingeführt werden sollen damit diese den Aufenthaltsort der Kinder zu ihrer Sicherheit überwachen können. Die Regierung führt Notfallgesetze ein und eine mit der Regierung verbundene Firma kündigt an, dass sie einen implantierbaren Mikrochip entwickelt habe.

Was ich hier gerade beschrieben habe war die Kindesentführungshysterie von 2002.

Ein Verständnis des Problem-Reaktion-Lösung-Paradigmas und wie dieses verwendet wird um die Welt in einen Gefängnisplaneten zu verwandeln ist die Grundlage dieses Buches. Das Spiel um das es hier geht nennt sich ‚Ordnung aus Chaos‘. Denken Sie an dieses System wenn Sie jedes einzelne Stück Information verarbeiten und die Realität der Ereignisse unserer Zeit wird sich vor Ihren Augen entfalten.

* * *

Weiter zu Teil 2

—–

Siehe auch:

9/11: Abstieg in die Tyrannei

Rezension von Daniel Estulins Buch “Die wahre Geschichte der Bilderberger”

Die Agenda der Nordamerikanischen Union

Okkulte Rituale im Bohemian Grove

Title says it all. What you thought were UFO’s, abducting gray men, the tall Nordic type of alien, the tall telepathic inner earth beings, or whatever, were all really Nazis. In late 1946 Byrd took a small fleet to the Antarctic Neuschwabenland and turned back after he lost four planes. In 1947, the Roswell “crash” shot them down. If weird creatures were flying them, its because the Nazi’s created them in a test tube. Nazi’s got into the U.S. after WWII through scientist, and historically through the German Thule society-based ‘Skull and Bones‘. Obama bomba’d the moon, because of a Nazi base there! Interesting right? If no, thanks for reading, if yes, well, there is an Indy underground collaborative film-making feature in production on the subject craving your creative juices.
http://www.ironsky.net/site/

http://www.wreckamovie.com/iron-sky

Cheers,

Space!

Iron Sky Promotional Artist Rendering.

This was posted on yahoo on Oct. 10th 2009, great post clears up a few things that I post so often on this site. But let me tell you, there is no luck about a billionaires empire. It’s created through the laws of attraction. Learn more about what the laws of attraction are by viewing more of this site.

Peace
Simranjeet Singh
Aim: Kether1985

America’s Richest

A Recipe For Riches
Duncan Greenberg, 09.30.09, 06:00 PM EDT

Want to become a tech titan or hedge fund tycoon? Up your chances by dropping out of college or going to Harvard and working at Goldman Sachs.

Are billionaires born or made? What are the common attributes among the uber-wealthy? Are there any true secrets of the self-made?

We get these questions a lot, and decided it was time to go beyond the broad answers of smarts, ambition and luck by sorting through our database of wealthy individuals in search of bona fide trends. We analyzed everything from entrepreneurs’ parents’ professions to where they went to school, their track records in the early stages of their careers and other experiences that may have set them on the path to extreme wealth.

Our admittedly unscientific study of the self-made members of the Forbes 400 yielded some interesting results.

First, a significant percentage of them had parents with a high aptitude for math. The ability to crunch numbers is crucial to becoming a billionaire, and mathematical prowess is hereditary. Some of the most common professions among the parents of Forbes 400 members (for whom we could find the information) were engineer, accountant and small-business owner.

Consistent with the rest of the population, more American billionaires and near-billionaires were born in the fall than in any other season. However, relatively few of them were born in December, historically the month with the eighth-highest birth rate.

Of the 274 self-made tycoons on the Forbes 400, 14% either never started or never completed college. The number of precocious college dropouts is highest among those who forged careers as technology entrepreneurs: Bill Gates of Microsoft (MSFT), Steve Jobs of Apple (AAPL), Michael Dell of Dell (DELL), Larry Ellison of Oracle (ORCL) and Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook.

Forbes 400 members who derive their fortunes from finance make up one of the most highly educated sub-groups: half of them have graduate degrees. Roughly 70% of those with M.B.A.s obtained their master’s degrees from one of three Ivy League schools: Harvard, Columbia or the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business.

Goldman Sachs (GS) has attracted a large share of hungry minds that went on to garner 10-figure fortunes. At least 11 current and recent billionaire financiers worked at Goldman or one of it subsidiaries early in their careers, including Edward Lampert, David Tepper, Daniel Och and Leon Cooperman.

Several Forbes 400 members suffered bitter professional setbacks early in their careers that heightened their fear of failure. Pharmaceutical tycoon R.J. Kirk’s first venture was a flop–an experience he regrets but appreciates. “Failure early on is a necessary condition for success, though not a sufficient one,” he told Forbes in 2007.

According to a statement read by Phil Falcone during a congressional hearing in November 2008, his botched buyout of a company in Newark, N.J., in the early 1990s taught him “several valuable lessons that have had a profound impact upon my success as a hedge fund manager.”

Several current and former billionaires rounded out their Yale careers as members of Skull and Bones, the secret society portrayed with enigmatic relish by Hollywood in movies like The Skulls and W. Among those who were inducted: investor Edward Lampert, Blackstone co-founder Stephen Schwarzman, and FedEx (FDX) founder Frederick Smith.

Parents Had Math-Related Careers

The ability to crunch numbers is typically a key to becoming a billionaire. Often, mathematical prowess is hereditary. Some of the most common professions among the parents of American billionaires for whom we could find that information were engineer, accountant and small-business owner.

September Birthdays

Of the 380 self-made American tycoons who have appeared on the Forbes list of the World’s Billionaires in the past three years, 42 were born in September–more than in any other month.

Tech Titans Who Dropped Out of College

Forget everything your guidance counselor told you: You don’t have to go to college to be successful. Close to 15% of the self-made American moguls on the Forbes 400 never finished college. Many of the list’s drop-outs made their fortunes in tech, including Bill Gates (Microsoft), Steve Jobs (Apple), Michael Dell (Dell), Larry Ellison (Oracle) and Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook).

Skull and Bones

Several current and former billionaires rounded out their Yale careers as members of Skull and Bones, the secret society portrayed with enigmatic relish by Hollywood in movies like The Skulls and W. Among those who were inducted: investor Edward Lampert, Blackstone co-founder Stephen Schwarzman and FedEx founder Frederick Smith.

Goldman Sachs

A stint at investment bank Goldman Sachs is a prime credential for achieving greatness on Wall Street. Of the 61 tycoons on our list who derive their fortunes from finance, at least six cut their teeth in Goldman’s investment banking, trading, or asset management divisions. The company’s crown jewel: its “risk arbitrage” unit, which launched the careers of billionaires Edward Lampert and Daniel Och, as well as former billionaires Tom Steyer and Richard Perry.

Fall Of The Republic comes out October 21st, 2009!!!! DO NOT MISS THIS VIDEO!

Fall Of The Republic documents how an offshore corporate cartel is bankrupting the US economy by design. Leaders are now declaring that world government has arrived and that the dollar will be replaced by a new global currency.

President Obama has brazenly violated Article 1 Section 9 of the US Constitution by seating himself at the head of United Nations’ Security Council, thus becoming the first US president to chair the world body.

A scientific dictatorship is in its final stages of completion, and laws protecting basic human rights are being abolished worldwide; an iron curtain of high-tech tyranny is now descending over the planet.

A worldwide regime controlled by an unelected corporate elite is implementing a planetary carbon tax system that will dominate all human activity and establish a system of neo-feudal slavery.

The image makers have carefully packaged Obama as the world’s savior; he is the Trojan Horse manufactured to pacify the people just long enough for the globalists to complete their master plan.

This film reveals the architecture of the New World Order and what the power elite have in store for humanity. More importantly it communicates how We The People can retake control of our government, turn the criminal tide and bring the tyrants to justice.

To order the Fall of The Republic dvd please visit the following link! http://infowars-shop.stores.yahoo.net/faofreprofba.html

***Please note any links to order the dvd from this blog take you directly to to the official infowars.com shop. You are NOT ordering from me!***