Der polemische islamkritische und pro-amerikansiche Weblog Politically Incorrect hat vor kurzem eine Spendenaktion für die österreichische FPÖ-Politikerin Susanne Winter gestartet. Anlass war ein Gerichtsurteil gegen Winter. Diese wurde wegen “Verhetzung und Herabwürdigung religiöser Lehren” unter anderem zu einer Geldstrafe von 24.000 Euro verurteilt. Des weiteren erhält sie nun Morddrohungen.

Ob man Winters Äußerungen (siehe Link oben) nun zustimmen mag oder nicht, bleibt jedem selbst überlassen. In jedem Falle können ihre trockenen Feststellungen über den islamischen Propheten Mohammed doch keine “Hetze” gewesen sein, genauso wie insgesamt ihre Aussagen in einem Staat, in dem de facto Meinungsfreiheit herrscht, auszuhalten sein sollten.

Dass dies nicht der Fall ist, und gar so drakonisch sanktioniert wird, ist ein weiteres Indiz für totalitären linksmotivierten Meinungsterror, den es – wie man ja sieht – nicht nur in Deutschland gibt. Schon allein deshalb wäre es ein schöner Schlag in die Fresse der Meinungsmacher in Politik, Verbänden und Medien, sollten die 24.000 Euro an Spenden schnell zusammenkommen!

Meine zwei Euro für die Meinungsfreiheit sind schon raus – mitmachen!

Wir sind umgezogen!

Diesen Artikel finden Sie jetzt HIER!

Wir sind umgezogen!

Diesen Artikel finden Sie jetzt HIER!

Trotz Antisemitismus unterhielt Hitler gute Beziehungen zu Semiten aus der arabischen Welt

Später unterstützte Haider den Baathisten Saddam Hussein. Baathismus ist die arabische Version vom Nationalen Sozialismus.

Während man die Muslime aus Europa schleunigst wieder entfernen möchte, unterstützt man heute militante Islamisten, sofern sie im eigenen Revier bleiben und den gemeinsamen Feind bekämpfen:

Klassisches Beispiel FPÖ:

Daham statt Islam – Kampagne:

Susanne Winter bezeichnete in ihrer Rede vom 13. Jänner 2008 den Propheten Mohammed als “Kinderschänder”, der den Koran “im Rahmen von epileptischen Anfällen geschrieben” habe und wurde dafür strafgerichtlich verurteilt.

Mölzer zum EU Beitritt der Türkei:

“Die Türkei ist religiös und kulturell kein europäisches Land, sondern in den Traditionen des Morgenlandes verhaftet. Die von der EU geforderten Reformen beschränken sich auf Absichtserklärungen der Türkei, und die Lage der ethnischen und religiösen Minderheiten ist durch vielfältige Diskriminierungen im Alltag geprägt”

Doch in der Ferne unterstützt man die rechtsextremen Seelenverwandten:

Mölzer zur Hamas:

Sofern sie sich vom Terror distanziert, sehr wohl als Gesprächs- und Verhandlungspartner in Frage käme. “Schließlich ist die Hamas im Jänner 2006 eindeutig als stärkste Partei aus den demokratischen Wahlen in den palästinensischen Autonomiegebieten hervorgegangen. Wenn die Hamas daher aus grundsätzlichen Erwägungen als Verhandlungspartner ausgeschlossen wird, dann wird dies die westliche Demokratie in den Augen unzähliger Araber diskreditieren”, schloss der freiheitliche Europaparlamentarier.

Strache zum Mullah-Regime:

Bundesparteiobmann HC Strache sprach sich massiv gegen die von Wirtschaftsminister Bartenstein geforderte und von der EU-Kommission diskutierte Ausgrenzung des Iran in wirtschaftspolitischen Belangen aus, wie etwa bei der Beteiligung am Nabucco-Pipeline Projekt. Mit der Pipeline sollte Gas aus dem kaspischen Raum nach Europa transportiert werden.

Aktuellstes Beispiel Pius Bruderschaft:

Der Distriktsobere der deutschen Piusbruderschaft (SSPX), Franz Schmidberger, hat den islamischen Propheten Mohammed als Kinderschänder bezeichnet.

Bischof Williamson spricht hingegen in Ahmadinejad Manier dem Judenstaat die Legitimation ab:

Das waren alles Lügen, Lügen, Lügen! Die Juden erfanden den Holocaust, damit wir demütig auf Knien ihren neuen Staat Israel genehmigen.

(Sherbrooke, 1989)

And you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free.” [John 8:32].

There is a belief that permeates our legal system. It is the idea that the truth is an absolute defense in all things. Well, it turns out this old judicial truth may not be true after all. “The times they are a changin,” and not for the better! The greatest test Western Civilization will face is happening now in the Netherlands as the truth is actually on trial. The mere fact that this trial is happening is a great victory for all those who oppose freedom, let alone what the consequences will be for the outcome…

Islam film Dutch MP to be charged (BBC News)
A Dutch court has ordered prosecutors to put a right-wing politician on trial for making anti-Islamic statements. Freedom Party leader Geert Wilders made a controversial film last year equating Islam with violence and has likened the Koran to Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf.
“In a democratic system, hate speech is considered so serious that it is in the general interest to… draw a clear line,” the court in Amsterdam said.

Mr Wilders said the judgement was an “attack on the freedom of expression. Participation in the public debate has become a dangerous activity. If you give your opinion, you risk being prosecuted,” he said. Not only he, but all Dutch citizens opposed to the “Islamisation” of their country would be on trial, Mr Wilders warned. “Who will stand up for our culture if I am silenced?” he added.

Who indeed? In March of 2008 Geert Wilders posted a short film that he made called “Fitna.” Fitna is an Islamic term meaning “strife.” Predictably this film was called an abomination and an offense to Islam even though there is not one false statement presented. The film featured quotes from the Qu’ran dubbed over video of actual scenes of these verses being brought to their full and violent fruition. Mr Wilders even had the audacity to compare the Qu’ran to Hitler’s famous book “Mein Kampf” and likened Islam to Nazism. Gee, I wonder where he got that idea…

“Muslims responded to the call of Muslim leaders and joined our side because of their hatred of our joint Jewish-English-Bolshevik enemies, and because of their belief and respect for, above all — Our Fuehrer.” – Heinrich Himmler

“…a religion that believed in spreading the faith by the sword and subjugating all nations to that faith. Such a creed was perfectly suited to the Germanic temperament. The Mohammedan religion…would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?” – Adolf Hitler

That truth stuff sure does get in the way of a good hate crimes prosecution doesn’t it? One might even call it…”inconvenient!” The two leading Nazi’s of the Third Reich are not only endorsing Islam with all of its Jew-hating consistencies with their own regime, but also, as clearly pointed out by Himmler, noting the fact that Islamic nations did ally themselves with the Nazi cause. So how are they going to prosecute Mr. Wilders for telling the truth? Well, obviously there has to be a higher authority. Something, or someone, whose interests outweigh the value of spreading TRUE information throughout a society. Reckon what that could be?

The three judges said that they had weighed Mr Wilders’s “one-sided generalisations…which can amount to inciting hatred” against his right to free speech, and ruled that he had gone beyond the normal leeway granted to politicians. The Amsterdam appeals court has ordered the prosecution of member of parliament Geert Wilders for inciting hatred and discrimination, based on comments by him in various media on Muslims and their beliefs.”
The court also considers appropriate criminal prosecution for insulting Muslim worshippers because of comparisons between Islam and Nazism made by Wilders,” it added.

“This is a happy day for all followers of Islam who do not want to be tossed on the garbage dump of Nazism” - Gerard Spong, lawyer

So there you have it. “Offensive” speech is now a prosecutable offense. Never mind that the offending speech is all true or the offended are all guilty. The complaint alleges it is “one sided,” and of course, it just happens to be the provably true side. Nevertheless Muslims have been offended and everything must be done to ease their inability to handle the truth. Offensive speech a.k.a. “hate speech” is the natural and necessary by-product of the foolish concept known as a hate crime. The idea of punishing people for “insulting” religious beliefs is exactly what Islamic countries have been practicing within their own societies and have long been clamouring for similar laws in the West. They desire that Western nations adopt blasphemy laws and stop the “defamation” of Islam. Defamation being defined as saying anything they decide they don’t like, which can and often does, include the simple act of repeating their own words.

There are, of course, limits to free speech, such as calls for violence but one doesn’t have to agree with Mr. Wilders to realize that he hasn’t even approached that line. In fact, he is only guilty of reporting the violent actions of Muslims. Some Muslims say they are outraged by his statements, but why are they not equally outraged by the violence done in the name of Islam? It seems their outrage would be better spent persecuting the actions of their own people rather than wasting it on the righteous condemnation of those act by others. They make a controversial issue about the speech while ignoring the action that is the subject of that speech. Nonetheless, if freedom of speech has any meaning, it must apply to the freedom of controversial speech. Non-controversial speech needs no protection. Without the right of free speech, all the other freedoms we cherish will soon perish.

For his part, Geert Wilders is convinced he has already been convicted and will go to prison:

“The decision of the court today was so strong that there is a real chance unfortunately that there will be a guilty verdict. In fact, it was so bluntly motivated that it already looks like a verdict instead of just ordering the public prosecutor to start a trial. I lost my freedom already four and a half years ago in October 2004, when my 24-hour police protection started because of threats by Muslims in Holland and abroad to kill me. So of course I don’t want to go to jail as a criminal, but I don’t fear losing my freedom since I already lost my freedom in 2004.” – Geert Wilders

And yet, this is not an isolated incident:

Vienna – Austrian far-right parliamentarian Susanne Winter was convicted Thursday of incitement because of her anti-Muslim statements, including the claim that Islam’s prophet Mohammed was a paedophile. A court in Winter’s home town of Graz also found the 51-year-old politician guilty of humiliating a religion. She was sentenced to a fine of 24,000 euros (31,000 dollars) euros and a suspended prison term of three months, Austrian news agency APA reported.

The politician, who took a seat in parliament last fall for the Freedom Party (FPOe), made the anti-Islamic remarks in January 2008. She also proposed in a discussion with students that Muslim men should commit bestiality rather than making “indecent advances” on girls. The politician had pleaded innocent Thursday, claiming that she “did not want to insult anyone, but only to point out problems.” The verdict is not yet legally binding.

Once again the truth was not allowed to be a defense. Muhammad’s consummation of his marriage with his wife Aisha is in the Hadith collection, Bukhari, several times. Of course you will remember that the girl was NINE YEARS OLD at the time of this consummation. Muslims consider Muhammad to be their “perfect example” and take emulating his behavior very seriously. How seriously you ask? Well consider the case of the infamous Ayatollah Khomeini. The leader of the Islamic Revolution in Iran married a ten year old girl when he was twenty eight. Of course he didn’t call it pedophilia. No, he referred to it as a “Divine Blessing.”

“Do your best to ensure that your daughters do not see their first blood in your house.” – Ayatolla Khomeini

It will probably come as no surprise to learn that the the legal age for marriage in Iran is nine for girls and fourteen for boys. Where do you suppose that magic number of nine years old came from? One could call Iran a pedophiles paradise. Certainly a Westerner speaking in a Western country should not be convicted of “incitement” for pointing out that the values of Islamic civilization are in conflict with the values of our own, especially when the “incitement” consists of citing examples from Islam’s own accepted traditional writings. Yet here it stands as another example of Western culture bending over and grabbing our ankles while the ever uncompromising ambassadors of Islam proudly mount us saying: “who’s your daddy?” Is our only response always going to be the infamous Kevin Bacon line from the Animal House movie? (Thank you sir, may I have another)

You are probably thinking to yourselves that this could never happen here. Perhaps President Obama would even be willing to grant Geert Wilders political asylum in America. After all, do we in America not have an absolute right to free speech as granted by the first amendment to the Constitution? Well don’t be so sure about that. Our new president is a “sensitive” sort of fellow to the feelings of certain groups of people, particularly those who like to fabricate the illusion of their own victim-hood, as is evidenced by the official White House website:

President Obama and Vice President Biden will strengthen federal hate crimes legislation, expand hate crimes protection by passing the Matthew Shepard Act, and reinvigorate enforcement at the Department of Justice’s Criminal Section.

Uh oh. There are those words again. Hate Crimes. As if there are any other kind. This is the kind of nonsense that leads to “incitement” laws prohibiting offensive speech. Slowly but surely, every group of people who perceives themselves as having been aggrieved by someone else seeks to have themselves added to the list of those “protected” classes of citizens who shall not be offended. You might as well call them “blasphemy laws” because Muslims will use them to stifle all criticism of their religion just as surely as the homosexuals will use them to repulse the condemnation of their deviant lifestyle. However you can be certain that speech offending Christians and Jews will somehow find a way to be excluded from such protections. We wouldn’t want to stifle all the “artistic creativity” in Hollywood now would we? Their freedom to mock all things decent, traditional and Judeo-Christian must not be infringed!

How is it you can be charged with offending someone’s beliefs, even as those very beliefs insult you and everything you stand for? Whenever we hear the words ‘human rights’ in connection with Islam, we are repeatedly confronted with ugly opportunism that spits in the face of real and genuine human rights and insults everyone’s intelligence. They get away with saying one thing to us while saying something entirely different and considerably more unsavory amongst themselves. We should not be expected to respect an ideology that doesn’t respect us. Be very clear about this: Islam respects nobody. It claims the right to dominate. Our portion is OBEDIANCE. They have not been shy about making that clear:

“Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Qur’an should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth” - Omar Ahmed, Chairman of the Board of CAIR (Council of American Islamic Relations)

It could be fairly said that I have a somewhat biased view on the issues of free/hate speech. After all, I am guilty of exactly the same crime as Geert Wilders. The Babylon Mystery Orchestra CD essentially does the same thing as Mr. Wilders movie Fitna. There are direct quotes from Muslims and the Qu’ran and an intentional linking of Muslim words to violent Muslim actions. I even went as far as to construct the lyrics of one song, God Given Right, entirely out of very offensive statements made by very offensive Muslims. However if Fitna or BMO’s “Axis Of Evil” are to be considered “hate speech” and guilty of the crime of “incitement,” might the same also be said of the Qu’ran itself or Muslim clerics like Omar Ahmed? Isn’t it amusing how much you can get away with if you simply claim yourself to be oppressed?

It does worry me that the first major interview our new President has done was with Al Arabiya, where he went out of his way to pacify the sensitivities of the Islamic world. It makes me wonder how far he is willing to go to placate them. These are dark days for the West if we don’t stand against Islam’s desire to remain beyond criticism. “Tolerance” and “multiculturalism” may seem like noble pursuits to some people but there is one group of people who have never and will never acquiesce to such ideas…Muslims. They can’t. Although the very act of saying that may soon be a prosecutable offense here too! Incitement crimes are coming to America! Still don’t believe me? Observe this:

The National Emergency Centers Act or HR 645 mandates the establishment of “national emergency centers” to be located on military installations for the purpose of to providing “temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance to individuals and families dislocated due to an emergency or major disaster,” according to the bill. The legislation also states that the camps will be used to “provide centralized locations to improve the coordination of preparedness, response, and recovery efforts of government, private, and not-for-profit entities and faith-based organizations.”

Ominously, the bill also states that the camps can be used to “meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security,” an open ended mandate which many fear could mean the forced detention of American citizens in the event of widespread rioting after a national emergency or total economic collapse. Many credible forecasters have predicted riots and rebellions in America that will dwarf those already witnessed in countries like Iceland and Greece.

With active duty military personnel already being stationed inside the U.S. under Northcom, partly for purposes of “crowd control,” fears that Americans could be incarcerated in detainment camps are all too real. (PrisonPlanet.com)

There is coming a time when Americans will be locking away people who say things that incite others in the name of “crowd control.” Freedom of speech is a dying principle. Such “emergency centers” are an ideal place to locate the incorrigible dissenters who fail to quietly follow the edicts of this, or any, administration. Dissent, which we were told was patriotic when Bush was President can now be seen as “incitement.” A wonderful method for making sure that everyone accedes to the will of the new Socialist Godhead that is Messiah Obama. It begins by failing to uphold the right of someone to offend someone else with simple words. It ends with the incarceration, or worse, of all those who dare oppose the all powerful state. What is happening to Geert Wilders in The Netherlands is going to come here.

Perhaps there is a place being prepared for me in one of President Obama’s new gulags. Guantonemo Bay may not be closed down after all. We will just change the kind of people we incarcerate there! If we do not act to restrain the coming speech codes soon, there are going to be a lot of you in there with me. But hey, at least we will get to meet Rush Limbaugh! The President has actually went so far as mentioning him by name. How long will it be before he decides he has to do something about all of us who won’t go along with his social engineering ideas. Hate speech and incitement laws are a fine way to get rid of us.

“nazidreck” im parlament, eine verurteilung für winters aussagen im grazer wahlkampf und ein “negerwitz”, der laut urheber gar keiner war. die österreichische innenpolitik schwimmt in zähem abwasser, welches voll von rechtsextremen exkrementen ist.

“ausländer raus!”, das sagte, oder besser titelte, christoph maria schlingensief 2000 zum anlass der wiener festwochen. damals war das ganze eine kunstaktion, welche mit slogans der fpö und einer vorgegaukelten unterstützung seitens der krone realisiert wurde. damals war alles irgendwie überschaubar, da es nur sechs, sieben tage andauerte. heute erinnern sich nicht viele an diesen streich des deutschen aktionskünstlers respektive die lehren daraus sind vergessen.

“nazidreck“, das sagte der dritte nationalratsprädient martin graf, als er zu den privaten aktivitäten seiner männlichen mitarbeiter stellung nahm. seine helfer haben da wohl eindeutig “nazipropaganda” gesucht und gefunden. das finde graf gar nicht schön, behält die vermeintlichen übeltäter dennoch, die der grüne nationalratsabgeordnete karl öllinger mit einer geklauten email entlarfte.

und irgendwo spalten sich hier die geister. ein nationalratspräsident findet, dass seine von ihm angestellten mitarbeiter wortwörtlich “nazidreck” und “nazipropaganda” gekauft haben, dennoch möchte er sie nicht verlieren. ob die knaben allesamt ebenfalls mitglieder in der rechtsextremen und deutschnationalen olympia sind, ist nur zweitrangig. aber: genau in dieser zweitrangigkeit verliert sich dieses thema. der nationalstaat österreich ist ja nicht auf grünen wiesen mit wunderschönen, unschuldigen blumen errichtet worden, sondern in den trümmern des nationalsozialismus. mitte bzw. ende der achtziger des letzten jahrtausend hat es auch erstmal begonnen zuzugeben, diese zerstörungen mitunter selber begangen zu haben: österreich war täter.

in österreich wird das treiben der politikerInnen im und außerhalb des parlaments eher regungslos zugesehen, nicht wie bei dieser demonstration in deutschland (PIXELIO/promifotos.de)

der täterstaat ist heute eine demokratie – und erstickt an seiner inneren ambivalenz. ein antifaschistischer grundkonsens vor über sechzig jahren konnte martin graf nicht verhindern. die beiden mittelparteien spö und övp haben das erkannt und erhoben ihn auch mit einer stimmenmehrheit von 109 von 183 in seine jetzige funktion. somit ist eines der höchsten politischen ämter in österrech von einem rechtsextremen politiker besetzt.

1:0 für blau

jetzt ist auch susanne winter verurteilt worden, wegen “herabwürdigung” von religiösen lehren. es sind noch andere delikte dabei, wie die forderung nach “tierbordellen” für moslems, doch die reihen sich in den bereits salonfähig gemachten jargon reibungslos ein. das urteil ist noch nicht rechtskräftig. ihr sohn ist ebenfalls verurteilt worden, von ihm kam der vorschlag, man solle im park schafe grasen lassen, um den “muslimisch-türkischen vergewaltigungen” ein ende zu bereiten. sein urteil ist rechtskräftig. gerhard dörfler ist nur ein weiterer stern am rechten himmel, der in letzter zeit besondere aufmerksamkeit genießt. sein “negerwitz” war, wie er sagte, gar keiner: es habe sich schlichtweg um einen “kakaowitz” gehandelt. irgendwie pietätlos.

“ausländer raus!”, das hat schlingensief irgendwie auch aus spaß gemacht, nicht zuletzt um die reaktionen der passantInnen zu sehen und die der medien. dann hat er, wie es für eine kunstaktion üblich ist, damit aufgehört. “daham statt islam”, das hat die fpö auch aus spaß gemacht. der wahlspruch ist markant, und wenn er auch von der politisch-medialen bühne verschwunden ist, so wissen alle, was damit gemeint war und vor allem: es erinnert sich jedeR noch daran. es ist ja nichts verwerfliches, unternehmungen aus der freude an sich zu machen, doch meinungsfreiheit impliziert doch auch zu sagen: das ist nicht lustig!

If you haven’t checked out Brigitte Gabriel at http://www.actforamerica.org/, give her site a look. She speaks from PERSONAL experience about the oppressiveness of radical Islam.

http://www.actforamerica.org/

The Handwriting on the Wall
By Brigitte Gabriel

During this first month of the New Year 2009, we have seen some stunning developments that, considered together, should leave absolutely no doubt about the rising radical Islamic threat on our doorsteps in America.

I have been warning Americans since 2002 about this threat, and that the threat is not just confined to terrorism. This is not a “war on terror.” Terror is a tactic, one of many in the arsenal of radical Islamists.

I have been declaring, to anyone who would listen, that Islamists are well on their way to subverting and transforming Europe, and they are riding that wave here to America.

I have told my personal story, of how Islamists, step by step, took over my country of Lebanon. How they used our freedoms and commitment to tolerance and multiculturalism against us to further their ultimate ends. And how they are using the same strategies and tactics against us in the West.

In just the past three weeks we have seen:
• A violent Islamic protest in Britain, where an angry mob shouting “Allahu Akbar” chased – yes, chased – dozens of British policemen for blocks. You must see this video to believe it! (Please be warned – there is offensive language and profanity). Click here to see this shocking video.

• Pro-Hamas, anti-Israel Muslims conducting demonstrations here in America, shouting praises to Hitler for what he did to the Jews, yelling “go back to the ovens,” and at times physically attacking counter-protestors.

• The Amsterdam Court of Appeals ordering the prosecution of Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders because he has made statements deemed “insulting” and harmful to “the religious esteem” of Muslims.

• Austrian parliamentarian Susanne Winter convicted of “incitement,” because of public statements she has made, including the claim that the prophet Mohammed was a pedophile.

• Muslim protest marches in Italy that ended with the protestors, in an obvious act of intimidation, conducting mass prayer vigils directly in front of Catholic places of worship.

• The release of an official U.S. government report stating that Hezbollah is forming terrorist cells here in the U.S. that could become operational.

• The UN continuing to move ahead with the “Durban II” conference and its document that is little more than an anti-Israel rant that calls for suppressing public “defamation” of religion – notably Islam. This has run parallel to an effort by the Organization of the Islamic Conference to get the UN Human Rights Commission to pass a resolution condemning public “defamation” of Islam.
My friends, the handwriting is clearly on the wall. Radical Islam is on the march, and it is growing stronger and bolder with every passing day.

What elected official in Europe or the UK will now have the courage to speak out against this threat? Certainly the actions against parliamentarians Wilders and Winter will ultimately have a chilling effect on American elected officials as well.

How many more “no-go zones,” Muslim enclaves where non-Muslims and even police officers fear to go, will appear in Europe? We’re already seeing such enclaves develop here in America right now. There’s a reason why Dearborn, Michigan, is frequently referred to as “Dearbornistan.”

What will happen in America when 50,000 ranting, chanting Islamist demonstrators attempt to aggressively back down and chase police officers trying to maintain order? Will the police use the force necessary? If they do, we can expect howls from groups like CAIR (the Council on American-Islamic Relations). How will government officials respond?

And if the police back down and run, as they recently did in Britain, what message is being sent to radical Islamists?

With the recent announcements by the Obama administration regarding ending the use of certain coercive interrogation practices, will this administration have the courage and use the tools necessary to protect us from Hezbollah, Hamas and al Qaeda terrorist cells in our midst?

It is becoming crystal clear that 2009 is going to be a critical year in our effort to roll back the rising tide of Islamofascism. Over the next several weeks we will be announcing various projects and programs designed so that we can more aggressively and effectively go on the offense against this threat.

I am asking you to pay close attention to these announcements when they occur and to participate in every way you can. We must all come together and ACT! this year, before the worldwide momentum building behind radical Islam becomes too powerful to stop.

Always devoted,

Brigitte Gabriel

Wir sind umgezogen!

Diesen Artikel finden Sie jetzt HIER!

Ich will hier nicht viel zur Person sagen, davon kann man z.B. hier schon genug lesen. Das Fazit ist, dass sie als Politikerin eine Schande und Peinlichkeit für Österreich ist.

Aufgrund einiger ihrer Äußerungen wurde sie am Donnerstag wegen Verhetzung und Herabwürdigung religiöser Lehren (nicht rechtskräftig) verurteilt. Natürlich kann man einwenden, dass es die entsprechenden Gesetze nun mal gibt und dass sie deswegen auch angewendet werden müssen – und wenn nicht in diesem Fall, wo dann? Beide Gesetzte werden nur sehr selten angewendet, die letzte Verurteilung wegen Herabwürdigung religiöser Lehren gab es 2006.

Aber ich möchte doch all jene, die sich jetzt über ihre Verurteilung freuen (z.B. hier und hier) fragen, wohin soll das führen? Es müssen da zwei Aspekte getrennt betrachtet werden:

Meinungsfreiheit

Der Weg, den unserer Gesellschaft zurückgelegt hat, um mit den Religionen so umgehen zu können, wie das heute möglich ist, war lang und steinig. Heute ist es – zumindest was das Christentum betrifft – schon fast normal, dass man sich darüber lustig machen kann, ja, dass man die religiösen Inhalte und die damit verbundenen Personen herabsetzen darf. Das sporadische Gezeter der Kirchen wird nur noch als Hintergrundrauschen wahrgenommen. Seit einiger Zeit haben wir aber diese Probleme mit dem Islam – irgendwie ist es sehr gefährlich den Islam zu kritisieren.

Aufgrund falsch verstandener Toleranz und der Neigung, Problemen aus dem Weg zu gehen, sind bedenklich viele für eine gewisse Einschränkung der Möglichkeiten, den Islam zu kritisieren. Man soll sich aber keine Illusion machen, dass das auf den Islam und nur die extremsten Auswüchse beschränkt bleibt.

Eine kleine Kostprobe haben wir ja schon bei Popetown gesehen. Ein angeblich (hab ich nicht gesehen) vollkommen harmloser Zeichentrickfilm führte zur Forderung nach Verschärfung des Gotteslästerungsparagraphen von Seiten der CSU und irgendwann waren dann auch Teile der SPD dafür, dass MTV die Ausstahlung nochmal überdenkt. Kommentar in kath.net:

„Man würde Muslimen eine solche Sendung niemals zumuten.” Das meint die deutsche Religionsphilosophin Hanna-Barbara Gerl-Falkovitz zur geplanten Ausstrahlung der Sitcom „Popetown”, die Papst und Kirche durch den Kakao zieht.

…

„Christen scheinen hier in der Tat aufgrund ihrer überzeugten Gewaltlosigkeit immer einen groben Spaß zu vertragen”, sagt Gerl-Falkovitz der Agentur „Zenit”. „Der Sender sollte sich aber täuschen.”

Man sieht also wo das hinführen soll: Zuerst geht man auf die religiösen Befindlichkeiten von Muslimen ein und danach schreien die Anderen, wir wollen auch.

Demokratie

Der zweite Aspekt ist, dass Susanne Winter eine Politikerin ist. Was sagt das über den Zustand einer Demokratie aus, wenn Politiker wegen inakzeptabler Aussagen nicht abgewählt, sondern verurteilt werden?

Fazit

Die, die sich eine Verurteilung von Susanne Winter wünschen, sollten aufpassen, weil ihr Wunsch vielleicht in Erfüllung gehen könnte. Bisher konnten wir immer zurückschauen und uns darüber freuen, dass die Freiheit zugenommen hat. Ich hoffe nicht, dass es eines Tages so weit kommen wird, dass wir sagen müssen: “Sowas wie Life of Brian könnte man heute nicht mehr machen.”.

Post Scriptum

Ich lese gerade im SpOn, dass das SWR Oliver Pocher wegen einer Stauffenberg-Parodie scharf kritisiert:

[...] es ist nicht hinnehmbar, dass man den Helden des deutschen Widerstandes so ins Lächerliche zieht”, sagte Wieland, die die katholische Kirche in dem Gremium vertritt.

3 Monate bedingt lautete das Ergebnis des Gerichtsprozesses im Fall Susanne Winter. Beim FPÖ Neujahrstreffen vor ungefähr einem Jahr sprach die FPÖ-Chefin und Nationalratsabgeordnete von „schleichenden Islamisierung“ und nannte Mohammed einen „Kinderschänder“. JUKreiz war vorort.

Der Freitag Morgen bringt außerdem folgende Schlagzeilen:

• Keine Öffnung des Gaza-Streifens,
• Warnstreiks bei der Lufthansa,
• 45 Pottwale auf Sandbank gestrandet,
• Tutsi-Führer gefasst,
• Obama will Guantanamo schließen.

Die Sendung gestalteten Clemens Ticar und Daniela Neubacher.

Mehr Fotos von Susanne Winter gibts von JUKreiz bei flickr.

Play

Download

( 7:49 minutes, 7.16 MB  )