I just couldn’t resist this one … In the latest Don Burleson news piece dated July 17, 2009 called “Tablespace size initial extent size” (although the referenced article itself… more →
Richard Foote's Oracle BlogRichard Foote wrote 4 months ago: I just couldn’t resist this one … In the latest Don Burleson news piece dated July 17, 2 … more →
Richard Foote wrote 1 year ago: Thought I might share some thoughts regarding recoverability issues with regard to having indexes se … more →
Richard Foote wrote 1 year ago: I’ve already discussed here some reasons why performance is not particularly improved by simpl … more →
Richard Foote wrote 1 year ago: Based on the discussions on whether there’s any performance benefit in storing indexes separat … more →
Richard Foote wrote 1 year ago: In Part I, I discussed how separating indexes from tables won’t likely improve performance as: … more →
Richard Foote wrote 1 year ago: Although by no means as common as it once was, there’s still some who believe separating index … more →
Richard Foote wrote 1 year ago: Thought it might be worth looking at the impact on the performance of Unique and small index range s … more →
Richard Foote wrote 1 year ago: A common misconception with using a larger block tablespace specifically for indexes is that this wi … more →
Richard Foote wrote 1 year ago: Thought I might begin by mentioning a lovely little story by Billy Verreynne in this OTN Forum Threa … more →
Richard Foote wrote 1 year ago: One of the great myths surrounding the use of differing block sizes is that storing indexes in large … more →
Richard Foote wrote 1 year ago: A suggestion that seems to pop up on a routine basis on various forums and discussion boards is that … more →