Serwis do wyszukiwania grafiki…banał, przecież google robi to lepiej (szczególnie z wtyczką Cooliris)…

Ta wyszukiwarka działa jednak inaczej. Dla podanego przez nas obrazu (zassanego z komputera lub z podanego przez nas adresu) dopasowuje podobne znalezione w sieci…I idzie jej zadziwiająco dobrze…dobre narzędzie dla webmasterów i tropiących spiski typu nasza-kasa.pl ukradła grafikę! (Admin: wpis niepoprawny politycznie – oczyszczono).

Wyniki można sobie uszeregować wedle podobieństwa, rozmiaru (żeby dotrzeć do oryginału) i porównywać w jednym oknie z obrazkiem, który my mamy…

Ale osobiście wolę szeregowanie od najmniej podobnych…Można się doszukać naprawdę zabawnych modyfikacji oryginału…Oczywiście można też się dowiedzieć, że piękność, która zaprosiła Cię na naszej-kasie (Admin) jest też na kilku zdjęciach z podpisem Jenna Jameson. Ale może nie każdy chciałby się tego dowiedzieć…

Co ciekawsze przykłady przeszukań:

…i z dedykacją dla saboteur81

A tu link do wyszukiwarki:

TINEYE

• ’’ مرئيات ‘‘

أعجبني في المقطع الطريقة التي اختاروها لإيصال مثل هذه المفاهيم  إلى الطلبة

الدروس المباشرة والأمثلة الواقعية من أكثر مايثبت في عقول الطلبة ويؤثر في نفوسهم

• ’’ مواقع ‘‘

TinEye

موقع للبحث عن الصورة ولكن بطريقة معاكسة

فأنت هنا تبحث عن مصدر الصورة باستخدام الصورة نفسها

* وصلني عن طريق الايميل .. شكراً لمن أرسله

*

موقع الشيخ د. محمد العريفي

يستحق الزيارة خصوصاً قسمي المرئيات والصوتيات بهما الكثير من الفوائد

• ’’ أدبيات ‘‘

ديوان الإمام الشافعي

لمن يحب الاطلاع والاستزادة

هناك خاصية التحميل بصيغ مختلفة ولكن بعد التسجيل

من أبياته الجميلة :

عزيزُ النفسِ مَن لزم القناعة  ،؛،  ولم يكشف لمخلوقٍ قِناعَه

أفادتني التجاربُ كل عزٍ  ،؛،  وهل عِزٌ أَعزُ من القَناعَة

فصَيّرها لنفسِك رأس مالٍ  ،؛،  وصيّر بعدها التقوى بِضاعَة

ولا تُطِع الهَوى والنَفسَ واعملْ  ،؛،  مِنَ الخَيراتِ قَدرَ الاستِطاعَة

أُحِبُ الصالِحينَ ولستُ مِنهم  ،؛،  لعلي أَن أنالَ بهِم شَفاعة

وأكرَهُ مَن تِجارَته المعاصي  ،؛،  ولو كُنّا سَواءً في البِضاعَة

• ’’ خدمات ‘‘

المحادثة الفورية مع الصحيحين

خدمة جميلة من موقع الدرر السنية

عن طريق برنامج المحادثة Google Talk

شرح الخدمة وايميل الإضافة

When I first developed an interest in photography just over a year ago, I used to upload the resulting full resolution images directly onto my Flickr photostream. At the time I didn’t really have a grasp of what was meant by the terms copyright, licensing or creative commons. If someone wanted to appreciate an image I’d posted & leave a comment, that was good enough for me.

After a few months, I put up some images taken on a hike in the Peak District & was contacted by someone enquiring as to how much it would cost to use the photos for commercial purposes. Not having a clue how to proceed, I turned to my fellow Flickr buddies for advice & contacted the person in question to try & establish how the images would be used & in how many places they would be reproduced so that I could provide them with a fair quote. Needless to say, I didn’t hear back from them & they removed their comments from the images & their Flickr account was deleted. Now, this could be because they were no longer interested in using my images, & I wouldn’t blame them if that was the case, or it could be because as soon as real money was mentioned they decided to help themselves to the full size digital images from my Flickr account.

From then on, resizing my images before uploading to the web became part of my work flow. By making the image smaller I hoped to retain enough quality so that people could appreciate the image online but low enough resolution to prove useless to anyone who wanted to reproduce it without my permission. At the time I discounted using a watermark or any other text overlay because I didn’t want anything to distract from the photo, plus I’ve seen some horrendous attempts of watermarking done badly.

Unfortunately, a couple of day ago I learnt of a friend who had one of their images stolen from their Flickr account & reproduced for commercial gain without permission. To make matters worse, he only came across the offending image completely by accident & the organisation carrying out the deed was a local media design company that really should know better. This problem is obviously rife & can effect anyone who innocently shares their images online with others. To that end, I’ve decided to bake in a text box to the images I post to the web &, if anything, it may even drive some traffic to my blog.

As I use Lightroom 2 to process my digital images, it appears that a plugin called Mogrify is the best solution to create watermarks, text overlays, frames, borders & many other cool things during export. PC users will also need to download & install ImageMagick as well to make the whole package work. I’ve posted an example of the text overlay I’m proposing to add to my images at the top of this post & any comments on whether you like it or how it could be improved would be much appreciated. Finally, for those who may be concerned that your images are being used elsewhere on the web without your knowledge, TinEye is a reverse image search engine that may be able to help you find them.

Si alguna vez has encontrado una imagen que te gusta muho pero que solo la encuentras en resoluciones resudisas o casi ni  la encuentras, o solo te interesa saber cuantas imagenes parecidas a otras existen pues te invito que visites tineye.

Pruebalo y luego me cuentas..

Link: http://tineye.com/

Happy-Word

Trouble finding where you got that image from?

Finding similar images on the internet that have been stolen or copied can be hard to find as it is not like text which can be easily found with any search engine.

Some reasons that you may need to find similar images on the internet include finding copies of your images, finding the source of the images you have and finding other versions of the images you have.

In this post you will learn how to find similar images on the internet using a website called TinEye (http://tineye.com)

Step 1:
Go to TinEye (http://tineye.com)

Step 2:
Use the “Upload an image” box if you wish to browse for an image on your computer then click search or paste the URL of the image into the second box and click search if the image is hosted on a website.

Step 3:
A results page should appear after clicking on “Search”. The results page contains a list of all the possible matches. It includes links to the website and specific location of the image.

TinEye es un motor de búsqueda de imágenes “reverso” creado por idée Inc., una empresa Canadiense de desarrollo avanzado de identificación de imágenes y software  de búsqueda visual

TinEye busca en las imágenes  indexadas (según anuncian en su página, hasta ahora ,121,525,514 imágenes indexadas) el origen y modificaciones  hechas a una imagen. Este motor permite ver el uso que se le da a una imagen en internet. Sus creadores lo presentan como el primer motor de búsqueda en internet en usar tecnología de identificación de imágenes en vez de palabras claves, metadatos y marcas de agua.

Al subir una imagen, TinEye genera una “Firma digital” o “huella” para la imagen la cual es comparada contra las “huellas ” de las imágenes indexadas para encontrar pares. La búsqueda se realiza en la imagen completa o en partes de ella.  No se trata de buscar imágenes temáticamente similares sino imágenes (o partes extraídas mediante “crop“) exactas, editadas.

Esta herramienta permitirá una vez haya indexado un número significativo de las imágenes en la web, hacer un rastreo de los usos legales e ilegales dados a las imágenes con derechos de uso restringido, entender la reinterpretación y uso hechos por los usuarios de una imagen.

La búsqueda funciona bastante bien con las imágenes indexadas.  Para está imagen bastante común en el tema de Blogs encontró 18 usos, todos exactamente deribados del original. Con otras búsquedas no encontró resultados lo cual se debe a la gran cantidad de imágenes que aún  le falta por indexar.

Es claro que los creadores de este motor son ante todo apasionados por el tema de reconocimiento de imágenes, algo que se ve claramente por una mirada a sus productos entre los cuales Piximilar es uno de los que más me interesaría probar. Visitando el twitter de TinEye se puede esperar que este motor de búsqueda pronto será una herramienta sumamente útil para todos aquellos que como Idée, somos apasionados del don de ver.

What is TinEye?

TinEye is the first image search engine on the web to use image identification technology. Given an image to search for, TinEye tells you where and how that image appears all over the web—even if it has been modified.

Just as you are familiar with entering text in a regular search engine such as Google to find web pages that contain that text, TinEye lets you submit an image to find web pages that contain that image.
What kind of images can it find?

View the cool searches

How does TinEye work?

Every day TinEye’s spiders crawl the web for additional images. Using sophisticated pattern recognition algorithms, TinEye creates a unique and compact digital signature or ‘fingerprint’ for each one and adds it to the index.

When you want to find out where an image is being used on the web, you submit it to TinEye. The attributes of the image are analyzed instantly, and its fingerprint is compared to the fingerprint of every single image in the TinEye search index. The result? A detailed list of any websites using that image, worldwide.

Use TinEye to find out where and how an image appears on the web, even if it has been cropped or heavily modified.

There are many uses for TinEye, but here are a few:

• Find out where an image came from, or get more information about it
• Research or track the appearance of an image online
• Find higher resolution versions of an image
• Locate web pages that make use of an image you have created
• Discover modified or edited versions of an image

So if you want to give it a try http://tineye.com/

Wow, 1/x. What an interesting function. Well here it is applied to cars. Math is so unintuitive half the time. I guess that’s what makes it interesting.

A logic problem our Concepts teacher gave us at the end of Friday’s lecture sounds surprisingly simple, but I still can’t figure out a solution (though I found one online that I haven’t read):

The 12 Pencil Problem (the solution I saw was for 12 Coins)

You have 12 identical looking pencils, but one of them is odd. It weighs more or less than the other pencils. Using a scale three times find out which pencil is odd and whether it weighs more or less than the other pencils. For clarification’s sake, if you weigh six pencils against six pencils and then remove one from each side that is considered two separate uses of the scale.

To get your brain thinking and to eliminate an easy case let’s take four pencils and weigh it against four other pencils. If they are even, then the last set of four contains the odd pencil. Take three from that set and weigh it against three normal pencils. If they are even weigh the last pencil from the odd set against a normal pencil. Otherwise, if it is heavier/lighter than the three normal pencils take any two pencils from that odd set and weigh them against each other. If they are even the last pencil in the odd set is heavierlighter than the other eleven. Else, having established that the odd pencil must be heavier/lighter from the 2nd weighing, the odd pencil of the two can be determined.

Another interesting link I’ve found is for the TinEye Reverse Image Search. You can take any image (like one that’s too small) and it searches for that same image (hopefully in higher resolution). The library it has is currently pretty limited, but it’s sort of that thing you figured we would’ve perfected by now since it seems pretty useful.

مع إتساع بحور الإنترنت هذه الأيام أصبح من الصعب تعقب أشيائك الخاصة مثلاً من قام بنقل موضوعك على الإنترنت بدون إذنك أو قام بنقل الصور التي تنتمي إليك بدون مراعاة حقوق الملكية الفكرية الخاصة بك أو قام بإستغلال توقيعك الذي صممته بنفسك ..

الموقع الذي نقدمه لك اليوم هو موقع مميز جداً حيث انه يقدم تكنولوجيا الهندسة العكسية Reverse Engineering في تتبع الصور بالقيام بالعملية العكسية حيث أنك تعطيه الصورة و هو يبحث لك عن صور مشابهة .. الموقع يعمل بشكل جيد جداً و هو الشيء المفاجيء نظراً لأنه من أوائل المواقع التي تقدم هذه التكنولوجيا .. جربوه و ستندهشون من النتائج المرضية ..

كل ما عليك فعله هو الدخول إلى الموقع و رفع الصورة التي تريد تعقبها من حاسبك أو تضع رابطاً لها و سوف تشهد السحر بعينيك  

الموقع من هــــــنــــــا

و قريباً بإذن الله أقدم لكم موقع يعمل بنفس التكنولوجيا لكي يجد لك صديقك على موقع FaceBook بمجرد الحصول على أي صورة له .. فابقو معنا 

احتمالا تا به حال تصویری نظر شما را جلب کرده و خواسته اید که اطلاعات بیشتری در مورد آن پیدا کنید. مطمئنا در این راه گوگل نقش زیادی نمی توانسته ایفا کند چرا که تا به حال هیچ راهی برای گوگل کردن یک تصویر ارائه نشده است.
روش جستجو بر مبنای تصاویر یکی از قابلیت های موتور های جستجوی آینده است و شرکت های بزرگی همچون گوگل سرمایه گذاری زیادی برای کار بر روی الگوریتم ها و پیاده سازی این نوع روش جستجو کرده است.

این روش در حال حاضر از سوی وب سایت Tineye به صورت آزمایشی ارائه شده است. تینای یک سرویس جستجو مبتنی بر تصاویر است که با دریافت یک تصویر از کامپیوتر کاربر و یا از سطح اینترنت ، لیست صفحاتی که از آن تصویر استفاده می کنند را نمایش می دهد.

واقعا که سایت جالب و عجیبی هستش !

نکته قابل توجه در مورد این موتور جستجوی تصاویر آن است که اگر نسخه ای ویرایش شده از تصویر نیز بر روی اینترنت وجود داشته باشد ، آن را هم در لیست نتایج جستجو نمایش خواهد داد. همچنین این جستجوگر تصویر قادر است (در صورت وجود) تصاویری با کیفیت بهتر و در اندازه های بالاتر را نیز پیدا کند و به شما نشان دهد. نتایج جستجو نیز بسیار دقیق است ، به نحوی که تصاویر یافته شده دقیقا دارای همان مشخصات و ویژگی های تصویر مورد نظر شماست. درواقع تینای با تصاویر همان کاری را می کند که گوگل با نوشته ها !

روش این موتور جستجو جهت یافتن نتیجه جستجوی مورد نظر کاربر به این شکل است که بعد از ارسال درخواست کاربر به این سرویس ، تصویر ارسال شده کاربر به صورت یک امضای دیجیتالی یکتا (اثر انگشت) مورد پردازش قرار می گیرد و سپس از بین میلیون ها امضای دیجیتالی دیگر ، نتایج منطبق بازگردانده می شود.

از این سرویس می توانید برای پیدا کردن اطلاعات در مورد تصویر و یا منبع اصلی تصویر ، یافتن تصاویر مشابه با کیفیت های متغییر و نسخه های ویرایش شده تصویر استفاده کنید.

تینای سرویسی کاربردی و در عین حال جالب و سرگرم کننده است و اینکه بتواند توجه گوگل و یا موتور های جستجوی دیگر را جلب کند دور از انتظار نیست.

برای مشاهده نمونه تصاویر جستجو شده به این آدرس مراجعه کنید ، برای نصب پلاگین های این سیستم بر روی مرورگرهای فایرفاکس و یا IE نیز به این آدرس مراجعه کنید.

by Miserere

While the Internet has changed the way art is distributed, it has also changed how it is stolen. Thousands upon thousands of photos are uploaded every day to a plethora of hosting sites and personal websites/blogs. I think most of us have read enough stories by now to know that no image on the internet is safe from robbery, which is why, if we care about the safety of our photos we add a watermark and upload only reduced sizes. This doesn’t stop images from being stolen everyday. So what can we do about it?

TinEye is a reverse image search engine that looks for images online. Unlike Google Images or other such services that rely on keywords associated with the image file or found in the text close to it, TinEye can search for specific images based on their content. Feed it one of your photos and it will search for it online, even if it’s been cropped and resized! Now how cool is that?

TinEye is just starting out, so the websites it has crawled through looking for images are still limited in number—the internet is a big place! However, as time progresses and TinEye’s database grows, it can provide a valuable resource to those of us who care about where our photos are being used. In their FAQs they’ve stated the following:

We hope to introduce a paid feature which will allow you to upload or point to a group of images, and have TinEye check for matches on a regular basis, sending you updates when a match is found.

This makes perfect business sense, both for them and for professional photographers worried about their artistic rights being violated.

For now, TinEye offer a Plugin for Firefox and IE that allows you to click on any image on the web and see if it’s posted elsewhere. You can also just go to TinEye’s mainpage and point to a specific online address or upload an image and search from there.

Tout photographe professionnel ou amateur qui publie ses œuvres sur le net peut se voir confronté au problème de vol de photos. Il existe pourtant 1001 manières de se protéger contre ce genre de larcin, mais toutes ont une limite et même des inconvénients.

Voici une liste non exhaustive des moyens à votre disposition :

• Bloquer le clic-droit : C’est nul ça ne sert à rien
• Superposer une image transparente à la photo (vu ici), le clic-droit accède ainsi à l’image transparente et non à la photo : Même remarque que le précédent, il suffit de faire “Enregistrer-sous …” dans votre navigateur et l’image sera téléchargé.
• Ajouter une grille transparente ou un texte transparent sur la photo : Ça peut gâcher la photo.
• Uploader ses images en qualité pourrie : la qualité sera pourrie …
• …

Toutes ces méthodes ne sont pas top vous l’aurez compris. Existe-t-il alors un moyen de se protéger ?

Oui et il s’appelle le watermarking ou tatouage numérique. Le watermark est une signature intégrer à n’importe quel fichier numérique (audio, video, photo). Cette signature est unique et permet d’identifier le fichier même modifié par un tiers. Pour une image il s’agirait de lui appliquer un filtre précis généré par un algorithme dépendant d’une clé.

“C’est bien beau tout ça , mais ça n’empêche pas les méchants de voler mes images !”. Non mais vous serez capable de les retrouver en utilisant un outil comme TinEye .

TinEye is a reverse image search engine. Il vous permettra de trouver à partir de n’importe quelle image (ou presque) toutes ses occurences sur le web. Comment ca marche ? Grâce au watermarking !

Sapere chi compra le nostre immagini e che uso ne fa è una curiosità che hanno tutti i microstoKKari. L’unico sito che metteva il nome del cliente nelle info delle vendite era Fotolia, ma è stato tolto per motivi di privacy dato che qualche cretino ha pensato bene di contattare direttamente il cliente per sapere che uso avesse fatto dell’immagine comprata, o almeno questa è la spiegazione di Fotolia, fermo restando che forse, e dico forse, un autore per quanto ceda i diritti di utilizzo di una immagine avrebbe forse e dico forse, il diritto di sapere dove va a finire…

Oltre alla naturale curiosità di vedere una nostra immagine su un dépliant o una rivista, sapere in che mercato si muovono le vendite è un dato utile e interessante, sottovalutato da molti. Se vedessi tra le mie vendite una buona percentuale di un determinato settore (edilizia, sanità, educazione, ecc.ecc.) potrei focalizzare la mia produzione, ma senza questa indicazione andiamo tutti un po’ alla cieca sperando che la nostra immagine capiti sotto gli occhi di un determinato cliente, è un po’ come giocare al gratta&vinci o rasca&gana secondo dove vi troviate rispetto i Pirenei.

Però qualcosa si può tentare, almeno per le immagini utilizzate su Internet, innanzi tutto c’è TinEye (si può installare anche come plug-in del browser) che cerca nel web l’immagine che gli indicate o caricate. Al momento non ho trovato nessuna delle mie immagini ma non ho foto o illustrazioni vendute migliaia di volte e se l’immagine è stata tagliata o usata come sfondo per dei testi sará difficile che TinEye la trovi.

Un altro sistema che può dare i suoi frutti è cercare con Google il proprio nome utente + nome agenzia, se chi ha comprato l’immagine è stato corretto avrà messo nei crediti il nome dell’autore e l’agenzia da cui ha comprato l’immagine.

C’è anche chi ha trovato una propria immagine su una copertina di un libro cercando su Amazon con lo stesso sistema di Google, dev’essere una bella soddisfazione

Io ho trovato queste con Google:

Comprata su Shutterstock:

e trovata in un sito tedesco (quale sia la relazione tra le moto e il mulino spagnolo sfugge alla mia comprensione)

Anche questa comprata su Shutterstock:

e pubblicata su un sito americano, anzi Texano, per promuovere il progetto di una centrale solare ad Austin:

Il mio Aceto Balsamico di Modena comprato su Dreamstime:

© Photographer: Milacroft | Agency: Dreamstime.com

Trovato su un sito inglese all’interno di un articolo che dice che per pulire acque contaminate si può usare l’aceto … eh sí certo … Aceto Balsamico di Modena .. se sapessero cosa cosa al litro si renderebbero conto che forse costerebbe meno sostituire l’acqua contaminata con acqua minerale

E questa paella che è stata comprata su Fotolia:

Ed è stata utilizzata in una guida TV tedesca in formato PDF:

Ora, una domanda sorge spontanea, anzi due, primo, se la trasmissione si chiama Italienisch-vegetarisch perchè c’è una paella spagnola? … Ah ok .. è una paella di verdure … e secondo e più inquietante quesito … su questo pianeta c’é ancora chi guarda Lassie?????????

]]> http://andypiper.wordpress.com/2009/06/30/update-creative-commons-issue-resolutions/ Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:03:46 +0000 Andy Piper http://andypiper.wordpress.com/2009/06/30/update-creative-commons-issue-resolutions/

Rather than appending to my previous post I thought I’d add this update as a separate entry.

Following my discovery that the Daily Mail had used one of my images without permission, a number of threads kicked off. I asked folks via my blog, on Flickr and on Twitter, what their recommendations were – and I was overwhelmed by the response.

My initial response was to contact the Mail and ask for attribution, but I received no response to my email. I then decided to contact the picture desk, and ended up invoicing them for use of the image based on breach of license terms. I was prepared to take the matter further had the attribution (at minimum) not been provided. They finally added an attribution yesterday – although that’s via an overlay on the image, so it’s not ideal as it’s not searchable, and there’s no link back to my original content.

It has been pointed out to me that simply retrospectively billing them may lend some legitimacy to what they have done here… and let’s be honest, unless someone had spotted the reuse of my image I wouldn’t have known about it. They hadn’t linked to my Flickr page so I wouldn’t have found it via search. I suppose one answer would be the use of a tool like Tineye. More importantly though, I think it’s completely unacceptable to use CC-licensed (or even fully rights-reserved) material in this way and news sites and other services need to learn to respect these licenses. As a result, I’ve had some other friends make contact with the Mail at a high level to make this point.

On Sunday I became aware that another site had reprinted the Mail’s story, and included my image. This time, it was a news site in Brazil. My initial approach to this was to use Google Translate to try to find contact details, and I ended up filling in a form in English. I then asked for assistance on Twitter, and @mauricioswg was able to put me in touch with a Brazilian friend of his who also contacted the site on my behalf. At first they took the image down, but they still wanted to use it and after some discussion they now have the “correct” unmodified version of the image with attribution by agreement, thus fulfilling the terms of the license.

The upshot of all this? Whilst it can sometimes be hard to locate sites that are using your images – be vigilant as far as possible, and insist on your license. It’s your material.

I’d like to thank everyone who has offered support and provided help. My Twitter and other online and offline contacts have been invaluable. Social networks FTW!

Facebook è diventato nel giro di pochi mesi un sito popolarissimo; prima, almeno in Italia, era sconosciuto ai piú. E se un sito diventa famoso, è chiaro che la curiosità degli utenti porta subito alla luce vari piccoli “segreti”.

Mentre preparavo un articolo (che pubblicherò a breve) riguardo il grande social network, mi sono imbattuto in questa curiosa immagine, di cui nemmeno Google sa fornirmi una spiegazione (e a dire il vero nemmeno TinEye, il motore di ricerca di immagini al quale ho dedicato un articolo, è stato in grado di aiutarmi).

Chi sono le due persone raffigurate? Ma soprattutto, vi chiederete, «cos’ha di cosí strano questa immagine?».

Questa curiosa fotografia non è altro che la favicon («favorites icon», «icona dei preferiti») del server delle immagini di Facebook. Per chi non sapesse che cos’è una favicon, è semplicemente la piccola immagine che appare nella barra dell’indirizzo del browser quando si visita un determinato sito Web.

Chi sono queste due misteriose figure? Se avete qualche informazione, non esitate a segnalarla! Altrimenti, saremo costretti a ricorrere a «Chi l’ha visto»…

This image is one of my favorites.  Can anybody tell me who the artist is and where it’s from?  

I posed that question yesterday and got a very wonderful hint from Steve Penny.  Check out TinEye at  http://tineye.com/.  It’s a reverse image search engine. You upload the image and TinEye provides a list of sites where that image is found.

To Try this…

1. go to  http://tineye.com

2. Cut & paste this url:

http://technicalprojectservices.wordpress.com/files/2009/04/headcomingthrough.jpg

4. See the results.  I got 23 pages of urls which contain this image, sorted (my option) from best to worst match.  Wow.

Another cool search from Idee: http://www.ideeinc.com/videos/multicolour

TinEye is a reverse image search engine. You can submit an image to TinEye to find out where it came from, how it is being used, if modified versions of the image exist, or to find higher resolution versions. TinEye is the first image search engine on the web to use image identification technology rather than keywords, metadata or watermarks.

–> TinEye

TinEye hatte ich ja schon mal vorgestellt. TinEye ist ein Bildersuchprogramm. Online kann man Kopien eigener Bilder im Web finden. Es werden selbst geänderte Bildvarianten gefunden.

TinEye ist die erste Bildersuchmaschine im Netz, die Pixelstruckturen und nicht  Schlüsselwörter, Metadaten oder Wasserzeichen zur Suche verwendet.

TinEye hat seinen Index um weitere 100 Milionen Bilder aufgestockt, und durchsucht damit nun über 600 Millionen Bilder im Internet, um sie mit vorgegebenen Fotos abzugleichen.

Dies war für mich der Grund mal wieder ein paar Testdurchläufe zu machen.

Meine Aufnahme wurde in einem Artikel gefunden. Und dies obwohl Schrift und ein anderes Logo im Schild eingearbeitet ist.

In diesem Fall muss ich keinen Anwalt aufsuchen, da ich für das Magazin damals die Aufnahme gemacht hatte.