<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>viewfinder &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/viewfinder/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "viewfinder"</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 04:39:08 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Merry Christmas!]]></title>
<link>http://thrumikesviewfinder.com/2009/12/25/merry-christmas/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 14:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mike Hendren</dc:creator>
<guid>http://thrumikesviewfinder.com/2009/12/25/merry-christmas/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Merry Christmas to you and your family and best wishes for the new year! Mike &amp; Bren Hendren]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p style="text-align:center;"><a rel="attachment wp-att-346" href="http://thrumikesviewfinder.com/2009/12/25/merry-christmas/xmas-card-meandbren/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-346" title="Christmas Card" src="http://thrumikesviewfinder.wordpress.com/files/2009/12/xmas-card-meandbren.jpg" alt="Merry Christmas" width="600" height="399" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:small;"><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">Merry Christmas to you and your family and best wishes for the new year!</span></strong></span><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;"><br />
</span></strong> <strong><span style="color:#ff0000;"></span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:small;"><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">Mike &#38; Bren Hendren</span></strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:small;"><br />
</span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Adobe Lightroom Magic]]></title>
<link>http://thrumikesviewfinder.com/2009/12/14/adobe-lightroom-magic-2/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mike Hendren</dc:creator>
<guid>http://thrumikesviewfinder.com/2009/12/14/adobe-lightroom-magic-2/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I took this photo just over 5 years ago and was never very happy with it. The building and foregroun]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div>
<div><img style="max-width:800px;" src="http://thrumikesviewfinder.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/20041011original.jpg?w=520&#038;h=346" alt="" width="520" height="346" /></div>
<p><strong>I took this photo just over 5 years ago and was never very happy with it.</strong> The building and foreground were too dark and the canyon in the background was washed out.  So, I&#8217;ve just ignored it for 5 years.</p>
<p>Then, today, I was going through my old images and came across this one and started &#8220;playing&#8221; with it.  <strong><span style="color:#800080;">Photo software has improved immensely in the last few years</span></strong> and <a title="Adobe Lightroom Software" href="http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshoplightroom/" target="_blank">Adobe Lightroom</a> wasn&#8217;t even available at that time.  Of course Adobe Photoshop had the capability to improve this image &#8211; I just never took the time to jump through all of the Photoshop hoops it would have taken to make these improvements.</p>
<p><img style="max-width:800px;float:left;margin-top:10px;margin-bottom:10px;margin-right:10px;" src="http://thrumikesviewfinder.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/littlesnapper.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>One of the things Lightroom does for you, is give you an easy to use panel where <strong><em>you make all of the adjustments while viewing the changes as they occur.</em></strong></p>
<p>Since part of the exposure was too bright and part too dark, I decided to leave exposure alone and make my corrections using &#8220;Recovery&#8221; and &#8220;Fill Light.  Moving the Recovery slider all the way to the right restored some of the detail to the canyon.  Then I added Fill Light which brightens the shadows.</p>
<p>To begin improving contrast, I moved the &#8220;Blacks&#8221; slider just slightly right and moved on to &#8220;Contrast&#8221; to finish.</p>
<p>I then moved &#8220;Clarity&#8221; all the way to the right for maximum effect.  What this slider does is increase the local contrast, mostly in the mid-tones, resulting in an appearance of better overall sharpness and giving more punch to the image.</p>
<p>&#8220;Vibrance&#8221; got bumped right a little bit &#8211; the most noticeable effect of this control (for me) is a deepening of the blues, especially in the sky, but it also sometimes can over saturate some colors.</p>
<p>Then, I used the individual color sliders to brighten the building a bit more (Orange Luminance), and make the greens just a bit brighter and more green.</p>
<p>The final color adjustment was with the Blue Luminance, just to darken that little bit of sky a tad more.</p>
<p>Finally, there are Sharpening and Noise Reduction sliders which I almost always use &#8211; normally with a little bit of sharpening and a lot of noise reduction.</p>
<p>With these tweaks, which really took just a few minutes, I was able to improve the image considerably.  Still not a contest winner, but I think it&#8217;s a much better representation of what I wanted when I took the photo back in 2004.</p>
<div><img style="max-width:800px;" src="http://thrumikesviewfinder.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/20041011grandcanyon.jpg" alt="" width="582" height="388" /></div>
</div>
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=a06e97af-74e3-829d-a10c-96d4ab20e21b" alt="" /></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sunrise Reflected - HDR]]></title>
<link>http://thrumikesviewfinder.com/2009/12/07/sunrise-reflected-hdr/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mike Hendren</dc:creator>
<guid>http://thrumikesviewfinder.com/2009/12/07/sunrise-reflected-hdr/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I was honored to have this image and blog post featured on the excellent Photography Tutorials websi]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.photogler.com/photo-tutorial-sunrise-reflected/"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-342" title="Featured Photo on Photogler.com" src="http://thrumikesviewfinder.wordpress.com/files/2009/12/photoglerfeaturedsmall.png" alt="" width="100" height="105" /></a><a title="Sunrise Reflected by Mike Hendren" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/thrumikesviewfinder/4115596503/" target="_blank"></a></div>
<div style="text-align:center;"><strong>I was honored to have this image and blog post featured on the excellent Photography Tutorials website: </strong><a title="Photogler.com photo tutorials" href="http://www.photogler.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Photogler.com</strong></a></div>
<div style="text-align:center;"><a title="Sunrise Reflected by Mike Hendren" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/thrumikesviewfinder/4115596503/" target="_blank"><img style="max-width:800px;" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2727/4115596503_8b89dbb788.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<span class="f1" style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:small;">Photo </span><span class="f2" style="font-family:'Lucida Grande';font-size:small;">© Mike Hendren, 2009</span></div>
<div style="text-align:center;"></div>
<p>One morning in November, I looked out the window to see what <strong>promised to be a gorgeous sunrise</strong>.  Fortunately, my <a href="http://www.nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/Product/Camera-Lenses/2163/AF-S-NIKKOR-14-24mm-f1142.8G-ED.html" target="_blank">Nikkor 14-24mm</a> lens was already on my camera, a <a href="http://www.nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/Product/Digital-SLR/25444/D700.html" target="_blank">Nikon D700</a>, so all I had to do was grab the tripod and run out the door.  I set up just behind the house and saw the <strong>bright clouds reflected in the windows</strong> of the house and giving a warm golden glow to the stone work.</p>
<p>One of the primary requirements for good HDR (High Dynamic Range) images is a tripod.  Even if the normal exposure could be hand held, you still need to be sure that every image in the bracketed series will line up perfectly.  <a href="http://www.hdrsoft.com/" target="_blank">Photomatix Pro</a>, the software I use to process HDR images, can do a decent job of lining up images, but the result is often less than desirable if a tripod was not used &#8211; resulting in what appear to be out of focus images.</p>
<p>Other <strong>important considerations</strong> are:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>aperture priority</strong> (to have a consistent depth of field),</li>
<li><strong>auto-ISO off</strong> (set the lowest ISO possible to reduce noise in the images),</li>
<li>and <strong>manual focus</strong> (to make sure the focal point doesn&#8217;t change from one image to the next).</li>
<li>Some also recommend setting the white balance to something other than Auto.  I always shoot in RAW, and this has not been an issue.  If it were, the white balance of RAW images can always be changed with software.</li>
</ul>
<p>So, I shot 7 bracketed images with 1EV spacing between each one, at an aperture of f/5.6 and the lens at 14mm.</p>
<p>After importing the images into <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshoplightroom/?promoid=DJGSN_P_US_FP2_LR_MN&#38;tt=P_US_FP2_LR_MN" target="_blank">Adobe Lightroom</a>, I immediately exported them to <a href="http://www.hdrsoft.com/" target="_blank">Photomatix Pro</a>.  <a href="http://www.hdrsoft.com/" target="_blank">Photomatix</a> default settings usually provide a very good starting point but optimum results will normally require tweaking some of the settings.  In this case, I left the strength at 100%, but reduced the Luminosity slightly because the default setting was too bright.</p>
<p>Next, I increased the Smoothing setting slightly to get rid of the halo around the house &#8211; this is sometimes introduced by HDR processing and can add impact to some images but often results in an unnatural looking effect.</p>
<p>Finally, I reduced the Micro-smoothing to zero to keep texture in the clouds and stone work on the house and then saved the image back in to <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshoplightroom/?promoid=DJGSN_P_US_FP2_LR_MN&#38;tt=P_US_FP2_LR_MN" target="_blank">Lightroom</a> for some minor tweaks.</p>
<p>The highlights were still a little too bright so I used <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshoplightroom/?promoid=DJGSN_P_US_FP2_LR_MN&#38;tt=P_US_FP2_LR_MN" target="_blank">Lightroom</a><a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshoplightroom/?promoid=DJGSN_P_US_FP2_LR_MN&#38;tt=P_US_FP2_LR_MN" target="_blank">&#8217;s</a> Highlight Recovery slider to reduce those slightly.  I almost always add some Contrast and Clarity &#8211; it seems to add a bit of a sharpening effect.  Then I normally increase the Vibrance, especially if there is some blue sky, to deepen and darken that sky.  Finally, I&#8217;ll sharpen slightly and do some noise reduction to make sure the image is as smooth and noise free as possible.</p>
<p>Producing HDR images is a lot of fun and can give some added dimension to your portfolio &#8211; so give it a try!<img class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=f4a4f8ca-b59a-83f8-a741-a6caaaaafca7" alt="" /></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[cultural autism.]]></title>
<link>http://travelersnote.wordpress.com/2009/12/06/cultural-autism/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ACHOR</dc:creator>
<guid>http://travelersnote.wordpress.com/2009/12/06/cultural-autism/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I grew up loving kaleidoscopes, they always seemd to intrigue me. You could look through the small v]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>I grew up loving kaleidoscopes, they always seemd to intrigue me. You could look through the small viewfinder lens and twist and twist and see a variegated schema of colors and sometimes if you twisted it just right you would get all the colors working together to create this rainbow of diversity. </p>
<p>Attributes of autism tend to include: </p>
<blockquote><p>Sameness is resistance to change; for example, insisting that the furniture not be moved or refusing to be interrupted.<br />
Ritualistic behavior involves an unvarying pattern of daily activities, such as an unchanging menu or a dressing ritual. This is closely associated with sameness and an independent validation has suggested combining the two factors.<br />
Restricted behavior is limited in focus, interest, or activity, such as preoccupation with a single television program, toy, or game. </p></blockquote>
<p>Some religious views might include a worldview that pervasively excludes the possibility of other belief systems containing any truth whatsoever. I would hope we could all sign-on to the reality that truth is bigger than one systematic approach to why we are here. That truth is in each of us as Jesus offered (John 14:6). Not that all truth could be handled by one person, but that when we come together, we get to experience truth in its fullness. Remember Jesus himself is linked up into a partnership, a community of sorts. And in more than one place, he says we can be just like Him. In fact, one place, He tells us to go and be like Him. This idea is beyond pantheism or any other label one might find to try and fit this, because it bigger than you or I or a group of people. It is a framework designed by God that we can all join in and seek to find truth together. But, when we get comfortable in our way of seeing the world rather than seeing the value in different worldviews we suspend some of our reality and promote a cultural autism that was never meant to be. </p>
<p>Christianity isn&#8217;t the only place where we can participate in the perpetration of cultural autism. It is something we can do in other faiths as well. Or politics. Or emotions. Or worldviews. Or family dynamics. If we are to move out from this then we must be able to move through the whole autistic spectrum to find what we are looking for. You never know what you are looking for until you find it. </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Perspective]]></title>
<link>http://jabraham.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/sandy-eye/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jabraham</dc:creator>
<guid>http://jabraham.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/sandy-eye/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[When the moment is seen through your eyes alone and alone is when the moment you own, no one to see ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>When the  moment is seen through your eyes alone<br />
and alone is when the moment you own,<br />
no one to see in your mind privately<br />
no noise to disturb your life, silently.<br />
A click of the frame that moment in time,<br />
A look in your soul, is one with your mind,<br />
Alone with your thought, but two with your heart<br />
Love steers your sight, not alone nor apart.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HDR Windmill and Double Rainbow]]></title>
<link>http://thrumikesviewfinder.com/2009/12/04/hdr-windmill-and-double-rainbow/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mike Hendren</dc:creator>
<guid>http://thrumikesviewfinder.com/2009/12/04/hdr-windmill-and-double-rainbow/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Photo © Mike Hendren, 2009 This summer, after a thunderstorm had passed overhead, I noticed a double]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div style="text-align:center;"><img style="max-width:800px;" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2490/4082725647_f240c523ae.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<span class="f1" style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:small;">Photo </span><span class="f2" style="font-family:'Lucida Grande';font-size:small;">© Mike Hendren, 2009</span></p>
<div style="text-align:left;">This summer, after a thunderstorm had passed overhead, I noticed a <span style="color:#cc0000;"><strong>double rainbow</strong></span> out my window. After taking a few shots, my wife got home and said, &#8220;You&#8217;ve got to see the rainbow at our neighbor&#8217;s house.&#8221; So I grabbed my camera and drove down.</p>
<p>It was such a nice setup with the <span style="color:#cc0000;">bright double rainbow</span>, seemingly coming down right at their house.  The sun was shining in the foreground and there was a dark sky behind to highlight the entire scene.</p>
<p>I only got a single exposure of this so a true HDR image was not possible. So I made a virtual copy in <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshoplightroom/" target="_blank">Lightroom</a>, exported the two images to <a href="http://www.hdrsoft.com/" target="_blank">Photomatix Pro</a>, and separated them with 4 ev (that&#8217;s a function of Photomatix). After the Photomatix processing, I imported the results back in to <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshoplightroom/" target="_blank">Lightroom</a>. There I cooled the color temp. a little to get the sky a little bluer, and with a few more tweaks of color and sharpening, ended up with this.</p>
<p>You can see a part of the result of the HDR processing in the <em><strong>halo around the windmill</strong></em>. This can happen when an image is sort of &#8220;overprocessed&#8221; in Photomatix and is not always desirable. However, in this case, I did it on purpose just because I liked the extra contrast around the windmill blades.</p>
<p>Prints of this image are available at My Zenfolio:<br />
<a href="http://mikehendren.zenfolio.com/p34363672/h2aaf95e3#h2aaf95e3" target="_blank">mikehendren.zenfolio.com/</a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="text-align:left;"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=62ed8625-293a-865c-bf20-83e99f461db4" alt="" /></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Shiny new old camera]]></title>
<link>http://oxforddreaming.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/shiny-new-old-camera/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Eachan</dc:creator>
<guid>http://oxforddreaming.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/shiny-new-old-camera/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Last summer, I came across my great grandfather&#39;s old camera, and I became fascinated by it. In ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div id="attachment_5" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 507px"><a href="http://oxforddreaming.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/dscf0928-800x600.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-5 " title="Akarelle" src="http://oxforddreaming.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/dscf0928-800x600.jpg" alt="Akarelle" width="497" height="372" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Last summer, I came across my great grandfather&#39;s old camera, and I became fascinated by it.</p></div>
<p>In a time when the DSLR reigns supreme, it is a joy to use a photographic instrument which requires no batteries and relies completely on the user&#8217;s skill, not his camera&#8217;s processing power. This Akarelle (c. 1958) is a simple viewfinder camera. The lens is f/3.5 with a focal length of 50 mm; the focussing is manual from 3.5 feet to infinity, and the aperture can be stopped down to f/16. The fastest shutter speed is 1/300 second, and the camera even has a mechanical self-timer!</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[NEW - Night Vision Viewer Downloadable Plan]]></title>
<link>http://atomiczombie.wordpress.com/2009/11/10/new-night-vision-viewer-downloadable-plan/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>atomiczombie</dc:creator>
<guid>http://atomiczombie.wordpress.com/2009/11/10/new-night-vision-viewer-downloadable-plan/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Using invisible infrared light, the Night Vision Viewer can see in 100% darkness, indoors and outdoo]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><img src="http://www.cancart.net/atomiczombie.com/images/pi_16195.jpeg" border="0" alt="" /></p>
<p>Using invisible infrared light, the Night Vision Viewer can see in 100% darkness, indoors and outdoors, and will run from a battery pack for several hours.</p>
<p>If covert surveillance or countermeasures is your game, then this is one piece of equipment you will definitely want in your spy gear arsenal.</p>
<p>The Night Vision Viewer is built around commonly available parts, most of which can be found new at any electronics store, or be taken from dead video appliances. This project is well within the reach of anyone with a desire to do a little hardware hacking, and even includes a basic guide to getting started in electronics.</p>
<p>There is a lot of room to add your own modifications as well, so you can create your own unique spy gear in order to further your cause. The truth is out there, and now you will be able to see it, even in total darkness!</p>
<ul>
<li>75 pages of detailed instructions</li>
<li>69 pictures and diagrams</li>
<li>Introduction to electronics</li>
<li>Instant download 16.5MB PDF file</li>
</ul>
<p>More details and ordering information at <a href="http://www.atomiczombie.com/">http://www.atomiczombie.com</a> .</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[DIY Viewfinder for D-SLR]]></title>
<link>http://surkrew.wordpress.com/2009/11/08/diy-viewfinder-for-d-slr/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>surkrew</dc:creator>
<guid>http://surkrew.wordpress.com/2009/11/08/diy-viewfinder-for-d-slr/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[After going through alot of DIY pictures and forums, I&#8217;ve finally managed to finish one of my ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>After going through alot of DIY pictures and forums, I&#8217;ve finally managed to finish one of my (many) DIY works for my 500D: DIY magnified viewfinder. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/surkrew/4085766644/" title="DIY Viewfinder side view by Shopian Said, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2597/4085766644_bc3163a880_o.jpg" width="400" alt="DIY Viewfinder side view" /></a></p>
<p>Based on the design from <a href="http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?t=185852" target="_blank">here</a>, I gathered the required materials needed: magnifying glass, a small square container, a couple of 2inch pvc pipes, matte black spray paint and hot glue.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t take a step-by-step pictures but here you can see the first prototype I did. Note the eyepiece from my DVX100.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/surkrew/4085008059/" title="DIY Viewfinder prototype by Shopian Said, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3491/4085008059_3c62bd2b52_o.jpg" width="400" alt="DIY Viewfinder prototype" /></a></p>
<p>And here&#8217;s another picture from another angle.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/surkrew/4085008225/" title="DIY Viewfinder back view by Shopian Said, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2562/4085008225_60a6d486c1_o.jpg" width="400" alt="DIY Viewfinder back view" /></a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Olympus Pen E-P2]]></title>
<link>http://theanaspot.wordpress.com/2009/11/07/olympus-pen-e-p2/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>TheAnaspot</dc:creator>
<guid>http://theanaspot.wordpress.com/2009/11/07/olympus-pen-e-p2/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Olympus realizes the all new E-P2, which includes an electronic viewfinder, an electronic multi-purp]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Olympus realizes the all new E-P2, which includes an electronic viewfinder, an electronic multi-purpose out, in which you can adapt a stereo microphone if you want your HD (720p) videos to have stereo sound. You can have it with the Olympus Digital Zuiko 14-42mm lens or with the 17mm pancake or even with both of them. It comes only in piano Black (color-colour), a bit more shiny than the Sigma DP-1 or the Sigma DP-2. Here it is:<br />
<img src="http://theanaspot.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/e-p2__sidele_1442mm_vf2_m.jpg" alt="E-P2" title="E-P2" width="225" height="215" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-54" /></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[iPhone Apps: "Car Finder"]]></title>
<link>http://jsubijano.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/iphone-apps-car-finder/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jsubijano</dc:creator>
<guid>http://jsubijano.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/iphone-apps-car-finder/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Car Finder app Picture this: It&#8217;s Holiday Shopping Season and you are stalking shoppers for a ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 327px"><img title="Car Finder app" src="http://www.cultofmac.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/car_finder.png" alt="" width="317" height="478" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Car Finder app</p></div>
<p>Picture this:<br />
It&#8217;s Holiday Shopping Season and you are <em>stalking</em> shoppers for a potential parking spot nearest the mall entrance. You&#8217;ve probably gone around the mall parking hundreds of times with no luck and your patience has worn thin. So you settle for the parking spot you never knew even existed and bolt for the mall entrance in the piercing winter cold.</p>
<p>Several hundreds &#8211; if not thousands &#8211; of dollars <em>gone</em> and bags from your favorite designers shackled to your arms&#8230;you trudge back outside only to remember that you <em>did not</em> remember where you parked. Remind you that it is probably <em>even</em> colder than when you first entered the mall. Sucks, but its happened to all of us.</p>
<p>ENTER the &#8220;Car Finder&#8221; app from the iTunes App Store. This app from Intridea, Inc. sets the location of your car (of course you set it when you first park). Then when you need to find your car turn the app on and use the camera viewfinder see an overlay of where your car is at. The app uses Augmented Reality to find your car and it will tell you what direction your car is and how far away it is. It is only compatible for the iPhone 3GS.</p>
<p>Helpful for those &#8220;OH <em>SHIT</em>!&#8221; moments during Holiday Shopping.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Olympus Pen (EP-2) Leaks Out]]></title>
<link>http://pastatech.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/olympus-pen-ep-2-leaks-out/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>pastatech</dc:creator>
<guid>http://pastatech.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/olympus-pen-ep-2-leaks-out/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[On the Internet, there are no secrets, especially in the tech industry. Rumors leak out by the dozen]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>On the Internet, there are no secrets, especially in the tech industry. Rumors leak out by the dozens and for the last few years, the insiders who leak documentation on gadgets are hitting the mark almost exactly.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-339" title="ep2-01" src="http://pastatech.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/ep2-01.jpg" alt="ep2-01" width="353" height="287" /></p>
<p>Today&#8217;s leak is the Olympus Pen (EP-2). The EP-2 is the second coming of the Pen (EP-1) that was released a few months back. Almost immediately after the EP-1 hit the streets, rumors were already spurring around on what the EP-2 would have. Sure enough, the EP-2 may fix nearly all the deficiencies that many photo-heads found in the first one.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-340" title="ep2-02" src="http://pastatech.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/ep2-02.jpg" alt="ep2-02" width="366" height="366" /></p>
<p>The EP-1 was a redesign of the famed classy Olympus PEN 35 mm film camera. Despite the film camera not being pen-like in any aspect, it was called PEN because of its small size and portability. The PEN was the worlds first half-frame camera at the time. Thanks to the micro four-thirds system, developed by Olympus and Panasonic, Olympus was able to recreate the camera for the digital era while keeping the PEN&#8217;s iconic body mostly intact.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-341" title="ep2-03" src="http://pastatech.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/ep2-03.jpg" alt="ep2-03" width="381" height="242" /></p>
<p>During my stay in Hong Kong this past summer, the EP-1 was <em>the</em> camera to drool over. Not as large as even the smallest DSLRs on the market (Nikon D40, 60, 3000, 5000/Canon XSi, XS, T1i to name a few) and not as compact as a point and shoot, micro four-thirds cameras are somewhere in the middle. With nearly the same optical features and manual controls of a DSLR, but in a much more compact body, its a win for everybody. Of course, like all things that are beautiful and shiny, the EP-1 would have put a hole in my pocket, roughly about $800 USD worth of patching necessary I&#8217;d estimate. My uncle who is a major photo-buff but only as a hobbyist was going to buy one, but smart thinking told him otherwise; the EP-2 was already on the horizon.</p>
<p>Although Olympus has yet to officially announce the camera, here is what we know according to source 43 Rumors:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>12 Megapixel: </strong>Plenty, this is double my Nikon D40</p>
<p><strong>3fps: </strong>More continuous shooting frames never hurts</p>
<p><strong>Stereo Sound: </strong>Sounds good. Pun intended.</p>
<p><strong>AF tracking: </strong>I love sharp images.</p>
<p><strong>1.44 million dot electronic viewfinder with 100% field of view: </strong>OMG. A 100% viewfinder would sell me immediately. I&#8217;m sick of 95-97% view finders.</p>
<p><strong>8 Art Filters (two more than the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#38;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fs%3Fie%3DUTF8%26x%3D0%26ref%255F%3Dnb%255Fss%255Fgw%26y%3D0%26field-keywords%3DOlympus%2520E-P1%26url%3Dsearch-alias%253Daps&#38;tag=43rumors-20&#38;linkCode=ur2&#38;camp=1789&#38;creative=390957" target="blank">E-P1</a> ….. Diorama Filter and Cross Process): </strong>I&#8217;m not big on these, but its nice to have.<img class=" lowrznvofogutazjjzkz lowrznvofogutazjjzkz lowrznvofogutazjjzkz lowrznvofogutazjjzkz lowrznvofogutazjjzkz lowrznvofogutazjjzkz" src="https://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=43rumors-20&#38;l=ur2&#38;o=1" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
<p><strong>i-Enhance function (color boost): </strong>Vivid. More vivid. Redder reds, yellower yellows. Yes.</p>
<p><strong>230K LCD<br />
X1/180</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>All in all the specs look great on paper, and Olympus may still have some surprises we don&#8217;t know yet! The EP-2 will cost about 950 Euros or about $1,409. That&#8217;s expensive, but did I mention it will come in black? Ooooh, black. Release date is scheduled to be around January 2010. Delicious.</p>
<p><a href="http://43rumors.com/olympus-e-p2/" target="_blank">43 Rumors</a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Manual setting bulb exposure]]></title>
<link>http://canon400d.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/manual-setting-bulb-exposure/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Rob Ashcroft</dc:creator>
<guid>http://canon400d.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/manual-setting-bulb-exposure/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&nbsp; Whilst experimenting with night photography, I discovered Bulb exposure on my 400D. What is i]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>&#160;</p>
<div id="_mcePaste">Whilst experimenting with night photography, I discovered Bulb exposure on my 400D.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste"></div>
<div><strong>What is it?</strong></div>
<div id="_mcePaste"></div>
<div>The bulb exposure focuses the shutter to stay open as long as you hold down the shutter button.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Bulb exposures offer the opportunity to condense serval seconds (or even minutes) into a single frame.  A long exposure will turn a night scene in a magical light show with streaks of colourful car lights whizzing past the lens.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste"></div>
<div>For the best results, i&#8217;d recommend using a tripod, or rest your camera on a solid surface.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste"></div>
<div><strong>How to perform a bulb exposure</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">If you keep turning the input dial anti-clockwise to slow down the shutter speed in Manual mode you&#8217;ll notice the word &#8216;bulb&#8217; in the viewfinder.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste"></div>
<div><strong>Setting an aperture value</strong></div>
<div id="_mcePaste"></div>
<div>You can set an aperture value using the Av +/- button on the input dial.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste"></div>
<div>It&#8217;s best to choose a narrow aperture and shoot at night so that the long exposure doesn&#8217;t create an overexposed photograph.</div>
<p>&#160;</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ill (but that wont stop me)]]></title>
<link>http://kippysmallsocks.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/ill-but-that-wont-stop-me/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
<guid>http://kippysmallsocks.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/ill-but-that-wont-stop-me/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Ok, I&#8217;m really bored right now. I&#8217;ve been at home all day because my bug has come back r]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Ok, I&#8217;m really bored right now. I&#8217;ve been at home all day because my bug has come back round, in a slightly different form this time. Anyway, I&#8217;ve gotten bored, so I thought I&#8217;d make another annoying, bitchy post.</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s topic of condemnation (and I dont know why I havent posted this before really) is D-SLR&#8217;s with HD/movie recording capabilities.</p>
<p>Just before I began writing this, I was on the Times Online website, on the Tech &#38; Web section, when I saw the top 5 SLR&#8217;s. Naturally, I had to check this out. Mostly to see how they&#8217;ve rated all the different models. I was surprised to see that they have 5 different categories; Best for Beginners, Best for Price, Best Overall Image Quality, Best For Looks (wtf?!) and finally, Best for 1080p video.</p>
<p>What worried me more than the fact that some shitty Nikon won the overall image quality, was that the Olympus PEN won the looks. The fact that I, and probably many others dont consider this a true SLR probably makes no difference. But seriously, have you seen one? The fact they have a few lenses you can swap around does not an SLR make. The Hasselblad XPan features interchangeable lenses, but everyone calls that a compact, NOT an SLR.</p>
<p>But let&#8217;s get back on track here. Go back, let&#8217;s say, 2 years, and I guarantee you that the last category, the best 1080p camera, would not exist. More importantly, I could probably guarantee you that there were absolutely no SLR camera&#8217;s that had HD video recording. I wont say no video recording whatsoever, because there might have been.</p>
<p>The fact of the matter is this; what is the need to implement video recording into a tool <em>specifically designed to take images</em>? When the first SLR&#8217;s were made, they were never designed to take video. We have these things called camcorders that do the same thing. Many compact cameras have taken up on video recording. I&#8217;ll accept that, because those cameras are more designed for the masses, and the video recording features have been around on them since basically the start of their digitalisation.</p>
<p>However, I am not happy that camera manufacturers, especially the bigger ones like Nikon and Canon, are putting video recording into SLR&#8217;s. Personally, I&#8217;m against Live View too. I rarely use it on my 40D, except when a shot is especially awkward, or when I give it to someone else to take a photo. But SLR&#8217;s are not designed for the masses. People buy them because their interest in photography is high, and they want to improve themselves. By using things like Live View, or using the totally unnecessary HD video features, they are, in my opinion, ruining the entire experience of using these photographic tools. People ask all the time, is digitalisation killing photography? I think that camera manufacturers doing things like this is killing photography.</p>
<p>I dont mean killing the medium. I simply mean that it is fundamentally killing everything we typically associate with photography, and the artform of taking a photograph. In the old days, you used to hold the camera up to your eye to frame the photo (or look down the ground glass screen). Now, I have to laugh when people stretch their camera&#8217;s out at arms length to frame their photos. But it&#8217;s also something that is sad to see, because the effort needed to take a photo with those little cameras is zero. You push a button, and the camera does the rest. If it isnt a very good photo, you just delete it and try again. There&#8217;s no skill needed anymore. I read a story in a camera magazine a long while back; someone was on holiday with his family etc etc, and brought along his Nikon (dont ask what model. D300 I think). Anyway, he asked a man who was walking past who owned the same camera to take his photo. But when the man tried to take the photo, he looking really bewildered. Then, the man watched the stranger set the camera to automatic. What sad times we live in, if some of the most excellent photographic tools and equipment we can buy are being used on automatic.</p>
<p>Went off tangent there. Bit of a rant. But fuck it, I have nothing better to do, and now my sister is kicking me off even though there are two computers in this house dammit.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Morning Buck in Fresh Snow]]></title>
<link>http://thrumikesviewfinder.com/2009/10/30/morning-buck-in-fresh-snow/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mike Hendren</dc:creator>
<guid>http://thrumikesviewfinder.com/2009/10/30/morning-buck-in-fresh-snow/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Photo © Mike Hendren, 2009 We had a few inches of fresh snow just a few days ago.  The morning broug]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p style="text-align:center;"><a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sensorphoto/4057301700/" target="_blank"><br />
<img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-217" title="Morning Buck in Fresh Snow" src="http://thrumikesviewfinder.wordpress.com/files/2009/10/4057301700_97b05e898b_b.jpg?w=650" alt="Morning Buck in Fresh Snow" width="585" height="497" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align:center;">Photo © Mike Hendren, 2009</p>
<p>We had a few inches of fresh snow just a few days ago.  The morning brought us clear skies and sunshine, and as I walked around the end of my garage, I was treated to this beautiful sight!</p>
<p>This mule deer buck was just meandering along, looking for food (or maybe love &#8211; it is the season), and of course my sudden arrival definitely got his attention.  But he didn&#8217;t run &#8211; he just stood there like a majestic statue studying my every move.</p>
<p>I quickly went back in the house, got my camera, and was fortunate enough to get off a few shots before he finally walked away.</p>
<p>I did discover a little trick with <a title="Lightroom" href="http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshoplightroom/" target="_blank">Adobe Lightroom</a> on this image &#8211; I desaturated the blue channel to get rid of the blue colored snow back in the shadows without affecting any of the other colors!</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Bracketing for HDR - Part 2]]></title>
<link>http://thrumikesviewfinder.com/2009/10/30/bracketing_for_hdr/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mike Hendren</dc:creator>
<guid>http://thrumikesviewfinder.com/2009/10/30/bracketing_for_hdr/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Okay, I know that some of you are now pretty enthusiastic about High Dynamic Range (HDR) imaging ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Okay, I know that some of you are now pretty enthusiastic about High Dynamic Range (HDR) imaging &#8211; and you should be!  HDR is another great tool that expands your photographic capabilities.  But first, there are a few things you need to do with your camera to give you a better chance of getting the images you need to make this work.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><strong>Important:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Put your camera on a <span style="color:#cc0000;">tripod</span>.  The software can help correct for slight misalignments in the photo series, but you&#8217;ll increase your chances of a nice sharp image if you&#8217;ll use that tripod.  However, if you don&#8217;t have the tripod, don&#8217;t miss the shot &#8211; brace yourself and your camera against something solid and fire away!</li>
<li>Set your camera to &#8220;<span style="color:#cc0000;">aperture priority</span>&#8220;.  This causes your camera to just change the shutter speed, so that each image in the series has the same depth of field.  Also, pick a higher f-stop if it&#8217;s feasible, like f/8 or f/16 (something about getting a slightly higher dynamic range in each image &#8211; technical stuff!).</li>
<li>While you&#8217;re at it, set your camera to a low ISO and <span style="color:#cc0000;">turn off the auto-ISO</span> feature if it&#8217;s on, to reduce noise in the images.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><strong>Recommended:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Instead of Auto White Balance (AWB), pick one like daylight or tungsten (depending on what your shooting).  Personally, I&#8217;ve always used AWB and haven&#8217;t noticed any problems.</li>
<li><span style="color:#cc0000;">Shoot in RAW</span> instead of JPG, if you can.  If you do shoot in JPG, turn off any in-camera processing that you may have set.  I prefer RAW because, for one thing, you can change the white balance after you get it into the computer.</li>
<li>Use <span style="color:#cc0000;">manual focus</span>, if possible, so each image has a constant focal point.  Or you can let the camera focus and then turn it off.</li>
<li>Use a <span style="color:#cc0000;">cable release</span> or a wireless remote release.  Again, this is just to help reduce camera movement during the series of shots.  (Also important for any photo with long exposure times.)</li>
</ul>
<p>While none of these things are absolute requirements, each one can increase your odds of producing a quality HDR image.  The software is amazing, but it can only do so much so give it all the help you can.  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Also, take a look at my previous post about bracketing and HDR:  <a href="http://activerain.com/blogsview/1309918/bracketing-photos-for-hdr-what-" target="_blank">Bracketing Photos for HDR . . . what?</a></p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=5a156057-0e0c-8312-a30e-53d6e47037a0" alt="" /></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Bracketing Photos for HDR . . . what?]]></title>
<link>http://thrumikesviewfinder.com/2009/10/29/hdr_info/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mike Hendren</dc:creator>
<guid>http://thrumikesviewfinder.com/2009/10/29/hdr_info/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&nbsp; Shortly after that guy first invented the camera, some other guy (or girl) noticed that their]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div style="text-align:center;"><img style="max-width:800px;float:none;" src="http://thrumikesviewfinder.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/20090906-201.jpg?w=201&#038;h=133" alt="" width="201" height="133" /><img style="max-width:800px;" src="http://thrumikesviewfinder.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/20090906-222.jpg?w=201&#038;h=133" alt="" width="201" height="133" /><img style="max-width:800px;" src="http://thrumikesviewfinder.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/20090906-24.jpg?w=201&#038;h=133" alt="" width="201" height="133" /></div>
<div style="text-align:center;"><img style="max-width:800px;" src="http://thrumikesviewfinder.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/20090906-20_1_2_3_4-2.jpg" alt="" />
<p>&#160;</p>
<div style="text-align:left;">Shortly after that guy first invented the camera, some other guy (or girl) noticed that their <strong>exposure was not always perfect</strong>.  So, they came up with the idea of bracketing photos, which is nothing more than taking your photo, and then underexposing one and overexposing another one.  Then, just in case the first try wasn&#8217;t perfect, one of the other images would probably be closer to what the photographer was looking for.</div>
<div style="text-align:left;">Of course, for years that was all done manually, one at a time.  However, with most modern digital cameras, that ability is built right in.  My camera, for instance, can take up to 9 bracketed images, with up to 1 f-stop between each one &#8211; it first takes the metered correct exposure and then starts underexposing and works right up to the last image which will be 4 f-stops overexposed.  You just have to check your camera&#8217;s manual to see how to set it up to do this.</div>
<div style="text-align:left;"><strong>As often happens, none of the images &#8211; even the bracketed ones are correctly exposed</strong>.  Like those 3 above, the sky is too bright, or the trees and foreground too dark.  So, what do we do?</div>
<p>&#160;</p>
</div>
<div>Our eyes can see about a 20 f-stop range, while digital cameras typically only record a range of about 6 to 8 f-stops.  Beyond that, the image may have very dark (or black) shadows and highlights so bright they&#8217;ve turned pure white with no visible detail.  This usually results in disappointing images that don&#8217;t look anything like the scene we saw when we took the photo.</div>
<div>The <strong>main reason I bracket</strong> these days is not to get the best exposure but to get a range of exposures to use with software like <a href="http://www.hdrsoft.com/" target="_blank">Photomatix Pro</a> to get what is called a &#8220;high dynamic range&#8221; (HDR) image, one that more closely resembles what our eyes see in the shadows and highlights.</div>
<div>If you&#8217;d like to see what&#8217;s possible with this technique, go take a look at <a href="http://www.hdrspotting.com/" target="_blank">HDRspotting.com</a>.  There are many truly amazing images there that will most likely get you really excited about HDR.</div>
<div>Then, once you&#8217;ve decided to take the plunge, go to Trey Ratcliff&#8217;s wonderful travel photography blog, <a href="http://www.stuckincustoms.com/" target="_blank">&#8220;Stuck in Customs&#8221;</a>, look at his images, and then check out his <a href="http://www.stuckincustoms.com/hdr-tutorial/" target="_blank">HDR Tutorial</a>. 
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>(Trey had the first  HDR photo to hang in the Smithsonian.)</p>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Brain - behind the Eye - behind the Viewfinder]]></title>
<link>http://thrumikesviewfinder.com/2009/10/24/the-brain-behind-the-eye-behind-the-viewfinder/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mike Hendren</dc:creator>
<guid>http://thrumikesviewfinder.com/2009/10/24/the-brain-behind-the-eye-behind-the-viewfinder/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;ll probably notice a slightly different look, here.  I changed themes, today, so I could g]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>You&#8217;ll probably notice a slightly different look, here.  <strong><span style="color:#000000;">I changed themes, today</span></strong><span style="color:#000000;">,</span> so I could get the page links across the top like a real (normal) website.  So the colors and format have changed a little bit.</p>
<p>If you have any comments, I&#8217;d sure appreciate hearing from you.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HDR Image of the Meteor Crater in Arizona]]></title>
<link>http://thrumikesviewfinder.com/2009/10/23/meteor-crater/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mike Hendren</dc:creator>
<guid>http://thrumikesviewfinder.com/2009/10/23/meteor-crater/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Meteor Crater by Mike Hendren I was traveling through Arizona a few days ago &#8211; headed home aft]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div>
<div id="attachment_181" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 595px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sensorphoto/4024551218/" target="_blank"><img class="size-large wp-image-181 " title="Meteor Crater in Arizona, by Mike Hendren" src="http://thrumikesviewfinder.wordpress.com/files/2009/10/4024551218_91542d8dbd_b.jpg?w=650" alt="Meteor Crater by Mike Hendren" width="585" height="446" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Meteor Crater by Mike Hendren</p></div>
<p style="text-align:left;">I was traveling through Arizona a few days ago &#8211; headed home after visiting my son and his wife in Phoenix. I took a little detour, just about 6 miles off I-40, near the eastern border of Arizona to visit the famous <a title="Meteor Crater Info" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meteor_crater" target="_blank">Meteor Crater</a>.</p>
<div style="text-align:left;">
<p>It is truly impressive, especially when you consider it was caused by a direct hit from a relatively small meteor. The crater is about 550 feet deep and 4,000 feet across and was caused by a meteor not much bigger than a large house &#8211; only about 150 feet across. It&#8217;s scary to even contemplate what would happen if a fairly large meteor hit the Earth &#8211; I&#8217;m afraid it would be a catastrophic event!  I&#8217;ll keep my fingers crossed.  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>One thing that shows the size of the crater is when you consider that I was standing on the edge, using a 14mm lens, and I still couldn&#8217;t get the whole thing into the photo!</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">For this HDR image, I started with 7 bracketed images and used <a href="http://www.hdrsoft.com/" target="_blank">Photomatix Pro</a> to combine them.</p>
<p style="text-align:left;">Taken with a Nikon D700, using the Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8 lens.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=3ef66af2-a190-809d-995c-856b61b1a3d9" alt="" /></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
