Since Sarah Palin was announced by old man river as the Vice Presidential candidate, the media has had a love affair with hating on her. While I could sit here and write an 8,000 word article on the instances when the media has hated on her, I will only site one (right now) of a recent article that caught my eye and disdain.

Enter Sally Quinn, a self professed atheist who coincidentally co-writes a crappy column for the Washington Post called On Faith. Sure, it makes a lot of sense that an avowed atheist with an obvious lack of knowledge on religion writes an article about religion. That would be like me penning a weekly article about how to run a large company that sells farm supplies and automobile transmissions.

Quinn, became an atheist at the ripe age of 13 says that Jon Meacham (who?) told her that religion is not something to be “dismissed or disdained.”

So why is it that Quinn devotes an entire article judging and dismissing Palin’s Christian faith? As a self-taught Apologist, I find it especially irking and annoying when someone who has no knowledge whatsoever about religion, fancies themselves experts. It is especially hard to find an atheist who can tell you anything at all about Christianity. I am not saying that all atheists are ignorant on things pertaining to religion, but they are certainly not authorities on the matter.

However, this is none to surprising as the MSM has always had it in for Christianity and Palin so it seems fitting that an idiot such as Quinn would write a blog about both.

Quinn starts off by mentioning when Palin came to salvation in Christ:

In her new book Sarah Palin writes that one summer at Bible Camp she “put my life in my creator’s hands and trust Him as I sought my life’s path.” For Palin, this grand divine plan was “a natural progression.” She writes. And later, “I don’t believe in coincidences.”

Then Quinn continues by asking rhetorical and asinine questions that show just how arrogant and unapprised she is.

What does she believe is God’s plan for her? Does she have any free will or is everything preordained. Can she see something coming and change her mind despite God’s plans for her?

Can Quinn be any dumber? Is Quinn trying desperately to fill in space in an article devoid of intelligence or substance? Does Quinn expect her readers to believe that she is an authoritative source on Christianity or any religion for that matter? Will the Longhorns lose, thusly allowing TCU to go to the national title game they so richly deserve?

Pictured: Sally Quinn no doubt giving a speech about something she has no knowledge of.

If Quinn truly knew anything about Christianity, these questions she asked are questions she could have answered herself.  She continues:

Did God plan for her to become Governor of Alaska. If so, did God plan for her to step down. Did God plan for her to run for Vice President? If so why did she and McCain lose?

Let me answer these questions. Yes, yes, yes and ask McCain.

You would think that God would ask of her to live her life as an example to others of a compassionate loving, caring person.

I guess Quinn skipped the part in the Bible where G-d said “My ways are not your ways, my thoughts are not your thought”

“You would think that God…”

Is she really that dumb? Those 5 words show what little knowledge she truly as. Even in Quinn’s min-bio she states

“I don’t have any idea who or what God is. But the closest explanation I’ve heard … is … ‘When two people relate to each other authentically and humanly, God is that electricity that surges between them.’”

That would almost be poetic if it wasn’t obvious that’s exactly what she was aiming for. But the important part in this is “I don’t have any idea who or what God is.”

In saying this, she tells us that she has no room to judge Sarah Palin when it comes to theology because she as admitting her lack of knowledge.

So is Quinn attacking Palin because of her theological beliefs or her conservative ideals? I think it’s painfully obvious that Quinn dislikes Palin and is simply reaching to find something to complain about when it comes to her. She is just reaching and searching for something to condemn Palin about.  This article she wrote won’t have any intelligent person shouting at their computer screen “Yep, you’re right about that Quinn! Yep, you go girl!” because everyone who reads this will come away with a bad taste in their mouth. Quinn comes off as an arrogant, contemptuous, despicable, hate-filled idiot with nothing better to do than write a fundamentally-flawed article about something she knows nothing about!

The North American Idiot in its natural habitat

David Limbaugh said something about Sarah Palin that I can’t help but to agree with because it oozes of truth.

“You can’t watch Sarah Palin in action or in interviews without recognizing her genuineness, her graciousness, her kindness and her authentic Christian spirit.”

I don’t think any unbiased individual can watch Palin and not agree with that statement.

Thanks for reading, make sure to friend my awesomeness on facebook by searching for “Von Paxton” so you may get updates when I post a new blog. Please feel free to comment and help a brother out and spread the word. Thanks again!

Love,

Uncle Von

BRUXELLES (Reuters) – I leader dell’Unione Europea hanno nominato oggi il premier belga Herman Van Rompuy primo presidente stabile del blocco e la britannica Catherine Ashton alto rappresentante per la Politica estera, facendo sfumare la candidatura a Mr Pesc dell’ex presidente del Consiglio Massimo D’Alema.

L’intesa è stata raggiunta nel corso di un vertice a Bruxelles, dopo che la Gran Bretagna ha rinunciato alla candidatura alla presidenza dell’ex primo ministro Tony Blair, ponendo fine all’impasse che durava da settimane e aprendo la strada alla nomina di Van Rompuy.

Van Rompuy, 62 anni, e Ashton, 53, sono però nomi di basso profilo, poco noti al di fuori dei confini europei e, almeno inizialmente, all’estero non avranno la presa che avrebbe invece avuto un uomo di stato com’è Blair.

Le nomine dovevano soddisfare sia gli Stati membri che il Parlamento europeo, che dovrà approvare la candidatura di Ashton, ma non quella di Van Rompuy.

Fonte:
http://it.reuters.com/article/topNews/idITMIE5AI0W920091119

David F. Hamilton, who is he? More importantly, why should you care who he is? I will tell you. Hamilton is currently awaiting an up-or-down vote from the senate to serve on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Barack Obama nominated him and had this to say about Hamilton:

“Judge Hamilton has a long and impressive record of service and a history of handing down fair and judicious decisions,” He continued  ”He will be a thoughtful and distinguished addition to the 7th Circuit.”

That’s cool

Let’s look at Hamilton’s record shall we?

I couldn’t find a picture of him that was labeled for reuse so here is a picture of a polar bear taking a nap on a rock next to a tire…

That looks like one comfortable rock...

What kind of a guy would say that the role of a judge includes “writing footnotes to the Constitution”? Delicious.

His career began as a fundraiser for a group called Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now in 1979. And you’re all like “So?” well that group is better known by “ACORN” you heard of em?

He once ruled that pornographic video stores could operate near churches a decision that went against Indiana statute. According to Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Hamilton had “blocked enforcement of an Indiana law that barred the sale or display of sexually explicit material within 500 feet of church or school.”

In this case, Hamilton sided with the video store owner saying that censoring the pornographic video store would “survive First Amendment scrutiny” Hamilton also wrote that “At this early stage in this lawsuit, the state has not met this evidentiary standard,” granting the store license to operate within 500 feet from a church.

If you would like to see more of what Hamilton ruled in this case you can go to this link which includes his complete decision. http://www.websupp.org/data/SDIN/1:05-cv-01712-21-SDIN.pdf

In Hinrichs v. Bosma the plaintiff Anthony Hinrichs alleged that speaker of the Indiana House Brian Bosma, violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment because Bosma invoked the name of Jesus Christ in his prayers opening house sessions.

Hamilton ordered Bosma not to invoke “Christ’s name or title” in house prayers. Former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich said that Hamilton ruled that “saying the words Jesus Christ in a prayer is a sign of inappropriate behavior, but saying Allah would be OK.”

Why did Newt say this? Because Hamilton only ruled that invoking Christ was wrong but mentioned no other religion. Instead of barring all religion from the House, he barred only Christianity. When asked, Hamilton said that “This record, however, shows no efforts by Jewish or Muslim clerics to use the prayer opportunity to advance their particular religions,” He continued, “At this juncture there is no need to be more specific in the injunction as to what would amount to a sectarian prayer in those traditions.”

So that translates to “Until someone else complains, I don’t really care and probably won’t even if they do for fear of offending others.”

Brian Bosma said of the decision “I am shocked and dismayed by the Court’s decision today. I find the Court’s unprecedented decision disturbing in that it directs me, as Speaker, to advise people that they are prohibited from using “Christ’s name or title or any other denominational appeal”

When I think “Indiana” I think Peyton Manning. Here is a picture of him in an orange shirt, pointing at something. or is his shirt "Creamsical"?

In A Woman’s Choice-East Side Women’s Clinic v. Newman, an abortion clinic challenged Indiana Public Law 187 which required “women to be given information about the procedure and other alternatives to abortion, in person, 18 hours before an abortion is performed.” (Quote courtesy of CNSNews.com)

Hamilton issued an injunction saying in his opinion the law caused “unconstitutional burden on a woman’s right to choose to have an abortion.” He also said “As a practical matter, that provision requires the vast majority of women seeking an abortion to make two trips to an abortion clinic,”

Heaven forbid someone who is about to murder a child has to make 2 whole visits. NO!!!!!!

“For many women that requirement would make abortion more expensive and less convenient,”

Yea cause that’s what we want, murder to be more convenient.

Thankfully, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals overturned his asinine decision.

In 2008, Hamilton ruled to strike a law that would require convicted sex offenders to release personal information like email addresses and internet screen-names and to submit to routine search warrants…

He once denied a Rabbi from displaying a Menorah from a holiday display in Indianapolis. The court of appeals rebuked Hamilton on this decision.

This is exactly the kind of person that we want nominated. Someone who’s biggest decisions were overturned because they were ridiculous and unfounded. Even the left-leaning American Bar Association said he was “not qualified” for his position.

Former Attorney General Edwin Meese said in a memo that Hamilton’s “record demonstrates that he would decide cases on the basis of his politics and personal agenda instead of the Constitution.” He also said “is precisely the kind of liberal judicial activist who would use our federal courts as his own super-legislature. The Senate should vote no on the cloture vote to stop this nomination.”

It’s no surprise that BO would nominate such an idiot to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Given his track record he loves people such as Hamilton who use their political beliefs to push their rulings on the bench. Let’s look at BO’s quote again:

“Judge Hamilton has a long and impressive record of service and a history of handing down fair and judicious decisions,” He continued  ”He will be a thoughtful and distinguished addition to the 7th Circuit.”

Do you concur with that statement? Or is this just another instance of BO talking without having any prior knowledge on the topic? BO says he is a Christian, does he want a porn shop mere feet from where he attends service? Does he think it’s wrong to invoke Christ’s name in a prayer? Does he think it’s wrong for a woman to get the facts and given other ways out instead of rushing to an abortion? Either he agrees with all of Hamilton’s ridiculous decisions or he is once again talking out his head about something he doesn’t know anything about, yet claims to have all the facts and knowledge.

Either way, Hamilton is a liberal scum-bag and has no place being a judge anywhere, let alone the court of appeals. A judge is not in a position of authority to push his agendas and ideologies; he is there to be an impartial arbitrator which Hamilton is not. Let’s pray (In Christ’s name!) that he does not make it to the court of appeals.

Thanks for stopping by, make sure to comment and tell your friends how awesome I am or how bad I am. Add me on facebook so you can get updates on my new blog posts. Type “Von Paxton” in the search thingy on facebook and get you some. Good day

Love,

Uncle Von

I’ve been wanting to write about VON for a long time.  Spawned from San Francisco’s dark underbelly in 1989, VON recorded two demos (Satanic Blood and Blood Angel) and played a handful of live shows before disappearing back into the unholy abyss from whence they came.

In spite of a total recorded output of about 20 songs, VON has been highly influential within the black metal underground, and with good reason.  Armed with piss-poor production values and a deliberately rudimentary approach to songstructure, the trio is responsible for some of the filthiest, most hypnotic extreme metal ever put to tape. Indeed, VON’s reliance on repetition, coupled with their ability to make the atmosphere provided by lo-fi production work to their advantage, has lead to 20 years of hopeless mimicry from all corners of the blackened globe.

VON’s demos have been compiled (along w/ some live recordings) as Satanic Blood Angel, and have been released on several occasions by the mighty Nuclear War Now! Productions (aka the label that snubs my e-mails because I’m not kvlt enough), and have also been bootlegged for a split with Dark Funeral called Devil Pigs.  While some will undoubtedly dismiss songs like “Watain”, “Satanic Blood” and “Blood Angel” as monotonous noise, they are missing the point entirely.  VON’s music is simplicity itself, pure evil distilled into two minute and thirty second bouts of demonic delerium.  Taken as a whole, these tracks have an uncannily ritualistic vibe, capable of inducing the grim, quasi-psychedelic trance-state so much black metal tries (and more often than not fails) to attain.

Personally, I find a lot of power in VON’s minimalism.  From song composition and instrumentation to production to imagery/artwork, everything about the band is crude, direct and to-the-point.  This stark, stripped down approach makes their music that much more sinister and mysterious, and whether or not the trio’s odes to the dark lord were legitimate, I can’t imagine a more genuinely eerie and esoteric batch of sounds than those found on Satanic Blood Angel ever being put to tape.  

It is the simplistic approach that lends the air of legitimacy to their sound.  While the concept of a bunch of devil worshippers whipping up slick-sounding metal in a multi-million dollar Pro-Tools equipped studio seems beyond ludicrous, the thought of three disciples of the left-hand path gathering in a dank, dark basement and capturing their unholy sonic ritual sacrifices on a decrepit 4-track machine sounds like the stuff of true nightmares.

So many so-called extreme bands get wrapped up in all the extra bells and whistles of the recording studio and over-the-top imagery that whatever they were originally attempting to get across becomes hopelessly diluted.  VON did not fall into this trap for even a second and this is why their music remains timeless in its black purity.

VON’s music IS the ritual.  Pentagrams smeared on the floor and walls with blood and vomit.  Acts of unspeakable human depravity invoking the unnameable.  Candlelit blood sacrifices.  Demonic possession.   Blood VON.

http://www.myspace.com/vonmusicgroup

Let’s play a game, yea? It’s called, “Who said this crap?” I will give you a quote and you tell me by yelling at your computer screen, the answer. You ready? Whatever…

Who Said This Crap? Number 1:

“You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them,” they said “And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

I’ll give you a second to answer as if this is a video or I can control how fast you read the rest…

“You wished you reeked of awesomeness like my boy Barracks does…..I mean, I said, Barack!” man Biden is a dummy

If you answered Barack Obama, then you are correct. I am thoroughly impressed with your intellect and your guile. You lay honor upon your family name, your family should be proud of you but most importantly, your Uncle Von is proud of you. Do you feel good? Happy that I treat you so well? Well then you should tell all your friends to read my blog. I digress…

Who Said This Crap? Number 2:

“In America, there’s a failure to appreciate Europe’s leading role in the world. Instead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive.”

So who said it, smarty pants? If you said Barack Obama, I again am highly impressed. You should probably be writing your own blog with a brain like that… actually, don’t, I don’t like competition.

“You!!! Do you dare challenge me as the king of complete and utter awesomenessocity?! What do you mean that’s not a word? If Barack says it’s a word, it’s a word. You get the initials P.O.T.U.S and come talk to me! Haha! Barack!”

Let’s try another.

Who Said This Crap? Number 3:

“I also believe that all too often our government made decisions based on fear rather than foresight; that all too often our government trimmed facts and evidence to fit ideological predispositions. Instead of strategically applying our power and our principles, too often we set those principles aside as luxuries that we could no longer afford.”

I’m fairly certain by this point that you know who this is. Its BO once again telling other people that America sucks. Not only does he tell these other jokers that America sucks but he apologizes for it. He also basically said in these speeches that he is awesome and everything in the world will be all good now that he is ruining….err… I mean running America’s Executive branch.

BO will soon be in Japan, the Japanese government has offered for him to visit Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He has since declined the offer sighting a busy schedule but he has promised to visit it while still in office, something no sitting president has ever done. You may think it would be hard for me to criticize BO for something he hasn’t said yet in place he hasn’t visited yet. But I have showed you exhibits A, B and C which are the quotes above. These are just a few of many quotes BO has used to emasculate America. I’m sure if he went to either Hiroshima or Nagasaki, he would tell the Japanese how crappy he thinks we are and how sorry he is that this happened. He won’t say that it was a necessary event to end the bloodiest war in history. This would just be another opportunity for him to go abroad and tell other countries that he doesn’t like us either.

So if I have my numbers correctly, BO has promised to visit the site of a brutal (albeit, necessary) bombing site(s). Yet he deems the 20^th anniversary of one of the most positive events in the last 50 years unworthy of his presence. I am of course talking about the anniversary of the fall of the Berlin wall.

The wall coming down was a great event in the fall of a soviet empire and freedom in general. Who had a large hand in this? America did, Ronald Reagan did. I’m sure you have seen or heard this famous speech. This isn’t the whole thing but it’s the most famous part.

BO decided this event was unworthy, but thank G-d, he made a video to show us. I’m not gonna put you through it but he fails to mention Ronald Reagan even once. Not a single mention of Reagan’s name, not a mention of Reagan’s legacy, not a mention of the good that Reagan did to help bring down the wall. This isn’t that surprising, BO cant step up to a level that would give props to a great Conservative leader. No love whatsoever because Reagan wasn’t a progressive, wasn’t a statist. Because Reagan is a symbol for Conservativism, BO couldn’t even utter his name. You think Berlin Wall falling, you think Reagan, and you think of those words he spoke “Tear down this wall!”

But BO couldn’t resist touting himself as awesome in his speech from the comfort of the White House.

“Few would have foreseen … that a united Germany would be led by a woman from Brandenburg or that their American ally would be led by a man of African descent. But human destiny is what human beings make of it.”

Yea we get it, you’re awesome and everyone else sucks. His arrogance knows no bounds; he said he would be a transparent president and it is painfully obvious how transparent he really is, he is showing us all what he really is. Maybe he should re-think that transparency stuff.

Good day. Make sure to leave a comment with some love or some hate.

Love,

Uncle Von

In this quick hit, I’m going to lead off with the conclusion.

In conclusion, Jane Fonda is still an idiot after all these years.

That’s a correct conclusion. So why do I call Jane “traitor” Fonda an idiot? Because she made the following quote:

“Every dictator—Stalin, Ceaucescu, Hilter—has made anti-choice a central component of their agenda. The anti-choice movement has used different strategies over the decades, growing more strategic and virulent in reaction to the modern U.S. women’s movement.”

Huh? That’s interesting that Hitler was pro-life. Wanna know why that’s interesting? Guess he wasn’t.

Huh?

Yea I said it! When Hitler came to power, he legalized abortion. It is estimated that 500,000 abortions were conducted annually under Hitler’s wing. In fact, some races that Hitler considered “un-desirable” were forced to have abortions.

It’s true; Stalin did ban abortion but was it because he didn’t want babies to be murdered before they were given a chance at life? No, Stalin was a socialist remember so he made abortion illegal so that he would have more workers once they came of age.

If I were Jane Fonda, I would cry too. Being an idiot isn't as easy as she makes it look

It’s cute that Fonda calls Pro-Life people “Anti-Choice” as if to say that Pro-Lifers hate freedom and don’t want people to be able to choose anything. This coming from a person who subscribes to a party that wants more government control and more regulations and government intervention. The word “choice” was given to pro-abortionist to empower women and their cause to commit legal murder. Just like a liberal to use words (albeit small ones) to twist things around and make others look like evil people who hate choice and love power.

She actually says in her rambling, ridiculous blog that pro-lifers are only pro-life because they want power.

Huh?

Yea that makes sense; pro-lifers only want abortion to be illegal because it makes them feel powerful. How long did it take you to pull that theory out your toilet, Jane? This traitorous swine shouldn’t be allowed to be within the walls of this country and here she is blabbing things and claiming facts that are simply inaccurate. Yea, let’s paint anti-abortionists as the bad guys. Hey Jane, this isn’t about women’s empowerment, this isn’t about women’s lib, and this isn’t about you feeling smart because you wrote an inaccurate blog. It’s about the life of an unborn child. This is the biggest genocide in human history and apparently it’s all about women feeling liberated and in charge. “This is about my body mister!” No it isn’t! Jane, you were a moron back in the 70’s when you hung out with America’s enemy while America was at war with said enemy. And you are still a moron today.

Here’s one last quote by Jane Fonda:

“Telling lies and showing off to get attention are mistakes I made that I don’t want my kids to make.”

Not only have you made those mistakes, but you continue to make em to this day. I guess that quote was a lie too. Weird

Good day,

Uncle Von

First of all, I want to let you know that I am a conservative. I know, you’re all like “huh?” it’s true that’s what I am. I am not a republican, I am a conservative there is a difference…

And throughout my blogs I have given some reasons as to why I am a conservative. They have mostly been along the lines of “I’m for small government”  “I’m for the free-market” “I’m for what the founding fathers and the constitution have given us”

Now I want you to understand this; I am not a closed minded individual. I will not only vote for people with a “C” or and “R” next to their name. If I believe someone from a different party intends on shrinking federal government, increasing personal freedoms and the like then I will vote for them. It is true. Now you’re asking “What’s your point, stupid?”

I’d appreciate it if you kept the insults to yourself, but my point follows.

I will be talking about Barack Obama. Understand this, my friend; I am going to talk about him not as a conservative but as a human who sees brosef for what he truly is. And I will tell you what he truly is.

When he was on the election trail, he made very few mistakes. He was very careful, he was eloquent, he was charismatic, and he promised the friggin moon to you. He stood up as a Senator with very little experience at all. He said he would not bring politics as usual to D.C. what has he done? Just that.

He spoke from his podiums in front of mesmerized sheep that ate out of the palm of his hand as if he was the redeemer in the flesh. The people jumped on his bandwagon and proclaimed that this guy was who he says he was, that he would indeed do as he said he would do.

Everyone loved him: black, white, purple, silver, aqua-maroon, Jews, Catholics, little people, circus clowns, Elvis impersonators, republicans, liberals, independents, old, young, middle-aged, hell even dead people loved him.

So why are people, a year from the election having voter’s remorse? Because he is showing us who he is, who some people knew he was the whole time.

So why did he win? Because voters didn’t do their research, because he is young and charismatic. Because the young voters are to inept and lazy to actually do some research as opposed to seeing a guy who eloquent and promised the moon and the stars and believed him. Because he wasn’t G-Dub. Because he smelled of fresh cut grass on a spring morning.

Freshly cut grass......

I believe he won the election because the vast majority of the people who voted for him didn’t care about his policies. Didn’t care about his vision, wasn’t willing to listen to learn. They just wanted someone who wasn’t G-Dub and wasn’t 80. The voters didn’t get off their butt to dig deeper, they weren’t willing to do some foot work because they probably weren’t that concerned about what would come of this. A lot of young voters turned out to vote and as I said, college kids and 20-somethings aren’t invested enough to vote for someone they agree with on the issues. Because they don’t care enough to know what the issues are and what the presidential candidates stand for. Obama was covered heavily by the drooling media and crammed down our throats and America loved every second of it.

So who is he really? He is a under qualified, hypersensitive, spineless, courage less, insensible, pompous, statist snob who is in way over his head.

Why is he under qualified? Well I wouldn’t consider 4 years in Illinois senate and 4 years in the U.S. senate doesn’t exactly qualify for the highest seat in all the land. Governors are more qualified than him. Out of the last 5 presidents, 4 were governors at one time. The only one that wasn’t was George H. W. Bush who had prior foreign policy experience by serving as director of the CIA, Ambassador to U.N. and Vice President under Reagan.

Having been a community organizers, civil rights lawyer and senator for four years does not make you qualified to be President.

Why is hypersensitive? Because he has been hailed as the messiah for so long that he isn’t used to being criticized. His supporters and advisors hang on his every word and kiss his feet as they lay down roses ahead of him as he walks. So what happens when someone speaks out against him? He singles them out by name and network affiliation and openly mocks them. No president that I can remember would was their time on such pettiness. He has more on his plate than Rosie O’Donnell with a tapeworm on thanksgiving. Yet he stoops to Olbermann levels by complaining and whining about everyone who is critical of his asinine policies. It’s of course impart to America eating out of the palm of his hand on the campaign trail, but I’m sure the sycophants in his inner circle kiss his bum like some kind of puppies wanting only to please their master. I imagine them fawning over his every word as if Christ himself were preaching the way to salvation.

"Bahhhh"

He is so thin-skinned that it’s sickening, what kind of President addresses his critics any chance he can? Such squabbles are beneath a man in such a high office. Give me a man-sized break over here.

Why is he spineless unt (that means ‘and’) courage less? He has spoken out several times against friend but never foe. Take Iran for example. During their obvious rigged elections and murder and arrest of outspoken opposition to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (aka midget aka Alphabet) Obama was silent. Not a word, not condemning the attacks, not condemning the elections, nothing.

“It’s true, I did steal that election and I would have gotten away with it if it was for you meddling kids” that’s a really bad joke and I’m sorry.

However, when sovereign nation and friend to America, Israel built settlements to house a growing Israeli population, BO was very vocal. Condemning the attacks from Jump Street, Obama had this to say:

“we continue to emphasize that America does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements,”

If I was Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu I would tell BO “I don’t give a steaming hot damn what you recognize as legitimate.” Israel is surrounded on all sides by enemies and has very little friends in the world (what with the growing global anti-Semitism and all) and here some America who is supposed to be Israel’s greatest friend and what do they say? “We don’t want you building houses for your growing population”

But Iran’s radical leader straight steals an election, MURDERS protesters and what does the mighty messiah have to say? Oh yea, he says nothing. Why was BO silent? Because he is a frightened coward who wants to appease enemies while condemning friends. When Honduras’s communist, Chavez puppet “president” was overthrown, Obama spoke out against it.

I think I saw this guy in Dallas, notice the cowboy hat and obscenely black mustache.

He was overthrown because of his trying to abolish term limits, and his growing ties with communist leaders Hugo Chavez and Raul Castro. And him being overthrown “deeply concerned” Obama. Why? Because BO is afraid of Chavez. What else could it be? The man was shrinking freedoms in Honduras and he got removed from power. Why is that a bad thing?

“I am Hugo Chavez fascist leader of Venezuela. Stare in wonder at my obnoxious sash and giant, weird, silver star medallion.”

Why is he insensible? Following Ft Hoods tragedy, The White House was notified immediately about the tragic events. Instead of seeing a solemn President take to the podium to immediately address those lost, we saw a light-hearted clownsical (yea I made that word up) giving a “shout-out”.

Imagine those (such as I) who were following the news of the Ft Hood massacre and saw as the President took to the stage and immediately made remarks thanking his cabinet and then giving a shout-out. Imagine what Americans at home were thinking, here comes the President to speak about Ft Hood and he comes out and makes a light-hearted remark. After speaking about the conference and giving another empty promise, he suddenly shifts gears and talks about Ft Hood. Yet he spends more time talking about the investigation then he does acting as a sympathetic leader of a country.  See for yourself:

How is he a pompous snob? Well I think his war with Fox news was proof enough as if he, Gibbs and Dunn were saying “how dare you speak out against me”. But I’m going to take it a step further by giving you health care reform as proof. Do you in all honesty believe that Obama wants healthcare free of charge because he cares so much about the poor? No way, it’s always been all about him and his legacy. Not President has passed universal health care before. That could be because it’s unconstitutional and socialist. But Obama is trying so hard to do so much in such a little amount of time because he wants to be remembered for how much good he has done. He wants to be touted as the first President to pass health care reform not because of his big heart, but because of his massive ego. Check out these bits from the e-mail he sent supporters after the health care vote in the house.

“Despite countless attempts over nearly a century, no chamber of Congress has ever before passed comprehensive health reform. This is history.”

TranslatVon- “Many people have tried for almost a century (a century equals 100 years for you folks that didn’t attend an elite college like Barack did) but they weren’t Barack fn Obama, you are witnessing history, Barack history.”

“Each “yes” vote was a brave stand”

TranslatVon- “Each ‘No’ vote was a bunch of haters who hate Americans and hate Barack (how is that possible?) And hate kittens and are stupid and Republicans and I hate them and their dumb Fox news”

“the old rules are changing — and the people will not be ignored.”

TranslatVon- “The rules are actually pretty much the same, but I like the word ‘change’…. The people will not be ignored if they agree with me, if they are the millions of tea party protestors and people who spoke up at town hall meetings I’m going to ignore those radical extremists.”

“Can you donate $25 or whatever you can afford so we can finish this fight?”

TranslatVon- “let me get your money, son”

“Please donate to Organizing for America’s campaign to win this fight and ensure that real health care reform reaches my desk by the end of this year.”

TranslatVon-“Seriously, let me get that money, any amount will help me cement my legacy as the most socialist president of all time. Only you can help make me a worse president than Jimmy “I hate Jews” Carter.”

I think you are catching my point. Obama is nothing more than a sniveling, whiney, frightened, pompous, obsequious (good word), out of touch, joker. He has harmed our relationship with friends while pushing statist agendas at a time when we need to increase America’s freedoms not destroy them. He is no were near qualified for the office he currently holds, he has shown no spine when dealing with our enemies. He has ignored the opinions of the American people, he has played nothing but partisan politics even though he promised there would be none. He has done more damage in less than a year than Clinton did in 4. He doesn’t represent us well in any fashion. While I feel all of this is true, he is still our President for at least another 3 years. Until then, I will be praying for a much needed and well deserved GOP resurgence.

Thanks for stopping by, make sure to comment and share your thoughts with me. A reply is guaranteed, until next time, good day.

Love,

Uncle Von

Who would’ve thunk it? An article in the Wall Street Journal telling the story almost like it was. And is.

Grupo: Von

Álbum: Satanic Blood

Año de salida: 1992

País: Estados Unidos

Género: Black Metal

Para quitarle el polvo al blog de una vez, tras una maldita semana de exámenes (y de perrerío por un tubo), voy a intentar darle caña a esto, y empiezo con esta famosa demo de Von, titulada Satanic Blood. Único trabajo que realizó el grupo, además de ese Satanic Blood Angels, compilación que une este disco con otro practicamente igual versionado en directo, de las pocas giras que hicieron en su época.

El grupo se formó en el 89, formado por Goat, Kill y Snake. El primero, Goat, se encargaba tanto de las guitarras como de las voces, mientras que Kill (Joe Allen), hacía el bajo. Por último, Snake se encargaba de la batería. En el 91, este trío norteamericano empezó a grabar esta demo, para sacarla al mercado al año siguiente.

En aquella época, el grupo no contaba con un número significativo de seguidores. A penas el género lo hacía, teniendo en cuenta que hablamos de San Francisco. Así que de aquí se explica su corta carrera musical. Aún así, aunque entonces no fueron realmente populares, en la actualidad es un grupo bastante reconocido y admirado, y muchos grupos les rinden homenaje con covers (de hecho, yo los conocí gracias a covers de otros grupos).

Personalmente no me guste demasiado esa semi mezcla de black con toques de death, que aparecen sobretodo en las voces. Además, tampoco le suma puntos la mala producción con la que cuenta esta demo. Aún así, me parece un trabajo bastante bueno. Corto y directo, además de innovador en la época. Disfrutadlo.

Canciones más recomendadas: Devil Pig, Veadtuck, Satanic Blood. Aunque realmente, todas las canciones se parecen, objetivamente, mucho.

Tracklist

1. Devil Pig (02:22)
2. Veinen (02:28)
3. Watain (02:51)
4. Lamb (01:43)
5. Veadtuck (03:18)
6. Satanic Blood (02:08)
7. Christ Fire (02:59)
8. Von (02:30)

Duración total: 20:22

Página oficial de la banda:

http://www.myspace.com/von666

Link

http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?yyycjauto14

Si te gusta, ¡compra!

http://cgi.ebay.com/VON-SATANIC-BLOOD-ANGEL-LP-blasphemy-mayhem-archgoat-_W0QQitemZ390114293093QQcmdZViewItemQQimsxZ20091104?IMSfp=TL091104191006r22611

(Os dejo el link del Satanic Blood Angel, que es la compilación que sacaron en 2003 con este Satanic Blood con una mejora en la calidad y además, un disco con directos)

You may be asking yourself, “What do liberals want? What do they yearn for?” Well thank G-d you are reading this cause I’m going to tell you! They want it all. All of it! You might now be asking, “What’s it?” well if you would just calm down a second, I’ll tell you. It is everything.  If it’s something, they want it all. If it speaks, they wanna tell it what to say. If it has an odor, they want it to smell of liberalism. This smells just like B.O. and salmonella. And if you think salmonella doesn’t have a smell, then you are a buffoon!

But in all seriousness, the liberals/statists can never have enough. EVER!

Just look at how they complain about Fox news and Conservative talk radio. Before Fox News came about, every Mainstream Media (MSM) network was run by statists and leaned to their agenda. They loved them some Clinton, they hated them some Bush and now they love them some Obama. And now there are even more. We are talking CNN, NBC, MSNBC, CBS, PBS and ABC. And it’s not just limited to Television either. Look at the print media as well; we are talking The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Boston Globe, USA Today, Newsweek, Time, and Rolling Stone. Just to name a few.

"Talk about me now please! MEEEEE!!!!!!"

But Conservatives get one news channel that has several Right leaning opinion shows and that’s a problem? So what?! Can’t we have one friggin channel to call our own? No, that is too much to ask. The liberals want it all. But they can’t even swallow their pride and admit that these stations don’t just lean left, they law down left. For the most part, conservatives don’t mind admitting that Fox news leans right at times and so what? Who cares? The statists have the rest of the MSM and we get one and that’s too much? Of course it is because the statists want it all. They also hate the FACT that Fox news consistently dominates the ratings. Check it out folks:

Fox News averaged 2.25 million total viewers in prime time for the third quarter, up 2% over the previous year. That’s more than CNN (946,000, down 30%) and MSNBC (788,000, down 10%) combined.

The O’Reilly Factor” led all cable news programs with an average of 3.295 million total viewers for the quarter, up 12% over the previous year. “Hannity” (2.603 million, up 9%), “Glenn Beck” (2.403 million, up 89%), “On the Record with Greta van Susteren” (2.150 million, up 16%), and “Special Report with Bret Baier” (1.997 million, up 20%) rounded out the top five. “ –Huffington Post online

"3 new york times best sellers in 1 year and 89% growth in ratings after all this succes, I'm still Uncle Von's biggest fan"

The first 10 spots, as far as ratings are concerned, are all Fox News channel shows. In fact, The O’Reilly Factor, when shown as a repeat ranks higher than Olbermann, Maddow, Nancy Grace, Anderson Cooper, Lou Dobbs and Chris Matthews. Also, Fox News Channel’s show Red Eye (which I am a huge fan of) does just .2 less than Olbermann and is shown at 2 am. Olbermann’s show is in prime time!

The Statists are afraid of Fox News. Frightened I say! Because regular people are sick of the liberal spin. They go to Fox News to get the truth. They get more truth in Fox News opinion shows than they do any of CNN’s or MSNBC’s.

I digress.

Let’s look at the leaning of talk radio. Conservatives like Limbaugh, Hannity, Savage and Beck dominate the talk radio market. And that too is a fact. Limbaugh, Hannity and Savage regularly take the top three slots in ratings, in that order. So now you are asking “But why uncle? Why aren’t there more liberal radio talk show hosts?” Well I will answer those questions and it’s really rather simple.

Because no one wants to listen to that crap. It’s true, liberal talk-radio doesn’t thrive or exist in the magnitude that Conservative talk radio does because no one wants to hear it. Let’s be honest, if there was a craving, a need and demand for liberal talk radio, they would certainly be more prevalent.  But liberal talk radio blows and we all know it. Bill Schulz from Red Eye has his own theory; he says Conservative talk radio is popular because Conservatives like to listen to it at work, whereas liberals don’t have jobs so they don’t listen to the radio. This could very well be true but it’s also true that liberal talk radio is garbled crap and doesn’t survive because no one cares for it.

The saddest part about this all is, the statists are so transparent in there double standards. They could bash G-Dub all day long but when someone see’s Obama for what he is, then proceeds to speak their mind, they are racists. For 8 years the liberal media and the soul-less, cowards in congress bashed our President, but we bash a socialist such as Obama and all of a sudden, we are racist and counterproductive. Liberals can protest and exercise free speech all they want, but when Conservative’s finally get off their butts and protest in the form of tea-parties, liberals react in a negative way. White house Adviser David Axelrod said the Tea Party movement is an “unhealthy” reaction to the nation’s current economic climate. Actress/Comedian (if you can call her that) Janeane “the best movie I was in was Mystery Men” Garofalo had this to say:

Let’s be very honest about what this is about,” she said on Keith Olbermann’s crap-tastic show. “It’s not about bashing Democrats. It’s not about taxes. They have no idea what the Boston Tea Party was about. They don’t know their history at all. This is about hating a black man in the White House. This is racism straight up. That is nothing but a bunch of tea-bagging rednecks.”

“I bought this outfit from a drunken hobo for 5 bucks…what a sucker. Don’t be fooled people, I may look alive but on the inside, I’m very much dead”

The most troubling thing about this is not that Garofalo fancies herself a political pundit. It’s not that she called Tea Party protestors “rednecks” and “racists”. And it’s not that she thinks people actually care about her stupid opinion. It’s that….she’s still alive. Seriously, who knew? Her career is about as lively as that squirrel I ran over with my minivan when I was in high school. I shouldn’t have said that, now PETA is gonna camp out in my front yard…

Again, I digress.

Nancy Pelosi suggests that these people (tea party protesters) aren’t smart enough or independent enough to organize these protests on their own.  Calling the protests “Astroturf” and that it’s “funded by high end” Americans who are using these events “to keep focus on tax cuts for the rich”.

Anyone else think she looks like the Crypt Keeper from Tales from the Crypt? No amount of botox can save her now...

No way could this be about Obama and his attempt at making the government even bigger.

When liberals protested at military members FUNERALS that was fine, but G-d forbid they protest “the anointed one”. We are talking about protesting a dead American who voluntarily gave their life in defense of these scumbags. But that’s all well and good and within their rights, but a conservative protests and its racism. Liberals spent 8 years (and continue to this day) calling G-dub unending slurs and horrible names and that was all good but you disagree with “the Messiah” and that means you’re an ignorant moron from the sticks.

With a quick ADD moment, here’s a picture of a cute puppy for no reason:

Man thats one cute puppy....now keep reading

My point is this: all over the place we see double standards. The liberals don’t want the conservatives to have anything…at all. They can overwhelm the market with liberal Media on television and print but the conservatives have one channel that leans to the right and that’s unacceptable to them. They can’t accept that Conservatives on Fox News and on the radio are popular because of the message they deliver. People want to watch and listen to these shows. No one is forcing them, no one has a gun to their domes making them watch and listen. Liberal talk radio blows, that’s why they don’t exist. It’s not that they don’t exist because of some massive conspiracy; they don’t exist because no one cares for what they have to say. Liberal leaning newspapers, magazines, and TV channels are spread as far as the eye can see, but that isn’t enough. Liberals have been protesting since Vietnam and that was them simply “exercising their first amendment rights” but when average folk who want small government protest, it’s widely orchestrated by the rich and is made up of nothing but idiots, rednecks, and racists.

The double-standards of liberals can be seen in almost any political venue, it’s no surprise and it isn’t new. And they wonder why people are having voter’s remorse from last year’s election. In the words of Queen, the liberals are clearly saying “I want it all I want it all I want it all and I want it now”.

Good day. I care about your opinions, share them with me by leaving a comment. I guarantee I will respond to them. Thanks for stopping by, see you soon.

Love,

Uncle Von

The Exorcist – 1973

Director – William Friedkin

Starring – Linda Blair, Ellen Burstyn, Max Von Sydow, and Jason Miller

As far as controversial movies go, I can think of no more infamous movie than William Friedkin’s The Exorcist. Often cited as the “scariest movie of all time”, or at the very least one of the scariest, banned across the United Kingdom from it’s release until fairly recently in the 90s, and condemned by prominant religious figures and organizations as vile and evil, it’s safe to say that The Exorcist had quite a lot to live up to. I even encountered some trouble when I tried to watch the film as my fiancee refused to be in the house when I did. I had to stop and come back to it 2 different times. But the big question is, “was it worth all the hype?” I’d have to say, resoundingly, yes.

To start with, the story. A young girl, Regan (Linda Blair), becomes possessed by a demon, and in the process, frightens her mother (Ellen Burstyn) with her foul behavior, filthy language, and her severe, self-inflicted wounds. After exhausting the options available to them through science and medicine, they turn to the church in an attempt to rid Regan of the demon. Sound original? Not really. The story isn’t a new one, stories similar to this one have been told before and since the release of the Exorcist. It is in the execution of this story, however, that the real difference comes in and where the magic lies.

The pacing of the film is huge. Without anything obviously scary happening, Friedkin still takes every opportunity to build the tension and create an atmosphere of un-ease, and anxiety. Every minute that goes by, we are slowly drawn in to the characters, the story, and the setting. The film is roughly 2 hours and 15 minutes. It could have been double that, and I still would have been caught up in it. Not one frame was wasted in moving us towards the climax, flickering lights, ambient sound, negative space, everything was used effectivly to create the mood. Without the time taken to get us into the minds of the characters, this could have very easily become a sensationalist monster movie, or a horror movie that was dependent upon shock value.

Sound. One very important method of ramping up the tension is through sound. It can be used to add an almost subliminal layer to the film, something like the rhythmic pounding of some machinery in the hospital, or the raspy breathing of Regan as she is possessed by the demon. The sound design is, when necessary, a bit more overt too. For example, the priests, fathers Merrin and Karras (von Sydow, and Miller respectively) walk up the stairs to start the exorcism and leave the girl’s miter Arther foot of the stairs watching. The camera pulls in slowly on the mother, and suddenly out of the blue, the phone rings causing her, and the audience, to jump out of our collective skins. These little, seemingly innocuous noises, like a phone ringing, or a floor creaking, or a soft scrabbling sound, go a long way towards building the tension for the inevitable climax of the movie.

Friedkin utilizes a lot of contrasting imagery to amplify the good versus evil theme of the story. One of the best examples of the use of this technique is the image used for the poster. Max von Sydow’s character (father Merrin) has just arrived at the house, and surrounded by a glowing white light he steps towards the darkly lit house. He is surrounded by darkness (evil), but brings with him light (good) and hope (still good). The light that surrounds him draws our eyes to the upstairs window of the house, where Regan and the demon are waiting, not only does this image characterize the themes of the story, but it visually connects the fate of the two opposing sides. This use of pregnant negative space occurs throughout the film. A darkly lit scene often times is immediately contrasted with a bright one, flip flopping to heighten the conflict, and draw the characters closer together. The imagery is at war with itself, vying for the audiences attention, while undermining and simultaniously accentuating the scenes that came before it. The positioning of the characters in The Exorcist speaks a lot about the battles and conflicts they face in the story. Often times characters are either ascending or descending into or from the scene (a buddy of mine actually wrote a bit about these contrasting visual qualities, you can read that here.). The staccato nature of the imagery builds to a frenzied pace, never letting up until the conclusion.

Tying all these elements together is the subdued yet distinctive musical score. It never overwealms the film, it instead helps to glue everything together. The score is instantly recognizable, and conjures up instantaneous images from the film (just ask my fiancé).

If it isn’t clear up until this point, I loved this film. Depite my lack of religion based fear, The Exorcist kept me on the edge of my seat, enthralled every step of the way. This is what horror and suspense films should aspire to. Completely and totally recommended!

It’s 4:30 AM in the morning and I just got up from my sleep. I started up my winamp and listen to the tune. I think I’m liking the Melty Blood -Act Cadenza B- theme songs, especially Ciel Song “Bassilica”. I thank Kaimax for giving me this cool songs and remembering that I wanted this song so bad. Anyway, this post is the response to windknight111 request for a Princess Lover Rainmeter skin. I think I will do all 4 characters in the Princess Lover series for the Rainmeter skin. For now, enjoy this Sylvia Von Hossen skin (I think she resembled Saber, or is it just me?)

Skin Name: Sylvia Von Hossen Rainmeter

File Size: 227 KB

Color Theme: Light Blue

Download: http://www.mediafire.com/file/ydzm3zbmdh4/SylviaVanHossen.rar

Note: A Rainmeter application can be downloaded in my previous post. Don’t forget to extract and move the folder to your Rainmeter skin directory. Happy downloading!

In America, if you have the scratch to purchase a business, a franchise, a hot dog cart; it is in your full right. Now let’s say you are a conservative talk show host who is Obama’s most vocal opponent, and you have the scratch to purchase a franchise, it is not your right. In fact, some will do all in their power to make sure that doesn’t happen. Who would try to stop you? WHO?!

Why, race-hustlers Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson of course! These two have a very serious track record for trying all they can to make race an issue. Their most recent race related incident involves Conservative talk-show host Rush Limbaugh. What? You’ve heard of him?

Rush Limbaugh was mentioned as a potential minority owner for the dreadful St. Louis Rams. Keep in mind that the St. Louis Rams were not even (and still aren’t) for sale. So what’s the problem Uncle Von? I’ll tell you the problem, He’s a Racist! A racist I say! He said such hateful things as this:

“I think the media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well.  They’re interested in black coaches and black quarterbacks doing well.  I think there’s a little hope invested in McNabb and he got a lot of credit for the performance of his team that he really didn’t deserve.”

What?! How dare you sir! Oh wait….there wasn’t anything racist about that…

Let’s be honest here, is Donovan McNabb over-rated? Yes. Is it racist for a white guy to express his opinion that a black quarterback is over-rated? No.

Enter Demaurice Smith. Who is Demaurice Smith you ask? He is the Executive Director of the National Football League Players Association, of course. Wow that’s a long title…

Anyway, Demaurice Smith is also a big contributor to Liberal organizations and Politicians. In fact, he contributed 3,300 doll-hairs to Obama’s campaign. He had this to say about Limbaughs bid:

“This communication is more about what we stand for than the reality of our role in any franchise sale. While it’s true the subject matter was related [to Limbaugh's bid], I do understand that the NFL does not present ownership bids to me or the NFLPA. I encourage our players to express their views.”

So he is saying “I am opposed to this, so please players, speak up about how much this sucks”

“I have asked our players to embrace their roles not only in the game of football but also as players and partners in the business of the NFL,” said Smith in the e-mail. “They risk everything to play this game, they understand that risk and they live with that risk and its consequences for the rest of their life. We also know that there is an ugly part of history and we will not risk going backwards, giving up, giving in or lying down to it.

“Our men are strong and proud sons, fathers, spouses and I am proud when they stand up, understand this is their profession and speak with candor and blunt honesty about how they feel.”

Wow, those are strong words. So strong that it sounds like being a person who gets paid millions of dollars a year to play a sport, is relatable to someone in the military who gets deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan.

The NFL: it’s basically Iraq light. Or is Iraq, the NFL light?

But this quote confuses me and here is why: What in the blue hell does this have to do with Limbaugh? So what you are saying is if Limbaugh was a minority owner of a crap football team, race-relations in the NFL, nay, America; would go back decades? Sure that makes sense…

So he stand up and says something about Limbaugh (remember, he is a vocal opponent of the anointed one, Obama) even though he has no pull or say in the matter? It’s weird that someone who was on Obama’s transition team would speak out against this so vocally. Oh, did I forget to mention that Demaurice Smith was a part of Obama’s transition team? Sorry.

Joseph Ashby of the American Thinker summed it up nicely when he wrote:

“Smith’s gross conflict of interest and apparent political targeting of Obama’s top foe is a huge story. Unfortunately the media appears too blinded by their prejudice of Limbaugh to report on it.

To summarize, we know that a former Obama official and political ally — who was chosen by the NFLPA specifically for his political clout and connections to the highest rungs of power in government — directly attacked Limbaugh for the radio-talker’s political commentary.

Historically politicians have been prone to vindictive and petty behavior, but never in American history has someone had so much power to pummel his political opponents as President Obama. With control over banks, insurance companies, car companies, media (sports media included) and unions (like the NFL players union), Obama tentacles seem to penetrate into nearly every corner of the nation.”

Indeed

Let’s Talk about Al Sharpton now. We all know Al Sharpton. He is an impartial, unbiased, man-child, who wants nothing more than to target and eliminate racism at every level. That last sentence was completely inaccurate. In fact, an argument can be made that he and Jesse Jackson, are actually doing harm to race-relations. Sharpton is more racist than Limbaugh, and I’ll show you.

“I could watch you eat ALL-day-long”

In 1991, a Hasidic Jewish driver in Brooklyn driving in a motorcade, accidently veered off the road and killed a seven-year-old Gavin Cato who was black. Smelling racism, Sharpton swoops on scene telling people that this was a hate crime.   At Gavin’s funeral, Sharpton railed against the Jews, calling them “Diamond merchants” and that they (the Jews) had “the blood of innocent babies” on their hands.

That’s not Anti-Semitic at all…

In 1998, Sharpton was ordered to pay 65,000 doll-hairs for defamation for falsely accusing a New York prosecutor of rape in the infamous Tawana Brawley case.  If you are unfamiliar with that case, simply go to Google and search ‘Tawana Brawley’. You will be repulsed by what you find I guarantee.

Not to be outdone, Jesse Jackson once said of Barack Obama:

“Barack…he’s talking down to black people…telling niggers how to behave.”

Let’s not forget in 1984 when Jackson referred to Jews as “Hymie’s” and called New York City “Hymie-town”

“The itsy-bitsy spider went up the water spout…then a white guy came in and squashed him. It’s a hate crime! He’s anti-spider! What did that innocent spider do to provoke such hate?"

So who is the real racist here? The people who seek out racism in any avenue possible, have spewed racial slurs more than Limbaugh has? Or Limbaugh himself for saying that over-rated McNabb is indeed, over-rated? Give me a man-sized break over here!

Sharpton and Jackson have made a living off of stuff like this. Anytime they think something public is race-related, they come in on their steed and save the day. But they are the ones doing the real harm. Conservatives don’t make issue of race. That is because they see people as human beings, regardless of color. Conservatives don’t have a problem with Obama because he’s half black, they have a problem with him because of his socialist ideologies. They have a problem with the nanny state he is creating. They have a problem with freedoms he is trying to strip us of.  Limbaugh isn’t a racist; he is simply a vocal conservative talk radio host who wants to buy an NFL team. It’s in his right. Owning an NFL team is a privilege but it can also be considered Limbaugh’s right to join the ranks. If he and his boy have more money than the other bidders, then why the hell not?

Limbaugh wouldn’t do any more damage than other minority owners have. Let’s talk about 2 minority owners of the Miami Dolphins.

“J-lo here, making being a sleezy hooker look easy since 1987”

The same day news broke that J-lo and Fergie became part owners of the Dolphins, Limbaugh was dropped from his ownership group seeking the Rams. Look at these lyrics (if you can call them that) from a song (if you can call it that) that J-lo performed with Ja Rule. Warning, this is some vulgar stuff:

What’s my motherf***in’ name? R-U-L-E
Blowin’ back on this Mary Jane, I’m analyzin’ the game
And the game done chose me
To bring pain to p***y n*ggaz and p***y hoes, it’s one in the same

That’s art like the thing my dog left in the backyard for me is a Picasso…

Fergie, do you have anything to present? Oh, you do? Lets see:

Overseas, yeah, we try to stop terrorism
But we still got terrorists here livin’
In the USA, the big CIA …

A war is goin’ on but the reason’s undercover
The truth is kept secret, it’s swept under the rug

No big deal, just accusing the CIA of being terrorists…

“It’s true, I did pee myself in front of everyone. I make being a drunken, slut-tastic, liberal, slob look like an art form”

Did I mention Fergie was so drunk one time at a show that she wet her pants mid-song in front of a live audience?

Oh yea, Serena Williams is also a part owner, who had this to say to a tennis official:

“ If I could, I would take this fu**ing ball and shove it down your fu**ing throat,”

That is all acceptable, but being a Conservative talk show host is so unacceptable, that you cannot be a minority owner of an NFL franchise. The double-standard is amazing. News organizations even went as far as falsifying quotes that Limbaugh supposedly uttered. Check out these videos if you please.

You get my point. Limbaugh being blocked is nothing more than tearing down the most popular Conservative out there today. I will leave you with this video of Representative Steve King (R-Iowa) straight tearing up NFL commissioner Goodell for his double-standards. It will bring you joy. Trust me.

Good day and thanks for reading. Please leave a comment and spread the word!

Love,

Your dear Uncle Von

In Kürze starten wir mit unserer großen Ebay-Aufklärungsserie!

Die Beschwerden häufen sich. So auch bei uns! Nahezu täglich erreichen uns e-mails von verärgerten Menschen, welche sich über ebay, paypal und viele weitere- der an den Mutterkonzern angeschlossenen Plattformen beschwerden.

Aus gegebenen Anlass werden wir daher an dieser Stelle über die Dauer der nächsten Monate für ein wenig Aufklärung bezüglich ebay und Konsorten sorgen. Dabei werden wir unter anderem Tatsachen und Machenschaften aufdecken, welche unsere Leserinnen und Leser sicher in Erstaunen versetzen werden!  

Im besonderen Focus unserer Aufklärungsserie wird dabei nicht nur ebay, paypal, kijii usw. stehen, sondern auch ”pseudo-berichterstattende” Plattformen, wie z.B. onlinemarktplatz.de. - und Vieles  mehr.

Unsere große Ebay-Aufklärungsserie wird in Kürze beginnen.
Schauen Sie also des Öfteren mal wieder bei newstopaktuell.wordpress.com herein.

Es lohnt sich!

http://wp.me/pzGLX-s3

NEWS TOP-AKTUELL

busco novas maneiras de se contar histórias. se alguém conhece me manda um email ou deixa um comentário aqui. ontem fui na mostra ver um filme argentino que parecia contar a história de um jeito diferente. Aqui está o trailer de “Todos Mienten”:

Infelizmente me pareceu uma releitura ruim do cineasta francês Erich Rohmer  misturada com o filme “Os Idiotas” do Lars Von Trier. Mas como eu mesmo digo: “coisa ruim serve ao menos pra incentivar produzirmos nossas coisas”. 

Concretizar nossos projetos não é nada fácil, sei bem. Existe a dificuldade de recursos, a coragem na decisão, na feitura e na exibição. Eu por exemplo curto animação. (Sabe aquele papo da pessoa bater o olho e saber que quer aquilo? sinto isso com animação). Pois aqui vai a parte auto-ajuda do meu post: Se você sente algo desse tipo por algo, pense se não quer trabalhar nisso. Eu achava que todo mundo via filmes e animações e percebia se a estética tava boa, a luz, o roteiro etc etc demorei pra notar que era uma facilidade minha e com boas possibilidades de tirar proveito próprio.

Aceito propostas e parcerias audiovisuais!

En entradas anteriores les había platicado del concurso Liga Cosplay organizado por el foro anim-arte y el grupo Drakkar. Este concurso es una serie de actividades que se han estado realizando durante todo el año,  como la  calificación se basa  en puntos, pueden inscribirse en cualquier momento.

Las actividades son muy divertidas y ponen a trabajar la creatividad que esconde todo cosplayer.

Las actividades consecutivas a la primera que les comente en pasadas entradas y el material con el que he concursado en cada una de ellas son las siguientes:

1.- Cubre bocas Cosplayero. Se trata de hacer un cubre bocas que se adapte a un traje que el cosplayer tenga. Yo hice el mío en base a mi traje de Squall (Final Fantasy).

Cubre Bocas de Squall (Final Fantasy)

2.- Fototutorial. Hacer un tutorial con fotografías. Esta actividad fue muy interesante ya que todos los cosplayer que participaron aportaron ideas muy creativas y utiles para cualquier cosplayer. El mío se titula:  Arma Hecha con Pasta Automotriz.

3.- Verano. Es exactamente igual a la primera dinámica “Primavera”, un concurso de cosplays. Aquí participe con Demian Von Prios.

 

Paty as Demian Von Prios

4.- Paper 2 Cosplay. Se trata de hacer un traje a base de puro papel en parejas. Mi pareja fue Arish, una linda colega cosplayer de Guadalajara. Los personajes fueron de Pokemon: Pikachu y Ledyba.

 

Arish y Paty

5.- Funny Photo Cosplay. Una foto graciosa de cosplay con texto que le agregué aun mas diversión.

 

Marisol y yo en TNT

Y por último, la actividad que en este momento se lleva a cabo.

6.- Video Cosplay. Se trata de hacer un video de algún anime, caricatura o película.

Esta actividad me volvió loca, era un pretexto perfecto para llevar a cabo un proyecto de tenía en mente hace años atrás. ¿Han visto la película del “Silencio de los Inocentes”?.  La parte donde el asesino en serie “Bufallo Biil” baila enfrente de una cámara siempre me trae a la mente el momento en que todo cosplayer se prueba su traje a medio terminar imaginándose como quedara. En la película Bufallo Bill es un acecino maniaco sicótico, en mi video es una cosplayer obsesionada por ser la mejor, por esto tiene prisionera a una linda cosplayer que trata de escapar secuestrando a la mascota del acecino al igual que en la película original.

La liga aún no termina… ¿Qué esperas para inscribirte y participar?

Siempre lo digo: ¡Vamos es divertido!, porque de eso se trata el cosplay ;D 

Untertitel wurde doch richtig abgedruckt. Und das Bild kriecht hie und da ins Netz.

It may be admitted that, as far as scientific knowledge is concerned, a body of suitably chosen experts may be in the best position to command all the best knowledge available—though this is of course merely shifting the difficulty to the problem of selecting the experts. What I wish to point out is that, even assuming that this problem can be readily solved, it is only a small part of the wider problem.
Today it is almost heresy to suggest that scientific knowledge is not the sum of all knowledge. But a little reflection will show that there is beyond question a body of very important but unorganized knowledge which cannot possibly be called scientific in the sense of knowledge of general rules: the knowledge of the particular circumstances of time and place. It is with respect to this that practically every individual has some advantage over all others because he possesses unique information of which beneficial use might be made, but of which use can be made only if the decisions depending on it are left to him or are made with his active cooperation.

Hayek’s point was directed at arguments for socialist central planning (common in Hayek’s time). But it applies with almost equal force to modern expertise-based arguments for paternalism. Last year, I discussed the broader relevance of Hayek’s thought to our own times in this post. In a follow-up post, I argued for the modern relevance of Hayek’s critique of conservatism.

Cherri V has been bubbling for a while so expect to hear more from her!

MG

For over a year now, Barack Obama has been complaining about Fox News being unfair to him. Which was cool back when he was campaigning but now that he is President, don’t you think such squabbles are beneath him? In a time where the economy is in the toilet, the dollar is becoming obsolete, the entire U.S. congress are on special interest pay rolls, the war in Afghanistan isn’t going so good, and Israel is fixin to stomp a mud hole into Iran and Alphabet’s (the Iran midget president) proverbial bum’s; the president has time for petty shenanigans such as this.

(“Hello, my name is Alphabet. I enjoy stealing elections, eating cheerios in my draws while I watch ‘sex in the city’, and having a perpetual 5 o’clock shadow.”

A President, in any era should think such things way beneath them. I don’t seem to recall President George Bush going on the Sunday morning talk circuit complaining and whining about EVERY news channel trashing him 24/7.

Every single news channel trashed that dude around the clock. Even idiots like John Stewart and David Letterman trashed him. But did you see G-dub taking to the podium whining and moaning about how unfair it is? No you didn’t. You wanna know why? Cause he had more important crap to attend to.

White House communications director Anita Dunn had this to say on the most unbiased news network (sarcasm) in the history of man, CNN: “What I think is fair to say about Fox — and certainly it’s the way we view it — is that it really is more a wing of the Republican Party,” she continued: “They take their talking points, put them on the air; take their opposition research, put them on the air. And that’s fine. But let’s not pretend they’re a news network the way CNN is.”

Hahaha…what?! CNN is unbiased and fair and balanced all of a sudden? Where was I when that happened?

Check  out this deliciousness from April 15^th:

Oh yea. Pizza.

This is supposed to be a reporter. That means to report things. Not to attack people who oppose your views. Not to throw in your stupid slant or moronic opinion. If people cared what she had to say, she would probably have her own show instead of being a street reporter.

"Hi my name is Anita Dunn. I look like a camel and only eat rice cakes and vanilla pudding. I enjoy watching CNN and old bootleg concert videos of 2pac. "

I think what Anita “rice cakes” Dunn and Robert “angry pants” Gibbs are looking at, are probably opinion shows which Fox is known for. Shows like Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity. Beck is a Libertarian and Hannity is a Reagan Conservative, so obviously they don’t like Obama.

You would think the White House press corps would have their hands full with daily empty promises, a health care bill that has Americans flooding the streets, and Obama’s lack of actually delivering on anything he said he would.  But instead, they take time to whine about Fox News to an extent that they opened a blog to attack “Fox Lies”. Delicious.

Obama is so busy fixing the parts of America that aren’t broken that he has time to play a pickup game.

GET SOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I’m thinking that Obama isn’t used to being criticized. Every other news organization salivates at the very mention of the dudes name.  So when someone actually opposes what he does, he throws a tantrum. If G-Dub focused his energy on what the media said, the dude wouldn’t have ever slept, ate, drank, or used the restroom. Give me a man-sized break!

Obama needs to grow up here. He is the President. His every move is under the microscope; of course people are going to speak out against his ridiculous-ness-ocity. And it’s about time there is a news organization that can offer different opinions. Let’s pretend that Fox news is completely and utterly biased for the right. Who cares? MSNBC is completely biased for the left yet no one says anything. Mr. President (err… I mean…Messiah), how about starting to use your energy on something constructive? Like playing four-square or combing Joe Bidens wig. Or maybe convincing Nancy Pelosi to stop with the collagen? Maybe going to speech therapy with Barney Frank for moral support? Just grow up already!

Thanks for stopping by. Support a brotha and spread the word. Hope to hear from you and hope to see you back soon.

Love,

Uncle Von