<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>xubuntu &amp;laquo; WordPress.com Tag Feed</title>
	<link>http://en.wordpress.com/tag/xubuntu/</link>
	<description>Feed of posts on WordPress.com tagged "xubuntu"</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:10:06 +0000</pubDate>

	<generator>http://en.wordpress.com/tags/</generator>
	<language>en</language>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Get Windows Explorer in Ubuntu with Thunar File Manager]]></title>
<link>http://ubuntugenius.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/get-windows-explorer-in-ubuntu-with-thunar-file-manager/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ubuntugenius</dc:creator>
<guid>http://ubuntugenius.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/get-windows-explorer-in-ubuntu-with-thunar-file-manager/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Thunar is the default file manager for Xubuntu&#8217;s Xfce desktop environment, and is as stable in]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><strong><span style="color:#800000;">Thunar</span></strong> is the default <strong>file manager</strong> for <strong><span style="color:#808080;">Xubuntu</span></strong>&#8217;s <strong><span style="color:#808080;">Xfce</span></strong> desktop environment, and is as stable in <strong><span style="color:#993300;">Ubuntu</span></strong> as the default app, <strong>Nautilus</strong> (especially since <strong><span style="color:#808080;">Xfce</span></strong> uses a lot from <strong><span style="color:#993300;">Gnome</span></strong> anyway). In many ways, you can&#8217;t tell the two programs apart, but for a time <strong><span style="color:#800000;">Thunar</span></strong> was way ahead of <strong><span style="color:#993300;">Gnome</span></strong>&#8217;s file manager. That&#8217;s not just because of advanced features like <strong>custom <em>actions</em></strong> you could add, but because of the various <em>views</em> you could have. For example, for newbies tentatively moving away from Windows, the <strong><em><span style="color:#008080;">Tree</span></em></strong> view in the side pane is assuringly similar to Windows Explorer.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://ubuntugenius.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/thunar.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-546 aligncenter" title="Thunar: A Great Alternative File Manager for Ubuntu" src="http://ubuntugenius.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/thunar.png" alt="" width="500" height="327" /></a></p>
<p>While <strong>Nautilus</strong> has certainly caught up, with being able to add to context menus via <em>actions</em>, and 6 different views for the side pane, <strong><span style="color:#800000;">Thunar</span></strong> is still worth installing because you can get the best of both worlds. You can leave <strong>Nautilus</strong> with the <strong><em><span style="color:#008080;">Places</span></em></strong> pane on the left and <em>&#8220;Icon View&#8221;</em> (thumbnails) on the right, and for when you want to browse via a <strong><em><span style="color:#008080;">Tree</span></em></strong> pane with<em> &#8220;Compact List&#8221;</em> icons (<em>&#8220;List View&#8221;</em> in Windows Explorer), you can open <strong><span style="color:#800000;">Thunar</span></strong>.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://ubuntugenius.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/thunar_shortcuts.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-547" title="Thunar: Shortcuts are easy to access even in Tree view" src="http://ubuntugenius.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/thunar_shortcuts.png" alt="" width="500" height="372" /></a></p>
<p>Also, unlike with <strong>Nautilus</strong>, you can still access the defined shortcuts (usually available via the left pane) while in <strong><em><span style="color:#008080;">Tree</span></em></strong> view by clicking a button at the end of the address bar. If you are thinking <strong><span style="color:#800000;">Thunar</span></strong> might be good to have as a backup in case <strong>Nautilus</strong> is having problems (which it is), but prefer it to look like <strong>Nautilus</strong>, then you can always change things back to how you like them (change the <strong><em><span style="color:#008080;">Tree</span></em></strong> pane to <strong><em><span style="color:#008080;">Shortcuts</span></em></strong>).</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://ubuntugenius.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/thunar_shortcuts_pane.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-548" title="Thunar: The Shortcuts Pane can be restored at any time" src="http://ubuntugenius.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/thunar_shortcuts_pane.png" alt="" width="500" height="372" /></a></p>
<p>If you like this idea, but are thinking the icons in <em>&#8220;Compact List&#8221;</em> view are too small, you can always make them bigger (seen above), via the <strong><em>View</em></strong> menu, or <strong><a href="http://ubuntugenius.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/thumbnails-in-ubuntu-zoom-in-or-out-with-your-mouse/">zoom with your scroll wheel</a></strong>.</p>
<p>If you look at the pics, you&#8217;ll see some minor differences between the two file managers. Firstly, while <strong><span style="color:#800000;">Thunar</span></strong> uses the same icons for toolbar buttons that <strong>Nautilus</strong> does (they both get them from the current icon theme), <strong><span style="color:#800000;">Thunar</span></strong>&#8217;s are bigger (which I personally like). You&#8217;ll also note from the second pic that in your home folder (and elsewhere), <span style="text-decoration:underline;">hidden folders and files are listed first</span>.</p>
<p>Other things worth mentioning are the <strong><a href="http://ubuntugenius.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/thumbnails-in-ubuntu-zoom-in-or-out-with-your-mouse/">differences between thumbnails and folder settings</a></strong> between the two, and that the <strong><span style="color:#800000;">Thunar</span></strong> <em>context</em> (right-click) menu will probably have less entries than you&#8217;re used to (though you should get<em> &#8220;<strong>Open Terminal Here</strong>&#8220;</em> by default, while with <strong>Nautilus</strong> you have to install a package to get <em>&#8220;<strong>Open in Terminal</strong>&#8220;</em>).</p>
<p>Lastly, since the <strong><em><span style="color:#008080;">Information</span></em></strong> pane in <strong>Nautilus</strong> is rather useless right now when it comes to info, you can use <strong><span style="color:#800000;">Thunar</span></strong> to get more info at a glance than <strong>Nautilus</strong> can offer. For example, when you&#8217;re in your <strong>~/Pictures</strong> folder and what to know the size in pixels of certain images, you generally need to right-click each file and view the info via <strong><em>Properties &#62; Image</em></strong>. But with <strong><span style="color:#800000;">Thunar</span></strong>, all you have to do is click each file and look at the bottom to the info displayed on the status bar (which can be enabled via the <strong><em>View</em></strong> menu if it is missing).</p>
<p>So you could even do what I did: set up <strong><span style="color:#800000;">Thunar</span></strong> to display over-sized icons in <em>&#8220;Icons&#8221;</em> view, and then <strong><a href="http://ubuntugenius.wordpress.com/2009/08/29/how-to-make-a-command-launcher-for-your-gnome-panel/">create a panel launcher</a></strong> to have your <strong>~/Pictures</strong> folder open in <strong><span style="color:#800000;">Thunar </span></strong>(the command for such a launcher would be: <strong><span style="color:#3366ff;">thunar /home/yourusername/Pictures</span></strong>). That way, you don&#8217;t have to mess with icon size in <strong>Nautilus</strong>, but still get really large thumbnails of all your pictures, as well as info on dimensions presented in the status bar.</p>
<p>To install <strong><span style="color:#800000;">Thunar</span></strong>, as well as select some <strong>plugins</strong> for installation, simply search for <em>&#8220;thunar&#8221;</em> in Synaptic. Or you can install the program and all related plugins via the terminal:</p>
<p><strong><span style="color:#3366ff;">sudo apt-get install thunar thunar-media-tags-plugin thunar-volman thunar-thumbnailers thunar-archive-plugin</span></strong></p>
<p>To get more info about the plugins, simply paste their names (individually) into the <strong><em>Quick search</em></strong> field in Synaptic.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Thumbnails in Ubuntu: Zoom In or Out with Your Mouse]]></title>
<link>http://ubuntugenius.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/thumbnails-in-ubuntu-zoom-in-or-out-with-your-mouse/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ubuntugenius</dc:creator>
<guid>http://ubuntugenius.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/thumbnails-in-ubuntu-zoom-in-or-out-with-your-mouse/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The default &#8220;view&#8221; in both Nautilus and Thunar file managers is the &#8220;Icon&#8220; o]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>The default &#8220;<strong>view</strong>&#8221; in both <strong><span style="color:#800000;">Nautilus</span></strong><strong> and <span style="color:#800000;">Thunar</span> file managers</strong> is the <em>&#8220;<strong>Icon</strong>&#8220;</em> or <em>thumbnail</em> view, which you can of course change if ever you want via the <strong><em>View</em></strong> menu. If you&#8217;re happy with thumbnails, but they&#8217;re too big for your liking, or you actually want to make them larger, like in your <strong>~/Pictures</strong> folder, hold the <strong><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#ff0000;">Ctrl</span></span></strong> button while you zoom in or out with your <strong><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="color:#ff0000;">mouse scroll wheel</span></span></strong>.</p>
<p>In <strong><span style="color:#800000;">Nautilus</span></strong> (the default file manager in <strong><span style="color:#993300;">Ubuntu</span></strong>), you can make the thumbnails of pics rather huge, like only 2 fitting in each row, and the icons for any folders in there won&#8217;t be too large. On top of that, the change will only be recorded in the folder you&#8217;re in, so you can have most of your folders displaying thumbnails at the default size, have a few where the thumbnails are quite small, and then have huge thumbnails for folders like <strong>~/Pictures</strong>.</p>
<p>In <strong><span style="color:#800000;">Thunar</span></strong> (<strong><span style="color:#808080;">Xubuntu</span></strong>&#8217;s default file manager), you can only go so big, and in your  <strong>~/Pictures </strong>folder the icons for any folders in there might actually look bigger than the thumbnails for pics; also, do that to one folder, and it is a <em>global</em> change (ie: it happens to the rest).</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[KDE was nice, but...]]></title>
<link>http://robinzrants.wordpress.com/2009/11/21/kde-was-nice-but/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>robinzrants</dc:creator>
<guid>http://robinzrants.wordpress.com/2009/11/21/kde-was-nice-but/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Well, I had to see what all the fuss was about. The award-winning, super-easy KDE interface for Linu]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Well, I had to see what all the fuss was about. The award-winning, super-easy <big><big><big><span style="color:#ff6600;">KDE interface</span></big></big></big> for Linux is indeed beautiful, versatile, and powerful. Major eye candy! It has some way-cool applications which have become my favorites for the job they do, replacing their Gnome equivalents. But KDE is, at least on my &#8216;puter, a resource hog. I know I said &#8220;<a href="http://robinzrants.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/lightweight-is-over-rated/">lightweight is over-rated</a>,&#8221; but there are limits to how heavy I&#8217;m willing to go. KDE is <span style="color:#ff6600;"><big><big><big>great for newbies</big></big></big></span>, but I&#8217;ve learned enough to make even the most spartan of Desktops &#8220;newbie-friendly.&#8221; So it&#8217;s back to Xfce for this kid.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=5f17b9ae-5285-89ec-aab0-f9dc61bf26d8" alt="" /></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Back to old reliable Xubuntu 9.04]]></title>
<link>http://mcloide.wordpress.com/2009/11/19/back-to-old-reliable-xubuntu-9-04/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mcloide</dc:creator>
<guid>http://mcloide.wordpress.com/2009/11/19/back-to-old-reliable-xubuntu-9-04/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, after spending some hours to get all development eviroment set, I have managed to finish ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><a rel="attachment wp-att-714" href="http://mcloide.wordpress.com/2009/11/19/back-to-old-reliable-xubuntu-9-04/xubuntu904/"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-714" style="border:0 none;margin:10px;" title="xubuntu 9.04" src="http://mcloide.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/xubuntu904.png?w=300" alt="" width="241" height="181" /></a>Yesterday, after spending some hours to get all development eviroment set, I have managed to finish the installation of the good and old Xubuntu 9.04.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a bit faster than the 9.10 and so far, no errors what so ever. Next step, wait for the next stable release for Xubuntu and check out some forums before the upgrade.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Intallation de Linux (Configuration légère)]]></title>
<link>http://anatife.wordpress.com/2009/11/18/intallation-de-linux-configuration-legere/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>anatife</dc:creator>
<guid>http://anatife.wordpress.com/2009/11/18/intallation-de-linux-configuration-legere/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[La réponse à un possesseur IMac 500 Bonjour, Il semblerait que ce soit possible ; pour ce faire , il]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><h2><span style="color:#000000;">La réponse à un possesseur IMac 500<br />
</span></h2>
<p><span style="color:#000000;">Bonjour,<br />
Il semblerait que ce soit possible ; pour ce faire , il faudrait télécharger un premier fichier .iso (LIVE), le graver sur un Cd, booter sur ce cd (Je ne connais pas MAC…. on parle d’une touche C pour booter sur un cd).<br />
Se contenter d’un bureau léger : XFCE!<br />
Si la reconnaissance de la carte graphique et si la connexion se font , il n’y a aucune raison pour qu’une installation définitive ne puisse pas se faire!<br />
Je tenterais en premier : Xubuntu<br />
xubuntu 8.04.1 Hardy Heron  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.xubuntu-fr.org/telechargement">ICI </a><br />
C&#8217;est une version stable et LST (supportée à long terme)!Choisir : XFCE<br />
LIRE les liens annexes!<br />
Par ailleurs Mint et Elive fontionnent bien sur de vieux PC!</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#000000;"><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://distrowatch.com/">Un site intéressant!</a><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#000000;">Bonne journée!</span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Don't upgrade to Xubuntu 9.10 Karmic]]></title>
<link>http://mcloide.wordpress.com/2009/11/16/dont-upgrade-to-xubuntu-9-10-karmic/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mcloide</dc:creator>
<guid>http://mcloide.wordpress.com/2009/11/16/dont-upgrade-to-xubuntu-9-10-karmic/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I have been working with Xubuntu for a while now and so far it has worked wonders at a point which I]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><a href="http://tyrannosauruswreck.com/angry_face.jpg"><img class="alignleft" style="border:0 none;margin:10px;" title="angry-face" src="http://tyrannosauruswreck.com/angry_face.jpg" alt="" width="262" height="117" /></a>I have been working with Xubuntu for a while now and so far it has worked wonders at a point which I haven&#8217;t used Windows for months.</p>
<p>About 2 weeks ago I have upgraded my current Xubuntu<strong> 9.04</strong> to <strong>9.10</strong> and this has become my biggest mistake ever.</p>
<p>Since the upgrade this is the kind of errors that I have been getting:</p>
<ul>
<li>Skype doesn&#8217;t have any more sounds or can&#8217;t find mic</li>
<li>Applications Bar gone</li>
<li>Turning off or rebooting fails drastically making a hardware shutdown and power up necessary</li>
<li>And the latest, my <strong>XServer</strong> is gone (all the user interface that looks like Windows)  and with it the login screen (everything now is terminal)</li>
</ul>
<p>From all the troubles so far, the Xserver is by far the worst. Since it is gone I haven&#8217;t been able to run it using my user and to execute it I have to run everything as root.</p>
<p>After making a short trip to Windows and checking Google to find some solution at least for the XServer, I could manage to make the everything come back, but all using root.</p>
<p>If you are about to upgrade <strong>→</strong> <span style="color:#ff0000;"><strong>DONT</strong></span> &#8211; This can be my best advise for you.</p>
<p>But if you are finding yourself in the same position that I was today then this is what you should do (you should be seeing only terminal at your screen):</p>
<ol>
<li>execute display &#8211; if your x-server have a problem, then it will warn you about</li>
<li>now execute startx &#8211; this will start the xserver and all display options for your user. If you can see your Desktop, yeay, nothing more is necessary, otherwise you will need to run it as root (sudo startx)</li>
</ol>
<p>Now is waiting for a good release of Xubuntu to solve this issues or reinstall everything from scratch.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ZevenOS 2.0]]></title>
<link>http://dinucody.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/zevenos-2-0/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 08:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Alin</dc:creator>
<guid>http://dinucody.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/zevenos-2-0/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&#160;&#160; De când aşteptam eu să treacă şi ZevenOS-ul pe tanti Koala (m-am tot jucat cu versiunil]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>&#160;&#160; De când aşteptam eu să treacă şi <strong>ZevenOS</strong>-ul pe tanti Koala (m-am tot jucat cu versiunile anterioare despre care am scris pe <a href="http://dinucody.wordpress.com/index.php?s=zevenos">aici</a> pe blog)! Acum ai un look and feel de BeOS combinat cu noile trăsături din Ubuntu 9.10 &#8211; ce poate fi mai bun ? Au şi un tool pentru customizare, dar cred că-l instalez aşa cum e şi îl customizez după &#8211; dacă reuşesc şi să-i bag un KDE 4.3.3 mă pot declara mulţumit . Principalele trăsături ale versiunii de faţă sunt următoarele: </p>
<p>* a completely new audio subsystem (pulseaudio)    <br />* the switch from HAL to Device-Kit     <br />* Magi-Kit a standard application management layer     <br />* Remaster-Kit for easy iso remastering     <br />* Encode &#38; SUPER Encode an all in all multimedia converting app     <br />* MAGI 2 an application launcher/installer and configuration center     <br />* The typical BeOS like look has been improved with changes to the Deskbar , Icon Theme and GTK-Theme     <br />* Disk-Manager now supports auto-detection of BFS(BeOS) partitions and allows to mount them .</p>
<p><a href="http://dinucody.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/zevenos2.jpg"><img style="border-bottom:0;border-left:0;display:inline;border-top:0;border-right:0;" title="zevenos 2" border="0" alt="zevenos 2" src="http://dinucody.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/zevenos2_thumb.jpg?w=659&#038;h=519" width="659" height="519" /></a> </p>
</p>
<p><a href="http://dinucody.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/zevenos2a.jpg"><img style="border-bottom:0;border-left:0;display:inline;border-top:0;border-right:0;" title="zevenos 2a" border="0" alt="zevenos 2a" src="http://dinucody.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/zevenos2a_thumb.jpg?w=659&#038;h=519" width="659" height="519" /></a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Kubuntu 9.10: First Thoughts]]></title>
<link>http://madmail.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/kubuntu-9-10-first-thoughts/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
<guid>http://madmail.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/kubuntu-9-10-first-thoughts/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[As I posted previously I am in the process of taking the plunge into the new Ubuntu 9.10. More accur]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><img class="alignleft" title="kubuntu" src="http://itechnology.files.wordpress.com/2007/02/kubuntu4.png?w=103&#038;h=148" alt="" width="103" height="148" /></p>
<p>As <a href="http://madmail.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/taking-the-9-10-plunge/">I posted previously</a> I am in the process of taking the plunge into the new Ubuntu 9.10. More accurately I am taking on Kubuntu and Xubuntu. Xubuntu has been my primary operating system for some time now, but a few months ago I installed Kubuntu on my fathers computer because of its &#8220;windows-like&#8221; feel. Due to this I decided to take on Kubuntu first so I felt comfortable when updating his system in a couple months. So lets have it, shall we?</p>
<p><strong>The Good:</strong></p>
<p>1. First and fore most this version of Kubuntu actually worked with my laptop. My laptop is an Everex gbook that uses a low power VIA processor and graphics. The last version had many install issues and I never did get it to work right, though the same version of Xubuntu worked fine.</p>
<p>2. Even on my system It feels much more snappy, I am excited to see how it will preform on my fathers full powered pc.</p>
<p>3. Flash installed easly and worked properly on the first try, a big improvement over the last version.</p>
<p>4. The widgets seem more stable this time around and do not randomly quit.</p>
<p><strong>The Bad:</strong></p>
<p>1. Kpackagekit is still crap. The gnome/xfce manager for downloading/updating seems faster, more intuitive, user friendly, and less prone to issues. I have a hard time finding packages in kpackagekit and a weird problem&#8230;</p>
<p>3. That weird problem is that the Mozilla Java plug-in broke my dependencies and now I get all these maddening alerts that fill my screen and obstruct its operation. You can follow my thread on this issue over at the <a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1323626">Ubuntu Forums</a></p>
<p>4. The reminders are worse than Windows Vista! I literally had 46 reminders about this dependency issue waiting for me when I got home. One would have done the job. There should be a way to turn these things off.</p>
<p>So far for me its about 50/50 which is a vast improvement over the last version. I will keep you all posted, hopefully can solve these few issues and move on to Xubuntu soon</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>**Update** I fixed the Java plugin issues. Apparently the Java plugin in the repos breaks some dependencies. I used aptitude to remove that package and installed the sun-java.bin instead via the terminal and all seems fine now.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New gdm not suited for xfce4 and xubuntu]]></title>
<link>http://gyllenbuste.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/new-gdm-not-suited-for-xfce4-and-xubuntu/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>gyllenbuste</dc:creator>
<guid>http://gyllenbuste.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/new-gdm-not-suited-for-xfce4-and-xubuntu/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The new gdm used in Karmic (x)ubuntu is a nightmare. It uses extremely long time to load and as xfce]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>The new gdm used in Karmic (x)ubuntu is a nightmare. It uses extremely long time to load and as xfce4 uses it&#8217;s own wm there is no benefit from the extended load time. gdm is now gnome only, and should be replaced.</p>
<p>A replacement you can use is <a href="http://slim.berlios.de/">Slim</a>. Slim is not bloatware like the new gdm and it is very fast. It lacks some of the functionality of the old gdm, but have a look and see if you like it.</p>
<p>I made a simple theme to use with xubuntu. You can download it from <a href="http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/xubuntu/slim/xfce-slim-theme.tar.gz">here</a> if you like.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Xubuntu makes my laptop feel like a supercomputer]]></title>
<link>http://mattiaswirf.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/xubuntu-makes-my-laptop-feel-like-a-supercomputer/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mattias Wirf</dc:creator>
<guid>http://mattiaswirf.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/xubuntu-makes-my-laptop-feel-like-a-supercomputer/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I really like Xubuntu (the Ubuntu Linux with interface xfce). It&#8217;s lighweight and fast, but st]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>I really like <a href="http://www.xubuntu.org/" target="_blank">Xubuntu</a> (the Ubuntu Linux with interface xfce). It&#8217;s lighweight and fast, but still have all the good things I like with Linux &#8211; the logic filesystem, the great programs etc. It makes my laptop feel very fast, eventhough it 5 years old. That it is very pretty and secure does help a bit <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Starting Linux after working with Windows XP on this computer feels like getting out in fresh air after suffocating. All the things I use is just an <em>apt-get</em> away. Lovely. The wireless works out of the box, it doesn&#8217;t in Windows.<strong> I&#8217;m happy, really happy</strong>. Now I can get some work done! Oh, and I use Opera as browser <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p><a href="http://mattiaswirf.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/xubuntu_logo_slogan1.png"><img src="http://mattiaswirf.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/xubuntu_logo_slogan1.png" alt="xubuntu_logo_slogan" title="xubuntu_logo_slogan" width="308" height="114" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-58" /></a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Open source software. Will it ever be used in Ethiopia?]]></title>
<link>http://kirba.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/open-source-software-will-it-ever-be-used-in-ethiopia/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>dckirba</dc:creator>
<guid>http://kirba.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/open-source-software-will-it-ever-be-used-in-ethiopia/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Those of us who live in Ethiopia complain about how much we have to pay for anything. We earn less t]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-187" title="OpenEthiopia" src="http://kirba.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/openethiopia1.jpg" alt="I wonder" width="500" height="216" /></p>
<p>Those of us who live in Ethiopia complain about how much we have to pay for anything. We earn less than most of the world yet we are expected to pay more. Take the case of a car for example. Say it costs 10,000 dollars in the US. Same car would cost at least 30,000 dollars in Ethiopia. Until recently, there really weren&#8217;t any locally made alternatives to choose from either.</p>
<p>The same principle applies to almost anything a consumer can buy &#8211; electronics, books, telecommunication, clothes and even powdered milk. But when it comes to software, ahhh&#8230; we are lucky. Until the copyright law catches up to us. But knowing Ethiopia, that may still be several years away.<!--more--></p>
<p>Even though pretty much any software I need is easily available in <q>software galleries</q> on every street in beautiful Addis (I am aware that this is true around the world as well), for reasons unknown I feel guilty when I use them. And that is why I began experimenting with open source and all that it has to offer.</p>
<p>Open source is not very well known in Ethiopia. I don&#8217;t have figures so I can&#8217;t really tell if it&#8217;s well known around the world either. But if the guy who fixes your computer gives you a pirated copy of software and it does the job you want, then why bother looking for an alternative? If you can have nice expensive software for less than 100 Birr, then&#8230;</p>
<h3>Why on earth would you want to use open source software?</h3>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure I can really answer this question but I&#8217;ll just explain why I personally like using it.</p>
<div style="line-height:170%;">
<ol>
<li><strong>Licenced to use</strong>: After I accidentally stumbled upon open source (in the form of <a title="Ubuntu Linux" href="http://www.ubuntu.com" target="_blank">Ubuntu Linux</a>), I realised that there were some really interesting tools out there that I had no idea about. And they were all free. <em>Legally</em>.</li>
<li><strong>Fast updates</strong>: Most open source programs follow regular release cycles that are sometimes faster than commercial alternatives. What good is that you say? Issues are dealt with and new features are incorporated quickly.</li>
<li><strong>Feedback</strong>: Open source is built around communities. Everyone has a say in it. If there&#8217;s a feature you&#8217;d like you can ask for it or if you&#8217;re a programmer, you can just add it. Because that&#8217;s what open source is -  the source is open. You can access the code.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<h3>Common misconceptions</h3>
<p>The general belief in Ethiopia is that open source software just doesn&#8217;t match commercial software. Though this is true to an extent, I must say that most open source software evolves quickly and some offer equivalents to commercial software.</p>
<p>I like to try my hand out at graphic design and a little 3D modelling. <a title="Inkscape official website" href="http://inkscape.org/" target="_blank">Inkscape</a> and <a title="Blender's official website" href="http://www.blender.org/" target="_blank">Blender</a> offer features that meet my needs sufficiently. Of course, I don&#8217;t really push the envelope of graphic design but I believe that these two examples of excellent open source software can meet most needs.</p>
<p>Office needs are met nicely by <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice</a> though there still are some formatting issues that crop up from time to time.</p>
<p>There are kinks that need to be ironed out. But the beauty of open source software lies in the fact that <strong>you</strong> can be a part of ironing out the wrinkles. If you don&#8217;t like the look of those icons, you can say so. Or better yet, you can make your own set.</p>
<p>Some open source software has made it big. <a title="Mozilla's home page" href="http://www.mozilla.org/" target="_blank">Firefox</a> would be the prime example. You may already be using it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not really sure if open source software will ever be used by the majority of the Ethiopian computer-using population. But if we ever have to pay the actual, expensive costs of the sofware we use, open source is a good alternative that is quickly getting better.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a good list of <a title="Open source alternatives" href="http://www.osalt.com" target="_blank">open source alternatives</a> to commercial software. Have some fun digging and let me know what your experiences or thoughts are.</p>
<h3>My personal favourites</h3>
<div style="line-height:170%;">
<ul>
<li>
<h4>Software</h4>
<ul>
<li><strong><a title="Mozilla's home page" href="http://www.mozilla.org/" target="_blank">Firefox</a></strong>: Firefox is a browser. It follows standards well and has a host of plugins that considerably extend its capabilities and functions.</li>
<li><strong><a title="Pidgin homepage" href="http://www.pidgin.im" target="_blank">Pidgin</a></strong>: Pidgin is a program for chatting. The nice thing about Pidgin (or <a title="Adium website" href="http://adium.im" target="_blank">Adium</a> if you&#8217;re on a Mac) is that you can log into several accounts simultaneously. Plays well with Yahoo, MSN Chat, Google Talk and even Facebook Chat.</li>
<li><strong><a title="Inkscape official website" href="http://inkscape.org/" target="_blank">Inkscape</a></strong>: This is a vector drawing program that has a Xara inspired interface. It&#8217;s simple, neat and has lots of functions and capabilities. It may not be Illustrator yet but you can do a lot with it.</li>
<li><strong><a title="Blender's official website" href="http://www.blender.org/" target="_blank">Blender</a></strong>: Is a 3D modelling software. It has a quirky interface that takes a while to get used to, but once you are used to it, it makes sense. Check out the <a title="Blender feature gallery" href="http://www.blender.org/features-gallery/movies/" target="_blank">Blender showcase</a> to see what this excellent program is capable of.</li>
<li><strong><a title="OpenOffice website" href="http://www.openoffice.org/" target="_blank">OpenOffice</a></strong>: One of the most common uses of a computer is to write documents, use spreadsheets or make presentations. OpenOffice does all this and does it well. It also has some useful features like word completion and saves to PDF without any plugins or updates.</li>
<li><strong><a title="The Gimp website" href="http://www.gimp.org" target="_blank">Gimp</a></strong>: The Gimp is a bitmap manipulation program. You can use it to edit pictures and manipulate images for use on the web. Currently the Gimp does not support CMYK and so cannot be used for offset printing. That said, it is still a very capable program and is quickly evolving.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<h4>Operating Systems</h4>
<ul>
<li><a title="Ubuntu Linux" href="http://www.ubuntu.com" target="_blank"><strong>Ubuntu</strong></a>: A version of linux that is easy to install, works out of the box on most systems and has a very helpful <a title="Ubuntu Forums" href="http://www.ubuntuforums.org" target="_blank">community</a> for support.</li>
<li><strong><a title="Xubuntu Home Page" href="http://www.xubuntu.org" target="_blank">Xubuntu</a></strong>: Xubuntu is a lighter version of Ubuntu that uses the XFCE desktop instead of Ubuntu&#8217;s default Gnome desktop. It works well on older hardware and can even work on systems with 256MB of RAM or less.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<h3>Updates:</h3>
<p>I found <a title="Michael Shiferaw's Blog" href="http://hiwotebeaddis.wordpress.com/2009/10/02/open-source-movement-and-ethiopia/" target="_blank">this post</a> by someone else who uses open source in Ethiopia. I guess there are users.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hablemos del Koala]]></title>
<link>http://fausto23.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/hablemos-del-koala/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>fausto23</dc:creator>
<guid>http://fausto23.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/hablemos-del-koala/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[*Ubuntu Karmic Koala lleva una semana con nosotros y es tiempo de ver que ha traido consigo. Como ex]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1419" title="GRUB-2" src="http://fausto23.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/grub-2.png" alt="GRUB-2" width="511" height="384" /></p>
<p>*Ubuntu Karmic Koala lleva una semana con nosotros y es tiempo de ver que ha traido consigo.</p>
<p>Como experiencia de usuario, parece haber mejorado bastante a la version anterior, siendo mas sencillo agregar repositorios, mejoras en cuanto a graficos (aunque parece que <a href="http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&#38;item=fedora12_ubuntu910&#38;num=2">Fedora 12 lleva ventaja en ello</a>) y que decir de aquellos que fueron <a href="http://www.dreamnotoftoday.com/?p=3792">decepcionados por Windows 7</a> y quieren probar un sistema potente y amigable.<br />
<!--more--><br />
Software Center y Ubuntu One son las aplicaciones mas destacadas por Canonical, y tiene por que, uno permitiria la instalacion de aplicaciones gratuitas y de paga en un futuro y el otro aprovecha el respaldo en linea, que ademas de archivos, puede sincronizar notas y marcadores. Algo que no obtienes en un sistema de paga.</p>
<p>Tambien sus variantes han conseguido un nuevo aire con esta actualizacion, Xubuntu (que he probado) ha mejorado adaptandose a lo que debe de ser, una distribucion ligera (bueno hasta que llegue Lubuntu). Los desarrolladores de Kubuntu se han propuesto implementar cambios y nuevas caracteristicas para hacer de Kubuntu una distribucion de calidad, el proyecto se llama <a href="http://www.kubuntu.org/news/timelord">TimeLord</a>, entre esto buscara estar un paso atras de KDE en cuanto a desarrollo, integracion en las aplicaciones y mas, pueden leer <a href="http://people.ubuntu.com/%7Eapachelogger/Timelord/Project_Timelord_Announcement.pdf">el documento para mas detalles</a>.</p>
<p>No todo es perfecto, y ciertamente Ubuntu tambien tiene sus fallas, y en ellas yo pondria la implementacion de GRUB2 y xsplash, el primero ha creado <a href="http://www.google.com.mx/search?hl=es&#38;client=firefox-a&#38;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#38;q=site:ubuntuforums.org+grub2&#38;start=10&#38;sa=N">una oleada de posts</a> acerca de su configuracion, fallas en la instalacion con otro sistemas, quizas algo normal cuando pasaun cambio como este. Y el otro es xsplash, que es bien sabido que este es parte del plan de booteo mas rapido para la proxima LTS de Ubuntu (<a href="http://www.netsplit.com/2009/09/02/making-a-splash/">más aqui</a>).</p>
<p>Como conclusion final, Ubuntu, lo uses o no lo uses, es parte del mundo GNU/Linux, y cada dia gana mas usuarios que buscan una alternativa a otros sistemas, y parece que no han sido decepcionados con esta version.</p>
<p>Que opinan, que les parecio Karmic Koala.</p>
<p>EXTRA:<br />
<a href="http://phyx.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/es-grub-dificil-de-configurar-preguntaidea/">Asi deberia configurarse GRUB2</a><br />
<a href="http://blogs.computerworld.com/15035/5_reasons_why_ubuntu_9_10_is_better_than_windows_7">5 razones por que Ubuntu es mejor que Windows 7</a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Splash Screen: Αλλαξτε τη μπαρα με πυγολαμπιδες!]]></title>
<link>http://ubuntugreek.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/splash-screen-%ce%b1%ce%bb%ce%bb%ce%b1%ce%be%cf%84%ce%b5-%cf%84%ce%b7-%ce%bc%cf%80%ce%b1%cf%81%ce%b1-%ce%bc%ce%b5-%cf%80%cf%85%ce%b3%ce%bf%ce%bb%ce%b1%ce%bc%cf%80%ce%b9%ce%b4%ce%b5%cf%82/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>xqtr</dc:creator>
<guid>http://ubuntugreek.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/splash-screen-%ce%b1%ce%bb%ce%bb%ce%b1%ce%be%cf%84%ce%b5-%cf%84%ce%b7-%ce%bc%cf%80%ce%b1%cf%81%ce%b1-%ce%bc%ce%b5-%cf%80%cf%85%ce%b3%ce%bf%ce%bb%ce%b1%ce%bc%cf%80%ce%b9%ce%b4%ce%b5%cf%82/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Στην εκδοση xubuntu, στο splash screen υπαρχει ενα πολυ ωραιο animation με πυγολαμπιδες&#8230; σιγου]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><span style="font-size:x-large;"><strong>Σ</strong></span>την εκδοση xubuntu, στο splash screen υπαρχει ενα πολυ ωραιο animation με πυγολαμπιδες&#8230; σιγουρα πολυ πιο ωραιο (για τα δικα μου γουστα) σε σχεση με την απλη μπαρα του ubuntu. Για να την αλλαξετε, κατεβαστε τα απαραιτητα αρχεια, απο εδω:</p>
<blockquote><p>http://gnome-look.org/content/show.php?content=114875</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Μετα ανοιξτε τον nautilus με δικαιωματα root και πηγαινετε στο φακελο:</p>
<blockquote><p>/usr/share/images/xsplash</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Κρατηστε ενα backup των αρχειων με ονομα throbber* και αντιγραψτε εδω, αυτα που κατεβασατε. Καντε ενα reboot και ειστε ετοιμοι&#8230;</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Karmic Koala (Kubuntu e Xubuntu 9.10): prova su strada]]></title>
<link>http://linuxbyprofkoji.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/karmic-koala-kubuntu-e-xubuntu-9-10-prova-su-strada/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>profkoji</dc:creator>
<guid>http://linuxbyprofkoji.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/karmic-koala-kubuntu-e-xubuntu-9-10-prova-su-strada/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Ubuntu nelle sue diverse varianti (Kubuntu e Xubuntu le più note) è senza dubbio la distribuzione GN]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Ubuntu nelle sue diverse varianti (Kubuntu e Xubuntu le più note) è senza dubbio la distribuzione GNU/Linux che ha fatto più proseliti, soprattutto tra i newbie, per la sua estrema semplicità d&#8217;uso e per il suo &#8220;parco&#8221; software vastissimo.</p>
<p>Per Kubuntu potete visitare  il <a href="http://www.kubuntu.org/news/9.10-release" target="_blank">sito</a> dove è postato l&#8217;annuncio ufficiale di rilascio ed un (<a href="http://www.seoexpertconsultants.com/index.php?linux&#38;release=Kubuntu%209.10" target="_blank">breve tour</a>) che illustra le caratteristiche salienti di questa versione. Il sito per il download è <a href="http://www.kubuntu.org/getkubuntu" target="_blank">questo</a>.</p>
<p>In modo simile anche per Xubuntu potete leggere <a href="http://www.xubuntu.org/news/9.10-release" target="_blank">l&#8217;annuncio</a>, visualizzare un breve <a href="http://www.seoexpertconsultants.com/index.php?linux&#38;release=Xubuntu%209.10" target="_blank">tour grafico</a> e quindi passare al <a href="http://www.xubuntu.org/get" target="_blank">download</a>.</p>
<p>Su Kubuntu in versione live vengono riconosciute e montate le eventuali partizioni windows presenti, così fin da subito si ha la possibilità di aprire i propri file per testare le applicazioni presenti in questa distribuzione, non invece su Xubuntu.</p>
<p>La scelta di Kubuntu è adatta all&#8217;utente che sa quello che fa, quella di Xubuntu è invece adatta all&#8217;utente che preferisce non correre il rischio di rovinare il file system preesistente sul pc.</p>
<p>Dopo una rapida &#8220;esplorazione&#8221; ci si renderà conto che non è possibile visualizzare correttamente siti con contenuto flash, come ad esempio <a href="http://www.youtube.com" target="_blank">YouTube</a>, e nemmeno potersi godere i propri file musicali ed i propri filmati.</p>
<p>Karmic Koala infatti non include i principali codecs audio e video (nemmeno flash) e nemmeno driver proprietari, quali ad esempio quelli della scheda video.</p>
<p>Ciò potrebbe far scoraggiare l&#8217;utente che sia avvicina per la prima volta al mondo GNU/Linux, ma occorre sottolineare che bastano pochi interventi perché Karmic Koala diventi perfettamente &#8220;usabile&#8221;.</p>
<p>I filmati che vi propongo servono soltanto a mostrare l&#8217;impatto visivo di queste due distribuzioni e fare una carrellata dei principali software che mettono fin da subito a disposizione.</p>
<p>Le durate dei filmati non corrispondono a quelle reali, infatti prima di postarli ho preferito cancellare i &#8220;tempi morti&#8221; di durata eccessiva, anche perché per la registrazione mi sono servito di macchine virtuali che non emulano a dovere le caratteristiche hardware dei pc in circolazione.</p>
<p><strong>Kubuntu</strong></p>
<p><span style='text-align:center; display: block;'><object width='425' height='350'><param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/3jFS9wqNRss&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' /><param name='allowfullscreen' value='true' /><param name='wmode' value='transparent' /><embed src='http://www.youtube.com/v/3jFS9wqNRss&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' allowfullscreen='true' width='425' height='350' wmode='transparent'></embed></object></span></p>
<p>L&#8217;ambiente desktop è KDE 4.3.2 ed il kernel 2.6.31.14.generic.</p>
<p>Ecco una breve rassegna dei software inclusi (cito solo quelli di uso più comune):</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>navigazione web:</strong> Konqueror</li>
<li><strong>posta elettronica:</strong> KMail</li>
<li><strong>chat:</strong> Kopete, Quassel IRC</li>
<li><strong>torrent:</strong> KTorrent</li>
<li><strong>ufficio:</strong> OpenOffice.org,  Okular (visore di svariati tipi di documenti)</li>
<li><strong>grafica:</strong> Gwenview (viewer)</li>
<li><strong>audio:</strong> Amarok</li>
<li><strong>video:</strong> Dragon Player</li>
<li><strong>CD burning:</strong> K3b</li>
<li><strong>navigazione file:</strong> Dolphin</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Xubuntu</strong></p>
<p><span style='text-align:center; display: block;'><object width='425' height='350'><param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/yGohnL9Uvnw&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' /><param name='allowfullscreen' value='true' /><param name='wmode' value='transparent' /><embed src='http://www.youtube.com/v/yGohnL9Uvnw&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' allowfullscreen='true' width='425' height='350' wmode='transparent'></embed></object></span></p>
<p>L’ambiente desktop è Xfce 4.6.1 ed il kernel è 2.6.31-14-generic</p>
<p>Ecco una breve rassegna dei software inclusi (cito solo quelli di uso più comune):</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>navigazione web:</strong> Firefox</li>
<li><strong>posta elettronica:</strong> Thunderbird</li>
<li><strong>chat:</strong> Pidgin, XChat IRC</li>
<li><strong>torrent:</strong> Transmission</li>
<li><strong>ufficio:</strong> Abiword, Gnumeric</li>
<li><strong>grafica:</strong> Ristretto (viewer), Gimp (editor)</li>
<li><strong>audio:</strong> Exaile</li>
<li><strong>video:</strong> Totem</li>
<li><strong>CD burning:</strong> Brasero</li>
<li><strong>navigazione file:</strong> Thunar</li>
</ul>
<p>Gli altri programmi possono essere scaricati ad installazione ultimata.</p>
<p>Kubuntu e Xubuntu sono senza dubbio delle ottime distribuzioni (adatte soprattutto a chi proviene da windows) e le consiglio caldamente. Da quanto vi ho appena descritto, è chiaro che un intervento, seppur minimo, dell&#8217;utente è richiesto perché il sistema si adatti alle nostre esigenze.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Taking the 9.10 Plunge]]></title>
<link>http://madmail.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/taking-the-9-10-plunge/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
<guid>http://madmail.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/taking-the-9-10-plunge/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Ubuntu 9.10 and all of its cousins came out just recently and from what I am seeing it looks like a ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><img class="alignleft" title="Bird" src="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/4/2009/02/linux-penguin.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="178" /><a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/">Ubuntu 9.10 </a>and all of its cousins came out just recently and from what I am seeing it looks like a good release, especially for the KDE derivative <a href="http://www.kubuntu.org/">Kubuntu</a>. With the previous version I had a lot of trouble with the new package manager and Flash when building a system for members of my family. I am hoping with this update I can fix those problems.</p>
<p>So this Friday I will update my laptop to the <a href="http://xubuntu.org/">latest Xubuntu</a> and partition out some space for the new Kubuntu to kick the tires before trying it on my families computer. I&#8217;ll be sure to keep you all up to date on how it goes and with my final verdict.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Lightweight is Over-rated]]></title>
<link>http://robinzrants.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/lightweight-is-over-rated/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>robinzrants</dc:creator>
<guid>http://robinzrants.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/lightweight-is-over-rated/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Wow, there are a zillion-and-a-half threads in the Linux forums about the relentless pursuit of ]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Wow, there are a zillion-and-a-half threads in the Linux forums about the relentless pursuit of &#8220;lightweight&#8221; distros, applications, desktop environments, and window managers. This versus that, which is lighter, which is better.</p>
<p>Almost from my first week as a Linux user (last March), I&#8217;ve been bombarded with <span style="color:#ff6600;"><big><big>&#8220;lighter, faster, less bloated&#8221;</big></big></span> until I thought I must really be missing something wonderful using &#8220;fat, bloated vanilla Ubuntu.&#8221; Well, I thought, I only have 512 of RAM. Maybe I should look into this, even though Ubuntu is way better and way faster than WinXP ever was. So my quest began the same week as Jaunty was released.</p>
<p><a href="http://crunchbanglinux.org" target="_blank">Crunchbang</a> was awesome! Stark beauty belying incredible Ubuntu-power. <a href="http://u-lite.org" target="_blank">U-Lite</a> was wicked fast and pretty, but out-of-date (Hardy) and didn&#8217;t pick up some of my hardware. My own minimal Ubuntu / LXDE mixture, <big><big><span style="color:#ff6600;">&#8220;<em>Robin&#8217;s Remix</em>&#8220;</span></big></big> was even faster than Crunchbang for some reason.</p>
<p>But y&#8217;know what? None were that noticeably faster than &#8220;plain vanilla Ubuntu.&#8221; I certainly had room for them all on my 80-gig hard drive (but never installed any side-by side). A <em>little teeny weenie bit</em> faster on some applications (but not others), no harder on my Celeron processor than any of the super-ultralight minimalist mixtures.</p>
<p>I suppose everyone who has a computer that is more than a year old thinks it&#8217;s <span style="color:#ff6600;font-size:x-large;">ancient</span> and won&#8217;t run the latest &#8220;bloated&#8221; Ubuntu or KDE or whatever.</p>
<p>But unless the darn thing is 10 years old or something, &#8220;plain vanilla&#8221; Ubuntu will pro&#8217;lly run just fine on it! My Xubuntu 9.10 disk arrived today and it&#8217;s flawless, pretty, powerful, and fast on my poor old decrepit, weak, sickly, has-been Dell Dimension with it&#8217;s scant 512 megs of RAM. Is it &#8220;<span style="color:#ff6600;"><big><big>bloated?</big></big></span>&#8221; Well, maybe in the &#8216;buntu effort to &#8220;be all things to all users&#8221; the term might apply, because here and there it has a pre-installed application that does the same thing that another pre-installed one does. So it gives me a choice. Is that &#8220;bloat?&#8221; Only if I run both at the same time. But it&#8217;s nice to play with new ones sometimes.</p>
<p>All I&#8217;m say&#8217;n is that I got so caught up in the pursuit of more lightweight, less bloat, faster speed, and low resource requirements that I sorta forgot what I quit Windows for!</p>
<p><big><big><big>I just want to run applications, not the operating system.</big></big></big></p>
<p>But I lost alot of time (and data, being a n00b) in this vain pursuit which turned out <span style="color:#ff6600;"><big><big>not to matter at all</big></big></span> in the big picture. I&#8217;m just about right back where I started, and I&#8217;m more than content. Except that I feel a little cheated. That oughtto teach me to quit following every little fad that comes along. Lightweight is over-rated. And contentment is way under-rated.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>Yes, Linux is amazingly customizable. We tweak it because we <span style="color:#ff6600;">can</span>.  That&#8217;s cool, and it&#8217;s fun! But I think I got so caught up in the obsessive quest for &#8220;lightweight Linux&#8221; that I missed the boat in other areas that matter just as much to a non-geeky boy like me.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=6274377a-794a-8ede-ad51-5adf31ade337" alt="" /></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Primeras impresiones Ubuntu 9.10]]></title>
<link>http://elavdeveloper.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/primeras-impresiones-ubuntu-9-10/</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>elavdeveloper</dc:creator>
<guid>http://elavdeveloper.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/primeras-impresiones-ubuntu-9-10/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Ayer terminé de instalar por fin en mi trabajo la nueva versión de Ubuntu, Karmic Koala o 9.10. Ante]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><div id="_mcePaste" style="text-align:justify;">Ayer terminé de instalar por fin en mi trabajo la nueva versión de <a title="Ubuntu" href="http://www.ubuntulinux.org" target="_blank">Ubuntu</a>, Karmic Koala o 9.10. Antes que nada debo decir que siempre fuí amante y fiel defensor de Debian, pero por primera vez, desde la versión 6.06 (si mal no recuerdo) me he visto en la dificultad de escoger entre la distribución de la espiral o la de Canonical. También debo aclarar que me instalé Ubuntu y no <a title="Xubuntu" href="http://www.xubuntu.org" target="_blank">Xubuntu</a> que es la que trae por defecto a mi querido entorno de escritorio <a title="Xfceando" href="http://xfceando.wordpress.com" target="_blank">Xfce</a>.</div>
<h3 style="text-align:justify;">Instalación.</h3>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="text-align:justify;">Me ha gustado mucho la rapidez con la que se instala Karmic en comparación a Jaunty. Mi instalación en un equipo con 1Ghz de RAM y un procesador Intel Celeron a 2.66 Ghz duró apenas 20 minutos para completarse. Debo añadir que, aunque corta, las nuevas diapositivas que se muestran cuando empieza el proceso de copia de archivos a la máquina, son una genial idea (que ya otras distribuciones como openSUSE habían implementado) y acerca al usuario un poco más al escritorio.</div>
<h3 style="text-align:justify;">Arranque:</h3>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="text-align:justify;">Desde que oprimo el botón de encendido, hasta que carga la pantalla del login, la máquina se toma unos 25 segundos, 12 a partir del grub y en menos de 5 segundos ya tengo mi ordenador listo para trabajar. ¿Increíble no? El nuevo diseño para el arranque de Ubuntu está sencillamente genial, amén de rápido.</div>
<h3 style="text-align:justify;">Una vez adentro.</h3>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="text-align:justify;">He quitado varias cosas que no utilizo en el arranque del sistema: La asistencia visual, el escritorio remoto, el gestor de bluetooth, la miniaplicación de la cola de impresión, las notificaciones de disco y actualizaciones y el notificador de alarma de Evolution, que son cosas que no uso todo el tiempo y que para mi son innecesarias.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="text-align:justify;">También he desactivado los efectos de escritorio, porque es algo que me dura solo un rato. Según el monitor del sistema, una vez realizado estos pasos, el equipo me consume una media de 115Mb de RAM de 999Mb. Luego algo otros reajustes que comentaré más adelante.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="text-align:justify;">Luego quito aplicaciones como Empathy, la cual sustituyo por Pidgin, Evolution que sustituyo por Thunderbird 3.04b e instalo otras: GMPlayer, Exaile, Chromium, Ubuntu Tweak, Guake..etc.</div>
<h3 style="text-align:justify;">Sin más las conclusiones.</h3>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="text-align:justify;">Por primera vez me siento a gusto con Ubuntu. Creo que el equipo de Canonical está haciendo un trabajo estupendo (algo que se ve a simple vista con los cambios en la interfaz de Gnome). Es un sistema operativo que cada vez es más fácil para el usuario, y bonito, claro está. Apenas acaba de empezar este período de prueba, pero por lo menos el inicio ha estado bastante bien. Luego sigo comentando.</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ubuntu 9.10 Final Release: Primeras Impresiones]]></title>
<link>http://dragoninformatico.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/ubuntu-9-10-final-release-primeras-impresiones/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>pablodragon</dc:creator>
<guid>http://dragoninformatico.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/ubuntu-9-10-final-release-primeras-impresiones/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[El pasado jueves 29 de octubre, la firma Canonical puso a disposición del público la versión final d]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p style="text-align:justify;"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-472" title="Ubuntu logo" src="http://dragoninformatico.wordpress.com/files/2009/10/ubuntu.png" alt="Ubuntu logo" width="90" height="89" />El pasado jueves <strong>29 de octubre</strong>, la firma Canonical puso a disposición del público la versión final de su sistema operativo <strong>Ubuntu 9.10 &#8220;Karmic Koala&#8221;</strong> (Koala Kármico). La distribución hizo su aparición en simultáneo con otros miembros de la familia ubuntera como <strong>Kubuntu, Xubuntu, Edubuntu, Mythbuntu y Ubuntu Studio</strong>, obviamente todos en su versión 9.10.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><!--more--></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">La <strong>instalación</strong> del sistema operativo se lleva a cabo en el mismo lapso de tiempo al que nos tienen acostumbrados las distribuciones anteriores, es decir, entre <strong>15 y 20 minutos aproximadamente</strong>, dependiendo del equipo. Nuevamente, la instalación limpia ocupa unos <strong>3,5 GB del disco rígido</strong> y emplea por defecto el <strong>sistema de archivos ext4</strong>.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Si empleados una configuración multiboot, observaremos al <strong>bootloader </strong>GRUB 1,97, quien dará paso a la carga del sistema operativo. Con respecto al <strong>tiempo de booteo</strong>, los tiempos arrojados fueron de <strong>30&#8243;</strong> aproximadamente en un Intel Core2Duo T6600 con 3 GB DDR2 de RAM y de <strong>45&#8243;</strong> para un Intel Celeron 550 con 2 GB DDR2 de RAM, ambos con discos SATA de 5400 RPM. No obstante, donde efectivamente se destaca Ubuntu &#8220;Karmic&#8221; es en el <strong>tiempo de apagado</strong>, donde logró tiempos gratamente sorprendentes de <strong>4&#8243; </strong>y <strong>6&#8243; </strong>en los equipos anteriormente descriptos.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">Mención aparte merecen los <strong>drivers</strong> para las <strong>GPU Intel</strong>, donde se cumplieron las promesas y la aceleración 3D funciona a la perfección y sin necesidad de ninguna intervención manual a archivo de configuración alguno.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">En lo relativo al <strong>apartado gráfico</strong>, se incluyeron algunas mejoras. Tanto la bootscreen como la pantalla de inicio de sesión se renovaron otorgando a Ubuntu un renovado aire en estos aspectos y el set de íconos incluido por defecto se halla más refinado que en versiones anteriores.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-491" title="Ubuntu Karmic - Splash Screen" src="http://dragoninformatico.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/ubuntu-karmic-splash-screen.png" alt="Ubuntu Karmic - Splash Screen" width="510" height="382" /></p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">En cuanto al <strong>software incluido</strong> en la plataforma, cabe mencionar que se reemplazó el cliente Pidgin por Empathy, está presente OpenOffice 3.1 y la versión del navegador Firefox es la 3.5. Se cuenta también con la inclusión de Ubuntu One, el cliente para la plataforma de cloud computing de Canonical y la utilidad &#8220;Agregar o quitar software&#8221;, accesible desde el menú &#8220;Aplicaciones&#8221;, fue reemplazada por el &#8220;Centro de software de Ubuntu&#8221;, que realiza la misma tarea.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify;">
<p style="text-align:left;"><strong>Destacados:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Sistema de archivos ext4</li>
<li>Drivers Intel</li>
<li>Tiempos de arranque y apagado</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align:left;">
<p style="text-align:left;"><strong>Mirrors de descarga:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/download/" target="_blank">Ubuntu 9.10</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.kubuntu.org/getkubuntu/download" target="_blank">Kubuntu 9.10</a></li>
<li><a href="http://xubuntu.org/get" target="_blank">Xubuntu 9.10</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.edubuntu.org/Download" target="_blank">Edubuntu 9.10</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.mythbuntu.org/downloads" target="_blank">Mythbuntu 9.10</a></li>
<li><a href="http://ubuntustudio.org/downloads" target="_blank">Ubuntu Studio 9.10</a></li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align:left;">
<p style="text-align:left;">
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ubuntu Fail]]></title>
<link>http://tedbuntu.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/ubuntu-fail/</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>theteddeh</dc:creator>
<guid>http://tedbuntu.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/ubuntu-fail/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Once again ubuntu failed on me. After the new upgrade to 9.10 the broadcom network card is no longer]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Once again ubuntu failed on me. After the new upgrade to 9.10 the broadcom network card is no longer supported. Some of the cards are not supported at all, other is just not supported as standard. Several fixes have been posted, but at this point i am back to my backup-copy of ***dows. I really hate doing this and i hate using ***dows, but let me asure you, this is only a temporary solution to my problem. The poll about what new type of Ubuntu i am going to use is still going good. Submit your opinion in the poll in the last post or in a comment below.<br />
Do i hate not being able to complain about free and opensource software when it doesn&#8217;t work? YES! Do i have to wait and be patient? Seems like it.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t noticed my friend Frank has made his own blog, check it out &#8211; link is in the blogroll! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Have a good day<br />
 &#8211; Sommer  </p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ubuntu 9.10 Review]]></title>
<link>http://abyteofozz.wordpress.com/2009/11/01/ubuntu-9-10-review/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>abyteofozz</dc:creator>
<guid>http://abyteofozz.wordpress.com/2009/11/01/ubuntu-9-10-review/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[On October 29th, 2009, Ubuntu 9.10 (codenamed “Karmic Koala”) was released. This is the 11th release]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>On October 29th, 2009, Ubuntu 9.10 (codenamed “Karmic Koala”) was released. This is the 11th release of the Linux distribution, and it may just be one of the best.</p>
<p>With this release of the Linux distribution, users will likely notice improved stability, along with a great selection of new desktop wallpapers and a slightly revamped theme. This is what the main desktop looks like:</p>
<p><a title="Ubuntu 9.10 Desktop by abyteofozz, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/abyteofozz/4065116826/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2551/4065116826_be3056d227.jpg" alt="Ubuntu 9.10 Desktop" width="500" height="313" /></a></p>
<p>There’s also some new applications included with this release. One of the most notable would be the new Ubuntu Software Center, which I <a href="http://abyteofozz.wordpress.com/2009/09/25/ubuntu-software-store/">reviewed</a> a little while back. The Ubuntu Software Center can install, uninstall, and search for applications available for the Linux distribution.</p>
<p>In addition to Ubuntu Software Center, Ubuntu 9.10 also ships with the Ubuntu One client, as well as a disk management utility. For more information about Ubuntu One you can read the review I posted a few months back <a href="http://abyteofozz.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/ubuntu-one-review/">here</a>.  For the disk management utility, it allows you to modify, add, and remove partitions on your hard drive(s). In addition to working with hard drives, you can also erase CDs and DVDs (provided that the media supports it), and burn ISO images to disk. Here&#8217;s what it looks like:</p>
<p><a title="Ubuntu Disk Utility by abyteofozz, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/abyteofozz/4061969082/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2602/4061969082_28e676d43f.jpg" alt="Ubuntu Disk Utility" width="500" height="388" /></a></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re an Ubuntu user, or are familiar with it, you&#8217;ll probably notice on the above screenshot that the window border is different. Instead of the more orange-like border seen with earlier releases, it&#8217;s now the dark brown color found above. You can still easily switch the window border to one of the other pre-installed ones. For those who aren&#8217;t aware, you can download more window borders and like-items from sites like <a href="http://gnome-look.org">http://gnome-look.org</a> and <a href="http://art.gnome.org">http://art.gnome.org</a>.</p>
<p>As for the new wallpapers, they all look pretty nice. The screenshot below is of the wallpaper selection tool, in which you can see a thumbnail of all of the new wallpapers. If you can&#8217;t find a wallpaper you like, the sites listed above for window borders also have a wide variety of wallpapers.</p>
<p><a title="Ubuntu 9.10 Wallpaper Chooser by abyteofozz, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/abyteofozz/4061968974/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2738/4061968974_4defc97f20_o.png" alt="Ubuntu 9.10 Wallpaper Chooser" width="550" height="470" /></a></p>
<p>The release is slightly buggy right now, but I&#8217;d imagine that most of the major issues will be fixed over the coming weeks.  Whether you&#8217;ll be upgrading or doing a clean install, it&#8217;s a very good idea to test your system using the Ubuntu 9.10 live CD to make sure all of your hardware and things like that don&#8217;t have any major issues.</p>
<p>For more information about all of the new features and improvements in Ubuntu 9.10, you can read the technical overview <a title="here" href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KarmicKoala/TechnicalOverview">here</a>. And if you&#8217;re looking for more screenshots, I&#8217;ve uploaded some to a set on Flickr, which can be found here: <a href="http://bit.ly/MdhWu">http://bit.ly/MdhWu</a>.</p>
<div>
<p><a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/"><img src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/80x15.png" alt="Creative Commons License" /></a><br />
This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/">Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Karmic Koala installert!]]></title>
<link>http://ramblingthomas.wordpress.com/2009/11/01/karmic-koala-installert/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ramblingthomas</dc:creator>
<guid>http://ramblingthomas.wordpress.com/2009/11/01/karmic-koala-installert/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Jeg begynner med skjermbildene, her er standard oppsett når du har en fersk installasjon , klikk for]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p>Jeg begynner med skjermbildene, her er standard oppsett når du har en fersk installasjon , klikk for større bilde :</p>
<div id="attachment_42" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://ramblingthomas.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/ubuntu-karmic-koala_1.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-42 " title="Ubuntu-Karmic-Koala_1" src="http://ramblingthomas.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/ubuntu-karmic-koala_1.jpg?w=150" alt="Default Layout" width="150" height="120" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Standard Karmic</p></div>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>Deretter kommer mine skjermbilder, klikk for større bilde :</p>
<div id="attachment_44" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://ramblingthomas.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/mykarmic1.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-44" title="mykarmic1" src="http://ramblingthomas.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/mykarmic1.jpg?w=150" alt="mykarmic1" width="150" height="93" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Min desktop1</p></div>
<div id="attachment_45" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://ramblingthomas.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/mykarmic2.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-45" title="mykarmic2" src="http://ramblingthomas.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/mykarmic2.jpg?w=150" alt="mykarmic2" width="150" height="93" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Min desktop2</p></div>
<div id="attachment_46" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://ramblingthomas.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/mykarmic3.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-46" title="mykarmic3" src="http://ramblingthomas.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/mykarmic3.jpg?w=150" alt="mykarmic3" width="150" height="93" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Min desktop3</p></div>
<div id="attachment_47" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://ramblingthomas.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/mykarmic4.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-47" title="mykarmic4" src="http://ramblingthomas.wordpress.com/files/2009/11/mykarmic4.jpg?w=150" alt="mykarmic4" width="150" height="93" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Med modifikasjoner ang tema</p></div>
<p>Som du ser kan det gjøres, uten store modifikasjoner til noe meget flashy.</p>
<p>Utover dette har Ubuntu Karmic Koala tatt vare på gode funksjoner fra tidligere utgivelser og opprettholdt brukervennligheten. Ubuntu gir deg et enkelt system (hvis du vil) som er lett og intuitivt å bruke. Og skulle du ha problemer finnes det nesten garantert en løsning på nettet. Bruk google for alt det er verdt. Det er dokumentasjon, wiki&#8217;er og IRC kanaler der man kan få hjelp. Jeg hjelper gjerne til så godt jeg kan, se Om Meg seksjonen, for å komme i kontakt med meg.</p>
<p>Har du en eldre maskin, en &#8220;low-end&#8221; pc, vil jeg anbefale Xubuntu. Et derivat av Ubuntu som er lettere for eldre maskinvare å kjøre. Last ned Xubuntu <a title="Xubuntu" href="http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/releases/9.10/release/" target="_blank">her</a>.</p>
<p>Men min Pentium 4 1.8 Ghz med litt over 700 MB ram og et relativt gammelt skjermkort, med 256 MB ram, kjører Ubuntu med alle effekter slått på, uten problemer.</p>
<p>Den eneste bakdelen med å kjøre linux nå for tiden er at f.eks TV2 sumo med sin silverlight plugin, ikke funker. Men for meg har ikke det så mye å si. Hvis du ikke er avhengig av en &#8220;gamer&#8221; pc eller spesifik programvare som kun funker til Windows eller Mac , og f.eks bare skal surfe , se på youtube videoer , bruke facebook , sjekke mail og chatte, er dette noe for deg(som regel funker alle webaserte applikasjoner). Det er også virusfritt og veldig stabilt(dette igjen betyr at din pc slipper å kjøre tunge antivirus programmer og spyware programmer som stjeler ressurser). Og nå tilbyr OpenOffice en kjempegod office-pakke som kan måle seg med Microsoft Office, og den bruker selvsagt bare åpne formater. Denne pakken kan du også laste ned til Windows som et gratis alternativ til MS Office, last ned <a title="Last ned OpenOffice" href="http://no.openoffice.org/" target="_blank">her</a>.</p>
<p>Så for å konkludere, er jeg meget fornøyd så langt.</p>
<p>Med dette takker jeg for meg for denne gang.</p>
<p>-thomas</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[El Koala Kármico]]></title>
<link>http://bubuntux.wordpress.com/2009/11/01/el-koala-karmico/</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Bubuntux</dc:creator>
<guid>http://bubuntux.wordpress.com/2009/11/01/el-koala-karmico/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Hace 2 días  salio la versión final de Ubuntu 9.10 y todas sus derivadas (Xubuntu, Kubuntu, Edubuntu]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p style="text-align:left;">Hace 2 días  salio la versión final de Ubuntu 9.10 y todas sus derivadas (Xubuntu, Kubuntu, Edubuntu, etc).<br />
Entre las novedades que mas me gustaron y les veo gran utilidad es Ubuntu One, el echo de que implementen la nube y el share entre nubes esta genial.<br />
Otra cosa es UXA al menos en mi tarjeta de vídeo intel si se nota una diferencia, aun que siempre le quito el compiz ahora si corre de lo lindo.<br />
No hay que olvidarse el siempre cambio de diseño, cada vez ta mas guapo xD.<br />
Y ya para finalizar he irme a dormir el grub2 y el ext4 por defecto si aceleran mucho el tiempo de boot.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="Koala_Karmico" src="http://ubuntulife.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/koala.jpg?w=500&#038;h=379" alt="" width="500" height="379" /></p>
<p>La verdad después del Deception Ibex, el Koala Kármico se lleva un 9, dirán que soy muy exigente pero el único detalle es que Canonical tiene que prevenirse mejor cada cambio de versión, los repositorios se saturan de manera exagerada y bajar un simple JRE toma horas!!</p>
<p>Y en cuanto a Xubuntu mi versión favorita, ahora me quedo debiendo, prácticamente no cambio nada. =/</p>
<p>Les recomiendo que bajen sus ISOS desde Torrents.  <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download" target="_blank">Ubuntu </a> <a href="http://www.xubuntu.org/get" target="_blank">Xubuntu</a> <a href="http://www.kubuntu.org/getkubuntu" target="_blank">Kubuntu</a></p>
<p>Ubuntu 9.10 &#62;&#62;&#62; Windows 7 //Cagado de la risa!</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Juste une parole Media Player]]></title>
<link>http://stemp.wordpress.com/2009/10/31/juste-une-parole-media-player/</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stemp</dc:creator>
<guid>http://stemp.wordpress.com/2009/10/31/juste-une-parole-media-player/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Parole Media Player [Fr] : Parole est un lecteur multimédia équivalent à totem, utilisant l&#8217;ar]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><div id="attachment_617" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://stemp.wordpress.com/files/2009/10/capture-2.png"><img src="http://stemp.wordpress.com/files/2009/10/capture-2.png?w=300" alt="Parole" title="Parole" width="300" height="163" class="size-medium wp-image-617" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Parole Media Player</p></div><br />
[Fr] : <a href="http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/parole">Parole</a> est un lecteur multimédia équivalent à totem, utilisant l&#8217;architecture <a href="http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/">Gstreamer</a> et développé par <a href="http://www.aliov.org/">Ali Abdallah</a> pour l&#8217;environnement <a href="http://www.xfce.org/">Xfce</a>.</p>
<p>La dernière <a href="http://archive.xfce.org/src/apps/parole/0.1/parole-0.1.91.tar.bz2">version 0.1.91</a> vient tout juste de sortir, et vous pouvez aussi récupérer les <a href="http://git.xfce.org/apps/parole">sources git</a>.</p>
<p>Pour l&#8217;instant j&#8217;ai créé un paquet tout simple pour karmic disponible dans mon <a href="https://launchpad.net/~stemp/+archive/xfce/+packages">PPA Xfce</a> :</p>
<ol>
<a href="https://edge.launchpad.net/~stemp/+archive/xfce/+files/parole_0.1.91-1~kkxfce2_i386.deb">parole 0.1.91-1 pour i386</a><br />
<a href="https://edge.launchpad.net/~stemp/+archive/xfce/+files/parole_0.1.91-1~kkxfce2_amd64.deb">parole 0.1.91-1 pour amd64</a><br />
<a href="https://edge.launchpad.net/~stemp/+archive/xfce/+files/parole_0.1.91-1~kkxfce2_lpia.deb">parole 0.1.91-1 pour lpia</a></ol>
<p>[En] : <a href="http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/parole">Parole</a> is a media player comparable to totem, using <a href="http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/">Gstreamer</a> framework and written by <a href="http://www.aliov.org/">Ali Abdallah</a> for the <a href="http://www.xfce.org/">Xfce</a> desktop.</p>
<p>The new <a href="http://archive.xfce.org/src/apps/parole/0.1/parole-0.1.91.tar.bz2">version 0.1.91</a> is out, and you can also get the <a href="http://git.xfce.org/apps/parole">git sources</a>.</p>
<p>I created a simple package for karmic available in my <a href="https://launchpad.net/~stemp/+archive/xfce/+packages">Xfce PPA</a> :</p>
<ol>
<a href="https://edge.launchpad.net/~stemp/+archive/xfce/+files/parole_0.1.91-1~kkxfce2_i386.deb">parole 0.1.91-1 for i386</a><br />
<a href="https://edge.launchpad.net/~stemp/+archive/xfce/+files/parole_0.1.91-1~kkxfce2_amd64.deb">parole 0.1.91-1 for amd64</a><br />
<a href="https://edge.launchpad.net/~stemp/+archive/xfce/+files/parole_0.1.91-1~kkxfce2_lpia.deb">parole 0.1.91-1 for lpia</a></ol>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Canonical libera família de SO's em versão 9.10]]></title>
<link>http://caminhandolivre.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/canonical-libera-familia-de-sos-em-versao-9-10/</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Josan Neves</dc:creator>
<guid>http://caminhandolivre.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/canonical-libera-familia-de-sos-em-versao-9-10/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Foram lançadas essa semana as versões 9.10 dos sistemas operacionais mantidos pela Canonical. Já est]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Foram lançadas essa semana as versões 9.10 dos sistemas operacionais mantidos pela Canonical. Já est]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Kubuntu 9.10, Xubuntu 9.10 y UbuntuStudio 9.10]]></title>
<link>http://b2dbuntu.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/kubuntu-9-10-xubuntu-9-10-y-ubuntustudio-9-10/</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Manuel</dc:creator>
<guid>http://b2dbuntu.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/kubuntu-9-10-xubuntu-9-10-y-ubuntustudio-9-10/</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&nbsp;]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><p><a href="http://www.kubuntu.org/news/9.10-release"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-588" title="released" src="http://b2dbuntu.wordpress.com/files/2009/10/released.png" alt="released" width="600" height="118" /></a></p>
<p><a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Xubuntu/KarmicKoala/Final"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-589" title="releasebanner_910_3" src="http://b2dbuntu.wordpress.com/files/2009/10/releasebanner_910_3.png" alt="releasebanner_910_3" width="430" height="387" /></a></p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p><a href="http://ubuntustudio.org/downloads"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-590" title="ubuntuStudio" src="http://b2dbuntu.wordpress.com/files/2009/10/ubuntustudio.png" alt="ubuntuStudio" width="600" height="345" /></a></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
