Sorry, I couldn’t not use that title. If you don’t understand yet, you will.
I wasn’t going to talk about the Hugo nominations this year because it’s basically just the same as last year’s debacle with a side of dinosaur porn. 904 more words
I see something from John ONeill on File 770 about the costs of being a loser in the 2015 Hugo Awards that bears consideration. ONeill notes that in several categories, being a loser means the author or editor lost to “no award,” which isn’t the best thing to put on a list of credits. 151 more words